Abstract
The oxygen (δ18Ocarbonate), strontium (87Sr/86Sr), and previously unpublished carbon (δ13Ccarbonate) isotope data presented herein from the Imperial Roman site of Velia (ca. 1st to 2nd c. CE) were obtained from the dental enamel of human permanent second molars (M2). In total, the permanent M2s of 20 individuals (10 male and 10 female) were sampled at the Museo delle Civiltà in Rome (formerly the Museo Nazionale Preistorico Etnografico “L. Pigorini”) and were subsequently processed and analysed at McMaster University. A subsample of teeth (n=5) was initially subjected to Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis to assess for diagenetic alteration through calculation of crystallinity index (CI) values. Subsequently, tooth enamel was analysed for δ13Ccarbonate and δ18Ocarbonate (VPDB) using a VG OPTIMA Isocarb isotope ratio mass spectrometer (IRMS) at McMaster Research for Stable Isotopologues (MRSI), and 87Sr/86Sr was measured by dynamic multi-collection using a thermal ionization mass spectrometer (TIMS) in the School of Geography and Earth Sciences. The dental enamel isotope data presented represent the first δ18O, δ13Ccarbonate, and 87Sr/86Sr values analysed from Imperial Roman Campania to date, providing data of use for comparative analyses of δ18O, δ13C, and 87Sr/86Sr values within the region and for assisting in documenting human mobility in archaeological contexts. Full interpretation of the δ18O and 87Sr/86Sr data presented here is provided in “Imperial Roman mobility and migration at Velia (1st to 2nd c. CE) in southern Italy” [1].
Keywords: Southwestern Italy (Campania), Cilento of Lucania, Isotope analyses, Dental enamel, Imperial Roman, Human mobility, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Crystallinity index (CI)
Specifications Table
| Subject | Archaeology |
| Specific subject area | Isotope analyses |
| Type of data | Table Figure Graph |
| How data were acquired | Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR); VG OPTIMA Isocarb isotope ratio mass spectrometer (IRMS); thermal ionization mass spectrometer (TIMS) |
| Data format | Raw Analysed |
| Parameters for data collection | Permanent second molars (M2) were selected (n=20) from an equal number of male (n=10) and female (n=10) individuals, providing a sex balanced sample. Permanent second molars were chosen as a control for age, based on crown development of the permanent second molar being complete by ca. 7 to 8 years of age. |
| Description of data collection | Utilizing Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), crystallinity index (CI) values for a subsample of individuals (n=5) were calculated to assess apatite preservation at Velia [4]. Ground enamel samples were then prepared for δ13Ccarbonate and δ18Ocarbonate VPDB [5] and 87Sr/86Sr [6] mass spectrometric analyses in reference to NIST SRM-987 = 0.710260 ± 0.000010 [7,8], and NBS-19 where δ13C VPDB = +1.95‰ and δ18O VPDB = −2.20‰ [7,9]. Resultant δ18Ocarbonate VPDB values were converted to δ18Ocarbonate VSMOW [10], δ18Odw[11], and δ18Ophosphate VSMOW [12] to facilitate comparability. |
| Data source location | City/Town/Region: Velia, Campania Country: Italy samples/data: Specimens were analysed at McMaster University in the School of Geography and Earth Sciences (87Sr/86Sr) and McMaster Research for Stable Isotopologues (MRSI) (δ18O and δ13C). |
| Data accessibility | Repository name: IsoArcH [13] Data identification number: https://doi.isoarch.eu/doi/2021.002 |
| Related research article | R.J. Stark, M.V. Emery, H. Schwarcz, A. Sperduti, L. Bondioli, O.E. Craig, T. Prowse, Imperial Roman mobility and migration at Velia (1st to 2nd c. CE) in southern Italy, J. Arch. Sci.: Reports 30 (2020) 102217. 10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102217. |
Value of the Data
-
•
These data reflect the first 87Sr/86Sr, δ13Ccarbonate, and δ18Ocarbonate values derived from Imperial Roman bioarchaeological contexts at Velia and more broadly Campania, Italy.
-
•
These data will be useful to bioarchaeological researchers investigating questions of diet, mobility, and migration, particularly for the Imperial Roman era and for contexts in southwestern Italy.
-
•
These data can be utilized for comparisons to 87Sr/86Sr, δ13Ccarbonate, and δ18Ocarbonate values from other sites as well as for future research at and around Velia. The data presented may be utilized for subsequent studies of the same individuals through integration into skeletal biological, palaeodemographic, palaeogenetic, palaeopathological and/or additional isotopic analyses (e.g. S, Pb).
1. Data Description
The data comprise crystallinity index (CI) values of five individuals from Velia, strontium (87Sr/86Sr), carbon carbonate (δ13Ccarbonate VPDB), and oxygen carbonate (δ18Ocarbonate VPDB) values using delta notation (δ) in per mil increments (‰). The presented values were derived from the permanent second molars (M2) of twenty individuals (10 male and 10 female) dated to Imperial Roman (ca. 1st to 2nd c. CE) contexts at the site of Velia located in the Cilento of Lucania, modern day Campania, Italy. Table 1 presents dental enamel crystallinity index (CI) values for five randomly selected individuals (two males and three females). Given the uniform environmental contexts of deposition at Velia, the five sampled individuals were utilized as a gauge of apatite preservation for the broader site environs. Table 2 presents sample data by individual, providing sex and age of the individuals analysed, original δ18Ocarbonate VPDB values, converted δ18Ocarbonate VSMOW values, converted δ18Ophosphate VSMOW values, expected δ18O values in meteoric precipitation (δ18Odw), δ13Ccarbonate values, and 87Sr/86Sr values with associated errors. The δ18O and 87Sr/86Sr data presented in Table 1 were imported into ‘R’ (https://www.r-project.org/) in CSV file format to facilitate statistical analyses and generation of a series of graphical representations of the data characteristics. A scatterplot of the 87Sr/86Sr and δ18Odw VSMOW data with associated expected local ranges for 87Sr/86Sr and δ18Odw VSMOW is presented in Fig. 1. Expected local bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr for Velia was established based on the 2σ range of values from nine archaeofaunal pig teeth [1], while the expected local range for δ18O was determined based on meteorological precipitation data [2] considered in conjunction with the local range for dental values at Portus [3], which falls within the same isopleth as Velia. To consider the variation between the expected local bioavailable baseline for 87Sr/86Sr at Velia, as derived from nine pig teeth, a boxplot presenting the expected local 87Sr/86Sr baseline, male (n = 10 individuals), and female (n = 10 individuals) 87Sr/86Sr values is presented in Fig. 2. Similarly, a boxplot comparing the δ18Ocarbonate VPDB of male (n = 10) and female (n = 10) individuals analysed from Velia is presented in Fig. 3.
Table 1.
Crystallinity index (CI) values of five sampled individuals from Velia.
| Individual | Sex | A565 | A605 | A595 | CI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Velia 134 | F | 0.59 | 0.55 | 0.30 | 3.8 |
| Velia 146 | M | 0.68 | 0.62 | 0.36 | 3.6 |
| Velia 194 | M | 0.36 | 0.33 | 0.19 | 3.6 |
| Velia 205 | F | 0.23 | 0.21 | 0.13 | 3.3 |
| Velia 214 | F | 0.24 | 0.21 | 0.12 | 3.7 |
Table 2.
Sex and age of individuals sampled from Velia, raw δ13Ccarbonate VPDB, δ18Ocarbonate VPDB, and 87Sr/86Sr values, with converted δ18Ocarbonate VSMOW, δ18Ophosphate VSMOW, and δ18Odw values (modified from [1]).
| Age | δ13Ccarbonate | δ18Ocarbonate | δ18OCarbonate | δ18OPhosphate | δ18Odw | 87Sr/86Sr | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Site | Sex | (Years) | VPDB (‰) | VPDB (‰) | VSMOW (‰) | VSMOW (‰) | (‰) | 87Sr/86Sr | Error ± |
| Velia 57 | M | 30-35 | −12.4 | −1.1 | 29.8 | 20.7 | −1.3 | 0.70788 | 0.00002 |
| Velia 82 | F | 50+ | −12.3 | −4.1 | 26.7 | 17.7 | −6.2 | 0.70879 | 0.00015 |
| Velia 117 | F | 20-30 | −13.0 | −5.6 | 25.1 | 16.1 | −8.7 | 0.70880 | 0.00002 |
| Velia 134 | F | 20-30 | −13.3 | −5.8 | 24.9 | 15.9 | −9.0 | 0.70890 | 0.00002 |
| Velia 139 | M | 30-40 | −13.0 | −4.6 | 26.2 | 17.1 | −7.0 | 0.70839 | 0.00015 |
| Velia 146 | M | 43-55 | −12.9 | −4.3 | 26.5 | 17.5 | −6.5 | 0.70827 | 0.00002 |
| Velia 160 | F | 30-40 | −11.5 | −4.9 | 25.9 | 16.8 | −7.5 | 0.70866 | 0.00002 |
| Velia 169 | M | 30-40 | −12.9 | −5.5 | 25.3 | 16.3 | −8.4 | 0.70874 | 0.00015 |
| Velia 174 | M | 40-50 | −12.9 | −4.7 | 26.1 | 17.1 | −7.1 | 0.70869 | 0.00002 |
| Velia 181 | F | 50+ | −13.1 | −4.7 | 26.1 | 17.1 | −7.1 | 0.70866 | 0.00002 |
| Velia 182 | M | 25-30 | −13.3 | −4.2 | 26.6 | 17.6 | −6.3 | 0.70873 | 0.00005 |
| Velia 186 | M | 20-24 | −12.8 | −3.6 | 27.2 | 18.1 | −5.4 | 0.70857 | 0.00002 |
| Velia 194 | M | 30-40 | −12.4 | −5.8 | 24.9 | 15.9 | −9.1 | 0.70860 | 0.00002 |
| Velia 205 | F | 30-40 | −13.6 | −2.4 | 28.4 | 19.3 | −3.5 | 0.70868 | 0.00025 |
| Velia 211 | M | 30-35 | −12.8 | −6.0 | 24.7 | 15.7 | −9.4 | 0.70901 | 0.00002 |
| Velia 214 | F | 25-35 | −13.3 | −5.5 | 25.3 | 16.3 | −8.5 | 0.70822 | 0.00002 |
| Velia 222 | M | 30-40 | −12.7 | −3.5 | 27.3 | 18.2 | −5.3 | 0.70878 | 0.00025 |
| Velia 223 | F | 40-45 | −12.9 | −5.4 | 25.3 | 16.3 | −8.4 | 0.70875 | 0.00003 |
| Velia 270 | F | 40-50 | −13.2 | −3.9 | 26.9 | 17.8 | −5.9 | 0.70900 | 0.00005 |
| Velia 283 | F | 50+ | −13.1 | −4.2 | 26.6 | 17.5 | −6.4 | 0.70882 | 0.00002 |
Fig. 1.
Scatter plot of 87Sr/86Sr and δ18Odw VSMOW values for individuals sampled from Velia (n=20) with expected local ranges shown in grey, as defined by the 2σ range of nine archaeofaunal pig teeth for 87Sr/86Sr [1,14] and meteorological precipitation data [2] considered in conjunction with the local range at Portus [3] for δ18Odw (after Supplementary Fig. 1 in [1]).
Fig. 2.
Boxplot showing variation between Male (n = 10) and Female (n = 10) 87Sr/86Sr values in relation to expected local bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr values for the area around Velia derived from pigs teeth (n = 9).
Fig. 3.
Boxplot showing variation between Male (n = 10) and Female (n=10) δ18Oc VPDB values.
2. Experimental Design, Materials and Methods
2.1. Sampling approach
The rationale for collecting the data presented herein was to compare 87Sr/86Sr and δ18Oc values preserved in human dental enamel to expected local 87Sr/86Sr and δ18Odw values for the region around Velia, to assess for possible instances of mobility to this Imperial Roman (ca. 1st to 2nd c. CE) secondary port settlement located in the Cilento of Lucania. Permanent second molars (M2) from twenty adult individuals interred at Velia were collected in 2012 and 2013 from the Museo delle Civiltà (formerly the Museo Nazionale Preistorico Etnografico “L. Pigorini”) in Rome, Italy where the human skeletal remains from Velia are curated. All sampled individuals were recovered from inhumation burials. A sex balanced sample of 10 males and 10 females was chosen to provide equal representation for comparison of isotope values. Following collection in Rome, all M2 samples were prepared for isotopic analyses at McMaster University, in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
2.2. Dental enamel sample pre-treatment
All of the human second molars (M2) subjected to isotopic analyses were initially manually brushed to remove any adhering debris before being submersed in distilled water (dH2O) and ultrasonicated for a period of 10 min. Ultrasonication was repeated three times changing the water for each rinse, after which the teeth were dried in a drying oven at 60 °C before being drilled to remove enamel for sampling.
2.3. FTIR and CI analyses
Testing for diagenetic alteration of apatite quality for the Velia samples was completed through subsampling of five randomly selected individuals (Velia 134, 146, 194, 205, 214) at the McMaster Combustion Analysis and Optical Spectroscopy Facility using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). FTIR spectra were utilized to calculate crystallinity (CI) index according to CI = (A565 + A605)/A595, where Ax is the absorbance at wave number x, assuming a straight line baseline between 750 and 450 cm−1 [4]. Samples for FTIR analysis were first cleaned before the enamel was ground into a fine powder and passed through a #200 mesh sieve. Each ground enamel sample was combined with dry potassium bromide (KBr) and ground before being compressed into pellets at 10,000 psi. The compressed pellets were then analysed using a Nicolet 6700 dry nitrogen purged FTIR, room temperature DTGS detector with extended KBr beam splitter, resolution 4 cm−1 (wavenumber) at 32 scans. CI values for all five individuals were ≤3.8, indicating sufficient apatite preservation and absence of diagenetic alteration (Table 1).
2.4. Sample preparation for δ13C and δ18O VPDB analysis
From each molar sampled, ≥10 mg of powdered dental enamel was removed using a diamond tipped drill bit in a hand-held electric Dremel drill. After each use the drill bit was soaked in 0.25M hydrochloric acid (HCl) for ca. 10 min to avoid cross contamination and then rinsed in distilled water (dH2O). After weighing, enamel powder was collected in 1.5 ml plastic centrifuge microtubes.
Powdered enamel samples were treated with 0.04 ml of 2.5% bleach solution (NaClO) per mg of sample after which they were agitated and allowed to react for a period of up to 24 h. Following this reaction, samples were centrifuged and rinsed with de-ionized water five times, centrifuging after each rinse. Each sample next had 0.04 ml of 1M acetic acid acetate buffer (CH3COOH) per mg of sample added to remove potential diagenetic secondary carbonates. Samples were agitated and allowed to react for a period of up to 24 h. Samples were then centrifuged and rinsed five times with de-ionized water, centrifuging after each rinse. After the fifth rinse samples were centrifuged and the remaining water removed before the teeth were dried in a drying oven at 60 °C [5].
Once the samples were dry, 2 mg of enamel powder was weighed into stainless steel cups. Each sample was reacted with 100% phosphoric acid at 90 °C in an autocarb analyser to produce CO2 gas, which was analysed on a VG OPTIMA Isocarb isotope ratio mass spectrometer (IRMS) at the McMaster Research for Stable Isotopologues (MRSI) laboratory to measure δ18O and δ13C values. For each carousel containing 14 samples one sample was run in duplicate to test for accuracy and reproducibility, which is to say 13 samples and 1 duplicate were run with each carousel. Returned δ18O and δ13C values are presented using delta notation (δ) defined as,
where, x = sample and std = standard, presented in per mil (‰) increments in reference to the Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite (VPDB) standard where NBS-19 δ18O VPDB = −2.2‰ and δ13C VPDB = +1.95‰ [7]; precision of analysis is ±0.2‰. The data have been corrected here on the premise that the CO2–CO3 offset is the same as that for acid reaction of calcite (CaCO3) at the same temperature; this was controlled by periodic reaction of a standard calcite (NBS-19) at the same temperature. The returned δ18Ocarbonate VPDB values were then converted to Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water (VSMOW) values according to δ18Ocarbonate (VSMOW) = 1.0309 × δ18Ocarbonate (VPDB) + 30.91 [10], and then subsequently to approximated meteoric water values (δ18Odw) according to, δ18Odw = 1.590 × δ18Ocarbonate (VSMOW)-48.634 [11] to allow for comparison to documented δ18Odw in global meteoric precipitation. For transparency in data presentation and to facilitate broader comparative value of these data, δ18Ocarbonate (VSMOW) values were additionally converted to δ18Ophosphate (VSMOW) values according to δ18Ophosphate (VSMOW) = 0.98 × δ18Ocarbonate (VSMOW) – 8.5 [12].
2.5. Sample preparation for 87Sr/86Sr
From each molar sampled, ≥60 mg of powdered dental enamel was removed using a diamond tipped drill bit in a hand-held electric Dremel drill. After each use the drill bit was soaked in 0.25M HCl for ca. 10 min to avoid cross contamination and then rinsed in distilled water (dH2O). After weighing, enamel powder was collected in 1.5 ml plastic centrifuge microtubes.
Strontium extraction followed the protocol of the thermal ionization mass spectrometry (TIMS) laboratory directed by Dr. Alan Dickin in the School of Geography and Earth Sciences at McMaster University. Enamel was initially dissolved in 1.2 ml of 2.5 M HCl. Following full dissolution of the enamel, samples were centrifuged for 10 min. Cation exchange was employed to complete the strontium separation. Cation exchange columns were calibrated by employing a test “spiked” sample allowing for the stage of Sr collection to be assessed. In order to cleanse the cation exchange columns before use, 10 ml of deionized water was introduced after which a wash of 60 ml of 6 M HCl was introduced, followed by 10 ml of deionized water, and then finally 5 ml of 2.5 M HCl.
Dissolved enamel solution for each individual was introduced to the exchange columns in 1 ml portions and was washed into the column using 1 ml of 2.5 ml HCl, after which a wash of 3 ml of 2.5 M HCl was introduced. Waste sample matrix was eluted using 20 ml of 2.5 M HCl. After the 20 ml elution, 6 ml of 2.5 M HCl was introduced to the columns to collect the strontium. Strontium was collected in 4 ml intervals into Teflon beakers. Once the strontium phase was collected samples were placed under a heat lamp to dry to a solid state. Once dry, each sample was loaded onto a pre-treated single tantalum filament in dilute phosphoric acid, after which the samples were loaded in sequence into a vacuum system [6].
87Sr/86Sr values of all samples were determined by dynamic multi-collection using a thermal ionization mass spectrometer (TIMS) in the School of Geography and Earth Sciences at McMaster University. Resultant strontium values were fractionation normalized to 88Sr/86Sr = .1194, with an average 87Sr/86Sr = 0.71026±18 (1σ) for the NIST 987 Sr standard and internal precision (within-run precision) of ±0.0012–0.0018% (1σ) standard error based on 150 dynamic cycles.
2.6. Data Analysis
Of the 20 samples analysed for 87Sr/86Sr and δ18O, 5/20 (25%) fall outside of the expected local δ18Odw range: Velia 57, 134, 194, 205, and 211; none of the individuals sampled fall outside of the expected local bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr range (Fig. 1). Of the five individuals outside of the expected local δ18Odw range, 2/5 (40%) are female (Velia 134 and 205) and 3/5 (60%) are male (Velia 57, 194, and 211). In terms of δ18Oc (VPDB) values, the interquartile range for both the male and female individuals sampled are overall similar, with males having a slightly less negative median value than females (Fig. 3). The same is not true of 87Sr/86Sr values, where a much narrower interquartile range of values is evident for the female individuals sampled than the males (Fig. 2). The interquartile ranges for both male and female 87Sr/86Sr values, however, fall within the interquartile range for the expected local bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr baseline for the area around Velia as established from pig dental enamel [1,14]. The δ13C values of the 20 individuals analysed fall within a relatively narrow range, spanning from −13.6‰ (Velia 205) to −11.5‰ (Velia 160). Considering these δ13C values further, the majority of individuals (18/20, 90%) fall between −13.3‰ and −12.3‰, increasingly suggesting overall similarities in whole diet among the individuals sampled. The δ18O, δ13C, and 87Sr/86Sr data presented herein indicate that most of the individuals sampled from Velia, both male and female, were likely local to the area around Velia, or similar proximate geological areas.
Ethics Statement
All research was conducted using bioarchaeological skeletal materials in compliance with the McMaster Research Ethics Board (MREB) of McMaster University. No data were collected from modern human populations or individuals with known relatives.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Robert J. Stark: Conceptualization, Project administration, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Funding acquisition. Matthew V. Emery: Conceptualization, Visualization, Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis. Henry Schwarcz: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. Alessandra Sperduti: Resources, Writing – review & editing. Luca Bondioli: Resources, Writing – review & editing. Oliver E. Craig: Resources, Writing – review & editing. Tracy L. Prowse: Supervision, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing – review & editing.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships which have or could be perceived to have influenced the work reported in this article.
Acknowledgments
The assistance of Dr. Alan Dickin and Martin Knyf in undertaking mass spectrometric analyses is greatly appreciated, as well as the opportunity to conduct research at the Museo delle Civiltà of Rome (previously the Museo Nazionale Preistorico Etnografico “L. Pigorini,”) where sampling of the Velia collection was undertaken. The collection and presentation of data from Velia was funded in part by a Joseph-Armand Bombardier CGS-Doctoral scholarship from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC), the Michael Smith Foreign Study Supplement (CGS-MSFSS), the Ontario Graduate Scholarship (OGS), the Lemmermann Foundation, the Shelley Saunders Scholarship in Anthropology (McMaster University), McMaster University Department of Anthropology, the Shelley R. Saunders Thesis Research Grant from the The Canadian Association for Physical Anthropology - L’Association Canadienne d’Anthropologie Physique (CAPA-ACAP), and the Italian Government Bursary for Foreign and I.R.E Students provided through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation (MAECI).
References
- 1.Stark R.J., Emery M.V., Schwarcz H., Sperduti A., Bondioli L., Craig O.E., Prowse T. Imperial Roman mobility and migration at Velia (1st to 2nd c. CE) in southern Italy. J. Arch. Sci. Rep. 2020;30 doi: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102217. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Giustini F., Brilli M., Patera A. Mapping oxygen stable isotopes of precipitation in Italy. J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud. 2016;8:162–181. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2016.04.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Prowse T.L., Schwarcz H.P., Garnsey P., Knyf M., Macchiarelli R., Bondioli L. Isotopic evidence for age-related immigration to Imperial Rome. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2007;132:510–519. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Shemesh A. Crystallinity and diagenesis of sedimentary apatites. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 1990;54:2433–2438. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(90)90230-I. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Koch P.L., Tuross N., Fogel M.L. The effects of sample treatment and diagenesis on the isotopic integrity of carbonate in biogenic hydroxylapatite. J. Arch. Sci. 1997;24:417–429. doi: 10.1006/jasc.1996.0126. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dickin A.P. 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge: 2018. Radiogenic Isotope Geology. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Brand W.A., Coplen T.B., Vogl J., Rosner M., Prohaska T. Assessment of international reference materials for isotope-ratio analysis (IUPAC Technical Report) Pure Appl. Chem. 2014;86:425–467. doi: 10.1515/pac-2013-1023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Moore L.J., Moody J.R., Barnes I.L., Gramlich J.W., Murphy T.J., Paulsen P.J., Shields W.R. Trace determination of rubidium and strontium in silicate glass standard reference materials. Anal. Chem. 1973;45:2384–2387. doi: 10.1021/ac60336a014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Verkouteren R., Klinedinst D. 2004 Ed. NIST Special Publication; Washington, D.C.: 2004. Value assignment And Uncertainty Estimation Of Selected Light Stable Isotope Reference Materials: RMs 8543−8545, RMs 8562−8564, and RM 8566. 260-149Department of Commerce. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Faure G., Mensing T.M. 3rd ed. Wiley; Hoboken: 2005. Isotopes: Principles and Applications. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chenery C.A., Pashley V., Lamb A.L., Sloane H.J., Evans J.A. The oxygen isotope relationship between the phosphate and structural carbonate fractions of human bioapatite. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectom. 2012;26:309–319. doi: 10.1002/rcm.5331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Iacumin P., Bocherens H., Mariotti A., Longinelli A. Oxygen isotope analysis of co-existing carbonate and phosphate in biogenic apatite: a way to monitor diagenetic alteration of bone phosphate? Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 1996;142:1–6. doi: 10.1016/0012-821X(96)00093-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Salesse K., Fernandes R., de Rochefort X., Brůžek J., Castex D., Dufour É. IsoArcH.eu: An open-access and collaborative isotope database for bioarcheological samples from Graeco-Roman World and its margins. J. Arch. Sci. Rep. 2018;19:1050–1055. [Google Scholar]
- 14.R. Stark, Ancient lives in motion: a bioarchaeological examination of stable isotopes, nonmetric traits, and mobility in an Imperial Roman context (1st–3rd century CE). Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, McMaster University, 2016, http://hdl.handle.net/11375/20937.



