Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021 Aug 10;30(10):1858–1866. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-0576

Plasma metabolic phenotypes of HPV-associated vs smoking-associated head and neck cancer and patient survival

Ronald C Eldridge 1, Karan Uppal 2, D Neil Hayes 3, M Ryan Smith 2, Xin Hu 2, Zhaohui S Qin 4, Jonathan J Beitler 5, Andrew H Miller 5, Evanthia C Wommack 5, Kristin A Higgins 5, Dong M Shin 5, Bryan Ulrich 5, David C Qian 5, Nabil F Saba 5, Deborah W Bruner 1, Dean P Jones 2, Canhua Xiao 1
PMCID: PMC8492502  NIHMSID: NIHMS1733272  PMID: 34376485

Abstract

Background:

Metabolic differences between human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and smoking-associated HNSCC may partially explain differences in prognosis. The former relies on mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) while the latter relies on glycolysis. These differences have not been studied in blood.

Methods:

We extracted metabolites using untargeted liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry from pretreatment plasma in a cohort of 55 HPV-associated and 82 smoking-associated HNSCC subjects. Metabolic pathway enrichment analysis of differentially expressed metabolites produced pathway-based signatures. Significant pathways (P<0.05) were reduced via principal components analysis and assessed with overall survival via Cox models. We classified each subject as glycolytic or OXPHOS phenotype and assessed it with survival.

Results:

Of 2,410 analyzed metabolites, 191 were differentially expressed. Relative to smoking-associated HNSCC, bile acid biosynthesis (P<0.0001) and octadecatrienoic acid beta-oxidation (P=0.01), were upregulated in HPV-associated HNSCC, while galactose metabolism (P=0.001) and vitamin B6 metabolism (P=0.01) were downregulated; the first two suggest an OXPHOS phenotype while the latter two suggest glycolytic. First principal components of bile acid biosynthesis (HR=0.52 per standard deviation, 95% CI:0.38–0.72, P<0.001) and octadecatrienoic acid beta-oxidation (HR=0.54 per sd, 95% CI:0.38–0.78, P<0.001) were significantly associated with overall survival independent of HPV and smoking. The glycolytic vs OXPHOS phenotype was also independently associated with survival (HR=3.17, 95% CI:1.07–9.35; P=0.04).

Conclusions:

Plasma metabolites related to glycolysis and mitochondrial OXPHOS may be biomarkers of HNSCC patient prognosis independent of HPV or smoking. Future investigations should determine if they predict treatment efficacy.

Impact:

Blood metabolomics may be a useful marker to aid HNSCC patient prognosis.

Introduction:

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) can be divided into two groups that are clinically, genetically, and possibly metabolically distinct: human papillomavirus-associated HNSCC and smoking-associated HNSCC (sometimes viewed as HPV-unassociated). The former consists of HPV-positive oropharyngeal tumors with little to no patient smoking history, while the latter consists of HPV-negative oropharyngeal and all other HNSCC sites from patients with a substantial smoking history (i.e., >10 pack-years); HPV-positive oropharyngeal patients with a substantial smoking history are likely a mix of HPV-associated and smoking-associated HNSCC. Clinically, HPV-associated HNSCC is less aggressive, responds better to treatment, and on average patients live two-to-seven times longer than smoking-associated HNSCC1. Genetically, “hot-spot” locations in the PIK3CA oncogene are mutated in HPV-associated tumors, while TP53 tumor suppressor loss-mutations are in most smoking-associated tumors2,3. These genes are known to regulate tumor metabolism. For instance, wild-type p53 dampens glycolysis and promotes mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) by regulating glucose transporters (GLUTs) and key enzymes in the glycolysis pathway4.

It has been hypothesized that loss or inactivation of p53 may promote the Warburg effect5, i.e., the reprogramming of tumor metabolism to favor glycolysis at the expense of OXPHOS6. Noticed in the 1920’s by Otto Warburg, this atypical metabolic state provides the energy and macromolecules for rapid proliferation and metastasis710. It links to nearly all hallmarks of cancer11. The Warburg effect can be seen, literally, via 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET)12. Higher tumor uptake of the fluorescent glucose marker means higher glycolytic activity, which is directly associated with poor prognosis and treatment resistance in HNSCC13,14. In fact, the Warburg effect may be a factor in HNSCC treatment resistance. Increased glycolysis and decreased OXPHOS promotes resistance to ionizing radiation therapy15 and studies suggest modulating glycolysis may re-sensitize a tumor16,17. Recent studies in HNSCC cell lines suggest that a Warburg-like metabolic phenotype differentiates HPV-positive from HPV-negative cells18,19. The Warburg effect may thus explain, in part, the differences in presentation, progression, and survival observed between these HNSCC groups. However, it has yet to be investigated as a potential blood biomarker.

Our goal was to investigate the metabolic differences of HPV-associated HNSCC relative to smoking-associated HNSCC in pretreatment patient plasma using untargeted high-resolution metabolomics (HRM) and test whether those differences were prognostic of overall survival independent of HPV status. HRM is the comprehensive measurement of small molecules arising from metabolic reactions occurring in a biospecimen – i.e., metabolites20. It uses gas or liquid chromatography paired with high-resolution mass-spectrometry to quantify thousands of metabolites via their mass-to-charge ratio (m/z)21. The metabolites are matched to reference databases22 or identified with authentic standards23. While single metabolite investigations used to be the norm, recent advances in high-throughput measurement, bioinformatics, and pathway analysis have shifted the field towards a systems-biology approach, gaining further insight into disease via dysregulated metabolic pathways and profiles2426.

Materials and Methods:

Cohort:

This was a prospective cohort of HNSCC patients recruited at radiation oncology clinics affiliated with Emory University Hospital from 2013 to 2016 before undergoing intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with or without chemotherapy27. In this analysis, all patients gave written informed consent to participate in the parent study and all ancillary studies. Recruitment and data collection for the parent study and the current ancillary study were guided by the ethical principles of the Belmont Report and reviewed and approved by the Emory University Institutional Review Board. Inclusion criteria were histological HNSCC with no distant metastasis, ≥21 years of age, and no evidence of uncontrolled metabolic, hematologic, cardiovascular, renal, hepatic or neurologic disease. Patients with simultaneous primaries or major psychiatric disorders were excluded. Demographic and clinical variables were collected through chart review and standardized questionnaires at study entry. Prior to IMRT, blood was collected into chilled EDTA tubes for the immediate isolation of plasma. Plasma was separated by centrifugation at 1000g for 10 minutes at 4°C then aliquoted into siliconized polypropylene tubes and stored at −80°C.

Classification of HPV-associated and smoking-associated HNSCC:

HPV status was ascertained via review of the tumor pathology report. We deemed a subject HPV-positive if p16 was positive or if HPV DNA was detected. Smoking status was ascertained via questionnaire of tobacco habits; the questionnaire did not allow calculation of pack-years. We defined our smoking-associated HNSCC group as all current or former smokers with a non-oropharyngeal or HPV-negative oropharyngeal tumor; non-oropharyngeal tumors are rarely attributed to HPV28 and thus not uniformly tested. We defined our HPV-associated HNSCC group as all subjects who were HPV-positive never smokers. We endeavored to mitigate group misclassification thus we deliberately excluded HPV-positive oropharyngeal patients with a smoking history. We believe these patients are a mix of smoking-associated and HPV-associated HNSCC and by including them would introduce misclassification. In a 2010 seminal paper, Ang et. al. demonstrated that HPV-positive oropharyngeal smokers with >10 pack-years – deemed as having “Intermediate risk” for survival – are clinically distinct from the “Low risk” group (i.e., HPV-positive, ≤10 pack-years) and the “High risk” group (i.e., HPV-negative, >10 pack-years)29.

Overall survival:

Vital status was ascertained via linkage to the Georgia Comprehensive Cancer Registry maintained at Emory University. Overall survival was defined as the time from study entry to death by any cause, or to the last contact up to August 2020.

High-resolution untargeted metabolomics (HRM) of blood plasma:

We used liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) protocols developed at the Emory Clinical Biomarkers Laboratory30,31. Frozen aliquots from randomized samples were removed from −80°C, thawed, and extracted with ice-cold acetonitrile. Supernatants were added to a 4°C autosampler. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate (10μL) using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) with positive electrospray ionization and Fourier transform Orbitrap high-resolution mass spectrometry (Dionex Ultimate 3000, Q-Exactive HF, Thermo Scientific). Analyte separation was achieved using a 2.1mm × 100mm × 2.6μm Accucore HILIC column (Thermo Scientific) and a gradient elution of 2% formic acid, water, and acetonitrile starting at 10%, 10%, 80%, for 1.5 min with a linear increase to 10%, 80%, 10% at 6 min and held for 4 min per injection.

The high-resolution mass spectrometer operated at 120,000 resolution and an m/z range of 85.0000–1275.0000. Probe temperature, capillary temperature, sweep gas and S-Lens RF levels were 200°C, 300°C, 1 arbitrary units (AU), and 45 AU, respectively. Positive tune for sheath gas, auxiliary gas, sweep gas and spray voltage settings were 45 AU, 25 AU and 3.5 kV, respectively. Spectral peaks were extracted and aligned using apLCMS32 and xMSanalyzer33. Mass, retention time, and ion intensity were recorded for unique m/z spectral features. Features with a coefficient of variation ≥75% were removed. Feature intensities were median summarized across triplicates and corrected for any batch effects34. Features were log2 transformed and quantile normalized. We restricted our investigation to m/z features annotated via the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and Human Metabolome (HMDB) reference databases22.

Statistical Analysis:

We identified differences in metabolic pathways of HPV-associated HNSCC relative to smoking-associated HNSCC via feature selection (step 1) followed by metabolic pathway enrichment analysis (step 2). We reduced each significant pathway via principal components analysis (PCA) (step 3) and estimated the first principal components (PC) with overall patient survival via Cox-models (step 4). Based on the pathway results, we classified each patient, post-hoc, into a binary glycolytic or OXPHOS metabolic phenotype and estimated that classification with overall survival (step 5).

Step 1: We selected m/z features that differentiated HPV-associated vs smoking-associated HNSCC in any of three models routinely used in untargeted metabolomics analyses: age at study entry, sex, and race adjusted logistic regression using a Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate P<0.10; Partial least squares discriminant analysis using a variable importance in projection>2; Support vector machine using recursive feature elimination. Step 2: We identified enriched metabolic pathways from the features using Mummichog, a pathway analysis tool that maps m/z to KEGG metabolic networks and uses resampling to obtain a Fisher’s exact test P-value24 – a similar methodology to Gene set enrichment analysis. Pathways with ≥3 metabolite hits and P<0.05 met our threshold for statistical significance. We note the Identification Level35 of the pathway metabolites and plot a heatmap. Step 3: We performed PCA on the metabolites that comprised each significant pathway. Step 4: The 1st PC for each pathway was z-standardized and regressed on overall patient survival using Cox proportional hazards adjusted for HPV and smoking status, age at study entry, sex, race, tumor stage and patient ECOG status; we found no statistically significant interaction by these variables. Further adjustment for body mass index, alcohol consumption, marriage status, treatment, feeding tube, and time of blood draw did not change our results and were not included in final models. The hazard ratios estimated the increase in mortality per 1 standard deviation (sd) change in the pathway-specific PC. We conducted a sub-analysis restricting to oropharyngeal and non-oropharyngeal carcinoma subjects to investigate whether results hold across tumor site. Step 5: We dichotomized the PCs at their study medians and used the three most significant pathways to classify each subject as having a glycolytic or an OXPHOS phenotype (i.e, if ≥2 of the 3 pathways indicated glycolysis the patient was classified that way and vice versa with OXPHOS). We regressed the glycolytic vs OXPHOS phenotype on overall survival with a Cox model and plotted a Kaplan-Meier survival curve.

We used publicly available R packages for feature selection (xmsPANDA 1.1.76)36, pathway analysis (Mummichog 2.0)24, and metabolite annotation (xmsAnnotator 1.3.2)22. PCA used the “prcomp” R package. Cox regression used SAS version 9.437.

Results:

Compared to smoking-associated, the HPV-associated HNSCC subjects on average were younger (56.8 years vs 60.1), more obese (29.0 kg/m2 vs 26.1), white (87% vs 72%) and male (89% vs 62%) (Table 1). As expected, the HPV-associated tumors were predominantly in the oropharynx (96%) and less advanced (29% were stage IV vs 64% for smoking-associated). Also expected, the smoking-associated subjects had higher mortality than HPV-associated group (unadjusted hazard ratio (HR)=7.6, 95% confidence interval (CI)=2.8, 25.5; P<0.001; Kaplan-Meier curve in Supplementary Figure 1).

Table 1.

Demographics and clinical characteristics of HPV-associated and smoking-associated HNSCC groups

HPV-associated (n=55) Smoking-associated (n=82) P value
Death* reported death 4 8% 24 34%
living/censored 47 92% 47 66%
Survival time (months) mean (sd) 46.3 17.8 37.3 20.6 0.01
Age (years) mean (sd) 56.8 7.8 60.1 10.5 0.05
BMI (kg/m2) mean (sd) 29.0 4.7 26.1 5.3 0.001
Sex Men 49 89% 51 62% <0.001
Women 6 11% 31 38%
Race white 48 87% 59 72% 0.03
All others 7 13% 23 28%
Alcohol use* <1 drink per wk 28 52% 49 60% 0.32
>=1 drink per wk 26 48% 32 40%
Tumor site Oropharynx 53 96% 12 15% <0.001
All others 2 4% 70 85%
Tumor Stage* I–III 38 70% 29 41% <0.001
IV 16 30% 52 59%
ECOG status* 0 (fully active) 39 74% 24 32% <0.001
1 (restricted) 13 25% 38 50%
2 (unable to work) 1 2% 14 18%
Treatment Radiotherapy only 10 18% 17 21% 0.43
Chemoradiotherapy 45 82% 65 79%

HPV=human papillomavirus; HNSCC=head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; sd=standard deviation; IQR=interquartile range;

*

indicates a variable that was missing in ≥1 subject.

From 16,342 extracted features, 3,075 matched to KEGG or HMDB reference databases. After filtering for missing values, 2,410 were left for analysis. The three feature selection models identified 191 metabolites that were differentially expressed between HPV-associated and smoking-associated HNSCC (Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Figure 2).

From 91 pathways, pathway enrichment analysis identified six statistically significant metabolic pathways from the 191 metabolites (Figure 1 and Supplementary Table 2). Notably, all six pathways are relevant to mitochondrial OXPHOS or glycolysis – demonstrating a potential Warburg-like metabolic phenotype. The pathways related to OXPHOS, i.e., bile acid biosynthesis (P<0.0001), 21-carbon steroid metabolism (P=0.007), and octadecatrienoic acid beta-oxidation (P=0.012), were upregulated in HPV-associated HNSCC and down-regulated in smoking-associated HNSCC. The pathways related to glycolysis, i.e., galactose metabolism (P=0.001), vitamin B6 metabolism (P=0.014), and starch and sucrose metabolism (P=0.02), were the opposite. Four pathways implicated in HNSCC did not meet significance but followed the Warburg-like pattern: selenoamino acid metabolism (P=0.065), phosphatidylinositol phosphate (P=0.076), and hexose phosphorylation (P=0.091) were upregulated in smoking-associated HNSCC, while omega-3 fatty acid metabolism (P=0.065) was upregulated in HPV-associated HNSCC.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

The metabolic pathways that were upregulated (green) or downregulated (blue) in HPV-associated relative to smoking-associated HNSCC. P values for each pathway are labeled. The dashed red line indicates statistical significance at the P<0.05 level. The pathways were identified through the metabolic pathway enrichment analysis program, Mummichog version 2.0, with 191 metabolites that differentiated HPV-HNSCC from Smoking-HNSCC in three feature selection models (Multivariable logistic regression, partial least squares discriminant analysis, and support vector machines). The first number following the pathway is the number of significant metabolites in the pathway found in the 191. The second number is the number of metabolites Mummichog mapped to that pathway from the 2,410 total.

For subsequent analyses, we reduced the six pathways to four because of metabolite overlap (five of the six 21-carbon steroid metabolites overlapped with bile acid biosynthesis, and all three of the starch and sucrose metabolites overlapped with galactose). In Table 2, we annotate the 23 metabolites that comprised the bile acid biosynthesis (n=9), galactose metabolism (n=6), octadecatrienoic acid beta-oxidation (n=5), and vitamin B6 metabolism (n=3) pathways. Twelve features were unique (*=identified via an authentic standard): adenosine 5’-monophosphate*, dihydroxy-5beta-cholestane, cholic acid, galactosylglycerol, 3-ketolactose, lactose*, inosine diphosphate, raffinose*, stachyose*, pyridoxamine*, pyridoxic acid*, and pyridoxamine 5-phosphate. The other 11 had multiple matches. A heatmap shows the relative intensity of each metabolite and the pathways between HPV-associated and smoking-associated HNSCC (Figure 2). In general, HPV-associated patients had higher levels of bile acid biosynthesis and octadecatrienoic acid beta-oxidation and lower levels of galactose metabolism and vitamin B6 metabolism; the smoking-associated HNSCC patients had the opposite.

Table 2.

Metabolite annotation for twenty-three metabolites mapped to four different metabolic pathways that differentiate HPV-associated HNSCC from smoking-associated HNSCC

m/z timea KEGG compound IDb Compound namec Adduct ID Leveld FCe PCf
Bile acid biosynthesis pathway
348.0692 102 C00020 Adenosine 5’-monophosphate M+H[1+] 1 −0.83 −0.18
403.3568 36 C06340; C05451; C15610; C05500; C05502; C15519; C13550; C03594 Hydroxycholesterol M+H[1+] 3 1.05 0.35
405.3726 36 C05452 Dihydroxy-5beta-cholestane M+H[1+] 3 1.73 0.39
409.2942 36 C00695 Cholic acid M+H[1+] 3 1.20 0.23
419.3517 36 C06341; C05458; C05453; C05501; C15518; C15520; CE5530; C05499; C05445 Dihydroxycholesterol M+H[1+] 3 1.37 0.38
421.3673 37 C05454; C05444 Trihydroxy-5beta-cholestane M+H[1+] 4 2.54 0.37
435.3466 36 C04554; CE4872; C01301 Dihydroxy-5beta-cholestanate M+H[1+] 4 0.81 0.38
437.3615 37 CE0232; C05446; CE1272 Tetrahydroxy-5beta-cholestane M+H[1+] 3 0.93 0.35
453.3571 36 CE4874; CE1277; CE1278; CE1279 5beta-cholestane-pentol M+H[1+] 3 1.25 0.30
Galactose metabolism pathway
277.0894 74 C05401 Galactosylglycerol M+Na[1+] 3 −1.60 0.12
341.1106 41 C05403 3-Ketolactose M+H[1+] 3 2.79 −0.40
365.1054 99 C00243 Lactose M+Na[1+] 1 −1.59 0.51
429.023 27 C00104 Inosine diphosphate M+H[1+] 3 −0.59 0.10
527.1585 153 C00492 Raffinose M+Na[1+] 1 −1.33 0.52
689.2079 249 C01613 Stachyose M+Na[1+] 1 −1.50 0.54
Octadecatrienoic acid beta-oxidation pathway
237.1486 36 CE5311; CE5323 Hydroxy-tetradeca-trienoic acid M[1+] 4 0.32 0.52
239.1641 36 CE5313; CE5312; CE5325; CE5324 Hydroxy-tetradeca-dienoic acid M[1+] 4 0.47 0.49
263.1639 37 CE5314; CE5326 Hydroxy-hexadeca-tetraenoic acid M[1+] 3 1.38 0.37
265.1796 35 CE5315; CE5316; CE5327; CE5328 Hydroxy-hexadeca-trienoic acid M[1+] 4 1.13 0.39
281.1748 37 CE5321; CE5309 3-oxo-hydroxy-hexadeca-dienoic acid M[1+] 4 0.69 0.44
Vitamin B6 metabolism pathway
169.0971 43 C00534 Pyridoxamine M+H[1+] 1 −0.47 0.78
184.0597 46 C00847 Pyridoxic acid M+H[1+] 1 −0.94 0.38
249.0611 59 C00647 Pyridoxamine 5’-phosphate M+H[1+] 3 0.29 −0.51

m/z=mass-to-charge, time=retention time in seconds HPV=human papillomavirus, HNSCC=head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, FC,=fold change, PC=principal component

a

Metabolite extraction retention time in seconds

b

Mummichog-based mapping to Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database identification number

c

m/z features that matched to multiple reference metabolites are named as specifically as the matching allowed

d

Identification Confidence Level for metabolite annotation23,35 (1=laboratory confirmed standard, 3=tentative structural identification with a match to a reference database, 4=molecular formula identification via isotope abundance distribution, charge state, adduct determination)

e

Log2 fold change association with HPV-associated HNSCC relative to smoking-associated HNSCC

f

Standardized loading factor for the 1st principal component of each metabolic pathway

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Hierarchical clustering heatmap of HPV-associated (HPV) and smoking-associated (SMK) HNSCC and 23 z-transformed metabolites that comprised the four metabolic pathways: bile acid biosynthesis (n=9 metabolites), galactose metabolism (n=6), octadecatrienoic beta-oxidation (n=5), and vitamin B6 (n=3). The HPV-associated HNSCC patients, in general, have higher levels of bile acid biosynthesis and octadecatrienoic acid beta-oxidation metabolites (red) and lower levels of galactose metabolism and vitamin B6 metabolism metabolites (blue) relative to the smoking-associated patients. The smoking-associated HNSCC patients, in general, have the opposite, higher levels of galactose metabolism and vitamin B6 metabolism metabolites and lower levels of bile acid biosynthesis and octadecatrienoic acid beta-oxidation metabolites.

We reduced each pathway to its first principal component (PC) and regressed that on overall mortality using adjusted Cox regression (PCA plots in Supplementary Figure 3; standardized loading factors in Table 2). Three of the four pathways were significantly associated with overall mortality in unadjusted models (Table 3). The bile acid biosynthesis and the octadecatrienoic acid PCs were inversely associated with mortality (HR=0.52 per sd, 95% CI:0.38–0.72, P<0.001; and HR=0.54 per sd, 95% CI:0.38–0.78, P<0.001, respectively). The galactose PC was positively associated mortality (HR=1.72 per sd, 95% CI:1.09–2.72, P=0.02); Kaplan-Meier curves in Supplementary Figure 4). To clarify, a subject at the lowest 20th percentile in the bile acid PC would have one-third the mortality of a subject at the highest 20th percentile (HR=0.52^1.68 sd=0.33). Most importantly, the associations for bile acid and octadecatrienoic acid were independent of HPV status, smoking history, age at study entry, and sex (Table 3). In fact, bile acid biosynthesis remained statistically significant after further adjustment for race, tumor stage, and patient ECOG status (HR=0.58 per sd, 95% CI:0.37–0.92, P=0.02). Restricting to tumor site had little effect on the bile acid biosynthesis pathway estimate but modest effects on the other pathways’ estimates; fewer deaths among the oropharyngeal subjects may have precluded statistical significance (Table 3).

Table 3.

First principal components of metabolic pathways that differentiate HPV-associated HNSCC from smoking-associated HNSCC and their association with overall patient mortality via Cox models

HR CI P value
Bile acid biosynthesis 1 st PC
 Unadjusted model 0.52 (0.38, 0.72) <0.001
 HPV, smoking, age, sex adjusted model 0.52 (0.36, 0.76) <0.001
 Fully adjusted modela 0.58 (0.37, 0.92) 0.02
 Fully adjusted model among oropharyngeal tumor subjectsa 0.45 (0.17, 1.17) 0.10
 Fully adjusted model among non-oropharyngeal subjectsa 0.50 (0.27, 0.94) 0.03
Galactose 1 st PC
 Unadjusted model 1.72 (1.09, 2.72) 0.02
 HPV, smoking, age, sex adjusted model 1.28 (0.79, 2.10) 0.32
 Fully adjusted modela 1.21 (0.71, 2.08) 0.48
 Fully adjusted model among oropharyngeal tumor subjectsa 1.85 (0.53, 6.49) 0.34
 Fully adjusted model among non-oropharyngeal subjectsa 1.04 (0.60, 1.80) 0.89
Octadecatrienoic acid beta oxidation 1 st PC
 Unadjusted model 0.54 (0.38, 0.78) <0.001
 HPV, smoking, age, sex adjusted model 0.65 (0.44, 0.97) 0.03
 Fully adjusted modela 0.75 (0.51, 1.10) 0.14
 Fully adjusted model among oropharyngeal tumor subjectsa 0.29 (0.08, 1.02) 0.05
 Fully adjusted model among non-oropharyngeal subjectsa 0.74 (0.47, 1.16) 0.19
Vitamin B6 1 st PC
 Unadjusted model 1.26 (0.86, 1.86) 0.23
 HPV, smoking, age, sex adjusted model 0.93 (0.61, 1.41) 0.74
 Fully adjusted modela 1.13 (0.75, 1.72) 0.56
 Fully adjusted model among oropharyngeal tumor subjectsa 0.51 (0.17, 1.53) 0.23
 Fully adjusted model among non-oropharyngeal subjectsa 1.35 (0.84, 2.18) 0.22

HR=Cox hazard ratio, CI=confidence interval, HPV=human papillomavirus, PC=principal component

a

adjusted for HPV and smoking status, age at study entry, sex, race, tumor stage, and patient ECOG status

We used median dichotomized PCs from bile acid biosynthesis, galactose metabolism and octadecatrienoic acid beta-oxidation, to classify each subject with a glycolytic or mitochondrial OXPHOS phenotype (Figure 3B). The Kaplan-Meier curve shows stark separation in survival (P<0.0001) with the OXPHOS phenotype having a 93% estimated three-year survival compared to 59% for the glycolytic phenotype (Figure 3A). That survival difference was larger than what we observed for HPV-associated vs smoking-associated HNSCC, at 88% and 69%, respectively (Supplementary Figure 1). The glycolytic vs OXPHOS Cox model showed the metabolic phenotype was significantly associated with mortality independent of HPV status and smoking history, age at study entry, sex, race, tumor stage, and patient ECOG status (HR=3.17, 95% CI:1.07, 9.35; P=0.04). Among HPV-associated subjects, 24% were classified as having the glycolytic phenotype (74% OXPHOS). Among the smoking-associated subjects, 34% of were classified as having the OXPHOS phenotype (66% glycolytic). This suggests that a glycolytic/OXPHOS phenotype may indeed be an independent prognostic biomarker and not merely an extension of HPV-positivity or smoking status.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

The classification scheme and survival curve of the glycolytic vs OXPHOS metabolic phenotype. Panel A) Kaplan-Meier survival curve of HNSCC subjects classified as having a glycolytic or mitochondrial OXPHOS metabolic phenotype. The estimated three-year survival probability is 93% for subjects with an OXPHOS phenotype vs. 59% for subjects with a glycolytic phenotype; the survival curves are statistically significant (logrank P<0.0001). The glycolytic vs OXPHOS Cox model estimated hazard ratio adjusted for HPV and smoking status, age, sex, race, tumor stage, and patient ECOG status is HR=3.17 (95% CI:1.07, 9.35; P=0.04). Panel B) The classification scheme for the glycolytic vs mitochondrial OXPHOS metabolic phenotype based on the median-dichotomized principal components of bile acid biosynthesis, octadecatrienoic acid beta-oxidation, and galactose metabolism (High=above median, Low=below median). Each subject was classified glycolytic or OXPHOS based on the direction of ≥2 pathways.

Discussion:

In this prospective study, we observed a glycolytic vs mitochondrial OXPHOS metabolomic phenotype in HNSCC patient plasma that was associated with patient survival independent of key clinical factors including HPV and smoking. Relative to smoking-associated HNSCC, the metabolic pathways of bile acid biosynthesis and octadecatrienoic acid beta-oxidation were upregulated in HPV-associated patient plasma, while galactose metabolism and vitamin B6 metabolism were downregulated. These pathways help regulate the balance between OXPHOS and glycolysis – a balance frequently dysregulated in tumors, termed the Warburg effect.

Four prior studies have investigated serum or plasma metabolomics in HNSCC patients3841, but to our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate metabolic differences of HPV-associated vs smoking-associated HNSCC. Perhaps the best comparison to our study is one by Jung et. al. that studied HPV-positive versus HPV-negative HNSCC cell lines18. Jung reported that HPV-positive cells rely on mitochondrial OXPHOS for energy metabolism while HPV-negative cells rely on glycolysis – results nearly identical to ours. Jung also found HPV-negative cells had increased levels of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) and hexokinase II (HK-II), regulating enzymes of the hexose phosphorylation pathway, the first step in glycolysis. We found the same pathway upregulated in smoking-associated HNSCC though the result was not statistically significant. Importantly, Jung found that pharmacologic reversal of the glycolytic phenotype increased a cell’s sensitivity to radiation therapy, suggesting a potential drug target. The similarity of our findings in patient blood to those in cell cultures suggests that circulating metabolites may be putative biomarkers of HNSCC tumor metabolism.

The Warburg-like plasma phenotype we observed has two parts. The first part was the dysregulated pathways related to glycolysis (i.e., galactose, starch and sucrose, phosphatidylinositol phosphate, and hexokinase metabolism). Of our findings, glycolysis has the strongest prior evidence. It is a hallmark of HNSCC proliferation and survival, driven by oncogenic signaling (e.g., p53 loss and PI3KCA mutation), altered metabolic enzymes (e.g., GLUT-1, HK-II), and a hypoxic tumor environment (e.g., HIF-1α)42,43. Tumor hypoxia activates HIF-1α, a transcription factor which increases a tumor’s reliance on glycolysis while reducing mitochondrial OXPHOS43. Using gene expression profiles, Keck et al. found hypoxia to be the discriminating feature of the basal HNSCC phenotype – a phenotype made up of HPV-negative smokers44. Higher levels of glycolytic metabolites found in the plasma of smoking-associated HNSCC patients may indeed be the downstream effect of tumor hypoxia. Hypoxia, and its glycolytic switch, is associated with aggressive disease45, treatment failure16, and poor survival46 in HNSCC. Glycolytic metabolites in serum are significantly associated with HNSCC relapse40, and in our study, upregulated glycolytic pathways in plasma were associated with a more aggressive tumor type and poor survival.

The second part of the Warburg-like phenotype we observed was the dysregulated pathways related to mitochondrial OXPHOS (i.e., bile acid biosynthesis, octadecatrienoic acid beta-oxidation, and omega-3 fatty acid metabolism). Bile acid biosynthesis was our most important finding. It was significantly upregulated in HPV-associated HNSCC and was positively associated with longer survival independent of HPV, smoking, and other clinical factors. It is understudied in HNSCC but deserves closer examination. Bile acids are synthesized in the liver from cholesterol to aid in the digestion of dietary fat. That process, however, is regulated via a host of nuclear receptor signaling pathways, notably FXR, TGR5, and PPAR, that are now recognized for suppressing cancer progression4750. Bile acids may also be related to tumor hypoxia as they have been shown to destabilize HIF-1α in prostate, lung, and mammary cancer cell lines51. Conversely, tumor hypoxia may represses CYP7A1, a key bile acid biosynthesis enzyme though many factors may affect this pathway52.

Like bile acids, we found octadecatrienoic acid beta-oxidation (i.e., oxidation of 18-carbon lipids such as omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids) upregulated in HPV-associated HNSCC and positively associated with longer survival independent of HPV and smoking. Pro-oncogenic pathways generally promote synthesis of fatty acids over oxidation because proliferating cells require lipids for biological membranes53. Apart from lipoprotein(a), serum lipids appear to decrease as HNSCC progresses5459 and short-chain fatty acids may suppress HNSCC growth60. Our findings agree that higher levels of lipid oxidation, in general, is a beneficial marker in HNSCC.

The Warburg effect is likely just one aspect of tumor metabolism linked to HNSCC progression. Molecular changes underlying HNSCC progression, such as p53 loss, EGFR mutation, and mutations in the signaling of PI3K-AKT, NOTCH1, and ALK1, parallel metabolic changes in the tumor10,6164. Metabolomics may thus provide a rich source of HNSCC biomarkers particularly if metabolic reprogramming drives treatment resistance. Resistance to radiation therapy, cisplatin chemotherapy, and cetuximab immunotherapy may be directly related to reprogrammed glucose metabolism and mitochondrial-generated oxidative stress15,65,66. Thus, metabolic biomarkers may give an early indication of HNSCC treatment efficacy and may be targets for novel metabolic therapies10,64.

The recruitment of the parent study limited our metabolome-wide analysis to HNSCC patient plasma and not tumor specimens. Additionally, we did not have healthy controls as a comparison group. However, we analyzed plasma metabolic differences in two important clinical subtypes and assessed those differences with survival – something no prior study has done. The exclusion of HPV-positive patients with a smoking history gave us distinct HPV-associated and smoking-associated groups but may limit our generalizability. The extracted metabolites are likely influenced by recent diet and the subjects did not fast before blood draw. Information on diet was not available, but we did adjust the models for factors that influence diet such as smoking, alcohol, age, sex, BMI, and the time of the blood draw. Lastly, untargeted metabolomics is a “shotgun” approach that measures the relative intensity of each mass-to-charge feature and we cannot be certain of the annotation, outside of laboratory standards23. To improve confidence in our annotation, we restricted our analysis to metabolites matched to the KEGG and HMDB reference databases. However, a feature may match to multiple reference metabolites and we cannot distinguish between them.

In conclusion, we observed a Warburg-like metabolomic phenotype in HNSCC patient plasma that may aid patient prognosis. We expound on the metabolic pathways that differentiate HPV-associated from smoking-associated HNSCC, two groups who differ in their presentation, treatment sensitivity, and survival. We are working to independently validate the results we observed with bile acids, lipid oxidation, and galactose metabolism so that they warrant future investigations as predictors of treatment efficacy and as therapeutic targets for treatment resistant tumors.

Supplementary Material

1
2
3

Acknowledgements:

R.C. Eldridge would like to thank the Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance (UL1TR002378 and KL2TR002381), and C. Xiao would like to thank the National Institute of Nursing Research (K99/R00NR014587 and R01NR015783) and the Winship Cancer Institute via the National Cancer Institute (P30CA138292) for funding the conducted research. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Georgia CTSA or the National Institutes of Health.

Author disclosures:

The authors have no conflicts of interest related to the work in the manuscript. Unrelated to this work, KAH is disclosing as a consultant for Astra Zeneca and funded research by RefleXion, and AHM is disclosing as a consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Ang KK, Sturgis EM. Human Papillomavirus as a Marker of the Natural History and Response to Therapy of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2012;22(2):128–142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Comprehensive genomic characterization of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Nature. 2015;517(7536):576–582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hayes DN, Van Waes C, Seiwert TY. Genetic Landscape of Human Papillomavirus-Associated Head and Neck Cancer and Comparison to Tobacco-Related Tumors. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2015;33(29):3227–3234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wilkie MD, Lau AS, Vlatkovic N, Jones TM, Boyd MT. Metabolic signature of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Consequences of TP53 mutation and therapeutic perspectives. Oral Oncol. 2018;83:1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Matoba S, Kang J-G, Patino WD, et al. p53 Regulates Mitochondrial Respiration. Science. 2006;312(5780):1650–1653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ward Patrick S, Thompson Craig B. Metabolic Reprogramming: A Cancer Hallmark Even Warburg Did Not Anticipate. Cancer Cell. 2012;21(3):297–308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB. Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science. 2009;324(5930):1029–1033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Vaupel P, Schmidberger H, Mayer A. The Warburg effect: essential part of metabolic reprogramming and central contributor to cancer progression. Int J Radiat Biol. 2019;95(7):912–919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lu J The Warburg metabolism fuels tumor metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2019;38(1–2):157–164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sandulache VC, Myers JN. Altered metabolism in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: an opportunity for identification of novel biomarkers and drug targets. Head Neck. 2012;34(2):282–290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Khalid OA, Claudiu TS, Laurent S. The Warburg Effect and the Hallmarks of Cancer. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2017;17(2):164–170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kapoor V, McCook BM, Torok FS. An Introduction to PET-CT Imaging. Radiographics. 2004;24(2):523–543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tantiwongkosi B, Yu F, Kanard A, Miller FR. Role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in pre and post treatment evaluation in head and neck carcinoma. World J Radiol. 2014;6(5):177–191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Feliciani G, Fioroni F, Grassi E, et al. Radiomic Profiling of Head and Neck Cancer: (18)F-FDG PET Texture Analysis as Predictor of Patient Survival. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2018;2018:3574310–3574310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cruz-Gregorio A, Martínez-Ramírez I, Pedraza-Chaverri J, Lizano M. Reprogramming of Energy Metabolism in Response to Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11(2):182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Meijer TWH, Kaanders JHAM, Span PN, Bussink J. Targeting Hypoxia, HIF-1, and Tumor Glucose Metabolism to Improve Radiotherapy Efficacy. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(20):5585–5594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhong J-T, Zhou S-H. Warburg effect, hexokinase-II, and radioresistance of laryngeal carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2017;8(8):14133–14146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jung Y-S, Najy AJ, Huang W, et al. HPV-associated differential regulation of tumor metabolism in oropharyngeal head and neck cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8(31):51530–51541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Krupar R, Robold K, Gaag D, et al. Immunologic and metabolic characteristics of HPV-negative and HPV-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinomas are strikingly different. Virchows Arch. 2014;465(3):299–312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Liu X, Locasale JW. Metabolomics: A Primer. Trends Biochem Sci. 2017;42(4):274–284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yu T, Jones DP. Improving peak detection in high-resolution LC/MS metabolomics data using preexisting knowledge and machine learning approach. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(20):2941–2948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Uppal K, Walker DI, Jones DP. xMSannotator: An R Package for Network-Based Annotation of High-Resolution Metabolomics Data. Anal Chem. 2017;89(2):1063–1067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Liu KH, Nellis M, Uppal K, et al. Reference Standardization for Quantification and Harmonization of Large-Scale Metabolomics. Anal Chem. 2020;92(13):8836–8844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Li S, Park Y, Duraisingham S, et al. Predicting Network Activity from High Throughput Metabolomics. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(7):e1003123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Uppal K, Walker DI, Liu K, Li S, Go Y-M, Jones DP. Computational Metabolomics: A Framework for the Million Metabolome. Chem Res Toxicol. 2016;29(12):1956–1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Osborn MP, Park Y, Parks MB, et al. Metabolome-wide association study of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e72737–e72737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Xiao C, Eldridge RC, Beitler JJ, et al. Association Among Glucocorticoid Receptor Sensitivity, Fatigue, and Inflammation in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer. Psychosom Med. 2020;82(5):508–516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lingen MW, Xiao W, Schmitt A, et al. Low etiologic fraction for high-risk human papillomavirus in oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas. Oral Oncol. 2013;49(1):1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ang KK, Harris J, Wheeler R, et al. Human Papillomavirus and Survival of Patients with Oropharyngeal Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(1):24–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Accardi CJ, Walker DI, Uppal K, et al. High-Resolution Metabolomics for Nutrition and Health Assessment of Armed Forces Personnel. J Occup Environ Med. 2016;58(8 Suppl 1):S80–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chandler JD, Hu X, Ko EJ, et al. Metabolic pathways of lung inflammation revealed by high-resolution metabolomics (HRM) of H1N1 influenza virus infection in mice. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2016;311(5):R906–R916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yu T, Park Y, Li S, Jones DP. Hybrid feature detection and information accumulation using high-resolution LC-MS metabolomics data. J Proteome Res. 2013;12(3):1419–1427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Uppal K, Soltow QA, Strobel FH, et al. xMSanalyzer: automated pipeline for improved feature detection and downstream analysis of large-scale, non-targeted metabolomics data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Johnson WE, Li C, Rabinovic A. Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods. Biostatistics (Oxford, England). 2007;8(1):118–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Schrimpe-Rutledge AC, Codreanu SG, Sherrod SD, McLean JA. Untargeted Metabolomics Strategies—Challenges and Emerging Directions. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2016;27(12):1897–1905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.R Package for Biomarker Discovery, Network, and Data Exploratory Analysis [computer program]. Version 1.1.76 GitHub: GitHub. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.SAS, Institute, Inc. Base SAS 9.4 Procedures Guide. Second ed.Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhou J, Xu B, Huang J, et al. 1H NMR-based metabonomic and pattern recognition analysis for detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Chim Acta. 2009;401(1–2):8–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tiziani S, Lopes V, Gunther UL. Early stage diagnosis of oral cancer using 1H NMR-based metabolomics. Neoplasia. 2009;11(3):269–276, 264p following 269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yonezwa K, Nishiumii S, Kitamoto-Matsuda J, et al. Serum and Tissue Metabolomics of Head and Neck Cancer. Cancer Genomics - Proteomics. 2013;10(5):233–238. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gupta A, Gupta S, Mahdi AA. 1H NMR-derived serum metabolomics of leukoplakia and squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Chim Acta. 2015;441:47–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sandulache VC, Ow TJ, Pickering CR, et al. Glucose, not glutamine, is the dominant energy source required for proliferation and survival of head and neck squamous carcinoma cells. Cancer. 2011;117(13):2926–2938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Semenza GL. HIF-1: upstream and downstream of cancer metabolism. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2010;20(1):51–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Keck MK, Zuo Z, Khattri A, et al. Integrative Analysis of Head and Neck Cancer Identifies Two Biologically Distinct HPV and Three Non-HPV Subtypes. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(4):870–881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhu G, Peng F, Gong W, et al. Hypoxia promotes migration/invasion and glycolysis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma via an HIF-1α-MTDH loop. Oncol Rep. 2017;38(5):2893–2900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Nordsmark M, Bentzen SM, Rudat V, et al. Prognostic value of tumor oxygenation in 397 head and neck tumors after primary radiation therapy. An international multi-center study. Radiother Oncol. 2005;77(1):18–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Fu T, Coulter S, Yoshihara E, et al. FXR Regulates Intestinal Cancer Stem Cell Proliferation. Cell. 2019;176(5):1098–1112.e1018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Burotto M, Szabo E. PPARγ in head and neck cancer prevention. Oral Oncol. 2014;50(10):924–929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Guo C, Su J, Li Z, et al. The G-protein-coupled bile acid receptor Gpbar1 (TGR5) suppresses gastric cancer cell proliferation and migration through antagonizing STAT3 signaling pathway. Oncotarget. 2015;6(33):34402–34413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Phelan JP, Reen FJ, Caparros-Martin JA, O’Connor R, O’Gara F. Rethinking the bile acid/gut microbiome axis in cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8(70):115736–115747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Phelan JP, Reen FJ, Dunphy N, O’Connor R, O’Gara F. Bile acids destabilise HIF-1α and promote anti-tumour phenotypes in cancer cell models. BMC Cancer. 2016;16(1):476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Moon Y, Park B, Park H. Hypoxic repression of CYP7A1 through a HIF-1α- and SHP-independent mechanism. BMB Rep. 2016;49(3):173–178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Santos CR, Schulze A. Lipid metabolism in cancer. The FEBS Journal. 2012;279(15):2610–2623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Sherubin EJ, Kannan KS, Kumar DN, Joseph I. Estimation of plasma lipids and its significance on histopathological grades in oral cancer: Prognostic significance an original research. Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP. 2013;17(1):4–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kumar P, Augustine J, Urs A, Arora S, Gupta S, Mohanty V. Serum lipid profile in oral cancer and leukoplakia: Correlation with tobacco abuse and histological grading. J Cancer Res Ther. 2012;8(3):384–388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Lohe VK, Degwekar SS, Bhowate RR, Kadu RP, Dangore SB. Evaluation of correlation of serum lipid profile in patients with oral cancer and precancer and its association with tobacco abuse. J Oral Pathol Med. 2010;39(2):141–148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Garg D, Sunil MK, Singh PP, Singla N, Rani SR, Kaur B. Serum lipid profile in oral precancer and cancer: a diagnostic or prognostic marker? J Int Oral Health. 2014;6(2):33–39. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Acharya S, Rai P, Hallikeri K, Anehosur V, Kale J. Serum lipid profile in oral squamous cell carcinoma: alterations and association with some clinicopathological parameters and tobacco use. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;45(6):713–720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Li G, Da M, Zhang W, et al. Alteration of serum lipid profile and its prognostic value in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med. 2016;45(3):167–172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Krishna S, Brown N, Faller DV, Spanjaard RA. Differential Effects of Short-Chain Fatty Acids on Head and Neck Squamous Carcinoma Cells. The Laryngoscope. 2002;112(4):645–650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Psyrri A, Seiwert TY, Jimeno A. Molecular Pathways in Head and Neck Cancer: EGFR, PI3K, and More. Alexandria, VA: American Society of Clinical Oncology; 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Landor SK-J, Mutvei AP, Mamaeva V, et al. Hypo- and hyperactivated Notch signaling induce a glycolytic switch through distinct mechanisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011;108(46):18814–18819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kraehling JR, Chidlow JH, Rajagopal C, et al. Genome-wide RNAi screen reveals ALK1 mediates LDL uptake and transcytosis in endothelial cells. Nature Communications. 2016;7(1):13516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Byeon HK, Ku M, Yang J. Beyond EGFR inhibition: multilateral combat strategies to stop the progression of head and neck cancer. Exp Mol Med. 2019;51(1):1–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Yu W, Chen Y, Putluri N, et al. Acquisition of Cisplatin Resistance Shifts Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Metabolism toward Neutralization of Oxidative Stress. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(6). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Li X, Lu Y, Lu H, Luo J, Hong Y, Fan Z. AMPK-mediated energy homeostasis and associated metabolic effects on cancer cell response and resistance to cetuximab. Oncotarget. 2015;6(13):11507–11518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1
2
3

RESOURCES