Skip to main content
Nature Portfolio logoLink to Nature Portfolio
. 2021 Aug 5;20(10):1358–1363. doi: 10.1038/s41563-021-01061-9

Long-range supercurrents through a chiral non-collinear antiferromagnet in lateral Josephson junctions

Kun-Rok Jeon 1,✉,#, Binoy Krishna Hazra 1,#, Kyungjune Cho 1, Anirban Chakraborty 1, Jae-Chun Jeon 1, Hyeon Han 1, Holger L Meyerheim 1, Takis Kontos 2, Stuart S P Parkin 1,
PMCID: PMC8463295  PMID: 34354216

Abstract

The proximity-coupling of a chiral non-collinear antiferromagnet (AFM)15 with a singlet superconductor allows spin-unpolarized singlet Cooper pairs to be converted into spin-polarized triplet pairs68, thereby enabling non-dissipative, long-range spin correlations914. The mechanism of this conversion derives from fictitious magnetic fields that are created by a non-zero Berry phase15 in AFMs with non-collinear atomic-scale spin arrangements15. Here we report long-ranged lateral Josephson supercurrents through an epitaxial thin film of the triangular chiral AFM Mn3Ge (refs. 35). The Josephson supercurrents in this chiral AFM decay by approximately one to two orders of magnitude slower than would be expected for singlet pair correlations914 and their response to an external magnetic field reflects a clear spatial quantum interference. Given the long-range supercurrents present in both single- and mixed-phase Mn3Ge, but absent in a collinear AFM IrMn16, our results pave a way for the topological generation of spin-polarized triplet pairs68 via Berry phase engineering15 of the chiral AFMs.

Subject terms: Superconducting properties and materials, Spintronics


Long-range lateral Josephson supercurrents are observed in a chiral non-collinear antiferromagnet, indicating topologically generated triplet pairing states.

Main

Spin-polarized triplet Cooper pairs68 can carry a non-dissipative spin angular momentum over a long distance914 and are a key ingredient for superconducting spintronics. This nascent research field aims to develop new types of device where spin and charge degrees of freedom are controllable by superconducting phase coherence68. Notably, recent experiments and theories have established that inhomogeneous exchange fields9,10 in real-space and/or spin-orbit fields1719 in reciprocal/k-space at engineered superconductor/ferromagnet interfaces can proximity-generate spin-polarized triplet pairing states via spin-mixing and spin-rotation processes614. There remain, however, several outstanding technical issues, in particular, how to simplify the necessary multiple ferromagnet elements, how to create the desired non-collinear alignment of their magnetization directions below the exchange length scales (a few nanometres) and how to avoid stray-field-driven screening supercurrents and Abrikosov vortex nucleation in adjacent superconductors when patterned to submicron lateral dimensions.

To address these issues, we consider here chiral non-collinear antiferromagnets (AFMs)15 whose total net magnetization is essentially zero and thereby lack stray fields. The main concept is that the chiral non-collinear atomic-scale spin arrangements in real-space and the resulting fictitious magnetic fields (as large as roughly 100 tesla, refs. 25) from a non-vanishing Berry phase15 in k-space, effectively fulfil the spin-mixing and spin-rotation mechanisms614 required for singlet-to-triplet pair conversion.

We demonstrate this radically different approach by fabricating Josephson junctions (JJs), in which several superconducting Nb electrodes are laterally separated by an epitaxial thin film of the triangular chiral antiferromagnetic Mn3Ge (refs. 4,5; Fig. 1a, see Methods for device fabrication) and by probing long-ranged Josephson supercurrents614 that show a clear magnetic field interference. The D019-Mn3Ge (ref. 20) epitaxial film used in this study (see Supplementary Text for structural analysis and magnetic properties) has a hexagonal lattice with magnetic Mn atoms forming Kagome-type sublattices stacked along the c axis (// z axis // [0001] in Fig. 1b), isostructural with Mn3Sn (ref. 2). Below the Néel temperature TNéel of roughly 380 K (refs. 35,20), Mn magnetic moments in the x–y Kagome plane form triangular spin structures and lead to a non-collinear AFM configuration with a uniform negative vector chirality3,4 caused by the Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction. Unlike Mn3Sn (ref. 2), the chiral AFM phase in Mn3Ge is robust to low temperature35 (T), which allows one to investigate the transport properties of Josephson supercurrents associated with Berry curvature in this chiral non-collinear AFM. Crucially, the observed decay length of the Josephson supercurrents through the Mn3Ge is far beyond the predicted singlet coherence length ξsingletAFM (refs. 914) and such long-ranged supercurrents are absent in JJs with a collinear AFM IrMn (ref. 15), providing an experimental indication of topologically generated triplet pairing states.

Fig. 1. Chiral non-collinear AFM JJs.

Fig. 1

a, Scanning electron micrographs of the fabricated JJs, consisting of a triangular chiral antiferromagnetic Mn3Ge (40-nm-thick) spacer and multiple superconducting Nb (50-nm thick) electrodes. These Nb electrodes are laterally edge-to-edge separated by 28–119 nm from each other (bottom). The upper scale bar is 3 µm, lower scale bars are 0.5 µm. Note that the 5-nm-ultrathin Ru underlayer serves as a buffer layer (Methods). b,c, Crystal structure (b) and 120o chiral antiferromagnetic configuration (c) of D019-Mn3Ge. Two layers of Mn and Ge atoms are stacked along the c axis (// z axis) where red and black circles (blue and grey) represent Mn and Ge atoms lying in the z = c/2 (z = 0) planes, respectively. The probable antiferromagnetic configurations are presented in c when an external magnetic field is applied along [21¯1¯0] (left) and [01¯10] (right). In each layer, Mn atoms form a Kagome-type lattice and their magnetic moments (blue or red arrows) constitute a 120° antiferromagnetic structure. The orange arrows indicate a weak uncompensated magnetization.

Figure 2a,c,e shows zero-field current–voltage I–V curves of the Nb/Mn3Ge/Nb JJs with several edge-to-edge separation distances, ds = 28, 80 and 119 nm, across the superconducting transition of the Nb electrodes. All the JJs exhibit clear Josephson I–V characteristics that are not strongly hysteretic and which are thus in the overdamped regime, indicating a low resistance-capacitance product21. The T-dependent Josephson critical current can be approximately described by22 IcTIc0(1TTc)α (black lines in Fig. 2b,d,f), where Tc is the superconducting transition temperature at the Nb/Mn3Ge interfaces. Using α = 0.50–0.55, we obtain the zero-temperature critical currents |Ic(0)| = 2.27, 0.90 and 0.43 mA for ds = 28, 80 and 119 nm, respectively. Note that these values are 1–2 orders of magnitude smaller than the depairing critical current in superconducting microbridges formed from Nb thin films23.

Fig. 2. Long-ranged supercurrents through a chiral non-collinear AFM.

Fig. 2

a,c,e, Zero-field current–voltage I–V characteristics of Nb/Mn3Ge/Nb JJs with different edge-to-edge separations ds = 28 (a), 80 (c) and 119 nm (e), taken above (grey) and below (red) the superconducting transition of the Nb electrodes. The black solid lines are fitting curves to determine the Josephson critical current Ic. b,d,f, Associated temperature T dependence of Ic with ds = 28 (b), 80 (d) and 119 nm (f). The black solid lines are theoretical fits to estimate the zero-temperature Ic. g, Normal-state zero-bias resistance Rn (top) and Ic (bottom) of the JJs versus ds. From Rn(ds), we extract the resistance-area product of Nb/Mn3Ge interfaces to be 1 mΩ µm2 and the effective resistivity for the Mn3Ge (40 nm)/Ru (5 nm) track to be 26 µΩ cm, using a standard transmission line (TL) theory (black line, see Supplementary Text for comparison with Hall-bar devices). h, Characteristic voltage Vc = IcRn as a function of ds, from which the decay length of the Josephson coupling through the Mn3Ge spacer is determined using an exponential decay function (black curves).

With increasing ds, the normal-state zero-bias resistance Rn increases linearly whereas Ic decays strongly (Fig. 2g), as expected from the diminishment of proximity-induced Cooper pairs in a longer Mn3Ge spacer. To quantify the decay length ξ of the supercurrents, we fit the ds-dependent characteristic voltage Vcds=IcRnds at T = 2 K (Fig. 2h) using an exponential decay function, expdsξ2426, where we take the dirty junction regime21 in which the mean free path is shorter than any other characteristic lengths. Note that in case of the AFM spacer, the proximity-induced pair correlations decay monotonically without an oscillatory behaviour (0–π phase transition, that is, characteristic of ferromagnet spacers) due to the microscopic cancellation of phase shifts through alternating up and down magnetic moments2426. The estimated ξ = 155–160 nm is significantly longer than the exchange-field-driven pair breaking and decay of spin-unpolarized singlet supercurrents in the AFM, ξsingletAFMħD2Eex = 1–3 nm. Here D=ħ23π22/33mne2n1/3ρ is the diffusion coefficient, e is the electric charge, mn is the effective electron mass that is assumed to be the free-electron m0 = 9.1 × 10−31 kg, n is the electron carrier density (1 × 1019 cm−3 at T = 2 K)27 and ρ is the resistivity (50–90 µΩ cm at T = 2 K)35,27 of the Mn3Ge. Eex ≅ 2πkBTNe´el is the AFM exchange energy of the Mn3Ge. In contrast, provided that spin-flip scattering and spin-orbit scattering are frozen12,13, spin-polarized triplet supercurrents can decay over a much longer length scale914 that is limited by a thermal coherence length, ξtripletAFMħD2πkBT = 33–46 nm at T = 2 K, which is in reasonable agreement with what we obtain. This long-range nature is one of the strongest indications of proximity-generated triplet pairing states614.

It is also worth noting that the values of ξ = 155–160 nm that we find in our system are two orders of magnitude larger than typical values (few nanometres) of the spin-diffusion length of chiral AFM Mn3X (X = Ge (ref. 28) or Sn (ref. 29)) thin films, quantifying how far out-of-equilibrium spin polarization propagates. This suggests that in such a particular class of antiferromagnetic topological semimetals, the transfer and relaxation mechanisms of equilibrium spin carried by triplet Cooper pairs6,17,30 may differ fundamentally from those of non-equilibrium spin by normal unpaired electrons. Further experimental and theoretical studies are required for a detailed understanding.

We next measure the magnetic field interference pattern Ic (μ0H) in Fig. 3a–f, from which one can evaluate the transverse uniformity21 of Ic across the Mn3Ge barrier. For all ds = 28, 80 and 119 nm devices, Ic is strongly modulated by applying a small (modest) external field μ0H < 15 mT (μ0H < 150 mT) perpendicular (parallel) to the interface plane of Nb electrodes. This excludes a short circuit between the neighbouring Nb electrodes and confirms a genuine Josephson effect21. Note that if a short exists, Ic would be almost independent of μ0H (μ0H) for such a small (modest) field range, as presented in the Supplementary Text. The zero-order maximum of Ic is obtained around zero applied field μ0H = μ0H = 0 without a detectable hysteresis, which indicates a vanishingly small spontaneous magnetization and is consistent with features of the AFM spacer25,26.

Fig. 3. Magnetic field interference patterns reflecting spatial quantum interference.

Fig. 3

a,c,e, Josephson critical current Ic versus magnetic field μ0H plots for the ds = 28 (a), 80 (c) and 119 nm (e) Nb/Mn3Ge/Nb junctions, taken at a fixed T = 2 K. In these measurements, μ0H is applied perpendicular to the interface plane of the Nb electrodes. The top inset displays the current–voltage I–V curve of each junction around zero-order minimum of Ic(μ0H). The bottom inset in a schematically illustrates the effective junction area Afluxeff of magnetic flux penetration, given by 2λL+dsw. Here λL is the London penetration depth of the Nb electrodes and w is the width of the Mn3Ge spacer. b,d,f, Data equivalent to a,d,e but for the magnetic field μ0H applied parallel to the interface plane of the Nb electrodes for ds = 28 (b), 80 (d) and 119 nm (f). Note that, accordingly, Afluxeff changes to 2λL+dst where t is the effective thickness of the Mn3Ge spacer.

For a single rectangular JJ, taking into account a non-uniform supercurrent density distribution from structural fluctuations21 of the barrier, the sinusoidal position-dependent superconducting phase by the enclosed magnetic flux Φ under application of μ0H gives rise to a characteristic modulation of Ic (ref. 21). often referred to as a single-slit Fraunhofer diffraction pattern, Icμ0H=IcsincΦΦ02+γ21sincΦΦ02. Here Φ=μ0HAfluxeff and Afluxeff is the effective junction area of magnetic flux penetration that is given by 2λL+dsw for μ0H (bottom inset of Fig. 3a) or 2λL+dst for μ0H (bottom inset of Fig. 3b) and λL is the London penetration depth (130 nm at 2 K)31 of 50 nm thick Nb electrodes. w(t) is the width (effective thickness) of the Mn3Ge spacer and Φ0=h2e is the magnetic flux quantum. γ is a measure of the supercurrent non-uniformity21. Best fits to the Icμ0H and Icμ0H data using this formula give γ=0.1100.138, 2λL+dsw = 0.40–0.46 µm2 and 2λL+dst = 0.040–0.047 µm2, respectively. We then find w = 1.2–1.4 µm and t = 120–140 nm, which are close to the actual dimensions of our devices. Rather, monotonic Ic(μ0H) interference patterns with less clear minima (Fig. 3a–f) for our JJs are likely because the position-dependent phase modulation deviates from the sinusoidal form due to the complicated magnetization reversal process32 of cluster octupole domains of the chiral AFM33, each of which induces a tiny uncompensated magnetization, and thereby the locally varying µ0H-dependent internal phase32.

To prove that the chiral non-collinear antiferromagnetic structure, directly linked to the Berry curvature in k-space, is responsible for the observed long-range supercurrents, we replace the single-phase hexagonal D019-Mn3Ge spacer with either a mixed phase of tetragonal D022- and hexagonal D019-Mn3Ge (Fig. 4a–c), or a polycrystalline collinear AFM IrMn (Fig. 4d–f). As presented in the Supplementary Text, the mixed-phase Mn3Ge reveals a large zero-field anomalous Hall effect (AHE) comparable to the bulk single crystal3,4, ensuring that it still hosts, to a large extent, triangular chiral antiferromagnetic domains relevant to a non-trivial topology15. In contrast, no AHE is detected in the polycrystalline IrMn, as expected for topologically trivial antiferromagnetic ground states16.

Fig. 4. Dependence of Josephson supercurrents on the degree of chiral non-collinearity.

Fig. 4

a, Scanning electron micrograph of the fabricated Nb/Mn3Ge/Nb lateral JJ, where the Mn3Ge spacer is a mixed phase of tetragonal D022 and hexagonal D019 (Supplementary Text). The scale bar (a,d) indicates 0.5 µm. b, Magnetic field interface pattern Ic(μ0H) when the magnetic field μ0H is applied perpendicular to the interface plane of Nb electrodes (bottom inset). The top left and right insets display the current–voltage I–V curves of the JJ, taken around zero-order maximum and zero-order minimum of Ic(μ0H), respectively. c, Data equivalent to b but for the magnetic field μ0H applied parallel to the interface plane of the Nb electrodes (bottom inset). d,e,f, Data equivalent to a,b,c but for the Nb/IrMn/Nb junction with a much shorter ds = 5–16 nm, in which the IrMn spacer is polycrystalline (Supplementary Text). Scanning electron micrograph (d), magnetic field interface patterns (e,f) and data equivalent to b,c. The left inset in f exhibits the characteristic voltage Vc = IcRn as a function of ds, from which the decay length scale of the Josephson coupling through the IrMn spacer is determined to the first order (see Supplementary Text for details).

The most noteworthy result is that in the presence of chiral non-collinearity (equivalently, non-zero Berry phase), long-ranged Josephson supercurrents are established even in the mixed-phase Mn3Ge (Fig. 4b,c) whereas this long-range effect almost disappears when the spin arrangements of the AFM spacer are topologically trivial (Fig. 4e,f). This points unambiguously to a topological origin of Josephson coupling in the chiral AFM Mn3Ge, which should be robust against structural disorder and impurity scattering. Note that the ξ value for the IrMn spacer is estimated to first order to be 3–5 nm (left inset of Fig. 4f and Supplementary Text) and this short-ranged Josephson coupling through the collinear AFM IrMn is in good agreement with previous reports on vertical JJs with γ−Fe50Mn50 (ref. 25) or Cr (ref. 26) spacers. An intuitive explanation of these results is as follows. The 120° non-collinear arrangements of Mn magnetic moments on the atomic-scale in real-space convert spin-unpolarized singlet Cooper pairs (S = 0) to spin-zero triplets (S = 1, ms = 0). The converted spin-zero triplets (S = 1, ms = 0) in motion then experience fictitious magnetic fields (as large as roughly 100 tesla)24 associated with the Berry curvature14 in k-space and rotate to form spin-polarized triplets (S = 1, ms = ±1), which are able to penetrate much deeper68. Here, the fictitious magnetic fields rooted in the chiral non-collinear spin texture24 play a crucial role in changing the quantization axis of the spin-zero triplets (S = 1, ms = 0) to be converted into the spin-polarized triplets (S = 1, ms = ±1). None of the above are present in the IrMn spacer, accounting for its short-range nature of Josephson coupling68,24,25.

The essential ingredient for the realization of the long-range spin-triplet proximity effect68 is the presence of a magnetically inhomogeneous ferromagnet/superconductor interface (often called a spin-active interface), which results in subsequent spin-mixing and spin-rotation processes914, and so far, the spin-triplet proximity effect has been experimentally observed in various JJs with half-metallic ferromagnet (CrO2)13, intrinsically inhomogeneous conical ferromagnet (Ho)11 and non-collinear magnetic heterostructures (PdNi or CuNi)12. The CrO2-based lateral JJs have revealed an exceptionally long decay length of 0.3‒1 µm (ref. 13), which is supported by its half-metallicity, albeit uncertainty in the nature of the magnetic inhomogeneity. The notable aspect of the present study is that instead of the nanometre-scale inhomogeneity of ferromagnetic materials, an atomic-scale non-collinear AFM (in combination with fictitious magnetic fields) is exploited to generate the spin-triplet correlation that can extend over 155‒160 nm, comparable to the CrO2-based JJs13.

We have experimentally demonstrated that lateral Josephson supercurrents through a triangular chiral AFM Mn3Ge (refs. 35) are long-ranged, which is a key aspect of proximity-induced spin-polarized triplet pairing states614. Although detailed theories, covering the triplet superconductivity and Berry curvature, need to be developed for a quantitative description, our results provide the experimental indication of topologically generated triplet pairing states via a chiral non-collinear AFM, which can potentially resolve the outstanding issues raised in conventional ferromagnet-based triplet JJs614. Last but not least, the characteristic decay length of Josephson supercurrents in our chiral AFM is found, not to be limited by hitherto believed spin-diffusion lengths, but rather hinting at topologically protected triplet supercurrents.

Methods

Sample preparation and characterization

All the thin films were grown by d.c. magnetron sputtering in a homemade ultra-high vacuum system with a base pressure of 1 × 10−9 Torr. The single-phase hexagonal D019-Mn3Ge(0001) thin film was grown epitaxially on a Ru-buffered Al2O3(0001) substrate. A 5 nm thick Ru buffer layer was first sputtered at 450 °C with a sputter power of 15 W and at an Ar pressure of 3 mTorr. The Mn and Ge were subsequently codeposited from elemental sputter targets on the Ru(0001) buffer layer at 500 °C and at an Ar pressure of 3 mTorr. The optimized sputter powers were 31 and 10 W for Mn and Ge, respectively. The final composition was determined ex situ by Rutherford backscattering spectrometry to be Mn3.2Ge, where the excess Mn helps to stabilize the hexagonal D019 phase28. To study the ground-state chiral non-collinearity dependence (Fig. 4), the mixed phase of tetragonal D022- and hexagonal D019-Mn3Ge(112¯0) film was prepared using the same growth procedure but on a Ru-buffered sapphire Al2O3(11¯02) substrate and the polycrystalline thin film of collinear AFM IrMn was sputtered at 27 °C on a SiO2(25 nm)/Si substrate. The used sputter powers were 15 and 30 W for Ir and Mn, respectively. We note here that the thickness of Mn3Ge and IrMn films was fixed at 40 nm that is much larger than their singlet coherence length (a few nanometres)2426. So the singlet-pair-mediated Josephson coupling through the ultrathin Ru buffer layer of Nb/Mn3Ge/Nb junctions is unlikely (see the main text for a detailed discussion). Using these unpatterned films, we performed magneto-transport measurements in a Van der Pauw geometry to investigate the Berry curvature-driven AHE15 (Supplementary Text). To probe AFM ordering, indirectly from exchange-biased magnetic hysteresis curve measurements (Supplementary Text), a 10 nm thick Ni8Fe2 layer was sputtered on top of the Mn3Ge and IrMn film. All these films were capped with a 1 nm thick AlOx layer to prevent oxidation.

Device fabrication

To fabricate the lateral JJs (Fig. 1a), we first defined a central AFM track with a lateral dimension of 1.5 × 50 μm2 using optical lithography and Ar-ion beam etching. We then defined Au (80 nm)/Ru (2 nm) electrical leads and bonding pads, which were deposited by Ar-ion beam sputtering. Subsequently, we defined multiple Nb electrodes with an active lateral dimension of 1.0 × 1.5 μm2 on top the AFM track via electron-beam lithography and lift-off steps. The 50-nm thick Nb electrodes were grown by Ar-ion beam sputtering at a pressure of 1.5 × 10–4 mbar and they were edge-to-edge separated by 28–119 nm from each other. Before sputtering the Nb electrodes, the Al2O3 capping layer and Au surface were Ar-ion beam etched away to make possible direct metallic electrical contacts.

Transport measurement

We measured current–voltage I–V curves of the fabricated JJs (Fig. 1a) with a four-probe configuration in a Quantum Design Physical Property Measurement System using a Keithley 6221 current source and a Keithley 2182A nanovoltmeter. The zero-field I–V curves (Fig. 2a–f) were measured across the superconducting transition of Nb electrodes. The Josephson critical current Ic and the normal-state zero-bias resistance Rn of each JJ (Fig. 2g) were determined by fitting the measured I–V curves with the standard formula for overdamped junctions21, V(I)=I|I|RnI2Ic2. As the I–V curves were slightly shifted horizontally, we defined Ic values in positive and negative current directions. We obtained the magnetic field interference patterns Ic (μ0H) (Figs. 3a–f and 4b,c) by repeating the I–V measurements at T = 2 K at the applied magnetic field μ0H (μ0H) perpendicular (parallel) to the interface plane of Nb electrodes. We note here that no significant change in the magnetic interference patterns between zero-field-cooled and field-cooled (1 T) conditions for our JJs with the single-phase Mn3Ge(0001) spacer has been observed. This supports that the chiral non-collinear atomic-scale AFM spin arrangements (as strong as a few hundred tesla at least) are indeed responsible for the observed long-range Josephson coupling in our system. For the same reason, asymmetric hysteretic behaviour in R-μ0H curves of our chiral AFM JJs, reflecting a link between the magnetic ordering and the superconducting state, is weak, but evident, further supporting the spin-polarized triplet pairing interpretation (Supplementary Text).

Online content

Any methods, additional references, Nature Research reporting summaries, source data, extended data, supplementary information, acknowledgements, peer review information; details of author contributions and competing interests; and statements of data and code availability are available at 10.1038/s41563-021-01061-9.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (3.7MB, pdf)

Supplementary Text, Figs. 1–8 and references.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. We are grateful to S. Komori and J. W. A. Robinson at the University of Cambridge for useful discussions, and to K. Mohseni at the Max Planck Institute of Microstructure Physics for the XRD data analysis.

Author contributions

K.-R.J. and S.S.P.P. conceived and designed the experiments with the help of T.K. B.K.H. prepared thin films of the chiral non-collinear AFM Mn3Ge and the collinear AFM IrMn, and characterized their crystallinity and magnetic properties. H.L.M. and H.H. contributed to the structural analysis. K.-R.J. fabricated the lateral JJs with help from K.C., A.C. and J.-C.J., and carried out the transport measurements with the help of J.-C.J. K.-R.J. performed the data analysis with help from T.K. S.S.P.P. supervised the project. K.-R.J., B.K.H. and S.S.P.P. wrote the manuscript with input from all the other co-authors.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Max Planck Institute of Microstructure Physics (2)

Data availability

The data used in this paper are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Kun-Rok Jeon, Binoy Krishna Hazra.

Change history

11/2/2021

In the version of this article initially published online, the following metadata was omitted and has now been included: “Open access funding provided by Max Planck Institute of Microstructure Physics (2)”

Contributor Information

Kun-Rok Jeon, Email: jeonkunrok@gmail.com.

Stuart S. P. Parkin, Email: stuart.parkin@mpi-halle.mpg.de

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41563-021-01061-9.

References

  • 1.Machida Y, Nakatsuji S, Onoda S, Tayama T, Sakakibara T. Time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect without magnetic dipole order. Nature. 2010;463:210–213. doi: 10.1038/nature08680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nakatsuji S, et al. Large anomalous Hall effect in a non-collinear antiferromagnet at room temperature. Nature. 2015;527:212–215. doi: 10.1038/nature15723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nayak AK, et al. Large anomalous Hall effect driven by a nonvanishing Berry curvature in the noncolinear antiferromagnet Mn3Ge. Sci. Adv. 2016;2:e1501870. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1501870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kiyohara N, Tomita T, Nakatsuji S. Giant anomalous Hall effect in the chiral antiferromagnet Mn3Ge. Phys. Rev. Applied. 2016;5:064009. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.5.064009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Soh J-R, et al. Ground-state magnetic structure of Mn3Ge. Phys. Rev. B. 2020;101:140411(R). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.140411. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Linder J, Robinson JWA. Superconducting spintronics. Nat. Phys. 2015;11:307–315. doi: 10.1038/nphys3242. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Eschrig M. Spin-polarized supercurrents for spintronics: a review of current progress. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2015;78:104501. doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/78/10/104501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Birge NO. Spin-triplet supercurrents in Josephson junctions containing strong ferromagnetic materials. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 2018;376:20150150. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2015.0150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bergeret FS, Volkov AF, Efetov KB. Long-range proximity effects in superconductor-ferromagnet structures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001;86:4096–4099. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Houzet M, Buzdin AI. Long range triplet Josephson effect through a ferromagnetic trilayer. Phys. Rev. B. 2007;76:060504(R). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.060504. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Robinson JWA, Witt JDS, Blamire MG. Controlled injection of spin-triplet supercurrents into a strong ferromagnet. Science. 2010;329:59–61. doi: 10.1126/science.1189246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Khaire TS, Khasawneh MA, Pratt WP, Jr, Birge NO. Observation of spin-triplet superconductivity in Co-based Josephson junctions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010;104:137002. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.137002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Keizer RS, et al. A spin triplet supercurrent through the half-metallic ferromagnet CrO2. Nature. 2006;439:825–827. doi: 10.1038/nature04499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cottet A. Inducing odd-frequency triplet superconducting correlations in a normal metal. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011;107:177001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.177001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Xiao D, Chang M-C, Niu Q. Berry phase effects on electronic properties. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2010;82:1959–2007. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.1959. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhou J, et al. Large spin-orbit torque efficiency enhanced by magnetic structure of collinear antiferromagnet IrMn. Sci. Adv. 2019;5:eaau6696. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau6696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jeon K-R, et al. Enhanced spin pumping into superconductors provides evidence for superconducting pure spin currents. Nat. Mater. 2018;17:499–503. doi: 10.1038/s41563-018-0058-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Banerjee N, et al. Controlling the superconducting transition by spin-orbit coupling. Phys. Rev. B. 2018;97:184521. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.184521. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bergeret FS, Tokatly IV. Spin-orbit coupling as a source of long-range triplet proximity effect in superconductor-ferromagnet hybrid structures. Phys. Rev. B. 2014;89:134517. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.134517. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Arras E, Caliste D, Deutsch T, Lançon F, Pochet P. Phase diagram, structure, and magnetic properties of the Ge-Mn system: a first-principles study. Phys. Rev. B. 2011;83:174103. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.174103. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Barone, A. & Paterno, G. Physics and Applications of the Josephson Effect 2nd edn (John Wiley & Sons, 1982).
  • 22.Likharev KK. Superconducting weak links. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1979;51:101–159. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.51.101. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rusanov AY, Hesselberth MBS, Aarts J. Depairing currents in superconducting films of Nb and amorphous MoGe. Phys. Rev. B. 2004;70:024510. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.024510. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Krivoruchko VN. Upper critical fields of the superconducting state of a superconductor-antiferromagnetic metal superlattice. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 1996;82:347–355. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bell C, et al. Proximity and Josephson effects in superconductor/antiferromagnetic Nb/γ−Fe50Mn50 heterostructures. Phys. Rev. B. 2003;68:144517. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.144517. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Weides M, Disch M, Kohlstedt H, Bürgler DE. Observation of Josephson coupling through an interlayer of antiferromagnetically ordered chromium. Phys. Rev. B. 2009;80:064508. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.064508. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wang X, et al. Robust anomalous Hall effect and temperature driven Lifshitz transition in Weyl semimetal Mn3Ge. Nanoscale. 2021;13:2601–2608. doi: 10.1039/D0NR07946D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hong D, et al. Large anomalous Nernst and inverse spin-Hall effects in epitaxial thin films of kagome semimetal Mn3Ge. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2020;4:094201. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.094201. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Muduli PK, et al. Evaluation of spin diffusion length and spin Hall angle of the antiferromagnetic Weyl semimetal Mn3Sn. Phys. Rev. B. 2019;99:184425. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.184425. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Flokstra MG, et al. Remotely induced magnetism in a normal metal using a superconducting spin-valve. Nat. Phys. 2016;12:57–61. doi: 10.1038/nphys3486. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gubin AI, Il’in KS, Vitusevich SA. Dependence of magnetic penetration depth on the thickness of superconducting Nb thin films. Phys. Rev. B. 2005;72:064503. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.064503. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Börcsök B, Komori S, Buzdin AI, Robinson JWA. Fraunhofer patterns in magnetic Josephson junctions with non-uniform magnetic susceptibility. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:5616. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41764-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Liu J, Balents L. Anomalous Hall effect and topological defects in antiferromagnetic Weyl semimetals: Mn3Sn/Ge. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017;119:087202. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.087202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information (3.7MB, pdf)

Supplementary Text, Figs. 1–8 and references.

Data Availability Statement

The data used in this paper are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.


Articles from Nature Materials are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES