Abstract
The three most common sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) and Trichomonas vaginalis (TV). The prevalence of these STIs in Taiwan remains largely unknown and the risk of STI acquisition affected by the vaginal microbiota is also elusive. In this study, a total of 327 vaginal swabs collected from women with vaginitis were analyzed to determine the presence of STIs and the associated microorganisms by using the BD Max CT/GC/TV molecular assay, microbial cultures, and 16S rRNA sequencing. The prevalence of CT, TV, and GC was 10.8%, 2.2% and 0.6%, respectively. A culture-dependent method identified that Escherichia coli and Streptococcus agalactiae (GBS) were more likely to be associated with CT and TV infections. In CT-positive patients, the vaginal microbiota was dominated by L. iners, and the relative abundance of Gardnerella vaginalis (12.46%) was also higher than that in TV-positive patients and the non-STIs group. However, Lactobacillus spp. was significantly lower in TV-positive patients, while GBS (10.11%), Prevotella bivia (6.19%), Sneathia sanguinegens (12.75%), and Gemella asaccharolytica (5.31%) were significantly enriched. Using an in vitro co-culture assay, we demonstrated that the growth of L. iners was suppressed in the initial interaction with TV, but it may adapt and survive after longer exposure to TV. Additionally, it is noteworthy that TV was able to promote GBS growth. Our study highlights the vaginal microbiota composition associated with the common STIs and the crosstalk between TV and the associated bacteria, paving the way for future development of health interventions targeting the specific vaginal bacterial taxa to reduce the risk of common STIs.
Keywords: Chlamydia trachomatis, Trichomonas vaginalis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, sexually transmitted infections, vaginal microbiome
1. Introduction
Vaginitis is a common disease for women with vaginal symptoms, including abnormal discharge, odor, irritation, dysuria, itching, or burning [1]. The most common causes of vaginitis are bacterial vaginosis (BV), vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC), and trichomoniasis, accounting for approximately 40–50%, 20–25%, and 15–20% of vaginitis cases, respectively [2]. BV is characterized by decreased abundance of Lactobacillus spp. and increased abundance of anaerobic bacteria, such as Atopobium vaginae, Gardnerella vaginalis, Mobiluncus mulieris, Prevotella spp., BV-associated bacterim-2 (BVAB-2), and Megasphaera spp. [3,4]. VCC is generally caused by an infection with the fungus Candida albicans [5]. Trichomoniasis is the most common non-viral sexually transmitted infection (STI) caused by the protozoan parasite Trichomonas vaginalis. Co-infection of two pathogens occurs frequently in women with vaginitis. For instance, women with BV are potentially co-infected with Candida spp. and T. vaginalis, with co-infection rates of 20–30% and 60–80%, respectively [6]. More research is necessary to better characterize the cause of inflammatory vaginitis, which is helpful to specifically develop therapies for complete eradication.
The three most common curable STIs are Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) and T. vaginalis (TV). It is estimated that the numbers of new cases worldwide for CT, GC, and TV infections are 78, 131, and 142 million every year, respectively [7]. The outcomes of these infections include pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), miscarriage, infertility, low birth weight, and increased risk of HIV transmission [8]. Increased resistance of T. vaginalis to metronidazole has emerged as a highly problematic public health issue [9]. Similarly, elevated antimicrobial resistance in GC-infected patients is another urgent threat in the 21st century [10]. Although true antimicrobial resistance of CT is rare [11], concern about treatment failure has arisen due to high repeat CT infections observed in several countries [12,13]. Hence, it is essential to discover alternative approaches to prevent and treat these common STIs.
Lactobacillus spp. primarily dominates a normal vaginal microbiome [14], producing lactic acid to maintain a normal vaginal pH and play a role in preventing STI acquisition. Human vaginal microbiomes can be subdivided into five distinct community state types (CSTs) [15], four of which (CST I–III and CST-V) are often dominated by a specific Lactobacillus species. CST-IV is characterized by reduced Lactobacillus spp. and, instead, consists of a higher proportion of facultative and strict anaerobes associated with BV [16]. It has been shown that CT-infected women are more likely to have cervicovaginal microbiota (CVM) dominated by L. iners or by diverse anaerobic bacteria, than by L. crispatus [17]. Additionally, specific vaginal bacteria, such as Prevotella, Sneathia, Mycoplasma, and Parvimonas, are associated with TV acquisition [18,19]. A previous study suggests that members of the CVM can modify N. gonorrhoeae, potentially facilitating the infectious process to men [20]. Based on the microbiome analyses associated with the common STIs, it is feasible to develop novel vaginal health interventions targeting specific bacterial species, and thus, reduce the risk of STI acquisition.
To date, the true prevalence of CT, TV, and GC infection is unknown in Taiwan, which may lead to mixed vaginitis and many co-infections. It is still elusive whether specific vaginal bacterial species or overall microbiota diversity contributes to an increased risk of these common STIs acquisitions. In this study, we used the BD max CT/GC/TV (MAX) panel assay for the diagnosis of CT, TV, and GC from samples initially collected for diagnosis of vaginitis. A cultivation-based identification of the STI-associated bacteria by MALDI-TOF analysis was utilized. We also conducted culture-independent 16S rRNA sequencing to investigate the relationships between the common STIs and the composition of the vaginal microbiota. Specific bacteria taxa enriched from the microbiome analysis were further co-cultured with TV to verify the bacteria–parasite interactions.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Sample Collection and Ethical Approval
A total of 327 vaginal swabs were collected from women (age 18–80 years old) diagnosed with vaginitis who sought medical care in an emergency department, Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB/GYN), and Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STD) Prevention Center in Northern Taiwan. Participant selection for this study took place between September 2018 and March 2019. Samples were identified only with the study identification number that had been assigned during the BD Max assay. This study was approved by the Committees for Ethics of Taipei City Hospital, Renai Branch (TCHIRB-1083008-E), with permission to use residual samples.
2.2. Culture-Dependent Identification of Microorganisms by MALDI-TOF Analysis
Vaginal swabs for culture were placed in tubes containing Amies to maintain the swabs’ moisture and prevent autolysis of the microorganisms. The vaginal specimens were plated onto 5% sheep blood agar, chocolate agar, and eosin methylene blue medium. The culture plates and medium were incubated at 37 °C aerobically for 24 h. Identification of the bacterial species was carried out by a phenotypic method, Gram stains, and MALDI-TOF analysis.
2.3. BD Max CT/GC/TV Assay and DNA Extraction
For diagnosis of the three most common STIs in women, the BD Max CT/GC/TV platform (BD, Franklin Lakes, NY, USA) provides high sensitivity and specificity using vaginal swabs [21]. Briefly, the BD Max assay is a TaqMan-based PCR assay that uses target-specific primers and probes to perform amplification and detection of amplified products, providing a diagnosis of chlamydia, gonorrhea, and trichomoniasis simultaneously. DNA extraction, reagent rehydration, amplification, and target nucleic acid sequence detection were handled automatically by the BD Max instrument (BD, USA).
2.4. Analysis of Microbiota Composition
2.4.1. PCR Amplification and Sequencing
After DNA extraction from the BD Max system, the amplicon library was constructed by PCR targeting the 16S rRNA V3-V4 region as previously described [22]. Illumina adaptor overhang nucleotide sequences were added to the gene-specific sequences (16S rRNA gene amplicon PCR forward primer sequence 5′-TCGTCGGCAGCGTCAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAGCCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3′ and 16S rRNA gene amplicon PCR reverse primer sequence 5’-GTCTCGTGGGCTCGGAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAGGACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3’) [23]. The first PCR mixture contained 1 µM of forward and reverse primers, 1× KAPA HiFi HotStart ReadyMix (Roche, Brighton, MA, USA), and 10 ng genomic DNA. The first PCR consisted of 3 min of denaturation at 95 °C followed by 25 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C/30 s, annealing at 55 °C/30 s, and extension at 72 °C/30 s, with a final 72 °C extension for 30 s. The PCR products were purified using Agencourt AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) and subjected to index PCR. Each index PCR mixture contained 5 µL of both Nextera™ XT index set primers (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), 1× KAPA HiFi Hotstart Ready Mix, and the purified products of the first PCR. The index PCR consisted of 3 min of denaturation at 95 °C followed by 8 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C/30 s, annealing at 55 °C/30 s, and extension at 72 °C/30 s, with a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The final amplicon libraries were approximately 630 bp in length and were validated using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer with the Agilent HS DNA Kit. The sequencing of the multiplexed pooled libraries was performed on the MiSeq System with MiSeq Reagent Kit v3 (600 cycles) (Illumina, CA, USA).
2.4.2. Bioinformatics Analysis
The sequencing reads were initially de-multiplexed using MiSeq Reporter v2.6 according to the sample barcodes. The resulting pairs of reads were processed by using USEARCH (v11) (https://drive5.com/ (accessed on 27 July 2021)). Briefly, we used the fastq_mergepairs command to merge the paired reads and the fastq_filter command to filter low quality reads by setting a maximum number of expected errors (E_max) = 1. The average merged reads of samples were 72,618 ± 15,482 tags. The Cutadapt v2.3 package [24] was used to remove forward and reverse sequencing primers from the merged reads of each dataset. Only sequence tags with length ≥ 400 bp were retained for subsequent analysis. The de-replication reads from effective reads were denoised to identify all correct biological sequences clustered into a zero-radius operational taxonomic unit (zOTU) using the UNOISE3 [25]. Furthermore, the RDP training set (v16) served as a reference species database and the final taxonomic assignments were performed using the SINTAX algorithm [26]. The α-diversity (e.g., Chao1 index and Shannon index) and β-diversity (e.g., Bray–Curtis dissimilarity) normalized by DESeq2 [27] were calculated by Qiime (version 1.9.1) [28]. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) and constrained principal coordinate analysis (CPCoA) were used to visualize the data in R (version 3.6.3). Finally, we used linear discriminant analysis (LDA) of effect size (LEfSe) [29] to determine the taxonomy that explains the significant differences in biomarkers between STI-positive and non-STI samples. The Kruskal–Wallis (KW) sum-rank test and pairwise Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used to determine the LDA score, with which greater than 3 is considered significant.
2.5. In Vitro Interactions of Specific Bacteria with TV
GBS and L. iners were cultured in Columbia agar II, containing 8% whole horse blood at 37 °C and 5% CO2. TV (ATCC 30236) was maintained in YIS medium [30], pH 5.8, containing 10% heat-inactivated horse serum and 1% glucose at 37 °C. The co-incubation of TV with the associated bacteria was performed as previously described [31]. Briefly, TV (5 × 105 cells/mL) and bacteria were co-incubated in 1 mL of keratinocyte serum-free media (K-SFM) (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) at a ratio of 1:10 at 37 °C for 1, 2, 4, and 6 h. Incubations of TV and bacteria alone were performed in parallel as controls. After co-incubation, the microbial cultures were plated out on agar plates for 24 h to monitor the growth of bacteria. Spread plates were photographed, and CFU counts were obtained. To observe the effect of co-incubation on TV growth, the microbial cultures were centrifuged, washed, and resuspended in YIS medium. The growth of the parasites was monitored by using trypan blue exclusion hemocytometer counts.
2.6. Statistical Analyses
Quantitative data were expressed as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. The unpaired Student t-test (two-tailed) was used to evaluate the significant differences between the two groups. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant (*) and p < 0.01 (**) or p < 0.001 (***) to be very statistically significant.
3. Results
3.1. The Prevalence of STIs and Their Differential Diagnosis in Women with Vaginitis
Three hundred and twenty-seven vaginal swabs specimens were originally collected from women with vaginitis who visited hospitals in Northern Taiwan, of which 323 were eligible for the BD Max assay. There were 48 STI-positive cases among the vaginitis patients. The demographic characteristics, clinic type, and differential diagnosis of each STI are summarized in Table 1. The prevalence of CT was 10.8% (35/323), TV was 2.2% (7/323) and GC was 0.6% (2/323). The mean age for the participants with CT, TV, and GC infection was 31.6, 37.1, and 25.2 years, respectively. Notably, there was a higher proportion for older women in the TV-positive group, with 57% of TV-infected patients above 40 years, whereas younger women were predominant in the CT- and GC-positive groups. In the CT-positive cases with various symptoms, there was a higher proportion of PID (n = 7, 20%). In the TV-positive cases, subacute vaginitis (n = 2, 28.5%) and cervicitis (n = 2, 28.5%) were the predominant symptoms. There were four participants with mixed STIs, including two with CT/TV, one with TV/GC, and one with CT/TV/GC (Supplementary Table S1). In summary, we firstly used a molecular-based test to evaluate the prevalence of CT, TV, and GC infection in women with vaginitis in Taiwan, and found that CT is the most common infection among these STIs.
Table 1.
Total Sample | Total STIs | CT | TV | GC | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STI Results | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % |
327 | 48 | 14.6 | 35 | 10.8 | 7 | 2.2 | 2 | 0.6 | ||
Demographic characteristics | ||||||||||
Age, Median | 39 | 29.1 | 31.6 | 37.1 | 25.2 | |||||
18 yrs and below | 20 | 6.1 | 6 | 12.5 | 5 | 14.2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 50 |
19 to 29 yrs | 73 | 22.3 | 20 | 41.6 | 14 | 40 | 2 | 28.5 | 0 | 0 |
30 to 39 | 85 | 25.9 | 11 | 22.9 | 9 | 25.7 | 1 | 14.2 | 1 | 50 |
40 yrs. and above | 149 | 45.7 | 11 | 22.9 | 7 | 20 | 4 | 57.1 | 0 | 0 |
Clinic type | ||||||||||
ER | 62 | 18.7 | 8 | 16.6 | 7 | 20 | 1 | 14.2 | 0 | 0 |
STD clinic | 98 | 29.8 | 15 | 31.2 | 11 | 31.4 | 1 | 14.2 | 1 | 50 |
OB/GYN | 167 | 51.5 | 25 | 52 | 17 | 48.5 | 5 | 71.4 | 1 | 50 |
Differential diagnosis | ||||||||||
Vulval pruritus | 18 | 5.5 | 4 | 8.3 | 4 | 11.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Acute vaginitis | 9 | 2.8 | 2 | 4.1 | 2 | 5.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Subacute vaginitis | 65 | 19.9 | 8 | 16.6 | 5 | 14.2 | 2 | 28.5 | 1 | 50 |
Cervicitis | 53 | 16.2 | 8 | 16.6 | 5 | 14.2 | 2 | 28.5 | 0 | 0 |
PID | 40 | 12.2 | 8 | 16.6 | 7 | 20 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
Vulvar vestibulitis | 32 | 9.8 | 4 | 8.3 | 2 | 5.7 | 1 | 14.2 | 0 | 0 |
Gonorrhea | 2 | 0.6 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
VVC | 12 | 3.7 | 2 | 4.1 | 1 | 2.8 | 1 | 14.2 | 0 | 0 |
Leiomyoma | 6 | 1.8 | 2 | 4.1 | 2 | 5.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Trichomoniasis | 1 | 0.3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14.2 | 0 | 0 |
Peritonitis | 5 | 1.5 | 2 | 4.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 50 |
Atrophic vaginitis | 17 | 5.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Battered rape | 20 | 6.1 | 6 | 12.5 | 6 | 17.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
STIs = Sextually transmitted infections; STD = Sextually transmitted disease; CT = Chlamydia trachomatis; TV = Trichomonas vaginalis; GC = Neisseria gonorrhoeae; ER = Emergency room; OB/GYN = Obstetrics and gynecology; PID = pelvic inflammatory disease; VVC = vulvovaginal candidiasis.
3.2. Identification of Bacterial Co-Infections in STI-Positive Patients by a Culture-Dependent Method Combined with MALDI-TOF Analysis
It has been demonstrated that traditional culture-dependent methods and modern molecular techniques should be performed simultaneously as their combined results would reflect the bacterial community composition more precisely [32]. Hence, we initially used a culture-dependent method combined with MALDI-TOF analysis to identify the specific microorganisms co-infected in the vagina of STI-positive patients (Figure 1). Since the sample size of GC-positive and mixed STIs was limited, we herein focused on the bacteria co-existing in the CT- and TV-positive samples. It is noteworthy that GBS is the most prevalent bacteria co-infected with these STIs, either single (CT or TV) or mixed infections (CT/TV, TV/GC, and CT/TV/GC). In the CT-positive samples, GBS (n = 8), Escherichia coli (n = 8), and Staphylococcus spp. (n = 7) were the main co-existing bacteria. The overgrowth of Candida spp. or G. vaginalis in the genital ecosystem may lead to microbial dysbiosis that increases the risk of acquiring CT [33]. Similarly, C. albicans (n = 2) and G. vaginalis (n = 2) were also identified in CT-infected patients. Additionally, GBS (n = 2), E. coli (n = 2), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 1), Staphylococcus spp. (n = 1), Enterococcus faecalis (n = 1), and G. vaginalis (n = 1) were identified as being associated with TV infections. Together, microbial culture results revealed that several bacterial species co-exist in the CT- and TV-positive samples, especially GBS and E. coli, whereas Lactobacillus spp. and C. albicans are only identified in the CT- but not TV-positive samples.
3.3. Vaginal Microbiota Profiling in STI-Positive Patients Using 16S rRNA Sequencing
To characterize the vaginal microbiome community in STI-positive patients, vaginal swabs were collected from CT-positive patients (n = 22), TV-positive patients (n = 7), GC-positive patients (n = 2), mixed infections (TV/CT = 2; TV/CT/GC = 1), and non-STI controls (NC, n = 36). The bacterial DNA was obtained from the samples via the BD Max system, and the bacteria 16S rRNA gene amplicon library was constructed targeting on the V3–V4 regions. The vaginal microbiota profiling in the STI-positive and NC samples were investigated using 16S rRNA sequencing. Microbial community variation among STI-positive and NC groups was determined by Chao1 (species richness) and Shannon (species diversity) indices and principal coordinate analysis (PCoA). We found that the presence of TV was more likely to have higher richness and diversity of the vaginal microbiota compared with the NC- and CT-positive groups (Figure 2A,B). PCoA revealed that the beta diversity of each CT- and TV-positive sample as well as the NC cases tended to cluster separately while the GC-positive case was more close to CT-positive patients. Additionally, the mixed infections (TV/CT and TV/CT/GC) showed similar bacterial community composition to the CT- and TV-positive groups (Figure 2B). These results suggested that the vaginal bacterial community was different between the STI-positive and NC groups.
3.4. Vaginal Microbiota Revealed Specific Bacterial Taxa Associated with STI-Positive Patients
To identify the differentially enriched bacterial taxa within the STI-positive and NC groups, linear discriminant analysis (LDA) was performed. The cladogram showed differences in 12 taxa among TV, GC, and mixed infections (TV/CT and TV/CT/GC) groups (Figure 3A). Bacteria from the Chlamydiae phylum and the Betaproteobacteria class were indeed identified in the TV/CT/GC and GC groups, respectively. The histogram displayed LDA scores of microbial taxa with significant differences within groups, showing that 19 bacterial taxa were enriched in the STI-positive groups (Figure 3B). The phylum Tenericutes was significantly abundant in the TV-positive group. The genus Prevotella was specifically correlated with the TV/CT group, while Mycoplasma and Gemella were associated with the TV-positive group. Taxonomic profiles of the bacterial community at the genus level revealed that Lactobacillus dominated in CT-positive patients as well as in the NC group, whereas it was specifically reduced in TV-positive patients (Figure 3C and Supplementary Table S2). Specifically, Gardenella spp. was found to be more abundant in the CT-positive group compared with the TV-positive and NC groups. This result was consistent with the finding identified by the aforementioned culture-dependent method. Additionally, Streptococcus spp., Prevotella spp., and Sneathia spp. were strongly associated with TV-infected patients compared with the NC group. Bifidobacterium breve has been shown to exert a strong antimicrobial activity against urogenital pathogens and significantly reduces CT invasion to HeLa cells [34]. We found that Bifidobacterium spp. was less abundant in CT- and TV-positive patients compared with the NC group. We further highlighted the enriched bacteria at the species level. L. iners (30.94%) and G. vaginalis (12.46%) were specifically abundant in the CT-positive group, whereas GBS (10.11%), P. bivia (6.19%), S. sanguinegens (12.75%), and G. asaccharolytica (5.31%) were enriched in the TV-positive group (Figure 3D and Supplementary Table S2). Additionally, the probiotic B. breve (0.88%) was distinctly enriched in the non-STI group. Collectively, our microbiome analysis indicated that specific vaginal bacteria showed significantly different abundance in CT- and TV-positive patients and generated a useful bacterial panel at the species level in these STIs compared to non-STI individuals.
3.5. In Vitro TV-Bacteria Co-Culture Revealed Different Influence on the Growth of L. iners and GBS
As L. iners was significantly reduced in the vaginal microbiota of TV-positive patients, we performed a co-culture assay to evaluate the effect of TV on bacterial growth. TV was co-incubated with L. iners at a ratio of 1:10 for different time intervals (1, 2, 4, 6 h) and the growth of L. iners was monitored by CFU after 24 h. Short-term interaction of bacteria and TV within 2 h showed that the growth of L. iners was markedly inhibited compared with L. iners cultivation alone (p < 0.001), with a reduction of 54.2% in CFUs (Figure 4A). After long-term co-incubation for 6 h, the inhibitory effect of TV on the growth of L. iners was not significant. This suggests that the survival of L. iners was suppressed at the initial stage of interaction with TV, but the bacteria may adapt and survive after prolonged exposure to TV. Additionally, both the culture-dependent and culture-independent methods identified GBS to be enriched in the TV-positive cases. We thus evaluated the impact of TV–GBS interaction on the growth of GBS by using the same approach. It is noteworthy that the interaction between TV and GBS, regardless of the co-incubation time, enhanced the growth of GBS after 24 h compared with GBS cultivation alone (p < 0.001) (Figure 4B). Hence, it is postulated that TV infection potentially enhances the colonization of GBS in the vaginal ecosystem.
3.6. Impact of the Crosstalk between TV and the Associated Bacteria on the Growth of Parasites
On the other hand, the influence of the interactions between the specific bacteria and TV on the growth of parasites was also verified. Co-incubation of TV and L. iners and GBS for 6 h in the co-culture medium was performed, followed by inoculation of the microbial cultures into the TV-specific culture medium to monitor the survival of TV after 24 h. Interestingly, the growth of TV was enhanced upon interaction with L. iners (p < 0.001), with about 10-fold higher cell density of the parasites at the initial stage (0 h) than TV cultivation alone (Figure 5A). After 24 h of cultivation, the growth of TV interacting with L. iners further enhanced compared with TV cultivation alone (p < 0.01) (Figure 5A). Additionally, the co-incubation of TV and GBS for 6 h significantly reduced the survival of TV after 24 h cultivation (p < 0.001) compared with TV without exposure to GBS (Figure 5B). This observation, in combination with the previous data, indicates that the crosstalk between GBS and TV promotes the growth of bacteria but inhibits the survival of parasites.
4. Discussion
According to a Taiwan Centers for Disease Control report, approximately 4500 gonorrhea cases were confirmed in 2019. Since chlamydia and trichomoniasis are not notifiable diseases in Taiwan, the true prevalence of these STIs is still unclear. Based on a previous epidemiological study, the overall prevalence of CT infection among patients visiting sexually transmitted disease and genitourinary clinics was around 18.4% [35]. In this study, we have conducted the first molecular-based testing to assess these common STIs in women with vaginitis in Taiwan, indicating that the prevalence for CT, TV, and GC was 10.8%, 2.2% and 0.6%, respectively. We found a significantly higher proportion of CT-positive cases than TV, which is different from the trends of STIs observed in other studies using the same diagnostic method. A previous report evaluated the prevalence of these STIs in women in the United States, with positive CT, TV, and GC rates of 7.1%, 13.5%, and 2.3% [21]. Another study assessed these STIs in women with vaginitis, showing positive CT, TV, and GC rates of 6.1%, 12.3%, and 1.8% [36]. The higher prevalence of CT-positive cases than TV in Taiwanese women with vaginitis may be due to different races and ethnicity. Hence, understanding the vaginal microbiota composition of these STI-positive patients compared with that of the non-STI group may help to identify specific bacterial taxa associated with these STIs in Taiwanese women.
We found that L. iners dominated the vaginal microbiome of CT-positive cases compared with the non-STI and TV-positive groups. Additionally, a higher relative abundance of G. vaginalis was observed in the CT-infected group than in the non-STI group. These results are consistent with previous findings, indicating that women testing positive for CT infection are more likely to have vaginal microbiomes dominated by L. iners than by L. crispatus [17] and that BV-associated microbiota increased risk of subsequent chlamydia infection [37]. It has been shown that L. iners-dominated vaginal microbiota is associated with increased susceptibility to CT infection due to reduced D(−) lactic acid production [38]. Characterization of vaginal bacterial communities indicated that L. iners-dominated CST-III were more likely to switch to CST-IV than other community states, suggesting the linking of L. iners to CT infections and BV [39]. Further investigations on the crosstalk between the highly enriched bacterial species and CT will be helpful to elucidate whether additional treatments such as probiotics could reduce an individual’s susceptibility to the STI.
Based on the vaginal microbiome analysis of TV-infected patients, we demonstrated that L. iners, the most abundant Lactobacillus species in the CT-positive and non-STI groups, was significantly reduced. Meanwhile, the relative abundance of GBS, P. bivia, S. sanguinegens, and G. asaccharolytica was enriched in the TV-positive samples. Our study parallels earlier findings, indicating that TV infection was associated with the vaginal microbiota belonging to the low-lactobacilli CST-IV group [18,40], where the presence of Prevotella spp. and S. sanguinegens was also demonstrated [19]. Additionally, it has been reported that a higher relative abundance of G. asaccharolytica was associated with significantly higher odds of HIV acquisition [41], suggesting a possible connection between TV-infected patients and HIV infection. It has been well known that GBS colonization in the vagina during pregnancy increases the risk of neonatal infection [42], which may result in several fetal injuries, including tissue damage, inflammation, lung and brain injury, pneumonia, meningitis, sepsis, and even fetal death [43]. However, the vaginal bacteria or other microorganisms promoting GBS colonization and adverse perinatal outcomes are far from understood. We showed for the first time that GBS is enriched in the vaginal microbiome of TV-infected women using both culture-dependent and culture-independent methods. Lactobacillus spp., including L. acidophilus, L. paracasei and L. reuteri, have been shown to prevent GBS adherence or outcompete GBS for adherence to vaginal epithelial cells [44], as well as to prevent GBS colonization in a mouse model [45]. Since Lactobacillus spp. are markedly reduced in the TV-positive cases compared to the CT-positive and non-STIs groups, it is likely that the inhibitory effect mediated by Lactobacillus spp. on GBS colonization is also decreased in this scenario. Additionally, it has been suggested that P. bivia may play a role in human GBS colonization [46] and is correlated with an increased risk of HIV acquisition [47]. Hence, P. bivia enriched in the vagina of TV-positive patients may link to enhanced GBS colonization and susceptibility to HIV infection. Together, understanding the mechanisms by which TV promotes P. bivia and G. asaccharolytica growth may provide novel strategies to reduce women’s risk of GBS and HIV infections.
Using an in vitro co-culture assay, we further proved the reciprocal interactions between TV and the associated bacterial species enriched from the microbiome analysis, including L. iners and GBS. We found that lactobacilli are significantly reduced after an initial interaction with TV. It has been shown that lactobacilli could be ingested by TV after 2 h of co-incubation [48]. Hence, it is likely that other specific vaginal bacteria may proliferate under this low-lactobacilli condition. On the other hand, TV that engulfs and digests bacteria may help to fulfill nutritional requirements during the establishment of an infection [49], as also supported by the enhanced growth of the parasite co-cultured with L. iners. We observed that GBS inhibits the growth of TV via an unknown mechanism. GBS has been shown to kill endothelial cells [50], epithelial cells [51], and fibroblasts [52] by β-hemolysin and induces apoptosis in macrophages via several virulence factors [53,54]. Hence, it is likely that GBS suppresses TV growth by using similar mechanisms and this hypothesis needs further investigations. On the other hand, it remains to be determined how TV promotes GBS growth, which will shed new light on the role of TV in GBS colonization and possibly reduce the risk of GBS infection.
The BD Max CT/GC/TV platform used in this study provided high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of the three most common STIs at the same time [21]. However, several limitations of this study need to be considered. As few identified GC-positive cases in women with vaginitis may result in failure to evaluate gonorrhea-associated bacterial species, more GC-positive cases will be needed in future studies. Additionally, we did not exclude the samples collected from women with vaginitis pretreated with any antibiotic, which may affect the microbiota composition in the vagina. A previous study has identified several differences in the composition of the vaginal microbial communities of pregnant women compared to non-pregnant women [55]. Since our study population is comprised of non-pregnant women, the vaginal microbiota of the STIs during pregnancy may not be reflected. The effects of menopausal status and different contraceptive methods on the vaginal microbiota were also not considered in this study. Menopause has been reported to significantly influence the community structure in the vagina, and Prevotella spp. is strongly associated with premenopause [56]. Additionally, a previous study suggests that changes in the vaginal bacterial composition are not associated with the use of a copper intrauterine device (Cu-IUD) and a levonorgestrel intrauterine system [57]. However, another study indicated that Cu-IUD may increase colonization by BV-associated microbiota, whereas most hormonal contraception does not alter vaginal microbiota [58]. The uninterrupted use of the combined oral contraceptive pill has been demonstrated to maintain the normal microbiota and reduce the frequency of BV [59]. Hence, the vaginal microbiota may be heterogeneous and dynamically affected by the physiological states of the host.
5. Conclusions
Collectively, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first report investigating the prevalence of CT, TV, and GC in women with vaginitis using a molecular-based approach in Taiwan. Additionally, vaginal microbiome analysis revealed that L. iners and G. vaginalis were found to be associated with CT-positive patients, whereas GBS, P. bivia, S. sanguinegens and G. asaccharolytica were more abundant in TV-positive patients. Co-culture assays between TV and the associated bacteria further clarified the dynamic interactions. Future research studies could develop novel vaginal health interventions targeting the specific vaginal bacterial taxa identified from our study, elucidating the potential roles for the associated microbiota in the promotion or inhibition of common STIs.
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms9091864/s1, Table S1: The prevalence of single and mixed infections in STI-positive cases. Table S2: The relative abundance of bacteria at the species level in the STI-positive and NC groups.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, S.-F.C., P.-J.H., W.-H.C., L.J.C., Y.-M.Y., K.-Y.H.; Data curation, S.-F.C., P.-J.H., W.-H.C., L.J.C., Y.-M.Y., K.-Y.H.; Formal analysis, S.-F.C., P.-J.H.,W.-H.C., C.-Y.H., H.-C.L., C.-H.T.; Funding acquisition, S.-F.C., C.-C.L., K.-Y.H.; Investigation, S.-F.C., Y.-M.Y., K.-Y.H.; Methodology, Y.-M.Y., P.-J.H., L.J.C.; Project administration, S.-F.C., W.-H.C., Y.-M.Y., K.-Y.H.; Resources, S.-F.C., W.-H.C., Y.-M.Y., K.-Y.H.; Software, Y.-M.Y., P.-J.H.; Supervision, W.-N.L., P.T., Y.-M.Y., K.-Y.H.; Validation, S.-F.C., C.-C.L., L.-C.C., Y.-M.Y., K.-Y.H.; Visualization, S.-F.C., Y.-M.Y., K.-Y.H. Writing—original draft, S.-F.C., Y.-M.Y., K.-Y.H.; Writing—review and editing, S.-F.C., P.-J.H., W.-H.C., C.-H.T., Y.-M.Y., K.-Y.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 107-2320-B-016-008-MY3 and MOST 110-2320-B-016-011-MY3) to K.-Y.H. and (MOST 108-2221-E-182-043-MY3) to P.-J.H. and (MOST 110-2320-B-182A-004) to Y.-M.Y., National Defense Medical Center, Taiwan (MAB-108-073 and MAB-109-054) to K.-Y.H., Taipei City Hospital, Renai Branch (TPCH-109-19) to S.-F.C. and Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Research Funding (CORPD2J0051) to C.-C.L.
Institutional Review Board Statement
This study was approved by the Committees for Ethics of Taipei City Hospital, Renai Branch (TCHIRB-1083008-E), with permission to use residual samples.
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Carr P.L., Felsenstein D., Friedman R.H. Evaluation and management of vaginitis. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 1998;13:335–346. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00101.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Paladine H.L., Desai U.A. Vaginitis: Diagnosis and Treatment. Am. Fam. Physician. 2018;97:321–329. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Roselletti E., Sabbatini S., Perito S., Mencacci A., Vecchiarelli A., Monari C. Apoptosis of vaginal epithelial cells in clinical samples from women with diagnosed bacterial vaginosis. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:1978. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58862-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gaydos C.A., Beqaj S., Schwebke J.R., Lebed J., Smith B., Davis T.E., Fife K.H., Nyirjesy P., Spurrell T., Furgerson D., et al. Clinical Validation of a Test for the Diagnosis of Vaginitis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017;130:181–189. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jeanmonod R., Jeanmonod D. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island, FL, USA: 2020. Vaginal Candidiasis (Vulvovaginal Candidiasis) [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sobel J.D., Subramanian C., Foxman B., Fairfax M., Gygax S.E. Mixed vaginitis-more than coinfection and with therapeutic implications. Curr. Infect. Dis. Rep. 2013;15:104–108. doi: 10.1007/s11908-013-0325-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rowley J., Vander Hoorn S., Korenromp E., Low N., Unemo M., Abu-Raddad L.J., Chico R.M., Smolak A., Newman L., Gottlieb S., et al. Chlamydia, gonorrhoea, trichomoniasis and syphilis: Global prevalence and incidence estimates, 2016. Bull. World Health Organ. 2019;97:548P–562P. doi: 10.2471/BLT.18.228486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wynn A., Bristow C.C., Cristillo A.D., Murphy S.M., van den Broek N., Muzny C., Kallapur S., Cohen C., Ingalls R.R., Wiesenfeld H., et al. Sexually Transmitted Infections in Pregnancy and Reproductive Health: Proceedings of the STAR Sexually Transmitted Infection Clinical Trial Group Programmatic Meeting. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2020;47:5–11. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kirkcaldy R.D., Augostini P., Asbel L.E., Bernstein K.T., Kerani R.P., Mettenbrink C.J., Pathela P., Schwebke J.R., Secor W.E., Workowski K.A., et al. Trichomonas vaginalis antimicrobial drug resistance in 6 US cities, STD Surveillance Network, 2009–2010. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2012;18:939–943. doi: 10.3201/eid1806.111590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Unemo M., Del Rio C., Shafer W.M. Antimicrobial Resistance Expressed by Neisseria gonorrhoeae: A Major Global Public Health Problem in the 21st Century. Microbiol. Spectr. 2016;4 doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.EI10-0009-2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang S.A., Papp J.R., Stamm W.E., Peeling R.W., Martin D.H., Holmes K.K. Evaluation of antimicrobial resistance and treatment failures for Chlamydia trachomatis: A meeting report. J. Infect. Dis. 2005;191:917–923. doi: 10.1086/428290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Walker J., Tabrizi S.N., Fairley C.K., Chen M.Y., Bradshaw C.S., Twin J., Taylor N., Donovan B., Kaldor J.M., McNamee K., et al. Chlamydia trachomatis incidence and re-infection among young women--behavioural and microbiological characteristics. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e37778. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Aghaizu A., Reid F., Kerry S., Hay P.E., Mallinson H., Jensen J.S., Kerry S., Kerry S., Oakeshott P. Frequency and risk factors for incident and redetected Chlamydia trachomatis infection in sexually active, young, multi-ethnic women: A community based cohort study. Sex. Transm. Infect. 2014;90:524–528. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2014-051607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Witkin S.S., Linhares I.M. Why do lactobacilli dominate the human vaginal microbiota? BJOG. 2017;124:606–611. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Romero R., Hassan S.S., Gajer P., Tarca A.L., Fadrosh D.W., Nikita L., Galuppi M., Lamont R.F., Chaemsaithong P., Miranda J., et al. The composition and stability of the vaginal microbiota of normal pregnant women is different from that of non-pregnant women. Microbiome. 2014;2:4. doi: 10.1186/2049-2618-2-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ravel J., Gajer P., Abdo Z., Schneider G.M., Koenig S.S., McCulle S.L., Karlebach S., Gorle R., Russell J., Tacket C.O., et al. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:4680–4687. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002611107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.van der Veer C., Bruisten S.M., van der Helm J.J., de Vries H.J., van Houdt R. The Cervicovaginal Microbiota in Women Notified for Chlamydia trachomatis Infection: A Case-Control Study at the Sexually Transmitted Infection Outpatient Clinic in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2017;64:24–31. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Brotman R.M., Bradford L.L., Conrad M., Gajer P., Ault K., Peralta L., Forney L.J., Carlton J.M., Abdo Z., Ravel J. Association between Trichomonas vaginalis and vaginal bacterial community composition among reproductive-age women. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2012;39:807–812. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3182631c79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jarrett O.D., Srinivasan S., Richardson B.A., Fiedler T., Wallis J.M., Kinuthia J., Jaoko W., Mandaliya K., Fredricks D.N., McClelland R.S. Specific Vaginal Bacteria Are Associated with an Increased Risk of Trichomonas vaginalis Acquisition in Women. J. Infect. Dis. 2019;220:1503–1510. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ketterer M.R., Rice P.A., Gulati S., Kiel S., Byerly L., Fortenberry J.D., Soper D.E., Apicella M.A. Desialylation of Neisseria gonorrhoeae Lipooligosaccharide by Cervicovaginal Microbiome Sialidases: The Potential for Enhancing Infectivity in Men. J. Infect. Dis. 2016;214:1621–1628. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiw329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Van Der Pol B., Williams J.A., Fuller D., Taylor S.N., Hook E.W., 3rd Combined Testing for Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, and Trichomonas by Use of the BD Max CT/GC/TV Assay with Genitourinary Specimen Types. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2017;55:155–164. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01766-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yang C.Y., Yeh Y.M., Yu H.Y., Chin C.Y., Hsu C.W., Liu H., Huang P.J., Hu S.N., Liao C.T., Chang K.P., et al. Oral Microbiota Community Dynamics Associated with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Staging. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:862. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Klindworth A., Pruesse E., Schweer T., Peplies J., Quast C., Horn M., Glockner F.O. Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:e1. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 2011;17:10–12. doi: 10.14806/ej.17.1.200. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Edgar R.C. UPARSE: Highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat. Methods. 2013;10:996–998. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Edgar R.C. SINTAX: A simple non-Bayesian taxonomy classifier for 16S and ITS sequences. biorxiv. 2016:074161. doi: 10.1101/074161. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Love M.I., Huber W., Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Caporaso J.G., Kuczynski J., Stombaugh J., Bittinger K., Bushman F.D., Costello E.K., Fierer N., Pena A.G., Goodrich J.K., Gordon J.I., et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods. 2010;7:335–336. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Segata N., Izard J., Waldron L., Gevers D., Miropolsky L., Garrett W.S., Huttenhower C. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 2011;12:R60. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Diamond L.S., Clark C.G., Cunnick C.C. YI-S, a casein-free medium for axenic cultivation of Entamoeba histolytica, related Entamoeba, Giardia intestinalis and Trichomonas vaginalis. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 1995;42:277–278. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1995.tb01579.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Pinheiro J., Biboy J., Vollmer W., Hirt R.P., Keown J.R., Artuyants A., Black M.M., Goldstone D.C., Simoes-Barbosa A. The Protozoan Trichomonas vaginalis Targets Bacteria with Laterally Acquired NlpC/P60 Peptidoglycan Hydrolases. mBio. 2018;9:e01784-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01784-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Al-Awadhi H., Dashti N., Khanafer M., Al-Mailem D., Ali N., Radwan S. Bias problems in culture-independent analysis of environmental bacterial communities: A representative study on hydrocarbonoclastic bacteria. SpringerPlus. 2013;2:369. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Filardo S., Di Pietro M., Tranquilli G., Sessa R. Biofilm in Genital Ecosystem: A Potential Risk Factor for Chlamydia trachomatis Infection. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol. 2019;2019:1672109. doi: 10.1155/2019/1672109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Giordani B., Melgoza L.M., Parolin C., Foschi C., Marangoni A., Abruzzo A., Dalena F., Cerchiara T., Bigucci F., Luppi B., et al. Vaginal Bifidobacterium breve for preventing urogenital infections: Development of delayed release mucoadhesive oral tablets. Int. J. Pharm. 2018;550:455–462. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Chen K.T., Chen S.C., Chiang C.C., Li L.H., Tang L.H. Chlamydial infection among patients attending STD and genitourinary clinics in Taiwan. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:120. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Van Der Pol B., Daniel G., Kodsi S., Paradis S., Cooper C.K. Molecular-based Testing for Sexually Transmitted Infections Using Samples Previously Collected for Vaginitis Diagnosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2019;68:375–381. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bautista C.T., Wurapa E.K., Sateren W.B., Morris S.M., Hollingsworth B.P., Sanchez J.L. Association of Bacterial Vaginosis with Chlamydia and Gonorrhea among Women in the U.S. Army. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2017;52:632–639. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.09.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Edwards V.L., Smith S.B., McComb E.J., Tamarelle J., Ma B., Humphrys M.S., Gajer P., Gwilliam K., Schaefer A.M., Lai S.K., et al. The Cervicovaginal Microbiota-Host Interaction Modulates Chlamydia trachomatis Infection. mBio. 2019;10:e01548-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01548-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gajer P., Brotman R.M., Bai G., Sakamoto J., Schutte U.M., Zhong X., Koenig S.S., Fu L., Ma Z.S., Zhou X., et al. Temporal dynamics of the human vaginal microbiota. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012;4:132ra152. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Torok M.R., Miller W.C., Hobbs M.M., Macdonald P.D., Leone P.A., Schwebke J.R., Sena A.C. The association between Trichomonas vaginalis infection and level of vaginal lactobacilli, in nonpregnant women. J. Infect. Dis. 2007;196:1102–1107. doi: 10.1086/521307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.McClelland R.S., Lingappa J.R., Srinivasan S., Kinuthia J., John-Stewart G.C., Jaoko W., Richardson B.A., Yuhas K., Fiedler T.L., Mandaliya K.N., et al. Evaluation of the association between the concentrations of key vaginal bacteria and the increased risk of HIV acquisition in African women from five cohorts: A nested case-control study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2018;18:554–564. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30058-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hoogkamp-Korstanje J.A., Gerards L.J., Cats B.P. Maternal carriage and neonatal acquisition of group B streptococci. J. Infect. Dis. 1982;145:800–803. doi: 10.1093/infdis/145.6.800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Vornhagen J., Adams Waldorf K.M., Rajagopal L. Perinatal Group B Streptococcal Infections: Virulence Factors, Immunity, and Prevention Strategies. Trends Microbiol. 2017;25:919–931. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2017.05.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zarate G., Nader-Macias M.E. Influence of probiotic vaginal lactobacilli on in vitro adhesion of urogenital pathogens to vaginal epithelial cells. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2006;43:174–180. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.01934.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.De Gregorio P.R., Juarez Tomas M.S., Leccese Terraf M.C., Nader-Macias M.E. Preventive effect of Lactobacillus reuteri CRL1324 on Group B Streptococcus vaginal colonization in an experimental mouse model. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2015;118:1034–1047. doi: 10.1111/jam.12739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Rosen G.H., Randis T.M., Desai P.V., Sapra K.J., Ma B., Gajer P., Humphrys M.S., Ravel J., Gelber S.E., Ratner A.J. Group B Streptococcus and the Vaginal Microbiota. J. Infect. Dis. 2017;216:744–751. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Gosmann C., Anahtar M.N., Handley S.A., Farcasanu M., Abu-Ali G., Bowman B.A., Padavattan N., Desai C., Droit L., Moodley A., et al. Lactobacillus-Deficient Cervicovaginal Bacterial Communities Are Associated with Increased HIV Acquisition in Young South African Women. Immunity. 2017;46:29–37. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.12.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Rendon-Maldonado J.G., Espinosa-Cantellano M., Gonzalez-Robles A., Martinez-Palomo A. Trichomonas vaginalis: In vitro phagocytosis of lactobacilli, vaginal epithelial cells, leukocytes, and erythrocytes. Exp. Parasitol. 1998;89:241–250. doi: 10.1006/expr.1998.4297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Petrin D., Delgaty K., Bhatt R., Garber G. Clinical and microbiological aspects of Trichomonas vaginalis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1998;11:300–317. doi: 10.1128/CMR.11.2.300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Nizet V., Kim K.S., Stins M., Jonas M., Chi E.Y., Nguyen D., Rubens C.E. Invasion of brain microvascular endothelial cells by group B streptococci. Infect. Immun. 1997;65:5074–5081. doi: 10.1128/iai.65.12.5074-5081.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Doran K.S., Chang J.C., Benoit V.M., Eckmann L., Nizet V. Group B streptococcal beta-hemolysin/cytolysin promotes invasion of human lung epithelial cells and the release of interleukin-8. J. Infect. Dis. 2002;185:196–203. doi: 10.1086/338475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Tapsall J.W., Phillips E.A. The hemolytic and cytolytic activity of group B streptococcal hemolysin and its possible role in early onset group B streptococcal disease. Pathology. 1991;23:139–144. doi: 10.3109/00313029109060813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Fettucciari K., Rosati E., Scaringi L., Cornacchione P., Migliorati G., Sabatini R., Fetriconi I., Rossi R., Marconi P. Group B Streptococcus induces apoptosis in macrophages. J. Immunol. 2000;165:3923–3933. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.7.3923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Oliveira L., Madureira P., Andrade E.B., Bouaboud A., Morello E., Ferreira P., Poyart C., Trieu-Cuot P., Dramsi S. Group B streptococcus GAPDH is released upon cell lysis, associates with bacterial surface, and induces apoptosis in murine macrophages. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e29963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Freitas A.C., Chaban B., Bocking A., Rocco M., Yang S., Hill J.E., Money D.M., Group V.R. The vaginal microbiome of pregnant women is less rich and diverse, with lower prevalence of Mollicutes, compared to non-pregnant women. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:9212. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07790-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Si J., You H.J., Yu J., Sung J., Ko G. Prevotella as a Hub for Vaginal Microbiota under the Influence of Host Genetics and Their Association with Obesity. Cell Host Microbe. 2017;21:97–105. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Bassis C.M., Allsworth J.E., Wahl H.N., Sack D.E., Young V.B., Bell J.D. Effects of intrauterine contraception on the vaginal microbiota. Contraception. 2017;96:189–195. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.05.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Achilles S.L., Austin M.N., Meyn L.A., Mhlanga F., Chirenje Z.M., Hillier S.L. Impact of contraceptive initiation on vaginal microbiota. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018;218:622.e1–622.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Fosch S.E., Ficoseco C.A., Marchesi A., Cocucci S., Nader-Macias M.E.F., Perazzi B.E. Contraception: Influence on Vaginal Microbiota and Identification of Vaginal Lactobacilli Using MALDI-TOF MS and 16S rDNA Sequencing. Open Microbiol. J. 2018;12:218–229. doi: 10.2174/1874285801812010218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.