Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2021 Sep 21;38:107408. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.107408

Estimating crop parameters using Sentinel-1 and 2 datasets and geospatial field data

Audrey Mercier a,, Julie Betbeder b,c, Julien Denize a,d, Jean-Luc Roger e, Fabien Spicher f, Jérôme Lacoux f, David Roger f, Jacques Baudry e, Laurence Hubert-Moy a
PMCID: PMC8477130  PMID: 34611541

Abstract

Crop monitoring is essential for ensuring food security in a global context of population growth and climate change. Satellite images are commonly used to estimate crop parameters over large areas, and the freely available Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Sentinel-1 (S-1) and optical Sentinel-2 (S-2) images are relevant for that purpose combining high temporal resolution and high spatial resolution. For this data article, field surveys were conducted from January to July 2017 in France to sample wheat and rapeseed crop parameters during the entire crops cycle. Phenological stages were identified in 83 wheat fields and 32 rapeseed fields in Brittany and Picardy regions. Moreover, Leaf Area Index (LAI), wet biomass, dry biomass and water content were sampled in three wheat fields and three rapeseed fields in Brittany. We assigned to each field sample 10 spectral bands and 12 vegetation indices from S-2 images and two backscattering coefficients, one backscattering ratio and four polarimetric indicators from S-1 images. This dataset can be used for crop monitoring in other regions, as well as for modelling development.

Keywords: LAI, Biomass, Phenological stages, Water content, Remote sensing, Optical and SAR satellite images, Wheat, Rapeseed

Specifications Table

 

Subject Agronomy and Crop Science
Specific subject area Applied remote sensing; crop biophysical parameters
Type of data Table
Spatial data
How data were acquired Spectral values and vegetation indices derived from S-2 images; backscattering coefficients and polarimetric indicators derived from S-1 images; LAI derived from hemispherical photographs using CAN-EYE software [5]; wet biomass, dry biomass and water content collected on the field.
Data format Raw
Analyzed
Parameters for data collection S-1 and S-2 pixels completely included within wheat and rapeseed fields and associated crop parameters collected during the field surveys (phenological stages, LAI, wet biomass, dry biomass and water content) from January to July 2017.
Description of data collection Field surveys were conducted from January to July 2017 to collect wheat and rapeseed crop parameters in 115 fields. Phenological stages were identified in 83 wheat fields and 32 rapeseed fields in Brittany and Picardy regions (France). LAI, wet biomass, dry biomass and water content were sampled in three wheat fields and three rapeseed fields in Brittany. As close as possible to the dates of field surveys, spectral values and vegetation indices were derived from S-2 images and backscattering coefficients and polarimetric indicators from S-1 images.
Data source location Region: Brittany and Picardy
Country: France
Data accessibility With the article
Related research article A. Mercier, J. Betbeder, J. Baudry, V. Le Roux, F. Spicher, J. Lacoux, D. Roger, L. Hubert-Moy, Evaluation of Sentinel-1 & 2 time series for predicting wheat and rapeseed phenological stages. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. 163 (2020) 231-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.03.009

Value of the Data

  • The datasets provide crop biophysical parameters (LAI, biomass and phenological stages) during the crop cycles of wheat and rapeseed and associated S-1 and S-2 features for crop monitoring.

  • The datasets can be used in many fields of research (Agronomy, Climatology, Ecology...) to analyze the relationships between crop growth and agricultural practices, climatic variables, landscape structure or species distribution.

  • These datasets can be used for crop monitoring in other regions, as well as for modelling development.

1. Data Description

The datasets include a vector GIS shapefile (RGF93/Lambert-93 system, ESPG 2154) containing 55 polygons located in Picardy [2,3] and 60 in Brittany regions [3,4] (France). The 115 polygons correspond to 32 rapeseed fields and 83 wheat fields sampled in 2017 during one crop cycle. Five attribute tables were assigned to each sampled field, which are crop types (wheat/rapeseed), LAI and biomass (i.e., LAI, wet biomass, dry biomass, water content), phenological stages, S-1 features (i.e., backscattering coefficients and polarimetric indicators) and S-2 features (i.e., spectral values and vegetation indices). The three last table columns that are labeled “DOY”, “Region” and “ID” correspond to the acquisition dates of satellite images or crop parameters in Day Of Year (DOY) 2017, region of France (Brittany or Picardy) and field identifier, respectively. Table 1 provides a full description of the acronyms and abbreviations used in this article.

Table 1.

List of acronyms and abbreviations.

Acronyms and abbreviations Description Unit
ID Field identifier Dimensionless
DOY Day of year 2017 Day number
LAI Leaf Area Index Dimensionless
entropy_shannon_norm Normalized shannon entropy Dimensionless
entropy_shannon_I_norm Normalized intensity of shannon entropy Dimensionless
entropy_shannon_P_norm Normalized polarization of shannon entropy Dimensionless
span Total scattered power Decibel (dB)
VV Sigma VV Decibel (dB)
VH Sigma VH Decibel (dB)
VHVV Sigma VH:Sigma VV Decibel (dB)
Band 2 Blue band Per ten thousand
Band 3 Green band Per ten thousand
Band 4 Red band Per ten thousand
Band 5 Red-edge band Per ten thousand
Band 6 Red-edge band Per ten thousand
Band 7 Red-edge band Per ten thousand
Band 8 Near-infrared band Per ten thousand
Band 8A Near-infrared band Per ten thousand
Band 11 Shortwave-infrared band Per ten thousand
Band 12 Shortwave-infrared band Per ten thousand
GNDVI Green Normalized Vegetation Index Dimensionless
IRECI Inverted Red-Edge Chlorophyll Index Dimensionless
MCARI Modified Chlorophyll Absorption in Reflectance Index Dimensionless
MSAVI Modified Soil-Adjusted Vegetation Index Dimensionless
MTCI MERIS Terrestrial Chlorophyll Index Dimensionless
NDI Normalized Difference Index Dimensionless
NDVI Normalized Difference Vegetation Index Dimensionless
PSSRa Pigment Specific Simple Ratio Dimensionless
REIP Red-Edge Inflection Point Dimensionless
SAVI Soil-Adjusted Vegetation Index Dimensionless
S2REP Sentinel-2 Red Edge Position Dimensionless
WDVI Weighted Difference Vegetation Index Dimensionless

2. Experimental Design, Materials and Methods

Concerning crop parameters, phenological stages were identified over the 115 field samples based on the Biologische Bundesanstalt, Bundessortenamt and Chemical industry (BBCH) scale [5]. These data were used in Mercier et al [2,3]. LAI, wet biomass, dry biomass and water content surveys were conducted on three wheat fields and three rapeseed fields in Brittany region. For this purpose, 10 digital hemispherical photographs were taken at each sampled field on each date. These data were used in Mercier et al [4]. LAI was estimated from the hemispherical photographs using CAN-EYE software [1] and averaged per date and field sample. Biomass measurements were performed in homogeneous areas (20 × 20 m) where five samples of wheat 50 cm and five rapeseed plants were collected during the field surveys. The wet biomass was directly weighed in situ, and the dry biomass was measured after drying the crop (oven, 65 °C, 48 h). Water content in the plant equals wet biomass minus dry biomass.

Concerning remote sensing features, S-1 and S-2 images were downloaded from the Copernicus Open Access Hub (https://scihub.copernicus.eu/). Cloud-free S-2 images used correspond to Level-2A products providing top of canopy reflectances. Twelve vegetation indices were calculated from S-2 spectral bands (Table 1). S-1 images used were acquired in Interferometric Wide (IW) swath mode and correspond to Single Look Complex (SLC) products. The backscattering coefficients (sigma VH and sigma VV) extraction process was performed using the S-1 Toolbox (http://step.esa.int/main/toolboxes/sentinel-1-toolbox/). This process includes (1) radiometric calibration, (2) speckle filtering using a Lee Refined 7 × 7 filter [6], (3) geometric corrections using Shuttle Radar Topography Mission data [7], (4) calculation of the sigma VH: sigma VV ratio and (5) conversion from linear to decibel values. The polarimetric indicators extraction process was performed using PolSARpro version 5.1.3 software [8]. This process includes (1) the extraction of a 2 × 2 covariance matrix, (2) a speckle filtering using a Lee Refined 7 × 7 filter, (3) the extraction of four polarimetric indicators (the Shannon entropy, the intensity, the degree of polarization and the span), (4) the normalization of the Shannon entropy, the intensity and the degree of polarization. Finally, all S-1 and S-2 images were projected onto the RGF93/Lambert-93 system (EPSG 2154) and resampled with bilinear interpolation to the resolution of 10 m. The median value was computed at the field scale with a negative buffer of 15 m and 10 m in Picardy and Brittany, respectively, to select only pixels fully contained within each field.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Audrey Mercier: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Visualization. Julie Betbeder: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Supervision. Julien Denize: Resources, Data curation. Jean-Luc Roger: Resources. Fabien Spicher: Resources, Data curation. Jérôme Lacoux: Resources. David Roger: Resources. Jacques Baudry: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Project administration, Funding acquisition. Laurence Hubert-Moy: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing, Project administration, Funding acquisition.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships which have, or could be perceived to have, influenced the work reported in this article.

Acknowledgments

We thank Sébastien Rapinel for his helpful comments on database contents. This research was funded through the 2015-2016 BiodivERsA COFUND call for research proposals, with the national funders ANR, MINECO, and BELSPO, and was supported by the Kalideos project funded by the CNES, the Zone Atelier Armorique project, and a Ph.D. grant to A. Mercier from the Ministry of Research.

Footnotes

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.dib.2021.107408.

Appendix. Supplementary materials

mmc1.zip (35.6KB, zip)
mmc2.zip (92.3KB, zip)
mmc3.zip (751B, zip)
mmc4.zip (49.4KB, zip)
mmc5.zip (429B, zip)
mmc6.zip (395B, zip)
mmc7.zip (2KB, zip)
mmc8.zip (620B, zip)
mmc9.zip (426B, zip)

References

  • 1.Baret F., Weiss M. CAN EYE tutorial document; Avignon, France: 2004. Can-Eye: processing digital photographs for canopy structure characterization. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mercier A., Betbeder J., Baudry J., Le Roux V., Spicher F., Lacoux J., Roger D., Hubert-Moy L. Evaluation of Sentinel-1 & 2 time series for predicting wheat and rapeseed phenological stages. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2020;163:231–256. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.03.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mercier A., Betbeder J., Baudry J., Denize J., Leroux V., Roger J.L., Spicher F., Hubert-Moy L. Remote Sensing for Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Hydrology XXI. International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2019. Evaluation of Sentinel-1 and -2 time series to derive crop phenology and biomass of wheat and rapeseed: northern France and Brittany case studies. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mercier A., Betbeder J., Rapinel S., Jegou N., Baudry J., Hubert-Moy L. Evaluation of Sentinel-1 and -2 time series for estimating LAI and biomass of wheat and rapeseed crop types. JARS. 2020;14 doi: 10.1117/1.JRS.14.024512. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bleiholder H., Weber E., Hess M., Wicke H., van den Boom T., Lancashire P.D., Buhr L., Hack H., Klose F.R., Strauss R. Federal Biological Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry; Berlin/Braunschweig, Germany: 2001. Growth Stages of Mono- and Dicotyledonous Plants, BBCH Monograph. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lee J.S., Jurkevich L., Dewaele P., Wambacq P., Oosterlinck A. Speckle filtering of synthetic aperture radar images: a review. Remote Sens. Rev. 1994;8:255–267. doi: 10.1080/02757259409532206. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Farr T.G., Rosen P.A., Caro E., Crippen R., Duren R., Hensley S., Kobrick M., Paller M., Rodriguez E., Roth L., Seal D., Shaffer S., Shimada J., Umland J., Werner M., Oskin M., Burbank D., Alsdorf D. The shuttle radar topography mission. Rev. Geophys. 2007;45 doi: 10.1029/2005RG000183. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pottier E., Ferro-Famil L. Proceedings of the IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. 2012. PolSARPro V5.0: An ESA educational toolbox used for self-education in the field of POLSAR and POL-INSAR data analysis; pp. 7377–7380. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

mmc1.zip (35.6KB, zip)
mmc2.zip (92.3KB, zip)
mmc3.zip (751B, zip)
mmc4.zip (49.4KB, zip)
mmc5.zip (429B, zip)
mmc6.zip (395B, zip)
mmc7.zip (2KB, zip)
mmc8.zip (620B, zip)
mmc9.zip (426B, zip)

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES