Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Neurosci. 2021 Aug 19;54(6):6229–6236. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15420

Ultra-high field in vivo characterization of microstructural abnormalities in the orbitofrontal cortex and amygdala in autism.

Elda Fischi-Gomez 1,2, Guillaume Bonnier 1, Noreen Ward 1, Cristina Granziera 1,3,4,5,*, Nouchine Hadjikhani 1,6,*
PMCID: PMC8455451  NIHMSID: NIHMS1732389  PMID: 34390517

Abstract

There are currently no biomarkers for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). This neurodevelopmental condition has previously been associated with histopathological findings, including increased neuronal packing density in the amygdala, abnormal laminar cytoarchitecture and increased average neuronal density in the prefrontal cortex. The present study examined whether new brain imaging technologies could reveal in vivo, in adults with ASD, the manifestation of previously described histopathological changes. Using quantitative mapping at ultra-high field (7 Tesla), we show that we can observe microstructural alterations in the right lateral orbitofrontal cortex and the bilateral amygdala in adult individuals with ASD in vivo. These imaging alterations point to an abnormal laminar cytoarchitecture and to an increased neuronal density, similar to what has been previously described in post-mortem data in ASD. Our data demonstrate that it is possible to visualize, in vivo and at the individual level, alterations of cortical and subcortical microstructure in ASD. Future studies will be needed to extend these findings to a larger group of individuals, and evaluate their association with symptomatology as well as their specificity among the different neurodevelopmental disorders.

Keywords: autism, quantitative MRI, amygdala, prefrontal cortex, biomarkers

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1732389-f0001.jpg

INTRODUCTION:

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a common, heterogeneous neurodevelopmental condition affecting more than 1% of children, according to the CDC (Baio et al., 2018). Currently there are no biomarkers for ASD, which relies principally on behavioral observation for its diagnosis. ASD is under substantial genetic influence, with a concordance rate in monozygotic twins of up to 90% (Rosenberg et al., 2009), however identified genetic causes only explain up to 17% of cases (Sanders et al., 2015). ASD already begins in utero, affecting neurons during essential development processes such as proliferation, neuronal growth and differentiation, migration, synapse formation and network construction (e.g. Bauman & Kemper, 1985; Casanova et al., 2002)).

Disruption of post-natal neuron migration and/or differentiation may contribute the observed cortical anatomical disorganization reported in ASD individuals (Stoner et al., 2014) and also to reported alteration in basic functional cortical units (i.e. cortical minicolumns (Mountcastle, 1997)), which have been described in ASD (Casanova et al., 2002; Buxhoeveden et al., 2006; Opris & Casanova, 2014).

At the subcortical level, post-mortem histological studies have revealed increased neuronal packing density in the amygdala (Bauman & Kemper, 1985). Histological studies of the cortex in ASD have concentrated in the prefrontal cortex and reported laminar disorganization with the presence of focal cortical dysplasia (i.e. disorganization of the normal cortical cyto- and myeloarchitecture) (Stoner et al., 2014), as well as heterotopia (i.e. when neurons that are supposed to form part of the cerebral cortex do not reach their correct location within the cortical ribbon and are misplaced and clustered in other regions)((Wegiel et al., 2010) - for review, see e.g.(Palmen et al., 2004; Amaral et al., 2008)).

The heterotopias and laminar disorganization described by Stoner et al. were associated with the presence of abnormal laminar cytoarchitecture in layers 4 and 5 (therefore affecting both neurons and their axonal projections and incoming axonal fibers from the thalamus), measuring up to 11.0 mm (Stoner et al., 2014), supporting the notion of faulty axon pathfinding and circuit development in ASD.

Anatomical studies of the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) in ASD (reviewed in (Liu et al., 2020)) have revealed abnormalities in the size and the structure of the OFC, together with differences in the subcortical white matter in this region, and more recently, Liu et al. (Liu et al., 2020) have reported post-mortem histological abnormalities in the right OFC of adult ASD individuals, with laminar-specific abnormalities of the density and the diameter of myelinated axons in that specific area.

Interestingly, areas described in the histological studies mentioned above were characterized by a significant increase in the average neuronal density as compared with control samples. However, there are no reports in vivo showing the presence and nature of such abnormalities in ASD individuals, and conventional structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) so far has not been able to provide imaging correlates of all the neuropathological and morphological findings in autism.

There have been many reports of abnormal anatomical findings using MRI in ASD, but most of them were macroscopic, non-specific findings, including early brain overgrowth (e.g. (Sparks et al., 2002; Courchesne et al., 2003; Courchesne et al., 2007; Chawarska et al., 2011; Courchesne et al., 2011; Hazlett et al., 2011)).

MRI can provide in vivo information about tissue types (gray matter (GM); white matter (WM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) but also tissue architecture and intra-tissue properties. For example, the tissue architecture of cortical GM is made by a characteristic organization of neurons, glia cells and more or less myelinated axons, which can be imaged with T1 relaxometry. Quantitative T1 mapping is a predictor of myelin presence in GM (Eickhoff et al., 2005), but also of cellular density as recently shown in a combined MRI and histology study (Goubran et al., 2015). Moreover, recent advances in MRI hardware and software have also permitted to achieve a submillimetric spatial resolution in clinically-compatible scan times, allowing to quantify T1 relaxation times in different cortical layers (Setsompop et al., 2016). Previous work from our group has shown that it is possible to disentangle different tissue properties in the deep gray matter nuclei, with results that are compatible with histological findings in the same region (Bonnier et al., 2016). We have also acquired preliminary data showing that T1 relaxometry acquired at submillimetric resolution in healthy controls show patterns of GM architecture, which can be related to cortical histological properties (Bonnier et al., 2017). Using 7T MRI, it is possible to achieve submillimetric spatial resolution in clinically compatible scan times with minimal penalties in signal-to-noise ratio. Thanks to this, 7T MRI allows to study the microstructural characteristics and the presence of subtle alterations in the cortical ribbon in in vivo individual subjects.

Here, we used cutting-edge technology (ultra-high field magnetic resonance imaging, 7T quantitative MRI) to examine in a proof-of-concept study whether we could observe in vivo the alterations previously described in histological studies in ASD. Considering histological post-mortem data, we decided to focus on the prefrontal cortex, on the lateral orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) in particular, and on the amygdala.

MATERIALS & METHODS

All procedures were approved by the local Institutional Review Board and all participants provided written consent. Images of brain T1 relaxometry were acquired with a 7 T Siemens whole-body scanner (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) using magnetization-prepared two inversion-contrast rapid gradient echoes sequence (MP2RAGE) providing both a uniform T1 weighted contrast and a T1 map (T1 relaxation time, T1-rt) corrected for the proton density, T2* contrast, and B1 inhomogeneities (Marques et al., 2010; O'Brien et al., 2014). The MP2RAGE data acquisition and online image reconstruction were performed with a vendor-supplied MP2RAGE package (WIP #944), with 0.75mm isotropic voxel size and the following protocol parameters: TI1/TI2/TR=800ms/2700ms/6000ms.

Data were acquired in 16 ASD participants (3 females), and 12 controls (2 females), matched for age (ASD= 26.5 ± 2.5; CON 26.8±2.3; p=0.9). None of the participants in either group had intellectual disability. All ASD patients had previously received a formal autism diagnosis by a psychiatrist or a licensed psychologist according to the DSM IV TR or the DSM 5. After preprocessing and quality evaluation of acquired MR images, two ASD subjects were excluded due to motion, distortion and other artifacts in the MP2RAGE.

Total Intracranial volume (TIV) extraction, tissue segmentation and definition of cortical and subcortical regions of interest (ROI) was performed over the MP2RAGE uniform image using the fully automatized FreeSurfer software (Fischl et al., 2002). In light of the published histopathological data, two ROIs in each hemisphere were specifically selected: the lateral orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and the amygdala.

Tissue concentration maps were computed over the same image by estimating the concentration of GM, WM and CSF in each voxel with an inhouse software based on (Bonnier et al., 2019). This was done by assigning to each imaging voxel a value computed as a mixture of tissues instead of assigning them a single tissue type as in (Bonnier et al., 2019). Mean values for GM and WM were initialized at 1000 ms and 2000 ms, resp. according to (Marques et al., 2010). The algorithm was applied on each ROI separately to account for the variability of T1 signal over the brain.

The mean T1-weighted (T1w) uniform intensity, mean T1-rt and GM concentration values as well as the ROI size (in number of voxels) were computed. In order to detect subtle alterations in tissue concentration in the cortical regions under study (effects that may be hidden by the macroscopic effect due to the averaging of the individual voxel values), we selected the number of voxels per ROI having a GM concentration higher that 95% and 90%, respectively.

Differences in T1w intensities, qT1, tissue concentrations and number of voxels containing GM concentrations higher from the selected threshold were evaluated between ASD and healthy controls using a non-parametric Wilcoxon test. For each variable, extreme values (values beyond the 95th percentile of the dataset) were identified based on the chi-squared score, defined as: χ2=(xmean(x))2var(x). From these extreme values, and after visual quality check of the Freesurfer’s ROI segmentation, the outlier values that corresponded to segmentation failures were removed from the dataset. The resulting p-values were corrected for multiple comparisons using False Discovery Rate (FDR). Statistical analyses were run in RStudio (running R version 3.4.1.).

Focal abnormalities in the layer architecture along the OFC - that were considered as anatomical surrogate of cortical lamina - of GM visually evaluated and counted by two experts (CG and NH) independently, and then agreed by consensus.

RESULTS

The qualitative evaluation of areas with abnormalities in the layer architecture in the OCF showed a higher number of discrete abnormalities in ASD patients compared to healthy controls (ASD n= 69 and HC n= 4, illustrated in Figure 1). Their size and location are comparable to those reported by Stoner et al (2014).

Figure 1:

Figure 1:

MP2RAGE T1w images and gray matter (GM) concentration map of 2 ASD participants and one healthy control, estimated from MP2RAGE flat image at 7T at high resolution. Blue corresponds to low GM concentration, while red correspond to high GM concentration. In both examples of ASD participants, one can observe areas of abnormal gray matter concentration in the prefrontal cortex (white arrows), reminiscent of the histological images published by Stoner et al.[3] Note these GM concentration differences are not visible on conventional native anatomical images (top row).

The quantitative analysis of GM concentration and of the number of voxels with high GM concentration in OFC and amygdala in controls and ASD patients is reported in Figures 2 and 3. While no significant differences were present in the left OFC, the right OFC showed significant increase in mean GM concentration (p=0.042), as well as in the number of voxels with a GM concentration superior to 0.95 (p=0.024) and in the number of voxels with a GM concentration superior to 0.90 (p=0.042), in line with the changes reported by Liu et al in the right OFC (Figure 2).

Figure 2:

Figure 2:

Statistical comparisons for the mean GM concentration and the number of voxels with high GM concentration in right and left lateral orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) between controls and ASD participants. A-B: Sagittal 3D view of the left and right OFC segmentations over the corresponding MP2RAGE uniform image for a representative control subject. C-H: Boxplots and significant corrected p-value after a non-parametric Wilcoxon test and false discovery rate (FDR) correction for multiplicity; from left to right, first column (C and F): mean GM concentration computed over the whole ROI for the L-OFC (C) and the R-OFC (F), showing significantly increased mean GM concentration in ASD participants (blue boxplots) (F, p=0.042, FDR corrected). (D, G) and (E, H) depicts the number of voxels showing a GM concentration higher than 0.95 and 0.90, respectively. D, E: no significant differences for the left OFC between ASD and controls. G, H: ASD participants have significantly increased values in the right OFC for GM concentration higher than 0.95 (Panel G, p=0.024, FDR corrected) and for GM concentrations higher than 0.90 (panel H, p=0.042, FDR corrected).

Figure 3:

Figure 3:

Statistical comparisons for the mean GM concentration and the number of voxels with high GM concentration in right and left amygdala between controls and ASD participants. C-H: Boxplots and significant corrected p-value after a non-parametric Wilcoxon test and FDR correction for multiplicity; from left to right, first column (C and F): mean GM concentration computed over the whole ROI for the L-amyg (C) and the R-amyg (F). No significant differences were found between controls and ASD patients for the mean GM concentration. Panels D, G: number of voxels showing a GM concentration higher than 0.95, showing statistically significant increase of GM concentration in ASD in L-amyg and R-amyg (p=0.036, FDR corrected). Panels E, H: number of voxels showing a GM concentration higher than 0.90, showing statistically significant increase of GM concentration in ASD in the L-amyg (p=0.018, FDR corrected) and the R-amyg (p=0.015, FDR corrected).

In the amygdala (Figure 3), the mean GM concentration did not differ between groups. The number of voxels with a GM concentration superior to 0.95 was significantly higher in ASD bilaterally (Left amygdala: p=0.036; right amygdala: p=0.036). This was also the case for the number of voxels with a GM concentration higher than 0.90 (Left amygdala: p=0.018; right amygdala: p=0.015). There was also a significant positive correlation between the grey matter concentration between the right amygdala and the right OFC (Spearman r=0.371, p=0.045) across groups, however we did not have the power to show any such correlation when groups were treated separately. No significant differences were found for T1 relaxation times after FDR correction.

DISCUSSION

Our in vivo data support histological observations made in post-mortem brains in autism, namely abnormal laminar cytoarchitecture and abnormalities in gray matter concentration in the right OFC, as well as increased neuronal density bilaterally in the amygdala.

Disruption of post-natal neuron migration and/or differentiation may contribute to the observed cortical anatomical disorganization reported in ASD individuals (Stoner et al., 2014) , and to the reported alteration in basic functional cortical units (i.e. cortical minicolumns), which have been described in ASD (Casanova et al., 2002).

Anatomical studies of OFC in ASD (reviewed in Rolls & Grabenhorst, 2008) have revealed abnormalities its size and structure, and more recently, Liu et al. (Liu et al., 2020) have reported post-mortem histological abnormalities in the right OFC of adult ASD individuals, with laminar-specific abnormalities of inhibitory neurons distribution.

The OFC plays an important role in the limbic system, with its connections with both the amygdala and the anterior cingulate cortex and is involved in social and emotional processing, as well as decision making (Rolls & Grabenhorst, 2008), and in particular decision making in social context. Damage to the OFC has been associated with impairment in emotional behavior and emotion-related learning. The OFC receives direct projections from the inferior temporal cortex, involved in face processing, has ‘face cells’ as well, and damage to the OFC is associated with impaired emotional face processing (Rolls, 2007).

There are substantial connections between the OFC and the amygdala in primates (Ghashghaei et al., 2007) , supporting goal-directed behaviors that are based on emotional information. Alterations in amygdala growth and microstructure, together with atypical amygdala activation have been frequently reported in autism in vivo (Bauman & Kemper, 1985) (for review, see (Donovan & Basson, 2017)). In addition, the OFC-amygdala coupling has been associated with emotion regulation (Lee et al., 2012) , as well as anxiety (Kim et al., 2011) and obsessive compulsive disorder (Paul et al., 2019), two frequent comorbidities in ASD.

There are to our knowledge no pediatric study at ultra-high field in autism, but several groups have recently reported successful data acquisition without sedation in other pediatric conditions such as pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis, Tourette syndrome or Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disoder (Datta et al., 2017; Mahone et al., 2018; Puts et al., 2020) and we hope that future studies will be able to examine younger children with autism using this protocol.

CONCLUSION

Our data show that the OFC and the amygdala display abnormal microstructure, that may be associated with the functional abnormalities that have been described in autism, including social emotional processing.

Conventional structural MRI so far has not been able to provide imaging correlates of all the neuropathological and morphological findings in autism. Here we show that with ultrahigh field quantitative MRI, it is possible to see in vivo, at an individual level, alterations of the orbitofrontal cortex and amygdala in autism. Given its small size, this constitutes a proof-of-concept study, and future research will need to extend these findings to a larger group of individuals, evaluate their association with symptomatology, and their specificity among the different neurodevelopmental disorders.

Acknowledgements:

This work was supported by NIH grant R21MH115306 to NH. The authors want to thank Jonathan Polimeni and Caterina Mainero for useful discussions.

Abbreviation list:

Amyg

Amygdala

ASD

Autism Spectrum Disorder

CDC

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

CSF

Cerebrospinal Fluid

DSM

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

FDR

False Discovery Rate

GM

Gray Matter

MRI

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

MP2RAGE

Magnetization-Prepared two inversion-contrast Rapid Gradient Echoes sequence

OFC

Orbitofrontal Cortex

ROI

Region of Interest

T1-rt

T1 Relaxation Time

T1w

T1-weighted

TI

Inversion Time

TIV

Total Intracranial Volume

TR

Repetition Time

WIP

Work-in-progress

WM

White Matter

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest: none

Data sharing: Data collected for this study are deposited at the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Data archive (NDA).

References

  1. Amaral DG, Schumann CM & Nordahl CW (2008) Neuroanatomy of autism. Trends in neurosciences, 31, 137–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baio J, Wiggins L, Christensen DL, Maenner MJ, Daniels J, Warren Z, Kurzius-Spencer M, Zahorodny W, Robinson Rosenberg C, White T, Durkin MS, Imm P, Nikolaou L, Yeargin-Allsopp M, Lee LC, Harrington R, Lopez M, Fitzgerald RT, Hewitt A, Pettygrove S, Constantino JN, Vehorn A, Shenouda J, Hall-Lande J, Van Naarden Braun K & Dowling NF (2018) Prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorder Among Children Aged 8 Years — Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 11 Sites, United States, 2014. CDC MMWR Surveill Summ 2018, 67, 1–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bauman M & Kemper TL (1985) Histoanatomic observations of the brain in early infantile autism. Neurology, 35, 866–874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bonnier G, Fischi-Gomez E, Roche A, Hilbert T, Kober T, Krueger G & Granziera C (2019) Personalized pathology maps to quantify diffuse and focal brain damage. Neuroimage Clin, 21, 101607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bonnier G, Kober T, Schluep M, Du Pasquier R, Krueger G, Meuli R, Granziera C & Roche A (2016) A New Approach for Deep Gray Matter Analysis Using Partial-Volume Estimation. Plos One, 11, e0148631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bonnier G, O'Brian K, Sati P, Fartaria M, Polimeni JR, Roche A, Reich DS, Krueger G & Granziera C (2017) An in vivo analysis of cerebral cortex organization using a bew partial volume method applied to 7T MP@RAGE ISMRM, Honolulu. [Google Scholar]
  7. Buxhoeveden DP, Semendeferi K, Buckwalter J, Schenker N, Switzer R & Courchesne E (2006) Reduced minicolumns in the frontal cortex of patients with autism. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol, 32, 483–491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Casanova MF, Buxhoeveden DP, Switala AE & Roy E (2002) Minicolumnar pathology in autism. Neurology, 58, 428–432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chawarska K, Campbell D, Chen L, Shic F, Klin A & Chang J (2011) Early generalized overgrowth in boys with autism. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 68, 1021–1031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Courchesne E, Carper R & Akshoomoff N (2003) Evidence of brain overgrowth in the first year of life in autism. JAMA, 290, 337–344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Courchesne E, Mouton PR, Calhoun ME, Semendeferi K, Ahrens-Barbeau C, Hallet MJ, Barnes CC & Pierce K (2011) Neuron number and size in prefrontal cortex of children with autism. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, 306, 2001–2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Courchesne E, Pierce K, Schumann CM, Redcay E, Buckwalter JA, Kennedy DP & Morgan J (2007) Mapping early brain development in autism. Neuron, 56, 399–413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Datta R, Sethi V, Ly S, Waldman AT, Narula S, Dewey BE, Sati P, Reich D & Banwell B (2017) 7T MRI Visualization of Cortical Lesions in Adolescents and Young Adults with Pediatric-Onset Multiple Sclerosis. J Neuroimaging, 27, 447–452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Donovan AP & Basson MA (2017) The neuroanatomy of autism - a developmental perspective. Journal of anatomy, 230, 4–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Eickhoff S, Walters NB, Schleicher A, Kril J, Egan GF, Zilles K, Watson JD & Amunts K (2005) High-resolution MRI reflects myeloarchitecture and cytoarchitecture of human cerebral cortex. Hum Brain Mapp, 24, 206–215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fischl B, Salat DH, Busa E, Albert M, Dieterich M, Haselgrove C, van der Kouwe A, Killiany R, Kennedy D, Klaveness S, Montillo A, Makris N, Rosen B & Dale AM (2002) Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron, 33, 341–355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ghashghaei HT, Hilgetag CC & Barbas H (2007) Sequence of information processing for emotions based on the anatomic dialogue between prefrontal cortex and amygdala. Neuroimage, 34, 905–923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Goubran M, Hammond RR, de Ribaupierre S, Burneo JG, Mirsattari S, Steven DA, Parrent AG, Peters TM & Khan AR (2015) Magnetic resonance imaging and histology correlation in the neocortex in temporal lobe epilepsy. Ann Neurol, 77, 237–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hazlett HC, Poe MD, Gerig G, Styner M, Chappell C, Smith RG, Vachet C & Piven J (2011) Early brain overgrowth in autism associated with an increase in cortical surface area before age 2 years. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 68, 467–476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kim MJ, Loucks RA, Palmer AL, Brown AC, Solomon KM, Marchante AN & Whalen PJ (2011) The structural and functional connectivity of the amygdala: From normal emotion to pathological anxiety. Behavioural Brain Research, 223, 403–410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lee H, Heller AS, van Reekum CM, Nelson B & Davidson RJ (2012) Amygdala–prefrontal coupling underlies individual differences in emotion regulation. Neuroimage, 62, 1575–1581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Liu X, Bautista J, Liu E & Zikopoulos B (2020) Imbalance of laminar-specific excitatory and inhibitory circuits of the orbitofrontal cortex in autism. Molecular autism, 11, 83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mahone EM, Puts NA, Edden RAE, Ryan M & Singer HS (2018) GABA and glutamate in children with Tourette syndrome: A (1)H MR spectroscopy study at 7T. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging, 273, 46–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Marques JP, Kober T, Krueger G, van der Zwaag W, Van de Moortele PF & Gruetter R (2010) MP2RAGE, a self bias-field corrected sequence for improved segmentation and T1-mapping at high field. Neuroimage, 49, 1271–1281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mountcastle VB (1997) The columnar organization of the neocortex. Brain, 120 (Pt 4), 701–722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. O'Brien KR, Kober T, Hagmann P, Maeder P, Marques J, Lazeyras F, Krueger G & Roche A (2014) Robust T1-weighted structural brain imaging and morphometry at 7T using MP2RAGE. Plos One, 9, e99676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Opris I & Casanova MF (2014) Prefrontal cortical minicolumn: from executive control to disrupted cognitive processing. Brain, 137, 1863–1875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Palmen SJ, van Engeland H, Hof PR & Schmitz C (2004) Neuropathological findings in autism. Brain, 127, 2572–2583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Paul S, Beucke JC, Kaufmann C, Mersov A, Heinzel S, Kathmann N & Simon D (2019) Amygdala–prefrontal connectivity during appraisal of symptom-related stimuli in obsessive–compulsive disorder. Psychological Medicine, 49, 278–286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Puts NA, Ryan M, Oeltzschner G, Horska A, Edden RAE & Mahone EM (2020) Reduced striatal GABA in unmedicated children with ADHD at 7T. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging, 301, 111082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rolls ET (2007) The representation of information about faces in the temporal and frontal lobes. Neuropsychologia, 45, 124–143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rolls ET & Grabenhorst F (2008) The orbitofrontal cortex and beyond: from affect to decision-making. Prog Neurobiol, 86, 216–244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rosenberg RE, Law JK, Yenokyan G, McGready J, Kaufmann WE & Law PA (2009) Characteristics and concordance of autism spectrum disorders among 277 twin pairs. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 163, 907–914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sanders SJ, He X, Willsey AJ, Ercan-Sencicek AG, Samocha KE, Cicek AE, Murtha MT, Bal VH, Bishop SL, Dong S, Goldberg AP, Jinlu C, Keaney JF 3rd, Klei L, Mandell JD, Moreno-De-Luca D, Poultney CS, Robinson EB, Smith L, Solli-Nowlan T, Su MY, Teran NA, Walker MF, Werling DM, Beaudet AL, Cantor RM, Fombonne E, Geschwind DH, Grice DE, Lord C, Lowe JK, Mane SM, Martin DM, Morrow EM, Talkowski ME, Sutcliffe JS, Walsh CA, Yu TW, Autism Sequencing C, Ledbetter DH, Martin CL, Cook EH, Buxbaum JD, Daly MJ, Devlin B, Roeder K & State MW (2015) Insights into Autism Spectrum Disorder Genomic Architecture and Biology from 71 Risk Loci. Neuron, 87, 1215–1233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Setsompop K, Feinberg DA & Polimeni JR (2016) Rapid brain MRI acquisition techniques at ultra-high fields. NMR Biomed, 29, 1198–1221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sparks BF, Friedman SD, Shaw DW, Aylward EH, Echelard D, Artru AA, Maravilla KR, Giedd JN, Munson J, Dawson G & Dager SR (2002) Brain structural abnormalities in young children with autism spectrum disorder. Neurology, 59, 184–192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Stoner R, Chow ML, Boyle MP, Sunkin SM, Mouton PR, Roy S, Wynshaw-Boris A, Colamarino SA, Lein ES & Courchesne E (2014) Patches of disorganization in the neocortex of children with autism. N Engl J Med, 370, 1209–1219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wegiel J, Kuchna I, Nowicki K, Imaki H, Wegiel J, Marchi E, Ma SY, Chauhan A, Chauhan V, Bobrowicz TW, de Leon M, Louis LA, Cohen IL, London E, Brown WT & Wisniewski T (2010) The neuropathology of autism: defects of neurogenesis and neuronal migration, and dysplastic changes. Acta Neuropathol, 119, 755–770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES