Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pediatr. 2021 May 20;237:24–33.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.05.035

Chronic Hepatitis Is Common and Often Untreated Among Children With Hepatitis B Infection in the United States and Canada

Simon C Ling 1, Hsing-Hua S Lin 2, Karen F Murray 3, Philip Rosenthal 4, Douglas Mogul 5, Norberto Rodriguez-Baez 6, Sarah Jane Schwarzenberg 7, Jeffrey Teckman 8, Kathleen B Schwarz 5; Hepatitis B Research Network (HBRN)
PMCID: PMC8478804  NIHMSID: NIHMS1706697  PMID: 34022250

Abstract

Objective:

To determine the outcomes of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in a large, prospectively studied cohort of children in the USA and Canada.

Study design:

A prospective observational study of children with chronic HBV enrolled in 7 clinical centers and evaluated at baseline, weeks 24 and 48, and annually thereafter, with analysis of demographic, clinical, physical examination and blood test data.

Results:

Among 362 children followed for a median of 4.2 years, elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels (>1 ULN) were present in 72% at last evaluation, including in 60% of children with loss of HBeAg during follow-up and 70% of those who were HBeAg negative at baseline. Significant ALT flares (males ≥400 U/L, females ≥350 U/L) occurred in 13 children. Of 129 children who fulfilled AASLD treatment criteria during follow-up, anti-HBV treatment was initiated in only 25. One child died (unrelated to liver disease), 1 developed cirrhosis, but no episodes of cirrhotic decompensation or hepatocellular carcinoma were observed. Decline in platelet count was inversely associated with ALT elevations.

Conclusion:

In a cohort of children with chronic HBV infection in the US and Canada, many children remained at risk of progressive liver disease due to active hepatitis, but major clinical outcomes such as cirrhosis, cancer and death were rare. Many children who met criteria for treatment remained untreated.

Keywords: Clinical outcomes, Vertical transmission, Phenotype, Alanine aminotransferase, Platelet count, Entecavir, Interferon, Lamivudine


Chronic infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a major global health problem affecting approximately 257 million people, in view of which the World Health Organization (WHO) has endorsed a global strategy to eliminate hepatitis B infection and other viral hepatitis by 2030 (1,2). Although anti-HBV medications are available to reduce the incidence of adverse outcomes, including cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (3), 887,000 deaths due to HBV infection occurred in 2015 (4). Transmission of hepatitis B infection is largely preventable by immunization, but programs to provide vaccine to newborns often fail to achieve high levels of coverage for their at-risk populations, and some countries have yet to implement such programs (5). Globally, large numbers of children continue to acquire chronic infection with HBV each year.

Among children in the United States (US) and in Canada, chronic HBV infection is found mostly in those who were born (or whose parents were born) in countries of high endemicity (6). There is a significant paucity of published data on the risk of adverse clinical outcomes occurring among these North American children with HBV infection. Studies of the natural history of chronic hepatitis B infection in children are mostly from Asia or Europe, have tended to focus on changes over time in virological and serological markers that are thought to predict adverse clinical outcomes, and were mostly performed in the era before widespread availability of nucleot(s)ide analogue therapies (718).

The Hepatitis B Research Network (HBRN) therefore aimed to prospectively follow a large cohort of children with chronic hepatitis B infection in the USA and Canada to improve our understanding of disease progression during childhood in the modern era and among children linked to clinical care.

Methods

Children ≥6 months and <18 years of age with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positivity were enrolled between 2010 and 2017 at 6 pediatric clinical sites in the United States and 1 in Canada. Subjects were excluded if they had a history of hepatic decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), or liver transplantation; human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C or hepatitis D co-infection; current antiviral therapy for HBV or chronic immunosuppressive therapy; inability or unwillingness to return for study visits; or evidence of severe illness or other medical or social condition that would make the subject, in the opinion of the investigator, unsuitable for the study. Informed consent was obtained from all participants or their parent/caregiver, and assent was obtained when appropriate from children without capacity to consent, according to the requirements of each site’s Institutional Review Board or Research Ethics Committee.

Study design

The HBRN and the enrollment criteria for its pediatric cohort study have been previously described in detail (6). Briefly, the HBRN was established and is funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) to conduct clinical, scientific, epidemiological and therapeutic research in acute and chronic HBV infection in children and adults.

In this prospective observational study, participants were evaluated during visits at baseline, week 24, week 48 and annually thereafter. For this analysis, week 24 visit blood test results were used to supplement any missing baseline data, and participants were required to have at least one follow-up visit occurring >24 weeks after baseline to be included. We also included data from adult follow-up visits for participants who transferred to the adult cohort study at 18 years of age.

Information collected at study visits included demographic, clinical and physical examination data including self-assessment of pubertal stage. Blood testing was performed at each visit. Participants experiencing significant alanine aminotransferase (ALT) flares (defined as ≥400 U/L in males and ≥350 U/L in females) underwent additional visits every 4 weeks until resolution of the enzyme elevations. Extra visits were undertaken as needed for participants with other unexpected clinical events. Ultrasound imaging of the liver and testing of blood alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels were not mandated by the study protocol, but results were collected if clinicians chose to undertake these tests.

During this HBRN cohort study, 3 participants were also enrolled in an industry-sponsored, placebo-controlled clinical trial of entecavir for immune active hepatitis B. For these participants, receipt of active treatment, timing of treatment start and laboratory results were identified in retrospect after completion of the treatment trial.

Also during this cohort study follow-up period, 52 children with normal or near-normal ALT levels (≤60 U/L in males and ≤40 U/L in females), positive HBeAg and high HBV DNA viral concentration > 107 IU/mL were enrolled from this cohort study into the HBRN clinical trial of combination therapy for “immune tolerant” hepatitis B (19). Data for these children were censored at the time of enrollment into the clinical trial and included again in this analysis after completion of the post-treatment 48-week follow-up period.

Laboratory analyses

Blood was collected at each visit and the analyses presented here were based upon complete blood counts and biochemistry, including liver enzymes and bilirubin, which were tested in the site’s local laboratory. For these analysis, a standardized upper limit of the normal range for ALT was defined as ≤33 U/L for male and female infants <1 year old; ≤25 U/L for male and female children 1 year to <13 years old; ≤25 U/L for males and ≤22 U/L for female between 13 years and <18 years old; and ≤30 U/L for males and ≤20 U/L for females over 18 years of age (2022). Laboratory-specific values were used for upper limit of normal for AST, due to variable methodology used in different laboratories.

Details of methodology for tests for HBsAg, HBeAg, anti-HBe, anti-HBs, HBV DNA, and HBV genotype are provided in the Appendix (available at www.jpeds.com).

Outcomes

Clinical outcomes

Death, liver transplantation, cirrhosis, decompensation of cirrhosis, development of HCC, and ALT flares were evaluated. These outcomes were adjudicated by an HBRN committee evaluating study data and all available clinical documentation submitted from the participating centers.

We also sought to evaluate progression of liver fibrosis. Serial liver biopsies were not considered part of routine clinical care and were not undertaken in this pediatric cohort solely for research purposes. Liver elastography measurements were not available in most centers for a major part of the study period. AST-to-platelet-ratio-index (APRI) varies markedly with acute changes in AST and therefore was expected to be an unreliable measure of fibrosis progression in this cohort. For these reasons, changes in platelet count were used to identify trends that might suggest advancing fibrosis with secondary thrombocytopenia. Age-specific, normal platelet count data were obtained from the Canadian Laboratory Initiative on Paediatric Reference Intervals (CALIPER) study investigators (personal communication, K Adeli) (23). Ultrasound scan reports were evaluated when available, to capture the appearance of the liver parenchyma, the size of the spleen, and imaging evidence of portal hypertension.

Serological and virological outcomes

We calculated the hepatitis B phenotype for participants at each follow-up time-point. Phenotypes were defined as follows: “immune tolerant” HBV infection, defined by normal serum ALT levels, positive HBeAg and high levels of HBV DNA in serum (≥105 IU/mL); “immune active” chronic hepatitis B, defined by elevated ALT levels and high levels of HBV DNA (≥105 IU/mL for HBeAg‐positive and ≥104 IU/mL for HBeAg‐negative participants); “inactive carrier” state, defined by normal ALT levels, negative HBeAg and no detectable or only low levels of HBV DNA (≤104 IU/mL). Participants who did not fulfil criteria for any one of these four categories were categorized as having an “indeterminant” phenotype (24).

We summarized the number of participants who at any time during follow-up became negative for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg), negative for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), whose measurement of HBV DNA became un-quantifiable (if quantifiable at baseline), and whose measurement of HBV DNA became quantifiable (if un-quantifiable at baseline). Additional analysis of these viral outcomes has been presented previously (25).

Commencement of anti-HBV treatment

We recorded the commencement of treatment for hepatitis B by the participant’s treating clinicians, including the choice of therapeutic agent. The status of participants who received treatment was evaluated at their last follow-up visit and when laboratory test results were missing at the last visit, results from the previous visit within 60 weeks were used. For comparison, we identified the number of participants who fulfilled criteria for treatment as defined in the clinical practice guideline of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) (26). The AASLD guideline suggests antiviral therapy in children (ages 2 to <18 years) who are positive for HBeAg with both elevated ALT and measurable HBV-DNA levels, noting that most studies consider ALT >1.3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) for > 6 months and a DNA level >104 IU/mL as criteria to initiate treatment (“AASLD criteria”). We also identified the number of participants fulfilling more extreme treatment criteria (ALT > 3 times the upper limit of normal for > 6 months and HBV DNA >104 IU/mL) (“more extreme treatment criteria”).

Statistical analyses

Data are summarized using frequencies (percentages) for categorical variables and means (standard deviation) or medians (25th and 75th percentiles) for continuous variables. Outcomes are presented as the number of cases experiencing each outcome and as incident rates per 100 person-years (PY) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Cumulative probability curves estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method were constructed for HBV treatment starts, significant ALT flares, and the virological and serological outcomes. For each outcome, we analyzed longitudinal data initially regardless of treatment status, and then censoring participants at the time of treatment initiation. Longitudinal ALT values and HBV phenotypes per individual were illustrated by heatmaps. Distributions of characteristics among participants meeting AASLD treatment criteria who received HBV treatment, and those who did not receive HBV treatment, were compared using exact Pearson chi-square or Kruskal-Wallis tests, as appropriate.

Platelet count was analyzed initially using cross-sectional enrollment data only, by age groups and compared graphically to the normal platelet count data obtained from the CALIPER study (no CALIPER data are available for children 6 month to <3 years old). We used mixed effect models to examine changes in platelet count per one-year increase in age and age-adjusted associations between platelet count and each clinical and laboratory variable, whilst accounting for correlations among repeated measures for the same participant. Changes in platelet count over time in individual participants were also examined using trajectory analysis to identify subgroups of participants with different rates of change of platelet count over time. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) and R (version 3.5.3; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Results

Of the 462 children enrolled into the HBRN pediatric cohort, 100 were excluded due to hepatitis C (n=2) or hepatitis D (n=7) co-infection, or inadequate follow-up visits (n=91), leaving 362 children for the current analysis. Baseline characteristics revealed a primarily Asian pediatric cohort (79%) with vertically acquired HBV infection (98%), mostly born outside of the USA and Canada (74%), among which HBV genotypes B (42%) and C (31%) predominated and ALT values were typically mildly elevated (66% with ALT >1–3 ULN) (Table I). The majority at enrollment were HBeAg positive (75%), with weight, height and body mass index appropriate for age.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics (n=362)

Sex
 Male 148 (41%)
 Female 214 (59%)
Age at baseline
 Mean(SD) 9.8 (4.4)
 Median(25th:75th) 10.0 (6.1 : 13.5)
 Min:Max 1.0 : 17.6
Age at baseline
 6 months–<5 yrs 67 (19%)
 5–<13 yrs 194 (54%)
 13–<18 yrs 101 (28%)
Race n=361
 White 32 (9%)
 Black 36 (10%)
 Asian 286 (79%)
 Other/Mixed 7 (2%)
Mode of Transmission of Hep B n=292
 Vertical transmission 286 (98%)
 Horizontal/Household contact 6 (2%)
Place of Birth n=361
 US/Canada 93 (26%)
 Other North America/South America 6 (2%)
 Europe 21 (6%)
 Asia/Australia 215 (60%)
 Africa 26 (7%)
Patient Adopted
 No 165 (46%)
 Yes 197 (54%)
HBV Genotype n=283
 A 13 (5%)
 B 118 (42%)
 C 88 (31%)
 D 52 (18%)
 E 11 (4%)
 Multiple 1 (0%)
Platelets (x103/mm3) n=325
 Median(25th:75th) 267 (229 : 311)
 Min:Max 122 : 582
ALTxULN n=355
 Median(25th:75th) 1.6 (1.1 : 2.3)
 Min:Max 0.3 : 82.7
ALTxULN n=355
 ≤1 ULN 69 (19%)
 >1–3 ULN 235 (66%)
 >3–5 ULN 25 (7%)
 >5 ULN 26 (7%)
ASTxULN n=355
 Median(25th:75th) 0.9 (0.8 : 1.2)
 Min:Max 0.3 : 27.5
ASTxULN n=355
 ≤1 ULN 209 (59%)
 >1–3 ULN 134 (38%)
 >3–5 ULN 7 (2%)
 >5 ULN 5 (1%)
HBeAg n=350
 Negative 89 (25%)
 Positive 261 (75%)
HBV DNA (log10 IU/mL) n=358
 Median(25th:75th) 8.1 (5.2 : 8.4)
 Min:Max BLD : 9.3
qHBeAg (log10 IU/mL) n=252
 Median(25th:75th) 3.1 (−0.6 : 3.3)
 Min:Max BLD : 3.8
qHBsAg (log10 IU/mL) n=251
 Median(25th:75th) 4.4 (4.0 : 4.8)
 Min:Max −0.2 : 5.6
Anti-HBe n=317
 Negative 227 (72%)
 Positive 90 (28%)
Anti-HBs n=305
 Negative 289 (95%)
 Positive 16 (5%)
BMI Z-score n=349
 Median(25th:75th) 0.1 (−0.7 : 0.8)
 Min:Max −2.9 : 2.2
Height Z-score n=358
 Median(25th:75th) −0.2 (−0.9 : 0.5)
 Min:Max −3.6 : 2.6
Weight Z-score n=361
 Median(25th:75th) −0.1 (−0.9 : 0.7)
 Min:Max −3.4 : 2.6
Tanner Stage: Physical Growth n=339
 I 186 (55%)
 II 28 (8%)
 III 49 (14%)
 IV 58 (17%)
 V 18 (5%)
Tanner Stage: Pubic Hair Growth n=338
 I 204 (60%)
 II 23 (7%)
 III 37 (11%)
 IV 53 (16%)
 V 21 (6%)

Outcomes observed during a median duration of follow-up of 4.2 years (range 0.8 to 7.9 years), their incidence rates and cumulative probabilities are presented in Table 2 and Figure 1. One participant died from a cause not related to liver disease (accidental choking). One female participant developed cirrhosis during follow-up at week 71 (at age 14 years) with liver histology showing fibrosis stage 4/4. This participant had a normal liver ultrasound scan at baseline and no associated co-morbidities. Baseline laboratory results revealed an ALT 152 U/L, AST 105 U/L and platelet count of 172 ×103/mm3. Platelet count subsequently fell to 148 ×103/mm3 at the time of liver biopsy.

Table 2.

Selected outcomes and incidence rates (n=362)

Regardless of treatment status
Censored at HBV treatment initiation
Outcomes na Incident cases person-years Incidence rate per 100 person-years (95%CI) na Incident cases person-years Incidence rate per 100 person-years (95%CI)


Clinical outcomes
Death 362 1b 1489 0.07 (0.01, 0.48) 362 1b 1153 0.09 (0.01, 0.62)
Cirrhosis 362 1 1489 0.07 (0.01, 0.48) 362 1 1153 0.09 (0.01, 0.62)
Decompensation 362 0 - - 362 0 - -
HCC 362 0 - - 362 0 - -

Serological outcomes
ALT flare (male ≥400, female ≥350 U/L) 337 13 1214 1.07 (0.62, 1.84) 315 11 1055 1.04 (0.58, 1.88)
Ever become HBeAg-Negative 240 50 759 6.59 (4.99, 8.69) 220 29 636 4.56 (3.17, 6.56)
Ever become HBsAg-Negative 332 8 1188 0.67 (0.34, 1.35) 312 4 1045 0.38 (0.14, 1.02)

Virological outcomes
Ever become HBV DNA unquantifiable c 325 49 1063 4.61 (3.48, 6.10) 306 27 949 2.85 (1.95, 4.15)
Ever become HBV DNA quantifiable d 14 8 43 18.67 (9.34, 37.33) 14 8 43 18.67 (9.34, 37.33)
a

Number of participants who were eligible at enrollment for each outcome and had at least one follow-up result.

b

Cause of death: choking.

c

If quantifiable at enrollment.

d

If unquantifiable at enrollment.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Cumulative probability of (A) onset of ALT flare; (B) becoming HBeAg negative for patients who were HBeAg positive at baseline; (C) becoming HBsAg negative; (D) developing unquantifiable HBV DNA for patients who had quantifiable HBV DNA at baseline; and, (E) commencing standard of care anti-HBV treatment.

No episodes of decompensation of cirrhosis, ascites, variceal hemorrhage or HCC were identified.

Serological and virological outcomes

Participants with HBeAg loss during follow-up

Of the 240 children who were HBeAg positive at baseline and had follow-up evaluation for HBeAg status, 50 became HBeAg negative (cumulative probability of 23% at the 4th year of follow up) (Table 2 and Figure 1, B). Among these 50, 40 were tested negative for anti-HBe before loss of HBeAg, of whom 34 developed anti-HBe.

The 50 participants who became HBeAg negative could be categorized into 4 groups according to the pattern of change in ALT, HBV DNA, and anti-viral treatment, after removal of 5 participants with inadequate follow-up after HBeAg loss. A significant decrease in DNA level was seen in 20 participants in whom ALT was initially either normal or elevated and became normal or near normal after HBeAg loss (Figure 2, A; available at www.jpeds.com). In 4 participants, HBV DNA remained high and ALT remained normal or elevated (Figure 2, B; available at www.jpeds.com). In 16 participants, treatment with entecavir (n=15) or lamivudine (n=1) was associated with a significant decline in HBV DNA values and an initially normal or high ALT level fell to normal or near normal after HBeAg loss (Figure 2, C; available at www.jpeds.com). Interferon treatment in 5 participants was associated with a significant reduction in HBV DNA and normalization or near normalization of initially elevated ALT levels (Figure 2, D; available at www.jpeds.com).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Sequential lab plots in four example patients demonstrating four different patterns of HBeAg loss. (2A) A significant fall in DNA was seen in 20 participants in whom ALT was initially either normal or elevated and became normal or near normal after HBeAg loss. (2B) In 4 participants, HBV DNA remained high and ALT remained normal or elevated. (2C) In 16 participants, treatment with entecavir (n=15) or lamivudine (n=1) was associated with a significant fall in HBV DNA and an initially normal or high ALT fell to normal or near normal after HBeAg loss. (2D) Interferon treatment in 5 participants was associated with a significant reduction in HBV DNA and normalization or near normalization of initially elevated ALT.

At final follow-up, an elevated ALT level (>1 ULN) was noted in 27 of the 45 (60%) participants after HBeAg loss (21 with >1–2x ULN, 2 with >2–3x ULN, and 4 with >3x ULN). High HBV DNA (≥4 log 10 IU/ml) was found at baseline in 44 of these 45 participants. At last follow-up, 12 (27%) had elevated HBV DNA ≥4 log 10 IU/ml (Table 3; available at www.jpeds.com).

Table 3.

Baseline and last ALT and HBV DNA for (a) 88 participants who were HBeAg (−) at baseline and last follow-up, and (b) 45 participants who were HBeAg (+) and lost HBeAg during follow-up, stratified by whether receiving HBV treatment before losing HBeAg

(a) HBeAg (−) at baseline & at last follow-up
n=88
(b) Received HBV treatment before losing HBeAg(−)
No
n=241
Yes
n=21

Baseline ALT x ULN n=87 n=24 n=21
 Median (25th: 75th) 1.5 (1.0 : 1.9) 2.3 (1.4 : 7.4) 5.6 (3.0 : 7.8)
 Min:Max 0.3 : 50.1 0.8 : 82.7 1.3 : 54.6
Baseline ALTxULN n=87 n=24 n=21
 ≤1 ULN 22 (25%) 2 (8%) 0 (0%)
 >1–2 ULN 48 (55%) 9 (38%) 2 (10%)
 >2–3 ULN 13 (15%) 4 (17%) 3 (14%)
 >3 ULN 4 (5%) 9 (38%) 16 (76%)
Last ALT x ULN n=88 n=24 n=21
 Median (25th: 75th) 1.3 (1.0 : 1.7) 1.2 (1.0 : 1.5) 1.0 (0.8 : 1.3)
 Min:Max 0.5 : 15.7 0.5 : 11.1 0.5 : 7.9
Last ALTxULN n=88 n=24 n=21
 ≤1 ULN 26 (30%) i 8 (33%) 10 (48%)
 >1–2 ULN 52 (59%) 13 (54%) 8 (38%)
 >2–3 ULN 9 (10%) 0 (0%) 2 (10%)
 >3 ULN 1 (1%) 3 (13%) 1 (5%)
Baseline HBV DNA (log10 IU/mL) n=88 n=24 n=21
 Median (25th: 75th) 2.6 (2.0 : 3.8) 7.4 (6.1 : 8.4) 8.0 (7.9 : 8.3)
 Min:Max <LLOQ : 8.5 3.5 : 9.3 6.8 : 8.5
Baseline HBV DNA (log10 IU/mL) n=88 n=24 n=21
 <3 51 (58%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
 3 – <4 20 (23%) 1 (4%) 0 (0%)
 4 – <5 9 (10%) 2 (8%) 0 (0%)
 5 – <7 6 (7%) 7 (29%) 2 (10%)
 7 – <8 0 (0%) 5 (21%) 6 (29%)
 ≥8 2 (2%) 9 (38%) 13 (62%)
Last HBV DNA (log10 IU/mL) n=88 n=24 n=20
 Median (25th: 75th) 2.4 (1.3 : 3.3) 2.4 (1.7 : 4.4) 1.3 (<LLOQ : 4.2)
 Min:Max <LLOQ : 8.2 <LLOQ : 8.0 <LLOQ: 8.8
Last HBV DNA (log10 IU/mL) n=88 n=24 n=20
 <3 61 (69%) 14 (58%) 15 (75%)
 3 – <4 20 (23%) 3 (13%) 0 (0%)
 4 – <5 5 (6%) 5 (21%) 0 (0%)
 5 – <7 1 (1%) 1 (4%) 3 (15%)
 7 – <8 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
 ≥8 1 (1%) 1 (4%) 2 (10%)

Participants with HBsAg loss during follow-up

Eight of 332 participants with follow-up evaluation of HBsAg became HBsAg negative (cumulative probability of 3% at the 4th year of follow-up) (Table 2 and Figure 1, C). HBsAg loss occurred in 4 participants after initiation of anti-HBV treatment, each of whom had sustained HBsAg seroconversion (e.g. at least two consecutive results of HBsAg negative and anti-HBs positive). At the last follow-up, one of 8 participants who became negative became HBsAg positive again. Five of 7 children who had sustained HBsAg loss had normal ALT levels and two children had mildly elevated ALT levels (1.1 and 1.5 xULN) at the last follow-up. All 6 children who were still HBsAg negative had HBV DNA below level of quantification at the time of last follow up test and the remaining child did not have HBV DNA results from the last visit.

Phenotype

Phenotype was calculated in 312 participants at baseline, showing 27% (n=86) to be immune tolerant, 44% (n=136) with HBeAg positive hepatitis, 3% (n=10) with HBeAg negative hepatitis, 12% (n=37) inactive carriers and 10% (n=32) indeterminant phenotype and 4% (n=11) had started antiviral treatment after enrollment but before the initial phenotype could be determined. At last available follow-up, 66% (57/86) of those initially immune tolerant remained as immune tolerant, 49% (66/136) remained as HBeAg positive CHB, 30% (3/10) remained as HBeAg- CHB, 78% (29/37) remained as inactive carriers, and 56% (18/32) remained as indeterminant phenotype (Table 4 and Figure 3; available at www.jpeds.com).

Table 4.

Cross-listing of calculated phenotype at enrollment and at the last available follow-up (n=312)

Calculated phenotype at enrollment
All
n=312
IT trial participants n=47 (15%)*
Immune tolerant HBeAg+ CHB HBeAg− CHB Inactive carrier Indeterminant HBV drugs
Immune tolerant HBeAg+ CHB
n=38 (12%) n=9 (3%) n=48 (15%) n=127 (41%) n=10 (3%) n=37 (12%) n=32 (10%) n=11 (4%)
Last available phenotype
HBsAg negative 7 (2%) 1 (3%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (2%) 1 (10%) 2 (5%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%)
Immune tolerant 80 (26%) 23 (61%) 3 (33%) 34 (71%) 18 (14%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (3%) 1 (9%)
HBeAg+ CHB 80 (26%) 7 (18%) 2 (22%) 6 (13%) 64 (50%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%)
HBeAg− CHB 7 (2%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (4%) 1 (1%) 3 (30%) 0 (0%) 1 (3%) 0 (0%)
Inactive carrier 67 (21%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (6%) 14 (11%) 4 (40%) 29 (78%) 12 (38%) 5 (45%)
Indeterminant 36 (12%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (4%) 7 (6%) 2 (20%) 6 (16%) 18 (56%) 1 (9%)
HBV drugs 26 (8%) 0 (0%) 2 (22%) 1 (2%) 21 (17%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (18%)
In the IT trial 9 (3%) 7 (18%) 2 (22%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)

Ever received HBV treatment during study follow-up n=38 n=9 n=48 n=127 n=10 n=37 n=32 n=11

Yes 38 (100%) 9 (100%) 2 (4%) 33 (26%) 1 (10%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (27%)

No 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 46 (96%) 94 (74%) 9 (90%) 37 (100%) 32 (100%) 8 (73%)
*

Among 47 participants who enrolled in the IT trial, 38 were immune tolerant and 9 were HBeAg+ CHB at the pediatric cohort enrollment. Pediatric IT clinical trial enrolled participants with normal or near-normal ALT (≤60 U/L in males and ≤40 U/L in females).

IT: Immune tolerant, CHB: chronic hepatitis B

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Heatmap of phenotype by baseline phenotype included 312 participants who had first available phenotype at week 0 and had at least one additional follow-up phenotype result.

Participants with negative HBeAg at baseline

Among the 89 children who were HBeAg negative at baseline, 2 children became HBeAg positive during follow-up, one with low levels of quantitative HBeAg levels (0.33 to 0.55 IU/mL) which then reverted to negative, and the other remained HBeAg positive at the last follow-up. At last follow-up, 62 of these 88 HBeAg-negative children (70%) had elevated ALT levels (52 with >1–2 ULN, 9 with >2–3 ULN, and 1 with 3> ULN) and 7 had HBV DNA levels ≥4 log 10 IU/ml (Table 3).

HBV DNA

Of the 325 children with quantifiable HBV DNA at baseline, 82% had a high HBV DNA level ≥ 4 log 10 IU/mL. 49 children had at least one unquantifiable HBV DNA level during follow-up (cumulative probability of 18% at the 4th year of follow-up) (Table 2 and Figure 1, D). Twenty-two of these 49 children achieved this outcome after starting anti-HBV treatment and 27 without treatment initiation. Of the 27 children whose HBV DNA levels became unquantifiable spontaneously, 17 had HBV DNA < 4 log 10 IU/mL and 20 were HBeAg negative at baseline. During follow-up 7 of the 27 children had undetectable HBV DNA levels and one was HBsAg negative at the time of the last visit. Fourteen children had detectable but unquantifiable HBV DNA levels at baseline, of whom 8 were found to develop quantifiable levels of HBV DNA with median 2.1 log 10 IU/mL, ranging between 1.4 and 5.1 log 10 IU/mL during follow-up.

Changes in ALT and ALT flares

ALT levels were above the ULN in 81% of the cohort at baseline. During follow-up, this proportion steadily decreased, such that 72% had elevated ALT levels at the last clinic visit. Measured ALT levels remained in the normal range throughout follow-up in 37 participants. In those with abnormal ALT levels recorded during follow-up, the peak value was below 2xULN in 138 participants (40%), 2–3xULN in 74 (21%), 3–5xULN in 41 (12%), and >5xULN in 56 (16%). ALT levels fluctuated significantly during follow-up in individual patients with, for example, 21 (38%) of 56 participants with peak ALT >5xULN also recording normal ALT values at other time points (Figure 4; available at www.jpeds.com).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Heatmap of ALT level during follow up of 346 participants who had at least two visits with ALT values.

Onset of significant ALT flares were observed during follow-up in 13 children (Table 5; available at www.jpeds.com). Two children developed a second flare after resolution of the first, but this analysis includes only the first flare for each. The cumulative incidence of significant ALT flares at 4 years of follow-up was 4% (Table 2 and Figure 1, A). Only one flare occurred in a child within the usual age range for onset of puberty (8–13 years in girls, 9–14 years in boys). HBeAg status changed from positive before the flare to negative after the flare in 5 children, whose baseline characteristics, severity of flare and likelihood of receiving treatment (2 of these 5 were started on anti-HBV treatment) were similar to the children who did not become HBeAg negative. All five children undergoing HBeAg loss after a significant flare developed anti-HBe.

Table 5.

Characteristics of ALT flares in 13 participants.

Characteristics n or median (min - max)
Sex n=13
 Female 6
 Male 7
Age at flare onset (years) 14.2 (3.5 – 18.7)
Pubertal stage at flare onset n=13
 I (prepubertal) 6
 II 0
 III 1
 IV 4
 V 2
HBV genotype n=13
 A 1
 B 8
 C 2
 D 1
 Unknown 1
Biochemical changes n=13
 Peak ALT recorded (U/L) 560 (352 – 1710)
 Elevation of bilirubin n=5
  Peak bilirubin recorded (mg/dL) 1.6 (1.2 – 2.5)
Treatment
 On treatment at flare onset n=0
 Treatment started during flare n=6
  Entecavir 4
  Interferon 1
  Lamivudine 1
 Time from flare onset to treatment start (weeks) 6.8 (1.3 – 20.4)
Flare Resolution Duration a n=11
 Time from flare onset to resolution (weeks) 8.6 (1.3 – 70.0)
HBeAg n=11
 HBeAg change from positive to negative after flare 5
 HBeAg positive before and after flare 4
 HBeAg negative before and after flare 2
Anti-HBe antibody n=11
 Anti-HBe change from negative to positive during flare 5
 Anti-HBe positive before and after flare 2
 Anti-HBe negative before and after flare 4
HBV DNA n=11
 HBV DNA at flare onset (log10 IU/mL) 8.2 (6.2 to 8.8)
 HBV DNA nadir after flare (log10 IU/mL) 2.1 (<limit of detection - 8.2)
 HBV DNA <4 log10 IU/mL after flare 7
Adjudicated cause of flare n=13
 HBV reactivation- rising HBV DNA during the flare 4 (including 1 after withdrawal of anti-HBV therapy)
 Immune clearance- decrease in HBV DNA and loss of HBeAg 2 (including 1 who failed to sustain the loss of HBeAg)
 ALT flare without change in HBV DNA 1
 Unknown 6
a

Resolution of flare defined as ALT falling below the flare diagnosis threshold of 400 U/L for males and 350 U/L for females. Eleven participants had available follow-up data after flare onset.

Commencement of anti-HBV treatment

Anti-HBV treatment was initiated at the treating physician’s discretion in 40 children during the study period with entecavir (n=25), interferon or peginterferon (n=11), lamivudine (n=3) or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (n=1). The cumulative probability of treatment commencement in the study cohort was 13% by the 4th year of follow-up (Figure 1, E). Incidence rates for treatment initiation were similar between most patient subgroups although higher among those with elevated ALT levels and lower among those negative for HBeAg (Table 6; available at www.jpeds.com). Five of these 40 children underwent a second course of treatment (2 with entecavir, 1 interferon, 2 tenofovir).

Table 6.

Incidence rates of standard-of-care HBV treatment initiation after enrollment among 362 participants

Baseline Characteristic No. of Participants No. w/Outcome Total PYR Incidence/100 PYR (95% CI) a
Age (Years) 6 months-<10 180 21 632 3.32 (2.17, 5.09)
≥10 182 19 521 3.65 (2.33, 5.72)
Sex Male 148 13 482 2.70 (1.57, 4.65)
Female 214 27 671 4.02 (2.76, 5.86)
Asian Asian 286 33 899 3.67 (2.61, 5.16)
Non-Asian 75 7 247 2.83 (1.35, 5.94)
Patient Adopted No 165 15 533 2.81 (1.70, 4.67)
Yes 197 25 620 4.03 (2.73, 5.97)
Caregiver Highest Education Below Bachelor’s degree 114 12 339 3.54 (2.01, 6.23)
Bachelor’s degree and above 232 27 749 3.61 (2.47, 5.26)
Annual Household Income <$50,000 60 4 181 2.21 (0.83, 5.88)
$50,000– <$100,000 83 13 252 5.17 (3.00, 8.90)
≥$100,000 119 12 406 2.95 (1.68, 5.20)
HBV Genotype A 13 3 40 7.59 (2.45, 23.52)
B 118 13 339 3.84 (2.23, 6.61)
C 88 11 320 3.44 (1.91, 6.21)
D 52 3 199 1.51 (0.49, 4.67)
E 11 2 32 6.33 (1.58, 25.33)
Multiple 1 0 2
HBeAg Negative 89 2 331 0.60 (0.15, 2.41)
Positive 261 38 777 4.89 (3.56, 6.72)
HBV DNA (log10 IU/mL) <4 75 0 288
4–<8 88 17 255 6.67 (4.15, 10.73)
≥8 195 23 603 3.82 (2.54, 5.74)
qHBeAg (log10 IU/mL) <3 113 14 367 3.81 (2.26, 6.43)
3–<5 139 18 408 4.41 (2.78, 7.00)
qHBsAg (log10 IU/mL) <3 17 0 69
3–<5 206 28 607 4.62 (3.19, 6.69)
≥5 28 4 91 4.42 (1.66, 11.77)
ALT x ULN ≤1 x ULN 69 0 232
>1 – 2xULN 173 6 604 0.99 (0.45, 2.21)
>2 x ULN 113 33 297 11.10 (7.89, 15.61)
Platelets (x103/mm3) <200 41 6 106 5.69 (2.55, 12.66)
≥200 284 34 929 3.66 (2.61, 5.12)
a

Confidence interval (CI) based on Wald

PYR = person-years

Before the 40 children received treatment, 37 were HBeAg positive, all were HBsAg positive and all had HBV DNA levels > 5.0 log 10 IU/mL. At the last evaluation of the 39 patients who had available data after treatment initiation (median duration of treatment 96 weeks, range 20 – 361 weeks), 18 were still receiving treatment, 14 had normal ALT (≤ 1 ULN), 24 had elevated ALT (median 45 U/L, range 23 – 237 U/L), (ALT unknown in 1), 22 were HBeAg negative (13 positive and 4 unknown), 19 anti-HBe positive (13 negative and 7 unknown), 4 were HBsAg negative (28 positive, 7 unknown), and HBV DNA levels were less than 4.0 log 10 IU/mL in 28, greater than this level in 10, and unknown in 1 patient.

Analysis of the cohort data revealed that 129 participants fulfilled the AASLD criteria for anti-HBV treatment (including ALT>1.3xULN for >6 months) during follow-up and 27 fulfilled more extreme treatment criteria (including ALT>3xULN for > 6 months), of whom only a subgroup received standard of care HBV treatment (25 [19%] and 14 [52%], respectively) (Table 7). Among children fulfilling the AASLD criteria, treatment rates were higher in the early years of the study (2011–2015, when 18 of 56 [32%] eligible children were treated) compared with the later years (2016–2018, when 7 of 73 [10%] eligible children were treated). Among treated children, the median pre-treatment peak ALT did not differ between the two eras.

Table 7.

Fulfilment of AASLD anti-HBV treatment criteria and more extreme criteria

ALT elevated > 6 months ALT elevated > 1 year
AASLD Guideline Criteria
ALT persistently elevated >1.3xULN a and other criteriab 129 110
 Received standard of care HBV treatment after ALT elevation 25/129(19%) 21/110 (19%)
More extreme criteria
ALT persistently elevated >3xULN a and other criteriab 27 14
 Received standard of care HBV treatment after ALT elevation 14/27 (52%) 7/14 (50%)
a

AASLD guideline recommends ULN for ALT of 35 U/L in males and 25 U/L in females.

b

Other criteria include HBeAg+, HBV DNA >104, no HBeAg loss or anti-HBe positive at around 6 months.

Sociodemographic profiles were similar between treated versus non-treated groups except that children who were treated had significantly higher peak ALT before treatment initiation. At last follow-up, those who did not receive treatment had higher HBV DNA levels, and were more likely to be HBeAg positive and anti-HBe negative, than those who were treated (Table 8; available at www.jpeds.com). Platelet counts at last follow-up were similar between the two groups, and none of these untreated participants became HBsAg negative.

Table 8.

Sociodemographics and lab results among 129 children who fulfilled the AASLD criteria for anti-HBV treatment.

Not treated with HBV therapy after meeting AASLD guideline n=104 Treated with HBV therapy after meeting AASLD guideline n=25
Age (years) at the beginning of flare
 6 months-<10 64 (62%) 12 (48%)
 ≥10 40 (38%) 13 (52%)
Sex
 Male 43 (41%) 8 (32%)
 Female 61 (59%) 17 (68%)
Race
 White 8 (8%) 0 (0%)
 Black 10 (10%) 4 (16%)
 Asian 83 (80%) 21 (84%)
 Other/Mixed 3 (3%) 0 (0%)
Patient Adopted
 No 56 (54%) 9 (36%)
 Yes 48 (46%) 16 (64%)
Time Since Migration (years)
 Born US/Canada 37 (36%) 6 (24%)
 >10–20 years ago 7 (7%) 5 (20%)
 ≤10 years ago 57 (55%) 14 (56%)
 Unknown Timing 3 (3%) 0 (0%)
Caregiver Highest Education
 Below Bachelor’s degree 37 (36%) 7 (28%)
 Bachelor’s degree and above 61 (59%) 17 (68%)
 Missing 6 (6%) 1 (4%)
Annual Household Income
 <$50,000 22 (21%) 4 (16%)
 $50,000– <$100,000 19 (18%) 8 (32%)
 ≥$100,000 36 (35%) 7 (28%)
 Missing 27 (26%) 6 (24%)
Type of Insurance
 None or Self Pay 1 (1%) 0 (0%)
 Medicaid 3 (3%) 1 (4%)
 Tricare 1 (1%) 1 (4%)
 Government 54 (52%) 8 (32%)
 Private 43 (41%) 15 (60%)
 Multiple 1 (1%) 0 (0%)
 Prefer Not to Answer 1 (1%) 0 (0%)
Max of ALT during the flare or before treatment **
 Median(25th:75th) 70 (53 : 93) 151 (96 : 231)
 Min:Max 35 : 2067 62 : 1710
Total follow-up weeks
 Median(25th:75th) 222.6 (131.3 : 282.5) 238.6 (187.1 : 336.6)
 Min:Max 42.6 : 402.4 30.7 : 405.4
Age at the last visit
 Median(25th:75th) 11.9 (8.4 : 17.2) 16.2 (10.3 : 17.5)
 Min:Max 2.1 : 24.4 5.4 : 21.4
Lab results at the last follow-up visit
Platelets (x103/mm3) n=95 n=22
 Median(25th:75th) 243 (204 : 300) 248 (235 : 302)
 Min:Max 123 : 390 133 : 424
ALT (U/L) n=103 n=25
 Median(25th:75th) 49 (36 : 68) 37 (23 : 66)
 Min:Max 14 : 782 7 : 352
ALT x ULN-AASLD n=103 n=25
 Median(25th:75th) 1.8 (1.4 : 2.2) 1.4 (0.9 : 2.4)
 Min:Max 0.6 : 31.3 0.3 : 14.1
HBV DNA (log10 IU/mL) ** n=102 n=24
 Median(25th:75th) 8.1 (7.3 : 8.5) 2.0 (<LLOD : 5.9)
 Min:Max <LLOD : >ULOQ <LLOD : 8.8
HBV DNA (log10 IU/mL) **
 ≤ 4 9 (9%) 15 (60%)
 > 4 93 (89%) 9 (36%)
 Missing 2 (2%) 1 (4%)
HBeAg **
 Negative 13 (13%) 10 (40%)
 Positive 89 (86%) 12 (48%)
 Missing 2 (2%) 3 (12%)
HBsAg *
 Negative 0 (0%) 1 (4%)
 Positive 96 (92%) 20 (80%)
 Missing 8 (8%) 4 (16%)
Anti-HBe **
 Negative 80 (77%) 12 (48%)
 Positive 13 (13%) 8 (32%)
 Missing 11 (11%) 5 (20%)

LLOD: lower limit of detection; ULOQ: upper limit of quantification.

AASLD guideline recommends ULN for ALT of 35 U/L in males and 25 U/L in females.

*

p<0.05

**

p<0.01

Platelet count

Cross-sectional analysis of platelet count at baseline revealed an association with age (Figure 5; available at www.jpeds.com). Compared with a 1-year younger child, an older child’s platelet count was lower by 5.8 ×103 per mm3 (95%CI: −7.3, −4.2) in the HBRN cohort. This result was similar to that observed in healthy children in the CALIPER study (−5.7 ×103 per mm3, 95%CI: −7.3, −4.0) (23). A similar relationship between platelet count and age was also found by examining HBRN longitudinal pediatric cohort data (Table 9; available at www.jpeds.com). Age-adjusted analysis of longitudinal platelet count data using mixed effect models showed an association between lower platelet count and elevation of ALT levels (Table 9). Two patterns for this association were noted, including an acute fall in platelet count during a transient ALT flare, with subsequent return to baseline values (Figure 6, A; available at www.jpeds.com), and a steady sustained fall in platelet count associated with chronic ALT elevations (Figure 6, B; available at www.jpeds.com). Trajectory analysis did not reveal a subgroup of participants with more rapid decline in platelet count during study follow-up (results not shown).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Platelet count (mean and 95% confidence intervals) by age in healthy children (CALIPER study) vs HBRN pediatric cohort at baseline (cross-sectional analysis). CALIPER data were obtained via personal communication from the CALIPER senior author (23)(Adeli 2015).

Table 9.

Age-adjusted differences in platelet counts (x103/mm3)a (longitudinal analysis: 354 children with 1414 observations with platelets).

Predictors Observations Age-adjusted association for each predictor
Change or differences in platelets: beta (95% CI) Type III p
Age, years obs=1414 −4.9 (−5.7, −4.1) <0.001
Sex obs=1414 0.15
 Female 848 (60%) 8.3 (−3.0, 19.6)
 Male 566 (40%) ref
ALTxULN obs=1407 <0.001
 ≤ 1 ULN 366 (26%) ref
 > 1–3 ULN 898 (64%) −7.1 (−13.6, −0.7)
 > 3–5 ULN 78 (6%) −18.2 (−29.5, −6.9)
 > 5 ULN 65 (5%) −26.7 (−37.7, −15.7)
ASTxULN obs=1398 <0.001
 ≤ 1 ULN 1007 (72%) ref
 > 1–3 ULN 357 (26%) −11.7 (−17.2, −6.2)
 > 3–5 ULN 20 (1%) −22.1 (−39.2, −5.0)
 > 5 ULN 14 (1%) −20.8 (−40.8, −0.7)
HBV DNA (log10 IU/mL) obs=1364 0.4 (−0.9, 1.7) 0.56
qHBeAg (log10 IU/mL) obs=1057 −0.4 (−2.8, 1.9) 0.72
qHBsAg (log10 IU/mL) obs=1031 2.7 (−0.9, 6.4) 0.14
HBeAg status obs=1336
 Negative 474 (35%) 3.1 (−5.2, 11.4) 0.47
 Positive 862 (65%) ref
Currently treated with Peg-IFN/IFN (4 weeks washout period) obs=1414 <0.001
 Yes 11 (1%) −73.9 (−96.6, −51.3)
 No 1403 (99%) ref
a

Mixed effects models were used to account for correlations among repeated measures for the same child.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Two case studies. Sequential platelet count and ALT measurements in two patients demonstrating different patterns of association between the two variables.

AFP monitoring

Clinicians measured AFP in 75% of participants at baseline, and in 63–79% at each subsequent annual follow-up visit. Recorded AFP values were normal (<10 ng/ml) in 99% of tests, and below 50ng/ml in all tests. Mild elevations of AFP in 15 children (median 21.4 ng/ml, range 10–44.8 ng/ml), returned to normal in 13 children, and reduced towards normal in 2 children at last follow-up (44.8 to 25.5 ng/ml in one child, 20 to 10 ng/ml in another child). In 5 of these children, mild AFP elevation coincided with significant elevation of ALT (median 654 U/l, range 143 to 2067 U/l). All but one of the 15 children had ultrasound scans performed that did not show focal lesions or nodular liver parenchyma.

Ultrasound imaging

Clinicians completed liver ultrasound imaging in 64% of participants at baseline and in 29–38% at each subsequent annual follow-up visit. Overall, 47% (range 17% to 77% in different centres) of participants underwent a liver ultrasound scan during follow-up. Clinical reports most commonly noted mild liver parenchymal abnormalities (13% of baseline scans), including appearances suggestive of steatosis. Splenomegaly was reported in a small number of participants (4% of baseline scans). One participant underwent ultrasound scan at their last study visit (week 96) that showed a 1.2cm left lobe lesion, AFP result was not available at this visit and the lesion was not demonstrated on a subsequent MRI scan.

Discussion

We prospectively followed a large cohort of children with HBV infection in North America, with data and biospecimen collection from a diverse group of 362 children occurring over 1,489 person-years of follow-up. Active hepatitis was common throughout follow-up, demonstrated by elevated ALT levels and an immune active phenotype, including among many participants who transitioned from HBeAg positive to negative during follow-up, and among those who were HBeAg negative throughout. Many children thus appeared to remain at risk for advancing severity of fibrotic liver disease and fulfilled recommended treatment criteria, although clinicians seldom provided anti-HBV treatment. A low incidence of cirrhosis and no other major clinical outcomes occurred during these childhood years, such as cirrhotic decompensation events, HCC, or death related to liver disease.

Our data confirm the rarity of end stage liver disease in children with chronic HBV infection. However, it is inaccurate to consider HBV infection in children as benign, in which most children are “immune tolerant” to the virus and will transition into an inactive carrier state over time. We show that active hepatitis phenotypes, elevated ALT levels and high HBV viral concentrations are prevalent in the cohort throughout follow-up, including participants with more significant degrees of ALT elevation (e.g. >3x ULN). Being HBeAg negative, or transitioning from HBeAg positive to negative during follow-up, did not ensure entry into an inactive carrier state although for some it did herald eventual loss of HBsAg. The variable progression of patients through different phenotypes, and occasional patients with unexpected combinations of laboratory results (eg. negative HBeAg, normal ALT, high HBV DNA) illustrates the need to better understand the complexity of host-virus interactions. Previous studies have shown variable findings, including similar proportions to our study with active hepatitis phenotypes during follow-up in Japan, but a lower proportion of children continuing with active hepatitis after HBeAg loss in studies from Italy, Spain, and Taiwan (7,8,10,13). These differences between studies may relate to race (e.g. Caucasian compared with Asian), route of infection (vertical vs. horizontal), length of follow-up, definition of normal range of ALT and AST, or other variables.

There is a lack of pediatric data describing risk factors for progression of liver fibrosis due to hepatitis B during childhood, although in adults with HBV infection the development of cirrhosis and HCC are associated with elevated ALT levels, HBeAg status and high HBV DNA titers (27). Extrapolation of these data to children would suggest that many of the participants in our cohort were at risk of progressive liver fibrosis. Unfortunately, serial liver biopsy and elastography measures were not available in our study; furthermore, a previous study of pediatric liver biopsies suggested that fibrosis stage may not correlate with age, duration of HBV infection, HBV genotype or HBV DNA level (28). We show that elevated ALT levels were associated with low platelet counts, which may be a biomarker for greater severity of liver fibrosis. However, further studies utilizing alternative markers of disease activity (other than ALT), and with serial liver biopsies or validated and accurate non-invasive tests of liver fibrosis in children, will be required to definitively address this issue.

Clinicians seldom started treatment for children in this cohort, although our data suggest that treatment should have been given more frequently according to published guidelines (26). We speculate that low treatment rates reflect clinicians’ perception of unsatisfactory outcomes of therapy including the rare achievement of clearance of HBsAg, concerns about the need for long-term therapy with nucleot(s)ide analogues, the possibility of antiviral resistance, the known, common adverse effect profile of interferon-based therapies, and awareness of the rarity of significant adverse outcomes of HBV infection during childhood (29). Clinicians seemed more likely to start treatment in children with higher ALT levels, suggesting that greater concern about poor clinical outcomes associated with more abnormal aminotransferase levels may be the major influence in decision making. Children with ALT flares were more likely to receive treatment probably because treating clinicians saw this high elevation of ALT as the indication for treatment. However, we did not collect data specifically to explore physician and patient/family approaches to treatment and why many of the children in our study remained untreated.

The low likelihood of children and adults with hepatitis B receiving treatment has been recognized as a problem globally (30). In particular, several barriers to anti-HBV care are common among immigrant populations, including lack of knowledge of HBV, language and cultural barriers, costs associated with healthcare and with potentially long-term drug treatment, conflicting family priorities related to new settlement, and adverse prior experience of health care (31,32). We showed no pattern of difference in incidence rate of treatment initiation related to family income, or the educational status of the caregiver. Some of the barriers identified in prior studies were probably less relevant to many of these families, including those with international adoptee children, as all of them were linked to healthcare in order to be included in the study. Higher incidence rates of treatment initiation were noted among international adoptee children compared with non-adopted children, although the confidence intervals for each of these estimates were wide and overlapping.

The small number of children treated precluded a detailed multivariable analysis of the impact of treatment on outcomes. Children who fulfilled AASLD treatment criteria but remained untreated had higher viral loads and were more likely to be HBeAg positive and anti-HBe negative at the end of follow-up, but the significance of these findings on clinical outcomes including progression of liver fibrosis remains unclear.

Major clinical outcomes during this childhood follow-up period were rare in our cohort. A low rate of diagnosis of cirrhosis and of HCC in children with hepatitis B has been previously reported (79,1315). For example, 4 of 89 children in Italy had cirrhosis on liver biopsies at the beginning of a mean 14.5-year follow-up during which no further incident cases were identified, and 3 of 205 children in Japan were diagnosed with HCC during a median 8.2 years follow-up (8,13). Therefore, vigilance is required in the clinical follow-up of children with chronic HBV who are at risk of HCC even in the absence of cirrhosis (33). Clinicians caring for the children in our cohort chose to check AFP levels at most annual follow-up visits and undertook ultrasound scans in approximately one-third to one-half of the participants at each annual visit. In the absence of published data or guidelines for screening for HCC in children with HBV, we noted considerable variation in practice between centers.

Data describing ALT flares in children with chronic HBV infection are scarce, although these flares are well recognized in clinical practice. In Japan, flares of ALT >500 U/L were recognized in 18 of 149 untreated children and 12 of 43 treated children, during a median follow-up of 8.2 years, which represents a similar rate to that observed in the current study (13). The cumulative incidence of flares at 4 years in our pediatric cohort (4%) was a lower than the 5.7% cumulative incidence at 4 years that was seen in the HBRN adult cohort (34). In our cohort, flares occurred mostly in HBeAg positive children with high viral load who were not receiving anti-HBV treatment and we found no association between timing of flares with puberty. Flares were associated overall with a significant reduction in HBV load and transition from HBeAg positive to negative.

Our study had several limitations. Although involving a large cohort of infected children, the study had limited ability to accurately measure the incidence rates of severe liver disease complications in HBV-infected children, due to the long time-course for their development and their rare incidence during childhood. We were unable to include serial measurement of elastography to provide an additional measure of advancing fibrosis. Annual evaluations of blood tests may have missed events occurring between these evaluations.

In conclusion, we report outcomes observed in a large, prospectively studied cohort of children with chronic HBV infection in North America. Active hepatitis was common throughout follow-up, but treatment only seldom used, suggesting that many children remain at risk for advancing severity of fibrotic liver disease. To enable improved treatment guidelines to be developed, future studies should identify barriers to anti-HBV treatment in childhood and quantify the potential long-term benefits of treatment, such as prevention of progression of fibrosis during childhood, or the development of cirrhosis and HCC arising as major clinical outcomes during young adult life.

Acknowledgements

We thank the participants and their caregivers for their important contribution to this research. The HBRN would like to acknowledge the contributions of the following: Johns Hopkins University: Hongxia Li, MBBS, MS, Robert Anders, MD, PhD, Hejab Imteyaz, Peter Lee, MD, Kiyoko Oshima, MD, Kim Kafka, RN, Naureen Islam, BS (Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD). Minnesota Alliance for Research in Chronic Hepatitis B Consortium: Shannon M. Riggs, LPN, AS (Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Masonic Children’s Hospital, Minneapolis, MN). Midwest Hepatitis B Consortium: Rosemary A. Nagy, RDN, LD, MBA, Jacki Cerkoski, RN, MSN (Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO). University of Toronto Consortium: Athena Hau, BSc, Daniel Cui PhD (Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario). HBV CRN North Texas Consortium: Laurie A. Rodgers-Augustyniak, RN, Shirley Montanye, RN (Department of Pediatrics, UTSW, Dallas, TX). San Francisco Hepatitis B Research Group Consortium: Natasha Feier, MS, Joel Feier, BS, Camille Langlois, MS (Department of Pediatrics, UCSF, San Francisco, CA), PNW/Alaska Clinical Center Consortium: Kara L. Cooper (Center for Clinical and Translational Research, Seattle Children’s Institute, Seattle, WA). Liver Disease Research Branch, NIDDK, NIH: Jay H. Hoofnagle, MD, Averell H. Sherker, MD, Edward Doo, MD, Rebecca J. Torrance, RN, MS, Sherry R. Hall, MS (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). Data Coordinating Center: Frani Averbach, MPH, Tamara Haller, Regina Hardison, MS, Stephanie Kelley, MS, Christina M. Lalama, MS, Sharon Lawlor, MBA, Manuel Lombardero, MS, Andrew Pelesko, BS, Donna Stoliker, Melissa Weiner, MPH, Ella Zadorozny, MS, Qian Zhao, PhD (Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA).

The HBRN was funded as a Cooperative Agreement between the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) and the following investigators: Kathleen B. Schwarz, MD (U01-DK082916), Steven H. Belle, PhD, MScHyg (U01-DK082864), Harry L. A. Janssen, MD, PhD (U01-DK082874), Mandana Khalili, MD (U01-DK082944), Lewis R. Roberts, MB, ChB, PhD (U01-DK082843), Adrian M. Di Bisceglie, MD (U01-DK082871), an interagency agreement with NIDDK: Lilia Milkova Ganova-Raeva, PhD (A-DK-3002–001). Additional funding to support this study was provided to Kathleen B. Schwarz, MD (CTSA UL1TR000423) and Norah A. Terrault, MD, MPH (CTSA UL1TR000004). Additional support was provided by Roche Molecular Systems via a CRADA through the NIDDK. S.L. receives research support from Abbvie and Gilead. K.M. serves as a consultant for Gilead and Albireo. P.R. receives research support from Abbvie, Gilead, Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche/Genentech, Merck, Travere and consults for Gilead, Abbvie, Intercept, Travere, Albireo, Audentes, Dicerna, and Mirum. N.R-B. receives research support from Gilead. S.S. receives research support from the Cystic Fibrosis Therapeutic Disease Network, the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, and Gilead and serves as a consultant for UpToDate. J.T. receives research support from Gilead, Alnylam Inc, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, and Dicerna Inc, and serves as a consultant for BioMarin, Editas, Proteostasis, and Retrophin. K.S. receives research support from Gilead, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche/Genentech, and serves as a consultant for Gilead, Roche/Genentech, and UptoDate. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

AASLD

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases

AFP

Alpha-fetoprotein

ALT

Alanine aminotransferase

APRI

Aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet-ratio-index

AST

Aspartate aminotransferase

CALIPER

Canadian Laboratory Initiative on Paediatric Reference

DNA

Deoxyribonucleic acid

HBeAg

Hepatitis B e antigen

HBRN

Hepatitis B Research Network

HBsAg

Hepatitis B surface antigen

HBV

Hepatitis B Virus

HCC

Hepatocellular carcinoma

IR

Incident rates

IU

International unit

MRI

Magnetic resonance imaging

U/L

Units per liter

ULN

Upper limit of normal

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.World Health Organization. Global health sector strategy on viral hepatitis, 2016–202: Towards ending viral hepatitis. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.World Health Organization. Global Hepatitis Report, 2017. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lok AS, McMahon BJ, Brown RS Jr, Wong JB, Ahmed AT, Farah W, et al. Antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B viral infection in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatology. 2016; 63: 284–306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.World Health Organization. Global Health Estimates 2016: Deaths by Cause, Age, Sex, by Country and by Region, 2000–2016. Geneva, World Health Organization; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.World Health Organization. Preventing perinatal hepatitis B virus transmission: a guide for introducing and strengthening hepatitis B birth dose vaccination. Geneva; World Health Organization; 2015. http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/208278 [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Schwarz KB, Cloonan YK, Ling SC, Murray KF, Rodriguez-Baez N, Schwarzenberg SJ, et al. ; Hepatitis B Research Network. Children with Chronic Hepatitis B in the United States and Canada. Journal of Pediatrics. 2015; 167: 1287–1294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bortolotti F, Jara P, Crivellaro C, Hierro L, Cadrobbi P, Frauca E, et al. Outcome of chronic hepatitis B in Caucasian children during a 20-year observation period. Journal of Hepatology 1998; 29: 184–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bortolotti F, Guido M, Bartolacci S, Cadrobbi P, Crivellaro C, Noventa F et al. Chronic hepatitis B in children after e antigen seroclearance: final report of a 29-year longitudinal study. Hepatology. 2006; 43: 556–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Boxall EH, Sira J, Standish RA, Davies P, Sleight E, Dhillon AP, et al. Natural history of hepatitis B in perinatally infected carriers. Archives in Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition. 2004; 89: F456–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chang MH, Sung JL, Lee CY, Chen CJ, Chen JS, Hsu HY et al. Factors affecting clearance of hepatitis B e antigen in hepatitis B surface antigen carrier children. The Journal of Pediatrics. 1989; 115: 385–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chiu YC, Liao SF, Wu JF, Lin CY, Lee WC, Chen HL, et al. Factors affecting the natural decay of hepatitis B surface antigen in children with chronic hepatitis B virus infection during long-term follow-up. The Journal of Pediatrics. 2014; 165: 767–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hong SJ, Park HJ, Chu MA, Choi BS, Choe BH. The Rate of Conversion from Immune-tolerant Phase to Early Immune-clearance Phase in Children with Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection. Pediatric Gastroenterol Hepatology and Nutrition. 2014; 17: 41–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Komatsu H, Inui A, Sogo T, Tsunoda T, Fujisawa T. Chronic hepatitis B virus infection in children and adolescents in Japan. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. 2015; 60: 99–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Marx G, Martin SR, Chicoine JF, Alvarez F. Long-term follow-up of chronic hepatitis B virus infection in children of different ethnic origins. The Journal of Infectious Disease. 2002; 186: 295–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Popalis C, Yeung LT, Ling SC, Ng V, Roberts EA. Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in children: 25 years’ experience. Journal of Viral Hepatology. 2013; 20: e20–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shimakawa Y, Lemoine M, Njai HF, Bottomley C, Ndow G, Goldin RD, et al. Natural history of chronic HBV infection in West Africa: a longitudinal population-based study from The Gambia. Gut. 2016; 65: 2007–2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Takano T, Tajiri H, Hosono S, Inui A, Murakami J, Ushijima K, et al. Natural history of chronic hepatitis B virus infection in children in Japan: a comparison of mother-to-child transmission with horizontal transmission. Journal of Gastroenterology. 2017; 52: 1041–1050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zacharakis G, Koskinas J, Kotsiou S, Pouliou E, Papoutselis M, Tzara F, et al. Natural history of chronic hepatitis B virus infection in children of different ethnic origins: a cohort study with up to 12 years’ follow-up in northern Greece. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. 2007; 44: 84–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rosenthal P, Ling SC, Belle SH, Murray KF, Rodriguez-Baez N, Schwarzenberg SJ, et al. ; Hepatitis B Research Network (HBRN). Combination of Entecavir/Peginterferon Alfa-2a in Children With Hepatitis B e Antigen-Positive Immune Tolerant Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection. Hepatology. 2019; 69: 2326–2337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Colantonio DA, Kyriakopoulou L, Chan MK, Daly CH, Brinc D, Venner AA, et al. Closing the gaps in pediatric laboratory reference intervals: a CALIPER database of 40 biochemical markers in a healthy and multiethnic population of children. Clinical Chemistry. 2012; 58: 854–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Schwimmer JB, Dunn W, Norman GJ, Pardee PE, Middleton MS, Kerkar N, et al. SAFETY study: alanine aminotransferase cutoff values are set too high for reliable detection of pediatric chronic liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2010; 138: 1357–64 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lok AS, McMahon BJ. Chronic hepatitis B: update 2009. Hepatology. 2009; 50: 661–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Adeli K, Raizman JE, Chen Y, Higgins V, Nieuwesteeg M, Abdelhaleem M, et al. Complex biological profile of hematologic markers across pediatric, adult, and geriatric ages: establishment of robust pediatric and adult reference intervals on the basis of the Canadian Health Measures Survey. Clinical Chemistry. 2015; 61: 1075–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Di Bisceglie AM, Lombardero M, Teckman J, Roberts L, Janssen HLA, Belle SH, et al. ; for the Hepatitis B Research Network. Determination of hepatitis B Phenotype using biochemical and serological markers. Journal of Viral Hepatitis 2017; 24: 320–329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Schwarz KB, Lombardero M, Di Bisceglie AM, Murray KF, Rosenthal P, Ling SC, et al. ; Hepatitis B Research Network (HBRN). Phenotypes of Chronic Hepatitis B in Children From a Large North American Cohort. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. 2019; 69: 588–594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Terrault NA, Lok ASF, McMahon BJ, Chang KM, Hwang JP, Jonas MM, et al. Update on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic hepatitis B: AASLD 2018 hepatitis B guidance. Hepatology. 2018; 67: 1560–1599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chen C-J, Yang H-I. Natural history of chronic hepatitis B REVEALed. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2011; 26: 628–638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rodriguez-Baez N, Murray KF, Kleiner DE, Ling SC, Rosenthal P, Carlin K, et al. Hepatic Histology in Treatment-naïve Children With Chronic Hepatitis B Infection Living in the United States and Canada. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. 2020; 71: 99–105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jonas MM, Lok AS, McMahon BJ et al. Antiviral therapy in management of chronic hepatitis B viral infection in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatology 2016; 63: 307–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Polaris Observatory Collaborators. Global prevalence, treatment, and prevention of hepatitis B virus infection in 2016: a modelling study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatology. 2018; 3: 383–403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sievert K, O’Neill P, Koh Y, Lee JH, Dev A, Le S. Barriers to Accessing Testing and Treatment for Chronic Hepatitis B in Afghan, Rohingyan, and South Sudanese Populations in Australia. Journal of Immigrant Minority Health. 2018; 20: 140–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lutgehetmann M, Meyer F, Volz T, Lohse AW, Fischer C, Dandri M, et al. Knowledge about HBV, prevention behaviour and treatment adherence of patients with chronic hepatitis B in a large referral centre in Germany. Z Gastroenterol. 2010; 48: 1126–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mogul DB, Ling SC, Murray KF, Schwarzenberg SJ, Rudzinski ER, Schwarz KB. Characteristics of Hepatitis B Virus-associated Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Children: A Multi-center Study. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. 2018; 67: 437–440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Brahmania M, Lombardero M, Hansen BE, Terrault NA, Lok AS, Perrillo RP, et al. Hepatitis B Research Network. Association Between Severe Serum Alanine Aminotransferase Flares and Hepatitis B e Antigen Seroconversion and HBV DNA Decrease in Untreated Patients With Chronic HBV Infection. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatology. 2019; 17: 2541–2551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ganova-Raeva L, Ramachandran S, Honisch C, Forbi JC, Zhai X, Khudyakov Y. Robust hepatitis B virus genotyping by mass spectrometry. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2010; 48: 4161–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES