Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
letter
. 2021 Sep 20;118(39):e2112373118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2112373118

Physiological cyanide concentrations do not stimulate mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase activity

Flavia Giamogante a, Tito Calì a, Francesco Malatesta b,1
PMCID: PMC8488603  PMID: 34544878

Randi et al. (1) claim that vanishingly small concentrations of cyanide added to human cell lines 1) increases cell proliferation, 2) reduces the basal glutathionylation of bovine cytochrome c oxidase (CcO), 3) increases the steady-state activity of CcO, and 4) produces spectral changes of purified CcO.

Our criticism arises from the following.

First, we have reproduced the effect of 1 nM cyanide on the respiration of mouse liver mitochondria by using the tetramethyl-p-phenylene diamine (TMPD)–ascorbate reducing system and found no evidence for increased CcO activity (Fig. 1A).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

(A) Effect of 1 nM and 100 μM cyanide (CN) on the respiration of rotenone- and antimycin-treated mouse liver mitochondria by using the TMPD–ascorbate system. Briefly, 20 mg of purified mitochondria were incubated with 1 nM or 100 μM KCN for 15 min in resuspension buffer (75 mM sucrose, Hepes 20 mM, 50 mM KCl, 1 mM NaH2PO4, 1 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM EGTA, pH 7.4). The respiratory activity of mouse liver mitochondria was measured with a Clark-type electrode, in an all-glass reaction chamber magnetically stirred, at 25 °C. Where indicated, 5 μM rotenone/1 μM antimycin A and 0.4 mM TMPD/5 mM ascorbate were added. The rate of O2 consumption (in units of nanomoles of O2 per minute per mg of protein) was calculated 10 to 14 s after the TMPD/ascorbate injection. Values are mean ± SEM; statistics of control vs. 1 nM is are nonsignificant while control vs. 100 μM KCN is P ≤ 0.01, one-way ANOVA. (B) Time course of scission of the SS bond in 20 μM DTNB (Ellman’s reagent) by 2 mM total cyanide at 25 °C. The buffer used was 0.1 M Na-phosphate, pH 7. The data are represented as difference spectra relative to DTNB alone. The data were filtered by singular value decomposition (6) and reconstructed with 2 s values (s1 = 4.3483, s2 = 0.4910, s2 = 0.0438). Analogous time courses were determined at 5, 8, and 11 mM total HCN. Time courses at 412 nm (slice through difference spectra) were fitted to an exponential process [y=α(1ekobst)]. A plot of kobs, measured at different cyanide concentrations, was linear, with a slope equal to the second-order rate constant reported herein. All calculations were carried with MathWorks MATLAB.

The reduced basal glutathionylation of CcO is based on Western blot and Ellman’s reagent. As for the former, the claimed differences are barely visible and detailed methods on densitometric analysis are missing. In the latter, purified CcO is reduced with Tris (2-carboxyethyl) phosphine and, after removal, treated with 0.1 nM cyanide. Following cyanide removal, free cysteines are shown to increase. Thus, unless one or two disulfide bridges are not reduced and can react with cyanide the reported result is flawed. However, the putative target cysteine residues (conserved subunit I M-side C498 and nonconserved subunit III C-side C115) are solvent-exposed. From Protein Data Bank ID code 3ASO the distances between the Sγ atom of these residues from the closest prosthetic group is about 18 Å (heme a) and 36 Å (CuB), respectively. In view of these large distances, glutathione-induced spectral perturbation appears unlikely. Cyanide binding to the a3-CuB site is readily probed by ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy. The spectra shown in Fig. 1J of ref. 1 appear to be consistent with cyanide binding to aa3-CuB, at least at high cyanide concentration; also, the low-cyanide (green) spectrum appears identical to the control and no isosbestic point is seen throughout the titration owing to an increase in light scattering.

Second, it is well known that cyanide reacts with disulfides, yielding a free thiol and a thiocyanate (2). The reaction is bimolecular with second-order rate constants of 0.03 (cyanide + cystine) and 0.002 (cyanide + penicillamine-cysteine disulfide) M−1⋅s−1 in aqueous buffered solutions (2), and sluggish. We confirm this result by studying the scission kinetics of the SS bond in Ellman’s reagent by cyanide. The results are shown in Fig. 1B, in which time-resolved spectra are reported. The time course was exponential and the calculated second-order rate constant determined to be 10.0 ± 0.2 M−1⋅s−1. We are not aware of the reaction of cyanide with S-glutathionylated proteins including CcO. However, 1) the reactive species is the cyanide anion and 2) the free cyanide concentration is about 1.5% of total HCN at pH 7.4 (the pKA of HCN being 9.2). Therefore, when using 0.1 nM HCN (or its salt) the concentration of the cyanide ion would be about 2 pM. Cyanide is known to bind to a3-CuB with second-order rate constants of ca. 103 M−1⋅s−1 in the resting and pulsed states and of ca. 106 M−1⋅s−1 during turnover (35). These rate constants are two to five orders of magnitude higher than the corresponding rate constant measured here for 5,5′-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB). Under the experimental conditions of ref. 1 the cyanide reaction would be complete in weeks and the partitioning of cyanide on a3-CuB would exceed 99.9%.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Professor Maria Pia Rigobello, Dr. Alessandra Folda, and Dr. Alberto Bindoli (University of Padova, Department of Biomedical Sciences) for their support with the experiments of mitochondrial respiration.

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing interest.

References

  • 1.Randi E. B., Zuhra K., Pecze L., Panagaki T., Szabo C., Physiological concentrations of cyanide stimulate mitochondrial Complex IV and enhance cellular bioenergetics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2026245118 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Boyde T. R., The reaction between cyanide and the mixed disulphide of cysteine and penicillamine. J Chem Soc Perkin 1 22, 2751–2753 (1968). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jones M. G., et al., A re-examination of the reactions of cyanide with cytochrome c oxidase. Biochem. J. 220, 57–66 (1984). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wilson M. T., Antonini G., Malatesta F., Sarti P., Brunori M., Probing the oxygen binding site of cytochrome c oxidase by cyanide. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 24114–24119 (1994). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Antonini E., Brunori M., Colosimo A., Greenwood C., Wilson M. T., Oxygen “pulsed” cytochrome c oxidase: functional properties and catalytic relevance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74, 3128–3132 (1977). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Henry E. R., Hofrichter J., Singular value decomposition: Application to analysis of experimental data. Methods Enzymol 210, 129–192 (1992). [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES