Skip to main content
G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics logoLink to G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics
. 2021 May 11;11(7):jkab164. doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab164

Tissue-specific regulation of epidermal contraction during Caenorhabditis elegans embryonic morphogenesis

Elizabeth D Drewnik 1, Tobias Wiesenfahrt 1, Ryan B Smit 1, Ye-Jean Park 1, Linda M Pallotto 1, Paul E Mains 1,
Editor: D Fay
PMCID: PMC8495928  PMID: 33974063

Abstract

Actin and myosin mediate the epidermal cell contractions that elongate the Caenorhabditis elegans embryo from an ovoid to a tubular-shaped worm. Contraction occurs mainly in the lateral epidermal cells, while the dorsoventral epidermis plays a more passive role. Two parallel pathways trigger actinomyosin contraction, one mediated by LET-502/Rho kinase and the other by PAK-1/p21 activated kinase. A number of genes mediating morphogenesis have been shown to be sufficient when expressed either laterally or dorsoventrally. Additional genes show either lateral or dorsoventral phenotypes. This led us to a model where contractile genes have discrete functions in one or the other cell type. We tested this by examining several genes for either lateral or dorsoventral sufficiency. LET-502 expression in the lateral cells was sufficient to drive elongation. MEL-11/Myosin phosphatase, which antagonizes contraction, and PAK-1 were expected to function dorsoventrally, but we could not detect tissue-specific sufficiency. Double mutants of lethal alleles predicted to decrease lateral contraction with those thought to increase dorsoventral force were previously shown to be viable. We hypothesized that these mutant combinations shifted the contractile force from the lateral to the dorsoventral cells and so the embryos would elongate with less lateral cell contraction. This was tested by examining 10 single and double mutant strains. In most cases, elongation proceeded without a noticeable alteration in lateral contraction. We suggest that many embryonic elongation genes likely act in both lateral and dorsoventral cells, even though they may have their primary focus in one or the other cell type.

Keywords: C. elegans, morphogenesis, actin, embryo, epidermis, Rho kinase, myosin phosphatase, p21 activated kinase

Introduction

Cell-shape changes are key features of biological events ranging from development to disease (Cooper 2000; Munjal and Lecuit 2014). Embryonic development relies on morphogenesis to determine organ and overall body shape. Groups of cells exhibit cytoskeletal rearrangements, often carried out by actin-myosin contractions, resulting in cell-shape changes that drive morphogenesis. A convenient model for studying morphogenesis is the Caenorhabditis elegans embryo, which transforms from an ovoid embryo into a long, thin vermiform larva by actin-myosin contractions within the epidermal cells (the nematode hypodermis) (Priess and Hirsh 1986; Chisholm and Hardin 2005; Vuong-Brender et al. 2016; Carvalho and Broday 2020).

Prior to the start of elongation, C. elegans epidermal cells arise on the dorsal side of the embryo and migrate toward the ventral midline (Williams-Masson et al. 1997). After encasing the embryo, the epidermis is composed of two rows of dorsal cells straddling the midline, with a row of lateral (seam) and ventral cells on each side of the embryo. The dorsal cells intercalate to form one single row across the midline, slightly lengthening the top side of embryo to result in the “bean” stage (Sulston et al. 1983; Williams-Masson et al. 1997). Elongation past this point occurs in two steps. Early elongation from the bean to the twofold stage is driven by nonmuscle actin-myosin contractions of epidermal cells (Figure 1A, “fold” refers to the length of the embryo curled up in the eggshell relative to the length of the long axis of the eggshell). Late elongation continues from the two to the fourfold stage and depends on body wall muscle contraction (Williams and Waterston 1994; Chisholm and Hardin 2005; Vuong-Brender et al. 2017; Lardennois et al. 2019).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Summary of early elongation in the C. elegans embryo. (A) Embryos at the 1.1-fold (left) and twofold (right) stages are shown with selected lateral membranes outlined. Anterior is to the left and dorsal to the top. Contraction of the lateral cells in the dorsoventral axis results in the shortening of the membranes highlighted in red with a lengthening of those marked in green. These cell shape changes drive embryo elongation. (B) Elongation pathway. Those genes for which lateral (green) or dorsoventral (blue) expression has been demonstrated to be sufficient are as indicated. Those that we tested have question marks. (C) Model of elongation proposing that genes are primarily active in either lateral (green) or dorsoventral (blue) epidermal cells. let-502, rhgf-2, and fhod-1 (column 3) are proposed to provide lateral force and so mutants could have less lateral cell shortening at any given stage of elongation. Weaker dorsoventral force in pak-1, pix-1, or fem-2 mutants (column 4) lead to relatively more lateral cell contraction. Stronger dorsoventral force resulting from loss of mel-11 or rga-2 (column 5) would result in less lateral shortening. Pairwise double mutants of let-502 or rhgf-2 with mel-11 or rga-2 (column 6) may have contractile dorsoventral cells and passive lateral cells. These may elongate with less lateral contraction at any given stage of embryo lengthening. A more detailed explanation is included in Supplementary Figure S1.

We focus on early elongation, up to the twofold stage. The core players include LET-502/Rho kinase and MEL-11/myosin phosphatase (Figure 1B) (Wissmann et al. 1997, 1999; Shelton et al. 1999; Piekny et al. 2003; Diogon et al. 2007; Gally et al. 2009). Rho kinase (also referred to as Rho-binding kinase, ROCK, or ROK) is activated by the small GTPase Rho (Sit and Manser 2011; Julian and Olson 2014; Truebestein et al. 2016). Among Rho kinase substrates are myosin light chain (MLC-4 in worms), whose phosphorylation leads to the activation of nonmuscle myosin. mel-11 encodes the regulatory MYPT subunit of myosin phosphatase, and opposes LET-502/Rho kinase activity by the dephosphorylation of myosin light chain. In addition, MEL-11 is inhibited by LET-502, adding a second layer of regulation to activate contraction. Consequently, let-502/Rho kinase mutants exhibit hypocontraction and arrest during early elongation, while mel-11/myosin phosphatase mutants undergo unregulated hypercontraction and often burst (Wissmann et al. 1997, 1999; Diogon et al. 2007; Gally et al. 2009).

let-502; mel-11 double mutants grow to adulthood, albeit with a mild dumpy and lumpy phenotype and sterility (Wissmann et al. 1997, 1999). Lethality in single mutants results when the system is out of balance. However, the viability of the double indicates that there is a parallel pathway that can mediate elongation when both let-502 and mel-11 are absent. Indeed, PAK-1/p21-activated kinase and its activators, FEM-2/PP2c protein phosphatase and PIX-1/Rac GEF regulate contraction in parallel to the LET-502/MEL-11 pathway (Figure 1B) (Piekny et al. 2000; Gally et al. 2009; Vanneste et al. 2013; Martin et al. 2014, 2016). LET-502/MEL-11 is likely the primary pathway as their individual null mutants show fully penetrant lethal elongation phenotypes. In contrast, pak-1, fem-2, and pix-1 are viable with each showing weak elongation phenotypes, unless they are in combination with let-502 to inactivate both pathways (Piekny et al. 2000; Gally et al. 2009; Vanneste et al. 2013; Martin et al. 2014, 2016).

Contraction driving embryonic elongation is primarily localized to the lateral subset of epidermal seam cells (Figure 1A). Dorsoventral cells are more passive but generate tension and so remain rigid as the lateral cells pull on them, transmitting the force around the embryo (Priess and Hirsh 1986; Chisholm and Hardin 2005; Martin et al. 2016; Vuong-Brender et al. 2017; Gillard et al. 2019). The contractile apparatus in lateral vs dorsoventral cells differs in several respects, contributing to their different behaviors (Figure 1B). Lateral epidermal cells exhibit a meshwork of actin, which is typical of animal cells that undergo shape change (Roh-Johnson et al. 2012; Munjal et al. 2015) while dorsoventral cells show circumferential actin bundles that stiffen the cells (Priess and Hirsh 1986; Gally et al. 2009; Vuong-Brender et al. 2017). FHOD-1, a member of the formin class of actin nucleators (Mi-Mi et al. 2012), rescues mutants when expressed laterally and so may contribute to the lateral vs dorsoventral differences in actin deployment (Vanneste et al. 2013; Refai et al. 2018). Nonuniform RHO-1 activity across the epidermal cells also appears to contribute to differences between lateral and dorsoventral contraction. The Rho activator RHGF-2/Rho guanine exchange factor (GEF) and the Rho inhibitor RGA-2/GTPase activating protein (GAP) are expressed throughout the epidermis; however, lateral RHGF-2 expression is sufficient for rhgf-2 viability and dorsoventral RGA-2 expression can rescue rga-2 mutants (Diogon et al. 2007; Lin et al. 2012; Chan et al. 2015). Several other genes appear to have their focus in either one or the other tissue. Mutants of LET-502/Rho kinase show phenotypes in the lateral cells (Martin et al. 2016) while lateral activity of its substrate MLC-4 is sufficient for elongation (Shelton et al. 1999; Gally et al. 2009). In addition, let-502 transcriptional reporters show higher lateral than dorsoventral expression (Wissmann et al. 1999). Mutant mel-11 dorsoventral cells show excess pulling forces, indicating the wild-type gene is active in those cells (Diogon et al. 2007) and mel-11 transcriptional reporters are higher dorsoventrally. pak-1 and its activator pix-1 have phenotypes primarily in the anterior dorsal cells (Martin et al. 2014, 2016). Another PAK-1 activator, FEM-2, is sufficient in dorsoventral epidermal cells (Refai et al. 2018).

An important observation is that all four pair wise double mutants that lose an activator of contraction that is thought to act in lateral cells (let-502 and rhgf-2) and an inhibitor that is expected to function dorsoventrally (mel-11 and rga-2) are viable even though the individual mutations are lethal (Wissmann et al. 1997; Diogon et al. 2007; Chan et al. 2015). Decreased lateral contraction in these strains could be compensated by a simultaneous increase in dorsoventral force. This leads to a hypothesis that, in the double mutants, the major contractile force shifts from in lateral to dorsoventral cells to result in near-normal elongation. Dorsoventral contraction could be triggered by either PAK-1 and/or Rho independent LET-502 activity (Truebestein et al. 2015).

Evidence of tissue-specific requirements for let-502, mel-11, and pak-1 are currently indirect, based on phenotypes and expression patterns as outlined above. In this study, we test the model of discrete gene requirements in lateral vs dorsoventral epidermal cells by using tissue-specific rescue of let-502 (expected to function laterally), and mel-11 and pak-1 (predicted to act dorsoventrally). We found sufficiency of lateral let-502 but did not detect mel-11 or pak-1 dorsoventral rescue of their mutants. As a complementary assessment of tissue-specific gene function, we surveyed 10 single and double mutations to see if elongation can occur without the usual lateral cell contraction in cases where force is predicted to shift dorsoventrally. We found few cases of this. We conclude that the system is robust to mutation and many elongation genes likely function in both lateral and dorsoventral cells rather than being restricted to one or the other population.

Materials and methods

Strains and alleles

Wild-type C. elegans (N2, var. Bristol) were maintained on OP50 Escherichia coli on Nematode Growth Media (NGM) (Brenner 1974). Stocks were maintained at 15°, while temperature-sensitive (ts) mutant phenotypes were observed after upshifting L4 animals overnight to the nonpermissive temperatures. A list of mutant alleles and transgenic strains can be found in Supplementary Table S1. Information on genes, alleles, and promoters involved in this project can be found at Wormbase.org.

Genomic DNA, RNA, and cDNA isolation

cDNA was used for tissue-specific expression of let-502, pak-1, and mel-11 to ensure that intronic regulatory regions would not interfere with functional expression in lateral or dorsoventral tissue, and to reduce the size of expression constructs. let-502 cDNA was isolated from a total wild-type RNA pool. pak-1 and mel-11 cDNA-containing plasmids were supplied by Dr. Y. KOHARA (National Institute of Genetics, Japan) and isolated using standard PCR. A list of primers used to isolate let-502, pak-1, and mel-11 cDNA can be found in Supplementary Table S2. Primers were designed using Primer3 and Oligocalc interfaces.

Genomic DNA was isolated from wild-type worms using lysis with Protease K (He 2011a). Total RNA was isolated using a Trizol-based protocol (He 2011b) and genomic DNA contamination was reduced with DNAse I (New England BioLabs). pak-1 and mel-11 cDNAs were isolated using a High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit with random hexamer primers (Thermo Fisher Scientific). let-502 cDNA was generated with primers oED1, oED2, oED36, and oED37 (Supplementary Table S2). let-502 could not be isolated as one product, so fragments were isolated and stitched together (oED1 and oED2) using PCR.

Tissue-specific rescue constructs

Tissue-specific rescue constructs were used to determine sufficiency of expression in lateral (pceh-16 promoter) (Cassata et al. 2005) or dorsoventral (pelt-3 promoter) (Gilleard et al. 1999) epidermal tissue. The cDNA of let-502 (3.5 kb, coding sequence C10H11.9.1), pak-1 (1.7 kb, coding sequence, C09B8.7a.1), and mel-11 (3 kb, coding sequence C06C3.1a.1) were cloned into pBluescript II KS(+) (2.9 kb). Primers used are listed in Supplementary Table S2 and restriction enzymes used in cloning are found in Supplementary Table S3. Endogenous promoters (plet-502 [5 kb upstream of the first ATG], ppak-1 [5.3 kb], and pmel-11 [4 kb]) and cell-specific rescue promoters (pceh-16 [2.9 kb] and pelt-3 [1.9 kb]) were cloned upstream of the cDNAs. gfp (1 kb) and unc-54 3’ UTR (305 bp) were cloned downstream of the cDNAs. Constructs were confirmed with restriction enzyme digestion and by DNA sequencing (University of Calgary DNA Services) to confirm that the genes were in frame.

Plasmids were injected at 5 ng/µl. For let-502 constructs, pRF4 [rol-6(su1006), 50 ng/µl] (Mello et al. 1991) and pJM67 (elt-2::gfp, 10 ng/µl) (Fukushige et al. 1999) served as transformation markers. For the pak-1 constructs, 20 ng/µl with pCFJ90 (myo-2::mCherry, 2.5 ng/µl) or pTG96 (sur-5::gfp, 50 ng/µl) were used as transformation markers (Gu et al. 1998). For mel-11, 10 ng/µl with pRF4 [rol-6(su1006), 50 ng/µl] and pJM67 (elt-2::gfp, 10 ng/µl) or only pRF4 [rol-6(su1006), 50 ng/µl] served as transformation markers. pBluescript II KS(+) was added to each injection mixture to make a final DNA concentration of 100 ng/µl. Plasmid mixtures were injected into let-502(ts) (HR1157) for let-502 constructs or pak-1; let-502(ts) (HR1500) for pak-1 constructs and both were then maintained at the permissive temperature. The balanced strain mel-11(ts) unc-4/mnC1 (HR604) was used for injecting mel-11 constructs. Stable transgenic lines are listed in Supplementary Table S4. The GFP tags inserted 3’ to the cDNAs were not visible in the epidermis of our transformants, even for those that rescued. The previously documented CAN neuron expression for pak-1 using its native promoter (Iino and Yamamoto 1998) was seen. The expected junction between the pak-1 cDNA and the gfp inserted 3’ to it was confirmed by PCR to demonstrate incorporation of constructs into extragenic arrays in nonrescuing pak-1 strains.

Light, Nomarski, and fluorescence microscopy

Rescue of let-502 and pak-1 transgenic constructs was scored by measuring body length. Animals were upshifted to 24° or 25° as L4 larvae, and embryos were laid by adults the next day over a 2 hour period to produce semi-synchronized cohorts. Embryos were incubated for 24 or 48 hours before being photographed with a Canon G700 Camera mounted to a Zeiss Stemi SV 11 fluorescence dissecting microscope. Nomarski microscopy was used to image pak-1; let-502 transgenic lines at higher magnification (40X) to score rescue to the twofold stage. Embryos were collected after 2 hours of laying and photographed 12 hours later. Larval lengths were measured with ImageJ, and data assessed with Mann-Whitney Rank Sum statistical tests from Prism software rather than t-tests due to nonnormality of distributions. mel-11 rescue animals were scored via hatching rates.

Measurements of lateral cell width were made by collecting embryos from NGM plates or by cutting gravid adults in a drop of dH2O. Embryos were mounted on a Polylysine-coated slide and freeze-cracked followed by fixation in MeOH and Acetone, and staining with antibody to the membrane junctional marker MH27/AJM-1 antibody (Francis and Waterston 1991). Embryos were imaged at 40X using a Zeiss Axioplan 2i equipped with a Hamamatsu Orca ER camera in a single plane. Measurements of cell membrane and embryo lengths were made using ImageJ. Slopes of lines fitted by linear regression of lateral cell membrane length vs fold elongation were compared using two-tailed testing with Prism software.

Data availability

Strains and plasmids are available upon request. The authors affirm that all data necessary for confirming the conclusions of this article are represented fully within the article and its Tables and Figures. Supplementary material is available at figshare: https://doi.org/10.25387/g3.14537895.

Results

LET-502/Rho kinase sufficiency in lateral vs dorsoventral epidermal cells

Actin microfilaments in lateral epidermal cells contribute the major contractile force for elongation, while the dorsoventral cells create tension against which this force pulls (Priess and Hirsh 1986; Diogon et al. 2007; Vuong-Brender et al. 2016). Asymmetric activity of let-502, pak-1, and mel-11 may contribute to the asymmetric contractile properties of the two cell populations. To explore this idea, cell-specific promoters for lateral (pceh-16, Cassata et al. 2005) and dorsoventral (ppelt-3, Gilleard et al. 1999) epidermal cells were utilized to limit expression of let-502, pak-1, and mel-11 to the desired cells. These promoters have been utilized extensively to demonstrate lateral function of rhgf-2, mlc-4, and fhod-1, dorsoventral sufficiency for fem-2 and rga-2 and to show that hmp-1 can act in either tissue (Diogon et al. 2007; Gally et al. 2009; Chan et al. 2015; Refai et al. 2018; Vuong-Brender et al. 2018).

A caveat of this approach is that the multicopy transgenic arrays, we use often show only zygotic expression and are also subject to somatic mosaicism. Although let-502 and mel-11 are expressed both maternally and zygotically, zygotic expression is sufficient for normal elongation (Wissmann et al. 1997, 1999; Piekny et al. 2000). These types of experiments show where a gene is sufficient for rescue, but this could differ from where a gene acts under normal conditions.

Previous evidence suggests that let-502/Rho kinase is likely required laterally (see Section Introduction). Transgenic worms with either the lateral or dorsoventral promoters driving the let-502 cDNA were generated in the temperature-sensitive let-502(sb118) background [hereafter referred to as let-502(ts), Supplementary Table S4]. At 25°, let-502(ts) embryos hatch with early elongation phenotypes that show incomplete penetrance and expressivity (Vanneste et al. 2013). L4 hermaphrodites from the transgenic lines were plated overnight at 25°, allowed to lay embryos for 2 hours to produce a semi-synchronous brood, and embryos were incubated for another 24 hours after which larval body lengths were measured.

Transgenic worms using let-502 cDNA driven by the lateral pceh-16 promoter showed rescue in all five independent lines (sbEx206, sbEx207, sbEx208, sbEx209, and sbEx210) that were all significantly different from the let-502(ts) parent (P ≤ 0.0001 for all lines, Figure 2). All animals that did show rescue expressed the Roller phenotype that was used as a co-transformation marker. Conversely, transgenic worms expressing let-502 under the control of dorsoventral pelt-3 (sbEx212 and sbEx213) showed no rescue. Although statistically different from the control, these lines were slightly shorter, rather than longer, than nontransgenic let-502(ts). Thus, only pceh-16 driven lateral let-502 appeared sufficient for elongation.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Rescue of body length when let-502 was expressed in lateral but not dorsoventral epidermal cells. let-502 cDNA expressing constructs were driven in lateral (pceh-16) or dorsoventral (pelt-3) epidermal cells in let-502(ts) mutant animals at 25°. Larvae were measured 24 hours after egg-laying. Expression of let-502 in lateral epidermal cells rescued embryonic growth in all five lines. Expression in two dorsoventral epidermal cells were actually shorter than nontransgenic controls. Statistical significance relative to the nontransgenic let-502(ts) control was assessed with the Mann-Whitney Rank Sum test. Mean standard error bars are shown. ***, P < 0.0001; **, P = 0.002. Significance denoted by blue asterisks indicate that larvae were shorter, rather than longer, than control.

MEL-11/myosin phosphatase sufficiency in lateral vs dorsoventral epidermal cells

mel-11 acts antagonistically with let-502, reducing actin contractility (Wissmann et al. 1997, 1999; Piekny et al. 2000) and we predict mel-11 expression would be sufficient if expressed dorsoventrally. Extragenic transgenes were generated for mel-11 cDNA driven by either the endogenous, pceh-16 or pelt-3 promoters and were examined for rescue of the ts allele mel-11(it26) [hereafter referred to as mel-11(ts), Supplementary Table S4]. This mutation produces 100% unhatched embryos at 25° (Kemphues et al. 1988; Wissmann et al. 1997). Three independent mel-11 cDNA lines driven by the endogenous pmel-11 promoter (sbEx254, sbEx255, and sbEx256) rescued the 25° lethal phenotype with 63%, 31%, and 37% hatching, respectively (P < 0.0005, Figure 3A). This compared to 0/1311 hatched embryos for the nontransgenic control strain. Of the two pceh-16 laterally driven transgenic lines, one showed 0.7% hatching (sbEx258) and the other showed none (sbEx257). Similarly, of the two pelt-3 dorsoventral driven transgenic lines, one showed 1.6% hatching (sbEx259) and the other (sbEx260) exhibited 0%.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

mel-11 driven by its endogenous promoter rescues hatching while lateral or dorsoventral promoters do not. mel-11 cDNA constructs were driven with the endogenous (pmel-11), lateral (pceh-16) or dorsoventral (pelt-3) promoters in mel-11(ts) animals. (A–D) Hatching was assessed at the indicated temperatures to compromise mel-11(ts) to different extents in an effort to detect weak rescue. While all three lines with the endogenous promoter rescued at all temperatures, hatching rates only increased sporadically above the control with lateral or dorsoventral transgenic lines. Significance vs the nontransgenic mel-11 control was determined by chi-square with 1 degrees of freedom. ***, P < 0.0005; *,P = 0.03; ns, P > 0.05. Significance was not calculated in cases where hatch rates, like the control, were 0%. Significance denoted by blue asterisks indicate hatch rates that were lower, rather than higher, than the control. N values are shown for each experiment. While N = 42 for the mel-11 control run in parallel at 25°, other experiments showed 0/1311 hatching embryos for this strain.

Experiments were repeated at lower temperatures (24°, 20°, and 15°) in an effort to detect weaker effects, but once again, clear rescue was only observed for transgenic lines using the endogenous pmel-11 promoter (Figure 3, B–D). Cases of statistical significance were for lower, rather than higher, hatching rates compared to controls. Our results may indicate that mel-11 is only sufficient if expressed in both tissues or that the pceh-16 and pelt-3 promoters do not provide appropriate temporal or spatial control.

PAK-1/p21-activated kinase sufficiency in lateral vs dorsoventral epidermal cells

In addition to the main contraction/elongation pathway involving let-502 and mel-11, the pak-1 pathway acts in parallel (Diogon et al. 2007; Martin et al. 2014, 2016). However, pak-1(ok448), a likely null allele (Lucanic and Cheng 2008), has modest elongation defects (Gally et al. 2009; Martin et al. 2014), which would make detection of rescue difficult. pak-1 is enhanced by let-502(ts) (Gally et al. 2009), and so we used a background sensitized with let-502(ts). We previously used let-502(ts) to sensitize the genetic background of fhod-1, which like pak-1 has impenetrant elongation defects, and we were able to demonstrate a lateral requirement for fhod-1 (Refai et al. 2018). pak-1 rescue was assessed at 24˚C, which is semi-permissive for let-502(ts) but results in a penetrant arrest phenotype in the double with pak-1 (Figure 4A). Because pak-1; let-502(ts) larvae are slow growing, embryos were measured 48 hours after egg laying rather than the 24 hours used in Figure 2 for let-502(ts). Transgenic animals were distinguished based on myo-2::mCherry, myo-2::gfp or sur-5::gfp co-injection markers (Supplementary Table S4) and compared to their nontransgenic sibs. Rescue was observed for pak-1 cDNA driven by its endogenous promoter (ppak-1) across all five independent lines (sbEx211, sbEx228, sbEx231, sbEx232, and sbEx233, P < 0.0001, Figure 4A).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

pak-1 driven by its endogenous promoter rescued elongation but lateral and dorsoventral promoters did not. pak-1 cDNA expressing constructs were driven with the endogenous (ppak-1) or tissue-specific promoters (pceh-16, lateral or pelt-3, dorsoventral) in the sensitized pak-1; let-502(ts) mutant animals at 24˚C. Larvae were measured 48 hours after egg-laying. Transgenic animals were distinguished based on myo-2::mCherry, myo-2::gfp or sur-5::gfp co-injection markers (Supplementary Table S4) and compared to their nontransgenic sibs. (A) ppak-1 rescued early arrest of pak-1; let-502(ts) in five lines compared to their nontransgenic siblings. pak-1 constructs driven in lateral (pceh-16, four lines) dorsoventral (pelt-3, three lines) did not rescue arrest. sbEx252 was statistically significant, but transgenic animals were shorter. (B) As pak-1 is required for late, muscle-driven elongation past the twofold stage, the same lines were observed at higher power (40x) to detect small differences in length to see if transgenes could rescue to the twofold stage. No rescue was observed with the lateral (pceh-16, four lines) or dorsoventral (pelt-3, three lines). sbEx252 was statistically significant, but transgenic animals were shorter rather than longer. (C) pak-1(+) is required for the elongation that occurs in the rhgf-2; rga-2 double mutant at 25°. Statistical significance was assessed with the Mann-Whitney Rank Sum test. Mean standard error bars are shown. ***, P < 0.0001; **, P = 0.002. Significance denoted by blue asterisks indicate that larvae were shorter, rather than longer than control.

We did not observe tissue-specific rescue for pak-1. Three pelt-3 dorsoventral lines (sbEx234, sbEx235, and sbEx236) and four pceh-16 lateral lines (sbEx241, sbEx250, sbEx252, and sbEx253) showed little difference from nontransgenic sibs (Figure 4A). sbEx252 showed statistical significance between transgenic and nontransgenic sibs, but transgenic animals were shorter rather than longer. It was possible that the transgenes rescued pak-1’s role during early elongation, but embryos then arrested at the twofold stage when the gene is again required, for muscle-mediated late elongation (Zhang et al. 2011). Unhatched embryos were observed at 40X using Nomarski microscopy 12 hours after egg laying. No rescue was observed (Figure 4B). The sbEx252 pceh-16 line was again statistically significant, but transgenic animals were shorter than their nontransgenic sibs. As we saw for mel-11, our results may indicate that pak-1 is only sufficient if expressed in both tissues or that the pceh-16 and pelt-3 promoters do not provide appropriate temporal or spatial control.

rhgf-2, rga-2 requires pak-1(+)

We have previously shown that elongation in double mutants of rhgf-2/Rho GEF and rga-2/Rho GAP is dependent on let-502/Rho kinase (Chan et al. 2015), perhaps reflecting Rho independent LET-502/Rho kinase activity (Truebestein et al. 2015). rhgf-2; rga-2 also requires the pak-1 activator fem-2 (Chan et al. 2015). To ask if this latter result reflects a need for pak-1(+) in rhgf-2; rga-2, we constructed rhgf-2; rga-2; pak-1 triple mutants and measured their body lengths 2 days after egg laying at 25°. While few rhgf-2; rga-2 showed retarded growth, about half of pak-1 animals did so (Figure 4C). Virtually all the triple mutant rhgf-2; rga-2; pak-1 arrested early, demonstrating that the near normal elongation in rhgf-2; rga-2 is dependent on pak-1(+) as well as on let-502(+) and fem-2(+) as reported previously (Chan et al. 2015).

Survey of elongation mutants reveals only minor changes in lateral cell shortening

To complement our tests for tissue-specific sufficiency, we examined mutants to gauge the necessity of gene function on lateral cell contraction. Our model of tissue-specific gene activity in Figure 1C leads to the following predictions. The lateral cells in mutants for the genes shown to be sufficient laterally (rhgf-2, let-502, and fhod-1) would contract proportionally less while mutants with decreased dorsoventral forces (pak-1, pix-1, and fem-2) would result in less rigid dorsoventral cells, allowing lateral cells to contract more (Figure 1C, columns 3 and 4, respectively, a more detailed discussion of the model is found in Supplementary Figure S1). Loss of dorsoventral inhibitors of contraction (rga-2 and mel-11) would act as an impediment to lateral cell shortening (column 5). The strongest prediction is for double mutants of a lateral activator (rhgf-2 or let-502) and a dorsoventral inhibitor (rga-2 or mel-11). Here, we predict less lateral contraction as the force is transferred to the dorsoventral cells (column 6).

To survey a large number of strains, we used a method similar to Vuong-Brender et al. (2018). Epidermal cell membranes were marked by indirect immunofluorescence of fixed embryos stained with the MH27 antibody (Francis and Waterston 1991), which is directed against the junctional marker AJM-1. This approach has the advantage that many strains can be examined quickly and it obviates the need to introduce the AJM-1::GFP into each of the single and double mutant strains that we examined. Since large numbers of embryos can be scored rapidly for each strain, relatively rare subpopulations are potentially detected, which could be important for mutations with variable phenotypes. This approach is static, measuring lateral cell shortening vs embryo lengthening rather than lateral shortening vs time for live imaging.

We first determined which lateral cell boundary would be the most consistent metric for the analysis based on the correlation of shortening as a function of embryo elongation. Our focus was on the anterior of the embryo, which undergoes the greatest reduction of lateral cell width (Martin et al. 2016). The lengths of the membranes in the circumferential axis of cells H0, H1, H2, V1, and V2 were measured along with the length of the embryo curled up within the eggshell (Figure 5A). We also measured the length of the eggshell to account for differences in embryo size. We focused on the 1.1 (bean stage) to the twofold stage. The best linear correlation as a function of fold elongation was for the anterior membrane of H2 (R2 = 0.645, Supplementary Figure S2, A–E). We will refer to this membrane as H2-A (note that the anterior membrane of H2 is the posterior of H1). Wild-type embryos stained on different days were not statistically different (P = 0.113 for slope comparisons of regression lines, Supplementary Figure S2F). Martin et al. (2016) found that this membrane showed the most rapid rate of shortening, which was linear with time. Embryos with lateral cells facing directly upward or tilted to one side yielded similar correlations (Supplementary Figure S3, A and B) and so measurements were pooled.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

The H2-A membrane length as a function of fold elongation in embryos mutant for genes predicted to induce lateral contraction. (A) An embryo immunostained with the junction marker M27/AJM-1. The H2-A membrane is indicated by the red double headed arrow while the length of the embryo and long axis of the eggshell are indicated with yellow arrows. Fold elongation is the embryo length divided by that of the eggshell. Scale bar = 10 μm. (B, C, E, F) Orange symbols represent the wild-type control on each panel. Shading denotes 95% confidence intervals for the slopes of the regression lines and two-tailed P-values compare the slopes of mutant vs control. (B) let-502(ts) shows less shortening of the H2-A membrane at any given degree of elongation as indicated by different slopes. (C) let-502(ts) is shown up to the 1.4 stage, which excludes escapers of early arrest. A subset of embryos begin elongation with shorter H2-A membranes while others are in the wild-type range. (D) An example of two let-502(ts) embryos near the onset of elongation but with different H2-A lengths (yellow arrows). Note the lower embryo is slightly more advanced and yet has a longer H2-A membrane. Both embryos have unfused dorsal cells characteristic of early elongation, indicating that they did not retract in length from a later stage. (E) Mutants of the let-502 activator rhgf-2 showed a similar pattern to let-502, with a subpopulation of embryos with short H2-A membranes at the outset of elongation. (F) The lateral-specific actin nucleator fhod-1 showed no apparent difference in slope from wild type.

Lateral contractile genes (rhgf-2, let-502, and fhod-1):

We predict that H2-A would contract relatively less in these mutants (Figure 1C, column 3). Martin et al. (2016) found that lateral cells shortened at a slower rate vs time for let-502(RNAi) as well as for the sb118 let-502(ts) allele that we use. As shown in Figure 5B, the slope of the regression line for let-502(ts) H2-A shortening vs fold elongation was shallower than wild type (P = 0.0002). This could imply that let-502 lateral cell contraction contributes less to elongation than in wild type for any given length of the embryo. However, the population in Figure 5B includes leakers in the ts strain that elongate past the early arrest phase. Focusing on embryos of <1.4 fold enriches for more severely affected individuals (Figure 5C). In this range, it is apparent that the width of H2-A was variable, with some embryos at the beginning of elongation having H2-A widths equivalent to wild type at the twofold stage. Figure 5D shows an example of two let-502(ts) embryos at similar elongation stages with different H2-A lengths. This narrower H2-A width is the opposite of what is expected if let-502 is necessary for the contraction of the lateral cells. Narrower than expected H2-A cells were also seen when the proportion of head width taken up by H2-A was plotted as a function of elongation (Supplementary Figure 3C). These phenotypes could reflect the gene’s earlier known function during ventral enclosure (Fotopoulos et al. 2013; Wernike et al. 2016; Wallace et al. 2018). It might appear that embryos with narrow H2-A cells may elongate without further lateral shortening, but the trajectory of individual embryos cannot be inferred from our static images.

RHGF-2 acts as the Rho GEF for LET-502/Rho kinase during early elongation and mutants of the two genes share similar phenotypes. Like let-502 (Figure 3), lateral rhgf-2 activity is sufficient for elongation (Chan et al. 2015). We used the hypomorphic allele sb100 since homozygous null mutations show uniform early arrest. Like let-502(ts), the rhgf-2(sb100) slope was shallower than wild type (P < 0.0001, Figure 5E), again with a subset of embryos having H2-A widths similar to wild type at the twofold stage.

fhod-1 encodes a member of the formin class of actin nucleators and lateral expression is sufficient for elongation (Refai et al. 2018). However, fhod-1 showed no change in slope compared to wild type in our assay (P = 0.868, Figure 5F). This is perhaps not surprising as only 15% of embryos with the null allele tm2363 that we used show elongation phenotypes (Vanneste et al. 2013).

Dorsoventral contractile genes (pak-1, pix-2, fem-2):

Loss of pak-1 or its activators pix-1 and fem-2 are predicted to lessen dorsoventral forces and so lateral cells may contract more (Figure 1C, column 4). Slopes for pak-1 and fem-2 did not differ from wild type (P = 0.401 and 0.164, respectively, Figure 6, A and B). The slope of pix-1 was slightly steeper as predicted (Figure 6C), with P = 0.069. Null mutations of these genes show impenetrant elongation phenotypes, therefore, their effects may be subtle.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

H2-A membrane length as a function of fold elongation in embryos mutant for genes predicted to induce dorsoventral contraction, inhibit lateral contraction, and multiply-mutant strains. The length of the H2-A membrane relative to fold length was determined as described in Figure 5A. In all panels, orange dots represent the wild-type control. Shading indicates 95% confidence limits for the slopes of the regression lines and two-tailed P-values compare the slopes of wild type vs mutant. Mutations in genes predicted to mediated dorsoventral contraction, pak-1 (A), fem-2 (B), and pix-1 (C) did not alter the slope. A mutation in rga-2 (D), which was expected to increase dorsoventral force, also resembled wild type. Double mutants that were thought to transfer contraction for lateral to dorsoventral cells were predicted to result in a shallower slope. This was true for let-502; mel-11 (E), but not for let-502 rga-1 (F), or rhgf-2; rga-2 (G). rhgf-2; rga-2 included individuals with narrow H2-A membranes at the onset of elongation, similar to rhgf-2 single mutants (Figure 5E).

Dorsoventral inhibitor gene (rga-2):

rga-2 mutations result in dorsoventral hypercontraction and are predicted to have less H2-A shortening. However, we observed no slope difference compared to wild type (P = 0.571, Figure 6D).

Double mutants of lateral contractile genes (let-502 and rhgf-2) and dorsoventral inhibitor genes (mel-11 and rga-2):

The viability of these double mutant combinations, where lateral contraction may be lost while dorsoventral contraction is gained, might result in the contractile force shifting from lateral to dorsoventral. This leads to the prediction that in double mutants lateral cells would undergo relatively less contraction during elongation, resulting in a shallower slopes of their regression lines (Figure 1C, column 6). This was observed in let-502; mel-11 (Figure 6E, P = 0.006) but not in let-502 rga-2 (P = 0.348, Figure 6F). rhgf-2; rga-2 also showed no differences (P = 0.753, Figure 6G). As for the rhgf-2 single mutant (Figure 5E), many early embryos had narrower H2-A cells compared to wild type.

Overall, the genes expected to change the balance of forces between lateral and dorsoventral cells had at best weak effects, indicating that the embryo can adapt to those deficits.

Discussion

Embryonic elongation of the C. elegans embryo up to the twofold stage is driven by changes in epidermal cell shape. This depends on multiple genes and interactions between those genes (Chisholm and Hardin 2005; Vuong-Brender et al. 2016; Carvalho and Broday 2020). Lateral and dorsoventral cells have distinctly different behaviors, with the former providing the contractile force and the latter producing tension against which this force pulls, to distribute force around the embryo (Priess and Hirsh 1986; Martin et al. 2016; Vuong-Brender et al. 2017). These differences are reflected by differential deployment of the actin cytoskeleton and at least parts of the Rho and Rac pathways in the two cell populations (Gally et al. 2009; Chan et al. 2015; Martin et al. 2016; Refai et al. 2018). Previously documented lateral or dorsoventral rescue (rhgf-2, fhod-1, mlc-4, rga-2, and fem-2) (Gally et al. 2009; Refai et al. 2018) or phenotypes (let-502, pak-1, pix-1, and mel-11) (Diogon et al. 2007; Martin et al. 2014, 2016) led to our hypothesis that there are generally discrete requirements for gene activity in either one or the other cell population (Figure 1, Supplementary Figure S1). This would explain why double mutants of genes thought to decrease lateral contraction with those that may function dorsoventrally to inhibit contraction suppress one another—the contractile force would switch from lateral to dorsoventral. The clearest example was for viability of double mutants of lethal mutations of the let-502 activator, rhgf-2/Rho GEF and the let-502 inhibitor rga-2/Rho GAP. The rhgf-2 gene has been shown to be sufficient when expressed laterally while rga-2 is sufficient when supplied dorsoventrally (Diogon et al. 2007; Chan et al. 2015). The dorsoventral force in rhgf-2; rga-2 would then be supplied by either Rho independent LET-502 activity (Truebestein et al. 2015) and/or PAK-1 as wild-type alleles of both genes are required for rhgf-2; rga-2 viability (Figure 4) (Chan et al. 2015). In this study, we test the model that elongation genes function either laterally or dorsoventrally but found that the system is more complex.

Lateral vs dorsoventral rescue of let-502, mel-11 and pak-1

We tested the prediction that let-502 would be sufficient when expressed in the lateral epidermis while mel-11 and pak-1 would suffice when supplied dorsoventrally (Figure 1). To provide tissue-specific gene expression, we used the ceh-16 and elt-3 promoters, which have been previously used in C. elegans to demonstrate lateral vs dorsoventral requirements for rhgf-2, mlc-4, fhod-1, rga-2, and hmp-1 (Diogon et al. 2007; Gally et al. 2009; Chan et al. 2015; Refai et al. 2018; Vuong-Brender et al. 2018). While let-502 cDNA expression was sufficient in lateral epidermal cells in (Figure 2), neither pak-1 nor mel-11 cDNA expression were sufficient either dorsoventrally or laterally (Figures 3 and 4). The nonrescuing pak-1 and mel-11 constructs were confirmed by sequencing and restriction digests prior to injection and the presence of gfp inserted into the 3’ end of the transgenes was confirmed in the transformed strains.

Failure to rescue pak-1 or mel-11 may reflect the limitations of the experimental system. Previously tissue-specific sufficiency for rga-2, rhgf-2, mlc-4, fhod-1, and fem-2 did not result in complete rescue of the corresponding mutants, either quantitatively (not all animals were rescued), or qualitatively (although viable, rescued mutant strains were not always morphologically wild-type) (Diogon et al. 2007; Gally et al. 2009; Chan et al. 2015; Refai et al. 2018). Incomplete rescue could be due to mosaic expression of extragenic arrays, lack of maternal expression and/or the levels and timings of the tissue-specific arrays being suboptimal. While mel-11 and pak-1 mutants were rescued by their native promoters, we were unable to generate the corresponding pceh-16 and pelt-3 double transgenic controls for either gene, either by multiple attempts of co-injection or crossing strains with single arrays to each other (data not shown). This failure may indicate toxicity when the genes are not under the fine control of the native promoters. For example, Martin et al. (2014, 2016) found that pak-1 and pix-1 phenotypes did not affect all dorsoventral cells similarly, with phenotypes being primarily anterior and dorsal. In contrast, the pceh-16 and pelt-3 promoters show uniform expression along the body axis (Gilleard et al. 1999; Cassata et al. 2005).

While negative outcomes must be treated with caution, failure to rescue mel-11 and pak-1 could indicate that the genes are required in both dorsoventral and lateral cells. Although mel-11 phenotypes are prominent in dorsoventral cells (Diogon et al. 2007), the gene is also expressed, albeit at lower levels, in lateral cells (Wissmann et al. 1999; Piekny et al. 2003). The higher dorsoventral expression of mel-11 could lead to stronger phenotypes in those cells, obscuring necessary functions in the lateral cells. Similar conclusions were drawn with the loss of function approach described below.

Survey of the effects of elongation genes on lateral cell shortening

As an independent test of lateral vs dorsoventral specific gene requirements, we examined mutant strains predicted to transfer contractile force from lateral to dorsoventral cells. This would result in less shortening of the lateral cells for any given amount of embryo lengthening as the dorsoventral cells contracted more (Figure 1). This assesses the necessity, rather than the sufficiency of a gene’s function as seen using tissue-specific promoters. The experiments were carried out on embryos fixed and stained with the cell junction marker MH27/AJM-1 (Francis and Waterston 1991). Rather than measuring the rates of lateral cell contraction and lengthening of the embryo over time as in live imaging [which is slower in mutants like let-502 (Norman and Moerman 2002; Diogon et al. 2007; Martin et al. 2014)], we measured how much the embryo lengthens for a given amount of lateral contraction. Ten different single and double mutant backgrounds could be quickly examined without having to introduce AJM-1::GFP into each strain. We focused on the anterior membrane of the H2 lateral cell (H2-A), which showed the most consistent correlation of shortening with elongation in wild type (Supplementary Figure S1). This membrane also undergoes the greatest amount of shortening (Martin et al. 2016; Vuong-Brender et al. 2018).

We found that mutants of let-502/Rho kinase and its activator rhgf-2/Rho GEF, which were predicted to decrease lateral contraction, did result in relatively less contraction for a given amount of embryo shortening (Figure 5). However, these mutations also produced a subset of embryos that began elongation with already shorter lateral cells. This phenotype likely reflects the known function of the let-502 pathway during the earlier phase of ventral enclosure, the epiboly-like migration of epidermal cells from the dorsal surface to the ventral midline that encases the embryo in a continuous epidermal sheet (Fotopoulos et al. 2013; Wernike et al. 2016; Wallace et al. 2018).

Other genes that we surveyed did not give the predicted results, including fhod-1, pak-1, pix-1, fem-2, and rga-2 (Figures 5 and 6). Our negative results could be attributed to impenetrant defects of some of the mutants. Double mutants that decreased lateral contraction while increasing dorsoventral force might be expected to have more dramatic effects by transferring contraction from one tissue to the other. We did find statistically significant effects for let-502; mel-11, but not for let-502 rga-2. The strongest prediction for our model was for double mutants of rhgf-2 and rga-2, where lateral and dorsoventral sufficiency, respectively, had been previously demonstrated (Diogon et al. 2007; Chan et al. 2015). However, the predicted decreased reliance on lateral shortening was not observed.

Collectively, our results argue against the simple model that early elongation can be accounted for entirely by discrete functions confined to either lateral or dorsoventral cells. Elongation appears to be robust to mutation, likely indicating extensive redundancy beyond the known parallel actions of let-502/Rho kinase and pak-1/p21 activated kinase. While rescuing activity for some of the genes involved in early elongation has been demonstrated in one or the other cell population, sufficiency does not always reflect necessity of gene function. Indeed, even though let-502, fhod-1, rhgf-2, and rga-2 have been shown to be sufficient either laterally or dorsoventrally, the corresponding proteins are expressed in both cell populations where their gene products may have a role (Wissmann et al. 1999; Piekny et al. 2003; Diogon et al. 2007; Vanneste et al. 2013). For example, as a cell changes shape, genes may function transiently to facilitate the redeployment of the contractile apparatus from areas where the cell is shrinking to areas where it is expanding. While any given gene may have its greatest effects either dorsoventrally or laterally, it is likely that most genes have critical roles in both groups of cells.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the members of the MCGHEE, HANSEN, and TARAILO-GRAOVAC labs and A. PIEKNY for suggestions throughout this project. Y. KOHARA is thanked for providing plasmids and J. MCGHEE, F. SNIDER, and K. MCGHEE for technical advice.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR, 14413) and the Natural Science and Engineering Council (NSERC, RGPIN-2017-04132) of Canada to PEM. Some strains were provided by the CGC, which is funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440).

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

Literature cited

  1. Brenner S. 1974. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 77:71–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carvalho CA, Broday L. 2020. Game of Tissues: How the Epidermis Thrones C. elegans Shape. JDB. 8:7. 10.3390/jdb8010007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cassata G, Shemer G, Morandi P, Donhauser R, Podbilewicz B, et al. 2005. ceh-16/engrailed patterns the embryonic epidermis of Caenorhabditis elegans. Development. 132:739–749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chan BG, Rocheleau SK, Smit RB, Mains PE.. 2015. The Rho guanine exchange factor RHGF-2 acts through the Rho-binding kinase LET-502 to mediate embryonic elongation in C. elegans. Dev Biol. 405:250–259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chisholm AD, Hardin J.. 2005. WormBook. The C. elegans Research Community. Epidermal morphogenesis, WormBook, editor. pp. 1–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cooper GM. 2000. Actin, Myosin, and Cell Movement in the Cell: A Molecular Approach. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates. [Google Scholar]
  7. Diogon M, Wissler F, Quintin S, Nagamatsu Y, Sookhareea S, et al. 2007. The RhoGAP RGA-2 and LET-502/ROCK achieve a balance of actomyosin-dependent forces in C. elegans epidermis to control morphogenesis. Development. 134:2469–2479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fotopoulos N, Wernike D, Chen Y, Makil N, Marte A, et al. 2013. Caenorhabditis elegans anillin (ani-1) regulates neuroblast cytokinesis and epidermal morphogenesis during embryonic development. Dev Biol. 383:61–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Francis R, Waterston RH.. 1991. Muscle cell attachment in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Biol. 114:465–479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fukushige T, Hendzel MJ, Bazett-Jones DP, McGhee JD.. 1999. Direct visualization of the elt-2 gut-specific GATA factor binding to a target promoter inside the living Caenorhabditis elegans embryo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 96:11883–11888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gally C, Wissler F, Zahreddine H, Quintin S, Landmann F, et al. 2009. Myosin II regulation during C. elegans embryonic elongation: LET-502/ROCK, MRCK-1 and PAK-1, three kinases with different roles. Development. 136:3109–3119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gillard G, Nicolle O, Brugiere T, Prigent S, Pinot M, et al. 2019. Force transmission between three tissues controls bipolar planar polarity establishment and morphogenesis. Curr Biol. 29:1360–1368.e4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gilleard JS, Shafi Y, Barry JD, McGhee JD.. 1999. ELT-3: A Caenorhabditis elegans GATA factor expressed in the embryonic epidermis during morphogenesis. Dev Biol. 208:265–280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gu T, Orita S, Han M.. 1998. Caenorhabditis elegans SUR-5, a novel but conserved protein, negatively regulates LET-60 Ras activity during vulval induction. Mol Cell Biol. 18:4556–4564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. He F. 2011a. Single worm PCR. Bio-protocol. 1:e60. [Google Scholar]
  16. He F. 2011b. Total RNA extraction from C. elegans. Bio-protocol. 1:e47. [Google Scholar]
  17. Iino Y, Yamamoto M.. 1998. Expression pattern of the C. elegans P21-activated protein kinase, CePAK. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 245:177–184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Julian L, Olson MF.. 2014. Rho-associated coiled-coil containing kinases (ROCK): structure, regulation, and functions. Small GTPases. 5:e29846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kemphues KJ, Kusch M, Wolf N.. 1988. Maternal-effect lethal mutations on linkage group II of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 120:977–986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lardennois A, Pasti G, Ferraro T, Llense F, Mahou P, et al. 2019. An actin-based viscoplastic lock ensures progressive body-axis elongation. Nature. 573:266–270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lin L, Tran T, Hu S, Cramer T, Komuniecki R, et al. 2012. RHGF-2 is an essential Rho-1 specific RhoGEF that binds to the multi-PDZ domain scaffold protein MPZ-1 in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS One. 7:e31499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lucanic M, Cheng HJ.. 2008. A RAC/CDC-42-independent GIT/PIX/PAK signaling pathway mediates cell migration in C. elegans. PLoS Genet. 4:e1000269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Martin E, Harel S, Nkengfac B, Hamiche K, Neault M, et al. 2014. pix-1 controls early elongation in parallel with mel-11 and let-502 in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS One. 9:e94684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Martin E, Ouellette MH, Jenna S.. 2016. Rac1/RhoA antagonism defines cell-to-cell heterogeneity during epidermal morphogenesis in nematodes. J Cell Biol. 215:483–498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mello CC, Kramer JM, Stinchcomb D, Ambros V.. 1991. Efficient gene transfer in C. elegans: extrachromosomal maintenance and integration of transforming sequences. EMBO J. 10:3959–3970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mi-Mi L, Votra S, Kemphues K, Bretscher A, Pruyne D.. 2012. Z-line formins promote contractile lattice growth and maintenance in striated muscles of C. elegans. J Cell Biol. 198:87–102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Munjal A, Lecuit T.. 2014. Actomyosin networks and tissue morphogenesis. Development. 141:1789–1793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Munjal A, Philippe JM, Munro E, Lecuit T.. 2015. A self-organized biomechanical network drives shape changes during tissue morphogenesis. Nature. 524:351–355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Norman KR, Moerman DG.. 2002. Alpha spectrin is essential for morphogenesis and body wall muscle formation in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Biol. 157:665–677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Piekny AJ, Johnson JL, Cham GD, Mains PE.. 2003. The Caenorhabditis elegans nonmuscle myosin genes nmy-1 and nmy-2 function as redundant components of the let-502/Rho-binding kinase and mel-11/myosin phosphatase pathway during embryonic morphogenesis. Development. 130:5695–5704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Piekny AJ, Wissmann A, Mains PE.. 2000. Embryonic morphogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans integrates the activity of LET-502 Rho-binding kinase, MEL-11 myosin phosphatase, DAF-2 insulin receptor and FEM-2 PP2c phosphatase. Genetics. 156:1671–1689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Priess JR, Hirsh DI.. 1986. Caenorhabditis elegans morphogenesis: the role of the cytoskeleton in elongation of the embryo. Dev Biol. 117:156–173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Refai O, Smit RB, Votra S, Pruyne D, Mains PE.. 2018. Tissue-specific functions of fem-2/PP2c phosphatase and fhod-1/formin during Caenorhabditis elegans embryonic morphogenesis. G3 (Bethesda). 8:2277–2290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Roh-Johnson M, Shemer G, Higgins CD, McClellan JH, Werts AD, et al. 2012. Triggering a cell shape change by exploiting preexisting actomyosin contractions. Science. 335:1232–1235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Shelton CA, Carter JC, Ellis GC, Bowerman B.. 1999. The nonmuscle myosin regulatory light chain gene mlc-4 is required for cytokinesis, anterior-posterior polarity, and body morphology during Caenorhabditis elegans embryogenesis. J Cell Biol. 146:439–451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sit ST, Manser E.. 2011. Rho GTPases and their role in organizing the actin cytoskeleton. J Cell Sci. 124:679–683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sulston JE, Schierenberg E, White JG, Thomson JN.. 1983. The embryonic cell lineage of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 100:64–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Truebestein L, Elsner DJ, Fuchs E, Leonard TA.. 2015. A molecular ruler regulates cytoskeletal remodelling by the Rho kinases. Nat Commun. 6:10029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Truebestein L, Elsner DJ, Leonard TA.. 2016. Made to measure—keeping Rho kinase at a distance. Small GTPases. 7:82–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Vanneste CA, Pruyne D, Mains PE.. 2013. The role of the formin gene fhod-1 in C. elegans embryonic morphogenesis. Worm. 2:e25040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Vuong-Brender TT, Ben Amar M, Pontabry J, Labouesse M.. 2017. The interplay of stiffness and force anisotropies drives embryo elongation. Elife. 6:e23866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Vuong-Brender TT, Yang X, Labouesse M.. 2016. C. elegans embryonic morphogenesis. Curr Top Dev Biol. 116:597–616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Vuong-Brender TTK, Boutillon A, Rodriguez D, Lavilley V, Labouesse M.. 2018. HMP-1/alpha-catenin promotes junctional mechanical integrity during morphogenesis. PLoS One. 13:e0193279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wallace AG, Raduwan H, Carlet J, Soto MC.. 2018. The RhoGAP myosin 9/HUM-7 integrates signals to modulate RhoA/RHO-1 during embryonic morphogenesis in C. elegans. Development. 145:1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Wernike D, Chen Y, Mastronardi K, Makil N, Piekny A.. 2016. Mechanical forces drive neuroblast morphogenesis and are required for epidermal closure. Dev Biol. 412:261–277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Williams BD, Waterston RH.. 1994. Genes critical for muscle development and function in Caenorhabditis elegans identified through lethal mutations. J Cell Biol. 124:475–490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Williams-Masson EM, Malik AN, Hardin J.. 1997. An actin-mediated two-step mechanism is required for ventral enclosure of the C. elegans hypodermis. Development. 124:2889–2901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wissmann A, Ingles J, Mains PE.. 1999. The Caenorhabditis elegans mel-11 myosin phosphatase regulatory subunit affects tissue contraction in the somatic gonad and the embryonic epidermis and genetically interacts with the Rac signaling pathway. Dev Biol. 209:111–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wissmann A, Ingles J, McGhee JD, Mains PE.. 1997. Caenorhabditis elegans LET-502 is related to Rho-binding kinases and human myotonic dystrophy kinase and interacts genetically with a homolog of the regulatory subunit of smooth muscle myosin phosphatase to affect cell shape. Genes Dev. 11:409–422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhang H, Landmann F, Zahreddine H, Rodriguez D, Koch M, et al. 2011. A tension-induced mechanotransduction pathway promotes epithelial morphogenesis. Nature. 471:99–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Strains and plasmids are available upon request. The authors affirm that all data necessary for confirming the conclusions of this article are represented fully within the article and its Tables and Figures. Supplementary material is available at figshare: https://doi.org/10.25387/g3.14537895.


Articles from G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES