Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic outbreak caused many negative effects on both the global and national economies. To implement effective policies to mitigate the negative impact of a pandemic, it is necessary to identify particularly vulnerable areas. The objective of this paper is to rank the EU countries in terms of the level of vulnerability of their economies to the impact of the pandemic. For this purpose, the COVID-19 Economic Vulnerability Index (CEVI) was constructed. It replaces the 15-dimensional set of characteristics of the countries with one aggregate, synthetic indicator estimated for 27 EU member states. In the study multivariate statistical methods, including agglomerative clustering and multi-attribute methods of object assessment were used to analyse the effects of the pandemic. The research shows that EU countries have different levels of economic vulnerability to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The southern European countries (Spain, Croatia, Greece and Italy), where the tourism sector plays an important role in GDP composition, are the most fragile. Germany and the Scandinavian countries proved to be the least sensitive to the negative impact of the pandemic. The CEVI can be an important part of the decision support system. It enables the identification of countries that show greater vulnerability to the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and may help support countries that need help the most. The proposed index also indicates certain areas in the country’s economy that make it more vulnerable. The CEVI in combination with other instruments can be a very useful tool to improve the economy’s resilience and help it recover faster in the event of a pandemic shock.
Keywords: economic vulnerability, COVID-19 pandemic, multivariate statistical methods, synthetic measure
References
- 1.WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard, https://covid19.who.int/
- 2.Zwart S., Davradakis E., Marchitto B., Santos R. The EIB COVID-19 Economic Vulnerability Index - An analysis of countries outside the European Union. European Investment Bank; 2020. DOI: 10.2867/812925. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Marti L., Puertas R. “European countries’ vulnerability to COVID-19: multicriteria decision-making techniques.”. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja. 2021 DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2021.1874462. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Salisu A.A., Ogbonna A.E., Oloko T.F., Adediran I.A. “A New Index for Measuring Uncertainty Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic.”. Sustainability. 2021;13(6):3212. DOI: 10.3390/su13063212. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Verma P., Dumka A., Bhardwaj A., Ashok A., Kestwal M.Ch., Kumar P. “A Statistical Analysis of Impact of COVID19 on the Global Economy and Stock Index Returns”. SN COMPUT. SCI. 2021;27(2) doi: 10.1007/s42979-020-00410-w. DOI: 10.1007/s42979-020-00410-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Diop, S., Asongu S.A., and Nnanna, J. (2020) “Covid-19 economic vulnerability and resilience indexes: global evidence.” Research Africa Network Working Papers 20/070. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3705253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 7.Raga S., te Velde D.W. Economic Vulnerabilities to Health Pandemics: which Countries are Most Vulnerable to the Impact of Coronavirus. Supporting Economic Transformation; 2020. pp. 6–11. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mikolai J., Keenan K., Kulu H. “Intersecting household-level health and socio-economic vulnerabilities and the COVID-19 crisis: An analysis from the UK.”. SSM – Population Health. 2020;12:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100628. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Weier M., Saunders I. Using the Social Progress Index to Identify COVID-19 Vulnerabilities. A CSI Amplify Response. Centre of Social Impact; 2021. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bhattacharya M., Banerjee P. “COVID-19: Indices of economic and health vulnerability for the Indian states.”. Social, Sciences & Humanities Open. 2021;4(1) DOI: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100157. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dong E., Du H., Gardner L. “An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time.”. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2020;20:533–534. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30120-1. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30120-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Walesiak M. Uogólniona miara odległości GDM w statystycznej analizie wielowymiarowej z wykorzystaniem programu R. Wrocław University of Economics Press; Wrocław: 2016. p. 18. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hellwig Z. In: Metody i modele ekonomiczno-matematyczne w doskonaleniu zarządzania gospodarką socjalistyczną. Welfe W., editor. PWE; Warszawa: 1981. “Wielowymiarowa analiza porównawcza i jej zastosowanie w badaniach wielocechowych obiektów gospodarczych”; p. 48. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Walesiak M. “Przegląd formuł normalizacji wartości zmiennych oraz ich własności w statystycznej analizie wielowymiarowej”. Przegląd Statystyczny. 2014;61(2):363–372. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kukula K., Bogocz D. “Zero Unitarization Method and its Application in Ranking Research in Agriculture”. ECREG STUDIES Economic and Regional Studies. 2014;7(3):6. DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.265035. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bąk A. “Comparative Analysis of Selected Linear Ordering Methods Based on Empirical and Simulation Data.”. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu. 2018;508:19–28. DOI: 10.15611/pn.2018.508.02. [Google Scholar]