Abstract
SNCA, the first gene associated with Parkinson’s disease, encodes the α-synuclein protein, the predominant component within pathological inclusions termed Lewy bodies. The presence of Lewy bodies is one of the classical hallmarks found in the brain of patients with Parkinson’s disease, and Lewy bodies have also been observed in patients with other synucleinopathies. However, the study of α-synuclein pathology in cells has relied largely on two-dimensional culture models, which typically lack the cellular diversity and complex spatial environment found in the brain. Here, to address this gap, we use three-dimensional midbrain organoids, differentiated from human-induced pluripotent stem cells derived from patients carrying a triplication of the SNCA gene and from CRISPR/Cas9 corrected isogenic control iPSCs. These human midbrain organoids recapitulate key features of α-synuclein pathology observed in the brains of patients with synucleinopathies. In particular, we find that SNCA triplication human midbrain organoids express elevated levels of α-synuclein and exhibit an age-dependent increase in α-synuclein aggregation, manifested by the presence of both oligomeric and phosphorylated forms of α-synuclein. These phosphorylated α-synuclein aggregates were found in both neurons and glial cells and their time-dependent accumulation correlated with a selective reduction in dopaminergic neuron numbers. Thus, human midbrain organoids from patients carrying SNCA gene multiplication can reliably model key pathological features of Parkinson’s disease and provide a powerful system to study the pathogenesis of synucleinopathies.
Keywords: human midbrain organoids, iPSCs, α-synuclein, Parkinson’s disease
Mohamed et al. investigate synucleinopathy in human midbrain organoids, derived from patients carrying a triplication of the SNCA gene. Human midbrain organoids recapitulate pathology observed in the brains of patients: an elevated level of α-synuclein, an age-dependent increase in aggregation and a selective reduction in dopaminergic neurons.
Graphical Abstract
Introduction
Parkinson’s disease is the second most prevalent neurodegenerative disorder, affecting more than 10 million people worldwide.1 Genetic factors contribute to the complex pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease with ∼5% of all patients suffering from a monogenic form of Parkinson’s disease. SNCA, the first gene associated with familial Parkinson’s disease, encodes the protein α-synuclein (α-syn).2 Missense mutations in the SNCA gene cause a rare, autosomal dominant inherited form of Parkinson’s disease.3–8 Moreover, copy number variations (CNVs) in the SNCA gene were also identified in patients with Parkinson’s disease.9,10 Indeed, the clinical phenotype of SNCA duplications resembles typical late-onset sporadic Parkinson’s disease whereas SNCA triplications lead to a more widespread neurodegeneration with early-onset parkinsonism and dementia.9,11–14 This implies that there is a direct relationship between SNCA gene dosage and disease severity.9,15 Beyond these rare genetically determined forms, the abnormal accumulation of α-syn in the brain is a classical pathological hallmark for a group of related neurodegenerative disorders, collectively referred to as synucleinopathies. These include the vast majority of patients with sporadic Parkinson’s disease, as well as those with Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB) and Multiple System Atrophy (MSA).
A cardinal feature of synucleinopathies is the pathological misfolding and aggregation of α-syn, and its accumulation within inclusion bodies in the brain, termed Lewy bodies (LBs), Lewy neurites (LNs) and Glia Cytoplasmic Inclusions (GCIs). A significant proportion of α-syn in these inclusions is phosphorylated at serine 129 (pS129Syn), a post-translational modification that has been detected in newly formed α-syn aggregates.16 The precursor to these phosphorylated aggregates is oligomeric α-syn, another important feature of α-syn pathology that is commonly observed in post-mortem Parkinson’s disease brains. Oligomeric forms are believed to represent the initial seeds following misfolding of native α-syn, which can then induce further templating and aggregation of α-syn into phosphorylated aggregates.17,18 These oligomers are believed to play a neurotoxic role by inducing mitochondrial and proteasomal defects, endoplasmic reticulum stress, inflammatory responses, and synaptic, autophagic and lysosomal dysfunction.19 Thus, while both oligomeric and phosphorylated α-syn aggregates have been shown to occur in synucleinopathies, how they form, and their precise effects have remained elusive.
To date, the majority of studies examining α-syn pathophysiology have relied on two-dimensional (2D) cell culture systems and rodent models.20,21 With the advent of human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and three-dimensional (3D) brain organoids, it is now possible to use patient-derived models to more faithfully reconstitute human brain-region specific features of the disease in vitro. One such region is the midbrain which contains the substantia nigra (SN), the area most affected in Parkinson’s disease and where the majority of dopaminergic neurons (DNs) are lost. Single-cell sequencing analysis of the SN demonstrated a high complexity of cell types, including neurons, astrocytes and oligodendrocytes and showed that the common genetic risk for Parkinson’s disease is associated with DN-specific gene expression.22 Recent protocols to generate human midbrain organoids (hMOs) from iPSCs have made it possible to generate 3D human tissue in vitro that more closely resembles the native environment and cellular diversity, including DNs, found in vivo in the SN.23 Neurons within hMOs form interconnected networks, are organized in multiple layers, and exhibit a number of functional properties normally displayed by neurons, that include synapse formation and spontaneous electrophysiological activity.24 Thus, hMOs provides a human model in a dish with the potential to capture the 3D architecture, cellular diversity and connectivity found in the midbrain in vivo. In contrast to in vivo rodent models, human iPSC-derived organoids also have the advantage of being generated from patients and are thus more likely to faithfully recapitulate disease features.25–27
To investigate whether key features of synucleinopathies could be detected in a brain organoid model, we generated hMOs from an iPSC line derived from a patient with an SNCA gene triplication (SNCA Tri). These were compared to hMOs generated from isogenic control iPSCs derived from the same line, but in which the SNCA gene copy-number had been corrected to wild-type, through CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing. Using a combination of molecular, biochemical, immunocytochemical and flow cytometry approaches, we report an age-dependent increase in ɑ-syn levels and aggregation, including oligomeric- and S129-phosphorylated α-syn, in the SNCA Tri but not the control hMOs. Interestingly, pS129Syn was detected in both neurons and glial cells and correlated with a reduction in the number of DN over time, coinciding with broader neuronal loss and, conversely, an increase in the number of glial cells. Taken together, our findings support the idea that hMOs from patients with SNCA CNVs can model key pathological features of synucleinopathies and provide a novel platform to investigate the mechanism of α-syn pathogenesis in Parkinson’s disease.
Materials and methods
Cell-line information and ethical approvals
The use of iPSCs in this research is approved by the McGill University Health Centre Research Ethics Board (DURCAN_IPSC/2019–5374). SNCA lines (originally named AST23, AST23-2KO, AST23-4KO) were provided and generated by Dr Tilo Kunath from The University of Edinburgh according to methodology described in Chen et al.28 The healthy individual line in Supplementary Fig. 4 is named the NCRM-1 cell-line (NIH CRM, http://nimhstemcells.org/crm.html) while the SNCA Tri (b) line is named ND34391*H (Coriell, https://www.coriell.org/0/PDF/NINDS/ipsc/ND34391_CofA.pdf).
Maintenance of iPSCs and hMO differentiation
For generation of hMOs, iPSCs were used only after a minimum of two passages following being thawed and were not passaged more than ten times. Details on iPSC passaging are found in our QC workflow for iPSC maintenance.29 hMOs were generated according to the published method.30 Briefly, 10 000 cells from a single-cell suspension of iPSCs were seeded in each well of a 96-well ultra-low attachment plate, containing neuronal induction media [DMEM/F12: Neurobasal (1:1), 1:100 N2 supplement (Gibco), 1:50 B27 without vitamin A (Invitrogen), 1% GlutaMAX (Gibco), 1% minimum essential media-nonessential amino acid (Invitrogen), and 0.1% β-mercaptoethanol (Gibco) supplemented with 1 μg/ml heparin (Sigma-Aldrich), 10 μM SB431542 (Selleck Chemicals), 200 ng/ml Noggin (PeproTech), 0.8 μM CHIR99021 (Selleck Chemicals), and 10 μM ROCK inhibitor Y27632 (Tocris Bioscience)]. Plates were then centrifuged for 10 min at 1200 rpm to aggregate the cells. After 48 h, embryoid bodies (EBs) formed and the medium was replaced with fresh neuronal induction media without ROCK inhibitor. After 2 days, the medium was replaced with midbrain patterning medium [neuronal induction media formulation with the addition of 100 ng/ml SHH-C25II (PeproTech) and 100 ng/ml FGF8 (PeproTech)], driving the EBs toward the midbrain fate. EBs were then embedded, 3 days later, in Matrigel® reduced growth factor and incubated for 24 h in tissue induction medium [containing neurobasal medium, 1:100 N2 supplement, 1:50 B27 without vitamin A, 1% GlutaMAX, 1% minimum essential media-nonessential amino acid, and 0.1% β-mercaptoethanol supplemented with 2.5 μg/ml insulin (Millipore Sigma), 200 ng/ml laminin (Millipore Sigma), 100 ng/ml SHH-C25II, and 100 ng/ml FGF8]. Finally, the following day, embedded hMOs were transferred into a six-well ultra-low attachment plate filled with final differentiation medium [containing neurobasal medium, 1:100 N2 supplement, 1:50 B27 without vitamin A, 1% GlutaMAX, 1% minimum essential media-nonessential amino acid, 0.1% β-mercaptoethanol, 10 ng/ml BDNF (PeproTech), 10 ng/ml GDNF (PeproTech), 100 μM ascorbic acid (Millipore Sigma), and 125 μM db-cAMP (Millipore Sigma)] and cultured on an orbital shaker until required for experiments.30 The medium was replaced 3 times per week. For quality control purposes, mycoplasma tests were run monthly on iPSC cells and hMOs to ensure the absence of contamination.
RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis and qPCR
RNA was purified from iPSCs and hMOs using a NucleoSpin RNA kit (Takara) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was generated using iScript Reverse Transcription Supermix (BioRad). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed on QuantStudio 3 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) using the primers listed in Supplementary Table 2. This enabled a total reaction volume of 10 µl, including 5 µl of fast advanced master mix (Thermofisher Scientific), 1 µl 20× Taqman assay (IDT), 1 µl of cDNA and 3 µl of RNAse free water. Relative gene expression levels were analysed using the Comparative CT Method (ΔΔCT method). The results were normalized to the GAPDH expression. The relative quantification (RQ) was estimated according to the ΔΔCt methods.31
Sanger sequencing of SNCA regions in iPSC lines
DNA was extracted from iPSC cultures using the Genomic DNA Mini Kit—Blood/Cultured Cell—(Genaid). The PCR reaction contained 1× Q5 Reaction Buffer (NEB), a detergent-free buffer containing 2.0 mM Mg++ at final 1× concentration, 200 µM dNTPs, 0.5 µM of each primer, 0.2 U/µl of Q5 High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (NEB) and 50–100 ng of DNA. Deletions were amplified from genomic DNA at 61°C and 63°C, while the SNCA coding region (without intron) was amplified at 65°C from cDNA. The amplification cycle was 2 min of denaturation at 96°C, followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 96°C, 30 s at 61°C for the 112 bp deletion, 63°C for 231 bp and 24 bp deletions or 65°C for SNCA cDNA, then 1 min at 72°C, with a final extension of 2 min at 72°C. PCR products were purified using ExoSAP-IT PCR product cleanup reagent (ThermoFisher). DNA sequencing reactions were performed using the BigDye v3.1 cycle sequencing kit (ThermoFisher), using 0.3 µM of the corresponding single sequencing primer and 50 ng of purified DNA product. Sequencing reactions were placed on a thermocycler programmed for denaturation at 96°C for 2 min, followed by 25 cycles at 96°C for 20 s, 50°C for 10 s, and 60°C for 4 min. Sequencing reactions were purified using a BigDye XTerminator Purification kit (Thermo-Fisher). Sequencing was carried out on an Applied Biosystems SeqStudio Genetic Analyzer (ThermoFisher).
Determination of SNCA copy number
The quantification of SNCA copy number was achieved using a combination of the Bio-Rad droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) QX200TM system and a TaqMan® assay which includes two sets of PCR primers and two DNA probes fused with different fluorophores (FAM and HEX). Locked Nucleic Acid (LNA®) DNA probes were used and designed according to the manufacturer’s protocol (IDT). One primer/probe set was specific to the SNCA gene and the other primer/probe set was specific to an internal autosomal control gene CDH2. Near-confluent iPSCs cultured in a six-well plate format were washed with PBS and treated with Accutase® for 10 min at 37°C. Genomic DNA was extracted using the DNeasy extraction kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Qiagen). To prepare a typical ddPCR master mix for one 8-well strip, we mixed 90 µl of ‘ddPCR Supermix for Probes (no dUTP)’ (Bio-rad), 75 µl H2O, 1.6 µl of each primer (stock 100 µM) and 0.5 µl of each probe (stock 100 µM). 19 µl of this master mix was distributed per well in an eight-well PCR tube strip. Two microliters of the DNA extract was added into each corresponding well. The ddPCR droplet generation, reading and quantification were performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol, and the ratio of SNCA alleles versus CDH2 alleles calculated.
Genomic stability testing
iPSC lines were sent to WiCell to be karyotyped according to WiCell’s sample preparation recommendations. For testing of hotspot mutations within the genome of the iPSCs used, genomic DNA was extracted with the Genomic DNA Mini Kit (Blood/Cultured Cell) (Geneaid). Genomic stability was then tested with the hPSC Genetic Analysis Kit (Stemcell, 07550) according to our earlier studies.29
Fixation and immunofluorescence staining of hMO cryosections
hMOs were fixed and cryosectioned according to our published methods.30 For staining, 14 μm cryosections were rehydrated in PBS for 15 min and surrounded with a hydrophobic barrier drawn with a barrier pen. The sections were then incubated with a blocking solution (5% normal donkey serum, 0.05% BSA, 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS) for 1 h at RT in a humidified chamber. The sections were subsequently incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies diluted in blocking solution (Supplementary Table 1). The following day, cryosections were washed three times in PBS (15 min each) and then incubated in secondary antibodies diluted in a blocking solution for one hour at RT (Supplementary Table 1). Sections were next washed three times in PBS for 15 min each, incubated with Hoechst (1/5000 in PBS) for 10 min, and finally washed once in PBS for 10 min. Finally, sections were mounted (Aqua-Poly/Mount, Polysciences), and the images were acquired with a Leica TCS SP8 confocal microscope.
Preparation of hMO cell lysates for immunoblotting
hMOs were washed with PBS and lysed through a syringe (BD #329420) in RIPA buffer [50 mM Tris HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% Triton X-100, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate (SDC), 1% sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 50 mM NaF, 5 mM Na3VO4] containing a protease inhibitor cocktail (Complete EDTA-free from Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN) and a phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (2×PhosSTOP from Roche Diagnostics). Proteins were quantified using the Bio-Rad DC Protein assay (Bio-Rad). The lysates were mixed with 4× Laemmli buffer and boiled for 5 min. Equal amounts of proteins were loaded for each sample and electrophoresed on a 10% polyacrylamide gel. Following SDS-PAGE separation, proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. To increase the sensitivity of α-syn detection, membranes were fixed for 30 min at RT in 4% paraformaldehyde and 0.1% glutaraldehyde.32 Next, membranes were incubated in a 5% milk solution diluted in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.2% Tween®20 (TBST) for 1 h. Membranes were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C (Supplementary Table 1), then washed in 0.2% TBST and incubated with peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h at RT. Membranes were again washed and revealed by chemiluminescence (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Quebec, Quebec, Canada). Image acquisition and densitometry were performed with a ChemiDoc™ MP System.
Fontana Masson staining and colorimetric extraction
hMOs were fixed with 4% PFA for 1 h at RT, then formalin fixed, dehydrated and paraffin infused using a tissue processor (HistoCore PEARL, Leica). The hMOs were then embedded in paraffin blocks before being sectioned using a microtome (RM2235, Leica). Fontana Masson staining was performed using an Abcam kit (#ab150669), following the manufacturer’s instructions on 4 μm paraffin sections of hMOs. Entire hMOs were then imaged with the ZEISS Stemi 508 stereomicroscope combined with the ZEISS Axiocam ERc 5 s camera. Images of sections were acquired with a clinical Olympus BX46 microscope and an Olympus DP27 digital colour camera. Black dots from Fontana Masson stainings pictures were extracted using colorimetric selection from GIMP software (version 2.8.22) and quantified by ImageJ (version 2.0.0-rc-69/1.52i) following the method described.33
Synuclein proximity ligation assay (Syn-PLA) on paraffin sections
The study involving substantia nigra sections from human subjects was approved by the C-BIG Biorepository Review Ethics Board (REB #IRB00010120). Fixed hMOs were processed and paraffin embedded. Blocks were then cut into 4 μm sections using a microtome, dewaxed and rehydrated as described in Bengoa-Vergniory et al.19 Briefly, Syn-PLA involves four steps: antigen retrieval and recognition, ligation, amplification, and detection. For the antigen retrieval step, sections were microwaved in 10 mM of sodium citrate buffer pH6, washed in TBS with 0.1% Triton X-100, and blocked 1 h in 1 M glycine, 10% normal goat serum, and TBS with 0.1% Triton X-100. Sections were then incubated overnight at 4°C with antibodies targeting α-syn and pS129Syn (Supplementary Table 1) for the antigen recognition step. The next day, after three washes in TBS with 0.1% Triton X-100, sections were incubated in secondary antibodies for 1 h at RT and subsequently washed three times in TBS with 0.05% Tween®20.
For the ligation, PLA probes and diluent materials were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich kits (#DUO92009, #DUO92010 and #DUO92007). Sections were blocked in a PLA blocking solution, and then incubated in PLA probes combined with an ɑ-syn antibody overnight at 4°C according to Roberts et al.34 After three washes, sections were incubated in a ligation solution for 1 h at 37°C. Next, sections were incubated in amplification and detection solution for 2.5 h at 37°C. Sections were finally washed four times in TBS and stained with Hoechst (diluted 1/5000 in TBS) for 10 min, before being mounted with an aqua-mounting media. Sections were then visualized under Leica TCS SP8 microscope, with consistent gain and laser settings across conditions.
Immunofluorescence quantification of hMOs
The intensity of immunofluorescence signals and the area of staining for each antibody were quantified using an in-house developed Organoid Quantification (OrgQ) macro script (https://github.com/neuroeddu/OrgQ) that used the ParticleAnalyzer function within ImageJ. The script, written in Python, used greyscale channel images and the merged image taken from the confocal microscope as inputs. A mask outlining the organoid from the merged image was first created to account for the organoid area by using an automatically chosen threshold. This mask was next applied to channel inputs, so the quantification of the organoid area remained consistent within each channel. The script next loops through each image within a folder (each channel) for which a given threshold was chosen per image (or were pre-set from a csv file) to count all the particles based on the intensity. This analysis yielded the total number of particles for each channel quantified. At the same time, it also measured the area of each particle within each channel to quantify the sum of particulate areas for a specific channel, as well as to measure the total area of the organoid. All quantified data were outputted in a csv file.
Flow cytometry analysis of dissociated hMOs
First, hMOs were harvested, washed with 1× D-PBS (MultiCell) and treated with TrypLE Express (Thermo-Fisher) three times (2× 10 min, 1× 5 min) at 37°C to create a single-cell suspension. Between each incubation period, hMOs were triturated with 1 ml pipet tips. The TrypLE reaction was stopped by adding 1× D-PBS. The single-cell suspension was next filtered through a 30 µm mesh (Miltenyi Biotec) and cells pelleted by centrifugation at 300 g for 5 min. Pelleted cells were resuspended in 1× D-PBS and viability staining with Fixable Live/Dead Aqua (Invitrogen) was performed for 30 min at RT (protected from light). Cells were then washed with 1× D-PBS and centrifuged at 300 g for 5 min. The cell pellet was next resuspended in FACS Buffer (5% FBS, 0.1% NaN3 in D-PBS) containing an Fc receptor blocking solution, Human TruStain FcXTM (Biolegend). Protected from light, extracellular antigen stainings were performed. The optimal concentration (determined by titration) of extracellular antibodies (Supplementary Table 1) was added to the cells suspended in FACS Buffer. These cells were incubated for 30 min at RT and protected from light. For intracellular staining (pS129Syn, α-syn, TH), the single-cell suspension was fixed with a FIX & PERM Cell Fixation & Cell Permeabilization Kit (Thermo-Fisher) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. After fixation, cells were washed with FACS Buffer and centrifuged at 350 g for 5 min. The optimal concentration (determined by titration) of pS129Syn antibody (Supplementary Table 1) was added to the cells in PERM Buffer. The intracellular staining was performed for 20 min at RT and protected from light. The cells were washed twice with FACS Buffer and centrifuged at 350 g for 5 min. After this step, cells were resuspended in FACS buffer and were then ready for flow cytometry analysis. For flow cytometry settings and parameters, voltages were set according to optimal PMT sensitivity using the peak 2 (Spherotech) voltration technique described previously by Maeker and Trotter.35 Compensation control was performed with Ultracomp beads (Thermo Fisher) using optimal antibody concentrations determined by titration. All data were acquired on the Attune NxT (Thermo-Fisher). Finally, all data generated were analysed with FlowJo (Version 10.6) (Becton-Dickinson Biosciences). For pS129Syn and α-syn signals, after gating out debris and dead cells, we reduced the probability of false positives (i.e. type I errors) by gating three standard deviations above the mean, using the SNCA KO line as a negative control, in order to reduce the size of the population.
Single-cell RNA sequencing of dissociated hMOs
For samples and library preparation, three hMOs for each genotype were pooled, dissociated to create a single-cell suspension then live labelled and sorted out, as described in flow cytometry methods. Cells were loading in the 10X Chromium system using 3′ amplification and targeting 6000 cells per lane. Libraries were prepared as recommended by 10× Genomics and Illumina sequencing was performed at 30 000 reads per cell. Sequencing data were analysed using the Seurat R framework.36 Single, healthy cells were filtered by selecting >500 and <10 000 unique RNA transcript and less than 20% mitochondrial RNA content. The genotypes were aligned using the Seurat’s integrate function and then variable genes were selected, PCA and UMAP embedding followed by clustering with Louvain network detection at a range of resolutions. Clusters were annotated using a combination of automated annotation (scCATCH,37 ClustifyR38 and SingleR39) and Seurat’s FindMarkers function, the top20 markers were selected for each cluster and cross referenced to expression databases manually.40,41 Clusters were annotated from 14 clusters; some groups of neurons were merged. Expression values extraction and data visualizations were also performed using Seurat. For details see R notebook and scripts (https://github.com/neuroeddu/MidbrainOrganoid_scRNAseq Accessed 30 September 2021).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 8.4.1 software. All statistical tests were selected according to the normal distribution of data tested. Statistical significance was evaluated with a two-tailed unpaired t-test or a two-tailed Mann–Whitney test when two conditions were compared. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test followed by a Tukey’s multiple comparison test or a Kruskal–Wallis test followed by a Dunn’s multiple comparisons test was performed for more than two groups comparison. The statistical analyses were performed using Prism 6.0c software.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of the study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Single-cell RNA sequencing data are available at https://github.com/neuroeddu/MidbrainOrganoid_scRNAseq Accessed 30 September 2021.
Results
Generation of midbrain organoids from patient-derived iPSCs with an SNCA triplication
As one of the genetic defects associated with the development of Parkinson’s disease, the SNCA triplication promotes elevated expression of α-syn, ultimately resulting in an increase in α-syn aggregation and an accompanying loss of DNs. To determine whether we could replicate the effects of this CNV event in a human model in a dish, in this study, we differentiated hMOs from iPSCs reprogrammed from a patient carrying a triplication in the SNCA gene (SNCA Tri). As our control, we differentiated hMOs from iPSCs derived from the same patient line, but in which the SNCA allele copy number had been corrected to a wild-type state by deleting two of the four copies of the SNCA gene (Isog Ctl), using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing. As an additional control, we differentiated hMOs from iPSCs derived from the same patient line in which all four SNCA alleles had been deleted (SNCA KO). To assess the quality of our three iPSC lines, we stained them for cell surface and pluripotency markers. All colonies expressed high levels of the glycoprotein antigen TRA1-60R, the glycolipid antigen SSEA-4, the transcription factor OCT3-4, and the transcription factor NANOG. Pluripotency markers were homogeneously observed in nearly all cells, which reflects the undifferentiated state of the iPSC cultures used as starting material for hMO generation (Supplementary Fig. 1A and Table 1). Karyotype analysis showed no clonal abnormalities for any of the three lines (Supplementary Fig. 1B). Genomic stability was assessed by monitoring copy numbers in critical hotspot regions that are often commonly mutated during reprogramming or extensive cell passaging.29 In these regions, we did not observe any of the recurrent abnormalities that have been reported42–44 (Supplementary Fig. 1C). At the DNA level, we also confirmed the number of SNCA alleles in each cell-line through digital droplet PCR (Supplementary Fig. 1D and Table 2). As expected, we detected twice the copy number of the SNCA alleles relative to a control gene (CDH2) in SNCA Tri, compared to the Isog Ctl iPSCs, with no copies of the SNCA alleles in the SNCA KO iPSCs. Sequencing of the Isog Ctl line identified the break points of the three CRISPR/Cas9-induced deletions within the SNCA locus (Supplementary Fig. 1E and Table 2). As only two of these are predicted to disrupt the α-syn protein-coding sequence (the third being a small 24 bp deletion within an intron), the findings confirm the desired correction from four to two functional copies of the SNCA gene in the Isog Ctl line.
Following our previously published methods,30 we derived hMOs from the SNCA iPSC lines using classical midbrain patterning factors26,45–51 (Fig. 1A). Across batches, we observed that SNCA Tri hMOs were slightly smaller than Isog Ctl at 60 days (2.8 ± 0.06 mm versus 3.1 ± 0.06 mm mean diameter) (Fig. 1B). This difference was more pronounced at 100 days (2.4 ± 0.03 mm versus 3.1 ± 0.06 mm mean diameter) (Fig. 1B). It has been reported that, upon exogenous treatment with dopamine, hMOs accumulate neuromelanin granules, a by-product of dopamine synthesis.26,30,52 Thus, we treated 35-day old hMOs for 10 days with 100 μm of dopamine followed by Fontana Masson staining of hMOs sections. We observed a similar increase in neuromelanin granules in SNCA Tri and Isog Ctl hMOs treated with 100 μm dopamine (Fig. 1C). Interestingly, we also noted spontaneous (without exogenous dopamine treatment) neuromelanin granule accumulation in long-term 6-month old hMOs cultures, as illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 1F.
To further confirm the midbrain identity of the hMOs, we performed immunoblotting with 30-day old hMO lysates to detect the expression of common midbrain markers. Tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) is the rate-limiting enzyme in dopamine biosynthesis and a marker of catecholaminergic neurons. Immunoblots revealed lower TH protein levels in SNCA Tri compared to Isog Ctl hMOs lysates whereas there were no significant differences in the levels of TUJ1, a pan-neuronal marker (Supplementary Fig. 1G). To further confirm that the organoids contained DNs, we stained cryosections from 50-day old hMOs for TH (Fig. 1D and Supplementary Fig. 2A), MAP2 a neuronal marker as well as GABA a midbrain marker for GABAergic neurons (Supplementary Fig. 2B). Consistent with other published findings,26,27,30 we could detect the presence of DNs stained for TH within the hMOs (Fig. 1D, E and Supplementary Fig. 2A). Quantification showed that the surface area of TH staining represented approximately 45% of the total MAP2 staining area, with no significant differences between Isog Ctl and SNCA Tri hMOs (Fig. 1E). In addition to immunocytochemistry, we used quantitative PCR (qPCR), to detect several transcripts known to be expressed in midbrain DNs that included engrailed homeobox 1 (EN1), nuclear receptor related 1 protein (Nurr1), LIM homeobox transcription factor 1-beta (LMX1B), calbindin 1 (Calb1), TH, catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) and dopa decarboxylase (DDC) in 50-day hMOs. As expected, their expression was absent in the parental iPSCs, whereas transcript levels of the housekeeping gene GAPDH were similar in both iPSCs and hMOs (Fig. 1F and Supplementary Fig. 2C). In addition to DNs, other cell types are also present within the hMOs and to assess the diversity of the cellular populations, we stained for MAP2, found primarily in neurons, and S100β, a marker for glia/astrocytes (Fig. 1G). Further double staining for GFAP and S100β53 confirmed the presence of astrocytes in the hMOs (Supplementary Fig. 2D). We observed similar stainings for both cell types in sections from hMOs across all three genotypes (Fig. 1G). The diversity of cell populations present in these hMOs was also confirmed by single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) of 165-day old SNCA Tri and Isog Ctl hMOs. The two sequencing libraries were aligned and clustered together to gain a global understanding of the cellular composition of the organoids. Cluster markers were determined, and expression was compared with single-cell sequencing adult54 and foetal brain55 to identify clusters (Supplementary Fig. 3A and B and Supplementary Data File 1). The organoids were composed of an equal split between neurons and glial cells with a small population of other cell types. The neuronal population consists of dopaminergic, excitatory (Glutamatergic neurons) and inhibitory neurons (GABAergic neurons), both in early and late stages of maturation as well as neural precursor cells. The dopaminergic neurons do not completely segregate into a single cluster, as markers are expressed in all neuronal clusters (Supplementary Fig. 3C). The glial population consists of dividing radial glia, radial glia, astrocytes and early oligodendrocytes (Supplementary Fig. 3A and B and Supplementary Data File 1). The diversity of cell populations present was also confirmed in our earlier study by scRNAseq in 47-day old hMOs.30 Taken together, our findings indicate that hMOs from our patient and control lines display neurochemical, gene and protein expression, and cellular characteristics consistent with a midbrain identity.
Elevated expression of α-syn in SNCA triplication midbrain organoids
Next, we sought to determine whether the increase in SNCA copy number in the patient iPSC line led to elevated synuclein transcription and translation. First, hMOs were cultured for 50 days, and total RNA purified from the hMOs, to quantify SNCA transcript levels by qPCR. We observed an approximate 2.5-fold increase of SNCA mRNA levels in SNCA Tri relative to Isog Ctl hMOs, whereas SNCA RNA levels were undetectable in SNCA KO hMOs (Fig. 2A, Supplementary Table 2). Consistent with qPCR findings, α-syn protein levels, as measured by immunoblotting, were significantly elevated in the SNCA Tri versus Isog Ctl hMOs, whereas α-syn was undetectable in SNCA KO hMOs (Fig. 2B). Staining for α-syn protein in cryosections of the 50-day old hMOs also revealed a higher expression in SNCA Tri compared to Isog Ctl hMOs (≃2-fold change), whereas α-syn staining was negligible in SNCA KO hMOs (Fig. 2C and D).
We next extended the maturation time of the hMOs and repeated our analysis with 100-day old hMOs. After 100 days in culture, immunoblot analysis using two antibodies recognizing distinct epitopes demonstrated that α-syn was increased in the SNCA Tri versus Isog Ctl hMOs (Fig. 3A), consistent with findings at 50 days (Fig. 2). No signal was detected in the SNCA KO, further confirming the specificity of the α-syn signal. Staining of cryosections from the 100-day old hMOs also confirmed that α-syn levels were elevated in the SNCA Tri relative to Isog Ctl hMOs, with no discernible signal in SNCA KO sections (Fig. 3B). While the majority of α-syn signal was colocalized with MAP2+ (arrows, Fig. 3C), colocalization of α-syn was also observed in S100β+ astrocytes (triangles, Fig. 3C). Interestingly, in sections from SNCA Tri hMOs, we observed an intense α-syn signal in astrocytes and neurons (stars, Fig. 3C), indicative of inclusions or aggregates that could potentially be forming in both cell types. Overall, our findings demonstrate an increase in the expression of SNCA mRNA and α-syn protein in hMOs from the SNCA triplication line relative to the Isog Ctl and SNCA KO, detectable at 50 days and persisting in 100-day old hMOs.
Oligomeric and phosphorylated ɑ-syn aggregates form over time in SNCA triplication midbrain organoids
Parkinson’s disease is associated not only with elevated α-syn levels but also with its misfolding and aggregation. Both oligomeric and phosphorylated α-syn aggregates have been reported to be present in LBs during advanced stages of Parkinson’s disease,19 leading to neuronal toxicity.56,57 First, to detect misfolded and oligomeric forms of α-syn, we used an α-syn proximity ligation assay (Syn-PLA)34 in which a signal is generated when two complementary PLA probes, recognizing interacting α-syn molecules (i.e. oligomers), bind in close proximity. The signal detected from each pair of PLA probes is then amplified and visualized as an individual fluorescent spot using confocal microscopy. This approach was first validated in post-mortem SN sections from a patient with DLB. We observed that the Syn-PLA signal colocalizes with α-syn and pS129Syn in cytoplasmic spherical LBs (triangles, Fig. 4A), as well as Lewy neurite structures (arrows, Fig. 4A). Similarly, we observed a robust accumulation in the oligomeric forms of α-syn in 100-day old SNCA Tri compared to Isog Ctl hMOs (Fig. 4B and C), and only a very faint background signal in SNCA KO hMOs. Consistent with this finding, we observed a similar pattern for Syn-PLA staining in hMOs derived from the SNCA triplication line, reprogrammed from a different patient with an SNCA triplication, compared to hMOs derived from a healthy individual with normal SNCA copy number (Supplementary Fig. 4A). Interestingly, the Syn-PLA signal was consistently stronger than the pS129Syn signal in SNCA Tri hMOs, suggesting that this approach is sensitive for detecting α-syn oligomers and that they are an early manifestation of α-syn pathology, prior to the appearance of abundant pS129Syn-positive inclusions (Fig. 4B). Indeed, whereas pS129Syn was clearly increased in 100-day old SNCA Tri hMOs lysates by immunoblotting (Fig. 5A), in cryosections, only a small proportion of cells within these hMOs were pS129Syn positive (Fig. 5B). Consistent with this finding, using paraffin-embedded sections, we observed only small, distinct populations of cells that were positive for pS129Syn staining in the hMOs derived from the second SNCA triplication line, compared to hMOs derived from our non-Parkinson’s disease control line (Supplementary Fig. 4B and C). Whereas pS129Syn occasionally colocalized with GFAP+ astrocytes (triangle, Fig. 5C), the majority of pS129Syn colocalized with neurons (MAP2+GFAP−) (arrows, Fig. 5C). Thus, SNCA Tri hMOs display features of α-syn pathology, including both oligomeric and phosphorylated forms of α-syn.
Levels of phosphorylated α-syn aggregates increase with maturation of the hMOs
As hMOs are composed of multiple cell types,23,26,27,58 they offer a unique model to explore the contribution of different cell populations on the ability of α-syn to aggregate. Our earlier findings with PLA and imaging of hMO cryosections showed aggregates were detected in both neurons and glia, albeit to varying degrees. To extend these findings further, we next performed single-cell flow cytometry analysis to assess α-syn quantity and localization. After dissociation of 100-day old hMOs into single-cell suspensions, we performed cell surface staining for neuronal and glial cells as well as internal staining for α-syn and pS129Syn, to both quantify the levels of phosphorylated α-syn aggregates, and to measure the levels of these aggregates within both neuronal and glial cells (Fig. 6A, Supplementary Table 1). Consistent with the results depicted in Fig. 5, we observed an enrichment of pS129Syn levels in the 100-day old SNCA Tri hMOs (≃4-fold more in viable dissociated SNCA Tri cells) compared to the Isog Ctl hMOs, with cells from SNCA KO hMOs used as our negative control in the gating strategy (Fig. 6B and C). This was in the same range as the ≃4.2-fold increase in staining previously observed in the cryosections (Fig. 5B). Similar to the cryosections, pS129Syn signal was detected in less than 1% of dissociated SNCA Tri cells after 100 days (Fig. 6C). To investigate whether α-syn and pS129Syn accumulate further over time, the same analysis was performed on hMOs that were matured for 170 days in culture (Fig. 7A–C, Supplementary Table 1). Consistent with findings by immunoblotting and immunostaining at earlier time points (Figs 2 and 3), we observed a significantly higher proportion of viable cells dissociated from SNCA Tri hMOs that express α-syn (≃11.1%) compared to those dissociated from Isog Ctl hMOs (≃5.5%) (Fig. 7A histogram, Supplementary Fig. 5A and Table 1). As expected from previous results, we also found a significant difference in the percentage of cells expressing pS129Syn in SNCA Tri hMOs relative to the Isog Ctl hMOs (≃0.74% versus ≃0.5%). Remarkably, we still observed that less than 1% of SNCA Tri cells were positive for pS129Syn (Fig. 7B), however, the amount of pS129Syn detected was almost double compared to the 100-day time point (≃0.74% versus ≃0.43%). As an additional control, we also verified that all cells which were pS129Syn positive were also α-syn positive in both genetic backgrounds (Fig. 7C).
Findings from immunohistochemistry imply that the pS129Syn signal mostly colocalizes in neurons relative to glial cells. Thus, we next investigated in which cell-type the pS129Syn signal was present after 100 days in culture, a time point when pS129 was just beginning to accumulate. We used a combination of surface markers59,60 that included CD56 (NCAM-1, a neural cell adhesion molecule) and CD24 (a heat stable antigen receptor, nectadrin). Based on the literature, neurons were classified as CD56+CD24+/CD56+CD24−/CD56−CD24+ and glial cells as CD56−CD24−.59,60 The breakdown of the specific marker combinations is indicated in Supplementary Fig. 5B. Quantification showed that, 75% of the pS129Syn signal was localized in neurons identified as CD56+CD24+, CD56+CD24− and CD56−CD24+, whereas 25% was localized in CD56−CD24− glia. For simplicity, in Fig. 8A, we pooled and collectively depicted the neuronal populations as CD56+CD24+ and the glial population as CD56−CD24−. In SNCA Tri hMOs (green), we observed more pS129Syn in neurons than glial cells, whilst its presence in both cell populations in Isog Ctl was comparable to the background signal observed in SNCA KO hMOs (red and blue). Overall, our findings revealed that phosphorylated α-syn aggregates appear in both neurons and glial cells, albeit to varying degrees, with the levels increasing with maturation of the hMOs.
An increase in α-syn aggregates correlates with a reduction in dopaminergic neuron numbers
As synucleinopathies are characterized by the degeneration of vulnerable cell populations in the brain, we next investigated whether we could detect cell loss in hMOs and whether this correlated with the appearance of pS129Syn aggregates. Using a similar strategy as above, we quantified the levels of neuron (CD56+CD24+, CD56+CD24−, CD56−CD24+) and glia populations (CD56−CD24−) by flow cytometry in 100-day hMOs. We detected similar proportion of neurons and glia in SNCA Tri and Isog Ctl hMOs (Supplementary Fig. 5C and D). Using CD49f+ as an astrocyte marker,61 we noted a tendency for astrocyte enrichment in SNCA Tri hMOs, but this did not reach significance in our analysis (Supplementary Fig. 5E). In contrast, after 170 days in culture, we observed a significant decrease in the proportion of neurons and an increase in glial cells in SNCA Tri hMOs compared to Isog Ctl (Supplementary Fig. 5F), implying that as neuronal numbers start decreasing, increased levels of gliosis may be occurring. This was further supported by our observations of a significant reduction in the number of TH-positive neurons in 100-day old SNCA Tri hMOs compared to Isog Ctl (Fig. 8B). We must however point out that there was no decrease in the overall number of total neurons at 100 days (Supplementary Fig. 5C) which may suggest that DN are selectively vulnerable, and when lost are replaced by other neuronal subtypes. These results were also confirmed by scRNAseq on 165-day old hMOs. As expected, the expression of TH was higher in neural precursors and DA neurons (Neurons-DA) in Isog Ctl hMOs; while the expression of SNCA was higher in SNCA Tri hMOs in DA neurons as well as astrocytes and radial glia (Fig. 8C), confirming our earlier findings with whole hMOs (Fig. 2A).
Taken together, hMOs with a Parkinson’s disease-associated triplication in the SNCA gene display increased levels of α-syn and α-syn aggregation, coinciding with a reduction in TH-positive neurons over time. Overall, our findings demonstrate that hMO can model key pathological features present in patients with Parkinson’s disease and other synucleinopathies.
Discussion
In this paper, we report for the first time an analysis of α-syn pathology in human midbrain organoids (hMOs) derived from a patient with Parkinson’s disease carrying an SNCA gene triplication. We observed that hMOs carrying this CNV exhibited pathological hallmarks of synucleinopathies and Parkinson’s disease that included the presence of oligomeric and phosphorylated α-syn aggregates after 100 days in culture. We further showed that these phosphorylated aggregates were localized in both neuronal and glial populations. Finally, we observed a loss of neurons, including DNs, which coincided with an accumulation of glial cells in the SNCA triplication hMOs.
Synucleinopathies are a diverse group of neurodegenerative disorders that share a common pathology, consisting of inclusions containing insoluble α-syn within neurons and glia. Missense mutations and multiplications of the SNCA locus have been reported in cases of familial Parkinson’s disease, and in particular, CNVs have been identified in families with early-onset, autosomal dominant forms of Parkinson’s disease. Interestingly the role of SNCA levels has also been investigated in idiopathic sporadic Parkinson’s disease, where elevated levels of SNCA-mRNA have been reported in midbrain tissue and in the DNs of the SN, suggesting a general role for increased SNCA levels in Parkinson’s disease.9,15 Consistent with this idea, the role of elevated SNCA levels were demonstrated in other synucleinopathies. For instance, analysis of SNCA mRNA expression in the human temporal cortex in patients with Parkinson’s disease and DLB revealed a correlation between the number of α-syn-immunoreactive LBs and the abundance of SNCA mRNA. Additionally, it was shown that oligodendrocytes isolated from the brains of patients with MSA expressed elevated levels of SNCA mRNA.62,63 Pathophysiological features of Parkinson’s disease have also been observed in hMOs derived from patients with mutations in other Parkinson’s disease genes. For instance, Smits et al.58 generated hMOs from patients with leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) G2019S mutations and observed a reduced number and complexity of midbrain DN compared to hMOs derived from healthy controls. Furthermore, Kim et al.64 examined the impact of the LRRK2-G209S mutation on pS129Syn levels in hMOs. These findings, in conjunction with the results we presented in this paper, help validate hMOs as a relevant model to study Parkinson’s disease and synucleinopathies. However, further work is required to test the influence of other α-syn mutations (A53T, A30P, etc.) on the development of synuclein pathology. For instance, the A53T mutation has been proposed to accelerate α-syn oligomer and aggregate formation65 and therefore may also lead to an earlier or more severe manifestation of synucleinopathy in hMOs.
Complementary to the studies of synucleopathies in the context of other Parkinson’s disease gene mutations, additional work is required to further characterize the features of the synucleopathy. In the SN of a patient with DLB, we used Syn-PLA staining to show that oligomeric α-syn colocalized with total α-syn and pS129Syn, in the LBs and LNs structures. However, in hMOs this observation was less pronounced, most likely as at 100 days, hMOs do not form characteristic LB-like structures. As a result, conducting Syn-PLAs on older cultures will be important to determine whether LBs can develop within hMOs at ages beyond 170 days. The observation that pS129Syn was enriched in 170-day compared to 100-day old hMOs, and that neurons were more significantly reduced at later time point (170 days), also supports the idea that older cultures will lead to more pronounced Parkinson’s disease phenotypes. Thus, we hypothesize that ageing hMOs for longer time periods, up to 12–18 months, could potentially unveil additional features of synucleinopathies.
To further confirm the pathological similarities between hMOs and patients with Parkinson’s disease, using a combination of immunostaining and flow cytometry, we localized phosphorylated α-syn to neuronal and glial populations. While α-syn is abundant in brain, localizing mostly at the presynaptic terminals of neurons, the question of whether it is also expressed in glial cells remains controversial.66 Thus, it remains unclear whether our detection of α-syn and pS129Syn in glial cells is the result of endogenous expression or uptake of α-syn released from nearby neurons, which would be consistent with the prion-like spreading and propagation model of synucleinopathies. This latter model is consistent with pathological studies in post-mortem Parkinson’s disease brain tissue, in which α-syn positive inclusions have been found in both astrocytes and neurons.67 In this scenario, it has been suggested that the α-syn oligomers, which are formed in neurons, are subsequently released and taken up by astrocytes.67,68 It is believed that the normal function of astrocytes is to take up α-syn for the purposes of removal and degradation, and to maintain a healthy environment for neuronal function.69 High concentrations of extracellular α-syn have been shown to induce inflammatory and stress responses in astrocytes,69 resulting in dysregulation of astrocyte function and eventual apoptosis.70–72 Intriguingly, we found a tendency towards a higher CD49f+ astrocytic population in SNCA Tri hMOs. However, further work on the inflammatory response and gliosis in SNCA Tri hMOs is required. It is also important to note that certain cell populations such as microglia, which are derived from mesoderm, are absent from hMOs. Exploring the contribution microglia to ɑ-syn pathology in hMOs, possibly by using co-culture approaches, should be the focus of future work.
It is interesting to note that we observed reduced TH expression levels in SNCA Tri hMOs at early culture stages (30 days) (Supplementary Fig. 1G). SNCA Tri hMOs were also smaller in size, suggesting that the SNCA triplication impacts early developmental stages in hMOs. Similar observations were reported previously in 2D iPSC-derived neural progenitor lines (2D NPCs) where it was shown that the overexpression of α-syn impaired the differentiation of neuronal progenitor cells.73 This could be a result of the neurodevelopmental impact of SNCA triplication which has been reported by other groups in iPSC-derived models.73 However, it is quite important to note that we didn’t detect differences in DN numbers at 50 days. Importantly, 100-day old SNCA Tri hMOs were smaller in size than at 60 days (2.8 ± 0.06 mm versus 2.4 ± 0.03 mm, Fig. 1B), while the Isog Ctl hMOs remained similar in size over time (3.1 ± 0.06 mm mean diameter). This observation implies that a neurodegenerative event is occurring in the SNCA Tri background. This was confirmed by flow cytometry with the selective loss of TH-positive DNs at 100 days in the SNCA triplication hMOs, coincidentally with a broader loss of neurons and an increase in glia. Our data together indicate that SNCA CNV led to a degenerative effect rather than a developmental effect with increased ageing of the hMOs.
In a broader context, previous studies with 2D iPSC-derived DNs showed that CNV of SNCA led to α-syn pathology. For instance, Zambon et al.74 used iPSC-derived DA neurons from Parkinson’s disease patients carrying the SNCA Tri to study the cellular mechanisms associated with α-syn. After 35 DIV, TH+ cells displayed an intracellular accumulation of α-syn, with SNCA Tri DA neurons exhibited an increased burden of oligomeric α-syn species as shown by the α-syn PLA technic and elevated α-syn release. These observations were associated with mitochondrial dysfunction, ER stress and impaired lipid metabolism; however, the authors didn’t report cell death in their study. One assumption is that 2D cultures are difficult to maintain for long-term observations, with neurons tending to detach around 50 days on the coated surfaces. This technical limitation could explain the absence of certain observations, in several 2D studies, such as a degeneration or progressive loss of DNs with time. Our model has the advantages to recapitulate several key features absent in 2D DN cultures, as it is composed of diverse cell populations and can be cultured over several months permitting a longer time for observations. Thus, not only can we observe accumulation of aggregates as we age the hMOs, but degeneration of neurons starts to occur. In another study, Shrigley et al.75 showed that DA progenitors derived from iPSCs carrying a SNCA CNV and transplanted into 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) lesioned rats, a neurotoxin-based model, developed α-syn related pathology. The model we present in our manuscript has the advantage of presenting with the endogenous appearance of psynS129 positive aggregates in a human model, without any exogenous transplantation or treatment. Angelova et al.76 demonstrated that increased levels of endogenous α-syn oligomers in iPSC derived cortical neurons, are associated with high cytosolic calcium influx. They demonstrated that abnormal calcium fluxes, as well as abnormal intracellular stores, is an important biological property of α-syn oligomers, when applied exogenously to cell systems. They also observed some neuronal death with their model. Such results would be interesting to confirm in a more complex Parkinson’s disease related model such as the hMOs. Taken together, our work highlights the importance of using iPSC-derived hMOs from Parkinson’s disease patients to study α-syn pathology in a physiologically relevant in vitro cell model of Parkinson’s disease.
Overall, our findings validated the hypothesis that hMO models of Parkinson’s disease faithfully recapitulate pathological phenotypes seen in patients with Parkinson’s disease and other synucleinopathies. They also highlight the potential of hMOs to advance our understanding of the underlying mechanisms involved in Parkinson’s disease pathogenesis.
Supplementary material
Supplementary material is available at Brain Communications online.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Drs Rosalind Roberts and Nora Bengoa-Vergniory for kindly sharing their protocol for immunofluorescence combined with Syn-PLA which was optimized for paraffin sections. We also want to acknowledge the MNI Microscopy Core Facility for confocal microscope management and maintenance. We thank the C-BIG repository histology core facility for processing and embedding the paraffin tissue blocks.
Funding
T.M.D. and E.A.F. received funding to support this project through the McGill Healthy Brains for Healthy Lives (HBHL) initiative, the Consortium Québécois sur la Découverte du Médicament (CQDM) Fonds d’accélération des collaborations en santé (FACS) programme and the Sebastian and Ghislaine Van Berkom Foundation. E.A.F. is supported by a Foundation grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) (FDN-154301), a Canada Research Chair (Tier 1) in Parkinson’s Disease and the Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging (CCNA). T.M.D. is supported by a project grant from the CIHR (PJT-169095) and received funding support for this project through the Ellen Foundation and a New Investigator award from Parkinson’s Canada. T.K. generated AST23 lines with funding received from the Medical Research Council, Grant Award Number: MR/K017276/1. M.N.V. is supported by a Fonds de recherche du Québéc-Santé (FRSQ), Parkinson Canada and Parkinson Québéc postdoctoral fellowships.
Competing interests
The authors report no competing interests.
Glossary
- 2D =
two-dimensional
- 3D =
three-dimensional
- Calb1 =
calbindin 1
- CNVs =
copy number variations
- COMT =
catechol-O-methyltransferase
- DDC =
dopa decarboxylase
- DLB =
Dementia with Lewy bodies
- DN =
dopaminergic neuron
- EN1 =
engrailed homeobox 1
- GCIs =
glia cytoplasmic inclusions
- hMOs =
human midbrain organoids
- iPSC =
induced pluripotent stem cell
- LBs =
Lewy bodies
- LMX1B =
LIM homeobox transcription factor 1-beta
- LNs =
Lewy neurites
- LRRK2 =
leucine-rich repeat kinase 2
- MSA =
multiple systems atrophy
- Nurr1 =
nuclear receptor related 1 protein
- pS129Syn =
α-syn phosphorylated at serine S129
- SN =
substantia nigra
- Syn-PLA =
synuclein proximity ligation assay
- TH =
tyrosine hydroxylase
- α-syn =
α-synuclein
References
- 1. Lee A, Gilbert RM.. Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease. Neurol Clin. 2016;34(4):955–965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Polymeropoulos MH, Lavedan C, Leroy E, et al. Mutation in the alpha-synuclein gene identified in families with Parkinson's disease. Science. 1997;276(5321):2045–2047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Fujioka S, Ogaki K, Tacik PM, Uitti RJ, Ross OA, Wszolek ZK.. Update on novel familial forms of Parkinson's disease and multiple system atrophy. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2014;20 (Suppl 1):S29–S34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Kasten M, Klein C.. The many faces of alpha-synuclein mutations. Mov Disord. 2013;28(6):697–701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Kruger R, Kuhn W, Muller T, et al. Ala30Pro mutation in the gene encoding alpha-synuclein in Parkinson's disease. Nat Genet. 1998;18(2):106–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Lesage S, Anheim M, Letournel F, et al. ; French Parkinson's Disease Genetics Study Group. G51D alpha-synuclein mutation causes a novel parkinsonian-pyramidal syndrome. Ann Neurol. 2013;73(4):459–471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Proukakis C, Dudzik CG, Brier T, et al. A novel alpha-synuclein missense mutation in Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2013;80(11):1062–1064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Zarranz JJ, Alegre J, Gomez-Esteban JC, et al. The new mutation, E46K, of alpha-synuclein causes Parkinson and Lewy body dementia. Ann Neurol. 2004;55(2):164–173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Chartier-Harlin MC, Kachergus J, Roumier C, et al. Alpha-synuclein locus duplication as a cause of familial Parkinson's disease. Lancet. 2004;364(9440):1167–1169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Singleton AB, Farrer M, Johnson J, et al. Alpha-synuclein locus triplication causes Parkinson's disease. Science. 2003;302(5646):841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Farrer M, Kachergus J, Forno L, et al. Comparison of kindreds with parkinsonism and alpha-synuclein genomic multiplications. Ann Neurol. 2004;55(2):174–179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Nishioka K, Hayashi S, Farrer MJ, et al. Clinical heterogeneity of alpha-synuclein gene duplication in Parkinson's disease. Ann Neurol. 2006;59(2):298–309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Ibanez P, Bonnet AM, Debarges B, et al. Causal relation between alpha-synuclein gene duplication and familial Parkinson's disease. Lancet. 2004;364(9440):1169–1171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Muenter MD, Forno LS, Hornykiewicz O, et al. Hereditary form of parkinsonism–dementia. Ann Neurol. 1998;43(6):768–781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Book A, Guella I, Candido T, et al. ; SNCA Multiplication Investigators of the GEoPD Consortium. A meta-analysis of alpha-synuclein multiplication in familial Parkinsonism. Front Neurol. 2018;9:1021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Oueslati A. Implication of alpha-synuclein phosphorylation at S129 in synucleinopathies: What have we learned in the last decade? J Parkinsons Dis. 2016;6(1):39–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Lashuel HA, Overk CR, Oueslati A, Masliah E.. The many faces of alpha-synuclein: From structure and toxicity to therapeutic target. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013;14(1):38–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Zhang G, Xia Y, Wan F, et al. New perspectives on roles of alpha-synuclein in Parkinson's disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2018;10:370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Bengoa-Vergniory N, Roberts RF, Wade-Martins R, Alegre-Abarrategui J.. Alpha-synuclein oligomers: A new hope. Acta Neuropathol. 2017;134(6):819–838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Visanji NP, Brotchie JM, Kalia LV, et al. Alpha-synuclein-based animal models of Parkinson's disease: Challenges and opportunities in a new era. Trends Neurosci. 2016;39(11):750–762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Delenclos M, Burgess JD, Lamprokostopoulou A, Outeiro TF, Vekrellis K, McLean PJ.. Cellular models of alpha-synuclein toxicity and aggregation. J Neurochem. 2019;150(5):566–576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Agarwal D, Sandor C, Volpato V, et al. A single-cell atlas of the human substantia nigra reveals cell-specific pathways associated with neurological disorders. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):4183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Smits LM, Magni S, Kinugawa K, et al. Single-cell transcriptomics reveals multiple neuronal cell types in human midbrain-specific organoids. Cell Tissue Res. 2020;382(3):463–476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Webber D-S-A-M. A human single-cell atlas of the substantia nigra reveals novel cell-specific pathways associated with the genetic risk of Parkinson’s disease and neuropsychiatric disorders. bioRxiv. 2020;11(1):4183. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17876-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Mead BE, Karp JM.. All models are wrong, but some organoids may be useful. Genome Biol. 2019;20(1):66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Jo J, Xiao Y, Sun AX, et al. Midbrain-like organoids from human pluripotent stem cells contain functional dopaminergic and neuromelanin-producing neurons. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;19(2):248–257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Monzel AS, Smits LM, Hemmer K, et al. Derivation of human midbrain-specific organoids from neuroepithelial stem cells. Stem Cell Rep. 2017;8(5):1144–1154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Chen Y, Dolt KS, Kriek M, et al. Engineering synucleinopathy-resistant human dopaminergic neurons by CRISPR-mediated deletion of the SNCA gene. Eur J Neurosci. 2019;49(4):510–524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Chen CX-Q, Abdian N, Maussion G, et al. Standardized quality control workflow to evaluate the reproducibility and differentiation potential of human iPSCs into neurons. bioRxiv. 2021;doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3804839. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Mohamed NV, Mathur MV, Da Silva R, et al. Generation of human midbrain organoids from induced pluripotent stem cells. MNI Open Res. 2021;3:1. [Google Scholar]
- 31. Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ.. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat Protoc. 2008;3(6):1101–1108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Sasaki A, Arawaka S, Sato H, Kato T.. Sensitive western blotting for detection of endogenous Ser129-phosphorylated alpha-synuclein in intracellular and extracellular spaces. Sci Rep. 2015;5:14211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Billings PC, Sanzari JK, Kennedy AR, Cengel KA, Seykora JT.. Comparative analysis of colorimetric staining in skin using open-source software. Exp Dermatol. 2015;24(2):157–159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Roberts RF, Bengoa-Vergniory N, Alegre-Abarrategui J.. Alpha-synuclein proximity ligation assay (AS-PLA) in brain sections to probe for alpha-synuclein oligomers. Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1948:69–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Maecker HT, Trotter J.. Flow cytometry controls, instrument setup, and the determination of positivity. Cytometry A. 2006;69(9):1037–1042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Hao Y, Hao S, Andersen-Nissen E, et al. Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data. Cell. 2021;184(13):3573–3587.e29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Shao X, Liao J, Lu X, Xue R, Ai N, Fan X.. scCATCH: Automatic annotation on cell types of clusters from single-cell rna sequencing data. iScience. 2020;23(3):100882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Fu R, Gillen AE, Sheridan RM, et al. Clustifyr: An R package for automated single-cell RNA sequencing cluster classification. F1000Res. 2020;9:223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Aran D, Looney AP, Liu L, et al. Reference-based analysis of lung single-cell sequencing reveals a transitional profibrotic macrophage. Nat Immunol. 2019;20(2):163–172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Xu X, Wells AB, O'Brien DR, Nehorai A, Dougherty JD.. Cell type-specific expression analysis to identify putative cellular mechanisms for neurogenetic disorders. J Neurosci. 2014;34(4):1420–1431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. McKenzie AT, Wang M, Hauberg ME, et al. Brain cell type specific gene expression and co-expression network architectures. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):8868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Baker D, Hirst AJ, Gokhale PJ, et al. Detecting genetic mosaicism in cultures of human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Rep. 2016;7(5):998–1012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Andrews PW, Ben-David U, Benvenisty N, et al. Assessing the safety of human pluripotent stem cells and their derivatives for clinical applications. Stem Cell Rep. 2017;9(1):1–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Merkle FT, Ghosh S, Kamitaki N, et al. Human pluripotent stem cells recurrently acquire and expand dominant negative P53 mutations. Nature. 2017;545(7653):229–233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Arenas E, Denham M, Villaescusa JC.. How to make a midbrain dopaminergic neuron. Development. 2015;142(11):1918–1936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Doi D, Samata B, Katsukawa M, et al. Isolation of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived dopaminergic progenitors by cell sorting for successful transplantation. Stem Cell Rep. 2014;2(3):337–350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Jaeger I, Arber C, Risner-Janiczek JR, et al. Temporally controlled modulation of FGF/ERK signaling directs midbrain dopaminergic neural progenitor fate in mouse and human pluripotent stem cells. Development. 2011;138(20):4363–4374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Kirkeby A, Grealish S, Wolf DA, et al. Generation of regionally specified neural progenitors and functional neurons from human embryonic stem cells under defined conditions. Cell Rep. 2012;1(6):703–714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Kriks S, Shim JW, Piao J, et al. Dopamine neurons derived from human ES cells efficiently engraft in animal models of Parkinson's disease. Nature. 2011;480(7378):547–551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Perrier AL, Tabar V, Barberi T, et al. Derivation of midbrain dopamine neurons from human embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(34):12543–12548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Tofoli FA, Semeano ATS, Oliveira-Giacomelli A, et al. Midbrain dopaminergic neurons differentiated from human-induced pluripotent stem cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1919:97–118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Fedorow H, Tribl F, Halliday G, Gerlach M, Riederer P, Double KL.. Neuromelanin in human dopamine neurons: Comparison with peripheral melanins and relevance to Parkinson's disease. Prog Neurobiol. 2005;75(2):109–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Soubannier V, Maussion G, Chaineau M, et al. Characterization of human iPSC-derived astrocytes with potential for disease modeling and drug discovery. Neurosci Lett. 2020;731:135028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Lake BB, Chen S, Sos BC, et al. Integrative single-cell analysis of transcriptional and epigenetic states in the human adult brain. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36(1):70–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. La Manno G, Gyllborg D, Codeluppi S, et al. Molecular diversity of midbrain development in mouse, human, and stem cells. Cell. 2016;167(2):566–580.e19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Alam P, Bousset L, Melki R, Otzen DE.. Alpha-synuclein oligomers and fibrils: A spectrum of species, a spectrum of toxicities. J Neurochem. 2019;150(5):522–534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Danzer KM, Krebs SK, Wolff M, Birk G, Hengerer B.. Seeding induced by alpha-synuclein oligomers provides evidence for spreading of alpha-synuclein pathology. J Neurochem. 2009;111(1):192–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Smits LM, Reinhardt L, Reinhardt P, et al. Modeling Parkinson's disease in midbrain-like organoids. NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2019;5:5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Pruszak J, Ludwig W, Blak A, Alavian K, Isacson O.. CD15, CD24, and CD29 define a surface biomarker code for neural lineage differentiation of stem cells. Stem Cells. 2009;27(12):2928–2940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Janssens S, Schotsaert M, Manganaro L, et al. FACS-mediated isolation of neuronal cell populations from virus-infected human embryonic stem cell-derived cerebral organoid cultures. Curr Protoc Stem Cell Biol. 2019;48(1):e65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Barbar L, Jain T, Zimmer M, et al. CD49f is a novel marker of functional and reactive human ipsc-derived astrocytes. Neuron. 2020;107(3):436–453.e12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Tagliafierro L, Chiba-Falek O.. Up-regulation of SNCA gene expression: Implications to synucleinopathies. Neurogenetics. 2016;17(3):145–157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Marti MJ, Tolosa E, Campdelacreu J.. Clinical overview of the synucleinopathies. Mov Disord. 2003;18 (Suppl 6):S21–S27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Kim H, Park HJ, Choi H, et al. Modeling G2019S-LRRK2 sporadic parkinson's disease in 3D midbrain organoids. Stem Cell Rep. 2019;12(3):518–531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Mohite GM, Kumar R, Panigrahi R, et al. Comparison of kinetics, toxicity, oligomer formation, and membrane binding capacity of alpha-synuclein familial mutations at the A53 site, including the newly discovered A53V mutation. Biochemistry. 2018;57(35):5183–5187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Filippini A, Gennarelli M, Russo I.. Alpha-synuclein and glia in Parkinson's disease: A beneficial or a detrimental duet for the endo-lysosomal system? Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2019;39(2):161–168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Braak H, Sastre M, Del Tredici K.. Development of alpha-synuclein immunoreactive astrocytes in the forebrain parallels stages of intraneuronal pathology in sporadic Parkinson's disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2007;114(3):231–241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Lee HJ, Suk JE, Patrick C, et al. Direct transfer of alpha-synuclein from neuron to astroglia causes inflammatory responses in synucleinopathies. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(12):9262–9272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Booth HDE, Hirst WD, Wade-Martins R.. The role of astrocyte dysfunction in Parkinson's disease pathogenesis. Trends Neurosci. 2017;40(6):358–370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Rannikko EH, Weber SS, Kahle PJ.. Exogenous alpha-synuclein induces toll-like receptor 4 dependent inflammatory responses in astrocytes. BMC Neurosci. 2015;16:57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Anderson JP, Walker DE, Goldstein JM, et al. Phosphorylation of Ser-129 is the dominant pathological modification of alpha-synuclein in familial and sporadic Lewy body disease. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(40):29739–29752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Liu M, Qin L, Wang L, et al. Alpha-synuclein induces apoptosis of astrocytes by causing dysfunction of the endoplasmic reticulum Golgi compartment. Mol Med Rep. 2018;18(1):322–332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Oliveira LM, Falomir-Lockhart LJ, Botelho MG, et al. Elevated alpha-synuclein caused by SNCA gene triplication impairs neuronal differentiation and maturation in Parkinson's patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Death Dis. 2015;6:e1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Zambon F, Cherubini M, Fernandes HJR, et al. Cellular alpha-synuclein pathology is associated with bioenergetic dysfunction in Parkinson's iPSC-derived dopamine neurons. Hum Mol Genet. 2019;28(12):2001–2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Shrigley S, Nilsson F, Mattsson B, et al. Grafts derived from an alpha-synuclein triplication patient mediate functional recovery but develop disease-associated pathology in the 6-OHDA model of Parkinson's disease. J Parkinsons Dis. 2021;11(2):515–528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Angelova PR, Choi ML, Berezhnov AV, et al. Alpha synuclein aggregation drives ferroptosis: An interplay of iron, calcium and lipid peroxidation. Cell Death Differ. 2020;27(10):2781–2796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of the study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Single-cell RNA sequencing data are available at https://github.com/neuroeddu/MidbrainOrganoid_scRNAseq Accessed 30 September 2021.