Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2021 Sep 30;11:19527. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97913-0

Neuronally-derived tau is increased in experienced breachers and is associated with neurobehavioral symptoms

Katie A Edwards 1,2, Kisha Greer 1, Jacqueline Leete 1, Chen Lai 1, Christina Devoto 1,2, Bao-Xi Qu 1,2, Angela M Yarnell 3, Elena Polejaeva 4, Kristine C Dell 5, Matthew L LoPresti 6, Peter Walker 7, Eric M Wassermann 8, Walter Carr 6,9, James R Stone 10, Stephen T Ahlers 11, Rany Vorn 1, Carina Martin 1, Jessica M Gill 1,12,
PMCID: PMC8484560  PMID: 34593828

Abstract

Military and law enforcement breachers are exposed to many low-level blasts during their training and occupational experiences in which they detonate explosives to force entry into secured structures. There is a concern that exposure to these repetitive blast events in career breachers could result in cumulative neurological effects. This study aimed to determine concentrations of neurofilament light (NF-L), tau, and amyloid-beta 42 (Aβ42) in serum and in neuronal-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) in an experienced breacher population, and to examine biomarker associations with neurobehavioral symptoms. Thirty-four participants enrolled in the study: 20 experienced breachers and 14 matched military or civilian law enforcement controls. EV tau concentrations were significantly elevated in experienced breachers (0.3301 ± 0.5225) compared to controls (−0.4279 ± 0.7557; F = 10.43, p = 0.003). No statistically significant changes were observed in EV levels of NF-L or Aβ42 or in serum levels of NF-L, tau, or Aβ42 (p’s > 0.05). Elevated EV tau concentrations correlated with increased Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI) score in experienced breachers (r = 0.596, p = 0.015) and predicted higher NSI score (F(1,14) = 7.702, p = 0.015, R2 = 0.355). These findings show that neuronal-derived EV concentrations of tau are significantly elevated and associated with neurobehavioral symptoms in this sample of experienced breachers who have a history of many low-level blast exposures.

Subject terms: Biomarkers, Neurological disorders

Introduction

Blast injury is a critical concern for military forces due to the use of improvised explosive devices in the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts1. In contrast to large magnitude explosives in combat, experienced breachers in military and law enforcement professions encounter hundreds to thousands of training and occupational exposures to low-level blast overpressure over the course of their careers. Breachers construct and detonate explosives, often while at a close distance, to create a breach in a locked door or wall to force entry into a secured structure. While these subconcussive blast exposures do not result in medically diagnosed injuries, there may be neurological sequelae due to the chronic, repetitive nature of these exposures. Research suggests that repeated low-level blast exposure is associated with neurological effects, including cognitive, somatic, and affective symptoms as well as neurocognitive and neurosensory decline and potentially increased vulnerability to diagnosable neurological injury26. It is important to further examine the risks of developing neurological symptoms following blast exposure in this unique population as well as elucidate the underlying biological mechanisms that relate to these associated symptoms.

Blood-based biomarkers are promising as potential objective indicators to identify blast exposed individuals who may be at risk for neurological symptoms and/or other deficits. In military and civilian populations, traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) have been linked to increased levels of neuronal proteins neurofilament-light (NF-L), tau, and amyloid beta-42 (Aβ42), and these increases have further been linked to symptom development712. Moreover, repeated exposure to low-level blasts has been associated with a reduction in neurocognitive performance that correlated with elevations in serum levels of NF-L, tau, and Aβ4213.

One important issue that has been raised in TBI blood-based biomarker research is the identification of neuronal effects. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are nanoparticles with a lipid bilayer membrane that carry proteins, genetic material, and lipids from inside of the cell, participate in cell-to-cell communication, and are readily measured in peripheral circulation14. EVs protect proteins from degradation and may be a stable source of brain-related proteins1518. Our lab identified elevated levels of GFAP in neuronal-derived EVs of TBI patients19, while lower serum GFAP levels were observed following blast exposure in a military training population20. These findings suggest that neuronal-derived EVs have a heightened specificity for central nervous system (CNS) processes, potentially increasing clinical relevance for neurological outcomes. However, the clinical relevance of serum versus neuronal-derived EV concentrations of NF-L, tau, and Aβ42 levels in experienced breacher populations remains elusive.

To address this critical issue, we analyzed concentrations of NF-L, tau, and Aβ42 in serum and in neuronal-derived EVs in an experienced breacher population with a high number of low-level blast exposures and examined if these biomarkers associate with neurobehavioral symptoms.

Results

Demographics and clinical characteristics

Thirty-four males were recruited into the study (20 breachers and 14 matched military or civilian law enforcement controls). Overall blast exposures ranged from 456 to 35,800 exposures in the breacher group and from 0 to 39 exposures in the control group. The majority of participants were white (85%) military personnel (65–71%). Participants’ ages ranged from 26 to 54 years, with a mean age of 39 years. There were no statistically significant differences in demographics, prior service, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) or Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI) between experienced breachers and controls (Table 1). There were higher reported PCL-M scores in experienced breachers when compared with controls, indicating increased PTSD-related symptoms, although these levels do not meet clinical criteria for PTSD diagnosis.

Table 1.

Demographics and clinical characteristics. Data is described using mean and SD.

Experienced breacher (N = 20) Unexposed control (N = 14) Significance
Race, no. (%)

χ2 = 2.893

p = 0.576

White 17 (85) 12 (85.71)
Black 0 (0) 1 (7.14)
Asian/Pacific Islander 1 (5) 1 (7.14)
American Indian/Alaskan 1 (5) 0 (0)
Other 1 (5) 0 (0)
Ethnicity (non-Hispanic), no. (%) 19 (95) 13 (92.86)

χ2 = 0.068

p = 0.794

Sex (male), no. (%) 20 (100) 14 (100) N/A
Type of service, no. (%)

χ2 = 2.839

p = 0.242

Military 14 (65) 10 (71.43)
Civilian law enforcement 3 (20) 4 (28.57)
Both 3 (15) 0 (0)
Age (years)
Mean age (SD) 39.65 (8.337) 38.86 (7.814)

t = 0.280

p = 0.781

Minimum–maximum 26–54 27–53
Mean years of education (SD) 14.25 (1.743) 14.43 (2.593)

t = -0.241

p = 0.811

Mean years of service (SD) 16.80 (6.693) 13.92 (6.986)

t = 1.209

p = 0.235

Number of prior blast exposures, no. (%) N/A
 < 40 0 (0) 14 (100)
400 +  20 (100) 0 (0)
Minimum–maximum 456–34,800 0–39
Most recent blast exposure, no. (%)

χ2 = 29.046

p < 0.01

Never 0 (0) 11 (78.57)
Past week 4 (20) 0 (0)
Past month 8 (40) 0 (0)
Past 6 months 3 (15) 0 (0)
Past year 3 (15) 0 (0)
More than 1 year 2 (5) 3 (21.43)
Mean number of self-reported head injuries (SD) 0.80 (0.616) 0.36 (0.497)

t = 2.228

p = 0.033

BDI (SD) 4.25 (4.518) 3.00 (5.038)

t = 0.757

p = 0.899

PCL-M (SD) 25.55 (6.924) 20.64 (4.483)

t = 2.327

p = 0.027

NSI (SD) 16.90 (5.955) 16.86 (5.289)

t = 0.022

p = 0.824

BDI Beck Depression Index, PCL-M Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-Military, NSI Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory.

Protein, neuronal-derived EV, and psychometric testing

Neuronal-derived EV tau concentrations (natural log-transformed mean ± SD) were significantly elevated in experienced breachers (0.3301 ± 0.5225) compared to controls (−0.4279 ± 0.7557; F = 10.43, p = 0.003) (Fig. 1a). No statistically significant changes were noted in EV NF-L (p = 0.224) or Aβ42 (p = 0.168) (Fig. 1b,c). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in serum levels of NF-L (p = 0.672), tau (p = 0.302), or Aβ42 (p = 0.190) (Fig. 1d–f).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Neuronal-derived EV tau distinguishes experienced breachers from controls. (a) Exosomal tau was elevated in the experienced breacher group compared to the control group. There were no statistically significant changes in EV levels of (b) NF-L or (c) Aβ42. There were no statistically significant changes in serum levels of (d) tau, (e) NF-L, or (f) Aβ42. *indicates p < 0.05, error bars represent the mean and SD. NF-L neurofilament light, amyloid-beta.

Elevated EV tau levels significantly correlated with increased NSI score in experienced breachers (r = 0.596, p = 0.015) (Table 2). In linear regression, EV tau significantly predicted higher NSI score (F(1,14) = 7.702, p = 0.015, R2 = 0.355).

Table 2.

Biomarker spearman correlations with psychometric tests.

Serum NF-L Serum Tau Serum Aβ42 EV
NF-L
EV
Tau
EV
Aβ42
BDI Pearson coefficient 0.367 0.055 0.281 0.363 −0.131 −0.106
p-value 0.111 0.819 0.229 0.126 0.627 0.665
N 20 20 20 19 16 19
PCL-M Pearson coefficient 0.302 0.231 0.277 0.266 −0.496 0.050
p-value 0.196 0.328 0.237 0.272 0.051 0.840
N 20 20 20 19 16 19
NSI Pearson coefficient −0.066 −0.009 −0.173 0.140 0.596* −0.310
p-value 0.783 0.968 0.466 0.568 0.015 0.196
N 20 20 20 19 16 19

*p < 0.01.

BDI Beck Depression Index, PCL-M Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-Military, NSI Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory.

Discussion

In this study we report a significant elevation in neuronal-derived EV concentrations of tau. Further, we found that this central measure of tau related to neurobehavioral symptom burden. These findings implicate neuronally-derived tau in repetitive, low-level blast exposures and suggest that this elevation relates to persistent neurological symptoms.

The observation of elevated tau in neuronal-derived EVs aligns with previous reports of EV sources of tau in mild TBI, including repetitive injuries21,22. Conversely, our finding that experienced breachers showed no statistically significant changes in serum levels of tau, NF-L, and Aβ42 differs from prior reports of elevated levels in military and civilian TBI populations712. This discrepancy may be explained by the studied population. Evidence suggests that blast exposure has a distinct neuropathology from the blunt force impacts observed in these aforementioned studies23. Prior work in a blast-exposed population also reports elevated serum levels of tau, NF-L, and Aβ4213; however, that population was exposed acutely and earlier in their careers, during initial breacher training activities, and did not experience the cumulative exposures in this current population of experienced breachers. Many studies are showing acute effects2,3,20, whereas ours assessed the cumulative effects over a career. The acute vs. cumulative (chronic) dimension is important, particularly if it sets the conditions for pathological conditions that take years to develop. These differing results imply not only the importance of stratifying heterogenous blunt impact and blast exposure populations (i.e. experienced breachers), but also the importance of differentiating central and peripheral neuropathological mechanisms.

Tau and Aβ42 are neuronal structure proteins that can be detected in circulation after TBI with elevations linked to TBI severity and clinical outcomes8,12. Accumulation of these proteins has well-recognized links to neurodegenerative processes including Alzheimer’s disease and chronic traumatic encephalopathy2426. Following blast exposure, evidence from preclinical models suggests marked disturbance to cerebrovascular functioning27, although altered BBB function following blast exposures in human populations remains unclear. Because EVs transport cellular material (including neurotoxic proteins) across the BBB and may contribute to neurodegenerative processes28, understanding the impact of neuronal-derived EVs in repetitive blast exposure is needed. Additionally, while tau is predominantly expressed in neurons, tau is not a brain-specific protein and is expressed in other tissues such as muscle fibers29. Thus, the ability to distinguish CNS from peripheral sources of tau is essential in the context of understanding the neurological response to repetitive blast exposures and subsequent chronic neurological outcomes; measuring tau in neuronally-derived EVs may be one avenue in which this can be accomplished.

Elevated neuronal-derived EV tau correlates with increased NSI score in the breacher population, implicating neuronal-specific tau with repetitive low-level blast exposures and worse clinical outcomes. This finding suggests clinical relevance considering prior studies in military populations have also reported poor neurocognitive outcomes. Acute blast overpressure has been previously linked to decreased neurocognitive performance2, and chronic occupational exposure to low level blasts has been linked to cognitive, affective, and physical symptoms similar to concussion3. Brain imaging changes together with cognitive and neurobehavioral deficits have been observed in military veterans with mTBI resulting from repetitive blast exposures30. Further, an over twofold increased risk in developing dementia was associated with mTBI in a large retrospective cohort study of 350,000 military personnel and veterans, highlighting an imminent concern for the aging veteran population31,32. The link between neurobehavioral symptoms and EV tau levels in breachers implies a combination approach of blood-based biomarkers and psychometric testing may be valuable to identify those who may be at risk for developing adverse long-term outcomes.

A major strength of this study is the comparison of both serum and neuronal-derived EV levels of proteins related to neurodegeneration in a unique population with occupational exposure to repetitive low-level blasts. Importantly, we determined neuronal sources of tau were linked with neurobehavioral outcomes. The recruitment of experienced breacher and control groups with similar occupational environments controls for career-related factors (e.g. physical exertion) between groups and suggests protein changes may be more specific to repetitive blast exposures rather than other occupational factors. This study was constrained by a small sample size. The lack of additional time points precluded a longitudinal comparison of outcomes in relation to the initially reported protein levels. The biodistribution of L1-CAM should be taken into consideration in the interpretation of these findings. Although enriched in neurons33, L1-CAM is expressed in both central and peripheral nerve cells34, and, as described more recently, in other cell types, including blood and immune cells35. Examination of the mechanism causing the observed increase in neuronal-derived EV tau was also outside the scope of this work.

Despite these limitations, our results suggest that examining links between neural proteins and symptoms may have clinical relevance in experienced breacher populations. Future studies should continue to investigate serum and neuronal EV levels of neuronal-related proteins to identify and verify biomarkers that may be indicative of neurological outcomes in experienced breachers.

Methods

Clinical methodology

The Institutional Review Boards at the Naval Medical Research Center (NMRC) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) reviewed and approved all study procedures, and all methods were performed in accordance with guidelines and regulations. All participants provided written informed consent prior to study enrollment. Procedures were implemented at the NIH Clinical Center over a five-day evaluation period. The study enrolled 20 active or prior active duty military or civilian law enforcement breachers with: (1) four or more years of active breaching experience or (2) exposed to greater than 400 breaching blasts during a career but no acute exposures prior to participation in this study. Fourteen controls were enrolled with 4 or more years of military or civilian law enforcement experience, with active involvement in military or civilian law enforcement training or operations, and exposure to 40 or less blasts over their career. Exclusion criteria included: a history of moderate to severe TBI with loss of consciousness greater than 5 min, central nervous system (CNS) disorder, respiratory conditions, cardiac conditions, and any other health conditions influencing cerebral metabolism.

Demographics, clinical history, and psychometric testing

Demographic and clinical information was gathered during interviews with participants. Psychometric tests were utilized to evaluate cognitive domains and symptomology. The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) was used to measure depression symptom severity36. The BDI is a 21-item self-report rating scale with high internal consistency for both psychiatric and non-psychiatric populations (α = 0.86 and 0.81, respectively)37. The Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-Military (PCL-M) was administered to screen for combat-related PTSD symptoms. The PCL-M is a 17-item self-report scale. It has been shown to have high test–retest reliability (r = 0.96) and internal consistency (α = 0.96) in Vietnam veterans38. The Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI) was used to assess postconcussive symptoms. The NSI is a 22-item self-report scale and has shown both excellent internal consistency (α = 0.95) as well as the ability to differentiate veterans with TBIs from those without39.

Blood biomarkers

Non-fasting blood samples were collected between 9:00am and 12:00 pm prior to interviews and the psychometric testing. Peripheral blood samples were drawn into ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) tubes and processed for serum within one hour using standard protocols11. Blood samples were stored at −80 °C until batch assay processing.

Neuronal-derived EV isolation

Total EVs were isolated from frozen serum aliquots and enriched for neuronal-derived EVs as previously described22. Briefly, EVs were isolated from 0.5 mL of frozen human serum following ExoQuick manufacturer instructions (System Biosciences, Cat # EXOQ5TM-1, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and MISEV2018 reporting guidelines40 as previously described41. For EV characterization data, see supplementary material and supplemental fig. S1. Neuronal-derived EVs were enriched by using 4 μg of biotinylated antibodies against neuronal surface markers CD171 (L1CAM) (clone 5G3; eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) in 50 μL of 3% Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) (Thermo-Fisher Scientific Inc., Rockford, IL, USA), and followed by adding 15 μL of Streptavidin-agarose Ultralink resin (Thermo-Fisher Scientific Inc., Rockford, IL, USA) in 25 μL of 3% BSA per tube. The resin pellet was resuspended in 200 μL of 0.1 M glycine–HCl and centrifuged at 4 °C (for 10 min at 4500 × g). Supernatant fluid was then harvested to new collecting tubes containing 25 μL of 10% BSA and 15 μL of 1 M Tris–HCl and mixed. Neuronal-derived EVs were lysed with equal volume of mammalian protein extraction reagent (M-PER) (Thermo-Fisher Scientific Inc., Rockford, IL, USA), and then the lysis was ready for downstream analysis.

Protein quantification

NFL, tau, and Aβ42 proteomic analyses were measured separately from serum samples and neuronal-derived EVs in duplicate using high-definition (HD-1), single-molecule array technology (Simoa, Quanterix, Lexington, MA). The coefficient of variation for all concentration values were < 20%. The lower limit of detection for each assay are: NFL, 0.038 pg/mL; tau, 0.019 pg/mL; and Aβ42, 0.045 pg/mL.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted with SPSS Build 1.0.0.1298 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). Figures were created using GraphPad Prism version 8.2.0 (La Jolla, CA: GraphPad Software). Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between the experienced breacher and control groups using chi-square and independent samples t-test. To compare biomarker levels between the experienced breacher and control groups, values were natural log-transformed to adjust for normality. Pearson’s correlations were used to evaluate biomarker values and psychometric tests within the breacher group. Protein concentrations were compared between groups using one-way ANOVA. Linear regression was subsequently run to determine ability of significant biomarkers to predict psychometric testing outcomes within the experienced breacher group. Statistical tests were two-tailed and p < 0.05 was considered a significant difference.

Supplementary Information

Acknowledgements

Material has been reviewed by the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. There is no objection to its presentation and/or publication. The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors, and are not to be construed as official, or as reflecting true views of the Department of the Army, Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. The investigators have adhered to the policies for protection of human subjects as prescribed in AR 70-25. Several of the authors are military service members or federal civil service employees. This work was prepared as a part of their official duties. Title 17 U.S.C. § 105 provides that “Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government.” Title 17 U.S.C. § 101 defines a U.S. Government work as a work prepared by a military service member or employee of the U.S. Government as part of that person’s official duties. This work was supported by National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) and National Institute of Neurological Disease and Stroke (NINDS) Intramural Research Programs. This work was supported in part by an appointment to the Research Participation Program at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education through an interagency agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy and the U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command. This work was supported/funded by the Joint Program Committee-5 Development of Exposure Standards to Repeated Blast Exposure program, work unit #603115HP-3730-001-A1118.

Author contributions

K.A.E., J.M.G., and K.G. contributed to the conception or design of the study. K.A.E. drafted the manuscript. K.A.E. and K.G. analyzed and interpreted the results. K.A.E., J.M.G., K.G., J.L., W.C., E.M.W., J.R.S., S.T.A, R.V., and C.M. contributed substantial revisions to the manuscript. E.M.W. supervised and provided clinical and administrative support for the clinical study. W.C., A.M.Y., M.L.L., P.W., E.P., and K.C.D. managed and executed the protocol, recruited the subjects, collected the samples, and contributed to the collection of data reported in this manuscript. C.L., C.D., and B.Q. conducted the experiments. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Funding

Open Access funding provided by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

Data availability

The anonymized data that support the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request from any qualified investigator to the corresponding author.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-021-97913-0.

References

  • 1.Ritenour AE, Baskin TW. Primary blast injury: Update on diagnosis and treatment. Crit. Care Med. 2008;36:S311–S317. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31817e2a8c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.LaValle CR, et al. Neurocognitive performance deficits related to immediate and acute blast overpressure exposure. Front. Neurol. 2019;10:949. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Carr W, et al. Relation of repeated low-level blast exposure with symptomology similar to concussion. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 2015;30:47–55. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Carr W, Kelley A, Cowan D, Toolin C, Weber N. Association of MOS-based blast exposure with medical outcomes. Front. Neurol. 2020;11:619. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Belding JN, et al. Self-reported concussion symptomology during deployment: Differences as a function of injury mechanism and low-level blast exposure. J. Neurotrauma. 2020 doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.6997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Belding JN, et al. Blast exposure and risk of recurrent occupational overpressure exposure predict deployment TBIs. Mil. Med. 2019;185:e538–e544. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usz289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pattinson CL, et al. Concurrent mild traumatic brain injury and posttraumatic stress disorder is associated with elevated tau concentrations in peripheral blood plasma. J. Trauma. Stress. 2019;32:546–554. doi: 10.1002/jts.22418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shahim P, et al. Serum neurofilament light protein predicts clinical outcome in traumatic brain injury. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:36791. doi: 10.1038/srep36791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bogoslovsky T, et al. Increases of plasma levels of glial fibrillary acidic protein, tau, and amyloid beta up to 90 days after traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma. 2017;34:66–73. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.4333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shahim P, Tegner Y, Marklund N, Blennow K, Zetterberg H. Neurofilament light and tau as blood biomarkers for sports-related concussion. Neurology. 2018;90:e1780–e1788. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Olivera A, et al. Peripheral total tau in military personnel who sustain traumatic brain injuries during deployment. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72:1109–1116. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.1383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rubenstein R, et al. Comparing plasma phospho tau, total tau, and phospho tau-total tau ratio as acute and chronic traumatic brain injury biomarkers. JAMA Neurol. 2017;74:1063–1072. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.0655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Boutté AM, et al. Brain-related proteins as serum biomarkers of acute, subconcussive blast overpressure exposure: A cohort study of military personnel. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0221036. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Raposo G, Stoorvogel W. Extracellular vesicles: Exosomes, microvesicles, and friends. J. Cell Biol. 2013;200:373–383. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201211138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Osier N, et al. Exosomes in acquired neurological disorders: New insights into pathophysiology and treatment. Mol. Neurobiol. 2018;55:9280–9293. doi: 10.1007/s12035-018-1054-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Taylor DD, Gercel-Taylor C. Exosome platform for diagnosis and monitoring of traumatic brain injury. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 2014;369:20130503–20130503. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Shi M, et al. CNS tau efflux via exosomes is likely increased in Parkinson’s disease but not in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers. Dement. 2016;12:1125–1131. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Banks WA, et al. Transport of extracellular vesicles across the blood-brain barrier: Brain pharmacokinetics and effects of inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:4407. doi: 10.3390/ijms21124407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mondello S, et al. Circulating brain injury exosomal proteins following moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: Temporal profile, outcome prediction and therapy implications. Cells. 2020;9:977. doi: 10.3390/cells9040977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tschiffely AE, et al. Assessing a blast-related biomarker in an operational community: Glial fibrillary acidic protein in experienced breachers. J. Neurotrauma. 2020;37:1091–1096. doi: 10.1089/neu.2019.6512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kenney K, et al. Higher exosomal phosphorylated tau and total tau among veterans with combat-related repetitive chronic mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2018;32:1276–1284. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2018.1483530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gill JM, et al. Higher exosomal tau, amyloid-beta 42 and IL-10 are associated with mild TBIs and chronic symptoms in military personnel. Brain Inj. 2018;32:1359–1366. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2018.1471738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Agoston DV. Modeling the long-term consequences of repeated blast-induced mild traumatic brain injuries. J. Neurotrauma. 2017;34:S44–s52. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mohamed AZ, Cumming P, Gotz J, Nasrallah F. Tauopathy in veterans with long-term posttraumatic stress disorder and traumatic brain injury. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2019;46:1139–1151. doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-4241-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gaiottino J, et al. Increased neurofilament light chain blood levels in neurodegenerative neurological diseases. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e75091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nakamura A, et al. High performance plasma amyloid-β biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease. Nature. 2018;554:249–254. doi: 10.1038/nature25456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cao R, et al. Comprehensive characterization of cerebrovascular dysfunction in blast traumatic brain injury using photoacoustic microscopy. J. Neurotrauma. 2019;36:1526–1534. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.6062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Caruso Bavisotto C, et al. Extracellular vesicle-mediated cell−cell communication in the nervous system: Focus on neurological diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:434. doi: 10.3390/ijms20020434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gu Y, Oyama F, Ihara Y. Tau is widely expressed in rat tissues. J. Neurochem. 1996;67:1235–1244. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1996.67031235.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Peskind ER, et al. Cerebrocerebellar hypometabolism associated with repetitive blast exposure mild traumatic brain injury in 12 Iraq war Veterans with persistent post-concussive symptoms. Neuroimage. 2011;54(Suppl 1):S76–82. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Barnes DE, et al. Association of mild traumatic brain injury with and without loss of consciousness with dementia in us military veterans association of mild traumatic brain injury and loss of consciousness with dementia in veterans association of mild traumatic brain injury. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75:1055–1061. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.0815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Pattinson CL, Gill JM. Risk of dementia after TBI - A cause of growing concern. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2018;14:511–512. doi: 10.1038/s41582-018-0041-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Moos M, et al. Neural adhesion molecule L1 as a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily with binding domains similar to fibronectin. Nature. 1988;334:701–703. doi: 10.1038/334701a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kapogiannis D, et al. Dysfunctionally phosphorylated type 1 insulin receptor substrate in neural-derived blood exosomes of preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. FASEB J. Off. Publ. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 2015;29:589–596. doi: 10.1096/fj.14-262048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Angiolini F, Cavallaro U. The pleiotropic role of L1CAM in tumor vasculature. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;18:254. doi: 10.3390/ijms18020254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 1961;4:561–571. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Beck AT, Steer RA, Carbin MG. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 1988;8:77–100. doi: 10.1016/0272-7358(88)90050-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Weathers, F., Litz, B., Herman, D., Huska, J. A. & Keane, T. The PTSD Checklist (PCL): Reliability, validity, and diagnostic utility. in Paper Presented in Annual Meeting of the International Society of Trauma Stress Studies. Vol. 462 (1993).
  • 39.King PR, et al. Psychometric study of the neurobehavioral symptom inventory. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 2012;49:879–888. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2011.03.0051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Théry C, et al. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): A position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines. J. Extracell. Vesicles. 2018;7:153570. doi: 10.1080/20013078.2018.1535750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mustapic M, et al. Plasma extracellular vesicles enriched for neuronal origin: A potential window into brain pathologic processes. Front. Neurosci. 2017;11:278. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The anonymized data that support the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request from any qualified investigator to the corresponding author.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES