New Phytologist229 (2021), 3587–3601, doi: 10.1111/nph.17101.
Since its publication, the authors of Akiyama et al. (2021) have brought to our attention an error in their article. The labels in the key to Fig. 2 were incorrectly presented. The correct Fig. 2 is shown below.
Fig. 2.
The results of a principal component analysis of environmental factors from 17 sites of Cardamine amara, Cardamine hirsuta, and Cardamine flexuosa that were subject to the analysis. The relative impacts of different factors are illustrated as vectors. SOSS, sky openness at season start; SOSE, sky openness at season end; IS NO3 −, incubated soil nitrate; IS NH4 +, incubated soil ammonium; soil C : N ratio, soil carbon‐to‐nitrogen ratio. The first two principal component (PC) axes accounted for 50% and 19% of total variation, respectively. Different colors of the points indicate different species composition: red, C. hirsuta only; orange, C. hirsuta and C. flexuosa; green, C. flexuosa only; blue, C. flexuosa and C. amara; and black, C. amara only. Blue, green, and red background colors indicate the sites with C. amara, C. flexuosa, and C. hirsuta, respectively. The color of the point is halved for sites with species composition being different between 2013 and 2014. Three sites in the Wehrenbach area are indicated with asterisks.
Corrected Fig. 2
We apologize to our readers for this mistake.
Contributor Information
Kentaro K. Shimizu, Email: kentaro.shimizu@ieu.uzh.ch.
Rie Shimizu‐Inatsugi, Email: rie.inatsugi@ieu.uzh.ch.
Reference
- Akiyama R, Sun J, Hatakeyama M, Lischer HEL, Briskine RV, Hay A, Gan X, Tsiantis M, Kudoh H, Kanaoka MMet al. 2021. Fine‐scale empirical data on niche divergence and homeolog expression patterns in an allopolyploid and its diploid progenitor species. New Phytologist 229: 3587–3601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]