Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2021 Sep 30;16(9):e0257804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257804

Magnitude and correlates of alcohol use disorder in south Gondar zone, northwest Ethiopia: A community based cross-sectional study

Getasew Legas 1,*, Sintayehu Asnakew 1, Amsalu Belete 1, Getnet Mihretie Beyene 1, Gashaw Mehiret Wubet 2, Wubet Alebachew Bayih 3, Ermias Sisay Chanie 3, Agimasie Tigabu 3, Tigabu Dessie 3
Editor: Markos Tesfaye4
PMCID: PMC8483395  PMID: 34591890

Abstract

Background

Alcohol use disorder is the major public health problem in low- and middle-income countries that account for up to 70% of alcohol related premature mortality in the region. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the magnitude of alcohol use disorder and its associated factors among adult residents in south Gondar zone, Northwest Ethiopia.

Methods

A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 848 adult residents of the south Gondar zone from January 13 to February 13, 2020. A multistage sampling technique was used to recruit study participants. We assessed alcohol use disorder (AUD) using the alcohol use disorder identification test (AUDIT). A binary logistic regression model was employed to identify factors associated with AUD.

Results

The prevalence of alcohol use disorder over the last 12-months was found to be 23.7% (95% CI: 20.9, 26.7). Being male (AOR = 4.34, 95 CI; 2.800, 6.743), poor social support (AOR = 1.95, 95 CI: 1.098, 3.495), social phobia (AOR = 1.69, 95 CI; 1.117, 2.582), perceived high level of stress (AOR = 2.85, 95 CI; 1.829, 34.469), current cigarette smoking (AOR = 3.06, 95 CI; 1.764, 5.307) and comorbid depression (AOR = 1.81, 95 CI; 1.184, 2.778) were significantly associated with alcohol use disorder.

Conclusion

The prevalence of alcohol use disorder is high among adult residents of the south Gondar zone and associated with many factors. So, it needs public health attention to decrease the magnitude of alcohol use disorder in Ethiopia.

Background

Alcohol use disorder is defined as a persistent pattern of alcohol use characterized by taking a large amount of alcohol drinking, unsuccessful effort to cut down, strong desire to use, increased amount of drinking to achieve the desired effect, and experience of withdrawal symptoms after reduction of drinking occurring within a 12-month period [1].

Alcohol is the most prevalent substance use disorder, up to 99.2 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) were attributed to alcohol use disorder [2]. Approximately more than 2 billion adults (48% of the adult population) use alcohol [3, 4]. Globally, 4% of the global burden of disease was contributed by alcohol consumption, which is equivalent to tobacco smoking, but alcohol is more contributes to premature death in young adults than tobacco smoking [5].

In recent years, high-income countries have increased their attention to alcohol-related harm by implementing governmental regulations to reduce alcohol consumption [6, 7]. It contributes to more than 200 alcohol-related preventable diseases. It was also responsible for 7.6% and 4% of alcohol-related deaths in men and women respectively [8, 9]. However, up to 70% of alcohol-related premature mortality occurs in low- and middle-income countries [10, 11].

In sub-Saharan Africa, alcohol consumption was higher than the global consumption rate (7.4% vs 6.2%) and the consumption rate was 42% higher than the global rate per adult drinker [12].

The magnitude of alcohol use disorder is different across the world. In the United States, approximately about 13.9% and 29.1% of persons aged 18 years and older suffer from 12-month and lifetime AUD respectively [13]. A study conducted in rural Brazil reported that 18.4% of subjects had AUD [14]. Another data in Brazil showed, almost half (50%) of participants had AUD [15]. A community-based study done in India showed that the magnitude of alcohol use disorder was 9.4% [16]. In Nepal, a number of researches were conducted in the general population and the magnitude of AUD ranged from 7.3% to 25.8% [1618].

In Africa, two studies were done in Uganda and Nigeria, the magnitude of alcohol use disorder was 9.8% and 39.5% respectively [19, 20]. A number of factors were found to affect alcohol use disorder. Different kinds of the literature showed that male sex, illiteracy, low level of education, perceived high level of stress, poor social support, stressful life events, cigarette smoking, comorbid depression, and social phobia were significantly associated with alcohol use disorder [2130].

In Ethiopia, the magnitude of alcohol use disorder in the general population ranges from 12.4% to 21% [3133]. So, assessing the magnitude of alcohol use disorder at the community level had a great significance to enforce the government and stakeholders to implement mental health services in primary health care settings to manage alcohol use disorder. So, this study is designed to determine the magnitude and factors associated with alcohol use disorder among adult residents of the south Gondar zone, northwest Ethiopia.

Methods and materials

Study settings and populations

A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from January 13 to February 13, 2020. The study was conducted in the South Gondar zone, northwest Ethiopia. South Gondar zone was divided into fifteen districts/woredas with an estimated population of 2,051,738. From those, 1,041,061 were men and 1,010,677 were women. Debre Tabor town is the capital city of the south Gondar zone. The town is 100 km far from Bahir Dar (the capital city of the Amhara region) and 667 km far from the capital city of Ethiopia. Currently, the south Gondar zone had one referral hospital, seven district hospitals, and 94 health centers but mental health service (outpatient and inpatient treatment) is delivered by only three governmental hospitals.

Study participants

The study was conducted among adult residents whose age was 18 years and above in the south Gondar zone, northwest Ethiopia. Individuals who were seriously ill and unable to communicate were excluded from the study. We determined the sample size by using the single population proportion formula assuming that 21% of adult residents in Ethiopia might have alcohol use disorder at 95% CI, 4% margin of error, and adding a 10% non-response rate. Considering of design effect of 2, the final sample size was 875.

Sampling

A multistage sampling technique was used to select 848 study participants. In a total of 15 districts/woredas, we selected three districts by simple random sampling technique. Then, we selected three sub-districts/kebeles in each of the selected districts of the south Gondar zone. In each of the selected sub-districts, we selected 875 households proportionally. In the case of more than one individual in a household, select one of them by lottery method. The number of households was obtained from health extension workers (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Schematic presentation of sampling procedure in adult residents of south Gondar zone, northwest Ethiopia, 2020.

Fig 1

n = 875.

Measurements

Sociodemographic factors age, sex, marital status (never married, married and living together, married and not living together, divorced, or widowed), living circumstance (living with family or alone), educational status (unable to read and write, primary education, middle school or college and above), residence (rural or urban), and occupational status (employed or unemployed) were adopted from different literatures conducted in Ethiopia.

To identify AUD, we used a 10-item alcohol use disorder identification test questionnaire (AUDIT). Each item of AUDIT was rated on a five-point scale, ranges from 0 to 40. A total score of 1–7 considered social drinker, the total of score 8 or more indicates probable alcohol use disorder, the total score of 8–15 indicates hazardous alcohol use, a score of 16–19 indicates harmful alcohol use and a score of 20 or more indicates probable alcohol dependence in the last 12-months [34]. The presence of comorbid depression in the last two weeks was assessed by the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9). The tool has nine items and each item has rated on a four-point scale, 0 (not at all), 1 (several days), 2 (more than half the days), and 3 (nearly every day) with the total score ranging from zero to 27. A score of five or more on the PHQ-9 questionnaire considered as having comorbid depression [35]. Individual-level of stress in the last one month was measured using 10 items of perceived stress scale questionnaire (PSS). Each item of PSS has rated on a five-point scale, 0(never), 1(almost never), 2 (sometimes), 3 (fairly often), 4 (very often) with a total score ranging from zero to 40. Scoring of 0–13 considered a low level of stress, scoring of 14–26 considered a medium level of stress, and scoring of 27–40 considered a high level of stress. Previous studies carried out based on this cut-off point [3639]. The level of social support was measured using a three-item Oslo social support scale which has three items with a range of between three and fourteen.” scoring of 12–14 = Strong support” score of 9–11 = Moderate social support and”, a score of “3–8” Poor social support scale [40]. Social phobia was assessed by a 17-item social phobia inventory scale (SPIN). SPIN has 17- items rates from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) with a total score ranges from 0 to 68. A score of 21 or more is considered as having social anxiety disorder [41]. The tool was validated both for adults and adolescents in different countries [42, 43].

Data collection

The data was collected by nine psychiatry nurses after three days of training and supervised by three-degree holder psychiatry professionals. The interviewer administered questionnaire was used after translated into Amharic language (local working language).

Data processing and analysis

The collected data were checked for completeness and consistency and entered into Epi-data V.3.1. Then, exported to SPSS window V.21 for analysis. Descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with the outcome variable. A p-value of < 0.05 at 95% CI with adjusted OR is considered as statistically significant.

Ethical consideration

Ethical clearance was obtained from the ethical review committee of Debre Tabor University. Confidentiality was maintained by omitting the name and address of the participants. Written informed consent was taken after explaining the purpose of the study. A formal written permission letter was obtained from the south Gondar zone health department.

Result

Sociodemographic characteristics

A total of 848 participants were interviewed with a response rate of 96.91%. The majority of the respondents, 528(62.3%) were male. 824 (97.2%) of participants were Amhara by ethnicity. Regarding religion, 804 (97.2%) were orthodox Christian followers. 320 (37.7%) were married and living together. 600 (70.8%) were employed. Most of the respondents 520 (61.3%) were from urban areas. 280(33%) were attended primary education and 616(72.6%) were living with family (Table 1).

Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of the participants in south Gondar zone, northwest Ethiopia, 2020 (n = 848).

Variable Category Frequency Percentage
Age 18–24 208 24.5%
25–34 200 23.6%
35–44 208 24.5%
45–44 104 12.3%
> = 55 128 15.1%
Sex Male 528 62.3%
Female 320 37.7%
Ethnicity Amhara 824 97.2%
other 24 2.8%
Educational status Unable to read and write 216 25.5%
1–8 grade 176 20.8%
9–12 grade 280 33%
Diploma & above 176 20.8%
Religion Orthodox Christian 804 94.8%
Other 44 5.2%
Marital status Never married 304 35.8%
Married & living together 320 37.7%
Married & not living together 56 6.6%
Divorced 112 13.2%
Widowed 56 6.6%
Living circumstance With family 616 72.6%
Alone 232 27.4%
Occupational status Employed 600 70.8%
Non-employed 248 29.2%
Residence Rural 328 38.7%
Urban 520 61.3%

Clinical, psychosocial, and substance use characteristics

Of the total 848 respondents, 312 (36.8%) had a family history of alcohol use, and the majority, 376(44.3%) had poor social support. Two hundred twenty-four (26.4%) had social phobia and 175(20.6%) having co-morbid depression. Regarding substance use, 322(38.4%) of respondents experienced Khat (leaves) chewing in their lifetime and one hundred eight (12.7%) were smoke cigarettes in the last three months (Table 2).

Table 2. Clinical, psychosocial, and substance use characteristics of the participants in south Gondar zone, northwest Ethiopia, 2020 (n = 848).

Variables Category Frequency Percent %
Family history of mental illness Yes 87 10.3%
No 761 89.7%
Family history of alcohol use Yes 312 36.8%
No 536 63.2%
Ever use of Khat Yes 322 38.4%
No 526 61.6%
Ever use of cigarette smoking Yes 214 25.2%
No 634 74.8%
Ever use of cannabis Yes 153 18%
No 695 82%
Current use of Khat Yes 188 22.2%
No 660 77.8%
Current use of cigarette smoking Yes 108 12.7%
No 740 87.3%
Current use of cannabis Yes 32 96.2%
No 816 3.8%
Depression Yes 175 20.6%
No 673 79.4%
Social phobia Yes 224 26.4%
No 624 73.6%
Social support Poor 376 44.3%
Moderate 312 36.8%
Strong 160 18.9%
Individual level of stress Low 640 75.5%
Moderate 160 18.9%
High 48 5.7%

Magnitude of alcohol use disorder

The magnitude of alcohol use disorder in adult residents of the south Gondar zone was 23.7% (95% CI: 20.9, 26.7). From these, 140 (16.50%) had hazardous alcohol use, 44 (5.2%) had harmful alcohol use, and 17 (2%) had probable alcohol dependence (Fig 2).

Fig 2. Bar chart showing that the level of alcohol use in adult residents of south Gondar zone, northwest Ethiopia, 2020 (N = 848).

Fig 2

Factors associated with alcohol use disorder

To determine the association of independent variables with alcohol use disorder. Bivariate and multivariable logistic analysis was carried out. Poor social support, living alone, having co-morbid depression, social phobia, male sex, current use of khat, current cigarette smoking, current use of cannabis, and high level of stress was associated with alcohol use disorder on bivariate analysis. Poor social support, social phobia, co-morbid depression, high level of stress, male sex, and current cigarette smoking were associated with alcohol use disorder on multivariable analysis.

This study showed that alcohol use disorder was 1.81 times higher among respondents who had depression compared with those who had no depression (AOR = 1.81, 95 CI; 1.184, 2.778). Alcohol use disorder was more common among respondents who had poor social support compared with the respondents who had strong social support (AOR = 1.95, 95 CI: 1.098, 3.495). Regarding the psychosocial factors, alcohol use disorder was 2.85 times higher among respondents who had a high level of stress compared with those who had a low level of stress (AOR = 2.85, 95 CI; 1.829, 4.469). Social phobia was the other factor that was found to be significantly associated with alcohol use disorder (AOR = 1.69, 95 CI; 1.117, 2.582). Current smoking cigarette was also a major factor in the development of alcohol use disorder (AOR = 3.06, 95 CI; 1.764, 5.307). Our study also identified male gender had a statistically significant positive correlation with alcohol use disorder (AOR = 4.34, 95 CI; 2.800, 6.743) (Table 3).

Table 3. Factors associated with Alcohol use disorder among residents of south Gondar zone, northwest Ethiopia, 2020 (N = 848).

Variables Category Alcohol use disorder COR 95% CI AOR 95% CI P-value
Yes No
Sex Male 168 360 4.05(2.709–6.080) 4.34(2.80–6.743) * 0.000
Female 33 287  1  1
Perceived stress Low 114 526  1  1
Moderate 71 89 2.30(1.225–4.346) 1.76(0.849–3.655)  0.128
High 16 32 3.68(2.538–5.339) 2.85(1.829–4.469) * 0.008
Social phobia Yes 91 133 3.19(2.283–4.478) 1.69(1.117–2.582) * 0.013
No 110 514  1  1
Living circumstance With family 124 492  1  1
Alone 77 155 1.97(1.407–2.761) 1.23(0.811–1.871)  0.328
Depression Yes 70 105 2.75(1.929–3.944) 1.81(1.184–2.778) * 0.006
No 131 542  1  1
Social support Poor 102 274 2.33(1.410–3.866) 1.95(1.098–3.495) * 0.023
Moderate 77 235 2.05(1.224–3.451) 1.50(0.851–2.671)  0.159
Strong 22 138  1  1
Current cigarette smoking Yes 49 59 3.21(2.114–4.883) 3.06(1.764–5.307) * 0.000
No 152 588  1  1
Current use of khat Yes 59 129 1.66(1.164–2.391)  0.93(0.606–1.426)  0.740
No 142 518  1  1
Current use of cannabis Yes 13 19 2.28(1.108–4.715) 0.65(0.249–1.737) 0.397
No 188 628  1  1

1 (reference group),

* (p<0.05), COR (crude odds ratio), AOR (adjusted odds ratio)

Discussion

The magnitude of alcohol use disorder in adult residents of the south Gondar zone was 23.7% (95% CI: 20.9, 26.7). The finding of this study was in line with a study carried out in Ethiopia, 21% [33], Dharan town, 25.8% [16], and Chitwan District of Nepal 23.8% [18]. However, the finding of the current study was lower than a study conducted in Brazil 50% [15], and Nigeria 39.5% [19].

Conversely, the finding of this study was higher than the findings in the USA 13.9% [13], India, 9.4% [44], Uganda 9.8% [20], Colombia 9% [45], and studies done in other parts of Ethiopia, (12.3%, in southwest Ethiopia and 13.9%, in southern rural, Ethiopia) [31, 32]. One of the possible explanations for the difference in the previous studies carried out in Ethiopia, the majority of the study participants in Jimma town was Muslim and Protestant, compared with the current study sample which was over 97% of the study sample was orthodox Christian followers. In Sodo, Gurage Zone, South Ethiopia, more than half of the sample was females compared to the current study sample, only 37.7% of the study sample was females. However, females are less likely to involve in public place drinking and heavy drinking due to cultural influence. As a result, females are less likely to have alcohol use disorder. The other possible reasons for this discrepancy might be the difference in the number of participants, differences in the assessment tool used, economic differences, and cultural differences that might have a higher contribution to the discrepancy.

We found an association between social phobia and alcohol use disorder (AOR = 1.69, 95 CI; 1.117, 2.582). The result is similar to the findings of studies conducted in the USA [25, 27, 46]. Subjects who had social anxiety disorder could be drink alcohol to control their fears and anxiety [47].

In the current study poor social support was predictive of alcohol use disorder (AOR = 1.95, 95 CI: 1.098, 3.495). The finding of this study was in line with studies carried out in Sweden [28], and previous Ethiopian studies [22, 29, 30]. The possible reason might be due to lack of experience in social relationships, social and psychological support from their neighborhood and relatives can lead to using alcohol.

Our study also identified male gender had a statistically significant positive correlation with alcohol use disorder (AOR = 4.34, 95 CI; 2.800, 6.743). This finding is supported by studies done in India [44], Brazil [14, 15], and other parts of Ethiopia [22, 32]. Heavy drinking is mostly occurred in men compared with women and biological differences among the two genders might be contributing to the discrepancy. Not only biological factors, but females are also less likely to involve in public places drinking due to cultural influence. So, it could be less likely to have alcohol use disorder [19, 48].

In our study, alcohol use disorder was found to be significantly associated with comorbid depression (AOR = 1.81, 95 CI; 1.184, 2.778). The study is also in line with studies done in Nepal [18], Lebanon [23], India [26], Greek [24], and Uganda [49]. The possible reason might be subjects who had depressive symptoms might be using alcohol to relieve their symptoms [50, 51].

This study showed that alcohol use disorder was 2.85 times higher among respondents who had a high level of stress compared with those who had low level of stress (AOR = 2.85, 95 CI; 1.829, 4.469). The current finding was supported by a study carried out in the UK [52], Korea [53], Greek [24], Lebanon [23], Having someone high level of stress can lead to drinking as a coping mechanism of stress [53].

Finally, we found also an association between current cigarette smoking and alcohol use disorder (AOR = 3.06, 95 CI; 1.764, 5.307). The finding of this study was similar to studies conducted in Nepal [18], Brazil [14], Nigeria [19], India [26], Greek [24], and other parts of Ethiopia [22, 30, 32, 54]. The possible reason might be the two substances share a rewarding effect in the activation of the mesolimbic pathway [55].

Limitations of the study

This study was a cross-sectional study we tried to assess different factors that may predict alcohol use disorder. However, the temporal relationship cannot be concluded by this study design. In addition, recall bias might be also the other limitation of this study. Although the alcohol use disorder identification test (AUDIT) was not validated in the general population of Ethiopia. Despite these limitations, this study had strengths, including many factors that were not addressed in previous Ethiopian studies.

Conclusion

Alcohol use disorder in south Gondar zone adult residents was found to be high. Comorbid depression, male gender, perceived high level of stress, poor social support, social phobia, and cigarette smoking were significantly associated with alcohol use disorder. Therefore, the researchers recommend regular screening of alcohol use disorder by trained health professionals at the community level and the referral linkage with mental health services should be strengthened.

Supporting information

S1 File. Data collection tool to assess magnitude and corelates of alcohol use disorder in south Gondar zone, northwest Ethiopia.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge data collectors and study participants. We would like also to thank Debre Tabor University for ethical clearance.

Abbreviations

AUDIT

alcohol use disorder identification test

DALYs

Disability Adjusted Life Years

PHQ

Patient Health Questionnaire

SPI

Social phobia inventory scale

OSS-3

Oslo-3 Social Support Scale

AUD

alcohol use disorder

PSS

perceived stress scale

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Association AP. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®): American Psychiatric Pub;2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Whiteford HA, Ferrari AJ, Degenhardt L, Feigin V, Vos T. The global burden of mental, neurological and substance use disorders: an analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. PloS one. 2015;10(2):e0116820. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116820 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wu L-T. Substance abuse and rehabilitation: responding to the global burden of diseases attributable to substance abuse. Substance abuse and rehabilitation. 2010;1:5. doi: 10.2147/SAR.S14898 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Degenhardt L, Mathers B, Guarinieri M, Panda S, Phillips B, Strathdee S, et al. Reference Group to the United Nations on HIV and injecting drug use. Meth/amphetamine use and associated HIV: Implications for global policy and public health Int J Drug Policy. 2010;21(5):347–58. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2009.11.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rehm J, Mathers C, Popova S, Thavorncharoensap M, Teerawattananon Y, Patra J. Global burden of disease and injury and economic cost attributable to alcohol use and alcohol-use disorders. The lancet. 2009;373(9682):2223–33. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60746-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Organization WH. Global status report on alcohol and health 2018: Executive summary. World Health Organization, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hanefeld J, Hawkins B, Knai C, Hofman K, Petticrew M. What the InBev merger means for health in Africa. BMJ Specialist Journals; 2016. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000099 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The lancet. 2012;380(9859):2224–60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fleischmann A, Fuhr D, Poznyak V, Rekve D, Alwan A, Saraceno B. Global status report on alcohol and health. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Organization WH. Global status report on alcohol and health-2014: World Health Organization. Geneva, Switzerland: [Google Scholar]. 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Room R, Babor T, Rehm J. Alcohol and public health. The lancet. 2005;365(9458):519–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Roerecke M, Obot I, Patra J, Rehm J. Volume of alcohol consumption, patterns of drinking and burden of disease in sub-Saharan Africa, 2002. African Journal of Drug and Alcohol Studies. 2008;7(1). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Grant BF, Goldstein RB, Saha TD, Chou SP, Jung J, Zhang H, et al. Epidemiology of DSM-5 alcohol use disorder: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions III. JAMA psychiatry. 2015;72(8):757–66. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.0584 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Reisdorfer E, Büchele F, Pires ROM, Boing AF. Prevalence and associated factors with alcohol use disorders among adults: a population-based study in southern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia. 2012;15(3):582–94. doi: 10.1590/s1415-790x2012000300012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Santos R, Baldin Y, Carlini CM, Sanchez ZM. Classification of alcohol use disorders among nightclub patrons: associations between high-risk groups, sociodemographic factors and illicit drug use. The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse. 2015;41(5):433–41. doi: 10.3109/00952990.2015.1050497 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jhingan H, Shyangwa P, Sharma A, Prasad K, Khandelwal S. Prevalence of alcohol dependence in a town in Nepal as assessed by the CAGE questionnaire. Addiction. 2003;98(3):339–43. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00301.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Luitel NP, Baron EC, Kohrt BA, Komproe IH, Jordans MJ. Prevalence and correlates of depression and alcohol use disorder among adults attending primary health care services in Nepal: a cross sectional study. BMC health services research. 2018;18(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2770-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rathod S, Luitel N, Jordans M. Prevalence and correlates of alcohol use in a central Nepal district: secondary analysis of a population-based cross-sectional study. Global Mental Health. 2018;5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lasebikan VO, Ayinde O, Odunleye M, Adeyefa B, Adepoju S, Fakunle S. Prevalence of alcohol consumption and alcohol use disorders among outdoor drinkers in public open places in Nigeria. BMC public health. 2018;18(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5344-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kabwama SN, Ndyanabangi S, Mutungi G, Wesonga R, Bahendeka SK, Guwatudde D. Alcohol use among adults in Uganda: findings from the countrywide non-communicable diseases risk factor cross-sectional survey. Global health action. 2016;9(1):31302. doi: 10.3402/gha.v9.31302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bultum JA, Yigzaw N, Demeke W, Alemayehu M. Alcohol use disorder and associated factors among human immunodeficiency virus infected patients attending antiretroviral therapy clinic at Bishoftu General Hospital, Oromiya region, Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):e0189312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189312 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Duko B, Toma A, Abraham Y. Alcohol use disorder and associated factors among individuals living with HIV in Hawassa City, Ethiopia: a facility based cross-sectional study. Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy. 2019;14(1):1–6. doi: 10.1186/s13011-018-0189-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Obeid S, Akel M, Haddad C, Fares K, Sacre H, Salameh P, et al. Factors associated with alcohol use disorder: the role of depression, anxiety, stress, alexithymia and work fatigue-a population study in Lebanon. BMC public health. 2020;20(1):1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7969-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bellos S, Petrikis P, Malliori M, Mavreas V, Skapinakis P. Prevalence of alcohol use disorders and their association with sociodemographic determinants and depression/anxiety disorders in a representative sample of the Greek general population. Psychiatry journal. 2020;2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Schneier FR, Foose TE, Hasin DS, Heimberg RG, Liu S-M, Grant BF, et al. Social anxiety disorder and alcohol use disorder comorbidity in the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Psychological medicine. 2010;40(6):977. doi: 10.1017/S0033291709991231 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rathod SD, Nadkarni A, Bhana A, Shidhaye R. Epidemiological features of alcohol use in rural India: a population-based cross-sectional study. BMJ open. 2015;5(12). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Buckner JD, Schmidt NB, Lang AR, Small JW, Schlauch RC, Lewinsohn PM. Specificity of social anxiety disorder as a risk factor for alcohol and cannabis dependence. Journal of psychiatric research. 2008;42(3):230–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2007.01.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Skagerström J, Alehagen S, Häggström-Nordin E, Årestedt K, Nilsen P. Prevalence of alcohol use before and during pregnancy and predictors of drinking during pregnancy: a cross sectional study in Sweden. BMC public health. 2013;13(1):1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tesfaye G, Demlew D, Habte F, Molla G, Kifle Y, Gebreegziabher G. The prevalence and associated factors of alcohol use among pregnant women attending antenatal care at public hospitals Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2019. BMC psychiatry. 2020;20(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2374-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Soboka M, Tesfaye M, Feyissa GT, Hanlon C. Alcohol use disorders and associated factors among people living with HIV who are attending services in south west Ethiopia. BMC research notes. 2014;7(1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-828 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zewdu S, Hanlon C, Fekadu A, Medhin G, Teferra S. Treatment gap, help-seeking, stigma and magnitude of alcohol use disorder in rural Ethiopia. Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy. 2019;14(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/s13011-018-0189-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bedaso A, Gobena M, Yigzaw N, Getachew M. Determinants of alcohol use disorder among residents of Agaro town, Jimma, southwest, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. J Addict Res Ther. 2019;10(377):2. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Teferra S, Medhin G, Selamu M, Bhana A, Hanlon C, Fekadu A. Hazardous alcohol use and associated factors in a rural Ethiopian district: a cross-sectional community survey. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dawson DA, Grant BF, Stinson FS, Zhou Y. Effectiveness of the derived Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT-C) in screening for alcohol use disorders and risk drinking in the US general population. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. 2005;29(5):844–54. doi: 10.1097/01.alc.0000164374.32229.a2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of general internal medicine. 2001;16(9):606–13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Asnakew S, Shumet S, Ginbare W, Legas G, Haile K. Prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder and associated factors among Koshe landslide survivors, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a community-based, cross-sectional study. BMJ open. 2019;9(6):e028550. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028550 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wiriyakijja P, Porter S, Fedele S, Hodgson T, McMillan R, Shephard M, et al. Validation of the HADS and PSS-10 and a cross-sectional study of psychological status in patients with recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine. 2020;49(3):260–70. doi: 10.1111/jop.12991 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Alharbi H, Alshehry A. Perceived stress and coping strategies among ICU nurses in government tertiary hospitals in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. Annals of Saudi medicine. 2019;39(1):48–55. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2019.48 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gambetta-Tessini K, Mariño R, Morgan M, Evans W, Anderson V. Stress and Health-Promoting Attributes in Australian, New Zealand, and Chilean Dental Students. Journal of Dental Education. 2013;77(6):801–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Dalgard OS, Dowrick C, Lehtinen V, Vazquez-Barquero JL, Casey P, Wilkinson G, et al. Negative life events, social support and gender difference in depression. Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology. 2006;41(6):444–51. doi: 10.1007/s00127-006-0051-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Connor KM, Davidson JR, Churchill LE, Sherwood A, Weisler RH, Foa E. Psychometric properties of the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN): New self-rating scale. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 2000;176(4):379–86. doi: 10.1192/bjp.176.4.379 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Caballo VE, Salazar IC, Irurtia MJ, Arias B, Hofmann SG. Measuring social anxiety in 11 countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Garcia-Lopez LJ, Bermejo RM, Hidalgo MD. The Social Phobia Inventory: Screening and cross-cultural validation in Spanish adolescents. The Spanish Journal of Psychology. 2010;13(2):970–80. doi: 10.1017/s1138741600002614 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ganesh Kumar S, Premarajan K, Subitha L, Suguna E, Vinayagamoorthy VK. Prevalence and pattern of alcohol consumption using alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT) in rural Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2013;7(8):1637. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/5521.3216 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rincon-Hoyos HG, Castillo A, Prada SI. Alcohol use disorders and psychiatric diseases in Colombia. Colombia Médica. 2016;47(1):31–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Buckner JD, Turner RJ. Social anxiety disorder as a risk factor for alcohol use disorders: A prospective examination of parental and peer influences. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2009;100(1–2):128–37. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.09.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Book SW, Randall CL. Social anxiety disorder and alcohol use. Alcohol Research & Health. 2002;26(2):130. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wilsnack RW, Vogeltanz ND, Wilsnack SC, Harris TR. Gender differences in alcohol consumption and adverse drinking consequences: cross-cultural patterns. Addiction. 2000;95(2):251–65. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.95225112.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Nalwadda O, Rathod SD, Nakku J, Lund C, Prince M, Kigozi F. Alcohol use in a rural district in Uganda: findings from community-based and facility-based cross-sectional studies. International journal of mental health systems. 2018;12(1):1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kuria MW, Ndetei DM, Obot IS, Khasakhala LI, Bagaka BM, Mbugua MN, et al. The association between alcohol dependence and depression before and after treatment for alcohol dependence. International Scholarly Research Notices. 2012;2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bolton JM, Robinson J, Sareen J. Self-medication of mood disorders with alcohol and drugs in the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Journal of affective disorders. 2009;115(3):367–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.10.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Clay JM, Parker MO. The role of stress-reactivity, stress-recovery and risky decision-making in psychosocial stress-induced alcohol consumption in social drinkers. Psychopharmacology. 2018;235(11):3243–57. doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-5027-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Yoon S-J, Kim H-J, Doo M. Association between perceived stress, alcohol consumption levels and obesity in Koreans. Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition. 2016;25(2):316. doi: 10.6133/apjcn.2016.25.2.23 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Alemu D, Soboka M, Tesfaye E, Ahmed G, Tesfaye Y. Alcohol use disorder and associated factors among Jimma University undergraduate students. Psychology research and behavior management. 2020;13:609. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S251510 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Adams S. Psychopharmacology of tobacco and alcohol comorbidity: a review of current evidence. Current addiction reports. 2017;4(1):25–34. doi: 10.1007/s40429-017-0129-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Markos Tesfaye

17 Jun 2021

PONE-D-21-07650

Magnitude and correlates of alcohol use disorder in south Gondar zone, northwest Ethiopia: a community based cross-sectional study

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Legas,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by July 22, 2021. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Markos Tesfaye, M.D., Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

The report presents results from a community survey of alcohol use disorder using screening tool AUDIT through interviews of 848 residents in north west Ethiopia. The authors also presented logistic regression analysis to identify factors associated with alcohol use disorder. The study attempts to address an important public health issue globally as well as in Africa. While the work and results may be relevant to wide range of audience, some of the methods and data interpretation is flawed. Therefore, the authors need to consider the following issues to improve the scientific value of the report.

1. The manuscript has many typographical and grammatical errors that interfere with comprehension. The manuscript needs extensive language revision preferably by a native English speaker.

2. The methods section needs to provide more detailed information about the psychometric properties of AUDIT rather than qualitative statement such as "... is the most preferable tool to identify individuals with AUD"

3. The methods section refers to PHQ-9 validation with a suggested cut-off of 5. The reference actually recommended cut-off of 10 and above. Therefore, the data needs to be re-analyzed using an appropriate cut-off.

4. Similarly, the citation made for PSS-10 does not provide any of the cut-offs mentioned in the manuscript. You may provide correct reference or re-analyze the data using stress scores as continuous variable.

5. It is not clear why the interviews were used rather than self-administered data collection. In addition, what was the setting of data collection? What is the potential effect of using health professionals as interviewers of this sensitive issue? The limitation need to address any biases arising from this.

6. The ethics statement need to be included in the manuscript submission system rather than just "human participants". In addition, information on what was done for any participant with suicide risk and alcohol dependence is important ethical issue. Please clarify what was done or why no action was taken.

7. In the abstract, results, and discussion, the authors use terms suggestive of causation which cannot be inferred from this cross-sectional survey. Terms such as 'risk factor', 'predictor', 'odds of developing', 'likely to develop', etc. need to be replaced with 'associated with' or other appropriate terms.

8. The discussion needs to provide in depth interpretation and implications than simple comparisons of prevalence. You may consider to provide if there are local factors known to increase alcohol use or indicators of complications such as road traffic accident data, etc.

Minor comments:

One or two decimal places are enough for the odds ratios.

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1.Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

 Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

No.

At this time, please address the following queries:

a) Please clarify the sources of funding (financial or material support) for your study. List the grants or organizations that supported your study, including funding received from your institution.

b) State what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role in your study, please state: “The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

c) If any authors received a salary from any of your funders, please state which authors and which funders.

d) If you did not receive any funding for this study, please state: The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf. 

3. Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

4. Please note that in order to use the direct billing option the corresponding author must be affiliated with the chosen institute. Please either amend your manuscript to change the affiliation or corresponding author, or email us at plosone@plos.org with a request to remove this option.

5. Please amend the manuscript submission data (via Edit Submission) to include author Sintayehu Asnakew, Amsalu Belete, Getnet Mihretie, Gashaw Mehiret, Wubet Alebachew, Ermias Sisay, Agimasie Tigabu, Tigabu Dessie.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Thanks for your invitation to review this study. Since evidences related to substance use disorders like alcohol are scared in low and middle-income countries like ours particularly in Amhara region. Thus, this study added a valuable contribution to the medical field. So, to make this useful for the general public the authors need to incorporate the comments mentioned below

Language

I advise extensive editing/proof-reading of the written English and re-drafting before the paper can be considered suitable for publication, b/se there are many odd phares and language errors.

Introduction

1. You put repeated sentence at your introduction and citing different references (reference number 6&7). For example, in recent years, high-income countries have increased their attention to alcohol-related harm by implementing governmental regulations to reduce alcohol consumption. In recent years, high-income countries have increased their attention to alcohol-related harm by implementing governmental regulations to reduce alcohol consumption.

Methods and materials

1. Better to say "study setting" rather than study settings

Study participants

1. Have you included participants with mental illness?

2. Under study setting and populations, it is good to mention the numbers and the type of health institutions in South Gondar Zone. In addition to this I strongly recommend you to include the type of mental health services delivered in those hospitals

Measurements

1. Why you preferred to measure alcohol used disorder by using CAGE other than AUDIT? More clarification is required.

Data collection

2. How study participants were reached e.g., door to door knocking/ or telephone interview?

Discussion

3. In paragraph 1 and 2 of your discussion were mentions Brazil twice in contradicting sentences " However, the finding of the current study was lower than a study conducted in Brazil 50% (15), and Conversely, the finding of this study was higher than the findings in USA 13.9% (13), India, 9.4% (41), Uganda 9.8% (20), Colombia 9% (42), Brazil, 18.4% (14) ...

4. On paragraph 4 of your discussion, References are particularly useful to substantiate statements which could be considered strengthen your justification e.g. "The possible reason might be due to lack of experience in social relationship, social and psychological support from their neighborhood and relatives can lead to use alcohol"

5. How did you manage the participant who are eligible for dependence treatment during the data collection time?

Reviewer #2: The statement of the problem at the last end of the of the background is not convincing because the community is part of the general population.

On the sampling, the authority used in using (21%) in calculating the size has to be indicated in the manuscript.

The authors used sociodemographic data in the analysis, but have not mentioned the instrument used to collect that demographic data under measurements.

Under results on sociodemographic, the author use figures to start sentence, they need to write those figures in words.

Under limitation, the authors failed to indicate the strength of their research and the application of their findings to solving the alcohol disorder in the study district.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Mengesha Birkie

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: reviewed.docx

PLoS One. 2021 Sep 30;16(9):e0257804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257804.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


28 Jul 2021

Response for the editor’s and reviewers’ enquiry

Dear Editor,

Thank you for your valuable comments and recommendations.

If further correction is needed from the editor, we are ready to do the requested enquires again including re-analysis before the decision has made.

1/ For the Editor

1. The manuscript has many typographical and grammatical errors that interfere with comprehension. The manuscript needs extensive language revision preferably by a native English speaker.

Great thanks! We tried to modify the language throughout the paper.

2. The methods section needs to provide more detailed information about the psychometric properties of AUDIT rather than qualitative statement such as "... is the most preferable tool to identify individuals with AUD"

Thank you for your constructive comment. Modified based on the comment. Please see page 6.

3. The methods section refers to PHQ-9 validation with a suggested cut-off of 5. The reference actually recommended cut-off of 10 and above. Therefore, the data needs to be re-analyzed using an appropriate cut-off.

Thank you dear editor! Yes, it is validated at a cut-point score of 10 in PHQ 9. We used a cut-off 5 to include mild form depression. However, the majority of literature conducted in Ethiopia used a 5 cut-off point of PHQ 9. So, we add the appropriate reference for this study. Please see page 6

4. Similarly, the citation made for PSS-10 does not provide any of the cut-offs mentioned in the manuscript. You may provide correct reference or re-analyze the data using stress scores as continuous variable.

Ok! We provide the correct reference for PSS-10. Please see page-6

5. It is not clear why the interviews were used rather than self-administered data collection. In addition, what was the setting of data collection? What is the potential effect of using health professionals as interviewers of this sensitive issue? The limitation needs to address any biases arising from this.

Thank you! As you have seen from the socio-demographic part of the result, 25.5% of study participants hadn’t formal education. Due to this reason, we can’t apply self-administered data collection and they were interviewed in a separate secure place. The main reason for using psychiatry nurses as interviewers was to provide appropriate information and psychoeducation for study participants who had comorbid mental illnesses like depression and anxiety.

6. The ethics statement need to be included in the manuscript submission system rather than just "human participants". In addition, information on what was done for any participant with suicide risk and alcohol dependence is important ethical issue. Please clarify what was done or why no action was taken.

Thank you, dear editor. For alcohol use disorder, we provide information on the availability of modern treatment for their problem and individuals who were ready (especially individuals who reach the dependency stage) to get the treatment center, send them to a treatment and rehabilitation center. But individuals who weren’t ready to get treatment center, we have informed them, they can be treated after they have prepared themselves to get modern treatment for their problem after we gave psychoeducation. But all individuals who were on hazardous/ harmful alcohol use (based on our screening tool) send to hospital for further diagnosis of alcohol dependency. we asked about suicidal behavior when we assess depression, and we send all participants who had suicidal behavior (ideation, attempt, or plan) to hospital for further diagnosis and treatment.

7. In the abstract, results, and discussion, the authors use terms suggestive of causation which cannot be inferred from this cross-sectional survey. Terms such as 'risk factor', 'predictor', 'odds of developing', 'likely to develop', etc. need to be replaced with 'associated with' or other appropriate terms.

Dear editor, thank you for your comments /suggestions. We have revised based on your comments.

8. The discussion needs to provide in depth interpretation and implications than simple comparisons of prevalence. You may consider to provide if there are local factors known to increase alcohol use or indicators of complications such as road traffic accident data, etc.

Thank you for your constructive comment. Modified based on the comment. Please see page-9

9. One or two decimal places are enough for the odds ratios.

The odds ratio decimal also modified.

2/ For Reviewer 1

Dear reviewer, thank you for the valuable comments and recommendations.

Thank you for your comments. Thank you for your comments on language and we tried to modify the language throughout the paper.

Introduction

1. You put repeated sentence at your introduction and citing different references (reference number 6&7). For example, in recent years, high-income countries have increased their attention to alcohol-related harm by implementing governmental regulations to reduce alcohol consumption. In recent years, high-income countries have increased their attention to alcohol-related harm by implementing governmental regulations to reduce alcohol consumption.

Thank you for the comments and modify based on your comment. Please, see the introduction part. Please see page-3

Methods and materials

1. Better to say "study setting" rather than study settings

Thank you, and we correct it as “Study setting”. Please, see the method part.

Study participants

1. Have you included participants with mental illness?

Yes! Participants who had mental illness and can be communicated and give appropriate information was included in our study. But Participants who were clinically diagnosis for known severe mental illness (who received a clinical diagnosis from mental health professionals or psychiatrists) who cannot give appropriate information due to their psychosis, low energy, motivation/hyperactivity and also difficult to give an interview due to complaining of any discomfort or pain, instability was excluded from the study.

2. Under study setting and populations, it is good to mention the numbers and the type of health institutions in South Gondar Zone. In addition to this I strongly recommend you to include the type of mental health services delivered in those hospitals

Thank you! We add the type of mental health services given by each hospital. Please, see at the study setting and populations part.

Measurements

1. Why you preferred to measure alcohol used disorder by using CAGE other than AUDIT? More clarification is required.

Thank you for your question. CAGE questionnaire is only assessed individuals who reached at dependency or abuse stage but it does not assessed individuals who had hazardous/harmful alcohol use disorder. The other reason it is not validated in Ethiopian setting, but AUDIT was validated in neighboring African countries. Additionally, the majority of previous Ethiopian studies were carried out based on AUDIT.

Data collection

2. How study participants were reached e.g., door to door knocking/ or telephone interview?

The participants were interviewed by the nocking door-to-door and they were interviewed in a separate secure place.

Discussion

3. In paragraph 1 and 2 of your discussion were mentions Brazil twice in contradicting sentences " However, the finding of the current study was lower than a study conducted in Brazil 50% (15), and Conversely, the finding of this study was higher than the findings in USA 13.9% (13), India, 9.4% (41), Uganda 9.8% (20), Colombia 9% (42), Brazil, 18.4% (14) ...

Great thanks! The contradicting information has been modified. Please see the discussion part of page-9

4. On paragraph 4 of your discussion, References are particularly useful to substantiate statements which could be considered strengthen your justification e.g. "The possible reason might be due to lack of experience in social relationship, social and psychological support from their neighborhood and relatives can lead to use alcohol"

Thank you for constructive comment! You are right, but we believe that if the explanation/justification is represented for the identified problem, a reference is may not be mandatory.

5. How did you manage the participant who are eligible for dependence treatment during the data collection time?

For alcohol use disorder, we provide information on the availability of modern treatment for their problem and individuals who were ready to get treatment center, send them to a treatment and rehabilitation center for further diagnosis and treatment. But individuals who weren’t ready to get treatment center, we have informed them, they can be treated after they have prepared themselves to get modern treatment for their problem.

3/ For reviewer 2

Thank you for your constructive comments.

1. The statement of the problem at the last end of the of the background is not convincing because the community is part of the general population.

Thank you! But if we understand your comment, we attempt to justify the importance of community-based researches to enforce the government than institution-based researches.

2. The authors used sociodemographic data in the analysis, but have not mentioned the instrument used to collect that demographic data under measurements.

Thank you for your constructive comment! There is no standardized tool to assess sociodemographic characteristics. We adopted from different kinds of literature. So, we included based on your comment. Please see on page 5.

3. Under results on sociodemographic, the author uses figures to start sentence, they need to write those figures in words.

Thank you! We put the figures and tables separately. So, the interpretation of all figures is available in the main manuscript pages 5 and 7.

4. Under limitation, the authors failed to indicate the strength of their research and the application of their findings to solving the alcohol disorder in the study district.

Thank you for your constructive comment! Modified based on your comment. Please see page 11.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewr.docx

Decision Letter 1

Markos Tesfaye

13 Sep 2021

Magnitude and correlates of alcohol use disorder in south Gondar zone, northwest Ethiopia: a community based cross-sectional study

PONE-D-21-07650R1

Dear Dr. Legas,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Markos Tesfaye, M.D., Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Thank you for addressing the comments.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: The manuscript has been revised and is now appropriate to be considered for publication in your journal.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Markos Tesfaye

22 Sep 2021

PONE-D-21-07650R1

Magnitude and correlates of alcohol use disorder in south Gondar zone, northwest Ethiopia: a community based cross-sectional study

Dear Dr. Legas:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Prof. Markos Tesfaye

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. Data collection tool to assess magnitude and corelates of alcohol use disorder in south Gondar zone, northwest Ethiopia.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: reviewed.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewr.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES