Skip to main content
Blood Transfusion logoLink to Blood Transfusion
. 2021 Aug 5;19(5):384–395. doi: 10.2450/2021.0083-21

A nationwide survey of clinical use of blood in Italy

Giuseppina Facco 1, Francesco Bennardello 2, Francesco Fiorin 3, Claudia Galassi 4, Chiara Monagheddu 4, Pierluigi Berti 5; the SIMTI Study Group for Clinical Use of Blood in Italy6
PMCID: PMC8486606  PMID: 34369873

Abstract

Background

In Italy, as in many developed countries, a decline in blood component (BC) consumption, especially red blood cells (RBC), has been described, but not studied at a national level. We, therefore, designed a nationwide survey to determine the main features of BC recipients and obtain a picture of the clinical use of BC for the first time in Italy, in order to understand BC demands better and identify specific fields in which to apply Patient Blood Management (PBM).

Material and methods

A nationwide survey of all Italian Blood Establishments working as Hospital Blood Banks (HBB) was performed. Data were collected through an online report form recording information on the number and geographic area of the responding HBB, year of birth and sex of the BC recipients, and clinical indications for every unit of RBC, platelets and plasma transfused in a 24-hour period.

Results

On the survey date, 153/237 (64.5%) of the HBB returned 4,356 forms, reporting 7,523 transfusions. The median and mean ages of the recipients were 73 (range, 0–106) and 67.5 years, respectively; 33.0% were >80 years old and 64.9% >65 years old, with no relevant differences between males and females. Overall, 6,309 RBC units were transfused to 3,850 recipients, 66.7% of them for a medical indication and 32.4% for a surgical indication. The commonest medical indication was acquired, non-cancer-related anaemia and more than 30% of the transfusions occurred in the Emergency Department. Five hundred and sixty platelet transfusions were given to 520 recipients, 62.7% of them for prophylaxis and 28.6% for bleeding before or during an invasive procedure or surgery or for thrombocytopenia. One hundred and ninety-four patients received 654 units of plasma, 71.1% of which were for therapeutic purposes in bleeding patients.

Discussion

We collected a picture of blood transfusion epidemiology in Italy. The data suggest that future PBM plans should be focused on medical anaemia especially in the setting of Emergency Departments.

Keywords: blood donors, Italy, epidemiology, blood component transfusion, surveys and questionnaires

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, the use of blood has decreased overall in many developed countries, thanks to the implementation of Patient Blood Management (PBM) programmes, adherence to guidelines encouraging restrictive transfusion thresholds, and advances in technology and surgical techniques15. Nevertheless, demographic changes are a threat to the balance of blood demand and supply in blood services, because both blood consumption and donation patterns vary according to age, as has been shown in different countries68. The decrease in younger age groups implies a reduction in the population eligible to donate blood, while the increase in the elderly population leads to a high demand for blood for older patients who are undergoing a growing number of complex therapeutic procedures, such as haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, cardiovascular surgery and solid organ transplantation9,10. In order to gain a broad perspective of the clinical use of blood and determine the main characteristics of recipients, many countries have carried out specific surveys1113. In the USA, Shehata et al. found that, despite a reduction in the mean number of red blood cell (RBC) units administered, there has been an increase in the proportion of patients admitted to hospital who are transfused. They also found that most RBC units are given to patients in general internal medicine and haematology-oncology services11. In both France12 and the UK13, most patients are transfused in a medical context and the median age of transfusion recipients is over 65 years. A decline in blood component (BC) consumption, especially RBC, has been described in Italy too15,16, but studies investigating whether this decline involves all recipients and occurs for both medical and surgical indications have not yet been done at a national level, and only occasionally performed at a local level17.

The concept of PBM was introduced as a tool to pursue the objective of national BC self-sufficiency18, and PBM recommendations were implemented in Italy by law in 201519. These recommendations suggested that PBM protocols be applied for all adult patients who are candidates for elective major surgery20,21.

In Italy, blood transfusion and transfusion medicine are recognised as essential activities of the National Health Service. Healthcare services, including blood and BC collection, processing, testing, storage and distribution as well as all transfusion medicine activities, are delivered by regional health services within a federalist legislative framework. The National Blood Centre (Centro Nazionale Sangue; CNS) is the competent authority in Italy for blood and BC. Regional health authorities inspect, authorise and accredit blood establishments (BE), according to regional, national and European legislation. In each of the 21 Italian regions, a regional blood centre is established by law. The regional blood centres coordinate the related local networks of BE, complying with national regulations and self-sufficiency, quality and safety plans. BE, which are mostly hospital-based, are responsible for collecting, processing, testing, storing and distributing blood and BC. Most of them also work as hospital blood banks (HBB), issuing BC to hospital inpatients, under the management of the hospital itself, with complete traceability from the donor to the patient, including haemovigilance. In 2019 the Italian population was 59,641,488 inhabitants22, while the number of RBC transfusions per 1,000 inhabitants was 40.6, as stated in the 2020 self-sufficiency national plan23.

With the purpose of determining the main characteristics of BC recipients, acquire a broader perspective of national usage of BC, and to identify specific fields of PBM application, we conducted a national survey of BC use in all Italian BE working as HBB.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All HBB in Italy were invited to participate in a survey of BC use by all patients who received a transfusion of RBC, platelet or fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) on a specific day. The numbers of RBC, platelet and FFP units transfused in Italy per year and per day were considered with respect to the number of BC transfused in one reference year. At the moment of the study, the most recently available national data were those referred to the year 201715, which was therefore chosen as the reference year. The national data came from annual reports by the Italian National Blood Centre (CNS). The CNS coordinates the National Blood Information System (Sistema Informativo dei Servizi TRAsfusionali; SISTRA) which collects the data related to the activities of the Italian Blood System. Daily BC use in 2017 was calculated as the total of BC transfused in 2017 divided by 365 days.

Participation per geographic area of the country (North-West, North-East, Centre, South, and Islands, based on the Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics [NUTS])24 was also investigated as the percentage of BC transfusions occurring in HBB participating in the study vs the number not participating in the survey.

Participants entered data electronically, using an online survey data collection sheet (Online Supplementary Content, Figure S1) which was a one-page pre-printed report form. The information collected was year of birth and sex of the BC recipient, and clinical indication, for every unit of RBC, platelets, and FFP transfused on Wednesday, 10th of April 2019. This date was selected as representative of an “ordinary” day; Saturday and Sunday were excluded because elective surgical procedures are not performed on these days.

The age of the patient receiving each unit was expressed as 2019 minus birth year. RBC, platelet and FFP are intended as therapeutic adult and neonatal units. FFP includes, as specified in Italian Blood System data15, recovered plasma, source plasma, source plasma from multiple apheresis and pharmaceutical inactivated plasma. The clinical indication was specified for every adult or neonatal unit of RBC, platelets and FFP transfused on the survey day. The categories of clinical indications were based on the Italian Guideline of clinical use of blood25 and other national studies12,13. The analyses were performed on both the recipients and the BC.

Regarding recipient data, the number of patients transfused, median and mean recipient age across all units used, the male-to-female ratios at all ages, the distribution of recipients by sex and age group, the number of BC transfused to males and to females, and the percentage of RBC, platelets and FFP transfused to males and females by 5-year age group were calculated.

Concerning BC data, the RBC, platelet and FFP units transfused for the main clinical indications were calculated. All platelet units are expressed as “therapeutic platelet dose”. An “adult platelet dose”, meaning ≥2×1011 platelets, is conventionally composed of five single units of whole blood-derived buffy coats. Each unit of apheresis platelets is equal to an “adult platelet dose”; paediatric platelet dose is conventionally composed of one single unit of whole blood-derived buffy coats15. The mean number of units transfused per patient was determined for RBC and platelets, but not for FFP because the specific dose, calculated as mL/kg, was not available. The clinical indications for RBC transfusion were first divided by broad category (surgical and medical). The following indications were considered as surgical: cardiothoracic surgery, gastrointestinal (oesophageal, gastric, colorectal, hepatic, pancreatic) surgery, orthopaedics and trauma, urology, vascular surgery, neurosurgery, obstetric and gynaecological surgery, and otolaryngology. Medical indications included anaemia (acquired non-oncological, neonatal/foetal, post-operative, oncological and onco-haematological, in solid organ transplantation, thalassaemia and haemoglobinopathies, not defined), gastrointestinal bleeding, and haemorrhage. For the main indications for RBC, platelet, and FFP transfusions, the most frequent sites in which the transfusions were administered were specified, as percentages of total transfusions.

All data were first managed with the software programme Excel, v. 14.1.0 (Microsoft Inc., Redmond, WA, USA). Data quality control and analyses were performed using the STATA software package (Stata, version 11.2; StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).

RESULTS

Participation and data

Of the 237 HBB invited to participate, 153 (64.5%) returned 4,356 reports.

The total number of BC transfused in all HBB in the reference year 2017 was 3,022,813 (2,473,714 RBC, 259,036 platelets, 290,063 FFP). The BC transfused in 2017 in HBB that participated in the survey and returned reports were 2,358,393, representing, when compared to the BC transfused in Italy in the same year, 78% of transfusions. Online Supplementary Content, Figure S2 shows the number of BC transfused in HBB participating and not participating in the survey in the reference year (2017) and illustrates geographical variations among NUTS: North-West, 73.2%; North-East, 100%; Centre, 71.1%; South, 67.5%; and the Islands (79%).

The mean number of BC transfused in a day in 2017 was 8,282, while the number of BC transfused on the 2019 survey date in HBB from which reports were received was 7,523, equivalent to 90.8% of the mean number of BC transfused in a day in 2017.

Characteristics of the blood component recipients

On the day chosen for the survey, 4,356 patients were transfused of whom 2,096 were women (48.1%), and 2,254 were men (51.7%). Data on gender were missing for six patients.

The BC recipients’ median and mean ages were 73 (range, 0–106) and 67.5 years, respectively. There were 1,437 recipients aged more than 80 years old, who accounted for 33.0% of all recipients. Almost two-thirds of patients (2,826; 64.9%) were aged more than 65 years, whereas 132 (3%) were younger than 15 years. The male-to-female ratio for all ages was 1.08.

The distribution of recipients by sex and by 5-year age group is shown in Figure 1. There were no relevant differences between the proportions of males and females, except in the age band from 30 to 54 years and over 90 in which the mean male-to-female ratio was 0.7 and 0.5, respectively. The percentage distribution of RBC transfusions given to males and females, by 5-year age group (Figure 2), has a shape similar to that of recipient distribution by age group, probably because RBC are the most frequently transfused BC; the percentages of platelets and FFP transfused to males and females, by 5-year age group (Online Supplementary Content, Figures S3 and S4) did not seem to show particular trends among age bands, possibly because of the small numbers of transfusions in the period surveyed (24 hours).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The distribution of blood component recipients by sex and 5-year age group

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The percentage of red blood cell units transfused to males and females, by 5-year age group

A total of 3,953 BC were transfused to males (52.5%) and 3,560 to females (47.3%), while the recipients’ sex was not specified for 10 (0.4%) BC. With regard to the distribution of BC use according to sex, males received 3,254 (82.3%) RBC, 320 (8.1%) platelet and 379 (9.6%) FFP transfusions, while females received 3,045 (85,5%) RBC, 240 (6.7%) platelet and 275 (7.7%) FFP transfusions.

Use of blood components

Each of the 4,356 reports provided data from a patient who was prescribed one or several BC which were transfused into them on the survey day. Table I summarises the BC received by the 4,356 patients.

Table I.

Blood components received by the patients on the survey date

Blood components Patients (n=4,356)
N %
Red blood cells only 3,670 84.3%
Plasma only 111 2.6%
Platelets only 387 8.9%
Red blood cells and plasma 55 1.3%
Red blood cells and platelets 105 2.4%
Plasma and platelets 8 0.2%
Red blood cells, plasma and platelets 20 0.5%

Among the patients who received at least one RBC unit, 50.0% were transfused with only one unit and 41.5% with two units (cumulative percentage, 92.49%). Among recipients of platelets or FFP, 93.8% received one platelet unit, while one unit of FFP was transfused to 24.7% of patients and two units of FFP to 27.8% (cumulative percentage, 52.6%). Regarding FFP transfusions, among patients in the year bands over 15 years, i.e., adult patients, 19.9% received only one FFP unit and 29.9% received two (cumulative percentage, 49.85%).

On the day of the survey, 6,309 RBC units were transfused to 3,850 recipients, 66.7% of them for a medical indication and 32.4% for a surgical indication. The number of RBC units transfused, the number of recipients, and the mean number of RBC transfused per recipient for medical and surgical indications are shown in Table II.

Table II.

Red blood cell transfusions

Indications N. of RBC transfusions % Patients Units/patient
Medical
Acquired non-oncological anaemia 1438 22.8 971 1.5
Oncological anaemia 996 15.8 741 1.3
Thalassaemia and haemoglobinopathies 651 10.3 342 1.9
Cancer 488 7.7 340 1.4
Gastrointestinal bleeding 449 7.1 249 1.8
Multiple trauma 79 1.3 39 2.0
Haemorrhage (AUB, haematuria, haemoptysis) 46 0.7 19 2.4
Undefined anaemia 46 0.7 32 1.4
Neonatal/foetal anaemia 17 0.3 17 1.0
Total Medical 4,210 66.7 2,750 1.7
Surgical
Orthopaedics and trauma 717 11.4 429 1.7
Cardiac surgery 372 5.9 168 2.2
Gastrointestinal surgery 290 4.6 144 2.0
Urology 178 2.8 89 2.0
Obstetric and gynaecological surgery 145 2.3 64 2.3
Vascular surgery 136 2.2 68 2.0
Solid organ transplantation 76 1.2 28 2.7
Neurosurgery 68 1.1 38 1.8
Thoracic surgery 28 0.4 14 2.0
Postoperative anaemia 25 0.4 16 1.6
Otolaryngology 12 0.2 9 1.3
Total Surgical 2,047 32.4 1,067 2.0
Not reported 52 0.8 33 1.6
Total 6,309 3,850

RBC: red blood cells; AUB: abnormal uterine bleeding.

Among medical indications, the highest number of RBC were transfused for acquired non-oncological and onco-haematological anaemia, then thalassaemia and haemoglobinopathies. The majority of RBC transfusions for acquired non oncological anaemia were administered in Emergency Departments/Intensive Care Units (30.9%) and Medicine services (23.6%), while 42.7% of RBC transfusions for onco-haematological anaemia were in Oncology/Haematology services and 12.7% in HBB. RBC transfusions for thalassaemia and haemoglobinopathies were mainly administered in Day Hospitals (40.9%) and in Oncology/Haematology services (29.8%).

Of the RBC transfused for surgical indications, 11.4% were used in the context of orthopaedics and trauma, with 90% of them being administered in general wards and not in operating theatres, Emergency Departments or Intensive Care Units. Cardiac and gastrointestinal surgery accounted for 5.9% and 4.6%, respectively, of RBC transfusions for surgical indications.

Five hundred and sixty platelet units were transfused to 520 recipients: 62.7% of the units were transfused for prophylactic purposes and 28.6% for bleeding (before or during an invasive procedure or surgery or in thrombocytopenia). Clinical indications were not specified for 8.8% of the units transfused. Of the platelet units transfused for prophylaxis, 64.1% were administered in Oncology/Haematology services. The mean number of platelet units transfused per recipient was uniform among the categories of clinical indications (Table III).

Table III.

Platelet transfusions

Indications N. of platelet transfusions % Patients Units/Patient
Prophylaxis 287 51.3 280 1.0
Bleeding during invasive procedures or surgery 113 20.2 96 1.2
Prophylaxis before invasive procedures or surgery 64 11.4 61 1.0
Not specified 49 8.8 43 1.1
Bleeding in thrombocytopenia 47 8.4 40 1.2
Total 560 520 1.1

Regarding FFP transfusions, 654 units were transfused to 194 recipients: 464 (71.1%) of them were for therapeutic purposes in 194 bleeding patients; 32.6% of them occurred in General Surgery and 20.6% in Cardiac Surgery. Eighteen FFP transfusions (2.8%) were for prophylaxis in patients with inherited clotting factor deficiency for whom virally inactivated specific clotting factors were not available, 109 (16.6%) were transfused during plasma exchange procedures or neonatal exchange transfusions (Table IV). The mean number of FFP units transfused per recipient was not calculated because the definition of a FFP unit15 comprises more than one standardised product.

Table IV.

Fresh-frozen plasma transfusions*

Indications N. of FFP transfusions % Patients
Bleeding in surgical procedures/trauma/delivery 319 48.8 104
Plasma exchange in TTP 97 14.8 10
Bleeding in DIC 75 11.5 27
Not specified 63 9.6 23
Bleeding in inherited clotting factor deficiency * 35 5.4 10
Bleeding in massive transfusion 35 5.4 9
Prophylaxis in inherited clotting factor deficiency * 18 2.8 9
Neonatal exchange transfusions 12 1.8 2
Total 654 194
*

The mean number of FFP units transfused per recipient was not calculated because the definition of a FFP unit15 comprises more than one standardised product.

FFP: fresh-frozen plasma; TTP: thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura; DIC: disseminated Intravascular coagulation;

*

Virally inactivated specific clotting factors not available.

DISCUSSION

This study is the first ever conducted on the epidemiology of BC transfusion in Italy at the national level. The survey found that 66.6% of BC recipients are more than 65 years old, with no relevant differences between males and females, as observed in other studies1214,26, except in the age band from 30 to 54 years old, in which the mean male-to-female ratio was 0.7, perhaps related to obstetric and gynaecological indications for transfusions. Females were also prevalent among BC recipients over 90 years old (male-to-female ratio 0.5), probably in relation to the longer life expectancy of the female population who, in 2018, at 65 years of age had a residual life expectancy of 22.4 years (+0.3), compared to the 19.3 years (+0.2) for men27.

In agreement with previous epidemiologic surveys of blood usage1214, our study shows that RBC transfusion has been aimed at the elderly, with almost 50% of RBC transfused into patients older than 70 years. As expected, RBC are the most frequently transfused BC: more than 84% of BC recipients received only RBC and 50.0% of them were transfused with only one unit14,24. The transfusion of only one unit could be in line with the use of restrictive transfusion thresholds and the application of the “only one strategy” i.e. in clinically stable inpatients needing RBC transfusions a single-unit blood transfusion policy shall be adopted and further RBC units should only be transfused after a thorough clinical reassessment of the patient 20.

The majority of RBC units (66.7%) were transfused to medical patients, while most of the platelet transfusions were for prophylactic purposes and FFP was mainly used for bleeding in patients undergoing surgical procedures, trauma or delivery.

The most frequent indication for RBC transfusion was acquired non-oncological anaemia, an undefined diagnosis; interestingly, 30.9% of transfusions were administered in Emergency Departments or Intensive Care Units and 23.6% in Medicine Departments. Clinically significant anaemia, requiring RBC transfusions, is frequently observed in Emergency Departments where, according to several studies, at least 20% of packed RBC transfusions are administered2831. Recently, it was shown that 4.6% of anaemic patients referred to Emergency Departments were transfused, the iron balance test was rarely ordered among microcytic patients and that intravenous iron was prescribed for fewer than 10% of eligible patients. The Authors concluded that PBM principles should also be applied in Emergency Departments in order to promote a more appropriate and effective clinical approach to anaemic patients32. The same Authors later confirmed that early intravenous iron administration in the Emergency Department reduces the transfusion of RBC units, hospital admissions, re-transfusions, duration of stay in hospital and costs33. Although not all cases of severe or moderate acquired non-oncological anaemia referred to Emergency Departments should be treated with intravenous iron administration, a quick and effective definition of a highly probable iron deficiency status in patients with stable haemodynamics and few clinical symptoms, could sometime avoid RBC transfusion.

As seen in previous surveys10,1214 and recently confirmed in a large observational multicentre study34, orthopaedic conditions represent the most frequent indication for RBC transfusion in the surgical setting. In Italy, PBM protocols were promoted nationally in 201519 and regulatory guidelines for the implementation of PBM in candidates for major orthopaedic surgery in adults and elective major surgery were published in 2016- and 2017, respectively20,21, but preliminary data on the clinical use of BC at a national level were not available before this study. The findings of future surveys of the clinical use of blood could be compared with those of the present survey in order to detect developments.

With regard to platelet transfusions, most units were given prophylactically, with the commonest indication for platelet use being prophylaxis in haematological diseases, as found in other studies12,14,35. However, our survey did not collect information on the platelet count before transfusion and a subsequent survey should investigate transfusion thresholds. The large share of platelet usage allocated to prophylaxis of bleeding calls for efforts aimed at optimising this use. Indeed, overall use in prophylaxis in onco-haematological disease could be substantially reduced by lowering the platelet count threshold in selected patients without compromising safety36,37. There are still debates about prophylactic platelet transfusions in thrombocytopenic patients prior to surgery. A Cochrane review found insufficient evidence to recommend the administration of pre-procedure prophylactic platelet transfusions in this situation, with a lack of evidence that transfusion resulted in a reduction in post-operative bleeding or all-cause mortality. These authors hoped for future trials, including those involving major surgery and reporting on bleeding, adverse effects, mortality (as a long-term outcome) after surgery, duration of hospital stay and quality of life measures38.

With regard to FFP, the survey showed that 71.1% of transfusions were for therapeutic use; in fact, plasma is used extensively in the treatment of bleeding patients, even though evidence from randomised controlled trials comparing its effects in this context with those of other therapeutic interventions is still lacking39. On the other hand, investigations about BC therapy with a targeted ratio of packed RBC, platelets, and plasma as a treatment for massive haemorrhage in trauma or pre-hospital administration plasma in traumatic haemorrhagic shock4042 are still ongoing and may re-evaluate the use of plasma in the setting of trauma.

It is noteworthy that, among recipients who received at least one unit of FFP, 24.7% were transfused with only one unit and 27.8% received two units. Among patients over 15 years old, i.e., adult patients, 19.9% received only one FFP transfusion and 29.9% received two FFP (cumulative percentage, 49.85%). Although the dosage per patient is not known, because the definition of a unit of FFP comprises more than one product15, the data do suggest inadequate doses and, therefore, inappropriate use, as found in other studies on the epidemiology of blood transfusion12. In order to evaluate the appropriateness of plasma transfusions the dose per patient should be determined in future investigations.

Our study has some weaknesses. The sample of units transfused nationally in 24 hours only was limited and may not be adequately representative. Another limitation, again related to the study’s duration, is that it was not possible to determine transfusion requirements associated with a specific pathology, because the management recorded for each patient was only 1 day and hence incomplete. It is, therefore, possible that infrequent conditions and procedures associated with high BC use, such as massive haemorrhages, extracorporeal cardiac pumps, or thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, might have been under- or overrepresented in our sample. On the other hand, our study does have several strengths, first of all, the participation was very good: although the response rate of the HBB was 64.5%, we estimated that the activity of responding HBB represented 78% of the yearly national activity (when expressed as number of BC transfused in the reference year), or, more than 90% when expressed as mean number of BC transfused nationally in the day included in this survey; participation was also uniform among Italian geographic areas. Furthermore, the study examined the clinical indications on the transfusion request, which are more likely to provide the real reason for the transfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study is the first ever conducted on the epidemiology of BC transfusion in Italy at the national level. It gives an indication of current transfusion practice in Italy, which could facilitate demand planning by blood services and guide application of PBM initiatives.

The survey provides a snapshot of the epidemiology of blood transfusion in Italy in the year 2019. It would be necessary to repeat this survey in the future to have a dynamic view of BC use and to capture the most relevant trends.

Another future development could be a national web-based blood management application. Based on the clinical indications for the BC used in this survey, a national clinical benchmarking database could be developed with the goal of collecting information on the reason for blood use and linking it with patient-specific data and laboratory results.

Supplementary Information

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Roberta Frisenda (Italian Society of Transfusion Medicine and Immunohaematology, Rome, Italy) who managed and facilitated data exchange between the Authors and the SIMTI group for Clinical use of blood in Italy. We also acknowledge the Italian National Blood Centre (National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy) for providing the data on blood component utilisation in the country.

APPENDIX 1

Authors Affiliations
Raffaele Laricchia UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Regionale Miulli, Acquaviva Delle Fonti - Santeramo
Cinzia Scipioni UOSD di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Santa Maria Regina Degli Angeli, Adria
Giorgio Gianotto UOSD di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale San Lazzaro, Alba
Roberto Guaschino, Francesca Pollis UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale SS. Antonio, Biagio E Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria
Gianluca Riganello UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona Torrette
Luciano Lorusso UOSVD Immunoematologia e Medicina Trafusionale, Presidio Ospedaliero Andria, Andria
Pierluigi Berti UOC di Immunoematologia e Medicina Trasfusionale - SRC Valle D’Aosta, Presidio Ospedaliero Regionale Umberto Parini, Aosta
Roberto Zadi UOC Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale S. Donato, Arezzo
Antonio Canzian UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Mazzoni, Ascoli Piceno
Ilvana T. Scuvera, Fabio Marletto UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Cardinal Massaia, Asti
Saverio Misso UOC Servizio di Immunoematologia e Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale S. Giuseppe Moscati, Aversa
Antonino Raineri UOSD di Medicina Trasfusionale, CRO Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, Aviano
Michele Scelsi UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale San Paolo, Bari
Angelo Ostuni UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale - SRC Puglia, Ospedale Policlinico-Consorziale, Bari
Domenico Visceglie, Maria Sodano UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale di Venere, Bari Carbonara
Eugenio Peres UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Presidio Ospedaliero Dimiccoli, Barletta
Corrado Sardella UOSD di Medicina Trasfusionale, PO Bassano Del Grappa, Asiago, Bassano Del Grappa
Giuseppe Pipolo, Emilio Casaburi UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale S. Maria Della Speranza, Battipaglia
Stefano Capelli UOC E Dipartimento Trasfusionale, Ospedale S. Martino, Belluno
Vanda Randi, Matteo Capponi, Marina Verenini SIMT AMBO - CRS Emilia-Romagna, Ospedale Maggiore Pizzardi, Bologna
Vanda Randi, Patrizia Bernardoni, Nicola Venturoli UOC Trasfusionale e Immunoematologia, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna
Vanda Randi, Annarita Cenacchi, Veronica Roverini UOC Medicina Trasfusionale, Istituti Ortopedici Rizzoli, Bologna
Cinzia Vecchiato UOC di Immunoematologia e Trasfusionale - SRC Prov. Aut. Bolzano, Bolzano
Giovanni Camisasca, Daniel De Martino UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale SS. Trinità, Borgomanero
Giampaolo Gaiga UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Orlandi, Bussolengo
Mario Pani, Maria B. Tronci UOC Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale San Michele, Cagliari
Salvatore Platania UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, PO Gravina e S. Pietro, Caltagirone
Mauro Vanzelli UOSD di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale di Camposampiero, Camposampiero
Cristina Tassinari UOSD Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale S. Giacomo Apostolo, Castelfranco Veneto
Domenico Filomia UOSD di Medicina Trasfusionale, PO Ferrrari, Castrovillari
Sonia A. Raimondi, Pasquale Amato UOC Servizio Immunoematologia e Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale S’Anna e San Sebastiano, Caserta
Francesco Sessa, Orlando Pignalosa UOC Servizio Immunoematologia e Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale S. Leonardo, Castellammare di Stabia
Mario Lombardo, Patrizia Italia UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Cannizzaro, Catania
Santi Sciacca, UOC Medicina Trasfusionale, PO Garibaldi, Catania
Sebastiano Costanzo UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, PO Gaspare Rodolico, Catania
Adalgisa Brescia, Gabriella Talarico UOC Medicina Trasfusionale e CRQB, Ospedale Pugliese Ciaccio, Catanzaro
Camilla Vezzoli UOSD Medicina Trasfusionale - DMTE Brescia, Servizio Immunoematologia e Medicina Trasfusionale, Chiari
Patrizia di Gregorio, Amalia Procida UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Policlinico Universitario, Chieti
Gabriella Mazzaro, Davide Sambo UOSD Medicina Trasfusionale, Presidio Ospedaliero di Chioggia, Chioggia
Elisabetta Agea USD di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale di Città di Castello, Città di Castello
Maria C. Buonanno UOSD Medicina Trasfusionale - DMTE Varese, Ospedale S. Anna, Como - San Fermo Della Battaglia
Mattia Lachin UOSD Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Civile, Conegliano Veneto
Massimiliano Viti, Emanuela Nicotri UOSD Medicina Trasfusionale - DMTE Cremona, PO Ospedale Maggiore, Crema
Massimo Crotti UOC Medicina Trasfusionale - DMTE Cremona, Istituti Ospitalieri Cremona, Cremona
Marco Lorenzi UOC Interaziendale di Immunoematologia e Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale S. Croce, Cuneo
Gianluca Gessoni UOSD Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale di Dolo, Dolo-Mirano
Francesco Spedale, Biagia Pavone UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Umberto I, Enna
Luigina Romano UOC Medicina Trasfusionale - DMTE Brescia, Ospedale di Valle Camonica Sede di Esine, Esine
Ersilia A. Barbone UOSD Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale di Feltre, Feltre
Giuseppina Siracusa UOC Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Unificato, Fermo
Maurizio Govoni UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Arcispedale Sant’Anna, Ferrara - Cona
Isio Masini, Antonella Esposito, Lucia Magliaro UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale San Giovanni di Dio, Firenze
Franco Bambi UOC di Immunoematologia e Medicina Trasfusionale e Lab Terapie Cell, Ospedale Pediatrico Meyer, Firenze
Marta Micheli USD di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale San Giovanni Battina, Foligno
Carla Gargiulo UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Fabrizio Spaziani, Frosinone
Ambrogio Pagani UOC Medicina Trasfusionale - DMTE Varese, Ospedale Sant’ Antonio Abate di Gallarate, Gallarate
Antonio Lodato, Fiorella Barocci UOC Medicina Trasfusionale - DMTE Garbagnate, Ospedale di Garbagnate Milanese, Garbagnate Milanese
Paolo Strada UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale - SRC Liguria, Ospedale San Martino, Genova
Giovanni Imberciadori, Maria P. Campanella UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedali Galliera, Genova
Alessandro Correggi UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Villa Scassi, Genova
Gino Tripodi, Marina Martinengo UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale G. Gaslini, Genova
Maria Giavitto UOSD di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedali Riuniti Gorizia-Monfalcone, Gorizia
Carmelo F. Tornabene UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Misericordia, Grosseto
Vanda Randi, Massimo Bellinazzi, Antonella Padovani SSD di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Civile, Imola
Clemente Mazzei Struttura Trasfusionale, Ospedale Civile, Imperia
Anna Rughetti UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Presidio Ospedaliero San Salvatore, L’Aquila
Paola D’Elia Struttura Trasfusionale, Presidio Ospedaliero Del Levante Ligure - Ospedale S. Andrea, La Spezia
Federico G. Morelli Struttura Trasfusionale, Presidio Ospedaliero, Lavagna
Nicola di Renzo UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale ‘Vito Fazzi’, Lecce
Alessandro Gerosa UOC Medicina Trasfusionale - DMTE Lecco, Ospedale di Circolo A. Manzoni, Lecco
Clemente Corvo UOSD di Medicina Trasfusionale, PO Legnago, Zevio, Bovolone, Legnago
Bruno Brando UOC Medicina Trasfusionale - DMTE Garbagnate, Ospedale Civile di Legnano, Legnano
Salvatore Avena, Francesco Tonelli UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Unico Versilia, Lido di Camaiore-Viareggio
Ceretelli Silvia UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Presidio Ospedaliero Spedali Riuniti, Livorno
Giuseppe Cambiè UOC Medicina Trasfusionale - DMTE Pavia, Presidio Ospedaliero di Lodi, Lodi
Rosaria Bonini, Annalisa Martinucci UOC Medicina Trasfusionale e Immunoematologia, Ospedale San Luca, Lucca - Loc. San Filippo
Massimo Franchini UOC Medicina Trasfusionale - DMTE Cremona, Ospedale Carlo Poma, Mantova
Anna Baldi UOC Medicina Trasfusionale, Nuovo Ospedale Delle Apuane, Massa
Gianfranco Giannella UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, PO Madonna Delle Grazie, Matera
Giuseppe Pugliese UOC Medicina Trasfusionale - DMTE Milano Policlinico, Ospedale S.Maria Delle Stelle, Melzo
Roberta Fedele UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Papardo, Messina
Andrea Alonci, Eugenia Quartarone UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Policlinico Universitario, Messina
Gianluca Gessoni UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale - DIMT, Ospedale Dell’Angelo, Mestre
Luca Santoleri UOC Medicina Trasfusionale - DMTE Milano Niguarda, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano
Fernando Ravagnani, Flavio Arienti UOC Medicina Trasfusionale - DMTE Milano Niguarda, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano
Daniele Prati, Alessandra Berzuini UOC Medicina Trasfusionale - DMTE Milano Policlinico, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano
Silvano Rossini UOC Medicina Trasfusionale - DMTE Milano Niguarda, Servizio di Immunoematologia e Medicina Trasfusionale, Milano
Giovanni Battista Ceccherelli, Laura Bensi UOC di Immunoematologia e Medicina Trasfusionale, Policlinico di Modena, Modena
Angela M. Iannone, Roberta Bertorelo UOSVD Immunoematologia e Medicina Trafusionale, Ospedale Don Tonino Bello, Molfetta
Lauretta M. Manenti, Mannida Pianese UOSD Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedali Riuniti della Valdichiana Senese, Montepulciano
Cristina Paci UOSD Immunoematologia e Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Santa Maria alla Gruccia, Montevarchi-Valdarno
Fabio Rossi UOC Medicina Trasfusionale - DMTE Lecco, Ospedale San Gerardo, Monza
Claudio Napoli, Annunziata Sansone, Mariangela Rusciano UOC Servizio di Immunoematologia e Medicina Trasfusionale, Policlinico II Università, Napoli, Italy
Antonio Leonardi, Antonietta D’Ambra UOC Servizio di Immunoematologia e Medicina Trasfusionale-SRC Campania, Policlinico Universitario, Napoli
Rosa Azzaro, Annamaria Diodato UOSD di Medicina Trasfusionale, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Pascale, Napoli
Michele Vacca UOC Servizio di Immunoematologia e Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Cardarelli, Napoli
Domenico Ripaldi UOC Servizio di Immunoematologia e Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Pausilipon-Santobono, Napoli
Gaspare M. Leonardi UOC Servizio di Immunoematologia e Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale San Paolo, Napoli
Bruno Zuccarelli, Federico Brighel UOC Servizio di Immunoematologia e Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Dei Colli, Napoli
Cosimo Nocera, Michela De Lucia UOC Servizio di Immunoematologia e Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Del Mare, Napoli
Sergio Giordano UOC Servizio di Immunoematologia e Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Umberto I, Nocera Inferiore
Pierpaolo Bitti UOC Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale San Francesco, Nuoro
Pierpaolo Bitti, Marco Cocco UOSD Medicina Trasfusionale, PO Giovanni Paolo II, Olbia
Piero Ottone, Tiziana Beltramo UOSD di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale S. Luigi Gonzaga, Orbassano
Luigi Destefano UOSD Immunolematologia e Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale S. Giovanni di Dio, Orbetello
Sergio Rizzo UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Policlinico Giaccone, Palermo
Gaetano Lucania UOC Medicina Trasfusionale, Presidio Ospedaliero V. Cervello, Palermo
Rosalia E. Agliastro UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Osp. Civico E Benefratelli, Osp. Pediatrico G. di Cristina, Osp. Oncologico M. Ascoli, Palermo
Lorena Zandomeni UOSD di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale di Jalmicco, Palmanova
Giustina De Silvestro UOC Immunotrasfusionale, Azienda Ospedaliera Università, Padova
Alessandro Formentini, Simona Urbani UOC di Immunoematologia e Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale di Parma, Parma
Cesare G. Perotti UOC Medicina Trasfusionale - DMTE Pavia, Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia
Mauro Marchesi UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale - SRC Umbria, Ospedale Policlinico, Perugia
Carlo Pazzaglia, Adriana Maiello UOC Medicina Trasfusionale - Qualità - Accreditameto, Ospedale S. Salvatore, Pesaro
Patrizia Accorsi UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Civile Dello Spirito Santo, Pescara
Francesco Romeo UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Guglielmo Da Saliceto, Piacenza
Diego Zorzi UOSD di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Immacolata Concezione, Piove di Sacco
Alessandro Mazzoni UOC Medicina Trasfusionale e Biologia dei Trapianti - Banca Sangue Cordonale e Tessuti, Ospedale Universitario, Pisa
Loretta Leardini UOSD di Medicina Trasfusionale, Nuovo Ospedale degli Infermi, Ponderano - Biella
Andrea Bontadini, Roberto Tassan Toffola UOC e Dipartimento di Area Vasta di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Santa Maria degli Angeli, Pordenone
Clelia Musto UOC Medicina Trasfusionale - SRC, Ospedale San Carlo, Potenza
Antonio Crocco UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Misericordia e Dolce, Prato
G.Garozzo, F. Bennardello, A. Guccione, V. Licitra UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Civile Maria Paternò Arezzo, Ragusa
Daniele Vincenzi UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale S. Maria Delle Croci, Ravenna
Alfonso Trimarchi UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale e Immunematologia, Ospedale Bianchi - Melacrino - Morelli, Reggio Calabria
Roberto Baricchi UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale e Immunoematologia, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia
Erminia Gentileschi UOSD Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale San Camillo De Lellis, Rieti
Luca Boetti, Laura Benedettini UOC Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Degli Infermi, Rimini
Riccardo Serafini UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Sandro Pertini, Roma
Rita Marinelli UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale San Giovanni Dell’Addolorata, Roma
Luca Pierelli, Alessandro De Rosa, Antonella Matteocci UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale San Camillo Forlanini, Roma
Gina Zini UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Policlinico Gemelli - Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Roma
Maria A. Stigliano, Guido Mistretta UOC Medicina Trasfusionale - CLV, Ospedale San Filippo Neri, Roma
Marco Della Ventura UOSD Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale S. Giovanni Calibita - FBF, Roma
Maria A. Stigliano, Roberto Guido UOSD Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Santo Spirito - San Filippo Neri, Roma
Ada M. D’Addosio, Franca Vaccaro UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Villa San Pietro FBF, Roma
Maria R. Cassetta, Tiziana Datturi UOSD Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale S. Eugenio - CTO A. Alesini, Roma
Maria C. Tirindelli, Carolina Nobile UOC Medicina Trasfusionale-Ematologia, Policinico Universitario, Roma
Stefania Vaglio, Umberto Paladini UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale - SRC, Ospedale Sant’Andrea, Roma
Gabriella Girelli, Gianluca Giovannetti UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale e Immunoematologia, Policlinico Umberto I, Roma
Guido Bussetta UOC Medicina Trasfusionale Miliatre - SRC Trasfusionale Militare, Ospedale Del Celio, Roma
Giuseppina De Rosa UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Giovanni Battista Grassi, Roma - Lido di Ostia
Cinzia Scipioni UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale - DIMT, Ospedale Santa Maria Della Misericordia, Rovigo
Roberto Piunti UOSD di Medicina Trasfusionale Materno-Infantile e Traumatologica, Ospedale di San Daniele, San Daniele Del Friuli
Francesco Fiorin, Maria P. Simeoni UOSD Medicina Trasfusionale, PO S. Donà P.Ve, Portogruaro, San Donà di Piave
Mariella Canavero UOSD Medicina Trasusionale, Ospedale Nostra Signora di Bonaria, San Gavino Monreale
Lazzaro di Mauro, Michele Prisciandaro UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo
Pietro Polito UOSD di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale San Vito al Tagliamento, San Vito al Tagliamento
Corrado Sardella USD di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Alto Vicentino, Santorso
Massimiliano Oggiano UOC Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale SS. Annunziata, Sassari
Viviana Panunzio, Alba G. D’Agosta UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale San Paolo, Savona
Giannino Cicuto UOSD di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Madre Teresa di Calcutta, Schiavonia-Monselice
Pasquale Gallerano UOC Medicina Trasfusionale - CQB - Banca del Cordone - Centro Talassemie, Presidio Ospedaliero Giovanni Paolo II, Sciacca
Daniela Spadini, Christina M. Regnery UOC Medicina Trasfusionale - Racc. Emocomponenti, Ospedale Civile, Senigallia
Roberto Dovigo UOC Medicina Trasfusionale - DMTE Bergamo, Presidio Ospedaliero Bolognini, Seriate
Antonio Monguzzi UOC Medicina Trasfusionale - DMTE Milano Niguarda, Ospedale Cinisello - Sesto S.Giovanni, Sesto San Giovanni
Giuseppe Campoccia UOC Immunoematologia e Medicina Trasfusionale, Policlinico Le Scotte, Siena
Paola Lanzini, Daniela Rigamonti UOC Medicina Trasfusionale - DMTE Lecco, Ospedale Civile di Sondrio, Sondrio
Mario Alessi UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, PO San Vincenzo, Taormina
Emilio M. Serlenga, Giuliano D’Andria UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Ss. Annunziata, Taranto
Gabriella Lucidi Pressanti, Rosa Balsamo UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Civile G. Mazzini, Teramo
Augusto Scaccetti UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Civile S. Maria, Terni
Anna M. Bordiga, Paola Manzini CPVE - Banca del Sangue e Immunoematologia, Banca del Sangue - Molinette, Torino
Osvaldo Giachino UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Maria Vittoria - S. Giovanni Bosco, Torino
Mauro Pagliarino, Giuseppina Facco UOSD di Medicina Trasfusionale Materno-Infantile e Traumatologica, OIRM S. Anna - CTO, Torino
Giuseppe Semino, Guido Balduzzi UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale SS Antonio e Margherita, Tortona
Renato Messina UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Presidio S. Antonio Abate, Trapani - Erice
Attilio F. Cristallo, Paola Boccagni Servizio di Immunoematologia e Trasfusione Multizonale, Servizio di Immunoematologia e Trasfusionale, Trento-Rovereto
Arianna Veronesi, Alessandro Spigariol UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale – DIMT, Ospedale Cà Foncello, Treviso
Monica Barcobello UOSD di Immunoematologa e Distribuzione, Ospedali Cattinara, Maggiore, Trieste
Vincenzo De Angelis, Donatella Londero UOC e Dipartimento di Medicina Trasfusionale di Area Vasta Udinese, Ospedale S. Maria della Misericordia, Udine
Giulio Feola USD di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale San Luca, Vallo Della Lucania
Rosa Chianese UOC Medicina Trasfusionale - SMTE Varese, Ospedale di Circolo - Fondazione Macchi, Varese
Pasquale Colamartino UOC Medicina Trasfusionale e SRC Abruzzo, Ospedale San Pio Da Pietrelcina, Vasto
Maria Cianci UOSD di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale S. Andrea, Vercelli
Giorgio Gandini, Pierluigi Piccoli UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Civile Maggiore, Verona
Maria G. Pezzali UOC Medicina Trasfusionale - DMTE Pavia, Ospdale Civile, Vigevano
Lucia La Rosa, Angelo Rosana UOC Medicina Trasfusionale - DMTE Garbagnate, Ospedale di Vimercate, Vimercate
Silvia Da Ros, Donatella Meo UOC di Medicina Trasfusionale, Ospedale Belcolle, Viterbo

Footnotes

AUTHORSHIP CONTRIBUTIONS

GF, FB, FF and PB designed the study and reviewed the paper. GF wrote the manuscript and, together with CG and CM managed the data and performed the quality control and statistical analyses. The SIMTI group for Clinical use of blood in Italy was responsible for data entry. All the Authors approved the final version of the paper.

The Authors declare no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Jones JM, Sapiano MRP, Savinkina AA, et al. Slowing decline in blood collection and transfusion in the United States - 2017. Transfusion. 2020;60(Suppl 2):S1–S9. doi: 10.1111/trf.15604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Carson JL, Guyatt G, Heddle NM, et al. Clinical practice guidelines from the AABB: red blood cell transfusion thresholds and storage. JAMA. 2016;316:2025–35. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.9185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hebert PC, Carson JL. Transfusion threshold of 7 g per deciliter–the new normal. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1459–61. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1408976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kaufman RM, Djulbegovic B, Gernsheimer T, et al. Platelet transfusion: a clinical practice guideline from the AABB. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:205–13. doi: 10.7326/M14-1589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Roback JD, Caldwell S, Carson J, et al. Evidence-based practice guidelines for plasma transfusion. Transfusion. 2010;50:1227–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02632.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Currie CJ, Patel TC, McEwan P, Dixon S. Evaluation of the future supply and demand for blood products in the United Kingdom National Health Service. Transfus Med. 2004;14:19–24. doi: 10.1111/j.0958-7578.2004.00475.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Greinacher A, Weitmann K, Lebsa A, et al. A population-based longitudinal study on the implications of demographics on future blood supply. Transfusion. 2016;56:2986–94. doi: 10.1111/trf.13814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Drackley A, Newbold KB, Paez A, Heddle N. Forecasting Ontario’s blood supply and demand. Transfusion. 2012;52:366–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03280.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Goldman M, Steele WR, Di Angelantonio E, et al. Comparison of donor and general population demographics over time: a BEST Collaborative group study. Transfusion. 2017;57:2469–76. doi: 10.1111/trf.14307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Seifried E, Klueter H, Weidmann C, et al. How much blood is needed? Vox Sang. 2011;100:10–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2010.01446.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shehata N, Forster A, Lawrence N, et al. Changing trends in blood transfusion: an analysis of 244,013 hospitalizations. Transfusion. 2014;54(Pt 2):2631–9. doi: 10.1111/trf.12644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fillet AM, Desmarets M, Assari S, et al. Blood products use in France: a nationwide cross-sectional survey. Transfusion. 2016;56:3033–41. doi: 10.1111/trf.13887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tinegate H, Pendry K, Murphy M, et al. Where do all the red blood cells (RBCs) go? Results of a survey of RBC use in England and North Wales in 2014. Transfusion. 2016;56:139–45. doi: 10.1111/trf.13342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bosch MA, Contreras E, Madoz P, et al. The epidemiology of blood component transfusion in Catalonia, Northeastern Spain. Transfusion. 2011;51:105–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02785.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Catalano L, Piccinini V, Pati I, et al. [Accessed on: 29/04/2021.];Italian Blood System 2017: activity data, haemovigilance and epidemiological surveillance. 1 https://www.centronazionalesangue.it/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Rapporto-ISTISAN-19-6.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ministerial Decree of 20th May, 2015 “Programma di autosufficienza nazionale del sangue e dei suoi prodotti per l'anno 2015”. [National blood and blood product self-sufficiency plan for 2015] Official Journal of the Italian Republic - series n. 161 of 14th July 2015
  • 17.Manzini PM, Dall'Omo AM, D'Antico S, et al. Patient blood management knowledge and practice among clinicians from seven European university hospitals: a multicentre survey. Vox Sang. 2018;113:60–71. doi: 10.1111/vox.12599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ministerial Decree of 4th September 2012 “Programma di autosufficienza nazionale del sangue e dei suoi prodotti per l'anno 2012”. [National blood and blood product self-sufficiency plan for 2012] Official Journal of the Italian Republic - series n. 241 of 15th October 2012
  • 19.Ministerial Decree of 2nd November 2015 “Disposizioni relative ai requisiti di qualità e sicurezza del sangue e degli emocomponenti”. [Provisions relating to the quality and safety requirements for blood and blood components] Official Journal of the Italian Republic - series n. 300 of 28th December 2015
  • 20.Vaglio S, Prisco D, Biancofiore G, et al. Recommendations for the implementation of a patient blood management programme. Application to elective major orthopaedic surgery in adults. Blood Transfus. 2016;14:23–65. doi: 10.2450/2015.0172-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Vaglio S, Gentili S, Marano G, et al. The Italian regulatory guidelines for the implementation of patient blood management. Blood Transfus. 2017;15:325–8. doi: 10.2450/2017.0060-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Istituto Nazionale di Statistica [National Institute of Statistics] Population and households. [Accessed on 25/05/2021]. Available at: https://www.istat.it/en/population-and-households.
  • 23.Ministerial Decree of 24th July 2020 “Programma di autosufficienza nazionale del sangue e dei suoi prodotti per l'anno 2020”. [National blood and blood product self-sufficiency plan for 20202]. Official Journal of the Italian Republic - series n. 231 of 17th September 2020.
  • 24.Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 on the establishment of a common classification of territorial units for statistics (NUTS).
  • 25.Velati C, Aprili G. SIMTI recommendations on the correct use of blood components and plasma derivatives. Blood Transfus. 2009;7:1–2. doi: 10.2450/2009.0003-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Karafin MS, Bruhn R, Westlake M, et al. Demographic and epidemiologic characterization of transfusion recipients from four US regions: evidence from the REDS-III recipient database. Transfusion. 2017;57:2903–13. doi: 10.1111/trf.14370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.ISTAT [internet] Demographic indicators. [Accessed on 10/09/2020]. Available at: https://www.istat.it/en/archivio/226922.
  • 28.Díaz MQ, Borobia AM, García Erce JA, et al. Appropriate use of red blood cell transfusion in emergency departments: a study in five emergency departments. Blood Transfus. 2017;15:199–206. doi: 10.2450/2016.0324-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Allameddine A, Heaton M, Jenkins H, et al. Inappropriate use of blood transfusion in emergency department in a tertiary care hospital and potential saving with patient blood management. Transfus Med. 2014;24(Suppl 1):25. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tirado-Anglés G, Gangutia-Hernández S, Rodríguez-Chacón L, et al. Influence of a transfusion pocket guide on physicians’ transfusion practices, 2010–2013. Transfus Med. 2014;24(Suppl 1):27. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Spradbrow J, Lin Y, Shelton D, Callum J. Iron deficiency anemia in the emergency department: over-utilization of red blood cell transfusion and infrequent use of iron supplementation. CJEM. 2017;19:167–74. doi: 10.1017/cem.2016.388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Beverina I, Brando B. Prevalence of anemia and therapeutic behaviour in the emergency department at a tertiary care hospital: are patient blood management principles applied? Transfus Apher Sci. 2019;58:688–92. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2019.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Beverina I, Razionale G, Ranzini M, et al. Early intravenous iron administration in the Emergency Department reduces red blood cell unit transfusion, hospitalisation, re-transfusion, length of stay and costs. Blood Transfus. 2020;18:106–16. doi: 10.2450/2019.0248-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Unal D, Senayli Y, Polat R, et al. Peri-operative blood transfusion in elective major surgery: incidence, indications and outcome - an observational multicentre study. Blood Transfus. 2020;18:261–79. doi: 10.2450/2020.0011-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Charlton A, Wallis J, Robertson J, et al. Where did platelets go in 2012? A survey of platelet transfusion practice in the North of England. Transfus Med. 2014;24:213–8. doi: 10.1111/tme.12126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Schiffer CA, Bohlke K, Delaney M, et al. Platelet transfusion for patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:283–99. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.1734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Crighton GL, Estcourt LJ, Wood EM, et al. A therapeutic-only versus prophylactic platelet transfusion strategy for preventing bleeding in patients with haematological disorders after myelosuppressive chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;9:CD010981. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010981.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Estcourt LJ, Malouf R, Doree C, et al. Prophylactic platelet transfusions prior to surgery for people with a low platelet count. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;9:CD012779. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012779.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Levy JH, Grottke O, Fries D, Kozek-Langenecker S. Therapeutic plasma transfusion in bleeding patients: a systematic review. Anesth Analg. 2017;124:1268–76. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sperry JL, Guyette FX, Brown JB, et al. Prehospital plasma during air medical transport in trauma patients at risk for hemorrhagic shock. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:315–26. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1802345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Pusateri AE, Moore EE, Moore HB, et al. Association of prehospital plasma transfusion with survival in trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock when transport times are longer than 20 minutes: a post hoc analysis of the PAMPer and COMBAT clinical trials. JAMA Surg. 2020;155:e195085. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.5085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.McQuilten ZK, Crighton G, Brunskill S, et al. Optimal dose, timing and ratio of blood products in massive transfusion: results from a systematic review. Transfus Med Rev. 2018;32:6–15. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2017.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Blood Transfusion are provided here courtesy of SIMTI Servizi

RESOURCES