Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2021 May 6;74(2):1117–1120. doi: 10.1002/hep.31681

Neurodegeneration in Hepatic and Neurologic Wilson’s Disease

André Viveiros 1, Vincent Beliveau 2, Marlene Panzer 1, Benedikt Schaefer 1, Bernhard Glodny 3, Benjamin Henninger 3, Herbert Tilg 1, Heinz Zoller 1,, Christoph Scherfler 2
PMCID: PMC8453945  PMID: 33316133

Abstract

Clinical presentation of Wilson disease (WD) includes hepatic and neurologic manifestations. This study compares subcortical brain regions by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with WD and without neurological symptoms. Distinct atrophy affecting the basal ganglia, accumbens, and hippocampus was present in neurological WD. Cerebellar atrophy was observed in hepatic WD without neurological symptoms.


Wilson disease (WD) is associated with recessive variants in ATPase copper transporting beta (ATP7B), causing insufficient copper incorporation into ceruloplasmin and reduced biliary copper excretion. Clinical presentation of WD is heterogeneous and includes hepatic and neurologic manifestations.( 1 ) A recent study has demonstrated that age and sex, but not genotype, are associated with clinical presentation.( 2 )

To study if the degree and patterns of neurodegeneration differ between hepatic and neurologic WD, a cohort of patients was studied with cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and images were subjected to automated segmentation of subcortical brain regions. A cohort of 20 patients with WD (Leipzig score ≥ 4) from whom MRI of the brain was available were included (Supporting Fig. S1). For further analysis patients were hierarchically grouped into neurologic or hepatic WD according to clinical manifestation. Patient characteristics including details on liver disease stage and neurological impairment quantified by the Unified Wilson Disease Rating Scale (UWDRS)( 3 ) are shown in Table 1. Patients with neurological symptoms were classified as neurological regardless of coexisting liver disease. Patients with hepatic WD had no neurological impairment.

TABLE 1.

Patient Characteristics

All Patients (n = 20) Hepatic WD (n = 13) Neurologic WD (n = 7) P
Female, n (%) 8 (40) 3 (23) 5 (71) 0.06
Age at onset, years 18 (13‐22) 16 (13‐23) 19 (14‐24) 0.79
Age at diagnosis, years 21 (14‐30) 18 (13‐30) 25 (19‐30) 0.82
Ceruloplasmin, mg/dL 6.4 (2.4‐14.2) 8.6 (2.6‐15.4) 2.7 (1.9‐11.7) 0.29
Kayser‐Fleischer ring, n (%) 6 (30) 2 (15) 4 (57) 0.05
Urine copper, µg/24 hours 328 (219‐759) 327 (162‐737) 329 (256‐825) 0.60
Hepatic copper, µg/g 832 (166‐914)* 832 (166‐882) 946 (502‐1390) 0.38
ATP7B mutations, n (%) 0.86
H1069Q homozygote 1 (8) 0 (0)
Other homozygotes 1 (8) 2 (29)
H1069Q compound 2 (15) 1 (14)
Other compound 4 (31) 1 (14)
Only H1069Q 2 (15) 1 (14)
Only other 2 (15) 1 (14)
Unknown 1 (8) 1 (14)
FibroScan, kPa 9.9 (6.8‐16.4)§ 8.1 (6.7‐16)|| 12.0 (6.5‐23.1) 0.50
MELD score# 9 (8‐11) 9 (8‐17) 9 (8‐11) 1.0
UWDRS score 0 (0‐33) 0 (0‐0) 27 (10‐33) <0.001
Treatment, n (%) 0.52
d‐Pencillamin 10 (50) 7 (54) 3 (43)
Trientine 5 (25) 3 (23) 2 (29)
Zinc 4 (20) 2 (15) 2 (29)
Treatment duration, years 12.5 (1‐16) 14 (3‐18) 10 (0‐16) 0.26
Cirrhosis, n (%) 11 (55) 8 (62) 3 (27) 0.42
Liver transplantation, n (%) 3 (15) 2 (15) 1 (14) 0.95
T1 hyperintensity in basla ganglia, n (%)** 2 (10) 0 2 (29) 0.06

Data are given as n (%) or median (25th percentile‐75th percentile).

*

n = 7 (range).

n = 5 (range).

n = 2 (range).

§

n = 18.

||

n = 11.

n = 7.

#

Scores are only reported for patients with cirrhosis.

**

Symmetric T1 hyperintensity in the globus pallidus and substantia nigra was present in 2 patients.

Abbreviation: MELD, Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease.

Normalized volume estimates revealed significant reduction in multiple subcortical brain regions of patients with WD (Supporting Table S1). Compared to age‐matched and sex‐matched healthy controls, signifcant subcortical volume loss was evident in the accumbens area, amygdala, caudate, cerebellar cortex, white matter (WM), hippocampus, middle cerebellar peduncle (MCP), pallidum, putamen, and superior cerebellar peduncle for both hepatic and neurological WD (P < 0.05; Fig. 1; Supporting Table S2). The volume of the pons and thalamus was significantly reduced only for hepatic WD.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1

(A) Subcortical volumetric data expressed as z scores for specified subcortical brain regions in patients with hepatic (full circles) or neurologic WD (open circles). Regional medians for each group are marked by horizontal lines. The dashed line at a z score of –2.0 serves as a visual reference for severe atrophy. *Statistically significant differences between hepatic and neurological WD. (B) Individual T1‐weighted 3‐dimensional magnetization‐prepared rapid gradient echo image of representative patients with hepatic WD, neurological WD, and a healthy participant and superimposed segmented areas of the caudate (turquoise), putamen (pink), globus pallidus (blue), thalamus (green), cerebellar gray matter compartment (orange), and cerebellar white matter compartment (yellow). Marked volume reduction can be inferred from smaller colored areas in the cerebellar white compartment and the cerebellar cortex from both patients with WD. In addition, the areas representing the putamen and the caudate of the patient with neurological WD are markedly reduced as an indicator of significant volume reduction in the respective brain regions. The area of the MCP overlaps entirely with the cerebellar white matter compartment as part of it and hence was not separately delineated. Abbreviation: SCP, superior cerebellar peduncle.

When patients with neurological WD were compared to those with hepatic WD, significant reductions of regional brain volumes were observed in the putamen and caudate nucleus of the former (P < 0.05; Fig. 1; Supporting Table S2).

Observer‐independent volumetric MRI analysis revealed widespread subcortical volume loss of the pallidum, putamen, cerebellar WM, and the accumbens area, being most severely affected in WD. Our findings are in line with recently published studies that revealed extended subcortical atrophy with basal ganglia involvement in patients with neurologic WD.( 4 ) Interestingly, the patterns of subcortical atrophy differed in hepatic and neurological WD, with predominant effects in the cerebellar WM compartment in the former and basal ganglia involvement in the latter. The results indicate that cerebellar atrophy is evident in hepatic WD without neurological symptoms and suggest that the magnitude of striatal atrophy might herald transition from hepatic to neurologic WD.

At present, the pathomechanism responsible for this phenotypical heterogeneity is unknown and requires confirmation in larger prospective studies. In addition to the low number of patients, another potential limitation of the present study is that patients were investigated for a median of 12.5 years after diagnosis, after which pharmacological treatment had been initiated in all but one patient with hepatic WD who underwent liver transplantation shortly after MRI. A potential effect of treatment on subcortical volume can therefore not be excluded. Recent studies have shown qualitative or semiquantitative MRI differences when comparing hepatic and neurologic WD. We objectively quantified volumes of the subcortical brain regions and compared results with age‐matched and sex‐matched controls, which may be independent of changes in previously reported signal intensities.( 5 )

Our finding of subclinical volume loss of subcortical brain regions in hepatic WD supports early diagnostic cerebellar MRI to improve disease staging and tailoring of the appropriate treatment.

Supporting information

Supplementary Material

Potential conflict of interest: Nothing to report.

References

  • 1.Bandmann O, Weiss KH, Kaler SG. Wilson's disease and other neurological copper disorders. Lancet Neurol 2015;14:103‐113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ferenci P, Stremmel W, Członkowska A, Szalay F, Viveiros A, Stättermayer AF, et al. Age and sex but not ATP7B genotype effectively influence the clinical phenotype of Wilson disease. Hepatology 2019;69:1464‐1476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Czlonkowska A, Tarnacka B, Moller JC, Leinweber B, Bandmann O, Woimant F, et al. Unified Wilson's Disease Rating Scale—a proposal for the neurological scoring of Wilson's disease patients. Neurol Neurochir Pol 2007;41:1‐12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yu XE, Gao S, Yang RM, Han YZ. MR imaging of the brain in neurologic Wilson disease. Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:178‐183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dezortova M, Lescinskij A, Dusek P, Herynek V, Acosta‐Cabronero J, Bruha R, et al. Multiparametric quantitative brain MRI in neurological and hepatic forms of Wilson's disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 2020;51:1829‐1835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material


Articles from Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES