Skip to main content
Brain logoLink to Brain
. 2021 Mar 20;144(8):2284–2290. doi: 10.1093/brain/awab120

Discriminatory ability of next-generation tau PET tracers for Alzheimer’s disease

Steven Y Yap 1,2,#, Barbara Frias 3,4,#, Melissa C Wren 1,2,3,4, Michael Schöll 5,6, Nick C Fox 6,7, Erik Årstad 1,2, Tammaryn Lashley 3,4, Kerstin Sander 1,2,
PMCID: PMC8453387  PMID: 33742656

Abstract

A next generation of tau PET tracers for the imaging of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias has recently been developed. Whilst the new compounds have now entered clinical studies, there is limited information available to assess their suitability for clinical applications. Head-to-head comparisons are urgently needed to understand differences in the radiotracer binding profiles. We characterized the binding of the tau tracers PI2620, RO948, MK6240 and JNJ067 in human post-mortem brain tissue from a cohort of 25 dementia cases and age-matched controls using quantitative phosphorimaging with tritium-labelled radiotracers in conjunction with phospho-tau specific immunohistochemistry. The four radiotracers depicted tau inclusions composed of paired helical filaments with high specificity, both in cases with Alzheimer’s disease and in primary tauopathy cases with concomitant Alzheimer’s disease pathology. In contrast, cortical binding to primary tauopathy in cases without paired helical filament tau was found to be within the range of age-matched controls. Off-target binding to monoamine oxidase B has been overcome, as demonstrated by heterologous blocking studies in basal ganglia tissue. The high variability of cortical tracer binding within the Alzheimer’s disease group followed the same pattern with each tracer, suggesting that all compounds are suited to differentiate Alzheimer’s disease from other dementias.

Keywords: neuroimaging, positron emission tomography, head-to-head comparison, tauopathies, monoamine oxidase B


To determine the binding profiles of next-generation tau PET tracers, Yap et al. performed a head-to-head comparison of four new compounds in human post-mortem brain tissue. The results suggest that the four tracers are equally well-suited to discriminating Alzheimer's disease from other dementias and from controls.

Introduction

PET imaging of pathological inclusions of the microtubule associated protein tau (MAPT) in the human brain has the potential to enhance the accuracy of a dementia diagnosis in life, track disease progression and provide an outcome measure in clinical trials. Studies with the first tau-targeting radiotracers, including the carbazole 18F-flortaucipir (TauvidTM) and the arylquinolines of the THK series, provided evidence that tau PET can be used to visualize the pathological tau burden and propagation in patients with Alzheimer’s disease.1 However, the ability of these ‘first-generation’ compounds to detect and discriminate tau inclusions in different primary tauopathies remains controversial. Furthermore, concerns have been raised about substantial off-target binding, in particular to the enzyme monoamine oxidase B (MAOB), which may limit routine clinical applications.2

A new generation of tau PET tracers has recently been developed with the aim of overcoming some of the limitations associated with the first-generation compounds, in particular to reduce MAOB affinity and improve the pharmacokinetic profile. Structurally, radiotracers, such as 18F-PI2620 and 18F-RO948, are carbazoles derived from 18F-flortaucipir, whereas 18F-MK6240 and 18F-JNJ067 bear an isoquinolinamine core.3-6 These new radiotracers have been optimized to have a high affinity for tau neurofibrillary tangles, which are composed of paired helical filaments (PHF) and are characteristic of Alzheimer’s disease. Pilot PET studies suggest that the tracers are suitable for depicting the pathological tau burden in patients with Alzheimer’s disease.7–13 However, it remains unclear how structural differences between the tracers may affect their sensitivity and specificity in binding to tau in its different forms in human brain.

Tracer validation studies in human post-mortem brain tissue are uniquely suited to bridge the findings from clinical PET scans and neuropathological examinations, as they allow the assessment of tracer binding at the molecular level. The correct interpretation of clinical PET scans relies critically on the validation of the imaging agent. It is crucial to confirm that the radiotracer binds to a biological target that is representative of the underlying disease. With the aims of characterizing and comparing the binding profiles of structurally distinct, next-generation tau radiotracers, we carried out a head-to-head assessment of 3H-PI2620, 3H-RO948, 3H-MK6240 and 3H-JNJ067 in human post-mortem brain tissue from cases with a range of dementias and age-matched controls.

Materials and methods

Tissue selection

Ethical approval for the collection of post-mortem human brain tissue through the Queen Square Brain Bank for Neurological Disorders, University College London, was obtained from the National Research Ethics Service Committee London (Central: 08/H0718/54+5). Informed consent was obtained from each donor.

All cases underwent standard neuropathological assessment and were diagnosed according to standard criteria (Supplementary Table 1). Disease cases were included based on a high load of disease-specific pathological protein burden in the frontal cortex. The demographic data are summarized in Table 1. The specificity of radiotracer binding was assessed in the frontal cortex (Brodmann area 9) and medial temporal lobe (hippocampus, parahippacampal gyrus). Basal ganglia sections (including putamen, globus pallidus and caudate nucleus) from cases with Alzheimer’s disease were examined to detect potential off-target binding.

Table 1.

Demographic data

Neuropathological diagnosis Case ID AAO AAD BW, g Gender Braak Thal ABC
Age-matched control 1 N/A 86 1230 Female I 4 A3B1C1
Age-matched control 2 N/A 95 1346 Male I 1 A1B1C1
Alzheimer’s disease 3 57 76 1303 Female VI 5 A3B3C2
Alzheimer’s disease 4 63 79 1423 Male VI 5 A3B3C3
Alzheimer’s disease 5 48 63 1042 Male VI 5 A3B3C3
Alzheimer’s disease 6 63 73 1269 Male VI 5 A3B3C3
Alzheimer’s disease 7 63 74 1022 Male VI 5 A3B3C3
Alzheimer’s disease (PCA) 8 55 68 1126 Female VI 5 A3B3C3
Alzheimer’s disease (PCA) 9 57 65 1121 Female VI 5 A3B3C3
R406W 10 55 66 1208 Male 0 0 A0B0C0
Pick’s disease 11 52 62 1123 Male 0 0–1 A1B0C0
Pick’s disease 12 60 67 1470 Male IV 4 A3B3C2
Pick’s disease 13 52 67 982 Male 0 2 A1B0C0
PSP 14 57 62 1369 Male V 5 A3B3C2
PSP 15 76 84 1370 Male 0 4 A3B0C1
Corticobasal degeneration 16 57 64 1456 Male 0 0 A0B0C0
Corticobasal degeneration 17 54 61 1389 Male 0 0 A0B0C0
Dementia with Lewy bodies 18 59 75 1123 Male II 1 A1B1C1
Dementia with Lewy bodies 19 79 89 1258 Female III 5 A3B2C2
TDPA 20 66 72 1274 Male 0 1 A1B0C0
TDPA 21 51 61 1065 Male I 3 A1B1C0
TDPC 22 73 83 1167 Male II 2 A1B1C1
TDPC 23 54 71 1363 Male 0 0 A0B0C0
C9orf72 24 64 73 1252 Male IV 3 A2B2C1
C9orf72 25 52 58 1303 Male I 3 A2B1C1

AAD = age at death; AAO = age at onset; BW = brain weight; C9orf72 =frontotemporal lobar degeneration due to a mutation in C9orf72; N/A = not applicable; PCA = posterior cortical atrophy; R406W = FTDP-17 due to a missense mutation in MAPT; TDPA/C = FTLD-TDP type A/C.

Immunohistochemistry of fresh frozen tissue sections

Staining with the phospho-tau specific antibody AT8 was carried out in sequential frozen tissue sections adjacent to those used for quantitative phosphorimaging as described previously.14 In brief, tissue sections were incubated with AT8 (Thermo Scientific, 1:600) for 1 h at room temperature, followed by biotinylated anti-mouse IgG (DAKO, 1:200; 30 min) and avidin-biotin complex (Vector Laboratories; 30 min). Colour was developed with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine and hydrogen peroxide. Counterstaining was carried out using Mayer’s haematoxylin. Immunostained slides were scanned on an Olympus VS120 slide scanner and the pathological tau load was analysed using Olympus VS120 software.

Quantitative phosphorimaging

Quantitative phosphorimaging was carried out as described previously.15 In brief, total tracer binding was determined using 5 nM 3H-PI2620 (0.91 GBq/µmol), 3 nM 3H-RO948 (0.94 GBq/µmol), 1 nM 3H-MK6240 (1.69 GBq/µmol) and 10 nM 3H-JNJ067 (2.71 GBq/µmol), respectively. Homologous blocking studies to determine non-specific binding were carried out using the non-radioactive analogues (10 µM PI2620, 10 µM RO948, 100 nM MK6240 and 10 µM JNJ067). Heterologous blocking with l-deprenyl (1 µM) was carried out in basal ganglia sections. Following incubation, unbound tracer was removed using either saline or, in the case of 3H-JNJ067 (Supplementary Fig. 1), ethanol/PBS. A detailed protocol can be found in Supplementary Table 2 and Supplementary material, Protocol 1).

Data availability

Data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Results

Pathological accumulation of hyperphosphorylated tau was confirmed by immunostaining with the phospho-tau specific antibody AT8 in frontal cortex sections directly adjacent to those used for quantitative phosphorimaging. In cases with Alzheimer’s disease, a high load of neurofibrillary tangles, neuropil threads and dystrophic neurites was detected in the grey matter. Neurofibrillary tangles and threads were observed in the case with frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17 (FTDP-17) due to a MAPT R406W mutation. Pick bodies and neuropil threads were found in cases with Pick’s disease. Cases with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and corticobasal degeneration exhibited neuronal inclusions in the grey matter as well as disease-specific astroglial pathology (tufted astrocytes and coiled bodies in oligodendrocytes in PSP, astrocytic plaques in corticobasal degeneration). In two of seven cases with sporadic primary tauopathies (Cases PiD#12 and PSP#14), concomitant Alzheimer’s disease pathology was observed. Tau aggregates were not observed in the assessed sections of cases with non-tau proteinopathies, including dementia with Lewy bodies and frontotemporal lobar degeneration linked to TAR DNA-binding protein-43 (FTLD-TDP) or in controls.

All four tau tracers were found to discriminate Alzheimer’s disease cases as well as the FTDP-17 case with the MAPT R406W mutation from controls (Fig. 1). In contrast, there was no evidence of enhanced tau tracer binding to the frontal cortex of primary tauopathies with inclusions predominantly composed of either three-repeat tau (Pick’s disease) or four-repeat tau isoforms (PSP and corticobasal degeneration) and non-tau proteinopathies (dementia with Lewy bodies, FTLD-TDP). In this group of diseases, total binding was low and comparable to that found in control cases (Supplementary Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table 3). An exception was Case PSP#14, where moderate tracer binding was observed with 3H-MK6240 and 3H-JNJ067 (see below).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Binding of the tau tracers 3H-PI2620, 3H-MK6240, 3H-RO948 and 3H-JNJ067 to the frontal cortex from age-matched controls, Alzheimer’s disease cases, an FTDP-17 case with a MAPT R406W mutation and PSP cases. (A) Immunohistochemistry with AT8 and tracer binding in adjacent tissue sections of representative cases. Scale bar = 10 mm. (B) Total (filled circles) and non-specific (open circles) tracer binding to the grey matter expressed in Bq/cm2. AD = Alzheimer’s disease; CTRL = age-matched control; GM/WM, grey-to-white matter ratio based on total tracer binding in these areas of interest; R406W = FTDP-17 due to a missense mutation in MAPT.

In Alzheimer’s disease, a high consistency between AT8 immunohistochemical staining and tau tracer binding was observed (Fig. 1A). Tracer binding occurred predominantly in the grey matter, with high global grey-to-white matter ratios. The specific binding to the grey matter of the Alzheimer’s disease cases, including those clinically diagnosed with posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), was high for all four tau tracers (3H-PI2620: 90 ± 6%; 3H-RO948: 97 ± 1%; 3H-MK6240: 88 ± 4%; 3H-JNJ067: 94 ± 1%) (Fig. 1B). The average specific 3H-PI2620 binding (1000 ± 400 Bq/cm2) was five times higher than in control cases (183 Bq/cm2). Specific 3H-RO948 binding in directly adjacent sections was found to be 690 ± 250 Bq/cm2, 15 times higher than the average specific binding determined in control cases (47 Bq/cm2). Specific 3H-MK6240 binding was determined to be 390 ± 160 Bq/cm2, which was 98 times higher than in control cases (4 Bq/cm2). Finally, a high specific signal was measured for 3H-JNJ067 binding to Alzheimer’s disease cases (2300 ± 1100 Bq/cm2), compared to very low tracer binding—close to the lower limit of quantification—in control cases (<6 Bq/cm2).

With the aim of confirming the specificity of the tau ligands for cortical tau inclusions composed of PHF, we assessed tracer binding to the frontal cortex of an FTDP-17 case with a MAPT R406W mutation (Fig. 1). This mutation gives rise to tau inclusions that morphologically resemble the type of pathology found in Alzheimer’s disease, albeit at lower density. Consistent with AT8 immunostaining, all four tau tracers showed elevated specific binding to the grey matter of this case (3H-PI2620: 503 Bq/cm2; 3H-RO948: 247 Bq/cm2; 3H-MK6240: 263 Bq/cm2; 3H-JNJ067: 672 Bq/cm2).

Intrigued by the positive signal observed in the frontal cortex of Case PSP#14, but not in the remaining cases with PSP and corticobasal degeneration, we hypothesized that the increased tracer binding is a result of the concomitant Alzheimer’s disease pathology found in Case PSP#14 (Table 1). To test this, we assessed tracer binding in medial temporal lobe sections of selected primary tauopathy cases compared with control and Alzheimer’s disease cases (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table 4). All cases, except the controls, were found to have a substantial amount of tau burden as indicated by AT8 immunostaining (Supplementary Fig. 3). Increased tracer binding, similar to that found in the cases with Alzheimer’s disease (e.g. Cases AD#4 and PCA#9), was observed in the entorhinal cortex of case PiD#12 (Braak stage IV) as well as in the hippocampus and parahippocampal cortex of Case PSP#14 (Braak stage V). In contrast, cases characterized as Braak stage 0, and with AT8-positive staining (Cases PiD#11, PiD#13, PSP#15 and CBD#16), lacked specific tracer binding.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Binding of the tau tracers 3H-PI2620, 3H-MK6240, 3H-RO948 and 3H-JNJ067 to the medial temporal lobe from selected cases with primary tauopathies, cases with Alzheimer’s disease and age-matched controls. Immunohistochemistry with AT8 and tracer binding in adjacent tissue sections of representative cases. Scale bar = 5 mm. AD = Alzheimer’s disease; CBD = corticobasal degeneration; CTRL = age-matched control; PiD = Pick’s disease.

With the aim of assessing the specificity of tau tracer binding in the basal ganglia, we performed homogenous and heterogeneous blocking studies using the non-radioactive analogue of each tracer and l-deprenyl, a selective MAOB inhibitor, respectively (Fig. 3). In agreement with AT8 immunostaining, all four tau tracers were found to bind to the putamen, globus pallidus and caudate nucleus. The signal was specific as demonstrated in self-block experiments, yet substantially lower than that detected in the adjacent insular cortex. In contrast, blocking of MAOB binding sites with l-deprenyl did not result in tau tracer displacement.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Comparison of carbazole (3H-PI2620, 3H-RO948) and isoquinolinamine (3H-MK6240, 3H-JNJ067) bearing tau tracers to basal ganglia sections from cases with Alzheimer’s disease. Representative images showing immunohistochemistry staining with (A) AT8, (B) total tracer binding, (C) self-block with the non-radiolabelled analogue of each tracer, and (D) MAOB inhibition with l-deprenyl. Scale bar = 10 mm. AD = Alzheimer’s disease; DEP = l-deprenyl block; NSB = non-specific binding after self-block; TB = total binding.

Discussion

In this study, we used directly adjacent tissue sections from cases with a broad range of dementias allowing for a definite head-to-head comparison of four next-generation tau PET tracers as well as validation of the target specificity of each tracer investigated. In line with recently reported studies, the cortical binding profiles of the four tracers were comparable in that the compounds were found to distinguish cases of Alzheimer’s disease from controls,7–13 primary tauopathies characterized by tau inclusions predominantly composed of three- or four-repeat tau isoforms and dementias with underlying TDP-43 and α-synuclein pathology with high robustness.16,17 The strong signal obtained in cases of Alzheimer’s disease as well as in the case of MAPT R406W mutation confirmed that the new tracers depict PHF-tau with high specificity. The binding profile of the new tau tracers was highly comparable to that observed with 18F-flortaucipir and its fluorescent analogue T726, which has been found to bind to neuropil threads, pre-tangles and a subset of neurofibrillary tangles.14,15 As observed previously with 18F-flortaucipir15 as well as 18F-THK5117,14 there was high variability in next generation tau tracer binding in the cases of Alzheimer’s disease; yet, the relative spread was similar for all four tracers investigated and most likely a reflection of individual differences in tau burden. Our results support the notion that all four tracers are suited to diagnose Alzheimer’s disease in life. Ultimately, this may be beneficial for future multicentre studies, as data from patient cohorts scanned with different tau tracers may be pooled.

High grey-to-white matter ratios in the cases of Alzheimer’s disease reflected radiotracer binding to the cortical neurons that are most affected and were in good agreement with the excellent contrast observed in human PET scans.1 The tracers were found to differ in the ratio between specific binding in Alzheimer’s disease and control cases (3H-MK6240 > 3H-RO948 > 3H-PI2620). A large margin between disease and healthy tissue can potentially permit the detection of small changes in the pathological tau load, which is of particular interest when assessing novel therapeutic interventions. The binding profile of the isoquinolinamine 3H-JNJ067 was found to be similar to that of 3H-MK6240; however, it must be noted that the higher lipophilicity of JNJ067 (logP = 3.18, compared with 2.24 for MK6240 and 2.57 for the carbazoles) prevented use of the physiological assay conditions. This precluded the direct comparison of the binding profile of JNJ067 with the other tracers, as the experimental conditions used will have exaggerated the apparent specific binding of this tracer. Whilst higher lipophilicity is associated with increased non-specific binding,18 it should be noted that the four tracers were used at different concentrations (up to 5-fold variation) and with different washing conditions (Supplementary material) to allow testing with similar levels of radioactivity. The specific and non-specific binding of each tracer will therefore to some extent reflect their respective molar activity, precluding direct comparison of the different datasets, yet such effects are unlikely to have affected the overall trends reported.

We observed enhanced tracer binding in the frontal cortex of one of two PSP cases studied (Case PSP#14) and in the medial temporal lobe of Cases PiD#12 and PSP#14. Given the concomitant Alzheimer’s disease pathology in these cases, combined with low tracer binding in other primary tauopathy cases (incommensurate with substantial tau load as indicated by AT8 immunostaining), it is likely that this binding reflected the high sensitivity and specificity of these tracers to depict PHF-tau. Cortical 18F-PI2620 binding in PSP has been observed,3,19 albeit in a subset of cases and patients and at a lower signal intensity than in Alzheimer’s disease cases and patients. Given the spread of tau load in the sporadic primary tauopathies, in particular PSP, a larger sample size would be needed to rule out any binding to this disease group. However, the lack of robust cortical tracer binding suggests that the tracers investigated do not have sufficiently high affinity for the cortical tau inclusions characteristic of these diseases, and therefore caution is required for the interpretation of clinical scans.

Off-target binding is a major limitation associated with the first-generation tau radioligands. In particular, the basal ganglia were found to be affected by extensive binding to MAOB.20 We observed low binding of the new tau radiotracers to selected regions of interest, including putamen, globus pallidus and caudate nucleus, in the cases with Alzheimer’s disease. Tracer uptake patterns and signal strength were in good visual alignment with the AT8 immunostaining. Tracer binding was not displaceable by the MAOB inhibitor l-deprenyl, confirming a trend observed by others in vitro and in vivo6,9,16,21 and providing evidence that MAOB is not a significant binding target for the new tau radiotracers. This is particularly important for future studies assessing the specificity of basal ganglia binding in the primary tauopathies.19

In conclusion, this head-to-head comparison of the next-generation tau radiotracers 3H-PI2620, 3H-RO948, 3H-MK6240 and 3H-JNJ067 in human post-mortem brain tissue demonstrates that all four radiotracers bind with high specificity to cortical PHF-tau, whereas tracer binding to cortical inclusions characteristic of primary tauopathies is low. Several limitations of the first generation of tau tracers, largely associated with MAOB off-target binding, appear to have been overcome. Our results suggest that the new tau PET tracers are suitable tools for distinguishing cases of Alzheimer’s disease from controls as well as other dementias (except for MAPT mutations causing PHF-tau pathology) with high robustness.

Supplementary Material

awab120_Supplementary_Data

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr André Müller and Dr Andrew Stephens (Life Molecular Imaging), Dr Edilio Borroni and Dr Gregory Klein (Roche), Dr Cyrille Sur (Merck) and Dr Maarten Timmers (Janssen) for providing the radiotracers.

Funding

The research was supported by the Fidelity Biosciences Research Initiative and the Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration (S.Y.Y., B.F.), the Leonard Wolfson Experimental Neurology Centre (M.C.W.), an Alzheimer’s Research UK Senior Fellowship (T.L.) and Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals (K.S.). The work was undertaken at the UCL Centre for Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and the Dementia Research Centre, which are funded in part by the Department of Health’s NIHR Biomedical Research Centres funding scheme. The Queen Square Brain Bank is supported by the Reta Lila Weston Institute for Neurological Studies.

Competing interests

The authors report no competing interests.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at Brain online.

Glossary

FTDP-17

frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17

PHF

paired helical filament

PSP

progressive supranuclear palsy

References

  • 1.Schöll M, Maass A, Mattsson N, et al. Biomarkers for tau pathology. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2019;97:18–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Leuzy A, Chiotis K, Lemoine L, et al. Tau PET imaging in neurodegenerative tauopathies - still a challenge. Mol Psychiatry. 2019;24(8):1112–1134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kroth H, Oden F, Molette J, et al. Discovery and preclinical characterization of [18F]PI-2620, a next-generation tau PET tracer for the assessment of tau pathology in Alzheimer’s disease and other tauopathies. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46(10):2178–2189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Honer M, Gobbi L, Knust H, et al. Preclinical evaluation of 18F-RO6958948, 11C-RO6931643, and 11C-RO6924963 as novel PET radiotracers for imaging tau aggregates in Alzheimer disease. J Nucl Med. 2018;59(4):675–681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hostetler ED, Walji AM, Zeng Z, et al. Preclinical characterization of 18F-MK-6240, a promising PET tracer for in vivo quantification of human neurofibrillary tangles. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(10):1599–1606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rombouts FJR, Declercq L, Andrés JI, et al. Discovery of N-(4-[18F]fluoro-5-methylpyridin-2-yl)isoquinolin-6-amine (JNJ-64326067), a new promising tau positron emission tomography imaging tracer. J Med Chem. 2019;62(6):2974–2987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kuwabara H, Comley RA, Borroni E, et al. Evaluation of 18F-RO-948 PET for quantitative assessment of tau accumulation in the human brain. J Nucl Med. 2018;59(12):1877–1884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pascoal TA, Shin M, Kang MS, et al. In vivo quantification of neurofibrillary tangles with [18F]MK-6240. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2018;10(1):74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Betthauser TJ, Cody KA, Zammit MD, et al. In vivo characterization and quantification of neurofibrillary tau PET radioligand 18F-MK-6240 in humans from Alzheimer disease dementia to young controls. J Nucl Med. 2019;60(1):93–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lohith TG, Bennacef I, Vandenberghe R, et al. Brain imaging of Alzheimer dementia patients and elderly controls with 18F-MK-6240, a PET tracer targeting neurofibrillary tangles. J Nucl Med. 2019;60(1):107–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mormino EC, Toueg TN, Azevedo C, et al. Tau PET imaging with 18F-PI-2620 in aging and neurodegenerative diseases. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48(7):2233–2244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mueller A, Bullich S, Barret O, et al. Tau PET imaging with 18F-PI-2620 in patients with Alzheimer disease and healthy controls: A first-in-humans study. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(6):911–919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Schmidt ME, Janssens L, Moechars D, et al. Clinical evaluation of [18F]JNJ-64326067, a novel candidate PET tracer for the detection of tau pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47(13):3176–3185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wren MC, Lashley T, Årstad E, Sander K.. Large inter- and intra-case variability of first generation tau PET ligand binding in neurodegenerative dementias. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2018;6(1):34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sander K, Lashley T, Gami P, et al. Characterization of tau positron emission tomography tracer [18F]AV-1451 binding to postmortem tissue in Alzheimer’s disease, primary tauopathies, and other dementias. Alzheimers Dement. 2016;12(11):1116–1124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Aguero C, Dhaynaut M, Normandin MD, et al. Autoradiography validation of novel tau PET tracer [F-18]-MK-6240 on human postmortem brain tissue. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2019;7(1):37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Leuzy A, Smith R, Ossenkoppele R, et al. Diagnostic performance of RO948 F 18 tau positron emission tomography in the differentiation of Alzheimer disease from other neurodegenerative disorders. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77(8):955–965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Oi N, Tokunaga M, Suzuki M, et al. Development of novel PET probes for central 2-amino-3-(3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolyl)propionic acid receptors. J Med Chem. 2015;58(21):8444–8462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Brendel M, Barthel H, van Eimeren T, et al. Assessment of 18F-PI-2620 as a biomarker in progressive supranuclear palsy. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77(11):1408–1419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Saint-Aubert L, Lemoine L, Chiotis K, Leuzy A, Rodriguez-Vieitez E, Nordberg A.. Tau PET imaging: Present and future directions. Mol Neurodegener. 2017;12(1):19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Smith R, Schöll M, Leuzy A, et al. Head-to-head comparison of tau positron emission tomography tracers [18F]flortaucipir and [18F]RO948. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47(2):342–354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

awab120_Supplementary_Data

Data Availability Statement

Data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Brain are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES