Abstract
Objective:
There is a rising burden of myocardial infarction (MI) within sub-Saharan Africa. Prospective studies of detailed MI outcomes in the region are lacking.
Methods:
Adult patients with confirmed MI from a prospective surveillance study in northern Tanzania were enrolled in a longitudinal cohort study after baseline health history, medication use, and sociodemographic data were obtained. Thirty days following hospital presentation, symptom status, rehospitalizations, medication use, and mortality were assessed via telephone or in-person interviews using a standardized follow-up questionnaire. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify baseline predictors of thirty-day mortality.
Results:
Thirty-day follow-up was achieved for 150 (98.7%) of 152 enrolled participants. Of these, 85 (56·7%) survived to thirty-day follow-up. Of the surviving participants, 71 (83·5%) reported persistent anginal symptoms, four (4·7%) reported taking aspirin regularly, seven (8·2%) were able to identify MI as the reason for their hospitalization, and 17 (20·0%) had unscheduled rehospitalizations. Self-reported history of diabetes at baseline (OR 0·32, 95% CI 0·10–0·89, p = 0·04), self-reported history of hypertension at baseline (OR 0·34, 95% CI 0·15–0·74, p = 0·01), and antiplatelet use at initial presentation (OR 0·19, 95% CI 0·04–0·65, p = 0·02) were all associated with lower odds of thirty-day mortality.
Conclusions:
In northern Tanzania, thirty-day outcomes following acute MI are poor, and mortality is associated with self-awareness of comorbidities and medication usage. Further investigation is needed to develop interventions to improve care and outcomes of MI in Tanzania.
Keywords: Acute myocardial infarction, emergency medicine, outcomes, Tanzania, sub-Saharan Africa
1. Introduction
Myocardial infarction (MI) is a leading cause of death in adults globally.1 In Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), the burden of MI is presumed to be rising as the region proceeds through the epidemiologic transition,2 but data regarding MI incidence or prevalence in SSA remain limited.3 A recent study in Tanzania found that acute MI was common among patients presenting to the emergency department, but that MI cases were frequently missed by providers and the use of evidence-based MI treatment was rare.4 Against this backdrop, little is known about patient-level MI outcomes in SSA. A handful of studies have investigated in-hospital or thirty-day mortality rates in SSA.5–8 These studies, which were conducted in advanced centers with capacity for cardiac catheterization, reported in-hospital mortality rates ranging from 9 to 17%.5–8 However, advanced cardiac centers are scarce in SSA;7,9 in 2017, for example, there were only 12 cardiac catheterization facilities within three countries in East and Central Africa7, a region containing 29 countries. In a recent study at a Tanzanian hospital without cardiac catheterization capacity, a 43% thirty-day mortality rate was observed,4 suggesting that MI outcomes may be worse in settings without access to specialized cardiac care.
Beyond the limited crude mortality data described above, much remains to be learned about MI outcomes in SSA. Specifically, to our knowledge, no published studies have reported healthcare utilization following discharge, use of evidence-based therapies for secondary prevention, re-hospitalization rates, or patient-perceived barriers to care. Furthermore, to our knowledge, there are no data regarding predictors of death following acute MI or symptom status among MI survivors in SSA. Obtaining such data would aid clinicians, researchers, and policy-makers in identifying gaps in care and targets for strengthening existing systems of care.
The aim of this prospective observational study was to report several thirty-day outcomes including healthcare utilization, predictors of death, and mortality among adult patients with confirmed MI in the Kilimanjaro Region of northern Tanzania.
2. Methods
2.1. Dating Sharing
All reasonable requests for data sharing will be honored; please contact the corresponding author to request data access.
2.2. Setting
This study was conducted in the Kilimanjaro Region of northern Tanzania. In 2014, the community prevalence of hypertension among adults living in Kilimanjaro was 28%,10 and the prevalence of diabetes was 6%.11 The dominant local tribe is the Chagga tribe. The local tertiary care center is Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre (KCMC), which was not staffed with a trained cardiologist or equipped with a cardiac catheterization lab at the time of this study.
2.3. Participant selection
The participants in this study were enrolled from a prospective MI surveillance study in northern Tanzania, with methods described elsewhere.4 The surveillance study was conducted in the KCMC emergency department (ED) in 2019. Adult patients (age ≥ 17 years) presenting with acute chest pain or shortness of breath to the ED were eligible for enrollment in the surveillance study and underwent testing for acute MI with electrocardiogram and point-of-care troponin-I testing (Abott iSTAT cTnI assay, Abbott Point of Care, Princeton, New Jersey, United States). Patients in the surveillance study who were found to have acute MI were enrolled into the longitudinal follow-up study. For study purposes, acute MI was defined according to the Fourth Universal Definition of MI criteria:12 any patient with pathologic ST elevation in contiguous leads or pathologically elevated troponin (>0·08ng/ml) were considered to have an acute MI. Three external independent physician adjudicators reviewed electrocardiograms to determine pathologic ST elevations and reviewed ECG and troponin levels to determine presence or absence of MI. Troponin and ECG results were shared immediately with the clinical team, but for study purposes determination of MI was performed by independent adjudicators. ST elevation MI (STEMI) was defined as pathologic ST elevation in at least two contiguous leads, and non-STEMI (NSTEMI) was defined as pathologically elevated troponin in the absence of STEMI.
2.4. Study procedures
Neither study participants nor the public were involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this study. At initial presentation, trained research assistants administered a standardized questionnaire to all participants, eliciting information about past medical history, medication use, and sociodemographic information. Blood pressure, weight, and height were measured at time of initial enrollment by research assistants. Thirty days following presentation to the ED, participants were contacted via telephone and a standardized follow-up questionnaire was administered by research assistants. Participants were asked to provide information about their symptom progression, rehospitalizations, medication use, and barriers to care subsequently encountered. They were also asked to identify their diagnosis in their own words. If participants were unreachable by telephone, they were called on five separate days. If they remained unreachable, they were visited in their home by a member of the study team to complete the follow-up questionnaire face-to-face. If the participant had died, the survey was administered to a relative. In case of participant death, a brief verbal autopsy based on the World Health Organization (WHO) 2016 verbal autopsy instrument was administered to available relatives.13
2.5. Study definitions
The primary outcome was death from any cause. Secondary outcomes included death from MI, location of death, resolution of symptoms, rehospitalization, numbers of days hospitalized, prescribed medications, follow-up rates, and knowledge about their disease. Causes of death were adjudicated by a committee of physicians from Tanzania and the United States. The adjudicating committee reviewed the verbal autopsy data, documented clinical diagnoses, patient demographics, vital signs at hospital presentation, electrocardiograms, laboratory data including troponin values, and all other available clinical data such as presenting symptoms and symptom duration prior to hospital presentation. After reviewing these data, the adjudicating committee ascribed one of the following causes of death to each case: recurrent myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, renal failure, or other. Deaths due to acute left heart failure or cardiogenic shock were both categorized as deaths due to heart failure. If the adjudicating committee did not feel there was enough data to determine a cause of death, the cause of death was reported as “indeterminant.” The adjudicating committee also reviewed participants’ self-identified diagnoses to determine whether or not the patient accurately identified MI as their diagnosis. Any patient description that was felt by the committee to describe MI (for example, “heart attack” or “heart problem”) was characterized as an accurate identification of the diagnosis. When patients did not know their diagnosis or provided a diagnosis unrelated to MI (for example, “pneumonia” or “malaria”), they were categorized as being unable to identify MI as their diagnosis. Disagreements among committee members were resolved by consensus. Health behaviors were explored using international standards. Sedentary lifestyle was defined as less than 150 minutes of moderately vigorous exercise per week, in accordance with WHO guidelines.14 Poor diet was defined as not eating vegetables and fruits daily, consistent with the known association between daily fruit and vegetable consumption and reduced risk of cardiovascular disease.15 Body mass index (BMI) was calculated directly from measured height and weight, and alcohol and tobacco use were defined by patient self-report. Baseline medical co-morbidities, such as hypertension and diabetes, were defined by patient self-report. Dual anti-platelet therapy was defined as self-report of taking both aspirin and another anti-platelet agent, such as clopidogrel.
2.6. Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were performed in the R Suite (Ver 1·3·1056·1). Descriptive statistics were used to describe participant characteristics and outcomes; continuous variables are presented as medians (interquartile ranges) and categorical variables are presented as frequencies and proportions. We secondarily sought to identify predictors of thirty-day mortality. A pool of potential predictor variables was developed based on biologic plausibility and known predictors of mortality in high-income settings.16 Univariate analyses were performed to assess associations between predictor variables obtained at enrollment and mortality, using Pearson’s chi-square for categorical variables and Welch’s t-test for continuous variables. Odds ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated directly from two-by-two contingency tables. Multivariate logistic regression was then performed to identify predictors of thirty-day mortality. Any variable with evidence of univariate association with mortality (p < 0·1) were included in the model; age and sex were also forced into the model.
2.7. Ethics
All participants provided written informed consent prior to study participation. This study received ethics approval from Duke Health, KCMC, and the Tanzanian National Institute for Medical Research.
2.8. Role of the Funding Source
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
3. Results
Of 681 screened patients, a total of 152 participants with acute MI (61 STEMIs and 91 NSTEMIs) were identified and enrolled in this study. Baseline sociodemographic characteristics and medical comorbidities of participants are presented in Table 1. The median (IQR) age of participants was 61 (49, 76) years and the median BMI was 23·2 (20·8,26·4) kg/m2, and 91 participants (59·9%) were male. At presentation, 94 (61·8%) participants reported a known history of hypertension and 27 (17·8%) reported a known history of diabetes. Eighteen (11·8%) participants reported taking an antiplatelet medication regularly prior to presentation. None of the participants received fibrinolysis during their index ED presentation.
Table 1.
Characteristics of adults presenting with acute myocardial infarction to a Tanzanian emergency department, 2019 (N=152)
| Median | IQR | |
| Age | 61 | 49·0,76·0 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 23·2 | 20·8,26·4 |
| Troponin (ng/ml) | 0·12 | 0·02,0·42 |
| Systolic blood pressure at initial presentation (mmHg) | 145 | 113–168 |
| Diastolic blood pressure at initial presentation (mmHg) | 85 | 68–101 |
| Number of Participants | (%) | |
| Sex | ||
| Male | 91 | 59·9% |
| Female | 61 | 40·1% |
| Education | ||
| None | 10 | 6·6% |
| Primary | 88 | 57·9% |
| Secondary | 20 | 13·2% |
| Post-Secondary | 34 | 22·4% |
| History of prior myocardial infarction | 4 | 2·6% |
| Current tobacco use | 16 | 10·5% |
| Current alcohol use | 54 | 35·5% |
| Poor diet | 140 | 92·1% |
| Sedentary lifestyle | 91 | 59·9% |
| Given aspirin in the ED | 35 | 23·0% |
| Received fibrinolysis in the ED | 0 | 0% |
| Medical History, self-reported | ||
| Diabetes | 27 | 17·8% |
| Hyperlipidemia | 8 | 5·3% |
| Hypertension | 94 | 61·8% |
| HIV | 5 | 3·3% |
| Chronic kidney disease | 16 | 10·5% |
| Taking antiplatelet medication at presentation | 18 | 11·8% |
ED: emergency department
HIV: human immunodeficiency virus
Thirty-day follow-up was achieved for 150 (98·7%) participants; two participants were lost to follow-up. Of the 150 for whom follow-up was obtained, 65 (43·3%) died. Table 2 summarizes outcomes of the 85 participants surviving to thirty-day follow-up. Of the 85 participants who survived to thirty-day follow-up, 14 (16·5%) reported their symptoms resolved, 53 (62·4%) reported symptom improvement, and 18 (21·2%) reported their symptoms had worsened or were unchanged. Among surviving patients, four (4·7%) reported taking aspirin daily and seven (8·2%) were able to identify MI as their diagnosis. In the 30 days following initial hospital presentation, 36 (42·4%) reported receiving a scheduled follow-up appointment and 17 (20·0%) reported having an unscheduled rehospitalization for recurrent MI symptoms.
Table 2.
Thirty day outcomes among patients with acute myocardial infarction surviving to thirty-day follow-up, northern Tanzania, 2019 (N=85)
| All surviving patients N=85* | Number of Participants | (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Symptom Progression at 30 days | ||
| Resolved | 14 | 16.5% |
| Improved | 53 | 63.4% |
| Worsened or unchanged | 18 | 21.2% |
| Received a prescription at hospital discharge | 81 | 95.3% |
| Reports taking medications as prescribed (N=81) | 75 | 92.6% |
| Reports taking aspirin | 4 | 4.7% |
| Reports taking dual anti-platelet therapy | 0 | 0% |
| Reports taking beta-blocker | 1 | 1.2% |
| Reports taking angiotension-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotension receptor blocker (ARB) | 3 | 3.5% |
| Reports taking statin | 1 | 1.2% |
| Identified acute MI as their diagnosis | 7 | 8.2% |
| Feels they understand their treatment | 64 | 75.3% |
| Given 30-day follow-up appointment | 36 | 42.4% |
| Attended follow-up clinic appointment (N=36) | 23 | 63.9% |
| Unscheduled hospitalizations for recurrent chest pain/shortness of breath after discharge | 17 | 20.0% |
2 lost to follow up
MI: myocardial infarction
The adjudicated causes of death are summarized in Table 3. Of the 65 deaths occurring within thirty days, 17 (26·2%) were due to myocardial infarction, 17 (26·2%) were due to heart failure, and 10 (15·4%) were due to renal failure. The majority of deaths (53, 81·5%) occurred in a hospital, and the median (IQR) time interval between hospital presentation and death was three (1, 16) days. Table 4 presents univariate analyses of predictors of thirty-day mortality. The following baseline characteristics were found to be potentially significant predictors of lower thirty-day mortality (p < 0·10) and were included in the multivariate model: self-reported history of diabetes (OR 0·40, 95% CI 0·15–0·98, p = 0·044), self-reported history of hypertension OR 0·26, 95% CI 0·18–0·72, p = 0·003, taking antiplatelet medication at presentation OR 0·34, 95% CI 0·09–1·03, p = 0·054, higher BMI (p = 0·014) and lower troponin level (p = 0·053).
Table 3.
Causes of death among adults dying within 30 days of acute myocardial infarction, northern Tanzania, 2019 (n=65)
| Number of participants | (%) | |
| Location of death | ||
| Hospital | 53 | 81·5% |
| Home | 6 | 9·2% |
| Other facility | 6 | 9·2% |
| Physician-adjudicated cause of death | ||
| Recurrent myocardial infarction | 17 | 26·2% |
| Heart failure | 17 | 26·2% |
| Renal failure | 10 | 15·4% |
| Indeterminate | 21 | 32·3% |
| Median | IQR | |
| Days from hospital presentation to death | 3 | 1,16 |
Table 4.
Univariate and Multivariate analysis of predictors of thirty-day mortality following acute myocardial infarction, northern Tanzania, 2019
| Participants surviving to 30 days n(%) | Participants dying within 30 days n(%) | Univariate OR (95% CI) | P | Multivariate OR (95% CI) | p | |
| Male sex | 51(60·0%) | 38(58·5%) | 0·94(0·48,1·82) | 0·849 | 0·86 (0·41,1·80) | 0·693 |
| Post-primary education | 40(47·1%) | 13(20·0%) | 0·23(0·05,0·94) | 0·025* | 0·20 (0·03,1·06) | 0·062 |
| Poor diet | 77(90·6%) | 61(93·8%) | 1·55(0·46,6·27) | 0·466 | ||
| Sedentary lifestyle | 50(58·8%) | 40(61·5%) | 1·12(0·58,2·18) | 0·737 | ||
| Self-reported History of Diabetes | 20(23·5%) | 7(10·8%) | 0·40(0·15,0·98) | 0·044* | 0·32 (0·10,0·89) | 0·037* |
| Self-reported History of hypertension | 62(72·9%) | 32(50·0%) | 0·36(0·18,0·72) | 0·003* | 0·34 (0·15,0·74) | 0·008* |
| Self-reported History of hyperlipidemia | 7(8·2%) | 1(1·5%) | 0·20(0·01,1·18) | 0·138 | ·· | ·· |
| Self-reported History of chronic kidney disease | 9(10·6%) | 7(10·8%) | 1·02(0·34,2·95) | 0·972 | ·· | ·· |
| Current Alcohol use | 25(43·8%) | 27(51·9%) | 1·37(0·65,2·96) | 0·400 | ·· | ·· |
| Current Tobacco use | 8(25·8%) | 7(31·8%) | 1·34(0·38,4·60) | 0·632 | ||
| Given Aspirin in the ED | 23(27·1%) | 12(18·5%) | 0·62(0·27,1·34) | 0·217 | ·· | ·· |
| Taking antiplatelet at presentation | 14(16·5%) | 4(6·2%) | 0·34(0·09,1·03) | 0·054 | 0·19 (0·04,0·65) | 0·016* |
| Mean (s.d) | Mean (s.d.) | p | ||||
| Age (years) | 60·08(16·0) | 63·34(21·17) | 0·303 | 1·02 (1·00,1·04) | 0·054 | |
| Troponin level (ng/ml) | 0·43 (1·32) | 1·70(5·05) | 0·053 | 1·18 (1·02,1·53) | 0·118 | |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 24·57(4·29) | 22·83(4·26) | 0·014* | 0·92 (0·84,1·01 | 0·072 |
ED: Emergency department
The results of a multivariate analysis of predictors of death are summarized in Table 4. Self-reported history of diabetes (OR 0·32, 95% CI 0·10–0·89, p = 0·04), self-reported history of hypertension (OR 0·34, 95% CI 0·15–0·74, p = 0·01), and taking antiplatelet at presentation (OR 0·19, 95% CI 0·04–0·65, p = 0·02) were associated with lower odds of 30-day mortality.
4. Discussion
To our knowledge, this is one of the first studies to assess multiple thirty-day outcomes following acute MI in sub-Saharan Africa. In northern Tanzania, we found that thirty days following MI, the majority of patients had died over three-quarters of those surviving reported persistent anginal symptoms. Few patients understood their diagnosis, and one in five surviving patients was re-hospitalized. Furthermore, use of evidence-based secondary prevention medications such as antiplatelet therapy was low. These findings call attention to an urgent need to develop patient-centered interventions to improve MI care and outcomes in Tanzania.
As discussed elsewhere, the thirty-day mortality rate within this cohort is among the highest reported globally.4 The majority of deaths occurred within three days of hospital presentation and occurred in-hospital. Recent quantitative and qualitative studies from Tanzania have identified potential contributors to poor MI outcomes, including inadequate physician training, lack of diagnostic capacity, frequent MI misdiagnosis, and an inefficient referral system.4,17 Our findings suggest that short term MI outcomes in Tanzania are substantially worse than in other world regions, and our data identify multiple potential explanations for these poor outcomes: low rates of ED aspirin administration, lack of local percutaneous coronary intervention capacity, low uptake of secondary prevention therapies, inconsistent follow-up appointments, and poor patient understanding.
Even among the patients who survived to thirty days, the majority (84%) reported persistent anginal symptoms, which may be due in part to the inability to obtain revascularization in these patients. This stands in contrast to what has been observed in high-income settings: in the United States for example, approximately 17% of patients report persistent angina thirty days following MI.18 In addition to high prevalence of persistent anginal symptoms, patient understanding of their disease appeared to be low: only a minority were aware that they had a recent MI. Improved understanding of disease and risk factors leads to improved health outcomes in a wide variety of settings, including in Tanzania.19,20 Perhaps most concerningly, few patients reported taking secondary prevention medications such as antiplatelet medications, statins, and antihypertensives, which are known to reduce morbidity and mortality following acute MI.21–23 The 5% of patients observed to be taking antiplatelet therapy following acute MI stands in stark contrast to data from other settings: in high-income settings like Australia and the United States, the vast majority of patients are taking antiplatelets and other recommended secondary prevention therapies.24,25 Even in low- and middle-income countries outside of SSA, a recent WHO study found that 81% of patients with recent MI were taking aspirin.26 The reasons for low uptake of secondary prevention therapies warrant further investigation. Possible explanations for the low usage rates of these therapies include physician failure to prescribe these medications at discharge, cost of medications, and patient non-adherence, among others. Our study methods did not include observation of the hospital discharge process, and therefore we are unable to determine whether these medications were in fact prescribed at discharge. Further study is needed to detail specific barriers to use of aspirin and other therapies following hospitalization.
Furthermore, few patients reported receiving 30-day follow-up and one in five were re-hospitalized for recurrent AMI symptoms. The 20% unscheduled 30-day rehospitalization rate observed in our study is also worse than what has been reported in other settings: recent studies from China and the United States reported 30-day rehospitalization rates of 6% and 14%, respectively.27,28 Statistically significant predictors of thirty-day survival included self-reported history of diabetes, self-reported history of hypertension, and taking an antiplatelet agent on presentation. These results are in contrast to prior studies of MI outcomes in other settings: a review of MI outcomes in Europe, for example, found that diabetes and hypertension are significant predictors of death.29 The apparent protective effect of a self-reported hypertension and diabetes in our cohort was unexpected. However, in the sub-Saharan African context, where a large majority of patients with hypertension and diabetes are unaware of their diagnoses,30–32 a self-reported history of diabetes and hypertension may be a proxy for health awareness, engagement with the healthcare system, and pre-existing use of secondary prevention therapies. This finding emphasizes the critical need for expanded screening, treatment, and education for hypertension and diabetes in SSA. The association between ongoing use of antiplatelet agent and improved MI mortality is unsurprising; treating MI patients with aspirin was recently cited by the WHO as a “best buy” for reducing noncommunicable disease morbidity and mortality.33, 34 Given the low numbers of MI patients observed to be treated with aspirin in the ED or taking aspirin on thirty-day follow-up, there is an urgent need to develop interventions to increase aspirin use in this patient population. Unfortunately, a recent systematic review of the WHO recommendations found no published studies of interventions to increase aspirin therapy for MI patients in low-income countries.35
4.1. Study Limitations
The findings of this study must be interpreted in light of its limitations. A major limitation of this study is that only patients presenting to a referral center hospital with typical MI symptoms were enrolled. Those who did not survive to hospital chose not to present hospital at all, went to a different facility, or had an atypical presentation were not included in our study. These patients likely had worse outcomes and perhaps were even less likely to be taking appropriate preventative medications. Furthermore, we relied on patient self-report to identify their comorbidities, such as hypertension and diabetes, which likely led to an underestimation of the prevalence of comorbid disease. Similarly, we relied on self-report for medication use at thirty-day follow-up. To maximize the accuracy of these data, research assistants asked the patients to read their prescriptions to them over the phone and when in-home follow-up visits were done, research assistants directly looked at the prescriptions. Nonetheless, it is possible that in some cases patients misidentified or forgot certain medications, which would have led to an underestimation of the proportion of patients on appropriate preventative therapy. Furthermore, due to resource limitations at the study site, we were unable to obtain coronary angiography or echocardiography on our participants and therefore cannot describe the severity of our participants’ underlying coronary artery disease or their ejection fractions, which may have been important unexplored predictors of death. Our study may have been under-powered to detect other important associations with death. Finally, as discussed elsewhere4, a major limitation of the parent surveillance study from which our participants were enrolled was that we were unable to completely exclude other causes of troponin elevation, such as pulmonary embolism or myocarditis. Due to resource limitations at the study site, we were unable to obtain coronary angiography, echocardiography, or serial troponins to confirm coronary atherothrombosis in our participants. We attempted to mitigate this limitation by excluding patients with self-reported fever and only enrolling patients with symptoms suggestive of acute MI. Moreover, as discussed elsewhere4, renal dysfunction was uncommon among our patient population and excluding patients with renal dysfunction did not substantially affect the number of participants meeting the study definition for MI or the thirty-day mortality rate among those with MI. Nonetheless, it remains possible that some participants without acute MI were included in our MI cohort; as advanced cardiac diagnostic testing becomes more widely available in SSA, additional study will be needed to confirm our findings.
In conclusion, in northern Tanzania, thirty-day outcomes following acute MI are poor and there are multiple opportunities to improve post-MI care. Among this cohort, self-reported hypertension, self-report diabetes, and taking antiplatelet medications were associated with lower thirty-day mortality, likely reflecting prior preventive care and health knowledge. Further investigation is needed to understand these findings. Interventions are needed to improve care and outcomes of MI in Tanzania.
Highlights.
There is a rising burden of myocardial infarction (MI) within sub-Saharan Africa.
In northern Tanzania, thirty-day outcomes following acute-MI are poor.
Mortality following acute-MI is associated with comorbidities and medication usage.
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge the collaboration of the KCMC ED staff. We thank Oscar Kamanga for assistance with patient enrollment and follow-up.
Sources of Funding
This study received support from the US National Institutes of Health Fogarty International Center (grant number D43TW009337, awarded to JTH) and the Duke Hubert-Yeargan Center for Global Health (awarded to JTH). Abbott Point of Care donated the troponin assays used in this study. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. No author received any payment for writing this article. The corresponding author had full access to all study data and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.
Footnotes
Conflicts of Interests
ATL’s institution received research support from Roche Diagnostics, Abbott Laboratories, and Siemens Diagnostics for studies in which he was a co-investigator. JTH’s institution received research support form Roche Diagnostics for a study in which he is an investigator. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.GBD 2017 Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1736–1788. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32203-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mensah GA, Roth GA, Sampson UKA, et al. Mortality from cardiovascular diseases in sub-Saharan Africa, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis of data from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2015;26(2 Suppl 1):S6–10. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2015-036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hertz JT, Reardon JM, Rodrigues CG, et al. Acute Myocardial Infarction in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Need for Data. PLoS One. 2014;9(5). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096688 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hertz JT, Sakita FM, Kweka GL, et al. Acute myocardial infarction under-diagnosis and mortality in a Tanzanian emergency department: A prospective observational study. American Heart Journal. 2020;226:214–221. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.05.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kimeu R, Kariuki C. Assessment of the management of acute myocardial infarction patients and their outcomes at the Nairobi Hospital from January 2007 to June 2009. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2016;27(4):218–221. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2015-091 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bahiru E, Temu T, Gitura B, Farquhar C, Huffman MD, Bukachi F. Presentation, management and outcomes of acute coronary syndrome: a registry study from Kenyatta National Hospital in Nairobi, Kenya. CVJA. 2018;29(4):225–230. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2018-017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Varwani MH, Jeilan M, Ngunga M, Barasa A . Outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome in a referral hospital in sub-Saharan Africa. CVJA. 2019;30(1):29–33. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2018-066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yao H, Ekou A, Hadéou A, N’Djessan J-J, Kouamé I, N’Guetta R. Medium and long-term follow-up after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in a sub-Saharan Africa population: a prospective cohort study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019;19. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1043-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hertz JT. Patterns of emergency care manuscript.
- 10.Galson SW, Staton CA, Karia F, et al. Epidemiology of hypertension in Northern Tanzania: a community-based mixed-methods study. BMJ Open. 2017;7(11):e018829. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018829 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Stanifer JW, Cleland CR, Makuka GJ, et al. Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Complications of Diabetes in the Kilimanjaro Region: A Population-Based Study from Tanzania. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(10):e0164428. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164428 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(18):2231–2264. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.1038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nichols EK, Byass P, Chandramohan D, et al. The WHO 2016 verbal autopsy instrument: An international standard suitable for automated analysis by InterVA, InSilicoVA, and Tariff 2.0. PLoS Med. 2018;15(1):e1002486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002486 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Organisation mondiale de la santé. Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. … World Health Organization; 2010. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Aune D, Giovannucci E, Boffetta P, et al. Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer and all-cause mortality—a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46(3):1029–1056. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw319 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rossello X, Bueno H, Pocock SJ, et al. Predictors of all-cause mortality and ischemic events within and beyond 1 year after an acute coronary syndrome: Results from the EPICOR registry. Clin Cardiol. 2018;42(1):111–119. doi: 10.1002/clc.23116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hertz JT, Kweka GL, Manavalan P, Watt MH, Sakita FM. Provider-perceived barriers to diagnosis and treatment of acute coronary syndrome in Tanzania: a qualitative study. Int Health. 2020;12(2):148–154. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihz061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Doll JA, Tang F, Cresci S, et al. Change in Angina Symptom Status After Acute Myocardial Infarction and Its Association With Readmission Risk: An Analysis of the Translational Research Investigating Underlying Disparities in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients’ Health Status (TRIUMPH) Registry. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(6). doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003205 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ojji DB, Lamont K, Ojji OI, Egenti BN, Sliwa K. Primary care in the prevention, treatment and control of cardiovascular disease in sub-Saharan Africa. CVJA. 2017;28(4):251–256. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2016-082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Muhihi AJ, Urassa DP, Mpembeni RNM, et al. Effect of training community health workers and their interventions on cardiovascular disease risk factors among adults in Morogoro, Tanzania: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018;19(1):552. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2924-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bansilal S, Castellano JM, Garrido E, et al. Assessing the Impact of Medication Adherence on Long-Term Cardiovascular Outcomes. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2016;68(8):789–801. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.06.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hansen ML, Gislason GH, Køber L, et al. Different angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have similar clinical efficacy after myocardial infarction. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;65(2):217–223. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.02991.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ryan Thomas J, Anderson Jeffrey L, Antman Elliott M, et al. ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction:Executive Summary. Circulation. 1996;94(9):2341–2350. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.94.9.2341 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chow CK, Brieger D, Ryan M, Kangaharan N, Hyun KK, Briffa T. Secondary prevention therapies in acute coronary syndrome and relation to outcomes: observational study. Heart Asia. 2019;11(1). doi: 10.1136/heartasia-2018-011122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Solomon Matthew D, Leong Thomas K, Levin Eleanor, et al. Cumulative Adherence to Secondary Prevention Guidelines and Mortality After Acute Myocardial Infarction. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2020;9(6):e014415. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014415 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mendis S, Abegunde D, Yusuf S, et al. WHO study on Prevention of REcurrences of Myocardial Infarction and StrokE (WHO-PREMISE). Bull World Health Organ. 2005;83(11):820–829. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Li Jing, Dharmarajan Kumar, Bai Xueke, et al. Thirty-Day Hospital Readmission After Acute Myocardial Infarction in China. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 2019;12(5):e005628. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.005628 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Fingar KR, Barrett ML, Jiang HJ. A Comparison of All-Cause 7-Day and 30-Day Readmissions, 2014: Statistical Brief #230. In: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2006. Accessed October 22, 2020. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK487973/ [Google Scholar]
- 29.Johansson S, Rosengren A, Young K, Jennings E. Mortality and morbidity trends after the first year in survivors of acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017;17(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0482-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ataklte Feven, Erqou Sebhat, Kaptoge Stephen, Taye Betiglu, Echouffo-Tcheugui Justin B, Kengne Andre P Burden of Undiagnosed Hypertension in Sub-Saharan Africa. Hypertension. 2015;65(2):291–298. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.04394 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Manne-Goehler J, Atun R, Stokes A, et al. Diabetes diagnosis and care in sub-Saharan Africa: pooled analysis of individual data from 12 countries. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology. 2016;4(11):903–912. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30181-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hall V, Thomsen RW, Henriksen O, Lohse N. Diabetes in Sub Saharan Africa 1999–2011: Epidemiology and public health implications. a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):564. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-564 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.RANDOMISED TRIAL OF INTRAVENOUS STREPTOKINASE, ORAL ASPIRIN, BOTH, OR NEITHER AMONG 17 187 CASES OF SUSPECTED ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: ISIS-2. The Lancet. 1988;332(8607):349–360. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(88)92833-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.World EF, World HO. From Burden to “Best Buys”: Reducing the Economic Impact of Non-Communicable Diseases in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Published online 2011.https://www.who.int/nmh/publications/best_buys_summary.pdf
- 35.Allen LN, Pullar J, Wickramasinghe KK, et al. Evaluation of research on interventions aligned to WHO “Best Buys” for NCDs in low-income and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review from 1990 to 2015. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(1):e000535. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000535 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
