Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Semin Cancer Biol. 2021 Mar 27;78:17–22. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.03.023

Multifaceted functions of chronic inflammation in regulating tumor dormancy and relapse

Saeed H Manjili 1,4, Madison Isbell 2, Negar Ghochaghi 3, Tyler Perkinson 4, Masoud H Manjili 2,5,6,*
PMCID: PMC8473586  NIHMSID: NIHMS1690777  PMID: 33785450

Abstract

Inflammation is a double-edged sword exhibiting multifaceted functions. On one hand, it either induces tumor cell apoptosis, or establishes tumor dormancy by inhibiting tumor cell proliferation; on the other hand, it either facilitates the tumorigenesis process or reawakens dormant tumor cells, resulting in disease recurrences. Each outcome would depend on the balance between type I and type II inflammation as well as the duration of inflammation being acute or chronic. In this essay, we provide a critical review of the empirical evidence suggesting that chronic inflammation, dominated by type I inflammatory cells and cytokines as a result of trauma and microbiome dysbiosis, could facilitate the carcinogenesis process in normal cells and retain nascent transformed cells in a dormant state. On the other hand, an elevated type II inflammation along with inefficient resolution of type I inflammation following trauma or major surgeries could delay the wound healing process and promote the growth and reawakening of dormant tumor cells, resulting in disease recurrences. Finally, cytokines exhibiting type I and II inflammatory functions, simultaneously, tend to promote tumor recurrence when become chronic. Therefore, the risk of reawakening dormant tumor cells should be considered in cancer survivors who experience major surgeries and trauma, or suffer from chronic inflammatory diseases.

Keywords: Tumor dormancy, inflammation, periodontal disease, autoimmune diseases, trauma

The characteristics of tumor dormancy: relapse or not relapse?

Tumor cell dormancy is defined by the presence of viable malignant cells that either do not proliferate (quiescent tumor dormancy) or their sluggish proliferation is counterbalanced by apoptosis (indolent tumor dormancy). Tumor dormancy exists in two forms: i) naturally-occurring tumor dormancy in healthy individuals prior to the appearance of primary cancer, and ii) treatment-induced tumor dormancy in cancer survivors prior to the appearance of metastatic recurrences 1. A trace of dormant cells can also be detected at the site of clinically active cancer as Ki67 negative quiescent cells, engulfing proliferating tumor cells and protecting their survival 24. Naturally-occurring tumor dormancy is established as a result of the function of tumor suppressor genes and/or tumor immunosurveillance 1,5. Treatment-induced tumor dormancy is the result of tumor cell clones responding to cancer therapies by becoming quiescent rather than undergoing apoptosis 6,7. Therefore, tumor dormancy differs from drug resistance, where cancer cells continue to grow without responding to treatments. Although some dormant tumor cells might show stemness properties, they are not necessarily cancer stem cells 2. The evolutionary conserved mechanisms of survival in normal cells from which tumor cells arise, protect some tumor clones from treatment-induced apoptosis by driving them into the state of dormancy. In fact, humans have evolved two major mechanisms of cell survival which include: i) tumor-intrinsic mechanisms such as, metastasis suppressor genes and cell cycle checkpoint molecules which could inhibit proliferation of malignant cells, and ii) tumor-extrinsic mechanisms regulated by the immune surveillance, which could either eliminate or inhibit proliferation of the nascent transformed cells, thereby facilitating the establishment of immunogenic tumor dormancy. In fact, Th1 cells have been reported to inhibit HER2 positive tumors such that loss of anti-HER2 or anti-HER3 Th1 response was found to be associated with tumor recurrences 8,9. We have recently proposed the adaptation model of immunity in which several adaptation receptors regulating tumor cell survival and dormancy are discussed 10.

Dormant tumor cells could remain quiescent longer than the lifespan of a host without causing primary cancer or metastatic recurrences 11. They could also exit from the state of dormancy and establish primary or metastatic cancers 12,13. Among breast cancer types, HER2 positive and triple negative breast cancers (TNBC) have the highest recurrence rates within two years 14. Within 10 years, the highest rates of distant recurrence and regional recurrence are reported in HER2 positive and TNBC, respectively 14. The decision-making mechanisms to relapse or not relapse, as well as to relapse early or late, are not fully understood. Increasing evidence suggests that inflammation and microbiome dysbiosis play an important role in decision-making process and facilitate tumor recurrences.

Inflammation: from promoting carcinogenesis and retaining tumor dormancy to reawakening dormant tumor cells and resulting in tumor relapse

Inflammation is a process which contains two steps or components including type I and type II inflammation. Type I inflammation is characterized by the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines, which is required during the induction of a host-protective immune response against pathogens or cancers. Type II inflammation is characterized by the production of either type I inflammation-resolving chemokines, or anti-inflammatory cytokines facilitating cell proliferation and wound healing mechanisms. During a normal wound healing process and natural defense mechanism, type I inflammation is resolved or replaced with a type II inflammation as soon as it has served its purpose. However, when type I inflammation fails to serve its purpose and becomes chronic, it promotes the carcinogenesis process in normal cells through STAT3 activation, the accumulation of oxidative DNA damage and gene mutations 15. This is evident by detecting a higher incidence of colorectal cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease 16. Anti-tumor function of type I inflammation could inhibit proliferation of the nascent transformed cells or primary tumor cells and support tumor dormancy. However, both types of inflammation could occur simultaneously, when becoming chronic, with one being predominant over another. In fact, subdominant levels of type II inflammation during type I inflammatory responses might induce wound healing mechanisms, facilitating the reawakening of dormant cells and tumor relapse. This could explain a strong correlation between inflammation and recurrence of endometrial cancer 17, oral cancer 18 and breast cancer 19,20. Also, major accidents and trauma which induce inflammation and tissue healing mechanism could facilitate tumor relapse as suggested by case reports. A patient who was treated for non-small lung cancer experienced rapid tumor growth and reoccurrence following a minor car accident near a trauma site in his skull bone 21. Therefore, an acute/transient type I inflammation would be an ideal because of its anti-tumor function without becoming chronic to induce carcinogenesis in normal cells. In contrast, a chronic type II inflammation could facilitate the reawakening of dormant tumor cells by producing tissue-regenerating factors VEGF and TGF-β, and result in disease recurrences.

Chronic type I inflammation promotes de novo cell transformation

Traumatic inflammation, oral cancer and beyond.

Chronic trauma induces type I inflammation characterized by the production of inflammatory cytokines, prostaglandins and TNF by injured tissues as well as infiltrating immune cells. This type of inflammation in turn leads to oxidative DNA damage and cell cycles arrest affecting both normal cells and nascent transformed cells. This could result in a malignant transformation of normal cells locally, or in distant organs if it becomes systemic. Very recently, it was demonstrated that inflammation-initiated tumorigenesis can be prevented by inducing the resolution of inflammation using dual COX-2/sEH inhibitor 22. A retrospective study in Australia revealed that the lateral side of tongue is the most common site of oral cancer in nonsmokers, perhaps because of a chronic dental trauma 23. This study confirmed a previously published work examining 28 patients with oral cancer in a dental set up, demonstrating that all tumors occurred in areas of contact with teeth and/or dental application 24. A retrospective study conducted on 406 patients between the ages of 18 and 80 with oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMD), oral cancer or healthy controls showed that chronic trauma of the oral mucosa is associated with carcinogenesis, and should be considered in follow-up protocols 25. Also, a case-control study in Brazil demonstrated a significant association between ill-fitting dentures and oral cancer 26. These carcinogenic effects are not merely due to dentures because, while chronic trauma due to tooth loss shows a strong correlation with oral cancer, well fitted dentures show no association with cancer 27,28. Some other studies have shown a significant association between oral hygiene and oral cancer 29,30. In fact, oral trauma and related sores may be colonized by candida or human papillomavirus (HPV) and in turn promote inflammation and epithelial dysplasia 31,32. Thus, trauma and injury might synergize with microbiome dysbiosis and promote chronic inflammation and cancer. A review of emerging evidence suggests a link between periodontal disease and oral cancer with chronic inflammation being a major factor in both diseases 33. Chronic periodontitis was associated with chronic Porphyromonas gingivalis, Fusobacterium nucleatum, candida, and other microbes 33. Examination of saliva samples from 45 patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and 229 OSCC-free subjects showed that an elevated Capnocytophaga gingivalis, Prevotella melaninogenica and Streptococcus mitis was detected in patients with OSCC 34. Several other periodontal bacteria have shown a strong association with squamous cell carcinoma 35. The association is because of the production of inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6, being induced by oral microbiome dysbiosis 35.

Periodontal disease could promote tumorigenesis at distant sites when chronic inflammation becomes systemic. The analysis of 50 studies published between 2011 and 2016 identified a positive association between periodontal disease and risk of oral, lung, and pancreatic cancers 36. Examination of 1,337 postmenopausal women who participated in the Buffalo OsteoPerio Study demonstrated that periodontal diseases were associated with increased total cancer risk, as well as an increase in lung cancer risk specifically 37. Another prospective study conducted between 1986–2004 in which 48,375 men aged 40–75 with no history of cancer were included, periodontal disease was associated with an increased risk of carcinogenesis, which persisted in non-smokers 38. After adjusting for known risk factors, including smoking and dietary habits, those with history of periodontal disease showed a 14% increase in total cancer cases compared with those with no history of periodontal disease. In addition, the risk for hematopoietic cancers, lung cancer, esophageal cancer, kidney cancer, and pancreatic increased by 30%, 36%, 44%, 49%, and 54%, respectively 38. Another study conducted in 15,333 patients showed increased cancer cases by 15% in those with periodontal disease, after adjusting for known risk factors 39. Specifically, the risk for corpus uterine cancer, colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer, and prostate cancer increased by 120%, 62%, 106% and 47% respectively 39.

Inflammatory chronic wounds and in situ cancers.

Chronic wounds are the result of a failure to resolve type I inflammation. Published evidence suggest a link between chronic foot ulcers observed in diabetes mellitus patients and formation of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) 40. A chronic ulcer in a 35-year-old female with ringworm in the upper extremities for ten years developed to cSCC. The case report concluded that it could be a result of recurrent trauma over a long period 41. Also, a 67-year-old male who suffered from an ulcer at the base of his foot for 8 years, which was infected with E. coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staph. aureus, and anaerobic species, developed highly differentiated carcinoma spinocellulare (SCC). The second case was a 72-year-old woman who also had a foot ulcer for 8 years suffering from PAD who developed SCC. The article concluded that histological samples should be taken from chronic wounds in order to test for possible carcinoma 42.

Inflammatory microbial dysbiosis and cancer.

Obesity is also associated with chronic self-directed tissue inflammation 43 and has been indicated in cancer prevalence. Western diet induces microbial dysbiosis by promoting an inflammatory microbiome 44 which facilitates carcinogenesis when it becomes chronic 45,46. A low-grade inflammation is present in adipose tissue of obese individuals, making it similar to the tumor microenvironment by producing a high ratio of reactive oxygen species (ROS) to antioxidants. This in turn increases the risk of mutation as well as tumor relapse 47. Adipose tissue in obese patients also produces high levels of tumor-promoting hormones such as leptin and estrogen, as well as low levels of the tumor suppressant hormone adiponectin 47. Also, there is a strong association between inflammation and colorectal cancer 48, which is mediated by the gut microbiota 49. In patients who received curative colorectal tumor resection, the Western diet Patients who underwent curative resection of colorectal cancer showed increased collagenolytic microbes in the intestine leading to tumor recurrence 50,51. Another study showed that diet induced obesity accelerates chemically induced colitis-associated colorectal cancer (CAC) in mice via increased inflammation and immune cell recruitment 52. Specifically, obesity induced IL-6 shifting macrophage polarization towards tumor promoting macrophages that produce chemokine CCL-20 in the tumor microenvironment 52. The excess adiposity in overweight and obese patients is associated with mammary adipose tissue inflammation, which is an event that could contribute to breast cancer development and progression 53. It was also reported that chemotherapy shifts the breast tumor microbiome, and that specific microbes, Brevundimonas and Staphylococcus, correlate with tumor recurrence 54.

Chronic type I inflammation eliminates some tumor cells and establishes dormancy in some other clones

Tumor elimination and equilibrium.

A recent review of literature on immunogenic tumor dormancy underscores the role of pre-existing T cell responses toward non-mutated tumor-associated antigens in healthy individuals in maintaining tumor dormancy 55. The role of type I inflammatory cytokines released by CD8+ T cells, CD4+ Th1 cells, group 1 innate lymphoid cells (ILC-1) or M1 macrophages in inducing apoptosis or inhibiting proliferation of malignant cells is well established. Multifaceted function of the inflammatory immune responses against malignant cells is because of cell-intrinsic heterogeneity of tumor cells in responding to inflammation as well as their heterogeneity in the expression of cytokine receptors. For instance, pro-inflammatory TNF-α could induce apoptosis or support cell survival and induce cell cycle arrest depending on the expression of TNFR1 and TNFR2 on tumor cells. While the engagement of TNFR1 induces apoptosis 56, activation of TNFR2 leads to increased cell survival 57. TNFR2 lacks a death domain and activates pro-survival pathways through the recruitment of TRAF2 and subsequent activation of PKB/Akt and NF-κB pathways 57. Kinase suppressor of Ras-1 (KSR1) also regulates TNF-activated anti-apoptotic signals in intestinal epithelial cells 58. Therefore, TNFR2 could be a potential adaptation receptor relaying survival signal upon the engagement with the adaptation ligand, TNF-α 59. Another pro-inflammatory factor is called endothelin 1 (ET-1), which is released during Th1 inflammation and T cell activation 60. This ligand has receptors A (ETA) and B (ETB). Binding of ET-1 to ETA results in the activation of anti-apoptotic Bcl-xL and support tumor cell survival whereas its binding to ETB induces tumor cell apoptosis 61. In fact, a higher responsiveness of melanoma to immunotherapy compared to prostate cancer or ovarian cancer is, in part, due to a higher expression of the ETA in prostate and ovarian cancers but not in melanoma 62. IFN-γ is another inflammatory cytokine released by Th1, ILC-1 and CD8+ T cells which is capable of inducing tumor cell apoptosis or cell cycle arrest and tumor dormancy 63, depending on the status of p53 expression in target cells 64,65. Recently, we proposed the adaptation model of immunity to explain the multifaceted functions of the immune system in facilitating tumor growth, tumor cell death, tumor dormancy or relapse simultaneously 10.

Although type I inflammation has a dual function on inducing carcinogenesis and inhibiting the growth of nascent transformed cells, tumor specific inflammatory T cells could support tumor dormancy without inducing carcinogenesis in normal cells. For instance, CD8+ T cells can inhibit tumor growth such that their depletion results in the outgrowth and relapse of metastatic dormant cells 66,67. In a murine model of B-cell lymphoma, IFN-γ–producing CD8+ T cells were shown to establish and maintain tumor dormancy 68. Very recently, we have reported that both local and distant breast cancer dormancy are associated with infiltrating T effector subsets while lack of tumor dormancy is associated with the tissue residing T central memory or T naïve subsets, suggesting that T effector cells retain tumor cells in the state of dormancy 2. This possibility was further confirmed, ex vivo, by demonstrating that T effector cells inhibit the reawakening of freshly isolated dormant cells 2. Ex vivo studies in human breast tumor cell lines showed that while M1 inflammatory macrophages contribute to tumor dormancy, M2 macrophages facilitate tumor relapse 69. The results of this study suggest that inducing the MErT program in dormant micrometastases by M1 macrophages may be a novel approach to maintaining the dormant state 69. Other studies have investigated the role of IFN-γ producing CD4+ Th1 cells on tumor dormancy showing that the combined effect of type I inflammatory cytokines, IFN-γ and TNF, induce T antigen (Tag)-expressing cancers and murine breast cancers into senescence 70. Since long term dormancy is caused by senescent cells, it could be concluded that these inflammatory cytokines help drive the cancer cells into dormancy 71. Studies in an experimental model of Tag-induced multistage carcinogenesis demonstrated that Tag-specific CD4+ Th1 cells induced tumor dormancy, while the absence of either IFN-γ signaling or TNFR1 signaling promotes carcinogenesis in the same Tag-specific Th1 cells 72. Thus, they concluded that IFN-γ signaling and TNFR signaling on endothelia induces tumor dormancy 72. In addition to Th1 cells, CD8+ T cells could regulate dormancy by producing inflammatory cytokines 72. Very recently, it was demonstrated that ER- breast cancer cells that survived high-dose Doxorubicin and Methotrexate chemotherapies elicit a state of immunological dormancy by the activation of the IRF7/IFN-β/IFNAR pathway is critical to this process 73. High levels of IFN-β activates STAT1, STAT2 and STAT3 signaling pathways to facilitate cellular dormancy in tumor repopulating melanoma cells 73.

Chronic inflammatory diseases and tumor dormancy.

Multiple studies have indicated a correlation between inflammatory autoimmune rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and incidence of cancer. For instance, one study performed a cross sectional analysis of patients with RA and demonstrated an increased risk of malignancy 74. Another retrospective case control study collected data from the Veterans Integrated Service Networks database to investigate the association between RA and lung cancer and determined that patients with RA are 43% more likely to develop lung cancer than patients without RA 75. Data analysis from a population based National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) determined an increased incidence of cancer in patients with RA, with an odds ratio of 1.632 76. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are twice as likely to suffer from colorectal cancer 77. One study examined cancer risk in the early stages of IBD in Korean patients and showed that patients with IBD are at increased risk for overall intestinal and hematological cancer 78. Patients with RA show chronically elevated levels of the type I inflammatory cytokine TNF-α, and type II inflammatory cytokines IL-33 and IL-6 being involved in both type I and II inflammation 79. Similar observations were made in patients with IBD showing Th17 cells producing IL-17 and IL-22. It is likely that inflammatory immune responses in patients with RA or IBD maintain transformed cells in a dormant state such that immune suppressive drugs for the treatment of the disease rescue dormant tumor cells from immune surveillance and result in a higher incidence of cancer. This possibility is supported by a nested case-control study on patients with rheumatologic conditions including RA, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis currently receiving TNF inhibitors (TNFi) showing a positive association between TNFi and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) 80.

Chronic type II inflammation facilitates tumor recurrences

Type II inflammation is associated with the elevation of M2 macrophages, group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC-2), and CD4+ Th2 cells, which play an essential role in the resolution of type I inflammation leading to tissue regeneration/repair during wound healing. Therefore, cell growth promoting wound healing mechanisms triggered following trauma or major injuries may also promote the reawakening of dormant tumor cells. To this end, ILC-2 cells were found to be associated with tumor relapse in an animal model of bladder cancer 81. Also, Th2 and Tcm (T central-memory) cells have been shown to be associated with the recurrence of prostate cancer 82. In breast cancer, perivascular M2 macrophages were found to induce tumor relapse after the completion of breast cancer chemotherapies 19. The relapse inducing M2 macrophages promote revascularization, in part, via the release of VEGF-A angiogenic factor. While there are several cases suggesting that trauma can directly induce tumor relapse, a study by Allawi et al. 83 suggested otherwise. This is because the patients included in their analysis were not representing an actual model of dormancy. The analysis was performed on 9366 patients with early-stage breast cancer who were receiving cancer therapies including Tamoxifen with anastrozole alone or the combination of anastrozole plus tamoxifen. About 64% of these patients had a primary tumor. In addition, patients who started chemotherapy more than 8 weeks after surgery, or completed their cancer therapies were not included in the trial. In their study, the patients’ trauma may not have induced chronic inflammation, as they were treated with tamoxifen, which has been reported to bear anti-inflammatory properties 84.

In a biological system, type I and II inflammation are present concurrently with one being predominant than another. Therefore, inflammation exhibits multifaceted functions by inducing tumor dormancy and tumor relapse, simultaneously. For instance, ILC-3 and Th17 cells producing both IL-17, which inhibits tumor cell proliferation, and IL-22, which promotes tumor growth and relapse. The outcome would depend on which pathway may become predominant while interacting with other inflammatory cells. Preclinical and clinical studies of premalignant oral lesions have shown increased levels of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, TNF-α and IL-17; but these cytokines subside as premalignant lesions progress to squamous cell carcinoma 85,86. Also, patients with benign salivary gland tumors had higher levels of IL-17 producing Th17 cells compared to those with malignant salivary gland tumors 87. Similar observations were made in melanoma patients exhibiting higher levels of Th17 cells being associated with better survival following vaccination with survivin-derived peptides 88. However, in breast cancer and colorectal cancer, Th17 cells promote tumor progression 89,90. The tumor promoting effect of IL-17 was not due to the function of Th17; it was due to the recruitment of neutrophils that promoted tumor progression 89. These data suggest the relapse inhibitory role of these cytokines during tumor dormancy such that their disappearance facilitates tumor relapse. Th17 cells also produce IL-22 by which they protect the intestinal epithelium from damage and promote its regeneration. It was demonstrated that IL- 22- induced proliferation of epithelial cells enhance the growth of colorectal cancer 91 and lung cancer 92. IL- 22 producing Th17 and ILC-3 cells were identified in human non- IBD cancer samples compare to adjacent healthy tissue 93. In breast cancer, the IL-22-induced MAP3K8 signaling pathway promotes tumor progression 94. Periodontitis is associated with the presence of pathogenic bacteria that initiate inflammation with increased levels of tissue damaging inflammatory cytokines IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-1β as well as the host protective IL-11 producing Th2 cells 95. IL-11 counteract TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-1β and reduces tissue damage 95. Another cytokine, IL-33 promotes TNF-α production by Th1 cells as well as inhibits apoptosis and promotes cell growth and proliferation during wound healing process 79.

The rate of distant recurrence of breast cancer is greater and faster in patients with TNBC than in patients with HER2 positive tumors. Also, patients with hormone receptor positive breast cancer show delayed tumor relapse compared with both TNBC and HER2 positive breast cancer. This is thought to be due to tumor intrinsic factors as well as the tumor stage, while less attention has been paid to the host-driven inflammatory immune responses to cancer therapies that varies for breast cancer types. Unlike TNBC, patients with hormone receptor positive breast cancer receive tamoxifen, and those with HER2 positive tumors receive antibody therapies. Interestingly, the relapse promoting function of the angiogenic factors was ablated by tamoxifen which is an anti-inflammatory compound 84. Preclinical studies demonstrated the anti-inflammatory activity of the tamoxifen derivative, Ridaifen-B (RID-B), by reducing NO, IL-6 and IL-1α 96. IL-6 is involved during type I and type II inflammation associated with tumor recurrence 97. Binding of IL-6 to the membrane IL-6 receptor α (mIL-6 Rα) induces anti-inflammatory classic signaling, whereas its binding to soluble IL-6 receptor α (sIL-6 Rα) induces pro-inflammatory trans-signaling 98. In animal models of spinal cord injury (SCI), tamoxifen was able to reduce the expression of NF-kB p65, thereby inhibiting the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines 84. In general, patients with ER+ breast cancer tend to have lower levels of sIL-6 Rα than those with ER- breast cancer, and patients with higher levels of sIL-6 Rα show increased recurrences 99. sIL-6R is an inflammatory factor facilitating IL-6 trans-signaling in tumor cells and subsequent tumor cell proliferation and relapse 100,101. In fact, a higher rate of recurrences of HER2+ and TNBC compared to ER+ breast cancer is associated with elevated levels of IL-6, facilitating an autocrine feedback loop through IL-6-activated STAT3 102,103. It is well-known that obesity is associated with a 35% to 40% increased risk of breast cancer recurrence due to chronic inflammation 104. Interestingly, obesity tend to increase M2-biased macrophages 105 that are involved in wound healing and cell proliferation.

Conclusions

Chronic inflammation contains type I and II inflammatory cells and cytokines/chemokines exhibiting multifaceted functions by orchestrating tumor cell apoptosis, tumor dormancy and relapse. As shown in Table 1, a predominant type I inflammation such as Th1 cells, M1 macrophages and ILC-1 cells as well as their cytokines TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-17 or sIL-6 Rα often promotes tumor dormancy. Therefore, the inhibition of anti-tumor inflammatory T cells could result in the rescue of dormant cells from immune surveillance and subsequent tumor relapse. On the other hand, a predominant type II inflammation including Th2 cells, M2 macrophages and ILC-2 cells as well as their cytokines IL-11, IL-22, IL-33 or mIL-6 Rα facilitates the reawakening of dormant cells leading to tumor relapse. To this end, the wound healing process following a traumatic event or surgery might trigger the reawakening of dormant tumor cells through the release of cell proliferation-inducing cytokines and growth factors. Finally, cells or cytokines that are involved in both type I and II inflammation tend to promote tumor relapse when their anti-inflammatory function becomes predominant over their pro-inflammatory function. For instance, a higher expression of mIL-6 Rα than sIL-6 Rα inhibits apoptosis and promotes anti-inflammatory function of IL-6 on tumor cells. Therefore, modulation of inflammation is expected to be more effective than the use of anti-inflammatory compounds for the prevention of tumor relapse.

Table 1.

The role of chronic inflammation in tumor dormancy and relapse

Inflammation Cytokines Cells Outcome
Type I TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-17, IL-6/sIL-6 Rα Th1, M1, ILC-1 Tumor dormancy
Type II IL-11, IL-22, IL-33, IL-6/mIL-6 Rα Th2, M2, ILC-2 Tumor relapse
Type I/II mIL-6 Rα > sIL-6 Rα Th17, ILC-3 Tumor relapse

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by pilot funding from the VCU Massey Cancer Center (M.H.M.) and supported in part by National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA016059.

Funding Source

All sources of funding should also be acknowledged and you should declare any involvement of study sponsors in the study design; collection, analysis and interpretation of data; the writing of the manuscript; the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. If the study sponsors had no such involvement, this should be stated.

Conflict of Interest

A conflicting interest exists when professional judgment concerning a primary interest (such as patient’s welfare or the validity of research) may be influenced by a secondary interest (such as financial gain or personal rivalry). It may arise for the authors when they have financial interest that may influence their interpretation of their results or those of others. Examples of potential conflicts of interest include employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or other funding.

Footnotes

competing interests

Authors have no conflict of interest to declare

Declarations

Seminars in Cancer Biology requires that all authors sign a declaration of conflicting interests. If you have nothing to declare in any of these categories then this should be stated.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Manjili MH The premise of personalized immunotherapy for cancer dormancy. Oncogene (2020). doi: 10.1038/s41388-020-1295-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Aqbi HF et al. Local and distant tumor dormancy during early stage breast cancer are associated with the predominance of infiltrating T effector subsets. Breast Cancer Res. 22, 116 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tonnessen-Murray CA et al. Chemotherapy-induced senescent cancer cells engulf other cells to enhance their survival. J. Cell Biol. 218, 3827–3844 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Francescangeli F et al. A pre-existing population of ZEB2+ quiescent cells with stemness and mesenchymal features dictate chemoresistance in colorectal cancer. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 39, 2 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Manjili MH Tumor Dormancy and Relapse: From a Natural Byproduct of Evolution to a Disease State. Cancer Res. 77, 2564–2569 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Aqbi HF et al. Autophagy-deficient breast cancer shows early tumor recurrence and escape from dormancy. Oncotarget 9, 22113–22122 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Payne KK et al. Tumor-reactive immune cells protect against metastatic tumor and induce immunoediting of indolent but not quiescent tumor cells. J. Leukoc. Biol. 100, (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Datta J et al. Progressive loss of anti-HER2 CD4+ T-helper type 1 response in breast tumorigenesis and the potential for immune restoration. Oncoimmunology 4, e1022301 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fracol M et al. Loss of Anti-HER-3 CD4+ T-Helper Type 1 Immunity Occurs in Breast Tumorigenesis and is Negatively Associated with Outcomes. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 24, 407–417 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Manjili MHH A Theoretical Basis for the Efficacy of Cancer Immunotherapy and Immunogenic Tumor Dormancy: The Adaptation Model of Immunity. Adv. Cancer Res. 137, 17–36 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Meng S et al. Circulating tumor cells in patients with breast cancer dormancy. Clin. Cancer Res. 10, 8152–8162 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Xu W et al. Isolation of circulating tumor cells in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma using a novel cell separation strategy. Clin. cancer Res. an Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res 17, 3783–3793 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Li S et al. Model of tumor dormancy/recurrence after short-term chemotherapy. PLoS One 9, e98021 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.van Maaren MC et al. Ten-year recurrence rates for breast cancer subtypes in the Netherlands: A large population-based study. Int. J. Cancer 144, 263–272 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Loh C-Y et al. Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (STATs) Proteins in Cancer and Inflammation: Functions and Therapeutic Implication. Front. Oncol. 9, 48 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Olén O et al. Colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis: a Scandinavian population-based cohort study. Lancet (London, England) 395, 123–131 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Folkman J Role of angiogenesis in tumor growth and metastasis. Semin. Oncol. 29, 15–18 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Okubo M et al. M2-polarized macrophages contribute to neovasculogenesis, leading to relapse of oral cancer following radiation. Sci. Rep. 6, 27548 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hughes R et al. Perivascular M2 Macrophages Stimulate Tumor Relapse after Chemotherapy. Cancer Res. 75, 3479–3491 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bowers LW et al. NSAID use reduces breast cancer recurrence in overweight and obese women: role of prostaglandin-aromatase interactions. Cancer Res. 74, 4446–4457 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.El Saghir NS, Elhajj II, Geara FB & Hourani MH Trauma-associated growth of suspected dormant micrometastasis. BMC Cancer 5, 94 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fishbein A et al. Resolution of eicosanoid/cytokine storm prevents carcinogen and inflammation-initiated hepatocellular cancer progression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 117, 21576–21587 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Perry BJ et al. Sites of origin of oral cavity cancer in nonsmokers vs smokers: possible evidence of dental trauma carcinogenesis and its importance compared with human papillomavirus. JAMA Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 141, 5–11 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lockhart PB, Norris CMJ & Pulliam C Dental factors in the genesis of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Oral Oncol. 34, 133–139 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Piemonte ED, Lazos JP & Brunotto M Relationship between chronic trauma of the oral mucosa, oral potentially malignant disorders and oral cancer. J. oral Pathol. Med. Off. Publ. Int. Assoc. Oral Pathol. Am. Acad. Oral Pathol. 39, 513–517 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rotundo LDB et al. Are recurrent denture-related sores associated with the risk of oral cancer? A case control study. Rev. Bras. Epidemiol 16, 705–715 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bundgaard T, Wildt J, Frydenberg M, Elbrønd O & Nielsen JE Case-control study of squamous cell cancer of the oral cavity in Denmark. Cancer Causes Control 6, 57–67 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Schildt EB, Eriksson M, Hardell L & Magnuson A Oral infections and dental factors in relation to oral cancer: a Swedish case--control study. Eur. J. cancer Prev. Off. J. Eur. Cancer Prev. Organ. 7, 201–206 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Talamini R et al. Oral hygiene, dentition, sexual habits and risk of oral cancer. Br. J. Cancer 83, 1238–1242 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sato T [A study on effect of mechanical irritation in development and progression of tongue cancer]. Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi. 62, 532–550 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zomorodian K et al. Assessment of Candida species colonization and denture-related stomatitis in complete denture wearers. Med. Mycol. 49, 208–211 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nishimura Y et al. [Human papillomavirus infection in the oral cavity of denture wearers]. Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi 48, 713–722 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gholizadeh P et al. Role of oral microbiome on oral cancers, a review. Biomed. Pharmacother. 84, 552–558 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mager DL et al. The salivary microbiota as a diagnostic indicator of oral cancer: a descriptive, non-randomized study of cancer-free and oral squamous cell carcinoma subjects. J. Transl. Med. 3, 27 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Nagy KN, Sonkodi I, Szöke I, Nagy E & Newman HN The microflora associated with human oral carcinomas. Oral Oncol. 34, 304–308 (1998). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Michaud DS, Fu Z, Shi J & Chung M Periodontal Disease, Tooth Loss, and Cancer Risk. Epidemiol. Rev. 39, 49–58 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mai X et al. Periodontal disease severity and cancer risk in postmenopausal women: the Buffalo OsteoPerio Study. Cancer Causes Control 27, 217–228 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Michaud DS, Liu Y, Meyer M, Giovannucci E & Joshipura K Periodontal disease, tooth loss, and cancer risk in male health professionals: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. Oncol. 9, 550–558 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Arora M, Weuve J, Fall K, Pedersen NL & Mucci LA An exploration of shared genetic risk factors between periodontal disease and cancers: a prospective co-twin study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 171, 253–259 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mantovani A et al. Cutaneous squamous carcinoma in a patient with diabetic foot: an unusual evolution of a frequent complication. Endocrinol. diabetes Metab. case reports 2018, (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ashraf M & Biswas J Chronic ringworm infestation and Marjolin’s ulcer, an association unknown in the literature. Rare tumors 2, e31 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Dörr S, Lucke-Paulig L, Vollmer C & Lobmann R Malignant Transformation in Diabetic Foot Ulcers-Case Reports and Review of the Literature. Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) 4, (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Vandanmagsar B et al. The NLRP3 inflammasome instigates obesity-induced inflammation and insulin resistance. Nat. Med. 17, 179–188 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Tilg H, Zmora N, Adolph TE & Elinav E The intestinal microbiota fuelling metabolic inflammation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 20, 40–54 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Mirshahi F et al. Longitudinal studies can identify distinct inflammatory cytokines associated with the inhibition or progression of liver cancer. Liver Int. 40, 468–472 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Asgharpour A et al. A diet-induced animal model of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and hepatocellular cancer. J. Hepatol. 65, 579–588 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zimta A-A et al. Molecular Links between Central Obesity and Breast Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bhatt AP, Redinbo MR & Bultman SJ The role of the microbiome in cancer development and therapy. CA. Cancer J. Clin. 67, 326–344 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sellon RK et al. Resident enteric bacteria are necessary for development of spontaneous colitis and immune system activation in interleukin-10-deficient mice. Infect. Immun. 66, 5224–5231 (1998). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Gaines S et al. Western Diet Promotes Intestinal Colonization by Collagenolytic Microbes and Promotes Tumor Formation After Colorectal Surgery. Gastroenterology 158, 958–970.e2 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Vigneswaran J & Shogan BD The Role of the Intestinal Microbiome on Colorectal Cancer Pathogenesis and its Recurrence Following Surgery. J. Gastrointest. Surg. Off. J. Soc. Surg. Aliment. Tract 24, 2349–2356 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wunderlich CM et al. Obesity exacerbates colitis-associated cancer via IL-6-regulated macrophage polarisation and CCL-20/CCR-6-mediated lymphocyte recruitment. Nat. Commun. 9, 1646 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Vaysse C et al. Inflammation of mammary adipose tissue occurs in overweight and obese patients exhibiting early-stage breast cancer. NPJ breast cancer 3, 19 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Chiba A et al. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Shifts Breast Tumor Microbiota Populations to Regulate Drug Responsiveness and the Development of Metastasis. Mol. Cancer Res. 18, 130–139 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Baxevanis CN T-cell recognition of non-mutated tumor antigens in healthy individuals: connecting endogenous immunity and tumor dormancy. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 68, 705–707 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kaiser GC & Polk DB Tumor necrosis factor alpha regulates proliferation in a mouse intestinal cell line. Gastroenterology 112, 1231–1240 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Mizoguchi E et al. Role of tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 (TNFR2) in colonic epithelial hyperplasia and chronic intestinal inflammation in mice. Gastroenterology 122, 134–144 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Yan F, John SK & Polk DB Kinase suppressor of Ras determines survival of intestinal epithelial cells exposed to tumor necrosis factor. Cancer Res. 61, 8668–8675 (2001). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Manjili MH The adaptation model of immunity. Immunotherapy 6, 59–70 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Shinagawa S et al. T cells upon activation promote endothelin 1 production in monocytes via IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha. Sci. Rep. 7, 14500–14505 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Nelson JB et al. Endothelin-1 production and decreased endothelin B receptor expression in advanced prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 56, 663–668 (1996). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Nelson J, Bagnato A, Battistini B & Nisen P The endothelin axis: emerging role in cancer. Nat. Rev. 3, 110–116 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Aqbi HF, Wallace M, Sappal S, Payne KK & Manjili MH IFN-γ orchestrates tumor elimination, tumor dormancy, tumor escape, and progression. J. Leukoc. Biol. 103, (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Liu Y et al. Blockade of IDO-kynurenine-AhR metabolic circuitry abrogates IFN-gamma-induced immunologic dormancy of tumor-repopulating cells. Nat. Commun. 8, 15207 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Kano A, Watanabe Y, Takeda N, Aizawa S & Akaike T Analysis of IFN-gamma-induced cell cycle arrest and cell death in hepatocytes. J. Biochem. 121, 677–683 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Eyles J et al. Tumor cells disseminate early, but immunosurveillance limits metastatic outgrowth, in a mouse model of melanoma. J. Clin. Invest. 120, 2030–2039 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Romero I et al. T lymphocytes restrain spontaneous metastases in permanent dormancy. Cancer Res. 74, 1958–1968 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Farrar JD et al. Cancer dormancy. VII. A regulatory role for CD8+ T cells and IFN-gamma in establishing and maintaining the tumor-dormant state. J. Immunol. (Baltimore, Md. 1950) 162, 2842–2849 (1999). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Yang M, Ma B, Shao H, Clark AM & Wells A Macrophage phenotypic subtypes diametrically regulate epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity in breast cancer cells. BMC Cancer 16, 419 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Braumuller H et al. T-helper-1-cell cytokines drive cancer into senescence. Nature 494, 361–365 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Triana-Martinez F, Loza MI & Dominguez E Beyond Tumor Suppression: Senescence in Cancer Stemness and Tumor Dormancy. Cells 9, (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Muller-Hermelink N et al. TNFR1 signaling and IFN-gamma signaling determine whether T cells induce tumor dormancy or promote multistage carcinogenesis. Cancer Cell 13, 507–518 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Lan Q et al. Type I interferon/IRF7 axis instigates chemotherapy-induced immunological dormancy in breast cancer. Oncogene 38, 2814–2829 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.McFarlane IM et al. Prevalence of Malignancy Among Urban Black Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients. Int. J. Clin. Res. trials 5, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Khurana R et al. Risk of development of lung cancer is increased in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a large case control study in US veterans. J. Rheumatol. 35, 1704–1708 (2008). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Bhandari B, Basyal B, Sarao MS, Nookala V & Thein Y Prevalence of Cancer in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Epidemiological Study Based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Cureus 12, e7870 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Itzkowitz SH & Harpaz N Diagnosis and management of dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology 126, 1634–1648 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Jung YS, Han M, Park S, Kim WH & Cheon JH Cancer Risk in the Early Stages of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Korean Patients: A Nationwide Population-based Study. J. Crohns. Colitis 11, 954–962 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Wu S et al. Interleukin-33 promotes proliferation and inhibits apoptosis of fibroblast-like synoviocytes in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. (2020). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Calip GS et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in a cohort of adults with rheumatologic conditions. Int. J. cancer 143, 1062–1071 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Chevalier MF et al. ILC2-modulated T cell-to-MDSC balance is associated with bladder cancer recurrence. J. Clin. Invest. 127, 2916–2929 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Rui X, Shao S, Wang L & Leng J Identification of recurrence marker associated with immune infiltration in prostate cancer with radical resection and build prognostic nomogram. BMC Cancer 19, 1179 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Allawi Z, Cuzick J & Baum M Does trauma or an intercurrent surgical intervention lead to a short-term increase in breast cancer recurrence rates? Ann. Oncol. Off. J. Eur. Soc. Med. Oncol. 23, 866–869 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Wei H-Y & Ma X Tamoxifen reduces infiltration of inflammatory cells, apoptosis and inhibits IKK/NF-kB pathway after spinal cord injury in rats. Neurol. Sci. Off. J. Ital. Neurol. Soc. Ital. Soc. Clin. Neurophysiol. 35, 1763–1768 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Woodford D, Johnson SD, De Costa A-MA & Young MRI An Inflammatory Cytokine Milieu is Prominent in Premalignant Oral Lesions, but Subsides when Lesions Progress to Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J. Clin. Cell. Immunol. 5, (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Young MRI, Levingston CA & Johnson SD Treatment to sustain a Th17-type phenotype to prevent skewing toward Treg and to limit premalignant lesion progression to cancer. Int. J. cancer 138, 2487–2498 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Haghshenas MR, Khademi B, Faghih Z, Ghaderi A & Erfani N Immune regulatory cells and IL17-producing lymphocytes in patients with benign and malignant salivary gland tumors. Immunol. Lett. 164, 109–116 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Køllgaard T et al. Pre-Vaccination Frequencies of Th17 Cells Correlate with Vaccine-Induced T-Cell Responses to Survivin-Derived Peptide Epitopes. PLoS One 10, e0131934 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Benevides L et al. IL17 Promotes Mammary Tumor Progression by Changing the Behavior of Tumor Cells and Eliciting Tumorigenic Neutrophils Recruitment. Cancer Res. 75, 3788–3799 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Yoshida N et al. A High RORγT/CD3 Ratio is a Strong Prognostic Factor for Postoperative Survival in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: Analysis of Helper T Cell Lymphocytes (Th1, Th2, Th17 and Regulatory T Cells). Ann. Surg. Oncol. 23, 919–927 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Jiang R et al. IL-22 is related to development of human colon cancer by activation of STAT3. BMC Cancer 13, 59 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Kobold S et al. Interleukin-22 is frequently expressed in small- and large-cell lung cancer and promotes growth in chemotherapy-resistant cancer cells. J. Thorac. Oncol. Off. Publ. Int. Assoc. Study Lung Cancer 8, 1032–1042 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Kirchberger S et al. Innate lymphoid cells sustain colon cancer through production of interleukin-22 in a mouse model. J. Exp. Med. 210, 917–931 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Kim K et al. Interleukin-22 promotes epithelial cell transformation and breast tumorigenesis via MAP3K8 activation. Carcinogenesis 35, 1352–1361 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Johnson RB, Wood N & Serio FG Interleukin-11 and IL-17 and the pathogenesis of periodontal disease. J. Periodontol. 75, 37–43 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Franks LN, Ford BM, Fujiwara T, Zhao H & Prather PL The tamoxifen derivative ridaifen-B is a high affinity selective CB(2) receptor inverse agonist exhibiting anti-inflammatory and anti-osteoclastogenic effects. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 353, 31–42 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Zhang M et al. Association between the expression levels of IL-6 and IL-6R in the hepatocellular carcinoma microenvironment and postoperative recurrence. Oncol. Lett. 16, 7158–7165 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Reeh H et al. Response to IL-6 trans- and IL-6 classic signaling is determined by the ratio of the IL-6 receptor α to gp130 expression: fusing experimental insights and dynamic modelling. Cell Commun. Signal. 17, 46 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Won HS et al. Soluble interleukin-6 receptor is a prognostic marker for relapse-free survival in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Cancer Invest. 31, 516–521 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Kumari N, Dwarakanath BS, Das A & Bhatt AN Role of interleukin-6 in cancer progression and therapeutic resistance. Tumour Biol. J. Int. Soc. Oncodevelopmental Biol. Med. 37, 11553–11572 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Cheteh EH et al. Interleukin-6 derived from cancer-associated fibroblasts attenuates the p53 response to doxorubicin in prostate cancer cells. Cell death Discov. 6, 42 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Hartman ZC et al. Growth of triple-negative breast cancer cells relies upon coordinate autocrine expression of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IL-8. Cancer Res. 73, 3470–3480 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Hartman ZC et al. HER2 overexpression elicits a proinflammatory IL-6 autocrine signaling loop that is critical for tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 71, 4380–4391 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Jiralerspong S & Goodwin PJ Obesity and Breast Cancer Prognosis: Evidence, Challenges, and Opportunities. J. Clin. Oncol. Off. J. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 34, 4203–4216 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Springer NL et al. Obesity-Associated Extracellular Matrix Remodeling Promotes a Macrophage Phenotype Similar to Tumor-Associated Macrophages. Am. J. Pathol. 189, 2019–2035 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES