Abstract
Background
Social media and secondary distribution (distributing self-testing kits by indexes through their networks) both show strong promise to improve human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) self-testing uptake. We assessed an implementation program in Zhuhai, China, which focused on the secondary distribution of HIV/syphilis self-test kits among men who have sex with men (MSM) via social media.
Methods
Men aged ≥16 years, born biologically male, and ever had sex with another man were recruited as indexes. Banner ads on a social media platform invited the participants to apply for up to 5 self-test kits every 3 months. Index men paid a deposit of US$15/kit refundable upon submitting a photograph of a completed test result via an online submission system. They were informed that they could distribute the kits to others (referred to as “alters”).
Results
A total of 371 unique index men applied for 1150 kits (mean age, 28.7 [standard deviation, 6.9] years), of which 1141 test results were returned (99%). Among them, 1099 were valid test results; 810 (74%) were from 331 unique index men, and 289 tests (26%) were from 281 unique alters. Compared to index men, a higher proportion of alters were naive HIV testers (40% vs 21%; P < .001). The total HIV self-test reactivity rate was 3%, with alters having a significantly higher rate than indexes (5% vs 2%; P = .008). A total of 21 people (3%) had a reactive syphilis test result.
Conclusions
Integrating social media with the secondary distribution of self-test kits may hold promise to increase HIV/syphilis testing coverage and case identification among MSM.
Keywords: HIV, self-testing, secondary distribution, social media, men who have sex with men, MSM
Compared to index men, significantly more alters who received an human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) self-test from an index case were naive HIV testers and HIV reactive, suggesting the potential for a social media–based secondary distribution strategy in improving HIV testing and case identification.
As the entry point into the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) care continuum [1] and a critical step in the “Treat All” strategy [2], HIV testing remains a cornerstone of HIV prevention and control. However, about 25% of people living with HIV (PLWH) worldwide do not know their serological status [3]. This is even worse among key populations in China, as nearly half of men who have sex with men (MSM) have never been tested for HIV [4–6]. Syphilis testing is also key to HIV prevention, yet 70% of Chinese MSM have never been tested for syphilis [7]. Serostatus unawareness plays a key role in ongoing transmission of HIV and syphilis; therefore, interventions must reach PLWH who are unaware of their status. Though wider availability of facility-based HIV testing services helped increase testing coverage, innovative interventions are needed to enhance coverage of harder-to-reach MSM [8, 9], especially those not receiving testing from a health facility [10].
The development of self-testing services will support HIV and syphilis control. Self-testing is the process whereby a person collects a specimen, performs the test, and interprets the result themselves [11, 12]. Dual HIV/syphilis self-testing is a promising approach for expanding HIV and syphilis testing that enables individuals to perform rapid HIV/syphilis antibody tests simultaneously and privately [13]. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that dual HIV/syphilis rapid tests be offered to screen at-risk populations [11, 14]. By July 2019, 77 countries had adopted policies or guidelines for implementation and support of HIV self-testing (HIVST) [15]. In China, the demand for and acceptability of HIVST among MSM has been high, and many Chinese local community-based organizations (CBOs) are working with health bureaus in piloting HIVST among MSM [16, 17]. No policies or guidelines are in place to improve integrative syphilis testing for MSM in China; only 1 cross-sectional survey study with Chinese MSM found that 92.5% of syphilis self-testers did HIVST at the same time, demonstrating the feasibility of integrating syphilis self-testing into HIV self-testing services [18]. Nevertheless, this study did not explore strategies for further expanding testing uptake.
While dual HIV/syphilis self-testing is a promising strategy for expanding testing coverage, it is critical to develop and evaluate outreach and distribution strategies for self-tests, such as secondary distribution [19]. Secondary distribution is a social network–based approach that involves giving 1 individual (index) multiple self-testing kits for distribution to people within their social networks (alters) [20]. Two studies conducted in Kenya have shown that secondary distribution has strong potential to promote HIV testing among the male sexual partners of women seeking antenatal and postpartum care [21, 22]. Three other cohort studies showed feasibility and effectiveness of secondary distribution of HIVST among male fishermen in Uganda, female sex workers, and women seeking perinatal care, as well as MSM in South Africa [20, 23, 24]. However, most previous studies in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) focused on the sexual network of the index participants. One study in the United States (US) revealed that 59% of alters who received a self-test were friends of the index MSM [25]. This indicates that we can further use this opportunity to leverage nonsexual social contacts of MSM and reach more people who have high risk but have not been reached by conventional services in LMIC settings. In addition, the testing results of the alters in most of the previous studies were self-reported by the index participants, which raises concerns about privacy and reliability of the test results. None have explored secondary distribution of syphilis self-testing as an integrated service into existing HIV self-testing programs. A social media–based secondary distribution of dual HIV/syphilis self-tests may hold potential in overcoming these barriers and add value to existing literature.
In this study, we evaluated a social media–based secondary distribution of HIV/syphilis self-testing among Chinese MSM. We defined “social media–based secondary distribution” as the implementation of the secondary distribution (including participant recruitment, screening, survey, kit application, and returning of results) is based on social media platforms. By leveraging the social contacts of participants, we explored whether this enhanced model can expand the coverage of HIV testing and help identify new HIV/syphilis cases. We assessed the feasibility of having the testers upload photographs of their completed self-tests for verification by study staff, and evaluated alters’ sexual intercourse with an index at the point of self-testing.
METHODS
Study Setting and Infrastructure Establishment
This implementation study was conducted in Zhuhai, southern China, with an estimated 17 000 MSM living in the city. It has an HIV prevalence of 7% among MSM and was one of the first sites to pilot HIVST among MSM in China [26]. The Zhuhai Center for Diseases Control and a gay community-led organization (Zhuhai Xutong Voluntary Services Center, hereafter “Xutong”) initiated a social-media based online system in 2016 for MSM to apply for free dual HIV/syphilis self-test kits. MSM were able to apply for HIVST kits using Xutong’s public WeChat account. WeChat is a multifunctional social app that can be used for messaging, public surveys, and monetary transactions.
Secondary Distribution
Beginning on 17 June 2018, index men could request up to 5 HIV/syphilis self-test kits (HIV/Syphilis Duo, Standard Diagnostics) per application (with a limit of 1 application per 3-month period). Figure 1 shows the secondary distribution model of the program. Test kits were mailed to index men after they paid the deposit (US$15 per kit) and provided shipping information. All test kit packages mailed to a participant were packed in 1 parcel and assigned an identical numerical identification number. Each dual test kit package contained instructions and a WeChat QR code for the tester to upload a photograph of the test result anonymously. Index MSM were informed that they could distribute the kits to other social contacts, including partners or friends (referred to as “alters”). Following the instructive notes, alters were encouraged to upload an anonymous photograph of the test result themselves. Upon receiving a photographed test result, the deposit was immediately refunded to index men through WeChat.
Consented MSM participants provided their mobile numbers for follow-ups. Volunteers at Xutong, mostly gay men, were trained as lay health workers to verify the photographed test results. Once participants’ test results were verified as reactive for HIV and/or syphilis, our CBO volunteers contacted and suggested that participants with a reactive result seek timely confirmatory testing and treatment services at a local health facility via telephone calls. These participants were provided with information about locations and open hours of local health facilities for MSM-friendly sexual healthcare.
Survey Instruments and Data Collection
Inclusion criteria for index participants included (1) men who were aged ≥16 years; (2) born biologically male; (3) ever had sex with another man; (4) were willing to provide a contact number; and (5) agreed to participate in a follow-up survey in 3 months. Eligible index participants completed a baseline online survey that collected information about the indexes’ sociodemographic characteristics (including age, education, income, marital status, residence, and occupation), sexual biography (including gender identity, sexual orientation, or sexual orientation disclosure), and HIV testing history.
Index men were followed up 3 months after the recruitment to collect information about their process of distributing dual test kits to individuals within their social networks. A short online survey was also administered to alters upon uploading their photographic evidence of a completed test. A small incentive of US$3 was provided to all participants who completed a questionnaire.
Outcomes
Primary outcomes included proportion of new testers (defined as naive HIV testers) among unique indexes and alters as well as HIV and syphilis reactivity rates among unique indexes and alters. Those who had a reactive result (for either HIV or syphilis or both) were followed up via telephone calls by the CBO volunteers and recommended to seek confirmatory testing and medical treatment at local facilities (ie, linkage-to-care services). We also calculated the rate of returning a photograph of the completed test within 30 days after receiving the test kit(s). Additionally, among those who reported a sexual relationship with the index, we measured their sexual intercourse behaviors at the point of testing, aiming to understand how participants used HIVST to inform their sexual behaviors.
Statistical Analyses
Duplicate applications were identified by duplicate mobile numbers used for the application and assumed to be from the same index participant, and only the baseline characteristics from the first application by calendar date were included for analysis for each index. We conducted descriptive analyses of the outcomes for both the unique index and the alter participants. The χ 2 or Fisher exact test was used to assess differences in proportion of naive HIV testers and HIV/syphilis reactivity rates between indexes and alters, and to compare alters’ reports of sexual decisions based on whether alters shared their HIV test result with their index (the alter shared a reactive result, a nonreactive result, or the alter did not share the result). Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 25 software (IBM SPSS, Armonk, New York).
Ethical Statement
The study protocol was approved by the Zhuhai Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Informed consent was collected from each participant online.
RESULTS
Test Kit Application and Distribution
This study was conducted between 17 June 2018 and 12 November 2019. Figure 2 shows the flowchart of the number of applications and dual test kits distributed. Overall, there were 851 application attempts, of which 649 applications met eligibility criteria, and 1150 test kits were distributed to 371 unique index men, with 48% of indexes requesting 2 or more kits.
Return of Photographed Test Results
In total, 1141 test results were returned with photographic evidence, resulting in an overall return rate of 99% (1141/1150) (Figure 2). A total of 1099 test results were valid, among which 810 (74%) were from 331 unique index men, and 289 (26%) were from 281 unique alter testers. On average, each index successfully reached 0.85 (281/331) alters.
Participant Characteristics
Table 1 shows the characteristics of study participants. The mean age for indexes and alters was 28.7 (standard deviation [SD], 6.9) years and 29.4 (SD, 7.0) years, respectively. Proportions of testers who obtained university or higher education were similar between the 2 groups. More index men than alter men (70% vs 60%, respectively) had disclosed their same-sex behavior to individuals other than their sexual partners. There were no significant differences in sociodemographic characteristics between index men who returned a result and those who did not (Table 2).
Table 1.
Characteristic | Unique Index Men (n = 371) | Unique Altersa (n = 281) | P Valueb |
---|---|---|---|
Age, y, mean (SD) | 28.7 (6.9) | 29.4 (7) | |
Sex | |||
Male | 371 (100) | 264 (98) | |
Female | … | 4 (2) | |
Marital status | |||
Never married | 312 (84) | 191 (72) | |
Engaged or married | 51 (14) | 60 (22) | |
Separated, divorced, or widowed | 8 (2) | 16 (6) | |
Residence | |||
Rural | 164 (44) | 91 (34) | |
Urban | 207 (56) | 177 (66) | |
Ethnicity | |||
Han | 367 (99) | 260 (97) | |
Other minorities | 4 (1) | 8 (3) | |
Highest education | |||
High school or less | 74 (20) | 64 (24) | |
Some college | 99 (27) | 62 (23) | |
University | 198 (53) | 142 (53) | |
Employment status | |||
Employed | 283 (79) | 227(81) | |
Unemployed | 74 (21) | 52 (19) | |
Annual income levels, US dollars | |||
<2518 | 48 (13) | 33 (12) | |
2518–5038 | 42 (11) | 27 (10) | |
5038–8393 | 99 (27) | 77 (29) | |
8393–13 430 | 103 (28) | 81 (30) | |
>13 430 | 79 (21) | 50 (19) | |
Gender identityc | |||
Male | 358 (96) | 254 (96) | |
Female | 3 (1) | 7 (3) | |
Transgender | 6 (2) | 1 (0.4) | |
Unsure/other | 4 (1) | 2 (1) | |
Sexual orientationc | |||
Gay | 259 (70) | 178 (67) | |
Heterosexual | 2 (0.5) | 13 (5) | |
Bisexual | 91 (24) | 56 (21) | |
Unsure | 19 (5) | 17 (6) | |
Disclosed same-sex behavior with another man to othersc | 260 (70) | 158 (60) | .007 |
Anal sex with a male partner in the past 6 moc | 314 (85) | 181 (69) | <.001 |
Consistent condom use | 184 (59) | 103 (57) | .71 |
Used a condom during last sexual intercourse with a male partner | 262 (83) | 146 (81) | .43 |
Sex with a female partner in the past 6 moc | 31 (8) | 35 (13) | .046 |
Consistent condom use | 13 (42) | 13 (37) | .69 |
Used a condom during last sexual intercourse with a female partner | 18 (58) | 15 (43) | .22 |
Ever tested for HIV beforec | 294 (79) | 158 (60) | <.001 |
Data are presented as no. (%) unless otherwise indicated.
Abbreviations: HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; SD, standard deviation; US, United States.
aTotal unique alter testers, including male and female participants. Responses of variables may not add up to the total due to missing values, and valid percentages were calculated.
bχ 2 test.
cMale participants only.
Table 2.
Characteristic | Did Not Return a Result (n = 40) | Returned a Result (n = 331) | P Value |
---|---|---|---|
Age, y, mean (SD) | 28.5 (7.8) | 28.7 (6.8) | .87 |
Marital status | |||
Never married | 33 (82) | 279 (84) | .49 |
Engaged or married | 7 (18) | 44 (13) | |
Separated, divorced, or widowed | 0 (0) | 8 (2) | |
Residence | |||
Rural | 15 (38) | 149 (45) | .40 |
Urban | 25 (62) | 182 (55) | |
Highest education | |||
High school/below | 7 (18) | 67 (20) | .92 |
Some college | 11 (28) | 88 (27) | |
University | 22 (55) | 176 (53) | |
Employment status | |||
Student | 8 (20) | 54 (16) | .51 |
Nonstudent | 32 (80) | 277 (84) | |
Annual income levels (in US dollars) | |||
<2518 | 7 (18) | 41 (12) | .50 |
2518–5038 | 5 (12) | 37 (11) | |
5038–8393 | 7 (18) | 92 (28) | |
8393–13 430 | 14 (35) | 89 (27) | |
>13 430 | 7 (18) | 72 (22) |
Data are presented as no. (%) unless otherwise indicated.
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; US, United States.
HIV/Syphilis Test Results
Overall, 20 of 612 unique testers (3%) had a reactive HIV self-test result. Fifteen of them were alters, and 5 were indexes. The HIV-reactive rate among alters was significantly higher than that among indexes (15/281 [5%] vs 5/331 [2%], respectively; P = .008). All men who had reactive results were first-time testers. Four of 5 index cases (80%) and 12 of 15 (80%) alter cases who had a reactive result were linked to facility-based confirmatory testing and enrolled in HIV treatment.
Twenty-one of 612 (3%) testers had a reactive syphilis result, with 13 among 331 (4%) indexes and 8 among 281 (3%) alters, with no significant difference. One index participant (0.3%) was found to be reactive for both HIV and syphilis. Among all syphilis-reactive participants, 8 were previously diagnosed with and formally treated for syphilis, and 8 were newly syphilis reactive and referred to confirmatory testing at a local facility. The remaining 5 were lost to follow-up.
Alters’ Testing Experiences
Among 281 alters who returned their test results, 268 (95%) completed an online survey, among whom 264 (98%) were male and 4 (2%) were female. Of the 264 male alters, 114 (43%) were a sexual partner of the index. The remaining 150 alters self-reported to be nonsexual contacts: 130 (49%) identified as a gay friend of the index, 13 (5%) as a family member, and 4 (2%) as a straight friend. Of the 264 male alters, 106 (40%) were new testers, compared to only 77 of 371 (21%) index men (P < .001) (Supplementary Figure 1). Among the 114 alters who reported a sexual relationship with the index, 33 (29%) were new testers, while the 150 nonsexual contacts had a higher proportion of new testers at 49% (P = .001).
Sex With the Index at the Point of Self-testing
Of the 114 male alters who were sexual partners of the index, 108 (95%) reported that they shared their test results with the index, including 5 reactive and 103 nonreactive results (Table 3). Sixty-one of the 114 alters (54%) reported having sexual intercourse with the index on the day of performing the self-test, of which 41 of 61 alters (67%) reported using a condom with intercourse.
Table 3.
Alters’ Test Result Sharing Status With the Index (n = 114) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Question | Variable | Total | Shared a Reactive Result (n = 5) | Shared a Nonreactive Result (n = 103) | Not Shared (n = 6) |
Did you have sex with the index on the day of testing? | Yes | 61 (54) | 3 (60) | 58 (56) | 0 (0) |
No | 53 (46) | 2 (40) | 45 (44) | 6 (100) | |
If you had sex with the index on the day of testing, when was it? | Before the test | 27 (44) | 2 (67) | 25 (43) | … |
After the test | 34 (56) | 1 (33) | 33 (57) | … | |
Did you or your partner use a condom during the sexual encounter? | Yes | 41 (67) | 3 (100) | 38 (66) | … |
No | 20 (33) | 0 (0.0) | 20 (34) | … |
Data are presented as no. (%).
DISCUSSION
Effective strategies to promote HIV/syphilis dual self-test uptake are underexplored. We introduced a social media–based secondary distribution model to expand dual HIV/syphilis testing among Chinese MSM. Our study breaks new ground by assessing the feasibility and effectiveness of an integrated social media–based secondary distribution model to expand HIV/syphilis testing coverage, finding new HIV/syphilis cases, and testing the feasibility of test verification by returning of photographed self-test results.
Our model demonstrated 2 important benefits over previously studied offline models of HIVST secondary distribution. First, a high results return rate demonstrated the feasibility of the model. Verifying self-test results is often challenging [27], but important for ensuring the accuracy of HIV case reporting and linking reactive testers to care further. We addressed this issue through 3 components of our model: a gay community-led organization; anonymous upload of test results followed by free telephone counseling services for reactive cases; and a refundable cost-level deposit mechanism. These components created a trusting relationship between testers and lay health providers, protected testers’ privacy against unwanted disclosure of HIV status, and monetarily incentivized positive behavior. Second, this modified model was one of the few secondary distribution studies that included a direct assessment of alters’ test results and experiences. This was mainly possible due to the social media component of our model, which allowed us to reach alters directly and provide them an electronic channel to participate in the study via individually packed test kits.
Overall, <40% of the index men distributed self-tests to their social contacts. This percentage is lower than reported in previous interventional studies [20, 22]. This is likely because we assessed voluntary distributing behaviors of the index MSM. However, the study demonstrated that our model reached those who have never been tested for HIV, identified reactive HIV cases, and facilitated linkage to facility-based care. The rate of first-time testers among alters reached in our study (40%) was significantly higher than that of an earlier secondary distribution study among fishermen (26%) in Uganda [24]. The study results suggest that by tapping into the existing influence of MSM within their own social networks, a social media–based platform holds promise to lower the barrier for hard-to-reach MSM to access the HIV testing and care continuum.
We found that a high proportion of the alters (95%) who had a sexual relationship with the index shared their test results with the index man. More than half of alters had had sexual intercourse at the point of self-testing. However, concerns have been raised about sex at point of self-testing because of the inability of HIV self-testing to detect the HIV infection status within a window period, thus promoting unprotected sex between discordant partners at the time of highest infectivity [28]. More research and efforts are needed to understand the role of self-tests in sexual decision making, especially in the early stage of introducing self-tests into Chinese settings [16].
Our study also demonstrated that secondary distribution is a feasible approach for promoting syphilis self-testing among MSM with a combined HIV/syphilis testing kit. Integrating syphilis testing into existing HIV testing services has been recommended by the WHO [14, 29]; however, few studies have examined effective strategies to accelerate the uptake of syphilis self-testing integrated with rapid HIV self-tests. While recent evidence showed that integrating syphilis self-testing into HIV self-testing services may be a feasible strategy to improve syphilis test uptake among MSM [18, 30], secondary distribution of a dual HIV/syphilis test kit is a promising strategy for further expanding syphilis test coverage among this at-risk population. The model may also have implications for integrating multiple sexually transmitted infection (STI) self-testing services into HIVST secondary distribution programs.
Our study findings have implications. We demonstrated that a social media–based secondary distribution model was feasible and acceptable, with significant potential to expand HIV/syphilis testing among this hard-to-reach subgroup. Furthermore, our study captured the potential of MSM for promoting test behaviors among their social networks. Collecting verifiable HIV/STI self-test results has proven to be challenging, and our model provides a successful example of obtaining test result photographs for better result verification and follow-up care. Since index men were refunded their deposit only when the alters returned a test result, a refundable deposit mechanism may incentivize index men to encourage alters to upload their test result photos. This may be an important strategy for encouraging alters, who were significantly more likely to be new testers, to report their test results. Being led and maintained by a gay community organization as well as supported by health authorities, our collaborative platform empowered the community, gained trust, and secured financial sustainability, showing promise of replicability and scalability in other similar settings.
The study has several limitations. First, our study was an evaluation of an implementation project and did not include a comparison group. Second, this study recruited participants who are relatively well-educated with higher-than-average income levels. This may limit the generalizability of the study, and further exploration of feasibility and acceptability of secondary distribution among MSM with lower economic payment capacity should be considered for future research. Finally, there was a possibility of alters further distributing the kits within their social networks, and these data were not captured in this study.
CONCLUSIONS
This study demonstrated that a social media–based secondary distribution of HIV/syphilis testing model is feasible and acceptable among MSM. It can be used to identify first-time testers, promote HIV/syphilis case identification, and encourage linkage to care. Further implementation studies are needed that expand this service model among MSM and other key populations.
Supplementary Data
Supplementary materials are available at Clinical Infectious Diseases online. Consisting of data provided by the authors to benefit the reader, the posted materials are not copyedited and are the sole responsibility of the authors, so questions or comments should be addressed to the corresponding author.
Notes
Acknowledgments. The authors are grateful to all of the participants who participated in this study.
Financial support. This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant number 2017YFE0103800); the Academy of Medical Sciences and the Newton Fund (grant number NIF/R1/181020); the National Institutes of Health (grant numbers National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [NIAID] 1R01AI114310-01, NIAID K24AI143471, and R25 AI140495); the University of North Carolina Center for AIDS Research (grant number NIAID 5P30AI050410); the National Science and Technology Major Project of China (grant number 2018ZX10101-001-001-003); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 81903371 and 81772240); and the Zhuhai Medical and Health Science and Technology Plan Project (grant number 20181117A010064).
Potential conflicts of interest. The authors: No reported conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest.
References
- 1.Kilmarx PH, Mutasa-Apollo T. Patching a leaky pipe: the cascade of HIV care. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 2013; 8:59–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. 90-90-90: an ambitious treatment target to help end the AIDS epidemic. 2017. Available at: https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/documents/2017/90-90-90. Accessed 9 March 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 3.World Health Organization. Fact sheets about HIV/AIDS. Available at: http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hiv-aids. Accessed 9 March 2020.
- 4.Best J, Tang W, Zhang Y, et al. . Sexual behaviors and HIV/syphilis testing among transgender individuals in China: implications for expanding HIV testing services. Sex Transm Dis 2015; 42:281–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chow EP, Wilson DP, Zhang L. The rate of HIV testing is increasing among men who have sex with men in China. HIV Med 2012; 13:255–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zou H, Hu N, Xin Q, Beck J. HIV testing among men who have sex with men in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS Behav 2012; 16:1717–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ong JJ, Fu H, Pan S, et al. . Missed opportunities for human immunodeficiency virus and syphilis testing among men who have sex with men in China: a cross-sectional study. Sex Transm Dis 2018; 45:382–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Higa DH, Crepaz N, Marshall KJ, et al. . A systematic review to identify challenges of demonstrating efficacy of HIV behavioral interventions for gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM). AIDS Behav 2013; 17:1231–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Estem KS, Catania J, Klausner JD. HIV self-testing: a review of current implementation and fidelity. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep 2016; 13:107–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Stahlman S, Lyons C, Sullivan P, et al. . HIV incidence among gay men and other men who have sex with men in 2020: where is the epidemic heading? Sex Health 2017; 14:15–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.World Health Organization. Guidelines on HIV self-testing and partner notification supplement to consolidated guidelines on HIV testing services. Available at: https://www.who.int/hiv/pub/self-testing/hiv-self-testing-guidelines/en/. Accessed 9 March 2020. [PubMed]
- 12.Ong JJ, Fu H, Smith MK, Tucker JD. Expanding syphilis testing: a scoping review of syphilis testing interventions among key populations. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2018; 16:423–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jamil MS, Prestage G, Fairley CK, et al. . Effect of availability of HIV self-testing on HIV testing frequency in gay and bisexual men at high risk of infection (FORTH): a waiting-list randomised controlled trial. Lancet HIV 2017; 4:e241–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.World Health Organization. WHO information note on the use of dual HIV/syphilis rapid diagnostic tests (RDT). Available at: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/rtis/dual-hiv-syphilis-diagnostic-tests/en/. Accessed 9 March 2020.
- 15.World Health Organization. Status of HIV self-testing (HIVST) in national policies (situation as of July 2019). Available at: https://www.who.int/hiv/topics/self-testing/HIVST-policy_map-jul2019-a.png?ua=1. Accessed 9 March 2020.
- 16.Tang W, Wu D. Opportunities and challenges for HIV self-testing in China. Lancet HIV 2018; 5:e611–2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jin X, Xu J, Smith MK, et al. . An internet-based self-testing model (easy test): cross-sectional survey targeting men who have sex with men who never tested for HIV in 14 provinces of China. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21:e11854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wang C, Cheng W, Li C, et al. . Syphilis self-testing: a nationwide pragmatic study among men who have sex with men in China. Clin Infect Dis 2020; 70:2178–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Operario D, Smith CD, Arnold E, Kegeles S. The Bruthas Project: evaluation of a community-based HIV prevention intervention for African American men who have sex with men and women. AIDS Educ Prev 2010; 22:37–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Thirumurthy H, Masters SH, Mavedzenge SN, Maman S, Omanga E, Agot K. Promoting male partner HIV testing and safer sexual decision making through secondary distribution of self-tests by HIV-negative female sex workers and women receiving antenatal and post-partum care in Kenya: a cohort study. Lancet HIV 2016; 3:e266–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Masters SH, Agot K, Obonyo B, Napierala Mavedzenge S, Maman S, Thirumurthy H. Promoting partner testing and couples testing through secondary distribution of HIV self-tests: a randomized clinical trial. PLoS Med 2016; 13:e1002166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gichangi A, Wambua J, Mutwiwa S, et al. . Impact of HIV self-test distribution to male partners of ANC clients: results of a randomized controlled trial in Kenya. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2018; 79:467–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lippman SA, Lane T, Rabede O, et al. . High acceptability and increased HIV-testing frequency after introduction of HIV self-testing and network distribution among South African MSM. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2018; 77: 279–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Choko AT, Nanfuka M, Birungi J, Taasi G, Kisembo P, Helleringer S. A pilot trial of the peer-based distribution of HIV self-test kits among fishermen in Bulisa, Uganda. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0208191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wesolowski L, Chavez P, Sullivan P, et al. . Distribution of HIV self-tests by HIV-positive men who have sex with men to social and sexual contacts. AIDS Behav 2019; 23:893–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zhou Y, Liu Y, He X, Huang S, Li X, Dai W. An estimate of the MSM population in Zhuhai. Chinese J AIDS STDs 2017; 23:730–3. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Christopoulos KA, Das M, Colfax GN. Linkage and retention in HIV care among men who have sex with men in the United States. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 52(Suppl 2):S214–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wood BR, Ballenger C, Stekler JD. Arguments for and against HIV self-testing. HIV AIDS (Auckl) 2014; 6:117–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Unitaid. Market and technology landscape: HIV rapid diagnostic tests for self-testing. 4th ed.2018. Available at: https://unitaid.org/assets/HIVST-landscape-report.pdf. Accessed 9 March 2020.
- 30.Ong JJ, Liao M, Lee A, et al. . Bridging the HIV-syphilis testing gap: dual testing among men who have sex with men living in China. Sex Transm Infect 2019; 95:251–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.