Skip to main content
Frontiers in Immunology logoLink to Frontiers in Immunology
. 2021 Sep 9;12:681504. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.681504

Minimizing Ischemia Reperfusion Injury in Xenotransplantation

Parth M Patel 1, Margaret R Connolly 1, Taylor M Coe 1, Anthony Calhoun 1,2, Franziska Pollok 1,3, James F Markmann 1,4, Lars Burdorf 1,2, Agnes Azimzadeh 1,2, Joren C Madsen 1,2, Richard N Pierson III 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC8458821  PMID: 34566955

Abstract

The recent dramatic advances in preventing “initial xenograft dysfunction” in pig-to-non-human primate heart transplantation achieved by minimizing ischemia suggests that ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) plays an important role in cardiac xenotransplantation. Here we review the molecular, cellular, and immune mechanisms that characterize IRI and associated “primary graft dysfunction” in allotransplantation and consider how they correspond with “xeno-associated” injury mechanisms. Based on this analysis, we describe potential genetic modifications as well as novel technical strategies that may minimize IRI for heart and other organ xenografts and which could facilitate safe and effective clinical xenotransplantation.

Keywords: xenotranplantation, ischemia reperfusion (I/R) injury, ex vivo perfusion, initial xenograft dysfunction, ischemia reperfusion injury mechanisms, ischemia reperfusion injury minimization

Introduction

Xenotransplantation has historically been studied by scientists and physicians as an appealing potential solution to numerous medical ailments. The earliest documented xenotransplant is the 17th century animal blood transfusion into humans (1, 2). Solid organ xenotransplantation studies began in the mid 19th century with the development of vascular anastomotic techniques and ex vivo machine perfusion (3). The current emphasis on using porcine xenografts in humans arose in the 1990s, and stimulated development of pig-to-non-human primate pre-clinical models (46). Simultaneously, genetic modification of pigs by nuclear deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) microinjection coupled with advances in in vitro fertilization of large mammals raised optimism that genetic engineering of source pigs could help overcome the formidable immunological barriers identified in early solid organ xenotransplantation efforts (7). While these efforts have generated remarkable progress over the last 25 years, recent evidence points to a particularly important role for ischemia reperfusion injury in the initial graft dysfunction often observed following whole organ xenotransplantation.

The concept of “ischemia” has been known for millennia; originating from the ancient Greek term “ischaimos,” meaning to restrain blood. However, the idea that reperfusion, rather than the ischemic event itself, triggers many of the adverse consequences associated with ischemia is relatively new, enabled by Alexis Carrell’s development of vascular surgical, organ transplant, and organ perfusion techniques that allowed restoration of flow to an ischemic limb or organ (5, 6, 811). Effects of reperfusion after acute myocardial infarction (MI) and associated with ischemic limb, kidney, and liver revascularization were first studied at a mechanistic level in the early 1970s (1216). Critical ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) pathways were discovered or better understood based on work in the 1980’s, which defined key roles for integrins, selectins, and complement, as well as involvement of diverse cell death pathways (1220). In parallel, IRI and techniques of ischemia reperfusion injury minimization (IRIM) have been studied extensively in solid organ allotransplantation (2124). Herein, we review the literature regarding the mechanisms of IRI following allotransplantation in order to better understand how they may correspond with known mechanisms of xenograft injury. We identify applications of IRIM techniques, as well as genetic and pharmacologic approaches, that could facilitate effective clinical use of organ xenografts.

Mechanisms of IRI

Understanding the mechanisms that mediate IRI and IRI-driven cell death is critical to developing strategies to avoid it. IRI ranges in severity from minor and transient to severe and life-threatening, reflecting variable degrees of cell and organ damage which manifest at the molecular, cellular, tissue, and whole organism levels. Table 1 and Figure 1 highlight the critical molecular mechanisms involved while Figure 2 shows how the systemic mechanisms interact. Each of the broad categories of IRI mechanisms considered below interact extensively to propagate the individual damage caused by the different mechanisms.

Table 1.

Enumeration of the various molecular mechanisms at play during ischemia reperfusion injury, their various mechanisms of activation, how their activation propagates injury, and the end effect of the activation.

Molecular Mechanism Mechanism of Activation Result of Activation End Effect
Calcium Overload Hypoxia→Anaerobic Respiration→H+ imbalance→compensatory intracellular hyper-Ca2+
  • Activation of mPTP

  • Inflammasome activation

  • Cell structure degradation

  • Inflammatory transcription factor promotion

Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) Oxygen influx at reperfusion overwhelms ROS scavenging mechanisms, mPTP opening→ROS release from mitochondria
  • Alter cell-cell signaling

  • Disruption of homeostatic intracellular protein activation

  • Direct protein and DNA damage

  • Apoptosis

  • Necrosis

  • Amplify injury and inflammation

  • Leukocyte activation

Cell Adhesion Molecules Increased expression following reperfusion
  • Promote interaction between activated leukocytes and endothelium

  • Innate inflammatory reaction

PAMPs/DAMPs Released from damaged cells→Recognized by pathogen recognition receptors
  • Proinflammatory molecule expression (ex: IL1β and IL18)

  • Proapoptotic molecule expression in recruited leukocytes

  • Inflammation

  • Apoptosis

Complement Classical, alternate, and lectin mediated pathway activation
  • Membrane attack complex-based cell disruption

  • Byproducts (C3a, C5a)→leukocyte attraction and inflammasome creation

  • Inflammation propagation

  • Cell death

Mitochondria dysfunction Hypoxia→Anaerobic respiration→Lactate and Succinate buildup→electron transport chain reversal→mPTP opening→mitochondrial damage
  • mPTP opening→ROS release

  • Mitochondrial fission

  • Apoptosis

  • Endothelial dysfunction

Endothelial dysfunction ROS, Calcium overload, Mitochondrial damage→Endothelial cell damage→Tight junction phosphorylation, adhesion molecule upregulation, immune cell activation, vasoconstriction
  • Recruitment of leukocytes

  • Activation of leukocytes

  • Decreased barrier function

  • Local thrombosis

  • Inflammation

  • Further ischemia

  • Cell and organ dysfunction and edema

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The molecular mechanisms involved in ischemia reperfusion injury and how they interact with one another.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The systemic mechanisms involved with ischemia reperfusion injury.

Allo- and xenotransplant IRI presumably share some of these mechanisms. However, the relatively short cold ischemia intervals typical of experimental xenotransplant research studies would almost never be associated with graft dysfunction in clinical practice or in preclinical allograft models (25, 26). Recent evidence suggests that IRI mechanisms may be amplified by xeno-rejection mechanisms, including recipient innate anti-pig antibodies, interspecies complement dysregulation, coagulation cascade incompatibilities, and perhaps by other features of the profound innate xeno-immune response (25, 27).

Innate Immune Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of IRI

Intracellular Calcium Overload/Calcium Paradox

Ischemia induces anaerobic respiration, which results in intracellular lactate and acid accumulation which decreases intracellular pH. Membrane Na+/H+ exchange pump activity increases to mitigate this (2832). Intracellular hypernatremia then leads to an increase in cell membrane Na+/Ca++ exchanger activity, increasing the intracellular calcium levels (2833). Ischemia also causes loss of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), which leads to dysfunctional intracellular organelle and cell membrane ATP-dependent calcium pumps, further exacerbating calcium overload (29, 31, 33). Upon reperfusion, the extracellular acid is washed out, increasing the proton gradient across the cell membrane and resulting in accumulation of cytosolic calcium (13, 28). This sequence of events was first observed by Zimmerman et al. in rat hearts; he termed this the ‘calcium paradox’ because although calcium was thought to be necessary for cardiac myocyte function, its reintroduction was detrimental during the reperfusion phase (34). This cytosolic hypercalcemia with immediate return of normal intracellular pH activates the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP), calpains, and calcium-dependent kinases which lead to lethal cell structure degradation, uric acid formation with inflammasome activation, inflammatory cytokine formation, and inflammatory transcription factor promotion (31, 35, 36). The fluctuations in pH and the ‘calcium paradox’ are particularly important in kidney, liver, and heart IRI given the importance of pH and calcium balance in normal cell and organ function (24, 31, 3739).

Reactive Oxygen Species

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as superoxide, hydroxyl radicals, peroxides, and singlet oxygen play a significant role in IRI (23, 24, 40, 41). Low levels of ROS are a physiologic mechanism of cell-to-cell signaling (42). The double bond in molecular oxygen provides a critical energy source that is normally harnessed by the mitochondrial oxidation-reduction system where the byproducts of converting oxygen and carbon-bound hydrogen molecular species to carbon dioxide and water maintains cellular oxygenation and reduction homeostasis (42, 43). Reperfusion causes a massive oxygen influx that generates significant quantities of free radicals (28). ROS generation in excess of physiologic ROS scavenging mechanisms coupled with acidosis leads to mitochondrial dysfunction and eventual rupture. ROS-mediated mitochondrial injury combined with mPTP opening driven by cytosolic hypercalcemia leads to an additional burst of ROS release from mitochondria (31, 44, 45). This bolus of ROS without functional protective scavenging molecules exceeds the capacity of ROS-degrading enzymes, and disrupts cellular function through three main pathways: 1) alteration of cell-cell signaling, 2) disruption of the oxygenation/reduction balance causing alteration of intracellular proteins, and 3) direct damage to cell proteins and molecules such as DNA (31, 42, 43). These three general mechanisms of damage can lead to cell death via apoptosis or necrosis (46).

ROS and oxidative stress are particularly important in allotransplantation (23, 24, 37, 47, 48). In lung allografts, ROS formed consequent to adenosine A2A receptor activation trigger activation of invariant NKT (iNKT) cells, leading to epithelial and endothelial damage (4953). ROS are one of the initial mediators of damage to hepatocytes and liver sinusoidal cells during liver allograft reperfusion (31). The heart is also particularly sensitive to ischemia and subsequent oxidative stress during reperfusion secondary to its high oxygen demand and rapid exhaustion of intracellular ATP stores with brief periods of normothermic ischemia (38, 39, 48, 54, 55).

In the context of xenotransplantation, ROS are also presumed to play a role in xenotransplantation ischemia reperfusion injury (XIRI). In vitro data from rat livers perfused with human blood showed that hyperacute rejection requires reactive oxygen species, with additional primary or secondary contributions from leukocytes and complement activation (56). Additionally, hydrogen peroxide and extracellular calcium have been shown to strongly induce cell adhesion molecule expression on porcine islet xenografts, presumably amplifying injury, inflammation, and islet xenograft attrition (57).

Cell Adhesion Molecules

Reperfusion following ischemia leads to increased expression of cell adhesion molecules including selectins and integrins on the endothelial surface of the injured tissue (58, 59). Upon reperfusion, endothelial cells and leukocytes activated by ROS and other pathways interact through these adhesion molecules via ligand proteins such as P-selectin glycoprotein ligand and sialyl LewisX (60, 61). This interaction is the basis of the innate inflammatory reaction associated with IRI in allotransplantation. Blocking selectin and integrin interactions in pre-clinical allotransplant models reduces both tissue damage and elaboration of pro-inflammatory chemokines into the circulation (59, 62).

Pathogen and Damage Associated Molecular Proteins

Cell damage triggered by the ‘calcium paradox’ and/or ROS elaboration triggers the release of multiple pro-inflammatory mediators and cytokines including chemotactic cytokines (chemokines), as well as activation of complement cascade proteins. The most potent proinflammatory mediators are broadly classified as damage-associated molecular proteins (DAMPs), such as various adenine phosphate nucleotides (ATP, ADP, and AMP). Heat shock proteins (HSPs) are also released. HSPs are produced during oxidative stress to ensure proper folding of other proteins and act as DAMPs (63, 64). DAMPs differ from bacterial- and virally derived pathogen associated molecular proteins (PAMPs) because they are endogenous molecules that are normally carefully prevented from release into the circulation. Like PAMPs, DAMPs are recognized by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) such as Toll Like Receptors (TLRs). Among PRRs, DAMPs are particularly efficient in activating NLRp3 (6568). TLRs have been generally associated with both immediate inflammatory responses (such as those implicated in IRI), and with later kidney fibrosis, thought consequent to amplifying inflammation with secondary recruitment of T and B cells (37). TLR2 and TLR4 are of particular interest as PRRs mediating DAMP-driven injury because genetic deletion of one or both decreases severity of kidney IRI in a mouse model (69). When PRRs recognize PAMPs and DAMPs, there is additional upregulation of a variety of transcription factors, most importantly NF-κB, which increase the expression of proinflammatory and pro-apoptotic molecules and proteins within the recruited immune cells (31, 66, 7073). NLRp3 activation leads to assembly of a caspase 1 activating platform called the inflammasome with subsequent release of active forms of IL1β and IL18 to promote the sterile inflammatory response characteristic of IRI (66, 70, 71). For example, formation of the inflammasome has been demonstrated in association with myocardial damage during heart IRI (66, 7476). The NF-κB pathway and the inflammasome are critical mediators common to the multiple upstream pro-inflammatory pathways within the systemic sterile inflammatory response that is characteristic of IRI (77).

Complement

Each of the three complement pathways (classical, driven by antibody binding and Fc-mediated complement activation; alternative, triggered by spontaneous unknown mechanisms; and lectin-mediated) can participate in IRI (31, 78, 79). Each pathway leads to formation of the C5b-9 ‘membrane attack complex’, the final common complement activation pathway which physically disrupts the cell membrane, overwhelming the ability of ion channels to maintain membrane polarization and osmolar gradients, resulting in cell death (31). Upstream byproducts of complement activation such as C5a and C3a are chemoattractants for neutrophils and macrophages which can lead to tissue inflammation (68, 72). Additionally, C3a and C5a can bind a variety of G protein coupled receptors as well as TLR2, which trigger NF-κB activation and the formation of the inflammasome (80, 81). Complement activation and deposition during reperfusion plays a role in IRI after acute MI, as well as in acute peripheral artery occlusion and in allografts, particularly kidney and liver (8284). Accordingly, inhibiting complement activation has shown therapeutic benefit in animal models of each of these conditions (8288). Clinical translation, however, has been slow and remains in preclinical and early-stage clinical trials (8991).

In wild type pig-to-non-human primate (NHP) xenotransplantation, complement activation by the direct pathway (antibody-driven complement activation) is a central mechanism contributing to the phenomenon of hyperacute rejection (HAR) (92). Prolific complement activation associated with HAR was mitigated by two key genetic engineering accomplishments. First, human complement pathway regulatory protein (hCPRP)-transgenic pigs were created to enhance pig endothelial cell (EC) protection from human complement-mediated injury. Later, the porcine Gal-α1,3Galactosyl transferase gene was knocked out (GalTKO) to eliminate the predominant carbohydrate antigen recognized by human-anti-pig antibodies (9395). Addition of one or more hCPRP’s to GalTKO further decreased the incidence of initial graft dysfunction by constraining amplification of the antibody-mediated classical complement cascade, inhibiting formation of the membrane attack complex, and better preventing endothelial injury relative to either hCPRP or GalTKO alone (96, 97).

Mitochondrial Dysfunction

Mitochondrial dysfunction plays an important role in IRI and subsequent cell death. Mitochondrial dysfunction starts during ischemia, with accumulation of lactate and succinate from anaerobic respiration damaging molecules in the electron transport chain (98). Upon reperfusion, the accumulated succinate leads to electron transport chain reversal and ROS formation (98). This reduces the mitochondrial membrane potential leading to mitochondrial Ca2+ bursts, and mPTP opening, as discussed above (98). mPTP opening causes structural damage in the form of mitochondrial swelling and is a key step in irreversible cell injury after IRI, which has been especially well-studied in heart IRI (13, 44, 45, 55, 98, 99). While ischemia and the associated lactate accumulation decreases intracellular pH and prevents mPTP opening, reperfusion rapidly returns the intracellular pH to normal, contributing to mPTP opening, particularly when combined with increased intracellular ROS and calcium (13, 100103). The open mPTP allows H+ to enter the inner mitochondrial matrix, further uncoupling the electron transport chain and decreasing ATP production (104106). Decreased ATP and increased mitochondrial ROS secondary to mPTP opening can lead to mitochondrial fission, a canonical step in initiating apoptosis (13, 31, 107). Mitochondrial fission also results in dysfunction of other cell organelles, particularly in endothelial cells, leading to endothelial dysfunction, seen in both IRI and xenograft injury (108).

Endothelial Dysfunction

Healthy endothelial cells are essential to maintain organ homeostasis and represent the first barrier between donor tissue parenchyma and recipient immune cells. Normal endothelium facilitates nutritive blood flow and waste clearance by preventing non-physiologic platelet adhesion and regulating local coagulation cascade activation (31). IRI disrupts multiple normal EC functions. Inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, proteases, histamine, and other proinflammatory mediators cause EC tight junction phosphorylation and internalization as well as calcium dependent myosin light chain phosphorylation, which leads to cytoskeletal contraction and loss of both paracellular and transcellular vascular barrier function (31, 109113). Dysregulation of sphingosine-1-phospate, an endothelial tight cell junction protein, has been noted to play a significant role in IRI, most thoroughly studied in lung endothelial IRI (114).

Dying or dead cells release the ROS created after reperfusion. ROS enhance adhesion between leukocytes and endothelial cells by means of upregulation or activation of selectins and integrins, including ICAM-1, P-selectin, JAM-A, JAM-C, and PECAM-1 (31, 115121). Similarly, multiple matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) such as MMP9, are inducible gelatinases that disrupt liver sinusoidal endothelial cells and promote leukocyte adhesion via changes to PECAM-1 (122). Macrophages and mast cells are then activated, releasing chemoattractants such as TNFα, other proinflammatory cytokines, platelet activating factor (PAF), and the lipid mediator LTB4 (31). These mediators amplify recruitment, adhesion, and activation of neutrophils, which release chemokines and cytokines that further propagate a pro-inflammatory response and recruit other immune cells to the site of injury (112). Liver sinusoidal endothelial cells are normally protective against inflammation by their expression of transcription factors KLF2 and NRF2, but IRI damages these cells, which results in degradation of the anti-inflammatory transcription factors (41, 123, 124). In addition to elaboration of pro-inflammatory cytokines, expression of angiogenic growth factors such as VEGF is increased during IRI, and contributes to increased endothelial permeability during IRI of the lung, heart, and liver but not kidney (125134).

ECs, damaged by pro-inflammatory cytokines and ROS, decrease production of endothelial nitric oxide (NO), a powerful vasodilator, which therefore results in vasoconstriction (135, 136). The decrease in EC NO release, coupled with upregulation of cell adhesion molecules, promotes platelet activation and adhesion, creating a prothrombotic local environment (137, 138). This leads to microthrombi formation, production of transcription factors for inflammatory mediators, and upregulation of costimulatory proteins such as CD28-B7 and ICOS-ICOSL that further propagate inflammation and cell/tissue death. They also contribute to amplification of adaptive immune responses to ‘non-self’ antigens, whether allo or xeno (117, 139, 140). Hypoxia inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) normally protects endothelial barrier function and vasodilatory function through modulation of VEGF and nitric oxide, but its dysregulation during ischemia is a significant factor in IRI (132, 141, 142).

In addition to endothelial injury, in all organs, but particularly in the lungs, epithelial injury increases levels of the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE). HMGB1 is a traditionally intracellular protein that regulates a variety of nuclear functions, however upon ischemia induced necrosis, it becomes extracellular and acts as a DAMP. HMGB1 by itself or bound to inflammatory cytokines binds to membrane RAGE and becomes endocytosed. HMGB1 and/or its accompanying molecule then signal TLR4 which leads to activating the NF-κB pathway (143145).

As in allotransplants performed in the setting of preformed anti-donor antibody (ABO mismatch, presensitized), in xenotransplantation, endothelial damage is initiated by pre-formed antibodies, in this case directed against pig carbohydrate and other antigens, that bind to the xenograft endothelium upon reperfusion, and are a critical initiator of XIRI. The pre-formed anti-pig antibodies activate complement and trigger Fc-mediated inflammatory cell adhesion and activation, amongst other inflammatory responses that damage the endothelium (146). Endothelial activation and consequent loss of thromboregulatory, anti-inflammatory, and anticoagulant functions propagates an already robust inflammatory response secondary to prolonged systemic inflammation in xenograft recipients (SIXR), which has been implicated as the culprit explaining the apparent requirement for an expanded spectrum of immunosuppressive treatments in successful xenotransplantation experiments (27).

Of particular note, the inflammatory mediators associated with SIXR are similar to those associated with XIRI (27). The importance of these inflammatory mediators in XIRI is highlighted by the especially robust response of immune cells to cross-species inflammatory mediators (147). French et al. explored this concept in IL8 and neutrophil interactions in an ex vivo pig-to-human lung xenotransplant model and in vivo pig-to-baboon lung xenotransplant model (147). These studies demonstrated that compared to allo- and autotransplantation, the xenotransplant model had significant elevation of baboon IL8 as early as four hours post-reperfusion (147). Additionally, human neutrophil adhesion was more robust when the neutrophil was activated by pig IL8 compared to human IL8 (147). Human TNFα activation of pig aortic endothelial cells also resulted in greater neutrophil adhesion compared to the neutrophil adhesion seen with human TNFα activation of human aortic endothelial cells (147).

Physiologically inappropriate formation or propagation of clot is also a feature shared between IRI and xenograft rejection due to hypoxia and inflammatory cytokine-induced upregulation of tissue factor production from endothelial cells (148). Tissue factor is a procoagulant enzyme that activates the extrinsic coagulation cascade. Intrinsic factor activation has also been implicated in the procoagulable state associated with IRI, especially in xenotransplantation (149). The procoagulable state associated with antibody binding and complement activation is amplified by a disturbance of the homeostatic balance between endothelial plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 to tissue plasminogen activator (150). As a consequence, transgenic expression of human tissue factor pathway inhibitor (hTFPI) in pigs is being studied to limit this coagulation dysregulation (151).

Dysregulated coagulation across species is known to contribute to xenograft injury, and has been addressed by expressing human coagulation pathway regulatory proteins (e.g., thrombomodulin, hTBM; endothelial protein C receptor, hEPCR; tissue factor pathway inhibitor, hTFPI) on pig endothelium (152). Xenografts from pigs with GTKO and complement regulatory transgenes, with or without additional coagulation pathway regulatory proteins, are the longest survivors to date in pig-to-NHP xenotransplantation, suggesting that the additional expression of one or more human coagulation pathway regulatory molecules may protect xenografts from IRI (25, 153, 154). Ultimately, genetic modification of the pig endothelium to prevent XIRI may prove to be critical in enabling successful clinical xenotransplantation (96, 155157).

Cell Death Mechanisms

Cell death occurs by four basic means: necrosis, apoptosis, autophagy, and necroptosis (31).

Necrosis

Necrosis is an uncontrolled or uncoordinated form of cell death generally triggered by extrinsic toxic exposures that damages the cell and disrupts biochemical functions essential to cell survival.

Apoptosis

Apoptosis is considered “programmed” cell death, and is often normal, coordinated, and beneficial, but may also occur in response to harmful stimuli. It is a controlled process of removing and recycling cells without causing inflammation or harming the organism. It occurs as the membrane blebs, shrinking the cell, while the nucleus collapses, chromatin condenses, and DNA fragments, until the remains are engulfed by macrophages. This process is mediated by a cascade of caspase proteases that result in cleavage of intracellular substrates. There are intrinsic and extrinsic pathways to initiate the caspase cascade. Importantly, apoptosis can be initiated by hypoxia via the intrinsic (mitochondrial) pathway, a key component of ischemic injury, as well as by ROS from reperfusion (158).

Autophagy

Autophagy, or “eating of self” is similar to apoptosis in that is also a noninflammatory process. As the cell begins to die, it degrades its own components via lysosomes (159). This is initiated by formation of a phagophore around intracellular contents to create an autophagosome, which fuses with the lysosome for degradation (159). This process is seen in both phases of IRI (160). ULK1 is a key component in autophagy, and is activated when the cell is depleted of nutrients and energy in ischemia (158).

Necroptosis

Necroptosis is an intermediate phenomenon, an amalgam of mechanisms that overlap between coordinated and uncoordinated cell death (31). It is essentially a “programmed” form of necrosis, triggered by RIPK3, seen in response to viral or intracellular bacterial infections and inflammatory diseases. This contrasts with apoptosis in that caspases are uninvolved and that the result is disorganized leakage of intracellular contents, including DAMPs, triggering innate and adaptive immune responses and causing inflammation (161). This is important in IRI, and RIPK3-deficient mice are protected from IRI (162).

Cell Death in Xenotransplantation

Cell death mechanisms in xenotransplantation are starting to be studied and apoptosis has been identified as one of the critical pathways (27, 163). Inhibition of the NF-κB pathway has been shown to lead to decreased porcine endothelial cell death/apoptosis in an in vitro model of xenotransplantation, whereas endothelial cell apoptosis has been shown to lead to xenograft rejection (164). These studies, however, reviewed the impact of SIXR leading to apoptosis, and were not specifically evaluating the role of cell death in XIRI (164).

Systemic Mechanisms of IRI

Innate Immune System

Neutrophils

Leukocytes are recruited by the local release of inflammatory chemokines and cytokines, by endothelial expression of selectins, integrins, and bound antibodies, by products of clot formation such as platelets and fibrin, and by exposed basement membrane secondary to endothelial cell retraction (165). Subsequently, neutrophils release additional inflammatory mediators including IL1, IL6, IL8, IL11, IFNγ, TNFα, LTB4, as well as proteases, and monocyte chemotactic factor 1 (23, 112). IL6, IL8, and TNFα have all been associated with xenograft injury and failure in multiple models (166168). The selectin-dependent, complement-driven migration of neutrophils into the parenchyma, endothelial dysfunction, parenchymal edema, and numerous other processes have been implicated in the condition of “No-Reflow”. No-Reflow is a clinical finding of lack of perfusion to the microvasculature despite reperfusion at the tissue level following a prolonged ischemic event. It has been established to be associated with IRI in particular of the heart and limb (65, 169173). Blocking cell adhesion molecules, particularly selectins and integrins, disrupting chemokine and cytokine release, as well as complement inhibition has each been shown to attenuate IRI and prevent or reduce the severity of “No-Reflow” (174178).

Macrophages and Mast Cells

Tissue resident macrophages are activated by ROS, PAMPs, and DAMPs (179). Activated macrophages release TNFα, which leads to upregulation of NF-κB and other transcription factors throughout the reperfused organ or tissue (31, 180). The resident macrophages of the liver, Kupffer cells, are activated by DAMPs as well as by hepatocyte damage and release of the proinflammatory ligand HMGB1 (181, 182). Kupffer cell activation can further exacerbate hepatocyte injury by promoting neutrophil recruitment and upregulating NF-κB (31, 182185). Similarly, resident lung macrophages are activated during ischemia reperfusion and enhance epithelial and endothelial dysfunction and inflammation by the TLR pathway (77, 186189). ROS, TNFα, IL17, and C-X-C motifs are released from the injured epithelium, activated macrophages, and iNKT cells (51, 143, 186, 190192). These are powerful pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines that recruit leukocytes (143, 186, 190192). ROS, complement, LTB4, and other molecular mediators of IRI activate mast cells as well (193). Mast cells are subendothelial and reside in nearly all tissues. Mast cell activation leads to release of various monoamines, proteases, TNFα, and other inflammatory mediators that result in edema, inflammation, and local hemorrhage (193).

Mast cells and resident tissue macrophages also play a significant role in xenograft dysfunction, and may aggravate XIRI (155). Burdorf et al. demonstrated in an ex vivo lung perfusion xenograft model that blocking thromboxane and histamine receptors, mediators released by peri-endothelial mast cells, led to a blunting of initial rise in pulmonary vascular resistance, decreased pulmonary edema, and delayed loss of vascular barrier function after reperfusion (155).

Platelets

During IRI, platelet activation occurs through a multitude of receptors including platelet collagen receptor, adenosine diphosphate receptor, glycoprotein-IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa), P-selectin, and G-proteins. Additionally, complement byproduct-mediated, histamine-mediated, and thromboxane-mediated pathways exist which lead to platelet activation (194197). Activated platelets release ROS, serotonin, and platelet activating factors, as well as interact with leukocytes and endothelial cells, propagating sterile inflammation, coagulation, and IRI (194).

In addition to these processes, Fc receptor mediated platelet activation and complement mediated platelet activation are particularly critical in xenotransplantation (198). The interaction between the complement system, coagulation-fibrinolytic system, and platelets leads to thromboinflammation. In the long run this leads to consumptive coagulopathy and is a major barrier in xenotransplantation (198). These processes have been traditionally associated with SIXR however each of the component pieces leading to thromboinflammation are also activated during XIRI (198).

Adaptive Immune System

The adaptive immune system has been found to play an important role in IRI (37, 199203). Dendritic cells, which are stimulated by ROS and DAMPs, are pivotal to triggering and amplifying activation of adaptive immunity (37). However, it is clear that the adaptive immune response not only propagates injurious mechanisms in IRI but can also down-regulate IRI (37). CD4+ and CD8+ T cells secrete inflammatory cytokines and chemokines such as IL1, TNFα, and IL17 to recruit other cells (37). CD8+ cells amplify IRI independent of the T-cell receptor and antigen specific T-cell functions (204). IgM and IgG produced by B-cells also contribute to IRI by ligating complement, neutrophils, macrophages, and platelets to xenoantigens in the graft and after release of cells and cell fragments into the circulation (37). The role of T-regulatory cells is an active avenue of research and they are thought to provide anti-inflammatory regulatory function in reducing IRI (37, 205, 206). NK and NKT cells are also thought to play a role in IRI, specifically in xenotransplantation where they have been shown to adhere to and damage the endothelium because of absence of self-recognition molecules (CD47, HLA-E), similar to a mechanism found in IRI-damaged or neoplastic cells (207).

Brain Death

Brain dead donors constitute a significant portion of the allograft donor pool, including more than 50% of kidneys, 85% of livers and lungs, and almost all hearts (208). Brain death induces a sterile inflammatory response that has been well-characterized, and activates many of the same pathways that mediate IRI (209). These pathways include pro-inflammatory cytokine release, endothelial injury, coagulation pathway dysregulation, and enhanced leukocyte adhesion and migration in the lung and other tissues (210213). Additionally, neuropeptides, such as neuropeptide Y, calcitonin gene related peptide, and substance P, released during brain death, propagate sterile inflammation within the donor (209, 214). Brain death also causes dysregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis resulting in decreased adrenocorticotropic hormone and cortisol (215217). There is also a rapid depletion of antidiuretic hormone resulting in diabetes insipidus, and thyroid stimulating hormone resulting in central hypothyroidism and subsequent decrease in serum T3 and T4 (215217). These changes have significant electrolyte and hemodynamic consequences throughout the brain death period requiring special attention and treatment so as to preserve the donor organs (215217). The injurious consequences of each of these “sterile inflammation” pathways differs from organ to organ, as exemplified by varying behavior of different organs from individual donors (209). Sterile inflammatory mediators elaborated in association with brain death “prime” transplanted organs for a ‘second hit’, such as IRI (218). For renal allografts, where there is a robust reference group of case-matched controls, allografts from brain dead donors demonstrate a higher incidence of primary graft dysfunction and reduced graft survival relative to living donors when all other variables are taken into account such as graft ischemic time, HLA mismatch, and immunosuppression regimen (219, 220). The brain death priming process is blunted in organs procured from donors after cardiac death (DCD). The effects and mechanisms of IRI from DCD organ procurement, and the competing risk of extended warm ischemic time between cardiac death and organ flush in situ, still need to be elucidated (40, 221226). With regards to known mechanisms contributing to IRI, xenotransplantation has the advantage of avoiding the “brain death priming” phenomenon seen in allotransplantation.

Organ-Specific Ischemia Reperfusion Injury Minimization (IRIM)

Specific organ allografts have unique properties that make them more or less susceptible to different mechanisms of IRI (23, 24, 40, 41, 66, 165). In allotransplantation, there is now significant research on organ-specific mechanisms contributing to IRI, and IRIM strategies (23, 24, 40, 41, 66, 165, 227). Current research in IRIM for heart, lungs, kidney, and liver allografts include reducing the effects of ROS, and directly or indirectly inhibiting inflammatory mediators, complement, immune cell platelet adhesion and activation, and maintaining, preserving, or restoring endothelial barrier and vasoregulatory functions (23, 41, 50, 52, 114, 190, 227265). Promising findings in reduction of lung IRI have included adenosine A2A receptor activation reducing microvascular permeability and lung injury, early growth response 1 (Egr1) deletion reducing neutrophil infiltration, C3a receptor antagonist decreasing cell injury and inflammation, carbon monoxide in cold flush reducing inflammatory mediators and cellular infiltrate, and nitric oxide to reduce pulmonary arterial pressures, inflammation, and apoptosis (50, 52, 190, 266269).

Certain IRIM targets and treatments are common between multiple organs. Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) treatment at the time of procurement, or during ex vivo perfusion before implantation, is a novel area of research in IRIM. MSCs are collected from bone marrow, amniotic tissue, or the umbilical cord, as their extracellular vesicles include apoptotic bodies, which were hypothesized to interact with other cells to quiet the inflammation seen in IRI (227, 228, 270). These have been administered by culturing the cells (with or without separation of extracellular vesicles) and adding to a perfusate such as Steen solution in ex vivo perfusion, as an intravenous infusion to the recipient at the time of reperfusion, or bronchoscopically (227, 239241, 244, 246, 270273).

MSC treatment has been found to be broadly protective of IRI in the heart, lungs, and kidney in preclinical models (23, 227, 239241, 246, 270274). It has been proposed that MSCs may have their protective effect by three general actions: paracrine secretion of soluble factors, increasing cell to cell interactions via microtubules, and secretion of vesicles containing proteins and nucleic acids (275). There is currently one phase 1 clinical trial using MSCs in kidney transplantation; early results have shown safety of MSC infusion in these patients (276). We expect the number of these studies to increase as has been done for in other disease processes that have trialed MSC therapy (277279). Similarly, use of inhaled pharmacologic agents, specific inhaled anesthetic, or either inhaled or perfusate dissolved gasses such as nitric oxide, hydrogen sulfide, and carbon monoxide have been used in preclinical models to mitigate IRI of the lungs, liver, and kidneys (266269, 280284).

Lung

In lung transplantation, primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is closely associated with duration of cold and warm ischemia, and is usually attributed to IRI (285, 286). Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) for normothermic organ preservation and rehabilitation is currently in use clinically and has been found to potentially reduce IRI (287289). EVLP was introduced to the clinic in 2011 for high-risk lungs (290). Preclinical studies in a porcine model have shown that EVLP may reduce IRI by decreasing the insult on the endothelium or by reducing the inflammatory cytokine load (291293). Controlling reperfusion by means of reversing oxygen debt in the absence of mechanical stress/strain and in the absence of platelets and neutrophils are also beneficial attributes of EVLP (291, 292). When comparing tissue cytokine levels of EVLP lungs versus cold static preserved lungs from biopsies obtained two hours post implantation, EVLP lung tissue had significantly lower concentrations of IL1β, IL18, and IFNγ. This indicates that ischemia minimization is associated with reduced elaboration of pro-inflammatory cytokines. In this study, the potential IRI reduction may have been secondary to decreasing the injury mechanisms associated with cold storage and subsequent reperfusion (291). EVLP has the potential to significantly reduce IRI by improving organ preservation by reducing or preventing oxygen debt and provides a platform for delivering preventive and/or adjunctive reparative treatments based on defined IRI mechanisms.

Kidney

In kidney transplantation, PGD encompasses both the relatively common delayed graft function (DGF), with recovery of glomerular filtration rate in days or weeks after transplant, as well as primary non-function, which does not recover. Renal allograft PGD is closely associated with duration of cold and warm ischemia, and is usually attributed to IRI (24). Inhibition of apoptosis, TLR signaling, and complement activation/injury are the IRIM strategies supported by strong preclinical and clinical evidence base, and are closest to clinical practice. QPI-1002 is an siRNA that temporarily inhibits p53 (37, 274). p53 inhibition in renal tubular cells has been shown to reduce apoptosis (37). QPI1002 was successful in reducing incidence and severity of DGF in phase I and II trials, and is currently in a phase III clinical trial to reduce DGF in kidney transplant patients (NCT0261096) (37, 294). An anti-TLR2 monoclonal antibody (Tomaralimab, Opsona Therapeutics Ltd, Dublin, Ireland) is currently in phase II clinical trials for DGF reduction (37, 262). Recombinant C1 inhibitors (C1-INH) are being evaluated in multiple clinical trials, with interim reports suggesting equivocal effects and other studies showing reduced severity of DGF (37). Complement Receptor 1 (CR1) is a protein found on the surface of many different cell types that downregulates C3 convertase (24). Mirococept (APT070, Inflazyme Pharmaceuticals, Richmond, BC, Canada) is a CR1 with a membrane anchor currently in phase III clinical trials for preventing IRI in kidneys (295). Orthosteric inhibition of leukocyte integrin CD11b/CD18 to diminish kidney IRI is an active area of research in a non-human primate model (296). Hypothermic (1-8°C) ex vivo perfusion is a long-established technology, and is a widely used method in many organ procurement organizations based on evidence of improved outcomes, including reduced DGF for deceased donor kidneys from high-risk donors or with expected prolonged cold ischemic times, intending to reduce IRI (253). More recently, normothermic blood based ex vivo perfusion has been shown to reduce the incidence of DGF in kidney allografts and this protocol is now in phase II clinical trials with primary outcomes being the incidence and nature of renal allograft DGF (ISRCTN15821205) (297, 298).

Liver

Liver PGD (early allograft dysfunction [EAD] or primary nonfunction [PNF]) is generally ascribed to IRI (299). Machine perfusion (MP) has been studied most extensively in preclinical models to combat IRI, paving the way for clinical trials (22, 300312). The three main techniques of MP that have become clinically applicable include hypothermic MP, hypothermic oxygenated MP, and normothermic MP (NMP). Each technique aims to mitigate IRI by reducing standard cold storage time and associated ischemic injury. In recent trials, the use of MP has been shown to reduce histologic bile duct injury and decrease post-operative hepatocellular enzyme release, both surrogates for IRI (22, 302, 304). Of interest, the first ischemia-free liver transplant was performed in China, where NMP was initiated in the donor and continued without interruption until graft revascularization in the recipient (313). This technique is hypothesized to have reduced IRI given minimal hepatocyte necrosis and apoptosis seen on post-reperfusion graft histology, low levels of inflammatory cytokine release by immunohistochemical staining and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, and low post-reperfusion hepatocellular enzyme levels.

Heart

Heart allograft primary graft dysfunction has been linked to IRI and manifests as global biventricular dysfunction – ranging from diastolic dysfunction in milder cases to progressively depressed systolic function in its more severe presentation (314). PGD after cardiac transplantation remains a significant clinical problem despite decades of research (315). Targeting inflammatory cytokines may be a new and promising avenue for IRIM. Tocilizumab (Genentech/Roche, San Francisco, CA, USA), an anti-IL6R monoclonal antibody, has proven efficacious in a clinical trial in reducing myocardial inflammation after acute myocardial infarction (316). It is currently being investigated in the heart transplant setting with study endpoints being donor specific antibodies, acute cellular rejection, antibody mediated rejection, hemodynamic compromise secondary to clinical rejection, death, or transplantation in the first year (NCT03644667). Antibodies against IL1R and TNFα reduce associated heart IRI in preclinical models but have not yet been evaluated in clinical trials (317, 318). The availability of clinically approved anti-IL1R and anti-TNFα antibodies (Anakinra, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB, Stockholm, Sweden and Etanercept, AMGEN, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA) make these avenues especially enticing. Heart IRIM via normothermic ex vivo perfusion has clinical approval and is currently available (319322). On the horizon for cardiac allotransplantation is hypothermic ex vivo perfusion. Nilsson et al. compared hypothermic ex vivo perfusion to cold static storage in a recent phase II clinical trial and showed safety and efficacy of the circuit in humans (323). Ex vivo heart perfusion limits IRI by minimizing cold static storage time and thus minimizing organ ischemia.

Cardiac reanimation after DCD procurement is being used to expand the transplant donor pool (319322). Optimizing the initial reperfusate of the heart contributed to the success of heart DCD (40). The DCD heart can be procured in two ways: direct procurement and preservation (DPP) and normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) (40). In DPP an emergent sternotomy is performed after declaration of death and the heart is perfused with cardioplegia solution during dissection. The heart is then explanted, connected, and reanimated with the normothermic ex vivo perfusion device. Throughout travel to the recipient’s facility the heart is perfused with normothermic oxygenated blood procured from the donor. The principles of the cardioplegia strategy for DPP and IRIM both aim to reoxygenate the myocardium, flush out ROS, replete ATP stores, and restore calcium homeostasis (40). In NRP, once death is declared, a sternotomy is performed, the head vessels are clamped, and the body is resuscitated via central or peripheral extracorporeal life support. The heart is then assessed in situ and if it is functionally normal, it is dissected, arrested, removed, and placed on the ex vivo perfusion device.

Discussion

IRI in Xenotransplantation

If shown to be dependably successful, organ xenotransplantation from pigs would provide an abundant and ethically acceptable alternative to human donors as a source of organs for transplantation that would be available on demand. Over the past 20 years, pigs have been genetically modified to address known xenograft injury mechanisms driven mainly by preformed antibody, complement activation, and coagulation pathway dysregulation. Long-term, life-supporting xenograft survival has recently been achieved using organs from several of these pig strains and transplanting them into non-human primates, the best available model for porcine-to-human xenotransplantation (4, 324). Three components of conventional allograft IRI that we believe are particularly critical to XIRI are complement activation, sterile inflammation, and endothelial activation (27, 146, 325, 326). However, heart xenografts of multiple different phenotypes and even pig hearts with three key xeno gene modifications (GalTKO.hCPRP.hTBM) were unable to dependably support life in vivo in the hands of multiple experienced investigators. Only with XIRI minimization were Langin et al. able to achieve consistent xenograft survival more than one day (25, 327, 328).

XIRI is a critical barrier to clinical xenotransplantation, but it affects xeno-organs to different degrees (25, 153, 329, 330). The xeno-heart seems to require robust XIRI minimization technique to avoid perioperative cardiac xenograft dysfunction (PCXD) (25, 153, 328). Additionally, Shah et al. showed that liver xenotransplant recipients suffer lethal coagulopathy, and Watanabe et al. showed that lung xenotransplantation is characterized by significant endothelial dysfunction and loss of vascular barrier function (alveolar hemorrhage) (329, 330). The mechanistic basis for the vulnerability of hearts and other organ xenografts to IRI may be related to xeno-specific mechanisms. For example, Khalpey et al. found that pig endothelial cells lose expression of ecto-5’ nucleotidase when exposed to human and non-human primate blood. This leads to loss of a key producer of extracellular cryoprotective, antithrombotic, and immunosuppressive adenosine which would put the porcine organ at increased risk of IRI (331). Porcine organ vulnerability may be due to this or a yet undiscovered peculiarity of pig physiology.

Ischemia Reperfusion Injury Minimization in Xenotransplantation

Complement and coagulation pathway regulatory molecules, self-recognition receptors that inhibit cell-mediated injury, and constitutive expression of anti-inflammatory transgenes that have been incorporated into porcine donors to address xeno-specific injury mechanisms are likely to play an important role in minimizing IRI (Table 2) (156, 157, 332). Preventing detrimental complement activation, endothelial dysfunction, and reducing the cross species inflammatory response will be critical for future research into XIRI minimization. Langin et al. and Mohiuddin et al. have used pigs that express complement regulatory protein (hCD46) and pretreat their heart xenotransplant recipients with complement inhibitors. However, Langin reported that those interventions along with additional expression of human thrombomodulin, did not prevent initial xenograft dysfunction (IXD) (25, 333). Thus, while expression of these two human complement and coagulation pathway regulatory proteins would be expected to be protective for GalTKO hearts in baboons, ischemia minimization was necessary and sufficient, at least when anti-IL6R, anti-IL-1R, and anti-TNFα were also administered.

Table 2.

Summary of the promising mechanisms of ischemia reperfusion injury minimization currently being used in in vivo and in vitro models.

Current Model Intervention Results
Complement Regulation
  • Pig-to-NHP in vivo transplant

  • Porcine transgenesis of human complement regulatory proteins such as hCD46

  • Successful transgenic pig to NHP xenotransplantation (Heart, Kidney, Lung)

Coagulation Regulation
  • Pig-to-NHP in vivo transplant

  • Porcine transgenesis of coagulation regulatory proteins such as hTBM, hTFPI, hEPCR

  • Successful transgenic pig to NHP xenotransplantation (Heart, Kidney, Lung)

Anti-inflammatory Medications
  • Pig-to-NHP in vivo transplant

  • Anti-IL1, Anti-IL6R, Anti-TNFα

  • Successful transgenic pig to NHP xenotransplantation (Heart, Kidney, Lung)

Ex vivo Cold perfusion
  • Pig-to-NHP in vivo transplant

  • Cold continuous ex-vivo reperfusion followed by intermittent reperfusion during organ implant until cross clamp is removed

  • Successful transgenic pig to NHP xenotransplantation with long term heart xenograft survival

Self-recognition proteins
  • Pig-to-NHP in vivo transplant

  • Porcine transgenesis of self-recognition proteins such as hCD47, hHLA-E

  • Successful transgenic pig to NHP xenotransplantation (Heart, Kidney, Lung)

Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSCs)
  • Human-to-sheep myocardial infarction (MI)

  • Human-to-Canine cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)

  • Intracoronary injection of MSCs

  • Intravenous injection of MSCs

  • MI model – improved myocardial perfusion in the treated group

  • CPB model – decreased inflammatory cytokine levels

Heme-oxygenase-1
  • Pig-to-human in vitro oxidative stress model

  • Porcine transgenesis of HO-1 put under oxidative stress and by human TNF in in vitro conditions

  • Reduced reactivity to oxidative and human TNF.

The relative contribution of complement, coagulation, and inflammation to XIRI remains unknown. Xenograft injury and allograft IRI are both associated with pro-inflammatory cytokines (168, 316318, 334336). Whether the IL6, IL1, and TNFα pathways and complement and coagulation pathway dysregulation contribute significantly to IXD of heart xenografts has not been addressed and could be studied by omitting these interventions from the regimen, or by including these agents when using hearts without the hCD46 or hTBM genetic modifications.

As described by Langin et al. in the orthotopic pig-to-baboon heart xenotransplant model, organ preservation with machine perfusion is the most obvious and readily available approach to IRIM. In their initial experiments, standard cold static ischemia was associated with IXD in all but one of four consecutive xenografts. In contrast, when the hearts were perfused with cold (8°C) oxygenated cardiac STEEN solution (XVIVO, Gothenburg, Sweden), a hyperkalemic, hyperosmotic, blood-containing cardiac preservation solution developed by the Steen group, no IXD was reported for 9 consecutive subjects (25, 337). The perfusate was administered continuously to the donor heart prior to explant and either continuously or intermittently, at 20-minute intervals, throughout implant. Their perfusate contained hormones, inotropes, and anesthetic agents based on 20 years of work in the field. Delivery of an oxygenated perfusate in an arrested heart allowed for restoration of oxygen supply with minimal consumption; avoiding ischemia minimized ROS production. The continual circulation of an electrolyte and pH balanced solution likely minimized ATP depletion, mPTP opening, and calcium and other ion flux. The absence of platelets and leukocytes and their associated pro-inflammatory cytokine and lipid arachidonic acid-derived mediators may have also helped in preventing IRI. The pretreatment of the recipient with a cytokine antibody cocktail may have blocked the effects associated with release of these inflammatory mediators at initial xenograft reperfusion. These multiple different treatments, in combination, were sufficient to prevent graft dysfunction; whether they had direct or indirect effects to inhibit significant endothelial dysfunction, complement activation, and significant initial inflammation remains to be determined.

Normothermic ex vivo perfusion is used clinically in allotransplantation with good effect, particularly in liver and heart transplantation (338, 339). There are no current studies demonstrating the effects of normothermic ex vivo perfusion in xenotransplantation. Normothermic machine perfusion shortens cold ischemia while supporting the full organ metabolism allowing for assessment of injury and function. Hypothermic and subnormothermic machine perfusion have also been shown to enhance mitochondrial function and replenish cellular energy stores (338). Lastly, ischemia-free organ transplantation requires normothermic machine perfusion and completely abolishes ischemia. Given that there is no component of trauma or brain death with xenotransplantation, and ideally no question of organ viability before procurement, the role of ex vivo/machine perfusion and ischemia minimization in xenotransplantation require further investigation for all organs, and may be critical to safe, successful clinical translation.

Other strategies in XIRI minimization include the use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). MSCs are hypothesized to mitigate IRI through their anti-inflammatory, pro-immunomodulatory, and tissue repair characteristics. Dayan et al. utilized a myocardial infarction model in sheep with treatment with human MSCs, showing improvement in myocardial perfusion at one month in the treated group without adverse events (270, 273). Qiang et al. utilized a canine model of cardiopulmonary bypass-induced IRI and treatment with human amniotic MSCs which led to mitigation of IRI as evidence by decreased levels of TNFα and IL8 and increased levels of IL10 relative to dogs not treated with MSCs (211).

Significant work has shown that activating the protective NRF2/heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) pathway may reduce oxidative and inflammatory stress associated with IRI (340, 341). Bach et al. demonstrated the importance of HO-1 in a mouse-to-rat cardiac xenograft model, noting increased expression of HO-1 in xenografts with long-term survival (342, 343). In vitro work involving transgenic expression of human HO-1 into pigs has shown a decrease in reactivity of pig fibroblasts to oxidative stress as well as human TNFα, therefore this gene has been added in genetically engineered pigs (344). The separate effect of HO-1 on organ behavior in xenotransplantation has not yet been studied. Of note, delivery of an ROS scavenger may also reduce oxidative stress and attenuate XIRI, but further work is needed (345, 346).

Limiting cross-species coagulation dysregulation may help minimize XIRI. Anticoagulant genes should diminish coagulation pathway dysregulation and blunt inflammation. CD39 expression should improve ADP and AMP catabolism, reducing platelet and EC activation, and promote elaboration of anti-inflammatory adenosine by endogenous CD73, thus inhibiting both physiologically inappropriate clotting and inflammation (347). Of note, pigs are relatively deficient in CD73, perhaps accounting in part for the pig’s particular IRI susceptibility. Human endothelial protein C receptor (hEPCR) transgenesis along with hTBM and hTFPI are all likely to reduce dysregulated coagulation, and EPCR, interacting with PPAR-1, upregulates potentially critical anti-inflammatory intracellular mechanisms (348, 349). Including one or more of these genetic modifications in the pig construct may reduce the need for ischemia minimization strategies to reduce IRI and its consequences. Parenthetically, addressing porcine vWF-human GP1b abnormal interaction (blocking Fab; humanizing pvWF by genetic engineering) reduces, but does not prevent, platelet sequestration seen in heart, kidney, liver, and lung models (350).

Molecular mechanisms of IRI mentioned previously such as the calcium paradox, mitochondrial dysfunction, and mPTP have not been studied in the context of xenotransplantation but may be presumed to be similarly important. Ex vivo perfusion should minimize activation of these pathogenic mechanisms since the cellular electrochemical and energy imbalances associated with ischemia and reperfusion are reduced or prevented prior to transplantation.

Immune cell adhesion and activation also play a role in XIRI. Using genetic engineering to express self-recognition molecules on the porcine endothelium may help attenuate XIRI. Damaged or neoplastic cells lose expression of self-recognition receptors such as CD47 and HLA-E, resulting in activation of innate immune cell scavenging by neutrophils and monocyte/macrophage lineage cells (CD47), NK cells, and other myeloid cells (HLA-E) (351, 352). Similarly, pig cells that lack human CD47 and HLA-E are susceptible to phagocytosis or cytolysis by these recipient effector leukocyte populations. In response, CD47 has been expressed in pigs, and was associated with prolonged survival in a porcine-NHP lung xenotransplant model (329). Incorporation of hHLA-E into the porcine endothelium also suppresses NK cell and macrophage activation (351).

Selectin antagonism is effective in decreasing IRI in MI, peripheral arterial, and allograft IRI models. It seems logical that selectin blockade will similarly attenuate XIRI by decreasing the rolling and adhesion of neutrophils, although this has not yet been confirmed. Further work specifically for XIRI needs to be done in models where other xeno-driven cell adhesive interactions are addressed, allowing this specific question to be answered (146).

While complement inhibition and coagulation regulation have been mentioned with respect to genetic engineering, these mechanisms can be targeted by other methods. Soluble hTBM or direct thrombin inhibitors can be administered, and should work synergistically to membrane bound hTBM to decrease activation of the coagulation cascade (353). IL4 activates the PI3K/Akt pathway in endothelial cells and has been shown to be protective of complement-mediated endothelial cell damage in xenotransplantation in vitro models. IL4 transfection with or without ex vivo perfusion, may be another avenue for protection from complement mediated IRI injury (354).

In addition to the innate immune system, altering how the adaptive immune system responds to the xenograft may attenuate XIRI by use of conventional immunosuppressive agents or other approaches. Artificial antigen presenting cells have been used in oncology to stimulate anti-tumor specific T-cell responses, and could in principle be engineered to regulate how the recipient immune system responds to the pig antigen (355).

Conclusion

IRI and its consequences for initial allograft organ function are well known to exert a critical negative influence on the initial and long-term outcomes of allotransplantation (23, 24, 41, 315). Minimizing IRI by ex vivo organ perfusion has allowed expansion of the donor pool in allotransplantation, and specifically enabled safer use of DCD organs. In addition, there is considerable evidence that IRI minimization by machine perfusion of ‘marginal’ kidneys, lungs, and livers is associated with improved allotransplant outcomes (288, 319, 356). To the extent that the major injury mechanisms are shared between xenograft injury and allograft IRI, including complement activation, endothelial dysfunction, and a profound inflammatory response, it is logical that genetic engineering modifications targeting these mechanisms should also attenuate XIRI (27, 146, 147, 155, 325, 326). Evidence to date indicates that XIRI is particularly critical in cardiac xenotransplantation. Efficacy of ischemia minimization in other xeno organs has not yet been evaluated (25, 153, 329, 330). By analogy with allograft experience, minimizing IRI either with ex vivo perfusion, or by targeting shared, overlapping injury mechanisms, may be critical for clinical translation. We suspect that using a combination of both approaches may offer critical advantages through redundancy to improve safety, maximize the odds of initial success with xenotransplantation in the short term, and the potential long-term benefits. With the advances of genetic modification, cytokine inhibition along with ischemia minimization via ex vivo organ perfusion has enabled a breakthrough in cardiac xenotransplantation. It remains to be seen which features are critical, and whether any drug treatments to the recipient can be eliminated using pigs with genes that constrain IRI mechanisms, like HO-1, HLA-E, hCD47. If not, continued progress in our understanding of XIRI mechanisms is likely to contribute to significant additional progress in pig-to-non-human primate XIRI minimization and xenotransplantation preclinical outcomes, providing hope for future clinical translation (25, 153, 329, 330).

Author Contributions

PP: Performed majority of background research and writing of the paper. MC and TC: Participated in background research and writing of the paper. AC, FP, JFM, LB, AA, and JCM: Participated in writing of the paper. RP: Participated in concept development and writing of the paper. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

RP: NIH RO1 AI153612 (PI: RP) CRISPR-Modified Cardiac Xenograft Transplantation. FP: German Heart Foundation (Deutsche Herzstiftung e.V.).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Abbreviations

ATP, adenosine triphosphate; CR1, complement receptor 1; DAMPs, damage-associated molecular proteins; DGF, delayed graft function; DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid; DPP, direct procurement and preservation; DCD, donors after cardiac death; EAD, early allograft dysfunction; EC, endothelial cell; EVLP, ex vivo lung perfusion; GalTKO, gal-α1,3galactosyl transferase gene was knocked out; GPIIb/IIIa, glycoprotein-IIb/IIIa; HO-1, heme oxygenase-1; hCPRP, human complement pathway regulatory protein; hEPCR, human endothelial protein C receptor; hTFPI, human tissue factor pathway inhibitor; HAR, hyperacute rejection; HIF-1, hypoxia inducible factor 1; IXD, initial xenograft dysfunction; iNKT, invariant NKT; IRI, ischemia Reperfusion Injury; IRIM, ischemia reperfusion injury minimization; MP, machine perfusion; MSC, mesenchymal stem cell; MMPs, metalloproteinases; mPTP, mitochondrial permeability transition pore; MI, myocardial infarction; NO, nitric oxide; NHP, non-human primate; NMP, normothermic Machine perfusion; NRP, normothermic regional perfusion; PAMPs, pathogen associated molecular proteins; PRRs, pattern recognition receptors; PCXD, perioperative cardiac xenograft dysfunction; PAF, platelet activating factor; PGD, primary graft dysfunction; PNF, primary nonfunction; ROS, reactive oxygen species; RAGE, receptor for advanced glycation end products; SIXR, systemic inflammation in xenograft recipients; TLRs, toll like receptors; XIRI, xenotransplantation ischemia reperfusion injury.

References

  • 1.Aristizabal AM, Caicedo LA, Martínez JM, Moreno M, J Echeverri G. Clinical Xenotransplantation, a Closer Reality: Literature Review. Cir Esp. Feb (2017) 95(2):62–72.   10.1016/j.ciresp.2016.12.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Roux FA, Saï P, Deschamps JY. Xenotransfusions, Past and Present. Xenotransplantation (2007) 14(3):208–16.   10.1111/j.1399-3089.2007.00404.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cyon E. Über Den Einfluss Der Temperaturänderungen Auf Zahl, Dauer Und Stärke Der Herzschläge. Berichte Über Die Verhandlungen Der Königlich Sächsischen Gesellschaft Der Wissenschaften Zu Leipzig, Mathematisch-Physische Classe1866 (1866) pp. 256–306. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lu T, Yang B, Wang R, Qin C. Xenotransplantation: Current Status in Preclinical Research. Front Immunol (2019) 10:3060.   10.3389/fimmu.2019.03060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cooper DKC, Ekser B, Tector AJ. A Brief History of Clinical Xenotransplantation. Int J Surg (2015) 23(Pt B):205–10.   10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.06.060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Carrel A. The Transplantation of Organs: A Preliminary Communication. 1905 [Classical Article]. Yale J Biol Med (2001) 74(4):239–41. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Camsonne R, Pottier D, Bustany P. Xenografts: Clinical Trials and Perspectives. Presse Med May (1998) 27(18):865–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Carrel A. La Technique Operatoire Des Anastomosis Vasculaires Et La Transplnatation Des Visceres. Lyon Med (1902) 1:859–64. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Carrel A. On The Permanent Life Of Tissues Outside Of The Organism. J Exp Med May (1912) 15(5):516–28.   10.1084/jem.15.5.516 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Carrel A. Technique and Remote Results of Vacular Anastomosis. Surg Gynecol Obstret (1912) 11:246–54. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Carrel A, Lindbergh CA. The Culture Of Whole Organs. Science (1935) 81(2112):621–3.   10.1126/science.81.2112.621 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Heyndrickx GR, Millard RW, McRitchie RJ, Maroko PR, Vatner SF. Regional Myocardial Functional and Electrophysiological Alterations After Brief Coronary Artery Occlusion in Conscious Dogs. J Clin Invest Oct (1975) 56(4):978–85.   10.1172/JCI108178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ferrari R, Balla C, Malagù M, Guardigli G, Morciano G, Bertini M, et al. Reperfusion Damage- A Story of Success, Failure, and Hope. Circ J Jan (2017) 81(2):131–41.   10.1253/circj.CJ-16-1124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jennings RB, Sommers HM, Smyth GA, Flack HA, Linn H. Myocardial Necrosis Induced by Temporary Occlusion of a Coronary Artery in the Dog. Arch Pathol (1960) 70:68–78. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Summers WK, Jamison RL. The No Reflow Phenomenon in Renal Ischemia. Lab Invest (1971) 25(6):635–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chait LA, May JW, O’Brien BM, Hurley JV. The Effects of the Perfusion of Various Solutions on the No-Reflow Phenomenon in Experimental Free Flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg (1978) 61(3):421–30.   10.1097/00006534-197803000-00017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.McCord JM. Oxygen-Derived Free Radicals in Postischemic Tissue Injury. N Engl J Med (1985) 312(3):159–63.   10.1056/NEJM198501173120305 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yong K, Khwaja A. Leucocyte Cellular Adhesion Molecules. Blood Rev (1990) 4(4):211–25.   10.1016/0268-960x(90)90001-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lachmann PJ. Biological Functions of the Complement System. Biochem Soc Trans (1990) 18(6):1143–5.   10.1042/bst0181143 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Searle J, Kerr JF, Bishop CJ. Necrosis and Apoptosis: Distinct Modes of Cell Death With Fundamentally Different Significance. Pathol Annu (1982) 17 Pt 2:229–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wernly B, Mirna M, Rezar R, Prodinger C, Jung C, Podesser BK, et al. Regenerative Cardiovascular Therapies: Stem Cells and Beyond. Int J Mol Sci (2019) 20(6).   10.3390/ijms20061420 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nasralla D, Coussios CC, Mergental H, Akhtar MZ, Butler AJ, Ceresa CDL, et al. A Randomized Trial of Normothermic Preservation in Liver Transplantation. Nature (2018) 557(7703):50–6.   10.1038/s41586-018-0047-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Laubach VE, Sharma AK. Mechanisms of Lung Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Curr Opin Organ Transplant (2016) 21(3):246–52.   10.1097/MOT.0000000000000304 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Salvadori M, Rosso G, Bertoni E. Update on Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Kidney Transplantation: Pathogenesis and Treatment. World J Transplant (2015) 5(2):52–67.   10.5500/wjt.v5.i2.52 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Längin M, Mayr T, Reichart B, Michel S, Buchholz S, Guethoff S, et al. Consistent Success in Life-Supporting Porcine Cardiac Xenotransplantation. Nature (2018) 564(7736):430–3.   10.1038/s41586-018-0765-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.D’Alessandro C, Golmard JL, Barreda E, Laali M, Makris R, Luyt CE, et al. Predictive Risk Factors for Primary Graft Failure Requiring Temporary Extra-Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support After Cardiac Transplantation in Adults. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg (2011) 40(4):962–9.   10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.01.064 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Li J, Hara H, Wang Y, Esmon C, Cooper DKC, Iwase H. Evidence for the Important Role of Inflammation in Xenotransplantation. J Inflammation (Lond) (2019) 16:10.   10.1186/s12950-019-0213-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sanada S, Komuro I, Kitakaze M. Pathophysiology of Myocardial Reperfusion Injury: Preconditioning, Postconditioning, and Translational Aspects of Protective Measures. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (2011) 301(5):H1723–41.   10.1152/ajpheart.00553.2011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Baines CP. The Mitochondrial Permeability Transition Pore and Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Basic Res Cardiol (2009) 104(2):181–8.   10.1007/s00395-009-0004-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Baines CP. The Molecular Composition of the Mitochondrial Permeability Transition Pore. J Mol Cell Cardiol (2009) 46(6):850–7.   10.1016/j.yjmcc.2009.02.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kalogeris T, Baines CP, Krenz M, Korthuis RJ. Cell Biology of Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol (2012) 298:229–317.   10.1016/B978-0-12-394309-5.00006-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Murphy E, Steenbergen C. Ion Transport and Energetics During Cell Death and Protection. Physiol (Bethesda) (2008) 23:115–23.   10.1152/physiol.00044.2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Talukder MA, Zweier JL, Periasamy M. Targeting Calcium Transport in Ischaemic Heart Disease. Cardiovasc Res (2009) 84(3):345–52.   10.1093/cvr/cvp264 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zimmerman AN, Hülsmann WC. Paradoxical Influence of Calcium Ions on the Permeability of the Cell Membranes of the Isolated Rat Heart. Nature (1966) 211(5049):646–7.   10.1038/211646a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Contreras L, Drago I, Zampese E, Pozzan T. Mitochondria: The Calcium Connection. Biochim Biophys Acta (2010) 1797(6-7):607–18.   10.1016/j.bbabio.2010.05.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Croall DE, Ersfeld K. The Calpains: Modular Designs and Functional Diversity. Genome Biol (2007) 8(6):218.   10.1186/gb-2007-8-6-218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nieuwenhuijs-Moeke GJ, Pischke SE, Berger SP, Sanders JSF, Pol RA, Struys MMRF, et al. Ischemia and Reperfusion Injury in Kidney Transplantation: Relevant Mechanisms in Injury and Repair. J Clin Med (2020) 9(1).   10.3390/jcm9010253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Miyamae M, Camacho SA, Weiner MW, Figueredo VM. Attenuation of Postischemic Reperfusion Injury Is Related to Prevention of [Ca2+]m Overload in Rat Hearts. Am J Physiol (1996) 271(5 Pt 2):H2145–53.   10.1152/ajpheart.1996.271.5.H2145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lemasters JJ, Bond JM, Chacon E, Harper IS, Kaplan SH, Ohata H, et al. The pH Paradox in Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury to Cardiac Myocytes. EXS (1996) 76:99–114.   10.1007/978-3-0348-8988-9_7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.White CW, Messer SJ, Large SR, Conway J, Kim DH, Kutsogiannis DJ, et al. Transplantation of Hearts Donated After Circulatory Death. Front Cardiovasc Med (2018) 5:8.   10.3389/fcvm.2018.00008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gracia-Sancho J, Casillas-Ramírez A, Peralta C. Molecular Pathways in Protecting the Liver From Ischaemia/Reperfusion Injury: A 2015 Update. Int J Mol Sci (2015) 129: (4):345–62.   10.1042/cs20150223 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lima B, Forrester MT, Hess DT, Stamler JS. S-Nitrosylation in Cardiovascular Signaling. Circ Res Mar (2010) 106(4):633–46.   10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.207381 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Go YM, Park H, Koval M, Orr M, Reed M, Liang Y, et al. A Key Role for Mitochondria in Endothelial Signaling by Plasma Cysteine/Cystine Redox Potential. Free Radic Biol Med Jan (2010) 48(2):275–83.   10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.10.050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lee HL, Chen CL, Yeh ST, Zweier JL, Chen YR. Biphasic Modulation of the Mitochondrial Electron Transport Chain in Myocardial Ischemia and Reperfusion. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (2012) 302(7):H1410–22.   10.1152/ajpheart.00731.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Perrelli MG, Pagliaro P, Penna C. Ischemia/reperfusion Injury and Cardioprotective Mechanisms: Role of Mitochondria and Reactive Oxygen Species. World J Cardiol (2011) 3(6):186–200.   10.4330/wjc.v3.i6.186 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Shen HM, Liu ZG. JNK Signaling Pathway Is a Key Modulator in Cell Death Mediated by Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species. Free Radic Biol Med (2006) 40(6):928–39.   10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2005.10.056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Porteous MK, Lee JC. Primary Graft Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation. Clin Chest Med (2017) 38(4):641–54.   10.1016/j.ccm.2017.07.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Zweier JL, Flaherty JT, Weisfeldt ML. Direct Measurement of Free Radical Generation Following Reperfusion of Ischemic Myocardium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (1987) 84(5):1404–7.   10.1073/pnas.84.5.1404 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Yang Z, Sharma AK, Linden J, Kron IL, Laubach VE. CD4+ T Lymphocytes Mediate Acute Pulmonary Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg (2009) 137(3):695–702; discussion 702.   10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.10.044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sharma AK, Laubach VE, Ramos SI, Zhao Y, Stukenborg G, Linden J, et al. Adenosine A2A Receptor Activation on CD4+ T Lymphocytes and Neutrophils Attenuates Lung Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg (2010) 139(2):474–82.   10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.08.033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sharma AK, Mulloy DP, Le LT, Laubach VE. NADPH Oxidase Mediates Synergistic Effects of IL-17 and TNF-α on CXCL1 Expression by Epithelial Cells After Lung Ischemia-Reperfusion. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol (2014) 306(1):L69–79.   10.1152/ajplung.00205.2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sharma AK, LaPar DJ, Stone ML, Zhao Y, Mehta CK, Kron IL, et al. NOX2 Activation of Natural Killer T Cells Is Blocked by the Adenosine A2A Receptor to Inhibit Lung Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2016) 193(9):988–99.   10.1164/rccm.201506-1253OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ferrari RS, Andrade CF. Oxidative Stress and Lung Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Oxid Med Cell Longev (2015) 2015:590987.   10.1155/2015/590987 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.StatPearls. Portland Press; (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hausenloy DJ, Yellon DM. The Mitochondrial Permeability Transition Pore: Its Fundamental Role in Mediating Cell Death During Ischaemia and Reperfusion. J Mol Cell Cardiol (2003) 35(4):339–41.   10.1016/s0022-2828(03)00043-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ngo BT, Beiras-Fernandez A, Hammer C, Thein E. Hyperacute Rejection in the Xenogenic Transplanted Rat Liver Is Triggered by the Complement System Only in the Presence of Leukocytes and Free Radical Species. Xenotransplantation (2013) 20(3):177–87.   10.1111/xen.12035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Lee S, Ha IS, Kim JH, Park KS, Han KH, Kim SH, et al. Hydrogen Peroxide-Induced VCAM-1 Expression in Pancreatic Islets and Beta-Cells Through Extracellular Ca2+ Influx. Transplantation (2008) 86(9):1257–66.   10.1097/TP.0b013e318188ab04 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Andonian S, Coulthard T, Smith AD, Singhal PS, Lee BR. Real-Time Quantitation of Renal Ischemia Using Targeted Microbubbles: In-Vivo Measurement of P-Selectin Expression. J Endourol (2009) 23(3):373–8.   10.1089/end.2008.0229 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Palazzo AJ, Jones SP, Anderson DC, Granger DN, Lefer DJ. Coronary Endothelial P-Selectin in Pathogenesis of Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Am J Physiol (1998) 275(5):H1865–72.   10.1152/ajpheart.1998.275.5.H1865 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Zarbock A, Müller H, Kuwano Y, Ley K. PSGL-1-Dependent Myeloid Leukocyte Activation. J Leukoc Biol (2009) 86(5):1119–24.   10.1189/jlb.0209117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Mulligan MS, Lentsch AB, Miyasaka M, Ward PA. Cytokine and Adhesion Molecule Requirements for Neutrophil Recruitment During Glycogen-Induced Peritonitis. Inflammation Res (1998) 47(6):251–5.   10.1007/s000110050326 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Martinez-Mier G, Toledo-Pereyra LH, McDuffie JE, Warner RL, Ward PA. P-Selectin and Chemokine Response After Liver Ischemia and Reperfusion. J Am Coll Surg (2000) 191(4):395–402.   10.1016/s1072-7515(00)00360-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Jin C, Cleveland JC, Ao L, Li J, Zeng Q, Fullerton DA, et al. Human Myocardium Releases Heat Shock Protein 27 (HSP27) After Global Ischemia: The Proinflammatory Effect of Extracellular HSP27 Through Toll-Like Receptor (TLR)-2 and TLR4. Mol Med (2014) 20:280–9.   10.2119/molmed.2014.00058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Szyller J, Bil-Lula I. Heat Shock Proteins in Oxidative Stress and Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury and Benefits From Physical Exercises: A Review to the Current Knowledge. Oxid Med Cell Longev (2021) 2021:6678457.   10.1155/2021/6678457 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Hausenloy DJ, Yellon DM. Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: A Neglected Therapeutic Target. J Clin Invest (2013) 123(1):92–100.   10.1172/JCI62874 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Toldo S, Quader M, Salloum FN, Mezzaroma E, Abbate A. Targeting the Innate Immune Response to Improve Cardiac Graft Recovery After Heart Transplantation: Implications for the Donation After Cardiac Death. Int J Mol Sci (2016) 17(6):958–82.   10.3390/ijms17060958 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.McDonald B, Pittman K, Menezes GB, Hirota SA, Slaba I, Waterhouse CC, et al. Intravascular Danger Signals Guide Neutrophils to Sites of Sterile Inflammation. Science (2010) 330(6002):362–6.   10.1126/science.1195491 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Matzinger P. The Danger Model: A Renewed Sense of Self. Science (2002) 296(5566):301–5.   10.1126/science.1071059 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Rusai K, Sollinger D, Baumann M, Wagner B, Strobl M, Schmaderer C, et al. Toll-Like Receptors 2 and 4 in Renal Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury. Pediatr Nephrol (2010) 25(5):853–60.   10.1007/s00467-009-1422-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Arslan F, de Kleijn DP, Pasterkamp G. Innate Immune Signaling in Cardiac Ischemia. Nat Rev Cardiol (2011) 8(5):292–300.   10.1038/nrcardio.2011.38 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Toldo S, Abbate A. The NLRP3 Inflammasome in Acute Myocardial Infarction. Nat Rev Cardiol (2018) 15(4):203–14.   10.1038/nrcardio.2017.161 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Liu L, Fang C, Fu W, Jiang B, Li G, Qin L, et al. Endothelial Cell-Derived Interleukin-18 Released During Ischemia Reperfusion Injury Selectively Expands T Peripheral Helper Cells to Promote Alloantibody Production. Circulation (2020) 141(6):464–78.   10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042501 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Luo JL, Kamata H, Karin M. IKK/NF-kappaB Signaling: Balancing Life and Death–a New Approach to Cancer Therapy. J Clin Invest (2005) 115(10):2625–32.   10.1172/JCI26322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Bracey NA, Beck PL, Muruve DA, Hirota SA, Guo J, Jabagi H, et al. The Nlrp3 Inflammasome Promotes Myocardial Dysfunction in Structural Cardiomyopathy Through Interleukin-1β. Exp Physiol (2013) 98(2):462–72.   10.1113/expphysiol.2012.068338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Sandanger Ø, Ranheim T, Vinge LE, Bliksøen M, Alfsnes K, Finsen AV, et al. The NLRP3 Inflammasome Is Up-Regulated in Cardiac Fibroblasts and Mediates Myocardial Ischaemia-Reperfusion Injury. Cardiovasc Res (2013) 99(1):164–74.   10.1093/cvr/cvt091 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Kawaguchi M, Takahashi M, Hata T, Kashima Y, Usui F, Morimoto H, et al. Inflammasome Activation of Cardiac Fibroblasts Is Essential for Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury. Circulation (2011) 123(6):594–604.   10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.982777 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Cantu E, Lederer DJ, Meyer K, Milewski K, Suzuki Y, Shah RJ, et al. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis Identifies Key Innate Immune Pathways in Primary Graft Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation. Am J Transplant (2013) 13(7):1898–904.   10.1111/ajt.12283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Weiser MR, Williams JP, Moore FD, Kobzik L, Ma M, Hechtman HB, et al. Reperfusion Injury of Ischemic Skeletal Muscle Is Mediated by Natural Antibody and Complement. J Exp Med May (1996) 183(5):2343–8.   10.1084/jem.183.5.2343 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Le Bas-Bernardet S, Tillou X, Branchereau J, Dilek N, Poirier N, Châtelais M, et al. Bortezomib, C1-Inhibitor and Plasma Exchange do Not Prolong the Survival of Multi-Transgenic GalT-KO Pig Kidney Xenografts in Baboons. Am J Transplant (2015) 15(2):358–70.   10.1111/ajt.12988 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Lin Z, Lin H, Li W, Huang Y, Dai H. Complement Component C3 Promotes Cerebral Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury Mediated by TLR2/Nfκb Activation in Diabetic Mice. Neurochem Res (2018) 43(8):1599–607.   10.1007/s11064-018-2574-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Triantafilou M, Hughes TR, Morgan BP, Triantafilou K. Complementing the Inflammasome. Immunology (2016) 147(2):152–64.   10.1111/imm.12556 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Damman J, Daha MR, van Son WJ, Leuvenink HG, Ploeg RJ, Seelen MA. Crosstalk Between Complement and Toll-Like Receptor Activation in Relation to Donor Brain Death and Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Am J Transplant (2011) 11(4):660–9.   10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03475.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Núñez K, Thevenot P, Alfadhli A, Cohen A. Complement Activation in Liver Transplantation: Role of Donor Macrosteatosis and Implications in Delayed Graft Function. Int J Mol Sci (2018) 19(6):1750–71.   10.3390/ijms19061750 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Danobeitia JS, Djamali A, Fernandez LA. The Role of Complement in the Pathogenesis of Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury and Fibrosis. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair (2014) 7:16.   10.1186/1755-1536-7-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Panagiotou A, Trendelenburg M, Osthoff M. The Lectin Pathway of Complement in Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury-Review of Its Significance and the Potential Impact of Therapeutic Interference by C1 Esterase Inhibitor. Front Immunol (2018) 9:1151.   10.3389/fimmu.2018.01151 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Mercurio D, Piotti A, Valente A, Oggioni M, Ponstein Y, Van Amersfoort E, et al. Plasma-Derived and Recombinant C1 Esterase Inhibitor: Binding Profiles and Neuroprotective Properties in Brain Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury. Brain Behav Immun (2021).   10.1016/j.bbi.2021.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Li C, Patel K, Tu Z, Yang X, Kulik L, Alawieh A, et al. A Novel Injury Site-Natural Antibody Targeted Complement Inhibitor Protects Against Lung Transplant Injury. Am J Transplant (2020).   10.1111/ajt.16404 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Kusakabe J, Hata K, Tamaki I, Tajima T, Miyauchi H, Wang Y, et al. Complement 5 Inhibition Ameliorates Hepatic Ischemia/reperfusion Injury in Mice, Dominantly via the C5a-Mediated Cascade. Transplantation (2020) 104(10):2065–77.   10.1097/TP.0000000000003302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Smith EF, Griswold DE, Egan JW, Hillegass LM, Smith RA, Hibbs MJ, et al. Reduction of Myocardial Reperfusion Injury With Human Soluble Complement Receptor Type 1 (BRL 55730). Eur J Pharmacol (1993) 236(3):477–81.   10.1016/0014-2999(93)90487-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Sommer W, Tudorache I, Kühn C, Avsar M, Salman J, Ius F, et al. C1-Esterase-Inhibitor for Primary Graft Dysfunction in Lung Transplantation. Transplantation (2014) 97(11):1185–91.   10.1097/TP.0000000000000034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Huang E, Vo A, Choi J, Ammerman N, Lim K, Sethi S, et al. Three-Year Outcomes of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Assessing Safety and Efficacy of C1 Esterase Inhibitor for Prevention of Delayed Graft Function in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol (2020) 15(1):109–16.   10.2215/CJN.04840419 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Platt JL, Fischel RJ, Matas AJ, Reif SA, Bolman RM, Bach FH. Immunopathology of Hyperacute Xenograft Rejection in a Swine-to-Primate Model. Transplantation (1991) 52(2):214–20.   10.1097/00007890-199108000-00006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Ekser B, Ezzelarab M, Hara H, van der Windt DJ, Wijkstrom M, Bottino R, et al. Clinical Xenotransplantation: The Next Medical Revolution? Lancet (2012) 379(9816):672–83.   10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61091-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Carrington CA, Richards AC, van den Bogaerde J, Tucker AW, White DJ. Complement Activation, Its Consequences, and Blockade by Gene Transfer. World J Surg (1997) 21(9):907–12.   10.1007/s002689900325 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Shimizu A, Hisashi Y, Kuwaki K, Tseng YL, Dor FJ, Houser SL, et al. Thrombotic Microangiopathy Associated With Humoral Rejection of Cardiac Xenografts From Alpha1,3-Galactosyltransferase Gene-Knockout Pigs in Baboons. Am J Pathol (2008) 172(6):1471–81.   10.2353/ajpath.2008.070672 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Burdorf L, Stoddard T, Zhang T, Rybak E, Riner A, Avon C, et al. Expression of Human CD46 Modulates Inflammation Associated With GalTKO Lung Xenograft Injury. Am J Transplant (2014) 14(5):1084–95.   10.1111/ajt.12673 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Ramírez P, Montoya MJ, Ríos A, García Palenciano C, Majado M, Chávez R, et al. Prevention of Hyperacute Rejection in a Model of Orthotopic Liver Xenotransplantation From Pig to Baboon Using Polytransgenic Pig Livers (CD55, CD59, and H-Transferase). Transplant Proc (2005) 37(9):4103–6.   10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.09.186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Marin W, Marin D, Ao X, Liu Y. Mitochondria as a Therapeutic Target for Cardiac Ischemia−Reperfusion Injury (Review). Int J Mol Med (2021) 47(2):485–99.   10.3892/ijmm.2020.4823 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Lesnefsky EJ, Chen Q, Tandler B, Hoppel CL. Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion: Implications for Novel Therapies. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol (2017) 57:535–65.   10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010715-103335 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Di Lisa F, Kaludercic N, Carpi A, Menabò R, Giorgio M. Mitochondria and Vascular Pathology. Pharmacol Rep (2009) 61(1):123–30.   10.1016/s1734-1140(09)70014-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Ong SB, Gustafsson AB. New Roles for Mitochondria in Cell Death in the Reperfused Myocardium. Cardiovasc Res (2012) 94(2):190–6.   10.1093/cvr/cvr312 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Qian T, Nieminen AL, Herman B, Lemasters JJ. Mitochondrial Permeability Transition in pH-Dependent Reperfusion Injury to Rat Hepatocytes. Am J Physiol (1997) 273(6):C1783–92.   10.1152/ajpcell.1997.273.6.C1783 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.He L, Lemasters JJ. Regulated and Unregulated Mitochondrial Permeability Transition Pores: A New Paradigm of Pore Structure and Function? FEBS Lett (2002) 512(1-3):1–7.   10.1016/s0014-5793(01)03314-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Griffiths EJ, Halestrap AP. Mitochondrial non-Specific Pores Remain Closed During Cardiac Ischaemia, But Open Upon Reperfusion. Biochem J (1995) 307(Pt 1):93–8.   10.1042/bj3070093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Halestrap AP. What Is the Mitochondrial Permeability Transition Pore? J Mol Cell Cardiol (2009) 46(6):821–31.   10.1016/j.yjmcc.2009.02.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Baines CP. The Cardiac Mitochondrion: Nexus of Stress. Annu Rev Physiol (2010) 72:61–80.   10.1146/annurev-physiol-021909-135929 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Chen L, Knowlton AA. Mitochondria and Heart Failure: New Insights Into an Energetic Problem. Minerva Cardioangiol (2010) 58(2):213–29. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Giedt RJ, Yang C, Zweier JL, Matzavinos A, Alevriadou BR. Mitochondrial Fission in Endothelial Cells After Simulated Ischemia/Reperfusion: Role of Nitric Oxide and Reactive Oxygen Species. Free Radic Biol Med (2012) 52(2):348–56.   10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.10.491 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Alexander JS, Elrod JW. Extracellular Matrix, Junctional Integrity and Matrix Metalloproteinase Interactions in Endothelial Permeability Regulation. J Anat (2002) 200(6):561–74.   10.1046/j.1469-7580.2002.00057.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Kumar P, Shen Q, Pivetti CD, Lee ES, Wu MH, Yuan SY. Molecular Mechanisms of Endothelial Hyperpermeability: Implications in Inflammation. Expert Rev Mol Med (2009) 11:e19.   10.1017/S1462399409001112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Mehta D, Malik AB. Signaling Mechanisms Regulating Endothelial Permeability. Physiol Rev (2006) 86(1):279–367.   10.1152/physrev.00012.2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Rodrigues SF, Granger DN. Role of Blood Cells in Ischaemia-Reperfusion Induced Endothelial Barrier Failure. Cardiovasc Res (2010) 87(2):291–9.   10.1093/cvr/cvq090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Terao S, Yilmaz G, Stokes KY, Russell J, Ishikawa M, Kawase T, et al. Blood Cell-Derived RANTES Mediates Cerebral Microvascular Dysfunction, Inflammation, and Tissue Injury After Focal Ischemia-Reperfusion. Stroke (2008) 39(9):2560–70.   10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.513150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Okazaki M, Kreisel F, Richardson SB, Kreisel D, Krupnick AS, Patterson GA, et al. Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Inhibits Ischemia Reperfusion Injury Following Experimental Lung Transplantation. Am J Transplant (2007) 7(4):751–8.   10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01710.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Cooper D, Russell J, Chitman KD, Williams MC, Wolf RE, Granger DN. Leukocyte Dependence of Platelet Adhesion in Postcapillary Venules. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (2004) 286(5):H1895–900.   10.1152/ajpheart.01000.2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Ishikawa M, Cooper D, Arumugam TV, Zhang JH, Nanda A, Granger DN. Platelet-Leukocyte-Endothelial Cell Interactions After Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion and Reperfusion. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab (2004) 24(8):907–15.   10.1097/01.WCB.0000132690.96836.7F [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Gawaz M. Role of Platelets in Coronary Thrombosis and Reperfusion of Ischemic Myocardium. Cardiovasc Res (2004) 61(3):498–511.   10.1016/j.cardiores.2003.11.036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Kokura S, Wolf RE, Yoshikawa T, Ichikawa H, Granger DN, Aw TY. Endothelial Cells Exposed to Anoxia/Reoxygenation Are Hyperadhesive to T-Lymphocytes: Kinetics and Molecular Mechanisms. Microcirculation (2000) 7(1):13–23. 10.1111/j.1549-8719.2000.tb00739.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Nourshargh S, Krombach F, Dejana E. The Role of JAM-A and PECAM-1 in Modulating Leukocyte Infiltration in Inflamed and Ischemic Tissues. J Leukoc Biol (2006) 80(4):714–8.   10.1189/jlb.1105645 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Woodfin A, Voisin MB, Beyrau M, Colom B, Caille D, Diapouli FM, et al. The Junctional Adhesion Molecule JAM-C Regulates Polarized Transendothelial Migration of Neutrophils In Vivo . Nat Immunol (2011) 12(8):761–9.   10.1038/ni.2062 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Proebstl D, Voisin MB, Woodfin A, Whiteford J, D'Acquisto F, Jones GE, et al. Pericytes Support Neutrophil Subendothelial Cell Crawling and Breaching of Venular Walls In Vivo . J Exp Med (2012) 209(6):1219–34.   10.1084/jem.20111622 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Kato H, Kuriyama N, Duarte S, Clavien PA, Busuttil RW, Coito AJ. MMP-9 Deficiency Shelters Endothelial PECAM-1 Expression and Enhances Regeneration of Steatotic Livers After Ischemia and Reperfusion Injury. J Hepatol (2014) 60(5):1032–9.   10.1016/j.jhep.2013.12.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Russo L, Gracia-Sancho J, García-Calderó H, Marrone G, García-Pagán JC, García-Cardeña G, et al. Addition of Simvastatin to Cold Storage Solution Prevents Endothelial Dysfunction in Explanted Rat Livers. Hepatology (2012) 55(3):921–30.   10.1002/hep.24755 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Gracia-Sancho J, Villarreal G, Zhang Y, Yu JX, Liu Y, Tullius SG, et al. Flow Cessation Triggers Endothelial Dysfunction During Organ Cold Storage Conditions: Strategies for Pharmacologic Intervention. Transplantation (2010) 90(2):142–9.   10.1097/TP.0b013e3181e228db [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Abraham D, Taghavi S, Riml P, Paulus P, Hofmann M, Baumann C, et al. VEGF-A and -C But Not -B Mediate Increased Vascular Permeability in Preserved Lung Grafts. Transplantation (2002) 73(11):1703–6.   10.1097/00007890-200206150-00003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Taghavi S, Abraham D, Riml P, Paulus P, Schäfer R, Klepetko W, et al. Co-Expression of Endothelin-1 and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Mediates Increased Vascular Permeability in Lung Grafts Before Reperfusion. J Heart Lung Transplant (2002) 21(5):600 3.   10.1016/s1053-2498(01)00346-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Krenn K, Klepetko W, Taghavi S, Lang G, Schneider B, Aharinejad S. Recipient Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Serum Levels Predict Primary Lung Graft Dysfunction. Am J Transplant (2007) 7(3):700–6.   10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01673.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Krenn K, Klepetko W, Taghavi S, Paulus P, Aharinejad S. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Increases Pulmonary Vascular Permeability in Cystic Fibrosis Patients Undergoing Lung Transplantation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg (2007) 32(1):35–41.   10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.04.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Diamond JM, Porteous MK, Cantu E, Meyer NJ, Shah RJ, Lederer DJ, et al. Elevated Plasma Angiopoietin-2 Levels and Primary Graft Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation. PloS One (2012) 7(12):e51932.   10.1371/journal.pone.0051932 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.van der Heijden M, van Nieuw Amerongen GP, Koolwijk P, van Hinsbergh VW, Groeneveld AB. Angiopoietin-2, Permeability Oedema, Occurrence and Severity of ALI/ARDS in Septic and Non-Septic Critically Ill Patients. Thorax (2008) 63(10):903–9.   10.1136/thx.2007.087387 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Salama M, Andrukhova O, Hoda MA, Taghavi S, Jaksch P, Heinze G, et al. Concomitant Endothelin-1 Overexpression in Lung Transplant Donors and Recipients Predicts Primary Graft Dysfunction. Am J Transplant (2010) 10(3):628–36.   10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02957.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Tsurui Y, Sho M, Kuzumoto Y, Hamada K, Akashi S, Kashizuka H, et al. Dual Role of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Hepatic Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Transplantation (2005) 79(9):1110–5.   10.1097/01.tp.0000161627.84481.5e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Andersson L, Scharin Täng M, Lundqvist A, Lindbom M, Mardani I, Fogelstrand P, et al. Rip2 Modifies VEGF-Induced Signalling and Vascular Permeability in Myocardial Ischaemia. Cardiovasc Res (2015) 107(4):478–86.   10.1093/cvr/cvv186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Kanellis J, Paizis K, Cox AJ, Stacker SA, Gilbert RE, Cooper ME, et al. Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Increases Endothelial VEGFR-2 Without Increasing VEGF or VEGFR-1 Expression. Kidney Int (2002) 61(5):1696–706.   10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00329.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Zhang C, Wu J, Xu X, Potter BJ, Gao X. Direct Relationship Between Levels of TNF-Alpha Expression and Endothelial Dysfunction in Reperfusion Injury. Basic Res Cardiol (2010) 105(4):453–64.   10.1007/s00395-010-0083-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Gourdin MJ, Bree B, De Kock M. The Impact of Ischaemia-Reperfusion on the Blood Vessel. Eur J Anaesthesiol (2009) 26(7):537–47.   10.1097/EJA.0b013e328324b7c2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Lindemann S, Klingel B, Fisch A, Meyer J, Darius H. Increased Platelet Sensitivity Toward Platelet Inhibitors During Physical Exercise in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. Thromb Res (1999) 93(2):51–9.   10.1016/s0049-3848(98)00155-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Pigazzi A, Heydrick S, Folli F, Benoit S, Michelson A, Loscalzo J. Nitric Oxide Inhibits Thrombin Receptor-Activating Peptide-Induced Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase Activity in Human Platelets. J Biol Chem (1999) 274(20):14368–75.   10.1074/jbc.274.20.14368 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Khandoga A, Biberthaler P, Enders G, Axmann S, Hutter J, Messmer K, et al. Platelet Adhesion Mediated by Fibrinogen-Intercelllular Adhesion Molecule-1 Binding Induces Tissue Injury in the Postischemic Liver In Vivo . Transplantation (2002) 74(5):681–8.   10.1097/00007890-200209150-00016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.de Ramon L, Guiteras J, Guiteras R, Cruzado JM, Grinyó JM, Torras J. The Costimulatory Pathways and T Regulatory Cells in Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: A Strong Arm in the Inflammatory Response? Int J Mol Sci (2018) 19(5):1283–97.   10.3390/ijms19051283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Zhao X, Jin Y, Li H, Wang Z, Zhang W, Feng C. Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1 Alpha Contributes to Pulmonary Vascular Dysfunction in Lung Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Int J Clin Exp Pathol (2014) 7(6):3081–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Shen B, Mei M, Pu Y, Zhang H, Liu H, Tang M, et al. Necrostatin-1 Attenuates Renal Ischemia and Reperfusion Injury via Meditation of HIF-1α/Mir-26a/TRPC6/PARP1 Signaling. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids (2019) 17:701–13.   10.1016/j.omtn.2019.06.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Sharma AK, LaPar DJ, Zhao Y, Li L, Lau CL, Kron IL, et al. Natural Killer T Cell-Derived IL-17 Mediates Lung Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2011) 183(11):1539–49.   10.1164/rccm.201007-1173OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Weber DJ, Gracon AS, Ripsch MS, Fisher AJ, Cheon BM, Pandya PH, et al. The HMGB1-RAGE Axis Mediates Traumatic Brain Injury-Induced Pulmonary Dysfunction in Lung Transplantation. Sci Transl Med (2014) 6(252):252ra124.   10.1126/scitranslmed.3009443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 145.Andersson U, Yang H, Harris H. Extracellular HMGB1 as a Therapeutic Target in Inflammatory Diseases. Expert Opin Ther Targets (2018) 22(3):263–77.   10.1080/14728222.2018.1439924 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Laird CT, Hassanein W, O’Neill NA, French BM, Cheng X, Fogler WE, et al. P- and E-Selectin Receptor Antagonism Prevents Human Leukocyte Adhesion to Activated Porcine Endothelial Monolayers and Attenuates Porcine Endothelial Damage. Xenotransplantation (2018) 25(2):e12381.   10.1111/xen.12381 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.French BM, Sendil S, Sepuru KM, Ranek J, Burdorf L, Harris D, et al. Interleukin-8 Mediates Neutrophil-Endothelial Interactions in Pig-to-Human Xenogeneic Models. Xenotransplantation (2018) 25(2):e12385.   10.1111/xen.12385 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Verrier E. The Microvascular Cell and Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol (1996) 27(Suppl 1):S26–30.   10.1097/00005344-199600001-00007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Jakobs FM, Davis EA, White T, Sanfilippo F, Baldwin WM. Prolonged Discordant Xenograft Survival by Inhibition of the Intrinsic Coagulation Pathway in Complement C6-Deficient Recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant (1998) 17(3):306–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Kalady MF, Lawson JH, Sorrell RD, Platt JL. Decreased Fibrinolytic Activity in Porcine-to-Primate Cardiac Xenotransplantation. Mol Med Sep (1998) 4(9):629–37. 10.1007/BF03401762 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Jung SH, Hwang JH, Kim SE, Young Kyu K, Park HC, Lee HT. The Potentiating Effect of hTFPI in the Presence of Hcd47 Reduces the Cytotoxicity of Human Macrophages. Xenotransplantation (2017) 24(3).   10.1111/xen.12301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Azimzadeh AM, Kelishadi SS, Ezzelarab MB, Singh AK, Stoddard T, Iwase H, et al. Early Graft Failure of GalTKO Pig Organs in Baboons Is Reduced by Expression of a Human Complement Pathway-Regulatory Protein. Xenotransplantation (2015) 22(4):310–6.   10.1111/xen.12176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Kim SC, Mathews DV, Breeden CP, Higginbotham LB, Ladowski J, Martens G, et al. Long-Term Survival of Pig-to-Rhesus Macaque Renal Xenografts Is Dependent on CD4 T Cell Depletion. Am J Transplant (2019) 19(8):2174–85.   10.1111/ajt.15329 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Singh AK, Chan JL, DiChiacchio L, Hardy NL, Corcoran PC, Lewis BGT, et al. Cardiac Xenografts Show Reduced Survival in the Absence of Transgenic Human Thrombomodulin Expression in Donor Pigs. Xenotransplantation (2019) 26(2):e12465.   10.1111/xen.12465 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Burdorf L, Harris D, Dahi S, Laird C, Zhang T, Ali F, et al. Thromboxane and Histamine Mediate PVR Elevation During Xenogeneic Pig Lung Perfusion With Human Blood. Xenotransplantation (2019) 26(2):e12458.   10.1111/xen.12458 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Mohiuddin MM, Singh AK, Corcoran PC, Hoyt RF, Thomas ML, Ayares D, et al. Genetically Engineered Pigs and Target-Specific Immunomodulation Provide Significant Graft Survival and Hope for Clinical Cardiac Xenotransplantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg (2014) 148(3):1106–13; discussion 1113-4.   10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.06.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Iwase H, Ekser B, Hara H, Phelps C, Ayares D, Cooper DK, et al. Regulation of Human Platelet Aggregation by Genetically Modified Pig Endothelial Cells and Thrombin Inhibition. Xenotransplantation (2014) 21(1):72–83.   10.1111/xen.12073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Wu MY, Yiang GT, Liao WT, Tsai AP, Cheng YL, Cheng PW, et al. Current Mechanistic Concepts in Ischemia and Reperfusion Injury. Cell Physiol Biochem (2018) 46(4):1650–67.   10.1159/000489241 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Glick D, Barth S, Macleod KF. Autophagy: Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms. J Pathol (2010) 221(1):3–12.   10.1002/path.2697 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Ma S, Wang Y, Chen Y, Cao F. The Role of the Autophagy in Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury. Biochim Biophys Acta (2015) 1852(2):271–6.   10.1016/j.bbadis.2014.05.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Linkermann A, Green DR. Necroptosis. N Engl J Med (2014) 370(5):455–65.   10.1056/NEJMra1310050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Linkermann A, Bräsen JH, Darding M, Jin MK, Sanz AB, Heller JO, et al. Two Independent Pathways of Regulated Necrosis Mediate Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2013) 110(29):12024–9.   10.1073/pnas.1305538110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Holzknecht ZE, Kuypers KL, Plummer TB, Williams J, Bustos M, Gores GJ, et al. Apoptosis and Cellular Activation in the Pathogenesis of Acute Vascular Rejection. Circ Res (2002) 91(12):1135–41.   10.1161/01.res.0000046236.20251.fa [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Shimizu A, Meehan SM, Kozlowski T, Sablinski T, Ierino FL, Cooper DK, et al. Acute Humoral Xenograft Rejection: Destruction of the Microvascular Capillary Endothelium in Pig-to-Nonhuman Primate Renal Grafts. Lab Invest (2000) 80(6):815–30.   10.1038/labinvest.3780086 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Boros P, Bromberg JS. New Cellular and Molecular Immune Pathways in Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury. Am J Transplant (2006) 6(4):652–8.   10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01228.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Gao H, Liu L, Zhao Y, Hara H, Chen P, Xu J, et al. Human IL-6, IL-17, IL-1β, and TNF-α Differently Regulate the Expression of Pro-Inflammatory Related Genes, Tissue Factor, and Swine Leukocyte Antigen Class I in Porcine Aortic Endothelial Cells. Xenotransplantation (2017) 24(2).   10.1111/xen.12291 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Gao H, Zhang Q, Chen J, Cooper DKC, Hara H, Chen P, et al. Porcine IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α Regulate the Expression of Pro-Inflammatory-Related Genes and Tissue Factor in Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells. Xenotransplantation (2018) 25(5):e12408.   10.1111/xen.12408 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Iwase H, Liu H, Li T, Zhang Z, Gao B, Hara H, et al. Therapeutic Regulation of Systemic Inflammation in Xenograft Recipients. Xenotransplantation (2017) 24(2).   10.1111/xen.12296 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Liu NB, Wu M, Chen C, Fujino M, Huang JS, Zhu P, et al. Novel Molecular Targets Participating in Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury and Cardioprotection. Cardiol Res Pract (2019) 2019:6935147.   10.1155/2019/6935147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Yellon DM, Hausenloy DJ. Myocardial Reperfusion Injury. N Engl J Med Sep (2007) 357(11):1121–35.   10.1056/NEJMra071667 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Ge L, Zhou X, Ji WJ, Lu RY, Zhang Y, Zhang YD, et al. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury-Induced Myocardial No-Reflow: Therapeutic Potential of DNase-Based Reperfusion Strategy. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (2015) 308(5):H500–9.   10.1152/ajpheart.00381.2014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Barzyc A, Łysik W, Słyk J, Kuszewski M, Zarębiński M, Wojciechowska M, et al. Reperfusion Injury as a Target for Diminishing Infarct Size. Med Hypotheses (2020) 137:109558.   10.1016/j.mehy.2020.109558 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Cowled PA, Khanna A, Laws PE, Field JB, Varelias A, Fitridge RA. Statins Inhibit Neutrophil Infiltration in Skeletal Muscle Reperfusion Injury. J Surg Res Aug (2007) 141(2):267–76.   10.1016/j.jss.2006.11.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Atkinson C, He S, Morris K, Qiao F, Casey S, Goddard M, et al. Targeted Complement Inhibitors Protect Against Posttransplant Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion Injury and Reveal an Important Role for the Alternative Pathway of Complement Activation. J Immunol (2010) 185(11):7007–13.   10.4049/jimmunol.1001504 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Farmer DG, Anselmo D, Da Shen X, Ke B, Carmody IC, Gao F, et al. Disruption of P-Selectin Signaling Modulates Cell Trafficking and Results in Improved Outcomes After Mouse Warm Intestinal Ischemia and Reperfusion Injury. Transplantation (2005) 80(6):828–35.   10.1097/01.tp.0000174337.53658.b0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Chamoun F, Burne M, O’Donnell M, Rabb H. Pathophysiologic Role of Selectins and Their Ligands in Ischemia Reperfusion Injury. Front Biosci (2000) 5:E103–9.   10.2741/chamoun [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Rabb H, Ramirez G, Saba SR, Reynolds D, Xu J, Flavell R, et al. Renal Ischemic-Reperfusion Injury in L-Selectin-Deficient Mice. Am J Physiol (1996) 271(2 Pt 2):F408–13.   10.1152/ajprenal.1996.271.2.F408 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Connolly ES, Winfree CJ, Prestigiacomo CJ, Kim SC, Choudhri TF, Hoh BL, et al. Exacerbation of Cerebral Injury in Mice That Express the P-Selectin Gene: Identification of P-Selectin Blockade as a New Target for the Treatment of Stroke. Circ Res (1997) 81(3):304–10.   10.1161/01.res.81.3.304 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Mosser DM, Edwards JP. Exploring the Full Spectrum of Macrophage Activation. Nat Rev Immunol (2008) 8(12):958–69.   10.1038/nri2448 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Meldrum DR. Tumor Necrosis Factor in the Heart. Am J Physiol (1998) 274(3):R577–95.   10.1152/ajpregu.1998.274.3.R577 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Li X, Wu Y, Zhang W, Gong J, Cheng Y. Pre-Conditioning With Tanshinone IIA Attenuates the Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury Caused by Liver Grafts via Regulation of HMGB1 in Rat Kupffer Cells. BioMed Pharmacother (2017) 89:1392–400.   10.1016/j.biopha.2017.03.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Brenner C, Galluzzi L, Kepp O, Kroemer G. Decoding Cell Death Signals in Liver Inflammation. J Hepatol (2013) 59(3):583–94.   10.1016/j.jhep.2013.03.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Duffield JS, Forbes SJ, Constandinou CM, Clay S, Partolina M, Vuthoori S, et al. Selective Depletion of Macrophages Reveals Distinct, Opposing Roles During Liver Injury and Repair. J Clin Invest (2005) 115(1):56–65.   10.1172/JCI22675 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Tsung A, Hoffman RA, Izuishi K, Critchlow ND, Nakao A, Chan MH, et al. Hepatic Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury Involves Functional TLR4 Signaling in Nonparenchymal Cells. J Immunol (2005) 175(11):7661–8.   10.4049/jimmunol.175.11.7661 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Tsung A, Sahai R, Tanaka H, Nakao A, Fink MP, Lotze MT, et al. The Nuclear Factor HMGB1 Mediates Hepatic Injury After Murine Liver Ischemia-Reperfusion. J Exp Med (2005) 201(7):1135–43.   10.1084/jem.20042614 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Fiser SM, Tribble CG, Long SM, Kaza AK, Cope JT, Laubach VE, et al. Lung Transplant Reperfusion Injury Involves Pulmonary Macrophages and Circulating Leukocytes in a Biphasic Response. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg (2001) 121(6):1069–75.   10.1067/mtc.2001.113603 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.de Perrot M, Liu M, Waddell TK, Keshavjee S. Ischemia-Reperfusion-Induced Lung Injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2003) 167(4):490–511.   10.1164/rccm.200207-670SO [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Johnston LK, Rims CR, Gill SE, McGuire JK, Manicone AM. Pulmonary Macrophage Subpopulations in the Induction and Resolution of Acute Lung Injury. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol (2012) 47(4):417–26.   10.1165/rcmb.2012-0090OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Naidu BV, Krishnadasan B, Farivar AS, Woolley SM, Thomas R, Van Rooijen N, et al. Early Activation of the Alveolar Macrophage Is Critical to the Development of Lung Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg (2003) 126(1):200–7.   10.1016/s0022-5223(03)00390-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Yamamoto S, Yamane M, Yoshida O, Waki N, Okazaki M, Matsukawa A, et al. Early Growth Response-1 Plays an Important Role in Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Lung Transplants by Regulating Polymorphonuclear Neutrophil Infiltration. Transplantation (2015) 99(11):2285–93.   10.1097/TP.0000000000000783 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Zhao M, Fernandez LG, Doctor A, Sharma AK, Zarbock A, Tribble CG, et al. Alveolar Macrophage Activation Is a Key Initiation Signal for Acute Lung Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol (2006) 291(5):L1018–26.   10.1152/ajplung.00086.2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Somers J, Ruttens D, Verleden SE, Vandermeulen E, Piloni D, Wauters E, et al. Interleukin-17 Receptor Polymorphism Predisposes to Primary Graft Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant (2015) 34(7):941–9.   10.1016/j.healun.2015.03.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.He Z, Ma C, Yu T, Song J, Leng J, Gu X, et al. Activation Mechanisms and Multifaceted Effects of Mast Cells in Ischemia Reperfusion Injury. Exp Cell Res (2019) 376(2):227–35.   10.1016/j.yexcr.2019.01.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Schanze N, Bode C, Duerschmied D. Platelet Contributions to Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury. Front Immunol (2019) 10:1260.   10.3389/fimmu.2019.01260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Lupia E, Del Sorbo L, Bergerone S, Emanuelli G, Camussi G, Montrucchio G. The Membrane Attack Complex of Complement Contributes to Plasmin-Induced Synthesis of Platelet-Activating Factor by Endothelial Cells and Neutrophils. Immunology (2003) 109(4):557–63.   10.1046/j.1365-2567.2003.01692.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Chueh TH, Cheng YH, Chen KH, Chien CT. Thromboxane A2 Synthase and Thromboxane Receptor Deletion Reduces Ischaemia/Reperfusion-Evoked Inflammation, Apoptosis, Autophagy and Pyroptosis. Thromb Haemost (2020) 120(2):329–43.   10.1055/s-0039-3400304 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Nosal R. Antiplatelet and Antileukocyte Effects of Cardiovascular, Immunomodulatory and Chemotherapeutic Drugs. Cardiovasc Hematol Agents Med Chem (2006) 4(3):237–61.   10.2174/187152506777698317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Zhou H, Hara H, Cooper DKC. The Complex Functioning of the Complement System in Xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation (2019) 26(4):e12517.   10.1111/xen.12517 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Hsu J, Krishnan A, Lee SA, Dodd-O JM, Kim BS, Illei P, et al. Cd3. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg (2019).   10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.09.188 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Ysebaert DK, De Greef KE, De Beuf A, Van Rompay AR, Vercauteren S, Persy VP, et al. T Cells as Mediators in Renal Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury. Kidney Int (2004) 66(2):491–6.   10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.761_4.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.de Perrot M, Young K, Imai Y, Liu M, Waddell TK, Fischer S, et al. Recipient T Cells Mediate Reperfusion Injury After Lung Transplantation in the Rat. J Immunol (2003) 171(10):4995–5002.   10.4049/jimmunol.171.10.4995 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Fiorina P, Ansari MJ, Jurewicz M, Barry M, Ricchiuti V, Smith RN, et al. Role of CXC Chemokine Receptor 3 Pathway in Renal Ischemic Injury. J Am Soc Nephrol (2006) 17(3):716–23.   10.1681/ASN.2005090954 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Rabb H. The T Cell as a Bridge Between Innate and Adaptive Immune Systems: Implications for the Kidney. Kidney Int (2002) 61(6):1935–46.   10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00378.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Rabb H, Daniels F, O’Donnell M, Haq M, Saba SR, Keane W, et al. Pathophysiological Role of T Lymphocytes in Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Mice. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol (2000) 279(3):F525–31.   10.1152/ajprenal.2000.279.3.F525 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Waldmann H, Graca L, Cobbold S, Adams E, Tone M, Tone Y. Regulatory T Cells and Organ Transplantation. Semin Immunol (2004) 16(2):119–26.   10.1016/j.smim.2003.12.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Ferrer IR, Hester J, Bushell A, Wood KJ. Induction of Transplantation Tolerance Through Regulatory Cells: From Mice to Men. Immunol Rev (2014) 258(1):102–16.   10.1111/imr.12158 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Inverardi L, Samaja M, Motterlini R, Mangili F, Bender JR, Pardi R. Early Recognition of a Discordant Xenogeneic Organ by Human Circulating Lymphocytes. J Immunol (1992) 149(4):1416–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Hassanain M, Simoneau E, Doi SA, Aljiffry M, Aloraini A, Madkhali A, et al. Trends in Brain-Dead Organ Donor Characteristics: A 13-Year Analysis. Can J Surg (2016) 59(3):154–60.   10.1503/cjs.007415 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Barklin A. Systemic Inflammation in the Brain-Dead Organ Donor. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand (2009) 53(4):425–35.   10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01879.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.McKeating EG, Andrews PJ, Signorini DF, Mascia L. Transcranial Cytokine Gradients in Patients Requiring Intensive Care After Acute Brain Injury. Br J Anaesth (1997) 78(5):520–3.   10.1093/bja/78.5.520 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Baldwin AS. The NF-Kappa B and I Kappa B Proteins: New Discoveries and Insights. Annu Rev Immunol (1996) 14:649–83.   10.1146/annurev.immunol.14.1.649 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Tesfamariam B, DeFelice AF. Endothelial Injury in the Initiation and Progression of Vascular Disorders. Vascul Pharmacol (2007) 46(4):229–37.   10.1016/j.vph.2006.11.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Mertes PM, el Abassi K, Jaboin Y, Burtin P, Pinelli G, Carteaux JP, et al. Changes in Hemodynamic and Metabolic Parameters Following Induced Brain Death in the Pig. Transplantation (1994) 58(4):414–8.   10.1097/00007890-199408270-00004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Barklin A, Theodorsson E, Tyvold SS, Larsson A, Granfeldt A, Sloth E, et al. Alteration of Neuropeptides in the Lung Tissue Correlates Brain Death-Induced Neurogenic Edema. J Heart Lung Transplant (2009) 28(7):725–32.   10.1016/j.healun.2009.04.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Cooper DK, Novitzky D, Wicomb WN. The Pathophysiological Effects of Brain Death on Potential Donor Organs, With Particular Reference to the Heart. Ann R Coll Surg Engl (1989) 71(4):261–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Tanriverdi F, Schneider HJ, Aimaretti G, Masel BE, Casanueva FF, Kelestimur F. Pituitary Dysfunction After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Clinical and Pathophysiological Approach. Endocr Rev (2015) 36(3):305–42.   10.1210/er.2014-1065 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Pouw IS, Drop SL, Ladée-Levy JV, Slijper FM. Pseudo- and Central Precocious Puberty Due to Adrenogenital Syndrome. Tijdschr Kindergeneeskd (1986) 54(3):77–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Michel SG, Madariaga MLL, LaMuraglia GM, Villani V, Sekijima M, Farkash EA, et al. The Effects of Brain Death and Ischemia on Tolerance Induction Are Organ-Specific. Am J Transplant (2018) 18(5):1262–9.   10.1111/ajt.14674 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Terasaki PI, Cecka JM, Gjertson DW, Takemoto S. High Survival Rates of Kidney Transplants From Spousal and Living Unrelated Donors. N Engl J Med (1995) 333(6):333–6.   10.1056/NEJM199508103330601 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Hariharan S, Johnson CP, Bresnahan BA, Taranto SE, McIntosh MJ, Stablein D. Improved Graft Survival After Renal Transplantation in the United States, 1988 to 1996. N Engl J Med (2000) 342(9):605–12.   10.1056/NEJM200003023420901 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Xu J, Sayed BA, Casas-Ferreira AM, Srinivasan P, Heaton N, Rela M, et al. The Impact of Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury on Liver Allografts From Deceased After Cardiac Death Versus Deceased After Brain Death Donors. PloS One (2016) 11(2):e0148815.   10.1371/journal.pone.0148815 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Weiss S, Kotsch K, Francuski M, Reutzel-Selke A, Mantouvalou L, Klemz R, et al. Brain Death Activates Donor Organs and Is Associated With a Worse I/R Injury After Liver Transplantation. Am J Transplant (2007) 7(6):1584–93.   10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01799.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Foley DP, Fernandez LA, Leverson G, Anderson M, Mezrich J, Sollinger HW, et al. Biliary Complications After Liver Transplantation From Donation After Cardiac Death Donors: An Analysis of Risk Factors and Long-Term Outcomes From a Single Center. Ann Surg (2011) 253(4):817–25.   10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182104784 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224.Mateo R, Cho Y, Singh G, Stapfer M, Donovan J, Kahn J, et al. Risk Factors for Graft Survival After Liver Transplantation From Donation After Cardiac Death Donors: An Analysis of OPTN/UNOS Data. Am J Transplant (2006) 6(4):791–6.   10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01243.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Inci I. Donors After Cardiocirculatory Death and Lung Transplantation. J Thorac Dis (2017) 9(8):2660–9.   10.21037/jtd.2017.07.82 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.De Oliveira NC, Osaki S, Maloney JD, Meyer KC, Kohmoto T, D'Alessandro AM, et al. Lung Transplantation With Donation After Cardiac Death Donors: Long-Term Follow-Up in a Single Center. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg (2010) 139(5):1306–15.   10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.02.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Stone ML, Zhao Y, Robert Smith J, Weiss ML, Kron IL, Laubach VE, et al. Mesenchymal Stromal Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Attenuate Lung Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury and Enhance Reconditioning of Donor Lungs After Circulatory Death. Respir Res (2017) 18(1):212.   10.1186/s12931-017-0704-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228.Inci I, Zhai W, Arni S, Hillinger S, Vogt P, Weder W. N-Acetylcysteine Attenuates Lung Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury After Lung Transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg (2007) 84(1):240–6; discussion 246.   10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.03.082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229.De Perrot M, Sekine Y, Fischer S, Waddell TK, McRae K, Liu M, et al. Interleukin-8 Release During Early Reperfusion Predicts Graft Function in Human Lung Transplantation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2002) 165(2):211–5.   10.1164/ajrccm.165.2.2011151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230.Sayah DM, Mallavia B, Liu F, Ortiz-Muñoz G, Caudrillier A, DerHovanessian A, et al. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Are Pathogenic in Primary Graft Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2015) 191(4):455–63.   10.1164/rccm.201406-1086OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231.Sharma AK, LaPar DJ, Stone ML, Zhao Y, Kron IL, Laubach VE. Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Products (RAGE) on iNKT Cells Mediates Lung Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Am J Transplant (2013) 13(9):2255–67.   10.1111/ajt.12368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232.Sternberg DI, Gowda R, Mehra D, Qu W, Weinberg A, Twaddell W, et al. Blockade of Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Product Attenuates Pulmonary Reperfusion Injury in Mice. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg (2008) 136(6):1576–85.   10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.05.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233.Schossleitner K, Habertheuer A, Finsterwalder R, Friedl HP, Rauscher S, Gröger M, et al. A Peptide to Reduce Pulmonary Edema in a Rat Model of Lung Transplantation. PloS One (2015) 10(11):e0142115.   10.1371/journal.pone.0142115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234.Mallavia B, Liu F, Sheppard D, Looney MR. Inhibiting Integrin αvβ5 Reduces Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in an Orthotopic Lung Transplant Model in Mice. Am J Transplant (2016) 16(4):1306–11.   10.1111/ajt.13605 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235.Stone ML, Sharma AK, Zhao Y, Charles EJ, Huerter ME, Johnston WF, et al. Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor 1 Agonism Attenuates Lung Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol (2015) 308(12):L1245–52.   10.1152/ajplung.00302.2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236.Ibrahim M, Wang X, Puyo CA, Montecalvo A, Huang HJ, Hachem RR, et al. Human Recombinant Apyrase Therapy Protects Against Canine Pulmonary Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. J Heart Lung Transplant (2015) 34(2):247–53.   10.1016/j.healun.2014.09.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 237.Sugimoto S, Lin X, Lai J, Okazaki M, Das NA, Li W, et al. Apyrase Treatment Prevents Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Rat Lung Isografts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg (2009) 138(3):752–9.   10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.04.049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 238.Gao W, Zhao J, Kim H, Xu S, Chen M, Bai X, et al. α1-Antitrypsin Inhibits Ischemia Reperfusion-Induced Lung Injury by Reducing Inflammatory Response and Cell Death. J Heart Lung Transplant (2014) 33(3):309–15.   10.1016/j.healun.2013.10.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 239.Lu W, Si YI, Ding J, Chen X, Zhang X, Dong Z, et al. Mesenchymal Stem Cells Attenuate Acute Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in a Rat Model. Exp Ther Med (2015) 10(6):2131–7.   10.3892/etm.2015.2806 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240.Tian W, Liu Y, Zhang B, Dai X, Li G, Li X, et al. Infusion of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Protects Lung Transplants From Cold Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Mice. Lung (2015) 193(1):85–95.   10.1007/s00408-014-9654-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 241.La Francesca S, Ting AE, Sakamoto J, Rhudy J, Bonenfant NR, Borg ZD, et al. Multipotent Adult Progenitor Cells Decrease Cold Ischemic Injury in Ex Vivo Perfused Human Lungs: An Initial Pilot and Feasibility Study. Transplant Res (2014) 3(1):19.   10.1186/2047-1440-3-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 242.Hashimoto K, Kim H, Oishi H, Chen M, Iskender I, Sakamoto J, et al. Annexin V Homodimer Protects Against Ischemia Reperfusion-Induced Acute Lung Injury in Lung Transplantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg (2016) 151(3):861–9.   10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.10.112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 243.Kim H, Zhao J, Zhang Q, Wang Y, Lee D, Bai X, et al. δv1-1 Reduces Pulmonary Ischemia Reperfusion-Induced Lung Injury by Inhibiting Necrosis and Mitochondrial Localization of Pkcδ and P53. Am J Transplant (2016) 16(1):83–98.   10.1111/ajt.13445 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 244.Martens A, Ordies S, Vanaudenaerde BM, Verleden SE, Vos R, Van Raemdonck DE, et al. Immunoregulatory Effects of Multipotent Adult Progenitor Cells in a Porcine Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion Model. Stem Cell Res Ther (2017) 8(1):159.   10.1186/s13287-017-0603-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 245.Lin H, Chen M, Tian F, Tikkanen J, Ding L, Andrew Cheung HY, et al. α1-Anti-Trypsin Improves Function of Porcine Donor Lungs during Ex-Vivo Lung Perfusion. J Heart Lung Transplant (2018) 37(5):656–66.   10.1016/j.healun.2017.09.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 246.Park J, Kim S, Lim H, Liu A, Hu S, Lee J, et al. Therapeutic Effects of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cell Microvesicles in an Ex Vivo Perfused Human Lung Injured With Severe. Thorax (2019) 74(1):43–50.   10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-211576 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 247.Zhou J, Chen J, Wei Q, Saeb-Parsy K, Xu X. The Role of Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Early Hepatic Allograft Dysfunction. Liver Transplantation (2020) 26(8):1034–48.   10.1002/lt.25779 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 248.Dar WA, Sullivan E, Bynon JS, Eltzschig H, Ju C. Ischaemia Reperfusion Injury in Liver Transplantation: Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms. Liver Int (2019) 39(5):788–801.   10.1111/liv.14091 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 249.Czigany Z, Lurje I, Schmelzle M, Schöning W, Öllinger R, Raschzok N, et al. Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Marginal Liver Grafts and the Role of Hypothermic Machine Perfusion: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Implications. J Clin Med (2020) 9(3):846.   10.3390/jcm9030846 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 250.Barzegar M, Kaur G, Gavins FNE, Wang Y, Boyer CJ, Alexander JS. Potential Therapeutic Roles of Stem Cells in Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Stem Cell Res (2019) 37:101421.   10.1016/j.scr.2019.101421 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 251.Moers C, Smits JM, Maathuis MH, Treckmann J, van Gelder F, Napieralski BP, et al. Machine Perfusion or Cold Storage in Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplantation. N Engl J Med (2009) 360(1):7–19.   10.1056/NEJMoa0802289 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 252.Moers C, Pirenne J, Paul A, Ploeg RJ, Group MPTS . Machine Perfusion or Cold Storage in Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplantation. N Engl J Med (2012) 366(8):770–1.   10.1056/NEJMc1111038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 253.Gill J, Dong J, Eng M, Landsberg D, Gill JS. Pulsatile Perfusion Reduces the Risk of Delayed Graft Function in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplants, Irrespective of Donor Type and Cold Ischemic Time. Transplantation (2014) 97(6):668–74.   10.1097/01.TP.0000438637.29214.10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 254.Kelpke SS, Chen B, Bradley KM, Teng X, Chumley P, Brandon A, et al. Sodium Nitrite Protects Against Kidney Injury Induced by Brain Death and Improves Post-Transplant Function. Kidney Int (2012) 82(3):304–13.   10.1038/ki.2012.116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 255.Hill P, Shukla D, Tran MG, Aragones J, Cook HT, Carmeliet P, et al. Inhibition of Hypoxia Inducible Factor Hydroxylases Protects Against Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. J Am Soc Nephrol (2008) 19(1):39–46.   10.1681/ASN.2006090998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 256.Imamura R, Moriyama T, Isaka Y, Namba Y, Ichimaru N, Takahara S, et al. Erythropoietin Protects the Kidneys Against Ischemia Reperfusion Injury by Activating Hypoxia Inducible Factor-1alpha. Transplantation (2007) 83(10):1371–9.   10.1097/01.tp.0000264200.38926.70 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 257.Grenz A, Osswald H, Eckle T, Yang D, Zhang H, Tran ZV, et al. The Reno-Vascular A2B Adenosine Receptor Protects the Kidney From Ischemia. PloS Med (2008) 5(6):e137.   10.1371/journal.pmed.0050137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 258.Land W, Schneeberger H, Schleibner S, Illner WD, Abendroth D, Rutili G, et al. The Beneficial Effect of Human Recombinant Superoxide Dismutase on Acute and Chronic Rejection Events in Recipients of Cadaveric Renal Transplants. Transplantation (1994) 57(2):211–7.   10.1097/00007890-199401001-00010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 259.Danilovic A, Lucon AM, Srougi M, Shimizu MH, Ianhez LE, Nahas WC, et al. Protective Effect of N-Acetylcysteine on Early Outcomes of Deceased Renal Transplantation. Transplant Proc (2011) 43(5):1443–9.   10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.02.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 260.Xue C, Liu Y, Li C, Li Y, Yang T, Xie L, et al. Powerful Protection Against Renal Ischemia Reperfusion Injury by T Cell-Specific NF-κb Inhibition. Transplantation (2014) 97(4):391–6.   10.1097/01.TP.0000438622.89310.95 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 261.Lepper PM, Bals R. On the Edge: Targeting Toll-Like Receptor 2 in Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury. Circ Cardiovasc Interv (2012) 5(2):146–9.   10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.968495 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 262.Reilly M, Miller RM, Thomson MH, Patris V, Ryle P, McLoughlin L, et al. Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Escalating Phase I, Healthy Subjects Study of Intravenous OPN-305, a Humanized Anti-TLR2 Antibody. Clin Pharmacol Ther (2013) 94(5):593–600.   10.1038/clpt.2013.150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 263.Gueler F, Rong S, Gwinner W, Mengel M, Bröcker V, Schön S, et al. Complement 5a Receptor Inhibition Improves Renal Allograft Survival. J Am Soc Nephrol (2008) 19(12):2302–12.   10.1681/ASN.2007111267 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 264.Kondo M, Tahara A, Hayashi K, Abe M, Inami H, Ishikawa T, et al. Renoprotective Effects of Novel Interleukin-1 Receptor-Associated Kinase 4 Inhibitor AS2444697 Through Anti-Inflammatory Action in 5/6 Nephrectomized Rats. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol (2014) 387(10):909–19.   10.1007/s00210-014-1023-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 265.Powell JT, Tsapepas DS, Martin ST, Hardy MA, Ratner LE. Managing Renal Transplant Ischemia Reperfusion Injury: Novel Therapies in the Pipeline. Clin Transplant (2013) 27(4):484–91.   10.1111/ctr.12121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 266.Cheng Q, Patel K, Lei B, Rucker L, Allen DP, Zhu P, et al. Donor Pretreatment With Nebulized Complement C3a Receptor Antagonist Mitigates Brain-Death Induced Immunological Injury Post-Lung Transplant. Am J Transplant (2018) 18(10):2417–28.   10.1111/ajt.14717 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 267.Kohmoto J, Nakao A, Sugimoto R, Wang Y, Zhan J, Ueda H, et al. Carbon Monoxide-Saturated Preservation Solution Protects Lung Grafts From Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg (2008) 136(4):1067–75.   10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.06.026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 268.Takashima S, Koukoulis G, Inokawa H, Sevala M, Egan TM. Inhaled Nitric Oxide Reduces Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Rat Lungs From Non-Heart-Beating Donors. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg (2006) 132(1):132–9.   10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.02.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 269.Yamashita H, Akamine S, Sumida Y, Inoue M, Sawada T, Nagayasu T, et al. Inhaled Nitric Oxide Attenuates Apoptosis in Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury of the Rabbit Lung. Ann Thorac Surg (2004) 78(1):292–7.   10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.12.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 270.Qiang Y, Liang G, Yu L. Human Amniotic Mesenchymal Stem Cells Alleviate Lung Injury Induced by Ischemia and Reperfusion After Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Dogs. Lab Invest (2016) 96(5):537–46.   10.1038/labinvest.2016.37 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 271.Nakajima D, Watanabe Y, Ohsumi A, Pipkin M, Chen M, Mordant P, et al. Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Therapy During Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion Ameliorates Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Lung Transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant (2019) 38(11):1214–23.   10.1016/j.healun.2019.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 272.Korkmaz-Icöz S, Li S, Hüttner R, Ruppert M, Radovits T, Loganathan S, et al. Hypothermic Perfusion of Donor Heart With a Preservation Solution Supplemented by Mesenchymal Stem Cells. J Heart Lung Transplant (2019) 38(3):315–26.   10.1016/j.healun.2018.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 273.Dayan V, Sotelo V, Delfina V, Delgado N, Rodriguez C, Suanes C, et al. Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Improve Cardiac Perfusion in an Ovine Immunocompetent Animal Model. J Invest Surg (2016) 29(4):218–25.   10.3109/08941939.2015.1128997 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 274.Benoit SW, Devarajan P. Acute Kidney Injury: Emerging Pharmacotherapies in Current Clinical Trials. Pediatr Nephrol (2018) 33(5):779–87.   10.1007/s00467-017-3695-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 275.Oliva J. Therapeutic Properties of Mesenchymal Stem Cell on Organ Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Int J Mol Sci (2019) 20(21):5511–32.   10.3390/ijms20215511 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 276.Sun Q, Huang Z, Han F, Zhao M, Cao R, Zhao D, et al. Allogeneic Mesenchymal Stem Cells as Induction Therapy Are Safe and Feasible in Renal Allografts: Pilot Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. J Transl Med (2018) 16(1):52.   10.1186/s12967-018-1422-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 277.Krześniak AM, Radzimowski K, Stolarczyk A. Comparison of the Treatment Results of Knee Osteoarthritis Using Adipose Tissue Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Derived Through Enzymatic Digestion and Mechanically Fragmented Adipose Tissue. Med (Baltimore) (2021) 100(9):e24777.   10.1097/MD.0000000000024777 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 278.Chung JW, Chang WH, Bang OY, Moon GJ, Kim SJ, Kim SK, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Ischemic Stroke. Neurology (2021) 96(7):e1012–23.   10.1212/WNL.0000000000011440 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 279.Lanzoni G, Linetsky E, Correa D, Messinger Cayetano S, Alvarez RA, Kouroupis D, et al. Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells for COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Double-Blind, Phase 1/2a, Randomized Controlled Trial. Stem Cells Transl Med (2021) 10(5):660–73.   10.1002/sctm.20-0472 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 280.Macdonald P, Mundy J, Rogers P, Harrison G, Branch J, Glanville A, et al. Successful Treatment of Life-Threatening Acute Reperfusion Injury After Lung Transplantation With Inhaled Nitric Oxide. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg (1995) 110(3):861–3.   10.1016/S0022-5223(95)70125-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 281.Rea RS, Ansani NT, Seybert AL. Role of Inhaled Nitric Oxide in Adult Heart or Lung Transplant Recipients. Ann Pharmacother (2005) 39(5):913–7.   10.1345/aph.1E228 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 282.George TJ, Arnaoutakis GJ, Beaty CA, Jandu SK, Santhanam L, Berkowitz DE, et al. Inhaled Hydrogen Sulfide Improves Graft Function in an Experimental Model of Lung Transplantation. J Surg Res (2012) 178(2):593–600.   10.1016/j.jss.2012.06.037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 283.Lang JD, Teng X, Chumley P, Crawford JH, Isbell TS, Chacko BK, et al. Inhaled NO Accelerates Restoration of Liver Function in Adults Following Orthotopic Liver Transplantation. J Clin Invest (2007) 117(9):2583–91.   10.1172/JCI31892 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 284.Khajuria A, Tay C, Shi J, Zhao H, Ma D. Anesthetics Attenuate Ischemia-Reperfusion Induced Renal Injury: Effects and Mechanisms. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan (2014) 52(4):176–84.   10.1016/j.aat.2014.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 285.den Hengst WA, Gielis JF, Lin JY, Van Schil PE, De Windt LJ, Moens AL. Lung Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: A Molecular and Clinical View on a Complex Pathophysiological Process. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (2010) 299(5):H1283–99.   10.1152/ajpheart.00251.2010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 286.Porteous MK, Diamond JM, Christie JD. Primary Graft Dysfunction: Lessons Learned About the First 72 H After Lung Transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant (2015) 20(5):506–14.   10.1097/MOT.0000000000000232 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 287.Fumagalli J, Rosso L, Gori F, Morlacchi LC, Rossetti V, Tarsia P, et al. Early Pulmonary Function and Mid Term Outcome in Lung Transplantation After Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion- a Single-Center, Retrospective, Observational, Cohort Study. Transpl Int (2020) 20(5):506–14.   10.1111/tri.13606 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 288.Chakos A, Ferret P, Muston B, Yan TD, Tian DH. Ex-Vivo Lung Perfusion Versus Standard Protocol Lung Transplantation-Mid-Term Survival and Meta-Analysis. Ann Cardiothorac Surg (2020) 9(1):1–9.   10.21037/acs.2020.01.02 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 289.Slama A, Schillab L, Barta M, Benedek A, Mitterbauer A, Hoetzenecker K, et al. Standard Donor Lung Procurement With Normothermic Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. J Heart Lung Transplant (2017) 36(7):744–53.   10.1016/j.healun.2017.02.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 290.Cypel M, Yeung JC, Liu M, Anraku M, Chen F, Karolak W, et al. Normothermic Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion in Clinical Lung Transplantation. N Engl J Med (2011) 364(15):1431–40.   10.1056/NEJMoa1014597 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 291.Charles EJ, Huerter ME, Wagner CE, Sharma AK, Zhao Y, Stoler MH, et al. Donation After Circulatory Death Lungs Transplantable Up to Six Hours After Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion. Ann Thorac Surg (2016) 102(6):1845–53.   10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.06.043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 292.Shafaghi S, Mortaz E, Abbasi Dezfuli A, Godarzi H, Sheikhy K, Ansari Aval Z, et al. Normothermic Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion in Brain-Dead Donors Reduces Inflammatory Cytokines and Toll-Like Receptor Expression. Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol (2016) 15(5):340–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 293.Stone JP, Ball AL, Crichley W, Yonan N, Liao Q, Sjöberg T, et al. Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion Improves the Inflammatory Signaling Profile of the Porcine Donor Lung Following Transplantation. Transplantation (2020) 104(9):1899–905.   10.1097/TP.0000000000003338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 294.Demirjian S, Ailawadi G, Polinsky M, Bitran D, Silberman S, Shernan SK, et al. Safety and Tolerability Study of an Intravenously Administered Small Interfering Ribonucleic Acid (siRNA) Post On-Pump Cardiothoracic Surgery in Patients at Risk of Acute Kidney Injury. Kidney Int Rep (2017) 2(5):836–43.   10.1016/j.ekir.2017.03.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 295.Kassimatis T, Qasem A, Douiri A, Ryan EG, Rebollo-Mesa I, Nichols LL, et al. A Double-Blind Randomised Controlled Investigation Into the Efficacy of Mirococept (APT070) for Preventing Ischaemia Reperfusion Injury in the Kidney Allograft (EMPIRIKAL): Study Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial. Trials (2017) 18(1):255.   10.1186/s13063-017-1972-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 296.Dehnadi A, Benedict Cosimi A, Neal Smith R, Li X, Alonso JL, Means TK, et al. Prophylactic Orthosteric Inhibition of Leukocyte Integrin CD11b/CD18 Prevents Long-Term Fibrotic Kidney Failure in Cynomolgus Monkeys. Nat Commun (2017) 8:13899.   10.1038/ncomms13899 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 297.Nicholson ML, Hosgood SA. Renal Transplantation After Ex Vivo Normothermic Perfusion: The First Clinical Study. Am J Transplant (2013) 13(5):1246–52.   10.1111/ajt.12179 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 298.Hosgood SA, Saeb-Parsy K, Wilson C, Callaghan C, Collett D, Nicholson ML. Protocol of a Randomised Controlled, Open-Label Trial of Ex Vivo Normothermic Perfusion Versus Static Cold Storage in Donation After Circulatory Death Renal Transplantation. BMJ Open (2017) 7(1):e012237.   10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 299.Neves DB, Rusi MB, Diaz LGG, Salvalaggio P. Primary Graft Dysfunction of the Liver: Definitions, Diagnostic Criteria and Risk Factors. Einstein (São Paulo) (2016) 14(4):567–72.   10.1590/s1679-45082016rw3585 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 300.Kim J, Zimmerman MA, Hong JC. Emerging Innovations in Liver Preservation and Resuscitation. Transplant Proc (2018) 50(8):2308–16.   10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.03.080 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 301.Van Rijn R, Van Leeuwen OB, Matton APM, Burlage LC, Wiersema-Buist J, Van Den Heuvel MC, et al. Hypothermic Oxygenated Machine Perfusion Reduces Bile Duct Reperfusion Injury After Transplantation of Donation After Circulatory Death Livers. Liver Transplantation (2018) 24(5):655–64.   10.1002/lt.25023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 302.Van Rijn R, Van Den Berg AP, Erdmann JI, Heaton N, Van Hoek B, De Jonge J, et al. Study Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Efficacy of End-Ischemic Dual Hypothermic Oxygenated Machine Perfusion With Static Cold Storage in Preventing Non-Anastomotic Biliary Strictures After Transplantation of Liver Gra. BMC Gastroenterol (2019) 19(1).   10.1186/s12876-019-0956-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 303.van Leeuwen OB, de Vries Y, Fujiyoshi M, Nijsten MWN, Ubbink R, Pelgrim GJ, et al. Transplantation of High-Risk Donor Livers After Ex Situ Resuscitation and Assessment Using Combined Hypo- and Normothermic Machine Perfusion: A Prospective Clinical Trial. Ann Surg (2019) 270(5):906–14.   10.1097/sla.0000000000003540 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 304.Ravikumar R, Jassem W, Mergental H, Heaton N, Mirza D, Perera MTPR, et al. Liver Transplantation AfterEx VivoNormothermic Machine Preservation: A Phase 1 (First-In-Man) Clinical Trial. Am J Transplantation (2016) 16(6):1779–87.   10.1111/ajt.13708 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 305.Jomaa A, Gurusamy K, Siriwardana PN, Claworthy I, Collier S, De Muylder P, et al. Does Hypothermic Machine Perfusion of Human Donor Livers Affect Risks of Sinusoidal Endothelial Injury and Microbial Infection? A Feasibility Study Assessing Flow Parameters Sterility Sinusoidal Endothelial Ultrastructure (2013) 45(5):1677–83.   10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.01.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 306.Henry SD, Nachber E, Tulipan J, Stone J, Bae C, Reznik L, et al. Hypothermic Machine Preservation Reduces Molecular Markers of Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury in Human Liver Transplantation. Am J Transplant (2012) 12: (9):2477–86.   10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04086.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 307.Ghinolfi D, Rreka E, De Tata V, Franzini M, Pezzati D, Fierabracci V, et al. Pilot, Open, Randomized, Prospective Trial for Normothermic Machine Perfusion Evaluation in Liver Transplantation From Older Donors. Liver Transplantation (2019) 25(3):436–49.   10.1002/lt.25362 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 308.Czigany Z, Schöning W, Ulmer TF, Bednarsch J, Amygdalos I, Cramer T, et al. Hypothermic Oxygenated Machine Perfusion (HOPE) for Orthotopic Liver Transplantation of Human Liver Allografts From Extended Criteria Donors (ECD) in Donation After Brain Death (DBD): A Prospective Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial (HOPE ECD-DBD). BMJ Open (2017) 7(10):e017558.   10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017558 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 309.Bral M, Gala-Lopez B, Bigam D, Kneteman N, Malcolm A, Livingstone S, et al. Preliminary Single Centre Canadian Experience of Human Normothermic Ex Vivo Liver Perfusion: Results of a Clinical Trial. Am J Transplant (2016) 17:1071–1080.   10.1111/ajt.14049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 310.Guarrera JV, Henry SD, Samstein B, Odeh-Ramadan R, Kinkhabwala M, Goldstein MJ, et al. Hypothermic Machine Preservation in Human Liver Transplantation: The First Clinical Series. Am J Transplantation (2010) 10(2):372–81.   10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02932.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 311.Dutkowski P, Schlegel A, de Oliveira M, Müllhaupt B, Neff F, Clavien P-A. HOPE for Human Liver Grafts Obtained From Donors After Cardiac Death. J Hepatol (2014) 60(4):765–72.   10.1016/j.jhep.2013.11.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 312.Mergental H, Perera MTPR, Laing RW, Muiesan P, Isaac JR, Smith A, et al. Transplantation of Declined Liver Allografts Following Normothermic Ex-Situ Evaluation. Am J Transplant (2016) 16: (11):3235–45.   10.1111/ajt.13875 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 313.He X, Guo Z, Zhao Q, Ju W, Wang D, Wu L, et al. The First Case of Ischemia-Free Organ Transplantation in Humans: A Proof of Concept. Am J Transplant (2018) 18(3):737–44.   10.1111/ajt.14583 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 314.Singh SSA, Dalzell JR, Berry C, Al-Attar N. Primary Graft Dysfunction After Heart Transplantation: A Thorn Amongst the Roses. Heart Fail Rev (2019) 24(5):805–20.   10.1007/s10741-019-09794-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 315.Subramani S, Aldrich A, Dwarakanath S, Sugawara A, Hanada S. Early Graft Dysfunction Following Heart Transplant: Prevention and Management. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth (2020) 24(1):24–33.   10.1177/1089253219867694 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 316.Kleveland O, Kunszt G, Bratlie M, Ueland T, Broch K, Holte E, et al. Effect of a Single Dose of the Interleukin-6 Receptor Antagonist Tocilizumab on Inflammation and Troponin T Release in Patients With Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2 Trial. Eur Heart J (2016) 37(30):2406–13.   10.1093/eurheartj/ehw171 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 317.Yang M, Chen J, Zhao J, Meng M. Etanercept Attenuates Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury by Decreasing Inflammation and Oxidative Stress. PloS One (2014) 9(9):e108024.   10.1371/journal.pone.0108024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 318.Zhu J, Huang J, Dai D, Wang X, Gao J, Han W, et al. Recombinant Human Interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist Treatment Protects Rats From Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. BioMed Pharmacother (2019) 111:1–5.   10.1016/j.biopha.2018.12.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 319.Ardehali A, Esmailian F, Deng M, Soltesz E, Hsich E, Naka Y, et al. Ex-Vivo Perfusion of Donor Hearts for Human Heart Transplantation (PROCEED II): A Prospective, Open-Label, Multicentre, Randomised Non-Inferiority Trial. Lancet (2015) 385(9987):2577–84.   10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60261-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 320.Chan JL, Kobashigawa JA, Reich HJ, Ramzy D, Thottam MM, Yu Z, et al. Intermediate Outcomes With Ex-Vivo Allograft Perfusion for Heart Transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant (2017) 36(3):258–63.   10.1016/j.healun.2016.08.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 321.Page A, Messer S, Large SR. Heart Transplantation From Donation After Circulatory Determined Death. Ann Cardiothorac Surg (2018) 7(1):75–81.   10.21037/acs.2018.01.08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 322.Messer S, Page A, Berman M, Colah S, Dunning J, Pavlushkov E, et al. First to 50: Early Outcomes Following Heart Transplantation at Royal Papworth Hospital From Donation After Circulatory Determined Death (DCD) Donors. J Heart Lung Transplant (2019) 12:1311–8. 10.1016/j.healun.2019.01.090 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 323.Nilsson J, Jernryd V, Qin G, Paskevicius A, Metzsch C, Sjöberg T, et al. A Nonrandomized Open-Label Phase 2 Trial of Nonischemic Heart Preservation for Human Heart Transplantation. Nat Commun (2020) 11(1):2976.   10.1038/s41467-020-16782-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 324.Cooper DK, Gollackner B, Sachs DH. Will the Pig Solve the Transplantation Backlog? Annu Rev Med (2002) 53:133–47.   10.1146/annurev.med.53.082901.103900 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 325.Ezzelarab MB, Ekser B, Azimzadeh A, Lin CC, Zhao Y, Rodriguez R, et al. Systemic Inflammation in Xenograft Recipients Precedes Activation of Coagulation. Xenotransplantation (2015) 22(1):32–47.   10.1111/xen.12133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 326.Bongoni AK, Kiermeir D, Jenni H, Wünsch A, Bähr A, Ayares D, et al. Activation of the Lectin Pathway of Complement in Pig-to-Human Xenotransplantation Models. Transplantation (2013) 96(9):791–9.   10.1097/TP.0b013e3182a3a52b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 327.Knosalla C. Success for Pig-to-Baboon Heart Transplants. Nature (2018) 564(7736):352–3.   10.1038/d41586-018-07419-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 328.Längin M, Reichart B, Steen S, Sjöberg T, Paskevicius A, Liao Q, et al. Cold Non-Ischemic Heart Preservation With Continuous Perfusion Prevents Early Graft Failure in Orthotopic Pig-to-Baboon Xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation (2021) 28(1):e12636.   10.1111/xen.12636 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 329.Watanabe H, Sahara H, Nomura S, Tanabe T, Ekanayake-Alper DK, Boyd LK, et al. GalT-KO Pig Lungs Are Highly Susceptible to Acute Vascular Rejection in Baboons, Which may be Mitigated by Transgenic Expression of Hcd47 on Porcine Blood Vessels. Xenotransplantation (2018) 25(5):e12391.   10.1111/xen.12391 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 330.Shah JA, Patel MS, Elias N, Navarro-Alvarez N, Rosales I, Wilkinson RA, et al. Prolonged Survival Following Pig-To-Primate Liver Xenotransplantation Utilizing Exogenous Coagulation Factors and Costimulation Blockade. Am J Transplant (2017) 17(8):2178–85.   10.1111/ajt.14341 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 331.Khalpey Z, Yuen AH, Kalsi KK, Kochan Z, Karbowska J, Slominska EM, et al. Loss of Ecto-5’nucleotidase From Porcine Endothelial Cells After Exposure to Human Blood: Implications for Xenotransplantation. Biochim Biophys Acta (2005) 1741(1-2):191–8.   10.1016/j.bbadis.2005.03.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 332.Sykes M, Sachs DH. Transplanting Organs From Pigs to Humans. Sci Immunol (2019) 4(41):1–13.   10.1126/sciimmunol.aau6298 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 333.Mohiuddin MM, Singh AK, Corcoran PC, Thomas Iii ML, Clark T, Lewis BG, et al. Chimeric 2C10R4 Anti-CD40 Antibody Therapy Is Critical for Long-Term Survival of GTKO.hCD46.hTBM Pig-to-Primate Cardiac Xenograft. Nat Commun (2016) 7:11138.   10.1038/ncomms11138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 334.Jordan SC, Choi J, Kim I, Wu G, Toyoda M, Shin B, et al. Interleukin-6, A Cytokine Critical to Mediation of Inflammation, Autoimmunity and Allograft Rejection: Therapeutic Implications of IL-6 Receptor Blockade. Transplantation (2017) 101(1):32–44.   10.1097/TP.0000000000001452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 335.Weigt SS, Palchevskiy V, Belperio JA. Inflammasomes and IL-1 Biology in the Pathogenesis of Allograft Dysfunction. J Clin Invest (2017) 127(6):2022–9.   10.1172/JCI93537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 336.Zhao Y, Cooper DKC, Wang H, Chen P, He C, Cai Z, et al. Potential Pathological Role of Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-17) in Xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation (2019) 26(3):e12502.   10.1111/xen.12502 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 337.Steen S, Paskevicius A, Liao Q, Sjöberg T. Safe Orthotopic Transplantation of Hearts Harvested 24 Hours After Brain Death and Preserved for 24 Hours. Scand Cardiovasc J (2016) 50(3):193–200.   10.3109/14017431.2016.1154598 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 338.Boteon YL, Afford SC. Machine Perfusion of the Liver: Which Is the Best Technique to Mitigate Ischaemia-Reperfusion Injury? World J Transplant (2019) 9(1):14–20.   10.5500/wjt.v9.i1.14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 339.Koerner MM, Ghodsizad A, Schulz U, El Banayosy A, Koerfer R, Tenderich G. Normothermic Ex Vivo Allograft Blood Perfusion in Clinical Heart Transplantation. Heart Surg Forum (2014) 17(3):E141–5.   10.1532/HSF98.2014332 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 340.Sun W, Wang Z, Sun M, Huang W, Wang Y. Aloin Antagonizes Stimulated Ischemia/Reperfusion-Induced Damage and Inflammatory Response in Cardiomyocytes by Activating the Nrf2/HO-1 Defense Pathway. Cell Tissue Res (2021) 3:735–44.   10.1007/s00441-020-03345-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 341.Shen Y, Liu X, Shi J, Wu X. Involvement of Nrf2 in Myocardial Ischemia and Reperfusion Injury. Int J Biol Macromol (2019) 125:496–502.   10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.11.190 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 342.Soares MP, Lin Y, Anrather J, Csizmadia E, Takigami K, Sato K, et al. Expression of Heme Oxygenase-1 can Determine Cardiac Xenograft Survival. Nat Med (1998) 4(9):1073–7.   10.1038/2063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 343.Öllinger R, Pratschke J. Role of Heme Oxygenase-1 in Transplantation. Transpl Int (2010) 23(11):1071–81.   10.1111/j.1432-2277.2010.01158.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 344.Yeom HJ, Koo OJ, Yang J, Cho B, Hwang JI, Park SJ, et al. Generation and Characterization of Human Heme Oxygenase-1 Transgenic Pigs. PloS One (2012) 7(10):e46646.   10.1371/journal.pone.0046646 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 345.Kim MJ, Hwang YH, Kim YH, Lee DY. Immunomodulation of Cell-Penetrating Tat-Metallothionein for Successful Outcome of Xenotransplanted Pancreatic Islet. J Drug Targeting (2017) 25(4):350–9.   10.1080/1061186X.2016.1258704 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 346.Yokoyama I, Negita M, Liu DG, Nagasaka T, Kobayashi T, Hayakawa A, et al. Prevention of Free-Radical Induced Apoptosis by Induction of Human Recombinant Cu, Zn-SOD in Pig Endothelial Cells. Transpl Int (2002) 15(5):220–5.   10.1007/s00147-002-0394-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 347.Knosalla C, Yazawa K, Behdad A, Bodyak N, Shang H, Bühler L, et al. Renal and Cardiac Endothelial Heterogeneity Impact Acute Vascular Rejection in Pig-to-Baboon Xenotransplantation. Am J Transplant (2009) 9(5):1006–16.   10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02602.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 348.Kim H, Hawthorne WJ, Kang HJ, Lee YJ, Hwang JI, Hurh S, et al. Human Thrombomodulin Regulates Complement Activation as Well as the Coagulation Cascade in Xeno-Immune Response. Xenotransplantation (2015) 22(4):260–72.   10.1111/xen.12173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 349.Harris DG, Quinn KJ, French BM, Schwartz E, Kang E, Dahi S, et al. Meta-Analysis of the Independent and Cumulative Effects of Multiple Genetic Modifications on Pig Lung Xenograft Performance During Ex Vivo Perfusion With Human Blood. Xenotransplantation (2015) 22(2):102–11.   10.1111/xen.12149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 350.Burdorf L, Riner A, Rybak E, Salles II, De Meyer SF, Shah A, et al. Platelet Sequestration and Activation During GalTKO.hCD46 Pig Lung Perfusion by Human Blood Is Primarily Mediated by GPIb, GPIIb/IIIa, and Von Willebrand Factor. Xenotransplantation (2016) 23(3):222–36.   10.1111/xen.12236 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 351.Maeda A, Kawamura T, Ueno T, Usui N, Eguchi H, Miyagawa S. The Suppression of Inflammatory Macrophage-Mediated Cytotoxicity and Proinflammatory Cytokine Production by Transgenic Expression of HLA-E. Transpl Immunol (2013) 29(1-4):76–81.   10.1016/j.trim.2013.08.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 352.Chang CL, Wu CC, Hsu YT, Hsu YC. Immune Vulnerability of Ovarian Cancer Stem-Like Cells Due to Low CD47 Expression Is Protected by Surrounding Bulk Tumor Cells. Oncoimmunol (2020) 9(1):1803530.   10.1080/2162402X.2020.1803530 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 353.Miwa Y, Yazaki S, Iwamoto M, Suzuki S, Iwasaki K, Haneda M, et al. Functional Difference Between Membrane-Bound and Soluble Human Thrombomodulin. Transplantation (2015) 99(4):702–9.   10.1097/TP.0000000000000571 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 354.Black SM, Grehan JF, Rivard AL, Benson BA, Wahner AE, Koch AE, et al. Porcine Endothelial Cells and Iliac Arteries Transduced With AdenoIL-4 Are Intrinsically Protected, Through Akt Activation, Against Immediate Injury Caused by Human Complement. J Immunol (2006) 177(10):7355–63.   10.4049/jimmunol.177.10.7355 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 355.Bruns H, Bessell C, Varela JC, Haupt C, Fang J, Pasemann S, et al. CD47 Enhances Ex Vivo Functionality of Artificial Antigen-Presenting Cells. Clin Cancer Res (2015) 21(9):2075–83.   10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2696 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 356.Bral M, Gala-Lopez B, Bigam D, Kneteman N, Malcolm A, Livingstone S, et al. Preliminary Single-Center Canadian Experience of Human Normothermic Ex Vivo Liver Perfusion: Results of a Clinical Trial. Am J Transplant (2017) 17(4):1071–80.   10.1111/ajt.14049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Immunology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES