Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 21.
Published in final edited form as: Br J Sports Med. 2018 Feb 23;52(15):1011–1012. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099148

Lowest perceived exertion in the late morning due to effects of the endogenous circadian system

Saurabh S Thosar 1, Maya Xolal Herzig 1, Sally A Roberts 1, Alec M Berman 1, Noal A Clemons 1, Andrew W McHill 1, Nicole P Bowles 1, Miki Morimoto 1, Matthew P Butler 1, Jonathan S Emens 1,2, Steven A Shea 1
PMCID: PMC8454050  NIHMSID: NIHMS1736717  PMID: 29475839

INTRODUCTION

There are daily variations in the rate of perceived exertion (RPE)1,2 during exercise, with lower RPE in the beginning of the night compared with the early morning. We studied whether RPE is affected by the internal circadian system while controlling for any effects of behavioural patterns, including sleep, activity and meals.

METHODS

Ten healthy adults (six females, aged 52±2 years (mean±SEM)) participated in a forced desynchrony protocol in dim light where all behaviours were evenly spread across the circadian cycle (figure 1A).3 After a normal night of sleep and baseline testing, participants underwent 10 recurring 5-hours 20-min of ‘behavioural cycles’ of 2-hours 40-min of sleep opportunities and 2-hours 40-min of standardised waking episodes.3 Approximately 1 hour after each sleep episode, participants performed mild intensity cycle ergometer exercise for 15 min at 50% predicted maximal heart rate (Karvonen’s formula4). The speed and resistance were identical across each cycling bout. Participants rated their exertion using the Borg RPE scale1 after 3, 8 and 13 minutes of exercise. Salivary melatonin was used as the circadian phase marker (0° = the dim light melatonin onset).5 RPE data were normalised within each participant (Z-scored), sorted into 60° (~4 hour) circadian phase bins and compared across phases using repeated measures analysis of variance (online supplementary information).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(A) Schematic of five days 5 hours 20 min of forced desynchrony protocol. Grey bars represent wakefulness in dim lighting (<3 lux), while black bars represent sleep opportunities (<0.1 lux). Rate of perceived exertion (RPE) was assessed during the same levels of mild intensity exercise performed during each standardised wake period. Circadian phase was assigned based on time of the dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) from salivary samples, indicated by open circles. The diagonal line through the DLMOs represents the free running rhythm of the central circadian clock in dim light. (B) A significant circadian rhythm of RPE, during identical exercise bouts, with greatest exertion during the biological night and least exertion in the late morning. Black bar represents the average times when sleep normally occurs in these participants (11 PM - 7 AM).

RESULTS

The endogenous circadian system significantly affected RPE for the same workload with lowest RPE in the late morning (circadian phase 210°, ≈10:45 AM) and highest RPE during the biological night (90°, ≈3:45 AM). The magnitude of the circadian variation was ~1 SD (1 Z-score unit; figure 1B).

DISCUSSION

We have uncovered an endogenous circadian effect on RPE by strictly controlling and evenly distributing all behavioural patterns across the entire circadian cycle. Our discovery of lowest perceived exertion in the late morning suggests that exercise training may be easier at this time. We studied healthy middle-aged adults during mild exercise. If similar results prevail in athletes performing high-intensity exercise, this would lead to the intriguing possibility of optimising circadian phase of athletes (eg, with bright light) to the expected time of performance.6

Supplementary Material

1

Funding

Financial support: R01-HL125893 (SAS), F32-HL131308, National Space Biomedical Research Institute through NCC 9–58 and Medical Research Foundation of Oregon (SST), F32DK107146 (AWM), American Sleep Medicine Foundation (MPB), Ford Foundation (NPB) and Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences and CTSA grant (UL1TR000128).

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: Disclaimer The findings and conclusions of this study are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Oregon Health & Science University or the National Institutes of Health.

Competing interests None declared.

Ethics approval Oregon Health & Science University IRB for human subjects research.

Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

REFERENCEs

  • 1.Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1982;14:377–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Faria IE, Drummond BJ. Circadian changes in resting heart rate and body temperature, maximal oxygen consumption and perceived exertion. Ergonomics 1982;25:381–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Butler MP, Smales C, Wu H, et al. The Circadian System Contributes to Apnea Lengthening across the Night in Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Sleep 2015;38:1793–801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Karvonen MJ, Kentala E, Mustala O. The effects of training on heart rate; a longitudinal study. Ann Med Exp Biol Fenn 1957;35:307–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Benloucif S, Burgess HJ, Klerman EB, et al. Measuring melatonin in humans. J Clin Sleep Med 2008;4:66. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Song A, Severini T, Allada R. How jet lag impairs Major League Baseball performance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017;114:1407–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES