Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2021 Oct 6;16(10):e0254293. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254293

easyFulcrum: An R package to process and analyze ecological sampling data generated using the Fulcrum mobile application

Matteo Di Bernardo 1,#, Timothy A Crombie 1,#, Daniel E Cook 1, Erik C Andersen 1,*
Editor: Syed Ahmad Chan Bukhari2
PMCID: PMC8494344  PMID: 34613959

Abstract

Large-scale ecological sampling can be difficult and costly, especially for organisms that are too small to be easily identified in a natural environment by eye. Typically, these microscopic floral and fauna are sampled by collecting substrates from nature and then separating organisms from substrates in the laboratory. In many cases, diverse organisms can be identified to the species-level using molecular barcodes. To facilitate large-scale ecological sampling of microscopic organisms, we used a geographic data-collection platform for mobile devices called Fulcrum that streamlines the organization of geospatial sampling data, substrate photographs, and environmental data at natural sampling sites. These sampling data are then linked to organism isolation data from the laboratory. Here, we describe the easyFulcrum R package, which can be used to clean, process, and visualize ecological field sampling and isolation data exported from the Fulcrum mobile application. We developed this package for wild nematode sampling, but it can be used with other organisms. The advantages of using Fulcrum combined with easyFulcrum are (1) the elimination of transcription errors by replacing manual data entry and/or spreadsheets with a mobile application, (2) the ability to clean, process, and visualize sampling data using a standardized set of functions in the R software environment, and (3) the ability to join disparate data to each other, including environmental data from the field and the molecularly defined identities of individual specimens isolated from samples.

Introduction

Ecological studies of small, difficult to identify species are challenging because researchers are effectively unable to see these species at sampling sites in nature. The ecology of most of these species can only be studied by sampling substrates from the wild and then separating the species of interest from substrates in the laboratory. The effort and time required to identify species in the laboratory can make it difficult to accurately connect the identified specimens back to the ecological data recorded at the site of collection and can hinder studies of natural populations. Variations of this laborious sampling strategy are used to study the ecology of many prominent model organisms, including Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and likely contribute to the comparative sparsity of ecological data for these species relative to nearly every other aspect of their biology [13]. Here, we address some of the difficulties associated with ecological sampling of small, difficult to identify species by leveraging mobile data collection platforms, cloud-based databases, and the R software environment.

Fulcrum is a customizable, data-collection platform compatible with Apple iOS and Google Android devices that allows users to collect rich, location-based data (https://www.fulcrumapp.com). It is a commercial application but can be used under a no-cost educational agreement. To facilitate large-scale ecological surveys of nematodes that are difficult to identify in the field, we developed two custom Fulcrum applications. The “Nematode field sampling” application allows the user to organize various ecological data types associated with the substrates sampled in the field, such as environmental parameters and substrate characteristics, using their mobile device. The “Nematode isolation” application helps organize data associated with the specimens isolated from samples after they have been brought into the laboratory [4]. Importantly, these applications are easily extensible to other organisms because Fulcrum uses a powerful GUI to help users customize data-collection applications even when they have no coding or database administration knowledge. This utility makes it easy to use Fulcrum’s robust, cloud-based database for sampling nearly any species from nature. Two key advantages of our approach are improvements in sampling efficiency and data organization, which translate into more samples collected by each researcher and greater accuracy when linking isolated specimens back to the ecological data at the sampling site.

Here, we describe the easyFulcrum R package, which contains a suite of functions designed to process and analyze data exported from Fulcrum and join these data with genotype information if organisms are identified using molecular barcodes. The easyFulcrum package uses standard R packages to rapidly read data into R, flag anomalies, join diverse data sources, and reformat data in a tidy format [5]. The package also includes functions to review these data in markdown reports, providing summary statistics, notes on potential anomalies, and interactive collection maps for discrete sampling projects. When combined, the Fulcrum data-collection platform and easyFulcrum R package are a powerful tool for collecting and processing ecological data in a simple, standardized format that can be employed by researchers with limited backgrounds in computer and data science.

Methods

Fulcrum and application customization

The Fulcrum data collection application for Apple iOS or Google Android devices can be downloaded online (https://www.fulcrumapp.com). Fulcrum uses a powerful GUI to allow users to create their own mobile applications. We created two different applications: Nematode field sampling and Nematode isolation. However, users can create their own applications for field sampling and isolation. When creating these applications, they can follow our Fulcrum templates and save their applications with a unique identifier followed by either “field sampling” or “isolation”. The template for the Nematode field sampling application is here: [https://www.fulcrumapp.com/apps/nematode-field-sampling] and the Nematode isolation template is here: [https://www.fulcrumapp.com/apps/nematode-isolation]. We provide the minimum requirements for customized field sampling and isolation applications to work with easyFulcrum (Table 1). For easyFulcrum compatibility, custom applications must use the same data names for the required fields. When creating custom applications, the isolation application can be linked to the field sampling application by setting the “Linked App” option in the C-label field of the isolation application to the name of your field sampling application. If the Worms on Sample field is not used in the custom isolation application, the “Visibility” and “Requirement” rules in the S-labeled Plates field must be removed. Other than these requirements, any fields can be added to the customized applications. The Fulcrum GUI will help guide application creation and/or editing.

Table 1. Minimum field requirements for customized field sampling and isolation applications.

field sampling application Isolation application
Fields data names Fields data names
Sample photo sample_photo C-Label c_label
Gridsect gridsect Photos photos
Substrate Temperature (C) substrate_temperature S-labeled Plates s_labeled_plates
Ambient Humidity (%) ambient_humidity Date date
Ambient Temperature (C) ambient_temperature_c Time time
C-Label c_label
Date date
Time time

Field sampling with Fulcrum

Before going into the field, unique collection labels (C-labels) are generated as scannable QR codes to distinguish one collection from another and attached to plastic collection bags. If no QR codes are used, the labels can be entered manually, but manual entry can lead to analysis errors later and is not recommended. In the field, a user will open the Fulcrum “Nematode field sampling” application and use the device camera to scan a C-label QR code from a collection bag to initiate a new collection record. The user then enters data associated with the sample into the fields of the collection record, including various environmental parameter values and photographic evidence of the sample at the site. This process is then repeated until the desired number of samples are collected. Once the samples are collected, they are brought to the laboratory and enter the specimen isolation workflow. The Nematode field sampling application expedites data recording by automatically recording the GPS location when the user initiates a new collection record. If a new collection record is created away from the sample collection site, the correct GPS location for the collection site can be extracted from the metadata associated with the photo of the sample. Importantly, all the data entered into the collection records are kept locally on the mobile device, whether the device is connected to cellular service or not, and it can be synchronized to the cloud at a later time when service is restored. This feature is useful for field sampling in remote locations. Moreover, with Fulcrum, teams of samplers can work independently at different locations using separate mobile devices, and all the collection records can be synchronized to the cloud database.

Specimen isolation with Fulcrum

The samples collected from the field are processed in a field station or laboratory using the Fulcrum Nematode isolation application. Here, the user initiates an isolation record for a particular collection by scanning the C-label QR code attached to the collection bag with the mobile device camera. This step ensures that the isolation record is linked to the correct collection record in the Fulcrum database. The user then enters information about the condition of the sample and the estimated number of organisms that are present on the sample. The user then transfers organisms to isolation containers that are pre-barcoded with unique isolation labels (S-labels). An isolation label is scanned into the isolation record for each isolated organism so that all specimens isolated from the sample can be traced back to the original collection record. After isolation, the specimens can be identified by analysis of morphology or by sequence similarity using molecular barcodes.

Specimen identification

We built easyFulcrum to read specimen identification data from a Google sheet, which we refer to as the genotyping sheet. We chose to use a Google sheet for these data rather than Fulcrum because we identify nematodes by sequence similarity using molecular barcodes and found it easier to track the genotyping data for S-labels in an online spreadsheet. We provide two templates for the genotyping sheet, users that wish to use a simple, generalizable genotyping sheet can find the general template here https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Soo7R7srnmBu29Z_ZbYweTMg_IdO1N5sWr6cr0NpioY/edit#gid=1595072024. The nematode specific genotyping template can be found here https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1pvdpujuJDTYaMwjjDlivjAnO0MrQuDguU2kRLs9eemQ/edit#gid=0. To use either of the genotyping sheet templates, right click the “genotyping template” tab on the lower left and select “Copy to new spreadsheet” then select “Open spreadsheet” to set up a new genotyping sheet for your collection project. Next, the S-labels for a collection project are exported from Fulcrum and pasted into the genotyping sheet in the “s_label” column, as described below (see Methods, Fulcrum data export). Once the genotyping sheet has the S-labels entered, the genotyping data are manually entered for each S-label. We include a description of each variable in the general genotyping sheet and how to enter results in Table 2. Similar instructions for the nematode specific genotyping sheet are included in the “column description” tab of the nematode-specific genotyping template. We emphasize that users should generate specimen sequence data and perform alignments to sequence databases outside of easyFulcrum. Then, these species identification labels should be entered into the genotyping sheet (e.g., enter the genus and species name with the best alignment score to the specimen in the species_id column. Users that want to identify nematodes can use the following primer sets to amplify molecular barcodes. The small subunit (SSU) primer set (RHAB1350F: TACAATGGAAGGCAGCAGGC and RHAB1868R: CCTCTGACTTTCGTTCTTGATTAA) amplifies a 500-bp fragment of the 18S rDNA gene in Rhabditid nematodes [6]. The SSU primer set can be used to place nematodes within Rhabditid groups and check the quality of lysis material since most nematode species will amplify with this primer set. The internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) primer set (oECA1687: CTGCGTTACTTACCACGAATTGCARAC and oECA202: GCGGTATTTGCTACTACCAYYAMGATCTGC) amplifies a 2,000-bp fragment of the ITS2 region between the 5.8S and 28S rDNA genes and can be used to identify nematodes to the species level within the Caenorhabditis genus [7]. The details of sample lysis, SSU and ITS2 PCR conditions, Sanger sequencing of amplification products, and alignment strategies for nematodes have been documented previously [4, 8] Furthermore, detailed instructions for how to use the nematode-specific genotyping sheet are included in the easyFulcrum package vignette http://andersenlab.org/easyfulcrum/articles/easyFulcrum.html. For non-nematode users, the choice of molecular barcodes will depend on the taxa that they want to identify. Although the construction and testing of molecular barcodes is beyond the scope of this paper, many excellent resources are available for guidance [9].

Table 2. Description of the general genotyping sheet variables.

Variable name Description
project_id Enter the project name. The project name should match the project name assigned to the S-label in Fulcrum.
s_label Enter the S-label name. Each row should be a unique S-label. Use Fulcrum data export tools to obtain S-labels and paste them into the sheet (see Methods, Fulcrum data export).
species_id Enter the species name for the top alignment score for the S-label. For species identification, the sequence to amplify and align is up to the user.
possible_new_sp Enter a 1 if the alignment indicates the S-label may be a new species. Leave blank if not.
strain_name Enter a unique name for the isolated strain. Leave blank if no name is to be given.

Fulcrum data export

Before processing collection data using easyFulcrum, the raw Fulcrum data must be exported from the Fulcrum database using the Fulcrum website’s data export tool. We recommend exporting with the following settings; select the checkboxes for the desired project, include photos, include GPS data, field sampling, and isolation. The field sampling and isolation data should be exported from the Fulcrum database in comma-separated value (csv) format and named as follows when exporting from the nematode field sampling and nematode isolation applications.

  • nematode_field_sampling_sample_photo.csv

  • nematode_field_sampling.csv

  • nematode_isolation_photos.csv

  • nematode_isolation_s_labeled_plates.csv

  • nematode_isolation.csv

If customized Fulcrum applications are used, the [nematode] prefix will be replaced with [your prefix] in the exported csv files. easyFulcum will use any prefix but custom applications must be named [your prefix] field sampling and [your prefix] isolation. The photos are exported as jpg files named with unique alpha-numeric record labels from the Fulcrum database. These files must then be moved to the correct location in the project directory structure to be processed with easyFulcrum, as described below. The easyFulcrum function makeDirectoryStructure() will create the required project directory structure for the user. The csv files are moved to [your project directory]/data/raw/fulcrum, and the jpg files are moved to [your project directory]/data/raw/fulcrum/photos.

easyFulcrum installation

The easyFulcrum package can be installed easily using the following command in R: devtools::install_github("AndersenLab/easyfulcrum”). Package installation requires R v3.5.0 or later and devtools v2.4.1 or later. For OS X users, easyFulcrum’s procPhotos() function requires users to install XQuartz outside of R; XQuartz software can be found here: (https://www.xquartz.org). For novice R users, we suggest one of many helpful guides on R programming that includes detailed instructions for installing R and RStudio (https://rstudio-education.github.io/hopr/starting.html) [10].

Results

easyFulcrum overview

The easyFulcrum R package is designed to simplify and standardize the processing of ecological field sampling data generated using the Fulcrum mobile application. easyFulcrum contains 13 main functions to read, process, check, join, and summarize collection data for a particular sampling project (Fig 1). This software package reads raw data and image files exported from the Fulcrum database and genotype data for isolated organisms sourced from a Google sheet (see Methods, Specimen identification). Below, we describe the workflow to process a typical sampling project using easyFulcrum.

Fig 1. easyFulcrum workflow.

Fig 1

The suggested workflow for processing a sampling project begins with making a project directory using the makeDirStructure() function (blue). The raw Fulcrum and photo data are exported from the Fulcrum database and loaded into the directory structure manually (grey). The raw genotype data is sourced directly from a Google sheet (grey). The workflow for read functions (green), processing functions (yellow), checking functions (red), and summarization functions (purple) is shown.

Reading, processing, and joining Fulcrum data

easyFulcrum uses a defined directory structure to read raw data files exported from Fulcrum into R and to write processed output data. We included the makeDirStructure() function to create the required directory structure at a location specified by the user (see Methods, Fulcrum data export, Fig 2). After files are loaded into the directory structure for a collection project, the readFulcrum() function reads the raw Fulcrum data files into R as named dataframes and adds them to a single list object.

Fig 2. easyFulcrum directory structure.

Fig 2

The makeDirStructure() function will produce the directory structure shown above. In this directory structure, the data folder represents the main subfolder containing both raw and processed Fulcrum data. The data/raw/fulcrum subfolder contains the five raw comma-separated value csv files exported from the Fulcrum website and the data/raw/fulcrum/photos subfolder contains the exported photos in jpg format (see Methods, Fulcrum data export) files exported from Fulcrum. The data/raw/annotate subfolder can be used to hold spatial annotation files that are used by the annotateFulcrum() function to relate sampling sites to known geographical features. The data/processed/fulcrum subfolder holds the processed collection data and photos exported by easyFulcrum functions. The reports directory is the default location for saving collection reports generated with the generateReport() function which is described in more detail in the text.

Once the data are read into R, the procFulcrum() function can process each of the five dataframes independently to standardize temperature, time, altitude, and location data into defined formats. Furthermore, this function generates ‘flag’ variables that identify anomalies in the data based on unusual temperature values and misformatted or missing collection labels. By default, procFulcrum() converts all temperature values above 40 from Fahrenheit to Celsius, which may not be appropriate for some collection projects, and flags these records. The checkTemperatures() function can be used to display flagged temperature values so that the user can decide if the conversion was inappropriate. This function also returns values that are flagged if the temperature probe has recorded identical values across many sequential collections, suggesting that mistakes could have occurred during temperature data collection. The fixTemperatures() function allows the user to revert improperly converted temperatures back to the original value after review and to eliminate any erroneous temperature values. Given that temperature unit errors are quite frequent, we have provided the easy to use fixTemperature() function such that even beginner R users can use the software to correct temperature values. After reverting all values that were improperly converted or eliminating erroneous temperature values, the user can run checkTemperatures() again to determine if the flagged values were corrected.

After processing the Fulcrum data and addressing temperature anomalies, the joinFulcrum() function is used to join the processed Fulcrum dataframes together. The function first joins the field_sampling dataframe to the isolation dataframe using unique alpha-numeric collection and isolation record identifiers exported from the Fulcrum database. Following this step, joinFulcrum() then selects the best photo for each collection record. If multiple photos exist for a single collection record, the best photo is chosen based on an estimate of GPS accuracy, which is extracted from the photo metadata in the field_sampling_sample_photo dataframe. Most modern mobile phones have a built-in GPS receiver that stores location information in the photo metadata when a picture is taken. The “exif_gps_dop” variable is a measure related to the GPS degree of precision that is exported from Fulcrum in units of meters. We select the photo with the smallest value corresponding to the highest GPS degree of precision. Once the best photos are selected, the unique photo record identifiers and GPS locations from the best photos are joined to the previous joined dataframe. joinFulcrum() then adds two location variables to the joined dataframe, one for the best photo GPS locations, and another for the GPS locations recorded at the time the collection records were generated. We recommend users prioritize the best photo GPS locations when available because we have found that they are typically closer to the actual sampling sites than the GPS locations recorded at the time the collection records were generated using Fulcrum. The S-labels are then added when the processed isolation_s_labeled_plates dataframe is joined to the previous dataframe on the basis of the unique isolation records. Finally, the joinFulcrum() function adds flags for extreme temperatures and altitude values, duplicated or missing C-labels or S-labels, and variables indicating whether the final collection location should be taken from the photo metadata or from the location at the time the collection record was generated. If needed, the joinFulcrum() function can handle the special case where isolation data are not generated and only the field_sampling and field_sampling_sample_photo dataframes exist. The checkJoin() function will display flags and indicate which of the input Fulcrum data files had errors. Because the R interface does not provide easy cell-by-cell manipulations once data are entered into the R workspace, the best method to fix errors is to alter flagged errors in R using the functions provided in easyFulcrum. Raw collection or isolation data should never be altered.

Finally, the optional annotateFulcrum() function maps collection locations to geographic features that the user can input based on the processed longitude and latitude of the sample. This function allows the user to input bounding boxes or polygons for known geographic features such as islands, trails, parks, and mountains. The annotateFulcrum() function acts as a wrapper for the sp::over function and will determine if a collection is located within any of the supplied geographic features and add these location descriptions to the dataframe [11]. Users that are unfamiliar with geospatial data can create geojson polygon points via a simple online mapping service [https://boundingbox.klokantech.com], which can be supplied to annotateFulcrum() following the easyFulcrum vignette.

Reading, processing, and joining genotyping results

After the processing and joining of Fulcrum data from the field sampling and laboratory isolation applications, easyFulcrum joins these data with genotyping data for the specimens isolated from the field samples. The genotyping data, often derived from Sanger sequence of isolated organisms, is pulled from a standardized Google Sheet format and filled with collection-specific data generated by the user. We refer to this data source as the genotyping sheet and describe in detail how to enter genotyping data in Methods (see Methods, Specimen identification). The readGenotypes() function performs the import of the genotyping sheet by using the googlesheets4 R package developed for this purpose [12]. Once the genotyping data are read into R, the checkGenotypes() function searches the genotyping data, flagging isolations with missing, improper, and/or duplicated S-labels, and performs other checks, including if the species description, strain name, proliferation label, or ITS2 genotype are missing. The checkGenotypes() function also reads the joined Fulcrum data to check if disparities exist between the S-labels in the genotyping and Fulcrum data. Again, given limited R functionalities in cell-by-cell manipulations, we suggest for the user to make edits to data programmatically using functions provided in easyFulcrum. Following these checks, the joinGenoFulc() function joins the Fulcrum and genotyping data by their shared S-labels. This function can also save an RDS file of the processed genotyping data in /data/processed/genotypes for fast data import in the future.

Reading, processing, and joining collection images

Once the genotyping and Fulcrum data are joined, the procPhotos() function can be used to copy, rename, and generate thumbnails of raw image files in data/raw/fulcrum/photos, so that they can be viewed more easily in interactive reports or online. The procPhotos() function renames the photos to the C-label names rather than the unique record identifiers names exported from Fulcrum. The renamed, full-size images are saved in the /data/processed/fulcrum/photos subdirectory and the renamed thumbnails are saved in the /data/processed/fulcrum/photos/thumbnails subdirectory. This function also allows for collection photos to be processed to fit criteria for specific community-wide data repositories, like the C. elegans Natural Diversity Resource [13]. The final output to the R environment is a single data frame identical to the output from joinGenoFulc() but with variables added to describe the original and processed file paths for all sample photos.

Generating summary and output files

The generateReport() function can be used to generate a summary report for a collection project. This function passes collection data to an example R markdown file sampleReport.Rmd, which is contained in the package. The generateReport() function will write the example sampleReport.Rmd to the /scripts subfolder and knit a report in HTML format to the /reports subfolder, which can be reviewed in any web browser (Fig 3). The sampleReport.Rmd file is provided to the user as a project summary template and can be edited as the user requires. The sampleReport.Rmd function includes code to summarize metadata relating to the collection and isolation, such as who conducted the respective processes and on what dates steps were completed. The markdown also provides summary tables of data relating to the collections and isolations. Additionally, we included functions to generate interactive maps of sampling sites (Fig 3A) and box plots of environmental parameters recorded at sampling sites, such as substrate temperature, ambient temperature, humidity, and elevation using the ggplot2 and leaflet R packages (Fig 3B and S1 Data and S1 File) [14, 15]. The workflow vignette can be used to generate a project summary HTML report using the example data included in the package.

Fig 3. Sample report attributes.

Fig 3

The generateReport() function will render an HTML file with interactive maps of the collections, summary plots of the collection data, and other sections summarizing a collection project. (A) A screenshot of the interactive map with a pop-up caption for a specific collection label C-3205 is shown. The substrate photo is included in the pop-up. The pins on the map represent distinct collection sites and are colored to indicate the presence of nematodes on the sample (red), no nematodes on the sample (blue), only nematode tracks on the sample (orange). This map contains information from OpenStreetMap and OpenStreetMap Foundation, which is made available under the Open Database License. (B) Environmental parameter values, including ambient temperature, substrate temperature, ambient humidity, and elevation for collection sites where Caenorhabditis nematodes were found are shown. Tukey box plots are plotted by species (colors) for each environmental parameter. The processed data used to generate the HTML report shown in this figure and a full version of the report are available (S1 Data and S1 File).

Conclusions

The easyFulcrum R package offers an organized workflow for processing ecological sampling data generated using the Fulcrum mobile application. The package provides simple and efficient functions to clean, process, and visualize ecological field sampling and isolation data collected using custom Fulcrum applications. It also provides functions to join these data with genotype information if organisms isolated from the field are identified using molecular barcodes. Together, the Fulcrum mobile application and easyFulcrum R package allow researchers to easily implement mobile data-collection, cloud-based databases, and standardized data analysis tools to improve ecological sampling accuracy and efficiency, while simultaneously enabling reproducible analysis and downstream integration with other R packages.

Supporting information

S1 Data. The processed data used to generate Fig 3.

(CSV)

S1 File. The full HTML report shown in Fig 3.

(HTML)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank members of the Andersen laboratory past and present for their helpful suggestions and feedback developing easyFulcrum.

Data Availability

All source code and example data for the easyFulcrum package are available in a GitHub repository (https://github.com/AndersenLab/easyFulcrum). A vignette of the easyFulcrum workflow with example data in the raw csv and jpg format is available online (http://andersenlab.org/easyfulcrum/articles/easyFulcrum.html). The easyFulcrum R package is open source, and we encourage users to open issues or comment on the GitHub repository.

Funding Statement

This project and equipment were funded using start-up funds from the Molecular Biosciences department and Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences at Northwestern University. E.C.A. was funded by an NSF Division of Integrated Organismal Systems CAREER award (1751035). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Petersen C, Dirksen P, Schulenburg H. Why we need more ecology for genetic models such as C. elegans. Trends Genet. 2015;31: 120–127. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2014.12.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Libkind D, Peris D, Cubillos FA, Steenwyk JL, Opulente DA, Langdon QK, et al. Into the wild: new yeast genomes from natural environments and new tools for their analysis. FEMS Yeast Res. 2020;20. doi: 10.1093/femsyr/foaa008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Behrman EL, Howick VM, Kapun M, Staubach F, Bergland AO, Petrov DA, et al. Rapid seasonal evolution in innate immunity of wild Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Biol Sci. 2018;285. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.2599 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Crombie TA, Zdraljevic S, Cook DE, Tanny RE, Brady SC, Wang Y, et al. Deep sampling of Hawaiian Caenorhabditis elegans reveals high genetic diversity and admixture with global populations. Elife. 2019;8. doi: 10.7554/eLife.50465 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wickham H. Tidy Data. Journal of Statistical Software, Articles. 2014;59: 1–23. doi: 10.18637/jss.v059.i10 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Haber M, Schüngel M, Putz A, Müller S, Hasert B, Schulenburg H. Evolutionary history of Caenorhabditis elegans inferred from microsatellites: evidence for spatial and temporal genetic differentiation and the occurrence of outbreeding. Mol Biol Evol. 2005;22: 160–173. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msh264 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kiontke KC, Félix M-A, Ailion M, Rockman MV, Braendle C, Pénigault J-B, et al. A phylogeny and molecular barcodes for Caenorhabditis, with numerous new species from rotting fruits. BMC Evol Biol. 2011;11: 339. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-339 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Barrière A, Félix M-A. Isolation of C. elegans and related nematodes. WormBook. 2014; 1–19. doi: 10.1895/wormbook.1.115.2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kress WJ, García-Robledo C, Uriarte M, Erickson DL. DNA barcodes for ecology, evolution, and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol. 2015;30: 25–35. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.10.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Grolemund G. Hands-On Programming with R: Write Your Own Functions and Simulations. “O’Reilly Media, Inc.”; 2014. Available: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=S04BBAAAQBAJ [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pebesma E, Bivand RS. S classes and methods for spatial data: the sp package. R news. 2005;5: 9–13. Available: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/sp/vignettes/intro_sp.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bryan J. googlesheets4: Access Google Sheets using the Sheets API V4. 2020. Available: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=googlesheets4
  • 13.Cook DE, Zdraljevic S, Roberts JP, Andersen EC. CeNDR, the Caenorhabditis elegans natural diversity resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45: D650–D657. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw893 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Graul C. leafletR: Interactive Web-Maps Based on the Leaflet JavaScript Library. 2016. Available: http://cran.r-project.org/package=leafletR
  • 15.Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag; New York; 2016. Available: https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Syed Ahmad Chan Bukhari

4 Aug 2021

PONE-D-21-18748

easyFulcrum: An R package to process and analyze ecological sampling data generated using the Fulcrum mobile application

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Andersen,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 18 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Syed Ahmad Chan Bukhari

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Your abstract cannot contain citations. Please only include citations in the body text of the manuscript, and ensure that they remain in ascending numerical order on first mention.

3. We note that Figure 1 in your submission contain copyrighted images. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

1. You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figure 1 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license. 

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission. 

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

2. If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only

4. We note that Figure 1 in your submission contain map images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

1. You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figure 1 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license.  

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

2. If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The paper by Bernardo et al. explains the data-collection platform Fulcrum and easyFulcrum applications to organize ecological sample data collection. These applications are easy to use using mobile devices, and helps with identification of microscopic organisms based on their location, photographs and genotyping. This paper focuses on easyFulcrum R package which can analyze exported data from Fulcrum and process the data by combining geographical and sequencing data. These applications are designed for nematodes but can be used for any other organism.

Review Points:

1. In line 53 authors explain about Fulcrum but no reference paper is added.

2. In line 126, authors mention Genotyping template (google sheet) to enter data for isolated samples. Author explain well how to duplicate and use the template but fail to explain columns like ssu_pcr_date, its2_pcr_date etc. Also, there is no mention of the column name to input sanger sequencing data.

3. Authors need to explain how to input genotyping data and blast results if any new species is identified.

4. In line 176, author is suggesting to see methods. It will be helpful if authors mention which subheading in the methods to look for.

5. Authors should mention that Figure 1 is also published on the following website:

6. Figure 3A image quality is not good. Labels in the image are not legible.

7. For Figure 3, authors can include the “genotyping template” made for C.elegans, C.briggsae and C. tropicalis.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript sounds technically poor, I have following concerns should be addressed before any decision.

1. There are some typos and grammatical errors in the manuscript. It is strongly suggested that the whole work to be carefully checked by someone has expertise in technical English writing.

2. Key contribution and novelty has not been detailed in manuscript. Please include it in the introduction section

3. What are the limitations of the related works

4. Are there any limitations of this carried out study?

5. How to select and optimize the user-defined parameters in the proposed model?

6. There are quite a few abbreviations are used in the manuscript. It is suggested to use a table to host all the frequently used abbreviations with their descriptions to improve the readability.

7. Some sentences are too long to follow, it is suggested that to break them down into short but meaningful ones to make the manuscript readable.

8. Explain the evaluation metrics and justify why those evaluation metrics are used?

9. It seems that the authors used images of equations, please use editable equation format.

10. The Related Works section is also fair, yet the criteria behind the selection of the works described should be explained.

11. The title is pretty deceptive and does not address the problem completely.

12. Every time a method/formula is used for something, it needs to be justified by either (a) prior work showing the superiority of this method, or (b) by your experiments showing its advantage over prior work methods - comparison is needed, or (c) formal proof of optimality. Please consider more prior works.

13. The data is not described. Proper data description should contain the number of data items, number of parameters, distribution analysis of parameters, and of the target parameter itself for classification.

14. The related works section is very short and no benefits from it. I suggest increasing the number of studies and add a new discussion there to show the advantage.

15. Method description is detailed and overall convincing, yet there is a big formatting problem with the end of this section and the beginning of the following one.

16. Figures 1-4 are low quality and very unprofessional figures please improve them.

17. Use Anova test to record the significant difference between performance of the proposed and existing methods.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Decision Letter 1

Syed Ahmad Chan Bukhari

24 Aug 2021

PONE-D-21-18748R1

easyFulcrum: An R package to process and analyze ecological sampling data generated using the Fulcrum mobile application

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Andersen,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 08 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Syed Ahmad Chan Bukhari

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

Reviewer 1 is still concerned. Would you mind revising accordingly?

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: In this study authors are explaining how to use the R-package apps Fulcrum and easyFulcrum which have been used by them in previous study published in eLife (https://elifesciences.org/articles/50465). In this paper authors introduce easyFulcrum to combine Fulcrum data with genotyping data to make sampling easy.

1. easyFulcrum installation in the methods can be more elaborated to make it user friendly. Authors can simplify how to install R from devtools::install_github ("AndersenLab/easyfulcrum”), Imager and other prerequisites.

2. Genotyping templates have the option of entering Blast results but authors do not explain how the actual sequences of the PCR products linked to the C- and S- label in fulcrum.

3. Authors should mention examples of Molecular barcodes that can be used to identify organisms like DNA or RNA sequencing and lipid profiling etc.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript is relatively improved. Moreover, the manuscript is in a better format in terms of technicality and other results. I suggest accepting it.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Decision Letter 2

Syed Ahmad Chan Bukhari

22 Sep 2021

easyFulcrum: An R package to process and analyze ecological sampling data generated using the Fulcrum mobile application

PONE-D-21-18748R2

Dear Dr. Andersen,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Syed Ahmad Chan Bukhari

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Acceptance letter

Syed Ahmad Chan Bukhari

27 Sep 2021

PONE-D-21-18748R2

easyFulcrum: An R package to process and analyze ecological sampling data generated using the Fulcrum mobile application

Dear Dr. Andersen:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Syed Ahmad Chan Bukhari

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Data. The processed data used to generate Fig 3.

    (CSV)

    S1 File. The full HTML report shown in Fig 3.

    (HTML)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: easyFulcrum Reviewers Responses.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: easyFulcrum Reviewers Responses Round 2.pdf

    Data Availability Statement

    All source code and example data for the easyFulcrum package are available in a GitHub repository (https://github.com/AndersenLab/easyFulcrum). A vignette of the easyFulcrum workflow with example data in the raw csv and jpg format is available online (http://andersenlab.org/easyfulcrum/articles/easyFulcrum.html). The easyFulcrum R package is open source, and we encourage users to open issues or comment on the GitHub repository.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES