Skip to main content
Applied Microscopy logoLink to Applied Microscopy
. 2021 Sep 25;51:13. doi: 10.1186/s42649-021-00062-x

Cryo-EM as a powerful tool for drug discovery: recent structural based studies of SARS-CoV-2

Han-ul Kim 1, Hyun Suk Jung 1,
PMCID: PMC8464538  PMID: 34562174

Abstract

The novel coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has arisen as a global pandemic affecting the respiratory system showing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, there is no targeted therapeutic agent yet and due to the growing cases of infections and the rising death tolls, discovery of the possible drug is the need of the hour. In general, the study for discovering therapeutic agent for SARS-CoV-2 is largely focused on large-scale screening with fragment-based drug discovery (FBDD). With the recent advancement in cryo-electron microscopy (Cryo-EM), it has become one of the widely used tools in structural biology. It is effective in investigating the structure of numerous proteins in high-resolution and also had an intense influence on drug discovery, determining the binding reaction and regulation of known drugs as well as leading the design and development of new drug candidates. Here, we review the application of cryo-EM in a structure-based drug design (SBDD) and in silico screening of the recently acquired FBDD in SARS-CoV-2. Such insights will help deliver better understanding in the procurement of the effective remedial solution for this pandemic.

Keywords: Transmission electron microscopy, Cryo-electron microscopy, Structure-based drug design, Fragment-based drug discovery, Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

Introduction

In biological environments, proteins do not statically function, interacting with various binding partners in the context of complex networks and have dynamic regulatory mechanisms. Simultaneously, individual proteins perform with several partners and change the assembly state of the complex (Berendsen and Hayward 2000). Namely, the structural study is required for a comprehensive understanding of the complex function of high-molecular proteins (Dubrovsky et al. 2015). The recent revolution in cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) has provided an outburst of structure determinations at better high-resolution (Kuhlbrandt 2014). This has allowed cryo-EM results to yield visualization of native molecular interactions such as ligand binding state, molecular complex and so on, and these results have provided unparalleled insights into the molecular mechanisms of physiological processes (Scapin et al. 2018). An adoption of structural biology in small molecule related drug discovery is well established in now. The consequence of structural study in drug discovery has been understood since 1980s, and, by the early 1990s the first successful cases were identified (Dorsey et al. 1994; Erickson et al. 1990; Roberts et al. 1990). Over the past two decades, X-ray crystallography has advanced to the magnitude the crystal structures of proteins or small complexes of protein–ligand could be generally resolved with near-atomic resolution (~ 3.0 Å) to contribute screening of drug candidate of small fragment and fragment-based drug discovery (FBDD) (Maveyraud and Mourey 2020). However, this technique requires protein crystallization step from enormous concentration of protein samples, which means there is certain limitation in challenging targets such as membrane proteins and molecular complexes since it is hard to purify and crystallize (Acharya and Lloyd 2005; Li and Sun 2017). As mentioned above, a revolution in cryo-EM has occurred in the past few years, owing to dramatic access in the technological improvement of the hardware and software (Egelman 2016). Thus, cryo-EM has risen as a complementary method to traditional techniques and furnished several advantages. For example, an achievement to larger molecular complex that have been impossible to determinate by X-ray crystallography or nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) (Frank 2017). Therefore, this improved structural determination of the protein and molecular complex by cryo-EM with near atomic-resolution structure aiding to promote drug development and support structure-based drug design (SBDD) in pharmaceutical industries now and in the near future. The global world is currently suffering from severe economic and health devastation from severe acute reparatory syndrome 2 (SARS-CoV-2) outbreak in Wuhan, China (Lai et al. 2020; Pan et al. 2020a). Vaccine development for this pandemic has been completed by enthusiastic researchers from various pharmaceutical companies such as Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Moderna and so on (Chagla 2021; Knoll and Wonodi 2021; Mahase 2020). Moreover, global vaccinations are underway to prevent infection of it, but the development of certain treatments for remedy is still ongoing. Further, scientists around the world are putting much effort into finding a therapeutic agent (Asai et al. 2020; Petushkova and Zamyatnin 2020; Zafar et al. 2020). This is achieved by analyzing whether it can be applied to SARS-CoV-2 by referring to previously published small molecules, such as by inhibiting replication of same type of viruses and comparing efficacy by screening similar small molecules on the large-scale screening methods (Caly et al. 2020; Jiang et al. 2021; Zhang et al. 2020b). In particular, FBDD is extensively applying on analysis of binding capabilities using molecular dynamics (MD) at in silico environment for selected small molecule candidates after screening the efficacy of the substantive large-scale screening with a preliminary candidate group from database (Chen et al. 2021; Muhseen et al. 2020; Sepay et al. 2021). In this review, we will focus on recent studies of the structural determination of SARS-CoV-2 by cryo-EM and discuss SBDD based on FBDD at in silico screening environment for the development of therapeutic agents for SARSC-CoV-2. We hope that this global pandemic will end soon with various approaches of the numerous researchers in drug development.

Cryo-EM in drug discovery

The exponential advancement in electron microscopy (EM) have allowed an increase in resolution for efficient drug discovery (Merk et al. 2016). While all of EM analysis has been in use for approximately 50 years to observe biological specimens, only in the past a few years has the result accomplished defining high-resolution structures useful for application in the field of drug discovery (Renaud et al. 2018). Jacques Dubochet, Joachim Frank and Richard Henderson was awarded the Nobel prize in chemistry in 2017, in recognition of their contributions to development of cryo- EM that progress into high-resolution in structural biology using EM. These advancements elucidating the method to promptly capture the native specimen in vitrified ice condition, deconvolute the manifold state of the sample in ice, and increase the performance of the equipment, notably high-sensitive detectors (Nogales 2016). As mentioned above, the improved cryo-EM can provide several advantages than x-ray crystallography, which is typically used in the field of drug discovery with structural studies. First, x-ray crystallography requires crystallized protein samples, a serious bottleneck that is highly restricted in the beginning of many target proteins. On the other hand, cryo-EM is directly observed in native without any modification of the target. Also, it has a wide range of application pool without limitations on macromolecule, virus, and protein complex because large proteins, protein complexes, or flexible samples are difficult to handle in x-ray crystallography. In other words, cryo-EM can observe the native mechanical working state in a target specimen often enabling observation of unexpected drug binding sites or providing an insight to understand the mechanism of molecular regulation. This is robust benefit in SBDD for membrane proteins such as multiple ion channels, transporters and G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR) (Jojoa-Cruz et al. 2018; Pan et al. 2020b; Scheres 2016; Van Drie and Tong 2020; Zhang et al. 2021). Although there are already many papers published for the cryo-EM method, the first step is the preparation of purified samples. This is the same as the starting stage of x-ray crystallography, However the concentration of the samples is usually small as 1 mg/ml (Kwon et al. 2019; Schmidli et al. 2019). Next, optimization procedure is required to obtain the best grid to observe by considering the thickness of the ice, distribution and orientation of the sample and so on. This is a similar step to crystallization of enormous bottle neck in x-ray crystallography (Kampjut et al. 2021). After confirming the quality of grid specimen, the cryo-EM movie images are obtained using the high-performance transmission electron microscope (TEM) and detector. The observed images are refining a three-dimensional reconstruction model employing a typical software according to a particular algorithm in a short time (Bell et al. 2018; Grant et al. 2018; Punjani et al. 2017; Zivanov et al. 2018). The time and cost consumed will be reduced in the future because, the software regarding the image processing step has rapidly improved. Moreover, the results of reconstructed map will also improve (Rohou and Grigorieff 2015; Zhang 2016; Zheng et al. 2017). In addition, these refined cryo-EM models can be used for structural determination fitted with the atomic model of x-ray crystallographic regardless of their resolution, and their own atomic structural modeling is possible at high-resolution (Afonine et al. 2018; Pettersen et al. 2004). Therefore, recent advances in hardware and software have made it easier to demonstrate the results of cryo-EM at ~ 4.0 Å of responsible high-resolution, which is sufficient in identifying the ligand binding state (Zhang et al. 2020a). The highest reconstruction result using cryo-EM is currently 1.2 Å, indicating that cryo-EM has no intrinsic limitations for atomic resolution results of the molecule, it is easy to detect not only the ligand binding but also the small molecule binding at the native water-like environment. suggesting its huge potential as a fascinating tool for SBDD and FBDD (Nakane et al. 2020; Wong et al. 2017; Yip et al. 2020).

Recent structural studies of SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins using cryo-EM

The coronaviruses are the largest enveloped positive-strand RNA viruses. They have a broad host range in mammalian and avian. It is also the cause to several lesions such as acute and chronic diseases of the respiratory, gastrointestinal, and neurological systems (Wu et al. 2020). The coronavirus spike (S) protein is a highly glycosylated transmembrane fusion protein containing ~ 1400 amino acids as a molecular machine that leads virus particle invade into host cells (Bosch et al. 2003). This S protein involves S1 subunit to bind into the specific target receptor of host cell surface and S2 subunit to conflate into host cell membrane. In addition, S protein can exist in two states, as prefusion and postfusion of structural conformational changes (Li 2016). To invade into the host cells, they have to defeat the surface membrane as a barrier of the host cell through specific target receptor. An individual enveloped virion accomplishes by fusion into membrane surface, mediated by s proteins on their viral membrane (Baker et al. 1999). The molecular and structural study about theses process and protein is required for better understanding to figure out the novel coronavirus in near future. In general, S protein in coronaviruses has been studied as a key target for diagnosis, treatment antibody, and vaccine development. D wrapp et al. determined the prefusion state of SARS-CoV-2 S protein as high-resolution using cryo-EM soon after the begin pandemic (Wrapp et al. 2020). The authors of this paper provided a lot of useful information, as well as high-resolution information about SARS-CoV-2 S protein. First, the authors suggested information to enable structural determination of this mechanical activation by up/down conformation reconstructing the active/inactive state of one monomer’s receptor binding domain (RBD) in intact trimeric structure in the prefusion state of S protein. This has been clearly identified in 3D the classification steps, and the local resolution map of the whole structure suggests that the resolution of this area is extremely lower than others, with significant flexibility (Rawson et al. 2016). Also, the trimer structure that is very similar to the S protein of SARS-CoV in overall shape (Sun et al. 2020). However, the formation of RBD that have a more structurally loose state in closed form. This structural determination supports 10 to 20 times higher affinity for angiotensin-converting enzyme 2(ACE2), the same target receptor as S protein in SARS-CoV. In addition, the authors confirmed the presence of the previously absent sequence RRAR through sequence alignment with SARS-CoV and bat RaTG13. This is a furin recognition sequence region found in critical influenza (Walker et al. 1994; Xia et al. 2020). which the one of suggestive clue that SARS-CoV-2 maybe fatal than before other types. Therefore, this paper can be thought as providing information that is a beginning point for solving this global pandemic. Next, a noticeable recent research paper on SARS-CoV-2 based on structural biology in pharmaceutical field is the stabilization of S protein using specific disulfide and determination of structural study of SARS-CoV-2 S trimer by cryo-EM published by Xiong et al. (2020). In this work, the authors not only suggest effective strategies for structural stability of S trimer, but also identifies the factors known to contribute to structural stability using high-resolution cryo-EM maps. First, the prefusion state of SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS)-CoV are unstable in metastable condition (Kirchdoerfer et al. 2018; Pallesen et al. 2017). Also, SARS-CoV-2 S protein shows similar characterization, and S protein of the SARS-CoV-2 solubilized by detergent can be changed into the postfusion conformation during purification process (Cai et al. 2020; Liu et al. 2020). A suitable immunization to develop successful vaccine need stable antigens, and instability of the prefusion state of SARS-CoV-2 S protein has caused the speed of vaccine development to slow down. In the previous study of stabilization of S protein, researchers inserted SOSIP mutation (a disulfide bond and a stabilizing protein) in the glycoprotein of human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) to stabilize the S protein of HIV-1 (Graham et al. 2019). In addition, the authors have tried to SARS-CoV-2 based on their attempts to stabilize structural states by introducing two prolines in the S2 region of former SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, however have observed that prefusion states cannot be maintained for long term periods (Kirchdoerfer et al. 2018; Pallesen et al. 2017). Thus, their strategy, successful stabilization by engineered disulfide bond adopt into S protein trimer and structural determination by cryo-EM can induce immune response, increase utilization when used as a vaccine, make it available as a diagnostic marker, provide a structural basis for stability for SARS-CoV-2. As a result, this study confirms that the trimer structure of S proteins of SARS-CoV2 maintains structural stability even in long-term storage for 30 days and a high temperature of 60 degrees. This construct showed the best stability compared to the previously known proline mutations or other mutations contributing to structural activity (Xiong et al. 2020). If these results are used for vaccine development or diagnosis reagent, not only will the disadvantages about storage issue of the vaccines currently used will be solved, but their utilization is also expected to be significant, especially in high-temperature areas with poor infrastructure. Currently, the study of SARS-CoV-2 by cryo-EM has also been applied to studies to better understand the overall immune mechanism, focusing on the study of stability and activity of S trimer based on structural information.

Application of cryo-EM in structure based in silico screening of SARS-CoV-2

‘In silico’ is used to mean experimentation conducted by computer and is related to the other biological environmental terms in vivo and in vitro. This method is generally used to test in vitro data to create an experimental model. Also, such virtual models have employed in the discovery and optimization of small molecules and compound with specific affinity to a biological target, the conformation of absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity properties as well as physicochemical characterization (Ghosh et al. 2006; Kitchen et al. 2004; Leach et al. 2006). Moreover, it means the use of this experimental data in the construct of computational models or virtual simulations can be suggested to make predictions, hypotheses, and to provide achievements in medicine and therapeutics (Rognan 2017). Therefore, this method can be aid to the numerous possible stages of drug discovery in now and future. Currently, rapid and effective development is required using structure based in silico screening without a clear drug development strategy of SARS-CoV-2 being presented. This section explains examples of structure based in silico screening for ligand screening and affinity profiling based on ligand and target, which are currently used mainly in SARS-CoV-2 therapeutic agent discovery/development (Ekins et al. 2007). Recent development of therapeutic agent and discovery of drug candidate for SARS-CoV-2 has led to large-scale screening of previously antiviral-effective compounds or already approved drugs (Caly et al. 2020; Riva et al. 2020; Zhang et al. 2020b). In molecular level, since the structure of S protein of SARS-CoV-2 is already determined by cryo-EM, research has been conducted on molecule levels that exhibit a certain level of affinity to the S protein using existing databases. This appears to be aimed at the more precise regulation by understanding at the molecular level, rather than at the preliminary experimental results, such as by suppressing the replication of virus at the cellular level (Boopathi et al. 2021). These studies are accompanied by the study of in silico environmental molecular dynamics (MD) based on structural biology (Chen et al. 2021; Ibrahim et al. 2020; Sepay et al. 2021). In particular, structure based inhibition of specific main targets are RBD, which causes host cell membrane fusion by contacting the ACE2 receptor in humans, and main protease (Mpro), which cleave the translated polyprotin from invaded viral RNA and makes it into an individual protein (Erlanson 2020; Muhseen et al. 2020). The life cycle of a virus consists of four main steps, the first in which the virus identifies specific receptors and attaches them to the host cells. In the second stage, it fuses with the host cell membrane and inserts genetic material of them to the host cell. Next, the viral genetic material begins to produce structural and non-structured proteins using the host’s system, and finally the viral particles are assembled and separated from the host cell, already ready to attack the other cells (Chazal and Gerlier 2003; Choudhary et al. 2020). Thus, antiviral drugs targeting S-RBD-ACE2 interactions and Mpro inhibition, the early stage of infection, can provide a quick solution to combat viruses. For more rapid and effective findings, current led method is depending on the structural information of each target, rather than starting from a large, substrate molecule or numerous drug-sized molecules, starts with more limited smaller molecules, or fragments (Chazal and Gerlier 2003; Maveyraud and Mourey 2020). However, because the fragment or the compound is too small, they tend to easily bind to other proteins. these non-specific binding can lead to unpredictable toxicity. Thus, the small antiviral agents must be designed more precisely and accurately observed (Kelly et al. 2021). Therefore, considering above mentioned the advantages of cryo-EM and the specificity of this drug candidate screening, cryo-EM could be quickly and accurately determined molecular interactions in near native condition among several methods of binding ligands to proteins, and it can be powerful option as most effective starting point for in silico drug screening.

Conclusions: future aspects of cryo-EM in drug discovery

Cryo-EM rapidly defined the high-resolution structure underlying SARS-CoV-2 drug development after the global pandemic outbreak, and many researchers are suggesting some notable candidates as a much-needed drug for SARS-CoV-2 by using this structural information (Panda et al. 2020; Wrapp et al. 2020). As has been much discussed now, various structural information by cryo-EM has provided unprecedented insights into the complex molecular mechanisms by dramatic technological achievement (Method of the year 2015 2016). Currently, by adopt of most structural biologists, drug design using structural information by cryo-EM is continuously increasing. A successful case is demonstrated on a paper by Wong et al., which identified an antimalarial mefloquine (MFQ) binding for 80S ribosome of plasmodium falciparum and used this information to structural improve an efficacy of MFQ (Wong et al. 2017). Unfortunately, of course, the representative advantage of cryo-EM is not applied that many samples can promptly observe high-resolution structural results. There are still key challenges to be resolved during structural analysis using cryo-EM. Nevertheless, this field is growing steadily, and cryo-EM is, by itself, a valuable technology in structural biology complementary to many traditional existing methods. If advances in software and hardware continue and further improve the efficiency of high throughput data analysis, such as automation of sample preparation, this will become a highly valuable technology development in structural biology and will greatly influence us to understand molecular events such as protein–ligand complexes, accelerating the drug discovery in near future.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable in this section.

Abbreviations

SARS-CoV-2

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

ARDS

Acute respiratory distress syndrome

FBDD

Fragment-based drug discovery

Cryo-EM

Cryo-electron microscopy

SBDD

Structure-based drug design

NMR

Nuclear magnetic resonance

MD

Molecular dynamics

EM

Electron microscopy

GPCR

G-protein coupled receptor

TEM

Transmission electron microscope

S

Spike protein

RBD

Receptor binding domain

ACE2

Angiotensin-converting enzyme2

MERS

Middle East respiratory syndrome

SARS

Severe acute respiratory syndrome

HIV-1

Human immunodeficiency virus-1

Mpro

Main protease

RNA

Ribonucleic acid

MFQ

Mefloquine

Authors’ contributions

H-u. K. and H.S.J. reviewed the publication and wrote paper. H.S.J. supervised the whole project and performed the editing of the paper. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant number: HI20C0344), the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) grant funded by the Korea government(MSIT) (2021R1A2C1009404 to HSJ) and the Korea Basic Science Institute(KBSI) National Research Facilities &Equipment Center(NFEC) grant funded by the Korea government(Ministry of Education) (2019R1A6C1010006).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article and no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Declarations

Competing interests

No potential competing interest relevant to this article was reported.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. Acharya KR, Lloyd MD. The advantages and limitations of protein crystal structures. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2005;26(1):10–14. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2004.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Afonine PV, Poon BK, Read RJ, Sobolev OV, Terwilliger TC, Urzhumtsev A, Adams PD. Real-space refinement in PHENIX for cryo-EM and crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. 2018;74(Pt 6):531–544. doi: 10.1107/S2059798318006551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Asai A, Konno M, Ozaki M, Otsuka C, Vecchione A, Arai T, Kitagawa T, Ofusa K, Yabumoto M, Hirotsu T, Taniguchi M, Eguchi H, Doki Y, Ishii H. COVID-19 drug discovery using intensive approaches. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21(8):2839. doi: 10.3390/ijms21082839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker KA, Dutch RE, Lamb RA, Jardetzky TS. Structural basis for paramyxovirus-mediated membrane fusion. Mol. Cell. 1999;3(3):309–319. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80458-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bell JM, Chen M, Durmaz T, Fluty AC, Ludtke SJ. New software tools in EMAN2 inspired by EMDatabank map challenge. J. Struct. Biol. 2018;204(2):283–290. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2018.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Berendsen HJ, Hayward S. Collective protein dynamics in relation to function. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2000;10(2):165–169. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(00)00061-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Boopathi S, Poma AB, Kolandaivel P. Novel 2019 coronavirus structure, mechanism of action, antiviral drug promises and rule out against its treatment. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2021;39(9):3409–3418. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2020.1758788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bosch BJ, van der Zee R, de Haan CA, Rottier PJ. The coronavirus spike protein is a class I virus fusion protein: structural and functional characterization of the fusion core complex. J. Virol. 2003;77(16):8801–8811. doi: 10.1128/jvi.77.16.8801-8811.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cai Y, Zhang J, Xiao T, Peng H, Sterling SM, Walsh RM, Jr, Rawson S, Rits-Volloch S, Chen B. Distinct conformational states of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Science. 2020;369(6511):1586–1592. doi: 10.1126/science.abd4251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Caly L, Druce JD, Catton MG, Jans DA, Wagstaff KM. The FDA-approved drug ivermectin inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. Antiviral Res. 2020;178:104787. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chagla Z. The BNT162b2 (BioNTech/Pfizer) vaccine had 95% efficacy against COVID-19 >/=7 days after the 2nd dose. Ann. Intern. Med. 2021;174(2):JC15. doi: 10.7326/ACPJ202102160-015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chazal N, Gerlier D. Virus entry, assembly, budding, and membrane rafts. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2003;67(2):226–237. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.67.2.226-237.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen TF, Chang YC, Hsiao Y, Lee KH, Hsiao YC, Lin YH, Tu YE, Huang HC, Chen CY, Juan HF. DockCoV2: a drug database against SARS-CoV-2. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(D1):D1152–D1159. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Choudhary S, Malik YS, Tomar S. Identification of SARS-CoV-2 cell entry inhibitors by drug repurposing using in silico structure-based virtual screening approach. Front. Immunol. 2020;11:1664. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dorsey BD, Levin RB, McDaniel SL, Vacca JP, Guare JP, Darke PL, Zugay JA, Emini EA, Schleif WA, Quintero JC, et al. L-735,524: the design of a potent and orally bioavailable HIV protease inhibitor. J. Med. Chem. 1994;37(21):3443–3451. doi: 10.1021/jm00047a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dubrovsky A, Sorrentino S, Harapin J, Sapra KT, Medalia O. Developments in cryo-electron tomography for in situ structural analysis. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2015;581:78–85. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2015.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Egelman EH. The current revolution in cryo-EM. Biophys. J. 2016;110(5):1008–1012. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ekins S, Mestres J, Testa B. In silico pharmacology for drug discovery: methods for virtual ligand screening and profiling. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2007;152(1):9–20. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Erickson J, Neidhart DJ, VanDrie J, Kempf DJ, Wang XC, Norbeck DW, Plattner JJ, Rittenhouse JW, Turon M, Wideburg N, et al. Design, activity, and 2.8 A crystal structure of a C2 symmetric inhibitor complexed to HIV-1 protease. Science. 1990;249(4968):527–533. doi: 10.1126/science.2200122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Erlanson DA. Many small steps towards a COVID-19 drug. Nat. Commun. 2020;11(1):5048. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18710-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Frank J. Advances in the field of single-particle cryo-electron microscopy over the last decade. Nat. Protoc. 2017;12(2):209–212. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2017.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ghosh S, Nie A, An J, Huang Z. Structure-based virtual screening of chemical libraries for drug discovery. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2006;10(3):194–202. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Graham BS, Gilman MSA, McLellan JS. Structure-based vaccine antigen design. Annu. Rev. Med. 2019;70:91–104. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-121217-094234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Grant T, Rohou A, Grigorieff N. cisTEM, user-friendly software for single-particle image processing. Elife. 2018;7:e35383. doi: 10.7554/eLife.35383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ibrahim MAA, Abdelrahman AHM, Hussien TA, Badr EAA, Mohamed TA, El-Seedi HR, Pare PW, Efferth T, Hegazy MF. In silico drug discovery of major metabolites from spices as SARS-CoV-2 main protease inhibitors. Comput. Biol. Med. 2020;126:104046. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Jiang YP, Zhao XX, Lv HQ, Wen CP. Drug screening and development from the affinity of S protein of new coronavirus with ACE2. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2021;40(4):715–723. doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-04048-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Jojoa-Cruz S, Saotome K, Murthy SE, Tsui CCA, Sansom MS, Patapoutian A, Ward AB. Cryo-EM structure of the mechanically activated ion channel OSCA1.2. Elife. 2018;7:e41845. doi: 10.7554/eLife.41845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kampjut D, Steiner J, Sazanov LA. Cryo-EM grid optimization for membrane proteins. iScience. 2021;24(3):102139. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kelly ML, Chu CC, Shi H, Ganser LR, Bogerd HP, Huynh K, Hou Y, Cullen BR, Al-Hashimi HM. Understanding the characteristics of nonspecific binding of drug-like compounds to canonical stem-loop RNAs and their implications for functional cellular assays. RNA. 2021;27(1):12–26. doi: 10.1261/rna.076257.120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kirchdoerfer RN, Wang N, Pallesen J, Wrapp D, Turner HL, Cottrell CA, Corbett KS, Graham BS, McLellan JS, Ward AB. Stabilized coronavirus spikes are resistant to conformational changes induced by receptor recognition or proteolysis. Sci. Rep. 2018;8(1):15701. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34171-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kitchen DB, Decornez H, Furr JR, Bajorath J. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications. Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov. 2004;3(11):935–949. doi: 10.1038/nrd1549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Knoll MD, Wonodi C. Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine efficacy. Lancet. 2021;397(10269):72–74. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32623-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kuhlbrandt W. Biochemistry. The resolution revolution. Science. 2014;343(6178):1443–1444. doi: 10.1126/science.1251652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kwon E, Pathak D, Kim HU, Dahal P, Ha SC, Lee SS, Jeong H, Jeoung D, Chang HW, Jung HS, Kim DY. Structural insights into stressosome assembly. IUCrJ. 2019;6(Pt 5):938–947. doi: 10.1107/S205225251900945X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lai CC, Shih TP, Ko WC, Tang HJ, Hsueh PR. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19): the epidemic and the challenges. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2020;55(3):105924. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Leach AR, Shoichet BK, Peishoff CE. Prediction of protein-ligand interactions. Docking and scoring: successes and gaps. J. Med. Chem. 2006;49(20):5851–5855. doi: 10.1021/jm060999m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Li F. Structure, function, and evolution of coronavirus spike proteins. Annu. Rev. Virol. 2016;3(1):237–261. doi: 10.1146/annurev-virology-110615-042301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Li J, Sun J. Application of X-ray diffraction and electron crystallography for solving complex structure problems. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017;50(11):2737–2745. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. C. Liu, Y. Yang, Y. Gao, C. Shen, B. Ju, C. Liu, X. Tang, J. Wei, X. Ma, W. Liu, S. Xu, Y. Liu, J. Yuan, J. Wu, Z. Liu, Z. Zhang, P. Wang, Liu L, Viral architecture of SARS-CoV-2 with post-fusion spike revealed by Cryo-EM. bioRxiv. 2020.2003.2002.972927 (2020). 10.1101/2020.03.02.972927
  40. Mahase E. Covid-19: Moderna vaccine is nearly 95% effective, trial involving high risk and elderly people shows. BMJ. 2020;371:m4471. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4471. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Maveyraud L, Mourey L. Protein X-ray crystallography and drug discovery. Molecules. 2020;25(5):1030. doi: 10.3390/molecules25051030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Merk A, Bartesaghi A, Banerjee S, Falconieri V, Rao P, Davis MI, Pragani R, Boxer MB, Earl LA, Milne JLS, Subramaniam S. Breaking cryo-EM resolution barriers to facilitate drug discovery. Cell. 2016;165(7):1698–1707. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Method of the year 2015. Nat. Methods. 13(1), 1 (2016). 10.1038/nmeth.3730. [DOI] [PubMed]
  44. Muhseen ZT, Hameed AR, Al-Hasani HMH, Tahir Ul Qamar M, Li G. Promising terpenes as SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) attachment inhibitors to the human ACE2 receptor: Integrated computational approach. J. Mol. Liq. 2020;320:114493. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2020.114493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Nakane T, Kotecha A, Sente A, McMullan G, Masiulis S, Brown P, Grigoras IT, Malinauskaite L, Malinauskas T, Miehling J, Uchanski T, Yu L, Karia D, Pechnikova EV, de Jong E, Keizer J, Bischoff M, McCormack J, Tiemeijer P, Hardwick SW, Chirgadze DY, Murshudov G, Aricescu AR, Scheres SHW. Single-particle cryo-EM at atomic resolution. Nature. 2020;587(7832):152–156. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2829-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Nogales E. The development of cryo-EM into a mainstream structural biology technique. Nat. Methods. 2016;13(1):24–27. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Pallesen J, Wang N, Corbett KS, Wrapp D, Kirchdoerfer RN, Turner HL, Cottrell CA, Becker MM, Wang L, Shi W, Kong WP, Andres EL, Kettenbach AN, Denison MR, Chappell JD, Graham BS, Ward AB, McLellan JS. Immunogenicity and structures of a rationally designed prefusion MERS-CoV spike antigen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2017;114(35):E7348–E7357. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1707304114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Pan A, Liu L, Wang C, Guo H, Hao X, Wang Q, Huang J, He N, Yu H, Lin X, Wei S, Wu T. Association of public health interventions with the epidemiology of the COVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan, China. JAMA. 2020;323(19):1915–1923. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Pan Y, Ren Z, Gao S, Shen J, Wang L, Xu Z, Yu Y, Bachina P, Zhang H, Fan X, Laganowsky A, Yan N, Zhou M. Structural basis of ion transport and inhibition in ferroportin. Nat. Commun. 2020;11(1):5686. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19458-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Panda PK, Arul MN, Patel P, Verma SK, Luo W, Rubahn HG, Mishra YK, Suar M, Ahuja R. Structure-based drug designing and immunoinformatics approach for SARS-CoV-2. Sci. Adv. 2020;6(28):eabb8097. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abb8097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE. UCSF Chimera–a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 2004;25(13):1605–1612. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Petushkova AI, Zamyatnin AA., Jr Papain-like proteases as coronaviral drug targets: current inhibitors, opportunities, and limitations. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2020;13(10):277. doi: 10.3390/ph13100277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Punjani A, Rubinstein JL, Fleet DJ, Brubaker MA. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods. 2017;14(3):290–296. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Rawson S, Iadanza MG, Ranson NA, Muench SP. Methods to account for movement and flexibility in cryo-EM data processing. Methods. 2016;100:35–41. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.03.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Renaud JP, Chari A, Ciferri C, Liu WT, Remigy HW, Stark H, Wiesmann C. Cryo-EM in drug discovery: achievements, limitations and prospects. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2018;17(7):471–492. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2018.77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Riva L, Yuan S, Yin X, Martin-Sancho L, Matsunaga N, Pache L, Burgstaller-Muehlbacher S, De Jesus PD, Teriete P, Hull MV, Chang MW, Chan JF, Cao J, Poon VK, Herbert KM, Cheng K, Nguyen TH, Rubanov A, Pu Y, Nguyen C, Choi A, Rathnasinghe R, Schotsaert M, Miorin L, Dejosez M, Zwaka TP, Sit KY, Martinez-Sobrido L, Liu WC, White KM, Chapman ME, Lendy EK, Glynne RJ, Albrecht R, Ruppin E, Mesecar AD, Johnson JR, Benner C, Sun R, Schultz PG, Su AI, Garcia-Sastre A, Chatterjee AK, Yuen KY, Chanda SK. Discovery of SARS-CoV-2 antiviral drugs through large-scale compound repurposing. Nature. 2020;586(7827):113–119. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2577-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Roberts NA, Martin JA, Kinchington D, Broadhurst AV, Craig JC, Duncan IB, Galpin SA, Handa BK, Kay J, Krohn A, et al. Rational design of peptide-based HIV proteinase inhibitors. Science. 1990;248(4953):358–361. doi: 10.1126/science.2183354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Rognan D. The impact of in silico screening in the discovery of novel and safer drug candidates. Pharmacol. Ther. 2017;175:47–66. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.02.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Rohou A, Grigorieff N. CTFFIND4: fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 2015;192(2):216–221. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2015.08.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Scapin G, Potter CS, Carragher B. Cryo-EM for small molecules discovery, design, understanding, and application. Cell Chem. Biol. 2018;25(11):1318–1325. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2018.07.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Scheres SH. Processing of structurally heterogeneous cryo-EM data in RELION. Methods Enzymol. 2016;579:125–157. doi: 10.1016/bs.mie.2016.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Schmidli C, Albiez S, Rima L, Righetto R, Mohammed I, Oliva P, Kovacik L, Stahlberg H, Braun T. Microfluidic protein isolation and sample preparation for high-resolution cryo-EM. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2019;116(30):15007–15012. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1907214116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Sepay N, Sekar A, Halder UC, Alarifi A, Afzal M. Anti-COVID-19 terpenoid from marine sources: a docking, admet and molecular dynamics study. J. Mol. Struct. 2021;1228:129433. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.129433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. C. Sun, L. Chen, J. Yang, C. Luo, Y. Zhang, J. Li, J. Yang, J. Zhang, L. Xie, SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV spike-RBD structure and receptor binding comparison and potential implications on neutralizing antibody and vaccine development. bioRxiv. 2020.2002.2016.951723 (2020). 10.1101/2020.02.16.951723
  65. Van Drie JH, Tong L. Cryo-EM as a powerful tool for drug discovery. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2020;30(22):127524. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2020.127524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Walker JA, Molloy SS, Thomas G, Sakaguchi T, Yoshida T, Chambers TM, Kawaoka Y. Sequence specificity of furin, a proprotein-processing endoprotease, for the hemagglutinin of a virulent avian influenza virus. J. Virol. 1994;68(2):1213–1218. doi: 10.1128/JVI.68.2.1213-1218.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Wong W, Bai XC, Sleebs BE, Triglia T, Brown A, Thompson JK, Jackson KE, Hanssen E, Marapana DS, Fernandez IS, Ralph SA, Cowman AF, Scheres SHW, Baum J. Mefloquine targets the Plasmodium falciparum 80S ribosome to inhibit protein synthesis. Nat. Microbiol. 2017;2:17031. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Wrapp D, Wang N, Corbett KS, Goldsmith JA, Hsieh CL, Abiona O, Graham BS, McLellan JS. Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science. 2020;367(6483):1260–1263. doi: 10.1126/science.abb2507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Wu Y, Wang F, Shen C, Peng W, Li D, Zhao C, Li Z, Li S, Bi Y, Yang Y, Gong Y, Xiao H, Fan Z, Tan S, Wu G, Tan W, Lu X, Fan C, Wang Q, Liu Y, Zhang C, Qi J, Gao GF, Gao F, Liu L. A noncompeting pair of human neutralizing antibodies block COVID-19 virus binding to its receptor ACE2. Science. 2020;368(6496):1274–1278. doi: 10.1126/science.abc2241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Xia S, Lan Q, Su S, Wang X, Xu W, Liu Z, Zhu Y, Wang Q, Lu L, Jiang S. The role of furin cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-mediated membrane fusion in the presence or absence of trypsin. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2020;5(1):92. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-0184-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Xiong X, Qu K, Ciazynska KA, Hosmillo M, Carter AP, Ebrahimi S, Ke Z, Scheres SHW, Bergamaschi L, Grice GL, Zhang Y, Collaboration C-NC-B, Nathan JA, Baker S, James LC, Baxendale HE, Goodfellow I, Doffinger R, Briggs JAG. A thermostable, closed SARS-CoV-2 spike protein trimer. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2020;27(10):934–941. doi: 10.1038/s41594-020-0478-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. K.M. Yip, N. Fischer, E. Paknia, A. Chari, H. Stark, Breaking the next Cryo-EM resolution barrier – atomic resolution determination of proteins! bioRxiv. 2020.2005.2021.106740 (2020). 10.1101/2020.05.21.106740
  73. Zafar S, Arshad MS, Fatima S, Ali A, Zaman A, Sayed E, Chang MW, Ahmad Z. COVID-19: current developments and further opportunities in drug delivery and therapeutics. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12(10):945. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12100945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Zhang K. Gctf: real-time CTF determination and correction. J. Struct. Biol. 2016;193(1):1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2015.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Zhang Y, Yang F, Ling S, Lv P, Zhou Y, Fang W, Sun W, Zhang L, Shi P, Tian C. Single-particle cryo-EM structural studies of the beta2AR-Gs complex bound with a full agonist formoterol. Cell Discov. 2020;6:45. doi: 10.1038/s41421-020-0176-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Zhang ZR, Zhang YN, Li XD, Zhang HQ, Xiao SQ, Deng F, Yuan ZM, Ye HQ, Zhang B. A cell-based large-scale screening of natural compounds for inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2020;5(1):218. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-00343-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Zhang M, Gui M, Wang ZF, Gorgulla C, Yu JJ, Wu H, Sun ZJ, Klenk C, Merklinger L, Morstein L, Hagn F, Pluckthun A, Brown A, Nasr ML, Wagner G. Cryo-EM structure of an activated GPCR-G protein complex in lipid nanodiscs. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2021;28(3):258–267. doi: 10.1038/s41594-020-00554-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Zheng SQ, Palovcak E, Armache JP, Verba KA, Cheng Y, Agard DA. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods. 2017;14(4):331–332. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Zivanov J, Nakane T, Forsberg BO, Kimanius D, Hagen WJ, Lindahl E, Scheres SH. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. Elife. 2018;7:e42166. doi: 10.7554/eLife.42166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article and no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.


Articles from Applied Microscopy are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES