Problem
Forceps are generally required to perform a skin punch biopsy in a common setting (Llamas-Velasco and Paredes, 2012, Nischal et al., 2008). However, surgical tools occasionally damage the sample or produce histological artifacts (Elston et al., 2016, Stratman et al., 2016). In addition, these tools may not always be available on certain occasions or their use may involve additional costs.
Solution
We present a novel technique for performing skin biopsies that only requires a punch biopsy and gauze. We have called the technique pinch biopsy due to the typical movement performed for specimen extraction, as shown in Fig. 1. First, the punch is introduced deep into the hypodermis (Fig. 1A) and, using the thumb and forefinger in a pinching movement, the distal portion of the cylinder is pulled vertically and fully released without causing damage to the sample (Fig. 1B and C). This method can easily be performed using a ≤ 5 mm punch on the skin of the trunk, as well as upper and lower limbs. In these locations, the skin cylinder is often partly detached from the hypodermis when pulling the punch and can be safely extracted with a mild traction. A piece of gauze is recommended to prevent the sample from sliding away covered in blood (Fig. 1D) and introduce the sample to the specimen cup.
Fig. 1.
Pinch biopsy procedure. (A) The biopsy punch is introduced deep into the hypodermis in an inflammatory lesion on the abdomen. (B, C) Using the thumb and forefinger like a pincer, the distal portion of the cylinder is pulled vertically and fully released. (D) The skin sample is gently introduced in the formaldehyde-filled specimen cup.
Pinch biopsies can be performed on most inflammatory diseases except for sclerosing diseases, such as morphea, scleroderma, or panniculitis. In these conditions, skin cylinders tend to sink in rather than readily pop out and it is thus more difficult to collect the skin sample. We do not recommend performing pinch biopsies on sensitive areas, such as the nose, forehead, and scalp, where finger extraction might be more difficult than on other locations. In every other setting, we consider this technique to be advantageous.
Conflicts of interest
None.
Funding
None.
Study approval
The author(s) confirm that any aspect of the work covered in this manuscript that has involved human patients has been conducted with the ethical approval of all relevant bodies.
References
- Elston D.M., Stratman E.J., Miller S.J. Skin biopsy: Biopsy issues in specific diseases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74(1):1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.06.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Llamas-Velasco M., Paredes B.E. Basic concepts in skin biopsy. Part I. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2012;103:12–20. doi: 10.1016/j.adengl.2011.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nischal U., Nischal K.C., Khopkar Techniques of skin biopsy and practical considerations. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2008;1:107–111. doi: 10.4103/0974-2077.44174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stratman E.J., Elston D.M., Miller S.J. Skin biopsy: Identifying and overcoming error in the skin biopsy pathway. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74(1):19–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.06.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

