Skip to main content
Emerging Microbes & Infections logoLink to Emerging Microbes & Infections
letter
. 2021 Sep 14;10(1):1819–1823. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2021.1968317

Re-emergence of H5N8 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus in wild birds, China

Juan Li a,, Chunge Zhang b,c,, Jian Cao c,d,, Yongchun Yang b, Hui Dong a,e, Yanan Cui a,e, Xue Yao a, Hong Zhou a, Lu Lu f, Samantha Lycett g, Xiaodu Wang b, Houhui Song b, Wenjun Liu c,d, George F Gao c,d, Weifeng Shi a,e,CONTACT, Yuhai Bi c,d,
PMCID: PMC8451669  PMID: 34392820

ABSTRACT

In mid-November 2020, deaths of whooper swan were reported in the Yellow River Reservoir Area, China. In the present study, we describe the genetic characterizations and phylogenetic relationships of four clade 2.3.4.4b H5N8 highly avian influenza viruses (HPAIVs) identified from a sick whooper swan and environmental samples collected in the Yellow River Reservoir Area in late November 2020. They were closely related to recent H5Nx HPAIVs causing outbreaks in Eurasia in the 2020-2021 influenza season, suggesting these isolates might be imported into China via migratory birds. The newly identified H5N8 HPAIVs possessed Q226 and G228 (H3 numbering), indicating that they prefer to avian-like receptors. However, they had three mutations falling within known antigenic regions, including T144A in antigenic region A, T192I in antigenic region B, and N240D in antigenic region D. Our study highlights the risk of the rapid global spread of H5N8 HPAIVs and the necessity for continuous monitoring of avian influenza viruses in wild birds.

KEYWORDS: Highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV), H5N8, clade 2.3.4.4b, migratory birds, re-emergence


Wild birds, in particular certain species of waterfowl and shorebirds, are considered the natural reservoirs for avian influenza viruses [1]. Long-distance spread, especially intercontinental spread of AIVs, such as H5N1 [2,3], H5N6 [4], and H5N8 [5] HPAIVs, is closely associated with wild bird migration. More importantly, the hemagglutinin (HA) gene of the H5Nx AIVs has evolved into multiple phylogenetic clades and subclades (https://www.who.int/influenza/gisrs_laboratory/201101h5n1evoconceptualdiagram.pdf?ua=1), some of which have shown propensity of global spread [6,7]. The ongoing surveillance of live bird markets in China revealed that clade 2.3.4.4 H5Nx HPAIVs were first detected in poultry in 2008, and have gradually become dominant both in domestic poultry [8,9] and wild birds [4,5,10] from 2014 onwards. In 2010, the first identification of clade 2.3.4.4 H5N8 HPAIV in poultry was documented in China, and H5N8 HPAIV caused outbreaks in South Korea in early 2014 [11]. In autumn/winter of 2014/2015, clade 2.3.4.4 H5N8 HPAIVs were extensively transmitted among eastern Asia, Europe and North America via the migration of wild birds. In the 2016/2017 influenza season, clade 2.3.4.4 H5Nx HPAIVs, particularly the H5N8 and H5N6 subtypes, repeatedly invaded Europe, causing numerous outbreaks in poultry and wild birds [11].

To date, clade 2.3.4.4 H5Nx AIVs have further diversified into eight subclades, namely clades 2.3.4.4a to 2.3.4.4h [12]. Clade 2.3.4.4 H5N8 HPAIVs re-emerged and have caused >640 outbreaks in wild birds and domestic poultry in ∼20 European and Asian countries including China during 2019–2021 (https://www.oie.int/en/disease/avian-influenza/). In this study, we described the genetic characterizations of clade 2.3.4.4 H5N8 HPAIVs causing an outbreak in whooper swan (Cygnus cygnus) in November 2020, China.

On 18 November 2020, two dead whooper swans were found in the Yellow River Wetland of Pinglu (https://news.cgtn.com/news/2020-12-03/H5N8-bird-flu-found-among-wild-swans-in-N-China-VV8nR4RhSM/index.html). The Yellow River Wetland of Pinglu is adjacent to the Sanmenxia Reservoir Area, both of which are located along the East Asian-Australasian (EA) flyway [13–15]. There are more than 200 bird species wintering or stopping over at the Yellow River Reservoir Area (including the wetland of Pinglu and Sanmenxia Reservoir Area), including whooper swan, Pochard, Crested Pochard, Red Duck, and so on. Generally, these birds arrive at the wetland in November from Mongolia and Siberia [14] and leave in next May. In January 2015, clade 2.3.2.1c H5N1 HPAIVs circulating in wild birds among Eurasia and Africa [2] were reported to kill tens of whooper swans [14] in the Sanmenxia Reservoir Area. However, in recent years, the number of wintering whooper swan in the Yellow River Reservoir Area has been gradually increasing, and has reached ∼10,000 in the winter of 2020.

On 28 November 2020, one dying whooper swan was found in the Yellow River Reservoir Area (Supplementary figure 1). The visible clinical signs included weakness, cloudy eyes, and shallow breathing. Oropharyngeal and cloacal swabs from the bird and 23 feces from the environment were collected for pathogen identification. The samples were maintained at 4°C in the viral-transport medium before use. Total viral RNA was extracted from each swab and fecal sample according to the instructions of the MagaBio plus Virus RNA Purification Kit (BIOER, China), then was tested by qRT-PCR kit for influenza A virus (Mabsky Biotech Co., Ltd.). Two swabs from the sick whooper swan and eleven fecal samples from environment were tested positive. Full-length AIV genome sequences of the qRT-PCR positive samples were obtained using both Sanger and Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) [9]. The bird species of the fecal samples was further confirmed through nested PCR and Sanger sequencing of the cytochrome oxidase I (COI) gene as described previously [16]. The partial COI sequences of the environmental samples CAS002-F17 and CAS002-F18 were identical and they shared the highest nucleotide identity (99.85%) with the whooper swan (Cygnus cygnus) COI gene across the aligned regions (680 bp). The partial sequences of the COI gene of CAS002-F17 have been deposited into China National Microbiology Data Center (NMDC; https://nmdc.cn/coronavirus; accession No. NMDCN0000Q29).

A total of four genomes of H5N8 HPAIVs were obtained, including two from the same sick bird (A/whooper swan/Henan/CAS001-G/2020(H5N8) (CAS001-G), A/whooper swan/Henan/CAS001-K/2020(H5N8) (CAS001-K)), and two from environmental feces (A/whooper swan/Henan/CAS002-F17/2020(H5N8) (CAS002-F17) and A/whooper swan/Henan/CAS002-F18/2020(H5N8) (CAS002-F18)), respectively. The four genomes have been deposited into NMDC (accession Nos. NMDCN0000IP1-NMDCN0000IS8) and the Global Initiative on Sharing Avian Influenza Data (GISAID) database (https://www.gisaid.org; accession Nos. EPI1843651-EPI1843682).

High nucleotide identities between the four strains resolved in this study and other Autumn/Winter 2020 H5N8 HPAIV genomes were revealed (>99.5% in all eight gene segments). The HA gene of the Asian strain (A/mallard/Korea/WA820/2020(H5N8) (Korea-WA820), the NA, PB2, PB1, NP and NS genes of A/whooper swan/Inner Mongolia/w1-1/2020(H5N8) (IM-w1-1)), the PA gene of the European strains (A/chicken/Omsk/0119/2020(H5N8) (EU-0119), and the M gene of A/chicken/Kostroma/304-10/2020(H5N8) (EU-304-10)) shared the highest nucleotide identities with CAS001 described in this study (Supplementary Table 1).

To better understand the evolution of these H5N8 AIVs, complete genomes of 1625 H5N8 strains were phylogenetically analysed, including the four H5N8 viruses sequenced in this study and all global H5N8 viruses (n = 1621) available in GISAID and GenBank databases. In the HA phylogeny (Figure 1 and Supplementary Figure 2), 65.5% of the H5N8 strains (n = 1065) fell within clade 2.3.4.4b, mainly from the 2016/2017 and 2020/2021 seasons, while 33.0% in clade 2.3.4.4c (n = 536) mainly from the 2014/2015 season. In clade 2.3.4.4b, the Eurasian H5N8 viruses during 2020/2021 (n = 372) were further divided into two separate groups (Group I and Group II) in the phylogenetic tree and the mean genetic distance between the two subclades was >4.0% (Supplementary Table 2), far greater than 1.5% used to propose a novel clade/subclade of H5Nx AIVs (https://www.who.int/influenza/gisrs_laboratory/201101h5n1evoconceptualdiagram.pdf?ua=1). 28.5% strains (n = 106) fell within Group I, including 64 European isolates from Hungary, Poland, Germany and Czech Republic since January 2020 (relating to outbreaks in the Spring of 2020), and 42 Asian isolates circulating in Korea and Japan from October 2020 [17–19]. The four strains in this study belonged to Group II, together with 70.0% H5N8 strains during 2020/2021 (n = 262). This group includes a strain from Iraq in May 2020; strains from the Russian Federation from July 2020 onwards; Asian strains include those from Inner Mongolia (October 2020), Korea (November 2020–January 2021), Japan (January 2021). European Group II strains include those from Netherlands, Germany and England (October 2020 onwards), and other European countries from November 2020 onwards [20]. Notably, the strain, A/Astrakhan/3212/2020, which caused the first human infection with H5N8 and was identified in Russia in December 2020 [21] was also clustered into Group II.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Phylogenetic analysis of H5N8 HPAIVs. Line colour in the topology of the HA phylogenetic tree represents the collection date of all H5N8 strains with whole genomes isolated before 2014, or from 2014 to 2021. Maximum likelihood trees in this study were performed using RAxML (version 8.1.6) under GTRGAMMA nucleotide substitution model with 1000 bootstrap replicates. The four strains in this study were colored in magenta, and the representative Eurasian isolates in 2020/2021 season were colored in black. The red pentagram represents the human-infecting H5N8 strain, A/Astrakhan/3212/2020(H5N8). In the right panel, different colours represent the different classified lineages for the HA, NA, PB2, PB1, PA, NP, MP, and NS genes, which have been shown in the figure.

We further analysed the phylogenetic relationships of the remaining seven genes of the Groups I and II H5N8 AIVs classified according the topology of the HA gene (Supplementary Figures 3–9 and Supplementary Data 1). Generally, most of the Group II strains were clustered together in the trees of the eight genes, except several strains with few internal genes (e.g. PA) presenting a separate source (Figure 1). Likewise, all the four new H5N8 strains fell within Group II in the eight gene trees, respectively (Figure 1). For Group I strains, their HA, NA and M genes were always grouped together. However, for other internal genes, some strains (n = 29) in this group originated from other sources, suggesting likely reassortment events. Apart from a few Group II strains (n = 3) possessing Group I-like NP gene sequences, no frequent reassortment events between Groups I and II were observed in our study (Figure 1).

The HA protein of the four newly resolved H5N8 HPAIV strains contained a cleavage site motif of REKRRKR↓GLF and Q226 and G228 (H3 numbering) at the receptor binding site, indicating that these H5N8 HPAIVs prefer to avian-like receptors. However, they also contained the amino acid substitution T160A in the HA protein, which has been reported to enhance the binding capacity to human-like receptors [10]. Amino acid substitutions of the antigenicity-associated amino acids in the HA protein, particularly in the HA1 protein, are considered a major evolutionary force driving antigenic variation of influenza A virus via impairing antibody recognition and prompting escape from immune responses [22–24]. In comparison with A/duck/Jiangsu/k1203/2010(H5N8) (K1203) [25], the four H5N8 HPAIVs described here belonging to Group II (2020–2021) of subclade 2.3.4.4b, possess three amino acid substitutions in the antigenic regions on HA including T156A (144, H3 numbering) in antigenic region A, T204I (192, H3 numbering) in antigenic region B, and N252D (240, H3 numbering) in antigenic region D. Notably, these antigenicity-associated amino acid substitutions were also seen in HA gene sequences of Group II H5N8 of subclade 2.3.4.4b. Therefore, the variations of antigenicity-associated amino acid sites in Group II might indicate the potential antigenic drift of these H5N8 viruses, including our strains.

We further summarized all the key amino acid changes in the four H5N8 strains (Supplementary Data 2). Amino acids Q591, E627 and D701 were observed in the PB2 protein of these strains, suggesting a low replication ability of these H5N8 AIVs in mammals [10]. No drug-resistance-associated mutations (Q136 K, G147 V, H274Y and R292 K in NA, N2 numbering; S31N in M2) were found in these strains, and therefore they may be sensitive to the NA and M2 inhibitors [14,26].

In conclusion, we identified and described the genetic and phylogenetic characteristics of four clade 2.3.4.4b H5N8 HPAIV genomes causing an outbreak in whooper swan in the Yellow River Reservoir Area, China in November 2020. These H5N8 HPAIV strains exhibited close genetic relationships with recent strains circulating in Asia and Europe. In fact, H5Nx HPAIVs, particularly the H5N8 subtype, have swept Eurasia in the 2020–2021 influenza season of the Northern Hemisphere, causing hundreds of outbreaks in tens of countries and more than 20 million domestic poultry have been culled in South Korea and Japan (https://www.oie.int/en/disease/avian-influenza/). Our results once again highlight the probability of rapid global spread of HPAIVs. Due to the antigenicity-associated molecular variations and pandemic potential, continuous monitoring of AIVs is urgently needed both in migratory birds and domestic poultry.

Supplementary Material

Editable_supplementary_materials.zip
Supplementary_Data_2.xls
Supplementary_Data_1.xls
Supplementary_Table_2-0730.docx
Supplementary_Table_1-0730.docx

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) [grant number XDB29010102], the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (STEP) [grant number 2019QZKK0304], the National Science and Technology Major Project [grant number 2018ZX10101004-002], the Open Research Fund Program of CAS Key Laboratory of Special Pathogens and Biosafety, Wuhan Institute of Virology [grant number 2021SPCAS002], the Academic Promotion Programme of Shandong First Medical University [grant number 2019QL006], and National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [grant number 31870163]. L. L., S. L. and W. L. are supported by an Ecology and Evolution of Infectious Diseases (EEID) collaborative grant (BBSRC) [grant number BB/V011286/1]; NSFC [grant number 32061123001], and S. L. is additionally supported by Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) Institute Strategic Programme Grant to Roslin Institute from ‘Pathogen diversity, host specificity and virulence' [grant number BBS/E/D/20002173], and the Scottish Government Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division. W.S. is supported by the Taishan Scholar Project of Shandong Province. Y.B. is supported by the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [grant number 31822055], and Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS [grant number 2017122].

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

References

  • 1.Webster RG, Bean WJ, Gorman OT, et al. . Evolution and ecology of influenza A viruses. Microbio Rev. 1992;56(1):152–179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bi Y, Chen J, Zhang Z, et al. . Highly pathogenic avian influenza: H5N1 clade 2.3.2.1c virus in migratory birds, 2014–2015. Virol Sin. 2016;31(4):300–305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wang G, Zhan D, Li L, et al. . H5N1 avian influenza re-emergence of lake Qinghai: phylogenetic and antigenic analyses of the newly isolated viruses and roles of migratory birds in virus circulation. J Gen Virol. 2008;89:697–702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bi Y, Liu H, Xiong C, et al. . Novel avian influenza A (H5N6) viruses isolated in migratory waterfowl before the first human case reported in China, 2014. Sci Rep. 2016;6:29888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Global Consortium for H5N8 and Related Influenza Viruses . Role for migratory wild birds in the global spread of avian influenza H5N8. Science. 2016;354(6309): 213-217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shi W, Gao GF.. Emerging H5N8 avian influenza viruses. Science. 2021;372(6544):784–786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lycett SJ, Pohlmann A, Staubach C, et al. . Genesis and spread of multiple reassortants during the 2016/2017 H5 avian influenza epidemic in Eurasia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(34):20814–20825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bi Y, Chen Q, Wang Q, et al. . Genesis, evolution and prevalence of H5N6 avian influenza viruses in China. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;20(6):810–821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bi Y, Li J, Li S, et al. . Dominant subtype switch in avian influenza viruses during 2016–2019 in China. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):5909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yamaji R, Saad MD, Davis CT, et al. . Pandemic potential of highly pathogenic avian influenza clade 2.3.4.4 A (H5) viruses. Rev Med Virol. 2020;30(3):e2099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lycett SJ, Duchatel F, Digard P.. A brief history of bird flu. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019;374(1775):20180257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Li Y, Li M, Li Y, et al. . Outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza (H5N6) virus subclade 2.3.4.4h in swans, Xinjiang, western China, 2020. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26(12):2956–2960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bi Y, Shi W, Chen J, et al. . CASCIRE surveillance network and work on avian influenza viruses. Sci China Life Sci. 2017;60(12):1386–1391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bi Y, Zhang Z, Liu W, et al. . Highly pathogenic avian influenza A (H5N1) virus struck migratory birds in China in 2015. Sci Rep. 2015;5:12986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yang H, Wang J, Xiao W, et al. . Relationship between hydroclimatic variables and reservoir wetland landscape pattern indices: a case study of the Sanmenxia Reservoir wetland on the Yellow River, China. J Earth Syst Sci. 2020;129:83. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cheung PP, Leung YHC, Chow CK, et al. . Identifying the species-origin of faecal droppings used for avian influenza virus surveillance in wild-birds. J Clin Virol. 2009;46(1):90–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jeong S, Lee DH, Kwon JH, et al. . Highly pathogenic avian influenza clade 2.3.4.4b subtype H5N8 virus isolated from mandarin duck in South Korea, 2020. Viruses. 2020;12(12):1389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Isoda N, Twabela AT, Bazarragchaa E, et al. . Re-invasion of H5N8 high pathogenicity avian influenza virus clade 2.3.4.4b in Hokkaido, Japan, 2020. Viruses. 2020;12(12):1439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Khalil AM, Fujimoto Y, Kojima I, et al. . Genetic characterization of H5N8 highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses isolated from falcated ducks and environmental water in Japan in November 2020. Pathogens. 2021;10(2):171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lewis NS, Banyard AC, Whittard E, et al. . Emergence and spread of novel H5N8, H5N5 and H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4 highly pathogenic avian influenza in 2020. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2021;10(1):148–151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pyankova OG, Susloparov IM, Moiseeva AA, et al. . Isolation of clade 2.3.4.4b A(H5N8), a highly pathogenic avian influenza virus, from a worker during an outbreak on a poultry farm, Russia, December 2020. Euro Surveill. 2021;26(24): 2100439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rockman S, Camuglia S, Vandenberg K, et al. . Reverse engineering the antigenic architecture of the haemagglutinin from influenza H5N1 clade 1 and 2.2 viruses with fine epitope mapping using monoclonal antibodies. Mol Immunol. 2013;53(4):435–442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wang TT, Palese P.. Universal epitopes of influenza virus hemagglutinins? Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2009;16(3):233–234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wiley DC, Wilson IA, Skehel JJ.. Structural identification of the antibody-binding sites of Hong Kong influenza haemagglutinin and their involvement in antigenic variation. Nature. 1981;289(5796):373–378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhao K, Gu M, Zhong L, et al. . Characterization of three H5N5 and one H5N8 highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses in China. Vet Microbiol. 2013;163(3–4):351–357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Choi WS, Jeong JH, Kwon JJ, et al. . Screening for neuraminidase inhibitor resistance markers among avian influenza viruses of the N4, N5, N6, and N8 neuraminidase subtypes. J Virol. 2018;92(1):e01580–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Editable_supplementary_materials.zip
Supplementary_Data_2.xls
Supplementary_Data_1.xls
Supplementary_Table_2-0730.docx
Supplementary_Table_1-0730.docx

Articles from Emerging Microbes & Infections are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES