Skip to main content
Antibiotics logoLink to Antibiotics
. 2021 Sep 4;10(9):1071. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10091071

Enhanced Antibacterial Potential of Amoxicillin against Helicobacter pylori Mediated by Lactobionic Acid Coated Zn-MOFs

Haseena 1, Adnan Khan 1, Fariha Aslam 2, Tasmina Kanwal 2, Muhammad Raza Shah 2,*, Atif Ali Khan Khalil 3, Syed Wadood Ali Shah 4, Eida M Alshammari 5, Eman A El-Masry 6,7, Gaber El-Saber Batiha 8, Roua S Baty 9
Editor: Giulia Bernardini
PMCID: PMC8470299  PMID: 34572653

Abstract

H. pylori (Helicobacter pylori) causes a common chronic infectious disease and infects around 4.4 billion people worldwide. H. pylori was classified as a member of the primary class of stomach cancer (stomach adenocarcinoma). Hence, this study was conducted to design a novel lactobionic acid (LBA)-coated Zn-MOFs to enhance bactericidal activity of Amoxicillin (AMX) against H. pylori. The synthesized Zn-MOFs were characterized by various techniques which included Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS), Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) Spectroscopy, Powder X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscope, and atomic force microscope. They were capable of encapsulating an increased amount of AMX and investigated for their efficacy to enhance the antibacterial potential of their loaded drug candidate. Interestingly, it was found that LBA-coated Zn-MOFs significantly reduced the IC50, MIC, and MBIC values of AMX against H. pylori. Morphological investigation of treated bacterial cells further authenticated the above results as LBA-coated Zn-MOFs-treated cells underwent complete distortion compared with non-coated AMX loaded Zn-MOFs. Based on the results of the study, it can be suggested that LBA-coated Zn-MOFs may be an effective alternate candidate to provide new perspective for the treatment of H. pylori infections.

Keywords: lactobionic acid, Amoxicillin, metal organic frameworks (MOFs), H. pylori

1. Introduction

Amoxicillin (AMX), a β-lactam penicillin-type antibiotic, is used for either curative anti-biotherapy or prophylactic [1]. AMX inhibits the process of transpeptidation (cross-linking process in cell wall synthesis) by binding with penicillin-binding proteins and activating the autolytic enzyme in the bacterial cell wall, which eventually results in bacterial cell lysis [2]. AMX has FDA approval for the treatment of various infections like genitourinary tract infections, nose, ear, and throat infections, infections of lower respiratory tract, Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infections, pharyngitis, tonsillitis, and skin structure infections. The Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) recommends it as the first-line treatment for acute bacterial rhinosinusitis and as one of the treatments for community-acquired pneumonia [3]. The microorganisms capable of producing β-lactamases show resistance against AMX and reduce its transportation across the bacterial cell membrane [3].

H. pylori causes a common chronic infectious disease and infects around 4.4 billion people worldwide [4]. H. pylori causes prolong gastritis, gastric cancer, and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma [5,6,7]. H. pylori (in 1994) was classified as a member of the primary class of stomach cancer (stomach adenocarcinoma).

H. pylori, by means of its flagella, enters into the mucus lining of the stomach and reaches the epithelial layer [8], where it produces biochemical, vacuolating cytotoxin A (VacA), and causes inflammation and especially carcinogenesis [9,10]. Recent research indicates that elimination of H. pylori can reduce the collective occurrence of gastric cancer in a healthy population; its elimination helps to inhibit gastric carcinoma in all stages of life [11]. However, antibiotic treatment failure can be caused by a variety of causes, including an ineffective antibiotic regimen, poor patient compliance, internalizing bacteria, gene mutations, resistance gene transfer, and biofilm formation [12]. H. pylori can form a well-structured biofilm containing outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) that are connected with extracellular DNA (eDNA) [13]. The eDNA associated with OMVs has been shown to enhance cell-to-cell interaction and contribute to the biofilm matrix’s stability. Furthermore, vesicle structures protect nucleic acid, ensuring both delivery and release of genetic material and essential proteins in other bacterial cells, as well as pathogenicity and survival of H. pylori [14]. As a result, biofilm-associated cells are 10–1000 times more resistant to drugs than planktonic counterparts [15].

Biofilms can be formed by 40–80% of bacterial cells on the planet, according to new research [16]. Biofilm development is thought to be responsible for up to 80% of all microbial illnesses in the healthcare sector [17]. Extracellular polymeric compounds in bacterial biofilms protect microorganisms from potentially harmful external environments [18]. Therefore, inhibiting the production of biofilms is one of the most promising approaches to combating bacterial drug resistance. Antibiofilm solutions, such as antibacterial coatings, have been developed to eradicate or inhibit biofilm [19] Meanwhile, raffinose has been demonstrated to attach to lectin, a carbohydrate-binding protein, and diminish the quantity of a signaling molecule that promotes the creation of biofilms [20]. Hao et al. constructed CeO2-decorated porphyrinic MOFs to inhibit the biofilm formation based on the synergic effect of extracellular ATP (eATP) deprivation through lanthanide nanoparticles and MOF-generated ROS [21]. Iqra et al. reported that chitosan coating on iron-based MOFs significantly overcome the MDR against vancomycine [22].

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), unique hybrid crystal material composed of the metal ions/cluster cross-linked with a multi-dentate organic molecule, have developed as a prominent carrier in the field of drug delivery. MOFs have tremendous properties, including a highly porous nature, adjustable pore size, larger surface area, and various surface functionalities which facilitate the enhanced encapsulation of drug candidate [23]. The biological application of MOFs has been intensively observed, as several therapeutic agents have been encapsulated in these nanomaterials [24]. Researchers seriously focus on these materials because of the remarkable potential of a constructed framework and promising applications in drug delivery [25], gas technology [26], catalysis [27], luminescent materials [28], stationary phase for chromatography [29], and sensors [30].

Furthermore, MOFs can be employed as a reservoir for antibacterial agents because to their construction, composition, and internal expensive surface volume, which is the advantage of MOFs as a new high-performance material with antibacterial capabilities [31]. It can also be used as a metal ion storage library for silver, zinc, copper, or nickel, and with the metal breakdown of the MOF’s skeleton being employed to gradually release metal ions to provide a long-lasting antibacterial effect [32]. The metal release mechanism of MOFs is changing constantly as the material deteriorates [33]. Furthermore, the organic ligands employed to make MOFs may have antimicrobial properties as well. Metal ions and the antibacterial characteristics of the organic ligand can be coupled to generate a synergistic effect by storing ligand molecules in the spatial structure inside MOFs [34].

Zn metal is considered as the second most abundant minor nutrient in living organisms [35], and essential for human anatomy, cell biology, and physiology. Zn2+ ions released from Zn-containing ceramic material possess the ability to interact with the bacterial cell wall and promote the shifting of charges, which in turn induces the bacteriolysis and cell distortion [36]. Almost all Zn-containing biodegradable material exhibited anti-bacterial activity by the formation of a generation of reactive oxygen species [37]. Non-toxic, photooxidant, and photocatalyst ZnO nanoparticles have skin-friendly qualities. Furthermore, due to the antibacterial capabilities of nanostructured materials, MOFs synthesis will yield not only desirable qualities, but also significant physicochemical features that may be applied to a variety of areas [38,39]. Hang and colleagues solvothermally created two-dimensional pillar-layered Zn-MOFs that selectively adsorb carbon dioxide over nitrogen and methane [40]. Due to the controlled release of the ligand, Restrepo and coworkers created Zn-MOF with hyderazine benzoate linker that has reasonably strong antibacterial activity against the Gram-positive bacterium Staphylococcus aureus [41].

Lactobionic acid (LBA) is a flexible polyhydroxy acid that consists of one galactose molecule connected to another gluconic acid molecule via an ether-like linkage with eight hydroxyl groups [42]. LBA has been proven to be a safe and non-toxic compound [43] and is now used in a variety of industries, including the food, chemical, pharmaceutical, and medical industries [44]. Additionally, LBA also has versatile biological activities, such as anti-bacterial [45], anti-oxidant, and chelating agent [42] anti-obesity properties [46]. LBA has been reported to alter the membrane permeability and damage of S. aureus cells and induce the leakage of nucleotides and alkaline phosphatase in the culture medium [47]. Hence, the use of LBA in reversing bacterial resistance would be an effective approach in the field of drug delivery.

Based on the described features of LBA, we synthesized the LBA-coated Zn-MOFs for the first time to the delivery of AMX, which was characterized through various techniques. Additionally, the antibacterial and biofilm effects of the synthesized AMX-loaded Zn-MOFs was evaluated on resistant H. pylori.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents

All solvents used in this study were of analytical grade and purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Germany) and utilized without further purification. Zinc acetate dihydrate (Zn(CH3CO2)2·2H2O) was purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), 2-aminoterephthalic acid (ATA) was purchased from Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co. Ltd., and 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) and poly-lysine were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Darmstadt, Germany). Tryptic soya agar and Mueller Hinton broth were obtained from Oxoid, UK. Amoxicillin was purchased from a local pharmaceuticals company.

2.2. Synthesis of Zn-MOFs

The synthesis of Zn-MOFs was accomplished according to the previously reported protocol with a slight modification to enhance their characteristics [48]. Briefly, in 10 mL DMF, 24.2 mg Zn(CH3CO2)2·2H2O (1.1 mmol) and 5.43 mg ATA (0.41 mmol) were dissolved by ultra-sonication for 15 min and the mixture was left for 18 h at 100 °C. The resulting product was separated by centrifugation at 8000 rpm for 15 min. The obtained precipitate was then washed with anhydrous DMF to remove the unreacted substances, and dried in a vacuum oven at 30 °C [49].

2.3. Incorporation of Amoxicillin in Zn-MOFs

AMX (20 mg) and Zn-MOFs (10 mg) were dispersed in distilled water and stirred for 24 h at 200 rpm. After that, the mixture was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 15 min, and the resulting AMX-loaded Zn-MOFs (Am-Zn-MOFs) were washed and dried. The pallet was then dispersed in ethanol and sonicated for 30 min, and the undissolved Zn-MOFs were separated by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 20 min. The drug content in the supernatant was studied using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (UV-240, Shimadzu, Japan) and the percent drug encapsulation (DE) was determined according to the Equation (1) [50].

%DEAmount of drug in ZnMOFsTotal amount of drug used×100 (1)

2.4. Coating of Lactobionic Acid on Am-Zn-MOFs

Surface coating of Am-Zn-MOFs was performed by using the dispersion of 22.1 mg of Am-Zn-MOFs in 10 mL acetate buffer of pH 4 (Sodium Acetate; 7.721 g and acetic acid; 0.353 g in water). Equivalent moles of ATA and LBA (0.089 mmoles) were dissolved in water and added to the dispersion of Am-Zn-MOFs followed by 2 h of stirring at 50 °C. After that, 20 equivalent solutions of NaBH4 were added to the above reaction mixture and stirred for 3 days at 50 °C. At the specific time period of 12 h, 20 freshly prepared equivalents of NaBH4 were added to the above mixture.

2.5. Characterization

2.5.1. FT-IR Analysis

The non-covalent interaction of AMX and LBA within the Zn-MOFs was studied through FT-IR spectroscopy. The minimum amount of each sample was grinded with KBr and formed a translucent disc by applying the pressure of 200 psi. The disc was then scanned in the UV-Vis spectrophotometer over a range of 400–4000 cm−1.

2.5.2. Determination of Size, Polydispersity Index (PDI), Zeta-Potential, and Surface Morphology

Polydispersity Index (PDI), size, and zeta-potential determination were performed through a dynamic light scattering (DLS) instrument (Nano ZS90 Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, UK). The samples were dispersed in water and analyzed on DLS in triplicate at a scattering angle of 90° at 25 °C. Morphological analysis of synthesized MOFs was performed on an atomic force microscope (AFM, 5500, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The diluted samples were loaded on a mica slide, dried at room temperature, and studied under microscope.

2.5.3. Powder XRD

The crystalline nature of Zn-MOFs was studied through Powder XRD. Diffraction patterns were measured from 5° to 60° (2θ) with Cu-Kα irradiation using an X-ray diffraction instrument (Axios Petro, PANalytical, Almelo, Netherlands, CoKα, λ = 1.79021 Å).

2.6. Antibacterial Assay

2.6.1. Bacterial Strains

A strain of Gram-negative bacterium (H. pylori ATCC 700392) as a test microorganism was selected for antibacterial assay. The stock culture of bacterial strain was kept on Tryptic soya agar at 4 °C. Before 24 h of experiment, the microbial strain was sub-cultured on a fresh appropriate agar plate. Several single colonies of microorganisms were transferred to a sterile Mueller Hinton broth to make the inoculum. The cell suspension of microbes was mixed to give a final density of 5 × 105 cfu/mL, which was confirmed by the viable counts.

2.6.2. Microplate Assay of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)

The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of test microorganisms and reference materials were determined by using a tetrazolium microplate assay according to the protocol described in the literature [51]. To conduct the analysis, a 96-well clear microtiter plate was used that was seeded with a 5 × 105 cfu/mL freshly harvested bacterial cells suspension of H. pylori. Different concentrations from 250 to 10 µg of AMX, Zn-MOF, Am-Zn-MOFs, and L-Am-Zn-MOF were serially diluted in Muller Hinton broth, then 200 µL of each concentration was transferred to the 96-well plate in triplicate manner and incubated for 18–24 h at 37 °C ± 0.5. After incubation, each well was then incubated with 50 µL of 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide MTT having a concentration of 0.2 mg/mL at 37 °C for 30 min. An appropriate solvent (dimethyl sulphoxide; DMSO) was included as a negative control and bacterial suspension was referred to as a positive control. The absorbance was measured at 570 nm with a reference wavelength of 650 nm by adding DMSO on a spectrophotometer and the percentage reduction of the dye (indicating the bacterial growth inhibition) was calculated by Equation (2) [52].

IC50=O.D. in Control  O.D. of testO.D. in control×100 (2)

2.6.3. Determination of Minimum Biofilm Inhibitory Concentration (MBIC)

Anti-biofilm activity of AMX, Zn-MOF, Am-Zn-MOFs, and L-Am-Zn-MOF was studied on H. pylori strain using microtiter plate method. The compounds were diluted as mentioned above in a 96-well flat bottom plate (Corning, Glendale, AZ, USA). An inoculum of 5 × 105 CFU mL−1 of bacteria was transferred to each well except broth control and the plate was subjected for overnight incubation at 37 °C followed by staining to allow the biofilm formation [53]. To eliminate planktonic cells, plates were washed three times with sterile distilled water and stained with 0.1% (w/v) crystal violet for 20 min. The biofilms retained a crystal violet color, and were dissolved in 30% (v/v) glacial acetic acid after the stained plates were rewashed. Using a microplate reader (Tecan, Baldwin Park, CA, USA), the absorbance of the plates was measured at 590 nm. Percent biofilm inhibition was calculated by formula (3):

% biofilm inhibition =O.D. in control  O.D. of testO.D. in control×100 (3)

2.6.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy of Biofilm

H. pylori cells were grown to the exponential phase before being resuspended at 5 × 105 CFU/mL. The cells were treated with the compounds (MBIC) for 60 min at 37 °C, cells without the drug serve as a control. The cells were then pelleted and fixed for 2 h at 4 °C in a 2% glutaraldehyde solution, as described before. In a graded succession of alcohols, the cells were dehydrated. After that, the samples were coated with gold and examined using a JSM-6380A scanning electron microscope (SEM).

2.6.5. Morphological Changes Studied by Atomic Force Microscopy

H. pylori was cultivated in tryptic soy agar at 37 °C for up to 24 h. The polylysine was loaded onto freshly cleaved mica slides and dried at room temperature. Drops of diluted culture of each bacterial strain with a density of 105 cfu were applied to prepared polylysine mica slides, dried at room temperature, and morphologically investigated using AFM analysis. Similarly, test compounds were evaluated for changes in bacterial culture morphologies. The samples were taken (5–10 μL) from their MIC microtiter plate wells and applied to freshly cleaved mica with dried polylysine on their surfaces. After drying at room temperature, the slides were examined for morphological analysis. The variations in morphology of the bacterial strain with and without test material were observed.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

All the experiments were carried out in triplicate and results were expressed as the mean ± SEM.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. FT-IR and UV Analysis

FT-IR analysis was conducted to evaluate the secondary interaction within the synthesized Zn-MOFs. The spectrum of ATA revealed the characteristic peak of O-H and C=O at 3505.20 and 1663.92 cm−1, respectively, while the stretching and bending vibration of NH2 appeared at 3333.45 and 1586.69 cm−1, respectively. In the synthesized Zn-MOFs, the characteristic peak appeared at 3460.58 cm−1, while in the pure ligand (Zn-Acetate), the peak was located at 3343.00 cm−1. Furthermore, the characteristic peak of C=O of ATA was slightly shifted to 1657.84 cm−1 after being coordinated with Zn as shown in Figure 1. The spectrum of AMX showed the characteristic peak of amide at 3424.6 cm−1 and β-lactam C=O at 1607.06 cm−1, with a sharp absorption of C=O of the carboxylic group at 1776.05 cm−1. After being encapsulated in Zn-MOFs, the characteristic peak of Zn-MOFs slightly shifted to 3455.58 cm−1 with a decrease in intensity, showing the interaction with AMX. Furthermore, the characteristic peak of β-lactam C=O of AMX also appeared in AMX-loaded Zn-MOFs, which authenticated the presence of AMX in the Zn-MOFs (Figure 1). Surface coating with LBA was also confirmed by FTIR spectroscopy. The pure ligand showed the characteristic peak at 3364.30 cm−1 and 1733.30 cm−1 for hydrogen bonded O-H and C=O, respectively. The peak located at 1065.20 cm−1 represented C-O stretching. After the modification, the characteristic peaks of Am-Zn-MOFs at 3455.58 cm−1 and LBA at 3364.30 cm−1 almost disappeared and a tiny peak observed at 3545.30 cm−1 showed the involvement of the respective functional groups in the process of surface coating (Figure 1). Furthermore, the interaction of AMX was also confirmed by UV analysis, where the pure AMX showed the characteristic peak at 230 nm (Figure 2a) while the Zn-MOFs showed an absorption peak at 326 nm (Figure 2b). After being encapsulated in Zn-MOFs, the AMX was slightly shifted to 219 nm owing to secondary interaction with Zn-MOFs (Figure 2c). Interestingly, once the drug was released from Zn-MOFs under the influence of ethanol, the AMX recovered its original wavelength and was observed at 230 nm (Figure 2d). The results suggest that AMX remains intact in Zn-MOFs without any kind of alteration in its structure.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

FTIR Spectrum of ATA, Zn-Acetate, Zn-MOFs, AMX, Am-ZnMOFs, and L-Am-Zn-MOFs.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The UV spectrum of pure AMX showing the peak at 230 nm (a). UV spectrum of Zn-MOFs showing the peak at 326 nm (b). UV spectrum of AMX-loaded Zn-MOFs showed a slight variation in AMX peak (c). UV spectrum of AMX after its release from Zn-MOFs (d).

3.2. Determination of Size, PDI and Zeta-Potential, and Surface Morphology

In drug delivery application, particle size plays a critical role as it is strongly related to the release of the encapsulated drug. MOFs are porous crystalline materials whose particle size depends on the solvent and method of preparation. Synthesis of MOFs in the solvent system composed of water and methanol yields a larger particle size, while the synthesis in DMF gives rise to a smaller particle size because of the enhanced solubility of the cross-linker in DMF as compared to water and methanol [54]. The particle size of the synthesized Zn-MOFs was found to be 619.6 ± 18.42 nm with a PDI of 0.78 ± 0.07. After encapsulation of AMX and surface coating, the size of the Zn-MOFs increased to 727.9 ± 11.95 nm and 943.6 ± 15.43 nm with an almost similar PDI value of 0.68 ± 0.04 and 0.66 ± 0.05, respectively. The negative zeta potential was observed for all the synthesized MOFs because of the presence of carboxylic groups in the cross linker and various hydroxyl moieties in LBA; the values are provided in Table 1. Morphological analysis revealed the spherical shape structure for Zn-MOFs with increasing particle size upon drug loading and LBA coating, showing the consistency with DLS results (Figure 3a,b).

Table 1.

Size, PDI, zeta potential, and encapsulation efficiency of synthesized Zn-MOFs.

Samples Size (nm) PDI Zeta-Potential (mV) %EE
Zn-MOFs 619.6 ± 18.42 0.78 ± 0.07 −14.2 ± 1.41 -
AM-Zn-MOFs 727.9 ± 11.95 0.68 ± 0.04 −15.4 ± 1.34 60.15 ± 4.15%
L-AM-Zn-MOFs 943.6 ± 15.43 0.66 ± 0.05 −10.2 ± 0.68 55.23 ± 6.22%

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Representative AFM images showing size variation between Zn-MOFs (a) and LBA-coated Am-Zn-MOFs (b).

3.3. Drug Encapsulation Efficiency

The loading of active therapeutics in the MOFs structure is directly related to their surface area bearing regular and large cages and tunnels, as they are responsible to entrap the active therapeutic agents in these cages and tunnels [55]. The synthesized Zn-MOFs showed 60.15 ± 4.15% encapsulation efficiency (EE), which was almost unaffected after coating with LBA as shown in Table 1.

3.4. Powder XRD

The use of X-ray diffraction (XRD) to analyze the crystalline properties of a synthesized substance is a useful technique. The solid crystals created during the synthesis were used straight away without any changes. High intensity Bragg diffraction peaks are observed at 2θ = 7.61°, 18.25°, 19.26°, 25.81°, 33.76°, and 42.44° as shown in Figure 4; the literature reported the high intensity Bragg diffraction peaks for the zinc MOFs as 2θ = 7.71°, 18.03°, 21.26°, 25.41°, 32.76°, 34.28°, and 58.44° [56]. The synthesized Zn-MOFs showed almost consistent diffraction patterns, which indicated the successful synthesis of Zn-MOFs.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Powder X-ray diffraction pattern of Zn-MOFs.

3.5. Antibacterial Assay

3.5.1. Determination of MIC Value

Tetrazolium microplate assay was used to determine the MIC value of AMX and the results are provided in Table 2. The MIC value of AMX against H. pylori was observed as 100 µg/mL, which was capable of inhibiting 42 ± 0.5% of bacterial growth. Zn-MOFs showed the similar MIC against H. pylori growth, but the inhibition was found to be only 20 ± 0.4%, while LBA showed the MIC value around 63 µg/mL with 18.08% inhibition. The MIC value of AMX was significantly decreased to 10 µg/mL for Am-Zn-MOF and L-Am-Zn-MOFs with 22 ± 0.4% and 32 ± 0.3% inhibition for the H. pylori growth, respectively. The increased inhibition for L-Am-Zn-MOFs may be because of the synergistic effect of AMX and LBA.

Table 2.

IC50, MIC, and MBIC values of AMX against H. pylori.

Sample IC50 µg/mL %
Inhibition
MIC
µg/mL
%
Inhibition
MBIC µg/mL % Inhibition
AMX 200 52 ± 0.3% 100 42 ± 0.5% 100 25 ± 0.3%
LBA 87 51 ± 0.4% 63 18.08% 70 36 ± 0.5%
Zn-MOFs 250 55.3 ± 0.5% 100 20 ± 0.4% 10 40 ± 0.3%
Am-Zn-MOFs 100 58 ± 0.8% 10 32 ± 0.3% 10 45 ± 0.4%
L-Am-Zn-MOFs 25 53 ± 0.4% 10 22 ± 0.4% 10 52 ± 0.6%

These results were also confirmed by AFM analysis, which demonstrated the surface morphology of bacterial cells after treatment with test samples, and the images are given in Figure 5. The control of H. pylori was observed as smooth rods (Figure 5a); the surface smoothness of H. pylori was decreased after treatment with AMX but the cells maintained their morphological characteristics upon treatment with Zn-MOFs (Figure 5b,c, respectively). Amx-Zn-MOF showed a slight distortion in bacterial morphology (Figure 5d), while significant damage of cell structure was observed for the L-Am-Zn-MOFs (Figure 5e); this is because of the fact that LBA is capable of altering the membrane permeability as well as the damage of bacterial cells [47], which synergistically enhance the efficacy of AMX against H. pylori.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

AFM images of H. pylori control cells (a), H. pylori AMX treated (b), H. pylori Zn-MOF treated (c), H. pylori Am-Zn-MOF treated (d), and H. pylori L-Am-Zn-MOF treated (e).

Similarly, IC50 values of AMX and Zn-MOFs against H. pylori bacterial cells were found to be 200 µg/mL and 250 µg/mL, respectively. In the case of LBA, it was observed as 87 µg/mL. Am-Zn-MOFs decreased the IC50 value up to 100 µg/mL while it was further reduced to 25 µg/mL after coating with LBA, as shown in Table 2. Results suggest AMX antibacterial activity significantly enhanced against H. pylori after loading in Zn-MOFs coated with lactobionic acid.

3.5.2. Determination of MBIC Value

Biofilms are the major mode of microbial life [57] which help bacterial cells to survive in unfavorable conditions [58]. Biofilms are also responsible for the enhanced bacterial resistance against antibiotics [59]. Hence, the synthesized Zn-MOFs were also investigated for their MBIC values. The MBIC values of AMX and Zn-MOFs against H. pylori were observed as 100 µg/mL and 10 µg/mL with biofilm inhibition of 25 ± 0.3% and 40 ± 0.3%, respectively. LBA showed 70 µg/mL with biofilm inhibition around 36 ± 0.5%. The MBIC value of AMX after encapsulation in Zn-MOFs was also found to be 10 µg/mL, with increased biofilm inhibition 45 ± 0.4%. Interestingly, L-Am-Zn-MOFs at the same concentration of 10µg/mL had significantly increased biofilm inhibition of the bacterial colony, i.e., 52 ± 0.6%. (Table 2).

The results of MBIC study were also confirmed by the investigation of morphological changes upon treatment with test samples. The SEM images of all the bacterial cells are presented in Figure 6. The SEM image of H. pylori control showed the smooth curved rod-shaped structure (Figure 6a) and was unaffected by treatment with AMX and Zn-MOF (Figure 6b and Figure 6c, respectively). The H. pylori cells were slightly destroyed when treated with Am-Zn-MOFs (Figure 6d), while being destroyed completely upon treatment with L-Am-Zn-MOFs (Figure 6e). The increased efficacy of AMX may be associated with LBA, which altered the membrane permeability of bacterial cells and induced the leakage of internal cellular components [47], because of the fact that LBA inhibits the function of flagellar protein and blocks the flagellar assembly that is significantly involved in biofilm formation and the secretion of virulence factor. Furthermore, it is also associated with the inhibition of nucleotide metabolism as well as protein and DNA synthesis [60]

Figure 6.

Figure 6

H. pylori control cells (a), H. pylori AMX treated (b), H. pylori Zn-MOF treated (c), H. pylori Am-Zn-MOF treated (d), and H. pylori L-Am-Zn-MOF treated (e).

4. Conclusions

In this study, we successfully synthesized LBA-coated Zn-MOFs and studied their potential towards the antibacterial activity of AMX against H. pylori. The synthesized L-Am-Zn-MOFs exhibited 55.23 ± 6.22% encapsulation for AMX and increased its bactericidal activity against H. pylori. Similarly, the LBA-coated Zn-MOFs significantly reduced the IC50, MIC, and MBIC values of AMX. These results were further confirmed by the morphological investigation through SEM and AFM which showed the complete distortion of bacterial cells treated with L-Am-Zn-MOFs. Hence, according to the observations of the study, it can be concluded that LBA coating on Zn-MOFs may be an effective strategy to treat the infections caused by H. pylori.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Taif University Researchers Supporting Program (project number: TURSP-2020/269), Taif University, Saudi Arabia.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H. and M.R.S.; methodology, H. and A.K.; software, H., A.K., F.A.; formal analysis, M.R.S., T.K., S.W.A.S., A.A.K.K. and R.S.B.; investigation, M.R.S. and T.K.; writing—original draft preparation, E.M.A., E.A.E.-M., G.E.-S.B., H. and M.R.S.; writing—review and editing, M.R.S., T.K., F.A., S.W.A.S., A.K., A.A.K.K. and R.S.B.; visualization, M.R.S., A.A.K.K., F.A. and T.K.; supervision, M.R.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting this study are available from corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Wilson W. Prevention of infective endocarditis: Guidelines from the American heart association: A guideline from the American heart association rheumatic fever, endocarditis, and Kawasaki disease committee, council on cardiovascular disease in the young, and the council on clinical cardiology, council on cardiovascular surgery and anesthesia, and the quality of care and outcomes research interdisciplinary working group. Circulation. 2007;116:1736–1754. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.183095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Akhavan B.J., Khanna N.R., Vijhani P. Amoxicillin. StatPearls Publishing; San Francisco, CA, USA: 2020. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Drissi M. Antibiotic susceptibility and mechanisms of β-lactam resistance among clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: First report in Algeria. Med. Mal. Infect. 2008;38:187–191. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2008.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hooi J.K. Global prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Gastroenterol. 2017;153:420–429. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.04.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hatakeyama M., Brzozowski T. Pathogenesis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Helicobacter. 2006;11:14–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-405X.2006.00424.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Matysiak-Budnik T. Helicobacter pylori and non-malignant diseases. Helicobacter. 2006;11:27–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-405X.2006.00426.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rocha G.A. STAT 3 polymorphism and Helicobacter pylori CagA strains with higher number of EPIYA-C segments independently increase the risk of gastric cancer. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:528. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1533-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Amieva M.R., El–Omar E.M. Host-bacterial interactions in Helicobacter pylori infection. J. Gastroenterol. 2008;134:306–323. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hatakeyama M., Higashi H. Helicobacter pylori CagA: A new paradigm for bacterial carcinogenesis. Cancer Sci. 2005;96:835–843. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2005.00130.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Backert S. Functional analysis of the cag pathogenicity island in Helicobacter pylori isolates from patients with gastritis, peptic ulcer, and gastric cancer. Infect. Immun. 2004;72:1043–1056. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.2.1043-1056.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bae S.E. The effect of eradication of Helicobacter pylori on gastric cancer prevention in healthy asymptomatic populations. Helicobacter. 2018;23:12464. doi: 10.1111/hel.12464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hu Y., Zhu Y., Lu N.-H. Novel and effective therapeutic regimens for Helicobacter pylori in an era of increasing antibiotic resistance. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017;7:168. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Grande R. Helicobacter pylori ATCC 43629/NCTC 11639 outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) from biofilm and planktonic phase associated with extracellular DNA (eDNA) Front. Microbiol. 2015;6:1369. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ronci M. Identification and characterization of the α-CA in the outer membrane vesicles produced by Helicobacter pylori. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2019;34:189–195. doi: 10.1080/14756366.2018.1539716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Schulze A. Biofilms by bacterial human pathogens: Clinical relevance-development, composition and regulation-therapeutical strategies. Microb. Cell. 2021;8:28. doi: 10.15698/mic2021.02.741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Flemming H.-C., Wuertz S. Bacteria and archaea on Earth and their abundance in biofilms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019;17:247–260. doi: 10.1038/s41579-019-0158-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Joo H.-S., Otto M. Molecular basis of in vivo biofilm formation by bacterial pathogens. Chem. Biol. 2012;19:1503–1513. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.10.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hu D. Surface-adaptive gold nanoparticles with effective adherence and enhanced photothermal ablation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus biofilm. ACS Nano. 2017;11:9330–9339. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b04731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yao L. Codeposition of polydopamine and zwitterionic polymer on membrane surface with enhanced stability and antibiofouling property. Langmuir. 2018;35:1430–1439. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b01621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kim H.-S. Raffinose, a plant galactoside, inhibits Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation via binding to LecA and decreasing cellular cyclic diguanylate levels. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:25318. doi: 10.1038/srep25318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Qiu H. Depriving Bacterial Adhesion-Related Molecule to Inhibit Biofilm Formation Using CeO2-Decorated Metal-Organic Frameworks. Small. 2019;15:e1902522. doi: 10.1002/smll.201902522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ghaffar I. Synthesis of chitosan coated metal organic frameworks (MOFs) for increasing vancomycin bactericidal potentials against resistant S. aureus strain. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2019;105:110111. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kaner D. Timing affects the clinical outcome of adjunctive systemic antibiotic therapy for generalized aggressive periodontitis. J. Periodontol. 2007;78:1201–1208. doi: 10.1902/jop.2007.060437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Simon-Yarza T. Nanoparticles of metal-organic frameworks: On the road to in vivo efficacy in biomedicine. Adv. Mater. 2018;30:1707365. doi: 10.1002/adma.201707365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Horcajada P. Porous metal–organic-framework nanoscale carriers as a potential platform for drug delivery and imaging. Nat. Mater. 2010;9:172–178. doi: 10.1038/nmat2608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hartmann M. Adsorptive separation of isobutene and isobutane on Cu3(BTC)2. Langmuir. 2008;24:8634–8642. doi: 10.1021/la8008656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Shultz A.M. A catalytically active, permanently microporous MOF with metalloporphyrin struts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:4204–4205. doi: 10.1021/ja900203f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rodrigues M.O. Modeling, structural, and spectroscopic studies of lanthanide-organic frameworks. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2009;113:12181–12188. doi: 10.1021/jp9022629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Aquino A. Coordination polymer adsorbent for matrix solid-phase dispersion extraction of pesticides during analysis of dehydrated Hyptis pectinata medicinal plant by GC/MS. Talanta. 2010;83:631–636. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2010.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chen B. Surface interactions and quantum kinetic molecular sieving for H2 and D2 adsorption on a mixed metal− organic framework material. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:6411–6423. doi: 10.1021/ja710144k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Abbasi A.R., Morsali A.A. Dense coating of surface mounted CuBTC metal–organic framework nanostructures on silk fibers, prepared by layer-by-layer method under ultrasound irradiation with antibacterial activity. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2012;19:846–852. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2011.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Alavijeh R.K. Investigation of reasons for metal–organic framework’s antibacterial activities. Polyhedron. 2018;156:257–278. doi: 10.1016/j.poly.2018.09.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cai W. Metal–organic framework-based stimuli-responsive systems for drug delivery. Adv. Sci. 2019;6:1801526. doi: 10.1002/advs.201801526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Shen M. Antibacterial applications of metal–organic frameworks and their composites. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2020;19:1397–1419. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kambe T. The physiological, biochemical, and molecular roles of zinc transporters in zinc homeostasis and metabolism. Physiol. Rev. 2015;95:749–784. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00035.2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wang Y.-W. Superior antibacterial activity of zinc oxide/graphene oxide composites originating from high zinc concentration localized around bacteria. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2014;6:2791–2798. doi: 10.1021/am4053317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhu P. Biomedical applications of functionalized ZnO nanomaterials: From biosensors to bioimaging. Adv. Mater. Interfaces. 2016;3:1500494. doi: 10.1002/admi.201500494. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Barman A. Review on biocompatibility of ZnO nano particles. In: Gupta S., Bag S., Ganguly K., Sarkar I., Biswas P., editors. Advancements of Medical Electronics. Springer; New York, NY, USA: 2015. pp. 343–352. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sargazi G. Fabrication of PVA/ZnO fibrous composite polymer as a novel sorbent for arsenic removal: Design and a systematic study. Polym. Bull. 2019;76:5661–5682. doi: 10.1007/s00289-019-02677-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhang Y.-H. A Zn (II)-based pillar-layered metal–organic framework: Synthesis, structure, and CO2 selective adsorption. Polyhedron. 2019;158:283–289. doi: 10.1016/j.poly.2018.10.067. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Restrepo J. An antibacterial Zn–MOF with hydrazinebenzoate linkers. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2016;2017:574–580. doi: 10.1002/ejic.201601185. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Alonso S., Rendueles M., Díaz M.L. Bio-production of lactobionic acid: Current status, applications and future prospects. Biotechnol. Adv. 2013;31:1275–1291. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Van Dokkum W. Tolerance of lactobionic acid in man. J. Food Nutr. Res. 1994;95:1–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Olivieri M. Experimental evidence of the healing properties of lactobionic acid for ocular surface disease. Cornea. 2018;37:1058–1063. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Chen H., Zhong Q. Lactobionic acid enhances the synergistic effect of nisin and thymol against Listeria monocytogenes Scott A in tryptic soy broth and milk. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2017;260:36–41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Mukherjee R., Yun J.W. Lactobionic acid reduces body weight gain in diet-induced obese rats by targeted inhibition of galectin-1. Biochem. Bioph. Res. Commun. 2015;463:1311–1316. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.06.114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Cao J. Antibacterial activity and mechanism of lactobionic acid against Staphylococcus aureus. Folia Microbiol. 2019;64:899–906. doi: 10.1007/s12223-019-00705-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Yang B., Shen M., Liu J., Ren F. Post-synthetic modification nanoscale metal-organic frameworks for targeted drug delivery in cancer cells. Pharm. Res. 2017;34:2440–2450. doi: 10.1007/s11095-017-2253-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gao X. Controllable synthesis of a smart multifunctional nanoscale metal–organic framework for magnetic resonance/optical imaging and targeted drug delivery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017;9:3455–3462. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b14795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Haydar M.A. Metal organic frameworks as a drug delivery system for flurbiprofen. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2017;11:2685. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S145716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Piaru S.P., Mahmud R., Perumal S. Determination of antibacterial activity of essential oil of Myristica fragrans Houtt. using tetrazolium microplate assay and its cytotoxic activity against vero cell line. Int. J. Pharmacol. 2012;8:e6 [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sarkar A. Antagonistic roles of Rac and Rho in organizing the germ cell microenvironment. Curr. Biol. 2007;17:1253–1258. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.O'Toole G.A.S. Genetic approaches to study of biofilms. Method Enzymol. 1999;310:91–109. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(99)10008-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Chalati T. Optimisation of the synthesis of MOF nanoparticles made of flexible porous iron fumarate MIL-88A. J. Mater. Chem. 2011;21:2220–2227. doi: 10.1039/C0JM03563G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Shen S. High drug-loading nanomedicines: Progress, current status, and prospects. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017;12:4085. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S132780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Dikio E.D., Farah A.M. Synthesis, characterization and comparative study of copper and zinc metal organic frameworks. Chem Sci. Trans. 2013;2:1386–1394. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Nadell C.D., Drescher K., Foster K.R. Spatial structure, cooperation and competition in biofilms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016;14:589–600. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Taylor P.K., Yeung A.T., Hancock R.E. Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms: Towards the development of novel anti-biofilm therapies. J. Biotechnol. 2014;191:121–130. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Dantas G. Bacteria subsisting on antibiotics. Science. 2008;320:100–103. doi: 10.1126/science.1155157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Kang S. Label free-based proteomic analysis of the food spoiler Pseudomonas fluorescens response to lactobionic acid by SWATH-MS. Food Control. 2021;123:107834. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107834. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting this study are available from corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Antibiotics are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES