Abstract
A monoclonal antibody against the O-antigenic polysaccharide chain of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of Acinetobacter strains belonging to the unnamed genomic species 13 Sensu Tjernberg and Ursing (13TU) was obtained after immunization of BALB/c mice with heat-killed bacteria and was characterized by enzyme immunoassay and Western blot analysis, by use of LPS and proteinase K-treated bacterial lysates, analyses in which the antibody was shown to be highly specific for the homologous antigen. In addition, when tested in dot and Western blots, reactivity was observed with 9 of 18 Acinetobacter strains of genomic species 13TU which had been isolated in Germany and Denmark; no reactivity was observed with strains of other genomic species, including the closely related genomic groups 1 (A. calcoaceticus), 2 (A. baumannii), and 3 (unnamed), or with other gram-negative bacteria. The antibody described here represents a convenient reagent for the simple, economical, and accurate differentiation of clinical isolates of genomic species 13TU from other Acinetobacter strains. Although the antibody does not identify all isolates of this genomic group, it is evident that it will be a useful reagent in the development of a serotyping scheme for clinical laboratories.
The genus Acinetobacter (Moraxellaceae [26]) is a group of gram-negative coccobacilli which can be found widespread in nature (18, 32), though most strains have also been isolated from various samples of animal and human origin (8, 11, 18, 27, 28). In general, Acinetobacter strains are not virulent (2, 18); however, some of them are involved in severe infections of immunocompromised patients in intensive care units with increasing frequency (2, 11, 31, 32). The infections are often difficult to treat, since many of the isolates are highly resistant to antibiotics (1, 2, 31). However, the importance of these organisms in hospitals may be underestimated, due to difficulties in the identification of Acinetobacter strains to the species level (2, 5, 7, 35). As a result of DNA-DNA hybridization studies, 20 DNA homology groups (genomic species) have been delineated, 7 of which have received formal species names (3, 4, 9, 30). Though Acinetobacter baumannii (genomic species 2) is the most prevalent species associated with outbreaks of nosocomial infection (2, 11, 31, 32), strains belonging to the unnamed genomic species 13 Sensu Tjernberg and Ursing (13TU) (30) have also been isolated from a number of outbreaks (6, 29). Unfortunately, phenotypic investigations of large numbers of Acinetobacter strains, validated by DNA homology studies, have shown that some DNA groups can only be identified unambiguously by DNA-DNA hybridization techniques (10). This has been shown to be particularly problematic for species belonging to the A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex (5, 10), which also includes the clinically relevant genomic species 2 and 13TU. However, DNA-DNA hybridization is laborious and time-consuming, making it inadequate for use in clinical microbiology laboratories (5). Other molecular identification methods have been proposed, but most are either too expensive, require too much experience or standardization, or have simply proven to be unsatisfactorily discriminative (5, 12). Thus, there is still a need for simple, reliable, and inexpensive identification methods for Acinetobacter strains, especially for those belonging to the above-mentioned clinically relevant DNA groups, methods that can be implemented in clinical microbiology laboratories (5).
Acinetobacter, like other gram-negative bacteria, contains lipopolysaccharide (LPS) on the surface of its outer membrane, which in many strains has been shown to be of the smooth (S) phenotype (13–17, 33, 34). Therefore, we are investigating the possibility of an identification scheme for Acinetobacter strains based on the different O antigens within the genus, as has been done for other bacterial genera (19, 21, 24, 25). For this purpose, we have started the generation of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against the O-antigenic polysaccharide from different Acinetobacter isolates of clinical and environmental origin.
We report here on the generation and characterization of an MAb specific for the O-antigen moiety of the LPS of strains belonging to the unnamed genomic species 13TU, and we evaluate its use as part of an O-serotyping scheme for the identification of these bacteria at the species level.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacteria.
The Acinetobacter strains of genomic species 13TU investigated in this study (Table 1) consisted of a selection of representative isolates associated with outbreaks in Germany and in Denmark, as well as a number of nonoutbreak strains. Additional Acinetobacter strains, belonging to other genomic species, were also examined (Table 2). All isolates had been identified previously to the species level by a wide variety of methods, including DNA-DNA hybridization, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis, ribotyping, biotyping, and electrophoretic protein profiling (6, 29). Epidemiologically related isolates had identical biotype and ribotype patterns, but in some cases different PFGE typing patterns were observed (29). The non-Acinetobacter strains used in this study were obtained from R. Podschun (National Reference Center of Klebsiella species, Kiel, Germany) or were from our own culture collection (Table 2). All bacteria were preserved in 10% (vol/vol) glycerol broth at −70°C until further use.
TABLE 1.
Reactivity of MAb S48-13 in dot blot assay with LPS from proteinase K-treated whole-cell lysates from Acinetobacter clinical isolates of unnamed genomic species 13TU
| Strain | Sourcea | Countryb | Outbreakc | Reactivity with MAb S48-13d |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 108 | Bronchus | The Netherlands | No | + |
| 353e | Sputum | Denmark | A | − |
| 387e | Sputum | Denmark | A | − |
| 4419e | Urine | Denmark | No | − |
| 9894e | Sputum | Denmark | No | + |
| 9836e | Sputum | Denmark | No | + |
| 10716e | Sputum | Denmark | No | + |
| 10717e | Sputum | Denmark | No | + |
| 12112e | Blood | Denmark | No | + |
| 53937bbe | Not known | Denmark | No | − |
| 3417f | Sputum | Denmark | B | − |
| 3418f | Sputum | Denmark | B | − |
| 3419f | Sputum | Denmark | B | − |
| 3420f | Sputum | Denmark | B | − |
| 3421f | Sputum | Denmark | B | − |
| St-11681e | Blood | Germany | C | + |
| St-7961e | Blood | Germany | C | + |
| St-8195e | Catheter | Germany | C | + |
| St-2312e | Blood | Germany | C | + |
Source or specimen from which the strain was originally isolated.
Country where the strain was originally isolated.
No, no epidemiological relationship; A to C, epidemiologically related isolates.
Dot blot analysis was performed with proteinase-digested whole-cell bacterial lysates (see Materials and Methods). +, positive reaction; −, no reaction.
Seifert and Gerner-Smidt (29).
Dijkshoorn et al. (6).
TABLE 2.
Non-Acinetobacter genomic species 13TU strains investigated in this study
| Strain | No. of strains examined |
|---|---|
| Acinetobactera spp. | |
| 1 (A. calcoaceticus) | 8 |
| 2 (A. baumannii) | 82 |
| 3 | 13 |
| 4 (A. haemolyticus) | 7 |
| 5 (A. junii) | 5 |
| 6 | 1 |
| 7 (A. johnsonii) | 8 |
| 8/9b (A. lwoffii) | 13 |
| 10 | 3 |
| 11 | 6 |
| 12 (A. radioresistens) | 7 |
| 14BJ | 2 |
| 14TU | 7 |
| 15BJ | 1 |
| 15TU | 2 |
| 16 | 1 |
| 17 | 1 |
| Non-Acinetobacter spp. | |
| Salmonella spp. | 10 |
| Escherichia coli | 4 |
| Shigella sonnei | 8 |
| Enterobacter spp. | 10 |
| Klebsiella pneumoniae | 39 |
| Proteus spp. | 20 |
| Hafnia spp. | 10 |
| Serratia spp. | 10 |
| Pseudomonas spp. | 6 |
| Stenotrophomonas maltophilia | 6 |
Bacterial LPS, whole-cell lysates, and proteinase K digestion.
LPS was extracted from Acinetobacter sp. strain 108 as described previously (33). Preparation of whole-cell lysates (undiluted or diluted 1:4 in sample buffer [33]) and proteinase K digestion were performed as reported previously (23). The samples were used immediately or otherwise stored at −20°C. In the latter case, they were heated again at 100°C for 5 min prior to use.
MAb.
The MAb was prepared by conventional protocols after immunization of mice with heat-killed bacteria. Acinetobacter sp. strain 108, against which rabbit hyperimmune sera had been produced in a previous report (23), was selected in this study for immunization. Four BALB/c mice were injected intravenously on days 0, 7, 14, and 21 with 20, 20, 60, and 120 μg of antigen, respectively. The mice were boosted intravenously on day 125 and intraperitoneally on days 126 and 127 with 200 μg of antigen each, followed by fusion on day 129. Primary hybridomas were screened by dot blot and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) with LPS as antigen. The relevant hybridoma was cloned three times by limiting dilution, isotyped with a commercially available isotyping kit (Bio-Rad), and purified by affinity chromatography on Protein G (Pharmacia). Purity was subsequently checked by Coomassie staining after sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and stored at −20°C.
Serological methods.
EIA and dot and Western blot analyses were performed as described earlier (23, 33), with purified LPS or proteinase K-treated bacterial lysates as antigens.
Acid hydrolysis of membrane-bound LPS.
Membrane-bound LPS was hydrolyzed in 0.1 M HCl as described in a previous study (22), with minor modifications. Briefly, undiluted bacterial lysates were treated with proteinase K, subjected to SDS-PAGE, and subsequently transferred overnight onto a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane, which was then incubated at 100°C for 1 h in a heat-resistant glass container containing 0.1 M HCl. After an extensive washing in blot buffer (33), the membrane was blocked in blot buffer supplemented with 10% nonfat dry milk and immunostained with lipid A-specific MAb S1 (20) as described elsewhere (22). A parallel SDS-polyacrylamide gel was stained with alkaline silver nitrate as described previously (33).
RESULTS
Immunization of mice and preparation of MAb.
BALB/c mice were successfully immunized with heat-killed bacteria from Acinetobacter sp. strain 108. Animals were tested on day 28 for serum antibodies against the antigen used for immunization by dot blot assay. The animal exhibiting the strongest reactivity was used for fusion on day 129. Primary hybridomas (n = 864) were tested by dot blot and by EIA for antibody reactivity, with LPS as antigen; 10 of these produced specific antibodies. One was finally selected for further studies on the basis of good reactivity in EIA and high specificity in the dot blot assay. The antibody (S48-13) was cloned three times by limiting dilution and was found to be of the immunoglobulin G1 class. The MAb was purified by using protein G; purification was ascertained by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie staining (data not shown). The results described below were obtained with the affinity-purified antibody.
Specificity of MAb in EIA.
MAb S48-13 was tested by EIA, with LPS as antigen. Reactivity with the homologous antigen was observed at a concentration of 2.5 ng of antibody per ml (data not shown). In addition, checkerboard titrations were performed, with antigen concentrations of between 32 and 4,000 ng/ml (1.6 to 200 ng of antigen per well) and antibody concentrations of between 0.5 and 1,000 ng/ml. The results (Fig. 1) showed that the antibody exhibits good reactivity with the homologous LPS over a broad range of antigen concentrations. The specificity of the antibody could be visualized by Western blot (see below).
FIG. 1.
Checkerboard titration of MAb S48-13 in EIA with native LPS from Acinetobacter sp. strain 108 as a solid-phase antigen. Plates were coated with antigen concentrations of 4,000 (●), 2,000 (■), 1,000 (▴), 500 (⧫), 250 (○), 125 (□), 63 (▵), and 32 (◊) ng/ml of coating solution (50 μl/well) and reacted with MAb at the concentrations indicated on the abscissa. OD405, optical density at 405 nm.
Reactivity of MAb in dot and Western blots.
When proteinase K-digested whole-cell lysate or LPS from Acinetobacter sp. strain 108 was separated by SDS-PAGE, blotted onto a PVDF membrane, and immunostained with MAb S48-13, a banding pattern typical of an O-polysaccharide chain could be observed (Fig. 2, lane 1). No staining was observed with the core lipid A portion when proteinase K-treated lysate was separated on a 15% gel (data not shown), thus indicating that MAb S48-13 does not react with the core oligosaccharide portion of the LPS molecule and that the observed banding pattern is not the result of a core-reactive antibody. To confirm that MAb S48-13 is indeed directed against the O antigen and not another polysaccharide proteinase K-treated bacterial lysate, which after SDS-PAGE had been immobilized on a PVDF membrane, was hydrolyzed in 0.1 M HCl, and the membrane-bound 4′-monophosphoryl lipid A was subsequently detected in situ with lipid A-specific MAb S1. A ladder-pattern, indistinguishable from that observed following immunostaining with MAb S48-13, could be observed following visualization of bands with MAb S1 (data not shown), thus indicating that the antibody is indeed directed against the O polysaccharide.
FIG. 2.
Reactivity of MAb S48-13 in a Western blot with clinical isolates of unnamed genomic species 13TU after separation of the proteinase K-treated whole-cell lysates (10 μl each) by SDS-PAGE on a 10% separating gel. The bacterial lysates are in the following lanes: 1, strain 108; 2, strain 353; 3, strain 387; 4, strain 4419; 5, strain 9894; 6, strain 9836; 7, strain 10716; 8, strain 10717; 9, strain 12112; 10, strain 53937bb; 11, strain 3417; 12, strain 3418; 13, strain 3419; 14, strain 3420; 15, strain 3421; 16, strain St-11681; 17, strain St-7961; 18, strain St-8195; and 19, strain St-2312.
To evaluate the possibility of using this antibody as part of a future O-serotyping scheme for the identification of Acinetobacter genomic species 13TU strains, the antibody was subsequently tested by dot blot with proteinase K-treated lysates from 11 isolates associated with outbreaks in Germany and Denmark and with 7 nonoutbreak strains and was found to react with 4 outbreak and 5 nonoutbreak strains (Fig. 3). The specificity of these reactions could also be visualized by Western blot (Fig. 2, lanes 2 to 19). Although most isolates exhibited no difference in banding pattern compared to that of the homologous strain, a different ladder pattern could be observed for three strains isolated in Denmark. Comparison of the core lipid A regions of these strains with that of the homologous strain in a silver-stained gel (data not shown) showed no differences in migration distance, thus suggesting that the O antigen of these three strains is different from that of the other isolates. No reactivity was observed in the dot blot when MAb S48-13 was tested with the Acinetobacter strains of other genomic species or with the non-Acinetobacter strains listed in Table 2 (data not shown).
FIG. 3.
Reactivity of MAb S48-13 with clinical isolates of unnamed genomic species 13TU in dot blot. Proteinase K-treated bacterial lysates were diluted 1:3 in distilled water, dotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane (1 μl per dot), and immunostained. The bacteria are as follows (from left to right): top row, strains 108, 353, 387, 4419, 9894, 9836, 10716, 10717, and 12112; second row, strains 53937bb, 3417, 3418, 3419, 3420, 3421, St-11681, St-7961, and St-8195; and third row, strain St-2312.
Determination of LPS phenotype by silver staining.
Proteinase K-treated bacterial lysates from the strains which had not reacted with MAb S48-13 were subjected to SDS-PAGE, and the gel was subsequently stained with alkaline silver nitrate. As shown in Fig. 4A, a distinct ladder pattern could be observed for strains 353 (lane 1), 383 (lane 2), 53937bb (lane 4), 3420 (lane 8), and 3421 (lane 9). However, no banding pattern was observed for the other strains.
FIG. 4.
Determination of LPS phenotype after SDS-PAGE on a 10% gel and staining with alkaline silver nitrate (A) or with MAb S1 in a Western blot after hydrolysis at 100°C in 0.1 M HCl (B) of proteinase K-treated bacterial lysates (15 μl each) from strains which had not reacted with MAb S48-13. Lanes: 1, strain 353; 2, strain 387; 3, strain 4419; 4, strain 53937bb; 5, strain 3417; 6, strain 3418; 7, strain 3419; 8, strain 3420; 9, strain 3421.
Since the acid hydrolysis method has been shown to be more sensitive than silver staining (22), all strains were also subjected to hydrolysis in 0.1 M HCl and subsequent immunodetection of the free lipid A with MAb S1. For those clinical isolates with a banding pattern in the silver staining (Fig. 4A), an identical pattern was visualized after immunostaining with MAb S1 (Fig. 4B). However, banding patterns were also observed for the three other strains which had been negative after silver staining. Surprisingly, all patterns were identical, suggesting the presence of only one additional serotype within this group of strains. The reason for the absence of a banding pattern in the case of strain 3419 (lane 7) is unclear, but it may be due to a reduced O-antigen expression or to the production of an LPS which is naturally of the rough phenotype.
DISCUSSION
Due to lack of phenotypic methods for the rapid and unambiguous identification of Acinetobacter strains at the species level (5, 10), we are currently investigating the possibility of an identification for the genus Acinetobacter based on the O-antigenic polysaccharide of the LPS from these bacteria. Using hyperimmune rabbit sera, we could show that such a scheme is feasible (23). However, though they were shown to be highly specific, the antisera have the disadvantage of containing core-reactive and non-LPS antibodies, e.g., capsular and protein antibodies, which would lead to false-positive results when the sera are used for identification purposes (23). MAbs, however, can be generated which are O antigen specific and thus are more suitable for such a scheme. Moreover, MAbs have the advantage of being producible in virtually unlimited amounts.
In this study, a murine MAb was generated against Acinetobacter strains belonging to the unnamed genomic species 13TU (30) which, next to genomic species 2 (A. baumannii), is the most frequent DNA group associated with nosocomial infections in intensive care units (2, 31). The antibody, S48-13, was characterized by EIA and Western blot analysis and was found to be highly specific for the O-antigenic polysaccharide of the homologous LPS. It has been shown in previous studies that Acinetobacter sp. strain 108 produces S-type LPS (22, 33), and this could be confirmed in our study. MAb S48-13 was additionally tested by dot and Western blot with 18 other clinical isolates belonging to unnamed genomic species 13TU, which had been characterized previously by several methods, including DNA-DNA hybridization, biotyping, ribotyping, and PFGE. Although epidemiologically related strains were observed to have identical bio- and ribotype patterns (6, 29), in some cases differing PFGE types were noted (29). Reactivity was observed with four outbreak and five nonoutbreak strains. A different O-antigen banding pattern was observed for three of the nonoutbreak strains from Denmark which had reacted positively with MAb S48-13. This is due to the presence of a chemically different but antigenically related O antigen in the LPS of these strains compared to that of the other isolates, since the migration distance of the core lipid A region of these strains after SDS-PAGE was the same as that of the homologous strain (data not shown). This will be confirmed by structural analysis.
To determine their LPS phenotype, those strains which had not reacted with MAb S48-13 were subjected to an acid hydrolysis procedure (22) in which, after SDS-PAGE and transfer of the LPS onto a PVDF membrane, the membrane is incubated in an acidic solution at 100°C for 1 h, resulting in the liberation of lipid A which remains membrane bound and can be detected in situ by using a lipid A-specific MAb such as S1 (20). Surprisingly, the ladder patterns observed for these strains were identical, suggesting that these strains may represent an additional serotype within genomic species 13TU. The sensitivity of this method is much greater than that of the silver-staining procedure and has been discussed in detail elsewhere (22). When SDS-polyacrylamide gels of proteinase K-digested lysates of the strains which did not react with MAb S48-13 were stained with alkaline silver nitrate, banding patterns were observed for five strains. However, with the acid hydrolysis method, O-antigen characteristic patterns could be observed for these five strains as well as for three additional strains. One isolate, strain 3419, did not show a distinct banding pattern, which is suggestive of a reduced O-antigen expression or the natural production of LPS of the rough phenotype.
MAb S48-13 did not react with any Acinetobacter strains belonging to other genomic species, including the closely related DNA groups 1, 2, and 3, or with the LPS of strains from several other gram-negative bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., Shigella sonnei, Enterobacter spp., Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas spp., Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Serratia spp., and Proteus spp. Moreover, only one additional putative serotype was found within the group of isolates that were investigated, suggesting that Acinetobacter genomic species 13TU may possibly only consist of a few serotypes. Thus, a mixture of a few MAbs may become a convenient tool to definitely identify strains belonging to Acinetobacter DNA group 13TU.
Although the antibody described in this study does not identify all clinical isolates, the data show that genomic species 13TU may be, due to its relatively low degree of diversity, particularly suited for a serotyping scheme with MAbs. To provide a more comprehensive understanding of the antigenic variations in Acinetobacter O antigens, we will perform the structural analysis of those antigens which are not detected by the antibody described here and generate new MAbs to fill the present gap. However, we also need the cooperation of clinical microbiologists willing to evaluate these antibodies in various clinical settings in different geographic areas. One should keep in mind that the well-established serotyping schemes for Salmonella, Shigella, E. coli, and other gram-negative human pathogens are extremely helpful tools and were not established at once.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank L. Dijkshoorn (Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands), H. Seifert (Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany), and P. Gerner-Smidt (Department of Clinical Microbiology, Statens Seruminstitut, Copenhagen, Denmark) for providing the Acinetobacter strains investigated in this study and R. Podschun (National Reference Center of Klebsiella species, Kiel, Germany) for the non-Acinetobacter strains. The excellent technical assistance of V. Susott, D. Brötzmann, S. Ruttkowski, and M. Willen is also gratefully acknowledged.
REFERENCES
- 1.Bergogne-Bérézin E. The increasing significance of outbreaks of Acinetobacter spp.: the need for control and new agents. J Hosp Infect. 1995;30:441–452. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(95)90048-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bergogne-Bérézin E, Towner K J. Acinetobacter spp. as nosocomial pathogens: microbiological, clinical, and epidemiological features. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1996;9:148–165. doi: 10.1128/cmr.9.2.148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bouvet P J M, Grimont P A D. Taxonomy of the genus Acinetobacter with recognition of Acinetobacter baumannii sp. nov., Acinetobacter haemolyticus sp. nov., Acinetobacter johnsonii sp. nov., Acinetobacter junii sp. nov., and amended descriptions of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus and Acinetobacter lwoffii. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1986;36:228–240. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bouvet P J M, Jeanjean S. Delineation of new proteolytic genomic species in the genus Acinetobacter. Res Microbiol. 1989;140:291–299. doi: 10.1016/0923-2508(89)90021-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dijkshoorn L. Acinetobacter—microbiology. In: Bergogne-Bérézin E, Joly-Guillou M L, Towner K J, editors. Acinetobacter: microbiology, epidemiology, infections, management. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press; 1996. pp. 37–69. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dijkshoorn L, Aucken H M, Gerner-Smidt P, Kaufmann M E, Ursing J, Pitt T L. Correlation of typing methods for Acinetobacter isolates from hospital outbreaks. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:702–705. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.3.702-705.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dijkshoorn L, van der Toorn J. Acinetobacter species: which do we mean? Clin Infect Dis. 1992;15:748–749. doi: 10.1093/clind/15.4.748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gennari M, Lombardi P. Comparative characterization of Acinetobacter strains isolated from different foods and clinical sources. Zentbl Bakteriol. 1993;279:553–564. doi: 10.1016/s0934-8840(11)80428-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gerner-Smidt P, Tjernberg I. Acinetobacter in Denmark. II. Molecular studies of the Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-Acinetobacter baumannii complex. APMIS. 1993;101:826–832. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gerner-Smidt P, Tjernberg I, Ursing J. Reliability of phenotypic tests for identification of Acinetobacter species. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29:277–282. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.2.277-282.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Grimont P A D, Bouvet P J M. Taxonomy of Acinetobacter. In: Towner K J, Bergogne-Bérézin E, Fewson C A, editors. The biology of Acinetobacter: taxonomy, clinical importance, molecular biology, physiology, industrial relevance. New York, N.Y: Plenum Press; 1991. pp. 25–36. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Grundmann H, Towner K J, Dijkshoorn L, Gerner-Smidt P, Maher M, Seifert H, Vaneechoutte M. Multicenter study using standardized protocols and reagents for evaluation of reproducibility of PCR-based fingerprinting of Acinetobacter spp. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:3071–3077. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.12.3071-3077.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Haseley S R, Holst O, Brade H. Structural and serological characterisation of the O-antigenic polysaccharide of the lipopolysaccharide from Acinetobacter strain 90 belonging to DNA group 10. Eur J Biochem. 1997;245:470–476. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.t01-1-00470.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Haseley S R, Holst O, Brade H. Structural and serological characterisation of the O-antigenic polysaccharide of the lipopolysaccharide from Acinetobacter haemolyticus strain ATCC 17906. Eur J Biochem. 1997;244:761–766. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.00761.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Haseley S R, Holst O, Brade H. Structural studies of the O-antigenic polysaccharide of the lipopolysaccharide from Acinetobacter (DNA group 11) strain 94 containing 3-amino-3,6-dideoxy-d-galactose substituted by the previously unknown amide-linked l-2-acetoxypropionic acid or l-2-hydroxypropionic acid. Eur J Biochem. 1997;247:815–819. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.00815.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Haseley S R, Holst O, Brade H. Structural studies of the O-antigen isolated from the phenol-soluble lipopolysaccharide of Acinetobacter baumannii (DNA group 2) strain 9. Eur J Biochem. 1998;251:189–194. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1998.2510189.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Haseley S R, Pantophlet R, Brade L, Holst O, Brade H. Structural and serological characterisation of the O-antigenic polysaccharide of the lipopolysaccharide from Acinetobacter junii strain 65. Eur J Biochem. 1997;245:477–481. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.t01-1-00477.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Juni E. Acinetobacter Brisou and Prevot 1954, 727AL. In: Krieg N R, editor. Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology. I. Baltimore, Md: Williams and Wilkins; 1984. pp. 303–307. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Knirel Y A, Kochetkov N K. The structure of lipopolysaccharides of gram-negative bacteria. III. The structure of O-antigens: a review. Biochemistry (Moscow) 1994;59:1325–1383. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kuhn H-M, Brade L, Appelmelk B J, Kusumoto S, Rietschel E T, Brade H. Characterization of the epitope specificity of murine monoclonal antibodies directed against lipid A. Infect Immun. 1992;60:2201–2210. doi: 10.1128/iai.60.6.2201-2210.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Orskov I, Orskov F, Jann B, Jann K. Serology, chemistry, and genetics of O and K antigens of Escherichia coli. Bacteriol Rev. 1977;44:667–710. doi: 10.1128/br.41.3.667-710.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pantophlet R, Brade L, Brade H. Detection of lipid A by monoclonal antibodies in S-form lipopolysaccharide after acidic treatment of immobilized LPS on Western blot. J Endotoxin Res. 1997;4:89–95. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pantophlet R, Brade L, Dijkshoorn L, Brade H. Specificity of rabbit antisera against lipopolysaccharide of Acinetobacter. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:1245–1250. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.5.1245-1250.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rietschel E T, Brade H. Bacterial endotoxins. Sci Am. 1992;267:26–33. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0892-54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rietschel E T, Brade L, Lindner B, Zähringer U. Biochemistry of lipopolysaccharides. In: Morrison D C, Ryan J L, editors. Bacterial endotoxic lipopolysaccharides. I. Molecular biochemistry and cellular biology. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press; 1992. pp. 3–42. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rossau R, van Landschoot A, Gillis M, de Ley J. Taxonomy of Moraxellaceae fam. nov., a new bacterial family to accommodate the genera Moraxella, Acinetobacter, and Psychrobacter and related organisms. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1991;41:310–319. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Seifert H, Baginski R, Schulze A, Pulverer G. The distribution of Acinetobacter species in clinical culture materials. Zentbl Bakteriol. 1993;279:544–552. doi: 10.1016/s0934-8840(11)80427-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Seifert H, Dijkshoorn L, Gerner-Smidt P, Pelzer N, Tjernberg I, Vaneechoutte M. Distribution of Acinetobacter species on human skin: comparison of phenotypic and genotypic identification methods. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:2819–2825. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.11.2819-2825.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Seifert H, Gerner-Smidt P. Comparison of ribotyping and pulsed-field electrophoresis for molecular typing of Acinetobacter isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:1402–1407. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.5.1402-1407.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tjernberg I, Ursing J. Clinical strains of Acinetobacter classified by DNA-DNA hybridization. APMIS. 1989;97:595–605. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1989.tb00449.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Towner K J. Clinical importance and antibiotic resistance of Acinetobacter spp. J Med Microbiol. 1997;46:721–746. doi: 10.1099/00222615-46-9-721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Towner K J, Bergogne-Bérézin E, Fewson C A. Acinetobacter: portrait of a genus. In: Towner K J, Bergogne-Bérézin E, Fewson C A, editors. The biology of Acinetobacter: taxonomy, clinical importance, molecular biology, physiology, industrial relevance. New York, N.Y: Plenum Press; 1991. pp. 1–24. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Vinogradov E V, Pantophlet R, Dijkshoorn L, Brade L, Holst O, Brade H. Structural and serological characterization of two O-specific polysaccharides from Acinetobacter. Eur J Biochem. 1996;239:602–610. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1996.0602u.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Vinogradov E V, Pantophlet R, Haseley S R, Brade L, Holst O, Brade H. Structural and serological characterization of the O-specific polysaccharide from lipopolysaccharide of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus strain 7 (DNA-group 1) Eur J Biochem. 1997;243:167–173. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.0167a.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Weaver R E, Actis L A. Identification of Acinetobacter species. J Clin Microbiol. 1994;32:1833. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.7.1833-.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]




