Abstract
Cortinarius subsalor and C. tibeticisalor, belonging to the section Delibuti, are described from China as new to science. Cortinarius subsalor has been found to be associated with Lithocarpus trees in subtropical China and resembling C. salor, but it differs from the later by having slender basidiomata and the narrower basidiospores. Cortinarius tibeticisalor was collected from eastern Tibetan Plateau, associated with Abies. It differs from other species within sect. Delibuti by having olive tinge of mature or dried basidiomata and bigger basidiospores. The molecular data also support C. subsalor and C. tibeticisalor as new species. The phylogenetic analyses and biogeography of sect. Delibuti are discussed and a key to the species of this section currently known in the world is provided.
Keywords: Agaricales, Biogeography, ITS, Myxacium, New taxon, Phylogeny, Taxonomy
Introduction
Cortinarius (Pers.) Gray is an ectomycorrhizal fungal genus, associated with a wide host range of plants, such as Betulaceae, Caesalpiniaceae, Cistaceae, Dipterocarpaceae, Fagaceae, Myrtaceae, Pinaceae, Rhamnaceae, Rosaceae, Salicaceae and some herbaceous plants (Frøslev, Brandrud & Jeppesen, 2006; Niskanen, 2008). The genus is distributed worldwide with nearly 3,000 species (Niskanen et al., 2018; Ammirati et al., 2021; Bidaud et al., 2021). Even though it is the largest genus among macrofungi, its species diversity is still unclear. Most of Cortinarius species were originally discovered from Europe and America but rarely in Asia and Africa (Horak, 1983; Garrido-Benavent et al., 2020; Xie et al., 2020). Several systems of subgenus and sections in Cortinarius are erected based on the macromorphology of geographically limited samplings, but these are not supported by phylogenetic studies (e.g. Fries, 1838; Trog, 1844; Orton, 1955; Bidaud, Moënne-Loccoz & Reumaux, 1994; Garnica, Weiß & Oberwinkler, 2003; Garnica et al., 2005; Harrower et al., 2011; Stensrud et al., 2014; Niskanen et al., 2015; Garnica et al., 2016; Soop et al., 2019). For example, Garnica et al. (2005) proposed natural classification system in Cortinarius involving the taxonomic rearrangement of the species into eight informal clades. Soop et al. (2019) presented a section-based taxonomy of Cortinarius based on four loci of a large global sampling.
Cortinarius sect. Delibuti (Fr.) Sacc. with characteristics of viscid pileus and stipe, have usually been considered as a section in subg. Myxacium (Fr.) Trog (Trog, 1844; Earle, 1902; Orton, 1955; Brandrud et al., 1989; Consiglio, Antonini & Antonini, 2003). Delibuti species can easily be distinguished by the anomaloid appearances, mild taste and subglobose basidiospores from other myxacioid species (Orton, 1955; Soop, 2014). Section Delibuti was also considered to belong to subg. Phlegmacium (Fr.) Trog (Bidaud, Moënne-Loccoz & Reumaux, 1992; Bidaud, Moënne-Loccoz & Reumaux, 1994). Recently, Soop et al. (2019) treated sect. Delibuti among anomaloid sections, not in myxacioid sections based on the shared characters of sect. Delibuti and sect. Anomali Konrad & Maubl., together with support in the phylogenetic analyses. In the past, numeral species were assigned to section Delibuti (Fries, 1838; Earle, 1902; Bidaud, Moënne-Loccoz & Reumaux, 1992; Soop, 2013; Soop, 2014); however, most species have been confirmed not to belong to this section (Orton, 1955; Consiglio, 2012; Dima et al., 2016; Soop et al., 2019). Soop et al. (2019) defined only ten species in sect. Delibuti, but the phylogenetic studies showed that the species diversity of this section is still unrevealed (Harrower et al., 2011; Garnica et al., 2016; Soop et al., 2019).
In China, over 237 Cortinairus species, including several new species, have been described from China (Wei & Yao, 2013; Xie et al., 2019; Xie et al., 2020; Xie et al., 2021; Yuan et al., 2020; Luo & Bau, 2021). Four species within sect. Delibuti, C. betulinus J. Favre from Heilongjiang, C. delibutus Fr. from Heilongjiang, Jilin, Qinghai, Sichuan and Yunnan, C. illibatus Fr. from Ningxia, and C. salor Fr. from Heilongjiang, Jilin, Liaoning and Inner Mongolia, were reported (e.g. Teng, 1963; Yuan & Sun, 1995; Shao & Xiang, 1997; Li & Azbukina, 2011; Xie, 2018; Wang et al., 2020), but the occurrence of species in China is controversial due to the lack of voucher specimens.
In this study, we have conducted taxonomic and phylogenetic studies of Cortinairus in China. Some glutinously violet Cortinarius specimens resembling C. salor were found during the intensive field work but during the identification process they turned out to be new species which we describe here based on morphological and ecological characteristics, as well as phylogenetic analyses evidences. We also discuss the phylogenetic relationship and biogeography of sect. Delibuti. A key is provided the species of sect. Delibuti.
Materials & methods
Specimens and morphological description
Specimens were collected from Zhejiang Province and Tibet Autonomous Region, respectively. The collection sites in Zhejiang are the subtropical areas with the evergreen broadleaf forests dominated by Lithocarpus brevicaudatus. Meanwhile, the collection sites in Tibet are the plateau-alpine areas with coniferous forests dominated by Abies georgei var. smithii. Fresh basidiomata were photographed in the field. Dried specimens were deposited in the Herbarium of Mycology, Jilin Agricultural University (HMJAU), Changchun, China. Macroscopic characteristics were measured and recorded for every basidiomata and color codes followed Kornerup & Wanscher (1978). Microscopic features were examined and described in 5% KOH, Congo Red or Melzer’s reagent and observed using a Zeiss AX10 light microscope. Thirty to forty mature basidiospores were measured (excluding apiculus and ornamentation) per collection. Q = variation in the L/W ratios between the specimens studied. Xav. and Qav. = average value of basidiospores of per specimen.
Phylogenetic reconstruction
DNA extraction, PCR amplifications, and sequencing methods followed Xie et al. (2019) and Guan & Zhao (2020). The primers ITS1F and ITS4 were used amplification of nrDNA ITS region (White et al., 1990; Gardes & Bruns, 1993). The newly generated ITS sequences were submitted to GenBank. The ITS sequences for the phylogenetic analyses were selected based on results of BLASTn (>90% identity) in GenBank and UNITE and followed the publication by Garnica et al. (2016) and Soop et al. (2019). Two species in section Cyanites Nespiak were chosen as outgroup followed Xie et al. (2021).
Sequences (Table 1) for the phylogenetic analyses were aligned and edited with BioEdit 7.1.3.0 and Clustal X (Thompson et al., 1997; Hall, 1999). For phylogenetic analyses, Bayesian Inference (BI), Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Maximum Parsimony (MP) methods were implemented in this study. MrModeltest 2.3 was used to calculate the best model (HKY+I+G) for BI analysis (Nylander et al., 2008). The BI analysis was performed with MrBayes 3.2.6 (Ronquist & Huelsenbeck, 2003). Four Markov chains were run for 500,000 generations until the split deviation frequency value < 0.01, and sampled every 100th generation. The posterior probability values were estimated from the samples after discarding the first 25% (1,250) generations. A 50% majority rule consensus tree of all remaining trees were calculated. RAxML v. 1.5, implemented in raxmlGUI, were used to construct a ML tree, with a rapid bootstrapping algorithm involving 1,000 replicates (Silvestro & Michalak, 2012; Stamatakis, 2014). All parameters in the ML analysis were kept as defaults except for GTRGAMMA were chose as the model. The MP analysis was conducted in MEGA X (Kumar et al., 2018). The most parsimonious tree with length = 1,012 is shown. The consistency index is (0.442350), the retention index is (0.708912), and the composite index is 0.355860 (0.313587) for all sites and parsimony-informative sites (in parentheses). The bootstrap test was performed 1,000 replicates (Felsenstein, 1985). The MP tree was obtained using the Tree-Bisection-Regrafting (TBR) algorithm (Nei & Kumar, 2000) with search level 3 in which the initial trees were obtained by the random addition of sequences (10 replicates). The phylogenetic trees were visualized in FigTree 1.4.3. The Bayesian posterior probabilities values (BPP) ≥ 0.95, ML bootstrap values (ML) ≥ 75% or MP bootstrap values (MP) ≥ 75% are shown on the branches at the nodes (BPP/ML/MP).
Table 1. ITS sequences used in the phylogenetic analyses.
Species | Voucher | Locality | Accession No. | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
C. acutovelatus | F16388 (UBC) | Canada | FJ039609 | Harrower et al. (2011) |
C. albocyaneus Epitype | CFP1177 (S) | Sweden, Jämtland | KX302206 | Dima et al. (2016) |
C. alpinus | HMJAU44407 | China, Inner Mongolia | MW911727 | This study |
C. anomalus Neotype | CFP1154 (S) | Sweden, Ångermanland | KX302224 | Dima et al. (2016) |
C. basipurpureus | PERTH 04259629 | Australia | AY669607 | Garnica et al. (2005) |
C. bolaris | TUB 0118524 | Germany | AY669596 | Garnica et al. (2005) |
C. boreicyanites Holotype | CFP931 (S) | Sweden, Jämtland | NR130214 | Liimatainen et al. (2014) |
C. calaisopus | 60224 (OTA) | New Zealand | MN846380 | GenBank |
C. calaisopus Holotype | PDD 94050 | New Zealand, Dunedin | NR157880 | GenBank |
C. camphoratus | DAVFP26155 | Canada | EU821659 | Harrower et al. (2011) |
C. camphoratus | SMI193 | Canada | FJ039626 | Harrower et al. (2011) |
C. carneoroseus | EN76 (CORD) | Argentina | JX983157 | GenBank |
C. collinitus | IB 19940257 | Sweden | AY033096 | Peintner et al. (2002) |
C. croceocoeruleus | TUB 011833 | Germany | AY669590 | Garnica et al. (2005) |
C. cyanites Neotype | AT2005069 (UPS) | Sweden, Uppland | NR130233 | Liimatainen et al. (2014) |
C. cypripedi Holotype | PDD 107723 | New Zealand, Otago | KT875199 | Soop (2016) |
C. cystidiocatenatus | HO A20518A6 | Australia, Tasmania | AY669651 | Garnica et al. (2005) |
C. delibutus | F17048 (UBC) | Canada | FJ717515 | Harrower et al. (2011) |
C. delibutus | SAT01-301-12 | USA | FJ717513 | Harrower et al. (2011) |
C. durifoliorum Holotype | PDD 101829 | New Zealand, Westland | KJ635210 | Soop, Wallace & Dima (2018) |
C. eunomalus | PDD 107706 | New Zealand | KT875201 | GenBank |
C. illibatus | HMJAU48760 | China, Heilongjiang | MW911735 | This study |
C. illibatus | AT2004220 (UPS) | Sweden | UDB002173 | UNITE |
C. illitus Holotype | IB 19630414 | Argentina | AF389128 | Peintner, Moncalvo & Vilgalys (2004) |
C. illitus | MQ19-CMMF003109 | Canada, Quebec | MN751331 | GenBank |
C. illuminus Neotype | F44877 (S) | Sweden | KP866156 | Niskanen et al. (2015) |
C. khinganensis Holotype | HMJAU44507 | China, Inner Mongolia | MT299952 | Xie et al. (2021) |
C. microglobisporus Holotype | IB 20110123 | Italy | NR153027 | Peintner et al. (2014) |
C. obtusus | SAT00-298-30 | USA | FJ717550 | Harrower et al. (2011) |
C. phlegmophorus | Typus-M3 | India | AY083186 | Peintner et al. (2003) |
C. pluvius | HMJAU44391 | China, Inner Mongolia | MW911726 | This study |
C. porphyroideus | 61406 (OTA) | New Zealand | JX178612 | Teasdale et al. (2013) |
C. pseudocandelaris | F17165 OC93 (UBC) | Canada, BC | GQ159908 | Harrower et al. (2011) |
C. psilomorphus Holotype | PDD 103885 | New Zealand | KF727393 | Soop (2016) |
C. putorius Holotype | TN 07-411 (H) | USA | NR153038 | Ariyawansa et al. (2015) |
C. pyrenaicus | JB-8573/15 | Spain, Gisclareny | KX239900 | Cadiñanos, Gomez & Ballarà (2016) |
C. rattinoides Holotype | PDD 88283 | New Zealand | JX000375 | GenBank |
C. rotundisporus | PERTH 05255074 | Australia | AY669612 | Garnica et al. (2005) |
C. rotundisporus | G12 | Australia | AF136738 | Sawyer, Chambers & Cairney (1999) |
C. salor | IB 19940297 | Austria | UDB001066 | Peintner et al. (2001) |
C. salor | TUB 011838 | Germany | AY669592 | Garnica et al. (2005) |
C. salor II | TUF106868 | Estonia | UDB011268 | UNITE |
C. salor II | TAAM128516 | Estonia | UDB015945 | UNITE |
C. septentrionalis | ARAN Fungi03516 | Sweden, Harjedalen | KX239915 | Cadiñanos, Gomez & Ballarà (2016) |
C. spilomeus Neotype | TEB CFP1137 (S) | Sweden | KX302267 | Dima et al. (2016) |
C. stillatitus | TUB 011587 | Germany | AY669589 | Garnica et al. (2005) |
C. subsalor | HMJAU48758 | China, Zhejiang | MW911733 | This study |
C. subsalor Holotype | HMJAU48759 | China, Zhejiang | MW911734 | This study |
C. subsalor | MHHNU 30409 | China, Hunan | MK250915 | GenBank |
C. suecicolor Holotype | PDD 74698 | New Zealand | JX000360 | GenBank |
C. tabularis Epitype | CFP949 (S) | Sweden | KX302275 | Dima et al. (2016) |
C. tasmacamphoratus | HO A20606A0 | Tasmania | AY669633 | Garnica et al. (2005) |
C. tessiae | PDD 94054 | New Zealand, Dunedin | JQ287698 | GenBank |
C. tessiae | PDD 72611 | New Zealand | HM060317 | GenBank |
C. tibeticisalor | HMJAU48761 | China, Tibet | MW911731 | This study |
C. tibeticisalor | HMJAU48762 | China, Tibet | MW911732 | This study |
C. tibeticisalor | HMJAU48763 | China, Tibet | MW911730 | This study |
C. tibeticisalor Holotype | HMJAU48764 | China, Tibet | MW911729 | This study |
C. vanduzerensis | VMS28 | Canada | FJ717562 | Harrower et al. (2011) |
C. vibratilis | IB 19970078 | USA | AF325584 | Peintner et al. (2001) |
C. sp. | CSU CO 2476 | Colombia, Antioquia | MF599228 | GenBank |
C. sp. | FLAS-F-60161 | USA | MF153022 | GenBank |
C. sp. | YM714 | Japan, Hokkaido | LC175538 | GenBank |
C. sp. | 1780 | Italy | JF907917 | Osmundson et al. (2013) |
C. sp. | SWUBC500 | Canada | DQ481723 | Wright, Berch & Berbee (2009) |
C. sp. | PDD 72685 | New Zealand | MH101524 | GenBank |
Note:
New species is in bold.
Nomenclature
The electronic version of this article in Portable Document Format (PDF) will represent a published work according to the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants, and hence the new names contained in the electronic version are effectively published under that Code from the electronic edition alone. In addition, new names contained in this work have been submitted to MycoBank from where they will be made available to the Global Names Index. The unique MycoBank number can be resolved and the associated information viewed through any standard web browser by appending the MycoBank number contained in this publication to the prefix “http://www.mycobank.org/MycoTaxo.aspx?Link=T&Rec=”. The online version of this work is archived and available from the following digital repositories: PeerJ, PubMed Central, and CLOCKSS.
Results
BLASTn results
The BLASTn against GenBank and UNITE databases taked the holotype specimens as the examples. The BLASTn results showed that these two new species distinct from other members of Cortinarius and close to sect. Delibuti. The ITS sequence of C. subsalor (MW911734, holotype) has 99% identity with C. salor (MK250915). Here we addressed it as C. subsalor. The percent identity of C. subsalor with C. salor s.l. (AY669592, UDB015945) and C. delibutus (FJ717515) are 96% and 95%, respectively. The ITS sequence of C. tibeticisalor (MW911729, holotype) has 93%, 91%, 90% identity with Cortinarius sp. (LC098750), C. delibutus (FJ717515) and C. tessiae (JQ287698), respectively.
Phylogenetic analyses
The matrix contained 66 ITS sequences with 767 nucleotide sites is available from TreeBASE under S28399 (https://www.treebase.org/treebase-web/search/study/summary.html?id=28399). The BI, ML and MP results showed similar topologies and ML tree was selected as the backbone phylogeny (Fig. 1). The phylogenetic analyses showed 11 sections including one singleton species from Argentina, and two singletons from New Zealand. Every section formed separate monophyletic lineages with strong statistical support. Section Delibuti formed a distinct clade (BPP = 0.96) separate from other sections. Section Delibuti split into five main clades based on the analyses of ITS sequences. Clade A and B consist of Australasian species. Clade C is a clade including our new species from the Tibetan Plateau. Clade D consist of the species distributed in Europe, Asia and North and South America. Clade E represents species in the Northern Hemisphere. Cortinarius subsalor (BPP/ML/MP = 1.00/100%/100%, clade E) and C. tibeticisalor (BPP/ML/MP = 1.00/100%/100%, clade C) formed a dinstinct lineages with high statistical support, respectively. Furthermore, C. subsalor formed a sister relationship with the European C. salor (BPP = 0.97, clade E).
Figure 1. ML phylogram inferred from nrDNA ITS sequence data.
The tree is rooted with sect. Cyanites. The Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) ≥ 0.95, ML bootstrap values (ML) ≥ 75% and MP bootstrap values (MP) ≥ 75% are shown on the branches (BPP/ML/MP). New species is marked by blue bold.
Taxonomy
Cortinarius subsalor M.L. Xie, T.Z. Wei & Y. Li, sp. nov.
MycoBank No. MB839320
(Fig. 2)
Figure 2. Cortinarius susalor.
(A) HMJAU48759 (Holotype). (B) HMJAU48758. (C, E) Basidiospores (HMJAU48759). (D, F) Pileipellis (HMJAU48759). (Photo credits: (A) Jun-Liang Chen; (B)–(F) Meng-Le Xie).
Etymology. The name refers to its affinity to Cortinarius salor.
Holotype. CHINA. Zhejiang: Baishanzu Mountain, Qingyuan county, on moist soil under Lithocarpus brevicaudatus (Fagaceae) forest with scattered Theaceae and Rhododendron, 27°45′44″N, 119°11′50″E, ASL 1,510 m, 20 July 2020, Jun-Liang Chen, QY-0235(1192-1198) (HMJAU48759), GenBank: MW911734.
Diagnosis. Pileus hemispherical to plane, violet, glutinous; lamellae violet at first, then turning pale grayish violet; stipe slender, pale violet, then brown; glutinous veil violet. Basidiospores on average 8.0–8.3 × 6.9–7.0 µm, subglobose to broadly ellipsoid. Differing from other species in sect. Delituti by the violet color of basidiomata, the distribution of subtropical China and association with Lithocarpus brevicaudatus.
Description
Pileus 20–50 mm, hemispherical at first, then convex to applanate; bluish violet (18B6-18C7) at first, purple (15B6-15C7) to purplish red (14A6-14B7) at the centre, then grayish violet (17B4-17C5), pale violet (19A3) at the margin; surface glutinous. Lamellae emarginate; moderately crowded; violet (17B6) when young, then grayish violet (17B4-17C5) to pale grayish violet (15B1-15C2); edge almost even. Stipe slender, 35–65 mm long, 3–7 mm thick, clavate at base (up to 14 mm); pale violet to grayish violet (19A3-19B5), later whitish, lightly brown to brown (7D6-7E7); surface with viscid universal veil, basal mycelium white with bluish tinge. Universal veil viscid, violet, remnants forming a girdle on the upper part of the stipe, disappearing with age. Context whitish at the pileus, slightly with yellowish tinge at the center, pale violet tinge extend outward, hygrophanous near lamellae; white with pale violet tinge at the apex of the stipe, yellow at the lower part; somewhat hollow within stipe. Odor not significant, taste mild.
Basidiospores 7.7–9.5 (10.6) × 6.2–7.7 (8.7) µm, Q = 1.10–1.29 (holotype), Xav. = 8.0–8.3 × 6.9–7.0 µm, Qav. = 1.20, subglobose to broadly ellipsoid, moderately coarsely verrucose, moderately dextrinoid. Basidia 4-spored. Lamellar edges fertile. Pileipellis: epicutis strongly gelatinous, about 180–250 µm thick, with hyphae 2–7 µm wide, yellowish to colorless in 5% KOH, some hyphae with small encrusted granules. Hypodermium present; hypodermial hyphae 4–10 µm wide, cylindrical, almost colorless in 5% KOH, smooth. Clamp connections present.
Exsiccatae. Pileus grayish violet (19B3-19C4) at the margin, light brown to dark brown (6D6-6F8) at the centre; lamellae rust brown (6E8); stipe brown (6D7-6E7), lighter downwards, yellowish white (4A2) at base.
ITS sequence. The ITS sequence of the holotype is distinct from other members of sect. Delibuti and deviating from them by at least 22 substitutions and indel positions.
Ecology and distribution. In subtropical evergreen broadleaf forests, associated with Lithocarpus brevicaudatus (Fagaceae). Known from Zhejiang and Hunan province of China.
Additional specimens examined. CHINA. Zhejiang: Baishanzu Mountain, Qingyuan county, on moist soil under Lithocarpus brevicaudatus (Fagaceae) forest with scattered Theaceae and Rhododendron, 27°45′55″N, 119°11′0″E, ASL 1500 m, 20 August 2020, Meng-Le Xie, 20xml12101 (HMJAU48758), GenBank: MW911733.
Cortinarius tibeticisalor M.L. Xie, T.Z. Wei & Y. Li, sp. nov.
MycoBank No. MB839321
(Fig. 3)
Figure 3. Cortinarius tibeticisalor.
(A) HMJAU48764 (Holotype). (B) HMJAU48762. (C, E) Basidiospores (HMJAU48764). (D, F) Pileipellis (HMJAU48764). (Photo credits: Meng-Le Xie).
Etymology. The name refers to the Tibetan Plateau, the type locality, and its similarity to C. salor.
Holotype. CHINA. Tibet Autonomous Region: Sejila Mountain, Linzhi city, on moist soil in Abies forest with scattered Rhododendron, 29°35′26″N, 94°35′53″E, ASL 4120 m, 5 September 2020, Meng-Le Xie, 20xml12416 (HMJAU48764), GenBank: MW911729.
Diagnosis. Pileus hemispherical to applanate, violet, glutinous, margin wavy, somewhat olive when mature; lamellae for a long time violet, then pale grayish violet to violet gray; stipe robust, bluish gray to brown with olive tinge; veil glutinous, violet. Basidiospores on average 10.3–10.8 × 8.7–8.9 µm, subglobose to broadly ellipsoid, rarely ellipsoid. Differing from other species in sect. Delituti by the olive tinge of basidiomata and the large basidiospores.
Description
Pileus 50–85 mm, hemispherical at first, then convex to plane, sometimes slightly depressed, wavy at margin of mature basidiomata, violet (17C7) at first, especially at the centre, paler violet towards the margin, then grayish orange (5B5) to brown (5D6-5E7) with olive tinge, dark at the centre; surface glutinous. Lamellae emarginate, moderately crowded, persistently violet (17C7), then grayish violet (19B4-19C6) to violet gray (19B2); edge uneven, slightly serrate. Stipe 85–120 mm long, 10–15 mm thick, clavate at base (up to 23 mm); surface with viscid bluish gray (19B2) universal veil remnants, then becoming yellow to brown with olive tinge (4B6-4D7), grayish violet (19B4-19C6) at the apex; basal mycelium white. Universal veil viscid, violet, remnants forming a girdle on the upper part of the stipe, dispearing with age. Context white with marbled violet tinge at first, slightly yellowish from the center of the pileus, then yellow at the stipe, especially at the middle. Odor weak when fresh, somewhat like honey when old or dry. Taste mild.
Basidiospores 9.7–10.9 (12.6) × 7.7–9.0 (10.0) µm, Q = 1.13–1.30 (holotype), Xav. = 10.3–10.8 × 8.7–8.9 µm, Qav. = 1.20–1.23, subglobose to broadly ellipsoid, rarely ellipsoid, moderately coarsely verrucose, weakly dextrinoid. Basidia 4-spored. Lamellar edges fertile, with narrow clavate cells. Pileipellis: epicutis strongly gelatinous, about 300–410 µm thick, hyphae 3–8 µm wide, with yellowish intracellular pigment in 5% KOH, smooth. Hypodermium present, hyphae 7–15 µm wide, irregular, almost colorless in 5% KOH, smooth. Clamp connections present.
Exsiccatae. Pileus olive brown (4E6-4F7) at margin, yellowish brown (5D7-5E8) at centre; lamellae dark bluish gray (19E2-19F2); stipe bluish white at apex, light brown (6D6-6E7) to dark brown (6F4-6F8), white at base.
ITS sequence. The ITS sequence of the holotype is distinct from other members of sect. Delibuti and deviating from them by at least 40 substitutions and indel positions.
Ecology and distribution. In plateau-alpine coniferous forests, associated with Abies (Pinaceae) trees. Known from Tibetan Plateau of China.
Additional specimens examined. CHINA. Tibet Autonomous Region: Sejila Mountain, Linzhi city, on moist soil under Abies forest with scattered Rhododendron, 29°35′25″N, 94°35′55″E, ASL 4170 m, 28 August 2019, Meng-Le Xie, 19xml10976 (HMJAU48761), GenBank MW911731, 19xml10981 (HMJAU48762), GenBank MW911732; Sejila Mountain, Linzhi city, on moist soil under Abies forest with scattered Rhododendron, 29°35′26″ N, 94°35′53″E, ASL 4120 m, 5 September 2020, Meng-Le Xie, 20xml12395 (HMJAU48763), GenBank: MW911730.
Key to species of sect. Delibuti
1 Distributed in Northern Hemisphere 2
- Distributed in Southern Hemiphere 9
2. Pileus usually yellowish to ochraceous without blue 3
- Pileus more or less violet to blue when young, sometimes partly yellow 4
3. Lamellae usually blue when young, veil yellowish C. delibutus
- Lamellae pinkish ochraceous clay, veil not yellowish C. illibatus
4. Pileus frankly blue when young, stipe bluish, veil violet 5
- Pileus grayish blue to olive brown, stipe pale, veil different 7
5. Basidiomata usually small, lamellae violet, then grayish to brownish, stipe usually slender (< 10 mm), base white with bluish tinge, basidiospores on average 8.0–8.3 × 6.9–7.0 µm, subglobose to broadly ellipsoid, distributed in subtropical China, associated with Lithocarpus brevicaudatus C. subsalor
- Basidiomata usually bigger, lamellae persistently lilaceous or bluish, stipe usually more robust (> 10 mm thick) 6
6. Pileus usually staining buff or fading from the centre, stipe base usually grayish brown, basidiospores 7–9 × 6–8 µm, globose to subglobose, distributed in Europue, associated with deciduous and coniferous trees C. salor
- Pileus usually olive brown when mature, stipe base usually white, basidiospores 10.3–10.8 × 8.7–8.9 µm, subglobose to broadly ellipsoid, rarely ellipsoid, distributed in Tibetan Plateau of China, associated with Abies C. tibeticisalor
7. Basidiomata small, pileus yellow to olive-ochre at the centre, grayish blue towards the margin, soon fading, veil yellow, basidiospores 7.5–9.5 × 6.5–7.5 µm, subglobose, associated with Betula . C. betulinus
- Basidiomata robust, associated with coniferous forests 8
8. Pileus usually olive brown with a violet margin, veil olive brown, basidiospores 8–10 × 7–8 µm, globose, associated with Picea C. transiens
- Pileus not olive brown, but prefer orange tinge, basidiospores 7.5–9.5×6.5–7.5 µm, subglobose, usually associated with Abies, rarely occur in Picea forests C. largodelibutus
9. Associated with Nothofagus 10
- Associated with Myrtaceae trees 11
10. Pileus viscid, blue-green to aerugineous, stipe blue green, basidiospores 6.5–8.5 × 6–7 µm, subglobose, destributed in Australasia C. tessiae
- Pileus glutinous, greyish yellow to greyish orange, stipe violet, then becoming white to pale brownish, basidiospores ellipsoid, destributed in North and South America C. illitus
11. Basidiomata distinctly viscid to glutinous, mainly greyish blue-green, basidiospores 7–9 × 7–8 µm, globose to subglobose C. rotundisporus
- Basidiomata weakly viscid, stipe often dry, mainly yellow-green to olive, Veil orange to ochraceous, basidiospores 6–7.5 × 5.5–6.5 µm, subglobose C. calaisopus
Discussion
Cortinarius subsalor is similar to C. betulinus, C. salor and C. transiens (Melot) Soop due to the bluish tinge of the basiodiomata. However, C. betulinus is usually grayish blue at the margin of the pileus and soon fading, the stipe is often pale and the veil usually is yellow (Kibby, 2005; Niskanen et al., 2008; Soop, 2014). The pileus of C. transiens has a violet tone towards the margin, while the centre is more olive gray to yellowish brown even in young specimens, the stipe is pale, and the gelatinous veil is olive brown (Soop, 1990, 2014). In China, sometimes some bluish myxacioid species have been misidentified as C. salor (MHHNU30409, GenBank: MK250915), collected from Hunan Province. Our phylogenetic analyses showed that this sequence belong to the new species C. subsalor. Cortinarius salor has persistently lilaceous lamellae, the stipe is more robust (>10 mm thick) and the base is more grayish brown, the basidiospores are rounder (7–9 × 6–8 µm), and it occurs in European woodlands (Orton, 1955; Consiglio, Antonini & Antonini, 2003; Soop, 2014). Based on these features, C. salor can be distinguished from the Asian C. subsalor.
Cortinarius tibeticisalor is characterized by the basidiomata usually violet when young, then grayish orange to brown with an olive tinge, larger basidiospores and a restricted distribution in the Tibetan Plateau. Cortinarius tibeticisalor is similar to C. salor in young stage, however, the basidiospores (7–9 × 6–8 µm) of C. salor are significantly smaller and rounder, and the basidiomata never have olive tinge (Orton, 1955; Consiglio, Antonini & Antonini, 2003; Soop, 2014).
According to our phylogenetic analyses, sect. Delibuti demonstrates a widely distributed lineage of Cortinarius, in both the Northern and Southern Hemispheres. This bihemispherical distribution is also seen in several other lineages in Cortinarius, such as Anomali, Bolares, Camphorati, Defibulati, Illumini, and Vibratiles, this is concordant with other studies (e.g. Harrower et al., 2015; Garnica et al., 2016; Soop et al., 2019). The nrDNA ITS region is not suitable to draw conclusions for comprehensive phylogenetic evaluation, however, there are some interesting patterns indicated in sect. Delibuti to be further discussed. The basal lineages (clade A and B) of Delibuti are solely distributed in the Australasia showing a presumable origin of this section in Australasia. Interestingly, clade D contains species from multiple continents in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres. Some species are distributed in Asia (Cortinarius sp., LC175538), in Europe (Cortinarius sp., JF907917), and South America, like Cortinarius sp. (MF599228) from Colombia and C. illitus Moser & Horak (1975) originally described from Argentina, but also found in North America (according to the sequences in GenBank).These patterns could explain that the evolution of sect. Delibuti is limited to the ectomycorrhizal host specificity, as well as geographic barriers (Wang & Qiu, 2006; Brandrud, 1996; Wilson, Hosaka & Mueller, 2017; Feng et al., 2016). The evolution and origin of sect. Delibuti, including the genus Cortinarius will be a subject for future research.
Supplemental Information
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the two reviewers, Tai-Hui Li and Chang-Lin Zhao, for their constructive comments and suggestions on the manuscript. We thank to Dr. Rong Xie and Ms. Hui-Juan Sun (Tibet Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences) and Mr. Ju-Zuo Li (Life Science College, Northeast Normal University) for their kind help in the fieldwork. We also thank to Mr. Ji-Peng Li and Yang Wang (Engineering Research Center of Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Ministry of Education, Jilin Agricultural University) for their kind help in the molecular studies.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by the China Agriculture Research System (No. CARS20), Overseas Expertise Introduction Project for Discipline Innovation (No. D17014), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31270072), the Special Funds for the Young Scholars of Taxonomy of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. ZSBR-001), the National Key Research and Development program of China (No. 2019YFC1604703). The work of Bálint Dima was supported by the ELTE Thematic Excellence Program 2020 (TKP2020-IKA-05) financed by the National Research, Development and Innovation Office. There was no additional external funding received for this study. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Contributor Information
Tie-Zheng Wei, Email: weitz@im.ac.cn.
Yu Li, Email: liyu@jlau.edu.cn.
Additional Information and Declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Author Contributions
Meng-Le Xie conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Jun-Liang Chen conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Chayanard Phukhamsakda analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Bálint Dima analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Yong-Ping Fu analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Rui-Qing Ji conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Ke Wang performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.
Tie-Zheng Wei conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Yu Li conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
DNA Deposition
Data Availability
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
The matrix of newly generated ITS sequences is available in the Supplemental Files.
The ITS matrix for phylogenetic analyses is available in the Supplemental Files and at TreeBASE: S28399. It is also available at Figshare: Xie, Meng-Le; Chen, Jun-Liang; Phukhamsakda, Chayanard; Dima, Bálint; Fu, Yong-Ping; Ji, Rui-Qing; et al. (2021): Cortinarius subsalor and C. tibeticisalor spp. nov., two new species from the section Delibuti from China. figshare. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.15982146.v1
https://treebase.org/treebase-web/search/study/summary.html?id=28399.
New Species Registration
The following information was supplied regarding the registration of a newly described species:
Publication LSID: Cortinarius subsalor M.L. Xie, T.Z. Wei & Y. Li, sp. nov. MycoBank No. MB839320
Cortinarius tibeticisalor M.L. Xie, T.Z. Wei & Y. Li, sp. nov. MycoBank No. MB839321
References
- Ammirati et al. (2021).Ammirati J, Liimatainen K, Bojantchev D, Peintner U, Kuhnert-Finkernagel R, Cripps C, Dentinger D, Niskanen T. Cortinarius subgenus Leprocybe, unexpected diversity and significant differences in species compositions between western and eastern North America. Persoonia. 2021;46:216–239. doi: 10.3767/persoonia.2021.46.08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ariyawansa et al. (2015).Ariyawansa HA, Hyde KD, Jayasiri SC, Buyck B, Chethana KWT, Dai DQ, Dai YC, Daranagama DA, Jayawardena RS, Lücking R, Ghobad-Nejhad M, Niskanen T, Thambugala KM, Voigt K, Zhao RL, Li G-J, Doilom M, Boonmee S, Yang ZL, Cai Q, Cui Y-Y, Bahkali AH, Chen J, Cui BK, Chen JJ, Dayarathne MC, Dissanayake AJ, Ekanayaka AH, Hashimoto A, Hongsanan S, Jones EBG, Larsson E, Li WJ, Li Q-R, Liu JK, Luo ZL, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Mapook A, McKenzie EHC, Norphanphoun C, Konta S, Pang KL, Perera RH, Phookamsak R, Phukhamsakda C, Pinruan U, Randrianjohany E, Singtripop C, Tanaka K, Tian CM, Tibpromma S, Abdel-Wahab MA, Wanasinghe DN, Wijayawardene NN, Zhang J-F, Zhang H, Abdel-Aziz FA, Wedin M, Westberg M, Ammirati JF, Bulgakov TS, Lima DX, Callaghan TM, Callac P, Chang C-H, Coca LF, Dal-Forno M, Dollhofer V, Fliegerová Křina, Greiner K, Griffith GW, Ho H-M, Hofstetter V, Jeewon R, Kang JC, Wen T-C, Kirk PM, Kytövuori I, Lawrey JD, Xing J, Li H, Liu ZY, Liu XZ, Liimatainen K, Lumbsch HT, Matsumura M, Moncada B, Nuankaew S, Parnmen S, de Azevedo Santiago Aé LCM, Sommai S, Song Y, de Souza CAF, de Souza-Motta CM, Su HY, Suetrong S, Wang Y, Wei S-F, Wen TC, Yuan HS, Zhou LW, Réblová M, Fournier J, Camporesi E, Luangsa-ard JJ, Tasanathai K, Khonsanit A, Thanakitpipattana D, Somrithipol S, Diederich P, Millanes AM, Common RS, Stadler M, Yan JY, Li XH, Lee HW, Nguyen TTT, Lee HB, Battistin E, Marsico O, Vizzini A, Vila J, Ercole E, Eberhardt U, Simonini G, Wen H-A, Chen X-H, Miettinen O, Spirin V, Hernawati Fungal diversity notes 111–252—taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity. 2015;75(1):27–274. doi: 10.1007/s13225-015-0346-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bidaud et al. (2021).Bidaud A, Loizides M, Armada F, de Dios Reyes J, Carteret X, Corriol G, Consiglio G, Reumaux P, Bellanger J-M. Cortinarius subgenus Leprocybe in Europe: expanded Sanger and next generation sequencing unveil unexpected diversity in the Mediterranean. Persoonia. 2021;46:188–215. doi: 10.3767/persoonia.2021.46.07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bidaud, Moënne-Loccoz & Reumaux (1992).Bidaud A, Moënne-Loccoz P, Reumaux P. Atlas des cortinaires IV. Meyzieu: Éditions Fédération Mycologique Dauphiné-Savoie; 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Bidaud, Moënne-Loccoz & Reumaux (1994).Bidaud A, Moënne-Loccoz P, Reumaux P. Atlas des cortinaires: clé générale des sousgenres, sections, sous-sections et séries. Meyzieu: Éditions Fédération Mycologique Dauphiné-Savoie; 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Brandrud (1996).Brandrud TE. Cortinarius, subgenus Phlegmacium, section Phlegmacium in Europe: a study of character variation and ecology including a numerical analysis of the C. argutus complex. Mycological Research. 1996;100(4):471–485. doi: 10.1016/S0953-7562(96)80146-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Brandrud et al. (1989).Brandrud TE, Lindström H, Marklund H, Melot J, Muskos S. Cortinarius flora photographica 1. Sweden: Cortinarius HB; 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Cadiñanos, Gomez & Ballarà (2016).Cadiñanos JA, Gomez MM, Ballarà J. Cortinarius oreoborealis y C. pyrenaicus, dos nuevas especies de la seccion Myxacium, subgenero Myxacium (Fr.) Trog ss. str. Journal des JEC. 2016;18:39–65. [Google Scholar]
- Consiglio (2012).Consiglio G. Il genere cortinarius in Italia, parte sesta. Luglio: Associazione Micologica Bresadola; 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Consiglio, Antonini & Antonini (2003).Consiglio G, Antonini D, Antonini M. Il genere cortinarius in Italia, parte prima. Luglio: Associazione Micologica Bresadola; 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Dima et al. (2016).Dima B, Lindström H, Liimatainen K, Olson A, Soop K, Kytövuori I, Dahlberg A, Niskanen T. Typification of Friesian names in Cortinarius sections Anomali, Spilomei and Bolares, and description of two new species from northern Europe. Mycological Progress. 2016;15(9):903–919. doi: 10.1007/s11557-016-1217-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Earle (1902).Earle FS. A key to the North American species of Cortinarius I. Torreya. 1902;2(11):169–172. doi: 10.2307/40594021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Felsenstein (1985).Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 1985;39(4):783–791. doi: 10.2307/2408678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feng et al. (2016).Feng B, Zhao Q, Xu JP, Qin J, Yang ZL. Drainage isolation and climate change-driven population expansion shape the genetic structures of Tuber indicum complex in the Hengduan Mountains region. Scientific Reports. 2016;6(1):21811. doi: 10.1038/srep21811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fries (1838).Fries EM. Epicrisis systematis mycologici seu synopsis hymenomycetum. Uppsala: Regiae Academiae Typographia; 1838. [Google Scholar]
- Frøslev, Brandrud & Jeppesen (2006).Frøslev TG, Brandrud TE, Jeppesen TS. New species and combinations in Cortinarius subgenus Phlegmacium section Calochroi. Mycotaxon. 2006;97:367–377. [Google Scholar]
- Gardes & Bruns (1993).Gardes M, Bruns TD. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes—application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Molecular Ecology. 1993;2(2):113–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.1993.tb00005.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garnica et al. (2016).Garnica S, Schön ME, Abarenkov K, Riess K, Liimatainen K, Niskanen T, Dima B, Soop K, Frøslev TG, Jeppesen TS, Peintner U, Kühnert-Finkernagel R, Brandrud TE, Saar G, Oertel B, Ammirati JF. Determining threshold values for barcoding fungi lessons from Cortinarius (Basidiomycota), a highly diverse and widespread ectomycorrhizal genus. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 2016;92(4):fiw045. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiw045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garnica, Weiß & Oberwinkler (2003).Garnica S, Weiß M, Oberwinkler F. Morphological and molecular phylogenetic studies in South American Cortinarius species. Mycological Research. 2003;107(10):1143–1156. doi: 10.1017/S0953756203008414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garnica et al. (2005).Garnica S, Weiß M, Oertel B, Oberwinkler F. A framework for a phylogenetic classification in the genus Cortinarius (Basidiomycota, Agaricales) derived from morphological and molecular data. Botany. 2005;83(11):1457–1477. doi: 10.1139/b05-107. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Garrido-Benavent et al. (2020).Garrido-Benavent I, Ballarà J, Liimatainen K, Dima B, Brandrud TE, Mahiques R. Cortinarius ochrolamellatus (Agaricales, Basidiomycota): a new species in C. sect. Laeti, with comments on the origin of its European-Hyrcanian distribution. Phytotaxa. 2020;640(3):185–200. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.460.3.2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Guan & Zhao (2020).Guan QX, Zhao CL. Two new corticioid species, Hyphoderma sinense and H. floccosum (Hyphodermataceae, Polyporales), from southern China. Mycosystema. 2020;40(3):447–461. doi: 10.13346/j.mycosystema.200382. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hall (1999).Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series. 1999;41(41):95–98. doi: 10.1021/bk-1999-0734.ch008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Harrower et al. (2011).Harrower E, Ammirati JF, Cappuccino AA, Ceska O, Kranabetter JM, Kroeger P, Lim S, Taylor T, Berbee ML. Cortinarius species diversity in British Columbia and molecular phylogenetic comparison with European specimen sequences. Botany. 2011;89(11):799–810. doi: 10.1139/b11-065. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Harrower et al. (2015).Harrower E, Bougher NL, Henkel TW, Horak E, Matheny PB. Long-distance dispersal and speciation of Australasian and American species of Cortinarius sect. Cortinarius. Mycologia. 2015;107(4):697–709. doi: 10.3852/14-182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Horak (1983).Horak E. Mycogeography in the South Pacifc region: Agaricales, Boletales. Australian Journal of Botany. 1983;10:1–41. doi: 10.1071/BT8310001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kibby (2005).Kibby G. Fungal portraits: no. 21: Cortinarius betulinus. Field Mycology. 2005;6(1):3–4. doi: 10.1016/S1468-1641(10)60282-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kornerup & Wanscher (1978).Kornerup A, Wanscher JHK. The methuen handbook of colour. Reprint Edition. London: Eyre Methuen Ltd; 1978. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar et al. (2018).Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2018;35(6):1547–1549. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li & Azbukina (2011).Li Y, Azbukina ZM. Fungi of Ussuri river valley. Beijing: Science Press; 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Liimatainen et al. (2014).Liimatainen K, Niskanen T, Dima B, Kytövuori I, Ammirati JF, Frøslev TG. The largest type study of Agaricales species to date: bringing identification and nomenclature of Phlegmacium (Cortinarius) into the DNA era. Persoonia. 2014;33(1):98–140. doi: 10.3767/003158514X684681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luo & Bau (2021).Luo Y, Bau T. Cortinarius jiaoheensis (Cortinariaceae), a new species of Cortinarius subgenus Telamonia section Flexipedes, from northeast China. Phytotaxa. 2021;494(1):113–121. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.494.1.7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Moser & Horak (1975).Moser M, Horak E. Cortinarius und nahe verwandte Gattungen in Südamerika. Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia. 1975;52:1–628. [Google Scholar]
- Nei & Kumar (2000).Nei M, Kumar S. Molecular evolution and phylogenetics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Niskanen (2008).Niskanen T. Cortinarius subgenus Telamonia p.p. in North Europe. 2008. PhD. Thesis, University of Helsinki.
- Niskanen et al. (2018).Niskanen T, Douglas B, Kirk P, Crous P, Lücking R, Matheny PB, Cai L, Hyde K, Cheek M. New discoveries: species of fungi described in 2017. In: Willis KJ, editor. State of the World’s Fungi 2018, Report. London: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; 2018. pp. 18–23. [Google Scholar]
- Niskanen et al. (2008).Niskanen T, Kytövuori I, Bendiksen E, Bendiksen K, Brandrud TE, Frøslev TG, Høiland K, Jeppesen TS, Liimatainen K, Lindström H. Cortinarius (Pers.) Gray. In: Knudsen H, Vesterholt J, editors. Funga Nordica. Agaricoid, boletoid, clavarioid, cyphelloid and gastroid genera. Copenhagen: Nordsvamp; 2008. pp. 676–677. [Google Scholar]
- Niskanen et al. (2015).Niskanen T, Kytövuori I, Liimatainen K, Ammirati JF. Nomenclatural novelties. Index Fungorum. 2015;256:1–2. [Google Scholar]
- Nylander et al. (2008).Nylander JAA, Zoology S, Posada D, Mrmodeltest R, Os F. MrModeltest 2.3 README. 2008. https://www.softpedia.com/get/Science-CAD/MrModeltest.shtml https://www.softpedia.com/get/Science-CAD/MrModeltest.shtml
- Orton (1955).Orton PD. Cortinarius I. Leeds: The Naturalist; 1955. [Google Scholar]
- Osmundson et al. (2013).Osmundson TW, Robert VA, Schoch CL, Baker LJ, Smith A, Robich G, Mizzan L, Garbelotto MM. Filling gaps in biodiversity knowledge for macrofungi: contributions and assessment of an herbarium collection DNA barcode sequencing project. PLOS ONE. 2013;8(4):e62419. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peintner et al. (2001).Peintner U, Bougher NL, Castellano MA, Moncalvo JM, Moser MM, Trappe JM, Vilgalys R. Multiple origins of sequestrate fungi related to Cortinarius (Cortinariaceae) American Journal of Botany. 2001;88(12):2168–2179. doi: 10.2307/3558378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peintner et al. (2014).Peintner U, Dresch P, Bellù F, Borghi E. Cortinarius microglobisporus (Basidiomycota): a new species with roundish spores related to C. illuminus. Mycological Progress. 2014;13(3):899–904. doi: 10.1007/s11557-014-0975-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Peintner et al. (2002).Peintner U, Horak E, Moser MM, Vilgalys R. Phylogeny of Rozites, Cuphocybe and Rapacea inferred from ITS and LSU rDNA sequences. Mycologia. 2002;94(4):620–629. doi: 10.1080/15572536.2003.11833190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peintner, Moncalvo & Vilgalys (2004).Peintner U, Moncalvo JM, Vilgalys R. Toward a better understanding of the infrageneric relationships in Cortinarius (Agaricales, Basidiomycota) Mycologia. 2004;96(5):1042–1058. doi: 10.1080/15572536.2005.11832904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peintner et al. (2003).Peintner U, Moser MM, Thomas KA, Manimohan P. First records of ectomycorrhizal Cortinarius species (Agaricales, Basidiomycetes) from tropical India and their phylogenetic position based on rDNA ITS sequences. Mycological Research. 2003;107(PT4):485–494. doi: 10.1017/S0953756203007585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ronquist & Huelsenbeck (2003).Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2003;19(12):1572–1574. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sawyer, Chambers & Cairney (1999).Sawyer NA, Chambers SM, Cairney JWG. Molecular investigation of genet distribution and genetic variation of Cortinarius rotundisporus in eastern Australian sclerophyll forests. New Phytologist. 1999;142(3):561–568. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00417.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Shao & Xiang (1997).Shao LP, Xiang CT. Forest mushrooms of China. Haerbin: Northeast Forestry University Press; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Silvestro & Michalak (2012).Silvestro D, Michalak I. RaxmlGUI: a graphical front-end for RAxML. Organisms Diversity & Evolution. 2012;12(4):335–337. doi: 10.1007/s13127-011-0056-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Soop (1990).Soop K. Observationer av några intressanta Cortinarius-arter. Agarica. 1990;10/11(19/20):30–43. [Google Scholar]
- Soop (2013).Soop K. Cortinarioid fungi of New Zealand. 9th edition. Sweden: Éditions Scientrix; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Soop (2014).Soop K. Cortinarius in Sweden. 14th edition. Sweden: Éditions Scientrix; 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Soop (2016).Soop K. A contribution to the study of the cortinarioid mycoflora of New Zealand, VII. New Zealand Journal of Botany. 2016;54(3):344–365. doi: 10.1080/0028825X.2016.1178149. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Soop et al. (2019).Soop K, Dima B, Cooper JA, Park D, Oertel B. A phylogenetic approach to a global supraspecific taxonomy of Cortinarius (Agaricales) with an emphasis on the southern mycota. Persoonia. 2019;42(1):261–290. doi: 10.3767/persoonia.2019.42.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Soop, Wallace & Dima (2018).Soop K, Wallace M, Dima B. New Cortinarius (Agaricales) species described from New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Botany. 2018;56(2):163–182. doi: 10.1080/0028825X.2018.1436574. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Stamatakis (2014).Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(9):1312–1313. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stensrud et al. (2014).Stensrud Ø, Orr RJS, Reier-Røberg K, Schumacher T, Høiland K. Phylogenetic relationships in Cortinarius with focus on North European species. Karstenia. 2014;54(2):57–71. doi: 10.29203/KA.2014.464. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Teasdale et al. (2013).Teasdale SE, Beulke AK, Guy PL, Orlovich DA. Environmental barcoding of the ectomycorrhizal fungus Cortinarius. Fungal Diversity. 2013;58(1):299–310. doi: 10.1007/s13225-012-0218-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Teng (1963).Teng SC. Fungi of China. Beijing: Science Press; 1963. [Google Scholar]
- Thompson et al. (1997).Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research. 1997;25(24):4876–4882. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Trog (1844).Trog JG. Verzeichniss schweizerischer Schwämme, welche grösstentheils in der Umgebung von Thun gesammelt worden sind. Mitteilungen der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft Bern. 1844;1844(15–23):17–92. [Google Scholar]
- Wang & Qiu (2006).Wang B, Qiu YL. Phylogenetic distribution and evolution of mycorrhizas in land plants. Mycorrhiza. 2006;16(5):299–363. doi: 10.1007/s00572-005-0033-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang et al. (2020).Wang K, Zhao MJ, Su JH, Yang L, Deng H, Wang YH, Wu HJ, Li Y, Wu HM, Wei XD, Wei TZ, Cai L, Yao YJ. The use of checklist of fungi in China database in the red list assessment of macrofungi in China. Biodiversity Science. 2020;28(1):74–98. doi: 10.17520/biods.2019163. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wei & Yao (2013).Wei TZ, Yao YJ. Cortinarius korfii: a new species from China. Mycosystema. 2013;32(3):557–562. doi: 10.13346/j.mycosystema.2013.03.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- White et al. (1990).White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, editors. PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Amplifcations. New York: Academic Press; 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Wilson, Hosaka & Mueller (2017).Wilson AW, Hosaka K, Mueller GM. Evolution of ectomycorrhizas as a driver of diversification and biogeographic patterns in the model mycorrhizal mushroom genus Laccaria. New Phytologist. 2017;213(4):1862–1873. doi: 10.1111/nph.14270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wright, Berch & Berbee (2009).Wright SH, Berch SM, Berbee ML. The effect of fertilization on the below-ground diversity and community composition of ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla) Mycorrhiza. 2009;19(4):267–276. doi: 10.1007/s00572-008-0218-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xie (2018).Xie ML. Resources and taxonomy of Cortinarius in northeast of China. 2018. MA. Thesis, Jilin Agricultural University.
- Xie et al. (2019).Xie ML, Li D, Wei SL, Ji RQ, Li Y. Cortinarius subcaesiobrunneus sp. nov., (Cortinariaceae, Agaricales) a new species from northwest China. Phytotaxa. 2019;392(3):217–224. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.392.3.4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Xie et al. (2021).Xie ML, Wei TZ, Dima B, Fu YP, Ji RQ, Li Y. Cortinarius khinganensis (Agaricales), a new species of section Illumini from northeast China. Phytotaxa. 2021;500(1):1–10. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.500.1.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Xie et al. (2020).Xie ML, Wei TZ, Fu YP, Li D, Qi LL, Xing PJ, Cheng GH, Ji RQ, Li Y. Three new species of Cortinarius subgenus Telamonia (Cortinariaceae, Agaricales) from China. MycoKeys. 2020;69(2):91–109. doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.69.49437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yuan et al. (2020).Yuan H-S, Lu X, Dai Y-C, Hyde KD, Kan Y-H, Kušan I, He S-H, Liu N-G, Sarma VV, Zhao C-L, Cui B-K, Yousaf N, Sun G, Liu S-Y, Wu F, Lin C-G, Dayarathne MC, Gibertoni TB, Conceição LB, Garibay-Orijel R, Villegas-Ríos M, Salas-Lizana R, Wei T-Z, Qiu J-Z, Yu Z-F, Phookamsak R, Zeng M, Paloi S, Bao D-F, Abeywickrama PD, Wei D-P, Yang J, Manawasinghe IS, Harishchandra D, Brahmanage RS, De Silva NI, Tennakoon DS, Karunarathna A, Gafforov Y, Pem D, Zhang S-N, De Azevedo Santiago ALCM, Bezerra JDP, Dima B, Acharya K, Alvarez-Manjarrez J, Bahkali AH, Bhatt VK, Brandrud TE, Bulgakov TS, Camporesi E, Cao T, Chen Y-X, Chen Y-Y, Devadatha B, Elgorban AM, Fan L-F, Du X, Gao L, Gonçalves CM, Gusmão LFP, Huanraluek N, Jadan M, Jayawardena RS, Khalid AN, Langer E, Lima DX, De Lima-Júnior NC, De Lira CRS, Liu J-K, Liu S, Lumyong S, Luo Z-L, Matočec N, Niranjan M, Oliveira-Filho Jé RC, Papp V, Pérez-Pazos E, Phillips AJL, Qiu P-L, Ren Y, Ruiz RFC, Semwal KC, Soop K, De Souza CAF, Souza-Motta CM, Sun L-H, Xie M-L, Yao Y-J, Zhao Q, Zhou L-W. Fungal diversity notes 1277–1386: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity. 2020;104(1):1–266. doi: 10.1007/s13225-020-00461-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yuan & Sun (1995).Yuan ML, Sun PQ. Sichuan mushroom. Chengdu: Sichuan Science and Technology Press; 1995. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
The matrix of newly generated ITS sequences is available in the Supplemental Files.
The ITS matrix for phylogenetic analyses is available in the Supplemental Files and at TreeBASE: S28399. It is also available at Figshare: Xie, Meng-Le; Chen, Jun-Liang; Phukhamsakda, Chayanard; Dima, Bálint; Fu, Yong-Ping; Ji, Rui-Qing; et al. (2021): Cortinarius subsalor and C. tibeticisalor spp. nov., two new species from the section Delibuti from China. figshare. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.15982146.v1
https://treebase.org/treebase-web/search/study/summary.html?id=28399.