Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1999 Mar;37(3):706–708. doi: 10.1128/jcm.37.3.706-708.1999

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Aeromonas jandaei, A. schubertii, A. trota, and A. veronii Biotype veronii

Timothy L Overman 1,2,*, J Michael Janda 3
PMCID: PMC84530  PMID: 9986836

Abstract

Fifty-six isolates of four Aeromonas species, which have been documented as causative agents of human infections or isolated from human clinical specimens, were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing using a MicroScan WalkAway conventional (overnight incubation) gram-negative panel. The four species tested and the number of isolates of each were as follows: Aeromonas jandaei, 17; A. schubertii, 12; A. trota, 15; and A. veronii biotype veronii, 12. All isolates of A. trota were susceptible to all antimicrobial agents tested, except cefazolin (20% of isolates were resistant) and cefoxitin (13% of isolates were resistant). All isolates of A. schubertii and A. veronii biotype veronii, as well as 88% of A. jandaei isolates, were resistant to ampicillin. Resistance to ampicillin-sulbactam ranged from 25% of A. schubertii strains to 100% of A. veronii biotype veronii strains. Cefazolin resistance ranged from 17% of A. veronii biotype veronii isolates to 59% of A. jandaei isolates. Imipenem resistance was detected in 65% of A. jandaei strains and 67% of A. veronii biotype veronii strains. A. jandaei displayed resistance to piperacillin and ticarcillin in 53 and 71% of the isolates, respectively. A. veronii biotype veronii strains were 100% susceptible to piperacillin and 100% resistant to ticarcillin. These antibiogram data may be useful in establishing the identification of these four species when members of the genus Aeromonas are isolated from human clinical sources.


Since 1976 the genus Aeromonas has been expanded from three phenospecies to 14 nomenspecies. The majority of these newer species were originally discovered when DNA-DNA studies performed on representative strains revealed the presence of genetic heterogeneity. From these studies a number of hybridization groups (HG) were identified, and some were given species names (10). Human infections caused by Aeromonas hydrophila (HG 1), A. caviae (HG 4), and A. veronii biotype sobria (HG 8), formerly phenospecies A. sobria (HG 8), are not uncommon and have been reported in clinical microbiology and infectious disease periodicals worldwide. Susceptibility patterns of these species to various antimicrobial agents are well documented (5, 6, 12, 13, 15, 16, 18, 20), as is an apparent increase in resistance to β-lactam antibiotics (11, 14). This increased resistance is attributed to the presence of β-lactamases, including those that hydrolyze the carbapenems, in these organisms (3, 7, 17). Other species documented to cause human infections include A. jandaei (HG 9), A. schubertii (HG 12), and A. veronii biotype veronii (HG 10), formerly A. veronii (HG 10) (10). A. trota (HG 13) has been isolated from human clinical sources (feces and appendix) but has not been firmly established as a causative agent of human disease (10). Identification of these organisms is problematic even when widely accepted commercial identification systems, both manual and automated, are used. The identification of isolates of A. schubertii and A. veronii biotype veronii as Vibrio damsela and Vibrio cholerae, respectively, has been reported (2). The antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of these more recently recognized species of aeromonads are not well documented because of the small number of single-isolate cases reported in the scientific literature. No susceptibility studies examining reasonable numbers of these less frequently isolated Aeromonas species have been published to date (10). The purpose of this study was to examine such a collection of reference laboratory-identified isolates of these four species. Determination of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns may also aid in the recognition of these species in the clinical microbiology laboratory.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-six isolates of four Aeromonas species, which have been documented as causative agents of human infections or isolated from clinical specimens, were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing using a MicroScan WalkAway conventional (overnight incubation) gram-negative panel. The four species tested and the number of each were as follows: A. jandaei, 17; A. schubertii, 12; A. trota, 15; and A. veronii biotype veronii, 12.

The Enteric Unit of the Microbial Diseases Laboratory, California Department of Health Services, Berkeley, Calif., identified all of the isolates by a battery of 65 biochemical tests (1, 9). The Clinical Microbiology Laboratory of the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Lexington, Kentucky, performed all of the antimicrobial susceptibility tests.

Isolates were shipped in vials containing 2.5 ml of motility medium containing 0.3% agar. Upon receipt, the vials were subcultured to sheep blood agar plates (SBAP) (Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Loveton, Md.) and incubated in an ambient air incubator at 35°C for 18 to 24 h. The SBAP were examined for culture purity, and a Kovács oxidase test was performed with an isolated colony. A second colony isolated from each SBAP was subcultured to a second SBAP and incubated as described above for an additional 18 to 24 h. Colonies from the second subculture were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing using the MicroScan Walkaway 40 system (Dade-Behring, West Sacramento, Calif.). Five well-isolated colonies of each strain were picked by using the MicroScan Prompt Inoculation System-D. The standardized inoculum was added to MicroScan Negative Combo Panel Type 16 microwell trays by using the MicroScan Renok device. Panels were placed in the MicroScan Walkaway 40 for overnight incubation and were read automatically by the instrument.

RESULTS

The antibiograms of A. jandaei (HG 9), A. schubertii (HG 12), A. trota (HG 13), and A. veronii biotype veronii (HG 10) are shown in Table 1. The MICs at which 50% of isolates were inhibited (MIC50s) and MIC90s of A. jandaei (HG 9), A. schubertii (HG 12), A. trota (HG 13), and A. veronii biotype veronii (HG 10) are shown in Table 2.

TABLE 1.

Antibiograms for Aeromonas species used in this study

Organism (n)a % Susceptible to:
Ampicillin Ampicillin-sulbactam Piperacillin Ticarcillin Cefazolin Cefotaxime Cefoxitin Ceftazidime Ceftriaxone Cefuroxime Amikacin Gentamicin Tobramycin Imipenem Aztreonam Ciprofloxacin Ofloxacin Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
A. jandaei (17) 12 12 47 29 41 100 94 100 100 100 100 100 94 35 100 100 100 100
A. schubertii (12) 0 75 92 83 67 100 83 100 100 92 92 92 58 100 100 100 100 100
A. trota (15) 100 100 100 100 80 100 87 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
A. veroniib (12) 0 0 100 0 83 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 83 33 100 100 100 100
a

n, number of strains tested. 

b

A. veronii biotype veronii. 

TABLE 2.

MICs for Aeromonas species in this studya

Antimicrobial agent A. jandaei (17)
A. schubertii (12)
A. trota (15)
A. veroniib (12)
MIC50 MIC90 MIC50 MIC90 MIC50 MIC90 MIC50 MIC90
Ampicillin c 4 8
Ampicillin-sulbactam —  8 16 8 8
Piperacillin 32 8 16 8 8 8 16
Ticarcillin 64 8 32 8 8 32 64
Cefazolin 16 4 4 16 4
Cefotaxime 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Cefoxitin 2 8 2 8 16 2 4
Ceftazidime 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Ceftriaxone 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Cefuroxime 2 2 2 8 2 4 2 2
Amikacin 4 8 4 16 4 8 8 16
Gentamicin 2 4 2 4 2 2 2 4
Tobramycin 4 4 4 2 2 4 6
Imipenem 8 4 4 4 4 8
Aztreonam 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Ciprofloxacin 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Ofloxacin 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 2 0.5 0.5
a

MIC50s and MIC90s are given in micrograms per milliliter. Parenthetical values after strains are numbers of strains tested. 

b

A. veronii biotype veronii. 

c

—, no MIC50 or MIC90

DISCUSSION

Aeromonas species have been the subject of a number of antimicrobial susceptibility studies over the last 30 years. Most of these studies have usually involved the three readily recognized phenospecies, A. hydrophila, A. caviae, and A. veronii biotype sobria (5, 6, 12, 13, 15, 16, 18, 20). In the last decade, increased resistance of these organisms to β-lactam antibiotics has been described in Japan (14) and Taiwan (11).

Until now, susceptibility data for these less frequently isolated Aeromonas species have been lacking (10). The results of this study indicated that these species of the genus Aeromonas were more susceptible to narrow-spectrum cephalosporins than the more frequently isolated species. However, resistance also occurred in these less frequently isolated species.

A. jandaei was the most resistant of the four species. Most isolates were resistant to penicillins, including both piperacillin and ticarcillin. Sixty-five percent of the A. jandaei strains were also resistant to imipenem. Previously reported Aeromonas resistance to imipenem varies from 3% (14) to 14% (11) for A. veronii biotype sobria and is 8% for A. hydrophila (11, 14). Recognition of A. jandaei isolates may be enhanced by the increased resistance to penicillins, including piperacillin and ticarcillin, and to imipenem. It is notable that this species which was the most resistant is, of the four species in this study, the one most frequently isolated from blood in clinical infections (10).

A. schubertii isolates had a susceptibility pattern very similar to those that have been reported for A. hydrophila and A. caviae (12).

A. trota was the most susceptible of the four species, with all isolates susceptible to ampicillin. Susceptibility to ampicillin is a characteristic of A. trota (4) and appears to be unique to this species because the more frequently isolated species of Aeromonas are usually resistant to ampicillin (11, 12, 14). Eighty percent of the A. trota strains were also susceptible to cefazolin. With the exception of A. veronii biotype sobria (8), the other species of the genus Aeromonas are resistant to narrow-spectrum cephalosporins (5, 6, 12, 13, 15, 16, 18, 20). Recognition of A. trota isolates may be enhanced by the increased susceptibility to narrow-spectrum cephalosporins and to penicillins, especially ampicillin.

A. veronii biotype veronii isolates displayed 100% susceptibility to piperacillin and 100% resistance to ticarcillin. Sixty-seven percent of the A. veronii biotype veronii strains were also resistant to imipenem. A. veronii biotype veronii was the only species to exhibit any significant aminoglycoside resistance, with 42% of the isolates being resistant to tobramycin. Previously reported values for Aeromonas resistance to tobramycin are 23% for A. veronii biotype sobria and 25% for A. caviae and A. hydrophila (11). Eighty-three percent of the A. veronii biotype veronii isolates were susceptible to cefazolin. Recognition of A. veronii biotype veronii isolates may be enhanced by the susceptibility to piperacillin coupled with resistance to ticarcillin, resistance to imipenem, and susceptibility to narrow-spectrum cephalosporins.

The recommended therapy for infections caused by members of the genus Aeromonas is the use of fluoroquinolones. However, fluoroquinolones should not be used in treating pediatric patients. Alternative therapies include trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, aminoglycosides, imipenem, meropenen, parenteral cephalosporins (expanded spectrum and broad spectrum), and tetracyclines (19). The data from the present study indicated the following. (i) A. veronii biotype veronii and A. schubertii had markedly increased resistance to tobramycin. (ii) A. veronii biotype veronii and A. jandaei were generally resistant to imipenem. (iii) A. schubertii and A. trota were less susceptible to cefoxitin, an expanded-spectrum cephalosporin, than to broad spectrum cephalosporins. Perhaps tobramycin, imipenem, and cefoxitin should be removed from the list of alternative therapies.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Abbott S L, Cheung W K W, Kroske-Bystrom S, Malekzadeh T, Janda J M. Identification of Aeromonas strains to genospecies level in the clinical laboratory. J Clin Microbiol. 1992;30:1262–1266. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.5.1262-1266.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Abbott S L, Seli L S, Catino M, Jr, Hartley M A, Janda J M. Misidentification of unusual Aeromonas species as members of the genus Vibrio: a continuing problem. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:1103–1104. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.4.1103-1104.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bakken J S, Sanders C C, Clark R B, Hori M. β-Lactam resistance in Aeromonas spp. caused by inducible β-lactamases active against penicillins, cephalosporins, and carbapenems. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988;32:1314–1319. doi: 10.1128/aac.32.9.1314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Carnahan A M, Chakraborty T, Fanning G R, Verma D, Ali A, Janda J M, Joseph S W. Aeromonas trota sp. nov., an ampicillin-susceptible species isolated from clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29:1206–1210. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.6.1206-1210.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fainstein V, Weaver S, Bodey G P. In vitro susceptibilities of Aeromonas hydrophila against new antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982;22:513–514. doi: 10.1128/aac.22.3.513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fass R J, Barnishan J. In vitro susceptibilities of Aeromonas hydrophila to 32 antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981;19:357–358. doi: 10.1128/aac.19.2.357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Iaconis J P, Sanders C C. Purification and characterization of inducible β-lactamases in Aeromonas spp. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990;34:44–51. doi: 10.1128/aac.34.1.44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Janda J M, Motyl M R. Cephalothin susceptibility as a potential marker for the Aeromonas sobria group. J Clin Microbiol. 1985;22:854–855. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.5.854-855.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Janda J M, Abbott S L, Khashe S, Kellogg G H, Shimada G H. Further studies on biochemical characteristics and serologic properties of the genus Aeromonas. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:1930–1933. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.8.1930-1933.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Janda J M, Abbott S L. Evolving concepts regarding the genus Aeromonas: an expanding panorama of species, disease presentations, and unanswered questions. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;27:332–344. doi: 10.1086/514652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ko W C, Yu K W, Liu C Y, Huang C T, Leu H S, Chuang Y C. Increasing antibiotic resistance in clinical isolates of Aeromonas strains in Taiwan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:1260–1262. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.5.1260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Koehler J M, Ashdown L R. In vitro susceptibilities of tropical strains of Aeromonas species from Queensland, Australia, to 22 antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993;37:905–907. doi: 10.1128/aac.37.4.905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kuijper E J, Peeters M F, Schoenmakers B S C, Zanen H C. Antimicrobial susceptibility of sixty human fecal isolates of Aeromonas species. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989;8:248–250. doi: 10.1007/BF01965270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Morita K, Watanabe N, Kurata S, Kanamori M. β-Lactam resistance of motile Aeromonas isolates from clinical and environmental sources. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:353–355. doi: 10.1128/aac.38.2.353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Motyl M R, McKinley G, Janda J M. In vitro susceptibilities of Aeromonas hydrophila, Aeromonas sobria, and Aeromonas caviae to 22 antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985;28:151–153. doi: 10.1128/aac.28.1.151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Overman T L. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Aeromonas hydrophila. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980;17:612–614. doi: 10.1128/aac.17.4.612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rasmussen B A, Bush K. Carbapenem-hydrolyzing β-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:223–232. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.2.223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Reinhardt J F, George W L. Comparative in vitro activities of selected antimicrobial agents against Aeromonas species and Plesiomonas shigelloides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985;27:643–645. doi: 10.1128/aac.27.4.643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sanford J P, Gilbert D N, Moellering R C, Jr, Sande M A. The sanford guide to antimicrobial therapy. 27th ed. Vienna, Va: Antimicrobial Therapy, Inc.; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.San Joaquin V H, Scribner R K, Pickett D A, Welch D F. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Aeromonas species isolated from patients with diarrhea. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986;30:794–795. doi: 10.1128/aac.30.5.794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES