Abstract
Background
Biofortification of staple crops with β-carotene is a strategy to reduce vitamin A deficiency, and several varieties are available in some African countries. β-Cryptoxanthin (BCX)-enhanced maize is currently in field trials. To our knowledge, maize BCX bioavailability has not been assessed in humans. Serum retinol 13C content and xanthophyll concentrations are proposed effectiveness biomarkers for biofortified maize adoption.
Objective
We determined the relative difference in BCX and zeaxanthin bioavailability from whole-grain and refined BCX-biofortified maize during chronic feeding compared with white maize and evaluated short-term changes in 13C-abundance in serum retinol.
Design
After a 7-d washout, 9 adults (mean ± SD age: 23.4 ± 2.3 y; 5 men) were provided with muffins made from BCX-enhanced whole-grain orange maize (WGOM), refined orange maize (ROM), or refined white maize (RWM) for 12 d in a randomized, blinded, crossover study followed by a 7-d washout. Blood was drawn on days 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 19. Carotenoid areas under the curve (AUCs) were compared by using a fixed-effects model. 13C-Abundance in serum retinol was determined by using gas chromatography/combustion/isotope-ratio mass spectrometry on days 0, 12, and 19. Vitamin A status was determined by 13C-retinol isotope dilution postintervention.
Results
The serum BCX AUC was significantly higher for WGOM (1.70 ± 0.63 μmol ⋅ L−1 ⋅ d) and ROM (1.66 ± 1.08 μmol ⋅ L−1 ⋅ d) than for RWM (−0.06 ± 0.13 μmol ⋅ L−1 ⋅ d; P < 0.003). A greater increase occurred in serum BCX from WGOM muffins (131%) than from ROM muffins (108%) (P ≤ 0.003). Zeaxanthin AUCs were higher for WGOM (0.94 ± 0.33) and ROM (0.96 ± 0.47) than for RWM (0.05 ± 0.12 μmol ⋅ L−1 ⋅ d; P < 0.003). The intervention did not affect predose serum retinol 13C-abundance. Vitamin A status was within an optimal range (defined as 0.1–0.7 μmol/g liver).
Conclusions
BCX and zeaxanthin were highly bioavailable from BCX-biofortified maize. The adoption of BCX maize could positively affect consumers’ BCX and zeaxanthin intakes and associated health benefits. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02800408.
Keywords: biofortification, carotenoids, corn, natural abundance, retinol isotope dilution, vitamin A, Zea mays
INTRODUCTION
Vitamin A deficiency affects millions of children <5 y of age (1). Interventions have included high-dose Vitamin A supplementation, fortification of targeted foods, and biofortification of staple and horticultural crops with provitamin A carotenoids, usually focusing on β-carotene (BC). Porridge prepared with high-BC maize was as efficacious as supplementation with 400 μg retinyl palmitate/d (2) and improved serum BC concentrations in Zambian children (3). Similarly, orange-fleshed sweet potato improved the vitamin A status of South African schoolchildren (4). BC from biofortified cassava mixed with oil modestly improved serum retinol concentrations in Kenyan children (5).
Maize (Zea mays) is an important staple crop with an estimated 900 million people who consume it (6), providing >50% of calories in some countries (7). Maize is processed in many ways, including dry milling, wet milling, and nixtamalization (i.e., cooking with lime) (8–10). Animal studies showed excellent BC bioefficacy [i.e., 3.6 and 3.7 μg BC equivalents to 1 μg retinol for whole and refined grain, respectively (8)]; however, milling may affect provitamin A carotenoid bioavailability from biofortified maize in humans. Up to 90% of carotenoids in yellow maize is found in the endosperm, which is maintained after refining (9). β-Cryptoxanthin (BCX), another provitamin A carotenoid, is found naturally in maize. The theoretical yield of vitamin A from BCX is half the potential yield from BC. However, BCX-biofortified maize feeding showed better bioefficacy than BC supplements in gerbils (11) and improved vitamin A status in chickens (12). Furthermore, BCX has higher apparent bioavailability than BC in humans (13), making it viable for biofortification.
It is well known that there is a difference in 13C-natural abundance between C4- and C3-photosynthesizing plants (14). Research in gerbils (15) and Zambian children (16) showed that long-term consumption of biofortified maize (a C4 plant) increased the natural abundance of 13C in retinol compared with dietary regimens containing provitamin A from carrots (a C3 plant) or white maize, respectively. Variation in 13C-abundance of serum retinol is due to intake from C3- and C4-plant sources, supplements, and fortificants (16, 17). The combination of serum retinol 13C-abundance shifts and changes in xanthophyll concentrations (e.g., zeaxanthin) has been proposed as a method to measure the effectiveness of biofortified maize consumption (16).
To our knowledge, high-BCX-biofortified maize, which is currently in field trials, has not been evaluated in humans. The primary objectives of this study were to determine the relative difference in BCX and zeaxanthin bioavailability from whole-grain and refined BCX-biofortified maize during chronic feeding periods in adults compared with white maize as a negative control and to evaluate the stability of and variation in the baseline measure of 13C-abundance in serum retinol among individuals with short-term maize feeding, which changed during long-term feeding studies (15, 16). Calculations were performed that used either individual- or group-mean baseline natural abundance in the 13C-retinol isotope dilution (13C-RID) test to evaluate changes in values when representative baseline blood draws are used in population evaluations.
METHODS
Subjects
All of the procedures involving human subjects were approved by the University of Wisconsin's Health Sciences Human Subjects Institutional Review Board (2015–1607). This study was registered as NIH clinical trial number NCT02800408 and protocol PEP-1508 from the primary sponsor. Subjects were recruited through flyers posted on the university's campus followed by phone screening by TJT and MS (Figure 1). Inclusion criteria included nonsmoking healthy young adults, aged 20–28 y with a BMI (kg/m2) of 19–26, with no known lipid malabsorption concerns. Participants were excluded if they were enrolled in another feeding study, were unable to consume the muffins at the research facility, had known schedule conflicts at the time of recruitment, or were unwilling to discontinue personal supplement use, in addition to any obvious indicators of poor health. Enrollment and treatment assignment occurred in July 2016 by TJT, and written informed consent was obtained from 10 healthy, nonsmoking adults (5 men and 5 women) aged 21–28 y (Table 1). This is the first study of this design to evaluate BCX; 5 subjects of each sex allowed us to have a high probability (∼90% power) of detecting a difference in carotenoid concentration between males and females that is ∼2 times as large as the within-sex SD. In previous studies that provided carrots containing either α- and β-carotene or the xanthophyll lutein, we recruited and reported on 9–10 women and men (18, 19), which provided adequate power to determine the difference between the treatment carrot and placebo white carrot muffin groups.
FIGURE 1.

CONSORT flow diagram of subject recruitment procedures and reasons for exclusions and loss to follow-up. CONSORT, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials.
TABLE 1.
Characteristics and baseline serum concentrations of subjects enrolled in a randomized, crossover orange maize feeding study1
| Characteristic | Value |
|---|---|
| Age, y | 23.4 ± 2.3 |
| Weight, kg | 76.2 ± 11.8 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 23.8 ± 1.62 |
| Body fat, % | 17.0 ± 7.9 |
| LDL cholesterol, mmol/L | 2.47 ± 0.71 |
| HDL cholesterol, mmol/L | 1.50 ± 0.34 |
| Total cholesterol, mmol/L | 4.39 ± 0.96 |
| Total triglycerides, mmol/L | 0.91 ± 0.42 |
| α-Carotene, μmol/L | 0.13 ± 0.13 |
| β-Carotene, μmol/L | 0.33 ± 0.27 |
| β-Cryptoxanthin, μmol/L | 0.12 ± 0.07 |
| Lutein, μmol/L | 0.19 ± 0.06 |
| Lycopene, μmol/L | 0.17 ± 0.10 |
| Zeaxanthin, μmol/L | 0.04 ± 0.02 |
| Serum retinol, μmol/L | 2.43 ± 0.64 |
| Total body retinol stores,2 μmol | 954 ± 560 |
| Total liver reserves,2 μmol/g liver | 0.42 ± 0.22 |
Values are means ± SDs; n = 9 (4 women, 5 men). Baseline samples were obtained after a 1-wk washout, immediately before the treatment began.
Vitamin A status was determined by retinol isotope dilution after the study was completed with the use of single baseline and 14-d blood draws at the end of the third-treatment washout period.
Percentage body fat at the beginning of each study arm was determined by air displacement plethysmography (BodPod version 2.30; Life Measurement, Inc.). Blood lipid concentrations were determined for each subject before beginning the study in typical clinical fashion by a contract laboratory (Meriter Laboratories) (Table 1).
Study design
The design was a randomized, single-blinded, 3 × 3, three-sequence crossover with treatment groups composed of 2 muffins from whole-grain orange maize (WGOM), refined orange maize (ROM), and refined white maize (RWM) as a negative control (Figure 2). After enrollment, a statistician not involved with the conduct of the study individually randomly assigned participants to 1 of 3 treatment sequences, blocked by sequence (3–4 subjects/sequence). The subjects remained in the study for a total of 120 d, including 1-wk washout periods before starting the study and before each treatment phase. One week before the first intervention, subjects followed the low-BCX diet (LBD; diets detailed below) for 4 d and then the stricter low-carotenoid diet (LCD) for 3 d as a washout to minimize serum carotenoids. Baseline blood draws were collected after the 1-wk washout period, after which participants immediately started treatments. Each treatment phase lasted 12 d (days 0–11), with a 1-wk washout after the 12-d blood sample while the subjects adhered to the LCD. In order to minimize carryover effects (18, 19), subjects were allowed to return to their regular diet for 2 wk in between phases. Each treatment day, subjects were provided with a breakfast consisting of the treatment muffins, tea or coffee, apple juice, yogurt, and coconut oil spread or strawberry jam, if desired. During each phase of the study, morning blood samples were collected after an 8-h fast on selected days to quantify serum carotenoids during muffin feeding and for 1 wk after treatment cessation. Blood samples were obtained on days 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 19 during each treatment phase. Extra blood was drawn on days 0, 12, and 19 to quantify 13C-abundance. Blood was allowed to clot at room temperature and centrifuged at 2800 × g for 15 min at 4°C, and serum was stored at −80°C until analysis.
FIGURE 2.

Timeline (A) and randomization order (B) of a 120-d crossover study in which each subject (n = 9) received each of the 3 treatments once. Subjects were individually randomly assigned to sequence group A, B, or C (n = 3/group) to follow 3 maize treatments preceded and followed by washout periods. A statistician not associated with the study performed the randomization by subject. LBD, low-β-cryptoxanthin diet; LCD, low-carotenoid diet; ROM, refined orange maize treatment; RWM, refined white maize treatment; WGOM, whole-grain orange maize treatment.
Carotenoid-restricted and vitamin A–controlled diets
Three diets were developed for the subjects to follow during various times of the study. Subjects followed the LBD during the first 4 d of each washout period. This diet eliminated foods containing significant amounts of BCX (yellow-corn products, oranges, other citrus fruit, and red bell peppers). For the remainder of the phase, 22 d, the subjects were required to follow the LCD, which had all of the restrictions of the LBD but also eliminated additional foods that were high in other carotenoids, such as red tomato products, orange carrots, and mangoes. Alcohol consumption was also restricted (2 standard drinks/d for men and 1/d for women) 2 d before beginning each phase and during the active treatment periods. Compliance was monitored by providing subjects with forms to record fruit and vegetable intake, which were collected weekly and reviewed. The controlled vitamin A diet was followed after completion of the third phase of the study in order to estimate total body stores (TBSs) of vitamin A using 13C-RID as described below. This diet had all of the restrictions of the LCD as well as limitations on liver and fortified cereals, which contain preformed vitamin A, as recommended for individual vitamin A status assessment (20, 21).
Maize and muffins
High-BCX experimental maize varieties were conventionally bred at the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center in Mexico as part of its HarvestPlus maize provitamin A biofortification project (22). For this study, maize was grown during the spring-summer cycle in 2015. Ears were harvested, dried, shelled, and stored at −20°C until being shipped to the University of Wisconsin–Madison. Biofortified and white maize kernels and flours were stored at −30°C for the duration of the study. Kernels (10–12% moisture) were ground by a Meadows 8-inch stone-burr mill in Lone Rock, Wisconsin. Mill stones were set 1.6 mm apart. All ground material was manually sifted through a 1.7-mm sieve. All material that passed through this sieve was considered “whole-grain” flour. For refined maize, ground maize was passed through a 0.6-mm sieve; all material that passed through this sieve was considered “refined” flour. RWM flour was also sifted by using a 0.6-mm sieve. Triplicate samples of the ROM, WGOM, and RWM flours were analyzed for carotenoid content before each treatment phase to monitor retention during storage.
WGOM and ROM recipes were developed to contain 250 μg BCX/muffin after baking for a total consumption of 500 μg/d from 2 muffins. Recipes for each food item were identical for different treatments, except for the maize flour type. The white maize recipe included yellow food coloring to match the appearance of orange maize muffins for blinding purposes. Recipes were standardized to ensure consistency by ingredient weight measured with a digital scale (American Weigh Scales LB-3000). Estimated macronutrient content was calculated by using the USDA Food Composition Database (Table 2). Muffins were made ≤3 d before consumption (except in one case of a participant who left town for >3 d who carried the muffins with her). Muffins were frozen at −30°C until the night before use, at which time they were moved to a refrigerator. In the morning, muffins were placed in a low-temperature oven (120°C) for 10–20 min. Treatment compliance was monitored by muffin weight consumed each day. Muffins were weighed after reheating, before dispensing to subjects, and then any remaining crumbs were weighed after consumption and subtracted from the total.
TABLE 2.
Estimated macronutrient and carotenoid intakes from 2 muffins as daily treatments in a randomized crossover study in young adults
| Maize | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Whole-grain orange | Refined orange | Refined white | |
| Energy,1 kcal | 810 | 800 | 800 |
| Carbohydrate, g | 132 | 135 | 135 |
| Protein, g | 14 | 13 | 13 |
| Fat, g | 252 | 23 | 23 |
| β-Cryptoxanthin,3 μg | 500 ± 184 | 500 ± 31 | 10 ± 2.0 |
| β-Carotene, μg | 380 ± 30 | 320 ± 16 | 13 ± 2.3 |
| Zeaxanthin, μg | 870 ± 149 | 780 ± 146 | 13 ± 2.2 |
| Lutein, μg | 230 ± 37 | 200 ± 37 | 12 ± 3.2 |
Energy and macronutrient content was estimated from the USDA Food-Composition Database.
Whole-grain milling retains most of the germ where the oil is contained.
Carotenoid profiles were determined by HPLC. Two muffins were equalized to deliver 500 μg β-cryptoxanthin/d.
Mean ± SD (all such values).
Muffin carotenoid analysis
WGOM flour was mixed with RWM flour so that the BCX concentration would match that of the ROM muffins after baking. All maize and muffins were analyzed with the same HPLC procedure (23). Ethanol (6 mL with 0.1% butylated hydroxytoluene) was added to a 0.5-g sample, mixed with a vortex for 20 s, and heated at 85°C for 5 min. Samples were saponified with 500 μL 80:20 KOH:H2O (weight:volume) at 85°C for 10 min with periodic mixing. Samples were placed in ice, and 3 mL cold deionized water was added along with 200 μL β-apo-8′-carotenal (Sigma-Aldrich) in methanol to calculate extraction efficiency. Carotenoids were extracted 3 times with 3 mL hexane. Extracts were combined, dried under nitrogen, redissolved in 500 μL 50:50 (volume:volume) dichloroethane:methanol; and 50 μL was injected into the HPLC (23) with a modified gradient. The 52-min linear gradient was run at 1 mL/min starting with 70% solvent A and transitioning to 44% A over 26 min. The flow then transitioned to 20% solvent A over 4 min and held for 10 min. The gradient was reversed in 2 min to 70% solvent A and re-equilibrated for 10 min. All of the sample analyses were performed under gold fluorescent lights to prevent photo-oxidation and isomerization of the carotenoids.
Serum carotenoid analysis
Serum aliquots were stored for ≤3 mo before analysis. To 200 μL serum, 100 μL β-apo-8′-carotenal dissolved in methanol as an internal standard was added along with 300 μL ethanol (0.1% butylated hydroxytoluene) to denature proteins. Samples were mixed by vortex for 30 s, and carotenoids were extracted 3 times with 500 μL hexane. The hexane layers were pooled, dried under nitrogen, and redissolved in 100 μL 50:50 (volume:volume) dichloroethane:methanol; and 50 μL was injected into the HPLC system (23). All samples from the same individual for each treatment were analyzed in the same day. Serum concentrations were calculated from standard curves generated for each carotenoid using HPLC-purified standards and the specific extinction coefficients (2592 for BC, 2800 for α-carotene, 2550 for lutein, 2386 for BCX, 2348 for zeaxanthin, 3450 for lycopene, and 1845 for retinol) at 450 and 325 nm for the carotenoids and retinol, respectively (24, 25). The extraction efficiencies ranged from 85% to 105%. Interassay CVs for BCX and zeaxanthin were 3.4% and 11%, respectively, with the use of aliquots of stock serum analyzed several times throughout the HPLC analyses.
TBSs and liver concentrations of retinol
The subjects’ vitamin A statuses were determined by using the 13C-RID test and estimating TBSs and total liver reserves (TLRs) with the equations described below at the end of the study. Analysis with gas chromatography/combustion/isotope-ratio mass spectrometry (GCCIRMS) allows sensitive assays of the abundance of 13C in serum retinol (26). After a baseline blood draw (which was the day-19 sample in the third phase of the muffin study), 2.0 μmol [14,15]13C2-retinyl acetate dissolved in soybean oil was delivered orally to each participant using a positive-displacement pipette and immediately followed by a high-fat–containing snack to facilitate absorption. After a 14-d mixing period, during which subjects consumed the controlled vitamin A diet, a second and final blood sample was taken. Serum retinol was purified by HPLC, and 13C:total C of serum retinol was determined by GCCIRMS (2).
In order to use the 13C-RID test in conjunction with the mass balance equation (20), the tracer-to-tracee ratio (TTR) must be determined with the use of the following calculation derived by Cobelli et al. (27) [with noted changes in abreviations adopted when using the 13C-RID test (20)]:
![]() |
(1) |
where a(t) (Fc) is the 13C-abundance of serum retinol 14 d postdose, aN (Fb) is the baseline natural 13C-abundance in serum retinol, and aI (Fa) is 13C-abundance in the retinol dose (the number of labeled 13C atoms plus natural abundance in the remaining carbon atoms, which was experimentally determined to be 0.11).
Biological factors and assumptions relating to the 13C-RID test are built into the mass balance equation as coefficients (20). Fb (natural abundance) was measured directly for each subject at day 0 or estimated by using the group mean, as was used in Thai (28) and Ghanaian (29) children to minimize the number of blood draws required. The parameter Fc was directly measured by GCCIRMS at day 14. With the use of Equation 1 above, the TTR for each individual was calculated from the directly measured day-14 postdose 13C-abundance measurement as Fc and either their own predose abundance or the mean of all 9 subjects’ predose measurements as Fb. The TTR was also calculated from Fc and all baseline measures of natural abundance during the muffin feeding (n = 9/subject) to determine variation. TBSs (micromoles) were calculated as previously described (20) with the use of the mass balance equation, as follows:
![]() |
(2) |
where a is the dose of 13C2-retinyl acetate in micromoles. The following assumptions were used: 90% dose absorption, equal serum and liver 13C enrichment before dosing and after the mixing period because subjects were fasting and maintained on a low–vitamin A diet (20, 21), and correction for dose catabolism according to a half-life of 140 d (20).
TLRs (micromoles per gram) were then calculated from TBSs using the following formula:
![]() |
(3) |
where BW is body weight (kilograms), liver fraction of BW was estimated as 2.4% in healthy adults, and 80% of TBSs was assumed to be in the liver storage pool in adults with adequate vitamin A status (20).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed with SAS software (version 9.4; SAS Institute). The serum concentrations of each carotenoid of interest were corrected by subtracting the baseline concentration from the post-treatment value and then determining the increase or decrease at each time point and plotted against time. The AUCs for days 0–19 (AUC0–19d) were calculated for all carotenoids by trapezoidal approximation as in previous studies (18, 19). Initially, a mixed-effects PROC MIXED model included a random effect of BMI and fixed-effects terms for treatment sequence, sex, type of muffin, and the interaction between sequence and treatment. Finally, nonsignificant variables were removed from the model to contain only sequence, treatment, and their interaction. Least-square means with the Tukey-Kramer method were used to make multiple group comparisons. A piecewise regression was used to evaluate whether a plateau occurred in serum carotenoid response.
For natural 13C-abundance, subject values at each time were compared by 1-factor ANOVA. The effect of time, treatment, and time-by-treatment with randomization for treatment sequence and subject was determined on the entire set of natural 13C-abundance values, expressed as atom percent (At%), by repeated-measures ANOVA, and compared by the Tukey-Kramer method. Mean and individual baseline TLR values were compared by 1-sample Student's t test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Significance was defined as P ≤ 0.05 for all statistical evaluations.
RESULTS
Subject baseline characteristics and compliance
Baseline serum carotenoid concentrations, vitamin A status, anthropometric characteristics, and a lipid panel were collected (Table 1). Two subjects, 1 man and 1 woman, had total cholesterol concentrations >2000 mg/L. One woman left the study due to time constraints after completion of the first phase; her data are not included. In general, compliance with the LCD was high, with no major deviations noted in daily food records or evident from serum analysis for the xanthophyll carotenoids. All of the subjects consumed >95% of the muffins during all treatments, except for one subject who consumed 89% of the WGOM treatment. Overall, treatment intakes were ≥98% for the 3 respective treatment groups.
Muffin carotenoid concentrations
The BCX retention after baking from the milled maize was ≥90% (30), which is higher than or similar to the BCX retention of other provitamin A–biofortified maize varieties and cooking methods (31, 32). Muffin BCX and α-carotene concentrations remained stable throughout the study. BC, zeaxanthin, and lutein concentrations decreased by ∼30% from the beginning of the study to the third phase, which is evident in the variation in the concentrations (Table 2).
Serum carotenoid concentrations and AUC analyses
The AUCs0–19d for all carotenoids quantified were determined in μmol ⋅ L−1 ⋅ d (Table 3). The increase in serum BCX from baseline (0.11 ± 0.07 μmol/L) to day 12 (0.26 ± 0.08 μmol/L) was 131% for the WGOM treatment (P < 0.0001) and 108% during the ROM treatment (0.14 ± 0.05 to 0.29 ± 0.12 μmol/L) (P = 0.003). The absolute day-12 serum BCX concentrations did not differ between WGOM (0.26 ± 0.08 μmol/L) and ROM (0.29 ± 0.12 μmol/L) muffin groups (P = 0.5). Serum BCX concentration during the RWM treatment, which was essentially devoid of BCX, did not substantially change from baseline (0.14 ± 0.07 μmol/L) to day 12 (0.10 ± 0.05 μmol/L) (P = 0.16). The BCX AUC0–19d for the WGOM and ROM treatments did not differ (Figure 3A). WGOM and ROM treatment AUCs were significantly higher than that for the RWM negative control (P < 0.003). Sequence and treatment-by-sequence interaction did not affect the BCX AUC0–19d (P = 0.34 and 0.41, respectively). Piecewise regression fit to both total WGOM and ROM treatment groups indicated that BCX concentrations had not reached a plateau stage in either treatment, indicating that a steady state had not yet occurred with an intake of 500 μg/d for 12 d.
TABLE 3.
Serum carotenoid AUC0–19d (determined by trapezoidal approximation) corrected for baseline concentrations at time 0 for each treatment arm1
| AUC0–19d, μmol ⋅ L−1 ⋅ d | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| WGOM | ROM | RWM | |
| β-Cryptoxanthin2 | 1.70 ± 0.63a | 1.66 ± 1.08a | −0.06 ± 0.13b |
| Zeaxanthin2 | 0.94 ± 0.33a | 0.96 ± 0.47a | 0.05 ± 0.12b |
| β-Carotene | −0.09 ± 0.08 | −0.06 ± 0.17 | −0.05 ± 0.09 |
| ɑ-Carotene | −0.02 ± 0.13 | −0.03 ± 0.05 | 0.01 ± 0.16 |
| Lutein | 0.04 ± 0.17 | 0.08 ± 0.17 | −0.04 ± 0.04 |
| Lycopene | −0.06 ± 0.11 | 0.08 ± 0.35 | −0.05 ± 0.03 |
Values are means ± SDs. All subjects completed each treatment; n = 9 (4 women, 5 men). Treatments were as follows: WGOM (500 μg BCX/d), ROM (500 μg BCX/d), or RWM (10 μg BCX/d) muffins, which were consumed for 12 d followed by 7 d of withdrawal. AUC0–19d, AUCs for days 0–19; BCX, β-cryptoxanthin; ROM, refined orange maize; RWM, refined white maize; WGOM, whole-grain orange maize.
Values in rows with different superscript letters are significantly different (least-square means test with the Tukey-Kramer method, P < 0.003).
FIGURE 3.

Serum β-cryptoxanthin (A) and zeaxanthin (B) concentrations after correction for baseline concentration in 9 adults who consumed WGOM muffins (500 μg β-cryptoxanthin and 870 μg zeaxanthin/d; ⬤), ROM muffins (500 μg β-cryptoxanthin and 780 μg zeaxanthin/d; ▴), or RWM muffins (negative control, ∼0 μg/d; ▪) for 12 d followed by a 7-d treatment withdrawal. Values are means ± SDs. All of the subjects completed the 3 treatments. AUC analyses with the use of trapezoidal approximation showed that the effects of the orange maize treatments were significantly different from those in the negative control group (P < 0.003 for both; least-square means test with the Tukey-Kramer method). (Note: the concentration scales are different for each carotenoid.) ROM, refined orange maize treatment; RWM, refined white maize treatment; WGOM, whole-grain orange maize treatment.
The AUC0–19d for zeaxanthin followed a similar response to that of BCX (Figure 3B), but concentration changes were smaller in magnitude. Similar to BCX, zeaxanthin WGOM and ROM treatment AUCs were significantly higher than that for the RWM negative control (P < 0.003). The baseline to day 12 increases in serum zeaxanthin concentrations in the WGOM and ROM treatments were 178% (P < 0.001) and 176% (P = 0.001), respectively, and there was a decrease of 15% for the RWM negative control. The absolute day-12 serum zeaxanthin concentration did not differ between WGOM (0.10 ± 0.03 μmol/L) and ROM (0.12 ± 0.06 μmol/L) treatment groups (P = 0.28). Piecewise regression for zeaxanthin concentrations showed that treatment with WGOM muffins reached a steady-state plateau by day 9. The piecewise regression was significant (P < 0.001), but it did not appear to explain more variation than a linear regression. A steady state for zeaxanthin did not yet occur for ROM treatment by day 12, meaning that a higher concentration may have occurred with longer feeding.
Serum BC decreased by 0.1 μmol/L in all 3 treatment groups by 6 d, resulting in negative BC AUCs0–19d (Table 3). Lutein concentrations remained relatively stable during the treatment phases. Although AUCs0–19d were positive for both WGOM and ROM treatments and negative for the RWM treatment (Table 3), the difference between lutein responses was not significant. Serum lycopene and α-carotene concentrations were used to measure compliance with the LCD because neither carotenoid is found in significant amounts in current varieties of biofortified maize. Lycopene concentrations decreased by 0.05 to 0.1 μmol/L in 6 d and did not differ by sequence or muffin type. The AUC0–19d for lycopene was positive for the ROM group, but not different from the WGOM and RWM AUCs0–19d (P ≤ 0.32) (Table 3). The BCX AUC0–19d was 22.5 times larger than that of the lycopene response from ROM. The positive lycopene AUC0–19d is largely explained by one subject's high value during the ROM treatment arm, likely caused by reported ketchup consumption. Even clearer evidence of diet compliance was the continued decreases in α-carotene during the study treatments. Serum α-carotene consistently decreased during each treatment, with the largest decrease of 0.05 μmol/L by 6 d, which was not surprising considering that the muffins contained <0.4 μg α-carotene/100 g. The α-carotene AUCs0–19d were close to zero for all treatments (Table 3).
Serum retinol, TBSs, and liver retinol concentrations
Serum retinol concentrations were not affected by any treatment (P > 0.05) but were higher during the second arm of the study (2.46 ± 0.43 μmol/L) compared with arm 1 (2.17 ± 0.44 μmol/L; P = 0.001) and arm 3 (2.27 ± 0.36 μmol/L; P = 0.04). Mean individual serum retinol concentrations (2.32 ± 0.41 μmol/L; n = 9 measurements/subject) measured during the analysis of natural 13C-abundance varied during the 4-mo study, with a mean CV of 17% (Table 4), although no values were <0.7 μmol/L [cutoff for deficiency (33)]. Serum retinol concentrations did not correlate with serum BCX concentrations throughout the study (P = 0.58). The TBSs of these adults were 954 ± 560 μmol (using the blood draw at day 19 after arm 3 as baseline and 14-d postdose values in Equation 2). Estimated TLRs based on a liver weight of 2.4% of body weight were 0.42 ± 0.22 μmol/g, which is considered optimal (33). One subject had a TBS of 2150 μmol (125% higher than the mean) with an estimated TLR of 0.74 μmol/g, which is considered high (33). In consultation with this subject after determining this value, he consumed whole milk and multiple eggs on a daily basis, both excellent sources of preformed retinyl esters.
TABLE 4.
Serum retinol, TBSs, and TLRs calculated by using each of 9 baseline natural abundance measurements (Fb in the mass balance equation for retinol isotope dilution) for subjects enrolled in a biofortified maize intervention study1
| Serum retinol | TBSs | TLRs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | μmol/L | CV, % | μmol | CV, % | μmol/g | CV, % |
| 1 | 2.19 ± 0.48 | 22 | 951 ± 20 | 2.12 | 0.423 ± 0.009 | 2.12 |
| 2 | 2.28 ± 0.39 | 17 | 743 ± 9 | 1.2 | 0.303 ± 0.004 | 1.2 |
| 3 | 2.70 ± 0.26 | 9.7 | 2190 ± 120 | 5.3 | 0.753 ± 0.040 | 5.3 |
| 4 | 2.10 ± 0.34 | 17 | 508 ± 7 | 1.4 | 0.266 ± 0.004 | 1.4 |
| 5 | 2.13 ± 0.61 | 29 | 1050 ± 10 | 1.3 | 0.417 ± 0.006 | 1.3 |
| 6 | 2.57 ± 0.44 | 17 | 1130 ± 30 | 2.9 | 0.591 ± 0.017 | 2.9 |
| 7 | 2.27 ± 0.28 | 12 | 1270 ± 40 | 3.5 | 0.690 ± 0.024 | 3.5 |
| 8 | 2.10 ± 0.39 | 18 | 397 ± 3 | 0.71 | 0.177 ± 0.001 | 0.71 |
| 9 | 2.59 ± 0.34 | 13 | 363 ± 11 | 3.0 | 0.144 ± 0.004 | 3.0 |
| Mean | 2.32 ± 0.413 | 17 ± 5.6 | 956 ± 443 | 2.4 ± 1.5 | 0.418 ± 0.0173 | 2.4 ± 1.5 |
Values are means ± SDs unless otherwise indicated; n = 9. TBS, total body store; TLR, total liver reserve.
CVs are the same because TLRs were estimated from TBSs.
Values are means of means ± mean SDs (square root of mean variance =
).
13C-Abundance in subjects before, during, and after treatment
The amount of retinol activity equivalents ingested during the WGOM or ROM muffin treatments was 2.2 μmol, estimated by using the Institute of Medicine's conversion factors for a mixed diet of 24 μg BCX or 12 μg BC equivalent to 1 μg of retinol (34). This amount is 0.23% of the mean TBS (954 μmol) in these young adults.
The mean 13C-abundances of the entire group composed of 9 subjects (3 subjects undergoing each of 3 treatments at any time point during the study) were not different from each other (mean At% = 1.0764 ± 0.0005; P = 0.83) (Figure 4A). Time (P = 0.62) and treatment (P = 0.18) did not affect 13C-abundance, but the treatment-by-time interaction approached significance (P = 0.09) (Figure 4B). However, comparison of individual subject mean 13C-abundance values from all time points (days 0, 12, and 19 from each of the 3 treatments) showed that individual subjects had significantly different 13C-natural abundance (P = 0.0002) despite having the same total amount of additional maize-derived provitamin A carotenoid added to their low–provitamin A regimens over all 3 treatment periods (Figure 4C). The significant finding of the variation among individual natural abundance values (Figure 4C) and the nonsignificant finding when using the group as a whole (Figure 4A) underscores the importance of determining natural abundance measurements for individual vitamin A status assessment for either the individuals themselves or a carefully selected representative sample of the cohort being evaluated (28, 29). This finding allows latitude when assessing the vitamin A status of population groups for evaluation purposes.
FIGURE 4.

13C-Natural abundance determined by gas chromatography-combustion-isotope ratio mass spectrometry in serum retinol expressed as At% by time (A), treatment-by-time (B), and subject (C). Values are means ± SDs. (D) TLRs of subjects calculated by using mean (white bars) or individual (black bars) baseline serum retinol 13C-natural abundance. TLRs calculated by using the mean baseline are shown as means ± SDs. Mean-derived and individual-baseline TLRs did not differ between subjects (1-sample t test, Bonferroni corrected P < 0.05). Values with different lowercase letters are significantly different by the Tukey-Kramer method (P < 0.05) after ANOVA. At%, atom percent of 13C in total carbon; d, day; TLR, total liver vitamin A reserve; Trt, treatment.
Calculated TLRs of retinol from individual or mean baseline values
TLRs determined by the individual's TTR were considered to be the hypothetical true value, and each true value was compared with the TLRs calculated from the mean Fb TTR. None of the mean-baseline TLR values differed from the individual-baseline TLR values (Bonferroni-corrected P > 0.05), and the difference between the 2 was not different from zero (−0.01 ± 0.03; P = 0.1) (Figure 4D), further supporting the use of a nonintervention group for evaluation studies. Finally, TLRs were calculated by using the 9 measures of the individual's 13C-natural abundance as Fbs with the postdose Fc, and the mean CV was 2.4% ± 1.5% (Table 4). The difference between the standard protocol (20) mean TBS value (calculated by using a baseline at time of dose; 954 μmol; Table 1) and that of all 9 baseline values (956 μmol; Table 4) was only 2 μmol (P = 0.93).
DISCUSSION
Muffins made from whole-grain and refined high-BCX maize significantly increased serum BCX concentrations. Maize milling did not affect responses, which confirms findings in animals (8) and in vitro models (35). Other health benefits associated with consuming whole grains include minerals (8), fiber, vitamins, and phytochemicals that are removed by milling. BCX was highly bioavailable from both flours, which is favorable for future products formulated with biofortified orange maize targeted to improve vitamin A status. This experimental variety of BCX maize was selectively bred for enhanced BCX, in part due to better stability of BCX during storage and processing (32, 36) and higher bioavailability in animals (11, 37) and humans (13, 38). High-BC varieties are currently being bred at a faster pace than BCX, but large genetic diversity exists for BCX in maize, which makes the breeding strategy feasible (39). Future product considerations should include high-BCX varieties, not only to improve vitamin A status but also for the other beneficial health effects associated with BCX (e.g., cancer prevention, bone health) (40).
Previous carrot muffin studies found carryover effects when feeding lutein from yellow carrots (19), α- and BC from orange carrots (41), and lycopene from red carrots (18) because subjects transitioned directly to the next treatment. BCX-response curves showed a continuous increase during 12 d of feeding that did not return to baseline by day 19, 7 d after the treatment. The washout period was based on previous experience (19) and the fact that less BCX (500 μg/d) than lutein (1.7 mg/d) was consumed. Nonetheless, baseline BCX concentrations were not different because subjects were allowed to resume their regular eating patterns for 2 wk in between treatments; thus, carryover effects did not occur and muffin sequence did not affect outcomes.
Although the mean lutein AUCs0–19d for both orange maize treatments were positive and the RWM group was negative, interindividual variations resulted in no overall difference. In contrast, significant treatment effects were obtained with lutein-containing yellow carrots (19), which had 8.5 times more lutein than the ∼200 μg/d from the muffins in this study, which maintained baseline concentrations. This lutein amount is similar to that found in supplements, such as Centrum Silver multivitamin for adults at 250 μg/tablet (http://www.centrum.com/).
Zeaxanthin is concentrated in the macula of the eye and may protect humans against macular degeneration (42). Zeaxanthin is not common in many foods, with the exception of yellow and orange maize, egg yolks, persimmons, and some leafy greens (43). Zeaxanthin intake from BCX-biofortified maize increased serum concentrations, confirming its use as a biomarker of prolonged biofortified maize intake (16). Including orange maize in maize-based foods could increase zeaxanthin consumption. Two hydroxylases, P450 cytochrome 97A and hydroxylase B, hydroxylate β-ionone rings leading to loss of provitamin A activity (44). When selecting for BCX, increased β-ring hydroxylase activity causes flux toward zeaxanthin and zeinoxanthin, resulting in a positive correlation between BCX and zeaxanthin (45). This high-BCX maize (5.0 μg/g) had nearly double the amount of zeaxanthin (8.8 μg/g), but the zeaxanthin response was relatively half that of BCX, confirming superior BCX bioavailability in humans (13).
Serum BC concentrations decreased and did not differ between groups. The amount of BC ingested from the orange maize muffins was ∼350 μg/d. Most of the absorbed BC was likely converted to meet daily retinol needs due to the long-term restricted dietary requirements. Subjects were not allowed to consume multivitamins, although they could consume dairy products, which are sources of preformed vitamin A. We assessed vitamin A status by using 13C-RID in case we had a nonresponder phenotype among them, which could partially be explained by low TBSs. Although we had one subject with high TBSs confirmed with previous diet history, the mean TLR of the group was optimal, and all subjects responded to the BCX treatments.
The difference between baseline subject 13C-natural abundance Fb values was not surprising because retinol stores build up over time from combinations of C3 and C4 foods, supplements, fortificants, and other biological factors. The lowest At% value was from a vegetarian who likely sourced most of her vitamin A from C3 plants. Shifts in natural abundance due to changes in the proportion of C3 and C4 foods consumed over longer periods support the application of using these measurements for program effectiveness in populations targeted to consume biofortified C4 plants (16, 46) or adherence to increased C3 vegetable intake regimens (17). Communities tend to consume similar foods with unique natural enrichments of 13C (2, 16).
Determining either individual or representative baseline values in evaluation studies is important. To show the extremes, Fb values from gerbils fed exclusively orange maize (C4) or carrots (C3) for 62 d resulted in different At% values (i.e., 1.083% and 1.071%, respectively) (15). When applying these extreme Fb values, the adjusted mean TLRs would be estimated as 1.8 ± 3.4 μmol/g and 0.32 ± 0.14 μmol/g, respectively. The value from C3Fb is similar to the actual value (i.e., 0.42 ± 0.22 μmol/g), but that from C4Fb reclassifies the group from having optimal vitamin A status to hypervitaminotic TLRs. Thus, the use of a single constant natural abundance is not appropriate in studies using 13C-RID tests and should be measured in a nonintervened, nondosed, or predose group from the same community. The lack of change in mean baseline Fbs over several months provides evidence that it may be appropriate to take a baseline blood sample at a reasonable time before a study. An expert recommendation is that in countries implementing high-dose vitamin A supplements (47), vitamin A assessment should occur in children ≤10 y (48). Having a simplified retinol isotope dilution procedure to monitor population subgroups is important when >1 intervention is occurring at the same time (49).
The lack of effect on 13C-natural abundance could be due to the generally high vitamin A status of the subjects. During 12 d of either WGOM or ROM feeding, the subjects consumed ∼2 μmol retinol activity equivalents. Despite enrichment of maize for 13C at an At% of 1.093 (17), the serum 13C-abundance did not change significantly when diluting this amount into TBSs of 370–2150 μmol. Recent studies reported significant natural abundance differences between gerbils when tested after 2 mo of being fed very diverse feeds (15) and between Zambian children fed either biofortified orange or white maize for 6 d/wk for a total of 42 d (16). These data indicate that natural abundance will vary with longer dietary modification, highlighting the need to determine Fb in intervention and effectiveness studies.
The clinical relevance of the 13C-RID findings was the applicability of the mean baseline as a good estimation of natural abundance in all subjects. This suggests that it is possible to limit the blood draws required in a population evaluation (for preintervention TLR calculations only). The subject with the highest TBSs showed a much larger difference between mean- and individual-baseline TLRs. If that subject's baseline is removed from the mean to provide a less-biased value, the difference between that subject's 2 TLRs becomes significant, indicating the need for further research in individuals with high or hypervitaminotic TLRs. Overall, these data suggest that the complexity and cost of retinol isotope dilution in the field and laboratory could be reduced by decreasing the stringency of the time requirements for predose baseline blood draws, and by limiting the number of draws by forming a mean baseline rather than taking an individual day 0 draw. The increased accessible field-friendliness of this technique follows the recommendations laid out for the future of the vitamin A–labeled isotope dilution (termed VALID) test (50).
One limitation of this research is that a BCX oil-based supplement in a placebo muffin, such as that used in the lutein carrot study (19), was not included. However, BCX supplements are not currently commercially available and analytical standards are cost-prohibitive. We would have needed ∼100 mg purified BCX for inclusion as a positive control. Although BCX is a vitamin A precursor, BCX and zeaxanthin likely have additional health benefits. BCX is linked to bone health (40) and zeaxanthin to eye health (42). Future long-term interventions with biofortified maize or BCX and zeaxanthin supplements should measure markers of bone and eye health.
Acknowledgements
We thank Melissa Kaczmarczyk for the helpful conversations in determining a mutually beneficial project, Michael Grahn for assistance in analyzing the 13C measurements, and Stephanie Mondloch for assisting with the institutional review board application process and on blood draw days. We thank Peter Crump for statistical consultation. We also thank Diane Krueger and Ellen Siglinsky at the Osteoporosis Clinical Research Program, School of Medicine and Public Health, for drawing the blood samples.
The authors’ responsibilities were as follows—TJT: was the dietitian in the monitoring and analysis of dietary compliance; JS: performed GCCIRMS 13C analysis on the serum samples; TJT, JS, and SAT: wrote the first draft of the manuscript; MS: assisted with all human subject procedures and was responsible for maize milling; TJT: analyzed samples for carotenoids under the guidance of CRD; BMG: trained TJT and MS in orchestration of the human feeding trial and assisted in finalizing the maize-milling methods; CRD: managed the laboratory and developed HPLC analyses with TJT; NP-R: grew the grain and oversaw its production at the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT); SAT: designed the study as principal investigator, discussed the protocol with the collaborators, ushered the protocol through the ethics committee, and is the guarantor of the study; and all authors: read and approved the final manuscript. The authors did not declare any conflicts of interest.
Notes
The analytical aspects of this work were presented at Experimental Biology 2017.
Supported by PepsiCo, Inc.; HarvestPlus breeding contract 5404, which was partially funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (no. OPP27510); and Global Health Funds at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. HarvestPlus (www.harvestplus.org) is a global alliance of agriculture and nutrition research institutions working to increase the micronutrient density of staple food crops through biofortification. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of PepsiCo, Inc., or of HarvestPlus. None of the organizations involved in supporting this work had a role in the analysis or interpretation of the data.
TJT and JS are joint first authors.
Abbreviations used:
- At%
atom percent of 13C in total carbon
- BC
β-carotene
- BCX
β-cryptoxanthin
- 13C-RID
13C-retinol isotope dilution
- GCCIRMS
gas chromatography/combustion/isotope-ratio mass spectrometry
- LBD
low-β-cryptoxanthin diet
- LCD
low-carotenoid diet
- ROM
refined orange maize
- RWM
refined white maize
- TBS
total body store
- TLR
total liver reserve
- TTR
tracer to tracee ratio
- WGOM
whole-grain orange maize
REFERENCES
- 1.WHO. Global prevalence of vitamin A deficiency in populations at risk 1995–2005: WHO global database on vitamin A deficiency. 2009. [cited 2017 Feb 7]. Available from: http://apps.who.int//iris/handle/10665/44110. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gannon BM, Kaliwile C, Arscott SA, Schmaelzle ST, Chileshe J, Kalungwana N, Mosonda M, Pixley KV, Masi C, Tanumihardjo SA. Biofortified orange maize is as efficacious as a vitamin A supplement in Zambian children even in the presence of high liver reserves of vitamin A: a community-based, randomized placebo-controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2014;100:1541–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Palmer AC, Siamusantu W, Chileshe J, Schulze KJ, Barffour M, Craft NE, Molobeka N, Kalungwana N, Arguello MA, Mitra Met al.. Provitamin A-biofortified maize increases serum β-carotene, but not retinol, in marginally nourished children: a cluster-randomized trial in rural Zambia. Am J Clin Nutr 2016;104:181–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.van Jaarsveld PJ, Faber M, Tanumihardjo SA, Nestel P, Lombard CJ, Benadé AJS. β-Carotene-rich orange-fleshed sweet potato improves the vitamin A status of primary school children assessed with the modified-relative-dose-response test. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;81:1080–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Talsma EF, Brouwer ID, Verhoef H, Mbera GNK, Mwangi AM, Maziya-Dixon B, Boy E, Zimmermann MB, Melse-Boonstra A. Biofortified yellow cassava and vitamin A status of Kenyan children: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2016;103:258–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zamora G, De-Regil LM. Equity in access to fortified maize flour and corn meal. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2014;1312:40–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Suri DJ, Tanumihardjo SA. Effects of different processing methods on the micronutrient and phytochemical contents of maize: from A to Z. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2016;15:912–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gannon BM, Pixley KV, Tanumihardjo SA. Maize milling method affects growth and zinc status but not provitamin A carotenoid bioefficacy in male Mongolian gerbils. J Nutr 2017;147:337–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lozano-Alejo N, Carrillo GV, Pixley KV, Palacios-Rojas N. Physical properties and carotenoid content of maize kernels and its nixtamalized snacks. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 2007;8:385–9. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nuss E, Tanumihardjo SA. Maize: a paramount staple crop in the context of global nutrition. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2010;9:417–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Davis CR, Jing H, Howe JA, Rocheford T, Tanumihardjo SA. β-Cryptoxanthin from supplements or carotenoid-enhanced maize maintains liver vitamin A in Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus) better than or equal to β-carotene supplements. Br J Nutr 2008;100:786–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Heying EK, Tanumihardjo JP, Vasic V, Cook ME, Palacios-Rojas N, Tanumihardjo SA. Biofortified orange maize enhances β-cryptoxanthin concentrations in egg yolks of laying hens better than tangerine peel fortificant. J Agric Food Chem 2014;62:11892–900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Burri BJ, Chang JST, Neidlinger TR. β-Cryptoxanthin- and α-carotene-rich foods have greater apparent bioavailability than β-carotene-rich foods in Western diets. Br J Nutr 2011;105:212–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.O'Leary MH. Carbon isotopes in photosynthesis. BioScience 1988;38:328–36. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gannon BM, Pungarcher I, Mourao L, Davis CR, Simon P, Pixley KV, Tanumihardjo SA. 13C natural abundance of serum retinol is a novel biomarker for evaluating provitamin A carotenoid-biofortified maize consumption in male Mongolian gerbils. J Nutr 2016;146:1290–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sheftel J, Gannon BM, Davis CR, Tanumihardjo SA. Provitamin A-biofortified maize consumption increases serum xanthophylls and 13C-natural abundance of retinol in Zambian children. Exp Biol Med 2017;242:1508–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Howe JA, Valentine AR, Hull AK, Tanumihardjo SA. 13C natural abundance in serum retinol acts as a biomarker for increases in dietary provitamin A. Exp Biol Med 2009;234:140–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Horvitz MA, Simon PW, Tanumihardjo SA. Lycopene and beta-carotene are bioavailable from lycopene “red” carrots in humans. Eur J Clin Nutr 2004;58:803–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Molldrem KL, Li J, Simon PW, Tanumihardjo SA. Lutein and β-carotene from lutein-containing yellow carrots are bioavailable in humans. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;80:131–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gannon BM, Tanumihardjo SA. Comparisons among equations used for retinol isotope dilution in the assessment of total body stores and total liver reserves. J Nutr 2015;145:847–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Green MH, Ford JL, Green JB. Retinol isotope dilution is applied during restriction of vitamin A intake to predict individual subject total body vitamin A stores at isotopic equilibrium. J Nutr 2016;146:2407–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pixley KV, Palacios-Rojas N, Babu R, Mutale R, Surles R, Simpungwe E. Biofortification of maize with provitamin A carotenoids. In: Tanumihardjo SA, editor. Carotenoids and human health. New York: Springer Science and Business Media; 2013. p. 271–92. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Howe JA, Tanumihardjo SA. Evaluation of analytical methods for carotenoid extraction from biofortified maize (Zea mays sp.). J Agric Food Chem 2006;54:7992–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.DeRitter E, Purcell AE. Carotenoid analytical methods. In: Bauerfeind JC, editor. Carotenoids as colorants and vitamin A precursors. Orlando (FL): Academic Press; 1984. p. 883. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cama HR, Collins FD, Morton RA. Spectroscopic properties of all-trans-vitamin A and vitamin A acetate: analysis of liver oils. Biochem J 1951;50:48–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tanumihardjo SA. Vitamin A status assessment in rats with 13C4-retinyl acetate and gas chromatography/combustion/isotope ratio mass spectrometry. J Nutr 2000;130:2844–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Cobelli C, Toffolo G, Foster DM. Tracer-to-tracee ratio for analysis of stable isotope tracer data: link with radioactive kinetic formalism. Am J Physiol 1992;262:E968–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pinkaew S, Wegmuller R, Wasantwisut E, Winichagoon P, Hurrell RF, Tanumihardjo SA. Triple-fortified rice containing vitamin A reduced marginal vitamin A deficiency and increased vitamin A liver stores in school-aged Thai children. J Nutr 2014;144:519–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Newton S, Owusu-Agyei S, Asante KP, Amoaful E, Mahama E, Tchum SK, Ali M, Adjei K, Davis CR, Tanumihardjo SA. Vitamin A status and body pool size of infants before and after consuming fortified home-based complementary foods. Arch Public Health 2016;74:10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sowa M, Yu J, Palacios-Rojas N, Goltz SR, Howe JA, Davis CR, Rocheford T, Tanumihardjo SA. Retention of carotenoids in biofortified maize flour and β-cryptoxanthin-enhanced eggs after household cooking. ACS Omega 2017;2:7320–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Pillay K, Siwela M, Derera J, Veldman FJ. Provitamin A carotenoids in biofortified maize and their retention during processing and preparation of South African maize foods. J Food Sci Technol 2014;51:634–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Rosales A, Agama-Acevedo E, Bello-Perez L, Gutiérrez-Dorado R, Palacios-Rojas N. Effect of traditional and extrusion nixtamalization on carotenoid retention in tortillas made from provitamin A-enriched maize (Zea mays L). J Agric Food Chem 2016;64:8289–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tanumihardjo SA, Russell RM, Stephenson CB, Gannon BM, Craft NE, Haskell MJ, Lietz G, Schulze KJ, Raiten DJ. Biomarkers of Nutrition for Development (BOND)—vitamin A review. J Nutr 2016;146(Suppl):1816S–48S. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Institute of Medicine Food and Nutrition Board . Vitamin A. In: Dietary Reference Intakes for vitamin A, vitamin K, arsenic, boron, chromium, copper, iodine, iron, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, silicon, vanadium, and zinc. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2001. p. 82–161. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kean EG, Hamaker BR, Ferruzzi MG. Carotenoid bioaccessibility from whole grain and degermed maize meal products. J Agric Food Chem 2008;56:9918–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Taleon V, Mugode L, Cabrera-Soto L, Palacios-Rojas N. Carotenoid retention of biofortified maize in different post-harvest storage and packaging methods. Food Chem 2017;232: 60–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.La Frano MR, Zhu C, Burri BJ. Assessment of tissue distribution and concentration of β-cryptoxanthin in response to varying amounts of dietary β-cryptoxanthin in the Mongolian gerbil. Br J Nutr 2014;111:968–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zhu C, Gertz ER, Cai Y, Burri BJ. Consumption of canned citrus fruit meals increases human plasma beta-cryptoxanthin concentration whereas lycopene and beta-carotene concentrations did not change in healthy adults. Nutr Res 2016;36:679–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Suwarno WB, Pixley KV, Palacios-Rojas N, Kaeppler SM, Babu R. Genome-wide association analysis reveals new targets for carotenoid biofortification in maize. Theor Appl Genet 2015;128:851–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Burri BJ, La Frano MR, Zhu C. Absorption, metabolism, and functions of β-cryptoxanthin. Nutr Rev 2016;74:69–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Tanumihardjo SA, Horvitz MA, Porter Dosti M, Simon PW. Serum α- and β-carotene concentrations qualitatively respond to sustained carrot feeding. Exp Biol Med 2009;234:1250–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Vishwanathan RJ, Johnson EJ. Lutein and zeaxanthin and eye disease. In: Tanumihardjo SA, editor. Carotenoids and human health. New York: Springer Science and Business Media; 2013. p. 215–35. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Holden JM, Eldridge AL, Beecher GR, Buzzard IM, Bhagwat S, Davis CS, Douglass LW, Gebhardt S, Haytowitz D, Schakel S. Carotenoid content of US foods: an update of the database. J Food Compos Anal 1999;12:169–96. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Quinlan RF, Shumskaya M, Bradbury LM, Beltrán J, Ma C, Kennelly EJ, Wurtzel ET. Synergistic interactions between carotene ring hydroxylases drive lutein formation in plant carotenoid biosynthesis. Plant Physiol 2012;160:204–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Muzhingi T, Palacios-Rojas N, Miranda A, Cabrera ML, Yeum K, Tang G. Genetic variation of carotenoids, vitamin E and phenolic compounds in provitamin A enriched maize. J Sci Food Agric 2016;97:793–801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Tanumihardjo SA, Ball AM, Kailwile C, Pixley KV. The research and implementation continuum of biofortified sweet potato and maize in Africa. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2017;1390:88–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.WHO . Guideline: vitamin A supplementation in infants and children 6–59 months of age. Geneva (Switzerland): WHO; 2011. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wirth JP, Petry N, Tanumihardjo SA, Rogers LM, McLean E, Greig A, Garrett GS, Klemm RDW, Rohner F. Vitamin A supplementation programs and country-level evidence of vitamin A deficiency. Nutrients 2017;9:190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Tanumihardjo SA. Vitamin A fortification efforts require accurate monitoring of population vitamin A status to prevent excessive intakes. Procedia Chem 2015;14:398–407. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Tanumihardjo SA, Kurpad AV, Hunt JR. Research recommendations for applying vitamin A-labelled isotope dilution techniques to improve human vitamin A nutrition. Int J Vitam Nutr Res 2014;84(Suppl 1):52–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



