Abstract
Accumulation of aggregated alpha-synuclein (α-syn) is believed to play a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of Parkinson’s disease (PD) and other synucleinopathies. As a key constituent of Lewy pathology, more than 90% of α-syn in Lewy bodies is phosphorylated at serine-129 (pS129) and hence, it is used extensively as a marker for α-syn pathology. However, the exact role of pS129 remains controversial and the kinase(s) responsible for the phosphorylation have yet to be determined. In this study, we investigated the effect of Polo-like kinase 2 (PLK2) inhibition on formation of pS129 using an ex vivo organotypic brain slice model of synucleinopathy. Our data demonstrated that PLK2 inhibition has no effect on α-syn aggregation, pS129 or inter-neuronal spreading of the aggregated α-syn seen in the organotypic slices. Instead, PLK2 inhibition reduced the soluble pS129 level in the nuclei. The same finding was replicated in an in vivo mouse model of templated α-syn aggregation and in human dopaminergic neurons, suggesting that PLK2 is more likely to be involved in S129-phosphorylation of the soluble physiological fraction of α-syn. We also demonstrated that reduction of nuclear pS129 following PLK2 inhibition for a short time before sample collection improves the signal-to-noise ratio when quantifying pS129 aggregate pathology.
Introduction
Mounting evidence from biochemical, pathological and genetic studies strongly suggests a role of alpha-synuclein (α-syn) in the pathogenesis of a group of neurodegenerative diseases, collectively called synucleinopathies [1]. These diseases, which include Parkinson’s disease (PD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and multiple system atrophy (MSA), share a common pathological hallmark, namely the development of inclusions containing α-syn aggregates in affected brain cells. The aggregated α-syn is a main constituent of Lewy pathology detected in neuronal axons and soma in PD and DLB, and in oligodendrocytes as glial cytoplasmic inclusions in MSA [1]. α-Syn is subject to multiple types of posttranslational modifications [2], and phosphorylation at serine-129 (pS129) has attracted special attention as approximately 90% of aggregated α-syn in the brains of PD patients is stably phosphorylated at this site [3–5]. In contrast, physiological α-syn is transiently phosphorylated on S129 with less than 4% phosphorylated [3, 4].
Despite the advantages of pS129 as a biomarker for pathological α-syn aggregates, its pathophysiological role has been contested [6–10]. Some studies demonstrate an increased toxicity associated with S129-phosphorylation [8, 9, 11], whereas others suggests it has no role in α-syn aggregation or toxicity [12, 13] or even being a protective modification [6, 7].
To date, in vitro and in vivo studies have determined a number of kinases able to phosphorylate α-syn at S129, including the Polo-like kinases (PLK) 2 and 3, casein kinases 1 and 2, Leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) and various G-protein coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) [11, 14–18]. Of these, PLK2 has been extensively studied [10, 19–22] but mostly in relation to phosphorylation of physiological, non-aggregated α-syn or the regulation of α-syn expression [19, 21–23].
In this study, we used a validated PLK2-inhibitor, compound 37 [21, 23, 24], and the PLK1-3 inhibitor BI2536 [25], to investigate the role of PLK2 in the S129-phosphorylation of α-syn aggregates in PD models induced by pre-formed α-syn fibrils (PFFs).
We employed multiple model systems of α-syn aggregation, including mouse organotypic brain slices, α-syn transgenic mice, and human dopaminergic cell cultures to assess the potential of preventing phosphorylation of emerging aggregates or dephosphorylating already formed pS129-positive aggregates by inhibition of PLK2. We demonstrate that inhibition of PLK2 could neither revert nor prevent S129-phosphorylation of α-syn aggregate inclusions or prevent the spreading of α-syn aggregate pathology between neurons. In contrast, PLK2 was responsible for a significant part of the basal α-syn S129-phosphorylation predominantly located in neuronal nuclei.
Materials and methods
1. Preparation of Organotypic Hippocampal Slice Cultures (OHSCs)
Organotypic hippocampal slices were prepared from 5-7-day-old C57Bl6 pups according to Stoppini et al. 1991 [26] with slight modifications as described in [13]. Briefly, the hippocampi were extracted in carbonated low Na cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (1 mM CaCl2, 10 mM D-glucose, 4 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 26 mM NaHCO3, 234 mM sucrose and 0.1% phenol red solution) and coronal slices of 400 μm were made using a tissue chopper (Stoelting, #51425). Hippocampal slices with intact dentate gyrus (DG) and cornu ammonis (CA) regions were selected and maintained on air-fluid interface-style Millicell culture inserts, 30 mm diameter, 0.4 μm (Millipore, #PICM0RG50) in 6-well culture plates (ThermoFisher Scientific) with 800 μL of 37°C pre-heated sterile medium (MEM Eagle medium 78.8% (Gibco #11095), 20% heat-inactivated horse serum (Gibco, #16050–122), 1 mM L-glutamine, 1 mM CaCl2, 2 mM MgSO4, 170 nM insulin, 0.0012% ascorbic acid, 12.9 mM D-glucose, 5.2 mM NaHCO3, 300 mM Hepes (Sigma #H3375), pH = 7.28, osmolality adjusted to 317–322). The medium was replaced completely three times per week.
2. Microinjection of OHSCs with S129A PFFs
PFFs were produced from monomeric human recombinant α-syn with residue serine-129 shifted to alanine (S129A). S129A PFF production, characterization and validation of efficient aggregation was done as described in [13]. The usage of S129A PFFs that are non-phosphorylatable at S129 ensures that only the endogenously expressed α-syn is detected when antibodies against pS129 are used during analysis.
Immediately before injection, an aliquot of S129A PFFs was thawed at room temperature (RT) and sonicated for 30 seconds using Branson Sonifier 250 with settings adjusted to 30% duty cycle, output control 3. The sonicator is customized and equipped with a water jacket cooling system to avoid sample heating during sonication. OHSCs were microinjected with S129A PFFs or sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS) at DG after 7 days in culture. Microinjection pipettes (item #1B200F-4 (with Filament), WPI) were pulled using a micropipette puller (P-1000, Sutter Instrument). For injection, a Pulse Pal v2 (#1102) was set to phase 1 voltage 5V, phase 1 duration 0.01 seconds, pulse interval 0.5 seconds. The pipette was loaded using Eppendorf microloader pipette tips (ThermoFisher). A final volume of 0.1 μL of either S129A PFFs (1 mg/mL) or PBS was injected at DG under microscopic guidance as described in [13].
Injections were performed under strict aseptic condition in a laminar flow hood equipped with a microscope. After injecting all slices on a culture insert, the medium was replaced with fresh pre-heated medium.
3. Polo-Like Kinase 2 (PLK2) inhibition in OHSCs
After 6 days in culture, 24 hours before S129A PFF microinjection, organotypic hippocampal slices were treated with either 20 μM PLK2i (compound 37 custom synthesized by Wuxi AppTec, Shanghai, China) [21, 23], or 0.2% DMSO (Sigma, #RNBF6889) as a solvent control. The drug activity and specificity of PLK2i were validated earlier in our lab as described earlier in [23]. Medium containing the drug/vehicle was added below the membrane insert along with a drop of 1 μL on the slice surface to facilitate an equal distribution of the drug throughout the organotypic brain slice thickness [27]. The drug/vehicle mixture was added throughout the experiment with each change of the medium, three times per week.
To evaluate the effect of short-term PLK2 inhibition on PFF-seeded OHSCs, organotypic slices were treated as described above with either 20 μM PLK2i (compound 37) or 1 μM of the PLK1-3 inhibitor BI2536 (Selleck, #S1109) [17] for 24 hours before fixation.
4. Immunoblotting and sequential biochemical fractionation of OHSCs
7 days following PFF injection, slices were cut from the culture membrane, maintaining a small border of membrane around the slice to ensure that all the tissue was collected. For each group, ten slices were analyzed. Protein quantification, sequential fractionation into RIPA-soluble and -insoluble fractions and subsequent immunoblotting was carried out as described in [13]. Antibodies used were: rabbit polyclonal anti-α-syn (ASY-1, 1:1000) [28], mouse monoclonal pS129-α-syn (11A5, kindly provided by Imago Pharmaceuticals, 1:2000) [4], rabbit monoclonal rodent-specific α-syn (D37A6, #4179, Cell Signaling, 1:1000, RRID: AB_1904156) and mouse monoclonal anti-β-tubulin III (TUJ1, #T8578, Sigma, 1:5000, RRID: AB_1841228). PageRuler pre-stained protein ladder 10–180 kDa (ThermoFisher, #26616) was used as the molecular size marker.
5. Immunofluorescence staining of OHSCs
7 days following S129A PFF-injection, OHSCs were fixed using 4% PFA in PBS (2.8 mM NaH2PO4·H2O, 7.2 mM Na2HPO4·2H2O, 123 mM NaCl, pH adjusted to 7.2) and processed for immunohistochemistry as described in [13]. Antibodies used were α-syn aggregate-specific antibody MJF-14 (rabbit monoclonal MJFR-14-6-4-2, #ab209538, Abcam, 1:25,000, RRID: AB_2714215) and mouse monoclonal pS129-α-syn (11A5, kindly provided by Imago Pharmaceuticals, 1:25,000) [4]. After washing off unbound primary antibody, slices were incubated with the appropriate Alexa Fluor-labelled (anti-rabbit 488 and anti-mouse 568) secondary antibodies (Invitrogen, A11008 and A11004, 1:2000) and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (TH.GEYER, 5 μg/mL) in 5% BSA/PBS.
6. M83 mouse treatment with PLK2i
"The study was approved with permission from the Danish board for animal experimentation # 2017-15-0201-01203." Animals were housed in a temperature-controlled room, under a 12 h light/dark period, with water and food ad libitum. Twelve-month-old M83+/− α-syn transgenic mice were anaesthetized by 3.5% isoflurane inhalation and bilaterally injected with recombinant mouse α-syn PFFs by inserting the needle ∼1 mm deep into the biceps femoris as described by [29]. Recombinant mouse α-syn PFFs were prepared and validated for aggregation properties as described previously for human α-syn PFFs in [13] (S1 Fig). Injections were made using a 10-μL Hamilton syringe with a 25-gauge needle.
Once mice displayed hind limbs paralysis (typically 10–12 weeks post-injection) mice were treated for 2 days with PLK2i (Lundbeck, compound 37) by oral gavage (n = 5, 2x100 mg/kg/day) or vehicle control (5% DMSO, 1% methylcellulose, n = 5). Then, mice were anaesthetized and perfused with PBS with 1× complete protease inhibitor cocktail (cOmplete, Roche) and phosphatase inhibitors (25 mM β-glycerolphosphate, 5 mM NaF, 1 mM Na3VO4, 10 mM Na-pyrophosphate), followed by 4% PFA/PBS. Brains were removed and kept in 4% PFA/PBS for 48 hours at 4°C, and then stored in 30% sucrose in PBS with 0.05% NaN3 until cryosectioning.
7. Cryosectioning and immunofluorescence staining of M83 mouse brain
For cryosectioning, brains were mounted on the cryostat stage (Leica) using Tissue-Tek® O.C.T. Compound (Sakura). After the OCT solidified, the brain was sliced at a thickness of 10–12 μm at -20°C. Sections were collected on Superfrost Plus Adhesion Microscope Slides (ThermoFisher) and subsequently processed for immunostaining. Tissue was permeabilized in 0.5% Triton X-100 followed by blocking with 10% BSA, for 45 minutes each at room temperature (RT) with gentle shaking. For primary antibody incubation, rabbit monoclonal pS129-α-syn (D1R1R, #23706, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:1000, RRID: AB_279886) was prepared in 5% BSA, and incubated overnight at 4°C. Slides were washed 3x 20 minutes in TBS + 0.03% Triton X-100, and then incubated with anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488 (Invitrogen, A11008, 1:2000) and DAPI (TH.GEYER, 5 μg/mL) for nuclear staining in 5% BSA for 2 hours at RT, protected from light. During antibody incubations, slides were kept in a humidity chamber with a hydrophobic barrier around the tissue to prevent them from the drying out. After the final washing step, the slides were mounted using DAKO fluorescent mounting medium (DAKO, #S3023). The edges of the coverslip were sealed using nail polish.
8. Neural stem cell differentiation, treatment and immunostaining
Healthy, human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neural stem cells were propagated and differentiated using Induction/DOPA Differentiation kit (XCell Science), as previously described [30]. At day 38 of differentiation, neurons were exposed to human recombinant α-syn S129A PFFs (14 μg/mL) added to the cell culture medium. After 24 hours, cells were carefully washed in PBS, and allowed to grow for an additional 6 days in fresh medium before fixation in 4% PFA at day 45. 4 hours prior to fixation, cells were treated with 1 μM BI2536 for inhibition of PLK1-3 [17] or DMSO as a vehicle control. Immunostaining was carried out as described in [23], using the following primary antibodies: chicken polyclonal MAP2 (#ab92434, Abcam, 1:2000, RRID: AB_2138147), mouse monoclonal pS129-α-syn (11A5, 1:10,000) and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH, #AB152, Merck Millipore, 1:1000, RRID: AB_390204). Appropriate secondary Alexa Flour antibodies (Life Technologies and Abcam) were diluted 1:1000 and DAPI (TH.GEYER, 5 μg/mL) was used for nuclear staining. Coverslips were mounted with DAKO fluorescent mounting medium (DAKO, #S3023) and edges sealed with nail polish.
9. Primary neuronal cultures, treatment and immunostaining
Primary hippocampal neurons were prepared from wild type P0 C57Bl6 pups, as previously described [31]. Briefly, hippocampi were dissected in ice-cold PBS and dissociated using papain for 20 minutes at 37°C. Hippocampi were then triturated in plating medium (MEM, Gibco, #51200–020) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), 0.5% w/v glucose, 2.38 mM NaHCO3, 1.3 μM transferrin (Calbiochem, #616420), 20 mM Glutamax, 86.2 μM insulin (Sigma, #I6634) and seeded on Matrigel matrix-coated coverslips (Corning, #354234). After 24 hours, medium was changed to growth medium (MEM, Gibco, #51200–020) supplemented with 5% FBS, 0.5% w/v glucose, 2.38 mM NaHCO3, 1.3 μM transferrin (Calbiochem, #616420), 5 mM Glutamax, 1x B-27 supplement, and at 3 days in-vitro (DIV) glial proliferation was inhibited with 2 μM cytosine arabinoside (Sigma, C6645).
At 14 DIV, neurons were treated with the PLK1-3 inhibitor BI2536 (10 nM) for 0–4 hours before fixation in 4% PFA and processed for immunocytochemistry as previously described [23]. Primary antibodies used were rabbit monoclonal pS129-α-syn (D1R1R, #23706, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:1000, RRID: AB_279886) and chicken polyclonal MAP2 (#ab92434, Abcam, 1:1000, RRID: AB_2138147). Appropriate secondary antibodies (Alexa Fluor, Life Technologies and Abcam) were diluted 1:1000, and DAPI (TH.GEYER, 5 μg/mL) was added for nuclear staining. Coverslips were mounted with DAKO fluorescent mounting medium (DAKO, #S3023) and edges sealed with nail polish.
10. Quantification
Western blot band density was calculated using ImageJ (National Institutes of Health) after first assuring that the bands were not saturated. Background was subtracted and the density of each band normalized to the density of the loading control (βIII-tubulin). Quantifications display the mean of three independent experiments.
For immunostainings of organotypic slices (Figs 2–4), four images covering the whole slice were taken using the X10 objective on a Zeiss AxioObserver 7 inverted fluorescence microscope fitted with an ApoTome to increase z plane resolution and analyzed in ImageJ. The focus of each image was adjusted to maximize the amount of visible aggregate pathology. For each image, tissue area was approximated by selection of DAPI-staining of the nuclei and expanded 25 pixel units. Aggregates were defined by the MJFR-14-6-4-2 staining; for each image, uneven background was subtracted by the rolling ball algorithm (size = 25 pixels), the image was thresholded using the Auto Threshold plugin (method = RenyiEntropy), and particles with a minimum size of 6 pixels2 were counted as aggregates. For comparisons of aggregate areas, the total aggregate area for each organotypic slice was normalized to its tissue area. For analysis of fluorescent intensities, the mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of either the MJF-14-staining or the pS129-staining was measured inside the MJFR-14-6-4-2-based definition of aggregates (defined as above) or outside the aggregate definition but inside tissue area (i.e., the fraction defined as “nuclear pS129”). The MFI ratio, defined as pS129 MFI inside aggregates divided by pS129 MFI outside aggregates, was used to compare the “signal-to-noise” ratio of the pS129 aggregate-staining before and after PLK2 inhibition.
For evaluation of a possible effect of the PLK2i-treatment on spreading of aggregation throughout the hippocampal slices (Fig 3), the previous images were stitched together using the Stitching plugin in Fiji (Fiji Is Just ImageJ, NIH) [32], and the DG and CA1 regions were defined manually from the DAPI-staining (Fig 3A). First, the DG was bound by a rectangle, and second, projections along one side of the rectangle and through one diagonal were used to define the limits of the CA1 region. The subsequent definition of aggregates and analysis of aggregate areas was performed as described above, based on the MJFR-14-6-4-2 staining.
For M83 mouse brain, 2–5 images per brain region were taken randomly with an X10 (2 images, region at frontal cortex), an X40 oil (3 images, region at DG and CA1 of the hippocampus) or an X63 oil objective (5 images, region at hind brain). For the regions hippocampus (both DG and CA1) and frontal cortex (Fig 5), no aggregate pathology was evident, and thus, only baseline nuclear pS129 was assessed. For analysis, DAPI-staining was used to define nuclei, and the MFI of nuclear pS129 was computed inside this DAPI-selection. For quantification of images from the hind brain (where aggregate pathology was present, S3 Fig), pS129-positive aggregates were defined by the Auto Threshold plugin (method = MaxEntropy), with a minimum particle size of 200 pixels2. pS129 aggregate MFI was then measured inside this selection, and pS129 non-aggregate MFI outside this aggregate selection. Again, the MFI ratio (aggregate-related pS129 divided by non-aggregate pS129) was computed.
For human dopaminergic neurons (Fig 6), 5 X20 images were taken randomly per coverslip. For each image, the number of nuclei was counted in Fiji using the built-in watershed algorithm and Analyze Particles function, and the MAP2+ cell area was defined using the Auto Threshold plugin (method = default). pS129-positive aggregates (inside the MAP2+ cell area) were defined as following: uneven background was subtracted using the rolling ball algorithm (size = 50 pixels), and aggregates were defined as signals with a fluorescent intensity minimum 14x above median intensity (of the entire image) and with a minimum size of 10 pixels2. MFI of non-aggregate pS129 was computed as pS129 intensity outside of aggregates (defined as above), but inside the neuronal cell area. Total aggregate area per image was normalized to the number of nuclei. A minimum of 2000 cells was analyzed per condition for each replicate, and two replicates formed the basis for the quantifications.
For primary hippocampal neurons (S4 Fig), 10–15 X20 images were taken per coverslip, selected based on MAP2-staining to ensure the presence of neurons. Neuronal nuclei were defined by the DAPI-staining co-localized with MAP2-staining, and pS129 MFI inside the neuronal nuclei was computed in ImageJ.
11. Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed in GraphPad Prism 9. Data were tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilks test, and normally distributed data were compared using a two-tailed Student’s T-test for comparison of two groups or Welch’s T-test when comparing groups with unequal variances. Non-normally distributed data were compared using the non-parametric two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test. For comparison of multiple groups, one-way ANOVA was conducted (or Brown-Forsythe and Welch’s ANOVA for uneven standard deviations), followed by the Holm-Šidák post hoc test, Dunnett’s T3 or Fisher’s LSD (least significant difference) as indicated throughout the manuscript. To assess the half-life of PLK2-sensitive nuclear pS129, MFI of nuclear pS129 was normalized into fraction of PLK2-sensitive pS129 relative to time point 0. Data were plotted against corresponding time points and a 4PL sigmoidal curve fitted to determine the time point corresponding to 50% reduction in PLK2-sensitive nuclear pS129. Data are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD) except where otherwise mentioned. A p-value below 0.05 was considered significant. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
Results
PLK2 is reported to be responsible for phosphorylation of α-syn in murine brain and may potentially be responsible for the pS129-phosphorylation of the α-syn aggregates abundant in PD and other synucleinopathies. To investigate the role of PLK2 in this process, we used an organotypic brain slice model where aggregation, pS129-phosphorylation and spreading of α-syn pathology is induced via injection of α-syn S129A PFFs [13, 33] combined with pharmacological inhibition of PLK2.
PLK2 inhibition reduces physiological nuclear pS129 levels but does not affect S129-phosphorylation of PFF-induced α-syn aggregates or their formation
To assess the effect of PLK2 inhibition on PFF-seeded aggregation using OHSCs, slices were treated continuously with 20 μM PLK2i (compound 37), from 24 hours prior to S129A PFFs injection until the end of experiment. PLK2i was added at each change of medium to ensure continuous inhibition of PLK2 function during the experiment (Fig 1A). Seven days following S129A PFF-injection, slices were collected for biochemical analysis and immunostaining, at which time point the organotypic slice cultures normally express robust levels of total and pS129 α-syn (Fig 1B). This time point allows the templating of α-syn aggregates in neurons at the site of injection at DG and the spreading of α-syn aggregate pathology to neurons in the CA3 and CA1 regions as described earlier [13].
Immunoblotting of slice cultures at 7 days post injection (dpi) showed that PLK2i treatment increased the level of mouse α-syn in the soluble fraction (Fig 1C and 1E) while the level of likely membrane associated pS129 in the RIPA-soluble fraction was reduced in a PFF-independent manner (Fig 1C and 1D). By contrast, PLK2 inhibition did not affect the formation of insoluble α-syn aggregates as detected by immunoblotting of 7M urea extracts using rodent-specific α-syn antibody D37A6 and pS129 (Fig 1F–1H).
IHC analysis of organotypic slice cultures confirmed the induction of aggregation of endogenous α-syn following S129A PFF-microinjection. Aggregates were detected by the aggregate-specific α-syn antibody, MJF-14, and pS129-α-syn (Fig 2A). Staining for pS129 using the monoclonal antibody 11A5 revealed two forms of pS129 immunoreactive signals. One is a bright and intense, aggregation-specific pS129-signal that co-localizes with MJF-14-signal and is only detected in PFF-injected slices (Fig 2A, arrows). The other type is a fainter, diffuse non-aggregate-specific pS129-signal, which is abundant in nuclei and co-localizes with DAPI-signal but never with MJF-14-signal, and is detected in both PFF and PBS-injected slices (Fig 2A, arrowheads) but not in the PLK2i treated slices. This indicates that PLK2i-treatment significantly reduced the diffuse, nuclear pS129-signal in both PFF- and PBS-injected slice cultures (Fig 2A and 2E). In contrast, PLK2 inhibition did not influence PFF-induced α-syn aggregation, as detected with aggregate specific MJF-14 antibody (Fig 2B and 2C), and it did not prevent or reduce S129-phosphorylation of the newly generated aggregates (Fig 2D). The lack of dissociation between MJF-14 and pS129-signals in the PFF-induced aggregates following the PLK2i treatment demonstrates that aggregate-associated pS129 is unaffected by PLK2 inhibition (Fig 2). Quantification analysis revealed an approximately 30% reduction of nuclear pS129 following PLK2i-treatment without reducing aggregate-specific pS129 inside MJF-14-signals (Fig 2D and 2E). This led to an approximate doubling of the signal-to-noise ratio of aggregate-specific pS129-signal, thereby facilitating the study of pS129 positive α-syn aggregates without interference of non-aggregate-specific pS129 (Fig 2F).
PLK2 inhibition does not hinder inter-neuronal spreading of PFF-induced α-syn aggregates
To test the influence of PLK2 inhibition on the spreading of PFF-induced α-syn aggregate pathology, aggregate signals at DG and CA1 regions were identified for quantification (Fig 3A). PLK2i-treatment of slices showed no significant influence on aggregates at the site of PFF injection at DG or at the distant region CA1 when compared to DMSO-treated slices (Fig 3B–3D). A tendency towards increased pathology load was observed in both regions, as also seen in Fig 2B, although this was not significant. To obtain a measure for the relative inter-neuronal spreading in each slice, the aggregate signal at CA1 was normalized to the aggregate signal at DG. Treatment with PLK2i had no influence on the spreading of the newly generated α-syn aggregates and their phosphorylation as determined by aggregate- and pS129-specific antibodies (Fig 3B and 3E).
As PLK2 inhibition did not affect either the PFF induced aggregation, S129-phosphorylation or spreading of α-syn aggregates, but only diminished the diffuse nuclear pS129-signal in our slice cultures setup, we tested whether short-term treatment of slices with PLK2i would generate the same result. Treatment of OHSCs with PLK2i or the PLK1-3 inhibitor BI2536 for 24 hours prior to fixation reduced nuclear pS129 intensity, with a concomitant increase of the signal-to-noise ratio of aggregate-specific pS129-signal similar to the continuous PLK2 inhibition during the culture period (Fig 4).
PLK2 inhibition reduces nuclear pS129 signal in the M83 model of synucleinopathy as well as in human neurons
To further substantiate the efficacy of a short-term PLK2 inhibition paradigm as a method to facilitate easier detection of α-syn aggregate pathology by the reduction of non-aggregate specific pS129 signals, we treated 15-month-old heterozygous A53T-α-syn transgenic mice (M83+/-) with PLK2i for 48 hours before sacrifice. Aggregate pathology in the models was initiated by injection of mouse recombinant PFFs in the hind limb gastrocnemius muscle at 12 months [29]. Immunostaining of the brain using anti-pS129 antibody showed a significant reduction in nuclear pS129 intensity as demonstrated in representative images from hippocampus and frontal cortex (Fig 5A–5C). The level of nuclear pS129 reduction varied slightly between brain regions, with nuclear pS129 α-syn of pyramidal neurons of the CA1 region in the hippocampus appearing particularly sensitive to PLK2 inhibition, with a reduction of 73.3% (Fig 5D). Nuclear pS129-signal in DG and frontal cortex was reduced to lesser extent by 63.7% (Fig 5E) and 62.5% (Fig 5F), respectively, although the difference in reduction between the three analyzed regions was not statistically significant (p-value = 0.8389 by Brown-Forsythe and Welch’s one-way ANOVA). Quantification the pS129-positive aggregated fibrillary signals detected in the hind brain region showed that treatment of the mice with PLK2i for 48 hours–unsurprisingly–had no effect compared to the control group, considering the short time of the treatment (S3A and S3B Fig). However, PLK2 inhibition strikingly increased the signal-to-noise ratio, facilitating the detection of aggregate-specific signals in the PLK2i treated mice (S3C Fig).
We also conducted a short-term PLK2 inhibition on cultured human dopaminergic neurons, where aggregation of endogenous α-syn was initiated by addition of α-syn S129A PFFs (Fig 6A). Treatment with PLK1-3 inhibitor (BI2536) four hours before fixing the cells effectively reduced nuclear pS129-intensity, especially in the tyrosine hydroxylase-positive neurons, which displayed intense nuclear pS129-staining in DMSO-treated cultures (Fig 6B and 6C). No modulation of aggregate levels following PLK2 inhibition was identified in the cultures treated with S129A PFFs (Fig 6B and 6D). Collectively, these results highlight the ability of short-term PLK2 inhibition prior to fixation to improve the signal-to-noise ratio of aggregate-related pS129-signal across model systems from neuronal cultures to ex vivo tissue slices and in vivo models.
To further explore how short a period of PLK2 inhibition is needed to reduce nuclear pS129 levels, we tested PLK inhibition from 10 minutes to 4 hours prior to fixation in primary hippocampal neurons (S4A Fig). As little as 30 minutes treatment with 10 nM BI2536 prior to fixation was sufficient to decrease nuclear pS129 staining to a minimal level, which remained unchanged at 2 and 4 hours of treatment (S4B and S4C Fig). Assessing specifically the PLK-sensitive pool of nuclear pS129, we estimated the half-life of this fraction to be approximately 16 minutes (S4D Fig). As indicated in S4B Fig, the nuclear pS129 staining is not removed completely upon treatment of the neuronal culture using BI2536, but it facilitates the study of the pS129-positive aggregates by increasing the signal-to-noise ratio as demonstrated in our cell, tissue and in vivo models.
Discussion
The phosphorylation of α-syn at serine-129 has for almost two decades been recognized as a prominent characteristic of pathological α-syn aggregates not only in human tissue but also in cell and animal models of α-syn aggregate pathology [3, 4, 34–38]. However, the exact role of S129-phosphorylation remains contested due to conflicting results from various cell and in vivo studies [6–13]. The contradictory results likely arise from the use of models where either α-syn or the studied kinases are over-expressed or expressed in mutated forms, such as our own earlier report where S129G-mutated α-syn was expressed using viral vectors in organotypic slices made from SNCA knockout pups [13].
In the current paper, we investigate whether PLK2, which has been identified as an efficient S129-directed kinase in rodent brains [4, 17, 19, 20, 22], is truly a kinase responsible for S129-phosphorylation of α-syn aggregates, and whether we can modulate the PFF-induced α-syn pathology and the associated pS129-level by pharmacological inhibition of PLK2 in a setup that expresses both α-syn and PLK2 at physiological levels.
As inhibitors, the specific PLK2 inhibitor, compound 37 [21, 23, 24], which has been validated earlier in our lab [23], and the PLK1-3 inhibitor BI2536 were used [17, 25, 39, 40]. Both are efficient inhibitors of PLK2 but whereas compound 37 is highly specific and well tolerated, it has to be custom synthesized. BI2536, on the other hand, is commercially available but reported to be toxic to mitotic cells [8, 40].
The low toxicity of compound 37 allowed us to treat the PFF-seeded organotypic slice cultures throughout the duration of the whole experiment. This demonstrated that inhibition of PLK2 does not affect the accumulation of aggregate-specific pS129. In contrast, PLK2 inhibition reduced the RIPA-soluble fraction of pS129 and elevated the level of soluble α-syn, corroborating earlier data reported where PLK2 inhibition led to increased α-syn level by affecting transcription an/or autophagy [10, 23]. Our data are in line with a recently published study using GFP-α-syn mice crossed with PLK2 knock-out mice and another study from the same group that opted for pharmacological inhibition of PLK2 in zebra fish, demonstrating that PLK2 deletion or inhibition had no influence on aggregate-formation even though they demonstrated a slight reduction in pS129 at the studied synaptic terminals [41, 42].
Prompted by the apparent potential of PLK2 inhibition to facilitate pS129 aggregate detection in immunostainings, we tested the effect of short-term PLK2 inhibitor treatment paradigms in various PFF-seeded models. In organotypic slices, identical results were obtained with short-term treatment of slices for 24 hours using either compound 37 or BI2536. The treatment with PLK2i and BI2536 was equally able to reduce nuclear pS129-staining in M83+/- and human neuronal models following treatment for 48 hours and 4 hours prior to tissue or cell collection, respectively. In none of the models did the short-term PLK2 inhibition affect the phosphorylation of aggregated α-syn.
Interestingly, PLK2i treatment of M83 +/- model demonstrated a slight regional variance in the reduction of nuclear pS129. Although the differences between the analysed regions were not statistically significant, the minimal differences demonstrated could be explained by differences in the expression level of PLK2 in various neuronal subtypes in different brain regions of mice [43–45], in accordance with the varying effect of PLK2 inhibition on total pS129-levels in different parts of the mouse brain [22].
As the detection of pS129 in inclusions is often used as a readout to quantify aggregate formation and the effect of strategies directed to counteract this process [34, 36–38, 46], the presence of non-aggregate-associated pS129-signals represents a confounding signal that requires segmentation of immunofluorescence images. Based on our results, we propose short-term treatment with a specific PLK2i or BI2536 as an easy and efficient strategy to improve signal-to-noise ratios when quantifying aggregate-associated pS129 signals. A time-course analysis of BI2536-treated hippocampal neurons demonstrated efficient reduction in nuclear pS129 after as little as 30 minutes of treatment. This timeframe is well in line with previous studies of the post-mortem stability of physiological pS129, where complete dephosphorylation is observed within 30 minutes of sacrifice, at which time point the kinase/phosphatase equilibrium is shifted towards dephosphorylation [3]. In contrast, aggregate-specific pS129 is a stable modification, prevalent in post-mortem patient brains many hours after death [3, 4].
Naturally, attention must be paid to other effects of the short-term PLK2 inhibition that were not assessed here, but if the treatment is brief and the primary read-out is α-syn aggregates, which are considered fairly stable structures as demonstrated in the tested models in this study, then this concern should be of minor importance.
The presence of S129-phosphorylated α-syn in the nucleus has been questioned due to the reported off-target and non-specific binding of commercially available α-syn and pS129 antibodies [47–50]. Nonetheless, others have validated the presence of soluble endogenous pS129-α-syn in the nucleus using antibodies with a high affinity towards pS129 epitopes or using a combination of different pS129 antibodies [20, 49, 51, 52]. With this in mind, the validity of the pS129-staining detected with the 11A5 antibody used in this study [4] was tested using slices from α-syn knock-out (ASKO) pups that do not express α-syn. Immunostaining of ASKO slices showed no off-target signals (S2 Fig) in accordance with our earlier data obtained by western blotting using 11A5 in ASKO slices [13] substantiating the specificity of 11A5 antibody and corroborating previous validations. Our finding of physiological, non-pathology-related pS129-α-syn is consistent with numerous studies of both in vitro and in vivo models, reporting the nuclear localization. Although our data do not identify the roles of nuclear pS129 α-syn, they provide a novel experimental strategy to investigate this enigmatic α-syn species that has been associated to processes such as histone acetylation, neurotoxicity, transcriptional regulation and repair of double-strand DNA breaks [6, 20, 51, 53–57].
Conclusion
The findings of this study demonstrate that PLK2 is involved in significant S129-phosphorylation of physiological α-syn but not the phosphorylation of serine-129 on aggregated α-syn. Moreover, short-term PLK2 inhibition can be used as an easy experimental procedure to facilitate specific detection of aggregated α-syn in different models of templated α-syn pathology.
Supporting information
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
The study was supported by Lundbeck Foundation grants R223-2015-4222 and R248-2016-2518 for Danish Research Institute of Translational Neuroscience-DANDRITE, Nordic-EMBL Partnership for Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark to PHJ. Parkinsonforeningen, Department of Health, Aarhus University to PHJ. Cultural Affairs and Mission Sector, Ministry of Higher Education, Arab Republic of Egypt to SE. The funders did not participate in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Spillantini MG, Schmidt ML, Lee VMY, Trojanowski JQ, Jakes R, Goedert M. α-synuclein in Lewy bodies [8]. Nature. 1997;388:839–40. doi: 10.1038/42166 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Oueslati A, Fournier M, Lashuel HA. Role of post-translational modifications in modulating the structure, function and toxicity of α-synuclein. Implications for Parkinson’s disease pathogenesis and therapies. Prog Brain Res. 2010;183:115–45. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(10)83007-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fujiwara H, Hasegawa M, Dohmae N, Kawashima A, Masliah E, Goldberg MS, et al. Α-Synuclein Is Phosphorylated in Synucleinopathy Lesions. Nat Cell Biol. 2002;4:160–4. doi: 10.1038/ncb748 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Anderson JP, Walker DE, Goldstein JM, De Laat R, Banducci K, Caccavello RJ, et al. Phosphorylation of Ser-129 is the dominant pathological modification of α-synuclein in familial and sporadic lewy body disease. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:29739–52. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M600933200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kim WS, Kagedal K, Halliday GM. Alpha-synuclein biology in Lewy body diseases. Alzheimer’s Res. Ther. 2014. doi: 10.1186/s13195-014-0073-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gorbatyuk OS, Li S, Sullivan LF, Chen W, Kondrikova G, Manfredsson FP, et al. The phosphorylation state of Ser-129 in human alpha-synuclein determines neurodegeneration in a rat model of Parkinson disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A [Internet]. 2008;105:763–8. Available from: http://www.pnas.org/content/105/2/763. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711053105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Paleologou KE, Schmid AW, Rospigliosi CC, Kim HY, Lamberto GR, Fredenburg RA, et al. Phosphorylation at Ser-129 but not the phosphomimics S129E/D inhibits the fibrillation of α-synuclein. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:16895–905. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M800747200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kragh CL, Lund LB, Febbraro F, Hansen HD, Wei-Ping G, El-Agnaf O, et al. α-synuclein aggregation and Ser-129 phosphorylation-dependent cell death in oligodendroglial cells. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:10211–22. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M809671200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Febbraro F, Sahin G, Farran A, Soares S, Jensen PH, Kirik D, et al. Ser129D mutant alpha-synuclein induces earlier motor dysfunction while S129A results in distinctive pathology in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2013;56:47–58. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2013.03.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Oueslati A, Schneider BL, Aebischer P, Lashuel HA. Polo-like kinase 2 regulates selective autophagic synuclein clearance and suppresses its toxicity in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A [Internet]. 2013;110:E3945–54. Available from: http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1309991110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chen L, Feany MB. Alpha-synuclein phosphorylation controls neurotoxicity and inclusion formation in a Drosophila model of Parkinson disease. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:657–63. doi: 10.1038/nn1443 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.da Silveira SA, Schneider BL, Cifuentes-Diaz C, Sage D, Abbas-Terki T, Iwatsubo T, et al. Phosphorylation does not prompt, nor prevent, the formation of α-synuclein toxic species in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18:872–87. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddn417 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Elfarrash S, Jensen NM, Ferreira N, Betzer C, Thevathasan JV, Diekmann R, et al. Organotypic slice culture model demonstrates inter-neuronal spreading of alpha-synuclein aggregates. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2019;7. doi: 10.1186/s40478-019-0658-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Okochi M, Walter J, Koyama A, Nakajo S, Baba M, Iwatsubo T, et al. Constitutive phosphorylation of the Parkinson’s disease associated α-synuclein. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:390–7. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.1.390 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Waxman EA, Giasson BI. Specificity and Regulation of Casein Kinase-Mediated Phosphorylation of??-Synuclein. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2008;PAP:402–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Qing H, Wong W, McGeer EG, McGeer PL. Lrrk2 phosphorylates alpha synuclein at serine 129: Parkinson disease implications. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;387:149–52. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.06.142 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Waxman EA, Giasson BI. Characterization of kinases involved in the phosphorylation of aggregated α-synuclein. J Neurosci Res. 2011;89:231–47. doi: 10.1002/jnr.22537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dzamko N, Zhou J, Huang Y, Halliday GM. Parkinson’s disease-implicated kinases in the brain; insights into disease pathogenesis. Front Mol Neurosci. 2014;7. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2014.00007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Inglis KJ, Chereau D, Brigham EF, Chiou SS, Schöbel S, Frigon NL, et al. Polo-like kinase 2 (PLK2) phosphorylates α-synuclein at serine 129 in central nervous system. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:2598–602. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C800206200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mbefo MK, Paleologou KE, Boucharaba A, Oueslati A, Schell H, Fournier M, et al. Phosphorylation of synucleins by members of the polo-like kinase family. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:2807–22. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.081950 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bowers S, Truong AP, Ye M, Aubele DL, Sealy JM, Neitz RJ, et al. Design and synthesis of highly selective, orally active Polo-like kinase-2 (Plk-2) inhibitors. Bioorganic Med Chem Lett. 2013;23:2743–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.02.065 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bergeron M, Motter R, Tanaka P, Fauss D, Babcock M, Chiou S s., et al. In vivo modulation of polo-like kinases supports a key role for PLK2 in Ser129 α-synuclein phosphorylation in mouse brain. Neuroscience [Internet]. IBRO; 2014;256:72–82. Available from: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.09.061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kofoed RH, Zheng J, Ferreira N, Lykke-Andersen S, Salvi M, Betzer C, et al. Polo-like kinase 2 modulates α-synuclein protein levels by regulating its mRNA production. Neurobiol Dis [Internet]. 2017;106:49–62. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0969996117301419. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2017.06.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Aubele DL, Hom RK, Adler M, Galemmo RA, Bowers S, Truong AP, et al. Selective and brain-permeable polo-like kinase-2 (Plk-2) inhibitors that reduce α-synuclein phosphorylation in rat brain. ChemMedChem. 2013;8:1295–313. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.201300166 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Johnson EF, Stewart KD, Woods KW, Giranda VL, Luo Y. Pharmacological and functional comparison of the polo-like kinase family: Insight into inhibitor and substrate specificity. Biochemistry. 2007;46:9551–63. doi: 10.1021/bi7008745 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Stoppini L, Buchs P-A, Muller D. A simple method for organotypic cultures of nervous tissue. J Neurosci Methods [Internet]. 1991;37:173–82. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/016502709190128M. doi: 10.1016/0165-0270(91)90128-m [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bahr BA. Long-term hippocampal slices: A model system for investigating synaptic mechanisms and pathologic processes. J Neurosci Res. 1995;42:294–305. doi: 10.1002/jnr.490420303 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jensen PH, Islam K, Kenney J, Nielsen MS, Power J, Gai WP. Microtubule-associated protein 1B is a component of cortical Lewy bodies and binds α-synuclein filaments. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:21500–7. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M000099200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sacino AN, Brooks M, Thomas MA, McKinney AB, Lee S, Regenhardt RW, et al. Intramuscular injection of α-synuclein induces CNS α-synuclein pathology and a rapid-onset motor phenotype in transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:10732–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1321785111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bogetofte H, Jensen P, Ryding M, Schmidt SI, Okarmus J, Ritter L, et al. PARK2 mutation causes metabolic disturbances and impaired survival of human iPSC-derived neurons. Front Cell Neurosci. 2019;13. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Betzer C, Lassen LB, Olsen A, Kofoed RH, Reimer L, Gregersen E, et al. Alpha-synuclein aggregates activate calcium pump SERCA leading to calcium dysregulation. EMBO Rep. 2018;19. doi: 10.15252/embr.201744617 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Preibisch S, Saalfeld S, Tomancak P. Globally optimal stitching of tiled 3D microscopic image acquisitions. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1463–5. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp184 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Elfarrash S, Jensen PH. Organotypic hippocampal slices, an emerging tool to model synucleinopathies. Neural Regen Res. 2021;16:999–1000. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.297065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Abdelmotilib H, Maltbie T, Delic V, Liu Z, Hu X, Fraser KB, et al. α-Synuclein fibril-induced inclusion spread in rats and mice correlates with dopaminergic Neurodegeneration. Neurobiol Dis. 2017;105:84–98. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2017.05.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Luk KC, Kehm VM, Zhang B, O’Brien P, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VMY. Intracerebral inoculation of pathological α-synuclein initiates a rapidly progressive neurodegenerative α-synucleinopathy in mice. J Exp Med. 2012;209:975–88. doi: 10.1084/jem.20112457 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mahul-Mellier A-LL, Burtscher J, Maharjan N, Weerens L, Croisier M, Kuttler F, et al. The process of Lewy body formation, rather than simply α-synuclein fibrillization, is one of the major drivers of neurodegeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A [Internet]. 2020;117:4971–82. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32075919. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1913904117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Masuda-Suzukake M, Nonaka T, Hosokawa M, Oikawa T, Arai T, Akiyama H, et al. Prion-like spreading of pathological α-synuclein in brain. Brain. 2013;136:1128–38. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Volpicelli-Daley LA, Luk KC, Patel TP, Tanik SA, Riddle DM, Stieber A, et al. Exogenous α-Synuclein Fibrils Induce Lewy Body Pathology Leading to Synaptic Dysfunction and Neuron Death. Neuron [Internet]. Elsevier Inc.; 2011;72:57–71. Available from: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.08.033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lénárt P, Petronczki M, Steegmaier M, Di Fiore B, Lipp JJ, Hoffmann M, et al. The Small-Molecule Inhibitor BI 2536 Reveals Novel Insights into Mitotic Roles of Polo-like Kinase 1. Curr Biol. 2007;17:304–15. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.12.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Steegmaier M, Hoffmann M, Baum A, Lénárt P, Petronczki M, Krššák M, et al. BI 2536, a Potent and Selective Inhibitor of Polo-like Kinase 1, Inhibits Tumor Growth In Vivo. Curr Biol. 2007;17:316–22. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.12.037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Weston LJ, Stackhouse TL, Spinelli KJ, Boutros SW, Rose EP, Osterberg VR, et al. Genetic deletion of Polo-like kinase 2 reduces alpha-synuclein serine-129 phosphorylation in presynaptic terminals but not Lewy bodies. J Biol Chem. 2021;100273. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100273 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Weston LJ, Cook ZT, Stackhouse TL, Sal MK, Schultz BI, Tobias ZJC, et al. In vivo aggregation of presynaptic alpha-synuclein is not influenced by its phosphorylation at serine-129. Neurobiol Dis [Internet]. Elsevier Inc.; 2021;152:105291. Available from: 10.1016/j.nbd.2021.105291 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lein ES, Hawrylycz MJ, Ao N, Ayres M, Bensinger A, Bernard A, et al. Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain. Nature. 2007;445:168–76. doi: 10.1038/nature05453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Simmons DL, Neel BG, Stevens R, Evett G, Erikson RL. Identification of an early-growth-response gene encoding a novel putative protein kinase. Mol Cell Biol. 1992;12:4164–9. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.9.4164-4169.1992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kauselmann G, Weiler M, Wulff P, Jessberger S, Konietzko U, Scafidi J, et al. The polo-like protein kinases Fnk and Snk associate with a Ca2+- and integrin-binding protein and are regulated dynamically with synaptic plasticity. EMBO J. 1999;18:5528–39. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.20.5528 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Henderson MX, Cornblath EJ, Darwich A, Zhang B, Brown H, Gathagan RJ, et al. Spread of α-synuclein pathology through the brain connectome is modulated by selective vulnerability and predicted by network analysis. Nat Neurosci. 2019;22:1248–57. doi: 10.1038/s41593-019-0457-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Huang Z, Xu Z, Wu Y, Zhou Y. Determining nuclear localization of alpha-synuclein in mouse brains. Neuroscience. 2011;199:318–32. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.10.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kumar ST, Jagannath S, Francois C, Vanderstichele H, Stoops E, Lashuel HA. How specific are the conformation-specific α-synuclein antibodies? Characterization and validation of 16 α-synuclein conformation-specific antibodies using well-characterized preparations of α-synuclein monomers, fibrils and oligomers with distinct struct. Neurobiol Dis. 2020;146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Delic V, Chandra S, Abdelmotilib H, Maltbie T, Wang S, Kem D, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of phospho-Ser129 α-synuclein monoclonal antibodies. J Comp Neurol [Internet]. 2018;526:1978–90. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21858823%0Ahttp://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/cne.24468 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Rutherford NJ, Brooks M, Giasson BI. Novel antibodies to phosphorylated α-synuclein serine 129 and NFL serine 473 demonstrate the close molecular homology of these epitopes. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2016;4:80. doi: 10.1186/s40478-016-0357-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Schell H, Hasegawa T, Neumann M, Kahle PJ. Nuclear and neuritic distribution of serine-129 phosphorylated α-synuclein in transgenic mice. Neuroscience [Internet]. IBRO; 2009;160:796–804. Available from: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.03.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Landeck N, Hall H, Ardah MT, Majbour NK, El-Agnaf OMA, Halliday G, et al. A novel multiplex assay for simultaneous quantification of total and S129 phosphorylated human alpha-synuclein. Mol Neurodegener. 2016;11. doi: 10.1186/s13024-016-0074-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Courte J, Bousset L, Boxberg Y Von, Villard C, Melki R, Peyrin J-M. The expression level of alpha-synuclein in different neuronal populations is the primary determinant of its prion-like seeding. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2020;10:4895. Available from: http://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-61757-x. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61757-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Maroteaux L, Campanelli JT, Scheller RHR. Synuclein: A neuron-specific protein localized to the nucleus and presynaptic nerve terminal. J Neurosci. 1988;8:2804–15. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.08-08-02804.1988 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.McLean PJ, Ribich S, Hyman BT. Subcellular localization of α-synuclein in primary neuronal cultures: Effect of missense mutations. J Neural Transm Suppl. 2000. p. 53–63. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6284-2_5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Pinho R, Paiva I, Jerčić KG, Fonseca-Ornelas L, Gerhardt E, Fahlbusch C, et al. Nuclear localization and phosphorylation modulate pathological effects of alpha-synuclein. Hum Mol Genet. 2019;28:31–50. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddy326 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Schaser AJ, Osterberg VR, Dent SE, Stackhouse TL, Wakeham CM, Boutros SW, et al. Alpha-synuclein is a DNA binding protein that modulates DNA repair with implications for Lewy body disorders. Sci Rep. 2019;9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36956-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.