Skip to main content
Microbial Genomics logoLink to Microbial Genomics
. 2021 Jul 7;7(7):000582. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000582

Achromobacter spp. genetic adaptation in cystic fibrosis

Migle Gabrielaite 1,*, Finn C Nielsen 1, Helle K Johansen 2,3, Rasmus L Marvig 1
PMCID: PMC8477396  PMID: 34232117

Abstract

Achromobacter spp. are emerging pathogens in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and Achromobacter spp. caused infections are associated with more severe disease outcomes and high intrinsic antibiotic resistance. While conventional CF pathogens are studied extensively, little is known about the genetic determinants leading to antibiotic resistance and the genetic adaptation in Achromobacter spp. infections. Here, we analysed 101 Achromobacter spp. genomes from 51 patients with CF isolated during the course of up to 20 years of infection to identify within-host adaptation, mutational signatures and genetic variation associated with increased antibiotic resistance. We found that the same regulatory and inorganic ion transport genes were frequently mutated in persisting clone types within and between Achromobacter species, indicating convergent genetic adaptation. Genome-wide association study of six antibiotic resistance phenotypes revealed the enrichment of associated genes involved in inorganic ion transport, transcription gene enrichment in β-lactams, and energy production and translation gene enrichment in the trimethoprim/sulfonamide group. Overall, we provide insights into the pathogenomics of Achromobacter spp. infections in patients with CF airways. Since emerging pathogens are increasingly recognized as an important healthcare issue, our findings on evolution of antibiotic resistance and genetic adaptation can facilitate better understanding of disease progression and how mutational changes have implications for patients with CF.

Keywords: within-host evolution, host-pathogen interaction, microbial genomics, genomic adaptation, Achromobacter, cystic fibrosis airway infection, GWAS

Data Summary

Achromobacter spp. whole-genome sequencing data is available at European Nucleotide Archive under study accession number PRJEB39108.

Impact Statement.

Achromobacter species are increasingly detected in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) in which they can cause chronic airway infections. However, the knowledge about how Achromobacter spp. genetically adapt to the human airway environment is lacking. To address these questions, we analysed 101 genomes of Achromobacter spp. from 51 Danish patients to investigate within-host genetic changes of Achromobacter spp. over up to 20 years of airway infections. We identified convergent evolution patterns of regulatory and inorganic ion transport genes. We additionally found that genes involved in inorganic ion transport, transcription, and energy production and translation were associated with antibiotic resistance phenotypes. Altogether, our analysis revealed the principal genomic adaptation and antibiotic resistance development patterns of Achromobacter spp. during the infection in patients with CF airway. The gained knowledge from our work helps to better understand how changes in the Achromobacter spp. genomes impact the disease progression in patients with CF and facilitates the identification of the improved treatment strategies of CF airway infections.

Introduction

Achromobacter spp. are emerging pathogens causing chronic bacterial infections in patients with CF [1–4]; however, it is still unclear to what extent Achromobacter spp. infections impact morbidity and mortality in these patients [3–5]. Analysis of pathogen genomes, i.e. pathogenomics, have shown that within-host pathogen genetic adaptation plays a role in these infections [6, 7]. While conventional CF pathogens, e.g. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus, are studied extensively, little is known about the extent within- and between-patient genetic adaptation has in Achromobacter spp. infections, particularly A. ruhlandii, A. insuavis and A. xylosoxidans as they were shown by Gade et al. to be the main cause of chronic, long-term infections in patients with CF infected with Achromobacter spp. [1, 4, 8–10] Furthermore, genetic features, when paired with phenotypic observations, could be used for successful resistance profile predictions as conventional methods are both time consuming and occasionally do not reflect the in vivo susceptibility profiles [11–13]. Knowledge of within-host Achromobacter spp. adaptation and genetic factors leading to antibiotic resistance development are key for urgently needed new treatment strategy development and pathogen elimination.

Here, we analysed 101 previously whole-genome-sequenced (WGS) Achromobacter spp. isolates from 51 patients to investigate the genetic relatedness and within-host genetic changes of Achromobacter spp. over the course of up to 20 years of infections. First, we aimed to identify the main gene content differences between and within Achromobacter spp. isolates. Second, we aimed to identify pace and patterns in genetic changes, and compare it to the other pathogenic bacteria in CF. Finally, we attempted to define the most significant associations between Achromobacter spp. genetic features and antibiotic resistance phenotypes. Ultimately, this work on the main Achromobacter spp. genomic changes acquired during infections in patients with CF, leads to the possibility of genomic-based disease progression prediction, and improved strategies to track and treat persistent airway infections.

Methods

Bacterial isolates

Our analysis included 101 clinical isolates of Achromobacter spp. that were defined in detail previously by Gabrielaite et al. [14]. The isolates were sampled from 51 patients with CF attending the Copenhagen Cystic Fibrosis Center at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. Over the timespan of 0–20 years (median 6.5 years), 64 isolates from 25 patients were longitudinally collected (median 2 isolates) and 37 isolates from 29 patients were single isolates. Overall, 29, 18 and 52 isolates belonged to A. ruhlandii, A. insuavis and A. xylosoxidans, respectively. Furthermore, single isolates belonging to A. aegrifaciens and a new genogroup were sequenced.

Bacterial genome sequencing and definition of clone type

Genomic DNA was prepared from Achromobacter spp. isolates using a DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen) and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq platform, generating 250 base paired-end reads. On average, 1124551 reads (range of 350677–2118817) for each of the genomic libraries were obtained. Clone types were defined by Pactyper [15] using the default parameters and species’ core genome defined by GenAPI [16]. Lineage was defined as all isolates belonging to the same species and the same clone type.

Bacterial genome assembly

Sequence reads from each isolate were corrected and assembled by SPAdes 3.10.1 [17] using default parameters and k-mer sizes ranging from 21 to 127. Assembled contigs were joined to 216 scaffolds on average (92–506).

Average nucleotide identity calculation

Wrongly annotated public Achromobacter species from RefSeq database [18] were identified by calculating ANI with fastANI 1.11 [19] using 95 % threshold.

Aggregated pan-genome generation, characterization and visualization

Aggregated pan-genome was created by clustering all pan-genomes from longitudinally collected lineages and de novo assemblies from single-isolate lineages with GenAPI [16]. Every gene in the aggregated pan-genome was then aligned back to the individual pan-genomes/de novo assemblies to determine if the gene is (1) non-present in the lineage (2), present and variable within the lineage or (3) present and non-variable. A matrix for an aggregated pan-genome was generated for 26 longitudinal lineages and 35 single-isolate lineages, and visualized using R [20] with a pheatmap library [21].

Bacterial genome alignment and variant calling

Alignments, variant calling and pairwise SNP distance identification for Achromobacter spp. isolates were performed using reference genomes [GCF_001051055.1 for A. ruhlandii (AX01 group), GCF_001558755.2 for A. insuavis (AX02 group) and GCF_001457475.1 for A. xylosoxidans (AX03 group)] with BacDist [22] workflow that is based on variant calling with Snippy [23]. Sequence alignments on average included 84 % (81.72–89.58 %) of the raw sequencing reads for A. ruhlandii, 87 % (75.45–92.57 %) for A. insuavis and 86 % (75.95–93.61 %) for A. xylosoxidans. Low-quality variants (<tenfold coverage or supported by <50 % of mapped reads) or variants shared among all isolates were discarded by BacDist (see Gabrielaite et al. [14] for detailed tool description).

Substitution rate estimation

The nucleotide substitution rate [24] estimation was performed for each lineage containing three or more isolates sampled at different timepoints (ten lineages in total) by using beast 2.6.1 [25]. Sequence alignments from BacDist were used as input with the following parameters: [1] sequences were annotated with the sampling date (‘dated tips’) [2], HKY substitution model with strict clock parameters [3], gamma prior for clock rate [4], prior for population size: 1/X [5], tree prior: coalescent constant population. MCMC was run for 50 000 000 iterations. Convergence was checked by inspecting an effective sample size and parameter value traces in the Tracer 1.7.1 software [26]. Multiple tests for each sample were performed to ensure reproducibility and convergence. The obtained clock rate (per site per year) was multiplied by the alignment size to obtain a substitution rate per genome per year.

Virulence and antibiotic resistance gene identification

Orthologues of resistance and virulence genes in 61 Achrmobacter spp. lineages were identified with Abricate [27] using VFDB (containing 2597 genes; retrieved: 21 September 2020) [28] for virulence genes and Resfinder 4 (containing 3122 genes; retrieved: 21 September 2020) [29] for resistance genes. Gene orthologue was considered present in the corresponding database if the alignment made up minimum 50 % of the gene length and its identity was minimum 75 %.

Frequently mutated gene definition

Most frequently mutated genes were defined as the top 1 % of all mutated genes for the species. If there were more genes mutated with the same frequency as the 1 % most frequently mutated genes, these genes were also included in the final analysis. The identified most mutated genes were annotated by EGGNOG-mapper 2.0.1 [30] using DIAMOND and EGGNOG’s bacterial database.

P. aeruginosa orthologues were identified by performing clustering with CD-HIT [31] using word size of 3 and 50% identity thresholds. Joint Achromobacter spp. most frequently mutated genes were identified by clustering with CD-HIT [31] with word size of 3 and 80% identity threshold.

Genome-wide association study with antibiotic resistance phenotypes

dbgwas 0.5.4 [32] software was used for bacterial genome-wide association analysis using ten [Amoxicillin-Clavulanate (AMC), Ceftazidime (CAZ), Chloramphenicol (CHL), Colistin (CST), Imipenem (IPM), Meropenem (MEM), Piperacillin-Tazobactam (TZP), Sulfamethizole (SMZ), Tigecycline (TGC) and Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole (SXT)] different antibiotic resistance phenotypes and de novo assembled scaffolds of 92 isolates for which the antibiotic susceptibility profiles were available (Gabrielaite et al. [14] for detailed information on isolate susceptibility). Core genome SNP-based phylogenetic tree was used to correct for population structure while all available annotations of Achromobacter spp. genes from UniProt database [33] were used for unitig annotation (271851 genes; retrieved: 19 April 2020). Ten of the most significant unitigs for each antibiotic test were used for further analysis as the tool authors advise against using a P-value threshold when testing several phenotypes. [32] Achromobacter spp. gene annotations were identified by clustering significant unitig gene sequences with CD-HIT [31] with word size of 3 and 80% identity threshold. Enrichment of COGannotated genes was estimated by comparing the fraction of the associated genes with the fraction in the Achromobacter spp. reference genomes for the five most frequently associated gene groups where more than one gene was present in a group.

Results

Achromobacter spp. dataset and incorrect annotations of public genomes

The genomes of 101 Achromobacter spp. isolates from the airways of 51 patients with CF attending the Copenhagen Cystic Fibrosis Center at Rigshospitalet were sequenced to follow the within-host evolution and genetic adaptation of the lineages over the initial 0–20 years of infection (Fig. 1). All isolates were previously defined as belonging to five different species: A. ruhlandii (N=29), A. insuavis (N=18), A. xylosoxidans (N=52), A. aegrifaciens (N=1) and a new genogroup (N=1). The latter two species were excluded from further analysis as the species contained only a single isolate. The remaining 99 Achromobacter spp. genomes were grouped to 61 lineages, which were defined as all isolates from one patient belonging to the same species and clone type (Table S1, available in the online version of this article).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Overview of 101 longitudinally collected Achromobacter spp. isolates from patients with CF.

We first performed phylogenetic analysis for all Achromobacter spp. genomes available in the RefSeq database (141 samples, Table S2) together with our clinical Achromobacter spp. genomes. Our sequenced genomes were widely distributed across the genetic variability observed within the A. insuavis and A. xylosoxidans group; however, A. ruhlandii isolates, of which the majority (27/29) belonged to Danish epidemic strain (DES), reflected little genetic variability of A. ruhlandii species. Furthermore, our phylogenetic and average nucleotide identity (ANI) analysis revealed that Achromobacter spp. annotations are inconsistent among the RefSeq genomes and require corrections to improve species designation (Fig. 2a, suggested corrections in Table S2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Achromobacter spp. genetic differences. (a) Phylogenetic tree based on core genome SNPs of 101 Achromobacter spp. isolates from patients with CF (inner layer of colours: turquoise) and 141 Achromobacter spp. isolates from RefSeq database (inner layer of colours: yellow). Outer layer of colours corresponds to species annotation with suggested corrections; red arrows mark supposedly incorrect species annotation in RefSeq isolates. The phylogenetic tree can be accessed on Microreact webserver [66]. (b) The aggregated pan-genome of 61 Achromobacter spp. lineages containing gene presence, absence, and gene variability (i.e. gene is present in some isolates while absent in other isolates within the lineage) information.

Aggregated pan-genome

Aggregated pan-genome was constructed from pan-genomes of each of the 61 lineages (35 of which were single-isolate lineages; Table S1). This approach allowed us to account for the nature of the dataset where multiple clonal isolates from the same patient were available. The aggregated Achromobacter spp. pan-genome consisted of 21198 genes: 2887 core genes, 18311 accessory genes of which 6917 genes were unique to a single lineage.

The aggregated pan-genome (Fig. 2b) contained Achromobacter species-specific genes (649 for A. ruhlandii, 648 for A. insuavis, and 494 for A. xylosoxidans) present in all isolates of the respective species but not in the isolates from other species. Pan-genomes for each Achromobacter species were defined by using all bacterial isolates available [18–52] for the species. The size of the species' pan-genomes contained 7070–14833 genes, of which 4225–5130 were core genes, 1940–10608 accessory genes and 976–3162 isolate-unique genes (Table 1).

Table 1.

Pan-genome size, number of core, accessory and unique genes for isolates from each Achromobacter species

Species

No. of bacterial isolates

Pan-genome size

Core genes

Accessory genes

Unique genes

A. ruhlandii

29

7070

5130

1940

976

A. insuavis

18

9900

4799

5101

1124

A. xylosoxidans

52

14833

4225

10608

3162

Achromobacter spp. substitution rates

Within-patient bacterial substitution rate was estimated for lineages where three or more Achromobacter sp. isolates from different timepoints were available (five lineages for A. ruhlandii, four for A. xylosoxidans and one for A. insuavis). The estimated substitution rates for A. ruhlandii (DES isolates which are known hypermutators [14, 34]) were on average 4.18·10−6 (2.71·10−6–5.39·10−6) SNPs/year/site, 8.77·10−7 (6.17·10−7–1.13·10−6) SNPs/year/site for A. xylosoxidans (0332-AX03DK11 hypermutator lineage [14] with the mutation rate of 2.37·10−6 SNPs/year/site was excluded), and 1.61·10−7 SNPs/year/site for A. insuavis. These substitution rates correspond to an average of 21.5, 2.19 and 0.79 SNPs/year/genome for A. ruhlandii, A. xylosoxidans and A. insuavis, respectively (Fig. S1).

Virulence and antibiotic resistance genes carried by Achromobacter spp. genomes

From de novo assembled genomes of the 99 Achromobacter spp. isolates we identified virulence (VFDB database) and antibiotic resistance (Resfinder database) gene orthologues. On average, bacterial isolates carried 2 (0–3) antibiotic resistance gene orthologues and 13 [8–18] virulence gene orthologues. The most frequently carried antibiotic resistance gene was the orthologue of catB10, which codes for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase. Interestingly, the gene was carried by all A. ruhlandii and nearly all (30/33) A. xylosoxidans lineages but none of the A. insuavis lineages (Fig. 3a). Furthermore, OXA-type class D β-lactamase bla OXA-258 was observed in all A. ruhlandii isolates and bla OXA-114 – in all but one (P7034-AX03DK13) A. xylosoxidans lineages. All 13 A. insuavis isolates carried one of the following bla OXA genes: bla OXA-243, bla OXA-455, bla OXA-457, bla OXA-458 or bla OXA-459. All bla OXA genes carried by A. insuavis had ≥92 % nucleotide identity. The latest isolate of DES (P7703-AX01DK01) appears to have acquired a new aph [6]-Id antibiotic resistance gene orthologue encoding for aminoglycoside resistance [35].

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Overview of genetic determinants related to virulence and antibiotic resistance, and pathoadaptive genes. (a) Antibiotic resistance and virulence gene orthologue distribution among lineages. (b) Venn diagram of the most frequently mutated genes and their overlap between the three Achromobacter species. (c) Candidate pathoadaptive gene mutation distribution by lineage.

The median number of virulence genes in A. ruhlandii DES genomes was markedly lower (N=8) than other Achromobacter spp. isolates (N=14; P-value=5.98·10−8; Wilcoxon signed-rank test) (Fig. 3a). The majority of virulence gene orthologues belonged to the secretion system (N=9), motility (N=7), and endotoxin (N=5) gene orthologs [28].

Genetic adaptation: Mutations of the same genes across lineages

To explore within-host genetic adaptation in Achromobacter spp., we first identified the genes, which were most frequently mutated within each species. Genes were defined as frequently mutated if they were among the 1 % most commonly mutated genes within species. If more than 1 % of the genes were mutated with the same frequency, those genes were also included in the analysis. A total of 27, 16 and 28 genes were identified as most frequently mutated for A. ruhlandii, A. insuavis and A. xylosoxidans, respectively (Fig. 3b). The clusters of orthologous groups (COG) functional annotations were performed for all species (Fig. 4a, Table S3 for detailed information) with the highest mutation frequency in genes coding for signal transduction (COG T); inorganic ion transport and metabolism (COG P); replication, recombination and repair (COG L); intracellular trafficking, secretion and vesicular transport (COG U); and transcription (COG K).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

COG annotations of (a) three Achromobacter spp. reference genomes and most frequently mutated genes, and (b) frequently associated with antibiotic resistance unitigs. Red boxes mark COGs, which are ≥2x enriched in GWAS compared to reference genomes.

Although knowledge is lacking about many Achromobacter spp. gene functions, bacterial sequence similarity analysis allowed us to identify possible antibiotic resistance and virulence-related genes among the most frequently mutated genes in Achromobacter spp. After manual literature search ten, four and four genes were defined as related to antibiotic resistance in A. ruhlandii, A. insuavis and A. xylosoxidans, respectively, whereas eight, two and seven genes were defined as virulence-related genes (Table S3).

Orthologue search of a previously defined list of 52 CF-associated pathoadaptive P. aeruginosa genes revealed three orthologues among the most frequently mutated Achromobacter genes: mexZ (WP_006389199.1), mexB (WP_024068614.1) and gyrA (WP_049072335.1).

Seven genes were defined as candidate pathoadaptive genes in several Achromobacter species. One gene was frequently mutated in all three species (10 out of 26 lineages) and six genes were observed as most frequently mutated in two of the Achromobacter species (Fig. 3c, Table 2). Six lineages did not acquire a single mutation in any of the seven pathoadaptive genes; however, 13 lineages acquired mutations in three or more genes (Fig. 3c). Lineages, which acquired mutations in three or more pathoadaptive genes, acquired markedly less non-synonymous mutations than lineages with less mutated pathoadaptive genes (pP-value=4.99·10−2; Fisher’s exact test). Furthermore, lineages only acquired non-synonymous mutations in the seven candidate pathoadaptive genes (Table S4).

Table 2.

Seven most frequently mutated genes and their function

RefSeq ID

(Locus tag)

No. of species

No. of lineages

Product

Function

WP_006389199.1

(AT699_RS06735)

3

10

DNA-binding transcriptional regulator AxyZ

Antibiotic resistance

WP_006227290.1

(AT699_RS01870)

2

5

NAD(P)/FAD-dependent oxidoreductase

Metabolic pathways

WP_013391523.1

(AT699_RS03490)

2

10

Penicillin-binding protein 2

Antibiotic resistance

WP_006392856.1

(AT699_RS03490)

2

9

ABC transporter substrate-binding protein

Transport

WP_006394390.1

(AT699_RS11865)

2

9

multidrug efflux RND transporter permease

Antibiotic resistance

WP_006387572.1

(AT699_RS22580)

2

8

Signal transduction histidine kinase

Two-component signalling

WP_006221301.1

(AT699_RS25090)

2

10

TonB-dependent hemin, ferrichrome receptor

Transport

The only pathoadaptive gene, which was frequently mutated among all three species – axyZ – encodes TetR family transcriptional regulator of the RND-type efflux system and is associated with innate Achromobacter spp. antibiotic resistance [36, 37]. Furthermore, we observed higher overall antibiotic tolerance by isolates, which acquired mutations in the axyZ gene with highest antibiotic resistance increase against piperacillin/tazobactam (P-value=3.28·10−2; Fisher’s exact test) and meropenem (P-value=2.87·10−3; Fisher’s exact test).

The ratio of non-synonymous to synonymous substitutions (dN/dS) was significantly different between the 1 % most frequently mutated genes and non-frequently mutated genes in Achromobacter spp. (dN/dS 99 %=1.21 vs dN/dS 1 %=2.10; Fisher’s exact test; P=3.4·10−4, respectively).

Finally, we investigated gene loss and acquisition patterns in 26 longitudinally collected Achromobacter spp. lineages. We observed genes to be two times more often lost than acquired, and lost/acquired in groups rather than individually; however, no convergent evolution patterns in Achromobacter spp. gene loss/acquisition were identified (detailed analysis in Text S1).

Genome-wide association between Achromobacter spp. genotypes and antibiotic resistance

To test for associations between bacterial genetics and antibiotic resistance phenotypes we performed unitig-based DBGWAS analysis. Out of 21 antibiotics where the resistance was phenotypically tested, only ten antibiotics had both susceptible and resistant isolates from all three Achromobacter species. Accordingly, we performed the association analysis for these ten antibiotics (see Methods for detailed information). Unitigs passed a 5 % FDR corrected q-value threshold only for CHL, IPM, MEM, TZP, SMZ and SXT. Ten of the most significant unitigs were used for the six remainder association test analysis, resulting in 60 genes (50 unique genes) significantly associated with antibiotic resistance phenotypes (Fig. 4b, Table S6). The most abundant group of associated unitigs belonged to inorganic ion transport (N=13; 2.4× enriched; COG P) genes. The other four most abundantly associated genes belonged to transcription (N=8; COG K); energy production and conversion (N=7; COG C); translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis (N=6; COG J), and defence mechanism (N=5; COG V) groups. Furthermore, transcription genes were enriched in the β-lactam (IPM, MEM and TZP) antibiotic group (N=7; 2.1× enriched) while translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis genes were 5.4× enriched in trimethoprim/sulfonamides (SMZ and SXT) group (N=4). Defence mechanism genes were 9.2 and 9.0× enriched in β-lactam and trimethoprim/sulfonamide groups, respectively while energy production and conversion genes were 2.9× enriched in a trimethoprim/sulfonamide group.

Of nine antibiotic resistance genes from the ResFinder four database which were present in the aggregated pan-genome, none were associated with antibiotic resistance phenotypes in the GWAS analysis. Furthermore, core and accessory genes were equally associated with antibiotic resistance phenotypes (Table S6).

Discussion

Achromobacter species are emerging pathogens causing chronic respiratory tract airway infections in patients with CF; however, the genetic epidemiology of these infections is little understood. We sequenced and analysed 101 genomes of Achromobacter spp. isolates from 51 patients with CF, which is the largest longitudinally collected Achromobacter spp. genome dataset available to date. This allowed us to investigate the population genomics and within-host adaptation, including genome-wide association analysis with antibiotic resistance phenotypes.

Phylogenetic analysis of our dataset with 141 publicly available Achromobacter spp. genomes from the RefSeq database revealed that our dataset well represented the genetic diversity of A. xylosoxidans and A. insuavis species. However, because of DES overrepresentation, A. ruhlandii isolates did not reflect the species genetic diversity. Furthermore, ANI together with core-genome-based phylogenetic analysis revealed that more than 10 % of publicly available Achromobacter spp. genomes are supposedly misannotated in the RefSeq database, which we anticipated to unravel to ease future research on Achromobacter spp. (Table S2).

From the aggregated pan-genome analysis we showed that core genome sizes were comparable between A. ruhlandii, A. insuavis and A. xylosoxidans which are similar to core genome size identified previously by Li et al. [38]. Nevertheless, the number of accessory and unique genes in species’ pan-genomes varied greatly as a result of the different number of independent genomes for each species. A. ruhlandii isolates mostly belonged to DES, which is spread through patient-to-patient transmission [14, 34], therefore, have lower pan-genome plasticity than A. xylosoxidans or A. insuavis.

Unlike many bacterial species, substitution rates for Achromobacter spp. are not known [39]. Our A. ruhlandii dataset only consisted of hypermutator DES lineages, which led to a high substitution rate estimate, and our substitution rate estimate for A. insuavis was based on only one longitudinally sampled lineage. A. xylosoxidans (8.77·10−7 SNPs/year per site) substitution rate is comparable to other Gram-negative bacterial species: P. aeruginosa (4.0·10−7 SNPs/year per site) [40], Shigella sonnei (6.0·10−7 SNPs/year per site) [41], Echerichia coli (2.26·10−7 SNPs/year per site) [42]. The substitution rate is substantially lower than S. aureus (1.87·10−6 SNPs/year per site) [43] or Klebsiella pneumoniae (1.9·10−6 SNPs/year per site) [44]. These findings suggest that A. xylosoxidans evolutionary rates are similar to other Gram-negative bacteria and the same models predicting evolutionary dynamics could be used [39]. Furthermore, the calculated substitution rates could be employed in future studies to estimate the date of possible lineage divergence or the occurrence of patient-to-patient transmission.

While it was previously suggested to use bla OXA genes for Achromobacter species typing [45–47], we showed that in some cases such strategy would not be sufficient for species identification as isolates can carry none of the bla OXA genes. Furthermore, we identified that A. insuavis can carry one out of several highly similar bla OXA genes, which might further complicate such species typing approach. We also show that none of the A. insuavis isolates carried catB10 chloramphenicol resistance gene orthologue; however, these identified resistance genes alone were not sufficient to explain the differences in antibiotic resistance phenotype between lineages and species.

Moreover, virulence gene orthologue analysis revealed that Achromobacter spp. carry several virulence factors with markedly less virulence genes in A. ruhlandii DES strain, which further supports the adaptive trade-off evolution hypothesis that virulence genes are not required or are selected against in chronic infections [39]. However, several virulence gene orthologues coding for host cell invasion (cheW and cheY) and facilitating evasion of the host immune response (brkB [48]) were observed in all lineages. Furthermore, our findings of secretion system, in particular type III secretion system, gene orthologues as the most prevalent virulence genes in Achromobacter spp. are in line with findings by Jeukens et al. and Li et al. [38, 49].

Among the candidate pathoadaptive genes (frequently mutated genes), we identified multiple antibiotic resistance genes, which were markedly more frequently mutated among A. ruhlandii isolates than A. insuavis or A. xylosoxidans isolates. This phenomenon might signal about the continuous adaptive evolution even in highly antibiotic-resistant strains such as DES [1]. Nonetheless, more antibiotic resistance and virulence genes among frequently mutated genes might be identified if gene annotation of Achromobacter spp. reference genomes improved. Overall, our identified candidate pathoadaptive genes (belonging to signal transduction; inorganic ion transport and metabolism; intracellular trafficking; transcription; and replication gene functional classes) are comparable to the observations in P. aeruginosa infecting patients with CF [50] and other smaller-scale studies on Achromobacter spp. [49]

Furthermore, we highlight that not all Achromobacter spp. lineages seem to undergo the same amount of selective pressure, and we show from the seven pathoadaptive Achromobacter spp. gene analysis that lineages tended to either have acquired not more than two pathoadaptive mutations and be under stronger positive selection or have acquired mutations in more pathoadaptive genes and be under weaker/neutral selection. These findings are comparable to findings from genetic adaptation studies in P. aeruginosa from patients with CF airway [50]. Overall, significantly higher dN/dS ratio in the 27, 16 and 28 most frequently mutated A. ruhlandii, A. insuavis and A. xylosoxidans genes confirms that there is strong selective pressure for changes in these genes during adaptation to the patients with CF airway. Altogether, dN/dS>1 in both frequently and non-frequently mutated genes show that more than the top 1 % mutated genes are under selective pressure; nonetheless, a larger dataset is needed to identify more genes without sacrificing analysis accuracy.

AxyZ (mexZ orthologue), which was the only candidate pathoadaptive gene in all three species, is involved in the development of multidrug resistance by regulating AxyXY-OprZ RND-type efflux system, hence is crucial during adaptation to the host environment [37]. AxyZ orthologue mexZ in P. aeruginosa is established among pathoadaptive genes directly associated with increase in antibiotic resistance [51–53]. Furthermore, mutations in axyZ could partially explain the increased tolerance to piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem.

The observed gene loss and acquisition patterns were comparable to the ones observed in P. aeruginosa; however, unlike in P. aeruginosa, no convergent loss or acquisition of gene clusters was observed [54]

To further explore the differences in antibiotic susceptibility between Achromobacter spp. isolates, we performed a k-mer based GWAS analysis. Limited number of bacterial isolates and high innate resistance to certain antibiotics restricted our analysis to only six successful GWAS associations, which revealed that inorganic ion transport genes contribute to antibiotic resistance development in all six antibiotics. Changes in inorganic ion transport genes (COG P) could have a secondary influence on antibiotic resistance as such changes help overcome the problem of iron deficiency in human airways allowing better intrinsically resistant bacteria survival despite the presence of antibiotics. Similar patterns were previously identified in other bacteria causing chronic infections in patients with CF [39, 55, 56]. Another possible explanation is that many inorganic ion transport genes are related to efflux pumps and transporter genes, which markedly contribute to increase in antibiotic resistance [57, 58]. The observed enrichment of transcription genes (COG K) associated with resistance to β-lactams could be explained by changes in transcriptional regulation of intrinsic antibiotic resistance, efflux pump and cell wall protein coding genes [57, 59, 60]. Enrichment of translation and ribosomal structure genes (COG J), and energy production genes (COG C) in trimethoprim/sulfonamide group might be due to altered metabolism and changes in energy production leading to bacterial persistence and escape of antibiotic effect [61, 62]. Similar findings were recently reported by Lopatkin et al. [63] where it was shown that mutations in metabolic genes, in particular, central carbon and energy metabolism genes, lead to the increased antibiotic resistance. Ultimately, GWAS is a promising approach for a systematic innately complex bacterial resistance analysis, which could be applied to better understand the genetics of antibiotic resistance development. Gained understanding on how Achromobacter spp. develops resistance in vivo from our and other studies could be applied to improve the resistance phenotype prediction in the clinic.

Our study has several limitations. First, even larger studies are necessary to further characterize and identify the genetic adaptation of Achromobacter spp. during CF airway infections. Second, the lack of genome annotation and overall knowledge about Achromobacter spp. limited the interpretation of putative pathoadaptive genes and genes associated with resistance phenotypes. Finally, a single isolate at a given time point is not sufficient to completely reflect the genetic diversity of the bacterial population [64, 65]; therefore, some of our findings might be the result of diversification and not the fixation of the adaptive mutations in Achromobacter spp.

In conclusion, by using the largest dataset to date of Achromobacter spp. clinical isolates from patients with CF, we used a comprehensive analytical framework for thorough bacterial genomic data analysis. Thus, we identified pathoadaptive and antibiotic resistance genes in Achromobacter spp. causing CF airway infections. Furthermore, we showed that current knowledge about antibiotic resistance gene presence or mutations in those genes cannot sufficiently explain the resistance phenotypes, and GWAS offers a new approach of addressing this problem. The gained knowledge allows us to better understand the requirements for successful Achromobacter spp. adaptation during infection in airways of patients with CF, which could help accurately predict antibiotic susceptibility and clinical progression of Achromobacter spp. infections, and further the development of urgently needed optimized treatment strategies.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary material 1

Funding information

This work was supported by the Danish Cystic Fibrosis Association (Cystisk Fibrose Foreningen) and the Danish National Research Foundation (grant number 126). HKJ was supported by The Novo Nordisk Foundation as a clinical research stipend (NNF12OC1015920), by Rigshospitalets Rammebevilling 2015-17 (R88-A3537), by Lundbeckfonden (R167-2013-15229), by Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF15OC0017444), by RegionH Rammebevilling (R144-A5287) by Independent Research Fund Denmark / Medical and Health Sciences (FTP-4183-00051) and by ‘Savværksejer Jeppe Juhl og Hustru Ovita Juhls mindelegat’.

Acknowledgements

Ulla Johansen is thanked for expert technical assistance and Niels Høiby is thanked for collecting the earliest Achromobacter spp. isolates. All figures were partly or completely created using BioRender (https://biorender.com/).

Author contributions

R. L. M. and H. K. J., conceived the study. R. L. M., H. K. J. and F. C. N., supervised the study. M. G. and R. L. M., designed the bioinformatics workflows for the analysis. M. G., conducted the analysis. M. G. and R. L. M., analysed and interpreted the data. M. G., prepared the manuscript draft and visualizations. R. L. M., H. K. J. and F. C. N., reviewed and edited the draft.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical statement

Use of the stored clinical isolates was approved by the local ethics committee at the Capital Region of Denmark RegionH (registration number H-4–2015-FSP).

Footnotes

Abbreviations: AMC, amoxicillin-clavulanate; ANI, average nucleotide identity; CAZ, ceftazidime; CF, cystic fibrosis; CHL, chloramphenicol; COG, clusters of orthologous groups; CST, colistin; DES, Danish epidemic strain; GWAS, genome-wide association study; IPM, imipenem; MEM, meropenem; SMZ, sulfamethizole; SXT, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; TGC, tigecycline; TZP, piperacillin-tazobactam; WGS, whole genome sequencing.

All supporting data, code and protocols have been provided within the article or through supplementary data files. Six supplementary tables, two supplementary figures and supplementary text are available with the online version of this article.

References

  • 1.Ridderberg W, Nielsen SM, Nørskov-Lauritsen N. Genetic adaptation of Achromobacter sp. during persistence in the lungs of cystic fibrosis patients. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0136790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ciofu O, Hansen CR, Høiby N. Respiratory bacterial infections in cystic fibrosis. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2013;19:251–258. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e32835f1afc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lambiase A, Catania MR, Del Pezzo M, Rossano F, Terlizzi V, et al. Achromobacter xylosoxidans respiratory tract infection in cystic fibrosis patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011;30:973–980. doi: 10.1007/s10096-011-1182-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rønne Hansen C, Pressler T, Høiby N, Gormsen M. Chronic infection with Achromobacter xylosoxidans in cystic fibrosis patients; a retrospective case control study. J Cyst Fibros. 2006;5:245–251. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2006.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hansen CR, Pressler T, Nielsen KG, Jensen PØ, Bjarnsholt T, et al. Inflammation in Achromobacter xylosoxidans infected cystic fibrosis patients. J Cyst Fibros. 2010;9:51–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2009.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Folkesson A, Jelsbak L, Yang L, Johansen HK, Ciofu O, et al. Adaptation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to the cystic fibrosis airway: An evolutionary perspective. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012;10:841–851. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Baishya J, Wakeman CA. Selective pressures during chronic infection drive microbial competition and cooperation. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2019;5:16. doi: 10.1038/s41522-019-0089-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Callaghan M, McClean S. Bacterial host interactions in cystic fibrosis. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2012;15:71–77. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2011.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.McGuigan L, Callaghan M. The evolving dynamics of the microbial community in the cystic fibrosis lung. Environ Microbiol. 2015;17:16–28. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gade SS, Nørskov-Lauritsen N, Ridderberg W. Prevalence and species distribution of Achromobacter sp. cultured from cystic fibrosis patients attending the Aarhus centre in Denmark. J Med Microbiol. 2017;66:686–689. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gordon NC, Price JR, Cole K, Everitt R, Morgan M, et al. Prediction of Staphylococcus aureus antimicrobial resistance by whole-genome sequencing. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52:1182–1191. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03117-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nguyen M, Long SW, McDermott PF, Olsen RJ, Olson R, et al. Using machine learning to predict antimicrobial MICs and associated genomic features for nontyphoidal salmonella. J Clin Microbiol. 2019;57 doi: 10.1128/JCM.01260-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Su M, Satola SW, Read TD. Genome-based prediction of bacterial antibiotic resistance. J Clin Microbiol. 2019;57 doi: 10.1128/JCM.01405-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gabrielaite M, Bartell JA, Nørskov-Lauritsen N, Pressler T, Nielsen FC, et al. Transmission and antibiotic resistance of Achromobacter in cystic fibrosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2021;59 doi: 10.1128/JCM.02911-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gabrielaite M, Marvig RL. Pactyper: Snakemake pipeline for continuous clone type prediction for WGS sequenced bacterial isolates based on their core genome. Zenodo. 2020 doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3695694. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gabrielaite M, Marvig RL. GenAPI: a tool for gene absence-presence identification in fragmented bacterial genome sequences. BMC Bioinformatics. 2020;21:320. doi: 10.1186/s12859-020-03657-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, et al. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012;19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.O’Leary NA, Wright MW, Brister JR, Ciufo S, Haddad D, et al. Reference sequence (Refseq) database at NCBI: Current status, taxonomic expansion, and functional annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D733–45. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun. 2018;9:5114. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.R The R Project for Statistical Computing [Internet] [Feb 10;2020 ]; https://www.r-project.org/ accessed.
  • 21.CRAN Package Pheatmap [Internet. [Feb 10;2020 ]; https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pheatmap/index.html accessed.
  • 22.Gabrielaite M, Misiakou MA, Marvig RL. BACDIST: Snakemake pipeline for bacterial SNP distance and phylogeny analysis. Zenodo. 2020 doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3667680. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Seemann T Snippy: Rapid haploid variant calling and core genome alignment [Internet] [Feb 10;2020 ];2018 https://github.com/tseemann/snippy accessed.
  • 24.Barrick JE, Lenski RE. Genome dynamics during experimental evolution. Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14:827–839. doi: 10.1038/nrg3564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bouckaert R, Heled J, Kühnert D, Vaughan T, Wu C-H, et al. Beast 2: A software platform for bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Comput Biol. 2014;10:e1003537. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA. Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using tracer 1.7. Syst Biol. 2018;67:901–904. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syy032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Seemann T Abricate: Mass screening of contigs for antimicrobial and virulence genes [Internet. [Feb 10;2020 ];2018 https://github.com/tseemann/abricate accessed.
  • 28.Chen L, Zheng D, Liu B, Yang J, Jin Q. VFDB 2016: hierarchical and refined dataset for big data analysis—10 years on. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D694–D697. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bortolaia V, Kaas RS, Ruppe E, Roberts MC, Schwarz S, et al. Resfinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020;75:3491–3500. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Huerta-Cepas J, Forslund K, Coelho LP, Szklarczyk D, Jensen LJ, et al. Fast genome-wide functional annotation through orthology assignment by eggNOG-Mapper. Mol Biol Evol. 2017;34:2115–2122. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fu L, Niu B, Zhu Z, Wu S, Li W. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:3150–3152. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jaillard M, Lima L, Tournoud M, Mahé P, van Belkum A, et al. A fast and agnostic method for bacterial genome-wide association studies: Bridging the gap between k-mers and genetic events. PLoS Genet. 2018;14:e1007758. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.The UniProt Consortium UniProt: a worldwide hub of protein knowledge. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D506–D515. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ridderberg W, Jensen Handberg K, Nørskov-Lauritsen N. Prevalence of hypermutator isolates of Achromobacter spp. from cystic fibrosis patients. Int J Med Microbiol. 2020;151393 doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2020.151393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Alcock BP, Raphenya AR, Lau TTY, Tsang KK, Bouchard M, et al. Card 2020: Antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic Resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:D517–525. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bador J, Amoureux L, Blanc E, Neuwirth C. Innate aminoglycoside resistance of Achromobacter xylosoxidans is due to AxyXY-OprZ, an RND-type multidrug efflux pump. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:603–605. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01243-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bador J, Neuwirth C, Grangier N, Muniz M, Germé L, et al. Role of Axyz transcriptional regulator in overproduction of Axyxy-oprz multidrug efflux system in achromobacter species mutants selected by tobramycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61 doi: 10.1128/AAC.00290-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Li X, Hu Y, Gong J, Zhang L, Wang G. Comparative genome characterization of Achromobacter members reveals potential genetic determinants facilitating the adaptation to a pathogenic lifestyle. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97:6413–6425. doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-5018-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Didelot X, Walker AS, Peto TE, Crook DW, Wilson DJ. Within-host evolution of bacterial pathogens. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016;14:150–162. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2015.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Marvig RL, Johansen HK, Molin S, Jelsbak L. Genome analysis of a transmissible lineage of Pseudomonas aeruginosa reveals pathoadaptive mutations and distinct evolutionary paths of hypermutators. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003741. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Holt KE, Baker S, Weill F-X, Holmes EC, Kitchen A, et al. Shigella sonnei genome sequencing and phylogenetic analysis indicate recent global dissemination from Europe. Nat Genet. 2012;44:1056–1059. doi: 10.1038/ng.2369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Reeves PR, Liu B, Zhou Z, Li D, Guo D, et al. Rates of mutation and host transmission for an Escherichia coli clone over 3 years. PLoS One. 2011;6:e26907. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Young BC, Golubchik T, Batty EM, Fung R, Larner-Svensson H, et al. Evolutionary dynamics of staphylococcus aureus during progression from carriage to disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:4550–4555. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1113219109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Mathers AJ, Stoesser N, Sheppard AE, Pankhurst L, Giess A, et al. Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae at a single institution: Insights into endemicity from whole-genome sequencing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:1656–1663. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04292-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Turton JF, Mustafa N, Shah J, Hampton CV, Pike R, et al. Identification of Achromobacter xylosoxidans by detection of the bla(OXA-114-like) gene intrinsic in this species. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011;70:408–411. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2011.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Papalia M, Almuzara M, Cejas D, Traglia G, Ramírez MS, et al. OXA-258 from Achromobacter ruhlandii: A species-specific marker. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:1602–1605. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03043-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Traglia G, Papalia M, Almuzara M, Gutkind G, Centrón D, et al. Presence of oxa-type enzymes in Achromobacter insuavis and A. dolens . Curr Microbiol. 2014;69:501–506. doi: 10.1007/s00284-014-0611-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Fernandez RC, Weiss AA. Cloning and sequencing of a Bordetella pertussis serum resistance locus. Infect Immun. 1994;62:4727–4738. doi: 10.1128/IAI.62.11.4727-4738.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Jeukens J, Freschi L, Vincent AT, Emond-Rheault J-G, Kukavica-Ibrulj I, et al. A pan-genomic approach to understand the basis of host adaptation in Achromobacter. Genome Biol Evol. 2017;9:1030–1046. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evx061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Marvig RL, Sommer LM, Molin S, Johansen HK. Convergent evolution and adaptation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa within patients with cystic fibrosis. Nat Genet. 2015;47:57–64. doi: 10.1038/ng.3148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Guénard S, Muller C, Monlezun L, Benas P, Broutin I, et al. Multiple mutations lead to MexXY-OprM-dependent aminoglycoside resistance in clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:221–228. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01252-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Frimodt-Møller J, Rossi E, Haagensen JAJ, Falcone M, Molin S, et al. Mutations causing low level antibiotic resistance ensure bacterial survival in antibiotic-treated hosts. Sci Rep. 2018;8:12512. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30972-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Marvig RL, Sommer LM, Jelsbak L, Molin S, Johansen HK. Evolutionary insight from whole-genome sequencing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from cystic fibrosis patients. Future Microbiol. 2015;10:599–611. doi: 10.2217/fmb.15.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Gabrielaite M, Johansen HK, Molin S, Nielsen FC, Marvig RL. Gene loss and acquisition in lineages of bacteria evolving in a human host environment. BioRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1128/mBio.02359-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Marvig RL, Damkiær S, Khademi SMH, Markussen TM, Molin S, et al. Within-host evolution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa reveals adaptation toward iron acquisition from hemoglobin. mBio. 2014;5:e00966–14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00966-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Tyrrell J, Whelan N, Wright C, Sá-Correia I, McClean S, et al. Investigation of the multifaceted iron acquisition strategies of Burkholderia cenocepacia . BioMetals. 2015;28:367–380. doi: 10.1007/s10534-015-9840-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Conn GL, Bavro VN, Davies C. Editorial: bacterial mechanisms of antibiotic resistance: a structural perspective. Front Mol Biosci. 2019;6:71. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2019.00071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Galperin MY, Kristensen DM, Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Koonin EV. Microbial genome analysis: the COG approach. Brief Bioinform. 2019;20:1063–1070. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbx117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hu Y, Zhu Y, Ma Y, Liu F, Lu N, et al. Genomic insights into intrinsic and acquired drug resistance mechanisms in Achromobacter xylosoxidans . Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:1152–1161. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04260-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Sommer LM, Johansen HK, Molin S. Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and adaptation to complex dynamic environments. Microb Genom. 2020;6 doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Vranakis I, Goniotakis I, Psaroulaki A, Sandalakis V, Tselentis Y, et al. Proteome studies of bacterial antibiotic resistance mechanisms. J Proteomics. 2014;97:88–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2013.10.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Harms A, Maisonneuve E, Gerdes K. Mechanisms of bacterial persistence during stress and antibiotic exposure. Science. 2016;354:aaf4268. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf4268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Lopatkin AJ, Bening SC, Manson AL, Stokes JM, Kohanski MA, et al. Clinically relevant mutations in core metabolic genes confer antibiotic resistance. Science. 2021;371:eaba0862. doi: 10.1126/science.aba0862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Lieberman TD, Flett KB, Yelin I, Martin TR, McAdam AJ, et al. Genetic variation of a bacterial pathogen within individuals with cystic fibrosis provides a record of selective pressures. Nat Genet. 2014;46:82–87. doi: 10.1038/ng.2848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Lieberman TD, Wilson D, Misra R, Xiong LL, Moodley P, et al. Genomic diversity in autopsy samples reveals within-host dissemination of hiv-associated mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat Med. 2016;22:1470–1474. doi: 10.1038/nm.4205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Microreact Phylogenetic tree of clinical Achromobacter isolates and Achromobacter genomes available on Refseq database [Internet. [Jun 23;2020 ]; https://microreact.org/project/XBjPPEXWl accessed.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material 1

Articles from Microbial Genomics are provided here courtesy of Microbiology Society

RESOURCES