Abstract
Background
Hypoxia is a striking feature of most solid tumors and could be used to discriminate tumors from normoxic tissues. Therefore, the design of hypoxia-conditioned Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T cells is a promising strategy to reduce on-target off-tumor toxicity in adoptive cell therapy. However, existing hypoxia-conditioned CAR-T designs have been only partially successful in enhancing safety profile but accompanied with reduced cytotoxic efficacy. Our goal is to further improve safety profile with retained excellent antitumor efficacy.
Methods
In this study, we designed and constructed a hypoxia-inducible transcription amplification system (HiTA-system) to control the expression of CAR in T (HiTA-CAR-T) cells. CAR expression was determined by Flow cytometry, and the activation and cytotoxicity of HiTA-CAR-T cells in vitro were evaluated in response to antigenic stimulations under hypoxic or normoxic conditions. The safety of HiTA-CAR-T cells was profiled in a mouse model for its on-target toxicity to normal liver and other tissues, and antitumor efficacy in vivo was monitored in murine xenograft models.
Results
Our results showed that HiTA-CAR-T cells are highly restricted to hypoxia for their CAR expression, activation and cytotoxicity to tumor cells in vitro. In a mouse model in vivo, HiTA-CAR-T cells targeting Her2 antigen showed undetectable CAR expression in all different normoxic tissues including human Her2-expresing liver, accordingly, no liver and systemic toxicity were observed; In contrast, regular CAR-T cells targeting Her2 displayed significant toxicity on human Her2-expression liver. Importantly, HiTA-CAR-T cells were able to achieve significant tumor suppression in murine xenograft models.
Conclusion
Our HiTA system showed a remarkable improvement in hypoxia-restricted transgene expression in comparison with currently available systems. HiTA-CAR-T cells presented significant antitumor activities in absence of any significant liver or systemic toxicity in vivo. This approach could be also applied to design CAR-T cell targeting other tumor antigens.
Keywords: receptors, chimeric antigen, tumor microenvironment, immunotherapy, cell engineering
Introduction
Hypoxia is a hallmark feature of solid tumors because of insufficient blood supply, the oxygen concentration may vary from 0.02% to 2% O2, as compared with 2% to 9% O2 in normal tissues.1 Hypoxia appears to be strongly associated with the resistance of cancer cells to radiotherapy and chemotherapy, as well as impaired functions of immune cells.2 3 Exploiting this unique environmental signal for targeted therapy is a promising strategy in cancer treatment. With an increased molecular understanding of tumor hypoxia, researchers have developed hypoxia-targeting gene therapy. Directional edited suicide genes or therapeutic genes could be activated at hypoxic tumor sites rather than normal tissues, which greatly enhances therapeutic safety.4–6 In addition, hypoxia-targeted delivery and activation of prodrug provide additional levels of selectivity to the treatment.7 To enable cells to sense and respond to hypoxia, many reporters utilized hypoxia-inducible transcription factor-1α (HIF-1α) and hypoxia response elements (HRE) to perform transcriptional and post-translational control of genes of interest (GOI).8 9 HIF-1α is degraded through hydroxylation of two prolines in an oxygen-dependent degradation domain (ODD) within its structure under normoxia.10 11 Under hypoxia, however, HIF-1α accumulates and then dimerizes with constitutively expressed HIF-1β (HIF-1β) to form HIF-1, which specifically binds to HRE sequence in the promoters of hypoxia inducible genes.2 12 Ruan et al placed the suicide gene BAX under the control of HRE and found that cells transfected with the BAX plasmid were preferentially killed through apoptosis under hypoxia.13 Collet et al used the HRE-driven soluble form of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) to control angiogenesis and reduce hypoxic tumor cells growth in vitro and in vivo.14 HRE-IL-2-engineered cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) were found to produce faster and more complete tumor regression than the parental CTLs and thus increase overall survival of tumor-bearing mice.15 Other potent hypoxia-inducible transgenes also have been reported using HIF/HRE system.16–18 Besides transcriptional regulation, ODD can even directly fuse to GOI to regulate transgenes expression at the translational level. Delivery of a cytotoxic TAT-ODD-Caspase 3 fusion protein reduced tumor masses without any obvious side effects in both a mouse model and a rat ascites model.19 20 Transfection of the plasmid expressing attenuated DTAW153F/ODD or DTAH21A/ODD resulted in hypoxia-dependent apoptosis of transfected cells.21
Currently, the overlapped expression of tumor-associated antigens in cancer cells with normal tissues poses a great safety challenge in clinical applications of engineered T cells, for example, chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) and TCR-T cells.22 23 Hypoxia-regulated CAR-T cells are proposed to increase tumor selectivity and reduce on-target off-tumor toxicity to normal tissues,22 23 and would be applicable to a wide range of tumors. HIF-CAR24 and HiCAR25 have been constructed by incorporating HRE and/or ODD into conventional CAR structure. Although these CAR-T cells exhibited well oxygen sensitivity, we observed residual CAR expression and cytolytic activity under normoxia but less-than-desirable CAR expression under hypoxia.24 25 Besides, compared with many hypoxia-activated prodrugs entering clinical trials,26 up to now, no hypoxia-regulated CAR-T cells have been progressed into clinical trial, suggesting further improvement is required.
In many previous reports, investigators constructed chimeric/hybrid promoters combining tissue-specific promoters with viral minimal promoters to achieve efficient gene transcription, which showed undesirable basal expression mainly due to the strong trans-activation activity of viral promoters.25 27–29 Our main goal is to engineer CAR-T cells to exhibit low basal activity under normoxia but high inducibility under hypoxia. This might be achieved by using transcriptional amplification approaches30 31 in which GOI expression was driven by a conditionally activated trans-activator under certain circumstances, otherwise it was regulated by a weak promoter to keep low basal expression. The Gal4/upstream activating sequence (UAS) system is one of the most powerful tools for GOI expression, which consists of Gal4 protein as the transcriptional activator and UAS that is targeted by Gal4 as an enhancer.32 Although this system has been widely used, we wondered if we could design a novel trans-activator specific to UAS with refined specificity and induction levels. The Cys2-His2 zinc finger is an attractive scaffold for designing DNA binding domains (DBDs) with desired specificity. Studies have demonstrated the flexibility of finger motif and the possibility of designing zinc finger proteins (ZFPs) that can bind specifically to customized sequences.33 34 Therefore, we used this powerful tool to design our novel DBDs in this study.
In this study, we first designed and generated an effective trans-activator comprising a UAS-specific zinc finger DBD (ZFDBD) and a transcriptional activation domain,35 and then optimized the corresponding response element, that is, the minimal promoter. To make this transcriptional system oxygen-sensing, we further developed a bidirectional hypoxia-inducible transcriptional amplification system (HiTA-system) where the transactivator is regulated by both HRE and ODD. The hypoxia-inducible transactivator can bind specifically to its target sequence upstream of GOI and initiate their transcription and expression under hypoxia. Our HiTA system demonstrated a marked improvement in hypoxia-induced transgene expression while retaining low background compared with currently available systems. HiTA-CAR-T cells under control of this system exhibited hypoxia-restricted CAR expression, cytokines secretion and hypoxia-dependent tumor killing in vitro. In addition, no on-target toxicity to liver expressing human target antigen was observed in naïve mice, which further confirmed their improved safety in vivo. HiTA-CAR-T cells, not unexpectedly, achieved comparable antitumor efficacy to eukaryotic elongation factor 1-α (EF1α)-CAR-T cells in tumor-bearing mice. Overall, the HiTA system could be used to balance safety and efficacy of CAR-T cells in the treatment of solid tumors, as well as therapeutic payloads, such as bispecific T-cell engager.
Methods
Cell lines and viruses
Human acute T cell leukemia cell line Jurkat (American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), TIB-152), lung cancer cell line NCI-H292 (ATCC, CRL-1848) and ovarian cancer cell line SKOV3 (ATCC, HTB-77) was cultured in RPMI 1640 (Corning) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Pen/Strep, Corning). Embryonic kidney cell line HEK293T (ATCC, CRL-3216), lung cancer cell line A549 (ATCC, CCL-185) and epithelioid cervix carcinoma cell line Hela (ATCC, CBP-60232) were cultured in Dulbecco’ s modified Eagle’s medium (Corning) supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% Pen/Strep. Tumor cells carrying the report gene firefly luciferase (SKOV3-Luc, NCI-H292-Luc and A549-Luc cells) were engineered as previously described.36 The cells were maintained in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 at 37°C. The hypoxia treatment (1% O2, 5% CO2 and 94 % N2) was carried out in Smartor 118 mobile three-gas control system (China Innovation Instrument) or by adding different concentration of CoCl2 into the culture medium to simulated chemical hypoxia.
The recombinant type 5 adenovirus expressing tumor antigen Her2 with reporter firefly luciferase (Ad5-Her2) was contracted for production to Shanghai Genechem Co., Ltd.
DNA constructs
Transactivators plasmids
The DNA fragment Gal4VP64 consisting of the DBD of yeast transcription factor Gal4 in Gal4-UAS system fused with the activating domain VP64,35 was PCR amplified from pHR_PGK_antiCD19_SynNotch_Gal4VP64 (Addgene #79125),37 and then inserted into the vector pLVX-EF1α-IRES-ZsGreen1 (Clontech, #632187) downstream of EF1α with restriction enzyme XhoI and BamHI. The generated transactivator plasmid was abbreviated as pLV- Gal4-VP64 in the following study.
To obtain a more effective trans-activator, we designed a ZFP DBD specific to UAS according to the Zinc Finger Tools (http://www.zincfingertools.org).38 The resulted DNA cassette coding ZFP was fused with VP64 and then inserted into the vector pLVX-EF1α-IRES-ZsGreen1 as mentioned above. The newly generated transactivator plasmid was termed as pLV-ZFP-VP64.
To make this transcriptional system oxygen-sensing, the C-terminal of ZFP-VP64 was fused with ODD25 to generate a hypoxia-regulated activator ZPO. The ZPO was further put in trans upstream to five copies of HRE39 followed by cytomegalovirus minimal promoter (CMV mp) to generate ZPO-HRE. ZPO and ZPO-HRE sequences were synthesized and cloned into pLVX-EF1α-IRES-ZsGreen1with restriction enzyme 5’ XhoI and 3’ BamHI to generate pLV-ZPO and pLV-ZPO-HRE, respectively.
Responsive element plasmids
The vector pHR_Gal4UAS_IRES_mC_pGK_tBFP (Addgene #79123),40 carrying reporter gene mCherry driven by CMV mp located downstream of UAS sequence, was named as pHR_UASCMV in this study. To reduce the undesirable basal expression due to the strong transactivation activity of CMV, HIV-1 long terminal repeated (LTR)41 minimal promoter (LTR mp) was PCR-amplified from pNL4-3-luc-△Env (NIH AIDS Reagent Program #3418), and used to replace CMV mp by using ClonExpress II One Step Cloning Kit (Vazyme). The generated construct was termed as pHR_UASLTR. The primers used for LTR mp amplification included 5’- GCACTGTCCTCCGAACGACTCTGCATATAAGCAGCTGCTT-3’, and 5’- ATCTGACGGTTCACTAAACGCCAAGCTTTATT-GAGGCTTA −3’.
One-step and HiTA bidirectional plasmids
The pHR_HRELTR one-step vector consisted of a mCherry reporter gene driven by 5HRE and LTR minimal promoter. To generate the HiTA bidirectional vector, the ZPO-HRE sequences were inserted upstream of UAS sequences in pHR_UASLTR to form pHR_ZPO-HRE-LTR plasmid. All the sequences were synthesized and confirmed by sequencing (Generay Biotech, Shanghai).
Plasmid transient transfection and western blot assay
The bidirectional plasmid pHR_ZPO-HRE-LTR were transiently transfected into 293 T cells (5×105/well) in 6-well plate. Twelve hours post transfection, the cells were divided into two groups and cultured in either normoxic (21% O2) or hypoxic (1% O2) chambers for another 24 hours and 48 hours. At the indicated time point, the cells were harvested and subjected to the detection by western blot, in which a rabbit monoclonal antibody against HIF-1a (CST #36169) and an HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody (ZSGB-BIO # ZB-2308) were used.
CAR and HiTA-CAR design
The DNA fragment of Her2-CAR described previously25 was inserted into pHR_ZPO-HRE-UASLTR plasmid with XbaI and Pfl23II to replace the reporter gene mCherry. The Her2-CAR expressing bidirectional plasmid was termed as pHR_HiTA-CAR. The plasmid containing Her2-CAR driven by EF1α constitutively25 was named as pHR_EF1α- CAR in the following study.
T cells transduction and expansion
Customized lentiviruses LV-HiTA-CAR and LV-EF1α-CAR, were produced by pHR_HiTA-CAR and pHR_EF1α-CAR lentiviral vectors, respectively (Kanglin Biotech., Hangzhou), and were used for T cell transduction as described previously.36 Briefly, T cells derived from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells of healthy donors, which were delinked before the study, were activated by anti-hCD3 and anti-hCD28-coated immunobeads at cell/bead ratio of 1:1 and cultured in T cell growth medium (TCM), consisting of X-VIVO 15 medium (Lonza #BE02-060F), human IL-7 (R&D systems #P13232), human IL-15 (R&D systems #P40933) and human IL-21 (Novoprotein #GMP-CC45)36 at 37°C for 48 hours. The activated T cells were then transferred into a 48-well plate and transduced with the lentivirus (multiplicity of infection (MOI)=5) by centrifugation at 1000×g at 32°C for 1.5 hours. Thereafter, the transduced T cells (HiTA-CAR-T and EF1α-CAR-T) expanded at least for 7 days when they were rested and could be used in assays. During expanding period, the cell density was adjusted to 0.5–2×106/mL by supplement of fresh TCM every 3 days. The untransduced T cells (UTD), as control cells, were treated the same.
In vitro evaluation of CAR-T cells function
Quantitation of cytokine
SKOV-3 cells (1×105/well) were seeded in 96-well flat-bottom plate. After cultured 12 hours, CAR-T cells were added at an effector/target (E/T) ratio of 3:1, and then continuously cultured in hypoxic condition (1% O2) or normoxic condition (21% O2) for 24 hours. IL-2 and interferon γ (IFN-γ) levels in the culture supernatant were determined using the Human IL-2 ELISA Set (BD Biosciences #555190) and Human IFN-γ ELISA Set (BD Biosciences #555142), respectively.
Validation of CAR-T cells cytotoxicity
CAR-T cells cytotoxicity was assessed using Luciferase Assay System as described previously.36 Briefly, tumor cell lines carrying the report gene firefly luciferase were plated in a 96-well black flat-bottom plate in triplicate and grown for overnight. HiTA- CAR-T and EF1α- CAR-T cells were added into the plate at the indicated E/T ratio and cocultured for another 24 hours, respectively. The culture supernatant was removed, and the viability of the remained tumor cells was assessed by quantifying the luciferase activity unit (LU) with a GloMax 96 reader (Promega #E1501). The formula is as follows:
Animal study
The mice used in this study were 8–10 weeks old female NOD-PrkdcscidIl2rgtm1/Bcgen (B-NDG) mice, which were purchased from Biocytogen (Shanghai, China) and maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions at the animal facilities of Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center (SPHCC) (Shanghai, China). There were at least four mice analyzed at each collection time point. All animal experiments were performed in accordance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of SPHCC.
For in vivo safety evaluation, mice were injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with 1×109 plaque forming unit of recombinant adenoviruses Ad5-Her2. After 7 days, the mice were intravenously injected with five million of the CAR-T cells. Mouse peripheral blood was collected from orbital vein bleeding at indicated time as shown in figure 5 and left to clot. After centrifuged at 8000 g for 20 min, the resulting serum was collected and stored at −80°C for aminotransferases assay and cytokines assay. To investigate the effect of injected CAR-T on Her2 expressing tissues, 125 µL of D-luciferin (3 mg/mL) were injected (i.p.) into mice anaesthetized with 1% pentobarbital sodium (i.p.). After 8 min, the mice were subjected to observe luminescence using in vivo imaging system NightOWL II LB 981 (Berthold Technologies). At the end of study, the blood samples and the single cell suspension of the digested tissues (liver, spleen, lung) collected from the mice were subjected to T cell analysis with flow cytometry. In addition, 1/4 part of the liver excision was paraformaldehyde-fixed followed by paraffin embedding and sectioning for Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence assay.
For in vivo efficacy evaluation, mice were subcutaneously (s.c.) inoculated with tumor cells NCI-H292 cells (5×106) or SKOV3 cells (2×106). To confirm the degree of hypoxia of tumors at the time of CAR-T infusion, mice were given the hypoxyprobe pimonidazole (Hypoxyprobe, #HP1) by i.p. injection at the dose of 60 mg/kg. Two hours later, tumor samples were obtained and fixed followed by paraffin embedding and sectioning for immunofluorescence assay. Then HiTA-CAR-T cells (green fluorescence protein positive (GFP)+) (5×106 cells resuspended in 125 µL phosphate buffered saline (PBS)) were injected intravenously into the mice 10- and 15-days post the tumor cells inoculation. T cells without transduction and transduced with EF1a-CAR were also transferred to mice as negative and positive control, respectively. The tumor size was monitored with calipers every 3 days after T cells transfusion, and its volume (V) was determined using the following equation: V = (length × width2)/2. At day 34, mice were sacrificed. Tumor tissues of SKOV3 were carefully separated, weighted and enzyme-digested for further T cell analysis with flow cytometry.
Flow cytometry analysis
To examine the effects of ZFP-VP64 on the specific UASLTR promoters, 250 ng of pLV-ZFP-VP64 and pHR_UASLTR were cotransfected into HEK-293T cells using Turbofect transfection reagent (Thermo Scientific #R0531) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In control groups, pHR_UASLTR was transfected alone or cotransfected with pKL-Gal4-VP64. Forty-eight hours post-transfection, the cells were assayed for mCherry expression using fluorescence microscopy and then digested and harvested for mCherry analysis.
To detect the Her2 CAR expressed on T cells surface in vitro, T cells (5×105) were harvested and stained with 0.5 µL PE-anti-DYKDDDDK (Biolegend # 637310) at 4°C for 30 min, washed twice with fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) buffer (1×PBS containing 2% FBS), and then resuspended in FACS buffer for detection.
To analyze T cells from the mice tissues, ex vivo single-cell suspensions were stained with a fixable live/dead blue stain (Cat #: L23105, Invitrogen), and the antibodies included anti-CD45-PerCP, anti-CD8-APC, and anti-DYKDDDDK tag-PE (Biolegend, California, USA). Data were collected on LSRFortessa (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using FlowJo software V.10.
Serum levels of aminotransferases and cytokines
Serum levels of mouse alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) were measured by ALT Assay Kit and AST Assay Kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute), respectively. The serum cytokines were measured using BD Human Th1/Th2/Th17 Cytometric Bead Array (BD Bioscience #560484).
Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence
Paraffin section slides were stained with anti-Her2/ERBB2 antibody (Sino Biological #10004-T56) to detect Her2 expression on liver cell surface or stained with H&E for the verification of inflammatory infiltration. T cells and CAR +T cells were stained with anti-CD3 antibody (Abcam #11089) and purified anti-DYKDDDDK tag antibody (Biolegend #637301) to perform immunofluorescence. Paraffin section slides of tumor tissues were stained with antipimonidazole monoclonal antibody (Hypoxyprobe, #HP1) and goat antimouse secondary antibody (Maokang Biotechnology, Shanghai), #MM51006) to detect hypoxic region in tumors by immunofluorescence. For staining quantification, slides were scanned digitally using TissueFAXS 200 (TissueGnostics).
Statistics
Statistics were analyzed using Prism V.8 (GraphPad Software). The Student’s t-test was used to compare two groups. The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for comparison of three or more groups in a single condition. Statistical analysis for cytotoxicity and tumor volume was performed using two-way ANOVA. The statistical test used for each figure was described in the corresponding figure legend. Data were transformed when needed to normalize variance. Symbols (*) indicate statistical significance as follows: *p<0.05; **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 and ****p<0.0001.
Results
Generation of a novel ZFP-VP64 trans-activator and corresponding response element for effective gene induction
We used Zinc Finger Tools38 as an assistant platform to design and generate two ZFDBDs specific to UAS sequence, with six (6ZFDBD) and seven (7ZFDBD) zinc fingers, respectively. To construct an effective trans-activator, ZFPDBD was fused with a nuclear localization signal (NLS) and the transcriptional activation domain VP64, a tetrameric repeat of the minimal activation domain of VP16.42 As positive control, we construct the other transcriptional activator, in which the NLS-VP64 sequence is fused to the DBD of yeast Gal4 protein, which is the natural transcriptional regulator recognizing UAS element. (figure 1A). The ZFP7-VP64 transactivator could be detected by the triple-FLAG tag at its C-terminus by western blot (online supplemental figre S1A, B). To determine whether the two designed ZFP-VP64 constructs were able to effectively activate transgene expression, we cotransfected the ZFP-VP64 expressing plasmid pLV-ZFP-VP64 with the reporter vector pHR_UASCMV to HEK-293T cells and Hela cells. The reporter vector transfected alone was used as a negative control. In this transient mCherry reporter assay, ZFP7-VP64 showed effective induction in both cell lines 48 hours post transfection, with nearly all cells (98.3% in 293T and 89.5% in Hela) expressing mCherry, producing 15-fold and 3-fold intensity upregulation in 293T and Hela cells, respectively. ZFP6-VP64 exhibited significantly lower transcriptional activity compared with ZFP7-VP64, particularly justified by intensity of mCherry of mCherry positive cells (online supplemental figure S1C, D). Consequently, we choose ZFP7-VP64 for further investigation in subsequent studies.
jitc-2021-002755supp002.pdf (431.3KB, pdf)
However, the basal expression of minimal CMV minimal promoter was as high as ~50% in 293T and ~30% in Hela, which is undesirable for precise transgenes regulation (online supplemental figure S1C). To create an optimal minimal promoter with low leaky expression, we cut 5’ LTR promoter of HIV-1 sequence to retain only three sp1 binding sites and TATA box sequence (PLTRSp1-TATA mp). We further deleted the three Sp1 binding sites and construct a new minimal promoter containing only TATA box (termed PLTRTATA mp), which presented the lowest leaky expression in 293T transfection assay compared with promoters described above (online supplemental figure S2). So, we replaced the CMV mp with LTR mp and constructed the new response element: UASLTR (figure 1A). In transient transfection assay, fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry demonstrated that the basal activity of this reporter was significantly lower than that of UASCMV (figure 1B–D). When pLV-ZFP-VP64 plasmid was cotransfected, a 20-fold increase of mCherry intensity was observed (figure 1D). When compared with Gal4-VP64, ZFP7-VP64 showed a higher induction rate and intensity of mCherry expression (figure 1B–D). Based on these data, ZFP7-VP64 and UASLTR were the optimal trans-activator and the corresponding response element to generate a new inducible transcription system.
jitc-2021-002755supp003.pdf (200KB, pdf)
Generation of a HiTA system for the control of gene expression
We next sought to develop a HiTA system for oxygen-regulation of target genes. Hypoxia-induced gene changes are mainly executed through HREs, which can be recognized by HIF-1α, a master transcriptional activator only stabilized in hypoxic cells. In normoxic cells, HIF-1α is degraded via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway by possession of an ODD. We thus envision that HRE and ODD can be used in combination to achieve hypoxia-inducible expression of ZFP-VP64. We first generated a hypoxia-inducible promoter by placing five tandem copies of HRE (5×HRE) upstream of minimal CMV. The HRE sequence was derived from VEGF gene promoter, shown previously to confer bidirectional gene activation under hypoxic condition.39 Given the potential bidirectionality of 5×HRE, we generated four constructs to examine whether orientation impacts the performance of 5×HRE, and by using mCherry and mCherry-ODD fusion as parallel reporters, to assess the oxygen-sensing efficacy of ODD (online supplemental figure S3A). Only the ODD-modified mCherry reporter exhibited oxygen sensitivity, which, when driven by 5×HRE in 3’ orientation, allowed the lowest basal expression under 21% O2 condition (online supplemental figure S3B, C). Guided by above analyses, coupling to the observation made in cotransfection of ZFP-VP64 expression vector and UASLTR reporter plasmid that the transcriptional activity of ZFP-VP64 can be fulfilled at lower expression level (online supplemental figure S4), we subsequently constructed a hypoxia-inducible ZFP-VP64 expression unit (figure 2A).
jitc-2021-002755supp004.pdf (421.8KB, pdf)
jitc-2021-002755supp005.pdf (163.8KB, pdf)
We first separated ZFP-VP64-ODD (ZPO) transactivator and the response element UASLTR into two different lentiviral vectors and stably cotransduced them into the Jurkat cell line to evaluate hypoxia-driven transcription amplification effect (figure 2A). We also construct a one-step vector where the reporter mCherry gene was driven directly by HRE and LTR minimal chimeric promoter (figure 2C) for comparison of these two methods. Jurkat cells were divided into two groups after lentiviral transduction of two separated plasmids, the first group was placed in a hypoxic chamber (1% O2, 5% CO2 and 94% N2) and the second group of control cells were kept in standard normoxic condition (5% CO2, 21% O2, 74% N2), all of them were maintained in a humidified incubator at 37°C. After 48 hours, we assessed the transcriptional activity by mCherry expression under normoxia and hypoxia. Both groups had very low basal mCherry expression under normoxia but with minimal induction (less than 10%) under hypoxia (figure 2E). We suspected whether the limited transcription amplification was attributed to separated plasmids of the two components, resulting in incoherent expression. Therefore, we construct a bidirectional vector where ZPO gene was placed in 3’ orientation of HRE concatemers and UASLTR response element inserted in in 3’ orientation (figure 2B). This single bidirectional vector allowed for a more coherent expression of transcription factor and transgenes regulation. With this design, western blot showed that the HRE and ODD regulated ZPO was hypoxia-dependent expression, only retained and tested in hypoxia (figure 2D). Furthermore, flow cytometry showed that the majority of transduced cells demonstrated a marked improvement in hypoxia-induced mCherry expression with retaining low background. A comparison of mCherry expression reveals a~20-fold gain with the HiTA system when compared with the one-step system (HRELTR) (figure 2E).
HiTA system mediates ‘on’ and ‘off’ switch of CAR expression in an O2-dependent manner
Considering the very low basal expression and transcription amplification of HiTA system, it has significant advantages in designing hypoxia-sensing CAR-T cells. We placed -Her2 CAR (Her2-BBz) under control of HiTA system and generated a HiTA-CAR (figure 3A). To assess the oxygen sensitivity, we prepared engineered T cells stably transduced with HiTA-CAR, and EF1α-CAR as a positive control. The surface CAR expression of HiTA-CAR was hypoxia-dependent, showing upregulation in 1% O2 and downregulation when returned to normoxia condition. Our results confirmed a highly dynamic and stringent on-off switch by oxygen concentration, with hypoxia-inducible 18.2-fold CAR expression rate and 16.8-fold CAR intensity upregulation. Although ~20% CAR expression was detectable 24 hours after returning to normoxia, the CAR intensity has already returned to the basal level. When EF1α-CAR was compared with the HiTA-CAR, the CAR intensity in the HiTA system was observed similar expression level as that driven by the EF1α promoter after 24 hours hypoxia treatment (figure 3B–C). Besides, the reduced oxygen level significantly increased CAR induction frequency and expression intensity of HiTA-CAR, confirming its excellent oxygen sensitivity (online supplemental figure S5).
jitc-2021-002755supp006.pdf (424.2KB, pdf)
HiTA-CAR-T cells exhibited hypoxia-restricted effector functions
To determine whether HiTA-CAR-T cells effector functions were oxygen-regulated, SKOV3 ovarian cancer cells were seeded into culture plates and coincubated with EF1α-CAR or HiTA-CAR-T cells from five donors under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. After 24 hours incubation, we tested surface CAR expression and cytokines secretion of CAR-T cells. The results demonstrated a very stringent hypoxia-restricted CAR expression with nearly no detectable CAR expression under normoxia, but different induction levels observed in different donors because of individual variation under hypoxia (figure 4A). The magnitude of induction by hypoxia was ~300-fold in CAR frequency and ~30-fold in CAR intensity (figure 4B, C). Consistently, IL-2 and IFN-γ, the two functional cytokines related to T cell response,43 44 were found little secretion under normoxia and hypoxia-inducible secretion to different degree (figure 4D). Besides, when coincubated with SKOV3, HiTA-CAR-T cells displayed efficient hypoxia-dependent cytotoxicity against the SKOV3 cells, almost equivalent to EF1α-CAR-T cells at the E/T ratio of 2:1, with no significant killing observed in normoxic conditions. In contrast, the control EF1α-CAR-T cells presented similar cytolytic activities under hypoxia and normoxia (figure 4E). These results confirmed oxygen-controlled function of HiTA-CAR-T cells in vitro.
HiTA-CAR-T cells exhibited enhanced safety without on-target liver toxicity
Having validated the hypoxia-restricted activation and cytotoxicity in vitro, we next sought to evaluate safety of HiTA-CAR-T cells in vivo. We have established a humanized mouse model where human target antigens (eg, Her2) were selectively expressed in mouse liver (unpublished data). The murine liver was transduced to coexpress human Her2 antigen and luciferase by i.p. injection of Ad5-Her2. The expression of luciferase in murine hepatocytes was detected using bioluminescent imaging (BLI) at day 8 post-infection, indicating the distribution of Her2, and then mice with similar luciferase expression level were randomly divided into four groups (figure 5A).
To compare the on-target toxicity to normal liver, EF1α-CAR-T cells were included and served as a positive control, which resulted in fatal on-target normal tissues toxicity.19 We postulated that our HiTA-CAR-T cells would exhibit less toxicity to mice compared with EF1α-CAR-T cells, since there is no CAR induction in normoxic condition although in the presence of antigens (figure 4A). We also included a Her2-negative control group that received EF1α-CAR-T cells, and a negative control group that expressed Her2 but received UTD to detect a Her2-independent T cell response. As predicted, mice infused with EF1α-CAR-T cells resulted in severe liver damage, evident by elevated serum ALT and AST levels, and a rapid loss of body weight. In contrast, mouse ALT and AST levels and weight change in HiTA-CAR-T group were similar to other negative control groups after T cells infusion (figure 5B). we monitored the expression of Her2 in hepatocytes at day 0, 3, and 7 post T cell transfer, equivalent to day 7, 10, and 14 after adenovirus inoculation, by immunofluorescence. The result indicated similar kinetics of Her2 expression in the hepatocytes among vehicle, control T and HiTA-CAR groups: the number of Her2-positive cells were gradually decreased during the 7-day observation period, starting with approximately 60% while ending with about 40%. In sharp contrast, the declining of Her2-positive hepatocytes was significantly more dramatic for EF1α-CAR group, consistent with effective targeted killing by EF1α-CAR T cells (figure 5C, D). Besides, the result of BLI kinetics revealed that the HiTA-CAR group, like the control T group, retained a strong bioluminescent signal by day 7 while the signal in the EF1α-CAR group was substantially reduced by day 3, and could not be detected by day 7, in line with the elimination of luciferase+ (surrogate of Her2+) hepatocytes by EF1-CAR-T cells (online supplemental figure S6). Besides, only Her2-expressing mice received EF1α-CAR-T cells had elevated T cell activation-associated cytokines, including human IL-2, IFN-γ and TNF- (figure 5E, left) in serum collected at day 7. Nine days after T cells infusion, the mice were sacrificed, and the H&E staining of hepatic tissue slides showed an obvious infiltration of myeloid cells distributed throughout liver, especially around blood vessels in EF1α-CAR-T cells treated group compared with other groups, which revealed the CAR-mediated inflammation in the liver expressing target antigens (figure 5E, right; Figure 5F). T cells from enzyme-digested spleen, lung or liver tissues and blood were isolated and analyzed for surface CAR expression by flow cytometry. Importantly, there was no detectable surface CAR expression on HiTA-CAR-T cells in blood and tissues, compared with nearly 100% CAR expression on EF1α-CAR T cells (figure 6A; online supplemental figure S7). Notably, the ratio of CAR+ (namely GFP+) EF1α-CAR-T preparation increased from 50% to about 100% 9 days after infusion, mainly due to antigen-specific expansion. However, CAR +HiTA-CAR-T cells retained similar ratio (figure 6A). In addition, immunofluorescence staining of liver tissues demonstrated that robust CAR-T cells only detected in Her2-expressing murine liver of EF1α-CAR-T cells treated group (figure 6B). Overall, compared with the conventional EF1α CAR-T cells, our HiTA-CAR-T cells exhibited enhanced safety without systemic toxicity and on-target toxicity to normoxic liver in vivo.
jitc-2021-002755supp007.pdf (554KB, pdf)
jitc-2021-002755supp008.pdf (872.5KB, pdf)
HiTA-CAR-T cells exhibit vigorous antitumor efficacy
To test the antitumor efficacy of HiTA-CAR-T cells, two tumor cell lines with different Her2 antigen expression levels-high densities of antigen-expressing SKOV3 and NCI-H292 expressing low levels of antigen, were selected as representative Her2-expressing tumors and were injected s.c. into NSG mice. HiTA-CAR-T cells, EF1α-CAR-T cells, untransduced control cells or vehicle were administered when tumor volumes reached approximately 150 mm3 in volume and were proved to be hypoxic (online supplemental figure S8). These tumor-bearing mice were injected (intravenous) with 5×106 CAR-T cells on day 10 and day 15 and serial tumor size assessments were conducted (figure 7A). The progressive tumor growth of NCI-H292 and SKOV3 were observed in the mice treated with untransduced control cells or vehicle. In contrast, mice treated with HiTA-CAR-T cells in both xenograft models exhibited excellent anti-tumor effect, showing no significant difference with EF1α-CAR-T cells. (figure 7B, C). At day 34, mice were sacrificed and the SKOV3 tumors were harvested, weighted and analyzed for the infiltration and CAR expression of T cells. Tumors from HiTA-CAR-T and EF1α-CAR-T cells treated mice showed significantly smaller size and lighter weight than that from mice received control T cells (figure 7D, E). To explore the kinetic accumulation of CAR-T at tumor site, mice with SKOV3 tumors were sacrificed 3/7/14/28 days post T cells infusion.(figure 7F). CAR +HiTA-CAR-T and EF1α-CAR-T were undetectable on day 3. CAR frequency and intensity of HiTA-CAR-T cells increased from day 7 to day 14 by the hypoxic tumor microenvironment (figure 7G). The proportion of tumor-infiltrated CAR +T cells rose from day 7 to day 14 due to migration and proliferation, and then felled from day 14 to day 28, which may result from tumor shrinkage and reduced CAR-T expansion (figure 7H). All together, these results indicated HiTA-CAR-T cells provided excellent antitumor effect in vivo.
jitc-2021-002755supp009.pdf (440.9KB, pdf)
HiTA-CAR-T suppressed tumor growth without on-target off-tumor toxicity
We established a mouse model that is more correlative to clinical cancer patients by injecting Adv-Her2 to SKOV3 tumor bearing mice, to explored both anti-tumor efficacy and safety of HiTA-CAR-T cells (figure 8A). Mice in HiTA-CAR-T group revealed no severe liver damage or weight loss (figure 8B), which was consistent with the result in figure 5B. Quantification of CAR +T cells in liver, spleen, and tumor at day 7 post infusion by flow cytometry clearly indicated that the induction of CAR expression in HiTA-CAR-T cells was restricted to tumor site, with the frequency of resultant CAR+ cells similar to that detected in tumors of EF1α-CAR group (figure 8C). Importantly, as expected, HiTA-CAR-T cells demonstrated excellent antitumor effect comparable to EF1α-CAR-T cells (figure 8D). Collectively, these data strengthened the notion that HiTA-CAR-T specifically target hypoxic tumor with minimal off-tumor toxicity.
Discussion
Here, we developed a HiTA system, which could be used for hypoxia-dependent control of CAR expression in T cells and thereby of their effector functions. Our developed HiTA system has several advantages: First, it incorporated an optimized artificial zinc finger transcriptional system. Compared with the most widely used eukaryotic transcriptional regulatory system-yeast Gal4/UAS system,31 our refined minimal LTR promoter and designed ZFP7-VP64 transactivator demonstrated lower basal activity and higher transcriptional induction level compared with minimal CMV promoter and Gal4-VP64 transactivator, respectively. Second, HRE concatemers together with ODD provided a double-sensing effect of hypoxia. ZFP7-VP64 regulated by both HRE and ODD confirmed excellent oxygen sensitivity and transcriptional amplification of target genes, compared with that driven by HRE promoter alone. Third, many researchers constructed transgenes fused with ODD domain to achieve hypoxia regulation. However, the function of transgenes, especially for small molecules, may be affected by the large ODD molecules. Target gene in our HiTA system was regulated by transcriptional process but not the protein level, thereby retains function. In addition, we constructed a refined bidirectional lentiviral vector to incorporate trans-activator and response element. Although many studies have relied on cotransduction of cells with separate plasmids, gene expression mediated by the dual vector system is difficult to operate because it strictly depends on two vectors entering one cell at once and requires precise control of the ratio of two vectors. Our results showed a limited induction when the ZPO-HRE trans-activator and response element were split into two vectors and cotransduced into Jurkat cells. Moreover, in the practical application for gene therapy, the dose of virus administrated to patients should be as low as possible, in order to reduce the risk of insertion mutation and oncogene activation caused by retrovirus/lentivirus integration. Therefore, our development of HiTA system with one bidirectional vector possesses advantages in applications for its cost-effective preparation and for its expression efficacy. However, this two-in-one vector system also had difficulty in lentivirus packaging due to the limited capacity of cargo size.45 This problem may be solved by using transposon system with larger transgene cargo size in the future.46 47
Adoptive CAR-T cell therapy can cause fatal on-target off-tumor toxicity to normal tissues,19 besides, off-tumor targeting can cause CAR-T cells to be sequestered and delayed from reaching their intended tumor targets, thus weaken the antitumor effect, as demonstrated in a recent study.48 Recent years, the hypoxia-regulated CAR fused with an ODD showed high background under normoxia and limited induction in hypoxic conditions,24 25 thus demonstrating the inability of ODD alone to achieve precise hypoxia-regulation as a single oxygen sensor. Our previous work improved the ODD-regulated HiCAR by adding HREs into upstream of EF1α promoter to generate a chimeric HRE-EF1α promoter (chHE).25 The improved chHE-HiCAR demonstrated enhanced CAR induction level, but also observed leaky CAR expression and residual cytotoxicity under normoxia. To further improve the design of HiCAR, we constructed HiTA-CAR-T cells for selective tumor targeting as this system showed stringent hypoxia-regulation of target genes by HiTA system and by the hypoxic tumor environment. As expected, our HiTA-CAR-T cells showed highly hypoxia-restricted CAR expression, cytokines secretion and cytotoxicity. Importantly, the adoptively transferred HiTA-CAR-T cells suppressed the growth of NCI-H292 and SKOV3 tumor xenografts, implicating its antitumor efficacy in vivo.
To rapidly evaluate on-target off-tumor toxicity of HiTA-CAR-T cells, we generated a mouse model that expresses human Her2 antigen on hepatocytes by i.p injection of Her2-expressing type 5 adenovirus (Ad5-Her2) (unpublished data). We considered it as a reasonable tool to assess off-tumor toxicity because it has CAR-targeted human expression on normal liver tissues, which is overlapped expressed on tumor cells. Recently, Castellarin et al have developed a similar mouse model to test on-target off-tumor toxicity of affinity-tuned CAR-T cells that recognize human Her2 antigens in normal murine livers by recombinant adenovirus-associated virus and transposon system.48 As expected, EF1α-CAR-T cells caused severe liver damage, as evidenced by elevated ALT and AST in mouse serum, and an obvious weight loss, suggesting on-target liver toxicity. In contrast, mice injected with HiTA-CAR-T cells did not show any significant toxicity as shown in mice received EF1α-CAR-T cells, which is further proved by the absence of surface CAR expression on HiTA-CAR-T cells from different tissues, including spleen, blood, lung and Her2 expressing liver. Overall, these data demonstrated that HiTA-CAR-T cells are highly conditioned by hypoxia and may provide a safe platform for CAR-T cell-mediated immunotherapy.
Our HiTA system could be adapted to drive additional immunomodulators, such as IL-12 which may cause side effect when expressed in normal tissues, in hypoxia tumor microenvironment or incorporated into oncolytic virus to express hypoxia-induced effectors to kill tumor cells.49 50 In addition, we may integrate cancer-specific promoters with HRE to create dual specific expression systems for increased tumor specificity, as demonstrated by a combination of cancer-specific promoter with HREs in a previous study.51 Moreover, the combination with other promoters of hypoxia up-regulated gene, like glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH)29 and VEGF,52 as an enhancer for gene expression in the future.
In summary, we established a highly effective HiTA system for stringent gene control to specific hypoxic conditions in this study. HiTA-CAR-T cells provided tumoricidal efficacy both in vitro and in vivo in the absence of on-target toxicity to mouse normal liver expressing human antigen. Hypoxia is one of the most common characteristics of solid tumors, our HiTA system could be applied to regulate CARs specific to diverse tumor antigens or any immunomodulators in tumor lesions. Our study provided a new promising strategy to balance the safety and efficacy of cancer immunotherapy or other diseases that require precise hypoxia-targeted delivery as a supplement to the existing therapy approaches.
jitc-2021-002755supp001.pdf (78.1KB, pdf)
Acknowledgments
We thank Chenli Qiu, Peng Sun for their help in flow cytometry. We thank Linxia Zhang, Lingyan Zhu for their advice in performing experiment. We also thank Animal Center of Shanghai Public health Clinical Center and its staff for their help in animal feeding and animal model construction.
Footnotes
HH and QL contributed equally.
Contributors: JX and XZ conceived and designed this project and supervised the experiments. MY supervised the experiments. HH and QL performed the analysis. HH, MF performed the in vitro experiments. HH, QL performed the in vivo experiments with the help of LJ, ZL, LZ and XD. C.Zhao helped writing and revising the manuscript. C.Zhu performed the IHC & IF experiments. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding: This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (2016YFC1303402), National 13th Grand Program on Key Infectious Disease Control(2017ZX10202102-006),Clinical Research Plan of SHDC (SHDC2020CR3002A & SHDC12018112) and the Intramural Funding from Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center (KY-GW-2019-16).
Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Supplemental material: This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.
Data availability statement
All supporting data are included in the manuscript and the online supplemental materials. Additional data are available on reasonable request to corresponding author.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Not required.
Ethics approval
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Public health Clinical Center. All animal experiments are conducted in accordance with the principles and procedures.
References
- 1.Sharma A, Arambula JF, Koo S, et al. Hypoxia-targeted drug delivery. Chem Soc Rev 2019;48:771–813. 10.1039/C8CS00304A [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sørensen BS, Horsman MR. Tumor hypoxia: impact on radiation therapy and molecular pathways. Front Oncol 2020;10:562. 10.3389/fonc.2020.00562 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Anderson KG, Stromnes IM, Greenberg PD. Obstacles posed by the tumor microenvironment to T cell activity: a case for synergistic therapies. Cancer Cell 2017;31:311–25. 10.1016/j.ccell.2017.02.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Biswal MR, Prentice HM, Dorey CK, et al. A hypoxia-responsive glial cell-specific gene therapy vector for targeting retinal neovascularization. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014;55:8044–53. 10.1167/iovs.14-13932 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Javan B, Shahbazi M. Hypoxia-inducible tumour-specific promoters as a dual-targeting transcriptional regulation system for cancer gene therapy. Ecancermedicalscience 2017;11:751. 10.3332/ecancer.2017.751 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rhim T, Lee DY, Lee M. Hypoxia as a target for tissue specific gene therapy. J Control Release 2013;172:484–94. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.05.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Patel A, Sant S. Hypoxic tumor microenvironment: opportunities to develop targeted therapies. Biotechnol Adv 2016;34:803–12. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.04.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Semenza GL. Targeting HIF-1 for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 2003;3:721–32. 10.1038/nrc1187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Semenza GL. Hif-1: mediator of physiological and pathophysiological responses to hypoxia. J Appl Physiol 2000;88:1474–80. 10.1152/jappl.2000.88.4.1474 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Huang LE, Gu J, Schau M, et al. Regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 is mediated by an O2-dependent degradation domain via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998;95:7987–92. 10.1073/pnas.95.14.7987 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bracken CP, Fedele AO, Linke S, et al. Cell-specific Regulation of Hypoxia-inducible Factor (HIF)-1α and HIF-2α Stabilization and Transactivation in a Graded Oxygen Environment. J Biol Chem 2006;281:22575–85. 10.1074/jbc.M600288200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kietzmann T, Mennerich D, Dimova EY. Hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) and phosphorylation: impact on stability, localization, and transactivity. Front Cell Dev Biol 2016;4:11. 10.3389/fcell.2016.00011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ruan H, Wang J, Hu L, et al. Killing of brain tumor cells by hypoxia-responsive element mediated expression of Bax. Neoplasia 1999;1:431–7. 10.1038/sj.neo.7900059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Collet G, Lamerant-Fayel N, Tertil M, et al. Hypoxia-regulated overexpression of soluble VEGFR2 controls angiogenesis and inhibits tumor growth. Mol Cancer Ther 2014;13:165–78. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0637 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kim H, Peng G, Hicks JM, et al. Engineering human tumor-specific cytotoxic T cells to function in a hypoxic environment. Molecular Therapy 2008;16:599–606. 10.1038/sj.mt.6300391 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gao S, Zhou J, Zhao Y, et al. Hypoxia-Response Element (HRE)-directed transcriptional regulation of the rat lysyl oxidase gene in response to cobalt and cadmium. Toxicol Sci 2013;132:379–89. 10.1093/toxsci/kfs327 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cai H, Ma Y, Jiang L, et al. Hypoxia response element-regulated MMP-9 promotes neurological recovery via glial scar degradation and angiogenesis in delayed stroke. Mol Ther 2017;25:1448–59. 10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.03.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Post DE, Sandberg EM, Kyle MM, et al. Targeted cancer gene therapy using a hypoxia inducible factor dependent oncolytic adenovirus armed with interleukin-4. Cancer Res 2007;67:6872–81. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Harada H, Hiraoka M, Kizaka-Kondoh S. Antitumor effect of TAT-oxygen-dependent degradation-caspase-3 fusion protein specifically stabilized and activated in hypoxic tumor cells. Cancer Res 2002;62:2013–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Inoue M, Mukai M, Hamanaka Y, et al. Kizaka-Kondoh S: targeting hypoxic cancer cells with a protein prodrug is effective in experimental malignant ascites. Int J Oncol 2004;25:713–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Koshikawa N, Takenaga K. Hypoxia-regulated expression of attenuated diphtheria toxin a fused with hypoxia-inducible factor-1α oxygen-dependent degradation domain preferentially induces apoptosis of hypoxic cells in solid tumor. Cancer Res 2005;65:11622–30. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Morgan RA, Yang JC, Kitano M, et al. Case report of a serious adverse event following the administration of T cells transduced with a chimeric antigen receptor recognizing ErbB2. Molecular Therapy 2010;18:843–51. 10.1038/mt.2010.24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.van den Berg JH, Gomez-Eerland R, van de Wiel B, et al. Case report of a fatal serious adverse event upon administration of T cells transduced with a MART-1-specific T-cell receptor. Mol Ther 2015;23:1541–50. 10.1038/mt.2015.60 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Juillerat A, Marechal A, Filhol JM, et al. An oxygen sensitive self-decision making engineered CAR T-cell. Sci Rep 2017;7:39833. 10.1038/srep39833 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Liao Q, He H, Mao Y, et al. Engineering T cells with hypoxia-inducible chimeric antigen receptor (HiCAR) for selective tumor killing. Biomark Res 2020;8:56. 10.1186/s40364-020-00238-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mistry IN, Thomas M, Calder EDD, et al. Clinical advances of hypoxia-activated prodrugs in combination with radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017;98:1183–96. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.03.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wu L, Matherly J, Smallwood A, et al. Chimeric PSA enhancers exhibit augmented activity in prostate cancer gene therapy vectors. Gene Ther 2001;8:1416–26. 10.1038/sj.gt.3301549 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yang L, Cao Z, Li F, et al. Tumor-specific gene expression using the survivin promoter is further increased by hypoxia. Gene Ther 2004;11:1215–23. 10.1038/sj.gt.3302280 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lu H, Zhang Y, Roberts DD, et al. Enhanced gene expression in breast cancer cells in vitro and tumors in vivo. Mol Ther 2002;6:783–92. 10.1006/mthe.2002.0813 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ray S, Paulmurugan R, Hildebrandt I, et al. Novel bidirectional vector strategy for amplification of therapeutic and reporter gene expression. Hum Gene Ther 2004;15:681–90. 10.1089/1043034041361271 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhang L, Adams JY, Billick E, et al. Molecular engineering of a two-step transcription amplification (TSTA) system for transgene delivery in prostate cancer. Mol Ther 2002;5:223–32. 10.1006/mthe.2002.0551 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Scheer N, Campos-Ortega JA. Use of the Gal4-UAS technique for targeted gene expression in the zebrafish. Mech Dev 1999;80:153–8. 10.1016/S0925-4773(98)00209-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Fedotova AA, Bonchuk AN, Mogila VA, et al. C2H2 zinc finger proteins: the largest but poorly explored family of higher eukaryotic transcription factors. Acta Naturae 2017;9:47–58. 10.32607/20758251-2017-9-2-47-58 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cassandri M, Smirnov A, Novelli F, et al. Zinc-finger proteins in health and disease. Cell Death Discov 2017;3:17071. 10.1038/cddiscovery.2017.71 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Brand AH, Perrimon N. Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 1993;118:401–15. 10.1242/dev.118.2.401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Liao Q, Mao Y, He H, et al. Pd-L1 chimeric costimulatory receptor improves the efficacy of CAR-T cells for PD-L1-positive solid tumors and reduces toxicity in vivo. Biomark Res 2020;8:57. 10.1186/s40364-020-00237-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Roybal KT, Williams JZ, Morsut L, et al. Engineering T cells with customized therapeutic response programs using synthetic Notch receptors. Cell 2016;167:419–32. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mandell JG, Barbas CF. Zinc finger tools: custom DNA-binding domains for transcription factors and nucleases. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;34:W516–23. 10.1093/nar/gkl209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Post DE, Van Meir EG. Generation of bidirectional hypoxia/HIF-responsive expression vectors to target gene expression to hypoxic cells. Gene Ther 2001;8:1801–7. 10.1038/sj.gt.3301605 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Roybal KT, Rupp LJ, Morsut L, et al. Precision tumor recognition by T cells with combinatorial Antigen-Sensing circuits. Cell 2016;164:770–9. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Garcia JA, Harrich D, Soultanakis E, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 LTR TATA and TAR region sequences required for transcriptional regulation. Embo J 1989;8:765–78. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03437.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Beerli RR, Segal DJ, Dreier B, et al. Toward controlling gene expression at will: specific regulation of the erbB-2/HER-2 promoter by using polydactyl zinc finger proteins constructed from modular building blocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998;95:14628–33. 10.1073/pnas.95.25.14628 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bhat P, Leggatt G, Waterhouse N, et al. Interferon-γ derived from cytotoxic lymphocytes directly enhances their motility and cytotoxicity. Cell Death Dis 2017;8:e2836. 10.1038/cddis.2017.67 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Rollings CM, Sinclair LV, Brady HJM, et al. Interleukin-2 shapes the cytotoxic T cell proteome and immune environment–sensing programs. Sci Signal 2018;11:eaap8112. 10.1126/scisignal.aap8112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yacoub Nal, Romanowska M, Haritonova N, et al. Optimized production and concentration of lentiviral vectors containing large inserts. J Gene Med 2007;9:579–84. 10.1002/jgm.1052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Nakanishi H, Higuchi Y, Kawakami S, et al. piggyBac transposon-mediated long-term gene expression in mice. Mol Ther 2010;18:707–14. 10.1038/mt.2009.302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Di Matteo M, Samara-Kuko E, Ward NJ, et al. Hyperactive piggyBac transposons for sustained and robust Liver-targeted gene therapy. Mol Ther 2014;22:1614–24. 10.1038/mt.2014.131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Castellarin M, Sands C, Da T, et al. A rational mouse model to detect on-target, off-tumor CAR T cell toxicity. JCI Insight 2020;5. 10.1172/jci.insight.136012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Cherry T, Longo SL, Tovar-Spinoza Z, et al. Second-generation HIF-activated oncolytic adenoviruses with improved replication, oncolytic, and antitumor efficacy. Gene Ther 2010;17:1430–41. 10.1038/gt.2010.100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kaufman HL, Kohlhapp FJ, Zloza A. Oncolytic viruses: a new class of immunotherapy drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2015;14:642–62. 10.1038/nrd4663 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Farokhimanesh S, Rahbarizadeh F, Rasaee MJ, et al. Hybrid promoters directed tBid gene expression to breast cancer cells by transcriptional targeting. Biotechnol Prog 2010;26:505–11. 10.1002/btpr.353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Koshikawa N, Takenaga K, Tagawa M, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of the suicide gene driven by the promoter of vascular endothelial growth factor gene against hypoxic tumor cells. Cancer Res 2000;60:2936–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
jitc-2021-002755supp002.pdf (431.3KB, pdf)
jitc-2021-002755supp003.pdf (200KB, pdf)
jitc-2021-002755supp004.pdf (421.8KB, pdf)
jitc-2021-002755supp005.pdf (163.8KB, pdf)
jitc-2021-002755supp006.pdf (424.2KB, pdf)
jitc-2021-002755supp007.pdf (554KB, pdf)
jitc-2021-002755supp008.pdf (872.5KB, pdf)
jitc-2021-002755supp009.pdf (440.9KB, pdf)
jitc-2021-002755supp001.pdf (78.1KB, pdf)
Data Availability Statement
All supporting data are included in the manuscript and the online supplemental materials. Additional data are available on reasonable request to corresponding author.