Skip to main content
Diagnostics logoLink to Diagnostics
. 2021 Sep 9;11(9):1655. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11091655

Biological Significance of the Protein Changes Occurring in the Cerebrospinal Fluid of Alzheimer’s Disease Patients: Getting Clues from Proteomic Studies

Cristina M Pedrero-Prieto 1,2, Javier Frontiñán-Rubio 1, Francisco J Alcaín 1, Mario Durán-Prado 1, Juan R Peinado 1,*, Yoana Rabanal-Ruiz 1,*
Editor: Panteleimon Giannakopoulos
PMCID: PMC8467255  PMID: 34573996

Abstract

The fact that cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) deeply irrigates the brain together with the relative simplicity of sample extraction from patients make this biological fluid the best target for biomarker discovery in neurodegenerative diseases. During the last decade, biomarker discovery has been especially fruitful for the identification new proteins that appear in the CSF of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients together with amyloid-β (Aβ42), total tau (T-tau), and phosphorylated tau (P-tau). Thus, several proteins have been already stablished as important biomarkers, due to an increase (i.e., CHI3L1) or a decrease (i.e., VGF) in AD patients’ CSF. Notwithstanding this, only a deep analysis of a database generated with all the changes observed in CSF across multiple proteomic studies, and especially those using state-of-the-art methodologies, may expose those components or metabolic pathways disrupted at different levels in AD. Deep comparative analysis of all the up- and down-regulated proteins across these studies revealed that 66% of the most consistent protein changes in CSF correspond to intracellular proteins. Interestingly, processes such as those associated to glucose metabolism or RXR signaling appeared inversely represented in CSF from AD patients in a significant manner. Herein, we discuss whether certain cellular processes constitute accurate indicators of AD progression by examining CSF. Furthermore, we uncover new CSF AD markers, such as ITAM, PTPRZ or CXL16, identified by this study.

Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, proteomics, cerebrospinal fluid, CSF, biomarkers

1. Introduction

The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulates around the brain and spinal cord, thus, constituting the most valuable biofluid for the identification of biomolecules associated with different brain pathologies, especially neurodegenerative diseases [1]. The number of studies aimed at understanding the composition in biomolecules with different origins in CSF and how they change during the development of brain associated diseases has increased strongly during the last decade [2,3]. Moreover, a basic search through the literature using MEDLINE (via PubMed) using the terms proteomics, CSF, and different brain pathologies reveals the significant increase that these studies have experienced during the last years (Figure 1), mostly due to the development of state-of-the-art technologies that have expanded the number of proteins and peptides identified in this biofluid from hundreds to thousands.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Articles published with the subject “proteomics, cerebrospinal fluid and different brain pathologies”. (Publications until June 2021). Articles published during the last three years are shown in grey.

Specifically, in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the most widespread neurodegenerative disease, more than 300 articles have addressed the search for CSF protein markers (Figure 1). The number of proteomic studies has increased during the last years and almost 100 of them have appeared since 2019. Several of these studies propose specific reliable biomarkers of AD in CSF [4] and several reviews have gathered information from them to demonstrate the consistent role for amyloid-β (Aβ1-42), total tau (T-tau), and phosphorylated tau (P-tau) [5,6], as well as other proteins such as VGF nerve growth factor inducible (decreased in AD) or CH3L1 (increased in AD) [7,8], and certain family of proteins, such as granins or pentraxins, as reliable hallmarks of AD relevant for diagnosis [6,9,10].

The recent exponential increase of new proposed candidates as protein biomarkers of AD in CSF evidence the necessity of a deeper analysis of the most consistent findings across studies. Therefore, we have compiled the most recent data from proteomic studies into a database in order to perform an analysis that takes into account the biological function of each protein, considering their role in the cell and their interrelationships. This study allowed us to identify underlying biological mechanisms in AD that appear reflected in CSF, as well as highlight emerging CSF biomarkers of AD.

2. Materials and Methods

The search for articles was limited between January 2012 and June 2021 (i.e., the last decade), and carried out using the PubMed and Google Scholar databases. The filter “humans” was applied and the following keywords were used for the search “cerebrospinal fluid” and/or “CSF”, “Alzheimer’s”, “biomarker”, “MS/MS”, “proteomics” and “mass spectrometry”. Notwithstanding this, our search retrieved several review articles and studies focused exclusively on unique proteins that were not included in the analysis.

A deeper analysis was performed in those articles to select AD CSF studies containing both quantitative information and a clear statistical analysis that corroborated their findings. Only those studies that compared healthy controls vs. AD were included, discarding the articles that compared samples of different diseases without including healthy individuals as controls. Following these criteria, a total of 30 articles were selected to generate a database (Supplemental Table S1). Supplemental Table S1 lists the titles of each of the selected articles, the proteomic approaches used, and the number of proteins identified in each article with up- or down- expression in AD. To generate our database, proteins that showed consistent direction of change across different studies (proteins that appeared in at least two studies following the same direction) were considered for the analysis and classified according to their biological function (Table 1) and the information obtained on July 2021 for each protein in Uniprot and IPA (QIAGEN Inc., Hilden, Germany) databases. Network analysis and relevant metabolic pathways were explored using IPA, String (https://string-db.org, accessed on 5 July 2021) and Reactome (https://reactome.org, accessed on 5 July 2021). Reactome p-values are corrected for the multiple testing (Benjamini–Hochberg procedure) that arises from evaluating the submitted list of identifiers against every pathway [9]. For these analyses, it was considered whether the proteins were up- or down-regulated in the context of AD, which was crucial for the interpretation and organization of the information discussed in this review. Those proteins that showed the most consistent changes were explored in order to obtain accurate information regarding their biological function and its potential correlation with AD pathology. Especial attention was given to those proteins that constitute potentially novel biomarkers of AD.

Table 1.

Proteins identified in CSF proteomic studies from Alzheimer’s patients that appear with similar direction of change in two or more articles. This analysis has been performed with the literature published during the last 10 years (see Materials and Methods).

Uniprot (Human) Description Identified in N Articles References
GLUCOSE/PYRUVATE METABOLISM
ALDOA aldolase, fructose-bisphosphate A 6 (up) * [10,11,12,13,14,15]
ALDOC aldolase, fructose-bisphosphate C 2 (up) [12,13]
ENOA enolase 1 2 (up) [12,13]
G6PI glucose-6-phosphate isomerase 2 (up) [12,13]
LDHA lactate dehydrogenase A 3 (up) [10,12,13]
LDHB lactate dehydrogenase B 2 (up) [16,17]
MDHC malate dehydrogenase 1 5 (up) * [10,12,14,18,19]
PGAM1 phosphoglycerate mutase 1 2 (up) [10,12]
KPYM pyruvate kinase M1/2 7 (up) [11,12,13,14,15,16,20]
TPIS triosephosphate isomerase 1 2 (up) [12,17]
RXR SIGNALING (LXR/RXR ACTIVATION PATHWAY)
FETUA alpha 2-HS glycoprotein 2 (down) [12,21]
ALBU # albumin 3 (down) * [17,21,22]
AMBP alpha-1-microglobulin/bikunin precursor 3 (down) [12,17,23]
APOA1 $ apolipoprotein A1 4 (down) [17,22,23,24]
APOC2 apolipoprotein C2 2 (down) [17,20]
APOL1 apolipoprotein L1 2 (down) [11,12]
C1QB complement C1q B chain 3 (down) [10,17,25]
CLUS $ clusterin 4 (up) [19,22,26,27]
CERU # ceruloplasmin 4 (down) * [11,12,13,17]
KNG1 Δ kininogen 1 3 (down) [12,13,17]
LDLR low density lipoprotein receptor 3 (down) [12,20,28]
RET4 retinol binding protein 4 2 (down) [12,17]
SODM Δ superoxide dismutase 2 2 (up) [12,13]
TR11B TNF receptor superfamily member 11b 2 (up) [12,28]
NEURONAL FUNCTION/SYNAPTOGENESIS
ACES acetylcholinesterase (Cartwright blood group) 2 (up) [10,12]
APLP1 $ amyloid beta precursor like protein 1 3 (down) * [17,21,26]
APLP2 $ amyloid beta precursor like protein 2 3 (up) [15,17,26]
A4 $ amyloid beta precursor protein 3 (down) * [17,26,29]
KCC2G calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase II gamma 2 (up) [12,13]
CSTN3 ε calsyntenin 3 3 (down) * [15,17]
CPLX2 complexin 2 2 (up) [10,12]
EPHA7 EPH receptor A7 2 (down) [10,12]
NEUM growth associated protein 43 4 (up) [11,12,14,30]
GDIA GDP dissociation inhibitor 1 2 (up) [10,12]
MANF mesencephalic astrocyte derived neurotrophic factor 2 (up) [12,20]
MARCS myristoylated alanine rich protein kinase C substrate 3 (up) [10,12,14]
MT3 Δ metallothionein 3 2 (down) [20,21]
NFL neurofilament light 2 (up) [12,20]
NFM neurofilament medium 3 (up) [11,12,26]
NPTX1 neuronal pentraxin 1 3 (down) [25,31,32]
NPTX2 neuronal pentraxin 2 4 (down) [12,20,25,33]
NPTXR neuronal pentraxin receptor 5 (down) [11,12,25,33,34]
NEUG neurogranin 4 (up) [12,20,30,33]
NRX1A neurexin 1 4 (down) * [12,21,25,31]
NRX2A neurexin 2 3 (down) [12,20,25]
NRX3B neurexin 3 2 (down) [20,31]
PACN1 protein kinase C and casein k. substrate in neurons 1 2 (up) [11,12]
PCLO piccolo presynaptic cytomatrix protein 2 (up) [12,26]
RP3A rabphilin 3A 2 (up) [12,20]
RTN4 reticulon 4 2 (up) [12,26]
SYUG synuclein gamma 2 (up) [10,12]
SYN1 synapsin I 2 (up) [11,12]
TKNK tachykinin precursor 3 2 (down) [21,26]
TREM2 $,ε triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 2 (up) [12,19]
CELL ADHESION/EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX
C1QT1 C1q and TNF related 1 2 (down) [11,12]
C1QT5 C1q and TNF related 5 2 (up) [12,35]
CD99 ε CD99 molecule (Xg blood group) 2 (up) [15,26]
NCHL1 cell adhesion molecule L1 like 2 (down) [17,32]
FBLN3 EGF containing fibulin extracellular matrix protein 1 2 (down) [17,20]
FBLN1 fibulin 1 3 (down) [10,13,17]
ITAM integrin subunit alpha M 3 (up) [11,12,20]
MUC18 melanoma cell adhesion molecule 4 (down) [15,17,25,32]
MMP2 Δ matrix metallopeptidase 2 2 (down) [12,28]
NID2 nidogen 2 2 (down) [12,13]
PGRP2 peptidoglycan recognition protein 2 2 (down) [11,12,17]
SMOC1 SPARC related modular calcium binding 1 7 (up) * [10,11,12,13,14,15,35]
SMOC2 SPARC related modular calcium binding 2 2 (up) [12,28]
SPRC secreted protein acidic and cysteine rich 3 (up) [17,24,26]
TICN1 SPARC (osteonectin), cwcv and kazal like domains proteoglycan 1 3 (down) * [10,17,21]
SPON1 spondin 1 3 (up) [12,15,26]
14-3-3 PROTEINS
1433B tyrosine 3-monooxygenase/tryptophan 5-monooxygenase activation protein beta 3 (up) [11,12,20]
1433E tyrosine 3-monooxygenase/tryptophan 5-monooxygenase activation protein epsilon 5 (up) [10,11,12,33,36]
1433G tyrosine 3-monooxygenase/tryptophan 5-monooxygenase activation protein gamma 4 (up) [10,12,13,20]
1433Z tyrosine 3-monooxygenase/tryptophan 5-monooxygenase activation protein zeta 5 (up) [10,11,12,13,33]
CYTOKINE (C)/HORMONAL (H) ACTIVITIES
CCKN cholecystokinin (H) 2 (up) [13,26]
CMGA chromogranin A (H) 4 (down) * [21,31,34,36]
SCG1 chromogranin B (H) 3 (down) * [12,17,21]
CXL16 C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 16 (C) 3 (up) [10,20,26]
MIF macrophage migration inhibitory factor (C) 2 (up) [12,13]
SCG2 secretogranin II (H) 6 (down) * [12,17,20,21,26,31]
SCG3 secretogranin III (H) 3 (down) * [17,21,26]
OSTP secreted phosphoprotein 1 (C) 7 (up) & [11,12,13,15,18,19,26]
SMS Somatostatin (H) 3 (down) [12,20,26]
VGF VGF nerve growth factor inducible (H) 11 (down) * [11,12,21,24,26,31,34,36,37,38]
VIP vasoactive intestinal peptide (H) 2 (down) [12,20]
CYTOSKELETAL PROTEINS
GELS $ gelsolin 3 (down) [11,12,20]
K22E keratin 2 2 (up) [11,12]
K1C9 keratin 9 2 (up) [20,29]
MAP1B microtubule associated protein 1B 2 (up) [11,12]
MTAP2 microtubule associated protein 2 3 (up) [11,12,20]
TAU microtubule associated protein tau 4 (up) [11,12,13,20]
STMN1 stathmin 1 2 (up) [11,12]
REDOX BALANCE/DETOXIFICATION PROCESSES
AATM glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase 2 2 (up) [12,13]
GSHR glutathione-disulfide reductase 2 (up) [12,13]
GSTO1 glutathione S-transferase omega 1 2 (up) [12,13]
PARK7 Parkinsonism associated deglycase 2 (up) [12,13]
PPIA peptidylprolyl isomerase A 2 (up) [12,13]
PPIB peptidylprolyl isomerase B 2 (down) [10,17]
SODE #,ε superoxide dismutase 3 2 (down) [10,15]
TRXR2 thioredoxin reductase 2 2 (up) [12,20]
SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION
IGF1R insulin like growth factor 1 receptor 2 (up) [12,20]
IBP6 ε insulin like growth factor binding protein 6 2 (down) [12,15]
IMPA1 inositol monophosphatase 1 2 (up) [12,13]
PEBP1 phosphatidylethanolamine binding protein 1 2 (up) [10,12]
PTPRZ protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type Z1 3 (up) [12,17,26]
SH3L3 SH3 domain binding glutamate rich protein like 2 (up) [12,13]
PROTEASE/PROTEASE INHIBITORS
CFAD complement factor D 2 (down) [17,20]
FETUB Δ fetuin B 2 (down) [11,12]
PCS1N proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 1 inhibitor 5 (down) * [10,17,21,25,32]
NEC2 proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 2 2 (down) [12,21]
ZPI serpin family A member 10 2 (down) [12,13]
THOP1 thimet oligopeptidase 1 2 (up) [12,20]
UCHL1 ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 3 (up) [11,12,19]
WFDC1 WAP four-disulfide core domain 1 2 (down) [12,20]
OTHER FUNCTIONS
ARP21 cAMP regulated phosphoprotein 21 2 (up) [11,12]
VAS1 ATPase H+ transporting accessory protein 1 2 (down) [12,17]
B3GN8 UDP-GlcNAc:betaGal
beta-1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase 8
2 (down) [11,12]
CH3L1 chitinase 3 like 1 7 (up) [11,12,18,19,24,28,39]
CHIT1 chitotriosidase-1 3 (up) [11,12,28]
TETN C-type lectin domain family 3 member B 2 (down) [12,29]
DDAH1 Δ dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase 1 2 (up) [12,20]
FABPH fatty acid binding protein 3 4 (up) [10,11,12,25]
FKB1A FKBP prolyl isomerase 1A 2 (up) [12,13]
GUAD guanine deaminase 2 (up) [11,12]
HBG2 Δ hemoglobin subunit gamma 2 2 (down) [11,12]
HPRT hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase 1 3 (up) [10,12,13]
OLR1 oxidized low density lipoprotein receptor 1 2 (up) [12,20]
AMD #,ε peptidylglycine alpha-amidating monooxygenase 2 (up) [15,20]
PBIP1 PBX homeobox interacting protein 1 2 (down) [17,20]
SLIT2 slit guidance ligand 2 2 (up) [12,35]
SYWC tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase 1 2 (up) [12,20]

The reference numbers correspond to those listed in Supplemental Table S1. *: Proteins identified with inverted pattern of expression in 1 additional article; &: Proteins identified with inverted pattern of expression in two additional articles; $: β-Amyloid-interacting proteins #: Proteins that bind copper; Δ: Proteins that bind metals. Down/up: protein down-up-regulated in the number of articles indicated; ε: Proteins that were identified at least in one article that used a less novel technique such as two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE); C: cytokine; H: hormone.

3. Variability of the Proteomic Approaches

Several proteomic aproaches have been used during the last decade for the identification of biomarkers in AD CSF (indicated in Supplemental Table S1). As expected, the most used technique was LC-MS/MS, since nowadays is one of the most advanced approaches for biomarker identification [40]. Despite the existence of different proteomic approaches, several proteins were consistently found to be upregulated (Table 1). The better examples constitute CLUS (upregulated) and NPTXR (downregulated) which were found with similar trend in three different proteomic aproaches. Although we have to be cautious to compare different proteomic techniques due to the intrinsic differences in protein handling and identification, herein we verified that proteins such as TREM2, CSTN3, CD99, SODE, IBP6 and AMD display similar results irrespectively of whether LC-MS/MS or 2DE were employed (Table 1). Notwithstanding this, the specific information of proteins that were found to be altered in AD CSF as a consequence of the inclusion 2DE experiments is indicated in Table 1. Supplemental Table S1 also shows now the predominant technique used in the selected articles.

4. Two Thirds of the of the Proteins That Change in the CSF of AD Are Intracellular

While the identification of biomarkers in CSF is crucial to the understanding of AD, unveiling the source of the change is essential to reveal the biological mechanisms that underlie this pathology. Contrary to what we initially expected, given the reduced number of cells present in CSF (approximately 5 cells per mL that mainly correspond to lymphocytes and monocytes); [41], our study reveals that 66% of the CSF altered proteins identified across studies are intracellular proteins, mostly cytoplasmatic (39%; Figure 2A). Amongst them, approximately 80% of the proteins (64) were increased in AD vs. controls. Taking into consideration the widely known neural death which occurs in AD [42], we would expect that a significant origin of these intracellular proteins in CSF may arise from remains of cellular debris that translocate to the CSF [43]. Furthermore, an increased infiltration of neutrophils has been observed during the development of AD. Indeed, increased expression of CD11b positive neutrophils, which are directly related to neutrophil migration, positively correlated with the severity of AD. In this line, a higher number of neutrophils were found in brain vessels of AD patients when compared with controls of similar age [44].

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Information regarding proteins that consistently emerge across proteomic studies. (A) Schematic distribution of intracellular (plasma membrane and cytoplasm) and extracellular proteins (extracellular space). (B) Molecular pathways identified using IPA. Only those pathways with a –log(p-value) over 2 and a z-score of + or − 2 were considered. Positive z-scores are represented in orange. Negative z-scores are represented in blue. (C) Classification of the proteins according to their function. Data obtained from Table 1.

Platelets are considered biomarkers for early diagnosis of AD (as reviewed in [45]). Treatment of platelets with Aβ led to platelet activation and enhanced generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and membrane scrambling, suggesting enhanced platelet apoptosis [46]. Interestingly, among the top five pathways detected using Reactome, three of them were related to platelets. Specifically, this study has identified a total of 17 proteins directly related to platelet degranulation (p-value 2.1 × 10−11) and or platelet aggregation (p-value 1.1 × −10−07) (Supplemental Table S2). Whether this finding is related to increased apoptosis requires further investigation.

Together with the cells discussed above an additional source for membrane proteins are exosomes. In this sense, it was previously shown that 1 mL of human CSF contains ~2 μg of endogenous exosomes [47]. The finding that exosomes isolated from human CSF or brain samples sequestered oligomeric Aβ in the brain has led to propose their protective role in AD pathogenesis [47]. Indeed, several proteins of our database such as CHL1, KNG1, or APOA1 were found to be constituents of human CSF exosomes [48].

5. Increased Glucose/Pyruvate Metabolism in AD CSF

A variety of proteins related to glucose metabolism were found altered in CSF to the extent that glycolysis and gluconeogenesis constitute the two metabolic pathways most represented in our study (p-value 9.5 × 10−11 and 6 × 10−9, respectively; Figure 2B,C). Furthermore, all the proteins related to glucose metabolism appeared increased in AD CSF (z-score 2.65, Table 1). Most of the identified proteins are common enzymes for both processes, glycolysis and gluconeogenesis (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Alteration of glucose/pyruvate metabolism in AD CSF. Schematic representation of glycolysis, gluconeogenesis and pyruvate metabolism. Proteins that increase in AD CSF are labelled in red and green indicates decreased proteins. G6P: glucose-6-phosphate; F6P: Fructose-6-phosphate; G3P: glyceraldehide-3-phosphate; 1,3-BPG: 1,3-Biphosphoglycerate; 3PG: 3-phosphoglyucerate; 2PG: 2-phosphoglycerate; PEP: phosphoenolpyruvate; Pyr: pyruvate; OAA: oxalacetate. Background images were created using templates from Servier Medical Art, which are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (http://smart.servier.com/ accessed on 5 July 2021).

It is also important to mention the glycolytic enzyme pyruvate kinase M1/2 (KPYM), that catalyzes the synthesis of pyruvate from phosphoenolpyruvate [49] and the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), which reduces pyruvate to lactate through a reversible reaction, thus allowing cells to generate or consume lactate depending on their metabolic profile.

Impaired glucose metabolism has been widely recognized as an early feature in the brain of subjects with AD since alteration of brain aerobic glycolysis is frequently observed in the course of AD [50,51]. It has also been proposed that reduced glucose availability in AD would force the brain to rely on gluconeogenesis (de novo synthesis of glucose). Interestingly, despite the low brain glucose uptake in AD, most post-mortem studies show consistent upregulation in glycolytic enzyme proteins [51,52], thus suggesting a compensatory mechanism for the low glucose supply in order to overcome a compromised mitochondrial function. In conclusion, evaluation of an increase of proteins directly related to glucose metabolism in CSF may reveal what takes place in surrounding tissues during AD progression.

6. RXR Signaling in CSF (LXR/RXR Activation Pathway)

One of the most relevant findings of this study is the significant reduction (p-value = 1.1 × 10−10) of proteins participating in the Liver X Receptor (LXR)/Retinoid X receptor (RXR) pathway in CSF from AD patients (z-score 2.7; Figure 2B,C). LXR/RXR activation pathway (Figure 4) is involved in a variety of processes associated with cholesterol metabolism, inflammation, oxidative stress, etc. [53,54]. Although LXR/RXR pathway represents a relevant pathway altered in AD [53,55], as far as we know, this is the first relevant mention of an overall reduction of LXR/RXR activation in AD CSF. In line with our observations, previous works have detected a reduction in the expression of LXR-β in plasma of AD patients compared to control samples [56]. Furthermore, the LXR/RXR pathway was also reduced in plasma samples of PSAPP and hTau mice models [57]. Retinoids modulate the expression of different key proteins in AD, as presenilin 1 (PS1), metalloprotease 10 (ADAM 10) or β-secretase [58,59]. Moreover, retinoic acid (RA) may have a central role in the pathophysiology of AD and reduced brain levels of this metabolite would constitute a risk factor for the development of the disease. Different mutations on the RA receptors can misregulate AD candidate genes such as PS1, ADAM 10, PS2 or APP [53].

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Alteration of LXR/RXR activation pathway in AD CSF. Summarized representation of the LXR/RXR activation pathway. Proteins that increase in AD CSF are labelled in red and green indicates decreased proteins. Background images were created using templates from Servier Medical Art, which are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (http://smart.servier.com/ accessed on 5 July 2021).

As we pointed out, a reduction in the LRX activation was predicted with high confidence. This decrease might be related to the advanced development of the pathology, since LXR activation plays a key role in plaque reduction by increasing clearance, thereby improving cognitive impairment [60,61]. Furthermore, genetic loss of LXR in APP/PS1 mice induced a greater accumulation of Aβ plaques [62], while loss of LXR in healthy mice triggered neurodegeneration [63]. Therefore, decreased LXR/RXR pathway components in CSF may inversely correlate with Aβ deposition in tissues.

Another function of the LXR/RXR pathway comprises the activation of apolipoproteins that may serve as cholesterol acceptors [64]. Apolipoproteins constitute a family of proteins with a key role in transport and delivery of lipids, cholesterol homeostasis, and central nervous system (CNS) remodeling [65]. In this study, we observed decreased levels of different apolipoproteins (APOA1, APOC2, and APOL1) in CSF. APOA1, one of the most abundant proteins in human CSF, has been identified as part of senile plaques of AD patients’ brains [66]. A link between the presence of APOC2 and familial Alzheimer’s was observed decades ago [67], although, to date, its specific role in late-onset AD (LOAD) is still unknown. Similarly, APOL1 has been related to other pathologies such as kidney disease [68], while a direct link with AD has not been established yet.

7. Neuronal Function/Synaptogenesis

The organization of the proteins according to their function (Table 1 and Figure 2C) revealed that a high number of them were directly related to neuronal function and specially, synaptogenesis. Synaptogenesis is a dynamic process by which the formation and stabilization of synapses occur in the CNS [69]. In neurodegenerative diseases, such as AD, synaptic degeneration and synapse loss have been described as early events that precede neuronal death [70,71]. Indeed, several studies have proposed a role for synaptic proteins as specific biomarkers for AD in CSF [7,44,45].

The clearest reflection in CSF of the synaptic degeneration that occurs in AD is the family of ‘long’ neuronal pentraxins (NPTX1, NPTX2) and its receptor NPTXR since they constitute the most consistently decreased proteins in CSF and they display a direct function in neural differentiation [72], synaptogenesis [73] and synaptic plasticity [74,75,76]. Specifically, these proteins form mixed NPTX complexes which traffic to the extracellular surface at excitatory synapses where they interact with postsynaptic glutamate receptors [77,78]. Taken together, these three proteins were found to decrease in 8 different proteomic studies. The parallel and consistent decrease of these proteins in CSF would not fit with our previous suggestion of increased neuronal cell death. However, different studies have already described a down-regulation of NPTX2 in AD brains [79,80]. It has also been described that NPTX1 is accumulated in dystrophic neurites and surround plaques in postmortem AD brains [81,82,83], which would explain their decreased levels in CSF. Therefore, the inverse correlation of pentraxins amount in plaques/CSF could be a good indicator of neuronal death and/or synaptic loss.

Similarly, neurexins (NRX), one of the best-characterized families of presynaptic organizers, appeared reduced in 6 different studies. Likewise NPTX1, two of the three family members (NRX1 and NRX2) have been proposed as direct targets of Aβ oligomers [84]. In the same line, calsyntenin-3 (CSTN3), a direct NRX interactor [85,86] was also found to decrease in CSF. This transmembrane protein of the cadherin superfamily is distributed in postsynaptic membranes throughout the adult brain [87]. As occur with NPTX1, CSTN3 accumulates in dystrophic neurite surrounding Aβ plaques [88].

In view of these studies, we have to take into consideration that several proteins may not be released to the CSF and, oppositely, they might somehow be accumulated into the plaque in a process that could be carried out by Aβ and tau aggregation, thus ultimately driving a reduction of certain proteins in CSF. This may explain the variability observed across proteins not only directly involved in neuronal function but also those related to cell adhesion and components of the cell-matrix (Table 1 and Figure 2C). Although at different levels, 21 of these proteins decreased while 25 increased in CSF. The best example that reflects this heterogeneity raises from the members of the SPRC family. Based on our results, four members of this family are differently altered in AD CSF. This family of proteins comprises six members that present calcium-binding domains and regulate cell interaction with the microenvironment [89]. It is worth highlighting the potential role of SPRC on vascular pathology in AD. In the brain, SPRC is also expressed in endothelial cells, wherein it affects trans-endothelial permeability [89]. Moreover, since it acts as a chaperone of collagen IV through the SPRC-collagen binding domain, it has been observed a direct relationship between increased SPRC, collagen IV, and the thickening of the basal lamina of the cerebral vasculature, a feature commonly observed in AD brains [89,90,91].

Notwithstanding this, according to our study, SMOC1 was consistently upregulated in AD CSF in seven different studies (Table 1), thus making it a potential biomarker. Among its functions, SMOC1 promotes endothelial proliferation [92], and although it is overexpressed in AD brains, wherein it colocalizes with Aβ plaques [93,94], its specific role in AD is still unknown. Conversely, testican-1 (TICN1) was consistently downregulated in AD CSF. Different studies have shown a link between TICN1 overexpression in the brain and AD [95]. It surrounds Aβ plaques in brains of AD patients [95] and regulates proteins related to Aβ production and degradation, such as MMP2 or cathepsin-L [96,97]. Finally, it has been linked to APP sorting. Therefore, as we have previously proposed for other proteins, lower CSF levels of this protein may indicate an accumulation in the brain during the development of the pathology [95].

8. 14-3-3 Proteins Are up Regulated in CSF

The 14-3-3 family consists of seven highly homologous molecules that were first reported as regulators of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) activity [98], four of which were consistently upregulated in the CSF of AD. These proteins have recently been linked to a variety of processes such as regulation of protein interaction and localization or transcription since they have a nuclear localization sequence [99]. It has been reported that 14-3-3 proteins regulate neuronal differentiation, morphogenesis and migration [100]. The expression of these proteins increases in cortical regions of AD patients and, even though they have not been observed in Aβ plaques, some evidence connects them with neurofibrillary tangles [99]. However, 14-3-3 family members cannot be considered suitable markers for differential diagnosis of AD [101,102] since they have also been detected in CSF of all dementia patients, thus suggesting their role as common markers for neurodegenerative diseases.

9. Cytokines and Hormones up and down Regulated in CSF

Five of the proteins in this section correspond to members of the granin family of proteins (chromogranins, secretogranins and VGF). These precursors of biologically active peptides and the products of their proteolitical cleavage have been proposed as biomarkers of different neurological diseases, included AD [103,104].

As expected, among them, VGF was the most consistent downregulated protein among the identified secreted proteins with biological activities. This protein is nowadays considered one of the best AD markers in CSF as it is consistently reduced in CSF of these patients [7].

Another remarkable protein that was consistently reduced in CSF was somatostatin (SMS). A long time ago it was proposed that diminished levels of somatostatin in CSF may be a specific AD signature compared to other neurodegenerative pathologies as Parkinson’s [105,106]. Whereas the reason for this reduction as a consequence of the pre-propeptide processing remains elusive, it has been recently reported that its deficiency has a direct link with a loss of integrity of the BBB in Aβ-induced toxicity [107].

On the contrary, among the four proteins in this group that appear increased, phosphoprotein 1 (SPP1, also called osteopontin) was found to be the most consistent upregulated protein (increased in seven different studies). This extracellular phosphoprotein is expressed in response to stress and injury and regulates macrophage infiltration and cytokine production [108,109]. In the past years, SPP1 has been linked to inflammation-associated neurological disease. Indeed, higher SPP1 levels have already been described in brain and CSF in AD patients [110,111].

10. Importance of Cofactors in CSF

Herein, we explored common affinities of the identified proteins for given cofactors. Interestingly, copper (Cu2+) emerged as the most common cofactor for several of the identified proteins (indicated in Table 1). Several meta-analysis have identified changes in Cu2+ concentration in brain and serum (reviewed by [112]), although conflicting evidence of copper’s role in AD has been pointed ([113,114], reviewed by [115]). It is well known that Cu2+ and Zn2+ interact with Aβ peptides with high affinity and these interactions have been proposed to accelerate Aβ1-40 and Aβ1-42 aggregation in vitro, thus contributing to their toxicity, ROS generation, and the development of Aβ neurotoxicity [116]. Nonetheless, the mechanism that Cu2+ utilizes to reach the brain is partially understood. Together with albumin (ALBU), the main protein needed for passive diffusion of Cu2+ through the blood-CSF barrier to the brain is ceruloplasmin (CERU) [117]. The fact that both proteins seem to behave inversely in CSF AD, showing decreased levels of ALBU and increased CERU, indicate that the equilibrium of Cu2+ transport in CSF is altered in AD.

Further evidence of the implication of Cu2+ in AD would be represented by metallothionein 3 (MT3), which regulates Cu2+ and Zn2+ transport and storage in CNS and inhibits their toxicity, thus representing one of the major players in metal homeostasis [118]. Conversely, the peptidylglycine α-amidating monooxygenase (AMD), a copper-dependent enzyme that regulates the secretory pathway, was found increased in CSF from AD patients. In mammals, AMD is essential to catalyze α-amidation, a necessary step to confer full biological activity to many neuropeptides [119,120]. Herein, we report for the first time the potential use of AMD as a consistent AD marker in CSF. Furthermore, to our knowledge, there is only one study investigating AMD in CSF where a reduction in enzyme activity in AD samples as compared to healthy, age-matched control was proposed, thus suggesting neuronal dysfunction within the CNS in AD patients [121].

11. Other amyloid β Interactors

The present analysis showed an increase in CLUS (APOJ) levels in CSF, which is in line with previous findings [122,123]. CLUS reduces aggregation and promotes clearance of Aβ at the blood-brain barrier under physiological conditions, suggesting that this protein, as proposed for SMS, may accumulate in CSF as a consequence of failed perivascular drainage of interstitial fluid [122].

Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) has been shown to play a role in the phagocytosis of apoptotic neuronal cells [124] and it has been recently identified as a microglial Aβ receptor that transduces physiological and AD-related pathological effects associated with Aβ [125]. Several studies have shown that the loss-of-function mutations of TREM2 variants are linked to increased AD risk [126,127]. Additionally, increased TREM expression has been observed in AD patients suggesting an association between TREM2 levels and apoptosis in AD [128], though this is the first demonstration of its consistent increase in CSF.

A role for the metalloendopeptidase THOP1 as a potential β-secretase candidate was demonstrated by Koike et al., since it cleaves the full-length APP when overexpressed in COS cells [129]. This enzyme also promotes soluble Aβ degradation while no degradation was observed in aggregated Aβ [130]. THOP1 expression was significantly increased in human AD brain tissue as compared to non-demented controls, suggesting that increased THOP1 expression might be part of a compensatory defense mechanism of the brain against high Aβ load [131]. Herein, we have found a direct correlation of the data described in brain tissue with that of CSF.

12. New Potential AD Markers

Together with the above highlighted information for MT3, TREM2, THOP1 or AMD, other potential AD markers in CSF emerge from this study. Although several of our candidates have already been proposed as markers in post-mortem tissue, their relevance in CSF has not been unveiled. Therefore, the proteins mentioned below correspond to those unique proteins from Table 1 whose information regarding to AD, to our knowledge, is very limited or unexistent.

12.1. Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase L1 (UCHL1)

Only a few reports address the implications of UCH-L1 genetic variation in AD [132,133], and, although this is the first study that shows a recurrent increase of these proteins in CSF by proteomic approaches, its increase in CSF has been verified by other methodologies [134].

12.2. C-X-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 16 (CXL16)

CXL16 is produced by dendritic cells and it is known to attract lymphocyte subsets [135], especially, natural killer (NK) cells that express its receptor [136]. NK cells play an important role in the host defense, which is related to their ability to secrete a variety of cytokines and chemokines, as well as killing infected host cells (reviewed by [137]). Therefore, this marker might be a good target to detect AD-related neuroinflammation via CSF.

12.3. Protein Kinase C and Casein Kinase Substrate in Neurons 1 (PACN1)

PACN1 is required for the activity-dependent internalization of AMPA receptor, a key regulator of synaptic plasticity, which is thought to be one of the key cellular components underlying learning and memory. An increase in the number of synaptic AMPARs leads to long-term potentiation (LTP), whereas the removal of surface AMPARs by endocytosis results in long-term depression (LTD) [138]. PACN1 also regulates activity-dependent retrieval of synaptic vesicles in the presynaptic terminals [139]. It has been implicated in various neurodegenerative diseases (Parkinson’s disease and AD) [140,141].

12.4. Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase Receptor Type Z1 (PTPRZ)

A thorough search through the literature allowed us to identify one bioinformatic study that speculated the possibility that PTPRZ may regulate the cognitive and memory pathways through the CNS, thereby promoting the development of AD [142]. It remains to be investigated whether this observation is accurate, although our collected data clearly support this concept as we also found a concomitant increase of these phosphatases in AD CSF.

12.5. Integrin Subunit Alpha M (ITAM)

To our knowledge, this protein has never been associated with AD. Remarkably, a recent work studied genetic variability of 4 new genes, one of which encodes ITAM, which were predicted to contain variants associated with AD [143]. According to our analysis, this protein appears consistently increased across proteomic studies. Therefore, our study constitutes the first nexus between gene expression and protein increase of this integrin.

12.6. Myristoylated Alanine-Rich Protein Kinase C Substrate (MARCS)

MARCS is an interesting innovative marker of AD in CSF, since little is known about its relationship with AD. MARCS phosphorylation at Ser46 has been shown to constitute a hallmark of neurite degeneration [116] and there are studies that point towards the beneficial effects of increased MARCS levels for memory improvement [144].

13. Conclusions

Every year there is an increasing number of published articles that take advantage of evolving state-of-the-art technologies to identify/propose new biomarkers of neurodegenerative diseases. This is especially evident when we perform a literature search of proteomics, CSF, and AD. Therefore, a continuous revision of the results is mandatory to redefine with extreme accuracy new potential biomarkers that may help to identify prodromal or initial stages of the devastating neurodegenerative disease that represents AD. Herein, we aimed at understanding the importance of clusters of proteins that share similar functions in AD pathology also indicating a potential explanation of their up- or down-regulation in CSF. Although this is a study of a database generated with previous proteomic studies and bioinformatics analysis it must be taken with caution, we propose herein certain proteins as potential new biomarkers since they consistently appear up- or down-regulated in AD CSF. Whether proteins such as TREM2, THOP1, AMD, or ITAM constitute good biomarkers will be confirmed by further proteomics studies that will certainly appear.

Acknowledgments

Background images in Figure 3 and Figure 4 were modified from Servier Medical Art, licensed under a Creative Common Attribution 3.0 Unported License. http://smart.servier.com (Last access 5 July 2021).

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/diagnostics11091655/s1, Table S1: Database information. Table S2: Reactome analysis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.M.P.-P., J.R.P. and Y.R.-R.; methodology, C.M.P.-P., J.F.-R. and J.R.P.; bioinformatics, J.R.P., J.F.-R., M.D.-P. and C.M.P.-P.; data curation, C.M.P.-P., J.F.-R. and J.R.P.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.R.-R., C.M.P.-P., F.J.A. and J.R.P.; writing—review and editing, M.D.-P., F.J.A., J.R.P. and Y.R.-R.; supervision, Y.R.-R. and J.R.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This review has been funded by grants from the Consejería de Educación de la Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha (grant number SBPLY/19/180501/000245, to Y.R.-R.); Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha (2020-GRIN-29101 to F.J.A.); MINECO-RETOS (AEI-FEDER) and “Plan Propio de Investigación” FEDER/UCLM 2021 to M.D.-P. Y.R.-R. is financed by FEDER (2018/D/LD/MC/8). The study was sponsored by the UCLM/ERDF (2020-GRIN-29145 to NPND), Spanish Ministries of Economy and Competitiveness/ERDF (grant no. SAF2016-75768-R) and Science and Innovation (grant no. PID2019-108659RB-I00) and Autonomous Government of Castilla- La Mancha/ERDF (grant no. SBPLY/17/180501/000430). The funders were not involved in the design, data collection, analysis or preparation of the review.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Al data generated in this review are included in the article in the form of tables and supplemental tables.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Llorens F., Schmitz M., Ferrer I., Zerr I. CSF biomarkers in neurodegenerative and vascular dementias. Prog. Neurobiol. 2016;138–140:36–53. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2016.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Solje E., Benussi A., Buratti E., Remes A.M., Haapasalo A., Borroni B. State-of-the-Art Methods and Emerging Fluid Biomarkers in the Diagnostics of Dementia—A Short Review and Diagnostic Algorithm. Diagnostics. 2021;11:788. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11050788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wu C.-Y., Bawa K.K., Ouk M., Leung N., Yu D., Lanctôt K.L., Herrmann N., Pakosh M., Swardfager W. Neutrophil activation in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of protein markers in blood and cerebrospinal fluid. Ageing Res. Rev. 2020;62:101130. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2020.101130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.McGrowder D.A., Miller F., Vaz K., Nwokocha C., Wilson-Clarke C., Anderson-Cross M., Brown J., Anderson-Jackson L., Williams L., Latore L., et al. Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers of Alzheimer’s Disease: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives. Brain Sci. 2021;11:215. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11020215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Baird A.L., Westwood S., Lovestone S. Blood-Based Proteomic Biomarkers of Alzheimer’s Disease Pathology. Front. Neurol. 2015;6:236. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2015.00236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Blennow K. Cerebrospinal fluid protein biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease. NeuroRX. 2004;1:213–225. doi: 10.1602/neurorx.1.2.213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pedrero-Prieto C.M., García-Carpintero S., Frontiñán-Rubio J., Llanos-González E., Aguilera García C., Alcaín F.J., Lindberg I., Durán-Prado M., Peinado J.R., Rabanal-Ruiz Y. A comprehensive systematic review of CSF proteins and peptides that define Alzheimer’s disease. Clin. Proteom. 2020;17:1–24. doi: 10.1186/s12014-020-09276-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wesenhagen K.E.J., Teunissen C.E., Visser P.J., Tijms B.M. Cerebrospinal fluid proteomics and biological heterogeneity in Alzheimer’s disease: A literature review. Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2019;57:86–98. doi: 10.1080/10408363.2019.1670613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fabregat A., Sidiropoulos K., Viteri G., Forner O., Marin-Garcia P., Arnau V., D’Eustachio P., Stein L., Hermjakob H. Reactome pathway analysis: A high-performance in-memory approach. BMC Bioinform. 2017;18:142. doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1559-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.McKetney J., Panyard D.J., Johnson S.C., Carlsson C.M., Engelman C.D., Coon J.J. Pilot proteomic analysis of cerebrospinal fluid in Alzheimer’s disease. Proteom. Clin. Appl. 2021;15:e2000072. doi: 10.1002/prca.202000072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhou M., Haque R.U., Dammer E.B., Duong D.M., Ping L., Johnson E.C.B., Lah J.J., Levey A.I., Seyfried N.T. Targeted mass spectrometry to quantify brain-derived cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease. Clin. Proteom. 2020;17:19. doi: 10.1186/s12014-020-09285-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Higginbotham L., Ping L., Dammer E.B., Duong D.M., Zhou M., Gearing M., Hurst C., Glass J.D., Factor S.A., Johnson E.C.B., et al. Integrated proteomics reveals brain-based cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in asymptomatic and symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease. Sci. Adv. 2020;6:aaz9360. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz9360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bader J.M., Geyer P.E., Muller J.B., Strauss M.T., Koch M., Leypoldt F., Koertvelyessy P., Bittner D., Schipke C.G., Incesoy E.I., et al. Proteome profiling in cerebrospinal fluid reveals novel biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2020;16:e9356. doi: 10.15252/msb.20199356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dayon L., Nunez Galindo A., Wojcik J., Cominetti O., Corthesy J., Oikonomidi A., Henry H., Kussmann M., Migliavacca E., Severin I., et al. Alzheimer disease pathology and the cerebrospinal fluid proteome. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 2018;10:66. doi: 10.1186/s13195-018-0397-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ringman J.M., Schulman H., Becker C., Jones T., Bai Y., Immermann F., Cole G., Sokolow S., Gylys K., Geschwind D.H., et al. Proteomic changes in cerebrospinal fluid of presymptomatic and affected persons carrying familial Alzheimer disease mutations. Arch. Neurol. 2012;69:96–104. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2011.642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Johnson E.C.B., Dammer E.B., Duong D.M., Ping L., Zhou M., Yin L., Higginbotham L.A., Guajardo A., White B., Troncoso J.C., et al. Large-scale proteomic analysis of Alzheimer’s disease brain and cerebrospinal fluid reveals early changes in energy metabolism associated with microglia and astrocyte activation. Nat. Med. 2020;26:769–780. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0815-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Khoonsari P.E., Haggmark A., Lonnberg M., Mikus M., Kilander L., Lannfelt L., Bergquist J., Ingelsson M., Nilsson P., Kultima K., et al. Analysis of the Cerebrospinal Fluid Proteome in Alzheimer’s Disease. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0150672. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Paterson R.W., Heywood W.E., Heslegrave A.J., Magdalinou N.K., Andreasson U., Sirka E., Bliss E., Slattery C.F., Toombs J., Svensson J., et al. A targeted proteomic multiplex CSF assay identifies increased malate dehydrogenase and other neurodegenerative biomarkers in individuals with Alzheimer’s disease pathology. Transl. Psychiatry. 2016;6:e952. doi: 10.1038/tp.2016.194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Heywood W.E., Galimberti D., Bliss E., Sirka E., Paterson R.W., Magdalinou N.K., Carecchio M., Reid E., Heslegrave A., Fenoglio C., et al. Identification of novel CSF biomarkers for neurodegeneration and their validation by a high-throughput multiplexed targeted proteomic assay. Mol. Neurodegener. 2015;10:64. doi: 10.1186/s13024-015-0059-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sathe G., Na C.H., Renuse S., Madugundu A.K., Albert M., Moghekar A., Pandey A. Quantitative Proteomic Profiling of Cerebrospinal Fluid to Identify Candidate Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s Disease. Proteom. Clin. Appl. 2019;13:e1800105. doi: 10.1002/prca.201800105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Holtta M., Minthon L., Hansson O., Holmen-Larsson J., Pike I., Ward M., Kuhn K., Ruetschi U., Zetterberg H., Blennow K., et al. An integrated workflow for multiplex CSF proteomics and peptidomics-identification of candidate cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Proteome Res. 2015;14:654–663. doi: 10.1021/pr501076j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Alzate O., Osorio C., DeKroon R.M., Corcimaru A., Gunawardena H.P. Differentially charged isoforms of apolipoprotein E from human blood are potential biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 2014;6:43. doi: 10.1186/alzrt273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chakrabarti A., Chatterjee A., Sengupta M.B., Chattopadhyay P., Mukhopadhyay D. Altered levels of amyloid precursor protein intracellular domain-interacting proteins in Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disord. 2014;28:283–290. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Khoonsari P.E., Shevchenko G., Herman S., Remnestal J., Giedraitis V., Brundin R., Degerman Gunnarsson M., Kilander L., Zetterberg H., Nilsson P., et al. Improved Differential Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease by Integrating ELISA and Mass Spectrometry-Based Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2019;67:639–651. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Spellman D.S., Wildsmith K.R., Honigberg L.A., Tuefferd M., Baker D., Raghavan N., Nairn A.C., Croteau P., Schirm M., Allard R., et al. Development and evaluation of a multiplexed mass spectrometry based assay for measuring candidate peptide biomarkers in Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) CSF. Proteom. Clin. Appl. 2015;9:715–731. doi: 10.1002/prca.201400178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Skillback T., Mattsson N., Hansson K., Mirgorodskaya E., Dahlen R., van der Flier W., Scheltens P., Duits F., Hansson O., Teunissen C., et al. A novel quantification-driven proteomic strategy identifies an endogenous peptide of pleiotrophin as a new biomarker of Alzheimer’s disease. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:13333. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13831-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Manral P., Sharma P., Hariprasad G., Chandralekha , Tripathi M., Srinivasan A. Can apolipoproteins and complement factors be biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease? Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2012;9:935–943. doi: 10.2174/156720512803251110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Whelan C.D., Mattsson N., Nagle M.W., Vijayaraghavan S., Hyde C., Janelidze S., Stomrud E., Lee J., Fitz L., Samad T.A., et al. Multiplex proteomics identifies novel CSF and plasma biomarkers of early Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2019;7:169. doi: 10.1186/s40478-019-0795-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Vafadar-Isfahani B., Ball G., Coveney C., Lemetre C., Boocock D., Minthon L., Hansson O., Miles A.K., Janciauskiene S.M., Warden D., et al. Identification of SPARC-like 1 protein as part of a biomarker panel for Alzheimer’s disease in cerebrospinal fluid. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. JAD. 2012;28:625–636. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2011-111505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Remnestal J., Just D., Mitsios N., Fredolini C., Mulder J., Schwenk J.M., Uhlen M., Kultima K., Ingelsson M., Kilander L., et al. CSF profiling of the human brain enriched proteome reveals associations of neuromodulin and neurogranin to Alzheimer’s disease. Proteom. Clin. Appl. 2016;10:1242–1253. doi: 10.1002/prca.201500150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Brinkmalm G., Sjodin S., Simonsen A.H., Hasselbalch S.G., Zetterberg H., Brinkmalm A., Blennow K. A Parallel Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometric Method for Analysis of Potential CSF Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s Disease. Proteom. Clin. Appl. 2018;12 doi: 10.1002/prca.201700131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wang J., Cunningham R., Zetterberg H., Asthana S., Carlsson C., Okonkwo O., Li L. Label-free quantitative comparison of cerebrospinal fluid glycoproteins and endogenous peptides in subjects with Alzheimer’s disease, mild cognitive impairment, and healthy individuals. Proteom. Clin. Appl. 2016;10:1225–1241. doi: 10.1002/prca.201600009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nilsson J., Gobom J., Sjodin S., Brinkmalm G., Ashton N.J., Svensson J., Johansson P., Portelius E., Zetterberg H., Blennow K., et al. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarker panel for synaptic dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. (Amst.) 2021;13:e12179. doi: 10.1002/dad2.12179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hendrickson R.C., Lee A.Y., Song Q., Liaw A., Wiener M., Paweletz C.P., Seeburger J.L., Li J., Meng F., Deyanova E.G., et al. High Resolution Discovery Proteomics Reveals Candidate Disease Progression Markers of Alzheimer’s Disease in Human Cerebrospinal Fluid. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0135365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wang H., Dey K.K., Chen P.C., Li Y., Niu M., Cho J.H., Wang X., Bai B., Jiao Y., Chepyala S.R., et al. Integrated analysis of ultra-deep proteomes in cortex, cerebrospinal fluid and serum reveals a mitochondrial signature in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Neurodegener. 2020;15:43. doi: 10.1186/s13024-020-00384-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Park S.A., Jung J.M., Park J.S., Lee J.H., Park B., Kim H.J., Park J.H., Chae W.S., Jeong J.H., Choi S.H., et al. SWATH-MS analysis of cerebrospinal fluid to generate a robust battery of biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:7423. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64461-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Duits F.H., Brinkmalm G., Teunissen C.E., Brinkmalm A., Scheltens P., Van der Flier W.M., Zetterberg H., Blennow K. Synaptic proteins in CSF as potential novel biomarkers for prognosis in prodromal Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Res. Ther. 2018;10:5. doi: 10.1186/s13195-017-0335-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wijte D., McDonnell L.A., Balog C.I., Bossers K., Deelder A.M., Swaab D.F., Verhaagen J., Mayboroda O.A. A novel peptidomics approach to detect markers of Alzheimer’s disease in cerebrospinal fluid. Methods. 2012;56:500–507. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wildsmith K.R., Schauer S.P., Smith A.M., Arnott D., Zhu Y., Haznedar J., Kaur S., Mathews W.R., Honigberg L.A. Identification of longitudinally dynamic biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease cerebrospinal fluid by targeted proteomics. Mol. Neurodegener. 2014;9:22. doi: 10.1186/1750-1326-9-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Korecka M., Shaw L.M. Mass spectrometry-based methods for robust measurement of Alzheimer’s Disease biomarkers in biological fluids. J. Neurochem. 2021 doi: 10.1111/jnc.15465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rahimi J., Woehrer A. Overview of cerebrospinal fluid cytology. In: Kovacs G., Alafuzoff I., editors. Neuropathology. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2018. pp. 563–571. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Guo T., Zhang D., Zeng Y., Huang T.Y., Xu H., Zhao Y. Molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Neurodegener. 2020;15:40. doi: 10.1186/s13024-020-00391-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Reiber H. Dynamics of brain-derived proteins in cerebrospinal fluid. Clin. Chim. Acta. 2001;310:173–186. doi: 10.1016/S0009-8981(01)00573-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Stock A.J., Kasus-Jacobi A., Pereira H.A. The role of neutrophil granule proteins in neuroinflammation and Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neuroinflamm. 2018;15:240. doi: 10.1186/s12974-018-1284-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Talib L.L. Platelet biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease. World J. Psychiatry. 2012;2:95. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v2.i6.95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Arai K., Gowert N.S., Donner L., Chatterjee M., Eisele Y.S., Towhid S.T., Münzer P., Walker B., Ogorek I., Borst O., et al. Blood Platelets in the Progression of Alzheimer’s Disease. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e0090523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.An K., Klyubin I., Kim Y., Jung J., Mably A.J., O’Dowd S.T., Lynch T., Kanmert D., Lemere C.A., Finan G.M., et al. Exosomes neutralize synaptic-plasticity-disrupting activity of Aβ assemblies in vivo. Mol. Brain. 2013;6:47. doi: 10.1186/1756-6606-6-47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Li M., Huang L., Chen J., Ni F., Zhang Y., Liu F. Isolation of Exosome Nanoparticles from Human Cerebrospinal Fluid for Proteomic Analysis. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2021;4:3351–3359. doi: 10.1021/acsanm.0c02622. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Zahra K., Dey T., Ashish , Mishra S.P., Pandey U. Pyruvate Kinase M2 and Cancer: The Role of PKM2 in Promoting Tumorigenesis. Front. Oncol. 2020;10:159. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bell S.M., Burgess T., Lee J., Blackburn D.J., Allen S.P., Mortiboys H. Peripheral Glycolysis in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:8924. doi: 10.3390/ijms21238924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Le Douce J., Maugard M., Veran J., Matos M., Jégo P., Vigneron P.-A., Faivre E., Toussay X., Vandenberghe M., Balbastre Y., et al. Impairment of Glycolysis-Derived l-Serine Production in Astrocytes Contributes to Cognitive Deficits in Alzheimer’s Disease. Cell Metab. 2020;31:503–517.e508. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Bigl M., Bruckner M.K., Arendt T., Bigl V., Eschrich K. Activities of key glycolytic enzymes in the brains of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neural. Transm. 1999;106:499–511. doi: 10.1007/s007020050174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Goodman A.B., Pardee A.B. Evidence for defective retinoid transport and function in late onset Alzheimer’s disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2003;100:2901–2905. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0437937100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ray S., Das B., Dasgupta S. Potential therapeutic roles of retinoids for prevention of neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease. Neural Regen. Res. 2019;14:1880. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.259604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kölsch H., Lütjohann D., Jessen F., Popp J., Hentschel F., Kelemen P., Friedrichs S., Maier T.A.W., Heun R. RXRA gene variations influence Alzheimer’s disease risk and cholesterol metabolism. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2009;13:589–598. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00383.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Xiong H., Callaghan D., Jones A., Walker D.G., Lue L.-F., Beach T.G., Sue L.I., Woulfe J., Xu H., Stanimirovic D.B., et al. Cholesterol retention in Alzheimer’s brain is responsible for high β- and γ-secretase activities and Aβ production. Neurobiol. Dis. 2008;29:422–437. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2007.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ojo J.O., Crynen G., Reed J.M., Ajoy R., Vallabhaneni P., Algamal M., Leary P., Rafi N.G., Mouzon B., Mullan M., et al. Unbiased Proteomic Approach Identifies Unique and Coincidental Plasma Biomarkers in Repetitive mTBI and AD Pathogenesis. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2018;10:405. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Sodhi R.K., Singh N. Retinoids as potential targets for Alzheimer’s disease. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2014;120:117–123. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2014.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Obulesu M., Dowlathabad M.R., Bramhachari P.V. Carotenoids and Alzheimer’s Disease: An insight into therapeutic role of retinoids in animal models. Neurochem. Int. 2011;59:535–541. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2011.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Fitz N.F., Nam K.N., Koldamova R., Lefterov I. Therapeutic targeting of nuclear receptors, liver X and retinoid X receptors, for Alzheimer’s disease. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2019;176:3599–3610. doi: 10.1111/bph.14668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Terwel D., Steffensen K.R., Verghese P.B., Kummer M.P., Gustafsson J.A., Holtzman D.M., Heneka M.T. Critical Role of Astroglial Apolipoprotein E and Liver X Receptor- Expression for Microglial A Phagocytosis. J. Neurosci. 2011;31:7049–7059. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6546-10.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Zelcer N., Khanlou N., Clare R., Jiang Q., Reed-Geaghan E.G., Landreth G.E., Vinters H.V., Tontonoz P. Attenuation of neuroinflammation and Alzheimer’s disease pathology by liver x receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:10601–10606. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701096104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Andersson S., Gustafsson N., Warner M., Gustafsson J.A. Inactivation of liver X receptor leads to adult-onset motor neuron degeneration in male mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:3857–3862. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0500634102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Zelcer N. Liver X receptors as integrators of metabolic and inflammatory signaling. J. Clin. Investig. 2006;116:607–614. doi: 10.1172/JCI27883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Dominiczak M.H., Caslake M.J. Apolipoproteins: Metabolic role and clinical biochemistry applications. Ann. Clin. Biochem. Int. J. Lab. Med. 2011;48:498–515. doi: 10.1258/acb.2011.011111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Paula-Lima A.C., Tricerri M.A., Brito-Moreira J., Bomfim T.R., Oliveira F.F., Magdesian M.H., Grinberg L.T., Panizzutti R., Ferreira S.T. Human apolipoprotein A–I binds amyloid-β and prevents Aβ-induced neurotoxicity. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2009;41:1361–1370. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2008.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Schellenberg G., Bird T., Wijsman E., Orr H., Anderson L., Nemens E., White J., Bonnycastle L., Weber J., Alonso M., et al. Genetic linkage evidence for a familial Alzheimer’s disease locus on chromosome 14. Science. 1992;258:668–671. doi: 10.1126/science.1411576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Friedman D.J., Pollak M.R. APOL1and Kidney Disease: From Genetics to Biology. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2020;82:323–342. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021119-034345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Cohen-Cory S. The developing synapse: Construction and modulation of synaptic structures and circuits. Science. 2002;298:770–776. doi: 10.1126/science.1075510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Masliah E., Mallory M., Alford M., DeTeresa R., Hansen L.A., McKeel D.W., Morris J.C. Altered expression of synaptic proteins occurs early during progression of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 2001;56:127–129. doi: 10.1212/WNL.56.1.127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Selkoe D.J. Alzheimer’s Disease Is a Synaptic Failure. Science. 2002;298:789–791. doi: 10.1126/science.1074069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Boles N.C., Hirsch S.E., Le S., Corneo B., Najm F., Minotti A.P., Wang Q., Lotz S., Tesar P.J., Fasano C.A. NPTX1 Regulates Neural Lineage Specification from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells. Cell Rep. 2014;6:724–736. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.01.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Sia G.-M., Béïque J.-C., Rumbaugh G., Cho R., Worley P.F., Huganir R.L. Interaction of the N-Terminal Domain of the AMPA Receptor GluR4 Subunit with the Neuronal Pentraxin NP1 Mediates GluR4 Synaptic Recruitment. Neuron. 2007;55:87–102. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Cummings D.M., Benway T.A., Ho H., Tedoldi A., Fernandes Freitas M.M., Shahab L., Murray C.E., Richard-Loendt A., Brandner S., Lashley T., et al. Neuronal and Peripheral Pentraxins Modify Glutamate Release and may Interact in Blood–Brain Barrier Failure. Cereb. Cortex. 2017;27:3437–3448. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhx046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Lee S.-J., Wei M., Zhang C., Maxeiner S., Pak C., Calado Botelho S., Trotter J., Sterky F.H., Südhof T.C. Presynaptic Neuronal Pentraxin Receptor Organizes Excitatory and Inhibitory Synapses. J. Neurosci. 2017;37:1062–1080. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2768-16.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Wang Z., Wang X., Zou H., Dai Z., Feng S., Zhang M., Xiao G., Liu Z., Cheng Q. The Basic Characteristics of the Pentraxin Family and Their Functions in Tumor Progression. Front. Immunol. 2020;11:1757. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Yue W., Wang T., Zachariah E., Lin Y., Yang C.S., Xu Q., DiPaola R.S., Tan X.-L. Transcriptomic analysis of pancreatic cancer cells in response to metformin and aspirin: An implication of synergy. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:1–11. doi: 10.1038/srep13390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Karagkounis G., Thai L., DeVecchio J., Gantt G.A., Duraes L., Pai R.K., Kalady M.F. NPTX2 is associated with neoadjuvant therapy response in rectal cancer. J. Surg. Res. 2016;202:112–117. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.12.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Lee G.W., Lee T.H., Vilcek J. TSG-14, a tumor necrosis factor- and IL-1-inducible protein, is a novel member of the pentaxin family of acute phase proteins. J. Immunol. 1993;150:1804–1812. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Xiao M.-F., Xu D., Craig M.T., Pelkey K.A., Chien C.-C., Shi Y., Zhang J., Resnick S., Pletnikova O., Salmon D., et al. NPTX2 and cognitive dysfunction in Alzheimer’s Disease. eLife. 2017;6:e23798. doi: 10.7554/eLife.23798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.De Groot J., Sontheimer H. Glutamate and the biology of gliomas. Glia. 2011;59:1181–1189. doi: 10.1002/glia.21113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Radin D.P., Patel P. A current perspective on the oncopreventive and oncolytic properties of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017;87:636–639. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.01.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Abad M.A., Enguita M., DeGregorio-Rocasolano N., Ferrer I., Trullas R. Neuronal Pentraxin 1 Contributes to the Neuronal Damage Evoked by Amyloid- and Is Overexpressed in Dystrophic Neurites in Alzheimer’s Brain. J. Neurosci. 2006;26:12735–12747. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0575-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Brito-Moreira J., Lourenco M.V., Oliveira M.M., Ribeiro F.C., Ledo J.H., Diniz L.P., Vital J.F.S., Magdesian M.H., Melo H.M., Barros-Aragão F., et al. Interaction of amyloid-β (Aβ) oligomers with neurexin 2α and neuroligin 1 mediates synapse damage and memory loss in mice. J. Biol. Chem. 2017;292:7327–7337. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.761189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Pettem K.L., Yokomaku D., Luo L., Linhoff M.W., Prasad T., Connor S.A., Siddiqui T.J., Kawabe H., Chen F., Zhang L., et al. The Specific α-Neurexin Interactor Calsyntenin-3 Promotes Excitatory and Inhibitory Synapse Development. Neuron. 2013;80:113–128. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Um J.W., Pramanik G., Ko J.S., Song M.Y., Lee D., Kim H., Park K.S., Südhof T.C., Tabuchi K., Ko J. Calsyntenins Function as Synaptogenic Adhesion Molecules in Concert with Neurexins. Cell Rep. 2014;6:1096–1109. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.02.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Hintsch G. The Calsyntenins—A Family of Postsynaptic Membrane Proteins with Distinct Neuronal Expression Patterns. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2002;21:393–409. doi: 10.1006/mcne.2002.1181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Uchida Y., Gomi F. The role of calsyntenin-3 in dystrophic neurite formation in Alzheimer’s disease brain. Geriatr. Gerontol. Int. 2016;16:43–50. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Pilozzi A., Carro C., Whalen M., Huang X. Blood-Brain Barrier Degradation and the Implication of SPARC Protein as a Potential Therapeutic Target for Alzheimer’s Disease. In: Huang X., editor. Alzheimer’s Disease: Drug Discovery. Exon Publications; Brisbane, Australia: 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.McCurdy S., Baicu C.F., Heymans S., Bradshaw A.D. Cardiac extracellular matrix remodeling: Fibrillar collagens and Secreted Protein Acidic and Rich in Cysteine (SPARC) J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2010;48:544–549. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2009.06.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Giannoni P., Arango-Lievano M., Neves I.D., Rousset M.-C., Baranger K., Rivera S., Jeanneteau F., Claeysen S., Marchi N. Cerebrovascular pathology during the progression of experimental Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 2016;88:107–117. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2016.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Awwad K., Hu J., Shi L., Mangels N., Abdel Malik R., Zippel N., Fisslthaler B., Eble J.A., Pfeilschifter J., Popp R., et al. Role of secreted modular calcium-binding protein 1 (SMOC1) in transforming growth factor β signalling and angiogenesis. Cardiovasc. Res. 2015;106:284–294. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvv098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Bai B., Wang X., Li Y., Chen P.-C., Yu K., Dey K.K., Yarbro J.M., Han X., Lutz B.M., Rao S., et al. Deep Multilayer Brain Proteomics Identifies Molecular Networks in Alzheimer’s Disease Progression. Neuron. 2020;105:975–991.e977. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.12.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Sathe G., Albert M., Darrow J., Saito A., Troncoso J., Pandey A., Moghekar A. Quantitative proteomic analysis of the frontal cortex in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurochem. 2020;156:988–1002. doi: 10.1111/jnc.15116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Barrera-Ocampo A., Arlt S., Matschke J., Hartmann U., Puig B., Ferrer I., Zürbig P., Glatzel M., Sepulveda-Falla D., Jahn H. Amyloid-β Precursor Protein Modulates the Sorting of Testican-1 and Contributes to Its Accumulation in Brain Tissue and Cerebrospinal Fluid from Patients with Alzheimer Disease. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2016;75:903–916. doi: 10.1093/jnen/nlw065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Schechter I., Ziv E. Cathepsins S, B and L with aminopeptidases display beta-secretase activity associated with the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Biol. Chem. 2011;392:555–569. doi: 10.1515/bc.2011.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Merlo S., Sortino M.A. Estrogen activates matrix metalloproteinases-2 and -9 to increase beta amyloid degradation. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2012;49:423–429. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2012.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Ichimura T., Isobe T., Okuyama T., Yamauchi T., Fujisawa H. Brain 14-3-3 protein is an activator protein that activates tryptophan 5-monooxygenase and tyrosine 3-monooxygenase in the presence of Ca2+,calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II. FEBS Lett. 1987;219:79–82. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(87)81194-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Cho E., Park J.-Y. Emerging roles of 14-3-3γ in the brain disorder. BMB Rep. 2020;53:500–511. doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2020.53.10.158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Cornell B., Toyo-oka K. 14-3-3 Proteins in Brain Development: Neurogenesis, Neuronal Migration and Neuromorphogenesis. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2017;10:318. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Foote M., Zhou Y. 14-3-3 proteins in neurological disorders. Int. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2012;3:152–164. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Kelly J., Moyeed R., Carroll C., Albani D., Li X. Gene expression meta-analysis of Parkinson’s disease and its relationship with Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Brain. 2019;12:1–10. doi: 10.1186/s13041-019-0436-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Bartolomucci A., Pasinetti G.M., Salton S.R.J. Granins as disease-biomarkers: Translational potential for psychiatric and neurological disorders. Neuroscience. 2010;170:289–297. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.06.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Bartolomucci A., Possenti R., Mahata S.K., Fischer-Colbrie R., Loh Y.P., Salton S.R.J. The Extended Granin Family: Structure, Function, and Biomedical Implications. Endocr. Rev. 2011;32:755–797. doi: 10.1210/er.2010-0027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Serby M., Richardson S.B., Twente S., Siekierski J., Corwin J., Rotrosen J. CSF somatostatin in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging. 1984;5:187–189. doi: 10.1016/0197-4580(84)90061-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Sagar S.M., Flint Beal M., Marshall P.E., Landis D.M.D., Martin J.B. Implications of neuropeptides in neurological diseases. Peptides. 1984;5:255–262. doi: 10.1016/0196-9781(84)90284-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Paik S., Somvanshi R.K., Kumar U. Somatostatin-Mediated Changes in Microtubule-Associated Proteins and Retinoic Acid–Induced Neurite Outgrowth in SH-SY5Y Cells. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2019;68:120–134. doi: 10.1007/s12031-019-01291-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Sodhi C.P., Phadke S.A., Batlle D., Sahai A. Hypoxia Stimulates Osteopontin Expression and Proliferation of Cultured Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells. Diabetes. 2001;50:1482–1490. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.50.6.1482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Rabenstein M., Vay S.U., Flitsch L.J., Fink G.R., Schroeter M., Rueger M.A. Osteopontin directly modulates cytokine expression of primary microglia and increases their survival. J. Neuroimmunol. 2016;299:130–138. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2016.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Wung J., Perry G., Kowalski A., Harris P.R., Bishop G., Trivedi M., Johnson S., Smith M., Denhardt D., Atwood C. Increased Expression of the Remodeling- and Tumorigenic-Associated Factor Osteopontin in Pyramidal Neurons of the Alzheimers Disease Brain. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2007;4:67–72. doi: 10.2174/156720507779939869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Comi C., Carecchio M., Chiocchetti A., Nicola S., Galimberti D., Fenoglio C., Cappellano G., Monaco F., Scarpini E., Dianzani U. Osteopontin is Increased in the Cerebrospinal Fluid of Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease and Its Levels Correlate with Cognitive Decline. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2010;19:1143–1148. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2010-1309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Sensi S.L., Granzotto A., Siotto M., Squitti R. Copper and Zinc Dysregulation in Alzheimer’s Disease. Trends. Pharmacol. Sci. 2018;39:1049–1063. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2018.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Mold M., Ouro-Gnao L., Wieckowski B.M., Exley C. Copper prevents amyloid-β1–42 from forming amyloid fibrils under near-physiological conditions in vitro. Sci. Rep. 2013;3:1256. doi: 10.1038/srep01256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Singh I., Sagare A.P., Coma M., Perlmutter D., Gelein R., Bell R.D., Deane R.J., Zhong E., Parisi M., Ciszewski J., et al. Low levels of copper disrupt brain amyloid-β homeostasis by altering its production and clearance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:14771–14776. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1302212110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Bagheri S., Squitti R., Haertlé T., Siotto M., Saboury A.A. Role of Copper in the Onset of Alzheimer’s Disease Compared to Other Metals. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2018;9:446. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Roberts B.R., Ryan T.M., Bush A.I., Masters C.L., Duce J.A. The role of metallobiology and amyloid-beta peptides in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurochem. 2012;120((Suppl. 1)):149–166. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07500.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Twomey P.J., Viljoen A., House I.M., Reynolds T.M., Wierzbicki A.S. Relationship between serum copper, ceruloplasmin, and non-ceruloplasmin-bound copper in routine clinical practice. Clin. Chem. 2005;51:1558–1559. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2005.052688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Vašák M., Meloni G. Mammalian Metallothionein-3: New Functional and Structural Insights. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;18:1117. doi: 10.3390/ijms18061117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Eipper B.A., Mains R.E. Peptide α-Amidation. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 1988;50:333–344. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.50.030188.002001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Eipper B.A., Stoffers D.A., Mains R.E. The biosynthesis of neuropeptides: Peptide alpha-amidation. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 1992;15:57–85. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.15.030192.000421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Wand G.S., May C., May V., Whitehouse P.J., Rapoport S.I., Eipper B.A. Alzheimer’s disease: Low levels of peptide alpha-amidation activity in brain and CSF. Neurology. 1987;37:1057–1061. doi: 10.1212/WNL.37.6.1057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Miners J.S., Clarke P., Love S. Clusterin levels are increased in Alzheimer’s disease and influence the regional distribution of Aβ. Brain Pathol. 2017;27:305–313. doi: 10.1111/bpa.12392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Thambisetty M., Simmons A., Velayudhan L., Hye A., Campbell J., Zhang Y., Wahlund L.-O., Westman E., Kinsey A., Güntert A., et al. Association of Plasma Clusterin Concentration With Severity, Pathology, and Progression in Alzheimer Disease. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 2010;67:739–748. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Hsieh C.L., Koike M., Spusta S.C., Niemi E.C., Yenari M., Nakamura M.C., Seaman W.E. A role for TREM2 ligands in the phagocytosis of apoptotic neuronal cells by microglia. J. Neurochem. 2009;109:1144–1156. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06042.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Zhao Y., Wu X., Li X., Jiang L.-L., Gui X., Liu Y., Sun Y., Zhu B., Piña-Crespo J.C., Zhang M., et al. TREM2 Is a Receptor for β-Amyloid that Mediates Microglial Function. Neuron. 2018;97:1023–1031.e1027. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.01.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Guerreiro R., Wojtas A., Bras J., Carrasquillo M., Rogaeva E., Majounie E., Cruchaga C., Sassi C., Kauwe J.S.K., Younkin S., et al. TREM2 Variants in Alzheimer’s Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013;368:117–127. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Jonsson T., Stefansson H., Steinberg S., Jonsdottir I., Jonsson P.V., Snaedal J., Bjornsson S., Huttenlocher J., Levey A.I., Lah J.J., et al. Variant of TREM2 Associated with the Risk of Alzheimer’s Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013;368:107–116. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Giraldo M., Lopera F., Siniard A.L., Corneveaux J.J., Schrauwen I., Carvajal J., Muñoz C., Ramirez-Restrepo M., Gaiteri C., Myers A.J., et al. Variants in triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 are associated with both behavioral variant frontotemporal lobar degeneration and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging. 2013;34:2077.e2011–2077.e2018. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.02.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Koike H., Seki H., Kouchi Z., Ito M., Kinouchi T., Tomioka S., Sorimachi H., Saido T.C., Maruyama K., Suzuki K., et al. Thimet Oligopeptidase Cleaves the Full-Length Alzheimer Amyloid Precursor Protein at a β-Secretase Cleavage Site in COS Cells. J. Biochem. 1999;126:235–242. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a022428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Yamin R., Malgeri E.G., Sloane J.A., McGraw W.T., Abraham C.R. Metalloendopeptidase EC 3.4.24.15 Is Necessary for Alzheimer’s Amyloid-β Peptide Degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:18777–18784. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.26.18777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Pollio G., Hoozemans J.J.M., Andersen C.A., Roncarati R., Rosi M.C., van Haastert E.S., Seredenina T., Diamanti D., Gotta S., Fiorentini A., et al. Increased expression of the oligopeptidase THOP1 is a neuroprotective response to Aβ toxicity. Neurobiol. Dis. 2008;31:145–158. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2008.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Choi J., Levey A.I., Weintraub S.T., Rees H.D., Gearing M., Chin L.-S., Li L. Oxidative Modifications and Down-regulation of Ubiquitin Carboxyl-terminal Hydrolase L1 Associated with Idiopathic Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s Diseases. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:13256–13264. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M314124200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Sultana R., Boyd-Kimball D., Cai J., Pierce W.M., Klein J.B., Merchant M., Butterfield D.A., Boldyrev A., Johnson P. Proteomics Analysis of the Alzheimer’s Disease Hippocampal Proteome. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2007;11:153–164. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2007-11203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Öhrfelt A., Johansson P., Wallin A., Andreasson U., Zetterberg H., Blennow K., Svensson J. Increased Cerebrospinal Fluid Levels of Ubiquitin Carboxyl-Terminal Hydrolase L1 in Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. Extra. 2016;6:283–294. doi: 10.1159/000447239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Wein A.N., McMaster S.R., Takamura S., Dunbar P.R., Cartwright E.K., Hayward S.L., McManus D.T., Shimaoka T., Ueha S., Tsukui T., et al. CXCR6 regulates localization of tissue-resident memory CD8 T cells to the airways. J. Exp. Med. 2019;216:2748–2762. doi: 10.1084/jem.20181308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Veinotte L., Gebremeskel S., Johnston B. CXCL16-positive dendritic cells enhance invariant natural killer T cell-dependent IFNγ production and tumor control. OncoImmunology. 2016;5:e1160979. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2016.1160979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Jadidi-Niaragh F., Shegarfi H., Naddafi F., Mirshafiey A. The Role of Natural Killer Cells in Alzheimer’s Disease. Scand. J. Immunol. 2012;76:451–456. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2012.02769.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Anggono V., Koç-Schmitz Y., Widagdo J., Kormann J., Quan A., Chen C.-M., Robinson P.J., Choi S.-Y., Linden D.J., Plomann M., et al. PICK1 interacts with PACSIN to regulate AMPA receptor internalization and cerebellar long-term depression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:13976–13981. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1312467110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Clayton E.L., Anggono V., Smillie K.J., Chau N., Robinson P.J., Cousin M.A. The Phospho-Dependent Dynamin-Syndapin Interaction Triggers Activity-Dependent Bulk Endocytosis of Synaptic Vesicles. J. Neurosci. 2009;29:7706–7717. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1976-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Modregger J. PACSIN 1 interacts with huntingtin and is absent from synaptic varicosities in presymptomatic Huntington’s disease brains. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2002;11:2547–2558. doi: 10.1093/hmg/11.21.2547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Takano M., Yamashita T., Nagano K., Otani M., Maekura K., Kamada H., Tsunoda S.-i., Tsutsumi Y., Tomiyama T., Mori H., et al. Proteomic analysis of the hippocampus in Alzheimer’s disease model mice by using two-dimensional fluorescence difference in gel electrophoresis. Neurosci. Lett. 2013;534:85–89. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Zhao X., Yao H., Li X. Unearthing of Key Genes Driving the Pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s Disease via Bioinformatics. Front. Genet. 2021;12:641100. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.641100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Salih D.A., Bayram S., Guelfi S., Reynolds R.H., Shoai M., Ryten M., Brenton J.W., Zhang D., Matarin M., Botia J.A., et al. Genetic variability in response to amyloid beta deposition influences Alzheimer’s disease risk. Brain Commun. 2019;1:fcz022. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcz022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Trovò L., Ahmed T., Callaerts-Vegh Z., Buzzi A., Bagni C., Chuah M., VandenDriessche T., D’Hooge R., Balschun D., Dotti C.G. Low hippocampal PI(4,5)P2 contributes to reduced cognition in old mice as a result of loss of MARCKS. Nat. Neurosci. 2013;16:449–455. doi: 10.1038/nn.3342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

Al data generated in this review are included in the article in the form of tables and supplemental tables.


Articles from Diagnostics are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES