Abstract
Patients bitten by Naja atra who are treated with bivalent freeze-dried neurotoxic antivenom in Taiwan have an improved survival rate but develop necrotic wound changes. The World Health Organization (WHO) has suggested using the minimum necrotizing dose (MND) of venom as a method of evaluating the neutralization effect of antivenom. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of antivenom for the prevention of necrosis based on the MND and clarify which component of the venom of N. atra induces necrosis. The neurotoxins (NTXs) were removed from the crude venom (deNTXs), and different concentrations of deNTXs were injected intradermally into the dorsal skin of mice. After three days, the necrotic lesion diameter was found to be approximately 5 mm, and the MND was calculated. A reduction in the necrotic diameter of 50% was used to identify the MND50. Furthermore, both phospholipase A2 (PLA2) and cytotoxins (CTXs) were separately removed from the deNTXs to identify the major necrosis-inducing factor, and the necrotic lesions were scored. All mice injected with deNTXs survived for three days and developed necrotic wounds. The MND of the deNTXs for mice was 0.494 ± 0.029 µg/g, that of the deNTXs-dePLA2 (major component retained: CTXs) was 0.294 ± 0.05 µg/g, and that of the deNTX-deCTX (major component retained: PLA2) venom was greater than 1.25 µg/g. These values show that CTX is the major factor inducing necrosis. These results suggest that the use of the deNTXs is necessary to enable the mice to survive long enough to develop venom-induced cytolytic effects. CTXs play a major role in N. atra-related necrosis. However, the MND50 could not be identified in this study, which meant that the antivenom did not neutralize venom-induced necrosis.
Keywords: Naja atra, snake, minimum necrotizing dose
1. Introduction
Naja atra, a member of the Elapidae family, is a medically significant venomous snake that is common in Central Taiwan [1]. Patients bitten by N. atra are treated with bivalent antivenom-freeze-dried neurotoxic antivenom in Taiwan [2]. Local injuries are more common than neurologic toxicity after bites from many Naja species, including Naja nigricollis, Naja mossambica, Naja nigricincta, Naja pallida, Naja nubiae, and Naja katiensis [3,4,5]. Among patients bitten by N. atra, 65.6% progress to skin necrosis, and 42.1% develop necrotizing soft tissue infections [1,6]. Even when patients receive antivenom, skin necrosis still occurs, and debridement surgery is usually suggested 3.5 days after snake bite [6]. Studies have investigated the mechanism for N. nigricollis [7,8] and N. atra [9], although there has been less research on the latter species.
Snakebite-related local toxicity is usually thought to be due to the action of phospholipase A2 (PLA2), cytotoxins (CTXs, also called cardiotoxins) and snake venom metalloproteinases (SVMPs) [10,11,12]. PLA2 disrupts the plasma membrane of muscle fibers and induces a signaling cascade, including a calcium influx and mitochondrial dysfunction, resulting in muscle cell damage [13,14]. CTXs are unique to the Elapidae family and induce extensive local injuries by disrupting the plasma membranes of different cells [5,15]. SVMPs are the major component of the venom of most Crotalinae and Viperinae species [16] and are less abundant in the venom of Elapidae species [10,17]. The venom of N. atra comprises neurotoxins (NTXs), PLA2, CTXs, and high-molecular-weight proteins (HMWPs) [18] which included Atrase B [19], Atragin [20], kaouthiagin-like [20], and L-amino acid oxidase (LAAO) [21]. In Taiwan, the composition of the venom of N. atra varies across its geographic range, particularly between Western and Eastern Taiwan [18]. The average component ratio of the crude venom of N. atra is as follows: NTXs, 22%; PLA2, 15.4%; CTXs, 56.2%; and other components, 6.5% [11,18]. Therefore, PLA2 and CTXs are suspected of being the major causes of the local injuries induced by N. atra bites.
A significantly improved survival rate has been observed among patients bitten by N. atra who receive antivenom; however, these patients still have a high likelihood of developing local necrotic wounds [6]. Dermonecrosis in humans caused by the venom of N. atra is an important clinical problem even in the era of antivenom. Traditionally, antivenom is evaluated based on the effective dose 50 (ED50), which is based on the lethal dose 50 (LD50) of crude venom in mice [22,23]. In summary, the effectiveness of traditional antivenom is evaluated based on the improvement in the survival rate and does not take into account cytolytic effects. Therefore, the World Health Organization (WHO) suggested using the minimum necrotizing dose (MND) of venom as a method of evaluating the neutralizing effect of antivenom [24]. The MND of venom is the smallest dose that, when injected intradermally into the dorsal skin of mice, leads to the development of a necrotic lesion 5 mm in diameter [24]. The MND50 is the value used to evaluate the neutralizing effect of antivenom on venom-induced necrosis [24]. There were other studies focused on the Naja genus-related local injury [5,7,9]. Our study separated each venom component performed as previously described [18] and approached with MND, MND50, and tissue necrosis score to identify the effects of venom and antivenom.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of antivenom with regard to the prevention of necrosis based on the MND/MND50 and to identify which component of the venom of N. atra leads to necrosis.
2. Results
2.1. An Example for the Clinical Observation of Patient Bitten by N. atra
A 51-year-old male who was bitten by N. atra, which was identified by the patient, received one vial of the bivalent antivenom against B. multicinctus and N. atra and developed progressive necrosis without any neurologic symptoms two days later (Figure 1). He underwent debridement several times and remained in the hospital for twenty-two days. The wound cultures showed infection with Morganella morganii and Enterococcus faecalis, which were commonly identified in patients who have been bitten by N. atra [25]. Patients bitten by N. atra developed delayed necrotic wounds, and an appropriate animal mode was necessary for mice to survive long enough to develop the cytolytic effects.
2.2. Characterization of Naja atra Crude Venom and the MND of the deNTXs
The crude venom of N. atra was found to contain NTXs, PLA2, CTXs, cysteine-rich secretory proteins (CRISPs) and high-molecular-weight proteins (HMWPs) (Figure 2A). We removed the NTXs (the lethal component) from the crude venom, creating venom devoid of NTXs (deNTXs) (Figure 2B). All mice that were intradermally injected (Figure 3) with the deNTXs survived for three days, and necrotic changes were observed, as in human wounds. Different concentrations of deNTXs were tested, and the MND of the deNTXs in mice was 0.494 ± 0.029 µg/g (injection volume: 50 µL, mouse weight: 20~22 g).
2.3. CTXs Are the Major Component Causing Necrosis
Furthermore, we removed the CTXs and PLA2 separately from the deNTXs to determine which component played the most important role in inducing necrosis (Figure 3C). The MND of deNTXs-dePLA2 (major component retained: CTXs) was 0.294 ± 0.050 µg/g, and the MND of deNTXs-deCTXs (major component retained: PLA2) was greater than 1.25 µg/g (Table 1). The results showed that CTXs played a major role in the mechanism generating necrosis.
Table 1.
Name | Retained Toxin | Concentration (mg/mL) | Toxin Weight (µg) | MND (µg/g) |
---|---|---|---|---|
deNTXs | PLA2, CTX, others 1 | 0.198 ± 0.012 | 9.88 ± 0.576 | 0.494 ±0.029 |
deNTXs-dePLA2 | CTX, others 1 | 0.118 ± 0.020 | 5.89 ± 1.005 | 0.294 ± 0.050 |
deNTXs-deCTXs | PLA2, others 1 | >>0.5 | >>25 | >>1.25 |
Abbreviations: NTX, neurotoxin; PLA2, phospholipase A2; CTX, cytotoxin also called cardiotoxin. 1: CRISP, cysteine-rich secretory protein; HMWP, high-molecular-weight proteins.
2.4. Development of Necrosis
After determining the MND, we established a series of low concentrations of deNTXs to investigate the mechanism underlying the development of necrosis. Mice were injected intradermally with different concentrations (0.5, 0.33, 0.22, 0.148, and 0.098 µg/g), and the necrotic changes were observed after 72 h. We removed the necrotic skin and sent it for biopsy. The necrosis was scored by a veterinary pathologist. The severity of the necrosis was classified as normal (score of 0), minimal (score of 1), mild (score of 2), moderate (score of 3), or severe (score of 4) (Table 2). In the biopsy, severe necrosis appears as the loss of organization and substantial increase in tissue space. The skin biopsies were evaluated in the individual layers, namely the epidermis, dermis, hypodermis, panniculus carnosus and adventitia (Figure 4). Even when the dose was less than the MND (0.494 ± 0.029 µg/g), the deNTXs at 0.098 µg/g still induced necrosis, and the pathology extended deeper than the dermis. The most severely destroyed layer was the panniculus carnosus and adventitia, even at the minimum dose (Figure 5 and Supplementary Table S1).
Table 2.
Necrosis Score | Severity | Description |
---|---|---|
0 | Normal | Within normal limits |
1 | Minimal | Sporadic occurrence |
2 | Mild | Aggregated distribution |
3 | Moderate | Regional distribution |
4 | Severe | Diffuse distribution and lose originality |
2.5. Neutralization Ability of the Antivenom
We used two times the MND of the deNTXs as the challenge dose. We mixed this with different dilutions of antivenoms in vitro and then injected the mixtures intradermally into each mouse (5 mice per group). We compared the results with those in mice injected with a challenge dose mixed with saline to identify the MND50, as per the recommendation of the WHO [24]. The mice injected with the challenge dose mixed with saline developed necrotic lesions with diameters of approximately 7 mm. The other mice injected with different dilutions of antivenom (from the original to 1:5 dilution) still had necrotic lesion diameters that were greater than 5 mm. None of the mice developed necrotic lesion diameters that were 50% smaller than those in the mice injected with two times the MND mixed with saline. Therefore, we could not identify the MND50 with this antivenom. The necrotic lesions were biopsied, and the necrosis was scored in the individual skin layers (Figure 6). Regardless of the concentration of antivenom, including the original concentration, the challenge dose of the deNTXs resulted in necrosis throughout all of the layers of the skin, including severe necrosis in the panniculus carnosus and adventitia.
3. Discussion
The traditional method of evaluating the antivenom effect with the LD50 and ED50 may not be suitable for the assessment of venom-related cytolytic effects. Mice injected with the crude venom of N. atra would not survive long enough to develop the necrotic wounds seen in humans [9]. NTXs are the most lethal component of N. atra venom [12]. NTXs have a strong affinity for the mouse post-synaptic acetylcholine receptor (AchR) and block neuromuscular function, resulting in acute toxicity, including tremors, rigidity and even death; this is the main mechanism leading to death [11,26]. We suspected that the NTXs in the venom of N. atra might have relatively low affinity for human neuroreceptors, or that there was another mechanism that remained unclear that explained why people bitten by N. atra develop few neurologic symptoms [6]. In people who have been bitten by N. atra, the NTXs do not lead to immediate mortality, which gives the other toxins enough time to cause necrosis. Patients bitten by N. atra developed delayed necrotic wounds, and the deNTXs were necessary for mice to survive long enough to develop the cytolytic effects.
The LD50 of the crude venom injected intravenously into adult mice was 0.56 µg/g [27]. The NTXs are the lethal component of the crude venom, and the LD50 of the NTXs intravenously injected was 0.075 µg/g [12]. After the NTXs were removed, the MND of the deNTXs was found to be 0.494 ± 0.029 µg/g. Evaluating the neutralizing ability of antivenom on the LD50 in mice alone is not adequate with regard to necrosis. The MND identifies the necrotic effect of the venom, and the MND50 refers to the anti-necrosis effect of the antivenom [24].
Both CTXs and PLA2 are suspected of being the major components of the venom of N. nigricollis causing dermonecrosis [5]. In this study, we identified that CTXs played a major role in the mechanism by which the venom of N. atra caused necrosis. CTXs are less toxic than NTXs, although they have cytotoxic effects that contribute to the lethality of the venom [12]. There are many subtypes of CTXs, including types I, II, III, and IV, and all have cytolytic activity [12]. CTXs can penetrate cell membranes by damaging the phospholipid bilayer [28]. CTXs have a positive charge and easily bind to membranes and vesicles, which have negative charges, and tighter binding leads to increased cellular lysis [26]. PLA2 can be classified as belonging to group I (Elapidae) and group II (Viperidae) [29]. In addition, PLA2 is also thought to play a role in local muscle injury. In this study, significant variation was noted in comparing the MND of deNTXs-dePLA2 (major component retained: CTXs) with the MND of deNTXs-deCTXs (major component retained: PLA2) (0.294 ± 0.050 µg/g vs. greater than 1.25 µg/g). We suspected that necrosis was mainly caused by CTXs, and there were no significant synergistic effects of CTXs and PLA2. Similarly, the use of a PLA2 inhibitor did not decrease the necrotic area caused by the venom of N. nigricollis [5]. However, whether there was a synergistic effect of NTXs could not be investigated in this study.
The fangs of N. atra are noticeably short [1,30]. We used intradermal injections to simulate the real-world condition. As observed in the biopsy specimen, the venom was injected into the intradermal layer, after which the venom penetrated deeper rather than spreading along the surface. The deNTXs was distributed throughout the soft tissue rather than remaining localized at the site of injection, and severe damage was observed in the panniculus carnosus and adventitia, even at low concentrations. The venom may penetrate the layers and be transported into the circulation by the lymphatic system [31]. This would explain the development of myotoxicity after the progression of necrosis, even given the short fang length [5]. As in the study of Iddon et al., even when the venom was injected intradermally, it penetrated deep into the layers of the skin, which could result in skeletal muscle injury [7].
Some animal studies have investigated the administration of antivenom to prevent venom-related dermonecrosis [5,7]. In Taiwan, the antivenom administered to patients who have been bitten by N. atra is a bivalent freeze-dried neurotoxic antivenom (FNAV) against B. multicinctus and N. atra [2]. The equine antivenom induced by the injection of crude venom from N. atra may not induce the production of adequate antibodies against the CTXs. In this study, we determined the MND of the deNTXs, and the MND50 could not be determined, which meant that the antivenom did not effectively neutralize the CTXs. In the study by Wu et al., the neutralization efficacy of antivenom was poor for CTXs A2, 4 and 5 [18]. As mentioned above, CTXs play a major role in necrosis. The polyvalent antivenom generated in horses after a challenge with crude venom cannot neutralize the CTXs, which might explain why it is ineffective at preventing necrosis. Other antivenoms also have little to no effect with regard to local damage [9,32,33]. To prevent necrosis after a patient has been bitten by a snake in the Naja genus, monoclonal antibodies against for CTXs [18,34,35] or combined treatment with other therapies [36] could be considered in the future.
The study of Dr. Liu et al. also discussed the venom effect of Naja atra [9]. We both used the deNTX model to present the human wound in the animal models and concluded that there was no effective neutralization of the antivenom for the necrotic progression. In our study, except the deNTX, we analyze the role of CTXs and PLA2 in the necrosis condition. We clarified that CTXs played the major role in the necrotic changes. We also highlighted that the venom went deeper to cause necrosis even though the dose was less than MND and the noneffective of antivenom anti-necrosis based on the tissue biopsy scored by an animal pathologist.
Limitations
There are several limitations of this study. Although we removed the toxins one-by-one in this study, we could not rule out the possibility of a synergistic effect of NTXs on necrosis. The antivenom concentration could not be increased in this animal experiment; however, in clinical practice, patients may respond to increased doses of antivenom [6].
4. Conclusions
The use of the deNTXs allows mice to survive long enough to develop venom-induced cytolytic effects. CTXs play a major role in Naja atra venom-induced necrosis. The MND50 could not be identified in this study, which meant that the antivenom did not prevent necrosis. In the future, management of Naja atra bites may include not only the existing antivenom to improve the survival rate but also the administration of monoclonal antibodies against the CTXs or combined treatment with other therapies.
5. Materials and Methods
5.1. Chemical Reagents and Samples
Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), ammonium bicarbonate (ABC), formic acid (FA), dithiothreitol (DTT), iodoacetamide (IAM), and Tween 20 were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Sodium hydroxide, DMSO, iodomethane and trichloromethane were purchased from Merck Millipore (Darmstadt, Germany). Trypsin was purchased from Promega (15,664 unit/mg, Sequence Grade, WI, USA). Acrylamide, SDS and TEMED were obtained from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA, USA). Acetonitrile (ACN) was purchased from J.T. Baker (Phillipsburg, NJ, USA). Deionized water was generated with a Simplicity Ultrapure Water System (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) with a measured value of 18 MΩ.
5.2. Snake Venom Approach and Analysis
Venom was collected from 10 healthy adult specimens of N. atra. Each specimen was manually restrained, and the venom was milked. The liquid venom samples were individually obtained, lyophilized and stored at −80 °C until use. Commercial bivalent equine antivenom intended for clinical usage and antivenin against the venom of B. multicinctus and N. naja atra (Trade name: Antivenin of B. multicinctus and N. naja atra Antivenin Bivalent (lyophilized), 1000 antivenom unit/vial; batch number: 61-06-0010) were produced from the Taiwan Centers for Disease Control (CDC).
5.3. Preparation of deNTXs, deNTXs-deCTXs, and deNTXs-dePLA2
The lyophilized crude N. atra venom was dissolved in water and centrifuged at 10,000× g for 10 min. The amount of protein in the venom was determined via a BCA Protein Assay kit (PierceTM, Thermo Scientific). The supernatants were diluted and further purified by size exclusion chromatography. The purified venom proteins, NTXs, were isolated from the crude venom following the procedure described by Huang et al. [18]. All the venom protein components other than the NTXs were combined and dissolved in PBS, creating the deNTXs. The crude venom and deNTXs were loaded onto a Phenomenex Jupiter® C18 (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm particle size, 300 Å pore size) column with an ultraperformance liquid chromatography (UPLC) system (LC-20ADXR, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a DAD detector (SPD-M20A, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) and autosampler (SIL-20ACXR, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The venom components were eluted at 1 mL/min with a linear gradient of 0.1% TFA in water (Solvent A) and 0.1% TFA in 100% ACN (Solvent B) (2% B for 5 min, followed by 2–10% B for 2 min, 10–16% B for 6 min, 16–28% B for 2 min and 28–65% B for 37 min) [18]. Protein elution was monitored at 215 nm (absorption wavelength for peptide bonds). The relative abundance (expressed as the percentage of the total venom protein) of each protein family was estimated as described by Huang et al. [18].
5.4. Minimum Necrotizing Dose (MND)
According to the WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization [24], the MND of venom is the smallest amount of venom (in μg of dry weight) that, when injected intradermally into the dorsal skin of lightly anesthetized mice, leads to the development of necrotic lesions 5 mm in diameter 3 days later. CD1 mice (10–12 weeks old) were obtained from BioLASCO Taiwan Co. Ltd. (Taipei, Taiwan) and grouped randomly (6 mice/group). The animal handling protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the National Defense Medical Center (IACUC-20-112). One group of mice underwent removal of the fur from the dorsal skin and the intradermal injection of 50 µL of sterile saline; these mice served as the control group. Next, the mice in the testing groups underwent removal of the fur from the dorsal skin and a single intradermal injection of deNTXs (16.5, 20.5, 25.5, 32, and 40 µg). The diameter of the necrotic area of dorsal skin was measured after 72 h. The MND was determined with linear interpolation.
5.5. MND50: Neutralization Efficacy of Antivenom
The MND50 is a measure of the ability of an antivenom to prevent venom-induced dermonecrosis [24]. The MND50 is identified as the dose of antivenom (in microliters) that results in a diameter of the necrotic lesion that is 50% smaller than that of the lesion induced by the injection of venom and saline [24]. Two times the MND of deNTXs was selected as the challenge dose. The antivenom was bivalent antivenom against B. multicinctus and N. atra, which was manufactured by the National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, and distributed by the Taiwanese Center for Disease Control, Taiwan, R.O.C. [1]. A fixed dose of venom was incubated with various dilutions of antivenom for 30 min at 37 °C. The positive control was venom incubated with saline instead of antivenom. Then, aliquots of 0.5 mL of the mixtures containing an amount of venom corresponding to two times the MND were injected intradermally into groups of six CD1 mice (10–12 weeks old).
5.6. Biopsy and Necrosis Score
The mice were intradermally injected with deNTXs (0.5, 0.33, 0.22, 0.148, and 0.098 µg/g) or 2 times the MND with different dilutions of antivenom (from the original: 1:2, 1:3, 1:4 and 1:5) into the dorsal skin. After 72 h, the mice were euthanized, and the dorsal skin was removed and sent for skin biopsy with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining. Then, the biopsy was scored by an animal pathologist based on the necrosis (Table 2).
5.7. Statistical Analysis
We report the data as the means ± standard deviations (SDs). Statistical analysis was performed by t-test, one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test using Prism 6 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Statistical differences were considered significant when p was ≤ 0.05.
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/toxins13090619/s1, Supplementary Data include: Table S1: Necrosis scores with different deNTXs doses (each group contained six mice). Table S2: Necrosis scores under a fixed challenge dose (2MND) mixed with different dilution times of antivenom (AV) (each group contains five mice).
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, S.-H.L., L.-C.C. and Y.-C.M.; methodology, L.-C.C., S.-H.T. and C.-H.L.; software, C.-H.H. and L.-C.C.; validation, L.-C.C.; formal analysis, C.-H.H.; investigation, Y.-J.S., Y.-S.T. and C.-S.L.; resources, W.-L.L. and W.-H.F.; data curation, K.-T.C. and D.M.-L.C.; writing—original draft preparation, C.-H.H.; writing—review and editing, S.-H.L.; visualization, S.-H.L.; supervision, S.-H.L.; project administration, C.-H.H.; funding acquisition, K.-C.L. and C.-S.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported in part by grant from the Tri-Service General Hospital (TSGH-D-109072).
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the Tri-Service General Hospital (TSGH IRB No.:2-107-05-039; 25 February 2021). The animal study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the National Defense Medical Center (IACUC-20-112; 30 April 2020).
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient(s) to publish this paper.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
Key Contribution
In this study, we highlighted an animal mode which can survive long enough to reproduce the necrotic wound as human. We clarified which was the major necrosis-inducing component of the venom and assessed the neutralization ability of antivenom based on the minimum necrotizing dose (MND).
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Mao Y.-C., Hung D.-Z. Epidemiology of Snake Envenomation in Taiwan. In: Gopalakrishnakone P., editor. Clinical Toxinology in Asia Pacific and Africa. 1st ed. Springer; Heidelberg, Germany: New York, NY, USA: Dordrecht, The Netherlands: London, UK: 2015. pp. 3–52. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Liu C.C., You C.H., Wang P.J., Yu J.S., Huang G.J., Liu C.H., Hsieh W.C., Lin C.C. Analysis of the efficacy of Taiwanese freeze-dried neurotoxic antivenom against Naja kaouthia, Naja siamensis and Ophiophagus hannah through proteomics and animal model approaches. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017;11:e0006138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ghose A., White J. Critical Care Toxicology. Springer; Cham, Switzerland: 2017. Asian Snakes; pp. 2343–2403. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Warrell D.A. Snake bite. Lancet. 2010;375:77–88. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61754-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rivel M., Solano D., Herrera M., Vargas M., Villalta M., Segura Á., Arias A.S., León G., Gutiérrez J.M. Pathogenesis of dermonecrosis induced by venom of the spitting cobra, Naja nigricollis: An experimental study in mice. Toxicon. 2016;119:171–179. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2016.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mao Y.C., Liu P.Y., Chiang L.C., Lai C.S., Lai K.L., Ho C.H., Wang T.H., Yang C.C. Naja atra snakebite in Taiwan. Clin. Toxicol. 2017;56:273–280. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2017.1366502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Iddon D., Theakston R.D., Ownby C.L. A study of the pathogenesis of local skin necrosis induced by Naja nigricollis (spitting cobra) venom using simple histological staining techniques. Toxicon. 1987;25:665–672. doi: 10.1016/0041-0101(87)90113-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kandiwa E., Mushonga B., Samkange A., Fabiano E. Quantitative Characterization of the Hemorrhagic, Necrotic, Coagulation-Altering Properties and Edema-Forming Effects of Zebra Snake (Naja nigricincta nigricincta) Venom. J. Toxicol. 2018;2018:6940798. doi: 10.1155/2018/6940798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Liu C.C., Chou Y.S., Chen C.Y., Liu K.L., Huang G.J., Yu J.S., Wu C.J., Liaw G.W., Hsieh C.H., Chen C.K. Pathogenesis of local necrosis induced by Naja atra venom: Assessment of the neutralization ability of Taiwanese freeze-dried neurotoxic antivenom in animal models. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2020;14:e0008054. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gutierrez J.M., Calvete J.J., Habib A.G., Harrison R.A., Williams D.J., Warrell D.A. Snakebite envenoming. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2017;3:17063. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Xu Y.-L., Kou J.-Q., Wang S.-Z., Chen C.-X., Qin Z.-H. Neurotoxin from Naja naja atra venom inhibits skin allograft rejection in rats. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2015;28:188–198. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2015.05.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Standker L., Harvey A.L., Furst S., Mathes I., Forssmann W.G., Escalona de Motta G., Beress L. Improved method for the isolation, characterization and examination of neuromuscular and toxic properties of selected polypeptide fractions from the crude venom of the Taiwan cobra Naja naja atra. Toxicon. 2012;60:623–631. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2012.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Montecucco C., Gutiérrez J.M., Lomonte B. Cellular pathology induced by snake venom phospholipase A2 myotoxins and neurotoxins: Common aspects of their mechanisms of action. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2008;65:2897–2912. doi: 10.1007/s00018-008-8113-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hiu J.J., Yap M.K.K. Cytotoxicity of snake venom enzymatic toxins: Phospholipase A2 and l-amino acid oxidase. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2020;48:719–731. doi: 10.1042/BST20200110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dubovskii P.V., Utkin Y.N. Cobra cytotoxins: Structural organization and antibacterial activity. Acta Nat. 2014;6:11–18. doi: 10.32607/20758251-2014-6-3-11-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Markland F.S., Jr., Swenson S. Snake venom metalloproteinases. Toxicon. 2013;62:3–18. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2012.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gasanov S.E., Dagda R.K., Rael E.D. Snake Venom Cytotoxins, Phospholipase A2s, and Zn(2+)-dependent Metalloproteinases: Mechanisms of Action and Pharmacological Relevance. J. Clin. Toxicol. 2014;4:1000181. doi: 10.4172/2161-0495.1000181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Huang H.W., Liu B.S., Chien K.Y., Chiang L.C., Huang S.Y., Sung W.C., Wu W.G. Cobra venom proteome and glycome determined from individual snakes of Naja atra reveal medically important dynamic range and systematic geographic variation. J. Proteom. 2015;128:92–104. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2015.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sun Q.Y., Bao J. Purification, cloning and characterization of a metalloproteinase from Naja atra venom. Toxicon. 2010;56:1459–1469. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2010.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Guan H.H., Goh K.S., Davamani F., Wu P.L., Huang Y.W., Jeyakanthan J., Wu W.G., Chen C.J. Structures of two elapid snake venom metalloproteases with distinct activities highlight the disulfide patterns in the D domain of ADAMalysin family proteins. J. Struct. Biol. 2010;169:294–303. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2009.11.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Li R., Zhu S., Wu J., Wang W., Lu Q., Clemetson K.J. L-amino acid oxidase from Naja atra venom activates and binds to human platelets. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2008;40:19–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7270.2008.00372.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Huang R.J., Chen S.W., Chen T.K., Liau M.Y. The detoxification of Naja naja atra venom and preparation of potent antivenin. Chin. J. Microbiol. Immunol. 1985;18:177–183. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Liu C., Lee C., Li R., Hsu C., Chen C., Chang S., Hsieh W.-C. Application of Snake-Venom and Technology of Antivenom Manufactory. Taiwan Epidemiol. Bull. 2015;31:76–85. doi: 10.6524/EB.20150224.31(4).001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization, Sixty-Seventh Report. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2017. (WHO Technical Report Series, No. 1004). [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mao Y.C., Liu P.Y., Hung D.Z., Lai W.C., Huang S.T., Hung Y.M., Yang C.C. Bacteriology of Naja atra Snakebite Wound and Its Implications for Antibiotic Therapy. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2016;94:1129–1135. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kumar T.K.S., Pandian S.T.K., Jayaraman G., Peng H.-J., Yu C. Understanding the Structure, Function and Folding of Cobra Toxins. Proc. Natl. Sci. Counc. Repub. China. 1999;23:19. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sun J.J., Walker M.J. Actions of cardiotoxins from the southern Chinese cobra (Naja naja atra) on rat cardiac tissue. Toxicon. 1986;24:233–245. doi: 10.1016/0041-0101(86)90149-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sala A., Cabassi C.S., Santospirito D., Polverini E., Flisi S., Cavirani S., Taddei S. Novel Naja atra cardiotoxin 1 (CTX-1) derived antimicrobial peptides with broad spectrum activity. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0190778. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gutierrez J.M., Lomonte B. Phospholipases A2: Unveiling the secrets of a functionally versatile group of snake venom toxins. Toxicon. 2013;62:27–39. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2012.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Warrell D.A., Greenwood B.M., Davidson N.M., Ormerod L.D., Prentice C.R. Necrosis, haemorrhage and complement depletion following bites by the spitting cobra (Naja nigricollis) Q. J. Med. 1976;45:1–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Helden D.F.V., Dosen P.J., O’Leary M.A., Isbister G.K. Two pathways for venom toxin entry consequent to injection of an Australian elapid snake venom. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:8595. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45022-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gutiérrez J.M., León G., Rojas G., Lomonte B., Rucavado A., Chaves F. Neutralization of local tissue damage induced by Bothrops asper (terciopelo) snake venom. Toxicon. 1998;36:1529–1538. doi: 10.1016/S0041-0101(98)00145-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Reid H.A. Cobra-Bites. Br. Med. J. 1964;2:540–545. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5408.540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lewin M., Samuel S., Merkel J., Bickler P. Varespladib (LY315920) Appears to Be a Potent, Broad-Spectrum, Inhibitor of Snake Venom Phospholipase A2 and a Possible Pre-Referral Treatment for Envenomation. Toxins. 2016;8:248. doi: 10.3390/toxins8090248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ahmadi S., Pucca M.B., Jurgensen J.A., Janke R., Ledsgaard L., Schoof E.M., Sorensen C.V., Caliskan F., Laustsen A.H. An in vitro methodology for discovering broadly-neutralizing monoclonal antibodies. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:10765. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67654-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Leao-Torres A.G., Pires C.V., Ribelato A.C., Zerbinatti M.C., Santarem C.L., Nogueira R.M.B., Giometti I.C., Giuffrida R., Silva E.O., Gerez J.R., et al. Protective action of N-acetyl-L-cysteine associated with a polyvalent antivenom on the envenomation induced by Lachesis muta muta (South American bushmaster) in rats. Toxicon. 2021;198:36–47. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2021.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.