Skip to main content
Physiological Reports logoLink to Physiological Reports
. 2021 Sep 23;9(18):e15029. doi: 10.14814/phy2.15029

Role of astrocytes in rhythmic motor activity

Alexia Montalant 1, Eva M M Carlsen 1, Jean‐François Perrier 1,
PMCID: PMC8461027  PMID: 34558208

Abstract

Rhythmic motor activities such as breathing, locomotion, tremor, or mastication are organized by groups of interconnected neurons. Most synapses in the central nervous system are in close apposition with processes belonging to astrocytes. Neurotransmitters released from neurons bind to receptors expressed by astrocytes, activating a signaling pathway that leads to an increase in calcium concentration and the release of gliotransmitters that eventually modulate synaptic transmission. It is therefore likely that the activation of astrocytes impacts motor control. Here we review recent studies demonstrating that astrocytes inhibit, modulate, or trigger motor rhythmic behaviors.


Astrocytes modulate synaptic transmission in neuronal networks that control rhythmic motor behavior. Astrocytes modulate respiration, locomotion, motor tremor, mastication and trigger switch in behaviors.

graphic file with name PHY2-9-e15029-g003.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Rhythmic activity characterizes motor behaviors such as walking, chewing, or breathing. The coordinated contraction of muscles is organized by neural networks called central pattern generators (CPG) that orchestrate the timing and the activation of motoneurons in the brainstem and in the spinal cord. Classical models consider that CPGs solely consists of interconnected neurons and that the intrinsic properties of individual neurons and their synaptic connections are sufficient to explain their rhythmicity (Goulding, 2009; Harris‐Warrick, 2011; Kiehn, 2006; Marder & Bucher, 2001). However, this view is challenged by the discovery that astrocytes—the most abundant glial cell in the central nervous system—integrate and process synaptic transmission and eventually modulate neuronal activity. Astrocytes are in close contact with blood vessels and synapses (Figure 1). In contrast to neurons, astrocytes occupy non‐overlapping territories and can be chemically coupled via gap junctions. Like neurons, astrocytes respond to various neurotransmitters released from pre‐ or postsynaptic terminals, including glutamate, ATP, GABA, noradrenaline, dopamine, and endocannabinoids. This results in an increase in intracellular Ca2+ concentration that triggers the release of gliotransmitter molecules that in turn interact with pre‐ or postsynaptic elements and modulate synaptic transmission (Perea et al., 2009) (Figure 1). Such bidirectional interaction between neurons and astrocytes is possible because astrocytes have a complex spongiform shape with branches, branchlet, and leaflets that are in very close contact with synapses (Khakh & Sofroniew, 2015; Santello et al., 2019). Remarkably, the increase of Ca2+ in a given branchlet can remain spatially restricted and trigger gliotransmitter release that remains local (Grosche et al., 1999). Thus, in contrast to neurons, information processing in astrocytes does not necessarily require somatic integration of signals. Gliotransmitters released from astrocytes include ATP, glutamate, D‐Serine, and GABA (Araque et al., 2014; Carlsen et al., 2021; Christensen et al., 2013, 2018; Khakh & Sofroniew, 2015; Perea et al., 2009; Santello et al., 2019). Consequently, astrocytes have all the properties necessary for participating in information processing in the central nervous system and the number of studies demonstrating their importance in physiological functions is continuously growing. Here we will review the most recent articles demonstrating a role for astrocytes in the modulation and the genesis of motor rhythmic behaviors illustrated by breathing, locomotion, tremor, and mastication (Broadhead & Miles, 2020; Carlsen et al., 2021; Carlsen & Perrier, 2014; Christensen et al., 2013; Gourine et al., 2010; Morquette et al., 2015; Mu et al., 2019).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Schematic representation of the tripartite synapse. Left: astrocytes (green) are in close contact with blood vessels and synapses. Inset: in addition to postsynaptic receptors, neurotransmitters activate receptors expressed by astrocyte. This induces an increase in intracellular Ca2+ concentration, which triggers the release of gliotransmitters that interact with pre‐ and postsynaptic receptors

2. ROLE OF ASTROCYTES IN BREATHING

Breathing is a vital behavior that ensures the intake of oxygen (O2) and the release of the byproduct carbon dioxide (CO2). It is organized by a rhythm‐generator located in the preBötzinger complex (preBötC) in the brainstem which drives the rhythmic activity of motoneurons that trigger the contraction of pump inspiratory muscles (diaphragm and external intercostal muscles) and thereby produces inspiration (Del Negro et al., 2018). Respiratory activity is continuously adjusted to metabolic activity, arterial partial pressure of O2 (PaO2), and CO2 (PaCO2 ) as well as pH so that any change in these parameters produces a modulation of the respiratory rate and/or tidal volume which brings them back to normal. These homeostatic responses are mediated by the carotid bodies and by central chemoreceptors located in the retrotrapezoid nucleus (RTN) and the preBötC (Guyenet & Bayliss, 2015) (Figure 2a). The physiology of breathing has been studied for thousands of years (French, 1978), but the possible implication of astrocytes has only recently been considered. Recent findings suggest that astrocytes play a role in the regulation of the respiratory rhythm and amplitude in response to changes in CO2, pH, and O2.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Astrocytes contribute to the modulation of breathing in response to changes in pH and pCO2. (a) Anatomical organization of the brainstem circuits responsible for breathing. pFv: ventral parafacial nucleus, also known as RTN: retrotrapezoid nucleus. preBötC: preBötzinger complex. pF: parafacial nucleus. pFl: lateral parafacial nucleus. pFv: ventral parafacial nucleus. LRN: lateral reticular nucleus. NA: nucleus ambiguus. preBötC: preBötzinger complex. BötC: Bötzinger complex. rVRG: rostral ventral respiratory group. cVRG: caudal ventral respiratory group. (b) Ca2+ response of astrocytes in the pFv (RTN) to acidification. (c) Response of neurons from the pFv (RTN) and of phrenic nerve to the optogenetic activation of pFv (RTN) astrocytes. b and c are adapted from (Gourine et al., 2010), with permission. (d) Hypothetical mechanisms for the regulation of breathing by pFv (RTN) astrocytes. Astrocytes sense CO2 increase via CO2‐sensitive connexin (Cx) hemichannels which directly release ATP. Acidification activates the Na+/HCO3 co‐transport (NBC), which in turn activates the Na+/Ca2+ exchange (NCX). The increase in intracellular Ca2+ leads to the Ca2+‐dependent vesicular release of ATP. ATP is likely to act on several downstream targets, including neighboring astrocytes, smooth muscle cells, and neurons

2.1. CO2 and pH sensing

The firing frequency of RTN neurons, which project to the preBötC (Figure 2a), increases in response to PaCO2 rise or pH decrease (Guyenet & Bayliss, 2015). Consequently, the respiratory rate and tidal volume increase, which brings the PaCO2 and pH back to normal. Astrocytes from the RTN at the ventral surface of the medulla oblongata play a critical role in this process. Acidification induces an increase in astrocytic intracellular Ca2+ concentration (Figure 2b) (Gourine et al., 2010). Importantly, the CO2/pH sensitivity of ventral medullary astrocytes is not shared with astrocytes from other regions of the brainstem or from the cortex (Gourine et al., 2010; Huckstepp, Id Bihi, et al., 2010; Kasymov et al., 2013), which suggests that astrocytes within distinct circuits are not interchangeable but are instead dedicated to distinct physiological functions. A CO2 increase (and/or a pH decrease) may initiate the activation of ventral medullary astrocytes in three ways: (1) CO2 activates CO2‐sensitive connexin hemichannels, which then release ATP (Huckstepp et al., 2010; Huckstepp, et al., 2010); (2) acidification promotes Na+/HCO3 co‐transport resulting in increased intracellular Na+ which triggers an influx of Ca2+ via the Na+/Ca2+ transporter and presumably the vesicular release of gliotransmitters (Turovsky et al., 2016); (3) CO2 depolarizes the membrane of astrocytes by inhibiting Kir4.1‐Kir5.1 inward rectifying potassium channels, which in turn induces the release of gliotransmitters (Sobrinho et al., 2014, 2017; Wenker et al., 2010, 2012). The activation of ventral medullary astrocytes results in the release of ATP (Gourine et al., 2010; Kasymov et al., 2013). ATP amplifies the response by activating neighboring astrocytes, which in turn release more ATP, leading eventually to the depolarization of RTN neurons via the activation of P2 receptors (Gourine et al., 2010). Because RTN neurons boost the excitability of the preBötzinger complex, the activation of RTN astrocytes is expected to promote breathing. Indeed, the optogenetic activation of ventral medullary astrocytes expressing the light‐gated cation channel channelrhodopsin two triggers respiratory activity from hypocapnic apnea in anesthetized rats (Gourine et al., 2010) (Figure 2c,d). ATP, most likely released by astrocytes also acts on arterial smooth muscle cells in the RTN, counteracting the vasodilating effect of CO2 and maintaining arteriole tone during hypercapnia (Cleary et al., 2020; Hawkins et al., 2017). This mechanism ensures that local levels of CO2 remain high in the RTN and in this way maintains the drive to breathe.

2.2. O2 sensing

Because astrocytes in the preBötC respond to a decrease in PaO2 by an increase in intracellular Ca2+ followed by the release of ATP (Angelova et al., 2015), it has been suggested that they also contribute to the homeostatic response to hypoxia (Gourine & Funk, 2017). Indeed, the disruption of purinergic signaling or of the vesicular machinery in preBötC astrocytes impairs the ventilatory response to hypoxia (Angelova et al., 2015; Rajani et al., 2018; SheikhBahaei, 2020; Sheikhbahaei et al., 2018). Once released, ATP activates metabotropic P2Y1 receptors expressed by preBötC neurons and stimulate breathing (Lorier et al., 2007; Rajani et al., 2018). In addition, astrocytes in the RTN sense decreases in PaO2 and modulate breathing by inhibiting the internalization of TRPA1 channels, thereby promoting their accumulation at the plasma membrane, the influx of Ca2+ through TRPA1 channels and the subsequent release of ATP which potentiates the activity of respiratory centers (Uchiyama et al., 2020).

3. ROLE OF ASTROCYTES IN LOCOMOTION

Locomotion is characterized by the coordinated activation of the left and right sides of the body and by the alternation of flexor and extensor muscle contraction within the limbs. This rhythmic activity is orchestrated by CPGs located in the ventro‐medial part of the spinal cord (Kjaerulff & Kiehn, 1996). Locomotion is a flexible behavior that is continuously adjusted to external and internal conditions. For example, the most widely used psychostimulant, caffeine, promotes locomotor activity in humans and rodents (Burke, 2008; Marin et al., 2011) and exerts its effect by inhibiting adenosine receptors (Snyder et al., 1981) in the central nervous system including in the spinal cord (Acevedo et al., 2016). Since astrocytes release ATP, which can be hydrolyzed by extracellular ectonucleotidases to produce adenosine (Dunwiddie et al., 1997), they can potentially modulate locomotion. Recent evidence indeed suggests that purines released by spinal astrocytes modulate the locomotor rhythm (Witts et al., 2012). Locomotion is commonly studied with isolated spinal cord preparations from neonatal rodents in which locomotor‐like activity induced by bath application of serotonin and NMDA can be monitored by recording the electrical activity of motoneuron axons. In this model, locomotor‐like activity occurs concurrently with an increase in the frequency of Ca2+ events in spinal astrocytes (Broadhead & Miles, 2020). However, the astrocytic Ca2+ activity is neither rhythmic nor phase‐locked to the locomotor‐like rhythm. The activation of spinal astrocytes by means of chemogenetics decreases the frequency of locomotor activity by approximately 10% (Acton & Miles, 2015; Broadhead & Miles, 2020). Conversely, the poisoning of astrocytes with the gliotoxin fluoroacetate increases the frequency of locomotor activity by 20%–30% (Broadhead & Miles, 2020; Witts et al., 2012). These observations suggest that one function of spinal astrocytes could be to slow down locomotion. Because the effects of astrocyte activation are blocked by an antagonist for adenosine A1 receptors and by ectonucleotidase blockers (Acton & Miles, 2015; Broadhead & Miles, 2020; Witts et al., 2012), it is likely that astrocytes release ATP, which then gets converted into adenosine. Evidence suggests that adenosine binds to presynaptic receptors and thereby inhibits neurotransmitter release (Acton & Miles, 2015; Carlsen & Perrier, 2014).

A recent study performed on larval zebrafish sheds further light on the possible role of astrocytes during locomotion (Mu et al., 2019). Paralyzed animals put in a virtual‐reality environment receive a visual feedback adjusted to their motor activity, as if they were swimming freely. Withholding visual feedback (causing all swimming attempts to seem “futile” to the animal) induces passivity within a few tens of seconds. Whole‐brain imaging shows that astrocytic Ca2+ in the lateral medulla oblongata rises prior to passivity onset and peaks at passivity onset (Figure 3b,c). Two strong arguments demonstrate that the activation of astrocytes triggers the behavioral state switch. First, LASER ablation of astrocytes prevents futility‐induced passivity (Figure 3d). Second, the selective activation of astrocytes by means of chemogenetics is sufficient to trigger passivity. This elegant study suggests that the computation performed by brainstem astrocytes is essential for implementing a behavioral state switch after integrating sensory information (Mu et al., 2019).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Astrocytes mediate futility‐induced passivity in larval zebrafish. (a) In closed loop, the visual feedback is adjusted to the motor activity. In open loop, the visual feedback does not match motor activity. After repeated motor failures, the animals enter a passive motor state. (b) Neuronal and glial Ca2+ aligned to passivity onset. (c) Whole‐brain neuronal and glial Ca2+ before, during, and after passivity onset. (d) The ablation of astrocytes in the lateral medulla oblongata reduces futility‐induced passivity. Adapted from (Mu et al., 2019), with permission

4. ROLE OF ASTROCYTES IN TREMOR REGULATION

Tremor is an involuntary rhythmic muscle contraction of low amplitude that occurs in all individuals. Under pathological conditions such as multiple sclerosis, stroke, or brain injury, tremor can become disabling. In a recent study, it was shown that astrocytes located in the ventral horn of the spinal cord are important for decreasing the amplitude of tremor (Carlsen et al., 2021). Active spinal interneurons from the ventral horn release endocannabinoids that bind to cannabinoid receptors type 1 (CB1) expressed by neighboring astrocytes. The resulting intracellular Ca2+ increase induces the release of purines that bind to presynaptic receptors and inhibits the release of excitatory neurotransmitters (Carlsen et al., 2021; Carlsen & Perrier, 2014). In animal model of essential tremor, the intrathecal injection of an agonist for CB1 receptors decreases the amplitude of tremor. This effect is suppressed when the expression of CB1 receptors is knocked out in astrocytes (Carlsen et al., 2021). These results provide a cellular mechanism for the anti‐tremor effect of cannabis reported by patients (Clifford, 1983; Consroe et al., 1997).

5. ROLE OF ASTROCYTES IN MASTICATION

Mastication is another example of rhythmic motor activity organized by a CPG. It is characterized by the alternated contraction of jaw opener (e.g., digastric) and jaw closer (e.g., masseter) muscles to achieve mechanical break of the food and mixing with saliva (Lund & Kolta, 2006). Both digastric and masseter muscles are innervated by trigeminal motoneurons which somata are in the trigeminal motor nucleus (NVmot) in the brainstem (Figure 4a). Sensory information originating from masticatory muscles reaches the brainstem via trigeminal primary afferents, which project to sensory nuclei including the trigeminal principal nucleus (NVsnpr) (Figure 4a). Principal cells from NVsnpr project to the thalamus as well as to diverse brainstem motor nuclei including NVmot (Morquette et al., 2012). Neurons from the dorsal part NVsnpr are characterized by persistent sodium inward currents (INaP ) and calcium‐ or sodium‐activated potassium currents (IK(Ca) , IK(Na) ) (Kadala et al., 2015). The interplay between these outward and inward currents produces oscillations of the membrane potential and consequently the rhythmic firing of action potentials (Kadala et al., 2015; Morquette et al., 2012). Importantly, the duration and the amplitude of the oscillations are inversely correlated to the extracellular Ca2+ concentration (Brocard et al., 2006). Astrocytes from the dorsal part of NVsnpr play a critical role in the induction of the rhythmic behavior (Morquette et al., 2015). Indeed, the electrical stimulation of axons from the sensory trigeminal tract triggers the bursting behavior of neurons concomitant with a depolarization of astrocytes. Similar responses induced by local application of NMDA are abolished by buffering Ca2+ in astrocytes with BAPTA, suggesting that the bursting behavior induced by NMDA requires astrocytic Ca2+. Neuronal oscillations are triggered by astrocytes that secrete the protein S100ß that binds extracellular Ca2+. This promotes INaP and the burst firing of neurons from NVsnpr (Figure 4b). One important characteristic, necessary for the masticatory behavior, is the synchronization of rhythmically active neurons. The induction of neuronal oscillations by NMDA or by stimulation of the trigeminal tract promotes coupling between astrocytes of the NVsnpr. Conversely, the selective blockade of connexin 43 abolishes NMDA‐induced rhythmic firing of NVsnpr neurons (Condamine et al., 2018). Because connexin 43 is the main protein forming gap junctions between astrocytes (but not between neurons), these results suggest that astrocytic coupling is necessary for the induction of bursting in neurons and for their synchronization.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Astrocytes trigger burst firing in the masticatory CPG. (a) Anatomical organization of mastication. The main jaw opener (digastric muscle) and closer (masseter) are innervated by motoneurons from NVmot which receive inputs from NVsnpr. (b) Schematic representation of the cellular mechanism. Glutamate released from sensory trigeminal neurons activates astrocytic NMDA receptors in NVsnpr. This induces the secretion of S100ß via a Ca2+‐dependent mechanism. The resulting decrease in extracellular free Ca2+ promotes INaP and burst firing in neighbor neurons. NVsnpr: trigeminal main sensory nucleus. NVmot: trigeminal main motor nucleus. For details, see Morquette et al. (2015)

6. CONCLUSION

It is now well‐established that astrocytes participate in fast information processing performed by neuronal circuits in the central nervous system (CNS). In this mini‐review, we listed some of the arguments for a role of astrocytes in different aspects of motor control. Astrocytes either process sensory inputs directly (Gourine et al., 2010) or integrate local neuronal circuit activity (Broadhead & Miles, 2020; Carlsen et al., 2021) as well as long range neuronal inputs (Morquette et al., 2015; Mu et al., 2019) and adjust motor behavior accordingly. Finally, the diversity of physiological functions of astrocytes in motor control and the variety of molecular mechanisms at play illustrates one of the fundamental concepts that have emerged in the field of neuron‐glia signaling research: neuron‐glia interactions are highly heterogeneous, with particularities related to the synaptic circuit and region involved (Araque et al., 2014; Khakh & Sofroniew, 2015). The same astrocyte can also release different gliotransmitters and exert distinct downstream effects depending on its activation pattern (Covelo & Araque, 2018). In conclusion, astrocytes are dedicated to specific physiological functions and are not interchangeable (Khakh & Sofroniew, 2015).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No conflict of interest, financial, or otherwise, are declared by the authors.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

AM, EMMC, and JFP wrote the manuscript.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

None.

Montalant, A., Carlsen, E. M. M., & Perrier, J.‐F. (2021). Role of astrocytes in rhythmic motor activity. Physiological Reports, 9, e15029. 10.14814/phy2.15029

Funding information

The study was funded by Offerfonden, Den Owensenske Fond, Læge Sofus Carl Emil Friis og hustru Olga Doris Fond, Independent Research Fund Denmark.

REFERENCES

  1. Acevedo, J., Santana‐Almansa, A., Matos‐Vergara, N., Marrero‐Cordero, L. R., Cabezas‐Bou, E., & Diaz‐Rios, M. (2016). Caffeine stimulates locomotor activity in the mammalian spinal cord via adenosine A1 receptor‐dopamine D1 receptor interaction and PKA‐dependent mechanisms. Neuropharmacology, 101, 490–505. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2015.10.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Acton, D., & Miles, G. B. (2015). Stimulation of glia reveals modulation of mammalian spinal motor networks by adenosine. PLoS One, 10, e0134488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Angelova, P. R., Kasymov, V., Christie, I., Sheikhbahaei, S., Turovsky, E., Marina, N., Korsak, A., Zwicker, J., Teschemacher, A. G., Ackland, G. L., Funk, G. D., Kasparov, S., Abramov, A. Y., & Gourine, A. V. (2015). Functional oxygen sensitivity of astrocytes. Journal of Neuroscience, 35, 10460–10473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Araque, A., Carmignoto, G., Haydon, P. G., Oliet, S. H. R., Robitaille, R., & Volterra, A. (2014). Gliotransmitters travel in time and space. Neuron, 81, 728–739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Broadhead, M. J., & Miles, G. B. (2020). Bi‐directional communication between neurons and astrocytes modulates spinal motor circuits. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 14, 30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brocard, F., Verdier, D., Arsenault, I., Lund, J. P., & Kolta, A. (2006). Emergence of intrinsic bursting in trigeminal sensory neurons parallels the acquisition of mastication in weanling rats. Journal of Neurophysiology, 96, 2410–2424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Burke, L. M. (2008). Caffeine and sports performance. Applied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism, 33, 1319–1334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Carlsen, E. M. M., Falk, S., Skupio, U., Robin, L., Zottola, A. C. P., Marsicano, G., & Perrier, J. F. (2021). Spinal astroglial cannabinoid receptors control pathological tremor. Nature Neuroscience, 24(5), 658–666. 10.1038/s41593-021-00818-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Carlsen, E. M., & Perrier, J. F. (2014). Purines released from astrocytes inhibit excitatory synaptic transmission in the ventral horn of the spinal cord. Frontiers in Neural Circuits, 8, 60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Christensen, R. K., Delgado‐Lezama, R., Russo, R. E., Lind, B. L., Alcocer, E. L., Rath, M. F., Fabbiani, G., Schmitt, N., Lauritzen, M., Petersen, A. V., Carlsen, E. M., & Perrier, J. F. (2018). Spinal dorsal horn astrocytes release GABA in response to synaptic activation. Journal of Physiology, 596, 4983–4994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Christensen, R. K., Petersen, A. V., & Perrier, J. F. (2013). How do glial cells contribute to motor control? Current Pharmaceutical Design, 19, 4385–4399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cleary, C. M., Moreira, T. S., Takakura, A. C., Nelson, M. T., Longden, T. A., & Mulkey, D. K. (2020). Vascular control of the CO2/H+‐dependent drive to breathe. Elife, 9, e59499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Clifford, D. B. (1983). Tetrahydrocannabinol for tremor in multiple sclerosis. Annals of Neurology, 13, 669–671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Condamine, S., Lavoie, R., Verdier, D., & Kolta, A. (2018). Functional rhythmogenic domains defined by astrocytic networks in the trigeminal main sensory nucleus. Glia, 66, 311–326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Consroe, P., Musty, R., Rein, J., Tillery, W., & Pertwee, R. (1997). The perceived effects of smoked cannabis on patients with multiple sclerosis. European Neurology, 38, 44–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Covelo, A., & Araque, A. (2018). Neuronal activity determines distinct gliotransmitter release from a single astrocyte. Elife, 7, e32237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. del Negro, C. A., Funk, G. D., & Feldman, J. L. (2018). Breathing matters. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 19, 351–367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dunwiddie, T. V., Diao, L., & Proctor, W. R. (1997). Adenine nucleotides undergo rapid, quantitative conversion to adenosine in the extracellular space in rat hippocampus. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 7673–7682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. French, R. K. (1978). The thorax in history 1. From ancient times to aristotle. Thorax, 33, 10–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gourine, A. V., & Funk, G. D. (2017). On the existence of a central respiratory oxygen sensor. Journal of Applied Physiology (1985), 123(123), 1344–1349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gourine, A. V., Kasymov, V., Marina, N., Tang, F., Figueiredo, M. F., Lane, S., Teschemacher, A. G., Spyer, K. M., Deisseroth, K., & Kasparov, S. (2010). Astrocytes control breathing through pH‐dependent release of ATP. Science, 329, 571–575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Grosche, J., Matyash, V., Moller, T., Verkhratsky, A., Reichenbach, A., & Kettenmann, H. (1999). Microdomains for neuron‐glia interaction: Parallel fiber signaling to Bergmann glial cells. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 139–143. 10.1038/5692 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Guyenet, P. G., & Bayliss, D. A. (2015). Neural control of breathing and CO2 Homeostasis. Neuron, 87, 946–961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Harris‐Warrick, R. M. (2011). Neuromodulation and flexibility in Central Pattern Generator networks. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 21, 685–692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hawkins, V. E., Takakura, A. C., Trinh, A., Malheiros‐Lima, M. R., Cleary, C. M., Wenker, I. C., Dubreuil, T., Rodriguez, E. M., Nelson, M. T., Moreira, T. S., & Mulkey, D. K. (2017). Purinergic regulation of vascular tone in the retrotrapezoid nucleus is specialized to support the drive to breathe. Elife, 6, e25232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Huckstepp, R. T., Eason, R., Sachdev, A., & Dale, N. (2010). CO2‐dependent opening of connexin 26 and related beta connexins. Journal of Physiology, 588, 3921–3931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Huckstepp, R. T., Id Bihi, R., Eason, R., Spyer, K. M., Dicke, N., Willecke, K., Marina, N., Gourine, A. V., & Dale, N. (2010). Connexin hemichannel‐mediated CO2‐dependent release of ATP in the medulla oblongata contributes to central respiratory chemosensitivity. Journal of Physiology, 588, 3901–3920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kadala, A., Verdier, D., Morquette, P., & Kolta, A. (2015). Ion homeostasis in rhythmogenesis: The interplay between neurons and astroglia. Physiology (Bethesda), 30, 371–388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kasymov, V., Larina, O., Castaldo, C., Marina, N., Patrushev, M., Kasparov, S., & Gourine, A. V. (2013). Differential sensitivity of brainstem versus cortical astrocytes to changes in pH reveals functional regional specialization of astroglia. Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 435–441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Khakh, B. S., & Sofroniew, M. V. (2015). Diversity of astrocyte functions and phenotypes in neural circuits. Nature Neuroscience, 18, 942–952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kiehn, O. (2006). Locomotor circuits in the mammalian spinal cord. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 29, 279–306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kjaerulff, O., & Kiehn, O. (1996). Distribution of networks generating and coordinating locomotor activity in the neonatal rat spinal cord in vitro: A lesion study. Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 5777–5794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lorier, A. R., Huxtable, A. G., Robinson, D. M., Lipski, J., Housley, G. D., & Funk, G. D. (2007). P2Y1 receptor modulation of the pre‐Botzinger complex inspiratory rhythm generating network in vitro. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 993–1005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lund, J. P., & Kolta, A. (2006). Generation of the central masticatory pattern and its modification by sensory feedback. Dysphagia, 21, 167–174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Goulding, M. (2009). Circuits controlling vertebrate locomotion: Moving in a new direction. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10, 507–518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Marder, E., & Bucher, D. (2001). Central pattern generators and the control of rhythmic movements. Current Biology, 11, R986–R996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Marin, M. T., Zancheta, R., Paro, A. H., Possi, A. P., Cruz, F. C., & Planeta, C. S. (2011). Comparison of caffeine‐induced locomotor activity between adolescent and adult rats. European Journal of Pharmacology, 660, 363–367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Morquette, P., Lavoie, R., Fhima, M. D., Lamoureux, X., Verdier, D., & Kolta, A. (2012). Generation of the masticatory central pattern and its modulation by sensory feedback. Progress in Neurobiology, 96, 340–355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Morquette, P., Verdier, D., Kadala, A., Fethiere, J., Philippe, A. G., Robitaille, R., & Kolta, A. (2015). An astrocyte‐dependent mechanism for neuronal rhythmogenesis. Nature Neuroscience, 18, 844–854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Mu, Y., Bennett, D. V., Rubinov, M., Narayan, S., Yang, C. T., Tanimoto, M., Mensh, B. D., Looger, L. L., & Ahrens, M. B. (2019). Glia accumulate evidence that actions are futile and suppress unsuccessful behavior. Cell, 178(27–43), e19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Perea, G., Navarrete, M., & Araque, A. (2009). Tripartite synapses: Astrocytes process and control synaptic information. Trends in Neurosciences, 32, 421–431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Rajani, V., Zhang, Y., Jalubula, V., Rancic, V., Sheikhbahaei, S., Zwicker, J. D., Pagliardini, S., Dickson, C. T., Ballanyi, K., Kasparov, S., Gourine, A. V., & Funk, G. D. (2018). Release of ATP by pre‐Botzinger complex astrocytes contributes to the hypoxic ventilatory response via a Ca2+‐dependent P2Y1 receptor mechanism. Journal of Physiology, 596, 3245–3269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Santello, M., Toni, N., & Volterra, A. (2019). Astrocyte function from information processing to cognition and cognitive impairment. Nature Neuroscience, 22(2), 154–166. 10.1038/s41593-018-0325-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sheikhbahaei, S. (2020). Physiology: New insights into central oxygen sensing. Current Biology, 30, R1004–R1006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Sheikhbahaei, S., Turovsky, E. A., Hosford, P. S., Hadjihambi, A., Theparambil, S. M., Liu, B., Marina, N., Teschemacher, A. G., Kasparov, S., Smith, J. C., & Gourine, A. V. (2018). Astrocytes modulate brainstem respiratory rhythm‐generating circuits and determine exercise capacity. Nature Communications, 9, 370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Snyder, S. H., Katims, J. J., Annau, Z., Bruns, R. F., & Daly, J. W. (1981). Adenosine receptors and behavioral actions of methylxanthines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 78, 3260–3264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sobrinho, C. R., Goncalves, C. M., Takakura, A. C., Mulkey, D. K., & Moreira, T. S. (2017). Fluorocitrate‐mediated depolarization of astrocytes in the retrotrapezoid nucleus stimulates breathing. Journal of Neurophysiology, 118, 1690–1697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Sobrinho, C. R., Wenker, I. C., Poss, E. M., Takakura, A. C., Moreira, T. S., & Mulkey, D. K. (2014). Purinergic signalling contributes to chemoreception in the retrotrapezoid nucleus but not the nucleus of the solitary tract or medullary raphe. Journal of Physiology, 592, 1309–1323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Turovsky, E., Theparambil, S. M., Kasymov, V., Deitmer, J. W., del Arroyo, A. G., Ackland, G. L., Corneveaux, J. J., Allen, A. N., Huentelman, M. J., Kasparov, S., Marina, N., & Gourine, A. V. (2016). Mechanisms of CO2/H+ sensitivity of astrocytes. Journal of Neuroscience, 36, 10750–10758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Uchiyama, M., Nakao, A., Kurita, Y., Fukushi, I., Takeda, K., Numata, T., Tran, H. N., Sawamura, S., Ebert, M., Kurokawa, T., Sakaguchi, R., Stokes, A. J., Takahashi, N., Okada, Y., & Mori, Y. (2020). O2‐dependent protein internalization underlies astrocytic sensing of acute hypoxia by restricting multimodal TRPA1 channel responses. Current Biology, 30(3378–3396), e7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Wenker, I. C., Kreneisz, O., Nishiyama, A., & Mulkey, D. K. (2010). Astrocytes in the retrotrapezoid nucleus sense H+ by inhibition of a Kir4.1‐Kir5.1‐like current and may contribute to chemoreception by a purinergic mechanism. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104, 3042–3052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Wenker, I. C., Sobrinho, C. R., Takakura, A. C., Moreira, T. S., & Mulkey, D. K. (2012). Regulation of ventral surface CO2/H+‐sensitive neurons by purinergic signalling. Journal of Physiology, 590, 2137–2150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Witts, E. C., Panetta, K. M., & Miles, G. B. (2012). Glial‐derived adenosine modulates spinal motor networks in mice. Journal of Neurophysiology, 107, 1925–1934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Physiological Reports are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES