Abstract
The fungus Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (FOL) is known to cause vascular wilt on tomato almost over the world. Inoculation of FOL reduced plant growth and increased wilt of tomato. The following study examined the possible role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) consortium comprising of Rhizophagus intraradices, Funneliformis mosseae and Claroideoglomus etunicatum against FOL in tomato and explored in an inducing plant systemic defense. AMF inoculation reduced the wilt disease within vascular tissue and in vivo production of fusaric acid was observed which may be responsible in reduced wilting. FOL had an antagonistic effect on AMF colonization, reduced the number of spores, arbuscules and vesicles. AMF also inhibited the damage induced by Fusarium wilt through increasing chlorophyll contents along with the activity of phosphate metabolising enzymes (acid and alkaline phosphatases). Moreover, tomato plants with mycorrhizal inoculation showed an increase in the level of antioxidant enzymes including glutathione reductase, catalase, and etc. with an ultimate influence on the elimination of reactive oxygen species. Moreover, rise in phosphatase along with antioxidant enzymatic systems and enhanced photosynthetic performance contributed to induced resistance against FOL in tomato.
Keywords: Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici, Oxidative stress, Osmolytes, Antioxidants, Phosphatases, Solanum lycopersicum, Soil borne fungi
1. Introduction
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) a member of the family Solanaceae, is an important food crop consumed worldwide. Tomato is rich in nutrients and anti-cancer and anti-oxidative compounds like lycopene and flavonoids (Gerszberg et al., 2015).
Cellular processes like photosynthesis, respiration, plasma membrane functions and water conductivity are affected by pathogenic fungi (Berger et al., 2007). This biotic stress leads towards the over accumulation of toxic reactive oxygen species (ROS) thus inducing oxidative stress in plant (Vellosillo et al., 2010). Excess accumulated ROS interacts with the cellular constituents including lipids, proteins and nucleic acids, thus hinders the normal working of the cell (El-Rahman et al., 2012, Egamberdieva et al., 2017, Hashem et al., 2017). One of the biotic stress induced by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (FOL) is responsible for intense yield losses of tomato due to wilt disease (Nirmaladevi and Sirnivas, 2012, Akhter et al., 2015).
To alleviate the adverse effect of wilt disease caused by FOL biologically, the biologists are looking for alternative means, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) one of the most effective biological strategy reported to control wilt diseases (Al-Hmoud and Al-Momany, 2015). AMF are ubiquitous and improves the plant growth and development via enhancing the nutrient uptake and the rhizospheric soil health (Nahiyan and Matsubara, 2012, Al-Hmoud and Al-Momany, 2015). AMF induced resistance by enhancing the accumulation of defense related proteins, osmolytes and strengthening of the antioxidant system (Alqarawi et al., 2014, Abd_Allah et al., 2015, Akhter et al., 2015). The antioxidant system constituted of the reactive and non-reactive components which can mediate the elimination of ROS, hence protect the plants from the stress induced by oxidative burst (Nahiyan and Matsubara, 2012, Egamberdieva et al., 2017). Superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and etc. (El-Rahman et al., 2012, Kurabachew and Wydra, 2014, Abd_Allah et al., 2015), exhibit a close coordination in neutralizing the ROS. AMF induced positive changes reflect as an improvement in growth of host plants and subsequently improve their potential to withstand the stress triggered deleterious changes (Al-Hmoud and Al-Momany, 2015, Hashem et al. 2016). Amelioration of the stress induced by the AMF has also been observed by active involvement of key phytohormones like auxins, cytokines, jasmonates and etc. (Cao et al., 2011, Beneduzi et al., 2012, Denancé et al., 2013, Hashem et al., 2015Hashem et al., 2015). Petti et al., 2012, Buhrow et al., 2016 have demonstrated that the up-regulated expression of genes encoding indole acetic acid, indole butyric acid, and nine-cis-epoxy carotenoid dioxygenase involved in the synthesis of abscissic acid improved tolerance to Fusarium head blight in barley. Therefore, symbiotic association between AMF and plants provides new avenues for developing alternative strategies against plant pathogenic fungi (Nahiyan and Matsubara, 2012, Lewandowski et al., 2013, Song et al., 2015).
Therefore, the present study was aimed to assess the influence of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici on the development of tomato and FOL induced wilt severity and the impact of AMF (Rhizophagus intraradices, Claroideoglomus etunicatum, Funneliformis mosseae,) were observed in mitigating the disease severity via enhancing the antioxidant metabolism, phytohormones homeostasis and osmolytes accumulation.
2. Material and methods
2.1. Plant material
Certified tomato seeds (Solanum lycopersicum L., cv Red Rock) were treated with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl, 5.0%, v/v) for 5 min to surface sterilize the seeds and washed afterwards with double distilled water. The seeds were sown in plastic plates (25x25x5 cm) containing autoclaved peat, perlite and sand (1:1:1, v/v/v) under controlled conditions (day/night temperature of 26/16 °C; Relative humidity, 56%) for two weeks after germination. The developed seedlings used for pathogenicity testing and pot experiments.
2.2. Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Lycopersici isolation and inoculum preparation
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (FOL) was isolated from tomato fields in Saleheyah Al Gadidah city (30.685725, 31.882915), Sharqia Governorate, Egypt (Fig. 1). Root tissue fragments of symptomatic tomato plants were surface-sterilized and plated on potato dextrose agar (PDA, Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI, USA) amended with 50 mg/L of antibiotic tetracycline. The inoculated PDA plates were incubated at 25 °C for 7–10 days under standard conditions according to Summerell et al. (2003), for the development mycelial growth of Fusarium oxysporum (Summerell et al., 2003) and sub-cultured onto PDA slants. The developed mycelia and conidia were characterized according to Booth, 1977, Nelson et al., 1983.
Fig. 1.
Location epidemic area of tomato cultivation in Saleheyah Al Gadidah city (30.685725, 31.882915), Sharqia Governorate, Egypt.
2.3. Disease incidence and severity assessment
Three weeks old healthy tomato seedlings were inoculated by standard root dip method as described by Nirmaladevi and Sirnivas (2012). The tomato seedlings were gently uprooted. The root tip (about 1 cm) was slightly trimmed and immersed for 30 min in the conidial suspension (106 CFU [colony forming units] ml−1 with sterile deionized water) of phytopathogen (FOL), carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC, 0.05%, w/v) used as adhering agent. Seedlings dipped in sterile water with CMC served as control. Afterwards, the seedlings were transplanted to plastic pots (25 cm diameter), containing autoclaved soil and sand (1:1). Five seedlings per pot were transplanted. Tomato plants were placed in a greenhouse where temperatures range varied between 25 and 30 °C. The plantlets were watered two times per week (50 mL/ pot) and fertilized once a week with NPK (15:15:15). Disease incidence was assessed after 6 weeks of inoculation. The disease index used throughout the experiments calculated as percentage according to the next equation:
The brownish discoloration of the xylem vessel (percent invaded vessels) was confirmed and measured by slitting the stem (Johnson et al.,1982).
2.4. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and its application
The endophytic AMF (Rhizophagus intraradices, Funneliformis mosseae, Claroideoglomus etunicatum), were isolated previously from Talh trees (Acacia gerrardii) roots grown natively in Khuraim Meadow in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (Hashem et al. 2016) according to the protocol as narrated by Daniels and Skipper (1982) and modified by Utobo et al. (2011). The trap culture protocol of Stutz and Morton (1996) was followed in this study. The inoculum of AMF was added to each pot at the application rate of 25 g of trap culture (counting approx.100 spores/g trap culture)/pot. Pots without mycorrhiza served as the control.
2.5. Experimental design, treatments and plant growing conditions
Completely randomized design experiment with ten replicates (one plant/each pot) was laid out to study the effect of AMF on FOL in tomato. The treatments were given as follows:
(1): Control (Without FOL and AMF inoculation); (2): FOL only; (3): FOL + AMF; (4): AMF only. The pots were placed in growth chamber. The disease incidence was assessed after 6 weeks of inoculation, subsequently the plant samples were collected for analyses.
2.6. Photosynthetic pigments
Tomato leaves (100 mg) were first extracted in acetone, then absorbance was measured at 622, 645, and 470 nm on spectrophotometer (Lichtenthaler and Wellburn, 1983). Chlorophyll and carotenoids contents were estimated by following formulae
where: Chl a: chlorophyll a contents; Chl b: chlorophyll b, and Cx+c: carotenoids contents
2.7. Determination of leaf relative water content
Relative water contents (LRWC) of leaves were estimated by punching discs from the leaf of each treated plant. After calculating the fresh weight, the same leaf discs were kept on water for 4 h for the calculation of turgid weight. The leaf samples were dried in oven at 85 °C to obtain dry weight (Smart and Bihgham, 1974). Calculation of leaf water content was done by the following formula:
2.8. Determination of antioxidant enzyme activities
Frozen leaf tissue (0.4 g) samples were homogenized in pre-chilled mortar and pestle using 4 mL ice-cold 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) containing 4 % (w/v) polyvinyl pyrrolidone. The mixture was centrifuged at 14000 rpm at 4 °C for 30 min and the supernatant was used as enzyme source. Superoxide dismutase (SOD, EC1.15.1.1) activity was determined according to the Beauchamp and Fridovich (1971). Ascorbate peroxidase (APX, EC1.11.1.1) activity was assayed by observing the change in absorbance at 290 nm. While, APX activity was calculated by using molar extinction coefficient (ε) of 2.8 mM−1 cm−1 for AsA and activity expressed as U mg−1 protein (Nakano and Asada, 1981). For the measurement of dehydro ascorbate reductase (DHAR, EC: 1.8.5.1) activity, the method of Nakano and Asada (1981) was employed. Glutathione reductase (GR, EC1.6.4.2) activity was estimated by following the protocol of Smith et al. (1988).
2.9. Estimation of fusaric acid
Fusaric acid was estimated using thin-layer chromatography. Spots are developed on the chromatogram descending for 10–12 h in sec-butanol formic acid–water solvent system (75:15:10 v/v). The chromatograms were placed under hood (14–16 h) for drying and bromophenol blue was sprayed. Fusaric acid gives a yellow color (Stefan, 2005).
2.10. Estimation of AMF colonization
At the harvesting time, the AMF spores were isolated from the the soil substrate from every treatment by wet sieving and decanting method as described by Daniels and Skipper (1982) and modified by Utobo et al. (2011). The intensity of mycorrhizal colonization (mycelium, vesicles and arbuscules) was determined by the following formula:
2.11. Statistical analysis
The experimental data were analyzed by employing two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the help of Statistical Analysis System (SAS version 9.1) software. Significant differences between means were calculated by the least significant differences (LSD) test at P = 0.05. Additionally, the correlation coefficients were calculated for the studied parameters.
3. Results
3.1. Influence of FOL and AMF on tomato growth parameters
The morphological growth parameters were significantly higher in AMF inoculated treatment in comparison to control treatment (not inoculated with FOL). AMF exhibited significant improvement in the growth with an increase in shoot and root length (30.07% and 26.29%, respectively). However, upon inoculation with FOL reduction in root and shoot length was recorded (70.09% and 61.33%, respectively). In contrast an increase in shoot and root dry weights (27.86 % and 32.60 %, respectively) was observed upon inoculation with AMF. Fusarium infection reduced the dry shoot and root weight by 61.22% and 55.91%, respectively, however plants treated with both FOL and AMF together exhibited only 29.45% and 30.89% reduction (Table 6).
Table 6.
Effect of Fusarium oxysporum triggered wilt disease on the Intensity of AMF structural colonisation is shown as poor (P), moderate (M) and abundant (A). Data presented is mean of thirty replicates.
Treatments | Intensity of Structural Colonization (%) |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mycelium (M) |
Vesicles (V) |
Arbuscules (A) |
|||||||
P | M | A | P | M | A | P | M | A | |
Fusarium + AMF | 71.0a | 24.0b | 5.01c | 83.3a | 16.6c | 1.7c | 83.3a | 10.0b | 6.66b |
AMFOnly | 45.0b | 27.3a | 27.6a | 63.0b | 24.6b | 12.3a | 61.3b | 26.3a | 12.33a |
LSD at 0.05: | 18.37 | 2.03 | 10.82 | 12.47 | 50.3 | 7.21 | 11.04 | 8.92 | 4.38 |
3.2. Influence of FOL and AMF on photosynthetic pigments
Tomato plants inoculated with AMF only exhibited a significant improvement in pigment content. Relative to the control increase in chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoids and total pigments was 33.47%, 12.73 %, 4.93% and 23.54%, respectively (Table 7). Tomato infected with FOL exhibited a reduction of 54.14%, 75.10% and 32.26% in chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total pigments, respectively. However, AMF inoculation to FOL infected (FOL + AMF) plants significantly ameliorated the negative effects on pigment synthesis (Table 7). Net photosynthetic rate was maximum in AMF inoculated plants as compared to control as well as wilt infected plants. As compared to the control net photosynthetic rate was increased in AMF inoculated (17.77%) and decreased in FOL (61.93%) infected plants (Table 7), while co-inoculation of AMF and FOL (FOL + AMF) resulted a reduction of net photosynthetic activity as 32.25%.
Table 7.
Pearson Correlation Coefficients between Colonization and Disease incidence.
WP | IV | FA | M | V | A | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WP | 1.00000 | 0.93731 0.2266 |
−0.59780 0.5921 |
0.34370 0.7766 |
0.34370 0.7766 |
−0.98512 0.1100 |
IV | 1.00000 | −0.28095 0.8187 |
−0.00511 0.9967 |
−0.00511 0.9967 |
−0.86346 0.3366 |
|
FA | 1.00000 | −0.95827 0.1846 |
−0.95827 0.1846 |
0.72669 0.4821 |
||
M | 1.00000 | 1.00000 <0.0001 |
−0.50000 0.6667 |
|||
V | 1.00000 | −0.823700.5634 | ||||
A | 1.00000 |
WP: Wilt plants; IV: invaded vessels; FA: Fusaric acid; M: Mycelium; V: Vesicles; A: Arbuscules.
3.3. Influence of FOL and AMF on leaf relative water contents
Mycorrhizae inoculated tomatoes showed an increase of 6.83% in the leaf relative water content (LRWC) as compared to un-inoculatedplants, however FOL induced wilt resulted in 43.30% reduction in LRWC (Table 8). Theplants received AMF inoculum exhibited significant increase in flavonoid content under infectin free as well as diseased conditions. Relative to the control, an increase in total flavonoids was observed in AMF inoculated plants both without and with FOL (FOL + AMF) infected conditions (44.00% and 71.12%, respectively). However, FOL induced wilt resulted in 50.98% decline in LRWC (Table 8).
Table 8.
Pearson Correlation Coefficients between Colonization and Phosphatases enzymes.
M | V | A | ACP | ALP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
M | 1.00000 | 0.79676 0.0578 |
0.75227 0.0845 |
0.95467 0.0030 |
0.96594 0.0017 |
V | 1.00000 | 0.93295 0.0066 |
0.78697 0.0632 |
0.79285 0.0599 |
|
A | 1.00000 | 0.83415 0.0390 |
0.82407 0.0437 |
||
ACP | 1.00000 | 0.99884 <0.0001 |
|||
ALP | 1.00000 |
M: Mycelium; V: Vesicles; A: Arbuscules; ACP: Acid phosphatase; ALP: Alkaline phosphatase.
3.4. Influence of AMF on wilt development and accumulation of fusaric acid
FOL triggered wilt and its disease incidence potential in tomato was 85.22% and 90.51% as wilted plants and invaded vessels, respectively (Table 1). Moreover, the infection of tomato plants was accompanied with accumulation of fusaric acid (22.09 µg/ g root fresh weight) as wilt inducing agent. Inoculation tomato plant with the AMF, caused significant decrease in disease incidence (wilted plants and invaded vessels) and fusaric acid accumulation in roots (79.04% and 10.92%, respectively), compared to the plants without AMF (Table 1).
Table 1.
Effect of Fusarium oxysporum triggered wilt disease on the length (cm / plant) and dry weight (gm/ plant) of shoot and root in Solanum lycopersicum with and without AMF inoculation. Data presented is mean of three replicates.
Treatments | Shoot height (cm) | Shoot dry wt (g) | Root depth (cm) | Root dry wt (g) | Shoot height/Root depth | Shoot / Root dry wt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control | 29.86b | 0.5093b | 14.3b | 0.257b | 2.100b | 1.992b |
Fusarium Only | 8.93d | 0.1963d | 5.53d | 0.1133d | 1.621c | 1.789c |
Fusarium + AMF | 21.63c | 0.3593c | 9.6c | 0.1776c | 2.253a | 2.019a |
AMFOnly | 42.7a | 0.706a | 19.4a | 0.3813a | 2.201a | 1.859b |
LSD at 0.05: | 4.78 | 0.066 | 1.642 | 0.036 | 0.42 | 0.58 |
3.5. Determination of AMF root colonization and correlation with FOL development
Colonization and total spore number of AMF were lower significantly in FOL-inoculated plants (Table 2). FOL infection resulted in considerable reduction in the mycelia (39.43%), vesicles (55.85%) and arbuscules (52.14%) as well as total spore number of AM fungi (52.61%) compared to control mycorrhizal plants. The intensity of fungal infection (structural colonization) in tomato plants with M along The intensity of AMF as (M) and (A) were reduced in FOL plants significantly, however (P) had significantly higher intensity as compared non-diseased plants (Table 3). The intensity of AMF was always comparable to the infection of FOL. The Pearson’s correlation coefficient between colonization of AMF and disease incidence of tomato caused by FOL was presented in the Table 4. The wilted plants have positive but non-significant effect on invaded vessels (IV), (M) and (V) as (0.937), (0.343) and (0.343) respectively, while non-significant and negative correlation were recorded for fusaric acid and (A) as (-0.597) and (-0.985), respectively. Invaded vessels (IV) showed negative correlation with fusaric acid, (M), (V) and (A). Fusaric acid showed positive and non- significant correlation with A (0.726) while negative correlation was recorded for both M and V. Mycelium showed highly significant and positive correlation for tomato vesicles, while vesicles showed negative correlation for (A) (Table 4).
Table 2.
Effect of Fusarium oxysporum triggered wilt disease on chlorophyll pigments (mg/ g fresh wt) and net photosynthetic rate (mmol CO2 M−2 S-1) in Solanum lycopersicum with and without AMF inoculation. Data presented is mean of three replicates.
Treatments | Photosynthetic activity |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Photosynthetic pigments (mg / g fresh wt) |
Net photosynthetic rate | ||||||
Chl a | Chl b | Chl a + b | Chl a/b | Carotenoids | Total pigments | ||
Control | 1.091b | 0.6973b | 1.788b | 1.564d | 0.3910d | 2.179b | 12.03b |
Fusarium Only | 0.5003d | 0.1736d | 0.674d | 2.928a | 0.8026a | 1.476d | 4.58d |
Fusarium + AMF | 0.7953c | 0.4666c | 1.262c | 1.707c | 0.5906b | 1.852c | 8.15c |
AMF Only | 1.640a | 0.7990a | 2.439a | 2.053b | 0.4113c | 2.850a | 14.63a |
LSD at 0.05: | 0.082 | 0.045 | 0.1073 | 0.492 | 0.032 | 0.12 | 1.24 |
Table 3.
Effect of Fusarium oxysporum triggered wilt disease on leaf relative water content (%) in Solanum lycopersicum with and without AMF inoculation. Data presented is mean of three replicates.
Treatments | LRWC % |
---|---|
Control | 86.09b |
Fusarium Only | 48.82d |
Fusarium + AMF | 64.14c |
AMF Only | 92.40a |
LSD at 0.05 | 2.57 |
Table 4.
Wilting percentage (WP), percent invaded vessels (IV) and fusaric acid (μg/ 10 g root fresh weight) in tomato infected with Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici. Data presented is mean of five replicates.
Treatments | WP (%) | Disease incidence |
|
---|---|---|---|
IV (%) | FA | ||
Fusarium only | 85.22a | 90.51a | 22.09a |
Fusarium + AMF | 15.19b | 18.97b | 9.16b |
LSD at 0.05: | 2.29 | 2.22 | 3.38 |
3.6. Influence of AMF on phosphatase and antioxidant enzyme activity
Mycorrhizal inoculation on tomato plants resulted in significant increase activities of both phosphatase enzymes (acid & alkaline) as compared to un-inoculated control plants (Fig. 2A, B). In contrast, FOL inoculation of tomato plants caused drastic decline in the activity of acid and alkaline phosphatases by 41.91% and 55.97%, respectively, as compared with the un-inoculated control plants. However, the pre-inoculation of tomato plants with AMF resulted in strong induction of acid and alkaline phosphatases compared with treatment only inoculated with FOL. The Pearson’s correlation coefficients between colonization and phosphatase enzymes is described in the Table 5. The mycelium showed non-significant but positive correlation against the vesicles (0.796) and arbuscules (0.752) while acid phosphatase (0.954) and alkaline phosphatase (0.965) recorded positive and significant correlation. On the other hand vesicles showed positive while non-significant correlation on arbuscules (0.932), ACP (0.786) and ALP (0.792). The arbuscules have positive and significant results on ACP (0.834) and ALP (0.824) respectively. ACP showed highly significant and positive correlation with Alkaline phosphatase activity (0.998). Tomato plants infected with FOL triggered an increase in SOD, APX, DHAR and GR activity. Tomato plants with FOL + AMF inoculation showed 51.75%, 12.75%, 18.83% and 26.38% increase in activity of SOD, APX, DHAR and GR, respectively, while AMF only treated plants resulted in 23.76%, 4.43%, 13.10% and 8.27% increase in activity of SOD, APX, DHAR and GR, respectively (Fig. 3 A-D).
Fig. 2.
A-B: Effect of Fusarium oxysporum triggered wilt disease on (A) acid and (B) alkaline acid phosphatase activity with and without AMF in Solanum lycopersicum L. Data presented are the means ± SE (n = 5).
Table 5.
Effect of Fusarium oxysporum triggered wilt disease on the AMF colonization characteristics; total spore number, percent colonization in terms of mycelium (M), vesicles (V) and arbuscules (A) in Solanum lycopersicum. Data presented is mean of thirty replicates.
Treatments | *Total spore number | Total colonization percent |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Mycelium | Vesicles | Arbuscules | ||
Fusarium + AMF | 664.6b | 57.3b | 20.0b | 34.6b |
AMF Only | 1402.3a | 94.6a | 45.3a | 72.3a |
LSD at 0.05: | 352.118c | 37.87 | 15.34 | 26.69 |
*Total spore number: spore per 250 g soil.
Fig. 3.
A-D: Effect of Fusarium oxysporum triggered wilt disease on activity of (A) superoxide dismutase, (B) ascorbate peroxidase (C) dehydroascorbate reductase, (D) glutathione reductase with and without AMF in Solanum lycopersicum L. Data presented are the means ± SE (n = 5).
4. Discussion
Tomato showed drastically reduced growth in plants inoculated with FOL. The phytotoxic potential of FOL is related to production of fusaric acid as wilt inducing agent which played a major role in a significant decrease of plant growth via photosynthesis inhibition (Landa et al., 2002, Wu et al., 2008). Our study revealed that there is a substantial accumulation of fusaric acid in Fusarium infected plants compared with control. In another context, water deficit stress developed by FOL which caused blocking of vascular system in tomato roots hence, significantly enhanced restricting plant growth rate when only limited resource was available during stress (Lima et al., 2019). Increased growth and biomass production with AMF inoculation was observed in both FOL inoculated and uninoculated plants. Several reports including Al-Askar and Rashad, 2010, Nahiyan and Matsubara, 2012, Al-Hmoud and Al-Momany, 2015 has reported enhanced growth of AMF inoculated plants in both healthy and diseased conditions on different crops. The induction of defense associated proteins including pathogenesis-related proteins (PRP) and cell wall degrading chitinase and β-1,3-glucanaseby AMF are known to induce systemic resistance against Fusarium oxysporum (Pozo et al., 2010). Disease resistance in tomatoes could be due to improved growth conditions. however the mechanisms actually inovolved was not established. Production of PRP is considered an indicator of induced defense response whileaccumulation of chitinases and β-1,3-glucanase also linked with inducing resistance against Alternaria solani in tomato and AMF-colonization induced increase in growth of the host is mainly due to the increased nutrient acquisition particularly the phosphorous (Evelin et al., 2009, Beltrano et al., 2013, Huang et al., 2014, Hashem et al., 2015Hashem et al., 2015). The beneficial impact of associations between plant roots and AMF enhance uptake & mobility of nutrients like inorganic phosphate to host plants in exchange for fixed carbon source, food for AMF (Garcia et al., 2016, Bukovská et al., 2018). Phosphatases play their role in increasing the availability of phosphorous to plants (Liao et al., 2003). In our investigation, acid and alkaline phosphatases decreased with FOL infection, whereas AMF ameliorated the effect considerably. In accordance to our findings, Zhang et al. (2014) has also reported the reduced uptake of phosphorous in pea due to the reduction in phosphatase activity. Valliyodan et al. (2017) has demonstrated considerable enhancement in the activity of phosphate assimilating enzymes in soybean due to AMF. In our study root phosphatase activity was higher in mycorrhizae inoculated plants. Probably, the higher resistance of the existing acid phosphatase to the degradation by stress-induced enzyme as well as production of acid phosphatases were among the prime reasons for improved acid phosphatase activity (Jakobek and Lindgren, 2002, Liao et al., 2003). Beltrano et al., 2013, Zhang et al., 2014 advocates that improved root phosphatase activity regulates phosphorous transport and assimilation. Tomato plants infected with Fusarium wilt had shown reduced AMF colonization which may be due to the release of fusaric acid by FOL. Fusaric acid inhibit the growth of microflora either natural or beneficial to plants (Landa et al., 2002). Earlier Al-Askar and Rashad (2010) has demonstrated significant reduction in the AMF root colonization in beans due to Fusarium root rot disease. Similarly, Nahiyan and Matsubara, 2012, Lewandowski et al., 2013, Al-Hmoud and Al-Momany, 2015 had also reported decline in the AMF root colonization in different crop plants infected with root pathogens. Moreover, fusaric acid produced by the F. oxysporum has the potential to inhibit photosynthesis and reduced chlorophyll synthesis (Wu et al., 2008), and it could have promoted the activity of chlorophyll degrading enzymes chlorophyllase concomitant with the decline in the Rubisco activase activity leading to reduced photosynthetic rate (Akhter et al. 2015). We also found significantly lower photosynthetic pigments in FOL-treated tomato plants. Our results are in line with the previous reports of other F. oxysporum attacks on watermelon (Wu et al., 2008); onion (Abdelrahman et al., 2016) and banana (Thakker et al., 2013). Moreover, the stomatal opening and closure as well as inhibition of chloroplast due to organelles damage caused by FOL and fusaric acid (Dehgahi et al., 2015) reduced stomatal conductance and activity of photosynthesis (Mcelrone et al., 2002, Wu et al., 2008). However, the AMF-inoculated plants maintained a higher photosynthetic activity as compared to the FOL infected plants. Sheng et al. (2008) suggested that improved mineral uptake particularly magnesium by AMF might be the reason and possible mechanism to induce an increase in chlorophyll contents. AMF protects photosynthetic apparatus via increasing electron transport (ETRI and ETRII) and decreasing the quantum yield of non-photochemical quenching Y (NPQ) as reported by Rehman et al. (2010). The antioxidant enzymes activity was elivayed in tomato plants by FOL induced stress and such activities were further up regulated by co-inoculation with FOL and AMF. The enhancement of antioxidant enzymes activity is mediated to decrease the oxidative stress and detoxify ROS triggered by the biotic stress of FOL (Vellosillo et al., 2010). Previously, Huang et al. (2014) also reported that in AMF-plant-pathogen interaction enhanced SOD gene expression resulted in lower accumulation of ROS (Huang et al., 2014). AMF may lead to the quick elimination of wilt-generated ROS, hence protecting the host plant against the deleterious effects of pathogen induced oxidative damage (Nahiyan and Matsubara, 2012, Song et al., 2015). The fungal colonization of xylem vessels induce symptoms like water stress (Yadeta and Thomma, 2013, Akhter et al., 2015). The SOD expression was greater in lettuce inoculated with AMF under osmotic stress (Ruiz-Lozano, 2003). Additionally, AMF increased the tolerance of plants against water stress by increased antioxidant enzymes activity for the protection of lipids in membranes (Qun et al., 2007, Tang et al., 2009, Rasool et al., 2013, Hashem et al., 2015Hashem et al., 2015). Wilt disease caused by FOL induced significant reduction in tomato plant growth by limiting the root colonization of mycorrhizal fungi, plant growth, chlorophyll contents and induce oxidative damage. AMF inoculation restored the wilt-triggered growth reduction by enhancing the chlorophyll synthesis, level of antioxidant, phosphorous metabolism and by reduced oxidative stress. AMF also enhanced the accumulation of osmolytes providing extra osmotic strength to plants against FOL stress. Therefore, AMF has the prospective to improve the tomato growth and increase the plant’s tolerance to Fusarium wilt.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to extend their sincere appreciation to the Researchers Supporting Project Number (RSP-2021/356), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Footnotes
Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.
References
- Abd_Allah E.S., Hashem A., Alqarawi A.A., Alwathnani H.A. Alleviation of adverse impact of cadmium stress in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Pak. J. Bot. 2015;47(2):785–795. [Google Scholar]
- Abdelrahman M., Abdel-Motaal F., El-Sayed M., Jogaiah S., Shigyo M., Ito S., Tran L.S.P. Dissection of Trichoderma longibrachiatum-induced defense in onion (Allium cepa L.) against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cepa by target metabolite profiling. Plant Sci. 2016;246:128–138. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2016.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Akhter A., Hage-Ahmed K., Soja G., Steinkellner S. Compostand biochar alter mycorrhization, tomato root exudation, and development of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici. Front. Plant Sci. 2015;6:529. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Al-Askar A.A., Rashad Y.M. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; a biocontrol agent against common bean Fusarium root rot disease. Plant Pathol. J. 2010;9(1):31–38. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Hmoud G., Al-Momany A.J. Effect of four mycorrhizal products on fusarium root rot on different vegetable crops. Plant Pathol Microb. 2015;6:2. doi: 10.4172/2157-7471.1000255. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Alqarawi A.A., Abd_Allah E.F., Hashem A. Alleviation of salt-induced adverse impact via mycorrhizal fungi in Ephedra aphylla Forssk. J. Plant Interac. 2014;9(1):802–810. http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tjpi20 [Google Scholar]
- Beauchamp C., Fridovich I. Superoxide dismutase: improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Anal. Biochem. Rev. 1971;44:276–287. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(71)90370-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beltrano J., Ruscitti M., Arango M.C., Ronco M. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhiza inoculation on plant growth, biological and physiological parameters and mineral nutrition in pepper grown under different salinity and P levels. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2013;13(1):123–141. [Google Scholar]
- Beneduzi A., Ambrosini A., Passaglia L.M.P. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): their potential as antagonists and biocontrol agents. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2012;35:1044–1051. doi: 10.1590/S1415-47572012000600020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berger S., Sinha A.K., Roitsch T. Plant physiology meets phytopathology: plant primary metabolism and plant–pathogen interactions. J Exp Bot. 2007;58(15/16):4019–4026. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erm298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Booth, C., 1977. Fusarium: Laboratory Guide Identification of the Major Species. Commonwealth Mycological Institute (CMI), Kew, England.
- Buhrow L.M., Cram D., Tulpan D., Foroud N.A., Loewen M.C. Exogenous abscisic acid and gibberellic acid elicit opposing effects on Fusarium graminearum infection in wheat. Phytopathology. 2016;106(9):986–996. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-01-16-0033-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bukovská P., Bonkowski M., Konvalinková T., Beskid O., Hujslová M., Püschel D., Řezáčová V., Gutiérrez-Núñez M.S., Gryndler M., Jansa J. Utilization of organic nitrogen by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: is there a specific role for protists and ammonia oxidizers? Mycorrhiza. 2018;28:269–283. doi: 10.1007/s00572-018-0825-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cao F.Y., Yoshioka K., Desveaux D. The roles of ABA in plant–pathogen interactions. J Plant Res. 2011;124:489–499. doi: 10.1007/s10265-011-0409-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Daniels, B.A., Skipper, H.D., 1982. Methods for the recovery and quantitative estimation of propagules from soil. In: Schenck, N.C. (Ed.), Methods and Principles of Mycorrhizal Research, The American Phytopathological Society, pp. 29–36.
- Dehgahi R., Zakaria L., Mohamad A., Joniyas A., Subramaniam S. Effects of fusaric acid treatment on the protocorm-like bodies of Dendrobium sonia-28. Protoplasma. 2015 doi: 10.1007/s00709-015-0895-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Denancé N., Sánchez-Vallet A., Goffner D., Molina A. Disease resistance or growth: the role of plant hormones in balancing immune responses and fitness costs. Front Plant Sci. 2013;2013(4):155. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Egamberdieva D., Wirth S.J., Shurigin V.V., Hashem A., Abd_Allah E.F. Endophytic Bacteria improve plant growth, symbiotic performance of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and induce suppression of root rot caused by Fusarium solani under salt stress. Front. Microbiol. 2017;8(1887) doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- El-Rahman S.S.A., Mazen M.M., Mohamed H.I., Mahmo N.M. Induction of defence related enzymes and phenolic compounds in lupin (Lupinus albus L.) and their effects on host resistance against Fusarium wilt. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2012;134:105–116. doi: 10.1007/s10658-012-0028-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Evelin H., Kapoor R., Giri B. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in alleviation of salt stress: a review. Ann. Bot. 2009;104:1263–1280. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcp251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garcia K., Doidy J., Zimmermann S.D., Wipf D., Courty P.E. Take a trip through the plant and fungal transportome of mycorrhiza. Trends Plant Sci. 2016;21:937–950. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gerszberg A., Hnatuszko-Konka K., Kowalczyk T., Kononowicz A.K. Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) in the service of biotechnology. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ. Cult. 2015;120:881–902. [Google Scholar]
- Hashem A., Abd_Allah E.F., Alqarawi A.A., Radhakrishnan R., Kumar A. Plant defense approach of Bacillus subtilis (BERA 71) against Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid in mung bean. J. Plant Int. 2017;12(1):390–401. doi: 10.1080/17429145.2017.1373871. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hashem A., Abd_Allah E.F., Ahmad P. Effect of AM fungi on growth, physio-biochemical attributes, lipid peroxidation, antioxidant enzymes and plant growth regulators in Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. subjected to different concentration of NaCl. Pak. J. Bot. 2015;47:327–340. [Google Scholar]
- Hashem A., Abd_Allah E.F., Alqarawi A.A., Al-Huqail A.A., Wirth S., Egamberdieva D. The interaction between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and endophytic bacteria enhances plant growth of Acacia gerrardii under salt stress. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1089. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang Y.M., Srivastava A.K., Zou Y.N., Ni Q.D., Han Y., Wu Q.S. Mycorrhizal-induced calmodulin mediated changes in antioxidant enzymes and growth response of drought-stressed trifoliate orange. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:682. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jakobek J.L., Lindgren P.B. Expression of a bean acid phosphatase cDNA is correlated with disease resistance. J. Exp. Botany. 2002;53(367):387–389. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/53.367.387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson L.E.B., Frosheiser F.I., Wilcoxson R.D. Interaction between Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. medicaginis and Corynebacterium insidiosum in alfalfa. Phytopathology. 1982;72:517–522. [Google Scholar]
- Kurabachew H., Wydra K. Induction of systemic resistance and defense-related enzymes after elicitation of resistance by rhizobacteria and silicon application against Ralstonia solanacearum in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) Crop Prot. 2014;57:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2013.10.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Landa B.B., Cachinero-Diaz J.M., Lemanceau P., Jimenez-Diaz R.M., Alabouvette C. Effect of fusaric acid and phytoanticipins on growth of rhizobacteria and Fusarium oxysporum. Can. J. Micobiol. 2002;48(11):971–985. doi: 10.1139/w02-094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lewandowski T.J., Dunfield K.E., Antunes P.M. Isolate identity determines plant tolerance to pathogen attack in assembled mycorrhizal communities. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(4):e61329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liao H., Wong F.L., Phang T.H., CheungMY Li WY, Shao G., Yan X., Lam H.M. GmPAP3, a novel purple acid phosphatase-like gene in soybean induced by NaCl stress but not phosphorus deficiency. Gene. 2003;318:103–111. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(03)00764-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lichtenthaler H.K., Wellburn A.R. Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 1983;11:591–592. [Google Scholar]
- Lima L.K.S., de Jesus O.N., Soares T.L., de Oliveira S.A.S., Haddad F., Girardi E.A. Water deficit increases the susceptibility of yellow passion fruit seedlings toFusarium wilt in controlled conditions. Scientia Horticulturae. 2019;243:609–621. [Google Scholar]
- Mcelrone A.J., Sherald J.L., Forseth I.N. Interactive effects of water stress and xylem-limited bacterial infection on the water relations of a host vine. J. Exp. Biol. 2002;54(381):419–430. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erg046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nahiyan A.S.M., Matsubara Y. Tolerance to Fusarium root rot and changes in antioxidative ability in mycorrhizal asparagus plants. Hort Sci. 2012;47(3):356–360. [Google Scholar]
- Nakano Y., Asada K. Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplast. Plant Cell Physiol. 1981;22:867–880. [Google Scholar]
- Nelson P.E., Toussoun T.A., Marasas W.F.O. Pennsylvania State University Press; University Park; Pennsylvania, USA: 1983. Fusarium Species: An Illustrated Manual for Identification; p. 193. [Google Scholar]
- Nirmaladevi D., Sirnivas C. Cultural, morphological and pathogenicity variations in Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici causing wilt of tomato. Batman Univ. J. Life Sci. 2012;2(1):1–16. [Google Scholar]
- Petti C., Reiber K., Ali S.S., Berney M., Doohan F.M. Auxin as a player in the biocontrol of Fusarium head blight disease of barley and its potential as a disease control agent. BMC Plant Biol. 2012;12:224. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-12-224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pozo, M.J., Jung, S.C., López-Ráez, J.A., Azcón-Aguilar, C., 2010. Impact of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis on plant response to biotic stress: the role of plant defence mechanisms. In: Koltai, Kapulnik, Y. (Eds.), Arbuscular Mycorrhizas: Physiology and Function, Amsterdam: Springer, pp. 193–207.
- Qun H.Z., Xing H.C., Bin Z.Z., Rong Z.Z., Song W.H. Changes of antioxidative enzymes and cell membrane osmosis in tomato colonized by arbuscular mycorrhizae under NaCl stress. Colloid. Surf. B Biointerf. 2007;59:128–133. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2007.04.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rasool S., Ahmad A., Siddiqi T.O., Ahmad P. Changes in growth, lipid peroxidation and some key antioxidant enzymes in chickpea genotypes under salt stress. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2013;35:1039–1050. doi: 10.1007/s11738-012-1142-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ruiz-Lozano J.M. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis and alleviation of osmotic stress. New perspectives for molecular studies. Mycorrhiza. 2003;13:309–317. doi: 10.1007/s00572-003-0237-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sheng M., Tang M., Chan H., Yang B., Zhang F., Huang Y. Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizae on photosynthesis and water status of maize plants under salt stress. Mycorrhiza. 2008;18:287–296. doi: 10.1007/s00572-008-0180-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smart R.E., Bihgham G.E. Rapid estimates of relative water content. Plant Physiol. 1974;53:258–260. doi: 10.1104/pp.53.2.258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith I.K., Vierheller T.L., Thurne C.A. Assay of glutathione reductase in crude tissue homogenates using 5,5′-dithiobis (2-nitrobenzoic acid) Anal. Biochem. 1988;175:408–413. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(88)90564-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Song Y., Chen D., Lu K., Sun Z., Zeng R. Enhanced tomato disease resistance primed by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:786. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stefan E. Thin-layer chromatography-an appropriate method for fusaric acid estimation. Biologia Bratislava. 2005;60(1):104. [Google Scholar]
- Stutz J.C., Morton J.B. Successive pot cultures reveal high species richness of arbuscular endomyccorhizal fungi in arid ecosystems. Can. J. Botany. 1996;74:1883–1889. [Google Scholar]
- Summerell B., Salleh B., Leslie J. A utilitarian approach to Fusarium identification. Plant Dis. 2003;87:117–128. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2003.87.2.117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tang M., Chen H., Huang J.C., Tian Z.Q. AM fungi effects on the growth and physiology of Zea mays seedlings under diesel stress. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2009;41:936–940. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.11.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Thakker J.N., Patel S., Dhandhukia P.C., 2013. Induction of defense-related enzymes in banana plants: effect of live and dead pathogenic strain of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense. ISRN Biotechnology. Article ID 601303, 6 pages. 10.5402/2013/601303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Utobo E.B., Ogbodo E.N., Nwogbaga A.C. Techniques for extraction and quantification of arbuscular rmycorrhizal fungi. Libyan Agric. Res. Center Int. 2011;2:68–78. [Google Scholar]
- Valliyodan B., Ye H., Song L., Murphy M., Shannon J.G., Nguyen H.T. Genetic diversity and genomic strategies for improving drought and waterlogging tolerance in soybeans. J. Exp. Bot. 2017;68:1835–1849. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vellosillo T., Vicente J., Kulasekaran S., Hamberg M., Castresana C. Emerging complexity in reactive oxygen species production and signaling during the response of plants to pathogens. Plant Physiol. 2010;154:444–448. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.161273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu H.S., Bao W., Liu D.Y., Ling N., Ying R.R., Raza W., Shen Q.R. Effect of fusaric acid on biomass and photosynthesis of watermelon seedlings leaves. Caryologia. 2008;61(3:258–268. [Google Scholar]
- Yadeta K.A., Thomma B.P.H.J. The xylem as battleground for plant hosts and vascular wilt pathogens. Front. Plant Sci. 2013;4:97. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang D., Song H., Cheng H., Hao D., Wang H., Kan G., Jin H., Yu D. The acid phosphatase encoding gene GmACP1 contributes to soybean tolerance to low-phosphorus stress. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004061. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]