Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 7.
Published in final edited form as: Vaccine. 2021 Jun 23;39(31):4320–4327. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.06.025

Maternal transfer of neutralizing antibodies to B. burgdorferi OspA after oral vaccination of the rodent reservoir

Kathryn Phillip a, Nisha Nair b, Kamalika Samanta b, Jose F Azevedo b, Grant D Brown c, Christine A Petersen d,e, Maria Gomes-Solecki b,*
PMCID: PMC8495753  NIHMSID: NIHMS1718409  PMID: 34172332

Abstract

Lyme Disease presents unique challenges for public health. Transfer of protective antibodies between mothers and offspring should occur after vaccination of mice. We present new evidence for maternal transfer of oral vaccine induced neutralizing anti-OspA IgG antibodies to mouse pups mainly through ingestion of colostrum. We found a strong statistical correlation of antibody transfer between mothers that produced the most robust IgG response to OspA and their respective pups. OspA-specific antibody was detected as early as 24h after birth and protective levels of antibodies lasted until ~5 weeks of age in the majority of pups but persisted in some mice until 9 weeks. This was further supported by detection of neutralizing antibodies in serum of all pups at 2–3 weeks after birth and in some offspring adult mice at 9 weeks of age. A clear association was found between robust antibody responses in mothers and the length of time antibody persisted in the respective pups using a novel longitudinal Bayesian model. These factors are likely to impact the enzootic cycle of B. burgdorferi if reservoir targeted OspA-based vaccination interventions are implemented.

Keywords: Lyme disease, Borrelia burgdorferi, oral vaccination, maternal-transfer, OspA, Bayesian modelling

Introduction

The proteins presented on the outer surface of B. burgdorferi change as the spirochete transits between the tick vector and the mammalian host. In unfed ticks, the spirochetes produce outer surface protein A (OspA) while B. burgdorferi resides in the tick midgut 1. OspA was proposed as a vaccine candidate for Lyme disease after passive transfer of anti-OspA antibodies 2,3 and active immunization with OspA recombinant protein 4 protected mice from challenge with strains of cultured B. burgdorferi. Additional studies showed that B. burgdorferi was nearly eliminated from infected nymphal ticks feeding on OspA vaccinated mice 5. Thus, when a nymphal tick feeds on an OspA vaccinated mammal, anti-OspA antibodies present in the tick bloodmeal neutralize most live spirochetes in the tick midgut which results in blockage of transmission of the spirochete from the tick vector to the host 6,7. In addition, OspA antibodies also reduce acquisition of B. burgdorferi by uninfected larval ticks feeding on infected mice 8. Hence, OspA is the ideal target for development of transmission-blocking vaccines to prevent Lyme disease. Vaccines based in recombinant OspA have been approved for use in humans 9 and dogs 10.

The risk of contracting Lyme disease is proportional to the probability of the host being bitten by an infected tick 11; this risk correlates significantly with infected I. scapularis nymph density 1214 and with nymphal infection prevalence 15,16. Control measures aimed at disrupting transit of B. burgdorferi to and from the vector tick can reduce exposure to Lyme disease risk 17. We developed a reservoir targeted vaccine using recombinant E. coli as an adjuvanted carrier to recombinant OspA 18 and showed that oral administration of such vaccines to mice induced OspA-specific IgG antibodies in blood that drastically reduced B. burgdorferi from the tick vector and prevented transmission to the murine host 19. Although other species such as chipmunks and shrews are competent reservoirs for B. burgdorferi 20, the white-footed mouse (Peromyscus leucopus) is the reservoir species that infects most larval ticks 21. White-footed mice vaccinated orally in a laboratory setting maintained sufficient levels of OspA-specific IgG in blood for up to a year 22. We targeted white-footed mice for disruption of I. scapularis infection in a large field study using a bait vaccine based on E. coli delivered OspA. We found that vaccination of wild white-footed mice resulted in a drastic reduction of nymphal infection prevalence in ticks flagged on the site treated with the vaccine for 5 consecutive years 17.

Transfer of antibodies from mother to offspring is a classical mechanism 23 by which newborns are protected from many infectious diseases. Maternal IgG antibodies against the relapsing fever spirochete Borrelia duttonii were found to be transferred to mice 24. Thus, it was reasonable to expect that maternal transfer of neutralizing anti-OspA antibodies should occur after vaccination of female mice. We immunized mice orally with the same vaccine master stock previously tested 17,19,22, and evaluated transfer of OspA-specific antibodies to offspring via transplacental and transmammary passage. In addition, we developed a novel Bayesian longitudinal model to jointly evaluate mother and pup immunity.

Methods

Ethics statement.

This study was carried out in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the US National Institutes of Health. The protocol was approved by the UTHSC Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, protocol #19–0103.

Bacterial strains and culture conditions.

Glycerol stocks of E. coli BL21(DE3)pLysS (NEB, Ipswich, MA) transformed with pET9c-ospA 19 were used to produce the vaccine. Untransformed E. coli BL21(DE3)pLysS were used as placebo controls. Multi-strain cultures of B. burgdorferi sensu stricto recovered from heart and bladder tissues from white-footed mice naturally infected with B. burgdorferi (Bb) in 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 are kept as glycerol stocks in the laboratory. We have sequenced DNA purified from ticks that fed on mice infected with this multi-strain culture and found it contains the following OspC variants: A, D, E, F, I, J, K, M, Q, T, X 25. To generate a multi-strain culture for neutralization assays, 200ul of each stock (2005 to 2008) was combined and cultured in 7mL of Barbour-Stoenner-Kelly (BSK) media supplemented with 100x antibiotic mix for Borrelia at 34°C for 2–4 weeks until a cell density of 107 Bb/mL was reached. All bacterial glycerol stocks are stored at −80°C.

Production of vaccine

Vaccine was produced according to published protocol 18 bypassing the lyophilization step 25. Briefly, pET9c-ospA-transformed and untransformed E. coli BL21(DE3)pLysS were cultured in TBY media supplemented with 50μg/ml Kan, and grown at 37°C, 220 rpm, for about 3h to reach an OD600=0.8. Protein expression was induced with 1mM IPTG/ml during 3h to reach OD600=1 (~109 E. coli cells/ml). The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4000×g for 10 min at 4°C and the biomass was resuspended in 20% glycerol/phosphate buffered salt solution (Gibco, Grand Island, NY) in 1% of the initial volume. Cell suspensions in aliquots of 1 ml were snap frozen in a dry ice bath and stored at −80°C. Aliquots of 300μl (~3×108 cells) were thawed and placed in a ball tipped disposable feeding needle (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) for oral gavage inoculation.

Immunization schedule, breeding and collection of blood

Female, 6-week old, C3H-HeN mice (Charles River) were separated into 2 groups: 10 females were assigned to the oral vaccine group (EcA, labeled as mothers M1 to M10) and 6 females were assigned to placebo (Ec Ctrl, labelled as mothers M11 to M16). A timeline diagram depicting vaccination, breeding and collection of samples is shown in Fig. 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Diagram of the immunization schedule, breeding, parturition and bleeding of mothers and offspring. OV, oral vaccination; D, day after first vaccine dose; w, weeks; cohort A, pups terminated and bled within 24h of birth; cohort B, pups bled 2 weeks after birth and then weekly until termination at 17 weeks.

Immunization schedule: mice received 1 vaccine dose (~3×108 E. coli cells) daily by intragastric inoculation for 2 full work-weeks (10 doses), rested for 1 week, received the 1st boost the following week (5 doses), rested for another week, and received a 2nd boost (5 doses) for a total of 20 vaccine doses per mouse over an 8 week period.

Breeding and birth: 2 weeks after receiving the last vaccine dose, pairs of females were cohoused with an age matched male for about 3–4 weeks. After breeding, each female was single housed until parturition, which occurred over the following ~6 weeks due to differences in successful mating between pairs. Females started giving birth to pups ~11–17 weeks after the first vaccine dose. Pups were followed for ~17 weeks.

Collection of blood for serology and neutralization assays: blood was collected from the mothers before immunization on D0, before the first boost on D21, before the second boost on D35, post-vaccination before-breeding on D54, post-vaccination post-birth on D133/154 (when the pups ~7 weeks old) and post-vaccination at termination ~ D203/218 (when the pups were ~17 weeks old). The pups were split into two cohorts. The first cohort of 44 pups (Cohort A) was sacrificed for collection of blood on the day of birth (most pups were born overnight). Cohort A included 12 control pups (born to Mother 11 and from the second litters born to Mothers 14 and 16) and 32 vaccinated pups (born to the first litter of vaccinated Mothers 6–10). The second cohort (n=59, Cohort B) was comprised of 33 control pups (born to the first litter of Mothers 12–16) and 27 vaccinated pups (from the first litter of vaccinated Mothers 1–5); blood was collected on a weekly basis starting 2 weeks after birth until the pups reached 17 weeks of age.

ELISA assay

OspA protein was purified from IPTG induced recombinant E. coli by affinity chromatography. ELISA was performed according to modified published protocol 26 as follows. Briefly, purified recombinant OspA quantified by the Lowry protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to coat Nunc MaxiSorp flat-bottom ELISA plates (eBioscience, San Diego, CA) at 1 μg/ml, and an indirect ELISA was performed using serum (1:100) from mice to identify OspA-specific IgG antibodies. Goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated to HRP (1:10000, Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) was used as secondary antibody. The OD450 was read on a SpectraMax Plus ELISA reader (Molecular Devices). The ELISA cutoff was determined as 3 standard deviations above the average of all timepoints for control mothers (OD450 0.8). We previously determined that vaccinated mice were protected from tick-transmitted B. burgdorferi if they had a minimum anti-OspA antibody in serum reading OD450 0.8–1 six weeks after receiving the first dose 17,22.

Neutralization assay

Presence of neutralizing anti-OspA antibody was determined as described 22. We used serum from mothers collected after vaccination and before breeding (D54) and the serum from pups was collected on the day of birth (0–24h), at 2–3 weeks after birth and at 9 weeks after birth. Briefly, 8 μL from a ≤107/mL multi-strain culture of B. burgdorferi was incubated with 4μL heat inactivated mouse serum in the presence of 4μL guinea pig complement per reaction and incubated for 6 days at 34°C. Cultures were checked on days 0, 3 and 6 and the number of motile B. burgdorferi were counted in a Petroff-Hausser chamber under a dark field microscope.

Bayesian Model

We introduce a novel Bayesian joint model for maternal and pup antibody levels using coupled, auto-regressive, Gaussian time-series with parameters for oral vaccine timing (mothers) and birth/weaning processes (pups). Parameters were estimated separately between experimental groups; Bayesian techniques allow us to directly compare the posterior distributions of group level parameters, rather than relying on hypothesis tests for interaction terms. For group i, mother j, and time t, we modeled the outcome (antibody levels, denoted Y) as in Eq. 1.

log(Yijt)~N(ηijt+ρ1log(Yij,t1),σ12);ηijt=Xmthr(i)βmthr(i) (1)

The design matrix X(i) contains an intercept, linear-time dose term (up to D54), and change point at D54. For each group, this parameterization allows an average starting mean log-antibody level, after which the average outcome changes continuously up to the end of the feeding period and a separate slope captures the decline in antibody levels. Correlation over time for observations on the same mother is included explicitly with each observation after the first, depending on the previous value via an autocorrelation term.

Pups are matched to their respective mothers. For pup j, define (Eq. 2):

log(Zijt)~N(ζijt,σ22);ζijt=Xpup(i)βpup(i)+γ(i)g(i,j,t)+ρ2log(Zij,t1) (2)

As with mothers, this auto-regressive Gaussian specification allows us to model individual mouse antibody levels over time by group, while accounting for key effects. The pup design matrices contain intercepts and a linear decay term. We further define (i,,t) to be zero, except on the first measurement for pups not sacrificed immediately post-parturition, where it is the matched maternal D54 antibody level in blood. This permits appropriate longitudinal characterization of antibody levels, while providing a clear test of post-parturition transfer by coupling the pup anti-OspA level in blood to matched mothers.

Vague prior distributions for all parameters were specified:

β.~iidN(0,10),σk2~iidgamma(1,1),ρk~iidbeta(1,1),andγk~iidN(0,1).

The model was implemented as a reproducible R-markdown document and is referenced in Supplementary Table S1. The analysis presents a novel approach to joint modeling of mechanistically-related longitudinal data sets and allows to fully use data from complex experiments and directly measure the effects of interest rather than relying on less powerful methods (e.g., doing separate comparisons at each time point, or for mother and pup groups). The model was fit using the rstan R package in R version 4.0.2 27,28.

Results

A total of 105 C3H-HeN pups were born to 16 mothers: 59 pups were born to mothers vaccinated with E. coli overexpressing OspA (EcA), and 46 pups were born to mothers that received E. coli control (Ec, Ctrl) with an average litter size of 5.9 for EcA and 5.75 for Ctrl. Insufficient blood was collected from 2 pups born to controls, and as such, those were not included in further analysis.

Kinetics of αOspA IgG in serum from orally vaccinated mothers over 7 months

We measured OspA-specific IgG in serum from orally vaccinated C3H-HeN mothers and controls by ELISA (Fig. 2). The prevalence of mice with protective levels of OspA antibody, defined by OD450 > 0.8, increased in EcA vaccinated mothers from 20% at 21 days after receiving the first vaccine dose by oral gavage, to 60% after the first boost (D35), to 90% after the second boost (D54). Five months after mothers received their first oral vaccine dose (~D133/154), prevalence of protective levels of antibody was 77.8%. Two months later, 7 months after the first dose ~D203/218, prevalence of protective anti-OspA antibody was 30%. As expected, controls that received E. coli placebo (Ec) did not develop OspA-specific IgG. Differences between EcA and Ec groups were statistically significant throughout the vaccination schedule (Fig. 2B). Of the 10 mothers that received the oral vaccine by gavage, Mothers 3, 4, 5, 6 and 9 developed the most robust IgG response to OspA on D54 (Fig 2C).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

OspA-specific antibodies in serum from orally vaccinated mothers over ~7 months post first vaccine dose. We measured anti-OspA IgG by ELISA in serum from 10 mothers orally vaccinated with E. coli expressing OspA (EcA, M1-M10) and 6 placebo controls (Ec, M11-M16). Mice were bled before (D0) and after immunization (D21, D35), before breeding (D54), after the pups were born at ~D140 (7-week old pups) and at ~D210 (17-week old pups). A, Protocol for vaccination, breeding and blood collection from mothers; B, Comparison of anti-OspA IgG (OD450>0.8) between EcA and Ec groups. Differences between EcA and Ec groups are statistically significant by unpaired t test with Welch’s correction, D21 p=0.0038, D35 p= 0.0260, D54 p=0.0003, D140 p=0.0147, D210 p=0.0488. C, Longitudinal log scale trajectory of antibody response over time, each line represents one mother, M5 was not bled on D140.

OspA-specific IgG was detected in serum from pups born to vaccinated mothers

We measured anti-OspA IgG in serum from offspring born to the vaccinated mothers from two cohorts of pups: one cohort was terminated on the day of birth to assess transplacental transfer of maternal antibodies and a second cohort of pups was bled over a period of 4 months, weekly from week 2–17 after birth, to access transfer of transmammary antibodies through colostrum and milk (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

OspA-specific antibodies in serum from offspring born to orally vaccinated mothers within 24h of birth and over 4 months post birth. A, Longitudinal log scale trajectory of anti-OspA IgG measured in serum from both cohorts of pups, by individual pup: Cohort A pups were analyzed on the day of birth, and Cohort B pups were analyzed 2 to 9 weeks after birth. B and C, Anti-OspA IgG in both cohorts of pups, grouped by mother. Statistics by Unpaired t test with Welch’s correction between EcA and Ec, * p<0.05, ** p<0.005, *** p<0.0005 and **** p<0.0001. EcA, oral vaccination with E. coli expressing OspA; Ec Ctrl, placebo control; M1-M10 EcA vaccinated mothers; w, weeks.

A longitudinal analysis of anti-OspA IgG between individual EcA and Ctrl mice taken at all time points showed a clear distinction between the two groups, except for the pups terminated on the day of birth (Fig 3A). In the cohort of pups terminated 0–24h after birth (Cohort A), overall differences in OspA-specific antibody were not significant between pups born to EcA and Ec Ctrl mothers. However, a breakdown of data by birth mother showed there was one litter of pups born to M9 that had anti-OspA antibodies in serum (Fig. 3B). In the second cohort of mice (Cohort B) we observed an increased anti-OspA IgG mean at 2 weeks post birth (OD450=1.649, 95% CI 0.677 to 1.832) that steadily decreased until 9 weeks post birth (OD450=0.382, 95% CI 0.019 to 0.366). Differences are significant from 2–9 weeks after birth: 2w p=0.0002, 3w p=0.0001, 4w p=0.0010, 5w p=0.0006, 6w p=0.0024, 7w p=0.0249, 8w p=0.0144 and 9w p=0.0309. When we analyzed the anti-OspA IgG by birth mother in Cohort B we observed significant differences in protective levels of anti-OspA IgG (OD450>0.8) between litters born to 4 out of 5 mothers (Fig. 3C). Pups born to M1, which never developed anti-OspA antibodies, did not have antibodies in serum. Of the pups born to M2, M3, M4 and M5, 93.3% had protective levels of anti-OspA antibody 2 weeks after birth and 64.7% had protective levels of anti-OspA antibody at weaning, 3 weeks after birth. Interestingly, pups from larger litters had less total antibody to OspA in serum, and pups with the highest levels of antibodies were born to the mothers of this cohort that produced the most robust response to OspA, M3, M4, M5 (Fig. 3C), which suggests a correlation between these two parameters.

Maternal and pup antibody levels are unambiguously connected

To assess evidence connecting anti-OspA maternal antibody levels and antibody transfer to offspring, we developed a Bayesian Hierarchical Model. We found clear evidence of a relationship between antibody in vaccinated mothers and their offspring. We estimate a greater than 99% probability that the effect of maternal vaccination on presence of anti-OspA antibodies in the pups was higher in the EcA group than Ec (Fig. 4). Due to unspecific antibody production to E. coli, both maternal groups show positive dose effects (probability ≥ 0.97), though temporal trends were very different between EcA and Ec groups. Additionally, EcA exhibited higher autocorrelation (probability 0.88). For pups, we see higher intercepts in the EcA group than the control group, as well as strong evidence of post-parturition transfer. EcA pups exhibited elevated baseline antibody levels relative to controls (probability ≈ 1), and a positive weaning effect (probabilities ≈ 1), capturing the relationship between pup antibody activity and D54 maternal anti-OspA levels. Crucially, Ec pups exhibited strong evidence (probability 0.99) of a small, negative weaning effect. Thus, despite presence of unspecific antibody activity in both groups, we observe unambiguous differences between vaccine-induced OspA-specific antibodies and unspecific antibodies in the control group. Autocorrelation was also higher (probability ≈ 1) in EcA pups than in control pups, and the drop in antibodies was slower (probability 0.89). Full results in Table 1.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Bayesian hierarchical model showing median anti-OspA antibody levels in EcA vaccinated and control mothers, and pups from each group. Each group median is given along with 95% posterior credible intervals (Cr-I). Differences in antibody curves between vaccinated and control mothers and their offspring are immediately apparent. Legend: EcA, oral vaccination with E. coli expressing OspA; Ec, oral vaccination with Ec placebo; Cr-I, Credible Intervals.

Table 1:

Parameter Estimates and Comparisons

Parameter Estimates
Parameter Cohort Mean (95% CrI) P(x>0) P(x<0)
EcA Intercept - baseline antibody activity Mothers −1.44 (−1.81, −1.05) 0 1
EcA Linear Dose Effect - change from baseline during dosing Mothers 2.38 (1.82, 2.93) 1 0
EcA Decay Term – decline/change in antibody levels after dosing stops Mothers −3.9 (−5.21, −2.58) 0 1
Control Intercept – baseline antibody activity Mothers −1.6 (−2.25, −0.96) 0 1
Control Linear Dose Effect – change from baseline during dosing Mothers 0.94 (−0.08, 1.96) 0.97 0.03
Control Decay Term – decline/change in antibody levels after dosing stops Mothers −2.48 (−4.88, −0.07) 0.02 0.98
EcA Autocorrelation – temporal dependence within mouse (persistence) Mothers 0.4 (0.2, 0.6) 0 1
Control Autocorrelation – temporal dependence within mouse (persistence) Mothers 0.2 (0.01, 0.5) 0.56 0.44
EcA Intercept – baseline antibody activity Pups −0.85 (−1.02, −0.67) 0 1
EcA Decay Term – decline/change over time Pups 0.03 (−0.4, 0.46) 0.06 0.94
Control Intercept – baseline antibody activity Pups −1.94 (−2.17, −1.7) 1 0
Control Decay Term – decline/change over time Pups −0.34 (−0.78, 0.09) 1 0
EcA Autocorrelation – temporal dependence within mouse (persistence) Pups 0.69 (0.61, 0.77) 1 0
Control Autocorrelation – temporal dependence within mouse (persistence) Pups 0.27 (0.19, 0.36) 1 0
EcA Pup Maternal Exposure Term – effect of D56 maternal antibodies on pup Mothers/Pups 1.39 (1.08, 1.71) 1 0
Control Pup Maternal Exposure Term – effect of D56 maternal antibodies on pup Mothers/Pups −0.01 (−0.02, 0) 0.01 0.99
EcA vs. Control (Ec) Comparisons
Comparison Cohort Mean (95% CrI) P(x>0) P(x<0)
Intercept – overall mean difference Mothers 0.16 (−0.59, 0.91) 0.67 0.33
Linear Dose Effect – difference during dosing Mothers 1.44 (0.26, 2.6) 0.99 0.01
Decay – rate of decline after dosing Mothers −1.42 (−4.16, 1.35) 0.15 0.85
Autocorrelation – difference in persistence Mothers 0.2 (−0.14, 0.48) 1 0
Intercept – overall mean difference Pups 1.09 (0.79, 1.39) 0.89 0.11
Decay – difference in rate of decline Pups 0.37 (−0.24, 0.98) 0.88 0.12
Autocorrelation – difference in persistence Pups 0.42 (0.3, 0.54) 1 0
Maternal Exposure Term – difference in dependence on maternal antibody levels Mothers/Pups 1.41 (1.09, 1.72) 1 0

Serum from vaccinated mothers and their pups neutralize B. burgdorferi in culture

The function of neutralizing antibody (nAb) was analyzed in serum from mothers before the females were bred on ~D54, and in the blood of their respective offspring (Fig. 5). nAb was measured over two time points. Due to insufficient sample to test all mothers independently, we pooled serum from the immune mothers used for the analysis of longterm kinetics of antibody to OspA (2–3 weeks and 9 weeks post-birth) and from the mothers used for analysis of antibody transfer at birth (0–24h). All the mothers included in this analysis (M2 to M10) had levels of OspA-specific antibodies OD450>0.8 before breeding on D54 (Fig. 2A). We did not include M1 because this mother did not develop antibodies to OspA. We were able to keep one mother from each group used to generate the two cohorts of mice (A and B) that maintained highest levels of antibody to OspA on ~D210 (M3 and M9), to test independently. We ran an immunoblot of a multi-strain culture used for the neutralization assay against an anti-OspA monoclonal antibody and show that OspA is expressed by B. burgdorferi (Bb) in culture (Supplementary Fig S1).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Anti-OspA neutralizing antibody (nAb) function against B. burgdorferi. Number of motile B. burgdorferi (Bb) after treatment of a multi-strain culture with A) pooled serum from mothers M6 M7 M8 M10, pooled serum from mothers M2 M4 M5 and individual serum samples from mothers M3 and M9; B, pooled serum from all pups born to M9 on the day of birth (Cohort A); C, pooled 2–3w serum from Cohort B pups born to M2 M3, M4 and M5 (pooled according to birth mother); and D, pooled serum from all pups born to M3 collected 9 weeks after birth (Cohort B). Live Bb were counted under a dark field microscope.

We found that serum from mothers M6-M10, that produced Cohort A pups used to evaluate transplacental transfer, had sufficient anti-OspA antibody to reduce the number of motile Bb in culture by about 1Log10 (Fig 5A); serum from the mothers that produced Cohort B pups, M2-M5 used to evaluate transmammary transfer of antibody, had sufficient anti-OspA IgG to reduce the number of motile Bb in culture by about 7Log10 (Fig 5A). Serum from M9 pups collected on the day of birth did not have enough anti-OspA antibody to neutralize motile Bb in culture (Fig 5B). Serum from 2–3 week old pups born to M2-M5 had enough anti-OspA IgG to neutralize motile Bb in culture by 1–2 Log10 (M2, M3 and M5) and by 7 Log10 (M4) (Fig 5C). Serum from pups born to M3 still had enough anti-OspA antibody to neutralize motile Bb in culture by 1 Log10 9 weeks after birth (Fig 5D).

Discussion

In this study we demonstrate that IgG antibodies from mothers immunized with E. coli overexpressing OspA were transferred to the respective offspring. Immunoglobulin G specific to OspA was passed mostly through ingestion of colostrum and milk during the lactation period shortly after birth. We were unable to conclude with all confidence that antibodies are not transferred via the placenta. We found a strong statistical correlation of antibody transfer between mothers that produced the most robust IgG response to OspA and their respective pups. Presence of protective levels of antibodies lasted until 4–5 weeks of age in the majority of pups but persisted in some mice until 9 weeks. We also show that serum obtained from vaccinated mothers and from the respective offspring neutralized motility of cultured B. burgdorferi containing several strains, demonstrating broad antibody function.

B. burgdorferi is maintained in the environment by tick-mediated infection of reservoir host species 29, mostly rodents, rather than through transovarial transmission between tick cohorts 30 and between mammalian hosts 31. As a logical follow up to our previous findings we hypothesized that maternal transfer of vaccine-induced OspA-specific IgG to offspring may help explain how the enzootic cycle of B. burgdorferi can be disrupted by oral bait immunization of field mice with OspA vaccines 32,17. We vaccinated C3H-HeN mothers using a standard intermittent 8-week immunization schedule for oral gavage of an E. coli culture overexpressing OspA and, due to COVID-19 social distancing restrictions, we extended the schedule of blood collection until day 203–218 post first vaccine dose. We found that the mean of anti-OspA IgG remained above OD450 ~0.8 for about ~ 5.5 months after the 1st boost at D35 (Fig 2B). In our previous studies 17,22 we determined that, unlike levels of LA-2 equivalent antibodies, an OspA ELISA 2<OD450>0.8–1 can be used to empirically establish the minimum levels of protective/neutralizing antibodies in serum from adult mice orally vaccinated with E. coli expressing OspA. We found that the number of mice with protective levels 22 of anti-OspA IgG remained above 60% for about ~3.5 months (between D35 until D154), and it remained above 30% for two additional months. This is important given that 30% oral vaccine antibody prevalence in immunized foxes resulted in disrupted transmission of Rabies virus 33. In addition, the potency of anti-OspA immunity differed considerably between the mothers (Fig 2C). This is also consistent with our previous findings using the same vaccine formulation and schedule 19.

Transfer of immune elements from mother to offspring via placenta and milk is a classical mechanism by which neonates are protected from infections, acknowledged for over 120 years 23,34,35. Recently it was found that maternal antibodies to Borrelia afzelii infection provided strain-specific protection against tick-transmitted B. afzelii in bank voles 36. When we tested for presence of anti-OspA antibodies in pups born to vaccinated mothers we found a clear difference in antibody levels at birth versus 2+ weeks after birth (Fig 3). Antibodies to OspA remained detectable in some pups from birth to about 2 months. In addition, the robustness of the maternal immune response to OspA correlated with the amount of antibody transferred to offspring. We observed a positive association between high levels of antibodies in the birth mother and the length of time these antibodies persisted in the offspring serum; for example, the mother with the highest level of anti-OspA antibodies produced offspring that had persistent antibodies 9 weeks after birth, indicating a more durable antibody response. Another interesting finding was that pups from larger litters had less total antibody to OspA in serum which strongly suggests a dilution effect between mother and offspring. In other words, the mother produces a fixed amount of antibody to OspA at the peak of her immune response and this is split between the number of offspring and the time of suckling. At birth, the pups born to 4/5 mothers did not have antibody to OspA. However, one mother (M9) produced pups that had antibodies to OspA on the day of birth. Since most of the pups were born overnight, M9 may have been the first mother to give birth and her pups may have begun nursing much sooner than the pups born to the other mothers. Although the data is suggestive of absence of transplacental transfer, we cannot reach an unequivocal conclusion, given that the mothers that produced the Cohort A pups also developed less overall antibody to OspA after vaccination. This difference may be explained by the longer time these mothers took to breed and produce offspring.

Through dual modelling of mothers and their corresponding pups we observed systematic differences in antibody profiles. In addition to the unambiguous detection of immunization effects in mothers and the presence of maternal transfer of antibodies to pups (Fig 4), maintenance of antibody activity was substantially different between vaccine and placebo groups. In addition, these comparisons remained clear in the presence of substantial effect heterogeneity from both mothers and pups, arising from factors such as the timing of birth of some litters, variability in maternal antibody levels and litter size variation. In addition to providing an efficient use of all the data available for these paired cohorts, this approach provides a template for how similar studies might make use of Bayesian hierarchical models. These techniques allow researchers to directly explore mechanisms under study and can be of use in a wide variety of problems where complex dependence among data sets is expected.

The protective mechanism of action of OspA based vaccines relies on the OspA antibody ability to neutralize motile spirochetes in the nymphal tick midgut, thus preventing migration to the tick salivary gland and subsequent transmission to the next mammalian host 6. We and others have developed transmission blocking vaccines based in OspA 19,32,37. Our reservoir targeted vaccine reduced prevalence of infected nymphal ticks by 76% after vaccination of the primary reservoir host species (P. leucopus) over 5 years 17. In the study reported here we show that 90% of vaccinated mothers produced neutralizing anti-OspA antibodies for 4–5 months after receiving the last vaccine dose. Transfer of these antibodies from mother to offspring happened mostly through consumption of colostrum and milk, and neutralizing antibodies persisted in some pups through two months of age (Fig. 5). We speculate that in a field setting where adult female mice are vaccinated in April and May, transfer of neutralizing anti-OspA antibodies from mother to offspring over a 4–5 month period through late Spring and Summer may lead to a population of reservoir offspring with significant levels of neutralizing anti-OspA antibodies in blood through July and August when the uninfected larva start to feed. This factor may impact the enzootic cycle of B. burgdorferi. This novel observation may explain how vaccinating field mice through the summer with baits containing OspA led to maintenance of sufficient neutralizing anti-OspA antibodies in the offspring to prevent new reservoir host infection into the larval feeding season and may have reduced acquisition of B. burgdorferi by the next nymphal tick cohort the following spring 17. Further experimentation is needed to sort out transplacental transfer of anti-OspA antibodies and provide unambiguous protection results in pups after tick challenge, which was not possible to do in 2020 for this study.

Supplementary Material

1
NIHMS1718409-supplement-1.docx (1,011.2KB, docx)
2

Highlights.

  1. Female mice vaccinated orally with E. coli expressing OspA transferred OspA-specific IgG to pups

  2. Antibody was transferred via mother’s milk and colostrum

  3. Serum from pups born to immunized mothers neutralized B. burgdorferi spirochetes in vitro

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Public Health Service awards AI139267 (to MGS and CAP) and AI155211 (to MGS) from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) of the United States of America. The content of this manuscript is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of NIAID or NIH. Kamalika Samanta is supported in part by the Doctoral Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences at UTHSC.

Conflict of interest statement

The following authors declare potential conflicts of interest: MGS (grants from federal agencies, employment, patents and consultant), CAP (grants from federal agencies, employment, and consultant). All other authors declare no conflicts.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Public Health Service awards AI139267 (to MGS and CAP) and AI155211 (to MGS) from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) of the United States of America. The content of this manuscript is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of NIAID or NIH.

Footnotes

Declaration of interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Literature

  • 1.Barbour AG, Tessier SL, Todd WJ. Lyme disease spirochetes and ixodid tick spirochetes share a common surface antigenic determinant defined by a monoclonal antibody. Infect Immun 1983; 41(2): 795–804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schaible UE, Kramer MD, Eichmann K, Modolell M, Museteanu C, Simon MM. Monoclonal antibodies specific for the outer surface protein A (OspA) of Borrelia burgdorferi prevent Lyme borreliosis in severe combined immunodeficiency (scid) mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990; 87(10): 3768–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schaible UE, Kramer MD, Wallich R, Tran T, Simon MM. Experimental Borrelia burgdorferi infection in inbred mouse strains: antibody response and association of H-2 genes with resistance and susceptibility to development of arthritis. Eur J Immunol 1991; 21(10): 2397–405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fikrig E, Barthold SW, Kantor FS, Flavell RA. Protection of mice against the Lyme disease agent by immunizing with recombinant OspA. Science 1990; 250(4980): 553–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fikrig E, Telford SR 3rd, Barthold SW, Kantor FS, Spielman A, Flavell RA. Elimination of Borrelia burgdorferi from vector ticks feeding on OspA-immunized mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992; 89(12): 5418–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.de Silva AM, Telford SR 3rd, Brunet LR, Barthold SW, Fikrig E. Borrelia burgdorferi OspA is an arthropod-specific transmission-blocking Lyme disease vaccine. J Exp Med 1996; 183(1): 271–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.de Silva AM ZN, Zhang Y, Dolan MC, Piesman J, Fikrig E. Influence of outer surface protein A antibody on Borrelia burgdorferi within feeding ticks. Infect Immun 1999; 67(1): 30–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tsao J, Barbour AG, Luke CJ, Fikrig E, Fish D. OspA immunization decreases transmission of Borrelia burgdorferi spirochetes from infected Peromyscus leucopus mice to larval Ixodes scapularis ticks. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2001; 1(1): 65–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Steere AC, Sikand VK, Meurice F, et al. Vaccination against Lyme disease with recombinant Borrelia burgdorferi outer-surface lipoprotein A with adjuvant. Lyme Disease Vaccine Study Group. N Engl J Med 1998; 339(4): 209–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Eschner AK, Mugnai K. Immunization with a recombinant subunit OspA vaccine markedly impacts the rate of newly acquired Borrelia burgdorferi infections in client-owned dogs living in a coastal community in Maine, USA. Parasit Vectors 2015; 8: 92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ginsberg HS. Transmission risk of Lyme disease and implications for tick management. Am J Epidemiol 1993; 138(1): 65–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mather TN, Nicholson MC, Donnelly EF, Matyas BT. Entomologic index for human risk of Lyme disease. Am J Epidemiol 1996; 144(11): 1066–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Stafford KC 3rd, Cartter ML, Magnarelli LA, Ertel SH, Mshar PA. Temporal correlations between tick abundance and prevalence of ticks infected with Borrelia burgdorferi and increasing incidence of Lyme disease. J Clin Microbiol 1998; 36(5): 1240–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Falco RC, McKenna DF, Daniels TJ, et al. Temporal relation between Ixodes scapularis abundance and risk for Lyme disease associated with erythema migrans. Am J Epidemiol 1999; 149(8): 771–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wallis RC, Brown SE, Kloter KO, Main AJ Jr. Erythema chronicum migrans and lyme arthritis: field study of ticks. Am J Epidemiol 1978; 108(4): 322–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Piesman J, Clark KL, Dolan MC, Happ CM, Burkot TR. Geographic survey of vector ticks (Ixodes scapularis and Ixodes pacificus) for infection with the Lyme disease spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi. J Vector Ecol 1999; 24(1): 91–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Richer LM, Brisson D, Melo R, Ostfeld RS, Zeidner N, Gomes-Solecki M. Reservoir targeted vaccine against Borrelia burgdorferi: a new strategy to prevent Lyme disease transmission. J Infect Dis 2014; 209(12): 1972–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gomes-Solecki M, Richer L. Recombinant E. coli Dualistic Role as an Antigen-adjuvant Delivery Vehicle for Oral Immunization. Methods Mol Biol 2018; 1690: 347–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gomes-Solecki MJ, Brisson DR, Dattwyler RJ. Oral vaccine that breaks the transmission cycle of the Lyme disease spirochete can be delivered via bait. Vaccine 2006; 24(20): 4440–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Brisson D, DE D, R O. Conspicuous impacts of inconspicuous hosts on the Lyme disease epidemic. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Brisson D, Dykhuizen DE. ospC diversity in Borrelia burgdorferi: different hosts are different niches. Genetics 2004; 168(2): 713–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Meirelles Richer L, Aroso M, Contente-Cuomo T, Ivanova L, Gomes-Solecki M. Reservoir targeted vaccine for lyme borreliosis induces a yearlong, neutralizing antibody response to OspA in white-footed mice. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2011; 18(11): 1809–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ehrlich P Ueber Immunitat Durch Vererbund and Saugung. Z Hyg u Infecktionskrankh 1892; 12: 183. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Morshed MG, Yokota M, Nakazawa T, Konishi H. Transfer of antibody against Borrelia duttonii from mother to young in ddY mice. Infect Immun 1993; 61(10): 4147–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Melo R, Richer L, Johnson DL, Gomes-Solecki M. Oral Immunization with OspC Does Not Prevent Tick-Borne Borrelia burgdorferi Infection. PLoS One 2016; 11(3): e0151850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nair N, Gomes-Solecki M. A Mouse Model of Sublethal Leptospirosis: Protocols for Infection with Leptospira Through Natural Transmission Routes, for Monitoring Clinical and Molecular Scores of Disease, and for Evaluation of the Host Immune Response. Curr Protoc Microbiol 2020; 59(1): e127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Team. RC. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria: 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Team SD. RStan: the R interface to Stan. R package version 2.19.3. 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Donahue JG, Piesman J, Spielman A. Reservoir competence of white-footed mice for Lyme disease spirochetes. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1987; 36(1): 92–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Magnarelli LA, Anderson JF, Fish D. Transovarial transmission of Borrelia burgdorferi in Ixodes dammini (Acari:Ixodidae). J Infect Dis 1987; 156(1): 234–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Woodrum JE, Oliver JH Jr. Investigation of venereal, transplacental, and contact transmission of the Lyme disease spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi, in Syrian hamsters. J Parasitol 1999; 85(3): 426–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tsao JI, Wootton JT, Bunikis J, Luna MG, Fish D, Barbour AG. An ecological approach to preventing human infection: vaccinating wild mouse reservoirs intervenes in the Lyme disease cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101(52): 18159–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Maki J, Guiot AL, Aubert M, et al. Oral vaccination of wildlife using a vaccinia-rabiesglycoprotein recombinant virus vaccine (RABORAL V-RG((R))): a global review. Vet Res 2017; 48(1): 57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Smith MG MR. Placental transmission of immunity to St Louis encephalitis virus inoculated intraperitoneally in mice. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 1943; 52(2): 83–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Melnick JL, Clarke NA, Kraft LM. Immunological reactions of the Coxsackie viruses. III. Cross-protection tests in infant mice born of vaccinated mothers; transfer of immunity through the milk. J Exp Med 1950; 92(5): 499–505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gomez-Chamorro A, Heinrich V, Sarr A, et al. Maternal Antibodies Provide Bank Voles with Strain-Specific Protection against Infection by the Lyme Disease Pathogen. Appl Environ Microbiol 2019; 85(23). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Scheckelhoff MR, Telford SR, Hu LT. Protective efficacy of an oral vaccine to reduce carriage of Borrelia burgdorferi (strain N40) in mouse and tick reservoirs. Vaccine 2006; 24(11): 1949–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1
NIHMS1718409-supplement-1.docx (1,011.2KB, docx)
2

RESOURCES