All letters are subject to editing and may be shortened. General letters can be sent to bjgpdisc@rcgp.org.uk (please include your postal address for publication), and letters responding directly to BJGP articles can be submitted online via eLetters. We regret we cannot notify authors regarding publication.
For submission instructions visit: bjgp.org/letters
We thank Dr Burch1 for his interest in our article and agree that the distinction between longitudinal and relational continuity is important.
We are pleased that he too thinks that ‘relational continuity for patients [in] primary care … should be maximised wherever possible’. He is correct that others have included information and management continuity in the broad concept of continuity of GP care. However, we prefer to separate these and believe that informational continuity is essentially good record-keeping, and management continuity good practice and care plans. Of course, both of these are desirable but our article concerned ‘relational continuity’.
The patients’ perception of having a deep (trusting) relationship with their GP has been reported by Ridd et al2 linked to the number of consultations had with that GP. It shows a linear increase in the depth of the relationship up to eight consultations when there is a 50% probability of patients thinking they have a ‘deep’ relationship with the GP concerned. We continue to think relational continuity is by far the most important part of continuity and is the main mechanism generating the important outcomes.3 It needs further study in a randomised controlled trial of an intervention to improve continuity.
We do not follow his point about general practice ‘as it is, rather than how we would like it to be’, as we very much study general practice as it is. Our earlier report,4 in 2019, reported the measured continuity in a group general practice with 9000 patients over 2 years that was actually received by patients; 65% of all appointments made by patients aged 65 or over were with their personal GP despite all the GPs being part-time.
Since then, we have learned of other practices where measured continuity of GP care is higher, and we have recently reported how it is also high in two other European countries.5
REFERENCES
- 1.Burch PBM. Beyond relational continuity. [Letter] Br J Gen Pract. 2021 doi: 10.3399/bjgp21X716537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 2.Ridd MJ, Lewis G, Peters TJ, Salisbury C. Patient–doctor depth-of-relationship scale: development and validation. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9(6):538–545. doi: 10.1370/afm.1322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sidaway-Lee K, Pereira Gray D, Harding A, Evans P. What mechanisms could link GP relational continuity to patient outcomes? Br J Gen Pract. 2021 doi: 10.3399/bjgp21X716093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 4.Sidaway-Lee K, Pereira Gray D, Evans P. A method for measuring continuity of care in day-to-day general practice: a quantitative analysis of appointment data. Br J Gen Pract. 2019 doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X701813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 5.Pereira Gray D, Sidaway-Lee K, Evans P, Harding A. Measuring GP continuity at scale. Br J Gen Pract. 2021 doi: 10.3399/bjgp21X716129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]