Abstract
Background
Thirty countries with the highest tuberculosis (TB) burden bear 87% of the world’s TB cases. Delayed diagnosis and treatment are detrimental to TB prognosis and sustain TB transmission in the community, making TB elimination a great challenge, especially in these countries. Our objective was to elucidate the duration and determinants of delayed diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary TB in high TB-burden countries.
Methods
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of quantitative and qualitative studies by searching four databases for literature published between 2008 and 2018 following PRISMA guidelines. We performed a narrative synthesis of the covariates significantly associated with patient, health system, treatment, and total delays. The pooled median duration of delay and effect sizes of covariates were estimated using random-effects meta-analyses. We identified key qualitative themes using thematic analysis.
Results
This review included 124 articles from 14 low- and lower-middle-income countries (LIC and LMIC) and five upper-middle-income countries (UMIC). The pooled median duration of delays (in days) were—patient delay (LIC/LMIC: 28 (95% CI 20–30); UMIC: 10 (95% CI 10–20), health system delay (LIC/LMIC: 14 (95% CI 2–28); UMIC: 4 (95% CI 2–4), and treatment delay (LIC/LMIC: 14 (95% CI 3–84); UMIC: 0 (95% CI 0–1). There was consistent evidence that being female and rural residence was associated with longer patient delay. Patient delay was also associated with other individual, interpersonal, and community risk factors such as poor TB knowledge, long chains of care-seeking through private/multiple providers, perceived stigma, financial insecurities, and poor access to healthcare. Organizational and policy factors mediated health system and treatment delays. These factors included the lack of resources and complex administrative procedures and systems at the health facilities. We identified data gaps in 11 high-burden countries.
Conclusions
This review presented the duration of delays and detailed the determinants of delayed TB diagnosis and treatment in high-burden countries. The gaps identified could be addressed through tailored approaches, education, and at a higher level, through health system strengthening and provision of universal health coverage to reduce delays and improve access to TB diagnosis and care.
PROSPERO registration: CRD42018107237.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-021-01841-6.
Keywords: Tuberculosis, Patient delay, Health system delay, Treatment delay, Total delay, High burden countries, Risk factors
Background
In 1993, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared global tuberculosis (TB) emergency to make TB a high priority [1]. Twenty-five years on, TB remains one of the leading infectious causes of illness and death worldwide [2]. Despite that TB is both preventable and curable, and efforts such as the implementation of directly observed treatment short course and coordinated national TB programs worldwide, approximately 10 million people fell ill with TB, of which 1.5 million died from the disease in 2018 [2]. The cumulative reduction in the TB incidence rate globally between 2015 and 2018 stood at 6% [2], imposing a significant delay in reaching the end TB milestone of 20% [3] reduction by 2020. TB control and elimination are critical challenges in many countries. However, the burden is disproportionately borne by 30 countries, mostly in Asia and Africa, accounting for 87% of the world’s TB (both pan-TB and drug-resistant TB) and TB/HIV cases [2].
In 2018, nearly one-third of the people with TB were estimated to be undiagnosed globally [2]. The delay in diagnosis and treatment is detrimental to the patients’ prognosis and perpetuates TB transmission in the community [4] and thus poses a great challenge to eliminating TB. Therefore, identifying the factors that lead to delayed TB diagnosis and treatment is imperative in developing interventions to reduce TB incidence substantially. Collectively, recent systematic reviews have provided empirical evidence associating sociodemographic, clinical, health system, and economic factors with delayed diagnosis and treatment of TB in different countries and regions [5–11]. However, delays in diagnosis and treatment vary across countries with a different burden of the disease. From what we know, no systematic reviews have addressed delayed diagnosis and treatment of TB among countries bearing most of the global TB burden. There is also a lack of reviews that triangulate qualitative and quantitative findings to provide a more complete and all-inclusive view of the matter. Therefore, a mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken to derive the determinants and duration of diagnosis and treatment delays of pulmonary TB in the high TB-burden countries.
Methods
We structured this review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA)-statement [12]. The protocol of this systematic review has been published [13] and registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (Registration Number CRD42018107237).
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
In this review, we considered all studies conducted in the WHO high TB-burden countries—Angola, Bangladesh, Brazil, Cambodia, Central African Republic, China, Congo, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nigeria, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, the Philippines, Russian Federation, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Tanzania, Thailand, Vietnam, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. We included studies that reported on individual and interpersonal risk factors, social and physical environment, health systems, and policies associated with delayed TB diagnosis and treatment initiation published between 2008 and 2018. The factors could be self-reported, ascertained by health providers, or abstracted from medical charts or programs/administrative records.
We included study populations comprising presumptive TB (persons presenting with signs and/or symptoms suggestive of TB) and people with TB (new diagnosis, previously treated, and those without a known history of previous TB treatment) regardless of HIV and bacteriological status. We included observational (cross-sectional, case–control, retrospective, and prospective cohort design) and qualitative studies published in English or Chinese. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, scoping reviews, intervention studies, publications in the form of letters and reviews, and studies lacking and/or unclear reporting of key outcomes were excluded.
Our primary outcomes were—(1) patient delay: the time interval between the onset of symptoms and the first encounter with healthcare professionals; (2) health system delay: the time interval between the first encounter with healthcare professionals and the diagnosis of pulmonary TB; (3) treatment delay: the time interval between TB diagnosis and TB treatment initiation; and (4) total delay: the time interval between onset of symptoms and TB treatment initiation. As there were no universal cut-offs [8] to a duration that constituted delay, we treated delay in this review as how they were defined in individual studies. We did not exclude studies based on the delay thresholds defined in individual studies.
Literature search strategy and study selection
First, we conducted a preliminary search of articles on PubMed and EMBASE to develop a set of appropriate Medical Subject Heading terms, index terms, and keywords [13], centered around three domains (population/problems: tuberculosis, outcomes: health-seeking behaviours; delays; barriers, countries: high burden countries). Using these identified search terms structured with Boolean logic operators (AND and OR), we contextualized the search strategies in PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycInfo (Additional file 1). The search fields included title, abstract, keywords, and text words. We also reviewed the reference list of key articles for additional studies. We managed all identified citations into EndNote X8 (Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, USA). Duplicates were removed, and the remainder was exported to Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Washington, USA) for further assessment. AKJT and SRS independently screened the titles, abstracts, and full-text articles based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Interrater agreements for the titles and abstract screening between the reviewers were high (agreement = 98%, Cohen’s kappa = 0.95, and Krippendorf alpha = 0.95), and discrepancies were discussed. The two primary reviewers were able to resolve all the discrepancies without having to involve a third reviewer. The search and selection processes were conducted and presented in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines.
Data extraction
Study characteristics and data on risk factors were extracted independently by two authors (AKJT and SRS). We recorded study and participants’ characteristics, exposure variables (various factors associated with delays reported by individual study), primary outcome measures, and study quality assessment scores using a standard form. Data on variables to be included in the meta-analysis were extracted by one author (AKJT) and subsequently reviewed by a second author (KP). This included duration of delay (median and interquartile range/range and mean and standard deviation) and the effect sizes (crude and adjusted odds ratios) for exposures of interest.
Quality assessment
The quality of the selected non-randomized (quantitative) and qualitative studies was critically evaluated using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale for cross-sectional studies, case–control studies, and cohort studies, and the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) tool, respectively [14–16]. For non-randomized quantitative studies, the assessment was made based on four main domains—(1) selection of samples (representativeness, sample size, definition and selection of cases and controls (for case–control studies), and non-response rate), (2) comparability of groups included in the analyses, (3) the ascertainment of exposures and outcomes, and (4) the statistical tests applied in the studies. A score of 1 was given to individual questions if the criterion was satisfied and 0 if the criterion was not satisfied or not justified. The highest possible score for cross-sectional studies was 10 (5 for selection, 2 for comparability, and 3 for outcomes). The highest possible score for case–control studies was 9 (4 for selection, 2 for comparability, and 3 for exposure). The highest possible score for cohort studies was 9 (4 for selection, 2 for comparability, and 3 for exposures). Studies that scored 0–3 were regarded as low quality (LQ), 4–6 were regarded as moderate quality (MQ), and ≥ 7 were regarded as high quality (HQ).
For qualitative studies, the assessment was made based on ten questions regarding the results, validity, and the value of the research. We gave a score of 1 if the paper fulfilled a criterion, 0.5 if we could not tell if the paper fulfilled a criterion, and 0 if the paper did not fulfill a criterion. A score of 0–5 equated to LQ study, a score of 6–7 equated to MQ study, and a score of ≥ 8 equated to HQ study. The final synthesized qualitative findings were graded based on the dependability and credibility of the findings using the ConQual approach [17].
Data synthesis and analyses
We described the studies by the populations, countries, study designs, and sample sizes. Countries were grouped by WHO region and categorized as low-income economies (LIC)—gross national income (GNI) per capita $1,025 or less in 2018; lower-middle-income economies (LMIC)—GNI per capita between $1,026 and $3,995; upper-middle-income economies (UMIC)—GNI per capita between $3,996 and $12,375 according to World Bank classification in 2019 [18]. We reported the independent variables significantly associated with the patient, health system, treatment, and total delays. Results from the multivariable analyses preceded bivariate for studies that reported both bivariate and multivariable analyses.
Median and interquartile range/range for the duration of delays in days were extracted and used to estimate a pooled median, i.e., median of study-specific medians [19]. We pooled weighted medians by incorporating study-specific sample sizes [19]. For patient delay, we excluded two studies [20, 21] from China with sample sizes > 10,000 because the pooled weighted medians were heavily skewed, including only estimates of the study with the largest sample size [21].
For independent variables (risk factors), effect sizes were extracted and used to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence interval (CI). We pooled effect sizes of covariates from studies that utilized similar delay thresholds if data were available in more than two studies and duration of delays by meta-analysis using R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna). We pooled effect sizes for studies that defined patient delay using threshold values of 14–15 days (n = 5), 20–21 days (n = 7), 28–30 days (n = 17); and health system delay using threshold values of 14–15 days (n = 5). We found five studies that reported treatment delay using a threshold value of 7 days. However, the studies did not report similar covariates with effect sizes that allowed pooling. Where adjustments for covariates had been performed, the data from the adjusted model were pooled.
We quantified between-study heterogeneity using Chi-square statistic Q, I2, and Tau [22]. We estimated the pooled OR and its 95% CI using a Bayesian random-effect model for each meta-analysis, which accounted for between-study heterogeneity [23]. The estimates for Tau and I2 statistics were presented together with the pooled estimates and the 95% CI. We used the inverse of the effect size variance to determine the pooling weights. We assessed the association of the primary outcomes and (1) sociodemographic and economic variables: sex, urbanicity; (2) behavioral variables: smoking, alcohol use, TB knowledge; and (3) clinical and health services-related variables: hemoptysis, weight loss, fever, chest pain, night sweats in the meta-analyses.
We extracted qualitative findings and sample quotes reported in qualitative and mixed-method studies verbatim. The extracted data were annotated and analyzed using NVIVO 12 (QSR International). We retrieved references deductively and applied thematic analyses to categorize the textual references. Two authors (AKJT and SRS) coded the data independently. Discrepancies, code definitions, and the emergence of sub-themes were discussed. The results were presented by income categories that the high-burden countries represent.
Results
Study selection
The systematic review process is presented in Fig. 1. A total of 4878 records were identified from electronic database searches. Following the removal of duplicates (n = 1189) and non-relevant records (n = 3383), 306 records were assessed for eligibility. Of these, 182 articles were further excluded. Finally, 124 articles were reviewed. A qualitative synthesis was performed for 36 studies. We conducted quantitative and narrative synthesis on 86 studies. Two mixed-method studies underwent both qualitative and quantitative/narrative synthesis. We found large heterogeneity among studies included in the meta-analyses—1 (7%) had I2 ≤ 50%, 14 (93%) had I2 > 50%, and 13 (87%) had I2 > 75%.
Study characteristics and quality assessments
These studies described data from 18,759 presumptive TB and 131,142 people with TB [20, 21, 24–109], 1659 in-depth and structured interviews, and 87 focus groups [48, 96, 110–145] from 19 countries in three continents (Table 1). A total of 14 countries were classified as lower-income (LIC) and lower-middle-income economies (LMIC), and five were classified as upper-middle-income economies (UMIC) [18]. Patient delay was reported in 103 studies, health system delay in 29 studies, treatment delay in 18 studies, and total delay in 21 studies. Of the 30 high TB-burden countries, 11 countries were not included in this review, either due to data unavailability or lack of key outcome data (Fig. 2). After assessments of study quality, a total of 81 HQ studies, 40 MQ studies, and one LQ study were identified. Two mixed-methods studies scored MQ/HQ and HQ/MQ for the quantitative and qualitative components, respectively. The final synthesized qualitative findings were rated HQ (55%) and MQ (45%) using the ConQual method. Details of the assessments were illustrated in the Additional file 1. No studies were excluded based on the outcome of quality assessments; instead, the information was considered during data synthesis and interpretation.
Table 1.
Income group* | Country | Study population | Study design | Sample size and study | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Newcastle–Ottawa scale score† | ||||||
HQ | MQ | LQ | ||||
Patient delay | ||||||
LIC | Ethiopia | People with TB | Cross-sectional | 216[24], 296[25], 360[26], 382[27], 398[28], 425[29], 605[30], 706[31], 924[32] | 129[33], 201[34], 226[35] | |
People with presumptive TB | Case–control | 838[36] | ||||
Cross-sectional | 476[37], 843[38], 1006[39] | 663[40], 763[41] | ||||
Mozambique | People with TB | Cross-sectional | 622[42] | |||
Tanzania | People with TB | Cross-sectional | 639[43] | 206[44] | ||
People with presumptive TB | Cross-sectional | 3388[45] | ||||
LMIC | Angola | People with TB | Cross-sectional | 385[46] | ||
Bangladesh | People with TB | Cross-sectional | 7280[47] | |||
Cambodia | People with TB | Mixed-methods | 96[48] | |||
India | People with TB | Cross-sectional | 216[49], 234[50] | 150[51], 261[52] | ||
People with TB (children) | Cross-sectional | 175[53] | ||||
People with presumptive TB | Cross-sectional | 437[54] | ||||
Indonesia | People with presumptive TB | Cross-sectional | 194[55] | 746[56] | ||
Kenya | People with TB | Cross-sectional | 230[57] | |||
People with presumptive TB | Cross-sectional | 426[58] | ||||
Nigeria | People with TB | Cross-sectional | 160[59], 450[60] | 102[61] | ||
Zambia | People with presumptive TB | Cross-sectional | 6708[62] | |||
Zimbabwe | People with TB | Cross-sectional | 383[63] | |||
UMIC | Brazil | People with TB | Cross-sectional | 139[64], 153[65] | 97[66], 101[67], 199[68], 218[69], 304[70] | |
TB-HIV co-infection | Prospective cohort | 201[71] | ||||
China | People with TB | Cross-sectional | 314[72], 1126[73], 2280[74] | 146[75], 259[76], 314[77], 323[78], 819[79], 1083[80] | ||
Prospective cohort | 202[81] | |||||
Retrospective cohort | 4677[82], 10356[20] | 75401[21] | ||||
People with presumptive TB | Cross-sectional | 1005[83] | ||||
Russia | People with TB | Cross-sectional | 105[84] | |||
South Africa | General population | Cross-sectional | 1020[85] | |||
People with presumptive TB | Cross-sectional | 104[86] | ||||
TB-HIV co-infection | Prospective cohort | 891[87] | ||||
Thailand | People with TB | Cross-sectional | 443[88] | 199[89] | ||
Health system delay | ||||||
LIC | Ethiopia | People with TB | Cross-sectional | 201[34] | ||
Nigeria | People with TB | Cross-sectional | 470[90] | |||
LMIC | Angola | People with TB | Cross-sectional | 385[46] | ||
UMIC | Brazil | People with TB | Cross-sectional | 218[69], 304[70], 305[91] | ||
China | People with TB | Cross-sectional | 314[72] | 146[75] | ||
Prospective cohort | 202[81] | |||||
Retrospective cohort | 4677[82] | |||||
South Africa | TB-HIV co-infection | Cross-sectional | 480[92] | |||
Treatment delay | ||||||
LIC | Tanzania | People with TB | Cross-sectional | 1161[93] | ||
LMIC | Bangladesh | People with TB | Cross-sectional | 123[94] | ||
Cambodia | People with TB | Mixed-methods | 96[48] | |||
India | People with TB | Cross-sectional | 234[50], 344[95] | 150[51] | ||
Mixed-methods | 2027[96] | |||||
Retrospective cohort | 662[97], 1800[98] | |||||
Zimbabwe | People with TB | Retrospective cohort | 2443[99] | |||
UMIC | China | People with TB | Cross-sectional | 314[100] | ||
Retrospective cohort | 4677[82] | |||||
South Africa | People with TB | Cross-sectional | 210[101] | |||
Total delay | ||||||
LIC | Ethiopia | People with TB | Cross-sectional | 216[24], 296[25], 328[102], 382[27] | 201[34] | |
Mozambique | People with TB | Cross-sectional | 622[42] | |||
Tanzania | People with TB | Cross-sectional | 206[44] | |||
LMIC | Bangladesh | People with TB | Cross-sectional | 7280[47] | ||
India | People with TB | Cross-sectional | 216[49], 289[103] | |||
Retrospective cohort | 656[104] | |||||
Indonesia | People with TB | Cross-sectional | 1116[105] | |||
Nigeria | People with TB | Cross-sectional | 450[60] | |||
Pakistan | People with TB | Cross-sectional | 844[106] | 252[107], 269[108] | ||
UMIC | Brazil | People with TB | Case–control | 242[109] | ||
Cross-sectional | 304[70] | |||||
South Africa | People with TB | Cross-sectional | 210[101] | |||
TB-HIV co-infection | Prospective cohort | 891[87] | ||||
Thailand | People with TB | Cross-sectional | 443[88] |
Income group* | Country | Study population | Methods of analysis | Study and sample size | ConQual rating‡ | CASP score§ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Qualitative studies | ||||||
LIC | Ethiopia | People with TB, contacts of people with TB, and health care workers |
Phenomenological analysis |
5 IDIs and 2 FGDs [110] | HQ | HQ |
People with TB | Thematic analysis | 26 IDIs [111] | HQ | HQ | ||
People with TB and policymakers | Thematic analysis | 19 IDIs [112] | HQ | HQ | ||
Mozambique | Caretakers of people with TB | Content analysis | 35 IDIs [113] | HQ | HQ | |
Tanzania | People with TB and traditional healers | Content analysis | 32 IDIs [114] | HQ | HQ | |
LMIC | Bangladesh | People with TB |
Qualitative analysis of open-ended survey questions |
229 interviews [115] | MQ | MQ |
People with TB and health care workers |
Qualitative analysis using apriori codes |
24 IDIs [116] | HQ | HQ | ||
Cambodia | People with TB, health care workers, and community volunteers | Thematic analysis | 43 IDIs and 6 FGDs [48] | MQ | HQ | |
People with TB and the general population | 13 FGDs [117] | HQ | HQ | |||
India | Health care workers | Thematic analysis | 16 IDIs [118] | HQ | HQ | |
People with TB |
Not presented in the article |
76 IDIs [119], 75 structured interviews [96] | MQ | MQ | ||
108 structured interviews [120] | MQ | HQ | ||||
Qualitative analysis of open-ended survey questions |
229 interviews [115] | MQ | MQ | |||
People with TB and health care workers |
Qualitative analysis using apriori codes |
19 IDIs [121] | MQ | HQ | ||
Thematic analysis | 71 IDIs [122] | HQ | HQ | |||
Indonesia | People with TB and community volunteers | Thematic analysis | 67 IDIs and 6 FGDs [123] | HQ | HQ | |
People with TB, TB survivors, village leaders, and community volunteers |
Not presented in the article |
50 IDIs and 3 FGDs [124] | HQ | HQ | ||
Nigeria | General population | Thematic analysis | 56 IDIs [125] | MQ | HQ | |
Philippines | People with TB and the general population | Thematic analysis | 22 IDIs and 3 FGDs [126] | HQ | HQ | |
Zambia | People with TB and community volunteers | Thematic analysis | 30 IDIs and 6 FGDs [127] | MQ | HQ | |
Zimbabwe | People with presumptive TB | Grounded theory | 20 IDIs [128] | HQ | HQ | |
UMIC | Brazil | Health care workers | Discourse analysis | 16 IDIs [129] | MQ | HQ |
People with TB | Content analysis | 23 IDIs [130] | MQ | HQ | ||
Thematic analysis | 7 IDIs [131] | MQ | HQ | |||
Discourse analysis | 7 IDIs [132] | HQ | MQ | |||
China | People with TB |
Qualitative analysis of open-ended survey questions |
70 interviews [133] | MQ | MQ | |
People with TB (migrants) | Thematic analysis | 34 IDIs [134] | MQ | HQ | ||
People with TB (migrants), People with presumptive TB, and health care workers |
Framework approach |
60 IDIs and 12 FGDs [135] | MQ | HQ | ||
People with TB, health care workers, policymakers, and community volunteers | Thematic analysis | 47 IDIs and 5 FGDs [136] | MQ | HQ | ||
Russia | People with TB | Grounded theory | 5 FGDs [137] | HQ | HQ | |
People with TB and health care workers |
32 IDIs and 11 participants in FGDs (number of FGDs not specified) [138] | HQ | HQ | |||
South Africa | Contacts of people with TB, health care workers, policymakers, and people with TB (miners) |
Thematic analysis and grounded theory |
104 applied ethnography using formal/informal IDIs, FGDs, field notes, and participant observations [139] | HQ | HQ | |
Health care workers, village leaders, and researchers |
Thematic analysis | 12 IDIs [140] | HQ | HQ | ||
People with TB | 41 IDIs [141] | MQ | HQ | |||
People with TB, contacts of people with TB, and health care workers | 25 IDIs and 4 FGDs [142] | HQ | HQ | |||
People with TB, the general population, and community volunteers | 93 reports from participatory research and participants observation [143] | HQ | HQ | |||
People with TB and general population |
Thematic analysis and grounded theory |
8 IDIs [144] | HQ | HQ | ||
Thailand | People with TB (migrants) and health care workers | Thematic analysis | 12 IDIs and 11 FGDs [145] | MQ | HQ |
Each number at the normal line of type in each cell referred to the sample size of each discrete study that shared the respective characteristics (country, study population, study design, and study quality). The number/s in bracket indicate the source article/s. Blank cells indicated that no studies of a particular set of characteristics were identified and included in this review
CASP critical appraisal skills program; FGD focus group discussions; HQ high quality, IDI in-depth interviews; LIC low-income countries, LMIC lower-middle-income countries, LQ low quality; MQ moderate quality, TB tuberculosis, UMIC upper-middle-income countries,
*Based on World Bank classification. Low-income economies—gross national income (GNI) per capita $1,025 or less in 2018; lower-middle-income economies—GNI per capita between $1,026 and $3,995; upper-middle-income economies—GNI per capita between $3,996 and $12,375
†Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. The highest possible score for cross-sectional studies was 10 (5 for selection, 2 for comparability, and 3 for outcome). The highest possible score for case–control studies was 9 (4 for selection, 2 for comparability, and 3 for exposure). The highest possible score for cohort studies was 9 (4 for selection, 2 for comparability, and 3 for exposure). Studies that scored 0–3 were regarded as LQ, 4–6 were regarded as MQ, and ≥ 7 were regarded as HQ
‡All papers were pre-ranked (high, moderate, low), and the levels were adjusted according to the dependability and credibility of the findings. We pre-ranked all papers as high. The ranking remained high if the papers were regarded as dependable, and the findings were unequivocal. We downgraded the paper from high to moderate if the papers scored 3 or less in terms of dependability or scored a mix of unequivocal and credible in terms of credibility
§CASP for qualitative study had 10 questions to appraise the paper critically. We gave a score of 1 if the paper fulfilled a criterion, 0.5 if we could not tell if the paper fulfilled a criterion, and 0 if it did not fulfil a criterion. A score of 0–5 equated to LQ study, a score of 6–7 equated to MQ study, and a score of ≥ 8 equated to HQ study
Patient delay
The pooled median patient delay (Fig. 3) in LIC and LMIC was 28 days (95% CI 17–30). The pooled median patient delay in UMIC was 10 days (95% CI 10–20). The overall median patient delay in high TB burden countries was 16 days (95% CI 11–20). In the meta-analysis and narrative synthesis of quantitative data (Table 2), females (pooled OR 1.48. 95% CI 1.09–1.98, P = 0.01) were more likely to delay care-seeking for TB (Fig. 4). Qualitative studies highlighted limitations for women to seek healthcare [115, 117, 125, 126, 130]. Women reported economic constraints and power imbalances in the decision-making process as barriers to care-seeking [115, 117, 125, 126]. We further stratified the analysis by sex. We found that women were disproportionately affected by risk factors for patient delay (Fig. 5), such as unemployment, poor TB knowledge, and difficulties traveling a long distance to visit health facilities [43, 51]. Long-distance to health facilities was also reported by qualitative studies as a barrier to care-seeking [48, 111, 112, 114, 117, 126, 131, 136, 137, 140, 142, 145]. In addition to physical barriers, financial insecurities and economic challenges also compounded patient delay [20, 25, 28, 33, 38–40, 43, 50, 51, 66, 67, 69, 72, 76, 77, 83, 87, 88]. Among qualitative studies (Table 3), seven articles reflected on participant’s experiences where competing priorities of livelihoods and commitment to work and family led to individual care-seeking delay [48, 125–127, 134, 138, 145]. We also found that being rural residents in LIC and LMIC (Table 2 and Fig. 4) was associated with patient delay (pooled OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.01–2.94, P = 0.02). No studies from the UMIC were included in the meta-analysis for urbanicity. This review also reported other sociodemographic and economic risk factors for patient delay, such as lower education level and being older, unmarried, and unemployed. High indirect medical costs [48, 126], absence of health insurance, productivity, time, and income loss [48, 125, 127, 134, 138, 145] resulting from disease suffering further worsen household vulnerabilities and contribute to a delay in TB diagnosis and poor health outcomes (Table 2) [146].
Table 2.
Risk factors | Number of studies that reported the risk factors associated with the different types of delay by economies | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient delay | Health system delay | Treatment delay | Total delay | |||||
LIC and LMIC | UMIC | LIC and LMIC | UMIC | LIC and LMIC | UMIC | LIC and LMIC | UMIC | |
Socio-demographic and economic | ||||||||
Sex | ||||||||
Female | 3[38, 39, 61] | 4[21, 69, 82, 83] | 1[69] | 1[108] | ||||
Male | 3[56, 58, 62] | 1[86] | 3[60, 102, 107] | |||||
Age | ||||||||
Older age | 5[27, 30, 31, 40, 61] | 3[20, 21, 74] | 1[92] | 3[48, 93, 95] | 5[34, 47, 60, 107, 108] | |||
Younger age | 1[72] | 1[94] | ||||||
Low education | 8[26, 32, 33, 40, 46, 54, 58, 60] | 2[67, 71] | 1[102] | |||||
Residence | ||||||||
Rural | 7[25, 26, 32–34, 47, 54] | 1[21] | 5[25, 34, 47, 105, 108] | 1[87] | ||||
Urban | 3[28, 60, 62] | 1[89] | 1[60] | |||||
Sub-urban | 1[46] | [106] | ||||||
In areas without health centres | 1[97] | |||||||
Marital status | ||||||||
Married | 1[94] | |||||||
Widowed/divorced/separated/not married | 1[57] | 2[71, 79] | 1[48] | |||||
Finances | ||||||||
Low income | 5[25, 28, 33, 38, 50] | 5[20, 66, 72, 77, 83] | 1[90] | 1[100] | 2[25, 108] | |||
High income | 2[41, 62] | 1[104] | ||||||
More working days per week | 1[72, 77, 78] | 1[72] | ||||||
Unemployed | 3[39, 40, 43] | 3[67, 69, 87] | 1[103] | 1[87] | ||||
No health insurance | [72, 76, 77, 83] | |||||||
Cost of treatment/transport to health facilities | 1[51] | 1[88] | ||||||
Cost of health care incurred before diagnosis | 1[50] | 2[103, 106] | ||||||
Long distance/traveling time to health facilities |
9[29, 33, 35, 36, 43, 52, 53, 55, 57] | 4[20, 72, 77, 101] | 1[72] | 1[48] | 1[60] | |||
Larger family size | 3[27, 38, 49] | 1[27] | ||||||
Behavioural | ||||||||
Tobacco and substance use | ||||||||
Smoking | 1[41] | 1[81] | ||||||
Non-smoking | 1[101] | |||||||
Alcohol use | 1[87] | 1[104] | 1[87] | |||||
Recreational drug use | 1[65] | 1[109] | ||||||
Poor TB knowledge | 12[30–32, 35, 42–44, 50–52, 57, 59] | 5[68, 74, 79, 83, 84] | 1[100] | 2[50, 106] | ||||
Poor perceived benefit that TB is incurable | 1[28] | |||||||
Poor perceived severity (perceived well and not sick) | 1[40] | |||||||
Stigma | 3[29, 44, 61] | 2[76, 85] | 1[102] | |||||
Health-seeking | ||||||||
Types of facilities and providers | ||||||||
Traditional/spiritual medicine | 3[32, 42, 44] | 1[93] | ||||||
Self-medication | 5[24, 27, 31, 50, 63] | 1[83] | 1[27] | |||||
Private health practitioner | 1[32] | 1[34] | 1[50] | 1[50] | ||||
Pharmacy | 2[32, 58] | |||||||
Non-formal health provider | 5[24, 25, 30, 31, 33] | 2[50, 103] | ||||||
Rural primary health facility/non-DOTS facility | 2[46, 63] | 1[46] | 1[106] | 1[101] | ||||
Non-hospital/lower-level facilities | 2[34, 90] | 2[72, 75] | 1[24] | |||||
Care-seeking | ||||||||
Multiple care-seeking prior to diagnosis | 1[59] | 2[50, 51] | 5[25, 27, 50, 103, 106] | |||||
Did not seek treatment because of first symptoms | 1[64] | |||||||
Not aware of other TB patients around | 1[80] | |||||||
Clinical/health services | ||||||||
Signs and symptoms | ||||||||
No chest pain | 1[44] | |||||||
Cough | 6[69, 70, 74, 80, 86, 88] | |||||||
Chest pain | 2[70, 88] | 1[109] | ||||||
Cough without sputum | 1[88] | |||||||
Night sweats | 1[74] | |||||||
Fever | 1[88] | |||||||
No cough | 1[70] | |||||||
No haemoptysis | 3[74, 78, 80] | |||||||
No weight loss | 1[64] | |||||||
Pulmonary cavities | 1[73] | |||||||
No cavitary lesion | 1[70] | |||||||
Shorter duration of symptoms | 1[39] | |||||||
Presence of more than 1 symptom | 1[45] | |||||||
Longer duration of suspicious symptoms | 1[81] | |||||||
Mild symptoms at onset | 1[72] | |||||||
Co-morbidities/infection | ||||||||
Presence of other known medical conditions | 1[42] | |||||||
Hyperglycaemia | 2[73, 74] | |||||||
HIV status not known | 1[96] | |||||||
HIV negative | 1[25] | 1[25] | ||||||
TB-HIV co-infection/HIV positive | 2[34, 90] | 1[98] | 2[87, 101] | |||||
Not on ART | 1[92] | |||||||
High HIV viral load | 1[92] | |||||||
History and types of TB | ||||||||
No history of TB | 4[36, 37, 39, 40] | 2[71, 82] | 1[99] | 1[103] | ||||
History of TB | 1[82] | |||||||
Smear positive | 1[32] | 2[73, 82] | 2[82, 101] | |||||
Smear negative | 1[27] | 3[81, 82, 91] | 2[48, 97] | 1[27] | 1[109] | |||
Extrapulmonary TB | 2[27, 34] | 1[91] | 3[24, 27, 34] | |||||
Retreatment cases | 5[94–98] | |||||||
Health services | ||||||||
Long waiting time in the health facility | 1[46] | |||||||
Untraceable contact details (loss to follow-up post diagnosis) | 1[95] | |||||||
Absence of TB diagnostic services in the local health facility | 1[96] |
The number at the normal line of type in each cell referred to the number of study/ies that reported the risk factors associated with the type of delay, respectively. The number/s in bracket indicate the source article/s. Blank cells indicate that no studies reported the respective risk factor. The studies are further grouped by economies based on World Bank classifications
ART antiretroviral therapy; DOTS directly observed treatment, short course; HIV human immunodeficiency virus; LIC low-income countries; LMIC low-middle-income countries; NTP national TB program; TB tuberculosis; UMIC upper-middle-income countries
Table 3.
Themes | Countries | Quotes |
---|---|---|
Patient delay | ||
Perceived stigma and discrimination at the workplace, within the family and the community against women, and associating TB with HIV deterred people with presumptive TB from seeking TB diagnosis and care | Bangladesh [115, 116], Brazil [129, 130], Cambodia [117], China [135, 136], Ethiopia [110], India [115, 121], Nigeria [125], Philippines [126], Russia [137], South Africa [139–144], Tanzania [114], Zambia [127], Zimbabwe [128] | “When someone says, ‘I have TB’ others will say that the person has three words [HIV].’’ [143] |
“The person would be scared that she would lose her job and that people and friends would avoid her.” [126] | ||
Long distance to health facilities and language barrier led to delay in care-seeking and TB diagnosis | Brazil [131], Cambodia [48, 117], China [136], Ethiopia [111, 112], Philippines [126], Russia [137], South Africa [140, 142], Tanzania [114], Thailand [145] | “Well, I didn’t come to the health centre early because it is far from my village.” [111] |
“I don't understand the language, so I don't know what to do next after I finished the 15 days medication. The problem for me is the language because I can't speak Thai.” [145] | ||
Long chains of care-seeking through multiple providers and the lack of trust in the health care system providing TB care led to delay in care-seeking and TB diagnosis | Bangladesh [115, 116], Brazil [131], Cambodia [117], China [134–136], Ethiopia [110–112], India [115, 118–122], Indonesia [123, 124], Mozambique [113], Nigeria [125], Philippines [126], Russia [137, 138], South Africa [139, 140, 142–144], Tanzania [114], Zambia [127], Zimbabwe [128] | “Government doctor did not show any interest, neither he responded to my questions. They never spoke to me at all. We went there 1–3 days and became fed-up. Even the 4th day, they did not say anything. They asked me to go here and there. It was really a horrible experience to run around there. So, finally, we decided and went to private” [122] |
“We usually try many other methods first, and the hospital is the last choice.” [117] | ||
Gender-specific factors such as men dominating and owning the decision-making power in the family, more economic constraints for women to seek healthcare, and men concealing health issues or denying disease severity by substance (alcohol and nicotine) abuse led to delay in care-seeking and TB diagnosis | Bangladesh [115, 116], India [115], Nigeria [125], Russia [137, 138], South Africa [144], Thailand [145], Zimbabwe [128] (alcohol and nicotine) abuse led to delay in care-seeking and TB diagnosis | “There are very few women in my community who can afford the costs of transportation to the hospital and to pay the hospital fees.” [125] |
“My husband told me to go to my parent’s home. He refused to give me money for the cost of treatment. My neighbour did not help me that much either.” [115] | ||
“When I drink, nothing is bad for me! Illness flies out with alcohol. You don’t feel it. Alcohol softens everything, all diseases. When you drink, you do not pay attention to illness. Well, today you sneeze, cough, but it will pass! In the morning, you wake up, something squeaks, whistles; you groan but go anyway, then you forget about it during work.” [138] | ||
Competing priorities of livelihood, work, and family led to delay in care-seeking and TB diagnosis | Cambodia [48], China [134], Nigeria [125], Philippines [126], Russia [138], Thailand [145], Zambia [127] | “They had to earn money for their families and had no time for illness and examinations.” [138] |
“I work almost every day except on market days on the farm and Sundays or if there are special occasions. I usually return in the late afternoon to cook for my husband and children. So, if I should go to the hospital in the morning hours as I am told that is when they open and return in the afternoon, that whole day is gone.” [125] | ||
Poor knowledge regarding TB symptoms and treatment and the availability of free treatment policy were barriers to early healthcare-seeking | Brazil [129], China [134, 135], Ethiopia [110, 112], India [121], Indonesia [123], Philippines [126], Russia [138], South Africa [140, 142], Tanzania [114], Zambia [127], Zimbabwe [128] | “TB is not yet a disease that people recognise, then any respiratory problem is associated with virus diseases, flu, smoke, the dust of the street, all but a disease like TB.” [129] |
“Some participants in rural areas were sceptical whether the free treatment actually existed” [123] | ||
People with presumptive TB delayed care-seeking due to low perceived severity of symptoms, low perceived susceptibility to TB, believed that TB is hereditary or retribution for sinful behaviour, blame others for the delay and then overpowered by hopelessness | Bangladesh [115], Cambodia [48, 117], Ethiopia [110], India [115, 119], Indonesia [124], Mozambique [113], Philippines [126], Russia [137], Tanzania [114] | “They also don’t take the symptoms seriously, they just assume that is a flu.” [142] |
“My uncle suspected that she [respondent’s mother] had TB. But my mother said that in her family, no one had ever had TB … She still rejected the idea and insisted that no one in her family ever had this TB. She asked us to stop referring her [to get medical help]” [117] | ||
“For all patients that had initially thought they were cursed, the fact that their disease was diagnosed in the hospital was perceived as a proof that TB is a punishment of God rather than caused by witchcraft forces. Now I realise it has nothing to do with witchcraft, like I thought in the past. It is a punishment of God. He pushes the wind that contains TB in the direction of the person that will subsequently develop TB.” [114] | ||
“I had been sick for two years. I went to a traditional healer, but he suggested to me to go to the hospital. Before that, my friend who also had got TB suggested to me to check my sputum because he thought I might have got TB as well. I insisted that it was not TB because I have never lived with TB patients… I have heard about TB, but I did not think I would get TB.” [124] | ||
“Patients referred to impoverished living conditions, unclean water and insufficient food as the reasons for their TB. These causes were linked to a sense of hopelessness and an inability to improve the conditions of one’s life.” [115] | ||
Health system delay | ||
Poor practice at the health facilities and ignorance of TB led to a delay in TB diagnosis | Bangladesh [116], Brazil [129, 132], China [133, 135], Ethiopia [110, 111], India [118, 122], Indonesia [123, 124], Tanzania [114] | “He had told me to take injections daily, and I was taking it as advised. But he did not tell me anything. He kept on saying it is typhoid. We told him that sputum is coming while coughing. But he said it will happen like this even for typhoid also.” [122] |
“There was poor adherence of the doctors to the recommended algorithm for investigating a patient suspected to have TB.” [118] | ||
Complicated procedures at the health facilities to reach TB diagnosis | Brazil [130, 132], China [133], India [96, 119], Philippines [126], South Africa [144] | “Referrals from the public day or tertiary hospitals to clinics were not managed smoothly and receiving clinics frequently seemed to question the referral and/or diagnosis, sending the patient away without treatment or referring the patient on to another service provider.” [144] |
Lack of resources and materials in the health facilities led to a delay in TB diagnosis | Brazil [129, 130, 132], India [96], Russia [138], South Africa [144] | “Very often, we do not have enough doctors or nurses in medical sites. Our doctor is absent very often. Then we go to another one. But she might not know my situation and prescribes something at random.” [138] |
“Where the patient was diagnosed at a centre without microscopy or had to be referred for treatment to a local DOTS centre, the delay was more likely to occur.” [96] | ||
Treatment delay | ||
Self-perception of health and unconvinced of the diagnosis and the effectiveness of TB treatment led to a delay in TB treatment initiation | Cambodia [48], India [96, 119], South Africa [141] | “Sometimes, they argued and denied (their condition). They would say they are healthy. Why did we think they had the disease? They didn't trust us because they were still feeling strong.” [48] |
“Some people distrust that the medication would not be effective. Some commented on such cases where the treatment did not work or where people repeatedly kept getting TB.” [141] | ||
Diagnosis and treatment initiated in different facilities caused a delay in TB treatment initiation | India [119] | “Active referrals by the diagnosing provider to another provider for treatment initiation constituted the major reason for delay.” [119] |
Geographical distance to health facilities and other competing priorities delayed TB treatment initiation | South Africa [141] | “Sometimes, respondents were referred for treatment, but because of work-related issues, particularly work hours and the place of work, they could not access care.” [141] |
Health system factors such as lack of organization at the facilities to manage patients, poor staff attitude, and logistic issues caused a delay in TB treatment initiation | India [96], South Africa [141] | “A lack of organisation at the facilities causing delays in service and queues.” [141] |
“Complaints included that staff sent a patient away when they assumed that he was not taking treatment, treat patients like children and in a derogatory manner, blame patients for problems for which they are not responsible and for shouting and swearing at patients. These raised anger and irritation at the services. While the fear may motivate patients to remain on treatment, it can make it difficult for them to return if they did not initiate treatment.” [141] | ||
“Delay in the transport of drugs from the Peripheral Health Institution to the DOTS centres where the patient is supposed to start his DOTS.” [96] | ||
Women experienced stigma due to TB diagnosis resulting in the concealment of diagnosis or being isolated | Zambia [127] | “A TB patient described that she was sent away and that in rural areas, TB treatment was not easily accessible or available. This contributed to her treatment disruption and aggravation of TB.” [127] |
DOTS directly observed treatment, short course; HIV human immunodeficiency virus; TB tuberculosis
Furthermore, poor TB knowledge (Table 2), unawareness of free TB treatment policies [30], low perceived susceptibility, and severity of TB was associated with patient delay [40, 48, 110, 113–115, 117, 119, 124, 126, 137]. However, the pooled estimates for TB knowledge (delay thresholds 21 days—(pooled OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.24–2.71, P = 0.62) and 28 days—(pooled OR 1.36, 95% CI 0.39–4.83, P = 0.25) were not significantly associated with patient delay in the meta-analysis (Fig. 6).
Perceived stigma and discrimination (Table 3) at the workplace, within the family, and community and associating TB with HIV deterred presumptive TB patients from care-seeking [110, 114–117, 121, 125–130, 135–137, 139–144]. From the qualitative data, we found studies that explained the use of alcohol and smoking to conceal health issues, especially among men, which resulted in delayed care-seeking [116, 128, 137, 138, 144, 145]. However, these lifestyle behaviors were not statistically significant in the meta-analysis, where the estimates from both sexes were pooled (Fig. 6). Several studies in Africa [110, 113, 114] highlighted superstitious beliefs that TB is caused by divine retributions of past misdeeds, sinful behaviors, and curses; thus, help is first sought from traditional or spiritual healers instead of a health provider. Besides, studies in Asia reported the misconception that TB is hereditary [117, 126].
Long chains of care-seeking through multiple non-formal or private health providers were also reported as a determinant of patient delay [110–128, 134, 135, 137, 138, 140, 142–144]. Qualitative data also suggested that the lack of trust in the public health care system perpetuated delays in care-seeking [122, 131, 136–139, 143, 144]. The inability of people with TB to recognize symptoms such as fever and cough that were not ascribed to TB intrinsically led to self-medication and treatment or waiting for symptoms to self-resolve due to low perceived disease severity [110, 119, 126, 128, 129, 134, 137, 140, 142]. Studies reported that the presence of cough [69, 70, 74, 80, 86, 88] was associated with patient delay compared to hemoptysis and weight loss that were perceived to be more severe (Table 2). However, the relationships between TB symptoms and patient delay were not statistically significant in the meta-analysis (Fig. 7).
Health system delay
The pooled median health system delay (Fig. 8) in LIC and LMIC was 14 days (95% CI 2–28). The pooled median health system delay in UMIC was 4 days (95% CI 2–4). The overall median health system delay in high TB-burden countries was 4 days (95% CI 2–4). We explored the association between sex and health system delay, and we did not find a significant relationship (Additional file 1). Twelve qualitative studies reported that poor practices and ignorance of TB among health providers at health facilities led to a delay in TB diagnosis [110, 111, 114, 116, 118, 122–124, 129, 132, 133, 135]. Seven qualitative studies explained that complicated administrative procedures at the health facilities [96, 119, 126, 130, 132, 133, 144], which could have resulted in longer waiting time [46], and complex referral system[144] that eventually prolonged health system delay. This review identified studies reporting that health system delays were associated with visiting lower-level facilities that did not provide TB services [34, 46, 72, 75, 90]. Six qualitative studies mentioned that inadequate resources and supplies in health facilities could have delayed TB diagnosis [96, 129, 130, 132, 138, 144]. Three quantitative studies reported that people with smear-negative TB were more likely to experience health system delay [81, 82, 91].
Treatment delay
The pooled median treatment delay (Fig. 8) in LIC and LMIC was 14 days (95% CI 3–84). The pooled median treatment delay in UMIC was 0 days (95% CI 0–1). The overall median treatment delay in high TB burden countries was 1 day (95% CI 0–14). One qualitative study noted that the geographical distance to health facilities, especially when treatment was initiated in separate institutions, delayed TB treatment initiation [141]. This could be exacerbated by residing in areas without health centers nearby [97]. Health system factors such as logistical issues in drug transportation [96, 141] and the absence of TB diagnostic services in local health facilities [96, 119] compounded delay in treatment initiation. Like patient delay, a qualitative study provided insights into TB stigma experienced by women resulting in the concealment of diagnosis, expulsion from their community, or isolation; thus, delaying access to TB care and treatment[127]. Four qualitative studies mentioned self-perception of health, unconvinced diagnosis and need for TB treatment, and the perceived low effectiveness of TB treatment led to a delay in TB treatment initiation [48, 96, 119, 141]. We also found that retreatment cases were more likely to delay TB treatment initiation [94–98].
Discussion
Our review is the first to focus on determinants of delayed TB diagnosis and treatment among high TB burden countries using evidence-based quantitative and qualitative information. Studies from high TB-burden LIC/LMIC reported longer median patient delay (28 days) than UMIC (10 days). Our findings were consistent with previous systematic reviews conducted in countries of different income levels [5, 8]. However, the median patient delay among UMIC in this review was shorter than the findings from observational studies conducted in other high-income countries [147, 148]. TB burden in high-income countries has been progressively reduced through improvements in socio-economic conditions, strong health systems components such as the delivery of TB services and universal health coverage, and social protection schemes [149]. Nevertheless, the high standards of living and wellbeing have shaped the notion that TB is not a significant concern, rendering a lower index of suspicion of TB and thus delaying TB care-seeking [150]. Notwithstanding, TB remains an issue, especially among hard-to-reach populations living in high-income settings like migrants [151, 152], who face challenges in accessing healthcare due to stigma, language barriers, and cost of testing and treatment [6].
The median health system delay in this review (LIC/LMIC: 14 days and UMIC: 4 days) was found to be shorter than previous systematic reviews conducted among countries of similar economies [5, 8]. As this review included studies conducted in the last decade, the improvement in health system delay may be attributed to the enhancements of healthcare systems [153] and the quality of TB laboratories [154]. The clinicians’ ability to consider TB as a differential diagnosis in high burden settings is also essential for early diagnosis and treatment [155]. However, there remains a paucity of data in several high TB burden countries, including seven in Africa (Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of Condo, Lesotho, Liberia, Namibia, Republic of the Congo, and Sierra Leone) and four in Asia (Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Myanmar, Papua New Guinea, and Vietnam), potentially due to logistical challenges in conducting such studies.
Patient delay
While TB is a disease mainly affecting men[156], in our review, we found that women faced challenges in accessing TB care promptly in some settings due to resource constraints, power imbalances, and poor TB knowledge. However, there was a paucity of sex-specific data on the determinants of delay in TB diagnosis and treatment. It is imperative to recognize sex disparities in TB care-seeking. Women with TB in high burden countries experienced delays in diagnosis and treatment because of barriers to TB services. Therefore, future studies should report disaggregated data by sex to inform programs and interventions addressing sex-specific vulnerabilities in improving access to TB services among men and women.
Despite wide coverage of free TB diagnostic and treatment services in high burden countries [157], people with TB and their families, especially the poor, bear the impact of high economic costs [158]. Studies included in our review also reported that livelihood, work, and family were prioritized and led to a delay in care-seeking. These factors, coupled with the physical environments and impoverished living conditions [127, 138], plunged low-income households into a vicious cycle of impoverishments [159, 160], making TB elimination overtly challenging. Aside from the broad expansion of TB services that have been shown to reduce the financial burden on TB-affected households [161], it is also essential to ensure that financial and social protection policies are in place to protect those at risk of catastrophic TB costs and poverty.
Our pooled estimates showed that rural dwellers were significantly associated with patient delay. In the rural setting, access to healthcare facilities, particularly an institution that offers TB diagnostic services, might be lacking [5]. Rural populations were also more likely to have a lower health literacy [162], resulting in poorer health status and outcomes [163]. Nevertheless, the concept of urban–rural is dynamic and context-dependent, driven by migration, population, and economic growth over time [164]. The consistent findings of rural residence and patient delay in TB [5, 8, 165] suggest increased efforts tailored to the country’s specific circumstances in reaching the affected communities are required.
In countries where TB diagnostic and treatment services are provided for free, access to TB care is further challenged by poor knowledge and awareness regarding such policies, making presumptive TB seek treatment early [123, 135]. In addition to poor awareness about the free TB treatment policy, we also identified studies that reported poor knowledge regarding TB symptoms associated with a delay in TB care-seeking. Therefore, people with TB would delay care-seeking until only when their illness compromised their ability to work and earn livelihoods [115]. Conventionally, symptomatic individuals are linked to TB transmission, and they are regarded as the target group for TB case-finding activities using the TB symptoms screening approach [166]. However, TB transmission could also occur during the subclinical (asymptomatic) phase, particularly heightened during episodes of symptoms exhibition unrelated to TB pathologies, such as bouts of either acute or chronic cough [167]. As people with subclinical TB might not report any symptoms, they have lower awareness and motivation to seek care; thus, leading to a delay in TB diagnosis and treatment and potentially sustaining TB transmission [168] in the household and community. Therefore, a better understanding of subclinical TB, its transmission dynamics, and the implications for TB control efforts are needed. Nevertheless, individuals who exhibit TB symptoms, such as cough, are more likely to have a higher bacillary load and transmit infection [169, 170]. Therefore, it is crucial to ensure that ill and symptomatic persons with TB are reached, tested, and treated promptly.
Furthermore, misperception regarding the causes of TB was also found to delay TB care-seeking. When no one in the family is ever diagnosed with TB, presumptive TB did not self-initiate care-seeking or is discouraged explicitly by family members to seek TB diagnosis and treatment [117]. Therefore, it is imperative first to measure the level of knowledge, awareness, and practices regarding TB in settings where studies as such have yet to be conducted. The gaps identified could then be used to develop health education programs and interventions about TB. Studies have shown that health education programs and dissemination of TB information effectively improve TB knowledge and awareness [171], enabling care-seeking and increasing the identification of TB cases [172]. Furthermore, understanding the knowledge and practices of health professionals could be done in parallel to improve care and facilitate the early identification of TB [173].
TB stigma continues to be a major barrier for people to access TB diagnosis and complete treatment [10, 143]. Moreover, stigma could also reduce the use of face masks [6, 174], further contributing to infection transmission. Despite being an increasingly important agenda of TB programs worldwide, there is a paucity of data on stigma [175], particularly information from the perpetrators of stigma [176]. There is also limited evidence on effective interventions that can reduce TB-related stigma [177]. Considering the importance of stigma reduction in TB control and elimination efforts, stigma should be systematically measured. De-stigmatisation must include approaches in healthcare institutions and beyond for a more inclusive care plan.
In high TB-burden countries, we found that people who presented with cough, fever, and night sweats were more likely to delay TB care-seeking. This is consistent with another systematic review conducted among low and middle-income countries [5]. The attribution of these symptoms to other respiratory infections or smoking and the inability to link them to TB was claimed as one of the primary reasons causing a delay in seeking care [138]. Contrarily, more severe symptoms such as hemoptysis were more likely to reduce delays in care-seeking. Therefore, education and awareness-raising activities could be recalibrated to specifically highlight the possibility of TB besides other respiratory illnesses in the event of more general symptoms such as cough and fever. Simultaneously, health workers' awareness on this matter in high-burden settings should be raised to improve TB case findings.
Health system and treatment delay
Health system delay was more pronounced in LIC and LMIC than UMIC, likely due to the standard of health care, the strength of the national health systems, and the availability of resources. Among LIC and LMIC, a systematic review reported that the quality of health care in the public and private sectors was poor. The private sector relatively outperformed the public sector regarding the delivery of care and medicines availability [178]. The discrepancies in effectiveness and efficiency were highlighted as a facilitator to seek private healthcare, which eventually leads to a delay in TB diagnosis in a high TB burden setting like Cambodia[179]. Narrowing down to high TB-burden countries, the quality of public and private healthcare was also found to be below par, and systematic evaluations are needed to identify gaps in the TB care pathway [157].
Likewise, treatment delay was longer in LIC and LMIC than UMIC. The delay might be due to logistic factors such as long distance to treatment centers, availability of anti-TB drugs, and the absence of TB diagnostic services in local health facilities [96, 97]. Beyond systemic factors, individuals’ low perceived susceptibility and TB stigma could delay a person’s decision to initiate TB treatment [48, 127]. Interventions to decrease isolation post-diagnosis and social support should be provided to encourage prompt initiation of TB treatment [180]. Health providers also play a vital role in assisting people with TB to internalize the diagnosis and support them in decision-making [181].
Strengths and limitations
To our knowledge, this systematic review will be the first to focus on countries with a high TB burden, where most of the TB cases in the world [2] are found. As the list consisted of countries from LIC, LMIC, and UMIC, we attempted to discern the differences in the determinants of delayed TB diagnosis and treatment between these countries.
However, we found high levels of heterogeneity amongst the studies potentially due to clinical and methodological diversities. We included studies from different high TB-burden countries and economic statuses. While we have restricted the study populations to people with presumptive TB and people with TB, their sociodemographic profiles were diverse. We acknowledged the limitation in analyzing data comprising of all possible subgroups in this review. Furthermore, we included the different observational non-randomized studies in this review. The design differed by temporality and the potential biases, contributing to methodological diversity.
In our attempt for comprehensiveness, we retained the threshold of delays as to how they were defined in individual studies. While it might not pose severe concerns for the narrative synthesis and pooling of median delays, the utilization of the delay threshold defined by individual studies in the meta-analysis of risk factors could lead to misinterpretation. Therefore, we pooled effect sizes from eligible studies that utilized similar delay thresholds in the meta-analyses. We incorporated heterogeneity into random-effects models using the Bayesian approach [23], which could yield more accurate interval estimates than conventional methods, especially for studies with a small sample size and are heterogenous [23, 182, 183]. However, the incorporation of heterogeneity in the random-effects models would not fully account for the clinical and methodological diversity in the studies. Analyses of study-level covariates in a meta-regression may be relevant to further investigate heterogeneities by the differences in studies characteristics and populations. We did not perform a meta-regression in this review, and this method could be considered in future reviews of similar nature.
Nevertheless, caution in interpreting and extrapolating the findings from the meta-analyses is warranted. For the pooled median delays, the overall estimates were influenced by studies in UMIC with larger sample sizes. Therefore, we opined that the pooled estimates by economies would be more informative. In the meta-analyses of risk factors, the pooling of estimates from studies with similar delay thresholds limited the number of studies that could be included. Most of the independent variables were also grouped differently, and we could not standardize them all. Hence, the meta-analyses were only performed for selected variables. However, we strived to maintain this review's comprehensiveness by triangulating findings from narrative synthesis and thematic analyses of qualitative studies.
This review did not include data from all 30 high TB-burden countries due to the absence of key outcome data and research activities. Notwithstanding the potential lack of representativeness due to the scarcity of data from several countries, this review highlights the gaps in knowledge and provides insights into the determinants of TB diagnosis and treatment delay in high-burden countries. However, the heterogeneity of the data limited the generalizability of our findings to settings underrepresented in this review.
Conclusions
Our analyses revealed a substantial delay between the onset of TB symptoms and TB care-seeking among high burden countries, highlighting the need to continue to shape knowledge, change attitude, and raise awareness of the community, people at risk of TB, and the health providers. Specific vulnerabilities such as sex disparities in care-seeking, being older, and geographic isolation should be recognized and addressed through tailored approaches to improve access to TB services and early diagnosis [184]. It is also crucial to improve the consciousness of the society regarding TB to battle stigma, and networks [185] of support from within the families, the grassroots, and institutions could create an enabling environment for early care-seeking and treatment adherence and success. In contrast to patient delay, the shorter health system and treatment delay were encouraging. Nonetheless, TB programs should strive to test and treat TB by adopting WHO recommendations for same-day TB diagnosis [186] to further reduce TB transmission and mortality [187]. Higher-level policies and interventions such as health system strengthening, universal health coverage, and the provision of sustainable social welfare schemes are important to reduce delays, improve access to TB care, and ultimately achieve the global TB targets [188].
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Dr. Asano Miho for her guidance in the early part of the study and Miss Annelissa Chin and Miss Ratnala Sukanya Naidu for their assistance with developing the search terms, scanning, and retrieving articles.
Abbreviations
- CASP
Critical Appraisal Skills Program
- CI
Confidence interval
- HIV
Human immunodeficiency virus
- HQ
High quality
- LIC
Low-income countries
- LMIC
Lower-middle-income countries
- LQ
Low quality
- MQ
Medium quality
- OR
Odds ratio
- PRISMA
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis
- PROSPERO
International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews
- TB
Tuberculosis
- UMIC
Upper-middle-income countries
- USA
Unites States of America
- WHO
World Health Organization
Authors' contributions
AKJT, SY, LYH, and SRS conceptualized and designed the study. AKJT and SRS developed the search terms. AKJT conducted the searches. AKJT and STS screened, extracted, and verified the data. AKJT, SRS, and KP analyzed the data. KP and AKJT performed the meta-analysis. AKJT and SRS performed the systematic review and analyzed the qualitative data. AKJT, KP, and SRS prepared the tables and figures. AKJT, KP, and SRS wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable. All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its Additional file 1.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Alvin Kuo Jing Teo, Shweta R. Singh and Kiesha Prem have contributed equally to this work
References
- 1.World Health Organization. TB: a global emergency, WHO report on the TB epidemic [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1994. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/58749.
- 2.World Health Organization . Global tuberculosis report 2019. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Stop TB Partnership, United Nations Office for Project Services (UNOPS). Global plan to end TB. The paradigm shift 2016–2020. Geneva: STOP TB Partnership and UNOPS; 2016.
- 4.Golub JE, Bur S, Cronin WA, Gange S, Baruch N, Comstock GW, et al. Delayed tuberculosis diagnosis and tuberculosis transmission. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2006;10:24–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Getnet F, Demissie M, Assefa N, Mengistie B, Worku A. Delay in diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in low-and middle-income settings: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pulm Med. 2017 doi: 10.1186/s12890-017-0551-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.de Vries SG, Cremers AL, Heuvelings CC, Greve PF, Visser BJ, Bélard S, et al. Barriers and facilitators to the uptake of tuberculosis diagnostic and treatment services by hard-to-reach populations in countries of low and medium tuberculosis incidence: a systematic review of qualitative literature. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17:e128–e143. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30531-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sullivan BJ, Esmaili BE, Cunningham CK. Barriers to initiating tuberculosis treatment in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review focused on children and youth. Glob Health Action. 2017;10:1290317. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2017.1290317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sreeramareddy CT, Panduru KV, Menten J, Van den Ende J. Time delays in diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review of literature. BMC Infect Dis. 2009;9:91. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-9-91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Storla DG, Yimer S, Bjune GA. A systematic review of delay in the diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Barnabishvili M, Ulrichs T, Waldherr R. Role of acceptability barriers in delayed diagnosis of Tuberculosis: literature review from high burden countries. Acta Trop. 2016;161:106–113. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sreeramareddy CT, Qin ZZ, Satyanarayana S, Subbaraman R, Pai M. Delays in diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis in India: a systematic review. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2014;18:255–266. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.13.0585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021 doi: 10.1136/bmj.n160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Teo AKJ, Singh SR, Prem K, Hsu LY, Yi S. Delayed diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis in high-burden countries: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e029807. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.CASP - Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. CASP Checklists [Internet]. CASP - Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. [cited 2019 Jan 26]. Available from: https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/.
- 15.Noyes J, Booth A, Flemming K, Garside R, Harden A, Lewin S, et al. Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series—paper 3: methods for assessing methodological limitations, data extraction and synthesis, and confidence in synthesized qualitative findings. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;97:49–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wells G, Shea B, O’connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses [Internet]. [cited 2019 Jan 27]. Available from: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.
- 17.Munn Z, Porritt K, Lockwood C, Aromataris E, Pearson A. Establishing confidence in the output of qualitative research synthesis: the ConQual approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:108. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.The World Bank. World Bank country and lending groups [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 29]. Available from: https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups.
- 19.McGrath S, Zhao X, Qin ZZ, Steele R, Benedetti A. One-sample aggregate data meta-analysis of medians. Stat Med. 2019;38:969–984. doi: 10.1002/sim.8013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lin X, Chongsuvivatwong V, Geater A, Lijuan R. The effect of geographical distance on TB patient delays in a mountainous province of China. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2008;12:288–293. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lin Y, Enarson DA, Chiang C-Y, Rusen ID, Qiu L-X, Kan X-H, et al. Patient delay in the diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis in China: findings of case detection projects. Public Health Action. 2015;5:65–69. doi: 10.5588/pha.14.0066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cochran WG. The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics. 1954;10:101–129. doi: 10.2307/3001666. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Spiegelhalter DJ. A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis. J R Stat Soc A. 2009;172:137–159. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2008.00552.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Belay M, Bjune G, Ameni G, Abebe F. Diagnostic and treatment delay among tuberculosis patients in Afar Region, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2012 doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bogale S, Diro E, Shiferaw AM, Yenit MK. Factors associated with the length of delay with tuberculosis diagnosis and treatment among adult tuberculosis patients attending at public health facilities in Gondar town, Northwest, Ethiopia. BMC Infect Dis. 2017. 10.1186/s12879-017-2240-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 26.Gebeyehu E, Azage M, Abeje G. Factors associated with patient’s delay in tuberculosis treatment in Bahir Dar City Administration, Northwest Ethiopia. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014:1–6. doi: 10.1155/2014/701429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Seid A, Metaferia Y. Factors associated with treatment delay among newly diagnosed tuberculosis patients in Dessie city and surroundings, Northern Central Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2018. 10.1186/s12889-018-5823-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 28.Fuge TG, Bawore SG, Solomon DW, Hegana TY. Patient delay in seeking tuberculosis diagnosis and associated factors in Hadiya Zone, Southern Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes. 2018. 10.1186/s13104-018-3215-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 29.Adenager GS, Alemseged F, Asefa H, Gebremedhin AT. Factors associated with treatment delay among pulmonary tuberculosis patients in public and private health facilities in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Tuberc Res Treat. 2017;2017:1–9. doi: 10.1155/2017/5120841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Asres M, Gedefaw M, Kahsay A, Weldu Y. Patients’ delay in seeking health care for tuberculosis diagnosis in east Gojjam Zone, Northwest Ethiopia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017;96:1071–1075. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gebreegziabher SB, Bjune GA, Yimer SA. Patients’ and health system’s delays in the diagnosis and treatment of new pulmonary tuberculosis patients in West Gojjam Zone, Northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Infect Dis. 2016. 10.1186/s12879-016-1995-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 32.Mesfin MM, Newell JN, Walley JD, Gessessew A, Madeley RJ. Delayed consultation among pulmonary tuberculosis patients: a cross sectional study of 10 DOTS districts of Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. 2009. 10.1186/1471-2458-9-53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 33.Hussen A, Biadgilign S, Tessema F, Mohammed S, Deribe K, Deribew A. Treatment delay among pulmonary tuberculosis patients in pastoralist communities in Bale Zone, Southeast Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes. 2012. 10.1186/1756-0500-5-320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 34.Yimer SA, Bjune GA, Holm-Hansen C. Time to first consultation, diagnosis and treatment of TB among patients attending a referral hospital in Northwest, Ethiopia. BMC Infect Dis. 2014. 10.1186/1471-2334-14-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 35.Gele AA, Bjune G, Abebe F. Pastoralism and delay in diagnosis of TB in Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. 2009. 10.1186/1471-2458-9-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 36.Yirgu R, Lemessa F, Hirpa S, Alemayehu A, Klinkenberg E. Determinants of delayed care seeking for TB suggestive symptoms in Seru district, Oromiya region, Ethiopia: a community based unmatched case-control study. BMC Infect Dis. 2017. 10.1186/s12879-017-2407-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 37.Abebe G, Deribew A, Apers L, Woldemichael K, Shiffa J, Tesfaye M, et al. Knowledge, health seeking behavior and perceived stigma towards tuberculosis among tuberculosis suspects in a rural community in southwest Ethiopia. Mokrousov I, editor. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e13339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 38.Senbeto M, Tadesse S, Tadesse T, Melesse T. Appropriate health-seeking behavior and associated factors among people who had cough for at least two weeks in northwest Ethiopia: a population-based cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2013. 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 39.Yimer S, Holm-Hansen C, Yimaldu T, Bjune G. Health care seeking among pulmonary tuberculosis suspects and patients in rural Ethiopia: a community-based study. BMC Public Health. 2009. 10.1186/1471-2458-9-454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 40.Engeda EH, Dachew BA, Kassa Woreta H, Mekonnen Kelkay M, Ashenafie TD. Health seeking behaviour and associated factors among pulmonary tuberculosis suspects in Lay Armachiho District, Northwest Ethiopia: a community-based study. Tuberc Res Treat. 2016;2016:1–7. doi: 10.1155/2016/7892701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Addisu Y, Birhanu Z, Tilahun D, Assefa T. Predictors of treatment seeking intention among people with cough in East Wollega, Ethiopia based on the theory of planned behavior: a community based cross-sectional study. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2014;24:131. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v24i2.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Saifodine A, Gudo PS, Sidat M, Black J. Patient and health system delay among patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in Beira city, Mozambique. BMC Public Health. 2013. 10.1186/1471-2458-13-559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 43.Mfinanga SG, Mutayoba BK, Kahwa A, Kimaro G, Mtandu R, Ngadaya E, et al. The magnitude and factors associated with delays in management of smear positive tuberculosis in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008. 10.1186/1472-6963-8-158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 44.Ngadaya ES, Mfinanga GS, Wandwalo ER, Morkve O. Delay in tuberculosis case detection in Pwani region, Tanzania. A cross sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009. 10.1186/1472-6963-9-196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 45.Senkoro M, Hinderaker SG, Mfinanga SG, Range N, Kamara DV, Egwaga S, et al. Health care-seeking behaviour among people with cough in Tanzania: findings from a tuberculosis prevalence survey. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015;19:640–646. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.14.0499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Segagni Lusignani L, Quaglio G, Atzori A, Nsuka J, Grainger R, Da Conceiçao Palma M, et al. Factors associated with patient and health care system delay in diagnosis for tuberculosis in the province of Luanda, Angola. BMC Infect Dis. 2013. 10.1186/1471-2334-13-168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 47.Rifat M, Rusen ID, Islam MdA, Enarson DA, Ahmed F, Ahmed SM, et al. Why are tuberculosis patients not treated earlier? A study of informal health practitioners in Bangladesh. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2011;15:647–51. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 48.Lorent N, Choun K, Malhotra S, Koeut P, Thai S, Khun KE, et al. Challenges from tuberculosis diagnosis to care in community-based active case finding among the urban poor in Cambodia: a mixed-methods study. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0130179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 49.Purty A, Chauhan R, Natesan M, Cherian J, Singh Z, Sharma Y. Patient and health system delays among adult smear-positive tuberculosis patients diagnosed at medical colleges of Puducherry in south India. Indian J Public Health. 2016;60:77. doi: 10.4103/0019-557X.177349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Thakur R, Murhekar M. Delay in diagnosis and treatment among tb patients registered under RNTCP mandi, Himachal Pradesh, India, 2010. Indian J Tuberc. 2013;60:37–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Tamhane A, Ambe G, Vermund S, Kohler CL, Karande A, Sathiakumar N. Pulmonary tuberculosis in Mumbai, India: factors responsible for patient and treatment delays. Int J Prev Med. 2012;3:13. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Basa S, Venkatesh S. Patient and healthcare system delays in the start of pulmonary tuberculosis treatment among tribal patients registered under DOTS, Odisha. J Clin Diagn Res [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2019 Nov 22]; Available from: http://jcdr.net/article_fulltext.asp?issn=0973-709x&year=2016&volume=10&issue=9&page=LC21&issn=0973-709x&id=8567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 53.Kalra A. Care seeking and treatment related delay among childhood tuberculosis patients in Delhi, India. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2017;21:645–650. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.16.0563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Satyanarayana S, Nair SA, Chadha SS, Sharma G, Yadav S, Mohanty S, et al. Healthcare seeking among people with cough of 2 weeks or more in India. Is passive TB case finding sufficient? Public Health Action. 2012;2:157–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 55.Lock WA, Ahmad RA, Ruiter RAC, van der Werf MJ, Bos AER, Mahendradhata Y, et al. Patient delay determinants for patients with suspected tuberculosis in Yogyakarta province, Indonesia: TB patients delay determinants. Trop Med Int Health. 2011;16:1501–1510. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02864.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Ahmad RA, Richardus JH, de Vlas SJ. Care-seeking behaviour among individuals with TB symptoms in Jogjakarta Province, Indonesia: a community-based study. Int Health. 2013;5:51–57. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihs002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Ayuo P, Diero L, Owino-Ong’or W, Mwangi A. Causes of delay in diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in patients attending a referral hospital in Western Kenya. East Afr Med J. 2008 doi: 10.4314/eamj.v85i6.9623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Njau IW, Karanja SM, Wanzala P, Omolo JO. Factors associated with late presentation of suspected tuberculosis cases to tuberculosis management facilities: the case in Dagoretti district, Nairobi, Kenya. Pan Afr Med J. 2012;12:93. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Biya O, Gidado S, Abraham A, Waziri N, Nguku P, Nsubuga P, et al. Knowledge, care-seeking behavior, and factors associated with patient delay among newly-diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis patients, Federal Capital Territory, Nigeria, 2010. Pan Afr Med J. 2014 doi: 10.11604/pamj.supp.2014.18.1.4166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Ukwaja KN, Alobu I, Nweke CO, Onyenwe EC. Healthcare-seeking behavior, treatment delays and its determinants among pulmonary tuberculosis patients in rural Nigeria: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013. 10.1186/1472-6963-13-25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 61.Fatiregun AA, Ejeckam CC. Determinants of patient delay in seeking treatment among pulmonary tuberculosis cases in a government specialist hospital in Ibadan, Nigeria. Tanzania J Health Res. 2010 doi: 10.4314/thrb.v12i2.56398. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Chanda-Kapata P, Kapata N, Masiye F, Maboshe M, Klinkenberg E, Cobelens F, et al. Health seeking behaviour among individuals with presumptive tuberculosis in Zambia. van Zyl-Smit R, editor. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0163975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 63.Takarinda KC, Harries AD, Nyathi B, Ngwenya M, Mutasa-Apollo T, Sandy C. Tuberculosis treatment delays and associated factors within the Zimbabwe national tuberculosis programme. BMC Public Health. 2015. 10.1186/s12889-015-1437-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 64.de Almeida CPB, Skupien EC, Silva DR. Health care seeking behavior and patient delay in tuberculosis diagnosis. Cadernos de Saúde Pública. 2015;31:321–330. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00195413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Deponti GN, Silva DR, Coelho AC, Muller AM, de Dalcin PTR. Delayed diagnosis and associated factors among new pulmonary tuberculosis patients diagnosed at the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital in Porto Alegre, South Brazil: a prospective patient recruitment study. BMC Infect Dis. 2013. 10.1186/1471-2334-13-538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 66.Wysocki AD, Ponce MAZ, Scatolin BE, Andrade RL de P, Vendramini SHF, Netto AR, et al. Atraso na procura pelo primeiro atendimento para o diagnóstico da tuberculose. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP. 2013;47:440–7. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 67.Trigueiro DRSG, Nogueira J de A, Sá LD de, Monroe AA, Anjos UU dos, Villa TCS, et al. The influence of individual determinants in the delay of the tuberculosis diagnosis. Texto & Contexto - Enfermagem. 2014;23:1022–31.
- 68.Maior M de L, Guerra RL, Cailleaux-Cezar M, Golub E, Conde MB. Time from symptom onset to the initiation of treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis in a city with a high incidence of the disease. J Bras Pneumol. 2012;38:202–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 69.Machado AC de FT, Steffen RE, Oxlade O, Menzies D, Kritski A, Trajman A. Fatores associados ao atraso no diagnóstico da tuberculose pulmonar no estado do Rio de Janeiro. Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia. 2011;37:512–20. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 70.Maciel ELN, Golub JE, Peres RL, Hadad DJ, Fávero JL, Molino LP, et al. Delay in diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis at a primary health clinic in Vitoria, Brazil. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2010;14:1403–1410. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Nogueira BMF, Rolla VC, Akrami KM, Kiene SM. Factors associated with tuberculosis treatment delay in patients co-infected with HIV in a high prevalence area in Brazil. Hasnain SE, editor. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0195409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 72.Zhou C, Tobe RG, Chu J, Gen H, Wang X, Xu L. Detection delay of pulmonary tuberculosis patients among migrants in China: a cross-sectional study. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2012;16:1630–1636. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.12.0227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Chen H-G, Liu M, Jiang S-W, Gu F-H, Huang S-P, Gao T-J, et al. Impact of diabetes on diagnostic delay for pulmonary tuberculosis in Beijing. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2014;18:267–271. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.13.0140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Wang Q, Ma A, Han X, Zhao S, Cai J, Kok FJ, et al. Hyperglycemia is associated with increased risk of patient delay in pulmonary tuberculosis in rural areas: 高血糖与农村地区肺结核患者延误就诊风险增加相关. J Diabetes. 2017;9:648–655. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Chimbatata NBW, Zhou C, Chimbatata CM, Mhango L, Diwan VK, Xu B. Barriers to prompt TB diagnosis—a comparative study between northern Malawi and eastern rural China. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2017;111:504–511. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/try002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Duan Q, Wang P, Lv J, Zhong R, Wang W. Health care seeking among pulmonary tuberculosis suspects in Wuhan: a community-based study. Int J Med Med Sci. 2013;5:273–278. [Google Scholar]
- 77.Tobe RG, Xu L, Zhou C, Yuan Q, Geng H, Wang X. Factors affecting patient delay of diagnosis and completion of Direct Observation Therapy, Short-course (DOTS) among the migrant population in Shandong, China. BioSci Trends [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2019 Nov 22]; Available from: http://www.biosciencetrends.com/getabstract.php?id=678. [PubMed]
- 78.Li X, Jiang S, Li X, Mei J, Zhong Q, Xu W, et al. Predictors on delay of initial health-seeking in new pulmonary tuberculosis cases among migrants population in east China. Pai M, editor. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e31995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 79.Zhao X, Yang P, Gai R, Mei L, Wang X, Xu L. Determinants of health care-seeking delay among tuberculosis patients in Shandong Province, China. Eur J Public Health. 2014;24:757–761. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckt113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Xia D, Zhang Z, Li X, Jiang C, Ma J, Ding S, et al. Factors associated with patient delay among new tuberculosis patients in Anqing, China. Biomed Res. 2016;27:8. [Google Scholar]
- 81.Shu W, Chen W, Zhu S, Hou Y, Mei J, Bai L, et al. Factors causing delay of access to tuberculosis diagnosis among new, active tuberculosis patients: a prospective cohort study. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2014;26:33–41. doi: 10.1177/1010539513502523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Xu X, Liu J-H, Cao S-Y, Zhao Y, Dong X-X, Liang Y, et al. Delays in care seeking, diagnosis and treatment among pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Shenzhen, China. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2013;17:615–620. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.12.0231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Wang Y, Long Q, Liu Q, Tolhurst R, Tang S. Treatment seeking for symptoms suggestive of TB: comparison between migrants and permanent urban residents in Chongqing, China: delay in treatment seeking for symptoms suggestive of TB. Trop Med Int Health. 2008;13:927–933. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2008.02093.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Woith WM, Larson JL. Delay in seeking treatment and adherence to tuberculosis medications in Russia: a survey of patients from two clinics. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008;45:1163–1174. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Møller V, Erstad I, Cramm JM, Nieboer AP, Finkenflügel H, Radloff S, et al. Delays in presenting for tuberculosis treatment associated with fear of learning one is HIV-positive. Afr J AIDS Res. 2011;10:25–36. doi: 10.2989/16085906.2011.575545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Meintjes G, Schoeman H, Morroni C, Wilson D, Maartens G. Patient and provider delay in tuberculosis suspects from communities with a high HIV prevalence in South Africa: a cross-sectional study. BMC Infect Dis. 2008. 10.1186/1471-2334-8-72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 87.Otwombe KN, Variava E, Holmes CB, Chaisson RE, Martinson N. Predictors of delay in the diagnosis and treatment of suspected tuberculosis in HIV co-infected patients in South Africa. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2013;17:1199–1205. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.12.0891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Butsorn A, Suggaravetsiri P, Tesama N. Delay of treatment among new smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Thai-Cambodia border: cases study in Surin and Sisaket Province, Thailand. Res J Med Sci. 2010;4:340–345. doi: 10.3923/rjmsci.2010.340.345. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Rattananupong T, Hiransuthikul N, Lohsoonthorn V, Chuchottaworn C. Factors associated with delay in tuberculosis treatment at 10 tertiary level care hospitals in Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2015;46:8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Adejumo OA, Daniel OJ, Otesanya AF, Adejumo EN. Determinants of health system delay at public and private directly observed treatment, short course facilities in Lagos State, Nigeria: a cross-sectional study. Int J Mycobacteriol. 2016;5:257–264. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmyco.2016.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Rossato Silva D, Müller AM, de Tarso Roth Dalcin P. Factors associated with delayed diagnosis of tuberculosis in hospitalized patients in a high TB and HIV burden setting: a cross-sectional study. BMC Infect Dis. 2012. 10.1186/1471-2334-12-57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 92.Boniface R, Moshabela M, Zulliger R, MacPherson P, Nyasulu P. Correlates of delayed diagnosis among human immunodeficiency virus-infected pulmonary tuberculosis suspects in a rural HIV Clinic, South Africa. Tuberc Res Treat. 2012;2012:1–7. doi: 10.1155/2012/827148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Hinderaker SG, Madland S, Ullenes M, Enarson DA, Rusen I, Kamara D. Treatment delay among tuberculosis patients in Tanzania: data from the FIDELIS initiative. BMC Public Health. 2011. 10.1186/1471-2458-11-306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 94.Htike W, Islam MA, Hasan MT, Ferdous S, Rifat M. Factors associated with treatment delay among tuberculosis patients referred from a tertiary hospital in Dhaka City: a cross-sectional study. Public Health Action. 2013;3:317–322. doi: 10.5588/pha.13.0067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Thomas BE, Subbaraman R, Sellappan S, Suresh C, Lavanya J, Lincy S, et al. Pretreatment loss to follow-up of tuberculosis patients in Chennai, India: a cohort study with implications for health systems strengthening. BMC Infect Dis. 2018. 10.1186/s12879-018-3039-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 96.Paul D, Busireddy A, Nagaraja SB, Satyanarayana S, Dewan PK, Nair SA, et al. Factors associated with delays in treatment initiation after tuberculosis diagnosis in two districts of India. Pai M, editor. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e39040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 97.Kant S, Singh A, Parmeshwaran G, Haldar P, Malhotra S, Kaur R. Delay in initiation of treatment after diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in primary health care setting: eight year cohort analysis from district Faridabad, Haryana, North India. Rural Remote Health. 2017 doi: 10.22605/RRH4158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Ilangovan K, Nagaraja SB, Ananthakrishnan R, Jacob AG, Tripathy JP, Tamang D. TB Treatment delays in Odisha, India: is it expected even after these many years of RNTCP implementation? Mistry N, editor. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0125465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 99.Mugauri H, Shewade HD, Dlodlo RA, Hove S, Sibanda E. Bacteriologically confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis patients: loss to follow-up, death and delay before treatment initiation in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe from 2012–2016. Int J Infect Dis. 2018;76:6–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2018.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Zhou C, Chu J, Geng H, Wang X, Xu L. Pulmonary tuberculosis among migrants in Shandong, China: factors associated with treatment delay. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e005805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 101.Van Wyk SS, Enarson DA, Beyers N, Lombard C, Hesseling AC. Consulting private health care providers aggravates treatment delay in urban South African tuberculosis patients. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2011;15:1069–1076. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.10.0615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Asefa A, Teshome W. Total delay in treatment among smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis patients in five primary health centers, southern Ethiopia: a cross sectional study. Pai M, editor. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e102884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 103.Bronner Murrison L, Ananthakrishnan R, Swaminathan A, Auguesteen S, Krishnan N, Pai M, et al. How do patients access the private sector in Chennai, India? An evaluation of delays in tuberculosis diagnosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2016;20:544–551. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.15.0423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Van Ness SE, Chandra A, Sarkar S, Pleskunas J, Ellner JJ, Roy G, et al. Predictors of delayed care seeking for tuberculosis in southern India: an observational study. BMC Infect Dis. 2017. 10.1186/s12879-017-2629-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 105.Mahendradhata Y, Syahrizal BM, Utarini A. Delayed treatment of tuberculosis patients in rural areas of Yogyakarta province, Indonesia. BMC Public Health. 2008. 10.1186/1471-2458-8-393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 106.Bassili A, Seita A, Baghdadi S, AlAbsi A, Abdilai I, Agboatwalla M, et al. Diagnostic and treatment delay in tuberculosis in 7 countries of the eastern Mediterranean region. Infect Dis Clin Pract. 2008;16:23–35.
- 107.Saqib MA, Awan IN, Rizvi SK, Shahzad MI, Mirza ZS, Tahseen S, et al. Delay in diagnosis of tuberculosis in Rawalpindi, Pakistan. BMC Res Notes. 2011. 10.1186/1756-0500-4-165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 108.Saqib SE, Ahmad MM, Amezcua-Prieto C, Virginia M-R. Treatment delay among pulmonary tuberculosis patients within the Pakistan National Tuberculosis Control Program. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018;99:143–149. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Coimbra I, Maruza M, de Militão-Albuquerque MFP, Moura LV, Diniz GTN, de Miranda-Filho DB, et al. Associated factors for treatment delay in pulmonary tuberculosis in HIV-infected individuals: a nested case-control study. BMC Infect Dis. 2012. 10.1186/1471-2334-12-208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 110.Sagbakken M, Frich JC, Bjune GA. Perception and management of tuberculosis symptoms in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Qual Health Res. 2008;18:1356–1366. doi: 10.1177/1049732308322596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Tadesse T, Demissie M, Berhane Y, Kebede Y, Abebe M. Long distance travelling and financial burdens discourage tuberculosis DOTs treatment initiation and compliance in Ethiopia: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2013. 10.1186/1471-2458-13-424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 112.Gele AA, Sagbakken M, Abebe F, Bjune GA. Barriers to tuberculosis care: a qualitative study among Somali pastoralists in Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes. 2010. 10.1186/1756-0500-3-86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 113.Mindu C, López-Varela E, Alonso-Menendez Y, Mausse Y, Augusto OJ, Gondo K, et al. Caretakers’ perspectives of paediatric TB and implications for care-seeking behaviours in Southern Mozambique. Graham SM, editor. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0182213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 114.Verhagen LM, Kapinga R, van Rosmalen-Nooijens KAWL. Factors underlying diagnostic delay in tuberculosis patients in a rural area in Tanzania: a qualitative approach. Infection. 2010;38:433–446. doi: 10.1007/s15010-010-0051-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Gosoniu GD, Ganapathy S, Kemp J, Auer C, Somma D, Karim F, et al. Gender and socio-cultural determinants of delay to diagnosis of TB in Bangladesh, India and Malawi. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2008;12:848–55. [PubMed]
- 116.Bam K, Bhatt LP, Thapa R, Dossajee HK, Angdembe MR. Illness perception of tuberculosis (TB) and health seeking practice among urban slum residents of Bangladesh: a qualitative study. BMC Res Notes. 2014 doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Sundaram N, James R, Sreynimol U, Linda P, Yoong J, Saly S, et al. A strong TB programme embedded in a developing primary healthcare system is a lose-lose situation: insights from patient and community perspectives in Cambodia. Health Policy Plan. 2017;32:ii32–42. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 118.Purohit MR, Sharma M, Rosales-Klintz S, Lundborg CS. ‘Multiple-test’ approach to the laboratory diagnosis of tuberculosis-perception of medical doctors from Ujjain, India. BMC Infect Dis. 2015. 10.1186/s12879-015-1037-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 119.Mistry N, Rangan S, Dholakia Y, Lobo E, Shah S, Patil A. Durations and delays in care seeking, diagnosis and treatment initiation in uncomplicated pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Mumbai, India. Hozbor DF, editor. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0152287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 120.Kapoor SK, Raman AV, Sachdeva KS, Satyanarayana S. How did the TB patients reach DOTS services in Delhi? A study of patient treatment seeking behavior. Neyrolles O, editor. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e42458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 121.McArthur E, Bali S, Khan A. Socio-cultural and knowledge-based barriers to tuberculosis diagnosis for women in Bhopal, India. Indian J Community Med. 2016;41:62. doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.170990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Yellappa V, Lefèvre P, Battaglioli T, Devadasan N, Van der Stuyft P. Patients pathways to tuberculosis diagnosis and treatment in a fragmented health system: a qualitative study from a south Indian district. BMC Public Health. 2017. 10.1186/s12889-017-4627-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 123.Rintiswati N, Mahendradhata Y, Suharna, Susilawati, Purwanta, Subronto Y, et al. Journeys to tuberculosis treatment: a qualitative study of patients, families and communities in Jogjakarta, Indonesia. BMC Public Health. 2009. 10.1186/1471-2458-9-158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 124.Dewi C, Barclay L, Passey M, Wilson S. Improving knowledge and behaviours related to the cause, transmission and prevention of Tuberculosis and early case detection: a descriptive study of community led Tuberculosis program in Flores, Indonesia. BMC Public Health. 2016 doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3448-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Oshi DC, Oshi SN, Alobu IN, Ukwaja KN. Gender-related factors influencing women’s health seeking for tuberculosis care in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. J Biosoc Sci. 2016;48:37–50. doi: 10.1017/S0021932014000534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Hu A, Loo E, Winch PJ, Surkan PJ. Filipino women’s tuberculosis care seeking experience in an urban poor setting: a socioecological perspective. Health Care Women Int. 2012;33:29–44. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2011.630495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Cremers AL, Gerrets R, Kapata N, Kabika A, Birnie E, Klipstein-Grobusch K, et al. Tuberculosis patients’ pre-hospital delay and non-compliance with a longstanding DOT programme: a mixed methods study in urban Zambia. BMC Public Health. 2016 doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3771-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Mavhu W, Dauya E, Bandason T, Munyati S, Cowan FM, Hart G, et al. Chronic cough and its association with TB-HIV co-infection: factors affecting help-seeking behaviour in Harare, Zimbabwe. Trop Med Int Health. 2010 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2010.02493.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.de Sa LD, Barreto AJR, de Nogueira JA, Cunha FTS, Palha PF, Villa TCS. The discourse of health managers on aspects related to the delay in tuberculosis diagnosis. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP. 2013;47:1165–71. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 130.Furlan MCR, Silva RLST, Marcon SS. Factors associated with early and late diagnosis of tuberculosis: a descriptive study. Online Braz J Nurs. 2014;13:62–71. doi: 10.5935/1676-4285.20144364. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 131.de Andrade SLE, de Souza Rodrigues DC, Barreto AJR, de Oliveira AAV, do Nascimento Santos ARB, de Sa LD. Tuberculosis among the elderly: health care system gateway and late diagnosis. Revista Enfermagem UERJ. 2016. 10.12957/reuerj.2016.5702.
- 132.Oliveira AAV de, Sá LD de, Nogueira J de A, Andrade SLE de, Palha PF, Villa TCS. Diagnóstico da tuberculose em pessoas idosas: barreiras de acesso relacionadas aos serviços de saúde. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP. 2013;47:145–51. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 133.Strand MA, Duan X, Johnson R, Li Y. Social determinants of delayed diagnosis of tuberculosis in a North China urban setting. Int Q Community Health Educ. 2011;31:279–290. doi: 10.2190/IQ.31.3.f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Wei X, Chen J, Chen P, Newell JN, Li H, Sun C, et al. Barriers to TB care for rural-to-urban migrant TB patients in Shanghai: a qualitative study. Trop Med Int Health. 2009;14:754–760. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2009.02286.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Long Q, Li Y, Wang Y, Yue Y, Tang C, Tang S, et al. Barriers to accessing TB diagnosis for rural-to-urban migrants with chronic cough in Chongqing, China: a mixed methods study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Hutchison C, Khan MS, Yoong J, Lin X, Coker RJ. Financial barriers and coping strategies: a qualitative study of accessing multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and tuberculosis care in Yunnan, China. BMC Public Health. 2017 doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4089-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Kuznetsov VN, Grjibovski AM, Mariandyshev AO, Johansson E, Enarson DA, Bjune GA. Hopelessness as a basis for tuberculosis diagnostic delay in the Arkhangelsk region: a grounded theory study. BMC Public Health. 2013 doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Kuznetsov VN, Grjibovski AM, Mariandyshev AO, Johansson E, Bjune GA. Two vicious circles contributing to a diagnostic delay for tuberculosis patients in Arkhangelsk. Emerg Health Threats J. 2014;7:24909. doi: 10.3402/ehtj.v7.24909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Adams LV, Basu D, Grande SW, Craig SR, Patridge MT, Panth N, et al. Barriers to tuberculosis care delivery among miners and their families in South Africa: an ethnographic study. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2017;21:571–578. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.16.0669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Finnie RKC, Mabunda T, Khoza LB, van den Borne B, Selwyn B, Mullen PD. Pilot study to develop a rapid assessment of tuberculosis care-seeking and adherence practices in rural Limpopo Province, South Africa. Int Q Community Health Educ. 2011;31:3–19. doi: 10.2190/IQ.31.1.b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Skinner D, Claassens M. It’s complicated: why do tuberculosis patients not initiate or stay adherent to treatment? A qualitative study from South Africa. BMC Infect Dis. 2016 doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-2054-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Kerrigan D, West N, Tudor C, Hanrahan CF, Lebina L, Msandiwa R, et al. Improving active case finding for tuberculosis in South Africa: informing innovative implementation approaches in the context of the Kharitode trial through formative research. Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0206-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Murray EJ, Bond VA, Marais BJ, Godfrey-Faussett P, Ayles HM, Beyers N. High levels of vulnerability and anticipated stigma reduce the impetus for tuberculosis diagnosis in Cape Town, South Africa. Health Policy Plan. 2013;28:410–418. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czs072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Skordis-Worrall J, Hanson K, Mills A. Confusion, caring and tuberculosis diagnostic delay in Cape Town, South Africa. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2010;14:171–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Tschirhart N, Nosten F, Foster AM. Access to free or low-cost tuberculosis treatment for migrants and refugees along the Thailand-Myanmar border in Tak province, Thailand. Int J Equity Health. 2016 doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0391-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Wingfield T, Boccia D, Tovar M, Gavino A, Zevallos K, Montoya R, et al. Defining catastrophic costs and comparing their importance for adverse tuberculosis outcome with multi-drug resistance: a prospective cohort study, Peru. PLoS Med. 2014;11:e1001675. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Williams E, Cheng AC, Lane GP, Guy SD. Delays in presentation and diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: a retrospective study of a tertiary health service in Western Melbourne, 2011–2014. Intern Med J. 2018;48:184–193. doi: 10.1111/imj.13551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Abbara A, Collin SM, Kon OM, Buell K, Sullivan A, Barrett J, et al. Time to diagnosis of tuberculosis is greater in older patients: a retrospective cohort review. ERJ Open Res. 2019;5:00228–2018. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00228-2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Lönnroth K, Castro KG, Chakaya JM, Chauhan LS, Floyd K, Glaziou P, et al. Tuberculosis control and elimination 2010–50: cure, care, and social development. Lancet. 2010;375:1814–1829. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60483-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Watts K. Is Australia neglecting the local topography when it comes to catastrophic costs and ending tuberculosis? Trop Med Infect Dis. 2018;3:126. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed3040126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Pareek M, Greenaway C, Noori T, Munoz J, Zenner D. The impact of migration on tuberculosis epidemiology and control in high-income countries: a review. BMC Med. 2016;14:48. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0595-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Lönnroth K, Migliori GB, Abubakar I, D’Ambrosio L, de Vries G, Diel R, et al. Towards tuberculosis elimination: an action framework for low-incidence countries. Eur Respir J. 2015;45:928–952. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00214014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Durrani H. Healthcare and healthcare systems: inspiring progress and future prospects. Mhealth. 2016 doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2306-9740.2016.01.03. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Olaru ID, Albert H, Zallet J, Werner U-E, Ahmed N, Rieder HL, et al. Impact of quality improvement in tuberculosis laboratories in low- and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2018;22:309–320. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.17.0629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Sulis G, Centis R, Sotgiu G, D’Ambrosio L, Pontali E, Spanevello A, et al. Recent developments in the diagnosis and management of tuberculosis. npj Prim Care Respir Med. 2016 doi: 10.1038/npjpcrm.2016.78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Horton KC, MacPherson P, Houben RMGJ, White RG, Corbett EL. Sex differences in tuberculosis burden and notifications in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2016 doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Cazabon D, Alsdurf H, Satyanarayana S, Nathavitharana R, Subbaraman R, Daftary A, et al. Quality of tuberculosis care in high burden countries: the urgent need to address gaps in the care cascade. Int J Infect Dis. 2017;56:111–116. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2016.10.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.World Health Organization . Addressing poverty in TB control: options for national TB control programs. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 159.Fuady A, Houweling TAJ, Mansyur M, Richardus JH. Catastrophic total costs in tuberculosis-affected households and their determinants since Indonesia’s implementation of universal health coverage. Infect Dis Poverty. 2018;7:3. doi: 10.1186/s40249-017-0382-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Prasanna T, Jeyashree K, Chinnakali P, Bahurupi Y, Vasudevan K, Das M. Catastrophic costs of tuberculosis care: a mixed methods study from Puducherry, India. Glob Health Action. 2018 doi: 10.1080/16549716.2018.1477493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Verguet S, Riumallo-Herl C, Gomez GB, Menzies NA, Houben RMGJ, Sumner T, et al. Catastrophic costs potentially averted by tuberculosis control in India and South Africa: a modelling study. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5:e1123–e1132. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30341-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Aljassim N, Ostini R. Health literacy in rural and urban populations: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2020;103:2142–2154. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.von Wagner C, Steptoe A, Wolf MS, Wardle J. Health literacy and health actions: a review and a framework from health psychology. Health Educ Behav. 2009;36:860–77. doi: 10.1177/1090198108322819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Kuddus MA, Tynan E, McBryde E. Urbanization: a problem for the rich and the poor? Public Health Rev. 2020;41:1. doi: 10.1186/s40985-019-0116-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Li Y, Ehiri J, Tang S, Li D, Bian Y, Lin H, et al. Factors associated with patient, and diagnostic delays in Chinese TB patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2013;11:156. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.World Health Organization . Systematic screening for active tuberculosis: an operational guide. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 167.Esmail H, Dodd PJ, Houben RMGJ. Tuberculosis transmission during the subclinical period: could unrelated cough play a part? Lancet Respir Med. 2018;6:244–246. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30105-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Houben RMGJ, Esmail H, Emery JC, Joslyn LR, McQuaid CF, Menzies NA, et al. Spotting the old foe—revisiting the case definition for TB. Lancet Respir Med. 2019;7:199–201. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30038-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Ayles H, Schaap A, Nota A, Sismanidis C, Tembwe R, Haas PD, et al. Prevalence of tuberculosis, HIV and respiratory symptoms in two Zambian communities: implications for tuberculosis control in the era of HIV. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e5602. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Turner RD, Bothamley GH. Cough and the transmission of tuberculosis. J Infect Dis. 2015;211:1367–1372. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Bisallah CI, Rampal L, Lye M-S, Mohd Sidik S, Ibrahim N, Iliyasu Z, et al. Effectiveness of health education intervention in improving knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding Tuberculosis among HIV patients in General Hospital Minna, Nigeria—a randomized control trial. PLoS ONE. 2018 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Jaramillo E. The impact of media-based health education on tuberculosis diagnosis in Cali, Colombia. Health Policy Plan. 2001;16:68–73. doi: 10.1093/heapol/16.1.68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Zwarenstein M, Fairall LR, Lombard C, Mayers P, Bheekie A, English RG, et al. Outreach education for integration of HIV/AIDS care, antiretroviral treatment, and tuberculosis care in primary care clinics in South Africa: PALSA PLUS pragmatic cluster randomised trial. BMJ. 2011 doi: 10.1136/bmj.d2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Gonzalez-Angulo Y, Geldenhuys H, Van As D, Buckerfield N, Shea J, Mahomed H, et al. Knowledge and acceptability of patient-specific infection control measures for pulmonary tuberculosis. Am J Infect Control. 2013;41:717–722. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Craig GM, Daftary A, Engel N, O’Driscoll S, Ioannaki A. Tuberculosis stigma as a social determinant of health: a systematic mapping review of research in low incidence countries. Int J Infect Dis. 2017;56:90–100. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2016.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Meershoek A, Zwerling A, Daftary A, Citro B, Smyth C, Lewis D, et al. TB stigma measurement guidance. Den Haag: KNCV Tuberculosis Foundation; 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 177.Sommerland N, Wouters E, Mitchell EMH, Ngicho M, Redwood L, Masquillier C, et al. Evidence-based interventions to reduce tuberculosis stigma: a systematic review. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2017;21:S81–86. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.16.0788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Berendes S, Heywood P, Oliver S, Garner P. Quality of private and public ambulatory health care in low and middle income countries: systematic review of comparative studies. Jenkins R, editor. PLoS Med. 2011;8:e1000433. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Teo AKJ, Ork C, Eng S, Sok N, Tuot S, Hsu LY, et al. Determinants of delayed diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis in Cambodia: a mixed-methods study. Infect Dis Poverty. 2020;9:49. doi: 10.1186/s40249-020-00665-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Johansson E, Winkvist A. Trust and transparency in human encounters in tuberculosis control: lessons learned from Vietnam. Qual Health Res. 2002;12:473–491. doi: 10.1177/104973202129120025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Deber RB, Kraetschmer N, Irvine J. What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making? Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:1414–1420. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1996.00440120070006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Bodnar O, Link A, Arendacká B, Possolo A, Elster C. Bayesian estimation in random effects meta-analysis using a non-informative prior. Stat Med. 2017;36:378–399. doi: 10.1002/sim.7156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Hartung J, Knapp G. A refined method for the meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials with binary outcome. Stat Med. 2001;20:3875–3889. doi: 10.1002/sim.1009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Teo AKJ, Prem K, Tuot S, Ork C, Eng S, Pande T, et al. Mobilising community networks for early identification of tuberculosis and treatment initiation in Cambodia: an evaluation of a seed-and-recruit model. ERJ Open Res. 2020;6:00368–2019. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00368-2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Daftary A, Frick M, Venkatesan N, Pai M. Fighting TB stigma: we need to apply lessons learnt from HIV activism. BMJ Global Health. 2017;2:e000515. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.World Health Organization. Same-day diagnosis of tuberculosis by microscopy: policy statement. [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011 [cited 2020 Jan 29]. Available from: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789241501606_eng.pdf.
- 187.Davis JL, Dowdy DW, den Boon S, Walter ND, Katamba A, Cattamanchi A. Test and treat: a new standard for smear-positive tuberculosis. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012;61:e6–8. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182614bc5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Lönnroth K, Glaziou P, Weil D, Floyd K, Uplekar M, Raviglione M. Beyond UHC: monitoring health and social protection coverage in the context of tuberculosis care and prevention. PLoS Med. 2014 doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable. All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its Additional file 1.