Abstract
We present here an evidence-based review of the utility, timing, and indications for laboratory test use in the domains of inflammation, cardiology, hematology, nephrology and co-infection for clinicians managing the care of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Levels of IL-6, CRP, absolute lymphocyte count, neutrophils and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio obtained upon admission may help predict the severity of COVID-19. Elevated LDH, ferritin, AST, and d-dimer are associated with severe illness and mortality. Elevated cardiac troponin at hospital admission can alert clinicians to patients at risk for cardiac complications. Elevated proBNP may help distinguish a cardiac complication from noncardiac etiologies. Evaluation for co-infection is typically unnecessary in nonsevere cases but is essential in severe COVID-19, intensive care unit patients, and immunocompromised patients.
Keywords: : CRP, COVID-19, d-dimer, high value care, IL-6, inpatient, laboratory test, labs, SARS-CoV-2, troponin
Lay abstract
Doctors managing the complex care of individuals with COVID-19 need timely evidence to guide which lab tests to send to predict outcomes and prevent and treat COVID-19 complications involving the heart, blood clots, the kidney, and other infections that occur during the hospital course. Several lab tests such as IL-6, CRP and white blood cell subset counts may help predict the severity of COVID-19 during the patient’s hospital course if obtained when the patient first presents to the hospital. Other tests such as LDH, ferritin and AST are also associated with severe illness and mortality but have less evidence for their utility beyond IL-6, CRP and other tests. A test related to blood coagulation, d-dimer, is also associated with COVID-19 severity, and it may be used if the patient is suspected of having a blood clot. Two heart biomarkers – cardiac troponin and proBNP – may help doctors diagnose and manage heart-related complications of COVID-19. Patients in the hospital with COVID-19 may be susceptible to other infections, but testing for these is most useful in patients with severe disease, such as those in the intensive care unit. Specific recommendations for testing for viral, bacterial and fungal infections are presented here. The judicious use of laboratory testing can help identify patients at high risk for severe or critical COVID-19 and aid in prevention, diagnosis and treatment of common COVID-19 complications.
As thousands of people with COVID-19 are newly hospitalized each day [1], clinicians around the world are rapidly learning how to manage this complex disease. Several laboratory tests may help clinicians predict outcomes and prevent or diagnose complications in patients with COVID-19. Here we provide an evidence-based review of appropriate laboratory testing in hospitalized, symptomatic COVID-19 patients for the practicing clinician.
Inflammatory markers
IL-6
A wide range of cytokines and chemokines are involved in the pathophysiology of COVID-19, but several studies reviewed in this section demonstrate that IL-6 is perhaps one of the most useful biomarkers in predicting COVID-19 severity during hospitalization and can also distinguish severe COVID-19 from severe influenza infection [2–4]. IL-6 is a pro-inflammatory cytokine primarily released by monocytes, macrophages and dendritic cells in response to pathogens, cellular damage, or signaling from other pro-inflammatory cytokines [5]. IL-6 stimulation of hepatocytes leads to reduced production of albumin and cytochrome p450 and rapid release of hematopoiesis factors and acute phase proteins such as CRP [6]. Other effects of IL-6 include differentiation of B cells, naive CD4+ T cells, and increased vascular permeability [6]. The actions of IL-6 are mediated through binding to soluble or membrane-bound IL-6 receptors, the latter of which is the target of tocilizumab and sarilumab [7]. Tocilizumab and sarilumab are IL-6 receptor inhibitors approved to treat inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and to treat cytokine release syndrome following CAR T-cell therapy of hematologic cancers. Tocilizumab received emergency use authorization on 24 June 2021, for hospitalized COVID-19 patients ages 2 years and up who are receiving systemic corticosteroids and require supplemental oxygen, noninvasive or invasive mechanical ventilation, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [8].
IL-6 is significantly higher on admission in COVID-19 patients who eventually experience severe or critical illness than in those with mild or moderate disease [2,9–12]. The risk of clinical deterioration within 3 days of admission is correlated with increasingly higher admission IL-6 levels [13]. In addition, IL-6 levels are significantly higher in COVID-19 nonsurvivors than in survivors [2,14–16].
Limitations of broad IL-6 use include the current lack of assay standardization and variability by laboratory or institution. Therefore, it is challenging to use a strict cutoff to help prognosticate severity of disease in COVID-19. Two studies suggest that COVID-19 patients with a serum IL-6 >80 pg/ml are at high risk of respiratory failure and death [15–17]. The longer turnaround time of IL-6 testing also may limit its clinical utility. Given these limitations and lack of availability in certain settings, other inflammatory markers such as CRP and ferritin may be more useful in certain settings than IL-6.
CRP
Serum levels of the acute-phase inflammatory protein, CRP, rise dramatically with infection, inflammation, or tissue injury. CRP is released primarily from hepatocytes, with IL-6 being the main inducer of CRP gene expression [18]. CRP activates the complement pathway and enhances phagocytosis of pathogens and apoptotic cells [18]. CRP production may be impaired in liver failure [19].
Most hospitalized patients with COVID-19 have elevated CRP levels [20,21]. However, extreme elevations of CRP are strongly associated with critical illness and mortality in COVID-19 [22,23]. In a prospective cohort study of 5279 patients in New York with COVID-19, a CRP >200 mg/l had a stronger association with critical illness than age or comorbidities (OR: 5.1; 95% CI 2.8 to 9.2) [24]. Like IL-6, a CRP level obtained on admission can be used as an independent predictor of COVID-19 disease severity during the patient’s hospital course [25]. In one study, COVID-19 patients with an admission CRP ≥65.1 mg/l were more likely to require high-flow oxygen, noninvasive or invasive mechanical ventilation, continuous renal replacement therapy or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (OR: 8.9; 95% CI 1.0–74.2) [26]. A recent meta-analysis of 32 studies and >10,000 COVID-19 patients found that CRP was independently associated with higher risk of composite severe COVID-19 outcome (pooled-OR: 4.37; 95% CI 3.37–5.68) [27].
Other laboratory tests associated with severe COVID-19
Ferritin
Ferritin plays a central role in iron homeostasis and, like CRP, is an acute-phase reactant; its levels generally correlate with the degree of pathologic inflammation. Macrophages are likely a major source of ferritin release [28]. Extreme hyperferritinemia is a hallmark of secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis or macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), a life-threatening hyperinflammatory disorder that can be triggered by infection. Severe COVID-19 may be complicated by MAS in some patients. In an intensive immunologic analysis of 28 COVID-19 patients with severe respiratory failure, seven (25%) had ferritin levels >4420 ng/ml and were classified as having MAS [29].
Ferritin is significantly elevated in severe cases of COVID-19 [14,30–34]. In one study of 229 COVID-19 patients, a ferritin level >750 ng/ml was an independent predictor of death (OR: 3.3; 95% CI 1.3–8.6) [35]. Another study of 252 COVID-19 patients found that those with a ferritin level ≥450 ng/ml were more likely to die (OR: 5.1; 95% CI 2.6–10.0). Two meta-analyses demonstrated a significant difference in ferritin levels between COVID-19 survivors and nonsurvivors as well as between severe COVID-19 and nonsevere COVID-19 [33,34].
Lactate dehydrogenase
LDH is an enzyme present in nearly all cells; elevated levels in the bloodstream signify tissue damage. Elevated LDH is associated with an increased risk of severe COVID-19 and mortality in COVID-19 [27,36,37]. Conversely, LDH levels <425 U/l are associated with lower odds of intensive care unit (ICU) admission [37].
White blood cell count & absolute lymphocyte count
Most patients with COVID-19 have a white blood cell count (WBC) in the normal range at presentation [20]. Severely ill COVID-19 patients may have a higher WBC than moderately sick patients. However, WBCs in severe COVID-19 patients are still significantly lower than in bacterial pneumonia [29]. Individuals with severe COVID-19 have a greater absolute neutrophil count, higher neutrophil frequency and higher neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) [38–41]. Indeed, elevated neutrophil count and NLR, among other laboratory parameters, are predictors of severe disease [42,43]. Additionally, the trajectory of the neutrophil count and NLR early in the course of hospitalization also predict severity and mortality [44,45].
Approximately 60–90% of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 have lymphopenia at the time of presentation [20,21]. Lymphopenia, and specifically low CD4+ and CD8+ T cell counts, is associated with eventual development of critical illness and death [46,47]. The correlation of lymphopenia and severe COVID-19 and mortality has been supported by several meta-analyses [38,48]. Flow cytometry analyses of lymphocyte subsets in patients with COVID-19 demonstrated that besides T cells, B cells and NK cells were also diminished in severe COVID-19 [49]. Thus, WBC, neutrophil count and absolute lymphocyte count are associated with either COVID-19 diagnosis or severe outcomes.
Transaminases & serum albumin
A vast majority of available reports on COVID-19 show only moderately increased ALT and AST levels [20,21] and moderately decreased serum albumin levels [47,50,51]. Additionally, a meta-analysis of 23 studies determined that mean liver function test values including ALT, AST and alkaline phosphatase, were normal, suggesting that most COVID-19 inpatients do not have liver function test elevation [52]. However, several reports suggest that elevated levels of ALT or AST are significantly higher in severe cases [47] and are associated with death [53,54], severe respiratory failure [29], and transfer to the ICU [53]. This association was evaluated by a meta-analysis with mostly hospitalized participants (n = 20,724) [55]. While heterogeneity between studies was high, there was an association between in-hospital mortality and elevated ALT (OR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.1–2.0), AST (OR: 4.4; 95% CI: 2.7–7.2); and total bilirubin (OR: 7.8; 95% CI: 2.3–26.4) [55]. Of these, AST elevation precedes that of the others and has the strongest association with mortality [56]. While liver function tests abnormalities are generally only modest, they are associated with severe COVID-19 outcomes.
Laboratory testing in treatment & prevention of venous thromboembolic disease
D-dimer
SARS-CoV-2 infection results in a profound inflammatory prothrombotic state associated with a high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) [57]. Common laboratory abnormalities include elevated d-dimer, fibrinogen, factor VIII, von Willebrand factor and thrombocytosis [58]. Among these, d-dimer is the biomarker most closely associated with risk of VTE. Guidance statements from the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis and from the American College of Chest Physicians, among other organizations, endorse VTE thromboprophylaxis in all hospitalized COVID-19 patients with acceptable bleeding risk [59,60].
Elevated d-dimer levels are associated with increased risk of severe COVID-19, VTE and mortality [61–63]. In a prospective ultrasound study of consecutive non-ICU patients, a d-dimer of <1570 ng/ml had a negative predictive value of 97.5% for VTE [64]. The American Society of Hematology endorses not ordering radiology studies for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism if the d-dimer is normal in the context of low pretest probability in COVID-19 inpatients [8].
Anti-Xa
COVID-19 is associated with heparin resistance [65,66]. This may be due to elevated levels of fibrinogen and other acute-phase reactants in COVID-19-associated inflammation, many of which bind heparin and antagonize its anticoagulant effects [67]. Given this, some clinicians monitor unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin anti-Xa levels for those receiving therapeutic anticoagulation.
Markers of cardiac injury & wall stress
COVID-19 carries significant cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and can manifest with an acute cardiovascular syndrome [68].
Troponin
Cardiac troponin (cTn), a highly specific test for myocardial injury, can be measured by conventional or high sensitivity assays. In addition to its traditional role in indicating a Type 1 or Type 2 myocardial infarction, which both can occur in COVID-19, troponin elevation can reflect pre-existing cardiovascular disease (CVD) or accompany a number of other COVID-19 cardiovascular presentations including viral myocarditis, indirect cardiac injury from inflammation, stress cardiomyopathy, heart failure, pulmonary embolism or arrhythmias [69,70].
cTn is elevated in about 16% of hospitalized COVID-19 patients (95% CI: 9–27%) [71]. Elevated troponin in COVID-19 is detected more often in patients with a history of chronic CVD [72]. Importantly, studies and meta-analyses including large (>1000) numbers of COVID-19 inpatients demonstrate that elevated cTn is associated with increased risk of mortality, even after accounting for pre-existing CVD [73–78]. Patterns of increasing levels of cTn are also associated with increasing risk for mortality [77,79]. Elevated cTn is also associated with arrhythmia in COVID-19 inpatients [75,80].
Assessment of cTn on admission is suggested for hospitalized COVID-19 patients, particularly those with severe illness. For those with elevated troponin on admission, serial troponins and cardiac point-of-care ultrasound, if safe and available, are suggested to guide further imaging and management until cTn levels are stable or down-trending [72,81]. Troponin can be re-measured again among those with new ECG, hemodynamic or cardiac ultrasound changes and for those with signs or symptoms of clinical cardiac deterioration. In this setting, cTn measurement is a part of a comprehensive management strategy including triage, imaging, monitoring and involvement of consultants. COVID-19 inpatients with elevated troponin who have recovered should be referred for outpatient cardiology follow up for guidance on further diagnostic work up or longer-term management.
ProBNP
ProBNP and its metabolite BNP are cardiac neurohormones that reflect ventricular wall stress from volume expansion and pressure overload [82] and have a well-established role in heart failure and various forms of myocarditis. BNP also helps distinguish cardiac and noncardiac causes of acute dyspnea [83–85].
ProBNP is elevated in approximately 10–15% of adult COVID-19 inpatients [73]. Even after adjusting for age, sex and comorbidities, an elevated proBNP value is associated with mortality (HR: 5.62; 95% CI: 3.99–7.93) [73,86,87], though not all studies report this [23]. One study noted that significantly rising proBNP levels were seen only in nonsurvivors [80].
ProBNP testing is useful for adult COVID-19 inpatients with signs or symptoms concerning for a cardiac complication that requires distinction from noncardiac etiologies. ProBNP or BNP testing is likewise useful in hospitalized children suspected of having multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C), and BNP has been identified as a key cardiac biomarker associated with severe MIS -C [88,89]. An elevated proBNP or BNP may prompt consideration of cardiac point-of-care ultrasound followed by transthoracic echocardiography when feasible given the association of proBNP with ventricular dysfunction and other urgent echocardiographic findings [90]. ProBNP measurement at hospital discharge in patients with elevated levels or a diagnosis of cardiomyopathy is reasonable, and may guide heart failure prognosis, treatment and follow-up strategies.
Markers of kidney injury
Basic metabolic panel & urine studies
COVID-19 inpatients are at increased risk of developing acute kidney injury (AKI) from a variety of mechanisms [91–93]. The incidence of AKI in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 is 20–50%, among which roughly 20% require kidney replacement therapy [94–96]. Potential etiologies for AKI include prerenal injury in the setting of volume depletion and high insensible losses, acute tubular injury from prolonged hemodynamic compromise and cytokine storm, thrombotic disease, glomerulonephritis, rhabdomyolysis and direct tubular injury from the virus [97,98]. AKI during hospitalization has been associated with significantly worse in-hospital mortality, with a meta-analysis of four COVID-19 cohorts demonstrating a HR of 3.08 (95% CI: 1.54–6.19) for mortality in patients with versus without AKI [99]. Additional evidence of kidney injury in the setting of COVID-19 include the presence of proteinuria and/or hematuria, which have been associated with worse short-term outcomes including in-hospital mortality [100]. Among survivors of COVID-19 hospitalization complicated by AKI, up to 35% did not recover to their baseline kidney function by the day of hospital discharge [92].
The initial evaluation of a hospitalized patient with COVID-19 includes a basic metabolic panel, urinalysis, urine output monitoring, assessment of volume status and evaluation of risk factors for kidney injury. Volume overload should be managed appropriately and exposure to nephrotoxins minimized [101]. Abnormalities on urinalysis require additional evaluation, including quantification of proteinuria or albuminuria and hematuria as indicated [93]. Worsening AKI, persistent volume overload, and/or electrolyte abnormalities refractory to medical management should prompt consideration for a nephrology consult.
Testing for co-infection & secondary infection
Viral & atypical bacterial respiratory testing
Viral and atypical bacterial (Legionella species, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydia pneumoniae and Chlamydia psittaci) respiratory co-infection in COVID-19 inpatients is uncommon. Large case series reported a 0.2–5% incidence of respiratory viral or atypical bacterial respiratory co-infection in 2020 [20,102–104]. Unlike other co-infections, there is not a significant difference in rates of viral co-infection found in ICU versus all hospitalized COVID-19 inpatients [105]. Therefore, routine testing for these pathogens in COVID-19 inpatients should only be considered when there is high clinical suspicion and when test results will alter clinical management.
Sputum cultures
Sputum cultures upon admission are useful primarily in severe COVID-19 pneumonia and in cases in which there is high clinical suspicion for typical bacterial respiratory co-infection (e.g., imaging findings are atypical for COVID-19). Respiratory sampling to test for ventilator-associated pneumonia in COVID-19 patients is discussed elsewhere [106]. The reported rates of co-infection, defined as a bacterial infection present upon admission for COVID-19, are between 1 and 8% in large case series and a meta-analysis [103,104,107]. Secondary infections arising 48 hours or more after admission for COVID-19 are more common, reported in 5–16% of COVID-19 inpatients [104,107–111]. The rates of secondary infection are higher in COVID-19 ICU patients compared with all hospitalized COVID-19 patients [105]. In two small prospective studies of 32 and 45 consecutive COVID-19 patients in ICUs with universal respiratory co-infection testing, between 40 and 44% of ICU patients had a bacterial respiratory co-occurring infection [112,113]. Secondary infection is associated with a higher risk of COVID-19-related mortality [108,114].
Sputum cultures are suggested for patients when they first meet the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA)/American Thoracic Society (ATS) definition of severe community-acquired pneumonia. This includes people who require mechanical ventilation or vasopressors and selected others (those with three or more of the following: respiratory rate ≥30 breaths/minute, PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≤250, multilobar infiltrates, confusion/disorientation, uremia with blood urea nitrogen ≥20 mg/dl, leukopenia <4000 cells/μl, hypothermia with core temperature <36°C, or hypotension requiring aggressive fluid resuscitation) [115].
Sputum cultures are also suggested for inpatients empirically treated for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection to detect their presence [115]. Not all symptomatic COVID-19 inpatients will be able to produce expectorated sputum; we suggest against performing sputum induction for co-infection respiratory testing given the exposure risk and low clinical utility in this setting.
Pneumococcal & Legionella urinary antigen
Pneumococcal urinary antigen testing (UAT) is used to identify Streptococcus pneumoniae, and therefore to justify narrowing of empiric antibiotic regimens in severe community-acquired pneumonia [115]. Pneumococcal UAT has a sensitivity of 74% in adults with pneumococcal pneumonia, which is higher than sputum and blood cultures [116]. Legionella UAT detects disease caused by L. pneumophila serotype 1. In the largest study of UAT in COVID-19, 0 of 249 pneumococcal UAT and 0 of 246 Legionella UAT returned positive, which was significantly fewer than in influenza patients [117].
Given relatively low rates of co-infection with these pathogens, we suggest not performing Pneumococcal or Legionella UAT except in severe pneumonia (see IDSA/ATS definition above). Legionella UAT may be useful in mild or moderate pneumonia when L. pneumophila is suspected based on epidemiologic factors [115].
Blood cultures
Bacteremia is uncommon in non-ICU COVID-19 inpatients, and so we suggest that blood culture ordering practices not be altered specifically for COVID-19 inpatients. In a study of 88,201 blood cultures, the rate of true bacteremia among COVID-19 inpatients with blood cultures was 1.6%, significantly lower than that in COVID-19-negative inpatients with blood cultures (5.9%; p < 0.001) [118]. Bacteremia is found more commonly in critically ill COVID-19 patients than in mildly or moderately ill COVID-19 inpatients. A case series from two New York City hospitals reported bacteremia in 15/126 (11.9%) patients who required mechanical ventilation compared with 4/222 (1.8%) who did not [102].
Blood cultures are suggested for patients who meet the IDSA/ATS definition of severe community-acquired pneumonia; this includes people who require mechanical ventilation or vasopressors and selected others [115]. Blood cultures are also suggested for inpatients empirically treated for MRSA or Pseudomonas infection to detect their presence [115]. Blood cultures are also suggested when co-infection is suspected and the pretest probability of bacteremia or candidemia is moderate or high.
Serum fungal markers & fungal respiratory sampling
Compelling evidence of pulmonary aspergillosis developing in people with severe COVID-19 infection, also known as COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) has emerged [119–123]. In a prospective ICU study, bronchoalveolar lavage galactomannan and Aspergillus PCR and serum galactomannan testing documented CAPA in 27.7% of patients; CAPA diagnosis was associated with high mortality [121]. A trend toward better outcomes in those with CAPA treated with antifungals suggests significance, similar to outcomes in people with severe influenza-associated aspergillosis [124].
We suggest infectious diseases consultation, consideration of chest imaging, and lower respiratory tract sampling (if safe and available) for culture, galactomannan testing, and Aspergillus PCR (if available) when CAPA is suspected, especially in COVID-19 inpatients with refractory respiratory failure and clinical signs such as refractory fever, new fever, hemoptysis, and worsening respiratory status, in concordance with the European Confederation for Medical Mycology consensus criteria statement [123]. Definitions of probable, possible, and proven CAPA based on host factors, clinical factors and mycologic evidence have been proposed [123]. Serum beta-D-glucan assay can be a helpful adjunctive diagnostic biomarker for aspergillosis in immunosuppressed hosts and may provide reasonable negative predictive value, but low specificity is a concern, especially in non-neutropenic patients and COVID-19 inpatients [125,126]. Similarly, serum galactomannan is positive in 20% or less of individuals with CAPA [127,128]. Given limited sensitivities of all serum-based biomarker assays noted in CAPA cohort studies, negative predictive value may be compromised, but positivity may be reasonably predictive of disease [129]. More data are needed on diagnostic assay performance in this setting, as much disease appears limited to the airways.
Co-infection testing in COVID-19 patients with compromised immunity
Transplant recipients are at risk for concurrent diseases that may appear contextually similar to COVID-19 pneumonia and require additional therapies, such as cytomegalovirus pneumonitis and respiratory virus lower tract involvement. Other populations may experience concurrent non-infectious complications that require additional immunosuppressive therapies, such as lung transplant recipients who develop bronchiolitis obliterans syndromes and oncology patients recently treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors or chimeric antigen T cell therapies. In a large cohort of cancer patients with COVID-19, recent treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors was associated with hospitalization and severe disease [130]. For these reasons, the clinician must maintain a high degree of diagnostic diligence for classic opportunistic infections in these populations and consider early involvement of infectious diseases consultants.
Conclusion
A thoughtful and judicious approach to laboratory testing is critically important for front-line clinicians caring for inpatients with COVID-19 (Table 1). Tests such as IL-6 and/or CRP, d-dimer, cTn, complete blood count with differential, and complete metabolic panel are suggested upon admission as part of a comprehensive examination and workup for determining the appropriate level of care and prognostication. AST, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and IL-6 and/or CRP may have added value when trended at least once for prognostication. Creatinine and urine output should be monitored throughout the hospitalization. Urinalysis and further workup is indicated if renal injury is apparent. ProBNP should be sent if there is concern for a cardiac complication. Elevated cTn or proBNP may prompt further workup for cardiac complications of COVID-19 and consideration of cardiac point-of-care ultrasound, if available. d-dimer may have utility in ruling out pulmonary embolism in COVID-19 patients if the pretest probability is low. In immunocompetent patients, blood cultures, sputum cultures, and Pneumococcal and Legionella urinary antigen testing should be reserved for COVID-19 inpatients who meet IDSA/ATS definition of severe community-acquired pneumonia or for a few specific scenarios detailed above. Aspergillosis is a concern for COVID-19 patients in the ICU, and consultation with infectious diseases, imaging, respiratory sampling and serum beta-D-glucan and galactomannan are indicated when there is clinical suspicion for CAPA. Serum beta-D-glucan and galactomannan have poor negative predictive value, as many patients with CAPA will not have abnormal results.
Table 1. Laboratory testing utility and guidance in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
Laboratory test | Utility in COVID-19 and associated diseases | Suggested context and timing of testing | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|
Biochemistry | |||
IL-6 | Extreme elevation associated with clinical deterioration, severe or critical illness and mortality. | Admission (if available with reasonable turnaround time). | [2,3,9–16] |
CRP | Extreme elevation associated with critical illness and mortality. | Admission, other times may or may not be useful. | [22–27] |
Ferritin | Extreme elevation associated with severe illness and mortality. | Unclear added utility beyond other markers listed here. | [14,29–35] |
LDH | Elevation associated with increased mortality. | Unclear added utility beyond other markers listed here. | [27,36,37] |
AST and ALT | Extreme elevation associated with severe illness and mortality. | Admission, regular intervals during acute-care hospitalization. | [47,52–56] |
Creatinine and BUN | Acute renal injury associated with mortality. | Admission, regular intervals during acute-care hospitalization. | [92–100] |
Urinalysis | Proteinuria and hematuria associated with poor short-term outcomes including mortality. | Admission and upon new acute renal injury. | [93,100] |
Cardiac troponin | Elevated and increasing levels associated with cardiac complications and mortality. | Admission, signs or symptoms of cardiac deterioration, new ECG or hemodynamic changes, new cardiac ultrasound changes. | [71–81] |
ProBNP | Elevated and increasing levels associated with cardiac complications and mortality. | Signs/symptoms of cardiac complication of COVID-19 that require distinction from noncardiac etiologies. Upon discharge for those with cardiomyopathy and those with elevated levels upon admission. | [73,80,86–90] |
Hematology | |||
---|---|---|---|
Neutrophil count or neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio | Elevation associated with severe illness and mortality. | Admission, trend over time may be useful in predicting severity. | [38–45] |
Absolute lymphocyte count | Lymphopenia associated with severe illness and mortality. | Admission, other times may or may not be useful. | [20,21,38,48,49] |
WBC | Elevation associated with severe illness. | Admission, other times may or may not be useful. | [20,29] |
D-dimer | Elevated levels associated with increased risk of severity, venous thromboembolism and mortality. | Admission and as indicated based on venous thromboembolic risk. | [8,58–64] |
Anti-Xa | Some clinicians monitor anticoagulated patients with anti-Xa levels given COVID-19-associated heparin resistance. | Per local guidance. | [65–67] |
Microbiology † | |||
---|---|---|---|
Viral and atypical bacterial respiratory testing | Low (1–3%) reported incidence of co-infection with these pathogens. | Do not routinely test. Test only if there is high clinical suspicion for a specific pathogen and test results will alter clinical management. | [20,102–105] |
Sputum cultures | Low incidence of typical respiratory bacterial co-infection in noncritically ill patients. Moderate incidence in critically ill patients. | Test when severe pneumonia is diagnosed (see IDSA/ATS definition in text). Test those empirically treated for MRSA or Pseudomonas. Testing in suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia discussed elsewhere. | [103–115] |
Pneumococcal and Legionella urinary antigens | Extremely low incidence of positive urinary antigen testing in COVID-19. | Test when severe pneumonia is diagnosed (see IDSA/ATS definition in text). Legionella UAT may be useful when this pathogen is suspected based on epidemiologic factors. | [115–117] |
Blood cultures | Extremely low incidence of bacteremia in non-ICU COVID-19 patients. Low-to-moderate incidence of bacteremia in critically-ill COVID-19 patients | Test when severe pneumonia is diagnosed (see IDSA/ATS definition in text). Test those empirically treated for MRSA or Pseudomonas. Test in cases of suspected co-infection in which pretest probability of bacteremia is moderate or high. | [102,115,118] |
Fungal respiratory sampling | Moderate incidence of CAPA in intubated patients. | BAL galactomannan, culture and Aspergillus PCR‡ are suggested when CAPA is suspected. | [119–131] |
Serum fungal markers | Beta-D-glucan may be useful for its negative predictive value in intubated patients. Galactomannan may be useful for its positive predictive value in intubated patients. | Do not routinely test in nonintubated patients. Test in patients at high risk for CAPA. CAPA requires respiratory sampling for diagnosis. | [123–129] |
Testing considerations for immunocompromised people hospitalized with COVID-19 are not included in this table. See text for discussion.
Aspergillus PCR is not widely available in the United States.
ALT: Alanine aminotransferase; AST: Aspartate aminotransferase; BAL: Bronchioalveolar lavage; BUN: Blood urea nitrogen; CAPA: COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis; CRP: C-reactive protein; ICU: Intensive care unit; IDSA/ATS: Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society; LDH: Lactate dehydrogenase; MRSA: Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus; proBNP: Pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; UAT: Urinary antigen testing; WBC: White blood cell count.
Key populations such as children, especially those with MIS-C, are not covered in this text. Hospitalized children with COVID-19 are likely to have elevated CRP and LDH and leukocyte indices are less reliable [131,132]. Children with MIS-C have grossly elevated inflammatory markers, proBNP, troponin and d-dimer [133]. People living with HIV with suppressed viral loads who are hospitalized with COVID-19 have similar levels of CRP, IL-6, ferritin and neutrophil counts as HIV-negative individuals, though these laboratory values were lower in people living with HIV without suppressed viral loads [134,135]. Chronic hepatitis B in COVID-19 inpatients may predispose to abnormal liver transaminases, and chronic active hepatitis C may be associated with COVID-19 severity [136,137].
Here we have reviewed in detail whether and how specific laboratory test abnormalities are associated with poor prognosis and important complications from COVID-19 such as VTE, kidney injury, adverse cardiac events and co-infection.
Future perspective
This review summarizes the literature regarding the utility and indications of various laboratory tests in hospitalized COVID-19 patients from the first year and a half of the COVID-19 pandemic. Already now there are multiple risk prediction tools that can reasonably predict critical outcomes based on vital signs, exam and lab tests obtained in the first 24 hours after presentation to the hospital or emergency room. We expect these risk prediction tools to improve and gain widespread use in the near future and thus narrow the potential laboratory tests used in risk prediction at admission and risk prediction during the course of hospitalization. Specific biomarkers heralding critical illness may yet be discovered, with the ultimate goal being a point-of-care home- or office-based test or panel of tests used for risk prediction, medication decision-making, and triage to the hospital in native infection and vaccine breakthrough infection.
Executive summary.
-
Inflammatory markers and biochemical tests associated with COVID-19 severity and/or mortality
-
○
IL-6
-
▪
IL-6 on admission and follow up is strongly correlated with severity and mortality in COVID-19
-
▪
-
○
CRP
-
▪
CRP on admission is strongly associated with severity and mortality in COVID-19
-
▪
-
○
Ferritin, lactate dehydrogenase and white blood cell count
-
▪
Also correlated with COVID-19 severity and mortality, though typically not as strong as IL-6 or CRP
-
▪
-
○
Lymphocyte and neutrophil counts
-
▪
Low absolute lymphocyte count is correlated with COVID-19 severity and mortality
-
▪
Elevated neutrophil count or neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio also correlated with COVID-19 severity and mortality
-
▪
-
○
AST/ALT
-
▪
AST > ALT associates with COVID-19 severity and mortality
-
▪
-
○
-
Testing in the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolic disease
-
○
D-dimer is closely associated with risk of venous thromboembolism, COVID-19 severity and mortality
-
○
A normal d-dimer in context of low pretest probability is suggestive of no pulmonary embolism
-
○
Heparin resistance may be associated with COVID-19
-
○
-
Markers of cardiac injury and wall stress
-
○
Cardiac troponin
-
▪
Indicates myocardial injury; is elevated in 10–25% of COVID-19 inpatients
-
▪
Elevated troponin is associated with mortality and cardiac complications of COVID-19
-
▪
Send troponin on admission; if elevated, obtain serial troponin levels and further evaluate
-
▪
-
○
ProBNP
-
▪
Reflects ventricular wall stress; elevated in 10–15% of COVID-19 inpatients
-
▪
Send if concerned for a cardiac complication that requires distinction from noncardiac etiologies
-
▪
A key cardiac biomarkers associated with multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children
-
▪
-
○
-
Markers of kidney injury
-
○
Incidence of acute kidney injury is 20–50%
-
○
Creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, urine output monitoring should be assessed throughout the hospital course
-
○
Abnormalities on urinalysis require additional evaluation
-
○
-
Testing for co-infection and secondary infection
-
○
Viral and atypical bacterial respiratory testing
-
▪
0.2–5% incidence of co-infection with these pathogens
-
▪
Testing often does not change management
-
▪
Consider when clinical suspicion is high and when test results would alter management
-
▪
-
○
Sputum cultures
-
▪
1–8% incidence of any bacterial co-infection (present at admission)
-
▪
5–16% incidence of any bacterial secondary infection (48+ h after admission); incidence is higher in intensive care unit (ICU) patients
-
▪
Send sputum cultures when patients meet Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA)/American Thoracic Society (ATS) definition of severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) or for specific situations discussed in text
-
▪
-
○
Pneumococcal and Legionella urinary antigen
-
▪
Send urinary antigens when patients meet IDSA/ATS definition of severe CAP and when Legionella pneumophila is suspected based on epidemiologic factors
-
▪
-
○
Blood cultures
-
▪
Bacteremia is uncommon in non-ICU patients (<2%)
-
▪
Send blood cultures when patients meet IDSA/ATS definition of severe CAP or for specific situations discussed in text
-
▪
-
○
Serum fungal markers and fungal respiratory sampling
-
▪
COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) occurs in ICU patients
-
▪
Monitoring for CAPA is institution specific
-
▪
Clinical suspicion warrants infectious diseases consultation, imaging, and respiratory and serum testing
-
▪
Serum beta-D-glucan and galactomannan test sensitivity in CAPA is low, limiting negative predictive value
-
▪
-
○
Immunocompromised patients
-
▪
Involve infectious diseases consultants and monitor for opportunistic infections
-
▪
-
○
Acknowledgments
The authors thank S Karaba, J Townsend, N Chida, K Carroll, MV Fabre, E Scully, R Avery, LL Smith, B Bodnar, P Welling and R Naik for literature review. The authors also thank D Brotman, RS Stephens, C Lowenstein, P Auwaerter, M Melia, E Avdic, DL Thomas, C Hoffmann, N West and C Herzke for review of the text.
Footnotes
Financial & competing interests disclosure
KA Marr is a consultant and/or advisor for Amplyx, Cidara, Merck and Sfunga and receives equity and/or licensing revenue from MycoMed Technologies. MB Streiff reports research funding from The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Janssen, Portola and Roche. MB Streiff has also consulted for Bristol Myers Squibb, Dispersol, Janssen, Pfizer and Portola and has given expert witness testimony in various medical malpractice cases. AAR Antar receives research funding from NIAID-NIH (K08 award) that was not specifically given for the writing of this review article. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.
No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.
References
Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest
- 1.CDC. Hospitalization Forecasts (2020). https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/hospitalizations-forecasts.html
- 2.Del Valle DM, Kim-Schulze S, Huang HHet al. An inflammatory cytokine signature predicts COVID-19 severity and survival. Nat. Med. 26(10), 1636–1643 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; •• Del Valle et al. provides strong evidence for predictive value of IL-6 for COVID-19 outcomes when obtained at admission and when trended early in hospital course.
- 3.Zhang J, Hao Y, Ou Wet al. Serum interleukin-6 is an indicator for severity in 901 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection: a cohort study. J. Transl. Med. 18(1), 406 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Karaba AH, Zhou W, Hsieh LLet al. Differential cytokine signatures of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza infection highlight key differences in pathobiology. Clin. Infect. Dis. (2021) (Epub ahead of print). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • Karaba et al. compares biomarkers in hospitalized COVID-19 and hospitalized influenza patients.
- 5.Tanaka T, Narazaki M, Kishimoto T. IL-6 in inflammation, immunity, and disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 6(10), a016295 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Narazaki M, Kishimoto T. The two-faced cytokine IL-6 in host defense and diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19(11), 3528 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Moore JB, June CH. Cytokine release syndrome in severe COVID-19. Science 368(6490), 473–474 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.FDA. Fact sheet for healthcare providers: emergency use authorization for actemra® (tocilizumab). (2021). https://www.fda.gov/media/150321/download
- 9.Kermali M, Khalsa RK, Pillai K, Ismail Z, Harky A. The role of biomarkers in diagnosis of COVID-19 - a systematic review. Life Sci. 254, 117788 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Feng X, Li S, Sun Qet al. Immune-Inflammatory Parameters in COVID-19 Cases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Med. (Lausanne) 7, 301 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Luo M, Liu J, Jiang W, Yue S, Liu H, Wei S. IL-6 and CD8+ T cell counts combined are an early predictor of in-hospital mortality of patients with COVID-19. JCI Insight 5(13), e139024 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Han H, Ma Q, Li Cet al. Profiling serum cytokines in COVID-19 patients reveals IL-6 and IL-10 are disease severity predictors. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 9(1), 1123–1130 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Vultaggio A, Vivarelli E, Virgili Get al. Prompt predicting of early clinical deterioration of moderate-to-severe COVID-19 patients: usefulness of a combined score using IL-6 in a preliminary study. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 8(8), 2575–2581 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhou F, Yu T, Du Ret al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 395(10229), 1054–1062 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chen T, Wu D, Chen Het al. Clinical characteristics of 113 deceased patients with coronavirus disease 2019: retrospective study. BMJ 368, m1091 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Aziz M, Fatima R, Assaly R. Elevated interleukin-6 and severe COVID-19: a meta-analysis. J. Med. Virol. 92(11), 2283–2285 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Herold T, Jurinovic V, Arnreich Cet al. Elevated levels of IL-6 and CRP predict the need for mechanical ventilation in COVID-19. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 146(1), 128–136 e124 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sproston NR, Ashworth JJ. Role of C-reactive protein at sites of inflammation and infection. Front. Immunol. 9, 754 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Silvestre JP, Coelho LM, Povoa PM. Impact of fulminant hepatic failure in C-reactive protein? J. Crit. Care 25(4), e657–612 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan Met al. Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes among 5700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the New York City Area. JAMA 323(20), 2052–2059 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Guan W-J, Ni Z-Y, Hu Yet al. Clinical characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. N. Engl. J. Med. 382(18), 1708–1720 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Potempa LA, Rajab IM, Hart PC, Bordon J, Fernandez-Botran R. Insights into the use of C-reactive protein as a diagnostic index of disease severity in COVID-19 infections. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 103(2), 561–56 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Alzahrani SH, Al-Rabia MW. Cardiac injury biomarkers and the risk of death in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiol. Res. Pract. 2021, 9363569 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Petrilli CM, Jones SA, Yang Jet al. Factors associated with hospital admission and critical illness among 5279 people with coronavirus disease 2019 in New York City: prospective cohort study. BMJ 369, m1966 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Liu F, Li L, Xu Met al. Prognostic value of interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin in patients with COVID-19. J. Clin. Virol. 127, 104370 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Liu X, Yue X, Liu Fet al. Analysis of clinical features and early warning signs in patients with severe COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS ONE 15(6), e0235459 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Malik P, Patel U, Mehta Det al. Biomarkers and outcomes of COVID-19 hospitalisations: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Evid. Based Med. 26(3), 107–108 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • This is a recent review of blood biomarkers that are associated with severity of clinical outcomes in COVID-19.
- 28.Kernan KF, Carcillo JA. Hyperferritinemia and inflammation. Int. Immunol. 29(9), 401–409 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Netea MG, Rovina Net al. Complex immune dysregulation in COVID-19 patients with severe respiratory failure. Cell Host Microbe 27(6), 992–1000 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wang F, Hou H, Luo Yet al. The laboratory tests and host immunity of COVID-19 patients with different severity of illness. JCI Insight 5(10), e137799 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wu C, Chen X, Cai Yet al. Risk factors associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome and death in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA Intern. Med. 180(7), 934–943 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ruan Q, Yang K, Wang W, Jiang L, Song J. Clinical predictors of mortality due to COVID-19 based on an analysis of data of 150 patients from Wuhan, China. Intensive Care Med. 46(5), 846–848 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cheng L, Li H, Li Let al. Ferritin in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 34(10), e23618 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Taneri PE, Gomez-Ochoa SA, Llanaj Eet al. Anemia and iron metabolism in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 35(8), 763–773 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Masetti C, Generali E, Colapietro Fet al. High mortality in COVID-19 patients with mild respiratory disease. Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 50(9), e13314 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhang S, Guo M, Duan Let al. Development and validation of a risk factor-based system to predict short-term survival in adult hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study. Crit. Care 24(1), 438 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Aloisio E, Chibireva M, Serafini Let al. A comprehensive appraisal of laboratory biochemistry tests as major predictors of COVID-19 severity. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 144(12), 1457–1464 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Melo AKG, Milby KM, Caparroz Aet al. Biomarkers of cytokine storm as red flags for severe and fatal COVID-19 cases: a living systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 16(6), e0253894 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Veras FP, Pontelli MC, Silva CMet al. SARS-CoV-2-triggered neutrophil extracellular traps mediate COVID-19 pathology. J. Exp. Med. 217(12), (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lucas C, Wong P, Klein Jet al. Longitudinal analyses reveal immunological misfiring in severe COVID-19. Nature 584(7821), 463–469 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Silvin A, Chapuis N, Dunsmore Get al. Elevated calprotectin and abnormal myeloid cell subsets discriminate severe from mild COVID-19. Cell 182(6), 1401–1418 e1418 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Soraya GV, Ulhaq ZS. Crucial laboratory parameters in COVID-19 diagnosis and prognosis: an updated meta-analysis. Med. Clin. (Engl. Ed.) 155(4), 143–151 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Tahtasakal CA, Oncul A, Sevgi DYet al. Could we predict the prognosis of the COVID-19 disease? J. Med. Virol. 93(4), 2420–2430 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Abensur Vuillaume L, Le Borgne P, Alame Ket al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and early variation of NLR to predict in-hospital mortality and severity in ED patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. J. Clin. Med. 10(12), (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ding X, Yu Y, Lu Bet al. Dynamic profile and clinical implications of hematological parameters in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 58(8), 1365–1371 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Yu C, Lei Q, Li Wet al. Clinical characteristics, associated factors, and predicting COVID-19 mortality risk: a retrospective study in Wuhan, China. Am. J. Prev. Med. 59(2), 168–175 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Chen G, Wu D, Guo Wet al. Clinical and immunological features of severe and moderate coronavirus disease 2019. J. Clin. Invest. 130(5), 2620–2629 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Elshazli RM, Toraih EA, Elgaml Aet al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of hematological and immunological markers in COVID-19 infection: a meta-analysis of 6320 patients. PLoS ONE 15(8), e0238160 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • This is a meta-analysis of the diagnostic and prognostic value of hematological parameters for predicting outcomes in COVID-19.
- 49.Wang F, Nie J, Wang Het al. Characteristics of peripheral lymphocyte subset alteration in COVID-19 pneumonia. J. Infect. Dis. 221(11), 1762–1769 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Chen N, Zhou M, Dong Xet al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet 395(10223), 507–513 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Huang C, Wang Y, Li Xet al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 395(10223), 497–506 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bzeizi K, Abdulla M, Mohammed N, Alqamish J, Jamshidi N, Broering D. Effect of COVID-19 on liver abnormalities: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 11(1), 10599 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Omrani-Nava V, Maleki I, Ahmadi Aet al. Evaluation of hepatic enzymes changes and association with prognosis in COVID-19 patients. Hepat. Mon. 20(4), e103179 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 54.Zhou F, Yu T, Du Ret al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 395(10229), 1054–1062 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Del Zompo F, De Siena M, Ianiro G, Gasbarrini A, Pompili M, Ponziani FR. Prevalence of liver injury and correlation with clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19: systematic review with meta-analysis. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 24(24), 13072–13088 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Lei F, Liu YM, Zhou Fet al. Longitudinal association between markers of liver injury and mortality in COVID-19 in China. Hepatology 72(2), 389–398 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Middeldorp S, Coppens M, Van Haaps TFet al. Incidence of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. J. Thromb. Haemost. 18(8), 1995–2002 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Panigada M, Bottino N, Tagliabue Pet al. Hypercoagulability of COVID-19 patients in intensive care unit: a report of thromboelastography findings and other parameters of hemostasis. J. Thromb. Haemost. 18(7), 1738–1742 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Spyropoulos AC, Levy JH, Ageno Wet al. Scientific and Standardization Committee Communication: clinical guidance on the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. J. Thromb. Haemost. 18(8), 1859–1865 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Moores LK, Tritschler T, Brosnahan Set al. Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of VTE in patients with COVID-19: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report. Chest 158(3), 1143–1163 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Gungor B, Atici A, Baycan OFet al. Elevated d-dimer levels on admission are associated with severity and increased risk of mortality in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 39, 173–179 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Shah S, Shah K, Patel SBet al. Elevated d-Dimer levels are associated with increased risk of mortality in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiol. Rev. 28(6), 295–302 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Al-Samkari H, Karp Leaf RS, Dzik WHet al. COVID and coagulation: bleeding and thrombotic manifestations of SARS-CoV2 infection. Blood 136(4), 489–500 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Demelo-Rodríguez P, Cervilla-Muñoz E, Ordieres-Ortega Let al. Incidence of asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and elevated D-dimer levels. Thromb. Res. 192, 23–26 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.White D, Macdonald S, Bull Tet al. Heparin resistance in COVID-19 patients in the intensive care unit. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis 50(2), 287–291 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Novelli C, Borotto E, Beverina I, Punzi V, Radrizzani D, Brando B. Heparin dosage, level, and resistance in SARS-CoV2 infected patients in intensive care unit. Int. J. Lab. Hematol. (2021) (Epub ahead of print). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Harr JN, Moore EE, Chin TLet al. Postinjury hyperfibrinogenemia compromises efficacy of heparin-based venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. Shock 41(1), 33–39 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Hendren NS, Drazner MH, Bozkurt B, Cooper LT Jr. Description and proposed management of the acute COVID-19 cardiovascular syndrome. Circulation 141(23), 1903–1914 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Chapman AR, Bularga A, Mills NL. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin can be an ally in the fight against COVID-19. Circulation 141(22), 1733–1735 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Jaffe AS, Cleland JGF, Katus HA. Myocardial injury in severe COVID-19 infection. Eur. Heart J. 41(22), 2080–2082 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.De Lorenzo A, Kasal DA, Tura BR, Lamas CC, Rey HC. Acute cardiac injury in patients with COVID-19. Am. J. Cardiovasc. Dis. 10(2), 28–33 (2020). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Sandoval Y, Januzzi JL Jr, Jaffe AS. Cardiac troponin for the diagnosis and risk-stratification of myocardial injury in COVID-19: JACC review topic of the week. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 76(10), 1244–1258 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Qin JJ, Cheng X, Zhou Fet al. Redefining cardiac biomarkers in predicting mortality of inpatients with COVID-19. Hypertension 76(4), 1104–1112 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Mikami T, Miyashita H, Yamada Tet al. Risk factors for mortality in patients with COVID-19 in New York City. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 36(1), 17–26 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Si D, Du B, Ni Let al. Death, discharge and arrhythmias among patients with COVID-19 and cardiac injury. CMAJ 192(28), E791–E798 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Parohan M, Yaghoubi S, Seraji A. Cardiac injury is associated with severe outcome and death in patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Eur. Heart J. Acute Cardiovasc. Care 9(6), 665–677 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Lala A, Johnson KW, Januzzi JLet al. Prevalence and impact of myocardial injury in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 76(5), 533–546 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Tanboga IH, Canpolat U, Ozcan Cetin EHet al. The prognostic role of cardiac troponin in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Atherosclerosis 325, 83–88 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • Tanboga et al. examines the role of troponin in predicting outcomes of COVID-19.
- 79.Shi S, Qin M, Shen Bet al. Association of cardiac injury with mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Cardiol. 5(7), 802–810 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Guo T, Fan Y, Chen Met al. Cardiovascular implications of fatal outcomes of patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol. 5(7), 811–818 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Skulstad H, Cosyns B, Popescu BAet al. COVID-19 pandemic and cardiac imaging: EACVI recommendations on precautions, indications, prioritization, and protection for patients and healthcare personnel. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 21(6), 592–598 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Levin ER, Gardner DG, Samson WK. Natriuretic peptides. N. Engl. J. Med. 339(5), 321–328 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Januzzi JL Jr, Chen-Tournoux AA, Moe G. Amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide testing for the diagnosis or exclusion of heart failure in patients with acute symptoms. Am. J. Cardiol. 101(3), S29–S38 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Mueller C, Mcdonald K, De Boer RAet al. Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology practical guidance on the use of natriuretic peptide concentrations. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 21(6), 715–731 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Inciardi RM, Lupi L, Zaccone Get al. Cardiac involvement in a patient with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol. 5(7), 819–824 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Gao L, Jiang D, Wen XSet al. Prognostic value of NT-proBNP in patients with severe COVID-19. Respir. Res. 21(1), 83 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Deng P, Ke Z, Ying B, Qiao B, Yuan L. The diagnostic and prognostic role of myocardial injury biomarkers in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Clin. Chim. Acta 510, 186–190 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Zhao Y, Patel J, Huang Y, Yin L, Tang L. Cardiac markers of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) in COVID-19 patients: a meta-analysis. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 49, 62–70 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Abrams JY, Oster ME, Godfred-Cato SEet al. Factors linked to severe outcomes in multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) in the USA: a retrospective surveillance study. Lancet Child Adolesc. Health 5(5), 323–331 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Yuan N, Wu S, Rader F, Siegel RJ. Determining which hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 patients require urgent echocardiography. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 34(8), 831–838 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Ronco C, Reis T, Husain-Syed F. Management of acute kidney injury in patients with COVID-19. Lancet Respir. Med. 8(7), 738–742 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Chan L, Chaudhary K, Saha Aet al. AKI in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 32(1), 151–160 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Nadim MK, Forni LG, Mehta RLet al. COVID-19-associated acute kidney injury: consensus report of the 25th Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) Workgroup. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 16(12), 747–764 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Argenziano MG, Bruce SL, Slater CLet al. Characterization and clinical course of 1000 patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in New York: retrospective case series. BMJ 369, m1996 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Hirsch JS, Ng JH, Ross DWet al. Acute kidney injury in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Kidney Int. 98(1), 209–218 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Bowe B, Cai M, Xie Y, Gibson AK, Maddukuri G, Al-Aly Z. Acute kidney injury in a National Cohort of Hospitalized US Veterans with COVID-19. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 16(1), 14–25 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Su H, Yang M, Wan Cet al. Renal histopathological analysis of 26 postmortem findings of patients with COVID-19 in China. Kidney Int. 98(1), 219–227 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Batlle D, Soler MJ, Sparks MAet al. Acute kidney injury in COVID-19: emerging evidence of a distinct pathophysiology. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 31(7), 1380–1383 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Ali H, Daoud A, Mohamed MMet al. Survival rate in acute kidney injury superimposed COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ren. Fail. 42(1), 393–397 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Cheng Y, Luo R, Wang Ket al. Kidney disease is associated with in-hospital death of patients with COVID-19. Kidney Int. 97(5), 829–838 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Selby NM, Forni LG, Laing CMet al. Covid-19 and acute kidney injury in hospital: summary of NICE guidelines. BMJ 369, m1963 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Goyal P, Choi JJ, Pinheiro LCet al. Clinical Characteristics of Covid-19 in New York City. N. Engl. J. Med. 382(24), 2372–2374 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Karaba SM, Jones G, Helsel Tet al. Prevalence of co-infection at the time of hospital admission in COVID-19 patients, a multicenter study. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 8(1), (2021) (Epub ahead of print). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Chen S, Zhu Q, Xiao Yet al. Clinical and etiological analysis of co-infections and secondary infections in COVID-19 patients: an observational study. Clin. Respir. J. 15(7), 815–825 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Lansbury L, Lim B, Baskaran V, Lim WS. Co-infections in people with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Infect. 81(2), 266–275 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Francois B, Laterre PF, Luyt CE, Chastre J. The challenge of ventilator-associated pneumonia diagnosis in COVID-19 patients. Crit. Care 24(1), 289 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Langford BJ, So M, Raybardhan Set al. Bacterial co-infection and secondary infection in patients with COVID-19: a living rapid review and meta-analysis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 26(12), 1622–1629 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • This is a meta-analysis of co-infection with other pathgens in patients with COVID-19.
- 108.Shafran N, Shafran I, Ben-Zvi Het al. Secondary bacterial infection in COVID-19 patients is a stronger predictor for death compared to influenza patients. Sci. Rep. 11(1), 12703 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Smith L, Karaba SM, Amoah Jet al. Hospital-acquired infections among adult patients admitted for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 1–4 (2021) (Epub ahead of print). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Chong WH, Saha BK, Ananthakrishnan R, Chopra A. State-of-the-art review of secondary pulmonary infections in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Infection 49(4), 591–605 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Ripa M, Galli L, Poli Aet al. Secondary infections in patients hospitalized with COVID-19: incidence and predictive factors. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 27(3), 451–457 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Dudoignon E, Camelena F, Deniau Bet al. Bacterial pneumonia in COVID-19 critically ill patients: a case series. Clin. Infect. Dis. 72(5), 905–906 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Verroken A, Scohy A, Gerard L, Wittebole X, Collienne C, Laterre PF. Co-infections in COVID-19 critically ill and antibiotic management: a prospective cohort analysis. Crit. Care 24(1), 410 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Rouze A, Martin-Loeches I, Povoa Pet al. Early bacterial identification among intubated patients with COVID-19 or influenza pneumonia: A European Multicenter Comparative Cohort Study. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Metlay JP, Waterer GW, Long ACet al. Diagnosis and treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia. An Official Clinical Practice Guideline of the American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 200(7), e45–e67 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Sinclair A, Xie X, Teltscher M, Dendukuri N. Systematic review and meta-analysis of a urine-based pneumococcal antigen test for diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 51(7), 2303–2310 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Hughes S, Troise O, Donaldson H, Mughal N, Moore LS. Bacterial and fungal co-infection among hospitalised patients with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study in a UK secondary care setting. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 26(10), 1395–13995 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Sepulveda J, Westblade LF, Whittier Set al. Bacteremia and blood culture utilization during COVID-19 Surge in New York City. J. Clin. Microbiol. 58(8), e00875–20 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Van Arkel ALE, Rijpstra TA, Belderbos HNA, Van Wijngaarden P, Verweij PE, Bentvelsen RG. COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 202(1), 132–135 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Wang J, Yang Q, Zhang P, Sheng J, Zhou J, Qu T. Clinical characteristics of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with COVID-19 in Zhejiang, China: a retrospective case series. Crit. Care 24(1), 299 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Bartoletti M, Pascale R, Cricca Met al. Epidemiology of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis among COVID-19 intubated patients: a prospective study. Clin. Infect. Dis. (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Lai CC, Yu WL. COVID-19 associated with pulmonary aspergillosis: a literature review. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 54(1), 46–53 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Koehler P, Bassetti M, Chakrabarti Aet al. Defining and managing COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis: the 2020 ECMM/ISHAM consensus criteria for research and clinical guidance. Lancet Infect. Dis. 21(6), e149–e162 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; •• This is the 2020 European Confederation of Medical Mycology/The International Society for Human & Animal Mycology consensus criteria on COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis.
- 124.Koehler P, Bassetti M, Kochanek M, Shimabukuro-Vornhagen A, Cornely OA. Intensive care management of influenza-associated pulmonary aspergillosis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 25(12), 1501–1509 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Son HJ, Sung H, Park SYet al. Diagnostic performance of the (1–3)-beta-D-glucan assay in patients with Pneumocystis jirovecii compared with those with candidiasis, aspergillosis, mucormycosis, and tuberculosis, and healthy volunteers. PLoS ONE 12(11), e0188860 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.White PL, Price JS, Posso RB, Barnes RA. An evaluation of the performance of the Dynamiker(R) Fungus (1–3)-beta-D-Glucan Assay to assist in the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis, invasive candidiasis and Pneumocystis pneumonia. Med. Mycol. 55(8), 843–850 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Arastehfar A, Carvalho A, Van De Veerdonk FLet al. COVID-19 associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA)-from immunology to treatment. J. Fungi (Basel) 6(2), (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.White PL, Dhillon R, Cordey Aet al. A national strategy to diagnose COVID-19 associated invasive fungal disease in the ICU. Clin. Infect. Dis. (2020) (Epub ahead of print). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Marr KA, Platt A, Tornheim JAet al. Aspergillosis complicating severe coronavirus disease. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 27(1), 18–25 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Robilotti EV, Babady NE, Mead PAet al. Determinants of COVID-19 disease severity in patients with cancer. Nat. Med. 26(8), 1218–1223 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Henry BM, Benoit SW, De Oliveira MHSet al. Laboratory abnormalities in children with mild and severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a pooled analysis and review. Clin. Biochem. 81, 1–8 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Bourgeois FT, Gutierrez-Sacristan A, Keller MSet al. International analysis of electronic health records of children and youth hospitalized with COVID-19 infection in 6 countries. JAMA Netw. Open 4(6), e2112596 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Kabeerdoss J, Pilania RK, Karkhele R, Kumar TS, Danda D, Singh S. Severe COVID-19, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, and Kawasaki disease: immunological mechanisms, clinical manifestations and management. Rheumatol. Int. 41(1), 19–32 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Laracy J, Zucker J, Castor Det al. HIV-1 infection does not change disease course or inflammatory pattern of SARS-CoV-2-infected patients presenting at a Large Urban Medical Center in New York City. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 8(2), (2021) (Epub ahead of print). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Patel VV, Felsen UR, Fisher Met al. Clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers by HIV serostatus and viral suppression in a large cohort of patients hospitalized with COVID-19. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 86(2), 224–230 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Cerbu B, Pantea S, Bratosin Fet al. Liver impairment and hematological changes in patients with chronic hepatitis C and COVID-19: a retrospective study after one year of pandemic. Medicina (Kaunas) 57(6), 597 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Lin Y, Yuan J, Long Qet al. Patients with SARS-CoV-2 and HBV co-infection are at risk of greater liver injury. Genes Dis. 8(4), 484–492 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]