Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2021 Jul 9;48(9):1025–1034. doi: 10.1111/joor.13218

Histopathology of the temporomandibular joint disc: Findings in 30 samples from joints with degenerative disease

Luca Guarda Nardini 1, Maddalena Meneghini 1, Maria Guido 2, Francesca Baciorri 2, Daniele Manfredini 3,
PMCID: PMC8456827  PMID: 34185892

Abstract

Aim

The aim of this study is to show the anatomical and histological features of the displaced temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc in joints with degenerative disease.

Methods

This study was performed on a total of 30 TMJ discs extracted from 22 patients, who underwent surgical discectomy after failure of conservative non‐surgical treatment regimens to control pain and/or limited range of motion. All joints had imaging signs of an anteriorized disc position and degenerative joint disease. Samples of the extracted discs were stored in formalin, cut into 3 micron‐thick sections imbedded in paraffin and processed with hematoxylin‐eosin.

Result

All the samples present irreversible morphologic and histological alterations. The macroscopical evaluation showed that 14 discs were worn and fragmented in several parts, and one disc was perforated. Morphological alterations with deformation and degenerative signs were shown in all discs, which were all severely worn and compromised. Histologically, various alterations were found, such as pre‐fibrous sclerosis with myxoid degeneration and collagen deposits (N = 25), an increase in fibro‐hyaline and fibrous tissues, with loss of elasticity (N = 25), scattered calcifications (N = 15), and synovial inflammation with microvascular proliferation and increased cellularity, presence of lymphocytes, histiocytes and plasma cells (N = 18). After the intervention, all patients reported decreased pain levels and showed improved function at 6 months.

Conclusion

These observations suggest that degenerative joint disease is accompanied by a anteriorized discs featuring abnormal macroscopical and histological changes. From a clinical viewpoint, this may suggest that, when treatment escalation leads to consider TMJ surgery, total discectomy is the most reasonable approach.

Keywords: dentistry, maxillofacial surgery, temporomandibular disorders, temporomandibular joint, TMJ

1. INTRODUCTION

For many years, the clinical relevance of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc position in patients with signs and symptoms of degenerative disease has been the topic of debate.1, 2 In particular, when escalation to surgical treatment is considered, the choice between removal (i.e., discectomy) and repositioning of the articular disc has been challenging.3, 4 TMJ degenerative disease is a progressive condition, which predominantly affects women aged over 40 years, has a chronic, fluctuating but generally favourable course and may be associated with psychosocial impairment.5, 6, 7, 8

At the tissue level, the condition is first characterized by a gradual degeneration of superficial articular cartilage and bone surfaces, leading to sclerosis or ischemia with aseptic necrosis. Osteophytic beaks and bone shape changes can then be found, with an alternation of areas of bone production and osteolysis. Over time, involvement of the subchondral bone can be observed, with or without pseudocysts.9, 10, 11 Clinically, patients complain of crepitus sounds during mandibular movements and possible painful limitation.12, 13

As far as the structure of the articular discs in patients with TMJ arthrosis is concerned, there is a loss of the normal histological pattern. Typically, the physiological disc is characterized by a homogeneous fibrocartilaginous tissue, with isolated or small groups of chondrocytes, separated from each other by a matrix rich in elongated and compact collagen fibers. A degenerated disc may have several types of alterations in its fibrous structure, with possible thickening or lacunae in the collagen matrix, calcifications, fibrosclerosis, and possible vacuolation or mixoid degeneration. The disc itself may lose its integrity, shape and anatomical location, and may interfere with jaw movements (e.g., disc displacement with or without reduction). All the above structural and histological changes, which are typically identifiable in a severe picture of osteoarthrosis, are de facto irreversible and usually accompanied by the presence of inflammatory molecules in the synovial fluid all around the disc structure.14, 15, 16, 17

Despite the favourable natural course and good response to conservative treatments,18, 19, 20 a minority of patients with TMJ internal derangements are unable to manage pain symptoms and restore acceptable jaw function with conservative or minimally invasive therapies. In these cases, possible escalation to surgery should be considered, letting the debate open about the possibility and need to try recapturing or preserving the disc for a smooth jaw function.21, 22

Within these premises, the aim of this study is to show the anatomical and histological features of the displaced temporomandibular joint disc in joints with degenerative disease and to discuss their possible clinical implications for the debate on disc repositioning. Pictorial correlation with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is also described with some example cases.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was performed at the Departments of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and of Pathological Anatomy of the Hospital of Treviso, Italy, with the coooperation of the Tissue Bank of Treviso. It received the approval of the local Ethical Committee. The sample included a total of 30 articular discs extracted from 22 patients, aged between 24 and 68 years (20 females).

Patients underwent discectomy after failure of conservative treatment regimens to restore jaw function and provide pain relief. At the clinical examination, all patients had pain during mandible movements and 15 of them also had severe functional limitation or jaw lock. Imaging showed that all patients had severe joint disease (i.e., Wilkes stage 3 or 4). Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI of the mandibular condyles, T1 and T2 weighted, with mouth closed and at maximum opening, sagittal and coronal cuts)23, 24, 25 showed disc displacement and deformation, along with alterations of the bony heads.

As per routine conservative protocols, all patients were first given instructions for behavioral hygiene as well as passive and active physiotherapy. In 13 individuals, a cycle of five weekly arthrocentesis with hyaluronic acid positioning was performed without any benefits (Sinovial Mini® 0,8% 1 ml 8 mg for unilateral infiltrations or Sinovial® 0.8% 2 ml 16 mg for bilateral infiltrations) in addition to sessions of physiotherapy and behavioral hygiene. Two of the other patients underwent a single arthrocentesis session to try solving a closed lock, without positioning any drug or medication. The other five patients were wearing an oral appliance delivered by a specialist dentist, and no further interventions besides physiotherapy and behavioral hygiene were planned. After up to 6‐to‐12 months of lack of improvement, the patients were planned for TMJ surgery. Human amniotic membrane (HAM) was positioned between the bone surfaces to replace the extracted disc.26, 27, 28 The discs were stored in formalin (4% formaldehyde) and sent to the pathological anatomy department for histological analysis. The samples were cut into 3 micron‐thick sections from the formalin‐preserved, paraffin‐embedded tissues. Then, the samples were processed with hematoxylin‐eosin stain and examined under a microscope.

From a clinical viewpoint, patients were monitored for 6 months after surgery, and re‐evaluated for pain levels and mouth opening values. As per the article’s aim, a descriptive analysis of the extracted discs was provided.

3. RESULTS

The samples of the extracted disc were evaluated both macroscopically and histologically.

The main findings of the macroscopical evaluation concern the presence of 15 hypotrophic and severely worn discs, 14 discs fragmented in several parts, and a perforated disc. Morphological alterations, with deformation and degenerative signs, were shown in all discs, often associated with macroscopically observable bone and condyle alterations.

Hematoxylin‐eosin staining allowed to highlight important histological changes:

  • Histological changes characteristic of an initial arthrosic alteration, with myxoid degeneration and collagen deposits, which usually precedes fibrous sclerosis, were shown in 25 samples;

  • An increase in fibro‐hyaline and fibrous tissues, with loss of elasticity, which indicates a more advanced stage of degeneration, was shown in 25 samples;

  • Synovial inflammation was shown in 18 samples. Inflammation occurred with microvascular proliferation and increased cellularity, presence of lymphocytes, histiocytes and plasma cells;

  • Scattered calcifications were shown in 15 samples;

  • No discs were free from alterations and multiple histological changes were present in all discs.

Features of each sample are described in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Features of each patient and specimen samples included in the study

Sex Age Diagnosis TMJ side Clinical signs (pain, loss of function) MRI Previous treatment TMJ disc substitute Intraoperative notes Anatomopathology of the sample Calcifications Synovitis Fibrous degeneration Other discal alterations or mixoid degeneration
F 68 TMJ severe arthrosis Right Yes Severe condylar resorption with effusion in the synovial cavity. Disc displacement without recapture. Oral appliance Hyaluronic acid Fragmented disc Fibrocartilaginous tissue, with pseudo cystic aspect Yes No Yes Yes
F 45 TMJ severe arthrosis Left Yes Bone or fibrous ankylosis with signs of degeneration Arthrocentesis HAM Morphological alteration of the condyle Fragments of fibrocartilaginous tissue with focal microvascular proliferation Yes Yes Yes Yes
F 57 TMJ severe arthrosis Right Yes Conspicuous effusion in the right articular space, wide central fissure of the disc. disc displacement without recapture. Arthrocentesis HAM Fragmented and macroscopically compromised disc Fragments of fibrous tissue thickened in continuity with the synovial tissue, notes of chronic inflammation No Yes Yes Yes
F 24 localized juvenile arthrosis of the TMJ Right Yes Severe condylar resorption with effusion in the synovial cavity. Wide tissue resorption and inflammatory fluid. Single arthrocentesis Condylar prosthesis Severe bone degeneration Fragments of fibrous tissue thickened in continuity with lymphohistiocytic infiltrate and calcifications Yes Yes Yes Yes
F 67 TMJ severe arthrosis Right Adhesions and bone or fibrous ankylosis HAM Severe condyle alteration Fibrous tissue fragments and signs of chronic disease No No Yes No
F 26 Localized juvenile arthrosis of the TMJ Right Yes Disc displacement without recapture; poor anterior excursion of the condyle, arthosic irregularities of the condyle profile, moderate intra‐articular effusion. Arthrocentesis HAM Fragmented and macroscopically compromised disc Fragments of fiscal fibrous tissue, mixoid degeneration No Yes Yes Yes
F 65 TMJ severe arthrosis Bilateral Yes Degenerative cortical irregularity in both mandibular condyle. Reduced thickness of the disc, especially on the left. Disc displacement on the left. Arthrocentesis HAM Severe bone degeneration Fibrohyaline tissue thickened with chronic inflammatory infiltrate No Yes Yes Yes
F 44 TMJ severe arthrosis Right Yes Disc anterior disclocation without recapture. Dissect intra‐articular effusion Single arthrocentesis HAM Fragmented and compromised disc Fragments of fibrohyaline tissue with notes of microvascular proliferation No Yes Yes Yes
F 51 TMJ severe arthrosis Right Yes Clear signs of tissue degenerations: resorption of the bone cortex, inflammatory fluid, severe condylar resorption on the right. Reduced mandibular excursion. Arthrocentesis HAM Severe bone degeneration Large areas of fibrosclerosis No Yes Yes Yes
F 62 TMJ severe arthrosis Bilateral Yes Left mandibular condyle within the limits, with antero‐medially disc displacement. Arthrosic alterations of the right condyle with anterolateral dislocation. Mild effusion in the upper left joint. Arthrocentesis HAM Discal degenration Fibrous tissue thickened with calcifications and focal chronic inflammation, in the right disc there are scattered calcifications Yes Yes Yes Yes
F 66 TMJ severe arthrosis Right Yes Right articular degeneration with disc displacement Arthrocentesis HAM Disc and bone alterations Chronic inflammation and synovitis Yes Yes Yes Yes
M 47 TMJ severe arthrosis Right Yes Severe degeneration changes affecting the right mandibular condyle and the eminence and the glenoid fossa. The disc is conspicuously degenerated and dislocated anteriorly, partially caught in the opening movement. Inflammatory fluid. Oral appliance HAM Discal degenration Fragments of collagen tissue with focal mixed degeneration Yes Yes Yes Yes
F 59 TMJ severe arthrosis Bilateral Yes Normally conformed condyles. On the right the articular disc is widely altered, in particular at the level of the posterior side. The left disc is also altered. Bilateral dislocated. Arthrocentesis HAM fragmented and compromised disc, bone degeneration Right fragments of compact bone, left compact fibrous tissue with inflammatory infiltrate Yes Yes Yes Yes
F 48 TMJ severe arthrosis Right Yes Right articular degenerative picture with disc displacement behavioral Hygiene and physiotherapy HAM hypotrophic and fragmented disc, bone degeneration Fragments of joint tissue with nonspecific lymphocyte infiltrate No Yes Yes Yes
M 62 TMJ severe arthrosis Left Yes Bilateral ankylosis and degeneration Oral appliance HAM Severe condyle alteration Thickened fibrous tissue including bone spicules Yes No Yes Yes
F 67 TMJ severe arthrosis Left Yes Condylar resorption and disc displacement Arthrocentesis HAM Disc perforation Adipose and striated muscle tissue, in continuity with fibrous tissue thickened with chronic inflammation Yes Yes Yes Yes
F 55 TMJ severe arthrosis Bilateral Yes Disc tissue in the glenoid cavity that displaces the condyle at the bottom Oral appliance HAM Disc and bone alterations On the right: fibrous connective tissue with mixed degeneration, on the left fibroadipose tissue comprising vascular ‐ nervous structures, fragments of salivary glandular parenchyma of the seromucinous type, associated with micro calcifications . Yes (left side) No Yes Yes left
F 60 TMJ severe arthrosis Bilateral Yes Bilateral articular degenerative picture with disc anteriorization Behavioral hygiene and physiotherapy HAM Fragmented Disc On the right, connective tissue with increase in cellularity , on the left , fibrous tissue thickened separately covered by synovium with neoangiogenesis Yes (left side) Yes right Yes No
F 48 TMJ severe arthrosis Bilateral Yes Bilateral condylar resorption with effusion and disc displacement Oral appliance and physiotherapy HAM FRAGMENTED disc Fibrous tissue thickened with overlapping calcifications, sclera ‐ hyaline hyopocellulated tissue partly covered by synovial tissue Yes No No Yes
F 57 TMJ severe arthrosis Bilateral Yes On the right: loss of the hyperintensity of the condyle which is affected by sclerosis. Disc displacement with inflammatory fluid. On the let : arthrosic signs and disc displacement without recapture. Behavioral hygiene physiotherapy and arthrocentesis HAM Morphological alterations of the condyle Bone tissue altered with intertrabecular fibrosis, increased vascular component and chronic inflammation, subsynovial tissue with chronic plasma cell inflammation, thickened fibrous tissue Yes Yes Yes left Yes left
F 63 TMJ severe arthrosis Left Yes Clear signs of tissue degenerations, reduced mandibular excursion Arthrocentesis HAM Disc and bone alterations Fibrosclerosis and chronic inflammation Yes No Yes Yes
F 34 TMJ severe arthrosis Bilateral Yes Severe condylar resorption with presence of inflammatory fluid bilaterally Arthrocentesis HAM Fragmented disc and severe condyle alterations Nonspecific lymphocyte phlogistic infiltrate No No No Yes

The figures show some examples of histological changes and the related MR image, for pictorial purposes: ischemia damage in a hypotrophic disc (Figure 1), bilateral pseudocystic degeneration in broken or several damaged discs (Figure 2), lymphoplasmacellular subsynovial inflammation in a plicated disc (Figure 3), chondroid metaplasia in a perforated disc (Figure 4), myxoid degeneration in a worn and fragmented disc (Figure 5).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Pooled panel. Histological findings show ischemic damage seen as ghost cells; nuclei are barely recognizable (arrow; haematoxylin eosin stain. Original magnification 60x) (A). MRI in the sagittal view shows severe condylar and disc degeneration (B). Surgical specimen of a disc reduced in size and deformed in shape (C)

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Pooled panel of a bilateral sample. Histological findings show in the right side synovial proliferation with inflammation and highly vascularised tissue (haematoxylin‐eosin stain, original magnification 40x) (A). On the left side severe myxoid degeneration is shown as deposition of amorphic basophilic substance, with microcystic degeneration (arrow; haematoxylin‐eosin stain. Original magnification 60x) (B). MRI in the frontal view shows bilateral effusion (C). Surgical specimen show a broken right disc (D) and severely deformed left disc (E)

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Pooled panel. Mild‐moderate lymphoplasmacellular subsynovial inflammation is visible histologically (arrow; haematoxylin eosin stain. Original magnification 60x) (A). MRI in the sagittal view shows a displaced disc and a large amount of inflammatory fluid in the antero‐superior joint compartment (B). Surgical specimen of a plicated and deformed disc (C)

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Pooled panel showing an example case of a disc with marked chondroid metaplasia. Several chondrocytes are evident (arrow; haematoxylin eosin stain. Original magnification 60x) (A). MRI in the sagittal view shows inflammatory fluid as well as severe disc degeneration, with direct contact between the glenoid fossa and the condylar head (B). Perforation of the disc is visible in the surgical specimen (C)

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Pooled panel. Myxoid degeneration is shown as deposition of amorphic basophilic substance (arrow; haematoxylin eosin stain. Original magnification 20x; insert 60x) (A). MRI shows a displaced disc with initial signs of fragmentation (B). Surgical specimen of a fragmented disc (C)

4. DISCUSSION

In the field of TMJ disorders management, escalation to surgery may be needed in selected cases of failure of conservative treatment. In those cases, discectomy offers the possibility of resuming mandibular movement and reducing pain. It can be accompanied by the replacement of the disc with different materials. Complete discectomy was one of the first intra‐articular TMJ procedures that has been described in the history of medicine and dates back to the early years of the past century. The effectiveness of the procedure has been supported since decades ago, but it seems that there is still some debate about the possibility and need to preserve the disc in some cases. Similar concerns exist for the management of disc displacement in the dental office, where the so‐called “Third Pathway” for TMD treatment (i.e., mandible repositioning strategies) seems to be still practiced by some communities of clinicians.2 Thus, this study was performed with the aim to provide an insight into the histological changes of displaced discs in joints with signs of degenerative disease, for possible addition to the discussion on the topic. Some pictorial examples of correlation between the extracted disc and the corresponding imaging findings were also provided for descriptive purposes.

The literature on the predictive factors for positive outcomes of TMJ disc surgery is not conclusive, since case series seem to support the effectiveness of both disc removal and disc repositioning strategies to provide adequate pain relief and improve jaw function in selected patients. An early study with a long‐term follow‐up of nearly 30 years after discectomy, all 15 patients declared themselves pain‐free and did not perceive any problems with mandibular dysfunction.29 In another study with a 30‐year follow‐up, 96% of patients had no pain after surgery and had a maximum interincisal opening greater than or equal to 30 mm.30 Successful outcomes at very long follow up were reported also by another paper.31 Nonetheless, clinical studies involved few patients and were performed by the same few clinicians. In parallel, some authors proposed that displaced TMJ discs might be repositioned or preserved with good outcomes, thus questioning the need to extract the disc during TMJ surgery procedures. Concerning disc repositioning, findings have been reported in some case series and few comparative trials. One of the largest case series described the results in 105 patients with early stage Wiles disease (i.e., stage 1 or 2) followed up for at least 1 year, describing a significant improvement in terms of pain and joint noise reduction.32 After disc repositioning procedures, there was an increase in mouth opening, even if lateral movements were not well preserved, as an inevitable consequence of disc fixation. Patients with a history of long‐lasting disc displacement (i.e., more than 4 years) had a poorer outcome (68% of success) than those with more recent disc displacement (90% of success). Of notice, clinical evaluation of treatment outcomes has been seldom accompanied by postoperative MRI to show the long‐lasting stability of disc repositioning and to associate it with pain relief. To this purpose, a smaller case series of 23 joints showed the persistence or re‐occurrence of disc displacement after their repositioning in 48% of joints.33 An interesting study compared three different surgical techniques: discoplasty, discectomy without disc replacement, discectomy with Teflon‐Proplast disc replacement.34 After 5 years, 94% of patients who underwent discectomy reported decrease of symptoms, whilst the group treated with discoplasty showed a high frequency of recurrences, requiring a second surgery. When the need for re‐intervention emerged in this group, patients underwent discectomy with or without replacement of the disc.

The literature on the management of disc displacement with the use of oral appliances to recapture the disc is equally discordant. In general, studies on repositioning strategies are limited to early papers on the use of anterior repositioning appliances (ARA) to try recapturing the disc and improve symptoms in patients with disc displacement with reduction.35, 36, 37, 38 Some investigations reported that joint sounds can be reduced more with ARA than flat appliances, which is an implicitly obvious finding based on the rationale of using ARA to place the condyle under the displaced disc. However, no literature is available that confirms the long‐term superiority in pain management of any definitive disc repositioning strategies with comparison to conservative approaches in such cases. In addition, the progressive increase in knowledge on the natural course of TMJ clicks has shown that most of them do not progress to become a more serious TMJ disorder.39, 40 Thus, the available evidence suggests that TMJ repositioning has not been proven necessary in treating either simple muscle or joint TMDs, nor for the long‐term treatment of displaced disc conditions (i.e., disc recapture), even after decades of practice.2

Taken together, these data suggest that achieving a position of the disc over the condylar head is not necessarily a fundamental target for treatments aiming at pain relief and functional improvement. Along with the diminished indications for TMJ surgery as a whole, they contributed to a progressive decline of disc repositioning surgeries as well as disc recapturing appliances.

Within these premises, this investigation added some info by evaluating the histological and anatomical features of displaced discs in joints with severe degeneration. Our specimen confirmed that disc displacement is not, as per its definition, just a displacement. Displaced discs feature some macro‐(i.e., anatomical) and microscopic (i.e., histological) changes that were already hypothesised by other authors.41 In particular, there was no disc with a preserved integrity. Generalized worn, fragmentation, jagged edge, calcification, inflammation were quite common findings in this study sample, which may require a future investigation for the possible identification of any specific correlation with MRI and clinical findings, which were out of the purposes of this investigation. The presence of such signs of disc degeneration put into serious doubt the rationale for attempting a repositioning when overall joint integrity is compromised. Thus, from an anatomo‐histological viewpoint it seems rationale to suggest that, when escalation from conservative treatments leads to consider surgery, discectomy should be the reference intervention concerning the approach to TMJ disc. The surgical choice of preserving and repositioning the disc is interesting, but it may be inconsistent with the concept of the physiology of mandibular movements, with the evidence of the irreversibility of disc degeneration itself with disease progression, and with current knowledge that conservative treatments are enough for most patients with early stage disease. Based on that, it is recommended that the clinical usefulness of disc preservation that can be achieved with some elected surgical strategies and technical showcases performed in the early stages of displacement is supported with respect to conservative treatments. On the other hand, from a biological and clinical viewpoint, the procedures aiming to reposition, by surgery or by using appliances, discs that have undergone deformation and degeneration, and that have irreversibly lost their anatomical identity and intrinsic structure, cannot be supported. To this purpose, orthopedic approaches to knee meniscus should be possibly taken as an example of concrete guidelines.

5. CONCLUSIONS

This histological and anatomical study of joints with severe degeneration showed that patients who are candidates for TMJ surgery present a worn or even perforated disc, with jagged edges, sometimes frowned or crushed towards the direction of displacement. These observations suggest that, when TMJ surgery is required in severely degenerated joints, total discectomy appears as the most reasonable approach based on the histopathological findings of TMJ disc alteration.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Nothing to declare

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

L. Guarda‐Nardini performed the surgical interventions and revised the manuscript, M.Meneghini drafted the article, M. Guido supervised histological specimen collection and revised the manuscript, F. Baciorri examined the histological specimen, D. Manfredini conceptualised the research, performed clinical assessments and revised the manuscript

Guarda Nardini L, Meneghini M, Guido M, Baciorri F, Manfredini D. Histopathology of the temporomandibular joint disc: Findings in 30 samples from joints with degenerative disease. J Oral Rehabil. 2021;48:1025–1034. 10.1111/joor.13218

Data Availability Statement

The authors declare that their data are available.

References

  • 1.Naeije M, Te Veldhuis AH, Te Veldhuis EC, Visscher CM, Lobbezoo F. Disc displacement within the human temporomandibular joint: a systematic review of a “noisy annoyance”. J Oral Rehabil. 2013;40:139–158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Greene CS, Manfredini D. Treating temporomandibular disorders in the 21st century: can we finally eliminate the “Third Pathway”? J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2020;34:206–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dolwick MF. Intra‐articular disc displacement: part I: its questionable role in temporomandibular joint pathology. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;53:1069–1072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hall HD. Intra‐articular disc displacement Part II: its significant role in temporomandibular joint pathology. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;53:1073–1079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Manfredini D, Guarda‐Nardini L, Winocur E, Piccotti F, Ahlberg J, Lobbezoo F. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review of axis I epidemiological findings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;112:453–462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.De Leeuw R, Boering G, Van der Kuijl B, Stegenga B. Hard and soft tissue imaging of the temporomandibular joint 30 years after the diagnosis of osteoarthritis and internal deranegement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996;54:1270–1280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Matos MF, Catunda IS, Matos JL, Vasconcelos BC, Learreta JA. Autoimmune temporomandibular arthropathy: diagnostic considerations. Gen Dent. 2018;66(4):56–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Canales GT, Guarda‐Nardini L, Rizzatti‐Barbosa CM, Conti PCR, Manfredini D. Distribution of depression, somatization and pain‐related impairment in patients with chronic temporomandibular disorders. Appl Oral Sci. 2019;7:27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Emshoff R, Brandlmaier I, Schmid C, Bertram S, Radish A. Bone marrow edema of the mandibular condyle related to internal derangement, osteoarthritis and joint effusion. J Oral Maxillofac Sure. 2003;61:35–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Larheim TA, How C, Ottersen MK, Mork‐Knutsen BB, Arvidsson LZ. The role of imaging in the diagnosis of temporomandibular joint pathology. Oral Maxillofac Sure Clin North Am. 2018;30:239–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Stegenga B. Osteoarthrits of the temporomandibular joint organ and its relationship with disc displacement. J Orofac Pain. 2001;15:193–205. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.De Bont LG, Dikkgraaf LC, Stegenga B. Epidemiology and natural progression of articular temporomandibular disorders. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997;83:72–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wiese M, Svensson P, Bakke M, et al. Association between temporomandibular joint symptoms, signs, and clinical diagnosis using the RDC/TMD and radiographic findings in temporomandibular joint tomograms. J Orofac Pain. 2008;22:239–251. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ghassemi Nejad S, Kobezda T, Tar I, Szekanecz Z. Development of temporomandibular joint arthritis: the use of animal models. Joint Bone Spine. 2017;84(2):145–151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Blaunstein DI, Scapino RP. Remodeling of the temporomandibular joint disk and posterior attachment in disk displacement specimens in relation to glycosaminoglycan content. Last Reconstr Sure. 1986;78:756–764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Suzuki T, Segami N, Nishimura M, Sato J, Nojima T. Bradykinin expression in synovial tissues and synovial fluids obtained from patients with internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint. Cranio. 2003;21(4):265–270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kaneyama K, Segami N, Nishimura M, Sato J, Suzuki T, Fujimura K. Osteoclastogenesis inhibitory factor/osteoprotegerin in synovial fluid from patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;32(4):404–407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Manfredini D, Favero L, Cocilovo F, Monici M, Guarda‐Nardini L. A comparison trial between three treatment modalities for the management of myofascial pain of jaw muscles: a preliminary study. Cranio. 2018;36(5):327–331. 10.1080/08869634.2017.1349571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Manfredini D, Rancitelli D, Ferronato G, Guarda‐Nardini L. Arthrocentesis with or without additional drugs in temporomandibular joint inflammatory‐degenerative disease: comparison of six treatment protocols. J Oral Rehabil. 2012;39(4):245–251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Al‐Moraissi EA, Wolford LM, Ellis E, Neff A. The hierarchy of different treatments for arthrogenous temporomandibular disorders: a network meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials. Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2020;48(1):9–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Goncalves JR, Cassano DS, Rezende L, Wolford LM. Disc repositioning. Does it really work? Oral Maxillofac Sure Clin North Am. 2015;27:85–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Renapurkar SK. Discectomy versus disc preservation for internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint. Oral Maxillofac Sure Clin North Am. 2018;30:329–333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Al‐Saleh MA, Alsufyani NA, Saltaji H, Jaremko JL, Major PW. MRI and CBCT image registration of temporomandibular joint: a systematic review. J of Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;45(1):30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kaimal S, Ahmad M, Kang W, Nixdorf D, Schiffman EL. Diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiography and MRI for detecting signs of TMJ degenerative joint disease. Gen Dent. 2018;66(4):34–40. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sano T, Yamamoto M, Okano T, Gokan T, Westesson PL. Common abnormalities in temporomandibular joint imaging. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2004;33(1):16–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Guarda‐Nardini L, Trojan D, Montagner G, Cogliati E, Bendini M, Manfredini D. Amniotic membrane positioning in the surgical treatment of temporomandibular joint degenerative disorder. Case Rep Surg. 2019; 2019:6037191. 10.1155/2019/6037191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Guarda‐Nardini L, Trojan D, Paolin A, Manfredini D. Management of temporomandibular joint degenerative disorders with human amniotic membrane: Hypothesis of action. Med Hypotheses. 2017;104:68–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Akhter M, Ahmed N, Arefin MR, Sobhan MU, Molla MR, Kamal M. Outcome of amniotic membrane as an interpositional arthroplasty of TMJ ankylosis. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;20(1):63–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Eriksson L, Westesson P‐L. Long‐term evaluation of meniscectomy of the temporomandibular joint. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1985;43(4):263–269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Silver CM. Long‐term results of meniscectomy of the temporomandibular joint. Cranio. 1984;3(1):46–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tolvanen M, Oikarinen VJ, Wolf J. A 30‐year follow‐up study of temporomandibular joint meniscectomies: a report on five patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988;26(4):311–316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mehra P, Wolford LM. The Mitek mini anchor for TMJ disc repositioning: surgical technique and results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;30(6):497–503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Westesson PL, Cohen JM, Tallents RH. Magnetic resonance imaging of temporomandibular joint after surgical treatment of internal derangement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1991;71(4):407–411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Trumpy IG, Lyberg T. Lyberg: surgical treatment of internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint: long‐term evaluation of three techniques. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;53(7):740–746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lundh H, Westesson PL, Jisander S, Eriksson L. Disk‐repositioning onlays in the treatment of temporomandibular joint disk displacement: comparison with a flat occlusal splint and with no treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1988;66(2):155–162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Westesson PL, Lundh H. Temporomandibular joint disk displacement: arthrographic and tomographic follow‐up after 6 months' treatment with disk‐repositioning onlays. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1988;66(3):271–278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Okeson JP. Long‐term treatment of disk‐interference disorders of the temporomandibular joint with anterior repositioning occlusal splints. J Prosthet Dent. 1988;60(5):611–616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Anderson GC, Schulte JK, Goodkind RJ. Comparative study of two treatment methods for internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint. J Prosthet Dent. 1985;53(3):392–397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Greene CS. A critique of nonconventional treatment concepts and procedures for TMJ disorders. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1984;5(10):848–51, 854. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zamburlini I, Austin D. Long‐term results of appliance therapies in anterior disk displacement with reduction: a review of the literature. Cranio. 1991;9(4):361–368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Stankovic S, Vlajkovic S, Boskovic M, Radenkovic G, Antic V, Jevremovic D. Morphological and biomechanical features of the temporomandibular joint disc: an overview of recent findings. Arch Oral Biol. 2013;58:1475–1482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The authors declare that their data are available.


Articles from Journal of Oral Rehabilitation are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES