Skip to main content
JGH Open: An Open Access Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology logoLink to JGH Open: An Open Access Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
. 2021 Aug 7;5(9):988–996. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12621

Understanding multiseptated gallbladder: A systematic analysis with a case report

Rayan S Terkawi 1,2,, Dua' Qutob 1,2, Mohamed A Hendaus 1,3
PMCID: PMC8454487  PMID: 34584965

Abstract

Multiseptated gallbladder (MSG) (also known as “Honeycomb gallbladder”) is a rare condition that was first described by Knetsch in 1952, and there are around 150 cases described over the world. MSG has been described as a congenital anomaly in most of the cases and as acquired in a few. Moreover, the phenomenon was described with a variety of different symptoms and management. The aim of this article is to have better understanding of this condition and management approach. We are reporting a 4‐year‐old girl, who presented to Sidra Medicine, Qatar with MSG. We have also included 97 cases for review and analysis. The median age of presentation of the condition was 27 years but may present in neonates and in the elderly, while gender was not a risk factor. Abdominal pain is the most common presenting symptom, but it can present without symptoms. Certain congenital anomalies were detected in the pancreaticobiliary system in few patients with MSG. Medical treatment was reported in eight symptomatic patients, four of whom failed therapy. Cholecystectomy was performed in 40 patients, which resulted in resolutions of symptoms in 13 of them. Based on the available literature, congenital MSG is probably due to in‐pouching of gallbladder wall to its own cavity forming septa containing muscular fibers. MSG can be diagnosed solely via imaging, and ultrasound appears to be an effective and feasible mode of diagnosis. Medical treatment efficacy is not well‐known, but cholecystectomy has resulted in complete resolution in symptomatic patients.

Keywords: biliary pain, cholecystectomy, honeycomb gallbladder, multi‐septated gallbladder


Multiseptated gallbladder is a rare condition. In this article, we present a case and provide an extended review of previously published reports.

graphic file with name JGH3-5-988-g005.jpg

Introduction

Multiseptated gallbladder (MSG) (also called “Honeycomb gallbladder”) is a rare condition that was initially described by Knetsch in 1952,1 and there has been less than 150 reported worldwide.

The etiology of MSG is not very clear yet and multiple embryological hypotheses have been suggested. Many of the reported cases of MSG have been diagnosed incidentally and the rest presented with a variety of different symptoms.2, 3 We present a case of an MSG seen at Sidra Medicine, the only tertiary pediatric center in the State of Qatar.

Given the rarity of incidence and the wide variation of presentations and management, we are conducting an extensive literature review and analysis of available data to have better understanding of this condition and management approach. To the authors’ knowledge, this manuscript is the latest and most comprehensive review of reported cases of MSG.

Case report

A 4‐year‐old girl presented to the pediatric outpatient clinic complaining of chronic constipation, associated with intermittent abdominal pain, initially described as nonspecific. There was no history of fever, vomiting, diarrhea, or urinary symptoms. Past medical history was remarkable for recurrent urinary tract infections. Family history was unremarkable. Her vital signs during her first clinic visit were within normal limits for her age. Her weight and body mass index (BMI) were on the 99th centile for age (z‐score 2.38). On physical examination, her abdomen was soft, with no tenderness, no masses, and no organomegaly. The rest of the physical examination was normal.

On further follow up, her constipation improved with Polyethylene glycol; however, she continued to have recurrent abdominal pain, which was ill‐localized, postprandial, and exacerbated by fatty meals.

Laboratory tests showed serum white blood cells of 8.1 ×10(9)/L, hemoglobin of 125 g/L, platelets of 383 ×10(9)/L, albumin of 44 g/L, aspartate aminotransferase of 31 U/L, and alanine aminotransferase of 16 U/L, total bilirubin of 9 μmol/L, C‐reactive protein of 3.1 mg/L, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 65 mm/h. Serum glucose, creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, calcium, sodium, chloride, and potassium were normal as well as urine analysis and culture.

Ultrasonography of the abdomen was done, revealing multiseptations in the gallbladder (Fig. 1a,b). No evidence of gallbladder wall thickening, pericholecystic fluid, or cholelithiasis were found.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a and b) Abdomen ultrasound shows multiple septations in the gallbladder in two views.

She was evaluated by the surgical team, and after discussing the risks and the benefits of surgical management with the family, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed. Histopathology showed normal gallbladder tissue with multiple septations. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 1 without complications. Her symptoms resolved after the surgery. She has been following in our pediatric clinic and has been asymptomatic for the last 2 years.

Methodology

We carried out a search in PubMed, Ovid, Embase, Cochrane, and Google Scholar and reviewed publications up to 15 September 2020. Terms used for searching were as follows: “Multiseptated Gallbladder,” “Multiseptate Gallbladder,” and “Septated Gallbladder.” To maximize the search, we scrutinized the references of the identified articles. Results were screened by title to exclude nonrelevant conditions (Fig. 2). We excluded any study that reported an ultrasound appearance falsely mimicking MSG. Single gallbladder septum/diaphragm cases were also excluded. Although some articles were written in other languages, information was obtained from the abstracts written in English. Twenty‐three articles were excluded (12 in Japanese, 5 in Spanish, 3 in French, and 3 in German) for having no available English report or abstract.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Inclusion and exclusion of reports.

The remaining articles were fully reviewed separately by two reviewers (Rayan S Terkawi and Dua' Qutob), and manuscripts of nonrelevant contents were excluded after agreement by the reviewers. Reports that did not describe specific variants were considered as missing data and excluded from that specific variant. Data were extracted from 83 articles (96 patients) in addition to our case report, resulting in 97 cases.

Data were analyzed using SPSS software (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 27.0. Armonk, NY, USA).

The analysis aimed to better delineate the age at diagnosis, presenting symptoms, diagnostic modalities, and management. Chi‐square analysis was used to explore the relation between the presence of symptoms with age groups and gender.

Results and discussion

All the reported cases are listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Reports included in the analysis

Publication year Author Number of patients Age of presentation Gender
1963 Simon and Tandon.4 1 32 years Female
1964 Bigg et al.5 1 38 years Male
1966 Haslam et al.6 1 15.5 years Female
1970 Bhagavan et al.7 1 27 years Female
1972 Isdale8 2 10 years Male
15 years Male
1973 Croce9 1 45 years Female
1975 Shaw et al.10 1 31 years Female
1977 Jena et al.11 1 28 years Female
1979 Okuda et al.12 1 37 years Male
1981 González Bethencourt et al.13 1 4 years Female
1981 Alawneh et al.14 1
1982 Toombs et al.15 1 22 years Female
1985 Pery et al.16 1 8 years Female
1985 Oliva et al.17 1 24 years Female
1987 Lev‐Toaff et al.18 2 23 years Female
30 years Male
1988 Seider et al.3 1 17 years Male
1989 Fremond et al.19 1 13 years Female
1990 Isomoto et al.20 1 43 years Female
1990 Adear and Barki.21 1 12 years Female
1990 Vasinrapee et al.22 1 24 years Male
1990 Hardoff and Hardoff.23 1 17 years Male
1991 Achong et al.24 1 58 years Male
1992 Esper et al.25 1 6 years Female
1993 Tan et al.26 1 14 years Female
1993 Strauss et al.27 3 9 years Female
3 years Male
16 years Male
1994 Naritomi et al.28 1 45 years Female
1994 Song et al.29 1 49 years Female
1994 Hahm et al.30 1 49 years Female
1996 Saimura et al.31 1 30 years Male
1996 Kong and Wong.32 1 9 years Male
1996 Fichera et al.33 1 3 years Male
1997 Paciorek et al.34 1 25 years Female
1998 Saddik35 1 10 years Male
1999 Joo et al.36 1 36 years Male
1999 Mrhac et al.37 1 33 years Male
2000 Miwa et al.38 1 70 years Female
2001 Mouratidis and Chen.39 1 21 years Male
2001 Sugawara et al. 3
2002 Koktener et al.40 1 75 years Female
2002 Kapoor et al.41 1 21 years Male
2003 Dalgiç et al.42 1 11 years Female
2003 Kocakoc et al.43 1 9 years Male
2004 Erdogmus et al.44 1 20 years Female
2004 Nakazawa et al.45 1 56 years Female
2004 Sasaki et al.2 2 84 years Female
78 years Female
2004 Erdogmus et al.46 7 10 years Female
33 years Female
40 years Female
40 years Female
23 years Male
12 years Male
45 years Male
2005 Yamamoto et al.47 1 46 years Female
2006 Bahadir et al.48 1 15 days Male
2006 Türkvatan et al.49 1 62 years Male
2007 Fitoz et al.50 1
2008 Yamasaki et al.51 1 53 years Female
2009 Tae et al.52 1 70 years Female
2009 Rivera‐Troche et al.53 1 19 years Female
2010 Demirpolat et al.54 1 5 years Female
2011 Atalar55 1 10 years Female
2011 Karaca et al.56 1 29 years Female
2011 Wanaguru et al.57 1 9 months Female
2011 Herliczek58 1 11 years Male
2011 Orokawa et al.59 1 29 years Male
2013 Tok et al.60 1 42 years Female
2013 Sunahara et al.61 1 20 years Female
2013 Geremia et al.62 1 10 years Male
2013 Aydin et al.63 1 10 years Male
2014 Acar et al.64 1 26 years Female
2014 Omuta et al.65 1 40s (years) Female
2014 Afrouzian et al.66 1 29 years Male
2015 Ortolá et al.67 1 5 months Female
2015 Otaibi et al.68 1 54 years Male
2016 Ozturk and Sigirci.69 1 12 years Female
2016 Koc70 1 69 years Female
2016 Edelman et al.71 1 16 years Male
2016 Aydin72 1 7 years Male
2017 Baram et al.73 1 25 years Female
2017 Honrubia López et al.74 1 28 years Male
2017 Sabra et al.75 1 12 years
2018 Dousse et al.76 1 30 years Female
2018 Öztorun et al.77 1 1 years Male
2019 Bertozzi et al.78 1 7 years Female
2019 Our case report 1 4 years Female
2019 Demko and Xhetani.79 1 6 years Female
2019 La Mendola et al.80 1 3 years Female
2020 Singh et al.81 1 49 years Female
2020 Talalaev et al.82 1 60 years Female
2020 Akbari and Putra.83 1 Term newborn Male

Means data are not available.

History

While reviewing the literature, it was found that many authors have cited Simon et al. as the first to describe this rare condition in 1963.4 However, scrutinizing the literature showed that this phenomenon was described 11 years earlier by Knetsch.1, 4

Etiology and embryology

Embryological hypothesis was described by Bhagavan et al. in 1970,7 who proposed that multiseptations of the gallbladder is a result of failure of disappearance of septations in the later stages of embryological development (Fig. 3a). The development, according to their hypothesis, starts with the formation of endodermal epithelial bud that will eventually wrinkle. Intraepithelial clefts will then fuse to form locules, which create spaces surrounded by septations (walls of locules) when they expand. This theory was supported by the fact that histopathology reports illustrated the presence of smooth muscles in the septations as a continuation of gallbladder wall muscles. The same authors described another theory called “Phrygian Cap” in which the embryonal gallbladder grows faster than its surrounding peritoneum forming kinks, resulting in multi‐septations.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(a and b) Theories of multiseptated gallbladder development.

On the other hand, in 1993, Tan et al.84 disagreed with the above described theory. In their study, 11 human embryos (29 days to 25 weeks of gestation) were investigated and none of them showed the phenomena of solid bud and wrinkling. Instead, they found multiple in‐pouching of the lumen into the surrounding mucosa around the age of 12 weeks of gestation. These cystic outpouchings are thought to be the precursors of multiseptations in the gallbladder during the first trimester (Fig. 3b).

The suggested hypotheses might explain multiseptations of the gallbladder, but do not explain the single septation or presence of a gallbladder diaphragm such as the one described by Mathur et al.85 Hence, we have decided to exclude those reports describing single septation from our review.

Furthermore, MSG has been considered a congenital abnormality until Sasaki et al.2 described two patients who developed MSG secondary to inflammation in the gallbladder. Surprisingly, histopathological review of those two patients did not show muscle fibers in the walls of septations, which may differentiate acquired MSG from congenital ones. Another report described a 16‐year‐old boy who had a trauma to the abdomen with visceral injuries, and normal ultrasound appearance of the gallbladder.3 He underwent chole‐cysto‐jejunostomy, and an abdominal ultrasound 1 year later showed multi‐septations of the gallbladder, thus confirming the acquired form. The authors attributed the acquired form of MSG to the direct trauma to the gallbladder or by influx of gastrointestinal tract contents. The report, however, missed to publish the histopathology.

Demography of patients

Within the 92 patients included in this report, the age group ranged from newborns up to 84 years with median age of 23 years and the mean value of around 27 years (Fig. 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Age of presentation of MSG.

Fifty‐three of them were above 18 years of age and 39 were children (18 years and below), and approximately 74% (n = 68) presented before the age of 40. Moreover, female patients accounted for almost 60% of the cases (n = 53). Turkey has the highest number of reported cases (n = 24), followed by United States (n = 19), then Japan (n = 15). Our case report is the first in Qatar.

Presenting symptoms

Almost one‐fourth of the patients were asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis, and imaging was done for other purposes. The rest (77%, n = 68) presented with wide spectrum of symptoms. Our data analysis did not show statistically significant correlation when correlating symptoms, gender, or age groups (P values > 0.05). Among the symptomatic patients, 42% (n = 28) were males, 58% (n = 38) were females, and 2 cases did not report the gender.

The most common presenting symptom was abdominal pain (88.2%) in the form of nonspecific or located to the right upper quadrant. Other presenting symptoms are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2.

Main symptoms of presentation

Symptom Frequency (n)
Nausea and/or vomiting 8
Jaundice 3
Poor growth 1
Back pain 1
Diarrhea 1
Pyrexia 1
Fatigue 1
Flank pain 1
Indigestion 1

In addition, few patients described other symptoms such as dyspepsia, pruritus, weight loss, and anorexia.

As for the duration of symptoms, it was inconsistent, varying from few days to several years.

Physical examination

Half of the diagnosed patients (whether they were symptomatic or non‐symptomatic) had a normal physical examination (27 patients out of 54 with reported physical examination). About one‐third of diagnosed patients (33%, n = 20) had localized tenderness over the gallbladder area. The rest had expressed different findings in physical examination such as generalized abdominal tenderness (6.7%, n = 4) and palpable liver (5%, n = 3). Each of the following signs was reported once: jaundice, right flank tenderness, positive Murphy's sign, enlarged kidney, and poor growth.

Liver function test and other laboratory tests

Among 60 patients with reported results, 70% had normal liver function test (LFTs). Elevated alkaline phosphatase (ALP) was seen in 10 patients (14%), elevated transaminases in 8 patients (11%), elevated bilirubin in 5 patients (7%), and another 5 with elevated gamma‐glutamyl transferase (GGT). Complete blood count (CBC) showed leukocytosis in 4 patients and anemia in 4 patients, while elevated pancreatic enzymes was reported in 1 patient, and elevated C‐reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in a different patient.

Diagnostic imaging

Ultrasonography of the abdomen was performed in 75 of the reported cases, including our case. The imaging reports were suggestive of MSG in 96% (n = 72). One case was diagnosed via computed tomography scan,68 and macroscopic examination intra‐and postoperatively was diagnostic in the other cases.26, 48

There were five older patients who utilized oral cholecystogram for diagnosis,4, 5, 6, 9, 11 three of whom showed evidence of MSG.4, 5, 6

Ultrasonography of the abdomen was also helpful in detecting other associated abnormalities. Four cases reported wall thickening on ultrasound, and 2.67% (n = 2) reported an enlarged gallbladder. On the other hand, a small or hypoplastic gallbladder was also reported in two cases.

Changes on ultrasound following fatty meals were described in 4% of the reports. In 9.3% of cases, cholelithiasis was detected, while biliary sludge was reported in 5.3% (n = 4).

Histopathological features

In addition to the macroscopic findings, 22 papers reported microscopic detailed findings. Presence of muscular layers of fibers in the wall of septa was seen in 59% (n = 13), chronic or acute inflammatory infiltrations in 36% (n = 8), and fibrous tissue in the wall of septa in 32% (n = 7).

As Tan et al.84 described earlier, presence of muscular layer supports his theory of development. On the other hand, muscular layer was not found (or not reported) in other cases, which make these data to be interpreted cautiously.

The appearance of multiseptations looks like a “honeycomb,” therefore, this term was used to describe MSG.2, 27, 30, 31, 34, 35, 38, 41, 43, 57, 63, 64, 69, 70

Other reported abnormalities

Seventeen patients had other anatomical malformations. Among these, nine patients had abnormalities related to the pancreaticobiliary system development: four with choledochal cysts, two with pancreaticobiliary ductal union before reaching the ampulla, one double cystic duct, one ectopic pancreas (together with choledochal cyst), and one gallbladder abscess/xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis. This may be explained by having a common embryological origin of those structures.

Other reported anomalies were related to the urinary system (four patients) and miscellaneous gastrointestinal tract abnormalities (five patients).

The described abnormalities in urinary system are as follows: hydronephrosis of both sides, bilateral kidney duplicity, bilateral kidney cysts, ectopic right ureter implantation (n = 3), and partial duplication of the left ureters.

Moreover, the described miscellaneous gastrointestinal tract abnormalities are as follows: non‐obstructing bands across the duodenum (n = 2), appearance of primary biliary cirrhosis, enlarged and inflamed liver, numerous polyps in the stomach and small and large bowel, gastric cancer, and anal fistula. None of the included reports indicated an association of MSG with gallbladder cancers.

We understand that gallbladder and pancreas originated together from the same bud,86 which may provide a logical explanation of this linking. However, we admit the lack of knowledge about the associations between abnormalities described in other parts of the gastrointestinal and urinary tracts and the MSG. Such abnormalities may have a common etiology or may be coincidental.

Treatment options

Medical treatment was reported in eight symptomatic patients, four of them failed therapy, and the rest had no reported follow up. Medical therapy included analgesics, ursodeoxycholic acid, diphenoxylate/atropine and dicyclomine, H2 receptor antagonist, and anticholinergic medication.

Cholecystectomy was done in 40 patients (5 of them were asymptomatic and 35 were symptomatic). Out of the asymptomatic patients, three underwent other surgeries for associated abnormalities together with cholecystectomy.47, 51, 83 Only 13 patients had a reported follow up after discharged. Follow up showed resolution of symptoms in all of them (100%). No one has reported failure of surgical therapy or recurrence of symptoms afterwards.

This reflect the lack of knowledge about efficacy of medical therapy and whether it is comparable with surgical therapy or not. However, available data provide promising outcomes of cholecystectomy.

Limitations

Our outcome may have been affected by the limited number of cases included in our review. This is due to the rarity of reported cases, and the exclusion of those reported in languages other than English. The lack of reporting medical treatment prevented comparison of medical with surgical treatment. Knowing that MSG is a rare condition with few case reports per year, understanding the condition may need years to achieve.

Conclusion

Congenital MSG is a rare condition that is probably a result of outpouching of gallbladder wall to its cavity forming septa with muscular fibers. Acquired cases of MSG have also been described, lacking muscular fibers in the walls of septa. Other congenital anomalies in the pancreaticobiliary system development were detected in few patients with MSG. The median age of presentation is 27 years, however cases diagnosed in neonates and elderly have been described. Males and females are almost affected in similar distribution. The phenomenon is frequently diagnosed incidentally in asymptomatic patients. However, the most common presenting symptom is abdominal pain. Physical examination is likely to be normal. It is a diagnosis of imaging, and ultrasound is an effective and feasible modality. LFTs may be affected, but most patients had normal blood tests. Medical treatment efficacy is not well‐known, but cholecystectomy showed complete resolution in symptomatic patients.

Acknowledgments

The submission of this article was funded by Qatar National Library. We would like to thank Ms Anushka Hardas and Mr Abdul Kareem Pullattayil Sulaiman, staff of Sidra Medicine Hospital library, for their extensive support in finding the articles. We also thank Dr Carolin Beck for her help with the interpretation of the article by Knetsch, and Ms Leena Terkawi for designing Figure 3.

Declaration of conflict of interest: Authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

References

  • 1.Knetsch A. Subdivided gallbladders. Fortschr. Geb. Rontgenstr. 1952; 77: 587–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sasaki M, Tokunaga Y, Minami N. The honeycomb gallbladder: a new category of acquired pseudo‐multiseptate gallbladder. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Surg. 2004; 11: 375–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Seider R, Darazsova B, Marais TJ. Genuine septation of the gallbladder. A case report. S. Afr. Med. J. 1988; 73: 310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Simon M, Tandon BN. Multiseptate gallbladder. A case report. Radiology. 1963; 80: 84–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bigg RL. Multiseptate gallbladder. Arch. Surg. 1964; 88: 501–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Haslam RH, Gayler BW, Ebert PA. Multiseptate gallbladder. A cause of recurrent abdominal pain in childhood. Am. J. Dis. Child. 1966; 112: 600–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bhagavan BS, Amin PB, Land AS, Weinberg T. Multiseptate gallbladder. Embryogenetic hypotheses. Arch. Pathol. 1970; 89: 382–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Isdale J. Septate gallbladder associated with duodenal bands in children. S. Afr. Med. J. 1972; 46: 437–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Croce EJ. The multiseptate gallbladder. Arch. Surg. 1973; 107: 104–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shaw RB, Donato CA, Douglas DD, Sass JK, Montegut FJ. Multiseptate gallbladder diagnosed during pregnancy.b0a. Am. Surg. 1975; 41: 818–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jena PK, Hardie RA, Hobsley M. Multiseptate hypoplastic gallbladder. Br. J. Surg. 1977; 64: 192–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Okuda K, Nakajima M, Nakayama M, Nomura F. Multiseptate gallbladder. Report of a case with a review of literature. Acta Hepatogastroenterol. 1979; 26: 70–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.González Bethencourt JV, González Espinosa C, Puente Domínguez JL. Septate gallbladder and acute cholecystitis in a four‐year‐old girl (author's transl). An. Esp. Pediatr. 1981; 14: 195–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Alawneh I, Baranzanchi I, Jacobi K. Multi‐septate gallbladder as a cause of colic. Med. Klin. 1981; 76: 190–1. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Toombs BD, Foucar E, Rowlands BJ, Strax R. Multiseptate gallbladder. South. Med. J. 1982; 75: 610–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pery M, Kaftori JK, Marvan H, Sweed Y, Kerner H. Ultrasonographic appearance of multiseptate gallbladder: report a case with coexisting choledochal cyst. J. Clin. Ultrasound. 1985; 13: 570–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Oliva Oliva I, Rodriguez Moran M, Lozano Sanchez F, Gomez AA. Multiseptate gallbladder. Int. Surg. 1985; 70: 83–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lev‐Toaff AS, Friedman AC, Rindsberg SN, Caroline DF, Maurer AH, Radecki PD. Multiseptate gallbladder: incidental diagnosis on sonography. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1987; 148: 1119–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fremond B, Stasik C, Jouan Het al. The multiseptate gallbladder. A rare malformation of the biliary tract. Chir. Pediatr. 1989; 30: 292–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Isomoto I, Matsunaga N, Ochi Met al. Multiseptate gallbladder: computed tomographic appearance. Radiat. Med. 1990; 8: 55–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Adear H, Barki Y. Multiseptate gallbladder in a child: incidental diagnosis on sonography. Pediatr. Radiol. 1990; 20: 192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Vasinrapee P, Linden K, Cook RE. Multiseptate gallbladder demonstrated on Tc‐99m hepatobiliary imaging. Clin. Nucl. Med. 1990; 15: 272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hardoff R, Hardoff D. Scintigraphic evaluation of septated hypokinetic gallbladder in a teenager. Clin. Nucl. Med. 1990; 15: 117–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Achong DM, Oates E, Lee SL, Doherty FJ. Gallbladder visualization during post‐therapy iodine‐131 imaging of thyroid carcinoma. J. Nucl. Med. 1991; 32: 2275–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Esper E, Kaufman DB, Crary GS, Snover DC, Leonard AS. Septate gallbladder with cholelithiasis: a cause of chronic abdominal pain in a 6‐year‐old child. J. Pediatr. Surg. 1992; 27: 1560–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tan CE, Howard ER, Driver M, Murray‐Lyon IM. Non‐communicating multiseptate gall bladder and choledochal cyst: a case report and review of publications. Gut. 1993; 34: 853–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Strauss S, Starinsky R, Alon Z. Partial multiseptate gallbladder: sonographic appearance. J. Ultrasound Med. 1993; 12: 201–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Naritomi G, Kimura H, Konomi Het al. Multiseptate gallbladder as a cause of biliary pain. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 1994; 89: 1891–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Song JH, Hahm KB, Cho HKet al. Case Reports: a case of multi‐walled gallbladder‐Gallbladder findings and literature review. Korean J. Gastroenterol. 1994; 26: 607–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hahm KB, Yim DS, Kang JK, Park IS. Cholangiographic appearance of multiseptate gallbladder: case report and a review of the literature. J. Gastroenterol. 1994; 29: 665–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Saimura M, Ichimiya H, Naritomi Get al. Multiseptate gallbladder: biliary manometry and scintigraphy. J. Gastroenterol. 1996; 31: 133–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kong MS, Wong HF. Multi‐septate gallbladder: an unusual sonographic pattern in acute hepatitis. J. Clin. Ultrasound. 1996; 24: 86–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Fichera A, Opinto V, Commendatore F. Septate gallbladder: a rare cause of recurrent abdominal pain (RAP) in infancy. A case report. Pediatr. Med. Chir. 1996; 18: 221–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Paciorek ML, Lackner D, Daly C, Sekas G. A unique presentation of multiseptate gallbladder. Dig. Dis. Sci. 1997; 42: 2519–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Saddik D. Multiseptate gall‐bladder: incidental diagnosis on ultrasound. Australas. Radiol. 1998; 42: 374–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Joo YE, Lee JJ, Chung IJet al. A case of xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis. Korean J. Intern. Med. 1999; 14: 90–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mrhac L, Zakko S, Ibrahim A. Imaging of septate gallbladder. Clin. Nucl. Med. 1999; 24: 209–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Miwa W, Toyama K, Kitamura Yet al. Multiseptate gallbladder with cholelithiasis diagnosed incidentally in an elderly patient. Intern. Med. 2000; 39: 1054–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mouratidis B, Chen SW. A false‐negative hepatobiliary scan due to the infected fundal end of a septated gallbladder. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2001; 26: 784–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Koktener A, Dilmen G, Tez S. Multisepate gall bladder: sonographic and computed tomographic appearances. Indian J. Gastroenterol. 2002; 21: 238. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kapoor V, Federle MP, Peterson MS, Coll DA. Long‐term sonographic follow‐up of stable imaging findings of multiseptate gallbladder. J. Ultrasound Med. 2002; 21: 677–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Dalgiç B, Özbay F, Boyunağa Ö. Multiseptate gallbladder with recurrent abdominal pain and elevated liver enzymes in a child. Gazi Med. J. 2003; 14: 39–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kocakoc E, Kiris A, Alkan A, Bozgeyik Z, Sen Y, Ozdemir H. Multiseptate gallbladder in a child with chronic abdominal pain: ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance cholangiography findings. Eur. J. Radiol. Extra. 2003; 47: 22–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Erdogmus B, Yazici B, Safak AA, Ozdere BA. Multiseptate gallbladder with acute acalculous cholecystitis. J. Clin. Ultrasound. 2004; 32: 423–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Nakazawa T, Ohara H, Sano Het al. Multiseptate gallbladder: diagnostic value of MR cholangiography and ultrasonography. Abdom. Imaging. 2004; 29: 691–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Erdogmus B, Yazici B, Ozdere BA, Akcan Y. Clinical and ultrasonographical findings in patients with multiseptate gallbladder. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 2004; 204: 215–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Yamamoto T, Matsumoto J, Hashiguchi S, Yamaguchi A, Sakoda K, Taki C. Multiseptate gallbladder with anomalous pancreaticobiliary ductal union: a case report. World J. Gastroenterol. 2005; 11: 6066–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bahadir B, Ozdamar SO, Gun BD, Bektas S, Numanoglu KV, Kuzey GM. Ectopic pancreas associated with choledochal cyst and multiseptate gallbladder. Pediatr. Dev. Pathol. 2006; 9: 312–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Türkvatan A, Erden A, Celik M, Olçer T. Ectopic hypoplastic and multiseptate gallbladder with coexisting choledochal cyst: evaluation with sonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography. J. Clin. Ultrasound. 2006; 34: 88–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Fitoz S, Erden A, Boruban S. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography of biliary system abnormalities in children. Clin. Imaging. 2007; 31: 93–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Yamasaki A, Chijiiwa K, Jimi Set al. Multiseptate gallbladder: report of a case. Hepatogastroenterology. 2008; 55: 859–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Lee TH, Park SH, Park JYet al. Gallbladder pseudodiverticulosis mimicking a multiseptate gallbladder with stones. Gut and Liver. 2009; 3: 134–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Rivera‐Troche EY, Hartwig MG, Vaslef SN. Multiseptate gallbladder. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2009; 13: 1741–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Demirpolat G, Duygulu G, Tamsel S. Multiseptate gallbladder in a child with recurrent abdominal pain. Diagn. Interv. Radiol. 2010; 16: 306–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Atalar M. Multiseptate gallbladder as a cause of recurrent abdominal pain in a child Çocuk hastada tekrarlayan karin ağrisinin nedeni olarak multiseptali safra kesesi. Cumhuriyet Tıp Derg. 2011; 33: 497–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Karaca T, Yoldas O, Bilgin BC, Bilgin S, Evcik E, Ozen S. Diagnosis and treatment of multiseptate gallbladder with recurrent abdominal pain. Case Rep. Med. 2011; 2011: 1–2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wanaguru D, Jiwane A, Day AS, Adams S. Multiseptate Gallbladder in an Asymptomatic Child. Case Rep. Gastrointest. Med. 2011; 2011: 1–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Herliczek TW. Multiseptate gallbladder. Indian J. Gastroenterol. 2011; 30: 286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Orokawa T, Sunagawa H, Mayama Y, Inamine S, Ohshiro N, Takeshima M. A case of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for multiseptate gallbladder. J. Jpn. Surg. Assoc. 2011; 72: 1526–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Tok S, Ülküden B, Evliya D‐K, Eğitim Ç, Hastanesi A. Ultrasonography findings of multiseptate gallbladder with recurrent abdominal pain ultrasonography findings of multiseptate gallbladder with recurrent abdominal pain radiology. CausaPedia Hakemli Olgu Derg. 2013; 2: 16–18. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Sunahara M, Kurauchi N, Kimura J. A case of multiseptate gallbladder treated by laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J. Jpn. Surg. Assoc. 2013; 74: 3459–64. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Geremia P, Tomà P, Martinoli C, Camerini G, Derchi L. Multiseptate gallbladder: Clinical and ultrasonographic follow‐up for 12years. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2013; 48: e25–e28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Aydin R, Bilgici MC, Polat AV, Aslan K, Kalayci AG. Honeycomb gallbladder: a very rare cause of right upper quadrant pain. Pediatr. Emerg. Care. 2013; 29: 1276–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Acar T, Acar T, Efe D, Buldu İ, Acar S, Güneyli S. Multiseptate Gallbladder: a different variant in an asymptomatic young woman. Acta Med. 2014; 45: 16–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Omuta S, Naruki M, Tokuhisa Jet al. A case of multiseptate gallbladder which was combined with adenomyomatosis. Tando. 2014; 28: 690–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Afrouzian M, Sonstein J, Dadfarnia T, Sreshta JN, Hawkins HK. Four miniature kidneys: supernumerary kidney and multiple organ system anomalies. Hum. Pathol. 2014; 45: 1100–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Ortolá P, Carazo ME, Cortés J, Rodríguez L. Multiseptate gallbladder in an asymptomatic pediatric patient. J. Gastrointest. Dig. Syst. 2015; 05: 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Otaibi W, Quach G, Burke B. Double cystic duct in a septated gallbladder. J. Investig. Med. High. Impact. Case. Rep. 2015; 3: 1–2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Ozturk M, Sigirci A. Multiseptate gallbladder in an adolescent patient with chronic abdominal pain: ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography findings/Kronik karin agrisi olan adolesanda multiseptat safra kesesi: ultrasonografi ve magnetik rezonans kolanjiopankreatografi bulgulari. J. Turgut. Ozal. Med. Cent. 2016; 23: 344. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Koc U. A woman with mild pain in the right upper quadrant. Eur. J. Emerg. Med. 2016; 15: 156. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Edelman M, Chawla A, Gill R. A multiseptated gallbladder in a 16‐year‐old boy with abdominal pain. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2016; 62: e33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Aydin E. Recurrent abdominal pain: multiseptate gall bladder. Appl. Med. Res. 2016; 2: 22. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Baram A, Sandrose SW, Marklund M. Multiseptate gallbladder in an asymptomatic patient. Eurorad. 2017; 2016. https://www.eurorad.org/case/14156. [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Honrubia López R, Poza Cordón J, Gómez Senent S, Mora SP. Multiseptate gallbladder: a rare ultrasonographic finding. Rev. Esp. Enferm. Dig. 2017; 109: 527. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Sabra T, Takrouney M, Osman M, Mostafa M. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic multiseptate gallbladder. Egypt J. Surg. 2017; 36: 457. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Dousse D, Marcu L, Martini F. A symptomatic multiseptate gallbladder without gallstones. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Endosc. 2018; 3: 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Öztorun C, Demir R, Karakuş Eet al. Multiseptate gallbladder, a rare cause of recurrent abdominal pain: A case report and review of the literature. Haseki Tıp Bülteni. 2018; 56: 172–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Bertozzi M, Bizzarri I, Angotti Ret al. Multiseptate gallbladder in a child. J. Pediatr. Surg. Case. Rep. 2019; 45: 101212. [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Demko V, Xhetani X. Multiseptate gallbladder with recurrent abdominal pain. A case report and literature review. Albanian J. Trauma Emerg. Surg. 2019; 3: 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.La Mendola F, Fatuzzo V, Smilari Pet al. Multiseptate gallbladder in a child: a possible cause of poor growth? J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2019; 68: e13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Singh AD, Simons‐Linares CR, Chahal P. A dilated common bile duct with “atypical” gallbladder. Gastroenterology. 2020; 159: e6–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Talalaev M, Tawil R, Rios H, Rey J, Zaman H, Blain‐Maiza S. Multiseptate gallbladder in a patient with biliary dyskinesia. J. Gastrointest. Abdom. Radiol. 2020; 3: S77–S79. [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Akbari A‐H, Putra J. Type 1 choledochal cyst with ectopic pancreas and septate gallbladder. Fetal Pediatr. Pathol. 2020; 29: 1–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Tan C, Howard E, Moscoso G, Driver M. Multiseptate gallbladder: a new theory of development. J. Japanese Soc. Pediatr. Surg. 1993; 29: 522. [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Mathur RC, Mathur NC, Reddy DN, Rao GV, Mathur YC. Septate gall bladder. Indian Pediatr. 1998; 35: 481–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Ando H, Kaneko K, Ito F, Seo T, Harada T, Watanabe Y. Embryogenesis of pancreaticobiliary maljunction inferred from development of duodenal atresia. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Surg. 1999; 6: 50–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JGH Open: An Open Access Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES