Abstract
Neuroinflammation play an important role in Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis. Advances in molecular imaging using positron emission tomography have provided insights into the time course of neuroinflammation and its relation with Alzheimer’s disease central pathologies in patients and in animal disease models. Recent single-cell sequencing and transcriptomics indicate dynamic disease-associated microglia and astrocyte profiles in Alzheimer’s disease. Mitochondrial 18-kDa translocator protein is the most widely investigated target for neuroinflammation imaging. New generation of translocator protein tracers with improved performance have been developed and evaluated along with tau and amyloid imaging for assessing the disease progression in Alzheimer’s disease continuum. Given that translocator protein is not exclusively expressed in glia, alternative targets are under rapid development, such as monoamine oxidase B, matrix metalloproteinases, colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor, imidazoline-2 binding sites, cyclooxygenase, cannabinoid-2 receptor, purinergic P2X7 receptor, P2Y12 receptor, the fractalkine receptor, triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2, and receptor for advanced glycation end products. Promising targets should demonstrate a higher specificity for cellular locations with exclusive expression in microglia or astrocyte and activation status (pro- or anti-inflammatory) with highly specific ligand to enable in vivo brain imaging. In this review, we summarised recent advances in the development of neuroinflammation imaging tracers and provided an outlook for promising targets in the future.
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, neuroinflammation, tau, microglia, astrocyte, amyloid (A) 42, positron emission tomography (PET), TSPO (18 kDa translocator protein)
Introduction
Neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease (AD), frontotemporal dementia, Parkinson’s disease (PD), and Lewy body dementia, represent a tremendous unmet clinical need. The major neuropathological features of AD are the deposition of amyloid-beta (Aβ) plaques, neurofibrillary tangles formed by misfolded hyperphosphorylated tau, neuronal loss, and neuroinflammation characterised by glial activation (1, 2). Neuroinflammation plays an important role in AD; however, its dynamics and impacts (protective or detrimental) have still not been fully elucidated (3, 4). Microglia, as the resident macrophage cells in the brain, have emerged as central players in the AD pathogenesis (1, 2, 5). Microglial activation was previous classified into proinflammatory (M1) or anti-inflammatory (M2) types (2). Recent single-cell sequencing and transcriptomics studies reported gene coexpression network diversity of microglia in AD and disease-associated-microglia (DAM) of transcriptionally distinct and neurodegeneration-specific profiles (6–12). Aβ-laden microglia has a unique gene-expression signature including triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2), apolipoprotein E (ApoE), and other AD-associated genes (13, 14). Microglia phagocytosis driven by Tyro3, Axl, and Mer (TAM) receptor has been shown to promote the development of dense-core plaque and the engulfing of Aβ plaques (15). Astrocytes are categorised into A1 and A2 subtypes based on their phenotype and genetic expression profiles (16–19). A1 astrocyte secretes and produces a large number of inflammatory factors and neurotoxins, whereas A2 astrocyte produces neurotrophic substances and supports neuronal growth. Reactive astrocytes precipitate both Aβ and tau (20–22) and are closely linked with microgliosis (16). Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma biomarkers for neurodegeneration and inflammatory markers [e.g., tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-10] were elevated in patients with AD and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) compared to healthy controls (6, 7, 13, 14), associated with an increasing age (23, 24) and cerebral amyloid pathology (25). Recent advances in molecular imaging have provided insights into the time course of AD pathology, including Aβ, tau, synaptic deficits, and neuroinflammation, in patients and in animal disease models (1, 26–35). In vivo imaging of neuroinflammation, however, is challenging, and the spatial–temporal pattern in the development of AD has still not been fully elucidated (23). One reason is that the astrocytes and microglia are highly dynamic and heterogeneous in their subtypes, locations, and activation status (1).
Neuroinflammation Positron Emission Tomography Imaging
Mitochondrial 18 kDa translocator protein (TSPO) is the most widely investigated neuroinflammation target for PET imaging (36). Other alternative targets are under rapid development (Table 1), such as monoamine oxidase-B (MAO-B), matrix metalloproteinases (144–147, 185, 186), colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R), imidazoline-2 binding sites (I2BS), cyclooxygenases, the phospholipase A2/arachidonic acid pathway, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor-1, reactive oxygen species, cannabinoid-2 receptor, purinergic P2X7 receptor and P2Y12 receptor, the fractalkine receptor (CX3CR1) (187), TREM2 (140), and receptor for advanced glycation end products (36, 188) (Table 1).
Table 1.
Summary of imaging probes for gliosis.
Target | Tracer | Human | Animal model |
---|---|---|---|
TSPO | (R)-[11C] PK11195 | MCI, AD, HC (37–43) | 3×Tg, APP/PS1 mice, rTg4510 mice (26, 44) |
[18F]DPA-714 | AD, MS, ALS, HC (45, 46) | APP/PS1 mice, TgF344 rats (47–51) | |
[11C]DPA-713 | AD, HC (52) | Murine stroke models (53), aged Monkeys (54) | |
[18F]F-DPA | APP/PS1 mice (55) | ||
[18F]FEBMP | PS19, rTg4510 mice (56–58) | ||
[11C]DAA1106, [18F]FEDAA1106 | AD, HC | APP23, APP/PS1, PS19 mice, TgF334 rats (50, 59, 60) | |
[18F]FEMPA | AD, HC (61, 62) | ||
[11C]AC-5216 | HC (63) | APP23, AppNL-G-F/NL-G-F-knock-in, APPE693, rTg4510, PS19 mice (26, 57, 60, 64, 65) | |
[18F]FEPPA | MCI, AD, HC (66, 67) | TgAPP21 rats (68) | |
[11C]PBR06 | MCI, AD, HC (69–71) | APPL/S mice (57, 72, 73) | |
[11C]PBR28 | AD, SD, MCI, FTD, DLB, ALS, HC (40, 69, 74–82) | 5×FAD, PS19 mice (57, 73) | |
[18F]PBR111 | APP/PS1 mice (83, 84) | ||
[125I]CLINDE | AD, HC (85) | LPS injected, 3×Tg mice, TgF344 rats (85–87) | |
[18F]GE-180 | AD, MS, FTD, HC (88–91) | APP/PS1, PS2APP, APP23, APP-SL70, APPswe, APPNL-G-F, APPL/S, Trem2 p.T66M knock-in, PS19 mice, TgF344 rats (47, 50, 53, 90, 92–102) | |
(S)-[18F]GE-387, (R, S)-[18F]GE-387 | HC (103) | LPS injected rats, non-human primates (103, 104) | |
[11C]ER176 | HC (75, 105, 106) | ||
[11C]CB184, [11C]CB190 | Mice, 6-OHDA injected rats (107) | ||
[11C]N′-MPB | Stroke rat model (108) | ||
[18F]LW223 | HC (109) | Rats (109) | |
P2X7R | [11C]GSK1482160 | HC (110) | LPS-injected mice, EAE rats, non-human primates (110, 111) |
[18F]JNJ-64413739 | HC (112), ALS (113) | LPS injected mice (112, 114) | |
[11C]JNJ-54173717 | ALS (113) | rAAV3flag-hP2X7R, α-synuclein, 6-OHDA injected rats, non-human primates (115, 116). | |
[11C]SMW139 | MS (117) | EAE, rAAV3flag-hP2X7R rats (118, 119) | |
[11C]JNJ-47965567 (A-740003) | MS (120) | Rats (121) | |
P2Y12R | [11C]P2Y12R-ant | MS (120) | EAE rats (120) |
[11C]5 | Stroke (122) | Murine stroke model (122) | |
[11C]AZD1283 | rTg4510, PS19, APP23, and APPNL-F/NL-F mice, ex vivo (123) | ||
CSF1R | [11C]CPPC | AD, HC (124) | LPS injected, EAE, APPsi, APPNL-G-F/NL-G-Fknock-in mice (64, 124) |
[11C]GW2580 | LPS injected, APPNL-G-F/NL-G-Fknock-in mice, non-human primates (64) | ||
COX-1 | [11C]-KTP-Me | AD, HC (125, 126) | APPswe mice (125–127) |
[11C]PS13, [18F]PS2 | LPS treated rhesus macaques (128) | ||
COX-2 | [11C]MC1 | LPS treated rhesus macaques (129) | |
[18F]FMTP | LPS injected mice (130) | ||
[18F]TMI | Non-human primates (131) | ||
iNOS | [18F]FBAT | LPS injected mice (132) | |
ROS | [18F]ROStrace [18F]ox-ROStrace, | LPS-treated mice (133) | |
[18F]dihydromethidine, | LPS-treated mice (134) | ||
[11C]Ascorbic. [11C]dehydroascorbic acid | Rats (135) | ||
[62Cu]ATSM | PD, ALS, MELAS (136, 137) | Brain tumor mice (138, 139) | |
TREM-2 | [124I]mAb1729,mAb1729-scFv8D3CL | APPArcSwe, APPswe mice (140) | |
TREM-1 | [64Cu]TREM1-mAb | Murine stroke, MS, GBM models (141–143) | |
Murine glioma and metastatic breast cancer model (144–146) | |||
MMP | [18F]BR-351, [18F]BR-420 | Murine stroke models (147, 148) | |
CB2R | [11C]A-836339, [18F]2f | HC (149) | J20APPswe/ind, APP/PS1 mice (150) |
[18F]RS-126, [18F]RoSMA-18-d6 | LPS injected, Huntington, stroke mice (151, 152) | ||
[18F]JHU94620 | LPS injected mice (153) | ||
[11C]NE40 | AD, HC (154) | SAMP10 mice (155) | |
MAO-B | [11C]DED | MCI, AD, HC (156–162) | APPArcSwe, APPswe mice (163, 164) |
[18F]fluorodeprenyl-D2 | Non-human primates (165) | ||
[18F]SMBT-1 | AD, HC (166, 167) | ||
[11C]SL25.1188 | HC, MDD (168, 169) | LPS-injected rats (170) | |
astrocyte | [11C]acetate | MCI, MS, HC (171, 172) | |
I2BS | [11C]BU99008 | AD, PD, HC (173–178) | Zucker rats, Non-human primates (179–181) |
[¹⁸F]FEBU (BU99018) | Mice and rats (182) | ||
[¹¹C]FTIMD | Non-human primates (183) | ||
OATP1C1 | [18F]2B-SRF101 | 3×Tg mice (184) |
ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; COX-1/2, cyclooxygenase 1/2; CSF1R, colony stimulating factor 1 receptor; DED, deuterium-L-deprenyl; FTD, Frontotemporal dementia; GBM, glioblastoma; HC, healthy control; iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase; I2BS, I2-imidazoline binding sites; LPS, lipopolysaccharides; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; MDD, major depressive disorder; MELAS, mitochondrial myopathy, encephalopathy, lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes; MMP, matrix metalloproteinases; MS, multiple sclerosis; OATP1C1, organic anion-transporting polypeptide 1C1; ROS, reactive oxygen species; PD, Parkinson’s disease; SD, semantic dementia; TREM-1, 2, triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 1, 2; TSPO, translocator protein; 6-OHD, 6-hydroxydopamine.
TSPO Imaging
TSPO is expressed mainly in the outer mitochondrial membrane of steroid-synthesizing cells in the central nervous system (microglia, astrocytes, endothelial cell, etc.) (Figures 1A, B ) and in the peripheral (191). TSPO is involved in many physiological processes including transporting cholesterol into mitochondria, steroid hormone synthesis, and bioenergetics (191, 192). Upregulation of TSPO was found in patients with AD and in animal models of AD (92, 193).
Figure 1.
Cellular location of emerging neuroinflammation imaging targets. (A, B) The RNA expression of TSPO, CSF1R, P2RX7, and P2RY12 in mouse (A) and human (B) brain [based on RNA-Seq data (189, 190)]. FPKM, fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads. Reproduced from https://www.brainrnaseq.org and (189, 190) with permission. (C) Representative transverse planes of [11C]GW2580 and [11C]CPPC SUV 60-120min images of a monkey brain superimposed on the monkey’s own MR images at baseline and with a homologous blocker treatment. (D, E) Time–radioactivity curves of [11C]GW2580 and [11C]CPPC in various brain regions obtained from corresponding PET images. FCTX, frontal cortex; CS, centrium semi-ovale. Reproduced from (64) with permission from Sage Publication. (F, G) Tau lesion-associated microglial TSPO was more sensitively captured by in vivo positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with [18F]FEBMP than [11C]PK11195. T2 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images and PET images with [18F]FEBMP and [11C]PK11195 in non-transgenic, and PS19 mice with less and severe brain atrophy at 9 months of age (F). Time course of hippocampus (Hip)-to-striatum (ST) ratios of radioactivity and binding potential (BPnd) calculated by simplified reference tissue model with striatum as reference tissue showing significantly increased [18F]FEBMP but not [11C]PK11195 signal in PS19 compared with non-transgenic mice (G). Reproduced from (57) with permission from Sage Publication.
The First Generation TSPO Tracers
The first-generation tracers exemplified with [11C]PK-11195 have been widely used in preclinical and clinical studies. However, [11C]PK-11195 suffers from several major limitations such as low permeability of the blood–brain barrier and high non-specific plasma binding, leading to a low signal-to-noise ratio in the final reconstructed PET images (194). Careful analysis of plasma metabolites is required to determine the accurate arterial input function for quantitative PET measurement (195). Increased [11C]PK11195 is reported to be associated with Aβ accumulation in patients with MCI and AD compared to healthy controls, correlating with the deficits in functional network connectivity, grey matters atrophy, and cognitive decline (37–39, 196). Using [11C]PK11195, recent studies have showed a biphasic trajectory of inflammation with an early microglial activation with increasing Aβ load and a later decline when Aβ load reaching plateau (AD) levels (40). Ismail et al. demonstrated a parallel increase in microglial activation and tau accumulation assessed by [11C]PK11195 and [18F]flortaucipir, respectively, in [11C]PIB Aβ-positive MCI patients (41). Su et al. further showed that grey matter atrophy mediated the effects of tau accumulation and neuroinflammation detected by PET tracers [18F]flortaucipir and [11C]PK11195, respectively on cognitive impairments in AD (42).
The Second Generation TSPO Tracers
A few second generation tracers including [11C]DAA1106, [1(F]FEDAA1106, [125I]CLINDE [11C]PBR06, [11C]PBR28, [18F]PBR111, [18F]DPA-713, [18F]DPA-714, [18F]F-DPA, [11C]AC-5216, [18F]FEMPA, and [18F]FEPPA have been developed to overcome the limitations of [11C]PK11195 (45, 46, 52, 61–63, 66, 69–71, 83, 84, 197) (Table 1). However, the binding affinities of second generation TSPO tracers in human brain differ based on the rs6971 polymorphisms, which introduces higher variability between subjects (45, 46, 52, 61–63, 66, 69–71, 197). In addition, the [11C]PBR28 binding appears to be affected by chromosome 1 variant rs2997325 on microglial activation (198). Several longitudinal studies using [18F]DPA-714, [11C]DAA1106, and [11C]PBR28 have reported decreased glucose metabolism and increased neuroinflammation in amyloidosis, four-repeat tauopathy animal models (47–50, 55) (Table 1). Ishikawa et al. has indicated an association between tau assessed by [11C]PBB3, neuronal damage measured by structural MRI, and neuroinflammation detected by using [11C]AC-5216 in rTg4510 mice (56–58). Chaney et al. showed an increased [18F]DPA-714 binding and myo-inositol levels using 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy in APP/PS1 mice (48). Zou et al. showed that microglial activation assessed by [11C]PBR28 is independently associated with amyloid load and memory impairment, but not with tau burden assessed by [18F]florbetaben and [18F]MK-6240, respectively, in patients with AD (74). Whereas Dani et al. showed that [11C]PBR28-measured microglial activation correlates with both tau and Aβ deposition assessed by [18F]flortaucipir and [18F]flutemetamol in patients with AD (69) (Figures 2D, E). Studies by Femminell et al. demonstrated an increased regional [11C]PBR28 binding in patient with MCI, which associated with higher grey matter and hippocampal volume (199). This suggests a potential protective effect of microglia activation in the early stages (199). Hamelin et al. showed a diverging pattern of progression in AD based on [18F]DPA-714 baseline binding, with a higher baseline associates with less subsequent microglial activation and better cognitive performance in 2-years follow-up (45).
Figure 2.
Biological parametric mapping (BPM) correlation between [11C]BU99008 and [18F]florbetaben binding in (A) all cognitively impaired (CI) subjects and in (B) Aβ-positive cognitively impaired subjects at a cluster threshold of p < 0.05 with an extent threshold of 50 voxels. These BPM are T maps describing the strength of the voxel-wise correlations between binding of the two radioligands represented in a common brain space. (C) Dot plot demonstrating the regional [11C]BU99008 total volumes of distribution (Vt) using two-tissue compartmental models in Aβ-positive cognitively impaired subjects (purple filled circle), Aβ-negative CI subjects (purple open circle), and healthy controls (HC, green triangle). “Brain” refers to the composite cortex, combining all the major cortical regions. *p < 0.05, uncorrected. Reproduced from (176) with permission from Springer Nature. (D, E) Voxel-level correlation between [18C]PBR28, [18F]florbetapir, and [18F]flutemetamol in the patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease who were positive for all three tracers. (D) Voxel-level correlations between microglial activation assessed by using [18C]PBR28 and tau aggregation assessed by using [18F]florbetapir. (E) Voxel-level correlations between microglial activation assessed by using [18C]PBR28 and amyloid deposition assessed by using [18F]flutemetamol. Reproduced from (69) with permission from Oxford University Press.
The Third Generation TSPO Tracers
Several third generations of TSPO tracers [18F]GE-180, (R,S)-[18F]GE-387, [11C]ER176, [11C]CB184, [11C]CB190, [11C]N′-MPB, and [18F]LW223 have been developed (75, 103, 105–109). [18F]GE-180 (flutriciclamide), (S)-[18F]GE-387, and [11C]ER176 resolve the problem of ligand-dependent attenuation of affinity (90, 97, 197) in in vitro binding assay where these tracers are insensitive to TSPO rs6971 polymorphisms (104). The rs6971 polymorphisms, however, affects in vivo [18F]GE-180 quantification, revealing lower binding in patients of low-affinity binders compared to the mixed- and high-affinity binders (88). Several studies have compared the binding properties and performance of second and third generations of TSPO tracers. James et al. found that the detection of microglial activation by using [18F]GE180 was more sensitive than that by using [18F]PBR06 (94). However, Chaney et al. indicated that [11C]DPA-713 PET reflects microglial activation with higher accuracy and sensitivity compared to [18F]GE-180 in a mouse model of stroke (53). Head-to-head comparative PET study by Zanotti-Fregonara et al. showed a more favourable brain entrance property of [11C]PBR28 compared to [18F]GE-180 in human (76). [11C]ER176 has demonstrated a higher binding potential and smaller variability compared to [11C]PK11195, [11C]PBR28, and [11C]DPA-713 (75, 105, 106). Clinical trial of PET using [11C]ER176 for accessing microglia activation in patients with MCI and AD is still ongoing (NCT03744312). Microglial activation assessed by using [18F]GE-180 in different amyloidosis, tauopathy rodent models have been reported (47, 50, 53, 89, 90, 92–102) (Table 1). López-Picón et al. showed that [18F]GE-180 signal reached plateaus at an early stage, while the Aβ load detected by [11C]PIB was still increasing in APP23 mice (90). A recent study by Sacher et al. showed an asymmetric pattern (hemispheric predominance) of Aβ load ([18F]florbetaben) accompanied by microglial activation ([18F]GE-180) in AppNL-G-F knock-in mice (96). Increased levels of [18F]GE-180 uptake indicative of microglial activation have been reported in patients with AD, semantic dementia, MCI, and four-repeat tauopathy compared to non-demented controls (88–91). Ramakrishnan reported that [18F]GE-387 visualised increased uptake in rat of acute inflammation induced by lipopolysaccharides (LPS) injection and demonstrated sufficient brain uptake in non-human primate (104).
The cellular location of the signal is another major concern for TSPO ligands. Two different binding sites on glial and vascular TSPO were reported for several TSPO ligands, e.g., [11C]PK11195 (57). Ji et al. reported that polymorphism-insensitive ligand [18F]FEBMP (200) yielded a higher contrast to neuroinflammation than [11C]PK11195 in PS19 tauopathy mouse model due to its higher glial-TSPO selectivity (Figures 1F, G ) (57, 58). Further studies evaluating the TSPO selectivity and insensitivity to TSPO polymorphism of the second and third generations TSPO tracers including [18F]GE-180, (S)-[18F]GE-387, and [11C]ER176 are highly desired.
Emerging Targets
Given that TSPO is not exclusively expressed in glia, it is thus imperative to search for new imaging biomarkers that can detect neuroinflammation with higher sensitivity and specificity. Promising targets should have almost exclusive expression in microglia or astrocyte and highly specific ligands to enable in vivo imaging evaluations (32, 170, 201, 202).
Colony-Stimulating Factor 1 Receptor
CSF1R is expressed mainly on microglia and on infiltrating macrophages/monocytes and dendritic cells in the brain (Figures 1A, B ). CSF1R is important for microglia growth, proliferation, and survival. Two endogenous ligands, the growth factors colony stimulating factor-1 and interleukin-34 (203), have been reported for CSF1R. Upregulation in CSF1R have been reported in response to injury and AD-related neuropathology (204, 205). Horti et al. developed a new CSF1R tracer [11C]CPPC and captured increased microglial levels of CSF1R in animal models of acute inflammation induced by LPS injection, encephalomyelitis model of multiple sclerosis, and APPsi with cerebral Aβ pathology (124). A recent study from Zhou et al. compared new CSF1R tracers [11C]GW2580 with [11C]CPPC in detecting both acute inflammation induced by LPS injection and chronic inflammation in APPNL-G-F/NL-G-F knock-in mice and showed that [11C]GW2580 captured changes in CSF1R with higher sensitivity, associated with increased TSPO pattern in the brain (64) (Figures 1C–E).
Cyclooxygenase-1 and Cyclooxygenase-2
Cyclooxygenase (COX) is an enzyme involved in the production of prostaglandin H2, which is the substrate for molecules including prostaglandins, prostacyclin, and thromboxanes (206). The two isoforms COX-1 and COX-2 are considered to be involved in the neuroinflammation in neurodegenerative diseases including AD. Immunochemical evidence showed that COX-1 and COX-2 are expressed in microglia and neuron in the central nervous system (207). Several tracers for COX-1 and COX-2 have been developed including [18F]TMI (131, 208), [18F]triacoxib (209), [11C]rofecoxib (210), [11C]KTP-Me (125, 127, 211), [11C]PS13, and [11C]MC1 (128, 129) (Table 1). Ohnishi et al. and Shukuri et al. reported that [11C]KTP-Me harbours an improved brain–barrier entrance and is highly selective for COX-1 (125, 127, 211). PET study with [11C]KTP-Me showed an increased brain uptake in AD patients compared to healthy controls and in APPswe (Tg2576) mice compared to wild-type mice (125–127): [11C]KTP-Me accumulation was detected in the frontal cortex and hippocampus, in activated microglia surrounding Aβ plaques. Shrestha et al. reported PET imaging of COX-2 ([11C]MC1) and COX-1 ([11C]PS13) in monkey brain after LPS-induced neuroinflammation and in human peripheral tissue with inflammation and showed specific detection patterns (128, 129).
Cannabinoid Receptor Type 2
Cannabinoid receptor type 2 (CB2R) are mainly expressed by immune cells including monocytes, macrophages, and microglia in the brain (151, 152) and have low expression levels under physiological conditions (2, 4, 31). Several classes of tracers for CB2R have been developed including [11C] methoxy-Sch225336 (212), [11C]NE40 (154), [11C]A-836339, [18F]2f (149, 150), [18F]JHU94620 (153), [18F]RS-126, and [18F]RoSMA-18-d6 (151, 152) (Table 1). Upregulation of brain CB2R expression has been demonstrated in acute inflammation such as LPS-injected model and murine stroke model (151–153) in chronic inflammation senescence-accelerated models (155) and in amyloidosis mouse model associated with Aβ deposits (150). Ahmad et al. reported lower CB2R availability in Aβ-positive AD patients compared to healthy controls assessed by PET using [11C]NE40 and [11C]PIB, respectively. However, no relationship between [11C]NE40 and cerebral Aβ load was observed (154).
Purinergic P2X7 Receptor and P2Y12 Receptor
The expression of purinergic P2X7 receptor is found upregulated specifically in M1 microglia. P2X7 receptor mediates NLRP3 inflammasome activation, cytokine and chemokine release, T lymphocyte survival and differentiation, transcription factor activation, and cell death (213). Microglia monitors and protects neuronal function through purinergic P2Y12 receptor-dependent junctions (214) linked with neuronal mitochondrial activity. Brain injury-induced changes at somatic junctions triggered P2Y12-receptor-dependent microglial neuroprotective effect, regulating neuronal calcium load and functional connectivity (215, 216). Immunohistochemical staining indicated that the levels of P2Y12 receptor were decreased in the brains derived from patients with multiple sclerosis and AD cases (217). Several P2X7 receptor tracers including [11C]GSK1482160 (110, 111), [11C]JNJ-47965567 (A-740003) (120), [18F]JNJ-64413739 (112, 114), [11C]JNJ-54173717 (113), [11C]SMW139 (118), and [18F]PTTP (218). Janssen et al. showed that [11C]SMW139 can detect with high affinity and specificity to the P2X7 receptor by using rAAV3flag-hP2X7R rat model overexpressing human P2X7 receptor (119). Moreover, [11C]SMW139 showed higher binding on postmortem brain of AD patients compared to controls by using in vitro autoradiography studies, corroborating with immunohistochemical staining results (119). One clinical trial is ongoing using [11C]SMW139 for imaging neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease [(PRI-PD) 2018-000405-23].
Several P2Y12 receptor probes such as [11C]AZD1283, [11C]P2Y12R-ant, and [11C]5 have been developed and evaluated in vivo in animal models (120, 122, 123). Maeda et al. showed a distinct response of P2Y12 receptor to tau and amyloid deposits using P2Y12 receptor tracer [11C]AZD1283. The levels of P2Y12 receptor decline in tau-laden region with increased total level of microglia in rTg4510 and PS19 tau mice and increase in APP23 and APPNL-F/NL-F mice (123). However PET imaging using [11C]AZD1283 showed no uptake signal in the wild-type mouse brain. Two other tracers [11C]P2Y12R-ant and [11C]5 have showed sufficient brain uptake and promising results in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis model of multiple sclerosis (120) and stroke model for detecting anti-inflammatory microglia (122).
Astroglia Imaging
MAO-B
Irreversible MAO-B inhibitors [11C]deuterium-L-deprenyl (DED) have been used in PET imaging studies and demonstrated early astrocytosis in sporadic and autosomal dominant AD patients (61, 156–161, 163) and in amyloidosis mouse models (163, 164). [18F]fluorodeprenyl-D2 showed favorable kinetic properties with relatively fast washout from non-human primate brain and improved sensitivity for MAO-B imaging (165). However, the technical challenges of irreversible inhibitors such as deprenyl hinder the accurate image analysis. Several reversible-binding inhibitors have been developed in recent years such as [11C]Cou (170, 219), [11C]SL25.1188 (168), and [11C]SMBT-1 (166). Harada et al. showed a specific increased regional retention of [11C]SMBT-1 in the cortical and hippocampal regions in patients with AD compared to healthy controls (166).
I2BS
I2BS that locates on both monoamine oxidases A (MAO-A) and B (MAO-B) is another emerging target for astrocytosis imaging (173–175, 220). [¹¹C]FTIMD shows the specific-binging to I₂BS as shown by PET and autoradiography in the monkey brain (183). Wilson et al. demonstrated reactive astroglia detected by using [11C]BU99008 PET early in Parkinson’s disease in response to α-synuclein accumulation (174). Recent postmortem binding and autoradiography study by Kumar et al. showed increased level of [3H]BU99008 binding in postmortem brain tissue from patients with AD compared to healthy controls (173, 221). Calsolaro et al. recently demonstrated increased cortical astrocytosis assessed by [11C]BU99008 with high cerebral Aβ load assessed by [18F]florbetaben in patients with MCI and AD (176) (Figures 2A–C). Livingston et al. demonstrated that increased astrocytosis assessed by [11C]BU99008 in regions of earlier stages with low Aβ loads assessed by [18F]florbetaben and reduced astrocytosis in regions of advanced stage with greater Aβ load and atrophy (177). In vitro autoradiography and immune-histochemical staining showed the specificity of [3H]BU99008 and the colocalization of with glial fibrillary acidic protein staining of astroctyes in brain tissues from patients with AD.
Discussion
Non-invasive detection of central pathologies is indispensable for understanding the mechanism underlying AD continuum and for facilitating early and differential diagnosis (28, 222–225). TSPO-PET is still the most powerful imaging tool for AD-associated neuroinflammation but is currently facing two challenges. First, a human TSPO polymorphism TSPO rs6971 commonly affects the binding affinities of the second generation tracers to a different extent. Classification with polymorphism enables to correct the variability and bias from different binding affinities, but it raises the threshold for sample size of human subjects. Third-generation tracers have been developed for circumventing this limitation. In vitro testing in post-mortem human brain tissues have demonstrated the insensitivity of [11C]GE-180, [11C]GE-387, and [11C]ER176 to TSPO polymorphism (75, 106, 197). However, recent clinical study with [11C]ER176 (105) and [11C]GE-180 (88) demonstrated a significant decrease in ligand retention in low-affinity binders, suggesting the necessity of further in vivo examination. Second, the heterogenous cellular sources of TSPO PET tracers have been demonstrated in astrocytes, endothelial cells, and vascular smooth muscle cells, in addition to microglia in both patients with AD and animal models (61, 85, 86, 193, 226–229) (Figures 1A, B ). Although conventional opinions consider microglia as major cellular source of TSPO in the central nervous system, latest study finds vascular TSPO provides major binding sites for TSPO ligands including most widely used [11C]PK11195 and [11C]PBR28 in normal mouse brains (57). These findings suggest the possibility that changes in TSPO PET signal may be partly due to changes in the levels of vascular TSPO and not purely of glial TSPO. [18F]FEBMP and [11C]AC-5216 showed relatively selectivity for glial-TSPO compared to other ligands such as [11C]PK11195 (200). It remains to be investigated whether the third generation of TSPO tracers shows a portion of vascular TSPO detection similarly. Moreover, further research on next generations of TSPO tracers are needed, with the selection criteria including optimal binding property, insensitivity for TSPO polymorphism, and high glial TSPO selectivity.
The role of neuroinflammation in AD pathogenesis is still not fully elucidated. Early clinical studies with first generation tracer [11C]PK11195 showed conflicting results in the brains from AD patients. Some studies demonstrated significant increases in [11C]PK11195 retention in diseased brain regions in AD (230, 231), which was not observed in some other studies (232, 233). Albrecht et al. recently reported negative associations between regional Aβ and tau PET uptake and CSF inflammatory markers in patients with AD and in non-demented controls and suggested a protective role of neuroinflammation (234). Ewers et al. showed that a higher CSF level of soluble TREM2 is indicative of microglia activation in patients with AD. The CSF level of TREM2 negatively aassociated with the rate of Aβ accumulation assessed by using [18F]florbetapir over 2-years follow-up in AD patients (101). Biphasic trajectory with an early increase and a later decline in the level of microglial activation might explain such inconsistency between results from clinical studies (62). The recently reported biphasic trajectory of astrocytosis (177) adds further complexity in the interpretation.
A recent study has showed that microglia is involved in the formation of senile plaque by promoting the diffuse form converting to dense cored form (15). In vitro immunohistochemical analysis found that TSPO-positive microglia were surrounded dense cored plaque, not diffuse plaques (235). These results may explain the complex spatial association between TSPO-PET and amyloid-PET signals. [11C]PBR28 signal correlated with both tau aggregation and Aβ deposition (55), suggesting distinct dynamic profiles of microglial activation. Collectively, current clinical studies have not provided a consensus on association between TSPO-associated neuroinflammation and AD-pathological changes. Given the different binding sites in glial and vascular TSPO for different tracers, the divergent results using different TSPO-PET tracers are not unexpected. A multitracer imaging paradigm for detecting the regional patterns of Aβ, tau, and microglia activation and astrocytosis is expected to provide better temporal and spatia mapping of disease processes and assessment of immunomodulatory therapeutic interventions in clinical study.
Several promising targets and tracers for neuroinflammation imaging have been reported but not yet been evaluated in AD patients or animal models, such as the ligands for inducible nitric oxide synthase ([18F]FBAT), reactive oxygen species ([18F]ROStrace [18F]ox-ROStrace, [18F]dihydromethidine, [11C]Ascorbic. [62Cu]ATSM, [11C]dehydroascorbic acid) (132–137), TREM-1 ([64Cu]TREM1-mAb), matrix metalloproteinases ([18F]BR-351, [18F]BR-420) (144–146), astrocyte metabolism ([11C]acetate) (171, 172), I2BS([¹⁸F]FEBU) (182), and organic anion-transporting polypeptide 1C1 ([18F]2B-SRF101) (184). More preclinical and clinical evidence are required to indicate the utilities of these emerging ligands in in vivo imaging. An almost exclusive expression of CSF1R and P2X7 receptor and P2Y12 receptor in microglia have demonstrated their potentials as next-generation imaging targets for microglia activation. Further evaluation of these tracers in amyloidosis and tauopathy models and patients with MCI and AD will potentially facilitate better phenotyping of microglia activation. The association of these emerging targets with AD pathologies, disease progression, and the improvement in the ligand binding properties and analysis methods for PET data require further investigations (236). With the advances in new techniques, e.g., single-cell analysis of neuroinflammatory responses and plasma biomarkers, the link between neuroinflammation PET with other indicators will likely be studied in a more systematic manner.
Author Contributions
RZ, BJ, and RN wrote the first draft and prepared the figures. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
RN acknowledged the funding by Helmut Horten Stiftung, Vontobel Stiftung, UZH Entrepreneur Fellowship (reference no. MEDEF-20-021).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
- 1.Leng F, Edison P. Neuroinflammation and Microglial Activation in Alzheimer Disease: Where do We Go From Here? Nat Rev Neurol (2021) 17(3):157–72. doi: 10.1038/s41582-020-00435-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ransohoff RM. How Neuroinflammation Contributes to Neurodegeneration. Science (2016) 353(6301):777. doi: 10.1126/science.aag2590 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Allen NJ, Lyons DA. Glia as Architects of Central Nervous System Formation and Function. Science (2018) 362(6411):181–5. doi: 10.1126/science.aat0473 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Heneka MT, Carson MJ, El Khoury J, Landreth GE, Brosseron F, Feinstein DL, et al. Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s Disease. Lancet Neurol (2015) 14(4):388–405. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(15)70016-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hickman S, Izzy S, Sen P, Morsett L, El Khoury J. Microglia in Neurodegeneration. Nat Neurosci (2018) 21(10):1359–69. doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0242-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Grubman A, Choo XY, Chew G, Ouyang JF, Sun G, Croft NP, et al. Transcriptional Signature in Microglia Associated With Aβ Plaque Phagocytosis. Nat Commun (2021) 12(1):3015. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23111-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Salter MW, Stevens B. Microglia Emerge as Central Players in Brain Disease. Nat Med (2017) 23(9):1018–27. doi: 10.1038/nm.4397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mathys H, Adaikkan C, Gao F, Young JZ, Manet E, Hemberg M, et al. Temporal Tracking of Microglia Activation in Neurodegeneration at Single-Cell Resolution. Cell Rep (2017) 21(2):366–80. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Friedman BA, Srinivasan K, Ayalon G, Meilandt WJ, Lin H, Huntley MA, et al. Diverse Brain Myeloid Expression Profiles Reveal Distinct Microglial Activation States and Aspects of Alzheimer’s Disease Not Evident in Mouse Models. Cell Rep (2018) 22(3):832–47. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.12.066 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Deczkowska A, Keren-Shaul H, Weiner A, Colonna M, Schwartz M, Amit I. Disease-Associated Microglia: A Universal Immune Sensor of Neurodegeneration. Cell (2018) 173(5):1073–81. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Keren-Shaul H, Spinrad A, Weiner A, Matcovitch-Natan O, Dvir-Szternfeld R, Ulland TK, et al. A Unique Microglia Type Associated With Restricting Development of Alzheimer’s Disease. Cell (2017) 169(7):1276–90.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Song WM, Colonna M. The Identity and Function of Microglia in Neurodegeneration. Nat Immunol (2018) 19(10):1048–58. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0212-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Leng K, Li E, Eser R, Piergies A, Sit R, Tan M, et al. Molecular Characterization of Selectively Vulnerable Neurons in Alzheimer’s Disease. Nat Neurosci (2021) 24(2):276–87. doi: 10.1038/s41593-020-00764-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Parhizkar S, Arzberger T, Brendel M, Kleinberger G, Deussing M, Focke C, et al. Loss of TREM2 Function Increases Amyloid Seeding But Reduces Plaque-Associated ApoE. Nat Neurosci (2019) 22(2):191–204. doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0296-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Huang Y, Happonen KE, Burrola PG, O’Connor C, Hah N, Huang L, et al. Microglia Use TAM Receptors to Detect and Engulf Amyloid β Plaques. Nat Immunol (2021) 22(5):586–94. doi: 10.1038/s41590-021-00913-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Liddelow SA, Guttenplan KA, Clarke LE, Bennett FC, Bohlen CJ, Schirmer L, et al. Neurotoxic Reactive Astrocytes are Induced by Activated Microglia. Nature (2017) 541(7638):481–7. doi: 10.1038/nature21029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Li T, Liu T, Chen X, Li L, Feng M, Zhang Y, et al. Microglia Induce the Transformation of A1/A2 Reactive Astrocytes via the CXCR7/PI3K/Akt Pathway in Chronic Post-Surgical Pain. J Neuroinflamm (2020) 17(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12974-020-01891-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Escartin C, Galea E, Lakatos A, O’Callaghan JP, Petzold GC, Serrano-Pozo A, et al. Reactive Astrocyte Nomenclature, Definitions, and Future Directions. Nat Neurosci (2021) 24(3):312–25. doi: 10.1038/s41593-020-00783-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Clarke LE, Liddelow SA, Chakraborty C, Münch AE, Heiman M, Barres BA. Normal Aging Induces A1-Like Astrocyte Reactivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci (2018) 115(8):E1896. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1800165115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chun H, Im H, Kang YJ, Kim Y, Shin JH, Won W, et al. Severe Reactive Astrocytes Precipitate Pathological Hallmarks of Alzheimer’s Disease via H(2)O(2)(-) Production. Nat Neurosci (2020) 23(12):1555–66. doi: 10.1038/s41593-020-00735-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kovacs GG, Ferrer I, Grinberg LT, Alafuzoff I, Attems J, Budka H, et al. Aging-Related Tau Astrogliopathy (ARTAG): Harmonized Evaluation Strategy. Acta Neuropathol (2016) 131(1):87–102. doi: 10.1007/s00401-015-1509-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Habib N, McCabe C, Medina S, Varshavsky M, Kitsberg D, Dvir-Szternfeld R, et al. Disease-Associated Astrocytes in Alzheimer’s Disease and Aging. Nat Neurosci (2020) 23(6):701–6. doi: 10.1038/s41593-020-0624-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Elahi FM, Casaletto KB, La Joie R, Walters SM, Harvey D, Wolf A, et al. Plasma Biomarkers of Astrocytic and Neuronal Dysfunction in Early- and Late-Onset Alzheimer’s Disease. Alzheimers Dement (2020) 16(4):681–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.09.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chatterjee P, Pedrini S, Stoops E, Goozee K, Villemagne VL, Asih PR, et al. Plasma Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein is Elevated in Cognitively Normal Older Adults at Risk of Alzheimer’s Disease. Trans Psychiatry (2021) 11(1):27. doi: 10.1038/s41398-020-01137-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Verberk IMW, Thijssen E, Koelewijn J, Mauroo K, Vanbrabant J, de Wilde A, et al. Combination of Plasma Amyloid Beta((1-42/1-40)) and Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Strongly Associates With Cerebral Amyloid Pathology. Alzheimers Res Ther (2020) 12(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s13195-020-00682-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ishikawa A, Tokunaga M, Maeda J, Minamihisamatsu T, Shimojo M, Takuwa H, et al. In Vivo Visualization of Tau Accumulation, Microglial Activation, and Brain Atrophy in a Mouse Model of Tauopathy Rtg4510. J Alzheimers Dis (2018) 61(3):1037–52. doi: 10.3233/jad-170509 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ni R, Ji B, Ono M, Sahara N, Zhang MR, Aoki I, et al. Comparative in-Vitro and in-Vivo Quantifications of Pathological Tau Deposits and Their Association With Neurodegeneration in Tauopathy Mouse Models. J Nucl Med (2018) 59(6):960–6. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.201632 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Villemagne VL, Dore V, Burnham SC, Masters CL, Rowe CC. Imaging Tau and Amyloid-Beta Proteinopathies in Alzheimer Disease and Other Conditions. Nat Rev Neurol (2018) 14(4):225–36. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2018.9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tagai K, Ono M, Kubota M, Kitamura S, Takahata K, Seki C, et al. High-Contrast In Vivo Imaging of Tau Pathologies in Alzheimer’s and Non-Alzheimer’s Disease Tauopathies. Neuron (2021) 109(1):42–58.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.09.042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Dubois B, Villain N, Frisoni GB, Rabinovici GD, Sabbagh M, Cappa S, et al. Clinical Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease: Recommendations of the International Working Group. Lancet Neurol (2021) 20(6):484–96. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00066-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Razansky D, Klohs J, Ni R. Multi-Scale Optoacoustic Molecular Imaging of Brain Diseases. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2021). doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05207-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kreisl WC, Kim MJ, Coughlin JM, Henter ID, Owen DR, Innis RB. PET Imaging of Neuroinflammation in Neurological Disorders. Lancet Neurol (2020) 19(11):940–50. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(20)30346-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ni R, Dean-Ben XL, Kirschenbaum D, Rudin M, Chen Z, Crimi A, et al. Whole Brain Optoacoustic Tomography Reveals Strain-Specific Regional Beta-Amyloid Densities in Alzheimer`s Disease Amyloidosis Models. bioRxiv (2020). doi: 10.1101/2020.02.25.964064 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ni R, Rudin M, Klohs J. Cortical Hypoperfusion and Reduced Cerebral Metabolic Rate of Oxygen in the Arcabeta Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. Photoacoustics (2018) 10:38–47. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2018.04.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ono M, Sahara N, Kumata K, Ji B, Ni RQ, Koga S, et al. Distinct Binding of PET Ligands PBB3 and AV-1451 to Tau Fibril Strains in Neurodegenerative Tauopathies. Brain (2017) 140:764–80. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww339 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Luzi F, Savickas V, Taddei C, Hader S, Singh N, Gee AD, et al. Radiolabeling of [(11)C]FPS-ZM1, a Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Products-Targeting Positron Emission Tomography Radiotracer, Using a [(11)C]CO(2)-To-[(11)C]CO Chemical Conversion. Future Med Chem (2020) 12(6):511–21. doi: 10.4155/fmc-2019-0329 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Parbo P, Ismail R, Hansen KV, Amidi A, Mårup FH, Gottrup H, et al. Brain Inflammation Accompanies Amyloid in the Majority of Mild Cognitive Impairment Cases Due to Alzheimer’s Disease. Brain (2017) 140(7):2002–11. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx120 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Malpetti M, Kievit RA, Passamonti L, Jones PS, Tsvetanov KA, Rittman T, et al. Microglial Activation and Tau Burden Predict Cognitive Decline in Alzheimer’s Disease. Brain (2020) 143(5):1588–602. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Nicastro N, Malpetti M, Mak E, Williams GB, Bevan-Jones WR, Carter SF, et al. Gray Matter Changes Related to Microglial Activation in Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurobiol Aging (2020) 94:236–42. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2020.06.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Fan Z, Brooks DJ, Okello A, Edison P. An Early and Late Peak in Microglial Activation in Alzheimer’s Disease Trajectory. Brain J Neurol (2017) 140(3):792–803. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww349 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ismail R, Parbo P, Madsen LS, Hansen AK, Hansen KV, Schaldemose JL, et al. The Relationships Between Neuroinflammation, Beta-Amyloid and Tau Deposition in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Longitudinal PET Study. J Neuroinflamm (2020) 17(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12974-020-01820-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Su L, Surendranathan A, Huang Y, Bevan-Jones WR, Passamonti L, Hong YT, et al. Relationship Between Tau, Neuroinflammation and Atrophy in Alzheimer’s Disease: The NIMROD Study. Inf Fusion (2021) 67:116–24. doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2020.10.006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Passamonti L, Rodríguez PV, Hong YT, Allinson KSJ, Bevan-Jones WR, Williamson D, et al. [11c]PK11195 Binding in Alzheimer Disease and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy. Neurology (2018) 90(22):e1989. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005610 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Chiquita S, Ribeiro M, Castelhano J, Oliveira F, Sereno J, Batista M, et al. A Longitudinal Multimodal In Vivo Molecular Imaging Study of the 3xtg-AD Mouse Model Shows Progressive Early Hippocampal and Taurine Loss. Hum Mol Genet (2019) 28(13):2174–88. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddz045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hamelin L, Lagarde J, Dorothée G, Potier MC, Corlier F, Kuhnast B, et al. Distinct Dynamic Profiles of Microglial Activation Are Associated With Progression of Alzheimer’s Disease. Brain (2018) 141(6):1855–70. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hagens MHJ, Golla SV, Wijburg MT, Yaqub M, Heijtel D, Steenwijk MD, et al. In Vivo Assessment of Neuroinflammation in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Proof of Concept Study With [(18)F]DPA714 PET. J Neuroinflamm (2018) 15(1):314. doi: 10.1186/s12974-018-1352-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Hu W, Pan D, Wang Y, Bao W, Zuo C, Guan Y, et al. PET Imaging for Dynamically Monitoring Neuroinflammation in APP/PS1 Mouse Model Using [(18)F]Dpa714. Front Neurosci (2020) 14:810. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00810 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Chaney A, Bauer M, Bochicchio D, Smigova A, Kassiou M, Davies KE, et al. Longitudinal Investigation of Neuroinflammation and Metabolite Profiles in the APP(swe) ×Ps1(Δe9) Transgenic Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. J Neurochem (2018) 144(3):318–35. doi: 10.1111/jnc.14251 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Sérrière S, Tauber C, Vercouillie J, Mothes C, Pruckner C, Guilloteau D, et al. Amyloid Load and Translocator Protein 18 kDa in APPswePS1-De9 Mice: A Longitudinal Study. Neurobiol Aging (2015) 36(4):1639–52. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.11.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Chaney AM, Lopez-Picon FR, Serrière S, Wang R, Bochicchio D, Webb SD, et al. Prodromal Neuroinflammatory, Cholinergic and Metabolite Dysfunction Detected by PET and MRS in the TgF344-AD Transgenic Rat Model of AD: A Collaborative Multi-Modal Study. Theranostics (2021) 11(14):6644–67. doi: 10.7150/thno.56059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Takkinen JS, López-Picón FR, Al Majidi R, Eskola O, Krzyczmonik A, Keller T, et al. Brain Energy Metabolism and Neuroinflammation in Ageing APP/PS1-21 Mice Using Longitudinal (18)F-FDG and (18)F-DPA-714 PET Imaging. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab (2017) 37(8):2870–82. doi: 10.1177/0271678x16677990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Yokokura M, Terada T, Bunai T, Nakaizumi K, Takebayashi K, Iwata Y, et al. Depiction of Microglial Activation in Aging and Dementia: Positron Emission Tomography With [(11)C]DPA713 Versus [(11)C](R)Pk11195. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab (2017) 37(3):877–89. doi: 10.1177/0271678x16646788 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Chaney A, Cropper HC, Johnson EM, Lechtenberg KJ, Peterson TC, Stevens MY, et al. (11)C-DPA-713 Versus (18)F-GE-180: A Preclinical Comparison of Translocator Protein 18 kDa PET Tracers to Visualize Acute and Chronic Neuroinflammation in a Mouse Model of Ischemic Stroke. J Nucl Med (2019) 60(1):122–8. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.209155 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Tsukada H, Nishiyama S, Ohba H, Kanazawa M, Kakiuchi T, Harada N. Comparing Amyloid-β Deposition, Neuroinflammation, Glucose Metabolism, and Mitochondrial Complex I Activity in Brain: A PET Study in Aged Monkeys. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2014) 41(11):2127–36. doi: 10.1007/s00259-014-2821-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Keller T, López-Picón FR, Krzyczmonik A, Forsback S, Takkinen JS, Rajander J, et al. Comparison of High and Low Molar Activity TSPO Tracer [(18)F]F-DPA in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab (2020) 40(5):1012–20. doi: 10.1177/0271678x19853117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Fairley LH, Sahara N, Aoki I, Ji B, Suhara T, Higuchi M, et al. Neuroprotective Effect of Mitochondrial Translocator Protein Ligand in a Mouse Model of Tauopathy. J Neuroinflamm (2021) 18(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12974-021-02122-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Ji B, Ono M, Yamasaki T, Fujinaga M, Zhang MR, Seki C, et al. Detection of Alzheimer’s Disease-Related Neuroinflammation by a PET Ligand Selective for Glial Versus Vascular Translocator Protein. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab (2021) 41(8):2076–89. doi: 10.1177/0271678x21992457 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Barron AM, Ji B, Fujinaga M, Zhang MR, Suhara T, Sahara N, et al. In Vivo Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of Mitochondrial Abnormalities in a Mouse Model of Tauopathy. Neurobiol Aging (2020) 94:140–8. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2020.05.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ji B, Maeda J, Sawada M, Ono M, Okauchi T, Inaji M, et al. Imaging of Peripheral Benzodiazepine Receptor Expression as Biomarkers of Detrimental Versus Beneficial Glial Responses in Mouse Models of Alzheimer’s and Other CNS Pathologies. J Neurosci (2008) 28(47):12255–67. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.2312-08.2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Maeda J, Zhang MR, Okauchi T, Ji B, Ono M, Hattori S, et al. In Vivo Positron Emission Tomographic Imaging of Glial Responses to Amyloid-Beta and Tau Pathologies in Mouse Models of Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders. J Neurosci (2011) 31(12):4720–30. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.3076-10.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Ni R, Röjdner J, Voytenko L, Dyrks T, Thiele A, Marutle A, et al. In Vitro Characterization of the Regional Binding Distribution of Amyloid PET Tracer Florbetaben and the Glia Tracers Deprenyl and PK1195 in Autopsy Alzheimer’s Brain Tissue. J Alzheimer’s Dis (2021) 80(4):1723–37. doi: 10.3233/JAD-201344 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Varrone A, Oikonen V, Forsberg A, Joutsa J, Takano A, Solin O, et al. Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of the 18-kDa Translocator Protein (TSPO) With [18F]FEMPA in Alzheimer’s Disease Patients and Control Subjects. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2015) 42(3):438–46. doi: 10.1007/s00259-014-2955-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Miyoshi M, Ito H, Arakawa R, Takahashi H, Takano H, Higuchi M, et al. Quantitative Analysis of Peripheral Benzodiazepine Receptor in the Human Brain Using PET With 11C-AC-5216. J Nucl Med (2009) 50(7):1095. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.062554 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Zhou X, Ji B, Seki C, Nagai Y, Minamimoto T, Fujinaga M, et al. PET Imaging of Colony-Stimulating Factor 1 Receptor: A Head-to-Head Comparison of a Novel Radioligand, (11)C-GW2580, and (11)C-CPPC, in Mouse Models of Acute and Chronic Neuroinflammation and a Rhesus Monkey. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab (2021) 41(9):2410–22. doi: 10.1177/0271678x211004146 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Takuwa H, Orihara A, Takado Y, Urushihata T, Shimojo M, Ishikawa A, et al. Tracking Tau Fibrillogenesis and Consequent Primary Phagocytosis of Neurons Mediated by Microglia in a Living Tauopathy Model. bioRxiv (2020) 2020.11.04.368977. doi: 10.1101/2020.11.04.368977 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Suridjan I, Pollock BG, Verhoeff NP, Voineskos AN, Chow T, Rusjan PM, et al. In-Vivo Imaging of Grey and White Matter Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Positron Emission Tomography Study With a Novel Radioligand, [18F]-FEPPA. Mol Psychiatry (2015) 20(12):1579–87. doi: 10.1038/mp.2015.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Knezevic D, Verhoeff NPL, Hafizi S, Strafella AP, Graff-Guerrero A, Rajji T, et al. Imaging Microglial Activation and Amyloid Burden in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab (2018) 38(11):1885–95. doi: 10.1177/0271678x17741395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Al-Khishman NU, Qi Q, Roseborough AD, Levit A, Allman BL, Anazodo UC, et al. TSPO PET Detects Acute Neuroinflammation But Not Diffuse Chronically Activated MHCII Microglia in the Rat. EJNMMI Res (2020) 10(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s13550-020-00699-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Dani M, Wood M, Mizoguchi R, Fan Z, Walker Z, Morgan R, et al. Microglial Activation Correlates In Vivo With Both Tau and Amyloid in Alzheimer’s Disease. Brain (2018) 141(9):2740–54. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy188 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Giridharan VV, Collodel A, Generoso JS, Scaini G, Wassather R, Selvaraj S, et al. Neuroinflammation Trajectories Precede Cognitive Impairment After Experimental Meningitis-Evidence From an In Vivo PET Study. J Neuroinflamm (2020) 17(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12974-019-1692-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Toppala S, Ekblad LL, Tuisku J, Helin S, Johansson JJ, Laine H, et al. Association of Early β-Amyloid Accumulation and Neuroinflammation Measured With [(11)C]PBR28 in Elderly Individuals Without Dementia. Neurology (2021) 96(12):e1608–19. doi: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000011612 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.James ML, Belichenko NP, Nguyen TV, Andrews LE, Ding Z, Liu H, et al. PET Imaging of Translocator Protein (18 kDa) in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease Using N-(2,5-Dimethoxybenzyl)-2-18F-Fluoro-N-(2-Phenoxyphenyl)Acetamide. J Nucl Med (2015) 56(2):311–6. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.114.141648 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Mirzaei N, Tang SP, Ashworth S, Coello C, Plisson C, Passchier J, et al. In Vivo Imaging of Microglial Activation by Positron Emission Tomography With [(11)C]PBR28 in the 5XFAD Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. Glia (2016) 64(6):993–1006. doi: 10.1002/glia.22978 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Zou J, Tao S, Johnson A, Tomljanovic Z, Polly K, Klein J, et al. Microglial Activation, But Not Tau Pathology, is Independently Associated With Amyloid Positivity and Memory Impairment. Neurobiol Aging (2020) 85:11–21. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.09.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Zanotti-Fregonara P, Pascual B, Veronese M, Yu M, Beers D, Appel SH, et al. Head-To-Head Comparison of (11)C-PBR28 and (11)C-ER176 for Quantification of the Translocator Protein in the Human Brain. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2019) 46(9):1822–9. doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04349-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Zanotti-Fregonara P, Pascual B, Rizzo G, Yu M, Pal N, Beers D, et al. Head-To-Head Comparison of (11)C-PBR28 and (18)F-GE180 for Quantification of the Translocator Protein in the Human Brain. J Nucl Med (2018) 59(8):1260–6. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.203109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Pascual B, Funk Q, Zanotti-Fregonara P, Cykowski MD, Veronese M, Rockers E, et al. Neuroinflammation is Highest in Areas of Disease Progression in Semantic Dementia. Brain (2021) 44(5):1565–75. doi: 10.1093/brain/awab057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Walker MD, Dinelle K, Kornelsen R, Lee NV, Miao Q, Adam M, et al. [11c]PBR28 PET Imaging is Sensitive to Neuroinflammation in the Aged Rat. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab (2015) 35(8):1331–8. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2015.54 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Schain M, Zanderigo F, Ogden RT, Kreisl WC. Non-Invasive Estimation of [(11)C]PBR28 Binding Potential. Neuroimage (2018) 169:278–85. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Donat CK, Mirzaei N, Tang SP, Edison P, Sastre M. Imaging of Microglial Activation in Alzheimer’s Disease by [(11)C]PBR28 PET. Methods Mol Biol (2018) 1750:323–39. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7704-8_22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Xu J, Sun J, Perrin RJ, Mach RH, Bales KR, Morris JC, et al. Translocator Protein in Late Stage Alzheimer’s Disease and Dementia With Lewy Bodies Brains. Ann Clin Transl Neurol (2019) 6(8):1423–34. doi: 10.1002/acn3.50837 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Kim MJ, McGwier M, Jenko KJ, Snow J, Morse C, Zoghbi SS, et al. Neuroinflammation in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Revealed by (11) C-PBR28 PET. Ann Clin Transl Neurol (2019) 6(7):1327–31. doi: 10.1002/acn3.50802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Eberl S, Katsifis A, Peyronneau MA, Wen L, Henderson D, Loc’h C, et al. Preclinical In Vivo and In Vitro Comparison of the Translocator Protein PET Ligands [(18)F]PBR102 and [(18)F]PBR111. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2017) 44(2):296–307. doi: 10.1007/s00259-016-3517-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Deleye S, Waldron AM, Verhaeghe J, Bottelbergs A, Wyffels L, Van Broeck B, et al. Evaluation of Small-Animal PET Outcome Measures to Detect Disease Modification Induced by BACE Inhibition in a Transgenic Mouse Model of Alzheimer Disease. J Nucl Med (2017) 58(12):1977–83. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.187625 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Tournier BB, Tsartsalis S, Ceyzériat K, Fraser BH, Grégoire MC, Kövari E, et al. Astrocytic TSPO Upregulation Appears Before Microglial TSPO in Alzheimer’s Disease. J Alzheimers Dis (2020) 77(3):1043–56. doi: 10.3233/jad-200136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Tournier BB, Tsartsalis S, Rigaud D, Fossey C, Cailly T, Fabis F, et al. TSPO and Amyloid Deposits in Sub-Regions of the Hippocampus in the 3xtgad Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurobiol Dis (2019) 121:95–105. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2018.09.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Szöllősi D, Hegedűs N, Veres DS, Futó I, Horváth I, Kovács N, et al. Evaluation of Brain Nuclear Medicine Imaging Tracers in a Murine Model of Sepsis-Associated Encephalopathy. Mol Imaging Biol (2018) 20(6):952–62. doi: 10.1007/s11307-018-1201-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Vettermann F, Harris S, Schmitt J, Unterrainer M, Lindner S, Rauchmann B-S, et al. Impact of TSPO Receptor Polymorphism on [18F]GE-180 Binding in Healthy Brain and Pseudo-Reference Regions of Neurooncological and Neurodegenerative Disorders. Life (2021) 11:484. doi: 10.3390/life11060484 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Palleis C, Sauerbeck J, Beyer L, Harris S, Schmitt J, Morenas-Rodriguez E, et al. In Vivo Assessment of Neuroinflammation in 4-Repeat Tauopathies. Mov Disord (2021) 36(4):883–94. doi: 10.1002/mds.28395 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.López-Picón FR, Snellman A, Eskola O, Helin S, Solin O, Haaparanta-Solin M, et al. Neuroinflammation Appears Early on PET Imaging and Then Plateaus in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer Disease. J Nucl Med (2018) 59(3):509. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.197608 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Kaiser L, Albert N, Lindner S, Unterrainer M, Mahler C, Brendel M, et al. TSPO Imaging Using the Novel PET Ligand [18F]GE-180: Quantification Approaches in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis. EJNMMI Res 7(2017) 45(8):1423–31. doi: 10.1186/s13550-017-0340-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Liu B, Le KX, Park MA, Wang S, Belanger AP, Dubey S, et al. In Vivo Detection of Age- and Disease-Related Increases in Neuroinflammation by 18F-GE180 TSPO MicroPET Imaging in Wild-Type and Alzheimer’s Transgenic Mice. J Neurosci (2015) 35(47):15716–30. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.0996-15.2015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Blume T, Focke C, Peters F, Deussing M, Albert NL, Lindner S, et al. Microglial Response to Increasing Amyloid Load Saturates With Aging: A Longitudinal Dual Tracer In Vivo μpet-Study. J Neuroinflamm (2018) 15(1):307. doi: 10.1186/s12974-018-1347-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.James ML, Belichenko NP, Shuhendler AJ, Hoehne A, Andrews LE, Condon C, et al. [(18)F]GE-180 PET Detects Reduced Microglia Activation After LM11A-31 Therapy in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. Theranostics (2017) 7(6):1422–36. doi: 10.7150/thno.17666 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Biechele G, Wind K, Blume T, Sacher C, Beyer L, Eckenweber F, et al. Microglial Activation in the Right Amygdala-Entorhinal-Hippocampal Complex Is Associated With Preserved Spatial Learning in App(NL-G-F) Mice. Neuroimage (2021) 230:117707. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117707 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Sacher C, Blume T, Beyer L, Biechele G, Sauerbeck J, Eckenweber F, et al. Asymmetry of Fibrillar Plaque Burden in Amyloid Mouse Models. J Nucl Med (2020) 61(12):1825–31. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.242750 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Kleinberger G, Brendel M, Mracsko E, Wefers B, Groeneweg L, Xiang X, et al. The FTD-Like Syndrome Causing TREM2 T66M Mutation Impairs Microglia Function, Brain Perfusion, and Glucose Metabolism. EMBO J (2017) 36(13):1837–53. doi: 10.15252/embj.201796516 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Eckenweber F, Medina-Luque J, Blume T, Sacher C, Biechele G, Wind K, et al. Longitudinal TSPO Expression in Tau Transgenic P301S Mice Predicts Increased Tau Accumulation and Deteriorated Spatial Learning. J Neuroinflamm (2020) 17(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12974-020-01883-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Biechele G, Blume T, Deussing M, Zott B, Shi Y, Xiang X, et al. Pre-Therapeutic Microglia Activation and Sex Determine Therapy Effects of Chronic Immunomodulation. bioRxiv (2021). doi: 10.1101/2021.05.30.445761 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Liu B, Hinshaw RG, Le KX, Park M-A, Wang S, Belanger AP, et al. Space-Like 56Fe Irradiation Manifests Mild, Early Sex-Specific Behavioral and Neuropathological Changes in Wildtype and Alzheimer’s-Like Transgenic Mice. Sci Rep (2019) 9(1):12118. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48615-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Ewers M, Biechele G, Suárez-Calvet M, Sacher C, Blume T, Morenas-Rodriguez E, et al. Higher CSF Strem2 and Microglia Activation are Associated With Slower Rates of Beta-Amyloid Accumulation. EMBO Mol Med (2020) 12(9):e12308. doi: 10.15252/emmm.202012308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Boutin H, Murray K, Pradillo J, Maroy R, Smigova A, Gerhard A, et al. 18f-GE-180: A Novel TSPO Radiotracer Compared to 11C-R-PK11195 in a Preclinical Model of Stroke. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2015) 42(3):503–11. doi: 10.1007/s00259-014-2939-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Ramakrishnan NK, Hird M, Thompson S, Williamson DJ, Qiao L, Owen DR, et al. Preclinical Evaluation of (S)-[18f]GE387, a Novel 18-kDa Translocator Protein (TSPO) PET Radioligand With Low Binding Sensitivity to Human Polymorphism Rs6971. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2021). doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05495-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Qiao L, Fisher E, McMurray L, Milicevic Sephton S, Hird M, Kuzhuppilly-Ramakrishnan N, et al. Radiosynthesis of (R,S)-[(18) F]GE387: A Potential PET Radiotracer for Imaging Translocator Protein 18 kDa (TSPO) With Low Binding Sensitivity to the Human Gene Polymorphism Rs6971. ChemMedChem (2019) 14(9):982–93. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.201900023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Ikawa M, Lohith TG, Shrestha S, Telu S, Zoghbi SS, Castellano S, et al. 11c-ER176, a Radioligand for 18-kDa Translocator Protein, Has Adequate Sensitivity to Robustly Image All Three Affinity Genotypes in Human Brain. J Nucl Med Off Publ Soc Nucl Med (2017) 58(2):320–5. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.178996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Fujita M, Kobayashi M, Ikawa M, Gunn RN, Rabiner EA, Owen DR, et al. Comparison of Four 11C-Labeled PET Ligands to Quantify Translocator Protein 18 kDa (TSPO) in Human Brain: (R)-PK11195, PBR28, DPA-713, and ER176—based on Recent Publications That Measured Specific-to-non-Displaceable Ratios. EJNMMI Res (2017) 7(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13550-017-0334-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Hatano K, Sekimata K, Yamada T, Abe J, Ito K, Ogawa M, et al. Radiosynthesis and In Vivo Evaluation of Two Imidazopyridineacetamides, [11C]CB184 and [11C]CB190, as a PET Tracer for 18 kDa Translocator Protein: Direct Comparison With [11C](R)-Pk11195. Ann Nucl Med (2015) 29(4):325–35. doi: 10.1007/s12149-015-0948-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Tiwari AK, Zhang Y, Yamasaki T, Kumari N, Fujinaga M, Mori W, et al. Radiosynthesis and Evaluation of Acetamidobenzoxazolone Based Radioligand [11C]N′-MPB for Visualization of 18 kDa TSPO in Brain. New J Chem (2020) 44(19):7912–22. doi: 10.1039/D0NJ00509F [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 109.MacAskill MG, Stadulyte A, Williams L, Morgan TEF, Sloan NL, Alcaide-Corral CJ, et al. Quantification of Macrophage-Driven Inflammation During Myocardial Infarction With 18F-LW223, a Novel TSPO Radiotracer With Binding Independent of the Rs6971 Human Polymorphism. J Nucl Med (2021) 62(4):536. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.243600 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Han J, Liu H, Liu C, Jin H, Perlmutter JS, Egan TM, et al. Pharmacologic Characterizations of a P2X7 Receptor-Specific Radioligand, [11C]GSK1482160 for Neuroinflammatory Response. Nucl Med Commun (2017) 38(5):372–82. doi: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000000660 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Territo PR, Meyer JA, Peters JS, Riley AA, McCarthy BP, Gao M, et al. Characterization of (11)C-GSK1482160 for Targeting the P2X7 Receptor as a Biomarker for Neuroinflammation. J Nucl Med (2017) 58(3):458–65. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.181354 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Koole M, Schmidt ME, Hijzen A, Ravenstijn P, Vandermeulen C, Van Weehaeghe D, et al. (18)F-JNJ-64413739, a Novel PET Ligand for the P2X7 Ion Channel: Radiation Dosimetry, Kinetic Modeling, Test-Retest Variability, and Occupancy of the P2X7 Antagonist JNJ-54175446. J Nucl Med (2019) 60(5):683–90. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.216747 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Van Weehaeghe D, Van Schoor E, De Vocht J, Koole M, Attili B, Celen S, et al. TSPO Versus P2X7 as a Target for Neuroinflammation: An In Vitro and In Vivo Study. J Nucl Med (2020) 61(4):604–7. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.119.231985 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Berdyyeva T, Xia C, Taylor N, He Y, Chen G, Huang C, et al. PET Imaging of the P2X7 Ion Channel With a Novel Tracer [(18)F]JNJ-64413739 in a Rat Model of Neuroinflammation. Mol Imaging Biol (2019) 21(5):871–8. doi: 10.1007/s11307-018-01313-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Ory D, Celen S, Gijsbers R, Van Den Haute C, Postnov A, Koole M, et al. Preclinical Evaluation of a P2X7 Receptor-Selective Radiotracer: PET Studies in a Rat Model With Local Overexpression of the Human P2X7 Receptor and in Nonhuman Primates. J Nucl Med (2016) 57(9):1436–41. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.169995 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Crabbé M, van der Perren A, Bollaerts I, Kounelis S, Baekelandt V, Bormans G, et al. Increased P2X7 Receptor Binding Is Associated With Neuroinflammation in Acute But Not Chronic Rodent Models for Parkinson’s Disease. Front Neurosci (2019) 13:799. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00799 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Hagens MHJ, Golla SSV, Janssen B, Vugts DJ, Beaino W, Windhorst AD, et al. The P2X7 Receptor Tracer [11C]SMW139 as an In Vivo Marker of Neuroinflammation in Multiple Sclerosis: A First-in Man Study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2020) 47(2):379–89. doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04550-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Beaino W, Janssen B, Kooijman E, Vos R, Schuit RC, O’Brien-Brown J, et al. PET Imaging of P2X7R in the Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis Model of Multiple Sclerosis Using [11C]SMW139. J Neuroinflamm (2020) 17(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12974-020-01962-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Janssen B, Vugts DJ, Wilkinson SM, Ory D, Chalon S, Hoozemans JJM, et al. Identification of the Allosteric P2X7 Receptor Antagonist [11C]SMW139 as a PET Tracer of Microglial Activation. Sci Rep (2018) 8(1):6580. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24814-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Beaino W, Janssen B, Kooij G, van der Pol SMA, van Het Hof B, van Horssen J, et al. Purinergic Receptors P2Y12R and P2X7R: Potential Targets for PET Imaging of Microglia Phenotypes in Multiple Sclerosis. J Neuroinflamm (2017) 14(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s12974-017-1034-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Janssen B, Vugts DJ, Funke U, Spaans A, Schuit RC, Kooijman E, et al. Synthesis and Initial Preclinical Evaluation of the P2X7 Receptor Antagonist [¹¹C]A-740003 as a Novel Tracer of Neuroinflammation. J Labelled Comp Radiopharm (2014) 57(8):509–16. doi: 10.1002/jlcr.3206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Villa A, Klein B, Janssen B, Pedragosa J, Pepe G, Zinnhardt B, et al. Identification of New Molecular Targets for PET Imaging of the Microglial Anti-Inflammatory Activation State. Theranostics (2018) 8(19):5400–18. doi: 10.7150/thno.25572 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Maeda J, Minamihisamatsu T, Shimojo M, Zhou X, Ono M, Matsuba Y, et al. Distinct Microglial Response Against Alzheimer’s Amyloid and Tau Pathologies Characterized by P2Y12 Receptor. Brain Commun (2021) 3(1):fcab011. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcab011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Horti AG, Naik R, Foss CA, Minn I, Misheneva V, Du Y, et al. PET Imaging of Microglia by Targeting Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor 1 Receptor (CSF1R). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2019) 116(5):1686–91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1812155116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Ohnishi A, Senda M, Yamane T, Sasaki M, Mikami T, Nishio T, et al. Human Whole-Body Biodistribution and Dosimetry of a New PET Tracer, [(11)C]ketoprofen Methyl Ester, for Imagings of Neuroinflammation. Nucl Med Biol (2014) 41(7):594–9. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2014.04.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Ohnishi A, Senda M, Yamane T, Mikami T, Nishida H, Nishio T, et al. Exploratory Human PET Study of the Effectiveness of (11)C-Ketoprofen Methyl Ester, a Potential Biomarker of Neuroinflammatory Processes in Alzheimer’s Disease. Nucl Med Biol (2016) 43(7):438–44. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2016.04.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Shukuri M, Mawatari A, Ohno M, Suzuki M, Doi H, Watanabe Y, et al. Detection of Cyclooxygenase-1 in Activated Microglia During Amyloid Plaque Progression: PET Studies in Alzheimer’s Disease Model Mice. J Nucl Med (2016) 57(2):291–6. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.166116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Shrestha S, Singh P, Cortes-Salva MY, Jenko KJ, Ikawa M, Kim M-J, et al. 3-Substituted 1,5-Diaryl-1 H-1,2,4-Triazoles as Prospective PET Radioligands for Imaging Brain COX-1 in Monkey. Part 2: Selection and Evaluation of [(11)C]PS13 for Quantitative Imaging. ACS Chem Neurosci (2018) 9(11):2620–7. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Shrestha S, Kim MJ, Eldridge M, Lehmann ML, Frankland M, Liow JS, et al. PET Measurement of Cyclooxygenase-2 Using a Novel Radioligand: Upregulation in Primate Neuroinflammation and First-in-Human Study. J Neuroinflamm (2020) 17(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12974-020-01804-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Kumar JSD, Prabhakaran J, Molotkov A, Sattiraju A, Kim J, Doubrovin M, et al. Radiosynthesis and Evaluation of [(18)F]FMTP, a COX-2 PET Ligand. Pharmacol Rep (2020) 72(5):1433–40. doi: 10.1007/s43440-020-00124-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Kumar JSD, Zanderigo F, Prabhakaran J, Rubin-Falcone H, Parsey RV, Mann JJ. In Vivo Evaluation of [11C]TMI, a COX-2 Selective PET Tracer, in Baboons. Bioorg Med Chem Lett (2018) 28(23):3592–5. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2018.10.049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Yeh SH, Huang WS, Chiu CH, Chen CL, Chen HT, Chi DY, et al. Automated Synthesis and Initial Evaluation of (4’-Amino-5’,8’-Difluoro-1’H-Spiro[Piperidine-4,2’-Quinazolin]-1-Yl)(4-[(18)F]fluorophenyl)methanone for PET/MR Imaging of Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase. Mol Imaging (2021) 2021:9996125. doi: 10.1155/2021/9996125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Hou C, Hsieh C-J, Li S, Lee H, Graham TJ, Xu K, et al. Development of a Positron Emission Tomography Radiotracer for Imaging Elevated Levels of Superoxide in Neuroinflammation. ACS Chem Neurosci (2018) 9(3):578–86. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.7b00385 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Egami H, Nakagawa S, Katsura Y, Kanazawa M, Nishiyama S, Sakai T, et al. (18)F-Labeled Dihydromethidine: Positron Emission Tomography Radiotracer for Imaging of Reactive Oxygen Species in Intact Brain. Org Biomol Chem (2020) 18(13):2387–91. doi: 10.1039/d0ob00126k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Carroll VN, Truillet C, Shen B, Flavell RR, Shao X, Evans MJ, et al. [11c]Ascorbic and [11C]Dehydroascorbic Acid, an Endogenous Redox Pair for Sensing Reactive Oxygen Species Using Positron Emission Tomography. Chem Commun (2016) 52(27):4888–90. doi: 10.1039/C6CC00895J [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Ikawa M, Okazawa H, Tsujikawa T, Matsunaga A, Yamamura O, Mori T, et al. Increased Oxidative Stress is Related to Disease Severity in the ALS Motor Cortex: A PET Study. Neurology (2015) 84(20):2033–9. doi: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000001588 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Ikawa M, Okazawa H, Kudo T, Kuriyama M, Fujibayashi Y, Yoneda M. Evaluation of Striatal Oxidative Stress in Patients With Parkinson’s Disease Using [62Cu]ATSM PET. Nucl Med Biol (2011) 38(7):945–51. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2011.02.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Fujibayashi Y, Taniuchi H, Yonekura Y, Ohtani H, Konishi J, Yokoyama A. Copper-62-ATSM: A New Hypoxia Imaging Agent With High Membrane Permeability and Low Redox Potential. J Nucl Med (1997) 38(7):1155–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Tsujikawa T, Asahi S, Oh M, Sato Y, Narita N, Makino A, et al. Assessment of the Tumor Redox Status in Head and Neck Cancer by 62Cu-ATSM PET. PloS One (2016) 11(5):e0155635. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Meier SR, Sehlin D, Hultqvist G, Syvänen S. Pinpointing Brain TREM2 Levels in Two Mouse Models of Alzheimer’s Disease. Mol Imaging Biol (2021) 23:s665–75. doi: 10.1007/s11307-021-01591-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Chaney A, Wilson E, Jain P, Cropper H, Swarovski M, Lucot K, et al. TREM1-PET Imaging of Pro-Inflammatory Myeloid Cells Distinguishes Active Disease From Remission in Multiple Sclerosis. J Nucl Med (2020) 61(supplement 1):199. [Google Scholar]
- 142.Johnson E, Murty S, Mayer A, Tsai C, Mehta S, Ilovich O, et al. TMIC-30. TREM1-TARGETED PET IMAGING OF TUMOR-ASSOCIATED MACROPHAGES IN AN ORTHOTOPIC GLIOBLASTOMA MOUSE MODEL. Neuro-Oncology (2017) 19(suppl_6):vi249–9. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox168.1019 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Liu Q, Johnson EM, Lam RK, Wang Q, Bo Ye H, Wilson EN, et al. Peripheral TREM1 Responses to Brain and Intestinal Immunogens Amplify Stroke Severity. Nat Immunol (2019) 20(8):1023–34. doi: 10.1038/s41590-019-0421-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Zheng Q-H, Fei X, DeGrado TR, Wang J-Q, Lee Stone K, Martinez TD, et al. Synthesis, Biodistribution and Micro-PET Imaging of a Potential Cancer Biomarker Carbon-11 Labeled MMP Inhibitor (2R)-2-[[4-(6-Fluorohex-1-Ynyl)Phenyl]Sulfonylamino]-3-Methylbutyric Acid [11C]Methyl Ester. Nucl Med Biol (2003) 30(7):753–60. doi: 10.1016/S0969-8051(03)00086-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Kasten BB, Jiang K, Cole D, Jani A, Udayakumar N, Gillespie GY, et al. Targeting MMP-14 for Dual PET and Fluorescence Imaging of Glioma in Preclinical Models. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2020) 47(6):1412–26. doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04607-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Butsch V, Börgel F, Galla F, Schwegmann K, Hermann S, Schäfers M, et al. Design, (Radio)Synthesis, and in Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of Highly Selective and Potent Matrix Metalloproteinase 12 (MMP-12) Inhibitors as Radiotracers for Positron Emission Tomography. J Med Chem (2018) 61(9):4115–34. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b00200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Barca C, Foray C, Hermann S, Döring C, Schäfers M, Jacobs AH, et al. Characterization of the Inflammatory Post-Ischemic Tissue by Full Volumetric Analysis of a Multimodal Imaging Dataset. NeuroImage (2020) 222:117217. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117217 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Zinnhardt B, Viel T, Wachsmuth L, Vrachimis A, Wagner S, Breyholz H-J, et al. Multimodal Imaging Reveals Temporal and Spatial Microglia and Matrix Metalloproteinase Activity After Experimental Stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab (2015) 35(11):1711–21. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2015.149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Caillé F, Cacheux F, Peyronneau MA, Jego B, Jaumain E, Pottier G, et al. From Structure-Activity Relationships on Thiazole Derivatives to the In Vivo Evaluation of a New Radiotracer for Cannabinoid Subtype 2 PET Imaging. Mol Pharm (2017) 14(11):4064–78. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.7b00746 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Savonenko AV, Melnikova T, Wang Y, Ravert H, Gao Y, Koppel J, et al. Cannabinoid CB2 Receptors in a Mouse Model of Aβ Amyloidosis: Immunohistochemical Analysis and Suitability as a PET Biomarker of Neuroinflammation. PloS One (2015) 10(6):e0129618. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129618 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Ni R, Müller Herde A, Haider A, Keller C, Louloudis G, Vaas M, et al. In Vivo Imaging of Cannabinoid Type 2 Receptors, Functional and Structural Alterations in Mouse Model of Cerebral Ischemia by PET and MRI. bioRxiv (2021) 2021:5.08.441033. doi: 10.1101/2021.05.08.441033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Ni R, Mu L, Ametamey S. Positron Emission Tomography of Type 2 Cannabinoid Receptors for Detecting Inflammation in the Central Nervous System. Acta Pharmacol Sin (2019) 40(3):351–7. doi: 10.1038/s41401-018-0035-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Moldovan R-P, Teodoro R, Gao Y, Deuther-Conrad W, Kranz M, Wang Y, et al. Development of a High-Affinity PET Radioligand for Imaging Cannabinoid Subtype 2 Receptor. J Med Chem (2016) 59(17):7840–55. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00554 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Ahmad R, Postnov A, Bormans G, Versijpt J, Vandenbulcke M, Van Laere K. Decreased In Vivo Availability of the Cannabinoid Type 2 Receptor in Alzheimer’s Disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2016) 43(12):2219–27. doi: 10.1007/s00259-016-3457-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Yamagishi S, Iga Y, Nakamura M, Takizawa C, Fukumoto D, Kakiuchi T, et al. Upregulation of Cannabinoid Receptor Type 2, But Not TSPO, in Senescence-Accelerated Neuroinflammation in Mice: A Positron Emission Tomography Study. J Neuroinflamm (2019) 16(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12974-019-1604-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Vilaplana E, Rodriguez-Vieitez E, Ferreira D, Montal V, Almkvist O, Wall A, et al. Cortical Microstructural Correlates of Astrocytosis in Autosomal-Dominant Alzheimer Disease. Neurology (2020) 94(19):e2026–36. doi: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000009405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Lemoine L, Gillberg PG, Bogdanovic N, Nennesmo I, Saint-Aubert L, Viitanen M, et al. Amyloid, Tau, and Astrocyte Pathology in Autosomal-Dominant Alzheimer’s Disease Variants: Aβpparc and PSEN1DE9. Mol Psychiatry (2020). doi: 10.1038/s41380-020-0817-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Marutle A, Gillberg PG, Bergfors A, Yu WF, Ni RQ, Nennesmo I, et al. H-3-Deprenyl and H-3-PIB Autoradiography Show Different Laminar Distributions of Astroglia and Fibrillar Beta-Amyloid in Alzheimer Brain. J Neuroinflamm (2013) 10:861. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-10-90 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Carter SF, Chiotis K, Nordberg A, Rodriguez-Vieitez E. Longitudinal Association Between Astrocyte Function and Glucose Metabolism in Autosomal Dominant Alzheimer’s Disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2019) 46(2):348–56. doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-4217-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Rodriguez-Vieitez E, Carter SF, Chiotis K, Saint-Aubert L, Leuzy A, Schöll M, et al. Comparison of Early-Phase 11c-Deuterium-L-Deprenyl and 11C-Pittsburgh Compound B PET for Assessing Brain Perfusion in Alzheimer Disease. J Nucl Med (2016) 57(7):1071–7. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.168732 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Schöll M, Carter SF, Westman E, Rodriguez-Vieitez E, Almkvist O, Thordardottir S, et al. Early Astrocytosis in Autosomal Dominant Alzheimer’s Disease Measured In Vivo by Multi-Tracer Positron Emission Tomography. Sci Rep (2015) 5:16404. doi: 10.1038/srep16404 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Rodriguez-Vieitez E, Saint-Aubert L, Carter SF, Almkvist O, Farid K, Schöll M, et al. Diverging Longitudinal Changes in Astrocytosis and Amyloid PET in Autosomal Dominant Alzheimer’s Disease. Brain (2016) 139(Pt 3):922–36. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv404 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Rodriguez-Vieitez E, Ni RQ, Gulyas B, Toth M, Haggkvist J, Halldin C, et al. Astrocytosis Precedes Amyloid Plaque Deposition in Alzheimer APPswe Transgenic Mouse Brain: A Correlative Positron Emission Tomography and In Vitro Imaging Study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2015) 42(7):1119–32. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3047-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Olsen M, Aguilar X, Sehlin D, Fang XT, Antoni G, Erlandsson A, et al. Astroglial Responses to Amyloid-Beta Progression in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. Mol Imaging Biol (2018) 20(4):605–14. doi: 10.1007/s11307-017-1153-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Nag S, Fazio P, Lehmann L, Kettschau G, Heinrich T, Thiele A, et al. In Vivo and In Vitro Characterization of a Novel MAO-B Inhibitor Radioligand, 18f-Labeled Deuterated Fluorodeprenyl. J Nucl Med (2016) 57(2):315–20. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.161083 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Harada R, Hayakawa Y, Ezura M, Lerdsirisuk P, Du Y, Ishikawa Y, et al. (18)F-SMBT-1: A Selective and Reversible PET Tracer for Monoamine Oxidase-B Imaging. J Nucl Med (2021) 62(2):253–8. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.244400 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Villemagne VLL, Harada R, Dore V, Furumoto S, Mulligan RS, Kudo Y, et al. Evaluation of the Novel 18F-Labeled PET Tracer SMBT-1 for Imaging Astrogliosis in Healthy Elderly Controls and A+/T+/(N+) Alzheimer’s Disease Patients. Alzheimer’s Dementia (2020) 16(S4):e039858. doi: 10.1002/alz.039858 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Moriguchi S, Wilson AA, Miler L, Rusjan PM, Vasdev N, Kish SJ, et al. Monoamine Oxidase B Total Distribution Volume in the Prefrontal Cortex of Major Depressive Disorder: An [11c]SL25.1188 Positron Emission Tomography Study. JAMA Psychiatry (2019) 76(6):634–41. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.0044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Rusjan PM, Wilson AA, Miler L, Fan I, Mizrahi R, Houle S, et al. Kinetic Modeling of the Monoamine Oxidase B Radioligand [¹¹C]SL25.1188 in Human Brain With High-Resolution Positron Emission Tomography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab (2014) 34(5):883–9. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.34 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Narayanaswami V, Drake LR, Brooks AF, Meyer JH, Houle S, Kilbourn MR, et al. Classics in Neuroimaging: Development of PET Tracers for Imaging Monoamine Oxidases. ACS Chem Neurosci (2019) 10(4):1867–71. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.9b00081 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Takata K, Kato H, Shimosegawa E, Okuno T, Koda T, Sugimoto T, et al. 11c-Acetate PET Imaging in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis. PloS One (2014) 9(11):e111598. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111598 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Duong MT, Chen YJ, Doot RK, Young AJ, Lee H, Cai J, et al. Astrocyte Activation Imaging With 11C-Acetate and Amyloid PET in Mild Cognitive Impairment Due to Alzheimer Pathology. Nucl Med Commun (2021). doi: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001460 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Kumar A, Koistinen NA, Malarte ML, Nennesmo I, Ingelsson M, Ghetti B, et al. Astroglial Tracer BU99008 Detects Multiple Binding Sites in Alzheimer’s Disease Brain. Mol Psychiatry (2021). doi: 10.1038/s41380-021-01101-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Wilson H, Dervenoulas G, Pagano G, Tyacke RJ, Polychronis S, Myers J, et al. Imidazoline 2 Binding Sites Reflecting Astroglia Pathology in Parkinson’s Disease: An In Vivo 11c-BU99008 PET Study. Brain (2019) 142(10):3116–28. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Tyacke RJ, Myers JFM, Venkataraman A, Mick I, Turton S, Passchier J, et al. Evaluation of (11)C-BU99008, a PET Ligand for the Imidazoline(2) Binding Site in Human Brain. J Nucl Med (2018) 59(10):1597–602. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.208009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Calsolaro V, Matthews PM, Donat CK, Livingston NR, Femminella GD, Guedes SS, et al. Astrocyte Reactivity With Late-Onset Cognitive Impairment Assessed In Vivo Using 11C-BU99008 PET and its Relationship With Amyloid Load. Mol Psychiatry (2021). doi: 10.1038/s41380-021-01193-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Livingston N, Calsolaro V, Hinz R, Nowell J, Raza S, Gentleman S, et al. Relationship Between Astrocyte Reactivity, Using Novel 11 C-BU99008 PET, and Glucose Metabolism, Grey Matter Volume and Amyloid Load in Cognitively Impaired Individuals. medRxiv (2021). doi: 10.1101/2021.08.10.21261690 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Venkataraman AV, Keat N, Myers JF, Turton S, Mick I, Gunn RN, et al. First Evaluation of PET-Based Human Biodistribution and Radiation Dosimetry of (11)C-BU99008, a Tracer for Imaging the Imidazoline(2) Binding Site. EJNMMI Res (2018) 8(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13550-018-0429-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Parker CA, Nabulsi N, Holden D, Lin SF, Cass T, Labaree D, et al. Evaluation of 11C-BU99008, a PET Ligand for the Imidazoline2 Binding Sites in Rhesus Brain. J Nucl Med (2014) 55(5):838–44. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.131854 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Kawamura K, Yamasaki T, Zhang Y, Wakizaka H, Hatori A, Xie L, et al. Change in the Binding of [(11)C]BU99008 to Imidazoline I(2) Receptor Using Brain PET in Zucker Rats. Mol Imaging Biol (2019) 21(1):105–12. doi: 10.1007/s11307-018-1206-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Kawamura K, Shimoda Y, Yui J, Zhang Y, Yamasaki T, Wakizaka H, et al. A Useful PET Probe [(11)C]BU99008 With Ultra-High Specific Radioactivity for Small Animal PET Imaging of I(2)-Imidazoline Receptors in the Hypothalamus. Nucl Med Biol (2017) 45:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2016.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Kawamura K, Shimoda Y, Kumata K, Fujinaga M, Yui J, Yamasaki T, et al. In Vivo Evaluation of a New ¹⁸F-Labeled PET Ligand, [¹⁸F]FEBU, for the Imaging of I₂-Imidazoline Receptors. Nucl Med Biol (2015) 42(4):406–12. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2014.12.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Kawamura K, Maeda J, Hatori A, Okauchi T, Nagai Y, Higuchi M, et al. In Vivo and In Vitro Imaging of I₂ Imidazoline Receptors in the Monkey Brain. Synapse (2011) 65(5):452–5. doi: 10.1002/syn.20897 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Kreimerman I, Reyes AL, Paolino A, Pardo T, Porcal W, Ibarra M, et al. Biological Assessment of a 18F-Labeled Sulforhodamine 101 in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease as a Potential Astrocytosis Marker. Front Neurosci (2019) 13:734. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00734 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Gerwien H, Hermann S, Zhang X, Korpos E, Song J, Kopka K, et al. Imaging Matrix Metalloproteinase Activity in Multiple Sclerosis as a Specific Marker of Leukocyte Penetration of the Blood-Brain Barrier. Sci Trans Med (2016) 8(364):364ra152. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf8020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Ni R, Vaas M, Ren W, Klohs J. Noninvasive Detection of Acute Cerebral Hypoxia and Subsequent Matrix-Metalloproteinase Activity in a Mouse Model of Cerebral Ischemia Using Multispectral-Optoacoustic-Tomography. Neurophotonics (2018) 5(1):15005–10. doi: 10.1117/1.NPh.5.1.015005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Gao M, Wang M, Meyer JA, Peters JS, Zarrinmayeh H, Territo PR, et al. Synthesis and Preliminary Biological Evaluation of [(11)C]methyl (2-Amino-5-(Benzylthio)Thiazolo[4,5-D]Pyrimidin-7-Yl)-D-Leucinate for the Fractalkine Receptor (CX(3)CR1). Bioorg Med Chem Lett (2017) 27(12):2727–30. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2017.04.052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Cary BP, Brooks AF, Fawaz MV, Drake LR, Desmond TJ, Sherman P, et al. Synthesis and Evaluation of [(18)F]RAGER: A First Generation Small-Molecule PET Radioligand Targeting the Receptor for Advanced Glycation Endproducts. ACS Chem Neurosci (2016) 7(3):391–8. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.5b00319 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Zhang Y, Chen K, Sloan SA, Bennett ML, Scholze AR, Keeffe S, et al. An RNA-Sequencing Transcriptome and Splicing Database of Glia, Neurons, and Vascular Cells of the Cerebral Cortex. J Neurosci (2014) 34(36):11929. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1860-14.2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Zhang Y, Sloan SA, Clarke LE, Caneda C, Plaza CA, Blumenthal PD, et al. Purification and Characterization of Progenitor and Mature Human Astrocytes Reveals Transcriptional and Functional Differences With Mouse. Neuron (2016) 89(1):37–53. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Rupprecht R, Papadopoulos V, Rammes G, Baghai TC, Fan J, Akula N, et al. Translocator Protein (18 kDa) (TSPO) as a Therapeutic Target for Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders. Nat Rev Drug Discov (2010) 9(12):971–88. doi: 10.1038/nrd3295 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Notter T, Schalbetter SM, Clifton NE, Mattei D, Richetto J, Thomas K, et al. Neuronal Activity Increases Translocator Protein (TSPO) Levels. Mol Psychiatry (2020). doi: 10.1038/s41380-020-0745-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Gui Y, Marks JD, Das S, Hyman BT, Serrano-Pozo A. Characterization of the 18 kDa Translocator Protein (TSPO) Expression in Post-Mortem Normal and Alzheimer’s Disease Brains. Brain Pathol (2020) 30(1):151–64. doi: 10.1111/bpa.12763 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Vivash L, O’Brien TJ. Imaging Microglial Activation With TSPO PET: Lighting Up Neurologic Diseases? J Nucl Med (2016) 57(2):165–8. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.114.141713 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Roivainen A, Någren K, Hirvonen J, Oikonen V, Virsu P, Tolvanen T, et al. Whole-Body Distribution and Metabolism of [N-Methyl-11C](R)-1-(2-Chlorophenyl)-N-(1-Methylpropyl)-3-Isoquinolinecarboxamide in Humans; an Imaging Agent for In Vivo Assessment of Peripheral Benzodiazepine Receptor Activity With Positron Emission Tomography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2009) 36(4):671–82. doi: 10.1007/s00259-008-1000-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Passamonti L, Tsvetanov KA, Jones PS, Bevan-Jones WR, Arnold R, Borchert RJ, et al. Neuroinflammation and Functional Connectivity in Alzheimer’s Disease: Interactive Influences on Cognitive Performance. J Neurosci (2019) 39(36):7218. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2574-18.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Fan Z, Calsolaro V, Atkinson RA, Femminella GD, Waldman A, Buckley C, et al. Flutriciclamide (18f-GE180) PET: First-In-Human PET Study of Novel Third-Generation In Vivo Marker of Human Translocator Protein. J Nucl Med (2016) 57(11):1753–9. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.169078 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Felsky D, Roostaei T, Nho K, Risacher SL, Bradshaw EM, Petyuk V, et al. Neuropathological Correlates and Genetic Architecture of Microglial Activation in Elderly Human Brain. Nat Commun (2019) 10(1):409. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-08279-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Femminella GD, Dani M, Wood M, Fan Z, Calsolaro V, Atkinson R, et al. Microglial Activation in Early Alzheimer Trajectory is Associated With Higher Gray Matter Volume. Neurology (2019) 92(12):e1331–43. doi: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000007133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Tiwari AK, Ji B, Yui J, Fujinaga M, Yamasaki T, Xie L, et al. [18f]FEBMP: Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of TSPO in a Model of Neuroinflammation in Rats, and In Vitro Autoradiograms of the Human Brain. Theranostics (2015) 5(9):961–9. doi: 10.7150/thno.12027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Janssen B, Mach RH. Development of Brain PET Imaging Agents: Strategies for Imaging Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s Disease. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci (2019) 165:371–99. doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2019.04.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Janssen B, Vugts DJ, Windhorst AD, Mach RH. PET Imaging of Microglial Activation-Beyond Targeting TSPO. Molecules (2018) 23(3). doi: 10.3390/molecules23030607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Lin H, Lee E, Hestir K, Leo C, Huang M, Bosch E, et al. Discovery of a Cytokine and its Receptor by Functional Screening of the Extracellular Proteome. Science (2008) 320(5877):807–11. doi: 10.1126/science.1154370 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Hamilton JA. Colony-Stimulating Factors in Inflammation and Autoimmunity. Nat Rev Immunol (2008) 8(7):533–44. doi: 10.1038/nri2356 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Murphy MC, Curran GL, Glaser KJ, Rossman PJ, Huston J, 3rd, Poduslo JF, et al. Magnetic Resonance Elastography of the Brain in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease: Initial Results. Magn Reson Imaging (2012) 30(4):535–9. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2011.12.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Dubois RN, Abramson SB, Crofford L, Gupta RA, Simon LS, Van De Putte LB, et al. Cyclooxygenase in Biology and Disease. FASEB J (1998) 12(12):1063–73. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.12.12.1063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Choi S-H, Aid S, Bosetti F. The Distinct Roles of Cyclooxygenase-1 and -2 in Neuroinflammation: Implications for Translational Research. Trends Pharmacol Sci (2009) 30(4):174–81. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2009.01.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Umeozulu S, Young N, Taddei C, Simeon F, Pike V. Chemical Studies Aimed at Developing Improved PET Radioligands for Imaging Brain Cyclooxygenase-2. J Nucl Med (2021) 62(supplement 1):1448. [Google Scholar]
- 209.Litchfield M, Wuest M, Glubrecht D, Wuest F. Radiosynthesis and Biological Evaluation of [(18)F]Triacoxib: A New Radiotracer for PET Imaging of COX-2. Mol Pharm (2020) 17(1):251–61. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.9b00986 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Ji B, Kumata K, Onoe H, Kaneko H, Zhang MR, Seki C, et al. Assessment of Radioligands for PET Imaging of Cyclooxygenase-2 in an Ischemic Neuronal Injury Model. Brain Res (2013) 1533:152–62. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.08.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Shukuri M, Takashima-Hirano M, Tokuda K, Takashima T, Matsumura K, Inoue O, et al. In Vivo Expression of Cyclooxygenase-1 in Activated Microglia and Macrophages During Neuroinflammation Visualized by PET With 11C-Ketoprofen Methyl Ester. J Nucl Med (2011) 52(7):1094. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.084046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Evens N, Bosier B, Lavey BJ, Kozlowski JA, Vermaelen P, Baudemprez L, et al. Labelling and Biological Evaluation of [(11)C]methoxy-Sch225336: A Radioligand for the Cannabinoid-Type 2 Receptor. Nucl Med Biol (2008) 35(7):793–800. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2008.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Di Virgilio F, Dal Ben D, Sarti AC, Giuliani AL, Falzoni S. The P2X7 Receptor in Infection and Inflammation. Immunity (2017) 47(1):15–31. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.06.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Cserép C, Pósfai B, Lénárt N, Fekete R, László ZI, Lele Z, et al. Microglia Monitor and Protect Neuronal Function Through Specialized Somatic Purinergic Junctions. Science (2020) 367(6477):528–37. doi: 10.1126/science.aax6752 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215.Zrzavy T, Hametner S, Wimmer I, Butovsky O, Weiner HL, Lassmann H. Loss of ’Homeostatic’ Microglia and Patterns of Their Activation in Active Multiple Sclerosis. Brain J Neurol (2017) 140(7):1900–13. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216.Badimon A, Strasburger HJ, Ayata P, Chen X, Nair A, Ikegami A, et al. Negative Feedback Control of Neuronal Activity by Microglia. Nature (2020) 586(7829):417–23. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2777-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217.Mildner A, Huang H, Radke J, Stenzel W, Priller J. P2Y(12) Receptor Is Expressed on Human Microglia Under Physiological Conditions Throughout Development and is Sensitive to Neuroinflammatory Diseases. Glia (2017) 65(2):375–87. doi: 10.1002/glia.23097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Fu Z, Lin Q, Hu B, Zhang Y, Chen W, Zhu J, et al. P2X7 PET Radioligand (18)F-PTTP for Differentiation of Lung Tumor From Inflammation. J Nucl Med (2019) 60(7):930–6. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.222547 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219.Drake LR, Brooks AF, Mufarreh AJ, Pham JM, Koeppe RA, Shao X, et al. Deuterium Kinetic Isotope Effect Studies of a Potential In Vivo Metabolic Trapping Agent for Monoamine Oxidase B. ACS Chem Neurosci (2018) 9(12):3024–7. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00219 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220.Tesson F, Limon-Boulez I, Urban P, Puype M, Vandekerckhove J, Coupry I, et al. Localization of I2-Imidazoline Binding Sites on Monoamine Oxidases. J Biol Chem (1995) 270(17):9856–61. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.17.9856 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221.Parker CA, Nabulsi N, Holden D, Lin S-F, Cass T, Labaree D, et al. Tyacke: Evaluation of 11C-BU99008, a PET Ligand for the Imidazoline2 Binding Sites in Rhesus Brain. J Nucl Med (2014) 55(5):838. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.131854 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222.Hansson O. Biomarkers for Neurodegenerative Diseases. Nat Med (2021) 27(6):954–63. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01382-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223.Ni R, Gillberg PG, Bogdanovic N, Viitanen M, Myllykangas L, Nennesmo I, et al. Amyloid Tracers Binding Sites in Autosomal Dominant and Sporadic Alzheimer’s Disease. Alzheimers Dement (2017) 13(4):419–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.08.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224.Perani D, Iaccarino L, Jacobs AH. Application of Advanced Brain Positron Emission Tomography-Based Molecular Imaging for a Biological Framework in Neurodegenerative Proteinopathies. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) (2019) 11:327–32. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2019.02.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 225.Perani D, Iaccarino L, Lammertsma AA, Windhorst AD, Edison P, Boellaard R, et al. A New Perspective for Advanced Positron Emission Tomography-Based Molecular Imaging in Neurodegenerative Proteinopathies. Alzheimers Dement (2019) 15(8):1081–103. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.02.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226.Nutma E, Ceyzériat K, Amor S, Tsartsalis S, Millet P, Owen DR, et al. Cellular Sources of TSPO Expression in Healthy and Diseased Brain. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2021). doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-05166-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227.Nutma E, Stephenson JA, Gorter RP, de Bruin J, Boucherie DM, Donat CK, et al. A Quantitative Neuropathological Assessment of Translocator Protein Expression in Multiple Sclerosis. Brain J Neurol (2019) 142(11):3440–55. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228.Tournier BB, Tsartsalis S, Ceyzériat K, Medina Z, Fraser BH, Grégoire MC, et al. Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting to Reveal the Cell Origin of Radioligand Binding. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab (2020) 40(6):1242–55. doi: 10.1177/0271678x19860408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229.Pannell M, Economopoulos V, Wilson TC, Kersemans V, Isenegger PG, Larkin JR, et al. Imaging of Translocator Protein Upregulation Is Selective for Pro-Inflammatory Polarized Astrocytes and Microglia. Glia (2020) 68(2):280–97. doi: 10.1002/glia.23716 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230.Cagnin A, Brooks DJ, Kennedy AM, Gunn RN, Myers R, Turkheimer FE, et al. In-Vivo Measurement of Activated Microglia in Dementia. Lancet (2001) 358(9280):461–7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05625-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231.Yokokura M, Mori N, Yagi S, Yoshikawa E, Kikuchi M, Yoshihara Y, et al. In Vivo Changes in Microglial Activation and Amyloid Deposits in Brain Regions With Hypometabolism in Alzheimer’s Disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2011) 38(2):343–51. doi: 10.1007/s00259-010-1612-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232.Wiley CA, Lopresti BJ, Venneti S, Price J, Klunk WE, DeKosky ST, et al. Carbon 11-Labeled Pittsburgh Compound B and Carbon 11-Labeled (R)-PK11195 Positron Emission Tomographic Imaging in Alzheimer Disease. Arch Neurol (2009) 66(1):60–7. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2008.511 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233.Groom GN, Junck L, Foster NL, Frey KA, Kuhl DE. PET of Peripheral Benzodiazepine Binding Sites in the Microgliosis of Alzheimer’s Disease. J Nucl Med (1995) 36(12):2207–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234.Albrecht DS, Sagare A, Pachicano M, Sweeney MD, Toga A, Zlokovic B, et al. Early Neuroinflammation is Associated With Lower Amyloid and Tau Levels in Cognitively Normal Older Adults. Brain Behav Immun (2021) 94:299–307. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2021.01.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235.Ji B, Chen C-J, Bando K, Ashino H, Shiraishi H, Sano H, et al. Distinct Binding of Amyloid Imaging Ligands to Unique Amyloid-β Deposited in the Presubiculum of Alzheimer’s Disease. J Neurochem (2015) 135(5):859–66. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13293 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236.Kong Y, Huang L, Li W, Liu X, Zhou Y, Liu C, et al. The Synaptic Vesicle Protein 2a Interacts With Key Pathogenic Factors in Alzheimer’s Disease: Implications for Treatment. Front Cell Dev Biol (2021) 9:1555. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.609908 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]