Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2021 Aug 28;13(8):e17528. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17528

Frequency of Neuropathic Sensory Symptoms Among Patients With Uncontrolled Diabetes Mellitus in Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Abdulrahman Alamri Sr 1,, Khalid Alharbi 2, Khaled Hassan 3, Salem Alhakami 3, Mohammed Alosaimi 1, Khalid Rofidi 4, Ibrahim Ahmed 4
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC8476209  PMID: 34603896

Abstract

Background

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a chronic sensorimotor length-dependent and symmetrical polyneuropathy. Some peripheral neuropathies have painful presentations, and some are painless. DPN can have a potential impact on the patient's life.

Objectives

This study was conducted in order to investigate the frequency of neuropathic sensory symptoms among patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional study conducted in the Security Forces hospital using the Neuropathy Total Symptom Score-6 (NTSS-6) questionnaire. The questionnaire was administered by contacting patients through the phone. Patients with uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1C >9) were included in the study.

Results

This study included 285 participants; 58.9% had type II diabetes and 41.1% had type I diabetes, 156 (54.7%) were females, and 129 (45.3%) were males. Most of the patients (51.1%) were 45-64 years old and the majority were non-smokers (77.9%). Patients with neuropathic pain were 182 (63.9%); 79 (43.4%) of them were males and 103 (56.6%) were females. The prevalence of neuropathic symptoms was much higher in females than in males.

Conclusion

The prevalence of painful DPN is high among patients with long-term uncontrolled diabetes mellitus. Older, unemployed, and low-educated patients are at higher risk of developing painful DPN. Proper glycemic control and lifestyle modifications are essential in preventing the progression of this condition.

Keywords: diabetes mellitus, hyperglycemia, diabetes complications, diabetic neuropathies, diabetic peripheral neuropathy (dpn)

Introduction

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the largest worldwide epidemics in developing and developed countries and one of the most important public health challenges [1]. In 2019, the global prevalence of DM is estimated to be 463 million (9.3%) [2]. An increase in DM's prevalence is expected and estimated to be 578 million (10.2%) and 700 million (10.9%) in 2030 and 2045 consecutively [2]. 

Mortality and morbidity of DM complications are the main contributors to the global burden [1]. Increased prevalence of DM is associated with increased diabetic complications which significantly affect patients' quality of life [3]. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is typically defined as a chronic sensorimotor length-dependent and symmetrical polyneuropathy [4]. DPN have several pathways; some of them have painful presentations, and the others are painless [5]. 

Although DPN is estimated to be the most common diabetic complication, it is still frequently underdiagnosed [6]. In addition, there is a lacuna in estimating the accurate prevalence of DPN which results in great variability in the prevalence reports [7]. The variability has been reported to be from 10-90% which could be explained by the diversity of criteria and how neuropathy is defined [8]. 

According to Wang et al., in Saudi Arabia, the prevalence of DPN was found to be 19.9% [9]. Algeffari reported that 35% of patients with type 2 DM were suffering from painful DPN, poor treatment compliance; additionally, high hemoglobin levels were found to be associated with painful DPN [10]. DPN has a great impact on patients' lives, affecting the psychological and social well-being of the patients, indicating the necessity of a thorough patient assessment [11]. In 2005, Bastyr et al. developed the Neuropathy Total Symptom Score-6 (NTSS-6) questionnaire that provided a valid and reliable evaluation of neuropathic symptoms among patients with DM and DPN [12]. The present study aims to explore the frequency of neuropathic sensory symptoms among patients with uncontrolled DM.

Materials and methods

Study design

This is a cross-sectional study that was conducted in Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia from December 2019 to February 2020. 

The questionnaire

The questionnaire was in Arabic which initiated with demographic data including age, gender, marital status, smoking status, duration and type of diabetes, and so forth. The Neuropathy Total Symptom Score-6 (NTSS-6) was used to estimate the frequency of neuropathic symptoms. It has six close-ended questions to assess aching pain, allodynia, burning pain, lancinating pain, numbness, and prickling sensation that can be answered by never or occasional, occasional but abnormal, often or almost continuous.

Data gathering

We enrolled all patients with uncontrolled DM (HbA1c > 9) who visited the diabetes clinic at Security Forces Hospital over the study period by registering their telephone numbers. Also, we excluded all patients who had known to have psychiatric illness and were thus incapable of answering questions Then, telephone interviews were held by a physician from the Family Medicine Department. 

Data analysis

The data were entered into Microsoft Excel and analyzed through Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) (version 25). Categorical variables including age, gender, type of DM, educational level, etc., were summarized and reported in terms of frequency distribution. A chi-square and fishers' exact tests were used to test the significance of cross-tabulation for neuropathic pain. P-value of <.05 was considered significant.

Statement of ethics

Verbal informed consent was obtained from participants prior to the study, after having a brief explanation about the aims of the study and the contents of this telephone interview. The identity of the patients as well as the raw data, which included personal information, were kept confidential. This consent procedure was reviewed and approved by Al-Imam University Institutional Review Board (IRB), approval number 81-2019.  

Results

A total of 285 participants were included in this current study; 58.9% had type II diabetes and 41.1% had type I diabetes, and 71.9% of patients were on insulin injection treatment. Around 156 (54.7%) of the participants were females, while 129 (45.3%) were males. Most of the patients (51.1%) were 45-64 years old, 77.9% were not smokers, and the majority (79.3%) had a low level of education. Around half the participants (43.9%) were unemployed, 9.8% were housewives and 8.4% were students. Additionally, 182 (63.9%) of patients had neuropathic pain and the remaining 103 (36.1%) had no pain at all.

Among patients experiencing neuropathic pain, 79 (43.4%) were males and 103 (56.6%) were females, most of them (56.0%) were between the ages of 45-64 years followed by those aged 65-96 years (23.6%), (P<.05). The majority (86.3%) of participants with neuropathic pain had secondary or lower education and 46.7% were unemployed, (P<.001). Of the participants with neuropathic pain, 33.5% were type 1. Of the diabetes mellitus patients, 66.5% were type 2 (P<.001) (shown in Table 1).

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the study population (n = 285).

All variables were tested to Fisher's exact test.

parameter All patients Participants having neuropathic pain(%) Participants not having neuropathic pain(%) p-value
Age 0-17 20(7.0%) 10(5.5%) 10(9.7%) .002
18-44 60(21.1%) 27(14.8%) 33(32.0%)
45-64 146(51.2%) 102(56.0%) 44(42.7%)
65-96 59(20.7%) 43(23.6%) 16(15.5%)
Gender Male 129(45.3%) 79(43.4%) 50(48.5%) .403
Female 156(54.7%) 103(56.6%) 53(51.5%)
Marital status Married 192(67.4%) 134(73.6%) 58(56.3%) .000
Divorced 5(1.8%) 1(0.5%) 4(3.9%)
Widower 41(14.4%) 30(16.5%) 11(10.7%)
Single 47(16.5%) 17(9.3%) 30(29.1%)
Educational status Secondary education or lower 226(79.3%) 157(86.3%) 69(67.0%) .000
Diploma 15(5.3%) 5(2.7%) 10(9.7%)
Bachelor 44(15.4%) 20(11.0%) 24(23.3%)
Occupation Unemployed 125(43.9%) 85(46.7%) 40(38.8%) .000
Housewife 28(9.8%) 22(12.1%) 6(5.8%)
Retired 27(9.5%) 21(11.5%) 6(5.8%)
Student 24(8.4%) 6(3.3%) 18(17.5%)
Civil servant 26(9.1%) 21(11.5%) 5(4.9%)
Private-sector employee 9(3.2%) 6(3.3%) 3(2.9%)
Military personnel 46(16.1%) 21(11.5%) 25(24.3%)
Smoking status Not a smoker 222(77.9%) 143(78.6%) 79(76.7%) .635
Former smoker 28(9.8%) 19(10.4%) 9(8.7%)
Currently smoking 35(12.3%) 20(11.0%) 15(14.6%)
Doing regular exercise No 165(57.9%) 110(60.4%) 55(53.4%) .247
Yes 120(42.1%) 72(39.6%) 48(46.6%)
Type of DM Diabetes mellitus type 1 117(41.1%) 61(33.5%) 56(54.4%) .001
Diabetes mellitus type 2 168(58.9%) 121(66.5%) 47(45.6%)
Duration of having diabetes mellitus Less than one year 10(3.5%) 3(1.6%) 7(6.8%) .019
6-10 years 41(14.4%) 22(12.1%) 19(18.4%)
More than 10 years 234 (82.1%) 41(86.3%) 77(74.8%)
Mode of current treatment Oral medications 80 (28.1%) 58(31.9%) 22(21.4%) .058
Insulin injections 205 (71.9%) 124(68.1%) 81(78.6%)
All participants 285 (100%) 182(63.9%) 103(36.1%)

The majority of patients never experience neuropathic pain, while 40.3% of patients experience occasional prickling or tingling feelings (shown in Table 2).

Table 2. Prevalence of different neuropathic symptoms and their frequencies among patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus.

Parameters Never or occasional number (%) Occasional but abnormal number (%) Often number (%) Almost continuous number (%)
Do you experience a deep, aching, tightness, boring, pulling, or squeezing pain in your feet or legs? 82(45.3%) 37(20.4%) 24(13.3%) 38(21%)
Do you experience unusual sensitivity or tenderness when your feet are touched or are used in activities such as walking? 88(48.4%) 37(20.3%) 15(8.2%) 42(23.1%)
Do you experience burning pain in your feet or legs? 88(48.4%) 38(20.9%) 27(14.8%) 29(15.9%)
Do you experience sharp, stabbing, or shooting pain, electrical shock-like pain, or surges of pain that last seconds to minutes in your feet or legs? 107(58.8%) 36(19.8%) 24(13.2%) 15(8.2%)
Do you experience numbness, lost sensation, or a 'dead feeling' like an anesthetic, without prickling in your feet or legs? 91(50%) 46(25.3%) 24(13.2%) 21(11.5%)
Do you experience a prickling or tingling feeling, with or without an 'asleep' feeling, in your feet or legs? 35(19.3%) 73(40.3%) 35(19.3%) 38(21%)

Table 3 shows the prevalence of different types of neuropathic symptoms with a comparison between type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) patients. Around 18% of type 1 DM patients experienced continuous deep, aching, squeezing pain in comparison to 22.5% of type 2 DM patients. Around 19.7% of type 1 DM experienced continuous abnormal sensations or tenderness during activities such as walking, whereas the prevalence of continuous pattern of this type of pain among type 2 DM is 24.8%. In addition, 11.5% of type 1 DM patients experienced continuous burning pain in their feet or legs compared to 18.2% of type 2 DM patients. Around 8.2 % of type 1 DM experienced continuous sharp, stabbing, electrical shock-like pain with nearly the same prevalence in type 2 DM patients (8.3%). Regarding continuous numbness and lost sensation, the prevalence was nearly the same in type 1 and type 2 DM patients (11.2% and 11.3%, respectively). Additionally, 18% of type 1 DM patients suffer from continuous prickling or tingling feeling in comparison with 22.5% of type 2 DM patients.

Table 3. Frequencies and percentages of different neuropathic symptoms across type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

All variables were tested to fisher's exact test

Parameter   Type1 (n=61) Type2 (n=121) p
Do you experience a deep, aching, tightness, boring, pulling, or squeezing pain in your feet or legs? Never or occasional 29 47.5% 53 44.2% .914
Occasional but abnormal 13 21.3% 24 20.0%
Often 8 13.1% 16 13.3%
Almost continuous 11 18.0% 27 22.5%
Do you experience unusual sensitivity or tenderness when your feet are touched or are used in activities such as walking? Never or occasional 31 50.8% 57 47.1% .830
Occasional but abnormal 12 19.7% 25 20.7%
Often 6 9.8% 9 7.4%
Almost continuous 12 19.7% 30 24.8%
Do you experience burning pain in your feet or legs? Never or occasional 33 54.1% 55 45.5% .517
Occasional but abnormal 11 18.0% 27 22.3%
Often 10 16.4% 17 14.0%
Almost continuous 7 11.5% 22 18.2%
Do you experience sharp, stabbing, or shooting pain, electrical shock-like pain, or surges of pain that last seconds to minutes in your feet or legs? Never or occasional 38 62.3% 69 57.0% .808
Occasional but abnormal 12 19.7% 24 19.8%
Often 6 9.8% 18 14.9%
Almost continuous 5 8.2% 10 8.3%
Do you experience numbness, lost sensation, or a 'dead feeling' like an anesthetic, without prickling in your feet or legs? Never or occasional 26 42.6% 65 53.7% .500
Occasional but abnormal 18 29.5% 28 23.1%
Often 10 16.4% 14 11.6%
Almost continuous 7 11.5% 14 11.6%
Do you experience a prickling or tingling feeling, with or without an 'asleep' feeling, in your feet or legs? Never or occasional 10 16.4% 25 20.8% .380
Occasional but abnormal 24 39.3% 49 40.8%
Often 16 26.2% 19 15.8%
Almost continuous 11 18.0% 27 22.5%

Table 4 demonstrates the prevalence of different types of neuropathic pain symptoms among males and females. Around 1.3% of males experience continuous deep, aching, squeezing pain, whereas 22.5% of females experience this type of neuropathic pain. Regarding the continuous feeling of unusual sensation or tenderness on touching the feet or during activities such as walking, the prevalence was high in females (40.8%) but absent in our male patients. Around 2.5% of males experience continuous burning pain in their feet or legs compared to 26.2% of female patients. None of the male participants experience continuous sharp, stabbing, electrical shock-like pain, whereas 14.6% of females do. Regarding continuous numbness and lost sensation, the prevalence was low in males (1.3%) and high in females (19.4%). In addition, 8.9% of males experience continuous prickling or tingling feelings in comparison to 30.4% of females. The prevalence of neuropathic symptoms was much higher in females than in males. The difference between the prevalence of all these symptoms in the males and females was statistically significant (P<.001).

Table 4. Frequencies and percentages of different neuropathic symptoms across both genders.

All variables were tested to chi-square test

Parameter   Males (n=79) Female (n=103) p
Do you experience a deep, aching, tightness, boring, pulling, or squeezing pain in your feet or legs? Never or occasional   57 72.2% 25 24.5% .000
Occasional but abnormal   14 17.7% 23 22.5%
Often   7 8.9% 17 16.7%
Almost continuous   1 1.3% 37 36.3%
Do you experience unusual sensitivity or tenderness when your feet are touched or are used in activities such as walking? Never or occasional   63 79.7% 25 24.3% .000
Occasional but abnormal   13 16.5% 24 23.3%
Often   3 3.8% 12 11.7%
Almost continuous   0 0.0% 42 40.8%
Do you experience burning pain in your feet or legs? Never or occasional   56 70.9% 32 31.1% .000
Occasional but abnormal   12 15.2% 26 25.2%
Often   9 11.4% 18 17.5%
Almost continuous   2 2.5% 27 26.2%
Do you experience sharp, stabbing, or shooting pain, electrical shock-like pain, or surges of pain that last seconds to minutes in your feet or legs? Never or occasional   62 78.5% 45 43.7% .000
Occasional but abnormal   10 12.7% 26 25.2%
Often   7 8.9% 17 16.5%
Almost continuous   0 0.0% 15 14.6%
Do you experience numbness, lost sensation, or a 'dead feeling' like an anesthetic, without prickling in your feet or legs? Never or occasional   53 67.1% 38 36.9% .000
Occasional but abnormal   15 19.0% 31 30.1%
Often   10 12.7% 14 13.6%
Almost continuous   1 1.3% 20 19.4%
Do you experience a prickling or tingling feeling, with or without an 'asleep' feeling, in your feet or legs? Never or occasional   12 15.2% 23 22.5% .001
Occasional but abnormal   39 49.4% 34 33.3%
Often   21 26.6% 14 13.7%
Almost continuous   7 8.9% 31 30.4%

Table 5 illustrates the prevalence of different types of neuropathic pain symptoms across various smokers and non-smokers. Around 26.1% of non-smokers experienced continuous deep, aching, squeezing pain; 5.3% of former smokers experienced this type of neuropathic pain, whereas none of the current smokers report such pain. Regarding continuous unusual sensation or tenderness on touching the feet or during activities such as walking, the prevalence was 29.4% among non-smokers, whereas these symptoms were absent in former and current smokers. Additionally, 19.6% of non-smokers experienced continuous burning pain in their feet or legs compared to 5.3% of the former smokers, while current smokers experienced none. None of the former and current smokers experienced continuous sharp, stabbing, electrical shock-like pain, whereas 10.5% of the non-smokers reported doing so. In a similar manner, none of the former and current smokers experienced continuous numbness and lost sensation, whereas 14.7% of the non-smokers did. Finally, 24.6% of the non-smokers experienced continuous prickling or tingling feelings compared to 5.3% of the former smokers and 10% of the current smokers. The difference between the prevalence of all these symptoms, except continuous prickling or tingling feeling, in the non-smokers, former smokers, and current smokers was statistically significant (P<.001).

Table 5. Frequencies and percentages of different neuropathic symptoms according to smoking status.

All variables were tested to chi-square test.

Parameter   Not a smoker (n=143) Former smoker (n=19) Current smoker (n=20)
Do you experience a deep, aching, tightness, boring, pulling, or squeezing pain in your feet or legs? Never or occasional 57 40.1% 13 68.4% 12 60.0%
Occasional but abnormal 28 19.7% 3 15.8% 6 30.0%
Often 20 14.1% 2 10.5% 2 10.0%
Almost continuous 37 26.1% 1 5.3% 0 0.0%
Do you experience unusual sensitivity or tenderness when your feet are touched or are used in activities such as walking? Never or occasional 56 39.2% 16 84.2% 16 80.0%
Occasional but abnormal 31 21.7% 3 15.8% 3 15.0%
Often 14 9.8% 0 0.0% 1 5.0%
Almost continuous 42 29.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Do you experience burning pain in your feet or legs? Never or occasional 61 42.7% 15 78.9% 12 60.0%
Occasional but abnormal 32 22.4% 2 10.5% 4 20.0%
Often 22 15.4% 1 5.3% 4 20.0%
Almost continuous 28 19.6% 1 5.3% 0 0.0%
Do you experience sharp, stabbing, or shooting pain, electrical shock-like pain, or surges of pain that last seconds to minutes in your feet or legs? Never or occasional 75 52.4% 13 68.4% 19 95.0%
Occasional but abnormal 33 23.1% 3 15.8% 0 0.0%
Often 20 14.0% 3 15.8% 1 5.0%
Almost continuous 15 10.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Do you experience numbness, lost sensation, or a 'dead feeling' like an anesthetic, without prickling in your feet or legs? Never or occasional 62 43.4% 17 89.5% 12 60.0%
Occasional but abnormal 42 29.4% 1 5.3% 3 15.0%
Often 18 12.6% 1 5.3% 5 25.0%
Almost continuous 21 14.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Do you experience a prickling or tingling feeling, with or without an 'asleep' feeling, in your feet or legs? Never or occasional 29 20.4% 4 21.1% 2 10.0%
Occasional but abnormal 53 37.3% 9 47.4% 11 55.0%
Often 25 17.6% 5 26.3% 5 25.0%
Almost continuous 35 24.6% 1 5.3% 2 10.0%

Discussion

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic metabolic disorder characterized by impaired glucose tolerance and disturbance of carbohydrate, protein, and fat metabolism, resulting from a lack of insulin or dysregulated insulin signaling [13]. Complications of DM are categorized into two main categories: macrovascular and microvascular complications of DM. Diabetic neuropathy is one of the microvascular complications and is the most common complication of DM and the most common neuropathy, resulting from long-term poor glycemic control [14]. Diabetic neuropathy affects predominantly the peripheries (hands and lower limbs) in a bilateral and symmetrical distribution; however, cranial nerves may be involved [15]. Consequently, the most common presentation is peripheral symmetrical polyneuropathy. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) tends to occur after the age of 50 and mainly in patients with type 2 DM as shown in our cases [16]. As reported by Wang et al., the prevalence of DPN in Saudi Arabia is 19.9% [9].

The symptoms of DPN include numbness, tingling, and pain. The clinical findings of DPN include the following: loss of temperature and sensation for pinprick, loss of vibration, and loss of proprioception. Our study demonstrates the frequency of each symptom of DPN in different groups of patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (HbA1c > 9) who visited the diabetes clinic over the study period. Painful DPN is a distressing symptom to patients suffering from diabetic neuropathy. It has two forms: an acute form that resolves within a year or a chronic form that lasts for years. Studies such as that conducted by Ziegler et al. reported that painful DPN is more prevalent in patients with type 2 diabetes than in patients with type 1, and in females than in males as also seen in our cases [16]. Moreover, it has been shown in our cases that painful DPN is more common in the following groups of patients: (1) patients with secondary or low education; (2) patients with long-term uncontrolled DM; (3) unemployed patients; and (4) patients with aged 50 years or more. In the present study, 64% of patients with DM are suffering from painful DPN, whereas Algeffari reported in their study that the prevalence of painful DPN among diabetic patients was 35% [10]. Therefore, these results indicate a high prevalence of painful DPN among diabetic patients.

Neuropathic pain should be clinically distinguished from non-neuropathic pain. Therefore, careful history, examination, diabetes screening, and evaluation of nerve function are essential. There are different types of neuropathic pain that patients may experience, such as deep-aching, tight, pulling, squeezing, burning, stabbing, shooting, and shock-like pain. Assessing the type and severity of pain is done mainly through specifically developed questionnaires that allow patients to describe their experience by neuropathy sensory symptom scale, the Neuropathy Total Symptom Score-6 (NTSS-6), which evaluates individual neuropathy sensory symptoms in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) such as (ie, numbness and/or insensitivity; prickling and/or tingling sensation; burning sensation; aching pain and/or tightness; sharp, shooting, lancinating pain; and allodynia and/or hyperalgesia). Questions delivered in a standardized and easy way to the patients in order to get precise and accurate answers would be valuable while monitoring the response to therapy. As painful DPN is associated with discomfort, anxiety, and depression, it has an impact on patients' quality of life and resembles a great burden to the healthcare system [17]. In a similar manner to pain assessment, quality-of-life assessment is made through questionnaires and assessing tools such as the Nottingham Health Profile or the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form [18].

There is no specific treatment for DPN. However, proper glycemic control and lifestyle modifications, such as exercise and appropriate diet, are required to prevent or delay the progression of DPN [19]. In addition, therapies such as α-lipoic acid, opioids, botulinum toxin A, Mexidol, or reflexology could be used [20]. In cases with painful DPN, serotonin, noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, and anticonvulsants are used for relieving pain and discomfort [21].

Conclusions

The prevalence of painful DPN is high among diabetic patients and is more common among patients with secondary or low education, patients with long-term uncontrolled DM, unemployed patients, and patients aged 50 years or more. Painful DPN negatively affects patients' quality of life and could represent a great burden to the healthcare system. Proper glycemic control and lifestyle modifications are essential in the prevention of the progression of the disease.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the participants in this study for their patience during the interview. The authors also acknowledge the support of the Security Forces Hospital for facilitating the data collection and the conduction of the telephone interviews

The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Ministry of Education, Al-Imam Muhammad Ibn Saud Islamic University Institutional Review Board (IRB) issued approval 81-2019. Title of the Study: Frequency and Intensity of Neuropathic Sensory Symptoms Among Patients With Uncontrolled Diabetes Mellitus in Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabian Security Forces Hospital, Saudi Arabia. Type of review: Full review Session no 28 The study is exempt Protocol is accepted Date: 24/12/2019

Animal Ethics

Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.

References

  • 1.Diabetes mellitus statistics on prevalence and mortality: facts and fallacies. Zimmet P, Alberti KG, Magliano DJ, Bennett PH. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2016;12:616–622. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2016.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition. Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, et al. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;157:107843. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Utility of DN4 questionnaire in assessment of neuropathic pain and its clinical correlations in Turkish patients with diabetes mellitus. Celik S, Yenidunya G, Temel E, et al. Prim Care Diabetes. 2016;10:259–264. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2015.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.The prevalence by staged severity of various types of diabetic neuropathy, retinopathy, and nephropathy in a population-based cohort: the Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study. Dyck PJ, Kratz KM, Karnes JL, et al. Neurology. 1993;43:817–824. doi: 10.1212/wnl.43.4.817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.A review of the epidemiology of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, and less commonly studied neuropathic pain conditions. Sadosky A, McDermott AM, Brandenburg NA, Strauss M. Pain Pract. 2008;8:45–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2007.00164.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Using screening tools to identify neuropathic pain. Bennett MI, Attal N, Backonja MM, et al. Pain. 2007;127:199–203. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.10.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Diagnosis and management of neuropathic pain. Wong CS, Hui GK, Chung EK, Wong SH. Pain Manag. 2014;4:221–231. doi: 10.2217/pmt.14.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Vinik AI. Controversies in Treating Diabetes. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2008. Diabetic neuropathies; pp. 135–156. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Prevalence and correlates of diabetic peripheral neuropathy in a Saudi Arabic population: a cross-sectional study. Wang DD, Bakhotmah BA, Hu FB, Alzahrani HA. PLoS One. 2014;9:0. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy among Saudi diabetic patients is common but under-recognized: multicenter cross-sectional study at primary health care setting. Algeffari MA. J Family Community Med. 2018;25:43–47. doi: 10.4103/jfcm.JFCM_145_16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Understanding the impact of painful diabetic neuropathy. Quattrini C, Tesfaye S. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2003;19 Suppl 1:0–8. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Development and validity testing of the neuropathy total symptom score-6: questionnaire for the study of sensory symptoms of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Bastyr EJ 3rd, Price KL, Bril V. Clin Ther. 2005;27:1278–1294. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Type 2 diabetes mellitus: new genetic insights will lead to new therapeutics. Wolfs MG, Hofker MH, Wijmenga C, van Haeften TW. Curr Genomics. 2009;10:110–118. doi: 10.2174/138920209787847023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Neuropathy among the diabetes control and complications trial cohort 8 years after trial completion. Martin CL, Albers J, Herman WH, et al. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:340–344. doi: 10.2337/diacare.29.02.06.dc05-1549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Neurologic complications of diabetes mellitus: transient ischemic attack, stroke, and peripheral neuropathy. Palumbo PJ, Elveback LR, Whisnant JP. http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/217254/ Adv Neurol. 1978;19:593–601. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.The epidemiology of diabetic neuropathy. DiaCAN Multicenter Study Group. Ziegler D, Gries FA, Spüler M, Lessmann F. Diabet Med. 1993;10 Suppl 2:82–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1993.tb00208.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Global and societal implications of the diabetes epidemic. Zimmet P, Alberti KG, Shaw J. Nature. 2001;414:782–787. doi: 10.1038/414782a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Health-related quality of life in patients with diabetes mellitus and foot ulcers. Ragnarson Tennvall G, Apelqvist J. J Diabetes Complications. 2000;14:235–241. doi: 10.1016/s1056-8727(00)00133-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.The effect of intensive diabetes therapy on the development and progression of neuropathy. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Ann Intern Med. 1995;122:561–568. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-122-8-199504150-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Systematic review of treatments for diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Çakici N, Fakkel TM, van Neck JW, Verhagen AP, Coert JH. Diabet Med. 2016;33:1466–1476. doi: 10.1111/dme.13083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Anticonvulsant drugs for management of pain: a systematic review. McQuay H, Carroll D, Jadad AR, Wiffen P, Moore A. BMJ. 1995;311:1047–1052. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7012.1047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES