Abstract
Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Salmonella is a threat to public health. Non-antibiotic therapies could serve as important countermeasures to control MDR Salmonella outbreaks. In this study, antimicrobial activity of cationic α-helical bovine NK-lysin-derived antimicrobial peptides was evaluated against MDR Salmonella outbreak isolates. NK2A and NK2B strongly inhibited MDR Salmonella growth while NK1 and NK2C showed minimum-to-no growth inhibition. Scrambled-NK2A, which is devoid of α-helicity but has the same net positive charge as NK2A, also failed to inhibit bacterial growth. Incubation of negatively charged MDR Salmonella with NK2A showed increased Zeta potential, indicating bacterial-peptide electrostatic attraction. Confocal and transmission electron microscopy studies revealed NK2A-mediated damage to MDR Salmonella membranes. LPS inhibited NK2A-mediated growth suppression in a dose-dependent response, suggesting irreversible NK2A-LPS binding. LPS-NK2A binding and bacterial membrane disruption was also confirmed via electron microscopy using gold nanoparticle-NK2A conjugates. Finally, NK2A-loaded polyanhydride nanoparticles showed sustained peptide delivery and anti-bacterial activity. Together, these findings indicate that NK2A α-helicity and positive charge are prerequisites for antimicrobial activity and that MDR Salmonella killing is mediated by direct interaction of NK2A with LPS and the inner membrane, leading to bacterial membrane permeabilization. With further optimization using nano-carriers, NK2A has the potential to become a potent anti-MDR Salmonella agent.
Subject terms: Biotechnology, Microbiology
Introduction
Salmonella causes an estimated 1.3 million food-borne related illnesses annually1, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has classified drug resistant Salmonella as a serious threat2. Multidrug-resistant (resistant to ≥ 3 antimicrobial classes, MDR) Salmonella infections have been associated with the consumption of food animal products such as ground beef, chicken, shell eggs, turkey and pork3. In 2011, an MDR S. Heidelberg outbreak associated with ground turkey caused 136 human illnesses, one death, and the recall of 36 million pounds of ground turkey4. In 2015, a multistate outbreak of MDR serovar I 4,[5],12:i- with resistance to ampicillin, streptomycin, sulfisoxazole, and tetracycline (R-type, ASSuT) was linked to the consumption of contaminated pork products, resulting in 188 human infections, 30 hospitalization, and the recall of 523,380 pounds of meat5. Currently, thousands of MDR serovar I 4,[5],12:i- sequences have been submitted to the NCBI Pathogens Detection database, with some isolates containing resistance genes for up to 13 antimicrobial classes including antibiotics of clinical importance for treatment of Salmonella infections (manuscript in preparation). Global health entities have issued a call to action to “improve strategies for reducing AMR” by developing novel non-antibiotic therapeutics6 against MDR Salmonella to enhance food safety and public health.
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), a diverse group of evolutionarily conserved molecules which are typically composed of 5–50 amino acids7–9, could be an important component of such non-antibiotic therapeutics. AMPs feature a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity and relatively low resistance development10. They are produced by most living organisms as a component of their innate immune system and are effective against a broad range of pathogens such as bacteria, protozoa, and fungi7,9,11. Based on the amino acid composition and structure, AMPs can be divided into five subgroups: anionic peptides, linear cationic α-helical peptides, cationic peptides enriched for specific amino acids, anionic and cationic peptides that contain cysteine and form disulfide bonds, and anionic and cationic peptide fragments of larger proteins7. In addition to antimicrobial activity, AMPs such as cathelicidin peptide LL-37 and chicken NK-lysin show immunomodulatory properties12,13.
Bovine NK-lysins are cationic, amphipathic α-helical AMPs produced by T lymphocytes and natural killer (NK) cells that are similar to human granulysin and porcine NK-lysin and are effective against various microbes14–18. Amino acid sequence comparisons indicated that granulysin and NK-lysins are related to the saposin-like protein (SAPLIP) family of lipid-binding proteins in lysosomes16,19,20. Endsley et al17 identified two NK-lysin expression clones (62 and 89) from cultured cattle PBMCs using degenerative primers, and Chen et al21 detected four NK-lysin genes (NK1, NK2A, NK2B, and NK2C) in bovine genome database search. Tissue specific NK-lysin gene expression patterns of NK1 and NK2A in cattle were highest in the intestinal Peyer’s patches, while NK2C expression was almost exclusively limited to the lungs; NK2B showed a more general expression pattern21. At this time, it is unclear why cattle have four active NK-lysin genes compared to one gene in humans and pigs14,18,21,22.
We and others have previously reported the effectiveness of 30-mer cationic, amphipathic α-helical peptides derived from the functional region of bovine NK-lysins against multiple bacterial pathogens17,20,23–25. While NK-lysin peptides were highly effective, a differential sensitivity of pathogenic bacteria to four bovine NK-lysin-derived peptides were observed20,23–25. Nevertheless, antimicrobial activity of bovine NK-lysin peptides has not been systematically studied against drug-resistant bacteria and MDR Salmonella in particular. Cationic AMPs are predicted to bind to bacterial membranes; however, such binding has not been established for bovine NK-lysin peptides. Additionally, although electrostatic attraction between negatively charged bacteria and cationic AMPs are predicted, bacterial Zeta potential changes following bacterial-AMP interactions has also not been reported for bovine NK-lysin peptides.
Exogenous antimicrobial therapeutics frequently display bioavailability deficiencies, requiring frequent dosing to maintain pharmacological efficacy26. Additionally, polypeptide agents like AMPs can be susceptible to acidic and protease-mediated proteolysis in the harsh enteric environment. Biodegradable polymer-based nanocarriers could help overcome these shortcomings, enabling an enhanced non-antibiotic anti-MDR Salmonella strategy. Polyanhydride nanoparticles composed of sebacic acid (SA), 1,6-bis(p-carboxyphenoxy)hexane (CPH), and 1,8-bis(p-carboxyphenoxy)-3,6-dioxaoctane (CPTEG) copolymers encapsulate and protect sensitive payloads, navigate challenging biological barriers, and alter payload biodistribution26–28. Copolymer chemistry can be modified to tune particle surface erosion and release kinetics, resulting in provision of long-term release to reduce administration frequency29–31. Through these mechanisms, polyanhydride nanoparticles enhance payload potency, resulting in a dose sparing effect observed with multiple antimicrobial payloads32–34. By controlling AMP release and improving AMP potency, such nanocarriers could form a complementary arm of a novel, non-antibiotic MDR Salmonella control strategy.
In the current study, the antimicrobial activity of multiple bovine NK-lysin peptides against MDR Salmonella outbreak isolates from swine (SX238), cattle (SX231), and turkey (SB395) was assessed. NK2A was identified as the most effective peptide against MDR Salmonella isolates. Therefore, NK2A binding to both LPS and MDR Salmonella was further evaluated. Furthermore, payload release kinetics of NK2A encapsulated polyanhydride nanoparticles and anti-MDR Salmonella activity of NK2A encapsulated nanoparticles were examined.
Results
Antimicrobial activity of NK-lysin peptides against MDR and non-MDR Salmonella isolates
The antimicrobial effectiveness of bovine NK-lysin-derived peptides was assessed against MDR Salmonella I 4,[5],12:i:- pork outbreak isolate USDA15WA-1 (SX238) and a non-MDR Salmonella isolate (SB377) which is known as universal killer (UK1) (Table 1) in LB broth medium. Four synthetic 30-mer peptides (i.e., NK1, NK2A, NK2B, and NK2C) corresponding to the functional region of bovine NK-lysin (helix-2-loop-helix-3) were tested in growth curve assays. As shown in Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. S1, NK1 did not show any Salmonella SX238 and SB377 growth inhibition activity at the tested peptide concentrations (highest up to 20 µM, Fig. 1a). Although 10 µM and 20 µM NK2C initially inhibited Salmonella SX238 and SB377 growth, bacteria recovered and grew at approximately 7 h and 20 h, respectively (Fig. 1a). In contrast, both NK2A and NK2B were highly effective and completely inhibited growth of Salmonella SX238 and SB377 at ≥ 5 µM concentration (Fig. 1a). Since NK2A peptide had a higher antimicrobial activity than NK2B (growth inhibition at 2 µM NK2A concentration for up to 8 h), this bovine NK-lysin peptide was selected for further studies, and the SX238 isolate was chosen for further studies with NK2A. Bactericidal activity of NK2A during 3 h incubation was also tested in PBS and LB broth, and all three NK2A concentrations (2, 5, 20 µM) were highly effective against Salmonella SX238, with greater than 97% and 99% killing, respectively (P = 1.000) (Fig. 1b).
Table 1.
Sources and properties of MDR and non-MDR Salmonella isolates.
| Salmonella isolates | Source |
|---|---|
|
SX238: MDR Salmonella enterica serovar I 4,[5],12:i:- strain USDA15WA-1 Resistant to: ampicillin, streptomycin, sulfisoxazole, and tetracycline |
Originally isolated from a 2015 U.S. multi-state pork outbreak from pork products5 and sequenced57 |
|
SX231: MDR Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT193 strain 1434 Resistant to: ampicillin, chloramphenicol, kanamycin, nalidixic acid, streptomycin, and tetracycline |
Originally a cattle isolate58 |
|
SB395: MDR Salmonella enterica serovar Heidelberg Resistant to: ampicillin, gentamicin, streptomycin, and tetracycline |
Originally isolated from a 2011 ground turkey outbreak4 Current isolate was passaged through a turkey59 |
|
SB377: Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium isolate UK-1 Resistant to: nalidixic acid (made NalR in the lab for isolation purposes) |
Originally isolated from the spleen of a chick orally inoculated 3 days earlier with a highly virulent S. typhimurium isolate retrieved from an infected horse in 1991 Our isolate was passaged through a pig and isolated from the ileocecal lymph node60,61 |
Figure 1.
Antimicrobial activity of bovine NK-lysin-derived peptides against MDR Salmonella. (a) An MDR Salmonella outbreak isolate SX238 was incubated with different concentrations of NK-lysin peptides (0, 2, 5, 10 and 20 µM; LB = Luria–Bertani (Lennox broth)), and optical density readings at 600 nm (OD600nm) were recorded using an automated growth curve reader. One representative growth graph out of at least three independent experiments is shown. (b) Different concentrations of NK2A were incubated with Salmonella isolate SX238 at 37 °C for 3 h in PBS (filled bars) or in LB broth (open bars), serially diluted and plated on XLT plates. Following overnight incubation, bacterial colonies were enumerated. Data represent mean percentages of (bacterial) killing ± SD from three independent experiments. P = 1.0000 as determined by ANOVA test using GLM procedure from SAS software, Version 9.4 of the SAS System for Windows.
CD spectroscopy of Sc-NK2A
In this study, the secondary structure of scrambled NK2A (Sc-NK2A) in a bacterial membrane-mimicking environment was determined using CD spectroscopy. Previous CD spectral profile analyses confirmed all four bovine NK-lysin peptides to have α-helical conformation when bound with liposomes24. The amino acid sequence in NK2A was scrambled and chemically synthesized as a control peptide (Sc-NK2A). Sc-NK2A is predicted to have no α-helical structure but with the same net positive charge as original NK2A (net charge = + 7.9). Both peptides in phosphate buffer (without liposomes) showed CD spectra indicative of random coil structures (Fig. 2a). NK2A peptide in liposomes showed a CD profile characteristic of predominantly α-helical structure (maximum near ~ 192 nm with double minima near ~ 208 nm and ~ 222 nm) (Fig. 2a). In contrast, Sc-NK2A did not show a CD profile indicative of α-helical structure (Fig. 2a), suggesting that the rearrangement of amino acids resulted in elimination of secondary α-helical structure.
Figure 2.
Characterization of scrambled NK2A (Sc-NK2A) peptide. (a) Secondary structures of Sc-NK2A and NK2A were determined using circular dichroism (CD) analysis in aqueous buffer (without liposome) and bacterial membrane-mimicking environment (with liposome). Raw data in millidegrees was converted to molar ellipticity (Θ∙cm2/dmol∙10−3). Average spectra with six accumulations after baseline correction for each of the peptides are shown. (b) Hemolytic activities of Sc-NK2A and NK2A on cattle red blood cells (RBCs) were determined spectrophotometrically (OD405nm) by measuring released hemoglobin. Data are presented as mean ± SD of percentage of hemolysis from two animals. P = 0.1650 as determined by ANOVA test using GLM procedure from SAS software, Version 9.4 of the SAS System for Windows. (c). Antimicrobial activity of Sc-NK2A (and NK2A) against Salmonella isolate SX238 was recorded using an automated growth curve reader. Optical density readings (OD600nm) of different bacterial CFU (104–107 CFU/well; BO = bacteria only) with 10 µM peptide concentrations are shown. Representative graphs out of three independent experiments are shown.
Cytotoxicity studies with NK-lysin peptides
To assess the toxicity of NK-lysin peptides, a hemolytic assay and a mouse study were performed. It has previously been reported that all four 30-mer NK-lysin-derived peptides have minimal cytotoxic effect against cattle RBCs24. To determine whether Sc-NK2A has hemolytic activity, a hemoglobin release assay was performed with cattle RBCs. Both NK2A and Sc-NK2A at the tested concentrations (2–20 µM) showed < 2% hemolytic activity with no significant differences observed between the two peptides (P = 0.1650) (Fig. 2b). Mice intraperitoneally injected with 100 µg of NK-lysin peptides (NK1, NK2A, NK2B, NK2C, or Sc-NK2A) did not show signs of toxicity or death during the 2-week observation period. These findings suggest that NK-lysin peptides have minimal toxic effects to both bovine red blood cells and mice at the tested concentrations.
Antimicrobial activities of Sc-NK2A peptide
Bacterial growth inhibition assays were performed with Salmonella isolate SX238 using both NK2A and Sc-NK2A peptides (Fig. 2c). NK2A completely inhibited growth of SX238 at 105–7 CFU/mL (or 104–6 CFU/well) during a 24 h growth period, and partial growth inhibition was observed (up to 9 h) at 108 CFU/mL (or 107 CFU/well). Sc-NK2A failed to inhibit bacterial growth even at the lowest bacterial concentration (104 CFU/well). Using additional MDR Salmonella outbreak isolates originating from cattle (SX231) and turkey (SB395) along with SX238 and SB377 at 105 CFU/well, the antimicrobial activity of NK2A and Sc-NK2A was compared. NK2A inhibited the growth of the four Salmonella isolates at or above the 5 µM concentration, although three of the four isolates were sensitive to a final NK2A concentration of 3.5 µM (Fig. 3). However, even 20 µM Sc-NK2A failed to show Salmonella growth inhibition activity (Fig. 3).
Figure 3.
Antimicrobial activity of NK2A and Sc-NK2A against Salmonella isolates. Three MDR Salmonella outbreak isolates (SX238, SX231 and SB395) and one non-MDR Salmonella isolate (SB377) (106 CFU/mL) were incubated with different concentrations of NK2A, Sc-NK2A or Luria–Bertani broth (LB) and optical densities (OD600nm) were recorded using an automated growth curve reader over a 24 h period. One representative graph (for each peptide and each isolate) out of at least three independent experiments is shown.
Effect of NK2A on Zeta potentials of MDR Salmonella
Bacterial Zeta potential has recently been shown to serve as a proxy for membrane permeabilization35. Accordingly, Zeta potential measurements of NK-lysin peptides and Salmonella were evaluated. Cationic NK-lysin peptides including Sc-NK2A showed positive Zeta potential values in the range of 16.3–24.8 mV (Table 2). In contrast, three MDR and one non-MDR Salmonella isolates had negative Zeta potential values, which is attributed to the anionic LPS-outer membrane (Table 3). Bacterial Zeta potential changes following incubation with NK2A (2 µM for 20 min) were assessed. Alteration of Salmonella Zeta potentials was observed following incubation with NK2A; the negative Zeta potentials of all four Salmonella isolates changed to positive Zeta potential values (ranging from 6.1–16.0 mV) suggesting NK2A-LPS (Salmonella) and/or NK2A-cytoplasmic membrane binding (Table 3). MDR Salmonella isolate SB395 with 2 µM Sc-NK2A increased Zeta potential value (7.8 mV), indicating that Sc-NK2A also bound to Salmonella membranes (Table 3). However, as shown in Fig. 3, Sc-NK2A at 20 µM did not inhibit Salmonella growth, suggesting that the scrambled, non-pore forming peptide can associate closely with the cell surface to change the observed bacterial surface charge to positive, but the presence of the α-helical structure is critical for anti-bacterial activity.
Table 2.
Characterization of bovine NK-lysin peptides and polyanhydride nanoparticles. NA not applicable.
| Reagent/formulation | Mean diameter (nm) | Zeta potential (mV) | Encapsulation efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|
| NK2A | NA | + 24.8 ± 1.1 | NA |
| Sc-NK2A | NA | + 16.3 ± 6.2 | NA |
| NK1 | NA | + 23.5 ± 2.3 | NA |
| NK2B | NA | + 17.0 ± 1.7 | NA |
| NK2C | NA | + 17.8 ± 2.2 | NA |
| Empty 20:80 CPTEG:CPH | 239 ± 96 | − 21.4 ± 3.5 | NA |
| Empty 10:90 CPTEG:SA | 334 ± 127 | − 33.5 ± 1.0 | NA |
| Empty 20:80 CPH:SA | 341 ± 139 | − 29.8 ± 0.9 | NA |
| 20:80 CPTEG:CPH 5% NK2A | 243 ± 97 | + 20.7 ± 2.9 | 34.3% |
| 20:80 CPTEG:CPH 5% kanamycin | 285 ± 91 | + 39.8 ± 4.4 | 42.1% |
| 10:90 CPTEG:SA 10% NK2A | 367 ± 156 | + 37.2 ± 2.5 | 47.3% |
| 20:80 CPH:SA 10% NK2A | 641 ± 150 | + 39.5 ± 3.0 | 38.9% |
Table 3.
Zeta potential of MDR and non-MDR Salmonella outbreak isolates before and after 2 µM NK2A and Sc-NK2A treatments for 20 min. NT not tested.
| SX238 | SX231 | SB377 | SB395 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H2O/PBS | − 2.8 ± 0.7 mV | − 6.3 ± 2.1 mV | − 9.0 ± 3.1 mV | − 4.0 ± 1.7 mV |
| NK2A | + 16.0 ± 1.5 mV | + 15.8 ± 1.2 mV | + 13.3 ± 1.9 mV | + 6.1 ± 2.7 mV |
| Sc-NK2A | NT | NT | NT | + 7.8 ± 1.4 mV |
Effects of NK2A on MDR Salmonella morphology
To morphologically evaluate the dead MDR Salmonella SX238 following incubation with NK2A, confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) studies were performed. The LIVE/DEAD (BacLight) bacterial viability staining method was used to differentiate live (stained with SYTO 9, green) from dead (stained with propidium iodide (PI), red) bacteria. Primarily SYTO 9-stained bacteria (green) and only a few PI-stained bacteria (red) were observed in both control (PBS; Fig. 4a) and Sc-NK2A (Fig. 4b) treated samples, indicating that Sc-NK2A did not have detectable antimicrobial activity. In contrast, many dead (red) Salmonella SX238 were detected in NK2A treated samples, further confirming the growth assay findings that NK2A is bactericidal to Salmonella (Fig. 4c).
Figure 4.
Morphological changes of Salmonella following incubation with NK2A and Sc-NK2A. Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) was performed to identify live (green, SYTO 9) and dead (red, PI) Salmonella. CLSM images of Salmonella outbreak isolate SX238 incubated with (a) PBS, (b) 5 µM Sc-NK2A, and (c) 5 µM NK2A. Transmission electron microcopy (TEM) was performed to visualize damage to the membranes of MDR Salmonella outbreak isolate SX238. TEM images of MDR Salmonella SX238 incubated with (d) PBS, (e) 20 µM Sc-NK2A, and (f) 20 µM NK2A (d–f = 23,000 × magnification). Dead bacteria with damaged outer- and inner-membranes [(f and g), white triangles], loss of normal bacterial morphology and cytosolic contents (g = 68,000 × magnification, white arrow) were visible only in NK2A treated samples. Representative images out of three independent experiments are shown.
To visualize ultrastructural changes to Salmonella SX238 outer- (LPS) and inner- (cytoplasmic) membranes following incubation with NK2A, bacterial samples were evaluated using TEM. Salmonella SX238 in PBS (control, Fig. 4d) or with Sc-NK2A (Fig. 4e) were normal bacilli-shaped bacteria with intact outer- and inner-membranes and typical electron-dense cytoplasm. The periplasmic spaces in both samples were thin and uniform. These observations suggest that the bacteria were alive, and Sc-NK2A did not cause detectable damage to the bacterial membranes. In contrast, SX238 treated with NK2A had extensively damaged outer- and inner-membranes and cytosolic content leakage (Fig. 4f,g). Due to the loss of membrane integrity and cytosolic contents, the bacteria were smaller in size, lacked the typical bacilli morphology and appeared collapsed. NK2A-treated SX238 had slightly wavy inner membranes (Fig. 4f,g), wider periplasmic spaces (Fig. 4f,g and 6d) and were visibly non-uniform. Collectively, these findings suggest that NK2A disrupted both the outer- and inner-membranes of Salmonella.
Figure 6.

NK2A binding to Salmonella lipopolysaccharides (LPS). (a) Affinity of NK2A to Salmonella LPS was assessed by bacterial growth assay. Five µM (or 2.2 μg) NK2A was preincubated with different concentrations of Salmonella LPS (0.5–8.8 μg) for 30 min prior to incubation with MDR Salmonella outbreak isolate SX238, and growth was recorded for 24 h using an automated growth curve reader (OD600nm; BO = bacteria only). One representative graph out of three independent experiments is shown. (b–e) TEM images were obtained for Salmonella outbreak isolate SX238 incubated with control AuNPs (b) or 20 μM NK2A-AuNPs (c–e). Black arrows indicate NK2A-AuNPs bound to MDR Salmonella LPS (outer membrane) and white arrows indicate NK2A-AuNPs bound to the inner cytoplasmic membrane. White triangles indicate damaged inner cytoplasmic membranes and black triangles indicate damaged outer membranes (LPS; d). A larger periplasmic space was observed in the bacteria incubated with NK2A-AuNPs compared to control AuNPs. (b/c = 30,000 × magnification; d = 68,000 × magnification; e = 120,000 × magnification). Representative images out of two independent experiments are shown.
Kinetics of MDR Salmonella killing by NK2A
The bacterial killing, CLSM and TEM studies suggest that the bactericidal effect of NK2A against Salmonella is membranolytic activity. To determine the kinetics of Salmonella cytosolic membrane permeabilization by NK2A, a PI uptake assay was performed. PI is a cell impermeant fluorescent dye and can only bind/intercalate with cellular DNA (and RNA) when the bacterial cytoplasmic membranes are compromised20. With similar features as NK2A, cyclic polycationic polymyxin B was selected as a positive control for the assay because polymyxin B is a peptide and a rapid-acting bactericidal antibiotic which interacts with bacterial LPS as well as the cytoplasmic membrane36. Growth curve assays with polymyxin B (2–512 µg/mL) showed that as little as 2 µg/mL was sufficient to completely inhibit Salmonella SX238 growth during the 24 h incubation (Fig. 5a). No PI uptake signal was observed with Salmonella SX238 incubated with polymyxin B at concentrations even as high as 100 µg/mL during a 30 min observation period (Fig. 5b) as well as 6 h observation period (Supplementary Fig. S2). Furthermore, Salmonella incubated with Sc-NK2A or PBS (negative control) did not show PI uptake signals (Fig. 5b), indicating that neither polymyxin B nor the scrambled NK2A peptide disrupted the cytosolic membranes. In contrast, rapid PI uptake was observed for Salmonella SX238 incubated with NK2A (5 µM), and PI fluorescent signal intensity steadily increased during the 30 min incubation period, suggesting that the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane was disrupted (or permeabilized) by NK2A (Fig. 5b).
Figure 5.
Assessment of propidium iodide (PI) uptake by Salmonella incubated with NK2A, Sc-NK2A and polymyxin B. (a) Growth curve graphs (OD600nm) were generated using an automated growth curve reader for Salmonella outbreak isolate SX238 after incubation with different concentrations of polymyxin B (0–512 μg/mL). One representative graph out of three independent experiments is shown. (b) Salmonella (SX238) was preincubated with PI followed by the addition of NK2A, Sc-NK2A (5 μM final concentration) or polymyxin B (100 μg/mL concentration), and PI signal was measured by a fluorescent microplate reader using flex mode with 15 s intervals for up to 30 min. PI uptake signals are shown as relative fluorescent units (RFUs). Bacteria incubated with PBS was used as a negative control. One representative PI uptake graph out of three independent experiments is shown.
Binding of NK2A with Salmonella LPS
To visualize NK2A binding to Salmonella LPS and assess concordant NK2A-induced Salmonella growth inhibition, a bacterial growth curve assay was performed following preincubation of NK2A (5 µM or 2.2 µg) with increasing LPS concentrations (0, 1.1, 2.2, 4.4 and 8.8 µg). As previously shown (Fig. 1 and 3), 5 µM NK2A was able to completely inhibit the growth of Salmonella SX238 during 24 h incubation (Fig. 6a). Preincubation of 5 µM NK2A with 1.1 µg and 2.2 µg LPS showed delayed bacterial growth recovery (~ 5–10 h), while LPS at 4.4 µg and 8.8 µg completely inhibited the antimicrobial activity of NK2A on Salmonella SX238 (Fig. 6a). These findings suggest that NK2A irreversibly binds to LPS.
To confirm this binding, Salmonella SX238 was incubated with NK2A conjugated with gold nanoparticles (NK2A-AuNP) (10 nm diameter) or control AuNPs (without NK2A) and investigated for particle-LPS localization and membrane integrity by TEM. No AuNP localization with Salmonella SX238 membranes were observed in AuNP control samples (Fig. 6b). By contrast, NK2A-AuNPs produced numerous Salmonella membrane localization sites (Fig. 6c). Most of the NK2A-AuNPs were bound to Salmonella outer membrane or LPS (Fig. 6c–e; black arrows), while fewer NK2A-AuNPs bound to the inner cytoplasmic membranes (Fig. 6e, white arrows). Bacteria with damaged outer LPS (Fig. 6d, black triangles) and inner cytoplasmic membranes were observed (Fig. 6d, white triangles), and these bacterial cells had expanded periplasmic spaces (Fig. 6d), presumably due to NK2A-mediated rupture of the inner cytoplasmic membrane.
Characterization of nanoparticles
To test the compatibility of NK2A with polymeric nano-carrier delivery devices, a small library of polyanhydride nanoparticle formulations was synthesized. Empty 20:80 CPTEG:CPH, 10:90 CPTEG:SA, and 20:80 CPH:SA nanoparticle formulations had mean diameters of ~ 239–341 nm (Table 2). NK2A-loaded formulations had similar size distributions to the corresponding empty formulations (Table 2). Morphologically, the CPTEG:SA and CPH:SA nanoparticles tended to be spherical and less aggregated, while the CPTEG:CPH nanoparticles tended to be less spherical and slightly more aggregated when visualized by SEM (Fig. 7a).
Figure 7.

Characterization and killing efficacy of polyanhydride nanoparticles. (a) SEM micrographs of NK2A and kanamycin loaded polyanhydride nanoparticles. (b) Nanoparticle release kinetics of NK2A and kanamycin in PBS, pH 7.4 were determined by microBCA assay or o-pthalaldehyde derivatization followed by spectroscopy, respectively. (c) Salmonella outbreak isolate SX238 was incubated with NK2A (final concentration = ~ 5 μM), kanamycin (kan; final concentration = ~ 16 μg/mL) nanoparticles, or empty nanoparticles (negative control) for 3 h. Samples were serially diluted in LB broth, plated on to XLT plates, and bacterial colonies were enumerated after overnight incubation. Percentages of bacterial killing are presented as mean ± SD from three independent experiments. Bars with no common letters (a and b) differ significantly (P < 0.0001) as determined by ANOVA test using GLM procedure from SAS software, Version 9.4 of the SAS System for Windows.
Payload type dramatically affected nanoparticle release kinetics in PBS, pH 7.4. Kanamycin-loaded nanoparticles showed a burst-dominated release profile, with approximately 90% release within 1 day and little drug released over the following 6 days (Fig. 7b). This result could indicate poor compatibility of the relatively hydrophilic drug within the hydrophobic polyanhydride polymer matrix, resulting in kanamycin localization at the particle surface. By contrast, NK2A formulations showed a slow, sustained release, releasing < 35% of their payload over 1 week (Fig. 7b). This slow release is likely a result of the hydrophobicity of the NK2A peptide enabling better mixing with the polymer within the nanoparticles. This correlates with a more homogeneous distribution of NK2A within the particles, allowing polymer degradation and surface erosion to control release. All NK2A- and kanamycin-loaded nanoparticles showed moderate encapsulation efficiencies between 34.3 and 47.3%.
Each empty nanoparticle chemistry showed negative Zeta potential values, attributable to dicarboxylic acid residues that are produced at the surface after hydrolysis of the anhydride bond37 (Table 2). However, NK2A encapsulation produced a profound, sign-inverting increase in observed Zeta potentials, likely due to the cationic nature of the NK2A peptide (Table 2).
Antimicrobial activity of NK2A nanoparticles
To assess the antimicrobial activity of NK2A nanoparticles, MDR Salmonella SX238 (106 CFU/ml) was incubated (3 h) with NK2A nanoparticles (5 µM final concentration). Efficient Salmonella SX238 killing was observed with 20:80 CPTEG:CPH kan nanoparticles (final kanamycin concentration = 16 µg/mL) (Fig. 7c). Both 10:90 CPTEG:SA and 20:80 CPH:SA NK2A-loaded nanoparticles showed 100% Salmonella SX238 killing, while 20:80 CPTEG:CPH NK2A-loaded nanoparticles exhibited ~ 80% SX238 killing (Fig. 7c) (P < 0.0001). This differential Salmonella SX238 killing could indicate polymer chemistry interactions with the NK2A peptide, affecting its capacity to localize at the bacterial surface, or alternatively polymer-bacteria interactions. These considerations should be explored further in future research.
Discussion
Salmonella is a major causative agent of bacterial foodborne illness in the U.S.3,38. In a 2019 United States antibiotic resistance threats report, the CDC classified both drug resistant nontyphoidal and typhoidal Salmonella as serious threats to global health2. Approximately 10% of Salmonella are multidrug-resistant with a few of the isolates defined as extremely resistant (resistant to eight or more antimicrobial classes39); thus, innovative non-antibiotic strategies are needed to limit Salmonella colonization of food animals and contamination of their food products40. Despite the availability of over 19,000 antimicrobial agents41, the literature on MDR Salmonella susceptibility to AMPs is notably sparse42. AMPs are ideal molecules to test against MDR Salmonella because AMPs generally induce rapid bacterial killing, have a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity, and have a reduced proclivity for cultivating bacterial resistance compared to classical antibiotics10. It has previously been reported that 30-mer peptides derived from bovine NK-lysins are potent inhibitors against a variety of bacteria17,20,21,23–25. This study established NK2A and NK2B as highly effective against Salmonella isolates (MDR and non-MDR). Both peptides were able to inhibit the growth of Salmonella at low micromolar concentrations (3.5–5 µM) during a 24 h incubation in LB broth (Fig. 1a). Although certain AMPs show reduced antimicrobial activity in the presence of salt12,13,43,44, NK2A and NK2B were highly effective in both LB broth and PBS containing physiological concentrations of salt (NaCl ~ 100–150 mM).
The antimicrobial activity of cationic AMPs is predicted to be due to nonspecific interaction with bacterial membranes7. Bovine NK-lysin peptides are cationic α-helical AMPs and are expected to electrostatically interact with negatively charged bacterial membranes, resulting in pore formation, intracellular content leakage and bacterial death20,21. The net positive charges of bovine NK-lysin peptides in physiological buffer (PBS) is predicted to be + 5.0 to + 7.9. In general, bacterial surface charge or Zeta potential is negative due to the presence of negatively charged lipopolysaccharides in Gram negative bacteria and teichoic acids in Gram positive bacteria. Due to the complex nature of Gram negative bacterial LPS molecules, interactions of AMPs and LPS are poorly understood. Phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylglycerol and cardiolipin are the major lipid components of bacterial cytoplasmic membranes among which the latter two are negatively charged45. Using a Zetasizer, it was confirmed that NK-lysin peptides have net positive Zeta potentials while Salmonella isolates have net negative Zeta potentials (Tables 2–3). Incubation of Salmonella isolates with NK2A resulted in increased bacterial Zeta potentials, suggesting electrostatic interaction and charge neutralization between NK2A and bacterial LPS and cytoplasmic membrane. Some studies suggested that increased Zeta potentials can be used as a potential marker to assess damage to bacterial membranes or viability46. However, increased Zeta potentials of Salmonella (isolate SB395) were observed even with Sc-NK2A which has minimal bacterial killing activity. Therefore, the findings suggest that increased bacterial Zeta potential alone is an imperfect tool for assessing AMP-mediated membrane permeability of Salmonella isolates.
Although direct bovine NK-lysin peptide binding to bacterial membranes has not been demonstrated, the increase in Zeta potential of Salmonella with NK2A in this study suggested NK2A-membrane interactions. Membranolytic activity of NK2A is supported by our experimental findings from live/dead bacterial viability staining, PI uptake assay, and TEM. Moreover, two specific experiments were conducted to confirm NK2A binding with MDR Salmonella SX238 membranes. Preincubation of NK2A with increasing concentrations of Salmonella LPS prevented NK2A-mediated MDR Salmonella SX238 growth inhibition (Fig. 6a). This suggests that NK2A-LPS binding is irreversible. TEM detection of NK2A-AuNP conjugates on both bacterial outer- and inner-membranes confirmed direct binding of NK2A to MDR Salmonella SX238 LPS and the cytoplasmic membrane.
Our ultimate goal is to develop non-antibiotic strategies to control Salmonella colonization and shedding in food animals. Of the four bovine NK-lysin peptides tested in this study, NK2A appeared to be the best candidate. In general, AMPs show poor pharmacokinetic properties because of their small size, hydrophobicity, and sensitivity to proteolytic degradation. Polyanhydride nanoparticles have been extensively characterized as a delivery platform for small molecules (including antimicrobials) and biomolecules29,30,32,47–51. Polyanhydride nanoparticles entrap and protect sensitive payloads from harsh physiological environments (like proteases and low pH), traffic the payload to the site of action, and control the release of the payload27,28. These features could improve peptide stability, enhance AMP bioavailability, reduce proteolytic degradation, and decrease treatment frequency. In vitro release kinetics assays revealed that all tested nanoparticle formulations produced slow and sustained release of NK2A. These nanoparticle formulations also preserved NK2A functional activity, given that ~ 80% (in the case of 20:80 CPTEG:CPH particles ) to 100% (for 10:90 CPTEG:SA and 20:80 CPH:SA particles) MDR Salmonella killing was observed. These findings suggest that polyanhydride nanoparticles have the features of a suitable nano-carrier delivery platform for NK2A, and merit further investigation in future animal trials.
In conclusion, this study revealed that among four bovine NK-lysin peptides, NK2A and NK2B showed potent antimicrobial activity against Salmonella isolates (MDR and non-MDR). Using a variety of techniques, it was demonstrated that NK2A directly and irreversibly binds to bacterial LPS and the cytoplasmic membrane, leading to membrane permeability, intracellular content leakage, and bacterial death. Initial investigation of NK2A-loaded polyanhydride nanoparticles indicates both sustained release and peptide protection capabilities, motivating further exploration of a nano-carrier delivery approach for NK-lysin-based therapies to treat MDR Salmonella infections. Such an innovative, non-antibiotic strategy could aid efforts to control the spread of MDR Salmonella infections in animal and human populations.
Materials and methods
Peptide synthesis
Thirty-mer peptides corresponding to the functional region helices 2-loop-3 of bovine NK-lysins (NK1: VIIHVTSKVCSKMGLWSILCNQMMKKYLNR, net charge = + 5.0; NK2A: TVIEVASKMCSKMRLLKGLCKSITKRFLRR, net charge = + 7.9; NK2B: TVIEAASKVCGKMGPLKGLCKSITKRFLRR, net charge = + 6.9; NK2C: TVIEEASKVCSKMRLLKGLCKSIMKKFLRT, net charge = + 5.9 and a scrambled version of NK2A (Sc-NK2A): MFVSLSLATIRLTGKSKCKKERCMILKRRV, net charge = + 7.9) were synthesized by FMOC solid-phase peptide synthesis chemistry, aliquoted (1 mg/tube), and supplied as trifluoroacetate salt with over 95% purity (Peptide 2.0 Inc., Chantilly, VA). Lyophilized peptides were dissolved in Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2), aliquoted, and stored at − 20 °C until used.
Peptide concentration determination
Concentrations of all NK-lysin peptides and Sc-NK2A were determined by quantitative amino acid analysis at the Protein Chemistry Laboratory, Texas A&M University and the Center for Biotechnology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Animals and ethics
The authors complied with the ARRIVE guidelines. All animal procedures were conducted in strict accordance with the Animal Welfare Act, and all procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the National Animal Disease Center, Ames, IA. Blood samples collected from 4 years old healthy two Holstein cows from National Animal Disease Center were used to isolate red blood cells.
Mouse study
To determine whether NK-lysin peptides show in vivo cytotoxic effects, a mouse study was conducted. Briefly, thirty 5–6 weeks old female Swiss-Webster mice (Envigo, Indianapolis, IN) were housed in groups in six individual cages (5 mice per cage) in ABSL2 facilities with ad libitum access to food and water in a 12-h light:dark cycle. After 1 week of acclimation, mice were intraperitoneally injected with a single dose of 100 µg of NK-lysin peptides (NK1, NK2A, NK2B, NK2C, or Sc-NK2A, ~ 4 mg/kg of body weight) in PBS (1 mL). Mice injected with PBS (1 mL) served as a negative control for the study. Mice were daily observed for any signs of toxicity and were euthanized 2 weeks post peptide administration.
Circular dichroism (CD) analysis
CD analysis of all four bovine NK-lysin peptides were previously described24. Therefore, CD analyses were performed here using the same methods for NK2A and Sc-NK2A in potassium phosphate buffer and liposomes using Jasco J-815 CD spectrophotometer (Jasco, Easton, MA).
Hemolytic activity assay
The hemolytic activity of all four bovine NK-lysin peptides, as the amount of hemoglobin released by the lysis of cattle red blood cells (RBCs), were previously determined20. Therefore, only hemolytic activity of Sc-NK2A was compared with NK2A (final concentrations for both peptides at 2, 5, 10, and 20 µM) using cattle RBCs in this study as described previously20. Triton X-100 and PBS were used as positive and negative control for the assay, respectively.
Nanoparticle synthesis
SA monomer was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). CPH and CPTEG monomers were synthesized as previously described52,53. The 20:80 CPTEG:CPH, 20:80 CPH:SA, and 10:90 CPTEG:SA copolymers were synthesized by melt condensation to number average molecular weights of approximately 7.5, 17.5, and 17.5 kDa, respectively49,52–54, and composition and molecular weight were confirmed by 1H NMR analysis using a Varian MR-400 (Varian, Inc., Palo Alto, CA). Nanoparticles were synthesized by flash nanoprecipitation29. Nanoparticles were collected by vacuum filtration, scanning electron microscopy (SEM, FEI Quanta 250, Hillsboro, OR) was used to image all formulations, and size distributions were calculated using Fiji image analysis software55. Nanoparticle Zeta potential was measured (see below) using a Zetasizer Nano (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Worcester, UK).
Nanoparticle release kinetics
Nanoparticle release kinetics and encapsulation efficiency were assayed in PBS, pH 7.4 as previously described29,30. Released NK2A peptide concentrations were quantified by micro bicinchoninic acid (microBCA) assay (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL). Kanamycin was quantified by o-pthalaldehyde derivatization56 (Fluoraldhehyde crystals, ThermoFisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA) followed by absorbance spectroscopy at 340 nm (SpectraMax M3, Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA). Drug release kinetics are presented as fraction released, where the cumulative payload mass released is normalized by the total encapsulated payload mass.
MDR Salmonella isolates and culture conditions
MDR Salmonella outbreak isolates (SX238, SX231, and SB395) as well as a non-MDR Salmonella isolate (SB377) used in this study are listed in Table 1. Bacterial freezer stocks were streaked individually onto Luria–Bertani (LB Lennox) agar (Sigma Aldrich) and incubated in a 37 °C incubator overnight. Bacterial cultures were prepared by growing each isolate from a single colony in 3 mL LB Lennox broth (ThermoFisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE) overnight at 37 °C in a shaker-incubator at 200 rpm.
MDR Salmonella-NK-lysin peptide susceptibility assays
Overnight cultures of a MDR Salmonella outbreak isolate (SX238) and one non-MDR Salmonella isolate (SB377) were diluted 1:1000 in LB broth to obtain approximately 1 × 106 colony forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL). One hundred microliters of each diluted culture were transferred into honeycomb® 100-well plates (~ 1 × 105 CFU/well) (Growth Curves USA, Piscataway, NJ). Bovine NK-lysin peptides (NK1, NK2A, NK2B, and NK2C) were added at the final peptide concentrations of 20, 10, 5, 3.5, 2 µM in PBS (total volume = 20 µL) with a final bacterial-peptide volume of 120 µL/well. The plates were covered with lids and placed in an automated growth curve reader (Bioscreen C; Growth Curves USA, Piscataway, NJ) which was programmed for continuous shaking at 37 °C, and optical density readings at 600 nm (OD600) were recorded every hour for 24 h. Bacteria incubated with kanamycin and PBS were used as positive and negative control for the assay, respectively. The optical density data were analyzed, and growth curve graphs for each isolate were generated using MS Excel. Because NK2A peptide showed the strongest Salmonella growth inhibition, this peptide was selected for further studies. Twenty-four-hour growth curve assays for Salmonella isolate SX238 were repeated at different bacterial CFU (~ 1 × 105, 1 × 106, 1 × 107, and 1 × 108 CFU/mL) with NK2A (5 µM and 10 µM). Sc-NK2A was included as a control for the assay.
The bactericidal effect of NK2A peptide against MDR Salmonella (SX238) was also determined. Overnight SX238 culture was centrifuged (10,000 rpm for 2 min) and diluted 1:1000 in LB broth and/or PBS to obtain ~ 1 × 106 CFU/mL; 100 µL of diluted bacterial culture was placed in a Honeycomb plate (~ 1 × 105 CFU/well), NK2A (20, 5, 2 and 0 µM) was added and incubated at 37 °C in the reader with continuous shaking for 3 h. Bacteria in each well was 10 × serially diluted in LB broth, 10 µL was plated on Xylose-Lysine-Tergitol 4 (XLT4) (ThermoFisher) agar plates and incubated at 37 °C overnight. Bacterial colonies were enumerated for each NK2A dilution.
Antimicrobial activity of NK2A (final concentration ~ 5 µM) encapsulated nanoparticles (CPTEG:CPH, CPH:SA and CPTEG:SA) were tested against Salmonella isolate SX238 as previously described32. To prepare 10 µM NK2A stock solutions, required amounts of nanoparticles was measured, added into 1 mL PBS and briefly sonicated as previously described32. One hundred microliters of NK2A nanoparticles and 100 µL of diluted bacterial culture in PBS was added into a Honeycomb plate (~ 1 × 105 CFU/well) and incubated at 37 °C in the reader with continuous shaking for 3 h. Bacteria in each well was 10 × serially diluted in LB broth, 10 µL was plated on XLT4 agar plates and incubated at 37 °C overnight. Kanamycin (final concentration = 16 µg/mL) encapsulated and empty nanoparticles were used as positive and negative control for the assay, respectively. Bacterial colonies were enumerated for each nanoparticle treatment.
The percentage of bacterial killing was calculated using the following Eq. (1 − [average number of live bacteria in NK2A-treated sample/average number of live bacteria in the negative control sample] × 100). The antimicrobial assays for Salmonella isolates were repeated at least three times in duplicate wells.
Zeta potential measurements
Salmonella isolates were prepared for Zeta potential measurements via the diffusion barrier technique as previously described but with some minor modifications35. Briefly, overnight cultures of Salmonella in LB broth were centrifuged (10,000 rpm for 2 min), washed twice in Milli-Q water and resuspended in Milli-Q water (~ 1 × 109 CFU/mL). Bacteria were then diluted 1:1000 in Milli-Q water supplemented with 10% PBS, then transferred to clear disposable folded capillary Zeta cells filled with 10% PBS via gel loading pipette tip (Malvern Instruments Ltd). The Zeta potential measurements (mV) of bacterial isolates were immediately measured using a Zeta potential analyzer equipped with He–Ne 633 nm laser (Zetasizer Nano, Malvern) at a constant voltage of 150 V at room temperature. The Zeta potential changes of Salmonella isolates following incubation with NK2A were also recorded. Bacterial isolates (~ 106 CFU in 1 mL Milli-Q water) were incubated with 2 µM NK2A (in PBS) at 37 °C for 20 min. Capillary Zeta cells were washed with Milli-Q water between samples and refilled with Milli-Q water containing 10% PBS before measuring the Zeta potentials. Zeta potential changes of one Salmonella isolate (SB395) was also similarly tested with Sc-NK2A (2 µM) peptide. This method was also used for assessing NK-lysin peptide Zeta potentials. A total of five Zeta potential measurements of 40 runs each with 30 s cooling cycles for each sample was performed.
Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM)
The viabilities of bacteria following incubation with NK2A and Sc-NK2A were determined using culture-independent (function of the membrane integrity of the bacteria) staining technique by using LIVE/DEAD™ BacLight™ bacterial viability kit (for microscopy) as described previously20. Bacteria in each treatment was visualized using a Nikon A1R + laser scanning confocal microscope (Nikon Instruments, Melville, NY) as described previously20. Images were obtained using plan Apo 60 × objective lens (oil) at numerical aperture 1.4. Final figures were prepared using Adobe Photoshop Elements 11.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
Morphological changes of bacteria following incubation with NK2A and Sc-NK2A peptides were studied by TEM. An overnight culture of Salmonella (isolate SX238) was centrifuged and resuspended in PBS. One hundred microliters of bacterial suspension were placed in a Honeycomb plate (~ 1 × 107 CFU/well) and NK2A, Sc-NK2A (20 µM), and PBS were added and incubated at 37 °C with continuous shaking for 1 h. The bacterial suspensions were mixed with an equal volume of 3% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) and processed for TEM as described before24. Sections were examined with a FEI Tecnai G2 Biotwin (FEI Co., Hillboro, OR) TEM and images were taken with Advanced Microscopy Technologies (AMT Inc., Danvers, MN) imaging camera.
Propidium iodide (PI) uptake assay
The kinetics of NK2A-induced damage to Salmonella cell membranes were evaluated using PI uptake assay as described previously24. Briefly, an overnight culture of MDR Salmonella outbreak isolate SX238 was centrifuged, washed with PBS, and resuspended in PBS. Ninety microliters of bacterial suspension was transferred to a 96-well opaque plate (~ 1 × 107 CFU/well), mixed with 10 µL of PI (final concentration = 3 µM) and incubated at 37 °C for 5 min. PBS, polymyxin B (2, 4, 25, 50 and 100 µg/mL), NK2A or Sc-NK2A (both at 2 and 5 µM) were added and PI fluorescent intensities in each well was continuously measured (15 s intervals, flex mode) using a FlexStation 3 multi-mode (fluorescent) microplate reader (Molecular Devices LLC., San Jose, CA) for up to 6 h. The excitation and emission wavelengths for PI was set up at 530 nm and 620 nm, respectively.
NK2A-Lipopolysccharides (LPS) binding studies
The binding of NK2A to Salmonella LPS was studied by growth curve assay and TEM. Five micromolar NK2A (~ 2.2 µg/well) was preincubated with different amounts of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium LPS (Sigma; LPS = 0, 0.5, 1.1, 2.2, 4.4, 8.8 µg/well, final volume of LPS and NK2A = 20 µL) at 37 °C in a honeycomb plate with continuous shaking for 30 min. Overnight Salmonella (isolate SX238) culture was diluted to ~ 1 × 106 CFU/mL and 100 µL was transferred into wells containing NK2A-LPS and further incubated at 37 °C with continuous shaking for 24 h. The optical density (OD600) data were analyzed, and growth curve graphs were generated.
The direct binding of NK2A to Salmonella LPS/membranes was also examined by TEM using gold nanoparticle-conjugated NK2A (NK2A-AuNPs). Ten nanometer (diameter) NHS-activated gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) were conjugated to NK2A as described by the manufacturer (Cytodiagnostics Inc., Burlington, ON, Canada). One hundred microliters of Salmonella isolate SX238 was placed in a Honeycomb plate (~ 1 × 107 CFU/well) and incubated with NK2A-AuNPs (20 µM) or AuNPs (without NK2A) at 37 °C with continuous shaking for 15–45 min. Bacterial samples were fixed with 3% glutaraldehyde and processed for TEM as described above.
Statistical analyses
The data analysis for this paper was generated using SAS® software, Version 9.4 of the SAS System for Windows. Copyright © 2002–2012. SAS Institute Inc. SAS and all other SAS Institute Inc. product or service names are registered trademarks or trademarks of SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA. When significant, mean comparisons were performed using the predicted differences (PDIFF) option. Significant differences were established at P ≤ 0.05.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Judith Stasko, Adrienne Shircliff, Tracy Porter, and Duane Zimmerman at the National Animal Disease Center for their excellent technical support. A.M and B.N were supported by the Iowa State University Nanovaccine Institute. B.N. also acknowledges the Vlasta Klima Balloun faculty chair for support.
Author contributions
R.D. and S.B conceived and supervised the project. R.D., B.A., E.C., B.N. and S.B. designed the study. R.D., B.A., A.M., E.N. and S.F. performed experiments and R.D., B.A., A.M., E.N., S.F., B.N., E.C. and S.B. analysed and interpreted the data. R.D., B.A., A.M., B.N. and S.B. wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Funding
This research was conducted at a U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) research facility. This research was supported by funding through internal USDA research dollars (USDA/Agricultural Research Service, National Animal Disease Center, 5030–32000-116-00D and 5030–32000-113-00D), 2020 USDA-ARS Antimicrobial Resistance Funding (No. 0426572) and USDA-ARS Alternatives to Antibiotics Funding (No. 0426570). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendations or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
Data availability
All the data supporting the conclusions have been included within the article.
Competing interests
B.N. is a co-founder of ImmunoNanoMed Inc., a start-up with business interests in the development of nano-based vaccines against infectious diseases. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Rohana P. Dassanayake, Email: rohana.dassanayake@usda.gov
Shawn M. D. Bearson, Email: shawn.bearson@usda.gov
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-021-98860-6.
References
- 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, N. C. f. E. a. Z. I. D., Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases. 25March2020] Available from https://www.cdc.gov/salmonella/index.html.
- 2.https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/biggest-threats.html, C. A. r. t. i. t. U. S.
- 3.www.cdc.gov/salmonella/outbreaks.html.
- 4.Routh JA, et al. Nationwide outbreak of multidrug-resistant Salmonella Heidelberg infections associated with ground turkey: United States, 2011. Epidemiol. Infect. 2015;143:3227–3234. doi: 10.1017/S0950268815000497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kawakami VM, et al. Notes from the field: outbreak of multidrug-resistant salmonella infections linked to pork-Washington, 2015. MMWR Morb. Mortal Wkly. Rep. 2016;65:379–381. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6514a4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Laxminarayan R, et al. Antibiotic resistance-the need for global solutions. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2013;13:1057–1098. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70318-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Brogden KA. Antimicrobial peptides: pore formers or metabolic inhibitors in bacteria? Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2005;3:238–250. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mahlapuu M, Hakansson J, Ringstad L, Bjorn C. Antimicrobial Peptides: an emerging category of therapeutic agents. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2016;6:194. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bahar AA, Ren D. Salmonella. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2013;6:1543–1575. doi: 10.3390/ph6121543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Divyashree M, et al. Clinical applications of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs): where do we stand now? Protein Pept. Lett. 2020;27:120–134. doi: 10.2174/0929866526666190925152957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sierra JM, Fuste E, Rabanal F, Vinuesa T, Vinas M. An overview of antimicrobial peptides and the latest advances in their development. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2017;17:663–676. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2017.1315402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bowdish DM, et al. Impact of LL-37 on anti-infective immunity. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2005;77:451–459. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0704380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kim WH, Lillehoj HS, Min W. Evaluation of the immunomodulatory activity of the chicken NK-lysin-derived peptide cNK-2. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:45099. doi: 10.1038/srep45099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Andersson M, et al. NK-lysin, a novel effector peptide of cytotoxic T and NK cells. Structure and cDNA cloning of the porcine form, induction by interleukin 2, antibacterial and antitumour activity. EMBO J. 1995;14:1615–1625. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07150.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Andreu D, Carreno C, Linde C, Boman HG, Andersson M. Identification of an anti-mycobacterial domain in NK-lysin and granulysin. Biochem J. 1999;344(Pt 3):845–849. doi: 10.1042/bj3440845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Stenger S, et al. An antimicrobial activity of cytolytic T cells mediated by granulysin. Science. 1998;282:121–125. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5386.121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Endsley JJ, et al. Characterization of bovine homologues of granulysin and NK-lysin. J. Immunol. 2004;173:2607–2614. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.4.2607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pena SV, Hanson DA, Carr BA, Goralski TJ, Krensky AM. Processing, subcellular localization, and function of 519 (granulysin), a human late T cell activation molecule with homology to small, lytic, granule proteins. J. Immunol. 1997;158:2680–2688. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Munford RS, Sheppard PO, O'Hara PJ. Saposin-like proteins (SAPLIP) carry out diverse functions on a common backbone structure. J. Lipid Res. 1995;36:1653–1663. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)41485-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Dassanayake RP, Falkenberg SM, Briggs RE, Tatum FM, Sacco RE. Antimicrobial activity of bovine NK-lysin-derived peptides on bovine respiratory pathogen Histophilus somni. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0183610. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chen J, et al. Bovine NK-lysin: Copy number variation and functional diversification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:E7223–7229. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1519374113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Andersson M, et al. NK-lysin, structure and function of a novel effector molecule of porcine T and NK cells. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1996;54:123–126. doi: 10.1016/s0165-2427(96)05677-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chen J, et al. Expression of the Bovine NK-Lysin Gene Family and Activity against Respiratory Pathogens. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0158882. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Dassanayake RP, et al. Antimicrobial activity of bovine NK-lysin-derived peptides on Mycoplasma bovis. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0197677. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Dassanayake RP, et al. Bovine NK-lysin-derived peptides have bactericidal effects against Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis. Vet. Res. 2021;52:11. doi: 10.1186/s13567-021-00893-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mullis AS, Peroutka-Bigus N, Phadke KS, Bellaire BH, Narasimhan B. Nanomedicines to counter microbial barriers and antimicrobial resistance. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2021;31:100672. doi: 10.1016/j.coche.2021.100672. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mullis AS, Schlichtmann BW, Narasimhan B, Cademartiri R, Mallapragada SK. Ligand-cascading nano-delivery devices to enable multiscale targeting of anti-neurodegenerative therapeutics. Biomed. Mater. 2018;13:034102. doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/aaa778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ross KA, et al. Nano-enabled delivery of diverse payloads across complex biological barriers. J. Control Release. 2015;219:548–559. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.08.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mullis AS, et al. Data analytics approach for rational design of nanomedicines with programmable drug release. Mol. Pharm. 2019;16:1917–1928. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.8b01272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mullis AS, Jacobson SJ, Narasimhan B. High-throughput synthesis and screening of rapidly degrading polyanhydride nanoparticles. ACS Comb. Sci. 2020;22:172–183. doi: 10.1021/acscombsci.9b00162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Torres MP, Vogel BM, Narasimhan B, Mallapragada SK. Synthesis and characterization of novel polyanhydrides with tailored erosion mechanisms. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A. 2006;76:102–110. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.30510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lueth P, et al. Nanotherapeutic provides dose sparing and improved antimicrobial activity against Brucella melitensis infections. J. Control Release. 2019;294:288–297. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.12.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Binnebose AM, et al. Polyanhydride nanoparticle delivery platform dramatically enhances killing of filarial worms. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2015;9:e0004173. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Phanse Y, et al. Cellular internalization mechanisms of polyanhydride particles: implications for rational design of drug delivery vehicles. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2016;12:1544–1552. doi: 10.1166/jbn.2016.2259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Soon RL, et al. Different surface charge of colistin-susceptible and -resistant Acinetobacter baumannii cells measured with zeta potential as a function of growth phase and colistin treatment. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2011;66:126–133. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zavascki AP, Goldani LZ, Li J, Nation RL. Polymyxin B for the treatment of multidrug-resistant pathogens: a critical review. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2007;60:1206–1215. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkm357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Goodman JT, Mullis AS, Dunshee L, Mitra A, Narasimhan B. Automated high-throughput synthesis of protein-loaded polyanhydride nanoparticle libraries. ACS Comb. Sci. 2018;20:298–307. doi: 10.1021/acscombsci.8b00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/foodborne-germs.html.
- 39.https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/national-antimicrobial-resistance-monitoring-system/2018-narms-update-integrated-report-summary. "2018 NARMS Update: Integrated Report Summary.". (2020).
- 40.Peterson E, Kaur P. Antibiotic resistance mechanisms in bacteria: relationships between resistance determinants of antibiotic producers, environmental bacteria, and clinical pathogens. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:2928. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kang X, et al. DRAMP 20, an updated data repository of antimicrobial peptides. Sci. Data. 2019;6:148. doi: 10.1038/s41597-019-0154-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Tsai WC, Zhuang ZJ, Lin CY, Chen WJ. Novel antimicrobial peptides with promising activity against multidrug resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Choleraesuis and its stress response mechanism. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2016;121:952–965. doi: 10.1111/jam.13203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Park CB, Kim HS, Kim SC. Mechanism of action of the antimicrobial peptide buforin II: buforin II kills microorganisms by penetrating the cell membrane and inhibiting cellular functions. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1998;244:253–257. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1998.8159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bals R, et al. Human beta-defensin 2 is a salt-sensitive peptide antibiotic expressed in human lung. J. Clin. Invest. 1998;102:874–880. doi: 10.1172/JCI2410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Dowhan W. Molecular basis for membrane phospholipid diversity: why are there so many lipids? Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1997;66:199–232. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.66.1.199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Halder S, et al. Alteration of Zeta potential and membrane permeability in bacteria: a study with cationic agents. Springerplus. 2015;4:672. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1476-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ulery BD, et al. Design of a protective single-dose intranasal nanoparticle-based vaccine platform for respiratory infectious diseases. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e17642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zacharias ZR, et al. Polyanhydride nanovaccine induces robust pulmonary B and T cell immunity and confers protection against homologous and heterologous influenza a virus infections. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:1953. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kelly SM, Mitra A, Mathur S, Narasimhan B. Synthesis and characterization of rapidly degrading polyanhydrides as vaccine adjuvants. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2020;6:265–276. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Petersen LK, Phanse Y, Ramer-Tait AE, Wannemuehler MJ, Narasimhan B. Amphiphilic polyanhydride nanoparticles stabilize Bacillus anthracis protective antigen. Mol. Pharm. 2012;9:874–882. doi: 10.1021/mp2004059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Carrillo-Conde BR, Brewer E, Lowman A, Peppas NA. Complexation hydrogels as oral delivery vehicles of therapeutic antibodies: an in vitro and ex vivo evaluation of antibody stability and bioactivity. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2015;54:10197–10205. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.5b01193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Shen E, Pizsczek R, Dziadul B, Narasimhan B. Microphase separation in bioerodible copolymers for drug delivery. Biomaterials. 2001;22:201–210. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00175-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Torres MP, Determan AS, Anderson GL, Mallapragada SK, Narasimhan B. Amphiphilic polyanhydrides for protein stabilization and release. Biomaterials. 2007;28:108–116. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.08.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kipper MJ, Shen E, Determan A, Narasimhan B. Design of an injectable system based on bioerodible polyanhydride microspheres for sustained drug delivery. Biomaterials. 2002;23:4405–4412. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00181-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Schindelin J, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods. 2012;9:676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Gubernator J, Drulis-Kawa Z, Kozubek A. A simply and sensitive fluorometric method for determination of gentamicin in liposomal suspensions. Int. J. Pharm. 2006;327:104–109. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.07.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Bearson BL, et al. Complete genome sequence of multidrug-resistant salmonella enterica serovar 4,[5],12:i:-2015 U.S. pork outbreak isolate USDA15WA-1. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 2019 doi: 10.1128/MRA.00791-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Brunelle BW, Bearson SM, Bearson BL. Tetracycline accelerates the temporally-regulated invasion response in specific isolates of multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. BMC Microbiol. 2013;13:202. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-13-202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Bearson BL, Bearson SMD, Looft T, Cai G, Shippy DC. Characterization of a multidrug-resistant salmonella enterica serovar heidelberg outbreak strain in commercial Turkeys: colonization, transmission, and host transcriptional response. Front. Vet. Sci. 2017;4:156. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Bearson SM, Bearson BL, Rasmussen MA. Identification of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium genes important for survival in the swine gastric environment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006;72:2829–2836. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.4.2829-2836.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Bearson SM, et al. Prophylactic administration of vector-encoded porcine granulocyte-colony stimulating factor reduces salmonella shedding, tonsil colonization, and microbiota alterations of the gastrointestinal tract in salmonella-challenged swine. Front. Vet. Sci. 2016;3:66. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2016.00066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All the data supporting the conclusions have been included within the article.





