Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2021 Jul 21;60(34):18605–18611. doi: 10.1002/anie.202101689

Photo Click Reaction of Acylsilanes with Indoles

Constantin Stuckhardt 1, Maren Wissing 1, Armido Studer 1,
PMCID: PMC8456837  PMID: 34129264

Abstract

Light‐mediated coupling of acylsilanes with indoles is reported. This photo click reaction occurs under mild conditions (415 nm) mostly in quantitative yield and provides stable silylated N,O‐acetals via light mediated siloxycarbene generation with subsequent indole‐N‐H insertion. We show that this very efficient and fully atom economic coupling process can be applied to conjugate complex systems, as documented by the clicking of carbohydrates with indole alkaloids. The method is also applicable to the conjugation of polymer chains. The linking acetal moiety can be readily cleaved and it is also shown that wavelength‐selective coupling and cleavage with acyl silanes bearing a second photoactive moiety is possible. This is documented by a successful polymerization/depolymerization sequence and by a polymer folding/unfolding process.

Keywords: acyl silanes, click chemistry, indoles, photochemistry, polymers


Visible‐light‐mediated coupling of acylsilanes with indoles is reported. This photoreaction occurs under mild conditions mostly in quantitative yield and provides stable silylated N,O‐acetals. The potential of the method is documented by the successful coupling of carbohydrates with indole alkaloids and by the conjugation of polymers.

graphic file with name ANIE-60-18605-g004.jpg


Photochemistry has recently gained great attention in synthetic chemistry and also in materials science, since light is cheap, allows for spatiotemporal control and can be tuned in terms of its wavelength and intensity, without producing any waste.[1] These features render photochemistry highly valuable in synthesis and light‐mediated processes have also found applications in biological chemistry.[2] Considering materials science, systems bearing photoswitches[3] and photocleavable functional groups[4] have been designed. Moreover, light‐mediated cycloaddition reactions[5] or photopolymerizations[6] have been applied to the construction of novel materials. As the irradiation wavelength can be easily varied, great efforts have been devoted to the development of wavelength‐orthogonal processes,[7] for example in the polymer field,[8] in surface science,[9] in supramolecular chemistry,[10] and even in the context of photoredox catalysis.[11]

Encouraged by our recent studies on the use of acylsilanes for light‐mediated metal nanoparticle generation,[12] we decided to apply such silanes as photolinkers for the mild conjugation (click reaction[13]) of complex systems. Acylsilanes feature an elongated bond between the carbonyl group and the silyl moiety which is cleaved upon visible light irradiation (for acylsilanes with a π‐system in conjugation to the carbonyl group).[14] Thereby, a siloxycarbene is generated, a reactive intermediate whose utility in organic synthesis has been studied. Synthetic applications of acylsilanes include additions to carbon–carbon[15] or carbon–oxygen[16] multiple bonds as well as to alkyl boronates,[17] among others.[18] Insertion of in situ generated siloxycarbenes into hydrogen‐heteroatom (H−X) bonds have also been reported.[19] These H‐X insertions usually occur with high efficiency. Regarding materials science, acylsilanes have only found limited applications, as light‐responsive polymerization initiators[20] and for visible light curing.[21] The ability to generate reactive carbenes which can undergo fast insertion reactions with high selectivity by visible light irradiation, along with their ready access render acylsilanes promising candidates as reactive functionalities in materials chemistry. Moreover, light‐mediated siloxycarbene generation from an acylsilane is a reversible process.[22] The reversible nature of the silyl migration provides the reactive siloxycarbene a formal longer lifetime as compared to the lifetime of carbenes generated by other methods. This fact will be of high importance for X‐H insertions in the area of materials science, where diffusion of the reaction partners may become the limiting factor. Herein we report our first results on the photo click reaction of acylsilanes with indoles.

We first investigated the insertion of the carbene 2 generated from benzoylsilane 1 a upon 415 nm irradiation into H‐X bonds of alcohols and thiols and found, in agreement with the literature,[19] efficient formation of the corresponding O‐silyl‐protected X,O‐acetals 3 (Scheme 1 A). However, the insertion products 3 were susceptible towards hydrolysis to give benzaldehyde (4, see Supporting Information). Upon storage (neat) and also in solution in various solvents tested, decomposition of 3 was observed and therefore these acetal functionalities are not suitable as linking moieties in materials science. Motivated by the mostly quantitative X‐H insertion reaction of 2 we were looking for reaction partners that lead to stable X,O‐acetals and identified the indole moiety as an ideal functionality. Hence, blue light irradiation of a solution of an equimolar amount of acylsilane 1 a and indole in acetonitrile, THF or dichloromethane afforded quantitatively the insertion product 5 a (Scheme 1 B). In contrast to the X,O‐acetals 3, TMS‐protected hemiaminal 5 a was bench stable for at least several weeks and stable in solution in various solvents (in benzene, in THF/D2O at 60 °C, in wet acetonitrile at 80 °C). Slow decomposition was observed in acid‐containing chloroform and in wet DMSO at 100 °C. The improved stability of 5 a can be explained by the lower leaving group ability of the indolide anion (pKa=21 in DMSO[23]) as compared to the alcoholates and thiolates in its congeners 3. Moreover, the indole N‐atom in 5 a shows a low basicity leading to an increased acetal stability towards acid hydrolysis. Our findings are in line with the unusual high stability of pyrrolyl and indolyl carbinols 6 a and 6 b (Scheme 1 C).[24] Besides the indole functionality, a few other RX‐H coupling partners can be used although only the stability of amide‐derived X,O‐acetals can compete with that of acetal 5 a (see Supporting Information for detailed stability studies). Of note, attempted insertion of 2 into the N−H bond of aliphatic and aromatic amines failed, probably due to a competing dark reaction.[25]

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

A) Insertion of siloxycarbenes generated from acylsilanes into H‐X bonds of alcohols and thiols provides unstable protected X,O‐acetals. B) Indole‐derived silylated N,O‐acetals show higher stability, reminiscent of the stability of aminals 6.

We then investigated the scope with respect to the acylsilane reagent in the reaction with indole (Scheme 2). Pleasingly, the photochemical insertion proceeded well when aroylsilanes bearing electron rich (1 b), electron deficient (1 c) or sterically demanding (1 d) aryl moieties were employed and acetals 5 b5 d were obtained in quantitative yields. With the aliphatic acylsilane 1 e, the insertion product 5 e was formed in 64 % yield, which was increased to 76 % for insertion product 5 f bearing a triethylsilyl group. When employing the corresponding acylsilane with a bulky diphenyl(tert‐butyl)silyl group, the corresponding insertion product could not be separated from side products although crude NMR and high resolution mass spectrometry confirmed the formation of the acetal. Interestingly, the X‐H insertion product is formed in quantitative yield when phenol is used as coupling partner for aliphatic acylsilanes (see Supporting Information). Benzoylsilanes 1 g and 1 h bearing larger silyl substituents also engage in the reaction with indole. For the triethylsilyl derivative, N‐H‐insertion proceeded quantitatively (5 g, 99 %), whereas a slightly reduced yield was noted for the triisopropyl congener (5 h, 90 %).

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Variation of the acylsilane. Reaction conditions: acylsilane (0.1 mmol, 1.0 equiv), indole (0.1 mmol, 1.0 equiv), CH3CN (2 mL), three 3 W 415 nm LED′s, room temperature. [a] Irradiation for 7.5 h in MeCN (0.5 mL). [b] Irradiation for 60 min until full consumption of 1 h.

If required, the N,O‐acetal of type 5 can be readily converted under mild conditions to the corresponding aldehyde and indole. For example, treatment of 5 a with CsF in acetonitrile provided quantitatively benzaldehyde and indole. Thus, the indole moiety can be protected and deprotected under mild conditions in excellent yields in both directions. To document the potential of this novel conjugation method, the indole N−H insertion was applied to more complex systems. The indole core is ubiquitous in organic chemistry and is found in various alkaloids and also in drugs, making such compounds viable targets for our method. Along these lines, we decided to apply the N‐H insertion to the conjugation of indole alkaloids with the β‐D‐glucose derivative 8 (for the synthesis of 8, see Supporting Information) and chose gramine (7), which is a simple natural product occurring in maple and barley,[26] as a first substrate. Pleasingly, 415 nm light irradiation of a solution of equimolar amounts of 8 and gramine (7) gave the TMS‐protected hemiaminal 9 in >95 % yield as a 1:1 mixture of diastereoisomers (Scheme 3). Reaction of 8 with the more complex alkaloid pergolide (10), a well‐known dopamine agonist which is dispensed to patients with Parkinson's disease,[27] under similar conditions worked equally well and the targeted conjugate 11 was formed in excellent yield. Deconjugation was documented on 9 by treatment with CsF in acetonitrile to give the glucose derivative 8′ in 96 % yield along with gramine (7, 86 %). The slightly reduced yield of recovered 7 was due to product loss during isolation.

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Light‐induced coupling of glucose derivative 8 with indole alkaloids.

Having established that the light‐mediated coupling works efficiently on low molecular weight compounds, we further applied the conjugation method to polymers. To this end, various polymeric acylsilanes were prepared by living radical polymerization (RAFT, see Supporting Information). Irradiation of the high molecular weight homopolymer 12 (M n≈23.5 kg mol−1) in dry CH2Cl2 in the presence of indole provided the poly‐acetal 13 (Mn ≈24.7 kg mol−1, Scheme 4 A). Based on NMR analysis, a quantitative transformation of the acylsilane moieties into the corresponding acetal functionalities was achieved.[28] Moreover, the method could be applied to the functionalization of statistical copolymers. The methyl acrylate containing copolymer 14 a (M n≈7.3 kg mol−1) and the copolymer 14 b (M n≈4.8 kg mol−1) bearing basic tertiary amino groups in their side chains were both capped with indole quantitatively (15 a, 15 b, Scheme 4 B). We also found quantitative coupling with an amide functionality by capping the benzyl acrylate containing copolymer 14 c (M n≈20.1 kg mol−1) with N‐methylbenzamide to give polymer 15 c. Moreover, the method was also applied to chemically modify the copolymer 16 (M n≈11.8 kg mol−1) containing additionally orthogonally addressable C≡C triple bonds. Thus, 415 nm irradiation of 16 in the presence of indole led to chemoselective functionalization of the acylsilyl side chains (17, Scheme 4 C). Alternatively, the alkyne side chains could be functionalized selectively via cycloaddition with benzyl azide using CuBr/pentamethyldiethylenetriamine (PMDETA) as catalyst system to give the polymeric triazole 18. Importantly, the acylsilane moiety remained unreacted and based on proton NMR analysis, both orthogonal transformations occurred in quantitative yields. Moreover, iterative double functionalization of copolymer 16 was achieved by applying both click reactions subsequently. This was documented by performing the cycloaddition reaction on polymer 17 to give 19, again in quantitative yield based on proton NMR analysis. Due to poor solubility of functionalized copolymer 18, applying our photo‐click reaction to form doubly functionalized polymer 19 via the alternative route was not implemented.

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

Indole/acylsilane conjugation in polymeric systems.

Next, we applied the click reaction to light‐induced polymer network formation. A concentrated solution of polymeric acylsilane 12 (M n≈23.5 kg mol−1) and poly 5‐vinylindole 20 (M n≈1.7 kg mol−1) in acetonitrile was charged onto a rheometer and irradiated with a blue LED (Scheme 5). The reaction progress was monitored by measuring the changes in viscosity η during continuous shearing of the sample (Figure 1). As expected, a strong increase in the viscosity was observed, after irradiation for 120 seconds. After 10 min, the sample solidified.

Scheme 5.

Scheme 5

Polymer network formation via light‐mediated crosslinking of polymeric acylsilane 12 and polyindole 20.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Polymer network formation monitored via changes in viscosity of the reaction solution.

Apart from side‐chain functionalization, the method can also be applied to block copolymer synthesis by reacting polymers containing single indole or acylsilyl moieties at the terminus. Poly(methyl methacrylate) 21 (M n≈1.5 kg mol−1) bearing an acyl silane entity at the terminus was successfully conjugated with the bis‐indolyl‐polyethylene glycol (PEG) 22 (M n≈1.4 kg mol−1) to provide the ABA triblock copolymer 23 (Scheme 6 A). The successful conjugation of the two short polymers was confirmed by NMR spectroscopy (see Supporting Information) and GPC analysis (Figure 2). Furthermore, we demonstrated cleavage of the triblock copolymer 23 by treatment with CsF in THF/water to reform 22 along with the poly(methyl methacrylate) 21′. The ligation method is also applicable to link high molecular weight polymers. Hence, acylsilyl‐terminated poly(methyl methacrylate) 24 (M n≈58.2 kg mol−1) and indole‐terminated polystyrene 25 (M n≈54.2 kg mol−1) were efficiently coupled to give the diblock copolymer 26 (Scheme 6 B). Furthermore, we demonstrated quantitative coupling of two narrow dispersity polymethylacrylates terminated with an indole (27, M n=52.7 kg mol−1) and with an acylsilyl group (28, M n=52.0 kg mol−1) to give polymer 29 (M n=103 kg mol−1, Scheme 6 C).

Scheme 6.

Scheme 6

Block copolymer synthesis.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

GPC traces of A) olymer 21 (black), triblock copolymer 23 (red) and cleaved polymer 21′ (blue), B) poly(methyl methacrylate) 24 (red), polystyrene 25 (black) and block copolymer 26 (blue), C) polymer 27 (black), 28 (red), 29 (blue).

Next, we aimed for the application of the method to λ‐orthogonal systems which can engage in wavelength‐controlled processes. Acylsilane 30 (see Supporting Information) bearing an additional orthogonally UV‐photoadressable α‐alkoxy ketone moiety and the indole functionality was designed. This monomer should allow for a wavelength‐controlled polymerization and depolymerization sequence using light as the only reagent, as sketched at the top of Scheme 7. Polymerization was conducted upon 415 nm irradiation of 30 via multiple siloxycarbene/N‐H insertions to give polyaminal 31, as analyzed using GPC and NMR methods. The polymers obtained were terminated by an aldehyde moiety which was formed by reaction of the siloxycarbene intermediate with trace amounts of water. Integration of the aldehyde proton against the benzylic CH2 protons showed a ratio of 1:44, which allows to estimate an average chain length of 22 monomers for 31 (M n≈14.6 kg mol−1). Surprisingly, this is in good agreement with the polymer's GPC data revealing a M n of around 13.8 kg mol−1 using poly(methyl methacrylate) as the standard. The polymer was also investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) which allowed to determine its glass transition as T g=55 °C. Depolymerization could be achieved by UV‐light irradiation (254 nm) of 31 to provide carboxylic acid 32. The UV‐induced cleavage of such an α‐alkoxy ketone moiety to give a benzofuran and a carboxylic acid functionality is an established photoreaction.[29] However, the N,O‐acetal moiety of compound 32 that also contains an acid functionality was found to be instable under the reaction conditions and acid‐induced acetal cleavage eventually provided the fragments 33 and 34 as the final products, as confirmed by NMR analysis (see Supporting Information).

Scheme 7.

Scheme 7

Wavelength‐controlled crosslinking and crosslinker cleavage in single polymer chains.

Finally, we could show that such λ‐orthogonal photochemistry can be used to control intramolecular crosslinking and crosslinker cleavage in polymer chains, as depicted in Scheme 8. To this end, linear copolymer 14 c was prepared by living radical polymerization of benzyl acrylate and acylsilane monomers. Irradiation of a dilute solution of polymer 14 c in the presence of photocleavable crosslinker 35 (c (35) ≈1.8⋅10−4 M) with blue light led to folding of single polymer strands by multiple intramolecular crosslinking events (see 36).[30] Thereby, single chain polymer nanoparticles 36 were formed, showing globular shape as compared to the linear precursor polymer 14 c. The altered shape of the nanoparticles led to longer retention times in GPC analysis (Figure 3), which is characteristic for folded polymers with increased compactness. Notably, this effect outcompetes the significant gain in the polymer's actual molecular weight due to incorporation of the crosslinkers. The nanoparticle can be retransformed into linear polymer chains by UV‐light mediated cleavage of the α‐alkoxy ketone crosslinkers. Hence, 254 nm irradiation of a solution of cross‐linked polymer 36 in THF gave the polymer 37 bearing N,O‐acetal functionalities at their side chains. As expected, this unfolding process to yield linear polymer chains caused a decrease in retention time of the GPC trace (Figure 3, blue line).[31] Since the observed changes in retention time were minimal, as it is always the case when single chain collapse is monitored, we mimicked and reproduced this process by using resorcinol as a commercial crosslinker (see SI). Again, light‐mediated single chain collapse led to smaller apparent molecular weights, as determined by GPC. Cleavage of the crosslinkers was achieved by acidic hydrolysis, again causing a shift of the GPC traces towards higher molecular weights.

Scheme 8.

Scheme 8

Wavelength‐controlled folding and unfolding of a linear polymer.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Single chain crosslinking and crosslinker cleavage monitored by GPC.

In summary, we have introduced the visible‐light‐mediated coupling between acylsilanes and indole derivatives as a valuable photoclick reaction for conjugation of small molecules and macromolecules. The mild photoreaction is highly efficient, fast and selective, giving rise to robust and thermally stable N,O‐acetal connections which do not hydrolyze in neutral media in various solvents. The method's applicability to a variety of systems has been documented by quantitative coupling of a sugar derivative to two indole alkaloids and by the conjugation, crosslinking and folding of polymers. Importantly, the silyloxy acetal moiety can be readily cleaved under mild conditions, rendering acylsilanes promising novel indole N‐protecting groups. Notably, photochemical X‐H insertion leading to stable products also works on amides and phenols as the coupling partners of the acyl silanes. Moreover, we have shown that a combination of acylsilane and an additional UV‐cleavable moiety can be used for wavelength‐selective polymerization/depolymerization with light as the only “reagent”. We are confident that the herein introduced acylsilane/indole photo click reaction will find many applications in organic synthesis and also in the field of materials science.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supporting information

As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.

Supporting Information

Acknowledgements

We thank the Verband der Chemischen Industrie (fellowship to C.S.) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG (SFB858) for their support. We thank Benedikt Nowak and Bart Jan Ravoo for help and access to the rheometer. We thank Elke Hagemeier for measuring DSC. Open access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

C. Stuckhardt, M. Wissing, A. Studer, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 18605.

References

  • 1.Brieke C., Rohrbach F., Gottschalk A., Mayer G., Heckel A., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 8446–8476; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2012, 124, 8572–8604. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hüll K., Morstein J., Trauner D., Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 10710–10747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. 
  • 3a.Göstl R., Senf A., Hecht S., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 1982–1996; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3b.Russew M., Hecht S., Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 3348–3360; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3c.Nie H., Self J. L., Kuenstler A. S., Hayward R. C., Read de Alaniz J., Adv. Opt. Mater. 2019, 1900224. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hansen M. J., Velema W. A., Lerch M. M., Szymanski W., Feringa B. L., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 3358–3377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. 
  • 5a.Tuten B. T., Wiedbrauk S., Barner-Kowollik C., Prog. Polym. Sci. 2020, 100, 101183; [Google Scholar]
  • 5b.Junkers T., Eur. Polym. J. 2015, 51, 273–280; [Google Scholar]; Marschner D. E., Frisch H., Offenloch J. T., Tuten B. T., Becer C. R., Walther A., Goldmann A., Macromolecules 2018, 51, 3802–3807; [Google Scholar]
  • 5c.Menzel J. P., Feist F., Tuten B., Weil T., Blinco J. P., Barner-Kowollik C., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 7470–7474; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2019, 131, 7548–7552; [Google Scholar]
  • 5d.Hock H. A., Blasco E., Du Prez F. E., Barner-Kowollik C., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 12329–12337; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5e.Truong V. X., Li F., Forsythe J. S., ACS Macro Lett. 2017, 6, 657–662; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5f.Ortiz-Rojano L., Rojas-Martín J., Rodríguez-Diaz C., Carreño M. C., Ribagorda M., Chem. Eur. J. 2019, 25, 15050–15054; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5g.Mueller J. O., Schmidt F. G., Blinco J. P., Barner-Kowollik C., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 10284–10288; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2015, 127, 10423–10427; [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem. 2015, 127, 10423–10427. [Google Scholar]
  • 6. 
  • 6a.Theriot J. C., Lim C.-H., Yang H., Ryan M. D., Musgrave C. B., Miyake G. M., Science 2016, 352, 1082–1086; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6b.Eibel A., Fast D. E., Sattelkow J., Zalibera M., Wang J., Huber A., Müller G., Neshchadin D., Dietliker K., Plank H., Grützmacher H., Gescheidt G., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 14306–14309; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2017, 129, 14496–14499; [Google Scholar]
  • 6c.Chen M., Zhong M., Johnson J. A., Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 10167–10211; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6d.Corrigan N., Yeow J., Judzewitsch P., Xu J., Boyer C., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 5170–5189; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2019, 131, 5224–5243; [Google Scholar]
  • 6e.Konkolewicz D., Schröder K., Buback J., Bernhard S., Matyjaszewski K., ACS Macro Lett. 2012, 1, 1219–1223; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6f.Anastasaki A., Nikolaou V., Brandford-Adams F., Nurumbetov G., Zhang Q., Clarkson G. J., Fox D. J., Wilson P., Kempe K., Haddleton D. M., Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 5626–5629; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6g.Michaudel Q., Kottisch V., Fors B. P., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 9670–9679; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2017, 129, 9798–9808; [Google Scholar]
  • 6h.Treat N. J., Sprafke H., Kramer J. W., Clark P. G., Barton B. E., Read de Alaniz J., Fors B. P., Hawker C. J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 16096–16101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. 
  • 7a.Protti S., Ravelli D., Fagnoni M., Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2019, 18, 2094–2101; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7b.Corrigan N., Boyer C., ACS Macro Lett. 2019, 8, 812–818; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7c.Corrigan N., Ciftci M., Jung K., Boyer C., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 1748–1781; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2021, 133, 1774–1809; [Google Scholar]
  • 7d.Kottisch V., Michaudel Q., Fors B. P., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 10665–10668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. 
  • 8a.Shanmugam S., Xu J., Boyer C., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 9174–9185; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8b.Xu J., Shanmugam S., Fu C., Aguey-Zinsou K., Boyer C., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 3094–3106; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8c.Frisch H., Kodura D., Bloesser F. R., Michalek L., Barner-Kowollik C., Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2020, 41, 1900414; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8d.Frisch H., Bloesser F. R., Barner-Kowollik C., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 3604–3609; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2019, 131, 3642–3648; [Google Scholar]
  • 8e.Frisch H., Mundsinger K., Poad B. L. J., Blanksby S. J., Barner-Kowollik C., Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 2834–2842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.San Miguel V., Bochet C. G., del Campo A., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 5380–5388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Xu S., Yeow J., Boyer C., ACS Macro Lett. 2018, 7, 1376–1382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ghosh I., König B., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 7676–7679; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2016, 128, 7806–7810. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mäsing F., Nüsse H., Klingauf J., Studer A., Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 752–755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kolb H. C., Finn M. G., Sharpless B., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2004–2021; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 2056–2075. [Google Scholar]
  • 14. 
  • 14a.Zhang H.-J., Priebbenow D. L., Bolm C., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 8540–8471; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14b.Priebbenow D. L., Adv. Synth. Catal. 2020, 362, 1927–1946. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Brook A. G., Kucera H. W., Pearce R., Can. J. Chem. 1971, 49, 1618–1621; [Google Scholar]; Hammaecher C., Portella C., Chem. Commun. 2008, 5833–5835; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Becker P., Priebbenow D. L., Zhang H., Pirwerdjan R., Bolm C., J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 814–817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. 
  • 16a.Brook A. G., Pearce R., Pierce J. B., Can. J. Chem. 1971, 49, 1622–1628; [Google Scholar]
  • 16b.Ishida K., Yamazaki H., Hagiwara C., Abe M., Kusama H., Chem. Eur. J. 2019, 25, 1249–1253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ito K., Tamashima H., Iwasawa N., Kusama H., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 3716–3719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. 
  • 18a.Becker P., Pirwerdjan R., Bolm C., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 15493–15496; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2015, 127, 15713–15716; [Google Scholar]
  • 18b.Becker P., Priebbenow D. L., Pirwerdjan R., Bolm C., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 269–271; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2014, 126, 273–275; [Google Scholar]
  • 18c.Zhang H., Becker P., Huang H., Pirwerdjan R., Pan F., Bolm C., Adv. Synth. Catal. 2012, 354, 2157–2161; [Google Scholar]
  • 18d.Shen Z., Dong V. M., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 784–786; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2009, 121, 798–800. [Google Scholar]
  • 19. 
  • 19a.Brook A. G., Duff J. M., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 454–455; [Google Scholar]
  • 19b.Duff J. M., Brook A. G., Can. J. Chem. 1973, 51, 2869–2883; [Google Scholar]
  • 19c.Watanabe H., Kogure T., Nagai Y., J. Organomet. Chem. 1972, 43, 285–291; [Google Scholar]
  • 19d.Ye J.-H., Quach L., Paulisch T., Glorius F., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 16227–16231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. 
  • 20a.Graff B., Klee J. E., Fik C., Maier M., Fouassier J. P., Lalevée J., Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2017, 38, 1600470; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20b.Bouzrati-Zerelli M., Kirschner J., Fik C., Maier M., Dietlin C., Morlet-Savary F., Fouassier J. P., Becht J.-M., Klee J. E., Lalevée J., Macromolecules Macromol. 2017, 50, 6911–6923. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mitterbauer M., Haas M., Stüger H., Moszner N., Liska R., Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2017, 302, 1600536. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Loncke P. G., Peslherbe G. H., J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108, 4694–4706. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bordwell F. G., Drucker G. E., Fried H. E., J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 632–635. [Google Scholar]
  • 24. 
  • 24a.Hoshino T., Chem. Ber. 1952, 85, 858–860; [Google Scholar]
  • 24b.Brandänge S., Rodriguez B., Acta Chem. Scand. 1987, B41, 740–744; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24c.Evans D. A., Borg G., Scheidt K. A., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 3188–3191; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 3320–3323. Moreover, pyrrolyl carbinols have found applications in the field of total synthesis: [Google Scholar]
  • 24d.Scott M. S., Luckhurst C. A., Dixon D. J., Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 5813–5816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Brook A. G., Yu Z., Organometallics 2000, 19, 1859–1863. [Google Scholar]
  • 26. 
  • 26a.O'Donovan D., Leete E., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85, 461–463; [Google Scholar]
  • 26b.Pachter I. J., Zacharias D. E., Ribeiro O., J. Org. Chem. 1959, 24, 1285–1287. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lemberger L., Crabtree R. E., Science 1979, 205, 1151–1153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.A control experiment on small molecules showed that within the short irradiation time necessary for the click reaction, photolysis of the trithiocarbonate functionality of the polymer does not occur, see Supporting Information.
  • 29.Sheehan J. C., Wilson R. M., Oxford A. W., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93, 7222–7228. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.In general, intra-chain crosslinking dominates over intermolecular chain ligation at concentrations <1 mg/ mL. The crosslinker concentration in the herein reported experiment is 10 times lower than this established concentration limit. See also:
  • 30a.Lyon C. K., Prasher A., Hanlon A. M., Tuten B. T., Tooley C. A., Frank P. G., Berda E. B., Polym. Chem. 2015, 6, 181–197; [Google Scholar]
  • 30b.Perez-Baena I., Asenjo-Sanz I., Arbe A., Morena A. J., Lo Verso F., Colmenero J., Pomposo J. A., Macromolecules 2014, 47, 8270–8280; [Google Scholar]
  • 30c.Mavila S., Eivgi O., Berkovich I., Lemcoff N. G., Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 878–961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.The N,O-acetal groups in the polymer's side chain of 34 are likely not stable in the presence of the formed acid functionality. Owing to the small amount of initially added crosslinker, we were not able to reisolate any small molecular weight products derived from the acetal cleavage (indole-2-carboxylic acid and an indole-2-carboxylic acid ester). GPC analysis did not allow to measure the degree of acetal hydrolysis in 34.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.

Supporting Information


Articles from Angewandte Chemie (International Ed. in English) are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES