Table 1.

Evaluation of the papers that were included in the present review. Both score columns are shown (i.e., SANRA Scheme 0), medium (i.e., (5–7]), or high (i.e., (7–10]).

Publication	Means of Analysis	SANRA Scores (Averaged)	SANRA and Added Questions Scores (Averaged)	Quality
Friedman et al. 1994 [42]	Breath	6.5	6.25	Medium
Hiroshi et al. 1978 [43]	Breath	7	5	Low
Letteron et al. 1993 [44]	Breath	9	6.5	Medium
Van den Velde et al. 2008 [33]	Breath	9.5	9.25	High
Dadamio et al. 2012 [45]	Breath	10	8.25	High
Pijls et al. 2016 [46]	Breath	10	8	High
Morisco et al. 2013 [22]	Breath	9	8.25	High
Del Rio et al. 2015 [47]	Breath	9	8	High
Eng et al. 2015 [48]	Breath	9.5	7.25	High
Alkhouri et al. 2015 [49]	Breath	10	7.25	High
De Vincentis et al. 2016 [50]	Breath	9	5.75	Medium
Khalid et al. 2013 [51]	Breath	9	6.75	Medium
O’Hara et al. 2016 [52]	Breath	10	8.5	High
Arasaradnam et al. 2015 [53]	Breath	9	5.5	Medium
Solga et al. 2006 [5]	Breath	9	6.75	Medium
Verdam et al. 2013 [54]	Breath	9	6.25	Medium
Alkhouri et al. 2013 [55]	Breath	9.5	6.75	Medium
Millonig et al. 2010 [35]	Breath	7.5	7.5	High
Hanouneh et al. 2014 [21]	Breath	9	7.75	High
Qin et al. 2010 [56]	Breath	7.5	6	Medium
Sinha et al. 2019 [57]	Breath	10	7	Medium
Ferrandino et al. 2020 [58]	Breath	10	7	Medium
Miller-Atkins et al. [59]	Breath	10	8.75	High
Raman et al. 2013 [60]	Faeces	9	6.75	Medium
Navaneethan et al. 2015 [37]	Bile	9	6.75	Medium
Navaneethan et al. 2015 [61]	Urine	9	6.75	Medium
Arasaradnam et al. 2012 [62]	Urine	8.5	6	Medium
Bannaga et al. 2021 [63]	Urine	9.5	7	Medium