Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Sep 17;16(9):e0257103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257103

Immunosurveillance and molecular detection of hepatitis B virus infection amongst vaccinated children in the West Gonja District in Savanna Region of Ghana

Theophilus Quaye 1,#, Patrick Williams Narkwa 1,*,#, Seth A Domfeh 2,3,, Gloria Kattah 1,4,, Mohamed Mutocheluh 1,#
Editor: Isabelle Chemin5
PMCID: PMC8448355  PMID: 34534234

Abstract

Hepatitis B vaccination is the most effective preventive measure in reducing the incidence of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and its consequences such as cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver failure and death. Ghana introduced the universal HBV vaccination in the national Expanded Programme on Immunization in 2002. The current study sought to determine the sero-protection rate and the prevalence of HBV infection among fully vaccinated children in the West Gonja District in the Savanna Region of Ghana. This cross-sectional study recruited three hundred and fifty (350) fully vaccinated children who visited West Gonja Catholic Hospital from September to December 2019 for healthcare. Structured questionnaires were administered to obtain information on the demographics. The clinical history of the participants was obtained from the hospital records. Sera were separated from 2-5ml of blood sample collected from each participant after informed consent had been sought from their parents/guardians. Sera were tested for HBsAg, anti-HBs and anti-HBc using ELISA. Samples positive for HBsAg or anti-HBc were tested for HBV DNA by Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction. The overall sero-protection rate (anti-HBs titers ≥ 10 mIU/mL) among the studied participants was 56% with anti-HBs geometric mean titer (GMT) of 95.7 mIU/mL (± 6.0; 95% CI) compared with GMT of 2.8 mIU/mL (± 0.2; 95% CI) among non-seroprotected participants. There was no statistically significant difference in sero-protection rate between males and females (p-value = 0.93) and in relation to age (p-value = 0.20). The prevalence of HBV infection among studied participants as determined by the HBV DNA/HBsAg positivity was 1.4% while anti-HBc sero-positivity was 2%. Even though the sero-protection rate and HBV infection rate reported in the current study compares with that of other international studies further studies need to be conducted to understand the factors related to sero-protection and HBV infection rate in the Savanna Region of Ghana.

Introduction

Even though hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a vaccine-preventable disease, the burden of chronic HBV infection in the world is still high especially in the sub-Saharan African Region [1]. It is estimated that approximately 257 million people worldwide are chronically infected with HBV with about 88% of them residing in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) [2]. Chronic HBV infection has been identified as one of the significant risk factors in developing cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [3]. In Ghana, the prevalence of chronic HBV infection has been estimated to be greater than 8% [4]. The best and the most effective way of preventing the perinatal and horizontal spread of HBV infection is through active vaccination. In view of that, World Health Organization (WHO) in 1992 recommended that all countries across the globe incorporate HBV vaccination into their national childhood immunization programme and by 2014, 184 countries had adopted this measure [5]. Ghana introduced hepatitis B vaccination as part of her Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) in 2002 [6]. Upon completion of the full doses of the vaccination series, the vaccine is expected to induce protective antibody levels in more than 95% of the recipients [7]. However, unreliable power supply in certain parts of sub-Sahara Africa including Ghana may affect the storage condition of the vaccine and hence its potency and efficacy. Administration of ineffective or impotent vaccine can lead to vaccination failure. Vaccination failure can predispose vaccinees to HBV infection and increase the transmission rate within the population. In view of this, it is appropriate that post-vaccination surveillance is carried out to assess the effectiveness of HBV vaccination programme in Ghana. Most studies in relation to HBV infection in Ghana have been focused largely on the prevalence of HBV among the unvaccinated component of the population. Even the limited studies that have been done on the vaccinated group since the commencement of the EPI in Ghana in 2002 have largely been conducted in the southern and the middle belt of the country and that data from Savanna Region of Ghana where West Gonja District is located is lacking hence the current study. It is anticipated that the outcome of the current study in the West Gonja District in the Savanna Region of Ghana would provide data or information that would help in assessing the effectiveness of hepatitis B vaccination programme in the District. This data would help policy makers in instituting measures that would detect early vaccination failures so that appropriate action could be taken to prevent spread of HBV infection in the district and Ghana as a whole.

Materials and methods

Study design and study site

This was a cross-sectional study conducted at the West Gonja Catholic Hospital, Damongo in the Savanna Region of Ghana from September to December 2019.

Damongo is the capital of the West Gonja District in the Savanna Region of Northern Ghana. The West Gonja District is located to the west of the Northern Regional capital Tamale. It lies within longitude 10 51 and 20 581 West and latitude 80 321 and 100 21North. The West Gonja District shares boundaries to the south with Central Gonja District, Bole and Sawla-Tuna-Kalba Districts to the west, Wa East District to the north-west and North Gonja District to the east. The District has a total land area of 4715.9sqkm, part of which is occupied by the Mole National Park and Kenikeni Forest Reserves [8]. According to the 2010 Population and Housing Census, the population of West Gonja District is estimated at 41,180 which constitutes 1.7% of the total population in the Savanna Region. Generally, temperatures in the West Gonja District are high. The maximum temperatures are mostly recorded during the dry season between March and April while lowest temperatures are recorded between December and January. The mean monthly temperature is 27°C. The dry season is characterized by the Harmattan winds which are dry, dusty and cold in the morning and very hot at noon. During the Harmattan periods, the humidity of the West Gonja District becomes very low and this results in dry skin and cracked lips in humans. The area experiences bimodal rainfall pattern with annual rainfall being estimated at 1,144 mm. The rains begin in April and ends in late October. The peak of rainfall is in June and July with prolonged period in August [8].

Study population and eligibility criteria

The study population comprised children aged 9 months to 17 years who had received the three doses of the pentavalent hepatitis B vaccine (DPT+HepB+ Hib) at ages 6, 10 and 14 weeks after birth as part of the EPI programme who visited the West Gonja Catholic Hospital, Damongo with their parents or legal guardians for healthcare. Children who had a complete record of vaccination duly endorsed in the vaccination cards were recruited into the study. The exclusion criteria included the following: (a) children who did not have proper vaccination records endorsed in their vaccination cards (b) children with interval between the last dose of hepatitis B vaccine and sampling less than one month and (c) children suffering from acute illness at the time of sampling. Using a prevalence (0.7%) of HBV infection among vaccinated Ghanaian children aged 5–32 months [9], a sample size of 350 was estimated at 95% confidence interval. Before their enrollment, written informed consent was obtained from the parents or legal guardians of the participants. Additionally, verbal assent was obtained from participants who were above 10 years. HBV vaccination of the participants was confirmed by taking a full detailed vaccination history from parents or legal guardians as well as examining the infant vaccination cards available with their parents. Fully vaccinated participants who declined or whose parents/legal guardians declined to partake in the study were excluded.

Ethical consideration

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Committee on Human Research, Publications and Ethics (CHRPE) of School of Medicine and Dentistry (SMD), Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), Kumasi-Ghana (reference number CHRPE/AP/555/19). Permission was sought from the management of the West Gonja Catholic Hospital, Damongo. Informed consent was sought from each parent or legal guardian of each participant after the purpose of the study had been explained to them in a language that they understood.

Data and blood sample collection

A total of three hundred and fifty (350) participants were recruited into the study. Structured questionnaires were administered to obtain demographic information of the participants. The clinical history of the participants was obtained from hospital records. Two to five milliliters (2–5 ml) of whole blood samples were collected from each participant by veni-puncture into pre-labelled BD Vacutainer with SST II Advance serum-separator gel (BD, United Kingdom). The samples were allowed to clot for 10–15 minutes and then centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 5 minutes to separate the sera. The sera were aliquoted into two (2) freshly labelled Eppendorf tubes and temporarily stored at -20°C at the laboratory of the West Gonja Catholic Hospital before being transported to the Virus Research Laboratory at the Department of Clinical Microbiology, School of Medicine and Dentistry at Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology where the samples were stored frozen at -20°C until testing.

Laboratory analysis

Serum samples were tested for HBsAg, anti-HBs and anti-HBc. Qualitative testing of HBsAg, anti-HBc and quantitative testing of anti-HBs was performed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Fortress Diagnostics, UK) following the instructions of the manufacturer. For the ELISA test, the samples were initially tested in singles. Samples that were initially reactive were retested in duplicates using the same ELISA test kits. Repeatedly reactive samples were considered positive for HBsAg, anti-HBs and anti-HBc. The sensitivity and specificity of the test kits were greater than 99.0% as indicated by the manufacturer. Serum samples positive for HBsAg or anti-HBc were quantitatively tested for HBV DNA by Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) using a fully automated system at Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital (KATH) in Kumasi in the Ashanti Region of Ghana. A fully automated HBV DNA extraction and RT-PCR amplification were done using COBAS® AmpliPrep Instrument (Roche Diagnostics, USA) and Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan (CAP/CTM) HBV test kits, v2.0 following the instructions of the manufacturer. A known HBV DNA positive sample was used as positive control while nuclease free water was used as negative control. The positive and negative controls were included in each run. The diagnostic sensitivity of the test kit was ≥ 95% while the diagnostic specificity was 100% with a confidence limit of 99.54% as indicated by the manufacturer of the test kit. The thermal cycling conditions were set according to the guidelines of the manufacturer.

Data analysis

Data generated were analyzed using GraphPad Prism version 8 software and IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 20 software (IBM SPSS version 20). Because of the skewed distribution of data, anti-HBs geometric mean titer (GMT) was calculated to estimate the centrality of the anti-HBs level. Anti-HBs titer value of 0.05 mIU/mL was assigned to participants who had undetectable anti-HBs titer [10]. Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages. Unpaired students t-test was used to compare two (2) means while one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare more than two means. p-value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Participants with anti-HBs titers ≥ 1mIU/mL were considered to have sero-converted and vice visa as per kit manufacturer’s instructions and WHO standard. Participants with anti-HBs titers ≥ 10 mIU/mL were considered to be sero-protected against HBV infection.

Results

Sero-protection status of study participants in relation to demographic and clinical history

A total of 490 children who visited the West Gonja Catholic Hospital with their parents or legal guardians for healthcare during the study period were screened for eligibility out of which 26.5% (130/490) did not meet the inclusion requirements and were excluded from the study while 73.5% (360/490) met the inclusion requirements. Of the 130 children who did not meet the inclusion requirements, 57.7% (75/130) had never been vaccinated against HBV infection while 42.3% (55/130) had missing vaccination records. Of the 360 children who met the inclusion criteria, 27.8% (10/360) declined to partake in the study and were excluded. In all 350 children comprising 49.1% (172/350) males and 50.9% (178/350) females were recruited into the study. The mean age of the participants was 6.8 years (± 4.32 at 95% CI). Of the 350 participants tested for anti-HBs titer levels, sero-protection (anti-HBs titer ≥ 10mIU/mL) was detected among 56% (196/350) with geometric mean titer (GMT) of 95.7 mIU/mL (± 6.0; 95% CI) compared to mean anti-HBs titer of 2.8 mIU/mL (± 0.2; 95% CI) among non-seroprotected participants (anti-HBs titer < 10mIU/mL). Of the 196 participants who were sero-protected, 52.0% (102/196) were males with GMT of 94.6 mIU/mL (± 8.2; 95% CI) while 48.0% (94/196) were females with GMT of 95.6 (± 8.7; 95% CI). There was no statistically significant difference in the sero-protection rate between males and females (p-value = 0.93). Majority (55.1%; 108/196) of the sero-protected participants were aged ≤ 5years with a GMT of 100.2 mIU/mL (± 7.6; 95% CI). However, there was no statistically significant difference in sero-protection levels among the different age groups (p-value = 0.20) Table 1.

Table 1. Association of demographics and sero-protection level.

Variables Anti-HBs (mIU/mL)
< 10 mIU/mL ≥ 10 mIU/mL
n (%) GMT (mIU/mL) (95% CI) p-value n (%) GMT (mIU/mL) (95% CI) p-value
Age (yrs.)
≤ 5 39 (25.3) 3.5 (± 0.46) 0.11 108 (55.1) 100.2 (± 7.6) 0.20
6–10 52 (33.8) 2.9 (± 0.42) 60 (30.6) 99.5 (± 12.4)
11–15 60 (39.0 2.1 (± 0.34) 25 (12.8) 61.8 (± 11.8)
> 15 3 (1.9) 5.0 (± 2.65) 3 (1.5) 135.7 (± 69.1)
Gender
Males 70 (45.5) 2.8 (± 0.34) 1.00 102 (52.0) 94.6 (± 8.2) 0.93
Females 84 (54.5) 2.8 (± 0.32) 94 (48.0) 95.6 (± 8.7)
Total 154 (44.0) 2.8 (± 0.20) 196 (56.0) 95.7 (± 6.0)

Sero-protection status of study participants in relation to clinical history

There was no statistically significant difference in sero-protection rate between participants with a history of hospital admission, open abscess, surgical operation, blood transfusion and participants with no such history (p-value = 0.29) Table 2.

Table 2. Association of participants’ clinical history and sero-protection level n (%) (p-value = 0.29).

Risk factors n (%) Levels of anti-HBs p-value Odds ratio (95% CI)
< 10 mIU/mL n (%) ≥ 10 mIU/mL n (%)
Hospital admission
Yes 219 (62.8) 100 (45.7) 119 (54.3) 0.50 1.2 (0.8–1.8)
No 131 (37.2) 55 (42.0) 76 (58.0)
Open abscess
Yes 16 (4.6) 2 (12.5) 14 (87.5) 0.12 0.2 (0.0–0.8)
No 334 (95.4) 153 (44.1) 181 (54.2)
Surgical operation
Yes 3 (0.9) 2 (66.7) 1 (33.3) 0.44 2.5 (0.2–28.2)
No 347 (99.1) 153 (44.1) 194 (55.9)
Blood transfusion
Yes 8 (2.3) 1 (12.5) 7 (87.5) 0.10 0.2 (0.0–1.4)
No 342 (97.7) 154 (45.0) 188 (55.0)

Molecular detection of HBV infection among the fully vaccinated participants

The prevalence of HBV infection as determined by HBsAg/HBV DNA positivity was 1.4% (5/350) while anti-HBc positivity was 2.0% (7/350). Of the 5 participants who tested positive for HBV DNA and HBsAg, 60.0% (3/5) were males while 40.0% (2/5) were females. In addition, 60.0% (3/5) of the participants who tested positive for HBV DNA and HBsAg were within the age group of 11–15 years. The majority of the participants who tested positive for anti-HBc were males (57.1%; 4/7) and within the age group of 11–15 years (57.1%; 4/7). Of the 7 participants who tested positive for anti-HBc, 71.4% (5/7) were positive for HBsAg and HBV DNA. The two (2) participants who were anti-HBc positive but HBsAg negative [anti-HBc (+ve)/HBsAg (-ve)] did not have detectable HBV DNA. All the five (5) participants who tested positive for HBsAg and the seven (7) participants who tested positive for anti-HBc had anti-HBs titer of < 10mIU/mL Table 3.

Table 3. Distribution of serological and molecular markers of HBV in relation to demographics.

Variables Frequency n (%) HBV DNA n (%) HBsAg n (%) Anti-HBc n (%)
Age (yrs.)
≤ 5 147 (42.0)
6–10 113 (32.3) 2 (40.0) 2 (40.0) 3 (42.9)
11–15 88 (25.1) 3 (60.0) 3 (60.0) 4 (57.1)
> 15 2 (0.6)
Gender
Males 172 (49.1) 3 (60.0) 3 (60.0) 4 (57.1)
Females 178 (50.9) 2 (40.0) 2 (40.0) 3 (42.9)
HBV DNA
Positive 5 (1.4)
Negative 345 (98.6)
HBsAg
Positive 5 (1.4)
Negative 345 (98.6)
Anti-HBc
Positive 7 (2.0)
Negative 343 (98.0)

Discussion

Reduction in transmission and the global burden of HBV is an achievable public health goal owing to the availability of commercially effective and safe hepatitis B vaccines. WHO in 1992 recommended that all countries incorporate the universal hepatitis B vaccination into their national childhood immunization programmes and by 2014, 184 countries had adopted this measure [5]. Ghana introduced hepatitis B vaccination as part of her Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) in 2002 [6]. The vaccine is administered to new borns who receive three doses of hepatitis B vaccine at age 6, 10 and 14 weeks after birth and all the participants recruited into the study received the same dose of the pentavalent vaccine with the same paediatric vaccination schedule at infancy. After completing the primary vaccination series, the immune system of the recipients induces protective antibody levels in more than 95% of the recipients and the protection may last for at least 20 years and possibly for life [7]. The current study sought to determine the prevalence of HBV infection among fully vaccinated children in the West Gonja District in the Savana Region of Ghana. The overall sero-protection rate among the studied participants was 56%. This is comparable to the sero-protection rate of 57.2% [11], 54% [12] but higher than the 39.7% [13] reported in Egyptian studies conducted among vaccinated children. Also, the 56% sero-protection rate reported in the current study compares favorably with the 56.7% reported among Iranian children [14] but lower than the 86.8% reported in South Africa [15], 90.0% reported in Brazil [16] and 88.7% reported in Bangladesh [17]. It was observed in the current study that the anti-HBs levels declined with increasing age. This finding is consistent with the findings of other studies [18,19]. Even though anti-HBs levels declined with increasing age, the difference observed in the current study was not statistically significant (p-value = 0.20). Additionally, no statistically significant difference in sero-protection rate was observed between males and females (p-value = 0.93). Some researchers have the opinion that a decline in the anti-HBs level below 10mIU/mL could make the individuals vulnerable to HBV infection and that a booster dose of HB vaccine may be needed [20]. However, other researchers are of the view that irrespective of the gradual fall and loss in the anti-HBs level, if the primary hepatitis B vaccination is adequately performed in healthy individuals, long term protection against HBV infection could be guaranteed and that booster dose may not be needed [21,22]. A study conducted in Egypt reported age and gender as the two main risk factors associated with non-sero-protection and that the risk was significantly higher in girls than boys [11]. It was observed in the current study that there was no statistically significant difference in non-sero-protection levels among the different age groups (p-value = 0.11) and between males and females (p-value = 1.0), a finding which is consistent with that of studies conducted in the USA [23] and Iran [24] but at variance with the findings of Salama et al.[11].

In the current study, it was observed that there was no statistically significant difference in sero-protection rate between participants with a history of hospital admission, open abscess, surgical operation, blood transfusion and participants with no such history (p-value = 0.29) a finding which is at variance with that of Salama et al. [11] who reported that children with the above-mentioned clinical history had significantly higher non-sero-protective rates compared to children with no such history (p-value<0.001). HBV infection was not detected among participants ≤ 5 years suggesting that there was no perinatal infection. This observation compares favorably with the findings of Soliman et al. [25] who reported that none of the Egyptian children aged < 5 years tested positive for HBsAg but another Egyptian study reported a prevalence of 0.8% among children aged ≤ 6 years [26]. However, 1.4% of the participants aged between 6–15 years were positive for HBsAg/HBV DNA while 2% of the children within the same age bracket were anti-HBc positive. All the participants who were HBsAg/HBV DNA positive were anti-HBc positive. The two participants who were anti-HBc positive but HBsAg negative [anti-HBc (+ve)/HBsAg (-ve)] did not have detectable HBV DNA indicating that there was no presence of occult HBV infection. Three mothers of the five participants who tested positive for both HBsAg and anti-HBc [anti-HBc (+ve)/HBsAg (+ve)] did not know their HBV status (data not shown) and therefore we could not tell whether the infected children contracted the HBV infection perinatally or horizontally. However, two mothers of the five participants who tested positive for both HBsAg and anti-HBc [anti-HBc (+ve)/HBsAg (+ve)] were negative for HBsAg/HBV DNA (data not shown) indicating that the participants might have contracted the HBV infection horizontally. All the five participants who tested positive for HBsAg and the seven participants who tested positive for anti-HBc had anti-HBs titer of < 10mIU/mL indicating that they were not sero-protected. The 1.4% HBsAg sero-positivity rate reported in the current study compares favorably with the findings of Wu et al. [27] who reported an HBsAg sero-positivity rate of 1.5% among vaccinated children in China. HBsAg sero-positivity rate reported in the current study was higher in males than females, although not statistically significant. The finding is consistent with that of Odusanya et al. [28] who reported that there was no statistically significant relationship between HBsAg sero-positivity rate and gender. The 2.0% anti-HBc sero-positivity rate reported in the current study compares favorably with the findings of other studies [29].

Conclusion

From this study, it was observed that 56% the study participants attained sero-protection status after primary hepatitis B vaccination but 44% of the participants who had been fully vaccinated against HBV still remain unprotected and could be susceptible to HBV infection. The prevalence of HBV infection as determined by HBsAg/HBV DNA positivity was 1.4% while anti-HBc sero-positivity was 2%. Further studies need to be conducted to understand the factors related to the sero-conversion and sero-protection rate in the West Gonja Municipal in the Savanna Region of Ghana. Additionally, further studies need to be conducted across the country to assess the effectiveness of HB vaccination in the country.

Limitations of the study

This study did not evaluate the effectiveness or efficacy of the hepatitis B vaccine but rather evaluated the ability of hepatitis B vaccination in providing protection thereby reducing the susceptibility of the vaccinated participants to the HBV. Also, age-matched unvaccinated controls residing in the same area were not recruited into the study to enable us determine whether the prevalence of HBV infection was the same in vaccinated and unvaccinated group so as to determine the efficacy of the vaccine in the current study.

Supporting information

S1 File. Questionnaire used in the study.

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We wish to sincerely thank all those who contributed to developing this new research, particularly, the research participants and those who helped with recruitment, sample collection, laboratory testing and data entry. Eddie-Williams Owiredu, Isaac Kusi-Amponsah, Hamdiyat Mustapha M-asheda, Alimatu Braimah and Alhassan Amina.

Data Availability

The data are available in the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST) space repository: http://ir.knust.edu.gh/handle/123456789/14537.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Stanaway JD, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Fitzmaurice C, Vos T, Abubakar I, et al. The global burden of viral hepatitis from 1990 to 2013: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Articles. 2016; 388(10049),1081–1088. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30579-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dionne-Odom J, Njei B, Tita ATN. Elimination of Vertical Transmission of Hepatitis B in Africa: A Review of Available Tools and New Opportunities. Clinical Therapeutics. 2018; 40(8),1255–1267. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.05.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yuen MF, Lai CL. Treatment of chronic hepatitis B: Evolution over two decades. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2011; 26(1),138–143. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06545.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mutocheluh M, Owusu M, Kwofie TB, Akadigo T, Appau E, Narkwa PW. Risk factors associated with hepatitis B exposure and the reliability of five rapid kits commonly used for screening blood donors in Ghana. BMC Research Notes. 2014; 7:873. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-873 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.WHO. Guidelines for the prevention, care and treatment of persons with chronic hepatitis B infection 2015. 166. [PubMed]
  • 6.Ofori-Asenso R, Agyeman AA. Hepatitis B in Ghana: A systematic review & meta-analysis of prevalence studies (1995–2015). BMC Infectious Diseases. 2016; 16:130. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1467-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.WHO. Global policy report on the prevention and control of viral hepatitis in WHO Member States. Available from: URL: http://www.who.int/. 2013.
  • 8.Ghana Statistical Service and Population and Housing Census, (PHC 2010) Version 1.0 of the public use dataset (December 2011), provided by the Ghana Statistical Service. www.statsghana.gov.gh. 2010.
  • 9.Apiung T, Ndanu TA, Mingle JAA, Sagoe KWC. Hepatitis B virus surface antigen and antibody markers in children at a major paediatric hospital after the pentavalent DTP-HBV-Hib vaccination. Ghana Med J. 2017; 51(1): 13–19. doi: 10.4314/gmj.v51i1.3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Su FH., Cheng S H, Li CY, Chen JD, Hsiao CY, Chien CC, et al. Hepatitis B seroprevalence and anamnestic response amongst Taiwanese young adults with full vaccination in infancy, 20 years subsequent to national hepatitis B vaccination. Vaccine. 2007; 25: 8085–8090. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.09.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Salama I, Sami SM, Said ZNA, El-Sayed MH, Etreby LAE, Rabah TM, et al. Effectiveness of hepatitis B virus vaccination program in Egypt: Multicenter national project. World J Hepatol. 2015; 7(22): 2418–2426. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i22.2418 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Shaaban FA, Samy SM, Salama SI, Said ZN. Longterm immunity to hepatitis B among a sample of fully vaccinated children in Cairo, Egypt. East Mediterr Health J. 2007; 13: 750–757. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.El Sherbini A, Mohsen SA, Seleem Z, Ghany AA, Moneib A, Abaza AHA, et al. Hepatitis B virus among schoolchildren in an endemic area in Egypt over a decade: impact of hepatitis B vaccine. Am J Infect Control. 2006; 4: 600–602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dahifar H. Immunogenicity of cuban hepatitis b vaccine in iranian children. Archives of Iranian Medicine. 2004; 7, 89–92. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tsebe KV, Burnett RJ, Hlungwani NP, Sibara MM, Venter PA, Mphahlele MJ, et al. The first five years of universal hepatitis B vaccination in South Africa: evidence for elimination of HBsAg carriage in under 5-year-olds. Vaccine. 2001;19: 3919–3926. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(01)00120-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ribeiro TM, Azevedo RS. Seroconversion of hepatitis B vaccine in infants related to the mother’s serostatus in a community of São José dos Campos, state of São Paulo, Brazil. Clinics. 2006; 61: 387–394. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322006000500004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Guho A, Abdul Ahad M, Salam MA, Alim MA, Haque AE, Islam QT, et al. Seroconversion after recombinant hepatitis B vaccination. Journal of Medicine. 2010; 11: 143–150. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Afifi SS, Mahran MH, Said ZN, Salama II, El Khayat H, et al. Serum level of antihepatitis B surface antigen among newborns and fully vaccinated infants and children aged 6 to 11 years. AJBAS. 2009; 3:3239–3245. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.El-Sayed B, El-Guindi M, El-Shaarawy A, Salama E, Sobhy GA, et al. Long-term Immunogenicity of Hepatitis B Vaccination in children. Zagazig J Occup Health Safety. 2009; 2: 17–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tilzey AJ, Hepatitis B vaccine boosting: the debate continues. Lancet. 1995; 345:1000–01. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90751-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Puvacić S, Ravlija J, Puvacić Z, Curić I. Long term protection after hepatitis B vaccination. Bosnian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences. 2005; 5: 50–53. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wainwright RB, McMahon BJ, Bulkow LR, Parkinson AJ, Harpster AP. Protection provided by hepatitis B vaccine in a Yupik Eskimo population; Seven-year results. Arch Intern Med. 1991; 151:1634–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hammitt LL, Hennessy TW, Fiore AE, Zanis C, Hummel KB, Dunaway E, et al. Hepatitis B immunity in children vaccinated with recombinant hepatitis B vaccine beginning at birth: a followup study at 15 years. Vaccine. 2007; 25: 6958–6964. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.06.059 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yazdanpanah B, Safari M, Yazdanpanah S. Persistence of HBV vaccine’s protection and response to hepatitis B booster immunization in 5-to 7-year-old children in the Kohgiloyeh and Boyerahmad Province, Iran. Hepatitis Monthly. 2010; 10: 17. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Soliman AA, Hassan MS, Makhlouf NA, Abd Elrhman MZ, Khalaf KA. Screening for HBsAg among Vaccinated School Children in Upper Egypt. J Am Sci. 2013; 3; 9: 404–406. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Reda AA, Arafa MA, Youssry AA, Wandan EH, Ab de Ati M, Daebees H, et al. Epidemiologic evaluation of the immunity against hepatitis B in Alexandria, Egypt. Eur J Epidemiol. 2003; 18:1007–1011. doi: 10.1023/a:1025805817101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wu WS, Sun CM, Jiang MB, Zhang GH, Shen FJ, Liu CB, et al. Serological study on status of hepatitis B virus infection and carry in vaccinated population: a historical comparison. Chin J Vaccines Immunization. 2005; 11;276–278. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Odusanya OO, Alufohai E, Meurice FP, Ahonkhai VI. Five-year post-vaccination efficancy of hepatitis B vaccine in rural Nigeria.Human Vaccin.2011; 7(6):625–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mele A, Tancredi F, Romanò L, Giuseppone A, Colucci M, Sangiuolo A, et al. Effectiveness of hepatitis B vaccination in babies born to hepatitis B surface antigen-positive mothers in Italy. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2018; 184(7), 905–908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Isabelle Chemin

5 Jul 2021

PONE-D-21-12148

Immunosurveillance and molecular detection of hepatitis B virus infection amongst vaccinated children in the West Gonja District in Savanna Region of Ghana

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Narkwa,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the different points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by 6 weeks. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Isabelle Chemin, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please include additional information regarding the survey or questionnaire used in the study and ensure that you have provided sufficient details that others could replicate the analyses. For instance, if you developed a questionnaire as part of this study and it is not under a copyright more restrictive than CC-BY, please include a copy, in both the original language and English, as Supporting Information.

3. We note that you have included the phrase “data not shown” in your manuscript. Unfortunately, this does not meet our data sharing requirements. PLOS does not permit references to inaccessible data. We require that authors provide all relevant data within the paper, Supporting Information files, or in an acceptable, public repository. Please add a citation to support this phrase or upload the data that corresponds with these findings to a stable repository (such as Figshare or Dryad) and provide and URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers that may be used to access these data. Or, if the data are not a core part of the research being presented in your study, we ask that you remove the phrase that refers to these data.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This is a cross-sectional study conducted by investigators at three universities of Ghana to decide the seroprotection rate and the prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection among 350 fully vaccinated children in the West of Gonja, Ghana, Africa, in 2019. Ghana is a low-income country where HBV vaccination was implemented in 2002. The study supplies data like international publications.

Although hepatitis B is an immuno-preventable disease, there is still a substantial proportion of people suffering from chronic infection and of these, more than 80% are in sub-Saharan Africa. Although in Ghana the prevalence of chronic HBV infection is less than 10%, it is particularly important to know the vaccination status.

The authors presented an interesting manuscript, whose implemented method that supports the obtained findings and their conclusions. The results of this study show the importance of monitoring seroprotection after vaccination for HBV to assess the ability of the vaccine.

This study is also important because in West Gonja, Damongo no studies have been carried out to evaluate seroprotection and therefore its findings supply new knowledge. Although electricity problems are known to affect the quality of the vaccine, it is important that these findings are considered when implementing post-vaccination surveillance programs.

Specific comments

1. The introduction has the overall context and approach of importance of vaccination HBV.

2. In the study design and study site section, the authors should include a further description of the geographical area where the study was carried out. Consider aspects of temperature, organization, size of the city, population or another information that authors considers important.

3. In the study population and eligibility criteria to include how much is the n of the population from 9 months to 17 years and of these how many are fully vaccinated. What was the sample size calculation? Indicate the prevalence for hepatitis B infection and the power considered to calculate the sample size. Additionally, describe in detail the inclusion criteria for the study.

4. In the laboratory analysis section to include the number of replicates of the experiment and how the authors confirmed the results.

5. In the DNA detection section, which controls were used. Mention the sensitivity and specificity of the molecular test.

6. In the results section, explain in detail how many children were initially screened and how many didn't have the inclusion criteria.

7.It is suggested to the authors for the presentation of the results of Table 3, to make a flow chart that writes down in better detail the results obtained in the serological and molecular study. This table does not have an adequate presentation.

8. The conclusion describes that 86% of the participants seroconverted after primary vaccination. Could the authors explain how was obtained this result?

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Sep 17;16(9):e0257103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257103.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


28 Jul 2021

20th July, 2021

The Editor in Chief

PLoS One Journal

Dear Editor in Chief,

SUBMISSION OF REVISED MANUSCRIPT FOR PUBLICATION

I would like to submit a revised version of our manuscript titled ‘Immunosurveillance and molecular detection of hepatitis B virus infection amongst vaccinated children in the West Gonja District in Savanna Region of Ghana by Theophilus Quaye, Patrick W. Narkwa, Seth A. Domfeh, Gloria Kattah and Mohamed Mutocheluh to be considered for publication as a research article in the PLoS One Journal.

We thank the academic editor and the reviewer(s) for their generous comments on the manuscript. We have edited the manuscript to address their concerns.

Below are the full responses to the comments of the academic editor and the reviewer(s).

Academic editor’s comments and responses

Comment 1

Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming.

Response

The manuscript has been carefully checked against PLOS ONE’s style requirement and we believe these requirements have been duly met.

Comment 2

Please include additional information regarding the survey or questionnaire used in the study and ensure that you have provided sufficient details that others could replicate the analyses. For instance, if you developed a questionnaire as part of this study and it is not under a copyright more restrictive than CC-BY, please include a copy, in both the original language and English, as Supporting Information.

Response

The questionnaire that was developed and used in the study has been provided as supporting information.

Comment 3

We note that you have included the phrase “data not shown” in your manuscript. Unfortunately, this does not meet our data sharing requirements. PLOS does not permit references to inaccessible data. We require that authors provide all relevant data within the paper, Supporting Information files, or in an acceptable, public repository. Please add a citation to support this phrase or upload the data that corresponds with these findings to a stable repository (such as Figshare or Dryad) and provide and URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers that may be used to access these data. Or, if the data are not a core part of the research being presented in your study, we ask that you remove the phrase that refers to these data.

Response

The sentence which was referenced as ‘data not shown’ has been deleted as it does not form a core part of the study.

Review comments and responses

Comment 1

The introduction has the overall context and approach of importance of vaccination HBV.

Response

Not Applicable

Comment 2

In the study design and study site section, the authors should include a further description of the geographical area where the study was carried out. Consider aspects of temperature, organization, size of the city, population or another information that authors considers important.

Response:

The study design and site section have accordingly been updated with the description as suggested by the reviewer in the revised manuscript.

Comment 3

In the study population and eligibility criteria to include how much is the n of the population from 9 months to 17 years and of these how many are fully vaccinated. What was the sample size calculation? Indicate the prevalence for hepatitis B infection and the power considered to calculate the sample size. Additionally, describe in detail the inclusion criteria for the study.

Response

Data on how much is the n of the population aged 9 months to 17 years was very difficult to obtain as data from Ghana Statistical Service 2010 Population and Housing Census only indicated that the population of the West Gonja District is youthful with14.6% being between the ages of 0-4 years. The prevalence of hepatitis B infection and the power considered in calculating the sample size has been indicated in the revised manuscript. Also the inclusion and exclusion criteria have been described.

Comment 4

In the laboratory analysis section to include the number of replicates of the experiment and how the authors confirmed the results.

Response

The number of replicates and how the ELISA tests results were confirmed have been indicated in the revised manuscript.

Comment 5

In the DNA detection section, which controls were used. Mention the sensitivity and specificity of the molecular test.

Response

The controls used in RT-PCR have been indicated in the revised manuscript. The sensitivity and specificity of the molecular test as indicated by the manufacturer of the kits have been stated.

Comment 6

In the results section, explain in detail how many children were initially screened and how many didn't have the inclusion criteria.

Response

The number of children who were screened and met the inclusion criteria have explained in the revised version of the manuscript.

Comment 7

It is suggested to the authors for the presentation of the results of Table 3, to make a flow chart that writes down in better detail the results obtained in the serological and molecular study. This table does not have an adequate presentation.

Response

The focus of Table 3 is to look at the distribution of serological and molecular markers of HBV in relation to the demographics of the study participants. Several options including graphical presentation as well as use of flow chart (as suggested by the reviewer) in presenting the data were considered initially. But after careful analysis, we observed that using graphs or flow chart in presenting the data would rather have some information hidden which would make it a bit difficult for readers to comprehend. We are therefore of the opinion that presenting the data in the table as has been done in Table 3 better makes it easier to understand the information that we want to put across.

Comment 8

The conclusion describes that 86% of the participants seroconverted after primary vaccination. Could the authors explain how was obtained this result?

Response

The sero-conversion rate was determined by dividing the number of participants which had anti-HBs titers > 1mIU/mL by the total number of participants that is 301 divided by 350. However since the focus of the study was on the level of protection gained after hepatitis B vaccination, the sero-conversion part in the conclusion has been removed as the sero-conversion analysis was not captured under the result section.

We believe the manuscript is now suitable for publication in PLoS One Journal.

Sincerely yours,

SIGNED

Patrick W. Narkwa (PhD)

(Corresponding author)

Attachment

Submitted filename: RESPONSE TO REVIEWER(S).docx

Decision Letter 1

Isabelle Chemin

24 Aug 2021

Immunosurveillance and molecular detection of hepatitis B virus infection amongst vaccinated children in the West Gonja District in Savanna Region of Ghana

PONE-D-21-12148R1

Dear Dr. Narkwa,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Isabelle Chemin, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Isabelle Chemin

8 Sep 2021

PONE-D-21-12148R1

Immunosurveillance and molecular detection of hepatitis B virus infection amongst vaccinated children in the West Gonja District in Savanna Region of Ghana

Dear Dr. Narkwa:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Mrs Isabelle Chemin

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. Questionnaire used in the study.

    (PDF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: RESPONSE TO REVIEWER(S).docx

    Data Availability Statement

    The data are available in the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST) space repository: http://ir.knust.edu.gh/handle/123456789/14537.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES